Question 1

In the following sentence, the part in brackets may be incorrect. Choose the option which best improves the phrase “had finished” in the sentence: “After they (had finished) eating they went for a walk.” If no improvement is needed, select “no impro…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines correct tense sequencing in complex sentences. English often uses past perfect tense to show that one action was completed before another past action. Here, the sentence describes finishing a meal first and then going for a walk. Candidates must decide whether “had finished” is the appropriate tense or whether a different form such as “have finished”, “finish”, or “will finish” should replace it. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: “After they had finished eating they went for a walk.” Bracketed part: “had finished”. Options include “no improvement”, “have finished”, “finish”, and “will finish”. We assume that the entire sentence is set in the past and that “went for a walk” definitely occurs after the earlier action of finishing eating. Concept / Approach: When two past actions are described and we want to show clearly that one happened before the other, English often uses the past perfect (had + past participle) for the earlier action and the simple past for the later action. For example, “After they had finished their work, they went home.” In this question, finishing eating clearly happens before going for a walk. Therefore “had finished” is grammatically correct and clearly expresses the sequence, so we should choose “no improvement”. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the two actions: finishing eating, and going for a walk. Step 2: Decide which action happens first. They obviously finish eating before they go for a walk. Step 3: Note that the later action “went for a walk” uses simple past tense. Step 4: For the earlier action, the standard pattern is past perfect: “had finished”. Step 5: Check the alternative tenses: “have finished” (present perfect), “finish” (simple present), and “will finish” (simple future) all conflict with the past time reference “went”. Step 6: Conclude that the original form “had finished” is already correct; hence the best answer is “no improvement”. Verification / Alternative check: We can rewrite the sentence slightly: “They went for a walk after they had finished eating.” This still sounds natural and preserves the clear time order. If we change it to “After they have finished eating they went for a walk”, the mixture of present perfect and simple past feels wrong because it mixes time frames. “After they finish eating they went for a walk” mixes present and past in the same sentence. “After they will finish eating they went for a walk” uses future with past, which is also incorrect. These checks confirm that the original past perfect is the best choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Have finished” (present perfect) would imply a connection to the present time, which clashes with “went” in the past. “Finish” (simple present) is inconsistent with the past action “went” and would suit habitual situations, not one specific past event. “Will finish” (simple future) is clearly wrong because the walk has already taken place, and we are not predicting a future event. Thus, none of the changes improve the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes avoid using past perfect because they feel any double past structure is wrong, and they may incorrectly change “had finished” to simple past. However, when two events are clearly ordered in the past, the past perfect is an important tool to avoid ambiguity. Another pitfall is selecting an option simply because it looks simpler; simplicity should not override correct tense usage. Final Answer: The correct choice is no improvement; the sentence “After they had finished eating they went for a walk” is grammatically correct.

Question 2

In the following question, choose the one word which is the best substitute for the given definition: “Interrupt a public speaker with derisive or aggressive comments or abuse.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One word substitution questions test whether candidates can match precise English words with their definitions. Here the definition describes a specific behavior often seen in political meetings, comedy shows, or public speeches, where audience members interrupt with hostile remarks. Knowing the correct term for this action helps in reading newspapers, reports, and literature where public speaking situations are described. Given Data / Assumptions: Definition: “Interrupt a public speaker with derisive or aggressive comments or abuse.” Options: “Heckle”, “Soothe”, “Allay”, “Dulcify”. We assume the question is about standard modern English, especially in journalistic and general usage contexts. Concept / Approach: The key ideas in the definition are “interrupt a public speaker” and “derisive or aggressive comments or abuse”. The word must therefore involve disturbance, criticism, or mockery, not calming or comforting. “Heckle” is the well known verb used when an audience member constantly interrupts a speaker with sarcastic or hostile questions or remarks. The other words are associated with calming, reducing fear, or softening, which are clearly opposite in nature. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the verbs that come to mind when imagining a loud audience member disturbing a speech. Step 2: Evaluate “Heckle”. This means to harass or disturb a speaker by shouting questions or insults, exactly matching the definition. Step 3: Evaluate “Soothe”. This means to calm, comfort, or reduce pain or distress, which is the opposite of aggressive interruption. Step 4: Evaluate “Allay”. This means to reduce fear, worry, or suspicion. It is about easing negative feelings, not causing disturbance. Step 5: Evaluate “Dulcify”. This means to make something more gentle, pleasant, or agreeable, again the opposite of abusive comments. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a news report: “The minister was heckled by protesters during his speech.” This sentence is completely natural and accurately describes protesters interrupting with hostile comments. If we replace “heckled” with “soothed”, “allayed”, or “dulcified”, the sentence becomes absurd, because these verbs convey calming or softening, not aggressive interruption. This simple substitution test strongly confirms that “Heckle” is the right one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Soothe” is used when someone calms a crying child or comforts a worried friend, not when they shout at a speaker. “Allay” is used when fears, doubts, or worries are reduced, such as “to allay concerns”, which is again calming rather than provoking. “Dulcify” means to make something more mild or agreeable, sometimes in taste or in behavior; it does not include shouting or abuse. None of these words matches the hostile interruption described in the question. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is choosing a word simply because it is unfamiliar and seems technical. Another pitfall is not paying attention to every part of the definition. Words like “allay” and “dulcify” may look advanced but do not contain any idea of interruption or abuse. Always break the definition into its components and ensure the chosen word reflects all essential elements, not just one vague sense. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute is Heckle.

Question 3

In the following question, choose the one word which is the best substitute for the definition “Not being what it purports to be; fake or false in its claim of authenticity.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question checks whether candidates can correctly identify the precise word used to describe something that is fake, false, or not genuine despite claiming to be real. Such vocabulary is extremely important in legal, scientific, and journalistic writing where authenticity and evidence are discussed. Understanding this term also improves reading of editorials and articles that criticize false claims or unreliable sources. Given Data / Assumptions: Definition: “Not being what it purports to be.” Options: “Legitimate”, “Palpable”, “Evident”, “Spurious”. We assume that “purports to be” means “claims to be” or “appears to be” and that the emphasis is on something falsely claiming authenticity. Concept / Approach: The word “spurious” is commonly used to describe things that are not genuine, such as spurious arguments, spurious claims, or spurious documents. It suggests that something looks or sounds correct on the surface but is actually false. The other words have positive or neutral meanings related to genuineness or clarity, so they cannot match the negative sense of the definition. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that the definition is negative: “not being what it purports to be”. Step 2: Check “Legitimate”. This means lawful, genuine, or proper, which is the direct opposite of what we need. Step 3: Check “Palpable”. This means noticeable or able to be felt, such as “palpable tension”. It does not refer to authenticity. Step 4: Check “Evident”. This means clear or obvious, again unrelated to being fake or genuine. Step 5: Check “Spurious”. This means false, fake, not genuine, or based on incorrect reasoning. This exactly fits the given definition. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a news line: “The court rejected the spurious documents submitted as proof.” This shows that the documents were not what they claimed to be. Similarly, one might say “spurious correlations” in statistics when two variables seem related but actually are not. If we replace “spurious” with “legitimate”, the meaning completely reverses. Replacing with “palpable” or “evident” merely suggests clarity or obviousness, not falseness. Therefore, only “Spurious” fully matches the definition of something not being what it claims to be. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Legitimate” implies authenticity and lawfulness, the exact opposite of the question's requirement. “Palpable” describes how strongly something can be felt or sensed, not whether it is real or fake. “Evident” refers to being clearly seen or understood, but even a spurious claim can appear evident; evidence is about clarity, not authenticity by itself. None of these conveys the idea of falseness or pretence. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse “spurious” with “curious” or other similar sounding adjectives and may not recall its specific meaning. Another pitfall is misreading the definition and focusing only on the phrase “purports to be”, without noticing the critical negative part “not being”. Always pay close attention to words like “not”, “never”, or “without” in definitions because they completely change the required meaning. Final Answer: The appropriate one word substitute for “not being what it purports to be” is Spurious.

