Question 1

Read the passage about riparian vegetation, winter cover, and the importance of trees and shrubs along streams. Then answer the question. What topic is mainly discussed in the second paragraph of this passage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage about riparian vegetation contains several paragraphs that each highlight a different aspect of streamside ecology. The second paragraph in particular discusses trees, shrubs, and woody plants in riparian zones. The question asks what is discussed in that specific paragraph, so we must distinguish its focus from the topics of the other parts of the passage, such as winter cover for birds, insects, dead trees, and disease organisms. Given Data / Assumptions: The second paragraph explains that in many parts of the arid West, trees and shrubs are found only in riparian areas. It states that woody plants are very important as winter cover for wildlife, including game birds like pheasants and turkeys. It mentions that this winter cover can be the main limiting factor for game bird populations. It also notes that woody vegetation provides hiding cover and browse for many other birds and mammals. Other paragraphs talk about dead trees, insects, diseases, and contacting extension agents if trees begin to die. Concept / Approach: To identify the main topic of a paragraph, we look for its central idea rather than isolated details. In the second paragraph, nearly every sentence refers to trees, shrubs, woody plants, and the cover they provide. Game birds and other wildlife are mentioned as users of this cover, which supports the central theme. We should not confuse this with the later discussion of insects in dead trees, or with water quality details that do not appear explicitly in the second paragraph. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the second paragraph begins by noting that in many arid regions trees and shrubs grow only in riparian zones. Step 2: It then describes how woody plants provide winter cover for wildlife, including game birds, and how this cover can limit their populations. Step 3: The paragraph also explains that woody vegetation offers hiding cover and browse for many species of birds and mammals. Step 4: Evaluate option C, which states that the role of trees and shrubs in riparian areas, especially as winter cover, is discussed. This summarises the paragraph accurately. Step 5: Option A mentions types of birds in riparian areas, but the detailed list of bird species appears later when the passage turns to dead trees and insects. Step 6: Option B refers to water purity, which is not the main focus of the second paragraph. Step 7: Option D restricts the discussion to game bird populations, but the paragraph also talks about many other species that use woody vegetation. Step 8: Option E brings in soil chemistry, which is not discussed in this paragraph. Verification / Alternative check: One quick verification method is to ask yourself what you would use as a heading for the second paragraph. A suitable heading would be something like Importance of woody vegetation as winter cover in riparian areas. That is very close to option C. None of the other options could serve as accurate headings because they either focus on different parts of the passage or introduce ideas that are not central to that paragraph. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the main list of bird species is tied to dead trees and insect feeding, not to the general definition of winter cover. Option B is wrong because there is no specific discussion of water purity or chemistry in that paragraph. Option D is wrong because the paragraph mentions many kinds of wildlife, not only game birds, so its scope is wider. Option E is wrong because the paragraph does not focus on soil chemistry at all. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes latch onto one or two words, such as game birds, and assume that is the entire subject of a paragraph. It is important to read all the sentences and see what unites them. In this case, trees, shrubs, and woody vegetation appear again and again, showing that the paragraph is really about the role of these plants in riparian areas, especially in relation to winter cover and wildlife habitat. Final Answer: The second paragraph mainly discusses the role that trees and shrubs play in riparian areas, especially as winter cover for wildlife.

Question 2

Read the passage about riparian vegetation, wildlife, and streamside management. Then answer the question. Overall, on what kind of basis do the author’s assertions in this passage appear to rest?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage about riparian vegetation is written in an informative and instructive style. It explains how vegetation stabilises stream banks, filters sediment, and provides habitat and winter cover, and it also discusses insects, dead trees, diseases, and the role of extension agents. The question asks what kind of foundation or basis underlies the author’s assertions. In other words, we must decide whether the passage is based on emotion, opinion, weak evidence, or solid scientific information. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage uses technical words such as riparian vegetation, stream banks, and winter cover. It discusses specific ecological functions such as sediment filtering, water absorption, and late summer stream flow. It identifies particular wildlife groups such as upland game birds and nongame mammals. It refers to disease organisms, pesticide misuse, and advice to contact a local extension agent. The tone is calm, factual, and practical rather than emotional or dramatic. Concept / Approach: To determine the basis of the assertions, we look at the language, the type of details, and the tone. The use of technical terms, ecological processes, and references to extension agents suggests that the writer is drawing from scientific knowledge and practical field studies. The passage does not sound like a personal rant or a poetic reflection. It also does not rely on myth or folklore. Instead, it reads like an educational extension or conservation document that summarises research based knowledge in accessible language. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine option A, which says the assertions are rash opinions with little observation. This is not consistent with the careful explanation of processes and the detailed ecological roles described. Step 2: Examine option B, which claims the basis is deeply held emotions. The passage is not emotional in tone; it is descriptive and instructive. Step 3: Examine option D, which suggests inconclusive evidence from weak field studies. Nothing in the passage suggests that the evidence is inconclusive or doubtful. The author speaks with confidence and clarity about the functions of riparian vegetation. Step 4: Examine option E, which refers to myths and oral stories. The passage clearly refers to scientific concepts and modern management advice, not legends or folklore. Step 5: Examine option C, which says the assertions are based on facts derived from scientific literature. The style, terminology, and reference to extension agents strongly support this view. The passage appears to condense established research into practical guidance. Verification / Alternative check: A good verification method is to ask what type of publication might contain such a passage. The content would fit well in an extension bulletin, environmental management guide, or conservation handbook that draws on scientific studies. This makes option C the most reasonable choice. There is no sign of personal ranting, poetic storytelling, or speculative opinion, which rules out the other options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the detailed explanations and specific terms clearly show careful observation and study, not rash opinion. Option B is wrong because emotion is not the dominant feature; the tone is calm and informative. Option D is wrong because the author does not express doubt or uncertainty about the effects described. Option E is wrong because there is no mention of myths or legendary stories; everything is presented in scientific and practical language. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse an accessible, non technical writing style with opinion based content. However, clear explanations and everyday language can still be grounded in research and scientific data. It is important to look for clues such as the type of examples given, the presence of technical terms, and references to expert resources like extension agents. These all signal a factual, research based foundation for the passage. Final Answer: The assertions in the passage appear to be based on facts and information derived from scientific and technical literature.

