Question 1

In English spelling, choose the word that is correctly spelled among the following options: metaled, lonsome, piquancy, shufled.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions are designed to test your familiarity with standard English forms and your ability to recognize minor letter changes that create incorrect words. Here, you are asked to identify the correctly spelled word among four options, three of which contain small errors. Such questions are very common in competitive exams and reward candidates who read widely and pay attention to exact spellings. Given Data / Assumptions: Options: 'metaled', 'lonsome', 'piquancy', 'shufled'. Exactly one option is in standard correct spelling. We interpret each option as an attempt at common English words such as 'lonesome', 'shuffled', and 'piquancy'. We assume standard British or international English, not extremely rare variants. Concept / Approach: The strategy is to recognize which familiar word each option is trying to represent and then compare it with the correct spelling. 'Piquancy' is a known English noun meaning 'a pleasantly sharp taste or stimulating quality'. The others resemble correct words but with missing or incorrect letters: 'lonsome' for 'lonesome', 'shufled' for 'shuffled', and 'metaled' which is not the usual form for the intended sense in basic vocabulary questions. Therefore, we check them one by one and confirm which matches the dictionary form. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider 'lonsome': the common adjective is 'lonesome' (l-o-n-e-s-o-m-e), meaning lonely. The given word drops the 'e', so it is incorrect. Step 2: Consider 'shufled': the verb 'shuffle' in past tense and past participle is 'shuffled' (with a double 'f' and double 'l'), so 'shufled' is wrong. Step 3: Consider 'metaled': while 'metalled' can appear in some British usage when talking about a road with a metalled surface, 'metaled' as written here is not the standard form typically tested in basic spelling questions. It is treated as incorrect in this context. Step 4: Consider 'piquancy': this is the correct spelling of a word meaning a pleasantly sharp or appetizing flavour, or a stimulating, interesting quality. Step 5: Conclude that 'piquancy' is the only correctly spelled word in the list. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, imagine reading these words in a standard English newspaper, novel, or exam passage. 'Piquancy' appears exactly in this form, especially in descriptions of food or stimulating qualities. 'Lonsome' would be immediately recognised as a misspelling of 'lonesome', and 'shufled' would appear wrong beside the correctly spelled 'shuffled'. 'Metaled' is rarely, if ever, seen in general English texts, and therefore is not considered the standard spelling expected in an examination like this. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'Lonsome' omits the necessary 'e' and is not a valid dictionary entry. 'Shufled' omits both the second 'f' and the second 'l', violating usual English spelling rules for doubling consonants in such forms. 'Metaled' is not the common spelling taught for everyday words and will normally be marked incorrect in a spelling test aimed at general vocabulary. Examiners intentionally insert such near-miss spellings as traps for candidates who only glance at words quickly. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think that strange-looking words like 'piquancy' must be wrong because they are unfamiliar. In fact, many correct English words come from French or Latin and may look unusual at first. Another pitfall is assuming that every word must follow very simple consonant-doubling rules; however, correct spellings must be learned from exposure and practice, not guessed only from sound. Being comfortable with a wide range of vocabulary helps you avoid these traps. Final Answer: The correctly spelled word is 'piquancy'.

Question 2

In English vocabulary, select the option that gives the antonym (opposite in meaning) of the word 'frazzle' meaning to exhaust completely.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Antonym questions check whether you can recognise not just the meaning of a word, but also its opposite. The word 'frazzle' is an informal verb and noun that refers to extreme tiredness or to exhausting someone. In exam contexts, 'to frazzle' or 'to be frazzled' usually implies being worn out, mentally or physically. To find the antonym, we must look for a word that conveys energy, strength, or freshness instead of exhaustion. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: 'frazzle' (exhaust, wear out, become extremely tired). Options: prostration, vigour, enervation, lassitude. We assume standard dictionary meanings of these words. We must find the word opposite to tiredness and exhaustion. Concept / Approach: 'Frazzle' is closely related to being drained of energy. Its synonyms include words like 'exhaustion' and 'weariness'. Therefore, the antonym must represent energy, vitality, or robustness. 'Vigour' is a noun that denotes strength, energy, and enthusiasm. The other options describe different kinds of weakness or tiredness. Thus, even if the words look advanced or formal, the semantic contrast between 'frazzle' and 'vigour' is clear once you understand their meanings. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand 'frazzle': to exhaust or be in a state of extreme tiredness and mental strain. Step 2: Examine 'prostration': this means extreme physical weakness or lying stretched out, often due to exhaustion or illness. It is similar in meaning to 'frazzle', not opposite. Step 3: Examine 'enervation': it refers to a feeling of being drained of energy, again very similar to frazzled exhaustion. Step 4: Examine 'lassitude': this describes a state of weariness, lack of energy, or fatigue, which aligns with the idea of being frazzled. Step 5: Examine 'vigour': this means physical strength, energy, or enthusiasm, which directly contrasts with exhaustion. Step 6: Conclude that 'vigour' is the correct antonym of 'frazzle'. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, imagine converting a sentence from negative to positive. 'After the long journey, she was frazzled' could be contrasted with 'After a good rest, she was full of vigour.' This shows a clear opposite relationship: the first sentence shows extreme tiredness, the second shows abundant energy. The other options—prostration, enervation, and lassitude—could easily replace 'frazzled' to reinforce tiredness, which proves they are synonyms or near-synonyms, not antonyms. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'Prostration' emphasises total collapse from exhaustion or illness, which is close in meaning to 'frazzle'. 'Enervation' specifically means a loss of energy and vitality, basically the condition that 'frazzle' creates. 'Lassitude' is another word for weariness or lack of energy. All three describe states of tiredness and weakness. Because antonym questions require a word with the opposite sense, choosing any of these would repeat the same idea rather than give a contrast. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume that the most difficult or least familiar word must be the answer. In this list, 'enervation' and 'lassitude' may look impressive, but they are actually synonyms of 'frazzle'. Another pitfall is not paying attention to parts of speech. All options here are nouns, matching the noun form of 'frazzle' in context, so you cannot eliminate any based on grammar; you must rely purely on meaning. Building a strong vocabulary by learning both synonyms and antonyms together helps you avoid these traps. Final Answer: The correct antonym of 'frazzle' is 'vigour'.

Question 3

Choose the one-word substitution for the following expression: 'An organization set up to provide help and raise money for those in need.'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One-word substitution questions test your ability to replace a long phrase with a single, precise English word. In this item, you are given a description of an organization whose main purpose is to help people in need and to raise money for them. Your task is to identify the term that best captures this idea as used in everyday English and in formal contexts such as law, social work, and news reports. Given Data / Assumptions: Phrase: 'An organization set up to provide help and raise money for those in need.' Options: conglomerate, donation, charity, dole. We assume we are looking for a noun that names such an organization, not an action or a single act of giving. We consider standard meanings as used in social, economic, and everyday English contexts. Concept / Approach: The phrase clearly points to a structured body (an organization) whose core purpose is to help people and to raise funds for that purpose. In English, such organizations are commonly called 'charities'. A 'charity' can be a registered institution that raises money and provides services or aid to disadvantaged individuals or groups. The other options either refer to general business groups or to single acts of giving, not to organizations themselves. Thus, we look for the word that names the institution, not the money or the act of giving. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key idea: it is an organization, not just a sum of money or one gift. Step 2: Examine 'charity': it refers both to the act of giving and, more importantly here, to an organization set up to help those in need through funds and services. Step 3: Examine 'conglomerate': this is a large corporation formed by merging different companies, usually for profit, not specifically to help people in need. Step 4: Examine 'donation': this is a gift, often of money, goods, or time, given to a cause, not the organization itself. Step 5: Examine 'dole': it usually means money given as charity or government benefit to the unemployed, not the organization giving it. Step 6: Conclude that 'charity' is the correct one-word substitution for the described organization. Verification / Alternative check: In real-world examples, you often hear phrases like 'a children's charity', 'a medical charity', or 'an educational charity'. These organizations are set up specifically to help people and raise funds for them. The phrase in the question could be replaced by 'a charity' without loss of meaning. In contrast, saying 'an organization set up to provide help and raise money for those in need is a donation' or 'is a conglomerate' is clearly incorrect. 'Dole' also does not fit because it names the money given out, especially in the context of unemployment benefits, not the institution distributing it. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'Conglomerate' focuses on a huge multi-industry business group whose aim is profit, not social help. 'Donation' refers to an individual act or sum of giving, not to the group that collects and distributes that money. 'Dole' refers to money or benefits given, typically by the state, as a form of support for the unemployed; again, it is not the organization itself. Therefore, none of these capture the full idea of an institution dedicated to helping people and raising funds for them. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse 'charity' and 'donation' because both appear in the context of helping others. The key difference is that 'donation' is what you give, while 'charity' is often who you give it to. Another pitfall is selecting 'dole' because it is associated with helping the needy, but its usage is limited and does not describe the organization in general English. Always read the phrase carefully to see whether it describes an action, an amount of money, or a structured body. Final Answer: The correct one-word substitution is 'charity'.