Question 4

In the following question, four words are given. Choose the correctly spelt word that matches the standard English spelling related to the verb “castigate”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions check familiarity with standard written English. The word in focus here is the past tense of the verb “castigate”, which means to criticize severely or punish verbally. Correct spelling is important not only for scoring well in exams but also for writing emails, essays, and reports that look professional and trustworthy. Given Data / Assumptions: We are given four spellings: “castegated”, “castigatad”, “castigated”, and “casttigated”. The task is to choose the correct standard spelling of the past tense of “castigate”. We assume modern standard English dictionaries as the reference and that the verb base form “castigate” is known to the learner. Concept / Approach: The correct base verb is “castigate”. To form the simple past, we normally add “d” or “ed” to regular verbs. Here, “castigate” ends with “e”, so we simply add “d” to get “castigated”. Therefore, we should look for the option that exactly reflects “castigate” plus “d” with no extra letters or vowel changes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Start from the base verb “castigate”. Step 2: Form the past tense by adding “d”: “castigate” becomes “castigated”. Step 3: Check option (c): “castigated” matches this pattern perfectly. Step 4: Check option (a): “castegated” changes the vowel sequence from “iga” to “ega”, which is incorrect. Step 5: Check option (b): “castigatad” incorrectly uses “ad” instead of “ed” or “d”. Step 6: Check option (d): “casttigated” adds an extra “t”, which does not appear in the base word. Verification / Alternative check: If you consult a reliable dictionary or spell checker, you will find the verb forms “castigate, castigates, castigated, castigating”. The spelling stays consistent in all these forms. When reading formal texts such as literary criticism or news commentary, you may encounter sentences like “The editor castigated the journalist for factual errors.” Seeing real usage reinforces that “castigated” is the correct spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Castegated” introduces the letter “e” after “t” in place of the correct “i” structure, which breaks the original spelling of the root word. “Castigatad” is wrong because English past tense endings are typically “ed” or “d”, not “ad”, unless the base verb itself ends in “a”. “Casttigated” duplicates the “t”, but the root “castigate” has only one “t”, so adding another letter is unjustified. These variations are typical misspellings that appear in exams to mislead candidates who only glance quickly at the word. Common Pitfalls: One frequent mistake is not recalling the base form and looking only at the ending, which leads students to think “any option ending with -ed must be correct”. Another pitfall is being distracted by letter patterns that look visually familiar, such as the double “t” in “casttigated”. To avoid these mistakes, always mentally reconstruct the base verb or try to use the word in a sentence while checking each letter carefully. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is castigated.

Question 5

In the following question, four spellings of a word are given. Choose the correctly spelt word which is the standard English spelling of the verb “possess” in the third person or in noun form.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question focuses on the correct form of the word based on the verb “possess”. Spelling of words with double consonants and added endings is a common source of error in exams and everyday writing. The word “possesses” appears frequently in descriptions of ownership, characteristics, and abilities, so using the correct spelling is important for professional communication. Given Data / Assumptions: Options given: “poseses”, “posesses”, “possesses”, and “posseses”. The task is to identify which spelling matches the correct English form derived from “possess”. We assume the base verb “possess” is known and correctly spelt with a double “s”. Concept / Approach: The base form is “possess”. When forming the third person singular present (“he possesses”) or the noun form that refers to more than one act of possessing in some contexts, the spelling rules for verbs ending in “s” require us to add “es”. Since “possess” already has a double “s”, we add “es” directly, giving “possesses”. Therefore, we are looking for the pattern “possess” plus “es” with all consonants correctly doubled. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the base verb “possess”. It has the structure p o s s e s s. Step 2: To form the present tense third person singular, add “es” to get “possesses”. Step 3: Check option (c): “possesses” matches this exactly: p o s s e s s e s. Step 4: Check option (a): “poseses” drops one “s” and changes the pattern, which no longer reflects the base word. Step 5: Check option (b): “posesses” contains only one double “s” and misses one “s” where the base has two. Step 6: Check option (d): “posseses” again misplaces the double “s” and omits another, so it does not correctly represent “possess”. Verification / Alternative check: Check real usage: “The company possesses vast experience in the market.” In print and online sources, this spelling remains consistent. A good way to verify is to mentally remove the ending “es”. Removing “es” from “possesses” correctly recovers the base “possess”. If we attempt the same with “posesses” or “posseses”, the remaining letters do not form the valid base verb, which confirms those forms are incorrect. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Poseses” removes one of the necessary “s” letters and does not reflect the original double “s” in “possess”. “Posesses” rearranges the double “s”, resulting in a form that does not match the base spelling when the ending is removed. “Posseses” or similar variants can appear plausible to the eye but are not supported by dictionaries or standard usage. Only “possesses” correctly maintains the structure of the root and adds the appropriate ending. Common Pitfalls: Many learners struggle with words that have repeated consonants, especially “s”, “l”, and “t”. They may add or remove an “s” because the sequence looks crowded on the page. To avoid this, always start by writing or visualizing the root word and then attaching the suffix “es” or “ed” as needed. Regular exposure to correct spellings through reading also greatly reduces such errors. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is possesses.

