Question 1

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the option that best expresses the meaning of the given idiom or phrase. On thin ice.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This idiom based question focuses on the phrase on thin ice, which is widely used in spoken and written English. The image comes from walking on ice that is not thick enough to support weight, creating a risk of falling through. In figurative language, the idiom refers to being in a situation that is risky, uncertain, or dangerous, especially where one wrong move can cause serious trouble. The candidate must select the option that captures this sense of precariousness. Given Data / Assumptions: Idiom: On thin ice. Options: keep failing after repeated efforts, endure a harsh winter, keep one's cool even in a tough situation, in a precarious or risky situation. No extra context is given, so the general idiomatic meaning is tested. We assume standard modern usage in social, professional, or academic contexts. Concept / Approach: When someone is said to be on thin ice, it means that they are already close to causing serious trouble, losing favour, or facing punishment. Any further mistake could have serious consequences. This is typical in sentences like After arriving late several times, he is on thin ice with his manager. The correct explanation is therefore that the person is in a precarious or risky situation. The other options either describe failure, physical hardship, or calm behaviour, none of which match the metaphor of fragile, unsafe conditions suggested by thin ice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the base image of thin ice, which cannot safely support heavy weight.Step 2: Connect that image to the figurative sense: a person on thin ice is at risk; one more wrong action could make them fall into trouble.Step 3: Compare this idea with option In a precarious or risky situation. This matches the notion of being close to danger or failure.Step 4: Examine option To keep failing after repeated efforts. This describes repeated failure, but not specifically a fragile, risky position with potential consequences.Step 5: Examine option To endure a harsh winter and option To keep one's cool even in a tough situation; these are unrelated to the specific metaphor of being dangerously close to trouble. Thus, option D is correct. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by fitting the idiom into typical sentences. Teachers may say You are on thin ice with your attendance, warning a student that further absence may cause serious action. Employers might tell an employee that after repeated mistakes, he is on thin ice. In all such usages, the phrase signals a risky status, not simply failure or calm behaviour. If we try to substitute options A, B, or C into these contexts, the result sounds illogical. Only the option that mentions a precarious or risky situation preserves the meaning of the original idiom. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To keep failing after repeated efforts: While being on thin ice could result from repeated failures, the idiom itself describes the current dangerous status, not the process of failing. To endure a harsh winter: This is a literal interpretation of ice and cold but has nothing to do with the figurative meaning. To keep one's cool even in a tough situation: This describes calmness under pressure, which can actually be a positive quality, unlike being on thin ice, which is a warning phrase. These options distract by referring vaguely to difficulty or ice, but they do not capture the core meaning of risk. Common Pitfalls: Some learners misinterpret idioms by focusing on a single word, such as ice, and then linking it to winter or cold rather than understanding the full expression. Others may confuse on thin ice with keep cool under pressure because both can appear in stressful situations, but they convey very different ideas. The safest strategy is to remember the mental picture: thin ice breaks easily, so the person standing on it is in danger. Any option that does not mention risk or precariousness is unlikely to be correct. Final Answer: The idiom on thin ice means in a precarious or risky situation where one more mistake can cause serious trouble.

Question 2

In the following question, a sentence is given with a bracketed part that may contain an error. Choose the alternative that will best replace the bracketed part. In case no improvement is needed, select the option no improvement. All (was surprising…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This grammar question tests subject verb agreement and correct tense in a sentence describing a past event. The subject of the sentence is All, which refers to a group of people. The bracketed verb phrase was surprising is grammatically awkward and does not agree in number with the subject. The task is to choose the correct verb form that agrees with All and expresses the intended meaning that everyone experienced surprise on discovering that he was not with them. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: All (was surprising) to find that he was not with them. Options: was surprised, were surprised, is surprised, no improvement. The context clearly refers to a completed action in the past. All refers to more than one person, functioning as a plural subject. Concept / Approach: In English, subject verb agreement requires that plural subjects take plural verbs in simple tenses. The indefinite pronoun all is usually treated as plural when it refers to people, as in All were happy, All were present. In the given sentence, the intended meaning is that every person in the group felt surprised. Therefore the verb must be were surprised. The phrase was surprising would describe something as causing surprise, not the people feeling surprise, and it also mismatches the plural subject. The approach is to identify the correct combination of plural auxiliary and past participle that matches the sense of the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the subject: All, referring to all the people in the group.Step 2: Recognise that All in this sense is plural, so a plural verb is required.Step 3: Understand the meaning: the group felt surprised at discovering he was not with them, so the correct predicate should be were surprised.Step 4: Test each option in the sentence. All was surprised is wrong because was is singular. All were surprised is correct and natural. All is surprised switches to present tense, which does not match the past context.Step 5: Conclude that the best replacement for was surprising is were surprised. Verification / Alternative check: We can compare with similar sentences: All were shocked to hear the news and All were delighted with the result. In each case, plural were is used because the group collectively experiences an emotion. Rewriting the given sentence as All were surprised to find that he was not with them matches this pattern exactly. Using was surprising would usually require a different structure, such as It was surprising to find that he was not with them, where it becomes an impersonal subject. The sentence given, however, clearly needs a personal plural subject verb agreement structure. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Was surprised: This uses a singular auxiliary and conflicts with the plural subject all. It might work only if the subject were a singular noun. Is surprised: This both uses the present tense and is singular; it fails on tense and agreement. No improvement: Retaining was surprising leaves the sentence grammatically awkward because All was surprising describes the group as causing surprise rather than experiencing it, and also mismatches number. Therefore, these options do not satisfy the requirements of subject verb agreement and correct meaning. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes treat all as singular because in everyday speech they may hear phrases like All is well, where all is used differently. In this question, however, all clearly refers to people and functions as a plural pronoun. Another common mistake is to not distinguish between being surprised and being surprising. The former describes emotion experienced by the subject, while the latter describes the quality of something that causes that emotion. Recognising this distinction helps avoid confusion when choosing between past participle and present participle forms. Final Answer: The correct replacement is were surprised, so the sentence should read, All were surprised to find that he was not with them.