Question 3

Read the passage about examinations, specialization, and the true purpose of education. Then answer the question. According to the author, how should specialization be viewed in the context of education?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage discusses the true purpose of education, which is to help a person understand the world, discover personal capacities, and decide what to be and do in life. The author then criticises two major hindrances to this purpose: examinations and specialization. The question asks how the author views specialization. To answer correctly, we must understand that the author is not praising specialization but is warning that it interferes with the deeper aims of education. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that implanting standards, right values, and the science of good and evil is an essential part of education. It says that many forces interfere with this work, and two of the most serious hindrances are examinations and specialization. The author describes examinations as both an opiate and a poison. The author stresses disinterestedness and liberal education. Specialization is grouped with examinations as a serious obstacle. Concept / Approach: Since the passage explicitly labels specialization as one of the most serious hindrances to the real work of education, we must interpret it as a negative factor in this context. The word obstacle in the options captures the idea of a hindrance or barrier. At the same time, the passage does not call specialization a total curse that must be abolished in all forms; it simply treats it as harmful to the broader, liberal purpose of education. Thus we need an option that shows criticism without exaggeration beyond the tone of the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the sentence that mentions specialization. It is mentioned alongside examinations as a serious hindrance to implanting right values and moral understanding. Step 2: Evaluate option A, which calls specialization a boon. This clearly contradicts the passage, which places specialization in the hindrance category. Step 3: Evaluate option C, which calls specialization a curse. This is stronger than the wording of the passage, which criticises it but does not use such extreme language. Step 4: Evaluate option D, which calls it a minor distraction. The passage says specialization is a serious hindrance, not a minor issue. Step 5: Evaluate option E, which treats specialization as the only meaningful goal of education. This is the opposite of the author’s view. Step 6: Evaluate option B, which calls specialization an obstacle. This fits the description of a serious hindrance and matches the passage. Verification / Alternative check: We can restate the author’s view in simple form: education should first implant values and help a person understand the world and self. Anything that narrows this aim too much or distorts it, such as an excessive focus on exams or narrow specialization, becomes an obstacle. Option B expresses exactly that sense, while all other options contradict or exaggerate the author’s position. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the author does not praise specialization as a boon. Option C is wrong because the passage does not use the language of total curse, only of serious hindrance. Option D is wrong because it understates the effect of specialization, which the author calls a serious hindrance, not a minor distraction. Option E is wrong because the author believes that true education has a much wider purpose than specialization alone. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to assume that any modern sounding concept like specialization is automatically viewed positively. Another pitfall is to be attracted to extreme words such as curse, which may feel dramatic but do not reflect the actual tone of the passage. Careful reading of the lines that mention specialization helps avoid these traps. Final Answer: According to the author, specialization should be viewed as an obstacle that hinders the real purpose of education.

Question 4

Read the passage about the purpose of education, examinations, and specialization. Then answer the question. According to the author, what is one of the core elements or essential parts of true education?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage sets out a clear view of what education should really do for a person. It says that education should implant standards, right values, and the science of good and evil, and it describes examinations and specialization as serious obstacles to this deeper aim. The question asks what one of the core elements of education is. To answer correctly, we must look at what the author highlights as essential at the beginning of the passage, not at the later criticisms of exams and specialization. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that implanting standards, right values, and the science of good and evil is an essential part of education. Examinations and specialization are described as serious hindrances to this work. The author says education should help a person discover personal capacities and understand what to be and do in the world. Tests of progress have some use but can distort attitudes when their result begins to matter too much. Liberal education requires disinterestedness and is not driven by exam results. Concept / Approach: The phrase essential part is crucial. The passage does not say that examinations or specialization are essential parts; instead, it treats them as obstacles. The only feature that is clearly called essential at the beginning is the implanting of standards and right values. Therefore, we must choose the option that expresses this moral and value based aspect of education. Options that focus on examinations, specialization, or purely extra curricular activity miss the author’s central point. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the sentence that describes education directly. It says that implanting standards, right values, and the science of good and evil is an essential part of education. Step 2: Evaluate option A, which mentions a right value system. This directly reflects the phrase right values and standards mentioned in the passage. Step 3: Evaluate option B. It refers to a good examination system, but the passage is actually critical of examinations and regards them as an opiate and a poison. Step 4: Evaluate option C. Extra curricular activities may be useful, but the passage does not mention them as core elements. Step 5: Evaluate option D. It refers to specialization, which the passage criticises as a serious hindrance, not as a core element. Step 6: Evaluate option E. Job placement and salaries do not appear in the passage at all, so this cannot be correct. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify our choice by restating the author’s view in a single line: education is meant to build character and moral understanding and to help a person find a meaningful role in life. Exams and specialization are mentioned only as obstacles. Therefore, any option that makes exams or specialization central must be rejected. Only option A captures the idea of a value system and moral standards as a core part of education. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B is wrong because examinations are criticised, not praised, by the author. Option C is wrong because extra curricular activities are not discussed in the passage. Option D is wrong because specialization is labelled a hindrance rather than a core element. Option E is wrong because the passage does not focus on economic outcomes. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse what modern education systems often emphasise in practice, such as exams and job skills, with what an author considers ideal. In this passage, the author is deliberately challenging examination centred and specialization centred models. It is therefore essential to read the first lines carefully to see what is celebrated as essential and what is criticised as harmful. Final Answer: One of the core elements of education, according to the passage, is implanting a right value system and moral standards in learners.