Question 6

The following question consists of a set of labelled parts X, Y, and Z of a sentence. Choose the option that gives the most logical order of these parts to form a coherent sentence about a room on the fourth floor of a boarding house.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the sentence reordering or jumbled parts category. A single sentence has been broken into three labelled segments X, Y, and Z, and the candidate must arrange them in a logical order. The sentence describes a room that gave great satisfaction to two boys and mentions its location in a boarding house. Such questions test understanding of sentence structure, grammar, and meaning rather than simple vocabulary. Given Data / Assumptions: The unlabelled framework is: “The room which yielded so X the fourth floor of a Y boarding house in Bleecker Street Z much satisfaction to the two boys was on”. We are told that the parts X, Y, Z must be arranged to create a clear, grammatical sentence. We assume that the intended final sentence is meaningful and describes the satisfaction given by the room and its position on the fourth floor of a boarding house in Bleecker Street. Concept / Approach: A correct English sentence about this situation is likely to be: “The room which yielded so much satisfaction to the two boys was on the fourth floor of a boarding house in Bleecker Street.” In this logical version, the phrase following “so” should be “much satisfaction to the two boys was on”, which must belong to one of the labelled parts. Then, after the verb phrase “was on”, the location “the fourth floor of a boarding house in Bleecker Street” must follow in the correct order. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify where the comparative phrase “so much satisfaction to the two boys was on” should appear. It clearly should follow “which yielded so”. Step 2: From the labelled parts, the one that fits this content is Z, which contains “much satisfaction to the two boys was on”. Step 3: After “was on”, we expect the location of the room: “the fourth floor of a boarding house in Bleecker Street”. Step 4: This location is split into X (“the fourth floor of a”) and Y (“boarding house in Bleecker Street”). Therefore, X must come before Y. Step 5: Putting them together after Z, we get the order Z X Y. Step 6: Hence, the correct sequence forming the complete sentence is ZXY, which corresponds to option (c). Verification / Alternative check: Write the full sentence using the chosen order: “The room which yielded so Z much satisfaction to the two boys was on X the fourth floor of a Y boarding house in Bleecker Street.” Substituting Z, X, Y yields: “The room which yielded so much satisfaction to the two boys was on the fourth floor of a boarding house in Bleecker Street.” The sentence is clear, grammatically correct, and semantically complete. Trying other orders such as XZY or YXZ leads to awkward or ungrammatical structures where “so” is not followed by “much satisfaction” in the correct position. Why Other Options Are Wrong: XZY would place “the fourth floor of a” immediately after “so”, producing “so the fourth floor of a much satisfaction”, which is ungrammatical. YXZ would begin the location phrase too early and leave “much satisfaction” in an incorrect position, breaking the sense of the sentence. ZYX would produce the phrase “on boarding house in Bleecker Street the fourth floor of a”, which is an unnatural order for describing a location. Only ZXY gives a smooth and logical English sentence. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes rely only on the order that “sounds” right without checking clause structure. Another mistake is ignoring how comparative words like “so” usually pair with “much” or “many” immediately after them. Paying attention to fixed patterns such as “so much satisfaction” and usual location phrases like “on the fourth floor of a boarding house in Bleecker Street” makes the correct order much easier to spot. Final Answer: The most logical and grammatically correct order of the parts is ZXY.

Question 7

The following question consists of labelled parts X, Y, and Z of a sentence. Choose the option that gives the most logical order of these parts to form a coherent sentence about government offices or educational institutions opening.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is another sentence reordering problem, which tests understanding of word order and clause structure. The sentence talks about government offices or educational institutions, the time they open, and the loss of daylight hours. A correct arrangement of X, Y, and Z should produce a fluent and meaningful statement about how many daylight hours are wasted by the time such offices open. Given Data / Assumptions: The skeleton of the sentence is: “By the time government X offices or educational institutions Y open, many daylight Z hours are already lost”. We know that the complete sentence should read naturally in standard English. We assume the parts X, Y, Z stand for phrases like “offices or educational institutions”, “open”, and “hours are already lost” in some combination. Concept / Approach: A logical complete sentence that fits the given skeleton is: “By the time government offices or educational institutions open, many daylight hours are already lost.” In this pattern, after the word “government” we naturally expect “offices or educational institutions”. Then we expect the verb “open” after this subject phrase. The object phrase “many daylight hours are already lost” appears later and must be treated as a separate unit. We must assign X, Y, and Z in a way that produces this natural flow. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify what each label likely represents from the fragment. X most logically completes “government” as “government offices or educational institutions”. Step 2: We then expect the verb “open” to follow the subject phrase, so Y must be the element that, combined with “open”, completes “offices or educational institutions open”. Step 3: Finally, Z must form the remaining phrase “many daylight hours are already lost”. Step 4: Combining these insights, we arrange the sequence as X Y Z after the starting words “By the time government”. Step 5: The full sentence becomes: “By the time government offices or educational institutions open, many daylight hours are already lost.” Step 6: The option that represents this order is XYZ, which is option (c). Verification / Alternative check: Placing X immediately after “government” gives “government offices or educational institutions”, which is a complete subject. Following this with Y gives “open, many daylight”, which fits the pattern “offices or educational institutions open”. Finally, adding Z completes the idea: “hours are already lost”. The resulting sentence is grammatically correct and semantically clear. Any other arrangement either breaks the logical subject verb order or places “hours” in the wrong position relative to “daylight”. Why Other Options Are Wrong: YZX would make the sequence after “government” start with “open”, which is not logical because “government open offices or educational institutions” is not a standard structure. ZXY would push the phrase involving “hours” right after “government”, leading to “government hours” or “government daylight hours”, which does not match the intended meaning. XZY would place the “hours” segment before “open”, resulting in an awkward and incorrect clause order. Only XYZ keeps the subject phrase together, followed by the verb “open”, and then the clause about daylight hours being lost. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may overthink these questions and choose a more complicated arrangement instead of trusting the natural English order of subject followed by verb. Another pitfall is ignoring the small clue given by the word “open”, which clearly behaves as a verb here and must be placed after the subject “government offices or educational institutions” rather than before or after an object phrase. Final Answer: The correct and logical order of the parts is XYZ.