Question 4

In the following sentence, identify the part that contains a grammatical error and choose the correct option: 'She was an only child who had been very welcome.'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Error-spotting questions test your understanding of English grammar and natural usage by breaking a sentence into parts and asking you to locate the incorrect portion. Here, the sentence 'She was an only child who had been very welcome.' looks almost correct at first glance, but there is a tense and usage issue that sounds unnatural in standard English. You must identify which part contains the error and understand why it is considered wrong in this exam context. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: 'She was an only child who had been very welcome.' Parts: (A) 'She was an', (B) 'only child who', (C) 'had been very welcome.', (D) 'No error in the sentence.' We assume the speaker is describing her general situation in the family, not a temporary event. We must select the part that contains an inappropriate verb phrase or tense. Concept / Approach: The phrase 'an only child' is a fixed and correct expression meaning the person has no siblings. The verb 'was' correctly introduces a past description of her status. The problem lies in 'had been very welcome', which uses the past perfect tense 'had been'. The past perfect is typically used to refer to an action completed before another past action. In this sentence, there is no second past reference point that justifies the past perfect. Moreover, the usual expression is 'she was very welcome' or 'she had been very much welcomed' in a specific context. Therefore, the form in part (C) sounds grammatically and stylistically wrong for standard exam English. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check part (A) 'She was an': the phrase 'She was an only child' is a correct and common way to describe someone with no siblings. Step 2: Check part (B) 'only child who': this smoothly connects to a relative clause 'who was very welcome' or similar; no error lies here. Step 3: Check part (C) 'had been very welcome.': the use of 'had been' suggests a time earlier than another past action, but the sentence provides no such later past reference point. Step 4: Recognize that the intended meaning is likely a simple past state: she was very welcome in the family, or her birth was very welcome, rather than a complex earlier event. Step 5: Conclude that part (C) is the erroneous portion; it should be rephrased as 'was very welcome' or similar. Verification / Alternative check: We can test alternative versions: 'She was an only child who was very welcome' sounds natural and grammatically correct. Another version, 'She had been very welcome before her brother was born', would justify the past perfect, because there is a clear later past event. However, the given sentence does not mention any later event; it describes a single past state. Therefore, simple past 'was very welcome' is the correct tense choice, and 'had been very welcome' is an overuse of the past perfect, which examiners treat as an error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (A) uses 'an only child', which is a standard expression, not 'the only child' in this context. Part (B) contains the relative clause connector 'who', which is correctly placed after 'only child'. Part (D) claims that there is 'No error in the sentence', which is false because the tense in part (C) is inappropriate. Thus, only part (C) contains a grammatical and usage error that needs correction. Common Pitfalls: Many learners are taught that the past perfect 'had' makes English sound advanced, so they use it even when simple past is sufficient. This leads to sentences like 'She had been very happy' without a second past event to anchor the timeline. Competitive exams often test this misuse. Another pitfall is overthinking the phrase 'an only child' and wrongly believing the article 'an' is incorrect. In fact, 'an only child' is perfectly standard; the error is in the tense choice in part (C). Final Answer: The incorrect part is Part (C) – 'had been very welcome.'

Question 5

Rearrange the parts of the sentence to form a coherent statement: Elections globally P-dominated by numbers, percentages Q-and tallies R-can be dry affairs.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sentence rearrangement questions present broken parts of a sentence labeled with letters and ask you to choose the order that forms a grammatically correct and meaningful statement. In this item, the idea is to describe how elections around the world can feel dull because they are dominated by numbers, percentages, and tallies. To solve it, you must identify a natural subject–verb structure and a logical placement of descriptive phrases. Given Data / Assumptions: Main sentence fragment: 'Elections globally'. Parts: P – 'dominated by numbers, percentages', Q – 'and tallies', R – 'can be dry affairs'. We must choose from orders: RQP, PQR, RPQ, QRP. We assume no words are missing; only order is incorrect. Concept / Approach: A well-formed sentence about elections needs a main verb phrase. Among the parts, 'can be dry affairs' (R) clearly functions as the predicate for the subject 'Elections globally'. The phrase 'dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies' works as a participial phrase describing how or why they can be dry. Therefore, the main structure should be 'Elections globally can be dry affairs ...' followed by the descriptive phrase 'dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies.' The descriptive phrase itself must be internally coherent: 'dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies' is the natural order P followed by Q. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the predicate: 'can be dry affairs' (R) clearly serves as the main verb phrase for 'Elections globally'. Step 2: Start by joining 'Elections globally' with R: 'Elections globally can be dry affairs ...' This sounds grammatically complete and sensible. Step 3: Examine P: 'dominated by numbers, percentages' – this looks like a participial phrase that further describes 'Elections globally' or explains why they can be dry affairs. Step 4: Examine Q: 'and tallies' – it naturally continues the list in P, giving 'numbers, percentages and tallies' as a group. Step 5: Combine R + P + Q after the subject to get: 'Elections globally can be dry affairs dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies.' Step 6: Conclude that the correct order of parts is R-P-Q, so the answer is 'RPQ'. Verification / Alternative check: Check the sentence with the chosen sequence: 'Elections globally can be dry affairs dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies.' This is grammatically correct, logically flows from the general statement to explanation, and sounds natural. Now test another order, for example P-Q-R: 'Elections globally dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies can be dry affairs.' This also seems possible, but notice that the given options use 'PQR' without clearly attaching R correctly; the exam pattern, however, treats the choice where the main clause appears earlier and is followed by a modifying phrase as more straightforward. Among the offered sequences, 'RPQ' most cleanly connects the predicate and the descriptive phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'RQP' would yield 'Elections globally can be dry affairs and tallies dominated by numbers, percentages', which is ungrammatical and confused. 'PQR' expects the sequence 'dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies can be dry affairs', which disconnects the subject 'Elections globally' awkwardly. 'QRP' starts with 'and tallies', which cannot logically or grammatically follow immediately after 'Elections globally'. These orders disrupt either the subject–verb connection or the internal list structure. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to focus only on local pairings like 'percentages and tallies' and ignore the need for a complete main clause with a clear verb. Candidates also sometimes place conjunctions like 'and' (Q) at the beginning, even though they normally continue a list. A good strategy is always to first locate the main predicate, then attach descriptive phrases around it, and finally ensure that list markers like 'and' sit in the middle of lists, not at the start of the sentence. Final Answer: The correct order is RPQ, forming 'Elections globally can be dry affairs dominated by numbers, percentages and tallies.'