Question 3

In the following question, a sentence is given with a bracketed part that may contain an error. Choose the alternative that will best replace the bracketed part. In case no improvement is needed, select the option no improvement. Read in order (beco…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests the correct use of the infinitive of purpose in English. The sentence Read in order become wise is intended to express the idea that one should read with the purpose of becoming wise. The phrase in order is commonly followed by an infinitive (to plus base verb) to express purpose. The candidate must therefore choose the grammatically correct and meaningful form to complete the sentence. Given Data / Assumptions: Original structure: Read in order (become) wise. Options: to have to be, to have become, to become, no improvement. The sentence is a general instruction or proverb like Read in order to become wise. We assume standard grammar rules for infinitives after in order. Concept / Approach: In English, the phrase in order to is the standard way to express purpose, followed by the base form of the verb. Examples include Study hard in order to succeed and Exercise regularly in order to stay healthy. Therefore, in order must be followed by to become in this sentence. The other options introduce unnecessary complexity or wrong tense, such as to have become, which suggests a completed action before another point in time, and to have to be, which does not fit the simple proverb like structure. The correct approach is to recognise the fixed collocation in order to plus base verb. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify in order as a marker of purpose that normally connects to an infinitive.Step 2: Recall the pattern: in order to plus base verb, such as in order to learn, in order to improve.Step 3: Decide the base verb needed here: become, because the desired meaning is become wise.Step 4: Combine in order with to become to form the phrase in order to become, giving the full sentence Read in order to become wise.Step 5: Compare with the options. To become is the only choice that creates this correct and natural structure. Verification / Alternative check: Let us test each option in the sentence. Read in order to have to be wise sounds unnatural and confusing, mixing obligation with purpose in a clumsy way. Read in order to have become wise suggests that the becoming wise must already be completed before reading, which does not fit the intended general advice. Read in order become wise lacks the essential to and is therefore grammatically incomplete. Read in order to become wise is concise, clear, and matches traditional proverb like expressions in English. This confirms that to become is the correct replacement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To have to be: This structure expresses obligation (have to) combined with be and does not fit with in order in this context. It also makes the sentence overly complicated. To have become: This perfect infinitive usually refers to an action completed before another reference point in time and does not work well in a general proverb. No improvement: Leaving become without to after in order gives a grammatically incorrect phrase because the standard pattern requires the full infinitive in order to become. Common Pitfalls: Some learners forget that in order almost always takes to plus verb, and they may write in order buy or in order go, which is incorrect. Others may be attracted to longer forms like to have become because they sound more formal, even though the meaning and tense become inappropriate for a simple general statement. A reliable method is to treat in order to as one fixed unit meaning so that, and always follow it directly with the base form of the main verb, such as become in this example. Final Answer: The correct replacement is to become, so the sentence should read, Read in order to become wise.

Question 4

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the one word which is the best substitute for the given definition. Showing strong feeling.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question checks knowledge of adjectives that describe intensity of emotion or attitude. The definition given is showing strong feeling, which typically refers to passionate, forceful expression in speech, behaviour, or opinion. The correct choice must reflect strong intensity, not weakness, lack of interest, or inability. The options contrast a powerful emotional word with weaker or negative ones, making discrimination between them essential. Given Data / Assumptions: Definition: Showing strong feeling. Options: Meek, Vehement, Apathetic, Impotent. We assume standard dictionary meanings for descriptive adjectives of character and behaviour. The answer must capture strong and active emotional expression. Concept / Approach: Vehement means showing strong and often intense feeling; forceful, passionate, or extremely emphatic. It is commonly used for arguments, protests, denials, and emotions that are expressed with great energy. Meek refers to being quiet, gentle, and easily imposed on, which is the opposite of forceful. Apathetic means showing or feeling little or no interest or emotion, again the opposite of strong feeling. Impotent means powerless or lacking strength, especially the ability to take effective action. Among the given choices, only vehement correctly matches the idea of powerful emotional expression. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key idea in the definition: strong feeling, which suggests passion or intensity.Step 2: Examine Vehement. It directly means forceful, passionate, or intense in expression, matching the definition almost exactly.Step 3: Examine Meek. This means submissive, gentle, or mild, describing someone who does not assert strong feelings openly.Step 4: Examine Apathetic. This describes a person who lacks interest, enthusiasm, or concern, which is very far from strong feeling.Step 5: Examine Impotent. This means lacking power or ability to act effectively, not describing emotional strength itself. Therefore, Vehement is the correct substitute. Verification / Alternative check: We can support the choice by recalling common collocations. People speak of vehement protests, vehement criticism, or vehement opposition, where the shared idea is strong, passionate feeling. By contrast, a meek protest sounds weak, apathetic criticism suggests no real emotional involvement, and impotent opposition suggests ineffective rather than emotionally intense response. These examples show that only vehement consistently carries the required sense of strong feeling in standard usage and exam oriented contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Meek: This word describes a quiet, submissive, or gentle personality, often associated with lack of assertiveness. It is closer to mildness than intensity. Apathetic: This directly opposes the idea of strong feeling because it describes emotional numbness or lack of interest. Impotent: This focuses on lack of power or effectiveness, which is not the same as lack or presence of feeling; a person can feel strongly and still be impotent in action. None of these words align with the definition provided in the question. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may confuse vehement with violent and then hesitate to choose it, believing it carries only physical aggression. In fact, vehement is often used for strong but non physical emotional expression. Another pitfall is to misread showing strong feeling as simply feeling strongly, which can lead students to consider even negative words that imply inner conflict. A safe approach is to focus on how the feeling is expressed outwardly; vehement clearly denotes forceful expression, whereas the other options describe quietness, indifference, or weakness. Final Answer: The one word substitute for showing strong feeling is Vehement.

Question 5

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the one word which is the best substitute for the given definition. A sheath for the blade of a sword.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question tests vocabulary connected with historical objects and weapons, often encountered in literature and general knowledge. The definition given is a sheath for the blade of a sword. The correct answer must name the specific protective covering into which a sword is placed when not in use. The distractor options are verbs related to uncovering or revealing, which are conceptually opposite to the idea of covering or protecting. Given Data / Assumptions: Definition: A sheath for the blade of a sword. Options: Scabbard, Denude, Divulge, Expose. We assume standard English usage found in novels, history, and competitive exams. The correct word should be a noun naming a physical object, not a verb describing an action. Concept / Approach: The technical term for the protective case that holds a sword, sabre, or similar weapon is scabbard. This word appears in historical fiction, military descriptions, and museum contexts. The other options denude, divulge, and expose are verbs. Denude means to strip something of its covering, divulge means to reveal information, and expose means to make visible or leave unprotected. All of these describe actions of removing protection rather than providing it. The approach is to recognise that the definition clearly points to an object and to select the only noun that matches this purpose. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the keywords sheath and blade of a sword, which indicate a protective case used to cover and carry the weapon.Step 2: Recall the standard term scabbard, which is exactly defined as a sheath for a sword or dagger.Step 3: Note that Denude, Divulge, and Expose are all verbs that describe removing cover, revealing, or uncovering something.Step 4: Since the question asks for a sheath, that is, the cover itself, these verbs cannot fit.Step 5: Therefore, Scabbard is the only option that matches both the grammatical form and the meaning of the definition. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by building simple sentences. A knight drew his sword from its scabbard is a standard English sentence and clearly refers to a sword being pulled out of its protective case. If we try to use denude, divulge, or expose in place of scabbard, the sentence becomes meaningless, because these words do not refer to an object. Moreover, dictionaries and historical descriptions consistently define scabbard as a sheath for a sword or a blade. This cross check confirms that scabbard is the correct one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Denude: This means to strip something of its covering, for example denuding a forest of trees. It is an action, not a thing, and runs opposite to the idea of a sheath. Divulge: This verb means to make known something private or secret, such as divulging information, which relates to knowledge, not physical objects. Expose: This means to leave something without protection or to reveal it to view. Again, it describes an action that removes cover, while a scabbard is the cover itself. None of these verbs can be used as the name of the sheath of a sword. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may not be familiar with the word scabbard because it is more common in older literature than in modern speech. Others may pay attention only to the general idea of covering and mistakenly select a verb that sounds like it might be related. A reliable exam strategy is to first decide whether the definition describes a thing, a person, or an action. Here, a sheath is clearly a thing, so only a noun can be correct. Among the options, scabbard is the only noun and also matches the definition perfectly. Final Answer: The one word substitute for a sheath for the blade of a sword is Scabbard.