Question 8

In the following question, a sentence is given in Active Voice. Choose the option that best expresses the same idea in Passive Voice: “Sarla changed the curtains.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of transforming a sentence from Active Voice to Passive Voice. In Active Voice, the subject performs the action. In Passive Voice, the focus shifts to the object, which becomes the grammatical subject of the sentence. Voice change questions are very common in competitive exams and help assess understanding of tense, agreement, and correct auxiliary verb usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Active sentence: “Sarla changed the curtains.” We must express the same meaning in Passive Voice. The options include sentences with different tenses and structures. We assume standard rules: object of the active sentence becomes the subject of the passive sentence, and the main verb is rewritten as a form of “be” plus past participle. Concept / Approach: The original sentence is in the simple past tense: “changed”. The object is “the curtains”. In Passive Voice, “the curtains” must become the subject. The passive structure for simple past is “was or were + past participle”. Since “curtains” is plural, we use “were changed”. We then add the agent phrase “by Sarla” to show who performed the action. Therefore, the correct passive form is “The curtains were changed by Sarla.” Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify subject, verb, and object in the active sentence. Subject: Sarla, Verb: changed, Object: the curtains. Step 2: Move the object “the curtains” to the subject position in the passive sentence. Step 3: Convert the verb “changed” (simple past) into passive form “were changed”, because “curtains” is plural and simple past passive uses “was or were + past participle”. Step 4: Add the agent phrase “by Sarla” at the end to indicate who performed the action. Step 5: The resulting sentence is “The curtains were changed by Sarla.” Verification / Alternative check: Compare option (b) “The curtains were changed by Sarla” with the original sentence. Both clearly describe the same past action. If we convert it back to active voice, we again get “Sarla changed the curtains”, confirming that the meaning and tense are preserved. Checking other options: “Sarla changes the curtains” changes the tense to simple present. “The curtain was changed by Sarla” makes the object singular, which alters the meaning. “Sarla was the one by whom the curtains were changed” is grammatically possible but unnecessarily wordy compared to the standard passive transformation and is not the direct expected answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option (a) uses present tense instead of past and fails to be passive; it remains active. Option (c) changes “curtains” to singular “curtain”, which changes the meaning, and also does not match the exact object given. Option (d) is an awkward and indirect construction. While it conveys roughly the same idea, exams typically expect the simplest and most direct passive form, which is option (b). Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes forget to maintain tense when shifting from active to passive and mistakenly move to present tense or another form. Another frequent mistake is failing to match subject verb agreement when using “was” and “were”. Always count the object and then choose the correct auxiliary verb. Also, avoid unnecessarily complicated structures when a simple passive form exists. Final Answer: The correct Passive Voice sentence is The curtains were changed by Sarla.

Question 9

In the following question, a sentence is given in Direct Speech. Choose the option that best expresses the same sentence in Indirect (Reported) Speech: My father said to the stranger, “Where do you live?”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question assesses understanding of converting Direct Speech to Indirect Speech, especially for questions. The original sentence contains a question in the present tense, introduced by “said to”. Candidates must change it into a reported question, which involves changes in tense, pronouns, and word order, while keeping the meaning intact. Such transformations are heavily tested in English grammar sections of competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct Speech: “My father said to the stranger, Where do you live?” We need an Indirect Speech form. We assume that “said to” will change to “asked”, because the sentence is clearly a question, and that normal backshifting of tense will apply, since the reporting verb is in past tense (“said”). Concept / Approach: For reporting questions, “said to” becomes “asked”. The question word “where” remains. Since the reporting verb is past (“said”), the present tense “do you live” usually changes to past tense “he lived”. Word order shifts from interrogative to statement order (subject before verb) in reported speech. Pronouns are adjusted from “you” to “he” to match the third person, because the stranger is being spoken about by the narrator, not addressed directly anymore. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Change the reporting verb: “said to the stranger” becomes “asked the stranger”. Step 2: Keep the question word “where” as it is, because it introduces the content clause. Step 3: Change the pronoun “you” to “he”, referring to the stranger in third person. Step 4: Backshift the tense: “do you live” (simple present) becomes “he lived” (simple past). Step 5: Use statement word order in the reported clause: “where he lived”, not “where did he live”. Step 6: Combine all parts to get: “My father asked the stranger where he lived.” Verification / Alternative check: Check the options. Option (d) “My father asked the stranger where he lived” matches each of the above rules: correct reporting verb, correct pronoun, correct backshifted tense, and correct word order. Option (a) keeps present tense “lives”, which is less usual given the reporting verb in past tense. Option (b) uses present perfect continuous, “has been living”, which adds unnecessary detail not present in the original sentence. Option (c) has faulty word order “where he lives to the stranger”, which is grammatically incorrect. Therefore, option (d) is clearly best. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option (a) does not perform backshift and uses “lives”, creating a tense mismatch with the reporting verb “asked”. Option (b) changes the meaning by introducing the idea of ongoing residence with “has been living”, which is not indicated in the original question. Option (c) is grammatically incorrect in English because the phrase “to the stranger” is placed inside the reported clause awkwardly and the clause structure is not acceptable. Only option (d) maintains tense consistency and grammatical correctness. Common Pitfalls: One common error is to preserve the question word order after “asked”, writing “asked the stranger where did he live”, which is wrong in Indirect Speech. Another pitfall is forgetting to change pronouns and tenses, which results in unnatural or grammatically inconsistent sentences. To avoid these mistakes, always follow the sequence: adjust the reporting verb, choose the correct connector (if any), backshift the tense when required, and then rewrite the reported clause in statement order. Final Answer: The correct Indirect Speech form is My father asked the stranger where he lived.

Question 10

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question: “What aspect of the coat did the narrator want to hide from others?”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question is based on a passage where the narrator describes a coat bought cheaply from a flea market. The coat has a label with a misspelt designer name, and the narrator quickly removes this label. The question asks precisely what aspect of the coat the narrator wanted to hide. To answer correctly, one must focus on the narrator's attitude towards the label and what it represents, rather than on the warmth or price of the coat alone. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage explains that the coat cost a low price at a flea market and had a label reading “CHRISTIN BIOR”, clearly intended to resemble the famous designer label “Christian Dior”. The narrator says that this label was cut out at home because it would not be acceptable at the workplace, where people value genuine labels or stylish, authentic clothing. We assume the narrator is self conscious about appearances and brand authenticity in that environment. Concept / Approach: The key idea is that the narrator is not ashamed of the coat being inexpensive or second hand; in fact, the narrator mentions that it is warm and affordable. However, the fake luxury label “CHRISTIN BIOR” is embarrassing because it tries to imitate a famous brand without actually being genuine. The narrator wants to hide this attempt at imitation, not the warmth or the low price. Therefore, we need the option that directly refers to the coat being a cheap copy or a fake brand item. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the narrator says the coat cost 9.99 pounds and came from a flea market, but this fact is not described as shameful; only the label is cut out. Step 2: Note that the label is “CHRISTIN BIOR”, which is a clear imitation of “Christian Dior” but spelt incorrectly. Step 3: The narrator states that one cannot work where they work and have “CHRISTIN BIOR” in the coat, but could have genuine Christian Dior, Japanese brands, or handmade clothes. Step 4: This shows that the problem is with the fake designer label, not with low cost or second hand origin. Step 5: Among the options, “That it was a cheap copy” directly captures the idea that the label is a counterfeit or imitation brand. Verification / Alternative check: Option (a) suggests embarrassment about the coat being too warm. The passage actually presents warmth as a positive feature, so this cannot be correct. Option (c) suggests the narrator wanted to hide that the coat was expensive, which is incorrect, as the coat is clearly cheap. Option (d) suggests the coat came from a luxury market, which contradicts the passage because it came from a flea market. Only option (b) matches the idea that the label “CHRISTIN BIOR” is a poor imitation, which the narrator wants to remove and hide. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “That it was too warm” misreads the passage; warmth is mentioned approvingly. “That it was expensive” is the opposite of the truth, since the low price is emphasised. “That it was from a luxury market” is wrong because the coat is specifically said to come from a flea market, not a luxury store. Only “That it was a cheap copy” focuses on the fake designer label and the narrator's embarrassment about it. Common Pitfalls: A common error in reading comprehension is focusing on isolated details (like price or warmth) without tracking the narrator's feelings. Another pitfall is ignoring the contrast the narrator draws between acceptable authentic labels and the unacceptable fake one. To avoid such mistakes, always connect factual details with the emotional or evaluative comments made by the narrator. Ask what exactly causes shame or discomfort in the passage. Final Answer: The narrator wanted to hide that it was a cheap copy with a fake designer label.