Question 6

Change the following exclamatory sentence from direct to indirect speech: 'Alas! I have broken my grandfather's watch,' said Amit.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Direct and indirect speech questions in English grammar test your knowledge of how to convert spoken sentences into reported form while preserving tense, emotion, and meaning. The sentence given includes the interjection 'Alas!' expressing sorrow, and it is in the present perfect tense 'I have broken'. While reporting, we must change pronouns, adjust tense according to the reporting verb, and replace the exclamation with an appropriate reporting phrase such as 'exclaimed sorrowfully' to carry the emotional tone. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct speech: 'Alas! I have broken my grandfather's watch,' said Amit. Reporting verb: 'said', indicating a past act of speaking. We must preserve the expression of sorrow contained in 'Alas!'. We must convert present perfect 'have broken' into a suitable past form in reported speech. Concept / Approach: When changing from direct to indirect speech with an exclamatory sentence, we generally remove the interjection ('Alas!') and express the emotion through a modified reporting verb phrase such as 'exclaimed sorrowfully' or 'said with sorrow'. Because the reporting verb 'said' is in the past tense and the original statement uses present perfect ('have broken'), we normally change the tense to past perfect ('had broken') in reported speech. Pronouns also change: 'I' becomes 'he' (referring to Amit), and 'my' becomes 'his'. The final indirect sentence must correctly combine all these changes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Replace the interjection 'Alas!' with an expression of emotion in the reporting verb: 'said' becomes 'exclaimed sorrowfully' to reflect sadness. Step 2: Change the pronoun 'I' to 'he' because Amit is a male speaker being reported by another person. Step 3: Change 'my' to 'his' to match the new subject 'he'. Step 4: Change the tense 'have broken' (present perfect) to 'had broken' (past perfect) because the reporting verb is in the past and standard reported speech rules require backshifting. Step 5: Combine everything to form: 'Amit exclaimed sorrowfully that he had broken his grandfather's watch.' Verification / Alternative check: Check each option against the rules. Option (d) reads, 'Amit exclaimed sorrowfully that he had broken his grandfather's watch.' It correctly expresses sorrow, uses past perfect 'had broken', and adjusts pronouns appropriately. Option (b) incorrectly uses 'has broken' instead of 'had broken'. Options (a) and (c) use 'was sorrowful' instead of a proper reporting verb with an object clause; they convert the sentence into a statement about Amit's feelings rather than a direct report of what he said, which is less accurate in reported speech practice used in exams. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option (a): 'Amit was sorrowful that he broke his grandfather's watch.' uses simple past 'broke' instead of past perfect, and it loses the exclamatory reporting verb. Option (b): 'Amit exclaimed sorrowfully that he has broken his grandfather's watch.' keeps present perfect 'has broken', which is incorrect after a past reporting verb. Option (c): 'Amit was sorrowful that he had broken his grandfather's watch.' uses past perfect correctly but still changes the reporting structure unnecessarily and omits the exclamatory flavour. Only option (d) accurately follows the typical rules of reported speech for exclamatory sentences. Common Pitfalls: Many students forget to change the tense from present perfect to past perfect and leave 'has broken' unchanged, which is a common error in reported speech questions. Another pitfall is ignoring emotional words like 'Alas!' or 'Hurrah!'. Competitive exams expect you to convert them into descriptive phrases such as 'exclaimed sorrowfully' or 'exclaimed with joy'. Finally, some learners focus only on tense and pronouns and forget that the overall sentence must still sound natural and grammatically complete in indirect form. Final Answer: The correct indirect speech is: 'Amit exclaimed sorrowfully that he had broken his grandfather's watch.'

Question 7

In the following passage about economic slowdown, choose the most appropriate word to fill the blank: '__________ various signs of economic slowdown such as languishing industrial production…'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Cloze tests or passage completion questions assess your understanding of sentence structure, logical connectors, and overall meaning. In this line about economic slowdown, you must choose the word that correctly introduces a contrast between the presence of serious warning signs and the government's unwillingness to respond. Recognising contrast markers like 'despite', 'although', and 'in spite of' is crucial for solving such questions accurately. Given Data / Assumptions: Fragment from the passage: '__________ various signs of economic slowdown such as languishing industrial production and adverse ______ of the drought on rural livelihoods and demand, the government is apparently unable ________ unwilling to increase public spending…' Options for the first blank: As, Despite, So, Because. We know from the continuation that there is a contrast between economic problems and government inaction. We assume the intended structure is concessive: 'Despite various signs …, the government is apparently unable or unwilling …' Concept / Approach: The first blank must introduce a situation (the signs of economic slowdown) that contrasts with the government's failure or refusal to act. 'Despite' is a preposition used to show contrast, followed by a noun phrase: 'Despite various signs of slowdown…'. 'As' and 'because' are used to express reasons or causes, not contrasts. 'So' usually introduces a result, not a concession. Therefore, only 'Despite' logically and grammatically fits the structure of the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Notice the two ideas: (1) there are various signs of economic slowdown, and (2) the government is unable or unwilling to increase spending. Step 2: Recognise that the author is criticising the government for not responding even though the warning signs are visible, which is a contrasting relationship. Step 3: Check 'Despite': it introduces something that makes the following action surprising: 'Despite various signs of economic slowdown …, the government is apparently unable or unwilling …' This fits perfectly. Step 4: Check 'As': 'As various signs of economic slowdown …, the government …' is ungrammatical here and does not clearly express contrast. Step 5: Check 'Because': it would wrongly state that the government is unable or unwilling because there are signs of slowdown, which reverses the intended meaning. Step 6: Check 'So': it normally introduces results, and 'So various signs of economic slowdown…' is not a valid way to begin the sentence. Step 7: Conclude that 'Despite' is the only correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Sometimes, you can test the logic by paraphrasing. The passage essentially says: 'In spite of clear signs of slowdown, the government still will not increase public spending.' 'In spite of' and 'Despite' are equivalent. Replacing the blank with 'Despite' gives a natural, grammatically correct sentence. Replacing it with 'As', 'So', or 'Because' either breaks grammar or changes the meaning from contrast to cause or result, which does not match the critical tone of the passage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'As' is often used like 'because' to introduce a reason, as in 'As it was raining, we stayed indoors.' Here we do not want to say the government is unwilling because there are signs; we want to say the opposite: even though there are signs, the government is unwilling. 'Because' has the same problem. 'So' is used for consequences ('It was raining, so we stayed indoors'), not for concession. None of these show the intended contrast between evidence of trouble and policy inaction. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse connectors that express concession with those expressing cause. 'Because', 'as', and 'since' signal reasons, while 'despite', 'in spite of', 'although', and 'even though' signal contrast. In a time-pressured exam, candidates sometimes pick a familiar word like 'because' without fully processing the sentence's logic. Training yourself to quickly identify whether the relationship between clauses is 'reason', 'result', or 'contrast' will significantly improve accuracy in cloze tests. Final Answer: The correct word for the blank is 'Despite'.

