Question 1

In this error spotting question, identify the incorrect part in the sentence describing the most obvious feature of the modern world.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting item tests your understanding of comparative and superlative adjectives in English. The sentence begins with The more obvious feature of the modern world is the enormous development of Science and Technology. However, there is no comparison being made between two or more features; instead, the sentence points to a single, outstanding feature. In such a case, we need the superlative form most instead of more. Recognising when to use comparative versus superlative forms is a key grammar skill. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: The more obvious feature Part 2: of the modern world is the enormous Part 3: development of Science and Technology. Part 4: No error The sentence aims to highlight one main, outstanding feature of the modern world. Concept / Approach: In English, we use the comparative form more when comparing two things and the superlative form most when something is at the top level among three or more. For example, we say taller when comparing two people and tallest when talking about one person who is higher than everyone else. In this sentence, we are not ranking several features; instead, we are stating that this is the most obvious feature. Thus, the correct phrase should be The most obvious feature, making part 1 incorrect as written. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the phrase The more obvious feature of the modern world in part 1. Step 2: Consider whether the sentence compares multiple features or identifies a single leading one. Step 3: Realise that the sentence selects one feature as the standout, so a superlative form is appropriate. Step 4: Replace more with most to form The most obvious feature of the modern world. Step 5: Conclude that the error lies in part 1 due to misuse of the comparative form. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence using the correction: The most obvious feature of the modern world is the enormous development of Science and Technology. This version reads smoothly and matches standard usage found in books and articles. If the writer intended to compare two specific features, the sentence would have to mention both, for example, The more obvious feature between A and B. Since no such comparison is present, most is clearly required instead of more. Thus, part 1 is the segment with the error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 2 correctly uses of the modern world is the enormous, maintaining agreement between feature and is and using the adjective enormous appropriately. Part 3, development of Science and Technology, properly names the area being described and contains no grammatical mistakes. Part 4 cannot be chosen because we have already identified an error in the form of the adjective in part 1. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overuse the comparative more when they see the article the before an adjective, without checking if a comparison is actually being made. To avoid this, always ask yourself whether you are talking about one thing in relation to many others (superlative) or directly comparing two things (comparative). Here, the modern world has many features, and we are picking the single most obvious one, so the superlative form most obvious is needed. Final Answer: The error is in part 1; the phrase should be The most obvious feature.

Question 2

In this error spotting question, identify the incorrect part in the sentence about critics of television focusing on violence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of correct word forms, particularly the difference between adjectives and nouns. The sentence says, Critics of television often focus on the prevalent of violence in today’s programmes. While the idea is clear, one word is used in the wrong form, creating a grammatical error. Such subtle vocabulary issues often appear in competitive exams to check careful reading and understanding of standard English usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: Critics of television often Part 2: focus on the prevalent of Part 3: violence in today’s programmes. Part 4: No error The intended phrase is the prevalence of violence, referring to how common violence is. Concept / Approach: The word prevalent is an adjective meaning widespread or commonly occurring. To serve as the object of the preposition on and to be followed by of, we need a noun, which is prevalence. The correct expression is the prevalence of violence, not the prevalent of violence. Therefore, part 2 contains the error. Parts 1 and 3 correctly describe critics and violence in programmes, so no changes are needed there. The key is to recognise that the structure focus on the something of requires a noun in place of something. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Look closely at part 2, focus on the prevalent of, and identify the grammatical role of prevalent. Step 2: Recall that prevalent is an adjective, which cannot stand alone as the object of a preposition followed by of. Step 3: Remember that the noun form is prevalence, meaning the fact or condition of being widespread. Step 4: Replace prevalent with prevalence to get focus on the prevalence of violence. Step 5: Conclude that part 2 is the segment with the error. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence correctly: Critics of television often focus on the prevalence of violence in today’s programmes. This version now uses a noun after the preposition on and before of, forming a smooth and grammatically correct phrase. Since only part 2 needed alteration, we can be sure that this is the part containing the grammatical mistake. Parts 1 and 3 remain unchanged and are in line with standard English usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 1, Critics of television often, serves as a proper subject phrase and introductory adverb and contains no error. Part 3, violence in today’s programmes, correctly specifies what is being discussed and is grammatically sound. Part 4, No error, cannot be chosen because we have identified a clear misuse of word form in part 2. Common Pitfalls: Learners often remember adjectives like prevalent and common but forget the corresponding nouns, which leads to mistakes in phrases such as prevalence of crime, frequency of accidents, or presence of pollution. A useful strategy is to study word families together, for example prevalent and prevalence, frequent and frequency, present and presence, so that you can choose the right form based on the grammatical role in the sentence. Final Answer: The error is in part 2; the phrase should be the prevalence of violence.

Question 3

In this error spotting question, identify the incorrect part in the sentence about school administration giving students more responsibility.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question tests your understanding of verb patterns after the verb consider. The sentence suggests that the school administration should think seriously about giving students more responsibility and empowering the student council. However, one part of the sentence uses the wrong form of a verb, which disrupts the correct structure that normally follows consider. Recognising verb ing forms after certain verbs is essential for accurate English usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: Our school administration should seriously consider Part 2: given students more responsibility and empowering Part 3: the student council to play more than a symbolic role. Part 4: No error The intended phrase is consider giving students more responsibility. Concept / Approach: After the verb consider, when it is followed by another verb, English typically uses the gerund form ending in ing. For example, we say consider doing something, consider changing the plan, or consider giving more time. The word given in part 2 is a past participle and does not fit directly after consider in this structure. Instead, we need giving, which is the gerund form. The second verb empowering is already in the correct ing form, which confirms that the pattern should be consider giving and empowering. Therefore, part 2 contains the error. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Look at the verb consider in part 1 and identify that another verb follows it in part 2. Step 2: Recall that after consider, we use the ing form of verbs, such as consider giving or consider changing. Step 3: Notice that part 2 uses given students more responsibility, which is a past participle, not a gerund. Step 4: Replace given with giving to form consider giving students more responsibility. Step 5: Decide that part 2 is where the grammatical error occurs. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence with the correction: Our school administration should seriously consider giving students more responsibility and empowering the student council to play more than a symbolic role. Now, both giving and empowering are in the ing form, correctly following consider in a parallel structure. The sentence reads naturally and matches standard patterns taught in grammar books. Since only part 2 required this change, we can confirm that part 2 is indeed the erroneous segment. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 1, Our school administration should seriously consider, correctly sets up the modal verb phrase and introduces the idea to be considered. Part 3, the student council to play more than a symbolic role, is grammatically acceptable as the continuation of empowering the student council. Part 4, No error, is incorrect because we have identified a misused verb form in part 2. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse the past participle and gerund forms when they look similar, especially with regular verbs. Many learners know that consider is followed by a verb ing form but may still write consider to give or consider given. To avoid this, memorise the pattern consider + gerund and practise with examples such as consider studying harder, consider moving abroad, and consider giving more responsibility. Final Answer: The error is in part 2; it should read giving students more responsibility, not given students more responsibility.