Question 6

In the following question, four words are given, out of which one word is spelt correctly. Select the correctly spelt word.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question tests knowledge of a legal term that appears frequently in news reports and law related passages. The target word refers to people who are involved in a lawsuit or legal action. Among the four similar looking options, only one reflects the standard dictionary spelling. The exam checks whether candidates pay attention to vowel placement and consonant patterns in formal English words. Given Data / Assumptions: Meaning: people who are engaged in a lawsuit or legal proceeding. Options: Litegants, Litigents, Litigants, Litegents. We assume standard legal English spelling used in newspapers and textbooks. The correct form should correspond to the plural of litigant. Concept / Approach: The correct word is litigants, formed from the singular litigant plus the plural suffix s. The root litigant is related to litigation, both sharing the sequence l i t i g. The syllable structure is li ti gant, not lete or lete, and the final vowel a before n is important. The incorrect options replace vowels or alter the sequence in a way that breaks this connection. The easiest approach is to recall the familiar noun litigation and notice how litigant and litigants match that pattern, retaining the i after t and using a before n in the last syllable. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the base noun litigant, which refers to a party in a lawsuit.Step 2: Form the plural by adding s, creating litigants.Step 3: Compare this spelling to the options and notice that option C, Litigants, matches exactly.Step 4: Observe that Litegants uses e after t instead of i, breaking the link to litigation.Step 5: Observe that Litigents and Litegents both contain e before n, which does not match the correct pattern in the final syllable gant. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by placing the word in typical sentences from news or law related articles: The court asked the litigants to submit additional documents and The litigants reached a settlement outside court. Reading these, the spelling litigants looks familiar and correct. If we tried Litegants or Litigents in such sentences, they would appear wrong to anyone familiar with the legal term. Checking the related words litigation and litigious further strengthens the connection between the letters l i t i g and confirms that Litigants is the correct spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Litegants: This replaces the second i with e, making the internal pattern l e t e, which does not appear in the family of words litigation and litigant. Litigents: Although this keeps l i t i g, it changes the final vowel to e and suggests a pronunciation similar to agents, which is incorrect. Litegents: This combines both sets of errors, making it even further from the accepted spelling. None of these variants are recognised in standard dictionaries and would count as spelling mistakes in an exam or formal writing. Common Pitfalls: Because several options differ only by one letter, candidates who rely purely on sound or quick visual impression may choose incorrectly. Another pitfall is to confuse litigants with derivatives of the word legend or agent because of the similar ending, leading to the choice of a form like Litigents. A robust strategy is to build words from their known roots. Remembering litigation and then deriving litigant and litigants from that root helps keep the vowel sequence consistent and avoids confusion with unrelated word families. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Litigants.

Question 7

In the following question, four words are given, out of which one word is spelt correctly. Select the correctly spelt word.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question checks knowledge of an adverb derived from the adjective stoic or stoical. The word describes a way of behaving that shows little emotion, especially in the face of pain or difficulty. Candidates often see it in reading comprehension passages that talk about characters bearing hardship calmly. Only one of the four similar looking spellings is correct according to standard English usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Target adverb: stoically. Options: Stoically, Stoicaly, Stoecally, Stoecaly. We assume standard spelling based on the adjective stoic or stoical. The correct form must follow the usual adverb forming pattern and preserve the correct vowel sequence. Concept / Approach: The adverb stoically is formed from stoic or stoical. When forming adverbs from adjectives ending in ic or ical, English usually adds ally or ally depending on the base. Stoic becomes stoically by inserting an a between ic and lly, shifting to a structure similar to basic to basically. Thus the correct spelling is s t o i c a l l y. The incorrect alternatives either drop the necessary a before l l y or use the wrong vowel combination oe instead of oi, leading to non standard forms. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the base adjectives stoic and stoical, which describe calm endurance.Step 2: Form the adverb according to the pattern stoic plus ally, with a added to keep pronunciation smooth, resulting in stoically.Step 3: Compare this with option A, Stoically, and confirm that it matches the expected pattern s t o i c a l l y.Step 4: Examine Stoicaly, which has only one l and drops one consonant from the expected lly ending, making it incorrect.Step 5: Examine Stoecally and Stoecaly, which both use oe instead of oi and therefore do not match the base adjective stoic. These are incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, consider similar adverbs like basic and basically or tragic and tragically. In all such cases, the adverb form has a double l y at the end. Applying the same pattern to stoic leads to stoically. Also, a quick mental search of sentences like She bore the pain stoically or He accepted the defeat stoically reveals that this spelling looks familiar from books and articles. The other variants look visually odd and do not align with common patterns in English spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Stoicaly: This variant has only one l and thus breaks the usual lly ending of adverbs formed from adjectives in ic. Stoecally and Stoecaly: Both introduce oe instead of oi, which would suggest a completely different pronunciation and is not supported by any standard dictionary. In addition, Stoecaly also drops one l, compounding the error. These forms are clearly designed distractors that test attention to detail. Common Pitfalls: Because English spelling is sometimes irregular, candidates may over rely on sound and pick a form that looks shorter or simpler, like Stoicaly. Others may get confused by the presence of both stoic and stoical and assume that the adverb must be stoecally, mixing spellings from different languages. A practical exam strategy is to remember that most adverbs derived from adjectives ending in ic take ally, with a double l, and that the vowel sequence should closely match the base adjective, here oi rather than oe. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Stoically.

Question 8

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentence parts X, Y and Z. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the labels to form a coherent sentence. The space in front of the large X - hut was empty, but Y - placed sev…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence rearrangement question provides three labelled segments X, Y, and Z that need to be placed correctly within a partially given sentence. The main clause already starts with The space in front of the large and ends with were, and the labelled parts must be arranged to produce a grammatically correct and logically coherent sentence. The candidate must pay attention to natural English word order, especially when dealing with inversion in phrases such as before it were placed several stools. Given Data / Assumptions: Fixed frame: The space in front of the large ... were. Label X: hut was empty, but Label Y: placed several stools Label Z: before it were Options: XYZ, XZY, ZYX, ZXY. Concept / Approach: The natural first step is to complete the phrase The space in front of the large hut was empty, but, which clearly requires placing X immediately after large. After that, we need to describe what was actually in front of the hut. The idiomatic expression in English here uses an inverted structure: before it were placed several stools. In this pattern, the normal order several stools were placed before it is rearranged for stylistic effect. To maintain correct subject verb agreement and a coherent flow, the parts must be ordered so that before it were immediately precedes placed several stools, completing the inversion smoothly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert X after large: The space in front of the large hut was empty, but ...Step 2: Recognise that the sentence now needs a contrasting clause that explains what was present despite this emptiness.Step 3: Consider the typical inverted expression: before it were placed several stools, which uses were before the subject stools for emphasis.Step 4: To produce this inversion, Z must come before Y, because Z supplies before it were and Y supplies placed several stools.Step 5: Combining these insights, we obtain the full sentence: The space in front of the large hut was empty, but before it were placed several stools. This corresponds to the order X Z Y, which is option XZY. Verification / Alternative check: If we try XYZ, we get The space in front of the large hut was empty, but placed several stools before it were, which is awkward and ungrammatical because placed several stools appears without a clear subject or correct inversion. ZYX would yield The space in front of the large hut was empty, but before it were were placed several stools, which incorrectly repeats were. ZXY and other combinations similarly break the natural inversion pattern and disrupt the flow. Only XZY gives a grammatically acceptable and stylistically natural sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: XYZ: The sequence hut was empty, but placed several stools before it were places the verb placed directly after but, creating confusion about the subject and producing an unnatural word order. ZYX and ZXY: Both start with before it were without first naming the hut as part of the main clause, and then either duplicate verbs or scatter the elements of placed several stools in odd positions. These options do not produce a coherent sentence that matches typical English narrative style. Common Pitfalls: Students often struggle with inversion structures, especially when the subject follows the verb, as in before it were placed several stools. Many try to reorder the words mentally into a more familiar pattern and then misplace the labels. A useful technique is to first identify any fixed units that clearly belong together, such as hut was empty, but and before it were placed several stools, and then assign labels accordingly. Recognising that Z and Y together form the inverted clause makes the XZY order easier to spot. Final Answer: The most logical and grammatically correct order of the labels is XZY.