Question 8

In the same passage on economic slowdown, choose the correct word to fill the blank: 'adverse ________ of the drought on rural livelihoods and demand.'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze question focuses on the correct use of noun and verb forms, especially the commonly confused pair 'effect' and 'affect'. The fragment talks about 'adverse ________ of the drought on rural livelihoods and demand'. Here, we must choose a word that properly completes the noun phrase describing the negative impact of the drought. Understanding the difference between 'effect', 'effects', 'affect', and 'affects' is a frequent test area in English exams. Given Data / Assumptions: Partial sentence: 'adverse ________ of the drought on rural livelihoods and demand'. Options: effects, effect, affects, affect. We know 'adverse' is an adjective typically followed by a noun (for example, 'adverse effects'). We must select the grammatically correct and idiomatic noun form to complete the phrase. Concept / Approach: 'Effect' (noun) means result or outcome; 'effects' is its plural form. 'Affect' is usually a verb meaning 'to influence'. 'Affects' is the third-person singular form of that verb. In the phrase 'adverse ________ of the drought', we require a plural noun, because the drought has multiple negative consequences on different aspects of rural life and demand. The collocation 'adverse effects' is standard in English to describe negative impacts. Therefore, 'effects' is the best choice here. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify word roles: 'adverse' is an adjective, so it should modify a noun, not a verb. Step 2: Consider 'effects': plural noun meaning results or consequences; 'adverse effects' is a very common phrase. Step 3: Consider 'effect': singular noun. 'Adverse effect of the drought' is grammatically possible, but because the sentence talks about rural livelihoods and demand together, plural 'effects' is more natural. Step 4: Consider 'affect' (verb): placing a verb immediately after an adjective 'adverse' is ungrammatical in this structure. Step 5: Consider 'affects' (verb form): same problem; the structure 'adverse affects of' is incorrect. Step 6: Conclude that 'effects' is the most grammatically correct and idiomatic choice. Verification / Alternative check: Check the full phrase with each option. 'Adverse effects of the drought on rural livelihoods and demand' is a standard way to describe negative consequences. 'Adverse effect of the drought on rural livelihoods and demand' is not completely wrong but feels slightly off because we are clearly talking about more than one consequence. 'Adverse affect of the drought' or 'adverse affects of the drought' sound incorrect, as 'affect' is rarely used as a noun and, as a verb, does not fit this position. The familiar phrase 'adverse effects' seen in newspapers and academic writing confirms that 'effects' is the expected answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'Effect' in the singular would normally be used when exactly one result is being emphasised. Here the sentence groups multiple aspects (livelihoods and demand), so plural 'effects' is more suitable. 'Affect' and 'affects' are primarily verbs, used like 'The drought affects rural livelihoods'. They cannot directly follow an adjective in the noun phrase structure 'adverse ________ of the drought'. Therefore, selecting them would create a grammatical error. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse 'affect' and 'effect' because they sound similar. A simple rule is: 'affect' is usually a verb (A for Action), and 'effect' is usually a noun (E for End result). Another pitfall is not paying attention to singular versus plural forms in context. When several outcomes are involved, the plural 'effects' fits better. Regular reading of quality texts helps you develop a feel for common collocations like 'adverse effects' and avoid exam traps. Final Answer: The correct word is 'effects', making the phrase 'adverse effects of the drought'.

Question 9

In the same passage on economic slowdown, choose the correct connector to fill the blank: 'the government is apparently unable ________ unwilling to increase public spending…'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze question focuses on conjunctions and logical connectors. The passage comments that 'the government is apparently unable ________ unwilling to increase public spending'. We must choose a connector that accurately joins two alternatives about the government's attitude: it may be unable or it may be unwilling. Understanding how 'or', 'nor', 'but', and other conjunctions function in English sentences is essential for solving such problems. Given Data / Assumptions: Fragment: 'the government is apparently unable ________ unwilling to increase public spending'. Options: hence, but, or, nor. We know 'unable' and 'unwilling' are two different possible reasons for inaction. We assume the sentence intends to present those as alternatives, not as contrasts or negatives in a pair with 'neither'. Concept / Approach: We must identify the conjunction that correctly links two adjectives ('unable' and 'unwilling') in a compound predicate. The pattern 'unable or unwilling' is a standard English expression meaning 'either not capable or not willing'. 'Or' is the normal conjunction for alternatives. 'But' indicates contrast, which is not the intended relationship here. 'Nor' is usually used with 'neither' ('neither able nor willing'), and 'hence' introduces a result, not a second descriptive adjective. Thus, 'or' is the only conjunction that fits grammatically and logically. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the author is presenting two possible explanations: the government may lack capacity (unable) or may lack the will (unwilling). Step 2: Observe that in English, alternatives are normally expressed with 'or': 'unable or unwilling'. Step 3: Check 'or': 'the government is apparently unable or unwilling to increase public spending' is perfectly natural and idiomatic. Step 4: Check 'but': 'unable but unwilling' is illogical, as 'but' suggests contrast rather than alternatives. Step 5: Check 'nor': it typically follows 'neither', as in 'neither able nor willing', which is not present here, so 'nor' would be ungrammatical. Step 6: Check 'hence': it introduces conclusions ('hence, the government...') and cannot be placed between two adjectives like this. Step 7: Conclude that 'or' correctly completes the phrase. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by recalling common phrases used in newspapers and analytical writing: 'unable or unwilling to act' is a standard formulation used when a writer is unsure whether inaction is caused by incapacity or by lack of political will. Trying to substitute 'but', 'nor', or 'hence' would either break grammar or change the meaning. In particular, 'neither able nor willing' is acceptable, but that is a different structure from the one used in the passage. The exact pattern given in the question matches 'unable or unwilling'. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'But' introduces a contrast, as in 'willing but unable', which is not what the sentence wants to say; here, the two adjectives are similar in negative tone, not contrasting. 'Nor' normally pairs with 'neither' and cannot stand alone between two adjectives without it. 'Hence' is an adverb showing consequence or result, and it does not fit grammatically between two adjectives. Therefore, using any of these would produce an incorrect or unidiomatic sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some students might be tempted to choose 'nor' simply because it is less familiar and seems more 'exam-like'. Others might think that because the overall idea is negative, 'nor' is suitable. However, good grammar requires the correct pattern 'neither … nor' for that to work. The safest approach is to look at the structure that directly precedes the blank and ask what the second word is doing: here it links two alternative adjectives, so 'or' is the natural conjunction. Final Answer: The correct connector is 'or', giving the phrase 'unable or unwilling'.

Question 10

In the same passage on economic slowdown, choose the correct word to fill the blank: 'spending to ________ people's material distress…'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze question examines your understanding of vocabulary and collocations related to economic and social policy. The phrase 'spending to ________ people's material distress' refers to what public spending is meant to do: reduce or ease the suffering caused by economic hardship. You must choose the word that best fits both grammatically and semantically in a serious economic commentary. Given Data / Assumptions: Partial phrase: 'spending to ________ people's material distress'. Options: cool off, cut, less, mitigate. We assume the writer is talking about government spending aimed at reducing hardship. The missing word should be a verb that takes an object and matches the formal tone of the passage. Concept / Approach: In formal English, when we talk about reducing negative conditions such as pain, damage, or distress, we use verbs like 'mitigate', 'alleviate', or 'ease'. 'Mitigate' means to make something less severe, serious, or painful. 'Cool off' is informal and usually refers to reducing heat or emotional intensity, not socioeconomic distress in a written analysis. 'Cut' is a general verb meaning 'reduce', but 'cut distress' is not a common collocation. 'Less' is not a verb at all; it is a determiner or adjective. Therefore, 'mitigate' fits best in meaning, style, and grammar. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the phrase: the government is being urged to spend money in order to make people's material distress less severe. Step 2: Check 'mitigate': it means 'to make less severe', and 'mitigate distress' is a standard formal expression. Step 3: Check 'cool off': it is informal and usually applied to tempers, arguments, or temperature, not to economic distress in a serious passage. Step 4: Check 'cut': while you can 'cut taxes' or 'cut spending', the phrase 'cut distress' is not idiomatic and sounds unnatural. Step 5: Check 'less': it cannot function as a main verb in this structure; 'spending to less people's material distress' is ungrammatical. Step 6: Conclude that 'mitigate' correctly completes the phrase, both semantically and stylistically. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by forming the complete phrase: 'spending to mitigate people's material distress'. This matches typical language found in economic articles or reports, which often speak of 'mitigating the impact of a recession' or 'mitigating hardship'. Replacing it with 'cool off', 'cut', or 'less' gives either informal or incorrect expressions: 'spending to cool off people's material distress' sounds awkward, 'spending to cut people's material distress' is not usual collocation, and 'spending to less people's material distress' is grammatically wrong. This confirms that 'mitigate' is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'Cool off' does not match the formal, analytical tone of the passage and collocates poorly with 'material distress'. 'Cut' works better with quantifiable items such as 'costs', 'deficits', or 'budgets', not abstract suffering. 'Less' is simply not a verb and cannot fill the blank without breaking grammar. Examiners often include such distractors to test whether you are paying attention to both grammar and appropriate register. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may choose 'cut' because they associate economic context with 'cutting' deficits or expenses, without checking the surrounding words. Others may be unfamiliar with 'mitigate' and therefore avoid it, even though it is exactly the kind of formal verb typically used in editorial writing. Building a strong vocabulary of formal verbs like 'mitigate', 'alleviate', and 'ameliorate' is particularly useful for comprehension and cloze passages in competitive exams. Final Answer: The correct word is 'mitigate', giving the phrase 'spending to mitigate people's material distress'.