Question 5

Read the passage about examinations as an opiate and a poison in the education system. Then answer the question. Why does the author describe the examination system as an opiate?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In the passage, the author sharply criticises the examination system and calls it both an opiate and a poison. This is a strong metaphor. The question asks specifically why the examination system is called an opiate. To answer, we must focus on the part of the passage that uses this word and explains its meaning. The word opiate suggests something that dulls awareness and creates a false sense of comfort or well being. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that the examination system is an opiate because it lulls man into believing that all is well when most is ill. The system is also called a poison because it paralyses or slows the natural activities of a healthy mind. The author believes that the true purpose of education is to help a person understand the world and personal capacities. Examinations and specialization are described as serious hindrances to this deeper purpose. Exams are harmless only when the student is indifferent to their result. Concept / Approach: The metaphor opiate is used to highlight a particular effect: it gives a comforting illusion that nothing is wrong, so people do not feel the need to examine or reform the system. This is different from the paralysing effect described later under poison. Therefore, we must select the option that refers to a false sense of well being, not physical or mental paralysis, laziness, or easy questions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the exact sentence in the passage. It says the examination system is an opiate because it lulls man into believing that all is well when most is ill. Step 2: Evaluate option B. It states that the examination system makes people believe that everything is fine even when much is actually wrong. This is almost a direct restatement of the passage. Step 3: Evaluate option A. It refers to complete paralysis of the mind, but paralysis is linked to the metaphor poison in the passage, not to opiate. Step 4: Evaluate option C. It exaggerates by saying all natural activities are slowed without exception, and again confuses the poison image with the opiate image. Step 5: Evaluate option D. It mentions laziness and physical comfort, but the passage does not focus on physical laziness as the main effect. Step 6: Evaluate option E. It claims that exams always give easy questions, which is not discussed in the passage at all. Step 7: Since option B accurately reflects the passage, it must be the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: We can check by recalling what an opiate does in ordinary language: it dulls pain and awareness and can create a feeling that all is well. That matches the author’s criticism that the exam system hides deep problems by giving a comforting illusion of success. The poison metaphor, on the other hand, is connected with paralysis of mental activity. Therefore, any option that focuses on paralysis is linked to the wrong image and should be rejected for this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because total paralysis connects more closely with the description of examinations as a poison. Option C is wrong because it overstates and misplaces the idea of slowing down, which again belongs to the poison image. Option D is wrong because laziness is not the central explanation given in the passage for the opiate metaphor. Option E is wrong because the difficulty level of questions is never mentioned as a reason for criticism. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up different metaphors used in the same passage. When a writer uses two separate images such as opiate and poison, each usually emphasises a different aspect of the problem. It is essential to match the correct explanation with the correct metaphor. Another pitfall is to rely on general associations, such as thinking of exams as hard or easy, rather than reading the author’s exact explanation. Final Answer: The author calls the examination system an opiate because it makes people believe that everything is fine in education even when much is actually wrong.

Question 6

Read the passage about the purpose of education, examinations, and specialization. Then answer the question. According to the author, what is the primary purpose of education?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage offers a thoughtful definition of education. It criticises examinations and specialization as serious obstacles, and then describes what education ought to do for human beings. The question asks what the purpose of education is according to this passage. To answer correctly, we must select the option that captures the full scope described, not a narrow or partial function such as passing exams or simply learning a list of moral rules. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that a person finds himself or herself a creature of unknown capacities in an unknown world. Such a person wants to learn what the world is like and what to be and do in it. The passage clearly says that helping a person answer these questions is the one and only purpose of education. Examinations are described as an opiate and a poison that hinder this purpose. Specialization is also identified as a serious hindrance. Concept / Approach: We must pick the option that matches the full statement of purpose in the passage. This purpose includes understanding one’s own capacities, understanding the world, and deciding how to act and live. It is wider than exam success, moral knowledge alone, or narrow career preparation. Therefore, any option that focuses only on tests, only on values, or only on jobs does not fully reflect the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the key sentence: To help man answer what the world is like and what he should be and do in it is the one and only purpose of education. Step 2: Evaluate option D. It says that education should help a person understand personal potential, the surrounding world, and one’s role and actions in it. This accurately reflects the cited sentence. Step 3: Evaluate option A. It reduces education to performance in examinations, but the passage criticises exam centred thinking. Step 4: Evaluate option B. It mentions right values, which are certainly important, but the passage connects values with a wider purpose, not as the only aim. Step 5: Evaluate option C. It treats knowing right and wrong as the only aim, which is again too narrow and incomplete. Step 6: Evaluate option E. It describes preparation mainly for specialised careers, which the passage treats as a hindrance, not the central goal. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify our answer by asking what the author would likely think of a system that produces exam toppers who have no clarity about themselves or the world. The passage suggests that such a system fails in its main task. Thus, the author would insist on a broader aim of self discovery and world understanding. Option D is the only one that covers all these elements. The other options either contradict the passage or oversimplify the aim of education. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the passage sees exams as a hindrance, not as an end. Option B is wrong because while values are important, the passage presents them as part of a larger educational purpose. Option C is wrong because it reduces education to moral knowledge alone, which the passage does not do. Option E is wrong because the passage treats specialization as a serious problem, not as the main goal. Common Pitfalls: Many learners equate education with examination success or with career training because that is how they experience it in practice. When reading a reflective passage like this one, it is important to put aside these assumptions and focus on what the author actually states. Here, the author offers a much deeper and more philosophical view of education’s purpose, and that must guide the answer. Final Answer: According to the passage, the primary purpose of education is to help a person understand personal potential, understand the world, and decide what to be and do in it.

Question 7

Read the passage about examinations, specialization, and the true aim of education. Then answer the question. What attitude does the author most clearly encourage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage expresses the author’s concern that examinations and specialization are obstructing the real purpose of education. The writer stresses disinterestedness and liberal education, meaning learning for its own sake rather than for exam marks alone. The question asks what the author encourages. To answer correctly, we must infer the positive attitude that stands behind the criticism of exams and specialization. Given Data / Assumptions: The author describes examinations as an opiate and a poison. Specialization is presented as a serious hindrance alongside examinations. Tests of progress are called useful and necessary, but become harmful when their results matter too much. The essence of good education is described as disinterestedness, which is essential for liberal education. The purpose of education is to help a person understand the world and personal role in it. Concept / Approach: We must distinguish between criticism of exams and specialization on one side, and the author’s positive view of what education should be on the other. The author does not encourage indifference to learning. In fact, the passage emphasises that education should genuinely help a person grow in understanding. Nor does the author call for the total removal of tests, only for a change in attitude. Therefore, the answer should point to an attitude that places learning and liberal education above exam obsession. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Evaluate option A. It suggests indifference to learning as long as exams are passed. The author criticises exam centred thinking and would not support this attitude. Step 2: Evaluate option B. It says the author encourages examinations, but the passage clearly criticises the exam system as an opiate and poison when treated as central. Step 3: Evaluate option C. It says the author encourages specialization. The passage names specialization as a serious hindrance. Step 4: Evaluate option E. It suggests avoiding all forms of testing, but the passage acknowledges that tests of progress are useful and necessary if approached correctly. Step 5: Evaluate option D. It speaks of genuine learning and liberal education beyond exam results. This matches the author’s praise of disinterestedness and the aim of helping a person understand the world and self. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify our answer by asking what the author wants education to look like if examinations and specialization are not allowed to dominate. The author would want students to focus on understanding, values, and self discovery. Liberal education is mentioned as impossible if disinterestedness is lost. Option D is the only choice that explicitly supports this wider, deeper learning. All other options either defend the exam and specialization system or misrepresent the author’s stance on testing. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the author does not want learning to be sacrificed to exam marks. Option B is wrong because the exam system is heavily criticised throughout the passage. Option C is wrong because specialization is listed as an obstacle. Option E is wrong because the author accepts that tests of progress can be useful when used properly. Common Pitfalls: Some students assume that if a writer criticises exams, then the writer must oppose all forms of testing. However, the passage draws a careful distinction between moderate, useful tests and obsessive exam culture. Another pitfall is assuming that modern career demands justify specialization, even when an author clearly challenges that idea. It is essential to base your answer on what the text says, not on outside assumptions. Final Answer: The author encourages genuine learning and liberal education that goes beyond mere exam results.