Question 9

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentence parts X, Y and Z. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the labels to form a coherent sentence. From our common experience X - of the relation of the Y - mental he s…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence order question involves three labelled parts X, Y, and Z that must be arranged to complete a somewhat formal philosophical sentence. The sentence begins with From our common experience and then needs to describe what kind of experience is being referred to. The difficulty arises because the fragments are not simple everyday phrases, so the candidate must rely on an understanding of logical structure and natural clause order rather than only intuition. Given Data / Assumptions: Fixed start: From our common experience ... Label X: of the relation of the Label Y: mental he starts out Label Z: physical and the Options: XYZ, XZY, ZYX, ZXY. We expect the final sentence to read like a formal statement about the relation between the physical and the mental. Concept / Approach: The most natural phrase after From our common experience is From our common experience of the relation of the physical and the mental. This already suggests that X should be followed by Z, because X gives of the relation of the and Z completes physical and the. Once this phrase is complete, the remaining words mental he starts out can follow to indicate the point from which he begins his discussion or argument. Therefore, the likely order is X Z Y, which yields a grammatically coherent and meaningful structure referring first to the relation and then to the thinker starting out from that relation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert X after the opening: From our common experience of the relation of the ...Step 2: Ask what words can naturally complete this phrase. The relation of the physical and the mental is a standard philosophical expression. That means Z, physical and the, must immediately follow X.Step 3: After combining X and Z, we have From our common experience of the relation of the physical and the ...Step 4: The remaining words mental he starts out fit well at the end, giving the idea that he begins with this commonly experienced relation.Step 5: Thus the full sentence reads: From our common experience of the relation of the physical and the mental he starts out. This corresponds to the label order XZY. Verification / Alternative check: Consider the other orders. XYZ would give From our common experience of the relation of the mental he starts out physical and the, which is ungrammatical and splits the phrase physical and the mental in an unnatural way. ZYX would start with physical and the immediately after From our common experience, which breaks the of the relation of the phrase that should follow experience. ZXY similarly scatters fragments so that the basic phrase the relation of the physical and the mental never appears intact. Only XZY yields that familiar phrase and a coherent final clause. Why Other Options Are Wrong: XYZ: This order produces a muddled sequence where mental he starts out interrupts the natural pairing of physical and the mental, causing confusion. ZYX and ZXY: Both of these start with Z, which gives physical and the without the necessary of the relation of the that normally precedes it. They break the logical semantic unit and result in a sentence that does not read like standard formal English. In all these cases, the expected philosophical collocation the relation of the physical and the mental is destroyed or badly fragmented. Common Pitfalls: Because the language is abstract, candidates might ignore meaning and try to arrange labels purely by sound or simple grammar. This often leads to combinations where the phrase the physical and the mental is split. A better strategy is to look for familiar structures. Many philosophy texts speak of the relation of the physical and the mental, and once that pattern is recognised, it becomes clear that X must be followed by Z. Then, with only Y left to place, the order XZY emerges as the only logical choice. Final Answer: The most logical and grammatically correct order of the labels is XZY.

Question 10

In the following question, a sentence has been given in Active voice. Out of the four alternatives suggested, select the one which best expresses the same sentence in Passive voice. The maid vacuums and dusts the house every day.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests the ability to transform a sentence from Active voice to Passive voice while preserving tense, aspect, and meaning. The original sentence describes a routine action performed by the maid: she vacuums and dusts the house every day. The candidate must select the passive form that correctly places the object the house as the new subject, maintains simple present tense, and keeps the adverbial phrase every day in a natural position. Given Data / Assumptions: Active sentence: The maid vacuums and dusts the house every day. Verb phrases: vacuums and dusts (simple present, two coordinated actions). Object: the house. Options are four possible passive voice constructions with different tenses and structures. Concept / Approach: To form the passive voice, the object of the active sentence becomes the subject, and the subject of the active sentence is moved to a by phrase. The main verbs are converted into the appropriate passive form using a form of be plus past participle. Because the original verbs are in the simple present tense and describe a habitual action, the passive form must also be in the simple present: is vacuumed and dusted. The adverbial phrase every day is best placed at the beginning or end of the sentence in a natural position. Therefore, Every day the house is vacuumed and dusted by the maid is the correct passive transformation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify subject, verbs, and object in the active sentence: subject = the maid, verbs = vacuums and dusts, object = the house.Step 2: Move the object to the subject position in passive voice: The house ...Step 3: Change the main verbs into simple present passive. Since the house is singular, use is plus past participles vacuumed and dusted.Step 4: Add the agent with by: by the maid, because we want to keep the information about who performs the actions.Step 5: Place the adverbial every day naturally, often at the beginning: Every day the house is vacuumed and dusted by the maid. Verification / Alternative check: Let us examine each option. Option A reads Every day the house is vacuumed and dusted by the maid, which uses the correct simple present passive and includes both actions. Option B uses were instead of is, which is wrong for a singular subject house in simple present and suggests a past tense plural subject. Options C and D use is being done and was being done, which refer to continuous actions rather than a regular daily routine. They also use an awkward nominalised form Dusting and vacuuming of the house, which is less direct and does not preserve the original simple structure. Thus, only option A exactly matches the tense, meaning, and natural style of the active sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: Every day the house were vacuumed and dusted by the maid mixes plural were with singular the house and indicates past habitual action rather than present, making it grammatically incorrect. Option C: Dusting and Vacuuming of the house every day is being done by the maid shifts to present continuous passive, which suggests an action in progress rather than a general routine, and the phrasing is clumsy. Option D: Dusting and Vacuuming of the house every day was being done by the maid is past continuous passive, which again does not match the simple present routine described in the active sentence. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overlook the tense and aspect when converting active to passive and choose any option that looks roughly similar. Another pitfall is to be distracted by nominalised forms like dusting and vacuuming of the house, which sound more complicated but are not direct equivalents of the original simple verbs. A reliable approach is always to match the tense first (simple present here), then match number (the house with is), and finally ensure that both actions, vacuums and dusts, are represented by two past participles in the passive form. Final Answer: The correct passive form is Every day the house is vacuumed and dusted by the maid.

Question 11

In the following question, a sentence has been given in Direct speech. Out of the four alternatives suggested, select the one which best expresses the same sentence in Indirect speech. The spectators said, "Bravo! Good hit, Jay!"