Question 4

In this error spotting question, decide whether there is any grammatical error in the sentence about not sacrificing high standards to make students happy.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question asks you to determine whether a sentence about school faculty and administration contains any grammatical error. The sentence discusses the idea that schools should not sacrifice high standards and regulations just to make students temporarily happy. Sometimes exam questions include sentences that are fully correct to test whether candidates can confidently recognise a no error situation instead of forcing an unnecessary correction. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: Our school’s faculty and administration should not Part 2: sacrifice high standards and regulations in order Part 3: to make students temporarily happy. Part 4: No error The sentence is intended to express a clear policy opinion in correct formal English. Concept / Approach: We analyse each part for subject verb agreement, prepositions, infinitive structures, and word order. The subject our school’s faculty and administration is a compound subject joined by and, which correctly takes the auxiliary should not. The verb phrase sacrifice high standards and regulations in order to make is properly constructed, with in order followed by the infinitive to make. The adverb temporarily correctly modifies happy. No part of the sentence breaks standard grammar rules or appears awkward in formal written English, so the correct choice is that there is no error. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check subject verb agreement in part 1: faculty and administration is a combined subject, so should not sacrifice is correct. Step 2: Examine part 2 to see whether sacrifice high standards and regulations in order is a normal structure; it is, as in order typically introduces purpose. Step 3: Look at part 3, to make students temporarily happy, and confirm that the infinitive to make expresses purpose and that the adverb temporarily correctly modifies happy. Step 4: Ensure that punctuation and word order do not create ambiguity or awkwardness. Step 5: Conclude that all parts are grammatically correct, so the correct answer is No error. Verification / Alternative check: Compare the sentence with typical policy statements found in educational reports: Schools should not sacrifice academic standards to please students or Institutions must not lower regulations simply to keep students satisfied. The structure used here follows similar patterns. There is a clear subject, a negative modal verb phrase, and a purpose clause introduced by in order to. Since no change is necessary to improve correctness or clarity, we can confidently mark part 4 as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 1 uses a possessive phrase our school’s faculty and administration correctly and matches it with the modal auxiliary should not. Part 2 uses the direct object high standards and regulations correctly after sacrifice and leads into the purpose clause smoothly. Part 3 accurately expresses the purpose of the potential sacrifice with the infinitive to make and additional detail temporarily happy. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates feel compelled to find an error in every sentence and may try to change perfectly acceptable phrases like in order to or high standards and regulations. It is important to remember that no error is often a valid answer. A useful strategy is to check whether any proposed change would clearly improve grammatical correctness; if you cannot justify a change, it is safer to select No error. Final Answer: The sentence has no grammatical error; the correct choice is part 4, No error.

Question 5

In this error spotting question, identify the incorrect part in the sentence about trend analysts and what will be in or out.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question focuses on subject verb agreement and noun phrase structure in a sentence about trend analysts. The sentence reads Trend-analysts experts specializes in predicting what will be in and what will be out. While the general meaning is clear, one part contains a mismatch between a plural subject and a singular verb, and the noun phrase itself is awkward. Competitive exams frequently test such agreement errors because they are common in everyday writing. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: Trend-analysts experts specializes Part 2: in predicting what will Part 3: be in and what will be out. Part 4: No error The intended subject is experts who specialise in trend analysis. Concept / Approach: The phrase trend analysts experts is intended to refer to experts in trend analysis. As written, it is somewhat redundant and should ideally be trend analyst experts or trend analysis experts. More importantly, experts is clearly plural, so the verb that follows must also be plural: specialise, not specializes. In standard English, the s form of the verb is used with singular third person subjects, whereas plural subjects take the base form without s. Because both the noun phrase and the verb form are problematic in part 1, this is the part that contains the error. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main subject and verb in part 1: Trend-analysts experts specializes. Step 2: Recognise that experts is plural, so the verb should be specialise, not specializes. Step 3: Notice that the compound noun phrase trend-analysts experts is awkward and would more naturally be trend analyst experts or trend analysis experts. Step 4: Mentally correct the phrase to Trend analyst experts specialise in predicting. Step 5: Conclude that the error lies in part 1, due to both verb agreement and awkward noun structure. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence in a corrected form: Trend analyst experts specialise in predicting what will be in and what will be out. This version uses a clear plural subject and matches it with the plural verb specialise. Parts 2 and 3, in predicting what will be in and what will be out, are grammatically sound and effectively express the idea of forecasting trends. Since the necessary corrections are concentrated in part 1, we can confidently mark part 1 as the segment containing the error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 2 correctly introduces the prepositional phrase in predicting what will, which leads naturally into the subordinate clauses in part 3. Part 3, be in and what will be out, uses parallel structure with will be in and will be out, and there are no grammatical mistakes. Part 4, No error, is not correct because we have identified clear subject verb agreement and noun phrase issues in part 1. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes focus only on the verb form and forget to check whether the noun phrase itself is well formed. When you see a hyphenated or compound term like trend analysts experts, it is worth checking whether it should be analysis experts or analyst experts instead. At the same time, always ensure that the verb agrees in number with the final noun in the subject phrase. Plural nouns like experts require verbs without the s ending in the present tense. Final Answer: The error is in part 1; the phrase should be Trend analyst experts specialise, not Trend-analysts experts specializes.

Question 6

In the following error spotting question, identify which part of the sentence contains a grammatical mistake: One of the hazard of swimming (1) in the ocean is an unexpected (2) encounter with a jellyfish. (3) No error (4).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is an error spotting item that tests your understanding of number agreement between subject and noun phrases. Competitive exams often use sentences of this type to check whether candidates can correctly use structures like "one of the" followed by a plural noun, as well as whether they can keep the rest of the sentence grammatically sound. Here, you must decide which numbered part of the sentence includes a grammatical error, or whether the sentence is error free. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into four parts, labelled (1), (2), (3), and (4). Part (1): One of the hazard of swimming. Part (2): in the ocean is an unexpected. Part (3): encounter with a jellyfish. Part (4): No error indicates that the sentence has no mistake. We assume standard exam level British or international English rules. Concept / Approach: When English uses the pattern "one of the", the noun that follows must be plural, because it refers to one item taken from a group of many. Thus, we say "one of the hazards", "one of the problems", or "one of the reasons". If the noun after "one of the" appears in singular form, as "hazard", the structure is incorrect. The rest of the sentence describes a specific type of danger related to swimming in the ocean, which is grammatically sound when viewed separately. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on part (1): "One of the hazard of swimming". The core pattern is "one of the hazard". Step 2: Recall the rule that the noun after "one of the" must be plural, so we expect "one of the hazards". Step 3: Recognise that "hazard" in the singular breaks this rule and should be corrected to "hazards". Step 4: Check part (2): "in the ocean is an unexpected". This correctly links to the subject phrase and leads into the complement. Step 5: Check part (3): "encounter with a jellyfish." This is a natural and grammatically correct noun phrase. Step 6: Part (4) claims that there is no error, but we have already found an error in part (1), so part (4) cannot be correct. Step 7: Conclude that the only error lies in part (1). Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the corrected sentence: "One of the hazards of swimming in the ocean is an unexpected encounter with a jellyfish." This version sounds fully natural and meets the standard rule about "one of the" followed by a plural noun. No other part requires any change. The verb "is" correctly agrees with the singular phrase "one of the hazards" because the real grammatical subject is "one". This confirms that there is exactly one error and that it is in part (1). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (2) is correct because "in the ocean is an unexpected" smoothly connects location and complement. Part (3) correctly completes the idea with "encounter with a jellyfish". Part (4), which stands for "no error", is wrong because we have identified a definite mistake earlier in the sentence. Therefore, none of the other parts can be marked as containing the error. Common Pitfalls: Many learners focus on the later parts of a sentence and ignore the apparently simple opening structure. Another common mistake is to think that because "one" is singular, the following noun can also be singular. Remember that "one of the" always selects a single item from a plural set, which is why the noun must be plural even though the verb agrees with "one". Keeping this pattern in mind will help you avoid similar errors in other questions. Final Answer: The error is in Part (1), because "hazard" should be plural as "hazards" after the phrase "one of the".