Question 8

Read the passage about indecision, fluctuating opinions, and firm resolution. Then answer the question. According to the passage, a man who cannot decide which of two things to do first finally ends up doing what?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage describes two kinds of people. One type hesitates endlessly between two possible actions and never decides. The other type consults wisely, resolves firmly, and perseveres until success. The question focuses on the first type: the man who is perpetually hesitating over which of the two things he will do first. The text gives a clear statement about what such a person actually achieves, and the question asks us to recall that statement accurately. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage says that the man who is perpetually hesitating which of two things he will do first will do neither. It also describes another man who fluctuates from opinion to opinion and veers like a weather cock. Such a person never accomplishes anything great or useful. The passage praises the man who first consults wisely, then resolves firmly, and then executes with flexible perseverance. Strong resolution and perseverance are presented as keys to advancement and success. Concept / Approach: This is a direct recall question. The correct option must match the wording or clear meaning of the sentence in the passage. The phrase will do neither clearly means the person will not carry out either of the two tasks. Therefore, the correct answer must express that he ends up doing nothing out of the two options. Any choice that suggests he manages to do one or both is opposite to the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Remember the exact wording: The man who is perpetually hesitating which of the two things he will do first, will do neither. Step 2: Check option D. It says he ends up doing nothing at all. This is equivalent to will do neither of the two things, so it matches the passage. Step 3: Check option A. It claims he does both things, which is the opposite of the statement in the text. Step 4: Check option B and option C. Each claims he does only one of the two tasks, but the passage clearly says he does neither. Step 5: Check option E. It introduces a third, unrelated task, which is not mentioned, and so cannot be correct. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by thinking about real life. A person who endlessly hesitates without deciding often never actually starts. This everyday experience reinforces the literal statement in the passage. That aligns perfectly with option D and contradicts all other options, which imagine that something still gets done despite constant hesitation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because it suggests success in doing both tasks, which the passage denies. Option B is wrong because the passage does not say that finally he does the second thing. Option C is wrong because he is not shown as finally choosing the first thing either. Option E is wrong because no third task appears in the passage. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to think that some progress must happen eventually and to choose an option that says he does at least one task. However, the author’s point is precisely that constant hesitation prevents any progress at all. Paying attention to phrases like will do neither is crucial in avoiding such errors. Final Answer: According to the passage, a man who cannot decide which of two things to do first ends up doing nothing at all.

Question 9

Read the passage about indecision, firm resolution, and progress. Then answer the question. In the context of the passage, what is the meaning of the word retrograde?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage compares people who hesitate or keep changing their plans with those who resolve firmly and persevere. It says that instead of being progressive, such an indecisive person will at best be stationary and more probably retrograde in all things. The question asks for the meaning of retrograde in this context. To answer, we must relate the word to the idea of progress versus going backward in life or work. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage contrasts being progressive with being stationary or retrograde. Progressive in this context means moving forward, advancing, or improving. Stationary means not moving or making no progress. Retrograde is presented as worse than stationary. The passage emphasises that indecision and fluctuating opinion prevent great or useful achievements. Concept / Approach: Retrograde literally means moving backward. In a figurative sense, it refers to decline rather than improvement. Since the passage places retrograde in contrast with progressive, it clearly uses the word to mean going backward in terms of development, progress, or success. Therefore, the best option will be the one that directly captures this backward movement, not merely standing still or moving slowly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note the contrast: instead of being progressive, he will be stationary or retrograde. Step 2: If progressive means moving forward, and stationary means not moving, retrograde as something worse than stationary must mean moving backward. Step 3: Evaluate option B. It defines retrograde as moving backwards instead of making progress. This fits both the literal meaning and the context in the passage. Step 4: Option A, to stop moving completely, matches stationary, not retrograde. Step 5: Option C, moving slowly, still suggests forward movement, which is not the intended meaning. Step 6: Option D, crawling without aim, is vague and does not express the idea of going backward. Step 7: Option E, moving in circles, suggests no net progress but not necessarily backward movement. Verification / Alternative check: In everyday usage, retrograde is often used to describe a policy or action as a step backwards. This matches the passage where the author is explaining that indecisive people not only fail to progress but may actually fall behind. Comparing this everyday sense with the options confirms that option B is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because it describes being stationary, but the passage clearly distinguishes stationary and retrograde. Option C is wrong because slow forward movement is still progress, whereas retrograde refers to decline. Option D is wrong because aimless crawling does not necessarily mean moving backward. Option E is wrong because moving in circles suggests no net progress but not a backward direction. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse retrograde with stationary because both are presented as negative. It is important to notice that the passage treats retrograde as even worse than stationary, which improves our understanding of the word. Associating the word with backward steps in progress helps avoid this confusion. Final Answer: In the passage, retrograde means to move backwards instead of making progress.