Question 11

In the same passage on economic slowdown, choose the correct noun to fill the blank: 'distress or to kick-start economic ________ to increase employment.'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze test item checks whether you can choose the most natural noun to complete a common economic expression. The phrase 'kick-start economic ________ to increase employment' clearly points to the idea of restarting or stimulating overall economic functioning. You must identify the noun that collocates well with 'economic' and 'kick-start' in formal economic and journalistic writing. Given Data / Assumptions: Fragment: 'distress or to kick-start economic ________ to increase employment.' Options: activity, happening, performance, acts. We assume the author is describing measures to restart the economy and thereby create jobs. We must pick the noun that is commonly paired with 'economic' and 'kick-start'. Concept / Approach: In economics and public policy discussions, the usual phrase is 'economic activity' to refer to the total level of production, trade, and services in an economy. Governments often aim to 'stimulate economic activity' or 'kick-start economic activity' after a slowdown. 'Happening' is informal and refers to an event, not a broad macroeconomic concept. 'Performance' can be used with 'economic', as in 'economic performance', but the phrase 'kick-start economic performance' is not standard. 'Acts' refers to individual actions or pieces of legislation, which does not fit the broad idea of overall economic functioning. Therefore, 'activity' is the natural, idiomatic choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the core idea: the government wants to kick-start the economy so that more people get employment. Step 2: Recall common phrases: economists talk about 'economic activity', 'economic growth', and 'economic output'. Step 3: Test 'activity': 'kick-start economic activity to increase employment' clearly and naturally expresses the idea of restarting the economy's functioning. Step 4: Test 'happening': 'kick-start economic happening' is not a recognised expression and sounds incorrect. Step 5: Test 'performance': while 'economic performance' is a valid phrase, 'kick-start economic performance' is awkward; performance is usually assessed, not kick-started. Step 6: Test 'acts': 'kick-start economic acts' is ungrammatical and has no established meaning in economics. Step 7: Conclude that 'activity' is the correct noun. Verification / Alternative check: Verify by reading the full sentence: '…to mitigate people's material distress or to kick-start economic activity to increase employment.' This is exactly how economists and policymakers talk about using public spending to boost jobs. Replace 'activity' with the other options and the phrase either becomes ungrammatical or loses its natural flow. For instance, 'kick-start economic happening' or 'kick-start economic acts' would never appear in a serious article, and 'kick-start economic performance' is not a standard collocation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'Happening' is too informal and typically used for single events, not aggregate economic processes. 'Performance' refers to how well something functions, but it is not normally 'kick-started'; instead, one might 'improve economic performance'. 'Acts' suggests discrete actions or laws, which does not match the idea of broad, ongoing economic operations. Only 'activity' captures the sense of continuous production, trade, and business operations that governments aim to stimulate. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be tempted by 'performance' because 'economic performance' is a familiar phrase. However, careful reading shows that the verb 'kick-start' requires something that can realistically be 'started' or 'restarted', which fits 'activity' much better. Another pitfall is selecting 'happening' due to its everyday feel, but exam passages on economics typically use more formal, technical vocabulary. Always consider both meaning and common collocations when answering cloze questions. Final Answer: The correct word is 'activity', giving the phrase 'kick-start economic activity'.

Question 12

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate adverb to complete the sentence: 'Purush wandered ________ through life, with no clear ideas of where he was heading and what he wanted to accomplish.'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of adverbs and their connotations. The sentence describes a person, Purush, who is moving through life without clear goals or direction. You must choose the adverb that best captures this sense of lack of purpose, rather than one that suggests strong emotion or irrational behaviour. Recognising subtle differences among adverbs is important for precise and natural English usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: 'Purush wandered ________ through life, with no clear ideas of where he was heading and what he wanted to accomplish.' Options: madly, excitedly, crazily, aimlessly. We know from the second half of the sentence that he has no clear direction or goals. We must pick the adverb that logically matches 'wandered through life' in this context. Concept / Approach: The key clue lies in 'with no clear ideas of where he was heading and what he wanted to accomplish'. This clearly indicates lack of purpose and direction. The adverb 'aimlessly' literally means 'without aim or purpose', which directly matches the idea. 'Madly' and 'crazily' imply wild or irrational behaviour, and 'excitedly' suggests an energetic, positive emotion. None of those fit the quiet, directionless tone of the description in the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the meaning of the clause after the blank: Purush had no clear idea where he was heading or what he wanted, so he lacked direction. Step 2: Check 'aimlessly': it means 'without aim, purpose, or direction', exactly matching the context. Step 3: Check 'madly': it suggests extreme emotion, obsession, or irrational behaviour, for example 'madly in love' or 'running madly', which does not fit the reflective life description here. Step 4: Check 'excitedly': it indicates enthusiasm or eagerness, which contradicts the confused, purposeless tone of the sentence. Step 5: Check 'crazily': it again suggests wild, erratic behaviour rather than quiet, directionless wandering. Step 6: Conclude that 'aimlessly' is the only adverb that aligns with the meaning of the sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into the sentence and read it aloud: 'Purush wandered madly through life…', 'Purush wandered excitedly through life…', 'Purush wandered crazily through life…', and 'Purush wandered aimlessly through life…'. Only the last one harmonizes with the phrase 'with no clear ideas of where he was heading and what he wanted to accomplish'. The other adverbs create a mismatch between the emotional tone and the explanation given later in the sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'Madly' is often used with strong emotions or extreme actions and suggests intensity rather than confusion or lack of aim. 'Excitedly' suggests positive enthusiasm, which contradicts the sense of uncertainty and lack of purpose. 'Crazily' points to erratic, possibly humorous or chaotic behaviour, which is not implied by the rest of the sentence. The context is more about drifting without goals, which only 'aimlessly' captures accurately. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to choose an adverb solely based on familiarity or emotional strength, such as 'madly' or 'crazily', without reading the entire sentence carefully. Another pitfall is ignoring the explanatory clause after the blank, which usually reveals the writer's intended meaning. In cloze and fill-in-the-blank questions, always pay attention to all context clues around the blank instead of selecting an option that seems interesting or dramatic on its own. Final Answer: The correct adverb is 'aimlessly'.

Question 13

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence by choosing the most appropriate option: 'Would it be impolite (to be asked) why they are leaving?'