Question 11

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question: “The narrator would prefer to be seen wearing all of the following types of clothes, except which one?”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question focuses on the narrator's preferences regarding clothing labels. In the passage, the narrator explains what kinds of labels or clothes are acceptable in her workplace and which are not. The question asks which type of clothing she would not want to be seen wearing, even though the other types are acceptable or even desirable. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that the narrator's coat came from a flea market and had a label “CHRISTIN BIOR”. The narrator cuts this label out and notes that at her workplace, one can wear a genuine vintage Christian Dior label, something Japanese, or clothes made personally from retro fabrics. However, one cannot have “CHRISTIN BIOR” in one's coat. We assume that the narrator cares about authenticity and style rather than about price alone. Concept / Approach: We must distinguish between genuine labels, stylish alternatives, and fake labels. Genuine Christian Dior is acceptable and even fashionable. Japanese brands are also listed positively. Clothes made at home from retro fabrics are presented as a creative and acceptable option. The only thing singled out as unacceptable is the fake or misspelt designer label “CHRISTIN BIOR”, which the narrator finds embarrassing in her professional environment. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: List the acceptable types mentioned explicitly: genuine vintage Christian Dior, something Japanese, and self made clothes from retro fabrics. Step 2: Notice the clear negative statement: “But not CHRISTIN BIOR.” This shows that the narrator rejects this type of label. Step 3: Match these possibilities with the options: Christian Dior label corresponds to option (a), Japanese brands to option (b), self stitched clothes to option (c), and “CHRISTIN BIOR” label to option (d). Step 4: Since the question uses the word “except”, we must choose the one type of clothing the narrator does not want to be seen wearing. Step 5: That type is clearly the fake label coat with “CHRISTIN BIOR”, so option (d) is correct. Verification / Alternative check: Re read the key sentences in the passage. The narrator says she cut out the “CHRISTIN BIOR” label as soon as she got home and insists that the workplace would not accept that label. In contrast, the narrator describes Christian Dior, Japanese brands, and handmade clothes in a positive and aspirational tone. This contrast confirms that the coat with “CHRISTIN BIOR” is the only unacceptable option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Those with the Christian Dior label” are explicitly described as acceptable and stylish in the passage. “Any Japanese brand” is also mentioned as a fashionable and acceptable alternative, not as a problem. “Clothes stitched by herself” from retro fabrics are praised as a creative and admired option. Only “Those with the CHRISTIN BIOR label” represent the embarrassing fake copy the narrator wants to avoid. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes misunderstand “except” questions and mistakenly choose something that appears most luxurious or most unusual instead of focusing on textual evidence. Another pitfall is ignoring negative markers like “but not” or “cannot”, which clearly indicate disapproval in the passage. To avoid such mistakes, always underline or mentally note contrast words in reading comprehension texts, because these often signal the correct answer to such questions. Final Answer: The narrator would not want to be seen wearing those with the CHRISTIN BIOR label.

Question 12

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question: “Why is the narrator’s boss angry and throwing ‘hissy fits’?”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question focuses on understanding the reason for the boss's anger in the passage. The narrator describes travelling to work on unreliable trains and mentions that the boss has been “throwing all sorts of hissy fits about people swanning in at all times”. The question asks what exactly is causing this anger. To answer correctly, one must interpret the expression “swanning in at all times” in context. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage explains that there have been many problems on the train line, with trains being cancelled without warning. The narrator is worried about being late because the boss is angry about staff arriving at irregular hours. The phrase used is “swanning in at all times”, suggesting that people arrive whenever they like, not at a fixed time. We assume the boss is concerned with punctuality and discipline at the workplace. Concept / Approach: The central concept is that of lateness and irregular arrival times. A “hissy fit” is an informal expression for an angry outburst or tantrum. When the boss complains about people “swanning in at all times”, the boss is accusing staff of coming in late or unpredictably. Therefore, we need an option that expresses the idea of employees arriving late or not following proper office timings, rather than one specific person's lateness or a medical condition. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the portion of the passage describing the boss's reaction. It clearly links the anger to people “swanning in at all times”. Step 2: Understand that “swanning in” means coming in casually, often late or without regard for punctuality. Step 3: Realise that the boss is angry about this general behaviour, not only about one specific day or one employee. Step 4: Match this understanding with the options. Option (d) “Because employees are coming late to work” captures the general problem. Step 5: Confirm that the other options either misrepresent the reason or over focus on the narrator alone. Verification / Alternative check: Option (a) suggests a medical issue, “started suffering from fits”, but “hissy fits” is a metaphorical phrase for emotional outbursts, not a medical condition. Option (b) “Because it is a bad day” is too vague; a bad day might include many factors, but the passage specifies the boss's complaint about arrival times. Option (c) focuses on “she was late the day before”, but the boss's comments clearly describe a pattern among multiple staff members, not just one previous incident. Only option (d) matches the continuing problem and the phrase “swanning in at all times”. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option (a) misinterprets “hissy fits” literally as medical fits, which is incorrect for this idiomatic expression. Option (b) gives a general statement about a bad day but does not capture the specific cause of anger mentioned in the text. Option (c) limits the boss's anger to the narrator's personal behavior, whereas the passage speaks about people in general coming at all sorts of times. Only option (d) reflects the actual reason: frequent lateness and irregular arrival times of employees. Common Pitfalls: Readers sometimes take idiomatic phrases too literally. “Hissy fit” is informal language for throwing a temper tantrum, not an indication of a health problem. Another common error is not noticing plural expressions like “people swanning in” and assuming the issue relates only to the narrator. Always check whether the author is describing a general trend or one individual when interpreting reasons for anger or criticism in a passage. Final Answer: The boss is angry because employees are coming late to work and arriving at irregular times.