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests the ability to convert an exclamatory sentence in Direct speech into an appropriate Indirect speech sentence. The original quotation includes both an exclamation of praise, Bravo, and a specific compliment, Good hit, Jay. When reporting such exclamations, English often uses reporting verbs like applauded, exclaimed, or cheered, together with a clause that summarises the praise. The task is to choose the option that best captures both the content and the tone in reported form, while maintaining correct tense. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct speech: The spectators said, "Bravo! Good hit, Jay!" Speaker: the spectators. Reported content: praise for Jay because of a good hit. Options include both past and present tenses and different reporting structures. Concept / Approach: When transforming exclamations like Bravo or Well done into Indirect speech, we do not usually preserve the interjection itself. Instead, we use a verb like applauded, congratulated, praised, or exclaimed, followed by a statement indicating what they praised. The reporting verb said can be replaced by a more specific verb like applauded, which fits the context of spectators reacting to a sporting action. Since said is in the past tense, the reported verb should also be in the past: applauded, not applaud. The phrase for his good hit neatly summarises the content Good hit, Jay without repeating the exclamatory structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the nature of the direct speech: it is an exclamation of praise directed at Jay.Step 2: choose a suitable reporting verb to replace said, such as applauded or praised, which conveys the idea of enthusiastic approval.Step 3: Maintain the past tense, because the original reporting verb is said, so the correct form is applauded, not applaud.Step 4: Summarise the exclamatory content as a statement: Jay for his good hit, indicating the reason for the applause.Step 5: This produces The spectators applauded Jay for his good hit, which matches option A. Verification / Alternative check: Option B, The spectators applauded Jay saying, bravo, good hit Jay, partially preserves the original exclamation but fails to change the punctuation and structure into proper Indirect speech; it still reads like a mixed direct quotation and is stylistically clumsy. Options C and D use applaud instead of applauded, shifting the tense from past to present without justification. Since the original sentence clearly refers to a completed event, the present tense is inappropriate. Among all choices, only option A correctly transforms the exclamation into a past tense report that is clear and grammatically sound. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: Although it includes applauded, it retains the direct exclamation bravo, good hit Jay within the sentence without proper quoting or conjunction, making it more like a hybrid between direct and indirect speech than a true report. Option C: The spectators applaud Jay for his good hit uses present tense applaud, which does not match the original past context and breaks standard backshifting rules. Option D: Similar to option C, it keeps applaud in the present and adds saying, bravo, good hit Jay without restructuring the exclamation into proper reported form. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes believe that Indirect speech must always begin with that and strictly follow mechanical rules, but exclamations and imperatives are often better reported using verbs like applauded, exclaimed, or wished without that. Another pitfall is ignoring tense consistency; when the reporting verb is in the past, the main reporting clause usually also remains in the past. A useful strategy is to first summarise the emotional content in your own words as a statement and then check which option matches that summary most closely in correct tense and tone. Final Answer: The best Indirect speech form is The spectators applauded Jay for his good hit.

Question 12

In the following passage, some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of the four alternatives. And then, a few glorious minutes ______________, it was time to reluctantly he…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a short narrative passage describing a swimming or snorkelling experience in the Andaman Islands. Several blanks have been left in the text to test the candidate's understanding of time expressions and collocations. The specific blank here comes after the phrase a few glorious minutes and before a comma, leading into it was time to reluctantly head ashore. The correct answer must fit both grammatically and idiomatically to describe what happened after a short period of time passed. Given Data / Assumptions: Target fragment: And then, a few glorious minutes ______________, it was time to reluctantly head ashore. Options: late, later, lately, latest. The narrative is in the simple past, describing a sequence of events in time. The phrase a few minutes later is a common English expression indicating what happened after some time. Concept / Approach: The standard collocation is a few minutes later, which means after a short interval of time. It is frequently used in stories to move the action forward. The words late, lately, and latest have different uses. Late usually describes being delayed or not on time; lately refers to recent times but not with an exact minute count; latest refers to the most recent item in a series. Only later functions correctly as a comparative time adverb after a duration phrase like a few minutes. Therefore the correct approach is to recognise and apply the familiar phrase a few minutes later in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the full clause: And then, a few glorious minutes ____, it was time to reluctantly head ashore.Step 2: Note that the blank must express that some time passed between an earlier moment and the decision to head ashore.Step 3: Recall the common time expression a few minutes later, which exactly fits the narrative pattern of moving forward in time.Step 4: Test each option: a few glorious minutes late, a few glorious minutes later, a few glorious minutes lately, a few glorious minutes latest.Step 5: Only a few glorious minutes later sounds natural and correct; the others are ungrammatical or unnatural in this position. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by thinking about how stories usually move through time. Writers often use expressions like a few seconds later, a few hours later, or a few days later to indicate that an event takes place after an interval. They do not say a few minutes late in this kind of narrative, because late normally describes being behind schedule for a fixed appointment. Lately is used in sentences like Lately, I have been very busy, which describes recent general time, not a precise period after a specific moment. Latest is used in phrases like the latest news or the latest phone model and does not work with minutes at all. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Late: A few glorious minutes late would suggest that those minutes themselves were delayed, which does not make sense in this context. Lately: A few glorious minutes lately is not a standard combination, and lately does not follow a specific measure of time like minutes in this way. Latest: This adjective refers to the most recent in a series and is not used directly after a time expression like a few minutes. These words do not form a natural time linking phrase in the narrative. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may quickly see late and connect it with time, but fail to check the exact phrase structure. Others might be influenced by lately because it sounds formal and is associated with recent times, even though it does not follow a number plus time unit. A reliable strategy is to recall typical story phrases used in English textbooks and novels, where later frequently follows expressions with minutes, hours, or days to indicate a subsequent event in the storyline. Final Answer: The correct word to complete the time expression is later, giving the phrase a few glorious minutes later.

Question 13

In the following passage, some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of the four alternatives. And then, a few glorious minutes ______________, it was time to reluctantly he…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This blank comes from the same descriptive passage about swimming or snorkelling in the Andamans. The sentence containing the blank describes how the swimmer's strokes and movements changed after some initial experience. The phrase ______ time, the strokes were more fluid, the movements more relaxed must be completed with a word that points to the current occasion, contrasting it with earlier attempts. The candidate must choose the demonstrative or preposition that produces a natural expression in English narrative style. Given Data / Assumptions: Target fragment: ____________ time, the strokes were more fluid, the movements more relaxed. Options: These, Those, At, This. The previous sentence mentions a few glorious minutes later, signalling progression in the same event. The idea is to compare the present moment of swimming with earlier, less confident attempts. Concept / Approach: The natural expression in English is This time, the strokes were more fluid, meaning on this particular occasion, in contrast to earlier times. These and those are plural demonstratives used with countable nouns, whereas time here refers to a specific occasion, often used with this or that. At time by itself is incomplete; we normally say at that time or at this time. Within the given options, only This forms a correct and idiomatic phrase at the beginning of the sentence: This time, the strokes were more fluid. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the full sentence: ____________ time, the strokes were more fluid, the movements more relaxed.Step 2: Recognise that this structure is used to highlight a change compared with earlier experiences: This time it was different.Step 3: Test each option. These time is incorrect because these normally modifies plural countable nouns, not a single occasion. Those time is ungrammatical; we say those times for multiple occasions.Step 4: Test At time, which is incomplete; we need at this time or at that time, but only single words are allowed here.Step 5: Test This. This time, the strokes were more fluid is the familiar and correct expression, so This is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by thinking of common everyday sentences: This time I will succeed, This time he did not argue, or This time the exam felt easier. In each case, the phrase this time marks a contrast with past attempts. The passage clearly implies that earlier, the swimmer's strokes were less fluid, and now they have improved. Using This time as an introductory phrase fits perfectly. The other options would either produce incorrect grammar or completely change the nuance of the sentence, making it sound unnatural to a fluent speaker. Why Other Options Are Wrong: These: These time is wrong because these must modify a plural noun, such as these times, not a single time. Those: Those time is similarly incorrect, and even those times would not capture the idea of the particular present occasion that is being contrasted with earlier ones. At: On its own, at time does not form a complete phrase; we require another word such as at this time or at that time. The question allows only one word in the blank, so at cannot succeed here. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may quickly choose At because they are used to the phrase at that time in narrative texts, without noticing that the required structure here is slightly different. Others may misapply these or those because they associate them with earlier or distant moments, but forget the singular versus plural distinction. A simple method to avoid such errors is to mentally add the word time after each option and ask which combination is one you have actually seen or heard frequently in English. This time is very common; the others are not. Final Answer: The correct word to complete the phrase is This, giving This time, the strokes were more fluid, the movements more relaxed.