Question 10

Read the passage about hesitation, firm resolution, and perseverance. Then answer the question. According to the passage, to what can a person advance if he sticks to his resolve and executes it with flexible perseverance?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage contrasts indecisive people with those who are capable of wise consultation, firm resolution, and steady execution. It states that only the person who follows this path, undismayed by petty difficulties, can advance to eminence in any line. The question asks what such a person can advance to. To answer correctly, we must recall the exact phrase used in the passage and understand the meaning of eminence. Given Data / Assumptions: Indecisive people who change plans frequently never accomplish anything great or useful. Such people may be stationary or retrograde instead of progressive. The passage praises the man who consults wisely, resolves firmly, and executes with flexible perseverance. The text explicitly says that such a man can advance to eminence in any line. Eminence refers to a high level of distinction, success, or prominence. Concept / Approach: The answer is a direct recall of the phrase advance to eminence. The question also allows us to interpret eminence in simple language as a high level of distinction. Therefore, the correct option must mention eminence and express that it is a high, honourable position in one’s chosen field. Any option that talks only about partial or temporary success, or only about wisdom without effort, will not reflect the full meaning of the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the key sentence: It is only the man who first consults wisely, then resolves firmly, and then executes his purpose with flexible perseverance who can advance to eminence in any line. Step 2: Consider option C. It says that such a person can advance to eminence, meaning a high level of distinction. This matches the passage exactly. Step 3: Option A speaks of wisdom without effort, but the passage connects eminence with hard work and perseverance, not with effortless wisdom. Step 4: Option B suggests only limited progress, but the passage suggests a significant achievement, not a modest one. Step 5: Option D mentions mere resolution without achievement, whereas the passage insists on both resolution and execution. Step 6: Option E suggests temporary success, but the passage implies a more stable, high position in any line. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can ask what the passage is trying to motivate readers to do. The whole argument encourages strong, steady effort so that one can reach a position of high achievement. That description clearly aligns with the idea of eminence. The other options either downplay the level of achievement or separate achievement from effort, both of which conflict with the message of the passage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the passage does not promise effortless wisdom. Option B is wrong because the passage suggests that great and useful achievements are possible, not just limited progress. Option D is wrong because mere resolution without action is criticised; execution is essential. Option E is wrong because the passage does not suggest that success is temporary if one perseveres; rather, it suggests a lasting high position. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes assume that the author is making a modest claim and choose an option that speaks of limited progress. However, the language of the passage is bold and inspiring, speaking of eminence and overcoming even large obstacles such as the Alps and Pyrenees. Recognising this tone helps in choosing the correct answer. Final Answer: According to the passage, a person who sticks to firm resolve and executes it with flexible perseverance can advance to eminence, a high level of distinction in any chosen line.

Question 11

Read the passage about hesitation, changing opinions, and perseverance. Then answer the question. According to the passage, whose spirit is daunted or discouraged by petty difficulties?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In the passage, the author contrasts a weak spirit that is easily daunted by petty difficulties with a firm and persevering spirit that can reach eminence. The question asks whose spirit is daunted by petty difficulties. To answer, we must recall the exact phrase used in the passage and understand that daunted means frightened, discouraged, or disheartened by obstacles. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage mentions petty difficulties which daunt a weaker spirit. A person with strong resolution and flexible perseverance is not daunted by such difficulties. The weak and fluctuating man is described as changing plans and opinions frequently and failing to accomplish anything great. The strong and persevering man holds firmly to his chosen course with heroic resolution. Daunted in this context means discouraged or made to lose heart. Concept / Approach: We must match the phrase weaker spirit from the passage to the correct option. The weak spirit is the one that gives up when faced with minor obstacles. The strong spirit is the one that remains undismayed. Therefore, the correct answer must explicitly mention a weak spirit or an equivalent phrase, not someone who is strong or eventually resolute. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the exact wording: petty difficulties which daunt a weaker spirit. Step 2: Examine option D, which refers to a person with a weak spirit who is easily discouraged. This clearly matches weaker spirit and daunted. Step 3: Option A speaks of someone who fluctuates but still has a strong inner spirit, which does not match weaker spirit. Step 4: Option B describes a hesitant person who eventually forms a firm resolution, which is closer to the positive character in the passage. Step 5: Option C directly mentions a strong spirit, which is the opposite of what is daunted. Step 6: Option E talks about a person with no opinions, which the passage does not mention. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify our answer by noting that the passage praises a spirit that is undismayed by petty difficulties. Since undismayed is the opposite of daunted, it must describe the strong spirit. Therefore, the weaker spirit is the one that is daunted, and the correct option is the one that emphasises weakness and easy discouragement. That is exactly what option D describes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because it mixes fluctuation with strength; the passage links fluctuation with weakness, not strength. Option B is wrong because eventually forming a firm resolution is a positive trait, but the daunted spirit is negative. Option C is wrong because a strong spirit is described as undismayed, not daunted. Option E is wrong because the passage does not discuss a person with no opinions at all. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to ignore the adjectives weaker and undismayed and to focus only on the general idea of hardship. However, the passage is precise: petty difficulties daunt a weaker spirit but not the strong, resolute person. Paying attention to these descriptive words helps avoid confusion between strong and weak characters in the text. Final Answer: According to the passage, a person with a weak spirit who is easily discouraged is daunted by petty difficulties.

Question 12

Read the passage about indecision, firm resolution, and perseverance. Then answer the question. What does the writer finally advise us to be in order to overcome obstacles and succeed?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage contrasts indecisive people with those who are capable of wise consultation, firm resolution, and flexible perseverance. Toward the end, the author gives direct advice: take your course wisely, but firmly, and then hold to it with heroic resolution. The question asks what the writer advises us to be. We must capture the combination of wisdom, firmness, and resolution, which are repeated and emphasised in the final lines. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage begins by criticising people who hesitate and fluctuate and do neither of the things they consider. The author then praises the man who consults wisely, resolves firmly, and executes his purpose with perseverance. The final advice is to take your course wisely but firmly and to hold to it with heroic resolution. The passage suggests that such a person can overcome even large obstacles, symbolised by the Alps and Pyrenees. The virtues highlighted are wisdom, firmness, perseverance, and resolution. Concept / Approach: We must identify the combination of qualities the writer encourages. Wisdom is needed to choose a course; firmness is needed to avoid changing plans under every influence; resolution is needed to continue in the face of difficulty. The correct option will include these elements. Options that include weakness, mere happiness, or constant hesitation contradict the author’s message. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the final sentence: Take your course wisely, but firmly; and having taken it, hold upon it with heroic resolution. Step 2: Option A summarises this as being wise, firm, and resolute. This clearly matches the message. Step 3: Option B strangely combines weakness with firmness and resolution, which is inconsistent with heroic resolution. Step 4: Option C adds happiness but ignores wisdom and planning, while the passage stresses wise consultation. Step 5: Option D leaves out wisdom, which plays a key role in choosing a course. Step 6: Option E encourages constant hesitation, which is the very attitude the passage condemns. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by imagining how the author would describe an ideal student or leader: someone who thinks carefully, chooses a path, and then sticks to it with courage. That person must be wise, firm, and resolute. None of the other options integrate all three qualities; instead they mix in qualities like weakness or hesitation that the passage treats as harmful. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B is wrong because weakness cannot coexist with the heroic resolution the author praises. Option C is wrong because happiness without wisdom or planning is not what the passage recommends. Option D is wrong because leaving out wisdom ignores the advice to consult and choose wisely. Option E is wrong because constant hesitation is criticised in the very first sentence of the passage. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students focus on single attractive words like happy or flexible, but lose sight of the exact advice given. The safest approach is to look at the closing sentences where authors often state their main recommendation most clearly. Doing so here leads directly to the combination of wisdom, firmness, and resolution. Final Answer: The writer advises us to be wise, firm, and resolute in our chosen course.