Question 13

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question: “What problem has recently affected the London trains on the narrator’s line?”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question asks about the specific issue affecting London trains in the passage. The narrator talks about travelling during rush hour and mentions how the train company has been handling recent problems on the line. To answer correctly, one must pay attention to the precise description of what the company has been doing with the trains, rather than just the general stress of commuting. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage clearly states that they have been having a lot of problems on the line recently and “keep cancelling trains with no warning”. The narrator then complains that in London rush hour, you cannot simply cancel trains because people need them to travel to work. We assume that the main issue is not poor quality of trains or overcrowding alone, but the sudden cancellations. Concept / Approach: The correct answer must directly reflect the phrase “keep cancelling trains with no warning”. This phrase highlights two aspects: cancellation and lack of prior notice. Any option that does not include both the idea of cancellation and the absence of warning is incomplete or inaccurate. Some options may mention delays or general awfulness of the trains, but we must focus on the exact complaint in the text. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Locate the relevant sentence in the passage. It reports that trains are being cancelled with no warning. Step 2: Identify the key words: “keep cancelling” and “with no warning”. Step 3: Look at option (d): “Trains are cancelled without prior intimation.” This restates the same idea using slightly different words. Step 4: Examine the other options to see whether they match this key idea or not. Step 5: Choose option (d) because it is the only one that clearly matches the problem described. Verification / Alternative check: Option (a) “The trains have become awful” is vague and does not specify cancellation or warning. Option (b) “There are more trains during rush hour” is the opposite of a problem; more trains would usually reduce crowding, and this is not mentioned in the text. Option (c) “People are late to work because of train delays” describes a possible consequence but does not focus on the specific action of cancelling trains without notice. The passage talks not just about delay but about the sudden removal of entire services, which is more serious. Therefore, option (d) best captures the narrator's complaint. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “The trains have become awful” is too general and not supported by detailed comments in the passage. “There are more trains during rush hour” is factually opposite to what one would expect to be a problem and is not mentioned at all. “People are late to work because of train delays” may be true in many cities but here the focus is on cancellations, not just delayed arrivals. Only “Trains are cancelled without prior intimation” echoes the passage precisely. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose options that describe a likely consequence, such as people being late, instead of the actual cause described in the passage. Another pitfall is being drawn to general negative words like “awful” without checking whether they appear in the text. To avoid these mistakes, always look for direct paraphrases of the important sentence and avoid options that introduce new ideas not mentioned in the passage. Final Answer: The recent problem is that trains are cancelled without prior intimation on the narrator's line.

Question 14

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question: “Which of the following situations creates a ‘bad day’ for the narrator?”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question asks what makes a day “bad” for the narrator in relation to commuting and work. The narrator explains that she leaves twenty minutes early on certain days in case it is a bad day and then observes what is happening on the train line. The key is to connect her use of “bad day” with the specific scenario she encounters as she approaches the station. Given Data / Assumptions: The narrator comments that the boss is angry about people arriving late, so she decides to leave home early “in case it was a bad day”. As she nears Catford Bridge, she sees that it is, in fact, “a god awful day”. The passage then explains that there have been many problems on the line and that trains are being cancelled with no warning. We assume that a “bad day” in this context refers to serious disruptions in train services that make punctual travel very difficult. Concept / Approach: A “bad day” here does not primarily refer to clothing issues or shopping expenses. It is clearly linked to train problems during rush hour, which affect her ability to reach work on time. The narrator is worried about the boss's reactions, so for her, a bad day means a day when the train service is disrupted, particularly when trains are cancelled unexpectedly during busy commuting times. We must select the option that directly reflects this situation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the paragraph where “bad day” is defined by context. It directly follows the narrator's concern about trains and the boss's anger. Step 2: Note that as she approaches the station, she realises it is a “god awful day” because of serious problems on the line, especially cancellations without warning. Step 3: Examine option (b): “Cancelled trains during London rush hour.” This exactly matches the situation described. Step 4: Verify that other options do not correspond to the narrator's specific use of “bad day”. Step 5: Choose option (b) as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Option (a) refers to being caught wearing a cheap brand coat, but the passage shows that the narrator has already removed the embarrassing label and is more concerned about workplace fashion than about a single incident of being caught. Option (c) mentions other employees being on time, but the passage does not define a bad day in that way; it is more about external train problems rather than internal competition. Option (d) concerns spending money on expensive clothes, whereas the narrator actually buys cheap clothing from flea markets. Only option (b) matches the explicit description of a problematic commuting day. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Being caught wearing a cheap brand coat” is not described as the core problem of the day and is partly solved by cutting out the fake label. “When other employees are on time but she is late” might be embarrassing, but the passage does not explicitly connect this with her phrase “bad day”. “Having to spend money on expensive clothes” is not mentioned as a difficulty; on the contrary, she avoids such expense by buying from the flea market. Cancelled trains during rush hour are clearly described as causing serious disruption, which she fears and tries to anticipate. Common Pitfalls: Readers sometimes link the idea of a “bad day” too broadly to any negative detail in the passage, instead of focusing on the specific context where the phrase is used. Another pitfall is allowing personal experience to guide the answer rather than the text. For example, many people may feel that being late or wearing the wrong clothes makes for a bad day, but the exam requires the interpretation that fits the narrator's description in the passage. Final Answer: For the narrator, a “bad day” is defined by cancelled trains during London rush hour.

Question 15

In the following question, a part of the sentence may have an error. Identify the part that contains an error, if any. If the sentence is grammatically correct, select “No error”. Sentence: “My best wishes (1) are always (2) with you. (3) No error (…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is an error spotting question in which a sentence is divided into numbered parts, and the candidate must identify whether any part contains a grammatical mistake. The sentence expresses a good wish towards someone. Such structures are common in both spoken and written English, so recognising correct forms helps in everyday communication as well as in exams. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: “My best wishes are always with you.” Parts: (1) My best wishes, (2) are always, (3) with you, (4) No error. We assume standard subject verb agreement rules and common usage in expressions of goodwill. The task is to determine whether any part is grammatically incorrect or awkward. Concept / Approach: The subject of the sentence is “my best wishes”. The noun “wishes” is plural, so the verb must also be plural, “are”. The phrase “are always with you” is a natural and standard way of expressing continuing support or good will. Therefore, there is no disagreement in number or tense, and the prepositional phrase “with you” correctly describes the direction of the wishes. The sentence is fully grammatical, so the correct choice is that there is no error. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (1) “My best wishes”. The noun “wishes” is plural, and the phrase is a common subject in blessing statements. Step 2: Examine part (2) “are always”. The verb “are” correctly agrees with the plural subject, and the adverb “always” expresses continuity. Step 3: Examine part (3) “with you”. This prepositional phrase is correct and natural in this context. Step 4: Combine the parts: “My best wishes are always with you.” This is a correct and polite English sentence. Step 5: Conclude that none of the three parts contains an error, so the correct option is “No error”, which is part (4). Verification / Alternative check: Compare with other common expressions: “My thoughts are with you”, “Our prayers are with you”, “Her blessings are always with you”. In all these examples, a plural subject is followed by “are” and then a phrase beginning with “with you”. The pattern is identical to the sentence in question. There is no reason to change the verb to “is”, which would be wrong with a plural subject. Hence the sentence stands as correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Marking part (1) as wrong would imply that “My best wishes” is incorrect, but this expression is common and grammatically sound. Marking part (2) as wrong would suggest that “are always” is incorrect; however, it matches the plural subject and is widely used in English expressions of continuing good will. Marking part (3) as wrong would suggest that “with you” should be changed, but the preposition “with” is appropriate to show that wishes accompany a person. Thus, no change is required in any part of the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some learners mistakenly think that any expression with “wishes” should use a different structure, or they doubt the verb “are” because “best wishes” sounds like a single fixed phrase. Another pitfall is overthinking short, simple sentences and imagining errors where none exist. When answering error spotting questions, always verify whether a widely used standard expression actually contains a grammatical error before deciding it is wrong. Final Answer: The sentence is grammatically correct, so the correct choice is 4 (No error).