Question 14

In the following passage, some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of the four alternatives. And then, a few glorious minutes ______________, it was time to reluctantly he…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This blank also belongs to the descriptive passage of a sea experience in the Andamans. The sentence I turned back one last time ____________ hello to a clown fish describes the action of the narrator turning and greeting the fish. The gap must be filled with a form that fits naturally between the verb turned back and the noun hello, forming a phrase of purpose similar to turned back one last time to say hello. The question tests knowledge of infinitive of purpose versus other verb forms. Given Data / Assumptions: Target fragment: I turned back one last time ____________ hello to a clown fish. Options: to say, said, saying, says. The narrative is in simple past tense (turned back), describing a deliberate action with a purpose. We assume standard usage for expressing purpose with verbs of motion. Concept / Approach: In English, when we want to state the purpose of a movement or action, we often use the infinitive form to plus base verb. Common examples include I went to the shop to buy milk, She called to say thank you, and He turned around to wave. Here, the narrator turned back in order to say hello, so the correct structure is to say hello. The other verb forms either clash with the tense or do not express purpose in a natural way. Therefore, the approach is to recognise this as a purpose construction and select the plain infinitive to say. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main verb in the clause: turned back, which is in the simple past tense.Step 2: Note that the action of turning back has a clear purpose: greeting the clown fish.Step 3: Remember that English normally expresses such purposes with to plus base verb: turned back to say hello.Step 4: Test each option in the sentence: turned back one last time to say hello, turned back one last time said hello, turned back one last time saying hello, turned back one last time says hello.Step 5: Only to say produces a smooth, grammatical phrase that expresses purpose. The other forms sound awkward or ungrammatical in this context. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, compare with similar narrative sentences: She looked back once more to wave goodbye, He returned to thank the guide, or They paused to take a photograph. All of these examples use the infinitive to state the reason for a previous action. Using said would require a different structure such as I turned back one last time and said hello, which is not what the blank format demands. Saying could work in a reduced non finite clause like I turned back, saying hello, but that changes the nuance and is less natural than the intended pattern in the test passage. Says is present tense and does not match the narrative past. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Said: The phrase turned back one last time said hello lacks a conjunction such as and and reads as if said hello were a separate clause awkwardly attached to turned back. Saying: Turned back one last time saying hello is grammatically possible but not the best fit here; it does not emphasise purpose clearly and is less idiomatic than to say. Says: This verb is in the simple present tense, which conflicts with the past tense narration and makes the sentence inconsistent in time. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may see said and quickly associate it with hello, remembering the common phrase said hello, without noticing the missing conjunction or the required purpose structure. Others might choose saying because they know that a present participle can sometimes follow a main verb, but they forget that here the writer is expressing intention rather than simply describing two simultaneous actions. A reliable strategy is to ask what the reason for turning back was and then express that reason with to plus the appropriate verb, which naturally leads to to say. Final Answer: The correct word to complete the sentence is to say, giving I turned back one last time to say hello to a clown fish.

Question 15

In the following passage, choose the correct preposition to complete the blank in the sentence: "As I watched, it played hide-and-seek ________ a sea anemone, before frisking away."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The question is taken from a short descriptive passage about snorkelling in the Andamans and watching a clown fish move playfully in the sea. The test item focuses on your understanding of correct preposition use in natural English expressions. Specifically, the phrase in question is "played hide-and-seek ______ a sea anemone". To answer accurately, you need both grammatical knowledge and a sense of common collocations in English. Given Data / Assumptions: The full sentence in the passage is: "As I watched, it played hide-and-seek ______ a sea anemone, before frisking away." The subject "it" refers to a clown fish. The clown fish is interacting playfully with a sea anemone. The options given are "to", "for", "from", and "with". We assume standard modern British or Indian English usage, as in competitive exams. Concept / Approach: The core concept here is correct preposition choice in idiomatic expressions. In English, the game "hide-and-seek" is commonly played "with someone", not "to someone" or "for someone". Prepositions show relationships between words in a sentence, and many expressions are fixed collocations. The verb phrase "play hide-and-seek" usually takes "with" to indicate the other participant in the game. Therefore, we focus on which preposition reflects a natural partnership or interaction between the clown fish and the sea anemone in the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the base phrase. The basic expression is "play hide-and-seek", which is followed by a prepositional phrase showing with whom or with what the game is being played.Step 2: Test "to". The phrase "played hide-and-seek to a sea anemone" is ungrammatical in English because "to" is not used to mark partnership in a game.Step 3: Test "for". "Played hide-and-seek for a sea anemone" suggests playing on behalf of the sea anemone, which does not fit the meaning of the sentence.Step 4: Test "from". "Played hide-and-seek from a sea anemone" is incorrect; "from" usually indicates movement away or origin, not partnership in play.Step 5: Test "with". "Played hide-and-seek with a sea anemone" clearly conveys that the clown fish is interacting and playing together with the sea anemone, which matches both grammar and context. Verification / Alternative check: To double-check, recall similar expressions: "play football with friends", "play chess with my brother", "play hide-and-seek with the children". In each case, "with" introduces the partner or co-player. Applying this pattern to the sentence in the passage strongly confirms that "with" is the correct choice. Reading the full line aloud as "it played hide-and-seek with a sea anemone" sounds natural and vivid, reinforcing that the clown fish is playfully interacting with the anemone. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "to": Used for direction or recipient (for example, "give it to me"), not for co-participation in a game, so it sounds wrong here. "for": Typically implies purpose or benefit ("do this for you"), which would wrongly suggest playing on behalf of the anemone. "from": Indicates source or separation ("from the house", "from danger"), which does not match the playful partnership described. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may overthink the imagery and think that the fish is darting away from the anemone, which could tempt them to choose "from". Others might wrongly generalise that almost any activity related to another object uses "to" or "for". The key is to remember that many English phrases are fixed collocations. For games and social activities, "with" is the standard preposition to indicate the person or thing you are interacting with. Ignoring common collocation patterns is a frequent reason for errors in such vocabulary and grammar questions. Final Answer: The correct preposition is "with", so the completed phrase is "played hide-and-seek with a sea anemone".