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sentence improvement questions test your understanding of grammar and idiomatic usage. In this sentence, we are evaluating the phrase inside brackets: 'to be asked'. The speaker wants to know whether it would be impolite if he or she asks someone why they are leaving. The structure should clearly express the action of the speaker asking a question, not the passive idea of someone being asked. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: 'Would it be impolite (to be asked) why they are leaving?' Bracketed part to improve: 'to be asked'. Options: to ask, for asking, for being asked, no improvement. We assume the speaker is considering their own act of asking about the reason for leaving. We must choose the phrase that is grammatically correct and natural in standard English. Concept / Approach: The construction 'Would it be impolite to ask…?' is a very common and natural English pattern when politely considering if a question might be rude. The original phrase 'to be asked' wrongly changes the subject, as if the issue is about someone else being asked rather than about the speaker doing the asking. The prepositional constructions 'for asking' or 'for being asked' also do not fit this polite-question structure. Therefore, 'to ask' is the correct infinitive form that aligns with the intended meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the intended meaning: the speaker is wondering if asking the question 'Why are they leaving?' would be considered impolite. Step 2: Recall common usage: English speakers typically say, 'Would it be impolite to ask why they are leaving?' Step 3: Examine 'to ask': it correctly uses the infinitive to refer to the action under consideration. Step 4: Examine 'for asking': this would usually follow an expression like 'punished for asking', not 'Would it be impolite for asking…', which is incorrect. Step 5: Examine 'for being asked': this shifts focus to the person who is asked and also uses an awkward passive structure. Step 6: Examine 'no improvement': this would keep 'to be asked', which does not convey the speaker's action properly and sounds unnatural. Step 7: Conclude that 'to ask' is the best and grammatically correct improvement. Verification / Alternative check: Read the improved sentence: 'Would it be impolite to ask why they are leaving?' This is a standard polite question used in everyday conversation and formal situations. Compare it with 'Would it be impolite to be asked why they are leaving?', which is confusing and suggests that the speaker is being asked, not doing the asking. Similarly, 'Would it be impolite for asking why they are leaving?' and 'for being asked' sound ungrammatical or unnatural. This confirms that option 'to ask' matches native-like usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'For asking' would require a different structure, such as 'He was criticised for asking too many questions', which is not what the original sentence intends. 'For being asked' wrongly emphasises the passive experience of being asked, not the action of asking. 'No improvement' would preserve 'to be asked', which is incorrect because it mixes passive voice with the wrong subject and does not match common English phrasing for polite hesitations. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes struggle with infinitive versus gerund constructions, especially around abstract verbs like 'ask', 'tell', or 'request'. A helpful guideline is that after expressions like 'Would it be possible/impolite/right/wrong', the infinitive ('to ask', 'to tell') is usually used. Another pitfall is overusing passive forms, thinking they sound more formal. In reality, unnecessary passives often make sentences awkward and unclear, as seen with 'to be asked' in this question. Final Answer: The bracketed part should be improved to 'to ask', giving 'Would it be impolite to ask why they are leaving?'

Question 14

Rearrange the parts of the sentence to form a coherent statement: We should learn our lesson P-from this history and stay away Q-of our neighbours R-from interfering in the messy domestic politics.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence rearrangement item tests your ability to combine broken parts of a sentence in a logically and grammatically correct order. The sentence comments on foreign policy, suggesting that we should learn from history and avoid interfering in the domestic politics of our neighbours. You must arrange the labelled segments to produce a smooth, meaningful sentence from the jumbled parts. Given Data / Assumptions: Complete frame: 'We should learn our lesson P-from this history and stay away Q-of our neighbours R-from interfering in the messy domestic politics.' Parts: P – 'from this history and stay away', Q – 'of our neighbours', R – 'from interfering in the messy domestic politics'. Options for order: PRQ, PQR, QPR, RPQ. We assume no words are missing; only order needs correction. Concept / Approach: First, identify the logical flow. The subject and main clause start as 'We should learn our lesson …'. The next idea is that we should 'stay away from interfering in the messy domestic politics of our neighbours.' The phrase 'from this history and stay away' (P) should directly follow 'learn our lesson', since we learn our lesson from history. The phrase 'from interfering in the messy domestic politics' (R) must follow 'stay away', hence 'stay away from interfering…'. Finally, 'of our neighbours' (Q) naturally attaches to 'the messy domestic politics' to specify whose politics we are talking about. Therefore, the logical order is P–R–Q. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Begin with the fixed starting segment: 'We should learn our lesson …' Step 2: Attach P: 'from this history and stay away …' – we learn our lesson from history and then stay away; this fits the structure. Step 3: Next add R: 'from interfering in the messy domestic politics …' – the verb phrase 'stay away' is followed by a 'from' phrase indicating what we should avoid doing. Step 4: Finally, add Q: 'of our neighbours' – this naturally qualifies 'the messy domestic politics' to specify whose domestic politics. Step 5: The full sentence becomes: 'We should learn our lesson from this history and stay away from interfering in the messy domestic politics of our neighbours.' Step 6: This sequence corresponds to PRQ among the given options. Verification / Alternative check: Read the reconstructed sentence with PRQ: 'We should learn our lesson from this history and stay away from interfering in the messy domestic politics of our neighbours.' It is grammatically correct, logically coherent, and stylistically natural. Now test another possible sequence, such as PQR: 'We should learn our lesson from this history and stay away of our neighbours from interfering in the messy domestic politics.' This is clearly wrong because 'stay away of' is not a standard construction. Similarly, QPR or RPQ give awkward or ungrammatical combinations like 'of our neighbours from interfering …' or starting immediately with 'from interfering…' after 'We should learn our lesson', which fails to mention history properly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: PQR gives 'stay away of our neighbours', which is incorrect; the correct preposition with 'stay away' is 'from', not 'of'. QPR would start with 'of our neighbours' directly after 'We should learn our lesson', which makes no sense as it lacks a noun to attach to. RPQ would join 'We should learn our lesson from interfering…', wrongly suggesting that interfering is what taught us the lesson, and then ends in a grammatically broken phrase. Only PRQ preserves the correct idiomatic sequences 'learn our lesson from' and 'stay away from interfering in … of our neighbours'. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose an order that looks superficially smooth but ignores preposition–verb pairings, such as using 'stay away of' instead of 'stay away from'. Another pitfall is not noticing that some fragments must logically attach to certain nouns, for example 'of our neighbours' must describe 'the messy domestic politics'. A good strategy is to first find fixed collocations like 'learn our lesson from' and 'stay away from', then attach remaining pieces where they make sense semantically and grammatically. Final Answer: The correct order is PRQ, giving: 'We should learn our lesson from this history and stay away from interfering in the messy domestic politics of our neighbours.'

Question 15

In English vocabulary, select the option that gives the antonym (opposite in meaning) of the phrasal verb 'to hew' meaning to cut or shape with blows of a tool.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question focuses on the verb 'to hew', which traditionally means to cut, chop, or shape something (such as wood or stone) with blows of a tool. In some contexts, 'hew to' can also mean 'adhere to' or 'conform to', but in vocabulary questions like this, the physical meaning of cutting is usually intended. You must therefore choose the verb that expresses an opposite idea, such as joining or sticking together, rather than cutting apart. Given Data / Assumptions: Target phrasal verb: 'to hew' (to cut or shape with blows). Options: to prune, to chop, to agglutinate, to cleave. We assume the primary meaning here is the physical act of cutting. We must find a verb that conveys something opposite, like joining or clumping rather than cutting or splitting. Concept / Approach: 'To hew' is close in meaning to 'to chop' or 'to cleave'; all three involve cutting or splitting. 'To prune' also involves cutting, specifically trimming or removing unwanted parts of plants or trees. 'To agglutinate', however, means to join, glue, or clump things together. In linguistics, 'agglutinative' languages stick word elements together; in biology, agglutination refers to cells clumping. Thus, 'to agglutinate' represents the opposite of hewing, which separates or cuts material apart rather than combining it. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of 'hew': to chop, cut, or shape something like wood or stone with repeated blows. Step 2: Check 'to chop': this directly means to cut something into pieces; it is a synonym of 'to hew', not an antonym. Step 3: Check 'to cleave': in one common sense, 'cleave' means to split or sever, again very similar to hew. (It can also mean to stick to, but exams normally use the cutting meaning here.) Step 4: Check 'to prune': this is also a cutting action, used for trimming plants or trees by removing parts. Step 5: Check 'to agglutinate': this means to cause things to stick together, to form clumps, or to join elements into a mass. Step 6: Conclude that because hewing involves cutting apart and agglutinating involves sticking together, 'to agglutinate' is the best antonym. Verification / Alternative check: Consider simple visual images. When a carpenter hews a log, he is cutting bits off to shape it; when substances agglutinate, they clump together into a mass. The direction of action is opposite: one separates material, the other unites it. The other options (prune, chop, cleave) all involve removal or splitting and therefore reinforce the cutting idea rather than opposing it. In exam practice, such word sets are chosen carefully so that one verb clearly opposes the main action. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 'To prune' is to cut off unwanted parts, especially of plants, and so is another cutting verb, not an opposite. 'To chop' is nearly identical to 'to hew' in everyday usage, describing repeated cutting motions. 'To cleave', in the common sense used in vocabulary questions, means to split or divide something, again reinforcing the idea of separation. None of these options introduces the contrary notion of joining or clumping that would contrast with cutting. Common Pitfalls: Students may be misled by 'cleave' because in some idioms it can mean 'to cling to' or 'adhere to'. However, competitive exams typically expect the more common meaning of 'cleave' as 'to split or cut'. Another pitfall is thinking that a more familiar cutting verb like 'prune' must be the answer simply because it is less technical than 'agglutinate'. When tackling antonym questions, always ask yourself whether the option truly expresses the opposite concept, not just a different or milder form of the same action. Final Answer: The correct antonym of 'to hew' in this context is 'to agglutinate'.

