Question 1

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word OMINOUS.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a vocabulary question that tests your knowledge of synonyms. The given word is ominous, which appears frequently in newspapers, novels and exam passages. Selecting the correct synonym requires that you recall or infer the typical situations in which ominous is used, and then choose the option that matches that meaning as closely as possible. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: OMINOUS. - Options: OFFICIOUS, PLEASANT, CONVENIENT, THREATENING. - Exactly one option should closely match the meaning of ominous. Concept / Approach: The word ominous is associated with bad signs, dark hints and the feeling that something harmful or unpleasant is about to happen. Headlines may speak of ominous clouds before a storm or ominous signs in the economy before a crisis. Therefore, the correct synonym should carry a sense of danger, warning, or threat. Words that suggest comfort, helpfulness or ease will not match this negative predictive meaning. By focusing on such context clues, we can narrow down the choices effectively. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that ominous is linked to omens and usually refers to a sign that something bad will happen. Step 2: Consider OFFICIOUS. Officious refers to a person who is too eager to offer unwanted help or advice. It does not carry the sense of danger or bad omen. Step 3: Consider PLEASANT. Pleasant means enjoyable or agreeable, which is the opposite of the dark and worrying feeling created by something ominous. Step 4: Consider CONVENIENT. Convenient means handy or easy to use or do, which is again neutral or positive, not threatening. Step 5: Consider THREATENING. Threatening means showing a threat, giving the impression that something bad or harmful is likely to happen. This aligns very closely with ominous. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify the choice by placing each option in a typical sentence. For example, ominous clouds gathered over the city can be rewritten as threatening clouds gathered over the city without changing the meaning. However, pleasant clouds or convenient clouds would sound odd, and officious clouds would be meaningless. Similarly, ominous silence can be restated as threatening silence, but not as convenient or pleasant silence. This consistency across contexts confirms that threatening is the best synonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Officious is wrong because it relates to overhelpful or interfering behaviour, not to predictions of danger. Pleasant is wrong because it conveys a positive and enjoyable feeling, the opposite of the negative mood created by ominous. Convenient is wrong because it relates to ease or suitability and has no connection with bad omens or danger. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may guess based on sound, because ominous somewhat resembles words like anonymous or unanimous, but this is misleading. Others may be unsure about officious and pick it simply because it looks formal. To avoid such errors, focus on meaning and remember typical collocations you have seen in reading. Words like ominous sign, ominous tone and ominous silence always indicate something bad is coming, so the memory of these phrases should automatically point you toward threatening as the correct choice. Final Answer: The word that best expresses the meaning of OMINOUS is THREATENING.

Question 2

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, choose the word which is opposite in meaning to the given word OBSTINATE.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question focuses on antonyms, that is, words with opposite meanings. The given word is obstinate, which describes a certain type of personality or behaviour. To answer correctly, you must know what obstinate means and then select the option that expresses the opposite quality. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: OBSTINATE. - Options: DOCILE, AGGRAVATE, OFFENSIVE, OPPRESSIVE. - One option must be opposite in meaning to obstinate. Concept / Approach: Obstinate usually describes someone who stubbornly refuses to change opinions or behaviour, even when given good reasons. Such a person is rigid, hard to convince, and does not listen easily. The opposite quality would be a person who is gentle, easily guided or willing to be taught and managed. Therefore, we are looking for a word that captures the meaning of easily managed or submissive, not words that describe actions or unrelated qualities. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define obstinate as stubborn, unyielding or difficult to persuade. Step 2: Examine DOCILE. Docile means easily taught, gentle and ready to accept instruction. This is the opposite of stubborn and unyielding. Step 3: Examine AGGRAVATE. Aggravate means to make something worse or to irritate, which has nothing to do with being stubborn or gentle. Step 4: Examine OFFENSIVE. Offensive means causing anger, hurt or disgust. It is about how behaviour affects others, not about how flexible or stubborn a person is. Step 5: Examine OPPRESSIVE. Oppressive means harsh, cruel or unbearably heavy. Again, this describes conditions or regimes, not the opposite of personal stubbornness. Verification / Alternative check: Think of simple example sentences. An obstinate child refuses to listen, while a docile child listens and obeys without resistance. Replacing obstinate with docile reverses the sense. If you try to use aggravate or offensive in the same structure, you do not get an opposite meaning, and sentences become awkward or unrelated. This confirms that docile is the correct antonym of obstinate among the options provided. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Aggravate is wrong because it relates to making situations worse or causing irritation, not to the flexibility of a person. Offensive is wrong because it describes behaviour that hurts or insults others and does not form a meaning pair with obstinate. Oppressive is wrong because it describes harsh conditions or regimes and is not the opposite of stubbornness. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose words that sound serious or negative without checking whether they are true antonyms. In antonym questions, it is vital to restate the core meaning of the target word in simple terms. If you remember that obstinate means very stubborn, you can easily match it with docile, which is gentle and easy to manage. Building mental pairs like stubborn and docile, courageous and cowardly, generous and stingy helps you answer such questions quickly in competitive exams. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to OBSTINATE is DOCILE.