Question 7

In the following error spotting sentence, identify which part contains a grammatical error: Many of us have striving to produce (1) a blend of all cultures that seem (2) today to be in clash with one another. (3) No error (4).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This item checks your understanding of correct verb forms in perfect tenses and of agreement between verbs and helping verbs. Sentences like this appear frequently in competitive examinations, where a single wrong auxiliary or missing past participle changes the entire grammatical structure. You are asked to decide which numbered part of the sentence has an error or whether the sentence is correct as written. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into four parts. Part (1): Many of us have striving to produce. Part (2): a blend of all cultures that seem. Part (3): today to be in clash with one another. Part (4): No error, meaning the sentence is completely correct. We assume standard present perfect usage in English. Concept / Approach: The auxiliary "have" in English is followed by a past participle to form the present perfect tense, such as "have worked" or "have been striving". The phrase "have striving" is incomplete because "striving" is a present participle and needs "been" to form the present perfect continuous ("have been striving") or needs to be replaced by the past participle "striven" to form "have striven". The rest of the sentence uses normal relative clause and prepositional structures and is grammatically acceptable. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (1): "Many of us have striving to produce". The sequence "have striving" looks unusual. Step 2: Recall that after "have" we usually use a past participle for present perfect, such as "have tried", or we use "been" plus an ing form for present perfect continuous, as in "have been striving". Step 3: Recognise that "have striving" is missing "been". A correct version would be "have been striving to produce" or "have striven to produce". Step 4: Check part (2): "a blend of all cultures that seem". This is a valid noun phrase with a relative clause; "that seem" correctly agrees with "all cultures". Step 5: Check part (3): "today to be in clash with one another". The phrase "in clash" is slightly unusual but acceptable as "in clash with"; the basic structure is acceptable for exam purposes. Step 6: Since the only clear grammatical problem is in part (1), the error must be located there. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the corrected sentence: "Many of us have been striving to produce a blend of all cultures that seem today to be in clash with one another." Now the present perfect continuous tense "have been striving" correctly shows an ongoing effort. The other parts of the sentence fit well with this form. Another valid alternative would be "have striven to produce", but the original stem clearly aims at a continuous action. No other part needs correction, confirming that only part (1) contains the error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (2) correctly uses "that seem" with the plural noun "cultures". Changing it to "seems" would create disagreement. Part (3) has a slightly formal but acceptable expression "to be in clash with one another", which can be understood as "in conflict with one another". Part (4), "No error", is wrong because the sentence clearly needs a correction in the verb phrase of part (1). Therefore, parts (2), (3), and (4) cannot be chosen as the error locations. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes overlook errors in helping verb chains, especially when they see a familiar ing form. They may also try to change "seem" in part (2), thinking it should be singular, or they may get distracted by the expression "in clash" in part (3). To avoid such mistakes, always check that each auxiliary is correctly followed by the right form of the main verb. Remember that "have" plus ing form almost always requires "been" in between for continuous aspect. Final Answer: The incorrect portion is Part (1), because "have striving" should be corrected to "have been striving" or "have striven".

Question 8

In the following sentence, identify which part contains a grammatical error: When the business is ran smoothly (1) directors are more than happy to pick an experienced insider, (2) who will continue along the present path. (3) No error (4).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines your control over passive voice forms and irregular verb patterns in English. Many verbs, including "run", have different past forms and past participle forms, which must be used correctly in passive constructions. Here, you need to spot the error in one of the numbered segments or decide that the sentence is fully correct. Errors with irregular verbs are a common target in competitive exams because they reveal whether candidates really know verb tables or only rely on rough intuition. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into four labelled parts. Part (1): When the business is ran smoothly. Part (2): directors are more than happy to pick an experienced insider, Part (3): who will continue along the present path. Part (4): No error, signalling a fully correct sentence. The verb "run" is irregular: base "run", past "ran", past participle "run". Concept / Approach: In passive voice, English uses the verb "be" plus the past participle of the main verb. For example, "is done", "was broken", "is run". With irregular verbs, it is important to know the correct past participle. For "run", the simple past is "ran", but the past participle is "run". Therefore, in a passive structure like "is run smoothly", the form "ran" is not correct. The remaining parts of the sentence describe directors choosing an insider to maintain the status quo and are grammatically integrated with the opening clause. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on part (1): "When the business is ran smoothly". Step 2: Recognise that "is" signals a passive structure and should be followed by a past participle. Step 3: Recall the verb forms of "run": run, ran, run. The past participle is "run", not "ran". Step 4: Conclude that the correct phrase must be "is run smoothly", not "is ran smoothly". Step 5: Examine part (2): "directors are more than happy to pick an experienced insider," which is a correct independent clause. Step 6: Examine part (3): "who will continue along the present path." The relative clause is grammatically sound and follows the rules for future will plus base verb. Step 7: This analysis shows that only part (1) contains an error. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the corrected sentence: "When the business is run smoothly, directors are more than happy to pick an experienced insider, who will continue along the present path." This is fully acceptable and clearly expresses the intended meaning. If we change "is ran" to "ran", the clause becomes "When the business ran smoothly", which is a valid simple past active clause, but that would remove "is" and alter the tense and voice. Since the sentence as given intends a present time general condition in passive, "is run" is the accurate correction, showing that part (1) is faulty. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (2) is correct; it uses "directors are more than happy to pick" in a clear and natural way. Part (3) uses "who will continue along the present path" correctly to describe a future action expected of the insider. Part (4) cannot be chosen because we have already identified an error in the sentence. Therefore, none of these parts are incorrect, and only part (1) deserves to be marked. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overlook irregular verb patterns and accept "is ran" simply because "ran" sounds familiar as the past form. Others might misinterpret the clause as active, forgetting that "is" plus a past form is usually a sign of passive voice. To avoid such traps, always recall the base form, simple past, and past participle of common irregular verbs, and remember that in passive voice, "be" must be followed by the past participle, not the simple past. Final Answer: The incorrect segment is Part (1), where "is ran" should be corrected to "is run".