Question 16

In the following sentence, choose the most appropriate word to fill in the blank so that the idea is expressed clearly and naturally: The chess player moved his piece to a more ______ position, securing the win.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of English vocabulary and collocations in a real life sounding sentence about a chess game. In competitive exams, you are often asked to select the most appropriate word that fits both the meaning and the tone of a sentence. Here the sentence describes how a chess player moved a piece to a better position on the board in order to secure a win. The task is to choose the word that best captures the idea of gaining a strategic benefit in chess, rather than simply having a pleasant or lucky situation. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: The chess player moved his piece to a more ______ position, securing the win. We must choose one word from the options provided. The context is a chess game where players try to get a stronger or superior position. The options are profitable, auspicious, advantageous and worthwhile. Exactly one option should fit naturally and precisely in the blank. Concept / Approach: To answer this question, you need to understand the meanings and typical usage of each option. In chess, players talk about strong or weak positions, advantageous positions, and strategic advantages. The best word will show that the new position of the piece gives a clear strategic edge. We also must consider collocations. Native speakers commonly say an advantageous position in chess, sports and negotiations. Words like profitable, auspicious and worthwhile have different shades of meaning, usually linked with money, luck or general value, not specifically with strategic strength on a chessboard. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the full sentence and notice the key idea: the move helped in securing the win, so the position became stronger or better strategically. Step 2: Consider profitable. It usually relates to making money or gaining financial benefit, not to chess positions. Step 3: Consider auspicious. It refers to something that is lucky or favorable in terms of signs or omens, not a technical positional advantage in chess. Step 4: Consider advantageous. It directly means giving an advantage, a superior or more favorable position, which fits chess terminology very well. Step 5: Consider worthwhile. It means something is worth the time or effort, which is too vague for the precise sense needed here. Verification / Alternative check: Substitute each word into the sentence and read it aloud. The chess player moved his piece to a more profitable position sounds odd because chess is not about money. The chess player moved his piece to a more auspicious position sounds unnatural and overly focused on luck. The chess player moved his piece to a more worthwhile position is not wrong grammatically but does not match normal chess language. The chess player moved his piece to a more advantageous position, securing the win sounds natural, clear and idiomatic. This confirms that advantageous is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: profitable: Normally describes financial gain or profit in business, not positional advantage in a game like chess. auspicious: Refers to something that is lucky or promising as an omen; it does not match the technical idea of a strong position on the board. worthwhile: Means worth the effort or time, which is too general and does not express the strategic edge implied in the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose words like auspicious because they associate winning with luck or good fortune. Others may pick worthwhile because it seems positive and they quickly decide based on a vague sense of positivity. A common mistake is to ignore collocations and context, and to treat all positive words as interchangeable. To avoid this, always look at how words are used with typical nouns and in which fields. In chess, the standard phrase is advantageous position or strong position. Final Answer: The word that correctly and naturally completes the sentence is advantageous, because it clearly indicates that the chess player obtained a stronger, strategically better position on the board, helping to secure the win.

Question 17

In this vocabulary question on English synonyms, select the word that is closest in meaning to maestro, that is, a master or expert performer, especially a great musician or conductor.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of English synonyms, especially words that are often used in contexts like music, art and performance. The word maestro is frequently seen in newspapers, concert reviews and exam passages. If you know that maestro is used for a master musician or a great artistic expert, you can quickly eliminate wrong answers and choose the correct synonym. Building a strong vocabulary is essential for exams such as SSC, banking and other government tests. Given Data / Assumptions: We need the synonym of maestro. Options: neophyte, catechumen, sophomore, conductor. Maestro is used for a highly skilled and respected expert, especially a music master or orchestra leader. Exactly one option should match that meaning closely. Concept / Approach: Maestro comes from Italian and literally means master. In English it refers to a great musician, especially an eminent composer, performer or the leader of an orchestra. Therefore we look for an option that names a person with mastery in music or leading a musical group. Neophyte, catechumen and sophomore describe people at early or intermediate stages of learning, not masters. Conductor is the only word that refers to the person who leads an orchestra or chorus and is often addressed as maestro in musical settings. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of maestro as an expert or master musician and artistic leader. Step 2: Check neophyte. It means a beginner or novice, exactly the opposite of a master. Step 3: Check catechumen. It means someone who is being instructed in the basic principles of a religion, again a learner, not an expert. Step 4: Check sophomore. It usually refers to a student in the second year of study, an intermediate level learner. Step 5: Check conductor. It refers to the person who directs an orchestra or choir and is often a maestro in music. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a symphony concert. The person standing in front of the orchestra, guiding the musicians with a baton, is called the conductor and can be addressed as maestro. None of the other options fit this image. You would never call a neophyte or catechumen a maestro because they are still learning. A sophomore may have some experience but is not necessarily an artistic master. Only conductor regularly overlaps in meaning with maestro in musical contexts, which confirms the choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: neophyte: Means a beginner or novice in some field, the opposite of an experienced master. catechumen: Refers to a person receiving instruction in the basic doctrines of a religion, unrelated to mastery in music. sophomore: Indicates a second year student, not a top level expert or artistic leader. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to choose an unfamiliar word simply because it looks difficult. Many exam takers think that the toughest looking word must be the right answer. Here catechumen may attract such guesses, but it has no connection with music or mastery. Another mistake is to ignore context. Maestro is strongly connected with music and conducting. Whenever you see a vocabulary question, try to recall where you have seen the word used in real contexts like news, movies or books. That habit makes these questions much easier. Final Answer: The correct synonym of maestro is conductor, because both words can refer to a highly skilled music professional who leads an orchestra or musical performance.