Question 3

Four spellings of the same word are given below. Only one of them is correct in standard English. Carefully read each option and choose the correctly spelt word for the noun that means kindness and goodwill, usually written as benevolence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question tests your familiarity with the correct written form of a common English noun that means kindness, generosity and goodwill. The word is pronounced in a way that may confuse learners about where to place vowels, especially the sequence around the letters l and e. You need to identify which option matches the standard dictionary spelling of the word benevolence. Given Data / Assumptions: - The intended word is a noun meaning kindness or goodwill. - Four candidate spellings are provided: Benevolens, Benevolene, Benevolence, Benevelence. - Only one spelling is correct in standard written English. Concept / Approach: Words ending in ence and ance are often confusing because they sound similar in speech. However, many common words have fixed, well known patterns. Benevolence is formed from benevolent plus the noun ending ence. The correct order of letters is benevolence, with the sequence o l e n c e at the end. A systematic approach is to look for this known pattern and reject options that insert letters incorrectly or change the vowel order. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the related adjective benevolent, which is correctly spelt b e n e v o l e n t. Step 2: Form the noun by replacing the final t with ce, resulting in benevolence, spelt b e n e v o l e n c e. Step 3: Look at option A, Benevolens. This ends with e n s instead of e n c e and is therefore incorrect. Step 4: Look at option B, Benevolene. This incorrectly ends with e n e and does not use the standard noun ending ence. Step 5: Look at option C, Benevolence, which correctly preserves the letters from benevolent and adds the standard noun ending ence. Step 6: Look at option D, Benevelence, where the order of vowels e and o is disturbed, producing vele instead of vole. Verification / Alternative check: A quick way to verify is to think of similar words, such as violence, silence and excellence, all of which end in ence. The rhythm and spelling pattern of benevolence matches these examples. Checking a mental picture of the word as seen in books or articles also helps. Benevolence appears frequently in phrases like an act of benevolence or a gesture of benevolence. Among the given options, only Benevolence looks and feels like such familiar uses, confirming it as the correct spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Benevolens is wrong because the ending e n s does not form a standard abstract noun and does not match common usage. Benevolene is wrong because the final e n e ending is not correct for this word and is not found in dictionaries. Benevelence is wrong because it misplaces the vowels, creating vele instead of vole and breaking the connection with benevolent. Common Pitfalls: Learners often confuse the order of vowels in complex words, especially when the pronunciation does not clearly show each letter. Another common mistake is to misremember suffixes like ence, ance, ent and ant. To avoid such errors, whenever you learn an adjective like benevolent, also learn the related noun benevolence and practice writing both together. Building groups of related words and noticing how suffixes change across them strengthens your spelling skills and improves your performance in such questions. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Benevolence.