Question 13

Read the passage about public sector banks in India, social responsibility, and risk taking. Then answer the question. According to the author, what are public sector banks currently witnessing in India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage comments on public sector banks in India. It says they are witnessing a period of transition and are at a crossroads. The author emphasises that they must remain socially responsible and financially healthy while also taking some risks and innovating. The question asks what the banks are currently witnessing. This is directly stated in the opening sentence, so it is a recall and understanding question. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that public sector banks are witnessing in India a period of transition. They are described as being at a crossroads. They must both keep social responsibility and remain healthy. They should undertake risky experiments, but in an innovative way so that they do not fail. The author explains that absence of bad advances does not always mean efficiency and warns against immense conservatism. Concept / Approach: We must simply identify the phrase period of transition and understand that at a crossroads implies a moment of important change and decisions. Therefore, any option that speaks of change or transition is likely to be correct, while statements that suggest complete certainty, guaranteed profit, or definite loss do not match the passage. The author presents the situation as delicate and uncertain but full of opportunity, not as fixed in either profit or loss. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the exact wording: The public sector banks are witnessing in India a period of transition and are at crossroads. Step 2: Evaluate option B. It speaks of a period of transition and change and mentions that they stand at a crossroads. This matches the passage almost exactly. Step 3: Option A claims there is steady and guaranteed profit, but the passage does not promise profit and actually warns that absence of bad advances is no guarantee of profit. Step 4: Option C speaks of complete certainty, which the phrase crossroads clearly contradicts. Step 5: Option D claims the banks are definitely making continuous losses; the passage does not support this, only that they face danger if they do not adopt new techniques. Step 6: Option E suggests they have no social responsibility, whereas the passage stresses that they must not give up social responsibility. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by asking what mood the passage sets. The author sees the situation as one of challenge and opportunity, not of automatic success or automatic failure. The key words transition and crossroads confirm that the main idea is change and choice. Option B captures this mood and wording, whereas all other options misrepresent or overstate the situation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the passage explicitly warns that profit is not guaranteed. Option C is wrong because transition and crossroads both imply uncertainty and change, not complete certainty. Option D is wrong because the passage does not say that they are definitely making losses. Option E is wrong because social responsibility is mentioned as something that must be retained. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to focus only on one aspect of the passage, such as risk or danger, and conclude that the banks must be in a loss making period. Another pitfall is to ignore key phrases like period of transition and at crossroads, which clearly point toward change rather than fixed outcomes. Careful reading of the first sentence avoids these errors. Final Answer: According to the passage, public sector banks in India are witnessing a period of transition and change in which they stand at a crossroads.

Question 14

Read the passage about public sector banks in India, social responsibility, and risk. Then answer the question. In addition to being socially responsible, what does the author want public sector banks to be?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage states that public sector banks in India are at a crossroads. They must keep their social responsibility but also remain healthy. They are encouraged to undertake risky experiments in an innovative way, without failure, and to make forays into new areas. The question asks what the author wants the banks to be in addition to being socially responsible. We must pick the option that reflects the need for financial health and strength. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage says that public sector banks should not give up social responsibility and should also remain healthy. They need to undertake risky experiments but perform them innovatively. They should explore new areas and not lose emerging opportunities. The absence of bad advances is not a sign of efficiency; it may show extreme conservatism. Banks must adopt novel and pragmatic techniques or else face danger. Concept / Approach: The key phrase is should also remain healthy. In the context of banking, healthy means financially sound and strong, not just socially responsible. The correct option must therefore combine social responsibility with financial strength. Options that suggest weakness, recklessness, or extreme conservatism do not match the balanced approach recommended in the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the exact line: They are at crossroads, where they without giving up social responsibility, should also remain healthy. Step 2: Examine option C, which states that banks should be financially healthy and strong while still being socially responsible. This matches the line very closely. Step 3: Option A suggests that banks can be customer friendly even if financially weak; the passage emphasises health, not weakness. Step 4: Option B focuses only on foreign investors, which are not mentioned in the passage. Step 5: Option D encourages reckless risk taking, but the passage calls for innovative experiments, not senseless risk. Step 6: Option E promotes extreme conservatism, but the passage warns that absence of bad advances alone is not a sign of efficiency and may indicate excessive caution. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by summarising the author’s position: banks must balance social responsibility with financial soundness and a moderate willingness to take calculated risks. This balance is exactly what option C expresses. The other options push banks either toward weakness, recklessness, or over cautious behaviour, none of which the passage supports. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because financial weakness is dangerous and the passage stresses health. Option B is wrong because attracting foreign investors is never discussed as a goal. Option D is wrong because the passage calls for innovative but careful experiments, not wild risk taking. Option E is wrong because total absence of risky advances may show immense conservatism, which is criticised in the passage. Common Pitfalls: A typical mistake is to assume that social responsibility and financial health are opposites and to choose an option that sacrifices one for the other. The passage, however, clearly states that banks must manage both. Another error is to misread criticism of excessive caution as encouragement of reckless behaviour. The passage argues for balance and innovation, not extremes. Final Answer: In addition to being socially responsible, the author wants public sector banks to be financially healthy and strong.