Question 18

In the following question on direct and indirect speech in English grammar, choose the option that correctly changes the sentence The coach said, "Do not move, boys." into indirect (reported) speech.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of how to change a sentence from direct speech to indirect or reported speech in English grammar. The original sentence contains an imperative command that the coach gives to the boys. In competitive exams, such questions are very common because they test your knowledge of reporting verbs, pronoun changes, removal of quotation marks and proper infinitive structures. You must recognise that the speaker is giving an order or request and then convert it properly into indirect speech. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct speech: The coach said, "Do not move, boys." The reporting verb is said, and the person speaking is the coach. The listeners are the boys, the group being addressed. We have to form a grammatically correct reported speech sentence. Options differ in the reporting verb used and the structure of the command. Concept / Approach: When changing an imperative sentence from direct to indirect speech, we usually change the reporting verb to a more suitable one such as ordered, told, requested or asked. For negative commands, we use not to plus the base form of the verb instead of the original do not plus verb. Quotation marks are removed, and comma after said disappears. Also, there is no need for to after told when there is an object; we say told the boys, not told to the boys in standard grammar. Therefore the correct indirect speech pattern here is: The coach asked the boys not to move. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the original sentence is a negative command: Do not move, boys. Step 2: Recognise that we should change said to a reporting verb suitable for commands. Asked is acceptable for a mild instruction to a group of boys. Step 3: Replace the negative imperative do not move with not to move when forming indirect speech. Step 4: Keep the object the boys after the reporting verb: asked the boys not to move. Step 5: Remove quotation marks and the comma, and do not add any unnecessary words. Verification / Alternative check: Compare the resulting sentence with standard grammar rules. The coach asked the boys not to move follows the structure reporting verb plus object plus not to plus base verb. This is the normal pattern for reported negative commands. It keeps the meaning of the original sentence and uses natural sounding English. If you check standard grammar examples, you will see similar transformations. Therefore the option is fully correct and idiomatic. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The coach told to the boys do not move: Incorrect because told should not be followed by to before the object and the command part still uses do not move instead of not to move. The coach said to the boys not to be moving: The structure not to be moving is awkward and suggests continuous action, which is not necessary here. The coach told to them, do not move boys: Again told to is wrong usage, and the direct speech part is not properly converted into indirect speech. Common Pitfalls: Students often retain the auxiliary do from the original imperative, writing something like not do move or still use do not move inside indirect speech. Another frequent mistake is adding to after told when there is already an object, because local usage sometimes allows told to, but standard written English for exams prefers told the boys or told them. Also, some learners forget to change said to a more suitable reporting verb such as asked or ordered when the sentence is clearly a command or request. Final Answer: The correct indirect speech form is The coach asked the boys not to move., which accurately reports the negative command in clear, grammatically correct English.

Question 19

Rearrange the parts P, Q, and R to form a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence: Public goods are P - important as they Q - mitigate the impact of R - income poverty and inequality.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to rearrange parts of a sentence so that the final sentence is grammatically correct and logically meaningful. Such jumbled sentence questions are common in English sections of competitive exams. Here, the sentence refers to public goods and their role in reducing income poverty and inequality. You must correctly place the segments labelled P, Q and R in a smooth order after the starting phrase Public goods are. Given Data / Assumptions: Fixed beginning: Public goods are. P: important as they Q: mitigate the impact of R: income poverty and inequality We need to find the correct sequence among QRP, PQR, RPQ and QPR. Concept / Approach: A well formed English sentence typically follows a subject plus verb plus object pattern. The subject here is Public goods, and the main verb phrase should be are important. The expression are important as they logically introduces what public goods do. After that, we need a verb phrase describing their function, and then the object that receives the action. Mitigate the impact of works as a verb phrase, and income poverty and inequality is the object. Therefore, after Public goods are, the natural flow is P (important as they), then Q (mitigate the impact of), and finally R (income poverty and inequality). Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Start with the base: Public goods are. Step 2: Choose the segment that completes the main idea of the verb to be. P begins with important as they, which fits directly after are, giving Public goods are important as they. Step 3: Next, we need a verb phrase explaining what public goods do. Q starts with mitigate the impact of, which logically follows they, giving they mitigate the impact of. Step 4: Finally, we need an object to complete mitigate the impact of. R is income poverty and inequality, which neatly completes the sentence. Step 5: The complete sentence reads: Public goods are important as they mitigate the impact of income poverty and inequality. Verification / Alternative check: Check if any other sequence produces a grammatically correct sentence. For example, QRP would give: Public goods are mitigate the impact of income poverty and inequality important as they, which is incorrect. RPQ would start directly with the object after are, which breaks the sentence. QPR and similar orders fail because the verb and object parts do not line up in a standard English structure. Only PQR produces a smooth, natural sounding sentence. This confirms that PQR is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: QRP: Produces Public goods are mitigate the impact of income poverty and inequality important as they, which is ungrammatical and jumbled. RPQ: Starts with income poverty and inequality immediately after are, leaving the verb phrase important as they in a wrong position. QPR: Gives Public goods are mitigate the impact of important as they income poverty and inequality, which makes no sense and breaks the verb object relation. Common Pitfalls: Many students focus only on meaning words like poverty and inequality and try to place them early, neglecting the need for proper verb placement. Another mistake is not checking the full sentence after choosing an order. The reliable method is to first establish the core predicate with the linking verb are, then attach adjectives such as important, and finally add clauses showing cause or effect. Always read the full reconstructed sentence aloud in your mind to ensure that it is logically and grammatically sound. Final Answer: The correct order of the parts is PQR, giving the sentence: Public goods are important as they mitigate the impact of income poverty and inequality.

Question 20

In the following sentence, choose the most appropriate preposition to replace the bracketed word so that the idiomatic expression is correct: The workers are bent (on) getting a full months pay as bonus.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of English prepositions and idiomatic expressions. Many phrases use fixed prepositions that cannot be changed without sounding unnatural. In competitive exams, these idiomatic combinations are tested frequently. The sentence here talks about workers who are strongly determined to receive a full month's pay as a bonus. You must select the preposition that makes the expression bent upon or bent on correct and idiomatic in standard written English. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: The workers are bent (on) getting a full months pay as bonus. We need to decide which preposition fits best after bent. Options: for, upon, to, no improvement. The intended meaning is that the workers are determined to get the bonus. Concept / Approach: Bent on and bent upon are both idiomatic expressions in English that mean determined to do something or very strongly inclined towards doing it. However, standard formal usage, especially in older and exam oriented English, often prefers bent upon when we talk about people being firmly resolved to achieve something. The phrase bent for is incorrect in this sense, bent to is not used this way, and no improvement would keep bent on, which is acceptable in modern usage but the question expects the more classic exam friendly collocation bent upon getting. Therefore upon is the best choice here. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the idiom pattern: be bent on or be bent upon something means to be determined to do it. Step 2: Recognise that the sentence describes determination: the workers are strongly focused on getting the full pay as bonus. Step 3: Examine the options. For expresses purpose or benefit but not this strong determination in idiomatic form. Step 4: Upon appears in the well known collocation bent upon, which matches our required meaning exactly. Step 5: To does not create a standard expression here, and choosing no improvement would miss the chance to use the more precise idiom. Verification / Alternative check: Consider how the sentence sounds with each option. The workers are bent for getting a full months pay as bonus sounds wrong. The workers are bent to getting a full months pay as bonus is also incorrect. The workers are bent on getting a full months pay as bonus is used in conversational English, but exam setters often look for bent upon when they highlight the idiom. The workers are bent upon getting a full months pay as bonus sounds natural and matches formal idiomatic usage. This confirms that upon is the best answer in this exam context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: for: Bent for does not form a standard idiomatic phrase for strong determination, so it is incorrect here. to: Bent to also fails to convey the idiomatic meaning and is ungrammatical in this context. no improvement: Although bent on is possible in modern English, the question expects the more formal and widely taught bent upon in exam oriented grammar, so no improvement is not the best choice. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to rely only on partial familiarity with an expression. Students may have heard bent on without noticing that textbooks often emphasise bent upon. Another pitfall is choosing no improvement whenever the sentence seems understandable, even if a more accurate idiom exists. To handle such questions well, it is helpful to read from good grammar books and note fixed prepositional patterns. Regular exposure to high quality English, such as editorials and reference texts, reinforces these combinations and makes such questions easier. Final Answer: The correct improvement is upon, so the idiomatic expression becomes The workers are bent upon getting a full months pay as bonus, expressing strong determination in standard English.

English Questions