Question 4

In the following question, some statements and conclusions based on them are given. Read the statements carefully and, assuming them to be true, decide which of the given conclusions logically follows. Statements: I. All rackets are bats. II. All ba…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a classic syllogism question often seen in logical reasoning sections of competitive exams. You are given two statements, also called premises, and two possible conclusions. Your job is to assume that the statements are absolutely true, even if they seem strange in real life, and then determine which conclusion or conclusions must logically follow from those statements. Given Data / Assumptions: - Statement I: All rackets are bats. - Statement II: All bats are wickets. - Conclusion I: Some wickets are rackets. - Conclusion II: All wickets are rackets. - We must accept the statements as true and judge the conclusions only on logical structure. Concept / Approach: Syllogism problems usually involve set relations such as all, some and no. From All A are B and All B are C, we can infer that All A are C. However, we cannot automatically claim anything about all of C from A. Here, we can symbolise rackets as R, bats as B and wickets as W. Statement I says all R are B. Statement II says all B are W. From this we get all R are W. Once we know that, we can check which conclusions are guaranteed to be true: that some W are R and that all W are R. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Draw the basic relation in mind. All rackets are inside the set of bats, and the set of bats lies inside the set of wickets. Step 2: From this nesting, it follows that every racket is also a wicket, because every racket is a bat and every bat is a wicket. Step 3: If all rackets are wickets, and there is at least one racket in the universe of discourse, then there is at least one object that is both a racket and a wicket. Therefore, some wickets are rackets is logically true and conclusion I follows. Step 4: Check conclusion II, which states that all wickets are rackets. This would mean that the set of wickets is fully inside the set of rackets, but the statements never say that. They only say that rackets go into bats and bats into wickets, not that all wickets come back into rackets. Step 5: It is possible that there are many wickets that are not bats and therefore not rackets. Since a possible diagram exists where some wickets are not rackets, conclusion II does not follow with necessity. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a simple example. Suppose there are 10 rackets, all of which are bats, and all those bats are wickets. In addition, there are 90 more wickets that are neither bats nor rackets. In this situation, statement I and statement II are both true. Conclusion I is true because some of the wickets, namely the 10 that are also rackets, are indeed rackets. However, conclusion II, which claims that all wickets are rackets, is clearly false because the extra 90 wickets are not rackets. Since we have found a case where the statements are true but conclusion II is false, conclusion II does not logically follow. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B is wrong because conclusion II alone does not follow, as explained above. Option C is wrong because conclusion I definitely follows from the given statements. Option D is wrong because it claims that both conclusions follow, but conclusion II fails in some possible cases. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse the direction of statements and assume that if all rackets are bats and all bats are wickets, then all wickets must be rackets. This is the fallacy of taking the converse of a statement. Another pitfall is ignoring the possibility of extra elements in the larger set of wickets. Good practice when solving syllogism questions is to draw simple Venn diagrams or imagine nested sets, and to test whether a conclusion must always be true or can fail in at least one possible arrangement. Final Answer: Only conclusion I follows, so the correct option is “Only conclusion I follows.”