Question 16

In the following sentence, some part may have an error. Identify the part that contains the error, or select ‘‘No Error’’ if the sentence is correct: This year, we were visited by the director of Austrian Culture Forum, (1) based on Delhi and togeth…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Error spotting questions in English grammar test your ability to notice incorrect prepositions, phrases, and structures within otherwise normal sounding sentences. In this item, the sentence talks about a visit from the director of the Austrian Culture Forum and about starting an art festival in South India. You must decide which numbered part contains the grammatical error, or whether there is no error at all. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: This year, we were visited by the director of Austrian Culture Forum, (1) based on Delhi and together we all wanted (2) to initiate an art festival in South India. (3) No Error (4) - Part (1): This year, we were visited by the director of Austrian Culture Forum, - Part (2): based on Delhi and together we all wanted - Part (3): to initiate an art festival in South India. - Part (4): No Error. - We assume Austrian Culture Forum is an organisation whose office is located in Delhi. Concept / Approach: The key concept here is the correct use of prepositions with the verbs based and located. In standard English, a person or organisation is described as being based in a city, not based on a city. The preposition on usually indicates support, dependence, or contact with a surface, while in is used for locations such as cities and countries. Therefore, the phrase based on Delhi is incorrect and should be based in Delhi. The rest of the sentence, including the idea of initiating an art festival in South India, follows normal grammar and meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read part (1). It introduces the time reference this year and tells us we were visited by the director of Austrian Culture Forum. This is grammatically acceptable. Step 2: Read part (2). The phrase based on Delhi appears immediately after the name of the organisation. This sounds incorrect because we normally say based in Delhi. Step 3: Still in part (2), the words and together we all wanted form a clear link to the next clause and are grammatically fine. Step 4: Read part (3). The phrase to initiate an art festival in South India correctly expresses purpose and destination. Step 5: Since parts (1) and (3) are acceptable and the only clear error is the preposition on in based on Delhi, mark part (2) as containing the error. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence in corrected form: This year, we were visited by the director of Austrian Culture Forum, based in Delhi, and together we all wanted to initiate an art festival in South India. Now the preposition in properly shows location, and the sentence reads smoothly. No other part needs correction, so the choice No Error would be wrong in this case. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (1) is simply a time reference combined with a passive construction and does not contain any grammatical error. Part (3) clearly expresses the intention to start an art festival in South India and is well formed. Part (4), No Error, is incorrect as an answer because we have identified a definite preposition error in part (2). Therefore, only part (2) deserves to be marked. Common Pitfalls: Students often read quickly and focus on content words like director or festival, while overlooking smaller prepositions such as in and on. Another common mistake is to treat based on and based in as interchangeable, although they have different meanings. Based on means founded on an idea or source, while based in shows location. Developing the habit of checking prepositions in every part of a sentence will greatly improve accuracy in such questions. Final Answer: The error is in part 2, where based on Delhi should be corrected to based in Delhi.

Question 17

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word to complete the sentence: Ramesh ______ into his own trap.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Fill in the blank questions check your understanding of verb forms, tense, and common expressions in English. In this sentence, the subject Ramesh has done something in the past and the phrase into his own trap is a common idiomatic expression used to describe someone being harmed by a plan that they themselves created. The task is to choose the verb form that produces a grammatically correct and natural sounding sentence. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: Ramesh ______ into his own trap. - Options: falling, was fell, fell, fall down. - The intended meaning is that Ramesh, in the past, became a victim of his own plot or mistake. - We assume a simple past description without any additional auxiliary verbs. Concept / Approach: The key concept here is the use of the simple past tense for a completed action. The subject is a singular proper noun, Ramesh, and the action happened in the past. In English, the simple past form of fall is fell. The expression fell into his own trap is a standard collocation used in many contexts. Other options either use the wrong form or create ungrammatical structures, so we must select the one that maintains correct tense and idiomatic usage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the needed tense. Because the sentence talks about an event that has already happened, we require the simple past tense of the verb. Step 2: Recall that the base form is fall and the simple past form is fell. Step 3: Test option falling. This is the present participle or gerund form and does not fit directly after a proper noun without an auxiliary verb, so Ramesh falling into his own trap is incomplete. Step 4: Test option was fell. This is grammatically incorrect because was should be followed by the present participle (falling) or a complement, not by a simple past verb. Step 5: Test option fell. Ramesh fell into his own trap is a correct, simple past sentence. Step 6: Test option fall down. This form requires an auxiliary for past tense (for example, did fall down) and also sounds awkward with the preposition into. Step 7: Conclude that fell is the only option that is grammatically correct and idiomatic. Verification / Alternative check: A quick way to verify is to compare with similar sentences such as He fell into the river or She fell into trouble. These sentences always use fell for a simple past event. If we tried He was fell into the river or He falling into the river without an auxiliary verb, the sentences would clearly be wrong. Applying this pattern to the original sentence confirms that Ramesh fell into his own trap is the correct form. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Falling is wrong because it needs an auxiliary verb like is, was, or has been to form a complete predicate. Was fell is wrong because it mixes an auxiliary verb with a simple past form instead of a participle. Fall down is wrong because it is in the base form and is not in the required past tense; it also clashes with the preposition into, as the idiom is fell into a trap, not fell down into a trap in this context. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse past forms and participles of irregular verbs like fall, choosing forms such as was fell or have fall. Another pitfall is to add extra words like down even when the standard expression does not require them. To avoid such mistakes, it helps to memorise common collocations like fall into a trap and to review the irregular verb table for verbs such as fall, choose, and go. Final Answer: The correct verb form to complete the sentence is fell, giving Ramesh fell into his own trap.