Question 9

In the following sentence on scientific description, identify which part has a grammatical error: Scientists show that there is a curious (1) relationship among a lion life span and (2) the pattern of spots on each side of its face. (3) No error (4).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question focuses on the correct use of prepositions in English, especially the difference between "among" and "between". Such fine distinctions are favourite topics in competitive examinations because they reveal whether candidates pay attention to subtle but important rules. The sentence refers to a relationship linking exactly two things, and you must identify which segment is grammatically incorrect or decide that the sentence is fully acceptable. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into four parts. Part (1): Scientists show that there is a curious. Part (2): relationship among a lion life span and. Part (3): the pattern of spots on each side of its face. Part (4): No error, indicating no grammatical mistake. The sentence compares two items: life span and pattern of spots. Concept / Approach: The general rule is that "between" is used when referring to two items or two clearly separate groups, while "among" is normally used when referring to more than two items or to a collective, less distinct group. In this sentence, there is a relationship linking two things: the life span of a lion and the pattern of spots on each side of its face. Therefore, "between" is the correct preposition. The use of "among" with exactly two items makes part (2) incorrect. The other parts are grammatically sound and follow standard descriptive style. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read part (1): "Scientists show that there is a curious". This sets up the idea of a surprising relationship and is grammatically correct. Step 2: Look at part (2): "relationship among a lion life span and". The important phrase is "relationship among" followed by two items. Step 3: Recall the rule that preposition "between" should be used when there are two elements, here life span and pattern of spots. Step 4: Recognise that "relationship between a lion life span and" would be the correct structure. Step 5: Examine part (3): "the pattern of spots on each side of its face." This is a correct noun phrase providing the second item in the comparison. Step 6: Since only the preposition in part (2) is wrong, the error is confined to that part. Verification / Alternative check: Construct the corrected sentence: "Scientists show that there is a curious relationship between the life span of a lion and the pattern of spots on each side of its face." The structure now follows the expected pattern "relationship between X and Y" with two clearly identified elements. No other part appears grammatically suspect when read in context. This confirms that part (2) is the only segment that requires correction, so it must be the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (1) correctly introduces the idea and uses the present simple "show" to describe a general scientific finding. Part (3) correctly describes "the pattern of spots on each side of its face" and fits well as the second element linked by "between". Part (4), "No error", is incorrect because a definite prepositional error has been found in part (2). Therefore, none of these parts should be marked as containing the error. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes believe that "among" and "between" are interchangeable and do not pay attention to the number of items involved. Another common mistake is to get distracted by details like "life span" or "pattern of spots" and overlook the preposition that links them. The safest approach is to mark clearly how many things are being related. Whenever exactly two elements appear, it is usually correct to use "between". Remembering phrases such as "relationship between cause and effect" helps reinforce this rule. Final Answer: The incorrect segment is Part (2), where "among" should be replaced by "between".

Question 10

In the following sentence about education and power, identify which part contains a grammatical error: Education is a instrument which (1) imparts knowledge and, therefore (2) indirectly controls power. (3) No error (4).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines a basic but extremely important feature of English grammar: the correct use of articles a and an before singular countable nouns. Error spotting items like this are common because they quickly reveal whether a learner has mastered foundational rules. You need to determine which labelled segment of the sentence contains an error, or whether the sentence is free from grammatical mistakes. Given Data / Assumptions: Part (1): Education is a instrument which. Part (2): imparts knowledge and, therefore. Part (3): indirectly controls power. Part (4): No error. The noun "instrument" begins with a vowel sound. Standard article usage rules apply. Concept / Approach: In English, the indefinite article "a" is used before words beginning with a consonant sound, while "an" is used before words beginning with a vowel sound. The noun "instrument" begins with the vowel sound "i", so the correct form is "an instrument". Using "a instrument" breaks this phonetic rule. The rest of the sentence uses a defining relative clause and a compound predicate to describe what education does, and these portions are grammatically correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Look at part (1): "Education is a instrument which". Step 2: Identify the article noun combination "a instrument" and recall that "instrument" starts with a vowel sound. Step 3: Apply the rule that "an" precedes vowel sounds, so the phrase should be "an instrument". Step 4: Check part (2): "imparts knowledge and, therefore". This correctly continues the clause and uses a proper linker "therefore". Step 5: Check part (3): "indirectly controls power." This is a correct verb phrase completing the idea. Step 6: Since no other obvious grammatical problems exist, the only error is in part (1). Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the corrected sentence: "Education is an instrument which imparts knowledge and, therefore, indirectly controls power." This version sounds natural and maintains the original meaning while respecting article usage. The phrase "an instrument which imparts knowledge" is a standard relative clause construction. There is no need to change any other part of the sentence, which confirms that the problem is limited to the article in part (1). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (2) is grammatically sound; it uses "imparts knowledge" correctly and places "therefore" in a reasonable position. Part (3) is also correct, as "indirectly controls power" clearly describes one effect of education. Part (4) cannot be correct because we have identified a definite article error earlier in the sentence. Thus, parts (2), (3), and (4) should not be chosen as the answer. Common Pitfalls: Many learners mistakenly focus on written spelling rather than spoken sound when choosing "a" versus "an". For example, they may misapply the rule when a word begins with a consonant letter but a vowel sound, or vice versa. In this case, "instrument" clearly starts with a vowel sound and must pair with "an". Practising with sets of examples like "an apple", "an instrument", "a book", and "a university" helps fix this rule by linking it to sound rather than spelling alone. Final Answer: The error is in Part (1), where "a instrument" should be corrected to "an instrument".

Question 11

In the following sentence on success in life, identify which part contains a grammatical error: Progress in life depends (1) a good deal under crossing (2) one threshold after another. (3) No error (4).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question checks your knowledge of fixed prepositional patterns after verbs such as "depend". Many English verbs are followed by particular prepositions, and using the wrong one makes the sentence sound unnatural or incorrect. Here, you must find which numbered portion of the sentence contains the mistake, or decide that the sentence is fully correct. Given Data / Assumptions: Part (1): Progress in life depends. Part (2): a good deal under crossing. Part (3): one threshold after another. Part (4): No error. The common collocation is "depends on", not "depends under". Concept / Approach: In standard English, the verb "depend" is normally followed by the preposition "on" (or sometimes "upon"), not by "under". Phrases like "depends on effort" or "depends on circumstances" are examples of this fixed pattern. The chunk "a good deal under crossing" is therefore wrong because "under" does not collocate with "depends". The rest of the sentence, which uses the metaphor "crossing one threshold after another" to describe progress through life, is grammatically acceptable and coherent. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (1): "Progress in life depends." This is correct so far and prepares for a following prepositional phrase. Step 2: Look at part (2): "a good deal under crossing." The important sequence is "depends a good deal under". Step 3: Recall that the standard expression is "depends a good deal on", not "under". The preposition is wrong here. Step 4: Recognise that the correct phrase should be "depends a good deal on crossing". Step 5: Check part (3): "one threshold after another." This is a clear and correct phrase extending the idea of continuous advancement. Step 6: Therefore, the only error lies in the choice of preposition in part (2). Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence correctly: "Progress in life depends a good deal on crossing one threshold after another." This version reads smoothly and follows the widely used pattern "depends on something". If we kept "under" instead of "on", the phrase "depends under crossing" would not match any recognised English structure. The rest of the sentence does not require modification, confirming that part (2) is the sole source of error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (1) is correctly formed; "Progress in life depends" is a natural starting clause. Part (3) uses the metaphor "one threshold after another" appropriately, so it contains no grammatical problem. Part (4), "No error", is incorrect because there is a clear error in part (2). Thus, none of the other labelled parts can be selected as containing the grammatical mistake. Common Pitfalls: Learners may overlook errors in small function words like prepositions, focusing instead on nouns and verbs. Some may imagine that "under" adds an extra nuance, but in this case it simply breaks the fixed collocation. To avoid such mistakes, it is helpful to memorise common verb preposition pairs such as "depend on", "insist on", "agree with", and "apologise for". Awareness of these patterns makes it easier to spot when an exam question deliberately uses a wrong preposition. Final Answer: The incorrect portion is Part (2), because "under" should be replaced with "on" in the expression "depends a good deal on crossing".