Question 5

In the following sentence, some part may have an error. The sentence is divided into four numbered parts. Find out which part contains an error and select the correct option. If the sentence is free from error, select the “No Error” option. The Tata…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Error spotting questions test your understanding of grammar and proper sentence structure in English. In this question, the sentence describes the Tata group and the industries it owns. The sentence is broken into parts so that you can examine each segment and decide which part contains a grammatical or usage error, or whether the sentence is entirely correct. Given Data / Assumptions: - Full sentence divided as: (1) The Tata group owns (2) many industries, that are spread (3) across the globe. (4) No Error. - We need to locate the part that contains an error in standard written English. Concept / Approach: The key concept here is the correct use of relative clauses and punctuation. In English, a defining relative clause that identifies which industries we are talking about usually does not take a comma before that. If we insert a comma, we normally use which instead of that to begin a non defining relative clause. Therefore, the phrase many industries, that are spread is incorrect because it mixes a comma with that, which is not standard usage. The rest of the sentence is grammatically sound. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part 1, The Tata group owns. This is a correct beginning with subject and verb properly placed. Step 2: Examine part 2, many industries, that are spread. This introduces additional information about the industries. However, the comma before that is problematic. Step 3: In a defining clause where the information is essential, the standard structure is many industries that are spread across the globe, without any comma. Step 4: Alternatively, if we keep the comma, we should replace that with which: many industries, which are spread across the globe. The current combination is therefore incorrect. Step 5: Examine part 3, across the globe. This phrase correctly completes the information about where the industries are spread. Step 6: Since the only definite error appears in part 2, that is the segment we must choose. Verification / Alternative check: Rewriting the sentence in correct English helps to verify the choice. One correct version is The Tata group owns many industries that are spread across the globe. Another correct version is The Tata group owns many industries, which are spread across the globe. Both versions are acceptable, but they either remove the comma or change that to which. The original wording many industries, that are spread breaks this rule, so identifying part 2 as the error is justified. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 1, The Tata group owns, is correct and forms a proper subject verb unit. Part 3, across the globe, is correct and complete in itself. Part 4, No Error, is wrong because the sentence as given does contain an error in part 2 and is not fully correct. Common Pitfalls: Many learners hardly notice the fine distinction between defining and non defining relative clauses and focus only on obvious errors like tense or agreement. Examiners often test these subtle punctuation and pronoun rules to differentiate between careful and careless readers. To avoid such mistakes, remember that a comma plus that in this position is usually wrong, and that non defining clauses normally begin with which, not that. Reading good quality English texts and paying attention to such patterns will improve your ability to spot similar errors quickly. Final Answer: The error is in the part many industries, that are spread, which should be corrected to many industries that are spread or many industries, which are spread.

Question 6

In the following sentence, some part may have an error. The sentence is divided into four numbered parts. Find out which part contains an error and select the correct option. If the sentence is free from error, select the “No Error” option. She has …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the error spotting section of English grammar. It checks whether you can recognise incorrect collocations and adverb usage in a simple sentence about visiting a restaurant. The sentence is divided into parts so that you can analyse each portion and identify which segment is not acceptable in standard English or confirm that there is no error. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence parts: (1) She has not been (2) to the restaurant (3) much late. (4) No Error. - We are looking for a grammatical or usage error. Concept / Approach: The main point in this question is correct adverb usage with time expressions. In English, we do not generally say much late in this context. Instead, we talk about not having been to a place lately or recently, or about arriving somewhere late. The phrase has not been to the restaurant lately would be natural. Therefore, the error lies in the phrase much late in part 3, which is not idiomatic in this structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Look at part 1, She has not been. This is a correct use of the present perfect tense, indicating that up to the present time she has not gone somewhere. Step 2: Look at part 2, to the restaurant. This correctly states the destination and fits with has not been. Step 3: Look at part 3, much late. The combination has not been to the restaurant much late is not standard. If we speak about visiting a place in recent times, we use lately or recently, not much late. Step 4: A correct version would be She has not been to the restaurant lately, or She has not been going to the restaurant much lately. Step 5: Since part 3 clearly contains the wrong expression, it is the segment with the error. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence with a correct adverb and see how it sounds. She has not been to the restaurant lately is a natural and commonly used sentence. You could also say She has not been to the restaurant for a long time. In both versions, the structure flows smoothly, unlike the awkward original version. Because the rest of the sentence is fine, this confirms that the wrong phrase is much late in part 3. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 1 is correct because has not been correctly introduces the idea of an action not done up to now. Part 2 is correct because to the restaurant correctly states the place she has not visited. Part 4, No Error, is wrong because the sentence as written does contain an error in part 3. Common Pitfalls: Learners who think directly in their mother tongue may attempt a literal translation and produce unusual phrases like much late. Another common pitfall is to overlook collocation errors because the sentence seems grammatically complete at first glance. To improve, you should learn and practice common time adverbs and their typical uses, such as lately, recently, often, rarely and so on. Regular exposure to authentic English sentences in reading materials will strengthen your sense of what sounds natural and what does not. Final Answer: The error is in the part much late., which should be replaced by an expression like lately or recently.