Question 15

Read the following passage about public sector banks in India and answer the question that follows. How can these banks take necessary risks without inviting failure in their operations?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage discusses public sector banks in India that are passing through a transitional phase. They are expected to balance their social responsibility with financial health, and at the same time explore new areas of business. The specific question asks how these banks can take risks without actually ending up in failure. Given Data / Assumptions: Public sector banks are in a period of transition and are at a crossroads. They must not give up their social responsibility but should remain financially healthy. They need to undertake risky experiments but must perform them in an innovative way so that they do not fail. The passage clearly says that absence of any bad advance only shows conservatism, not efficiency. The passage stresses the need for a balance between liquidity and risk. Concept / Approach: This is a reading comprehension question that tests the ability to locate a specific idea in a passage. The key is to identify the exact phrase in the text that answers the question. Instead of relying on general knowledge about banking, the candidate should focus on the wording used by the author to show how risk can be managed without failure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Revisit the lines in the passage that talk about risky experiments and failure. Step 2: The passage states that banks need to undertake risky experiments yet perform them innovatively in a way they do not fail. Step 3: The phrase “perform it innovatively in a way it does not fail” directly connects innovation with safe risk taking. Step 4: Compare each option with this idea and find the one that matches innovation as the tool for managing risk. Step 5: Conclude that the correct option must describe innovation as the method for taking risks without failing. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, notice that the passage does not mention government support or pure financial strength as the main method of handling risk. Instead, it clearly links risky experiments with innovative execution. Therefore, the option that highlights innovation perfectly reflects the author's statement and is consistent with the overall theme of balancing risk and liquidity. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option b: Government help may support banks, but the passage does not present it as the method for taking risks without failure. Option c: Being financially healthy but inactive does not involve experimenting with risk and so does not answer the question. Option d: Conservatism is described in the passage as an attitude that avoids bad advances but is not a sign of efficiency and does not guarantee profit. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates quickly choose options that sound safe and familiar, such as dependence on the government or extreme conservatism. However, these are not supported by the text. Another common mistake is to ignore the precise wording in the passage and rely instead on assumptions about how banks work in general. The correct strategy in reading comprehension is always to base the answer strictly on the passage, not on outside knowledge. Final Answer: By being innovative is the correct answer, because the passage explicitly says that risky experiments must be carried out innovatively in a way that they do not fail.

Question 16

Read the following passage about public sector banks in India and answer the question. According to the passage, what does the complete absence of any bad advance in a bank actually indicate?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In the given passage on public sector banks, the author explains how banks should handle risk, liquidity and new opportunities. An important line talks about the absence of any bad advance and what that really shows about a bank. The question focuses on interpreting this specific statement and understanding the author's attitude toward extremely safe banking practices. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that the absence of any bad advance is no sign of an efficient banking system. It further explains that such absence only indicates immense conservatism. The author warns that conservatism does not guarantee profit. Banks are encouraged to explore new areas and not miss emerging opportunities. There must be a balance between liquidity and risk, not complete avoidance of risk. Concept / Approach: This is a direct detail question from a reading passage. The correct method is to locate the sentence in the text that mentions “absence of any bad advance” and then read what the author says it indicates. The focus is on comprehension rather than grammar or calculation. A precise match between the passage and an option is required. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the relevant line in the passage: “It should be understood that absence of any bad advance is no sign of efficient banking system. It only indicates immense conservatism.” Step 2: Highlight the phrase “only indicates immense conservatism” as the author's clear explanation. Step 3: Compare the options and search for the one that repeats the idea of “immense conservatism.” Step 4: Observe that option b is exactly “Immense conservatism.” Step 5: Confirm that no other option captures this exact meaning from the passage. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification is to note that the passage explicitly rejects the idea that zero bad advances prove efficiency. Instead, the writer insists that such a situation simply shows that the bank has been overly conservative and possibly missing profitable opportunities. Therefore, the only accurate interpretation is that the bank is extremely conservative, not necessarily efficient or profitable. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a: A penchant for risks is the opposite of conservatism and contradicts the idea of zero bad advances. Option c: Financial independence is not mentioned in connection with bad advances at all. Option d: Social commitment is discussed separately in the passage but is not linked to the absence of bad advances. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes assume that if a bank has no bad loans it must be efficient or very strong. The author deliberately challenges this assumption. Another frequent error is to infer that such a bank must be deeply committed to social goals, but that association is not made anywhere in the passage. The correct approach is to follow the author's exact words and not impose personal opinions about banking practices. Final Answer: Immense conservatism is the correct answer, because the passage clearly states that the absence of bad advances only indicates conservatism rather than efficiency.

Question 17

Read the following passage about public sector banks and answer the question. According to the passage, what would happen to banks if they failed to adopt novel and pragmatic techniques?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage about public sector banks in India emphasises that these institutions must modernise. They must not cling only to conservative methods but should adopt new and practical techniques if they want to survive. This question asks what the passage says will happen if such novel and pragmatic techniques are not adopted. Given Data / Assumptions: Public sector banks are in a transitional period and stand at a crossroads. They must balance social responsibility, profitability, and healthy risk taking. The passage clearly states that novel and pragmatic techniques should be adopted. It warns that without these techniques, banks would be in danger. No mention is made of social commitment weakening or talent being revealed as a result of ignoring such techniques. Concept / Approach: This is a factual question that depends entirely on a specific line in the passage. The correct approach is to recall or reread the sentence that mentions novel and pragmatic techniques, and then identify the consequence the author attaches to not adopting them. The answer must be in the same spirit and meaning as the original text. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Find the sentence that talks about novel and pragmatic techniques in the passage. Step 2: Note that the passage states that such techniques should be adopted without which banks would be in danger. Step 3: Focus on the phrase “would be in danger,” which states the explicit consequence of ignoring those techniques. Step 4: Compare options and find the one that matches this consequence most directly. Step 5: Identify option a, “It will put the banks in danger,” as the exact restatement of the author's warning. Verification / Alternative check: An alternative check is to look at the other options and see whether any of them is mentioned or implied in the passage. The text does not connect the neglect of new techniques with weakening social commitment, revelation of talent, or any narrow issue such as inefficient portfolio management alone. The danger referred to is broader, covering the very survival and health of the banks. Therefore, option a is the only consistent and complete answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option b: The passage never states that social commitment will be undermined by not using novel techniques. Option c: There is no suggestion that hidden talent will be revealed when techniques are ignored. Option d: While poor management may be a problem, the passage speaks of a more serious and general danger, not just one technical issue. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may be tempted to over interpret terms like “novel” and “pragmatic,” assuming they relate directly to efficiency or new talent. Others may try to inject ideas about social responsibility even where the text does not link them. The safe and accurate method in reading comprehension is to stay close to the wording of the passage and avoid inserting meanings that are not clearly stated. Final Answer: It will put the banks in danger. is the correct answer, as the passage clearly warns that without novel and pragmatic techniques, banks will be in danger.