Question 12

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: A learned man may be stupid for he knows only from books and not from his ______.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests vocabulary and understanding of how abstract nouns are used in meaningful sentences. The sentence contrasts knowledge gained from reading with the wisdom that comes from real life. The correct completion should express the idea that true understanding does not arise only from books, but also from what a person lives through. You must choose the option that best completes the contrast in a natural and logical way. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: "A learned man may be stupid for he knows only from books and not from his ______." Option A: experiences. Option B: arbitration. Option C: consequenced. Option D: repercussions. Option E: resentments. We assume standard meanings of all given words. Concept / Approach: The key idea in the sentence is the contrast between book knowledge and practical wisdom. A common and natural phrase is "to learn from one experiences". Real learning often comes from personal successes, failures, and observations. Words like "arbitration", "repercussions", "resentments", or the incorrect form "consequenced" do not fit this contrast. Arbitration refers to dispute settlement, repercussions refers to consequences, and resentments refers to feelings of bitterness. None of these describe the normal, positive source of wisdom that complements book learning. "Experiences" directly expresses the intended idea. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the contrast created by "only from books and not from his". The missing word should name another source of knowledge. Step 2: Consider option A, "experiences". People commonly say that they learn from their experiences, so this fits the context perfectly. Step 3: Consider option B, "arbitration". This refers to a legal or formal process to settle disputes, not a general source of wisdom for an individual. Step 4: Consider option C, "consequenced". This is not a standard noun in English; the correct noun is "consequences", so the option is grammatically wrong. Step 5: Consider option D, "repercussions". Although people experience repercussions, the phrase "knows from his repercussions" is unnatural. Step 6: Consider option E, "resentments", meaning feelings of bitterness. Knowledge does not normally come "from resentments" in a standard expression. Step 7: Conclude that "experiences" is the only option that yields a natural and meaningful sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into the sentence: "A learned man may be stupid for he knows only from books and not from his experiences." This reads smoothly and expresses a widely accepted idea that life experience provides an important form of knowledge. By contrast, "not from his arbitration" or "not from his repercussions" sound forced and do not represent common idiomatic English. This confirms that "experiences" is the correct and intended completion of the sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Arbitration" is wrong because it names a formal process for resolving disputes and does not match the general idea of where a person gains wisdom. "Consequenced" is not a valid noun form and therefore cannot be used grammatically in this position. "Repercussions" is too narrow and negative; it refers to bad consequences rather than the broad learning process of life. "Resentments" relates to emotional bitterness, which also does not function as a natural source of knowledge in this context. None of these options creates a fluent or meaningful sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may be tempted by complex sounding words like "repercussions" or "arbitration", believing that the exam will always prefer the most advanced vocabulary. However, clumsy or unnatural usage of advanced words does not make a sentence correct. The best approach is to read the sentence as a whole and choose the word that fits the meaning and tone, not merely the one that looks sophisticated. In many cases, the simplest and most common word, such as "experiences", is the correct one. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with experiences, giving the complete sentence: "A learned man may be stupid for he knows only from books and not from his experiences."

Question 13

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: Modern India has a secular constitution and ______ itself on being a secular country.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of verb collocations, especially reflexive structures like "pride oneself on". The sentence describes modern India and its secular constitution, so the missing verb must express a positive attitude that India takes toward this feature. Recognising which verb naturally combines with "itself" and with "on being a secular country" is essential for choosing the correct option. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence reads: "Modern India has a secular constitution and ______ itself on being a secular country." Option A: prides. Option B: humiliates. Option C: shy. Option D: disgraces. Option E: condemns. The subject is "Modern India" and the pronoun "itself" refers back to this subject. Concept / Approach: In English, the idiom "pride oneself on something" means to take pride in or feel pleased about a particular quality or achievement. The context here is clearly positive: having a secular constitution and being a secular country are presented as achievements. The other verbs listed are negative in meaning or grammatically unsuitable. "Humiliates itself", "disgraces itself", or "condemns itself" would suggest shame, which contradicts the idea of pride. "Shy" is a noun or adjective and cannot function correctly as a verb in this structure. Therefore, "prides" is the only verb that fits both grammatically and in meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note the reflexive pronoun "itself", which suggests a verb that can be used in reflexive form, such as "prides itself". Step 2: Consider option A, "prides". The phrase "prides itself on being" is a standard and positive collocation. Step 3: Consider option B, "humiliates". The phrase "humiliates itself on being a secular country" would mean India causes shame to itself because it is secular, which does not match the intended positive sense. Step 4: Consider option C, "shy", which is not a suitable finite verb in this structure. We do not say "shy itself on being". Step 5: Consider option D, "disgraces". "Disgraces itself on being a secular country" again gives a negative meaning opposite to what the context expects. Step 6: Consider option E, "condemns". "Condemns itself on being a secular country" also expresses criticism, not pride. Step 7: Conclude that only "prides" produces a correct and meaningful sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Insert the correct option into the sentence: "Modern India has a secular constitution and prides itself on being a secular country." This is a common way of expressing national pride in a constitutional feature. The reflexive construction "prides itself on" clearly signals satisfaction and approval. Substituting any other option results in either grammatical errors or a meaning that clashes with the positive tone of the sentence, confirming that "prides" is the right choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Humiliates" and "disgraces" are wrong because they describe causing shame, which contradicts the idea of being pleased with a constitutional value. "Shy" does not function as a verb here and cannot take "itself" as a reflexive object in this pattern. "Condemns" expresses strong disapproval, so "condemns itself on being a secular country" would mean India strongly criticises itself for being secular, which obviously does not align with the described pride in a secular constitution. Therefore, none of these alternatives fit the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may think that exam setters always prefer complex or negative words and might consider "condemns" or "disgraces" just because they look advanced. Others may miss the importance of the reflexive pronoun "itself" in guiding the choice of verb. The best strategy is to pay attention to the overall tone of the sentence and to recall common idioms like "pride oneself on", "avail oneself of", and "confine oneself to", which frequently appear in exam questions. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with prides, giving the sentence: "Modern India has a secular constitution and prides itself on being a secular country."