Question 16

In the following passage about swimming in the Andamans, choose the correct preposition to complete the phrase: "a kinship with the blue waters ________ the Bay of Bengal."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This item is again based on the same descriptive passage about an underwater experience in the Andamans. The narrator says that they suddenly felt "a kinship with the blue waters ________ the Bay of Bengal". The question tests your knowledge of idiomatic preposition use, especially how English expresses relationships and belonging between abstract nouns such as "kinship" and a geographical feature like the "Bay of Bengal". Given Data / Assumptions: The key fragment is "a kinship with the blue waters ________ the Bay of Bengal". The noun "kinship" suggests an emotional or spiritual bond. "Blue waters" refers to the sea water in the Bay of Bengal. Options: "for", "from", "to", and "of". We assume standard exam-level English usage, without regional variations. Concept / Approach: The grammatical concept is the use of prepositions to show possession, origin, or association. In English, when we specify that something belongs to or is a part of a larger geographical feature or container, we typically use "of": for example, "the waters of the Atlantic", "the plains of India". In the phrase "the waters of the Bay of Bengal", "of" links the waters to the bay as the larger body. The phrase "kinship with the blue waters of the Bay of Bengal" therefore uses "with" for the emotional relationship and "of" to show that those waters belong to or are contained within the Bay. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the structural pattern. The phrase "the blue waters ________ the Bay of Bengal" parallels common constructions like "the hills of the Nilgiris".Step 2: Test "for". "The blue waters for the Bay of Bengal" does not express belonging; it would suggest purpose, which is illogical here.Step 3: Test "from". "The blue waters from the Bay of Bengal" emphasises origin or source, which would slightly change the meaning to refer to water coming out of the bay, not the waters that are part of the bay.Step 4: Test "to". "The blue waters to the Bay of Bengal" is not a standard structure in English and sounds ungrammatical.Step 5: Test "of". "The blue waters of the Bay of Bengal" is a natural, idiomatic phrase that clearly indicates that the waters are those belonging to that bay. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify the pattern by substituting similar examples: "waters of the Arabian Sea", "deserts of Rajasthan", "forests of the Amazon". In each case, "of" shows that the first noun is a part or feature of the second. Applying that same logic, "blue waters of the Bay of Bengal" is the only choice that fits both sense and standard collocation. Reading the full sentence with "of" also produces a smooth, poetic rhythm that matches the tone of the passage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "for": Indicates purpose or benefit, such as "a gift for you", and does not appropriately join a body of water to a geographical region. "from": Focuses on origin, as in "water from the tap". While not impossible in some contexts, it shifts the meaning away from describing the bay itself. "to": Normally expresses direction or movement, such as "go to the market", and is completely unsuitable here. Common Pitfalls: One common mistake is confusing "of" and "from". Students may overgeneralise "from" whenever they think about origin, but in descriptions of geographical features, "of" is overwhelmingly used. Another pitfall is choosing prepositions based on vague familiarity rather than analysing the underlying structure. Whenever you see "waters ___ the ocean", "mountains ___ a region", or "plains ___ a country", train yourself to test "of" first as the default, and then verify against context. Final Answer: The correct preposition is "of", so the complete phrase is "a kinship with the blue waters of the Bay of Bengal".

Question 17

In the following sentence about Chilika Lake, identify the part that contains a grammatical error or select the "No Error" option: "Chilika is the largest brackish water lagoon in Asia."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is a classic error-spotting item in English grammar. The sentence describes Chilika, a famous lake in India, and you are asked to decide which underlined part (1, 2, 3) contains an error, or to choose the "No Error" option, labelled as part 4. Such questions test your ability to recognise correct sentence structure, article use, and noun phrases in standard written English. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided as: (1) Chilika is the (2) largest brackish water (3) lagoon in Asia. (4) No Error. "Chilika" refers to Chilika Lake in Odisha. "Largest brackish water lagoon in Asia" is meant as a descriptive noun phrase. We assume neutral, formal descriptive English as used in textbooks and exam passages. Concept / Approach: The key concepts are correct article usage and formation of noun phrases. The pattern "X is the largest Y Z in Asia" is perfectly valid, where Y and Z form a compound noun or noun plus classifier. "Brackish water lagoon" is a standard environmental phrase; "brackish water" describes the type of water, and "lagoon" is the primary noun. We therefore examine each segment to see whether there is any disagreement in tense, number, or article usage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Analyse part (1): "Chilika is the". The subject "Chilika" takes the singular verb "is", and "the" begins a definite noun phrase. This is grammatically correct.Step 2: Analyse part (2): "largest brackish water". Here "largest" is a superlative adjective modifying "brackish water lagoon". Superlatives usually take "the", which is already present before "largest". The sequence "the largest brackish water" is therefore grammatically sound as part of the full phrase.Step 3: Analyse part (3): "lagoon in Asia." The noun "lagoon" is correctly singular, and the prepositional phrase "in Asia" is correct to specify the location. There is no error in spelling or structure.Step 4: Since parts (1), (2), and (3) are all correct, we conclude that there is no grammatical error, so part (4) "No Error" is the right choice. Verification / Alternative check: Rephrase the sentence to see if it still feels natural: "Chilika is the largest brackish water lagoon in Asia." This is exactly how environmental science texts and encyclopaedia entries describe Chilika Lake. You could also compare similar sentences, such as "X is the largest freshwater lake in India" or "Y is the highest mountain in the world", which follow the same grammatical template. The match in pattern confirms that the original sentence is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 1: "Chilika is the" is grammatically correct; there is no subject–verb agreement issue. Option 2: "largest brackish water" correctly functions as the beginning of a compound noun phrase and does not need an additional article. Option 3: "lagoon in Asia" is a proper noun phrase with an appropriate prepositional phrase indicating location. Common Pitfalls: Some learners might suspect that "brackish water" must be hyphenated or that another article is required, for example "a largest brackish water lagoon". This is incorrect; superlatives almost always use "the" before them, not "a". Another pitfall is overthinking regional names or believing that "in Asia" should be replaced with "of Asia". While both can be encountered, "in Asia" is perfectly correct and widely accepted. Overcorrecting well-formed phrases is a common exam trap. Final Answer: The sentence is grammatically correct as written, so the correct choice is part (4), "No Error".