Question 18

Read the following passage about the human eye and answer the question. According to the passage, what do we actually see when we look at an object?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage explains how the human eye functions, comparing it to a television camera. It describes how light, the eye, the nervous system, and the brain work together to produce sight. The specific question asks what we actually see when we look at an object, which is a central concept in the description of vision. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that when someone looks at an object, what he really sees is the light reflected from the object. This reflected light passes through the lens of the eye. The light then falls on the retina and creates nerve impulses. Nerve impulses travel through the optic nerve to the brain. The brain interprets these impulses as the sense perception called sight. Concept / Approach: This is a detail based question about basic physics of vision. The approach is to locate the exact sentence that starts with “When someone looks at an object” and to read carefully what follows. The reasoning is scientific: we do not see objects directly in the absence of light, but only through light that reflects from or is emitted by them. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Find the line in the passage that starts with “When someone looks at an object.” Step 2: Read the full statement: the text clearly says that what a person really sees is the light reflected from the object. Step 3: Understand that the object itself is not entering the eye, only the reflected light does. Step 4: Compare the options and pick the one that mentions “the light reflected from the object.” Step 5: Recognise that option b matches the passage exactly. Verification / Alternative check: The eye cannot work in complete darkness, which shows that light is necessary for seeing. This supports the idea that we must be seeing light rather than the object in isolation. The passage reinforces this, making the explanation consistent with both common experience and science. Therefore, the answer that refers to reflected light is certain to be correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a: The phrase “object reflected by the light” is unclear and not used in the passage. Option c: Shadows exist because of blocked light, but the passage does not say we mainly see shadows. Option d: Seeing an object without any light is impossible, so this option contradicts basic science and the passage. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may confuse “object” with “light from the object” and believe that the distinction is not important. Others may choose the shadow option because they associate vision with silhouettes. However, scientific reading demands attention to the exact wording, and the passage is very clear about reflected light being the real visual input. Final Answer: The light reflected from the object is the correct answer, because the passage explicitly states that this is what we really see when we look at an object.

Question 19

Read the following passage about the human eye and answer the question. In what way is the human eye similar to a television camera, according to the passage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage compares the human eye with a television camera to explain how vision works. It explains that both devices transform light energy into another form of energy that can be processed further. The question asks precisely what kind of transformation both the eye and the television camera perform according to the text. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage clearly states that the eye is similar to a television camera. Both the eye and the television camera convert light energy to electrical energy. The eye converts light into nerve impulses that are interpreted by the brain as sight. A television camera converts light into electronic signals that are broadcast and converted back into light images in a television receiver. No mention is made of mechanical energy in relation to the eye or the camera. Concept / Approach: This is a comprehension question that tests the understanding of an analogy. The eye is compared to a television camera to show that both work as converters of one form of energy into another. The approach is to read the part of the passage that begins with “The eye is similar to a television camera” and to extract the key phrase that describes their common function. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Locate the sentence where the passage explicitly compares the eye with a television camera. Step 2: Read that sentence carefully. It says that both convert light energy to electrical energy. Step 3: Note that in the eye, electrical like nerve impulses are generated, while in the camera, electronic signals are produced. Step 4: Compare this information with the answer choices. Step 5: Choose option b, which directly repeats “convert light energy to electrical energy.” Verification / Alternative check: From basic physics, we know that sight involves conversion of light stimuli into electrical signals in the nervous system. Television technology also uses photoelectric conversion to change light into electronic signals. Therefore, both science and the literal passage support option b. The other options add mechanical elements not mentioned in the text and not relevant to the eye or the television camera in this context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a: Conversion to mechanical energy is not discussed at all, and it does not describe the main function of either device. Option c: The expression “mechanical light” is not meaningful in this context and is not used in the passage. Option d: The passage never says that either device converts mechanical light to electrical energy; the starting point is always light energy itself. Common Pitfalls: Test takers may get distracted by unfamiliar phrases or may guess based on partial memories of physics. Some may think of mechanical analogies for focusing or movement of the eye. The correct strategy is to rely on the explicit wording in the passage and choose the option that exactly matches it without adding extra concepts. Final Answer: Both convert light energy to electrical energy. is the correct answer because the passage clearly states that this is the common feature linking the human eye and a television camera.

Question 20

Read the following passage about the human eye and answer the question. What name is given to the sense perception released by the brain after the eye converts light into nerve impulses?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage explains how the human eye, in coordination with the nervous system and the brain, produces the experience of seeing. It describes each stage, from light hitting the retina to the interpretation by the brain. The question asks for the specific term used in the passage to describe the final sense perception after nerve impulses reach the brain. Given Data / Assumptions: When light reflected from an object falls on the retina, it induces nerve impulses. These nerve impulses travel through the optic nerve to the brain. The brain interprets the impulses as a sense perception. The passage explicitly says that this sense perception is called sight. The passage does not use the words blindness, glare, or generic image as names for this perception. Concept / Approach: This is a direct vocabulary based comprehension question. The correct method is to recall the exact wording in the passage. The phrase to focus on is “interpreted by the brain as the sense perception called sight.” We must then pick the option that repeats the same term rather than a loosely related concept. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Locate the part of the passage where conversion of light into nerve impulses and the brain's role is described. Step 2: Identify the exact phrase: the eye converts light to nerve impulses that are interpreted by the brain as the sense perception called sight. Step 3: Notice that the key phrase is “sense perception called sight.” Step 4: Compare this phrase with the answer options. Step 5: Choose option c, “Sight,” because it directly matches the passage. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can rule out the other options. Blindness is the absence of vision, glare is an uncomfortable intensity of light, and image is a general word for visual representation. The author clearly wishes to name the normal perception of vision and uses the familiar everyday term “sight.” Therefore, the only accurate choice is sight. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a: Blindness is the loss of vision, which contradicts the idea of successful sight. Option b: Image is too general and is not the specific term used by the author to name the sense perception. Option d: Glare refers to harsh or painfully bright light, not to normal visual perception. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes test takers overthink such questions and try to interpret “sense perception” as a technical term, which may lead them toward the word “image.” Others may confuse the idea of perception with unusual visual effects like glare. The best practice in reading comprehension is to remember that the passage often gives the exact word or phrase that must be chosen, so quoting it accurately is enough to find the correct answer. Final Answer: Sight is the correct answer because the passage explicitly calls the sense perception created by the brain after processing nerve impulses by that name.

English Questions