Question 18

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate conjunction: India is the second most populous country ______ the seventh largest country by area in the world.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of conjunctions used to join two related facts about the same subject. The sentence presents two positive statements about India: one about population rank and one about area rank. You must choose the conjunction that links these two facts smoothly without creating unnecessary contrast or complexity. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: India is the second most populous country ______ the seventh largest country by area in the world. - Options: but, however, and, while. - The subject of both clauses is India. - Both clauses state factual rankings, and neither clause contradicts the other. Concept / Approach: Conjunctions like and, but, and while have different discourse functions. And is the simplest coordinator used to add information of the same general type, without contrast. But introduces contrast or exception. However is usually used as a sentence connector, not as a simple conjunction in the middle of a sentence. While can introduce a contrast or indicate simultaneous actions. Since the two facts about India are both neutral and compatible, the conjunction should simply add one fact to the other, making and the most suitable choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that both parts of the sentence describe rankings of India in the world: second in population and seventh in area. Step 2: Observe that there is no opposition or contradiction between these two facts; they both describe size in different ways. Step 3: Test option but. Using but would incorrectly suggest a contrast, as if the second fact somehow goes against the first. Step 4: Test option however. However is normally used at the beginning of a clause or sentence and is separated by commas or semicolons; it does not fit naturally as a simple blank here. Step 5: Test option and. The sentence India is the second most populous country and the seventh largest country by area in the world sounds natural and simply adds the second fact. Step 6: Test option while. While could introduce a contrast, but there is no real contrasting relationship here, so it is less appropriate. Step 7: Conclude that and is the correct conjunction to join these two compatible facts. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine writing a geography textbook sentence: India is the second most populous country and the seventh largest country by area in the world. This is exactly how such information is normally presented. If we replace and with but, the sentence sounds as if being large in area clashes with being populous, which is not logical. Similarly, inserting however in the middle without punctuation breaks the normal grammatical pattern. While implies a contrast or simultaneous action, which is not the focus here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: But is wrong because it signals contrast or unexpected information, which does not apply between the two factual ranks. However is wrong in this slot because it functions as a conjunctive adverb and usually needs punctuation, not a simple blank within a sentence. While is wrong because it tends to introduce a contrasting or background clause and would make the sentence sound awkward and less direct. None of these options provides the straightforward addition that is needed. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to overuse while or however whenever there are two clauses, even when no contrast is implied. Another pitfall is to think that using but or while makes sentences sound more advanced, which leads to unnecessary complexity and incorrect logic. A good rule is to choose and when you are simply adding another similar fact about the same subject and there is no contrast or condition. Final Answer: The correct conjunction is and, giving the sentence: India is the second most populous country and the seventh largest country by area in the world.

Question 19

In the following question, select the option which best expresses the meaning of the given word: Actuate.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Vocabulary questions that ask for the meaning of a single word are common in competitive exams. The word actuate is often used in both technical and general English. It appears in contexts involving machines, devices, or human motivation. Understanding its core sense helps you interpret a wide range of sentences in articles, instructions, and scientific descriptions. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Actuate. - Options: True, Move, Select, Kill. - Only one option should capture the main meaning of actuate in standard English. - We assume the usual meanings: to cause something to act, to move, or to put into operation. Concept / Approach: The verb actuate means to make a machine or device operate, or to cause a person to act in a particular way. In other words, it means to set something in motion, to move it, or to stimulate action. Among the options, Move best reflects this underlying idea of putting into action. The other options describe truth, choice, or ending life, none of which align with the core concept of causing to act or operate. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall a simple definition of actuate, such as to put into action or to make something start working. Step 2: Examine option True. This is an adjective (or sometimes a noun) meaning correct or accurate, and it does not relate to causing movement or action. Step 3: Examine option Move. As a verb, move can mean to cause to change position or to act, which fits the idea of setting something in motion. Step 4: Examine option Select. This means to choose from a number of options and does not in itself imply operating or setting in motion. Step 5: Examine option Kill. This means to cause death and is too specific and negative; it does not capture the neutral sense of making something act or operate. Step 6: Conclude that Move is the closest match to actuate in both literal and metaphorical usage. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences: The motor is actuated by a small battery and His desire for justice actuated his decision. In both, substituting Move in the sense of to set moving or to stir to action works reasonably: The motor is moved by a small battery and His desire for justice moved his decision. The words True, Select, and Kill clearly fail in these positions. This sentence substitution method confirms that Move is the best synonym among the given options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: True is wrong because it describes correctness, not motion or activation. Select is wrong because it refers to choosing, not to causing to act. Kill is wrong because it indicates ending a life, whereas actuate is neutral and often positive or technical, referring to starting an action. None of these alternatives preserves the sense of initiating motion or operation. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may confuse actuate with accurate or actual because of similar letters, leading them to associate it with truth or reality. Others may assume that a complex sounding word must have a very specialised meaning. A good habit is to link actuate mentally with activate or action, which keeps the idea of motion or operation clear in your mind. Final Answer: The word that best expresses the meaning of actuate is Move, in the sense of set in motion or cause to act.

Question 20

In the following question, select the option which is opposite in meaning to the given word: Courtly.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Antonym questions test your ability to understand not just the meaning of a word, but also its opposite. The adjective courtly is often used to describe very polite, refined, and gracious behaviour, similar to how people might behave in a royal court. To answer correctly, you must select the option that conveys the opposite kind of manner or style. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Courtly. - Options: Formal, Elegant, Conventional, Rough. - Courtly generally refers to refined, polite, and dignified behaviour. - Only one option should represent a clear opposite in manner or style. Concept / Approach: Courtly behaviour is characterised by grace, politeness, and often elaborate courtesy. It suggests smooth, well mannered interactions, similar to those in aristocratic or royal settings. The opposite would be behaviour that is coarse, rude, or lacking in refinement. Among the given options, Rough best expresses this idea of unpolished and possibly rude conduct, while the others are fairly close in meaning to courtly rather than opposite. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall a simple definition of courtly: very polite, refined, and gracious in manner. Step 2: Examine Formal. Formal can mean proper, official, or following rules of etiquette; this is quite similar to courtly in many contexts. Step 3: Examine Elegant. Elegant refers to tasteful beauty and refinement, which again is close to the sense of courtly. Step 4: Examine Conventional. Conventional means following accepted customs or norms, which is not necessarily opposite to polite and refined behaviour. Step 5: Examine Rough. Rough can mean coarse, rude, or lacking in smoothness and refinement, which contrasts directly with courtly politeness. Step 6: Conclude that Rough is the only option that clearly opposes the meaning of courtly. Verification / Alternative check: Compare sentences such as He greeted her in a courtly manner with He greeted her in a rough manner. The contrast is strong and clear: the first suggests gracious politeness, the second suggests a lack of refinement. If we tried substituting Formal or Elegant, we would get similar or overlapping meanings, not opposites. Conventional describes behaviour that follows accepted standards and therefore does not conflict with courtly etiquette either. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Formal is wrong because it implies proper, well mannered behaviour, which often goes together with being courtly. Elegant is wrong because elegance is a form of refined beauty and grace, which supports the idea of courtly style rather than opposing it. Conventional is wrong because it simply means customary; there is no built in suggestion of rudeness or coarseness. Only Rough carries the negative sense of unrefined or rude behaviour. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to choose a word that is merely different rather than truly opposite. Another pitfall is assuming that any unfamiliar word must be the correct answer. To avoid such errors, always restate the target word in your own language and then look for the option that directly reverses that meaning, not just one that belongs in the same general area of formality or style. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to courtly is Rough.

English Questions