Question 18

In the following sentence, identify the part that contains a grammatical error or select the "No Error" option: "The climb upside the mountains was not easy."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error-spotting question tests preposition and adverb use in English. The sentence describes a difficult climb in the mountains, and you must find which segment is grammatically incorrect. Many such questions focus on wrong word choice, especially when two words look similar but have different meanings, such as "up" and "upside". Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is split as: (1) The climb upside (2) the mountains (3) was not easy. (4) No Error. The intended meaning is that climbing up the mountains was hard. We assume standard modern English usage where "upside" and "up" are clearly distinct forms. Concept / Approach: The key concept here is correct prepositional phrasing. The natural phrase to describe movement along the slope of a mountain is "the climb up the mountains" or "the climb up the mountain side". The word "upside" is primarily a noun meaning advantage, as in "What is the upside of this decision?", or can appear in idioms like "upside down". It is not used as a preposition before a noun phrase like "the mountains" to indicate direction. Therefore, we examine whether "upside" is appropriate in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider the intended meaning. The statement wants to say that climbing the mountains was difficult, suggesting upward movement along the slope.Step 2: Check part (1): "The climb upside". The combination "climb upside" does not form a standard phrase in English. It sounds incorrect because "upside" does not function as a preposition here.Step 3: Check part (2): "the mountains". This is a correct plural noun phrase referring to the mountains.Step 4: Check part (3): "was not easy." This is a correct verb phrase and complement; "was" agrees with the singular noun "climb", and "not easy" correctly describes difficulty.Step 5: Since parts (2) and (3) are fine, the error must lie in part (1), where "upside" should be replaced by "up" or "up the side of". Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence in a natural way: "The climb up the mountains was not easy." This is grammatically correct and idiomatic. You can also compare with similar patterns: "the walk up the hill", "the drive up the road", "the hike up the trail". In each case, "up" is the preposition showing direction. None of these would use "upside" in that slot, confirming the error in part (1). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (2): "the mountains" is correct; the definite article "the" properly introduces the noun "mountains". Part (3): "was not easy" is a grammatically sound predicate; "was" correctly matches the singular subject "climb". Part (4): "No Error" is incorrect because we have identified a genuine error in part (1). Common Pitfalls: Some learners may overlook the nuance between "upside" and "up" or may think that "upside" is a more descriptive version of "up". In reality, "upside" usually means advantage, as in "the upside of the plan", or appears in the fixed phrase "upside down". Using it before a location noun like "mountains" is incorrect. Another pitfall is focusing on parts later in the sentence and assuming the error must be there, without checking the first part carefully. Always read the sentence as a whole, but then analyse each labelled segment closely. Final Answer: The error is in part (1); "upside" should be "up", so the correct answer is segment (1).

Question 19

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: "Rituals play into the ________ understandings of a society."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence comes from a more academic style of writing, probably from sociology or anthropology, and tests precise vocabulary knowledge. The idea is that rituals reflect unspoken assumptions and shared meanings in a society. The blank must be filled with a word that correctly describes a particular kind of understanding that people hold without explicitly stating it. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: "Rituals play into the ________ understandings of a society." The options are: "tactfully", "tacit", "taciturn", "tacitly". We know that "understandings" is a plural noun. We assume a formal, academic register where words like "tacit" are commonly used. Concept / Approach: The main concepts are part of speech and nuanced meaning. The blank comes immediately before the plural noun "understandings", so we need either an adjective directly modifying the noun or, less likely, an adverb used in a special way. In conventional English, a noun phrase like "tacit understandings" is common in academic writing. "Tacit" is an adjective meaning unspoken, implied, or understood without being openly expressed. By contrast, "tactfully" and "tacitly" are adverbs, and "taciturn" is an adjective meaning habitually silent but is usually used to describe a person, not understandings. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the grammatical role of the blank. It must modify the noun "understandings". Therefore, an adjective is required.Step 2: Classify each option. "Tactfully" is an adverb; "tacit" is an adjective; "taciturn" is an adjective; "tacitly" is an adverb.Step 3: Check meaning of "tacit". It refers to something that is understood or implied without being said. "Tacit understandings" therefore means unspoken but shared understandings.Step 4: Check "taciturn". This describes a person who is reserved or uncommunicative. Phrases like "a taciturn man" are common, but "taciturn understandings" is not idiomatic.Step 5: Rule out the adverbs "tactfully" and "tacitly" because an adverb cannot directly modify the plural noun "understandings" in this position.Step 6: Conclude that "tacit" is the best and only grammatically and semantically correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Check collocations from academic English: phrases like "tacit knowledge", "tacit assumptions", and "tacit agreements" are standard. Replacing "knowledge", "assumptions", or "agreements" with "understandings" keeps the same pattern: "tacit understandings" is natural and widely used. Read the full sentence: "Rituals play into the tacit understandings of a society." This neatly captures the idea that rituals make use of and reinforce unspoken cultural meanings. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Tactfully": Means in a sensitive or diplomatic way. It is an adverb that describes how an action is performed, not the nature of understandings, so it is grammatically and semantically wrong. "Taciturn": Describes a person who is silent or uncommunicative. It does not fit logically with "understandings" and sounds unnatural. "Tacitly": Means in an unspoken or implied manner, but as an adverb it would need to modify a verb, such as "tacitly accept". It cannot directly modify "understandings". Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse "tacit" with "taciturn" because both share the same Latin root. The key difference is that "tacit" describes things like knowledge or agreement, while "taciturn" describes people. Another pitfall is mechanically picking adverbs like "tacitly" without checking whether the blank needs an adjective. Always look at the immediate word after the blank: if it is a noun, chances are high that the correct answer must be an adjective, not an adverb. Final Answer: The correct word is "tacit", so the phrase becomes "Rituals play into the tacit understandings of a society."

Question 20

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: "Repetition bred a sense of ________ with the characters."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic vocabulary and correct word form. The sentence refers to repeated exposure to characters, most likely in a novel or television series, and how that repetition affects the reader or viewer. You must pick the word that fits both grammatically and semantically to express the idea of growing closeness or recognition with the characters. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: "Repetition bred a sense of ________ with the characters." Options: "familiarity", "familiar", "familiarly", "familiarise". We assume standard usage where "a sense of" is followed by a noun expressing a feeling or state. Concept / Approach: The key concepts are correct choice of noun versus adjective versus adverb, and knowledge of collocations. The phrase "a sense of" normally takes an abstract noun, such as "a sense of duty", "a sense of joy", or "a sense of urgency". Therefore, in "a sense of ________", the blank must be filled by a noun that names the feeling produced by repetition. The natural noun is "familiarity", which means the quality or state of being well known or intimate with someone or something. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the grammatical pattern: "a sense of" + noun. So we first check which options are nouns.Step 2: Examine "familiarity". This is a noun meaning closeness or ease of recognition. It fits the pattern "a sense of familiarity".Step 3: Examine "familiar". This is an adjective, as in "a familiar face". It cannot directly follow "of" after "a sense of" in this structure.Step 4: Examine "familiarly". This is an adverb, usually used to modify verbs or adjectives, for example "he smiled familiarly". It is not appropriate after "of".Step 5: Examine "familiarise". This is a verb meaning to make someone acquainted with something. A verb does not fit grammatically after "of".Step 6: Conclude that "familiarity" is the only option that matches both the grammatical pattern and the intended meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Read the complete sentence with each possibility to test the sound and sense. "Repetition bred a sense of familiarity with the characters" flows smoothly and clearly expresses that repeated exposure helped the reader or viewer feel more at ease with the characters. In contrast, "a sense of familiar", "a sense of familiarly", and "a sense of familiarise" are ungrammatical and sound awkward, confirming that "familiarity" is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Familiar": As an adjective, it cannot directly follow "of" in the phrase "a sense of", which expects a noun. "Familiarly": As an adverb, it normally modifies actions or adjectives, not a noun phrase like "a sense of". "Familiarise": As a verb, it would need auxiliary verbs or a different structure, such as "to familiarise oneself with". It does not fit this noun phrase. Common Pitfalls: Examinees sometimes attempt to substitute adjectives after "of" because they focus only on meaning and not on form. Another pitfall is confusion between related derivatives of a root word, like "familiar", "familiarity", "familiarly", and "familiarise". A good strategy is to memorise common frames such as "a sense of + noun". When you see those frames in an exam, shortlist only the options with the correct part of speech. Final Answer: The correct word is "familiarity", giving the complete sentence: "Repetition bred a sense of familiarity with the characters."

English Questions