Question 14

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: The goal of education should be to help the student to grow physically strong, mentally brilliant, spiritually ______, culturally rich, prosperous, globally peaceful and environment friendly.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence completion question focuses on selecting a word that matches the overall positive and holistic vision of education described in the stem. The list includes qualities such as physical strength, mental brilliance, cultural richness, prosperity, global peace, and environmental friendliness. The missing adjective must describe a desirable spiritual condition that harmonises with the other positive attributes, rather than introducing a negative or aggressive idea. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence lists several goals of education for a student: physically strong, mentally brilliant, spiritually blank, culturally rich, prosperous, globally peaceful, environment friendly. Option A: enlightened. Option B: misleading. Option C: dominating. Option D: hopeful. Option E: confused. We assume that the context praises education as a force for balanced development. Concept / Approach: The phrase "spiritually enlightened" is a common collocation in discussions about education and personal growth. Enlightened suggests wisdom, inner clarity, and an elevated understanding of life. This fits perfectly alongside the other positive adjectives in the series. The remaining options are either negative in meaning or not appropriately tied to spiritual growth. "Misleading" and "confused" suggest error, "dominating" implies control over others rather than inner growth, and "hopeful" is positive but more emotional than spiritual and does not fit as well as "enlightened". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Observe the pattern of adjectives: physically strong, mentally brilliant, spiritually ______, culturally rich, prosperous, globally peaceful, environment friendly. Step 2: Recognise that each adjective describes a desirable quality in a well educated person. Step 3: Consider option A, "enlightened". Spiritual enlightenment is a well known phrase meaning deep inner understanding and wisdom, which fits this context. Step 4: Consider option B, "misleading". This means causing someone to go in the wrong direction, which is clearly negative and does not match a goal of education. Step 5: Consider option C, "dominating". This implies overpowering others and does not sit well with ideals like global peace and environmental friendliness. Step 6: Consider option D, "hopeful". Although positive, it refers more to emotional expectation and is less precise than "enlightened" in describing spiritual development. Step 7: Consider option E, "confused", which is clearly negative and does not belong among positive outcomes of education. Step 8: Conclude that "enlightened" is the only option that perfectly aligns with spiritual growth and the tone of the list. Verification / Alternative check: Insert "enlightened" into the sentence: "The goal of education should be to help the student to grow physically strong, mentally brilliant, spiritually enlightened, culturally rich, prosperous, globally peaceful and environment friendly." The sentence now reads smoothly and reflects many educational philosophies that connect learning with moral and spiritual development. If we try "spiritually dominating" or "spiritually confused", the sentence becomes either aggressive or negative, which conflicts with the surrounding adjectives. This confirms that "enlightened" is the intended choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Misleading" and "confused" describe states of error or lack of clarity, which contradict the idea that education leads to wisdom. "Dominating" suggests controlling others, which does not match with being globally peaceful and environmentally conscious. "Hopeful" is positive but vague; it does not specifically capture a spiritual state, and the collocation "spiritually hopeful" is less natural than "spiritually enlightened". Therefore, these alternatives do not provide the precise meaning required here. Common Pitfalls: Some students may choose "hopeful" simply because it is a positive word, without considering whether it specifically fits the spiritual context. Others may overlook the harmony among all adjectives in the list and pick an option at random. To avoid such mistakes, always consider the broader sentence structure and the tone of surrounding words. Recognising fixed phrases like "spiritually enlightened" is also very helpful in vocabulary based questions. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with enlightened, completing the phrase "spiritually enlightened".

Question 15

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: Vivekananda dared to attempt to ______ all that was rotting in Indian society and to enrich and learn from all that was noble.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your vocabulary and understanding of how word meanings interact with context. The sentence refers to Vivekananda and his efforts concerning what was "rotting in Indian society". The verb in the blank must fit with the idea of dealing with decayed or corrupt elements, and it must contrast with the later aim "to enrich and learn from all that was noble". The correct choice should convey the sense of reforming or renewing, not creating, sustaining, or ignoring what is rotten. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: "Vivekananda dared to attempt to ______ all that was rotting in Indian society and to enrich and learn from all that was noble." Option A: create. Option B: sustain. Option C: derive. Option D: revamp. Option E: neglect. We assume the phrase "rotting in Indian society" is metaphorical for decayed customs or harmful practices. Concept / Approach: The key idea is that Vivekananda was a reformer who wanted to remove or improve decayed social practices. The verb "revamp" means to renovate, improve, or give a new and better form to something that is old or defective. This fits perfectly with the phrase "all that was rotting". "Create" would mean to bring rotten elements into existence, which is illogical. "Sustain" would mean to keep rotten practices alive, which contradicts his reforming role. "Derive" does not logically apply to rotten practices in this way. "Neglect" would mean simply ignoring them, rather than actively confronting and changing them. Therefore, "revamp" is the only verb that matches the context and meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the metaphor "rotting in Indian society", which suggests harmful or decayed customs and beliefs. Step 2: Understand the structure "attempt to ______ all that was rotting" and that Vivekananda is presented as a bold reformer. Step 3: Consider option D, "revamp". Revamping rotten practices means reforming and renewing them, which fits well with daring social reform. Step 4: Examine option A, "create". It would give the strange meaning that he created what was rotting, which opposes the idea of reform. Step 5: Examine option B, "sustain". Maintaining rotten elements is the opposite of what a reformer like Vivekananda would do. Step 6: Examine option C, "derive". The phrase "derive all that was rotting" does not form a meaningful or idiomatic expression. Step 7: Examine option E, "neglect". Ignoring rotten aspects does not match the phrase "dared to attempt", which signals active engagement. Step 8: Conclude that "revamp" is the only suitable and meaningful option. Verification / Alternative check: Insert "revamp" into the sentence: "Vivekananda dared to attempt to revamp all that was rotting in Indian society and to enrich and learn from all that was noble." This produces a coherent and powerful statement about his mission. It shows that he wanted to reform decayed customs while appreciating noble traditions. Trying any other option makes the sentence either logically inconsistent or grammatically awkward. For example, "attempt to sustain all that was rotting" clearly contradicts the implied moral judgement, confirming that "revamp" is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Create" is wrong because it suggests producing rotten things rather than correcting them. "Sustain" is wrong because it means keeping something in existence, so sustaining rotten elements would be negative. "Derive" is wrong because it does not fit grammatically or logically with the idea of rotten customs. "Neglect" is wrong because someone who merely neglects problems is not a bold reformer. Thus, none of these verbs accurately describe Vivekananda role as presented in the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may confuse "revamp" with more basic verbs like "create" or "sustain" if they are unfamiliar with the word. Others might think "neglect" is appropriate because people often ignore problems, but the sentence clearly emphasises courage and active effort, indicated by "dared to attempt". To improve performance on such questions, it helps to learn reform related vocabulary such as "revamp", "reform", "renew", and "overhaul" along with their typical contexts. Final Answer: The correct word is revamp, completing the sentence as "attempt to revamp all that was rotting in Indian society".

Question 16

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: Education is not just for giving you livelihood but giving you the art of ______ wholly and joyously.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence completion question tests your ability to understand collocations and the broader meaning of a statement about education. The sentence contrasts earning a livelihood with something deeper that education should provide. The phrase "the art of" is commonly followed by a gerund that captures a skill or way of life, such as "the art of living". The correct option must express the idea that education teaches more than just survival; it also teaches how to live in a fulfilling way. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: "Education is not just for giving you livelihood but giving you the art of ______ wholly and joyously." Option A: living. Option B: leaving. Option C: believing. Option D: driving. Option E: spending. We assume that the statement is idealistic and philosophical, praising education as a guide to life. Concept / Approach: The phrase "the art of living" is a well known expression that refers to the skill of living life well, with balance and joy. It fits perfectly with "wholly and joyously", which describes a complete and happy way of life. "Leaving" means going away, and "the art of leaving wholly and joyously" does not make sense. "Believing" refers to faith; while positive, it does not match the structure as closely as "living". "Driving" and "spending" focus on specific activities, not on life as a whole. Therefore, "living" is the natural and idiomatic choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the structure "the art of ______ wholly and joyously", which suggests a broad and positive activity. Step 2: Option A, "living", produces the phrase "the art of living wholly and joyously", which is a familiar and meaningful expression. Step 3: Option B, "leaving", would yield "the art of leaving wholly and joyously", which sounds odd and does not align with the idea of education as a guide to life. Step 4: Option C, "believing", gives "the art of believing wholly and joyously". Although belief can be strong, this phrase is not as standard or directly linked to the idea of living life well. Step 5: Option D, "driving", is too narrow and practical; education is not mainly about the art of driving. Step 6: Option E, "spending", would give "the art of spending wholly and joyously", which has no clear meaning in this philosophical context. Step 7: Conclude that "living" is the only option that makes the sentence meaningful and idiomatic. Verification / Alternative check: Insert "living" into the sentence: "Education is not just for giving you livelihood but giving you the art of living wholly and joyously." This sounds like a typical line from an educational or motivational talk. It emphasises that education should shape character and lifestyle, not only employment. Replacing "living" with any of the other options either results in a strange expression or changes the meaning away from this central idea. Hence, "living" is clearly the intended word. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Leaving" suggests going away or departing and does not capture an ongoing way of life. "Believing" is more about faith or conviction, and the phrase "art of believing" is not commonly used in discussions about the aims of education. "Driving" is a specific skill that does not match the universal scope suggested by "wholly and joyously". "Spending" usually relates to money or time and does not fit the philosophical tone. Consequently, none of the other options produce a natural or meaningful sentence here. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may be distracted by rhyming or visually similar words like "leaving" and "living", especially when reading quickly. Others might pick "believing" because it sounds abstract and positive. The best approach is to consider the usual collocations you have seen in reading, such as "art of living", and to check whether the whole sentence maintains a coherent, positive message about education. Doing so leads directly to the correct option. Final Answer: The correct completion is living, giving the phrase "the art of living wholly and joyously".

Question 17

In the following error spotting sentence, identify which part contains a grammatical mistake: She was (1) quite amusing (2) at that story. (3) No error (4).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question focuses on the difference between adjectives that describe how someone feels and adjectives that describe the effect someone or something has on others. Words like "amused" and "amusing" are often confused by learners, and exam setters use this confusion to create questions. Your task is to determine which part of the sentence is wrong, or to confirm that the sentence has no error. Given Data / Assumptions: Part (1): She was. Part (2): quite amusing. Part (3): at that story. Part (4): No error. The sentence aims to describe her reaction to a story. Concept / Approach: The adjective "amusing" describes something that causes amusement in others, such as "an amusing story" or "an amusing person". The adjective "amused" describes how someone feels when they find something funny. Here, the sentence structure "She was ... at that story" shows that she has a reaction to the story. Therefore, we need the feeling adjective "amused", not the effect adjective "amusing". The prepositional phrase "at that story" is acceptable, though "by that story" is also possible. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Look at part (1): "She was". This is a normal subject plus verb link and contains no error. Step 2: Examine part (2): "quite amusing". Combined with "She was", this means she caused amusement, which is not what the following phrase suggests. Step 3: Note that part (3) says "at that story", indicating that the story is the cause and she is the one reacting. Step 4: Recognise that to describe her reaction to the story, we should use "amused" and not "amusing". Step 5: The correct sentence should read "She was quite amused at that story." Step 6: Since the only inappropriate word is in part (2), that part must contain the error. Verification / Alternative check: Consider both versions: "She was quite amusing at that story" and "She was quite amused at that story." The first suggests that she herself was funny while telling or reacting to the story, but the grammatical pattern "amusing at that story" is unnatural. The second clearly states that the story made her feel amused, which fits the structure with the preposition "at". Exam usage typically aims at testing the amused versus amusing distinction, so "amused" is the right correction. This confirms that part (2) is wrong. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (1) is simple and correct; "She was" is a standard opening clause. Part (3) "at that story" is acceptable because you can say "amused at that story" or "amused by that story". Part (4), "No error", cannot be chosen because we have already identified a clear adjective error. Therefore, parts (1), (3), and (4) are not the source of the grammatical problem. Common Pitfalls: Learners often confuse pairs like "amused/amusing", "bored/boring", and "excited/exciting". A useful rule of thumb is that adjectives ending in "ing" generally describe the cause of a feeling (for example, a boring lecture), while adjectives ending in "ed" describe the person who experiences the feeling (for example, the students were bored). Remembering this distinction will help you answer many similar questions correctly. Final Answer: The incorrect portion is Part (2), where "amusing" should be replaced by "amused".

Question 18

In the following sentence about parliamentary procedure, identify which part contains a grammatical error: Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, (1) and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha, (2) where it can be deliberated u…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question deals with language used to describe the procedure for money bills in the Indian Parliament. While the content is factual, the exam focuses on correct English usage, spelling, and word spacing. The sentence is split into numbered parts, and you must identify which part contains a grammatical or lexical error, or conclude that there is no error. Here, special attention is needed for the expression that refers to the time period for deliberation. Given Data / Assumptions: Part (1): Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, Part (2): and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha, Part (3): where it can be deliberated upon for upto 14 days. Part (4): No error. The phrase "upto" appears in part (3). Standard written English separates "up to" into two words. Concept / Approach: In formal English, the correct spelling is "up to" as two separate words, not "upto" as a single word. Official documents and standard grammar references treat "up to" as a prepositional phrase indicating a limit of quantity, time, or degree. Thus, "for up to 14 days" is correct, whereas "for upto 14 days" is incorrect. The rest of the sentence uses present simple passive forms appropriately to describe a general constitutional procedure, and its structure is acceptable for exam purposes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read part (1): "Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha," which correctly describes where such bills originate. Step 2: Read part (2): "and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha," which is grammatically acceptable and logically follows from part (1). Step 3: Read part (3): "where it can be deliberated upon for upto 14 days." The problematic phrase is "for upto 14 days". Step 4: Recall that the accepted spelling in standard English is "up to", two words, not one. Step 5: Recognise that the sentence should read "for up to 14 days" to be correct. Step 6: Verify that there are no other grammatical errors in part (3); the rest of the clause is acceptable in exam style. Step 7: Conclude that the error lies in part (3). Verification / Alternative check: Consider the corrected sentence: "Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha, where it can be deliberated upon for up to 14 days." This version now uses standard English spelling. The phrase "for up to 14 days" is commonly found in legal, academic, and journalistic writing. The present simple "can only be introduced" and "are sent" correctly describe ongoing constitutional rules, so they do not require change. This confirms that the only clear error is the spelling of "up to" in part (3). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (1) correctly expresses the rule that money bills can only originate in the Lok Sabha. Part (2) correctly describes their being sent to the Rajya Sabha after being passed. Although some might debate minor stylistic choices, there is no clear grammatical mistake in these segments. Part (4), "No error", is incorrect, because the spelling error in part (3) must be acknowledged. Therefore, none of the other parts should be marked as containing the error. Common Pitfalls: Many learners and even some informal writers incorrectly join "up to" into a single word "upto", especially in digital communication. Because of this habit, exam candidates may overlook the mistake when reading quickly. To avoid this error, remember that in standard written English, "up to" is always two separate words. Developing the habit of noticing such small spelling and spacing issues will help you score better on error spotting questions. Final Answer: The incorrect segment is Part (3), where "upto" should be written as "up to".

Question 19

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: I ______ not attend the party.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of auxiliary verbs and sentence structure. The sentence "I ______ not attend the party" already contains "not attend", which clearly marks a negative statement in the simple future. Therefore, the blank must be filled with a suitable modal auxiliary that correctly combines with "not attend". The correct choice must produce a natural and grammatically complete sentence, matching the level of formality and style usually expected in exam English. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: "I ______ not attend the party." Option A: probably be. Option B: will be. Option C: won’t. Option D: shall. Option E: must. We assume the sentence is intended as a simple statement of refusal or decision about future attendance. Concept / Approach: In standard English, a sentence like "I shall not attend the party" or "I will not attend the party" is formed by placing a modal auxiliary before "not" and then the base verb "attend". In this question, the blank appears immediately before "not", so the auxiliary used must not already contain the negative "not"."Shall" is a suitable auxiliary in formal style and fits the structure "I shall not attend". Options that contain "be" or contracted forms like "won’t" do not fit directly before "not attend" without creating double negatives or incorrect verb chains. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the structure is "I [auxiliary] not attend the party". The auxiliary goes into the blank. Step 2: Consider option D, "shall". Placing it in the blank yields "I shall not attend the party", which is grammatically correct and clear. Step 3: Examine option C, "won’t". If we insert it, we get "I won’t not attend the party", which is a double negative and completely changes the meaning. Step 4: Examine option B, "will be". This would produce "I will be not attend the party", which is ungrammatical because "be" is unnecessary and the verb form is wrong. Step 5: Examine option A, "probably be", which does not function as a modal auxiliary and gives "I probably be not attend", an incorrect structure. Step 6: Examine option E, "must". "I must not attend the party" is grammatically correct but significantly changes the meaning to a strong prohibition, and the exam stem usually aims at simple future intention with "shall" or "will". Step 7: Conclude that "shall" is the best and most appropriate completion for a simple, neutral refusal. Verification / Alternative check: Read the full corrected sentence: "I shall not attend the party." This is a standard way to express a decision about future attendance in a slightly formal register. It matches the pattern used in many textbooks and exams. While "I will not attend the party" would also be correct, there is no option containing just "will", and "will be" does not fit. Therefore, the only option that keeps the sentence simple and grammatically correct is "shall". Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Probably be" fails because "probably" is an adverb and "be" would need a different construction, such as "I will probably not attend", which is not offered. "Will be" is wrong because "will be not attend" does not match any standard English pattern. "Won’t" already contains the negative and cannot be followed by "not attend" without creating a double negative sense. "Must" is grammatically possible but implies compulsion or prohibition rather than the straightforward intention that exam setters typically test here, making "shall" the more appropriate answer in this context. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes get confused by contracted forms like "won’t" and forget that they already include "not". Others may not notice how adding "be" mis-structures the verb phrase. When answering similar questions, it helps to mentally expand contractions and to recall basic future tense patterns: "I shall not attend" or "I will not attend". Doing this quickly reveals which options fit and which do not. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with shall, giving the correct sentence "I shall not attend the party."

Question 20

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: Happy thoughts release hormones that work for our well being and negative thoughts release hormones that make us ______.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence completion question checks your ability to follow logical meaning in a contrast structure. The sentence compares the effects of happy thoughts and negative thoughts on the body. Happy thoughts release hormones that support well being, so negative thoughts must logically produce the opposite effect. The word you choose should describe a negative condition, not another positive feeling, and it should fit naturally after "make us". Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: "Happy thoughts release hormones that work for our well being and negative thoughts release hormones that make us ______." Option A: ill. Option B: happy. Option C: excited. Option D: rejuvenated. Option E: curious. The structure sets up a clear positive versus negative contrast. Concept / Approach: The first clause states that happy thoughts help our well being, which is clearly positive. The second clause begins with "and negative thoughts", signalling that the second effect should be negative. The hormones released by negative thoughts are implied to have an unhealthy impact. Thus, "ill" is the natural choice because it describes poor health. "Happy", "excited", "rejuvenated", and "curious" are positive or neutral states and would contradict the intended contrast. Therefore, the best completion is "ill". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Notice the parallel: happy thoughts (positive) versus negative thoughts (negative). Step 2: Recognise that the first part mentions hormones that work for our well being, which indicates improved health or mood. Step 3: Expect the second part to show harmful effects from negative thoughts. Step 4: Test option A, "ill". The phrase "make us ill" is natural and matches the idea that negative thoughts harm our health. Step 5: Test option B, "happy", which would contradict the idea that negative thoughts produce bad results. Step 6: Test option C, "excited", which is a generally positive emotional state and not the likely outcome of negative thoughts. Step 7: Test option D, "rejuvenated", which means refreshed and more energetic, again a positive state that mismatches the context. Step 8: Test option E, "curious". Negative thoughts usually do not make people curious; they lead to stress or sadness, not interest. Step 9: Conclude that "ill" is the only option that completes the contrast correctly. Verification / Alternative check: Insert "ill" into the full sentence: "Happy thoughts release hormones that work for our well being and negative thoughts release hormones that make us ill." This version clearly expresses the idea that thinking patterns affect physical health. It is consistent with common psychological and medical discussions, where negative thinking is linked to stress and illness. Substituting any of the other options leads to an illogical or contradictory statement, which confirms that "ill" is the intended answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Happy" and "rejuvenated" are strongly positive words and cannot follow "negative thoughts release hormones that make us" without contradicting common sense. "Excited" usually describes a positive or at least high energy emotion, which does not clearly link to negative thinking and health problems. "Curious" relates to interest in learning or discovering, and it has no direct connection with hormones produced by negative thoughts. None of these options support the sentence logic or the health based contrast the author is creating. Common Pitfalls: A few candidates may rush through the question and focus only on whether the word grammatically fits after "make us", ignoring the meaning. Others may try to over interpret the sentence and imagine unusual psychological effects. The safest strategy is to look at the positive negative pattern and choose a word that is clearly opposite in effect to "well being". Doing so naturally leads to "ill", which is both simple and correct. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with ill, giving the sentence: "negative thoughts release hormones that make us ill."

English Questions