Question 7

In the following sentence, a blank is given which must be filled with the most appropriate word. Select the correct alternative out of the four given options. He could excel in his board exams only after _____ very hard.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Fill in the blank questions check whether you can choose the most suitable word so that the sentence expresses a clear and natural meaning. Here, the sentence describes a student who did well in board exams only after putting in a certain kind of effort. The correct answer must fit both grammatically and in terms of sense, showing the type of hard work needed for success. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: He could excel in his board exams only after _____ very hard. - Options: continuing, functioning, learning, toiling. - The blank comes before very hard and must combine naturally with it. Concept / Approach: The phrase very hard suggests intense effort or labour. We often use verbs like work, study or toil with this adverbial phrase. The word toil is a verb that means to work very hard, especially over a long period. The present participle toiling is therefore an excellent fit before very hard. Other options like continuing, functioning and learning do not collocate naturally with very hard in this context. They either have different meanings or would require different sentence structures. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the context. Excelling in board exams typically requires a lot of hard work and sustained study. Step 2: Consider continuing. To say continuing very hard does not sound natural. Continuing needs an object or complement, such as continuing his studies. Step 3: Consider functioning. Functioning very hard is not a natural expression in English. We usually say functioning normally or functioning properly, not functioning hard. Step 4: Consider learning. Learning very hard is also not a standard phrase. We talk about studying hard or working hard, but learning hard sounds odd. Step 5: Consider toiling. Toiling very hard is meaningful and emphasises hard and often tiring work, which matches the context of exam preparation. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into the sentence and check the result. He could excel in his board exams only after continuing very hard sounds incorrect. The same is true for functioning very hard and learning very hard. However, He could excel in his board exams only after toiling very hard strongly conveys that he worked extremely hard to achieve that success. The meaning and grammar both fit correctly, confirming that toiling is the appropriate choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Continuing is wrong because it needs an object or phrase after it and does not combine well with very hard alone in this structure. Functioning is wrong because it is used for operating or working in a mechanical or organisational sense, not for studying or working hard for exams. Learning is wrong because the English phrase is to study hard rather than to learn hard, so the collocation is unnatural. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose words that generally relate to study, like learning, without checking whether the exact phrase is idiomatic. Collocations matter a lot in English. Words like work, toil and study collocate naturally with hard or very hard, while words like function or learn do not. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to read widely in English and notice which verbs frequently appear with common adverbs and expressions, especially around work and study. Final Answer: The sentence is correctly completed as: He could excel in his board exams only after toiling very hard.

Question 8

In the following sentence, a blank is given which must be filled with the most appropriate verb form. Select the correct alternative out of the four given options. He _____ his camera on the table.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of commonly confused verb forms, particularly the verbs lay and lie. Many learners mix up these verbs because their forms look similar. The sentence describes an action of putting an object, namely a camera, on a table. You need to select the correct past tense form that matches this action. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: He _____ his camera on the table. - Options: laid, lain, lay, lie. - The sentence clearly refers to past time and involves an object, the camera, which is being placed somewhere. Concept / Approach: The key is to remember that lay is a transitive verb, which means it takes a direct object, and its past tense is laid. The base form lie, meaning to recline, is intransitive and does not take a direct object, and its past tense is lay and past participle is lain. Because the sentence has a direct object, his camera, we must choose a form of lay in the sense of put or place. Among the options, laid is the correct past tense of this transitive verb. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that his camera is the object of the verb, so the verb must be transitive. Step 2: Recall that lay (to put or place something) takes an object and has the forms lay, laid, laid. Step 3: Recall that lie (to recline) does not take an object and has the forms lie, lay, lain. Step 4: Since the sentence is in simple past and involves placing the camera on the table, we need the past tense of lay in the transitive sense, which is laid. Step 5: Therefore, He laid his camera on the table is the correct sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Test each option in the sentence. He laid his camera on the table is natural and correct. He lain his camera on the table is wrong because lain is a past participle of lie and is not used with a direct object in this way. He lay his camera on the table sounds wrong because lay as past tense of lie does not take an object, and in standard English we use laid when an object is present. He lie his camera on the table is incorrect because lie is the base form and does not match the past time reference. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lain is wrong because it is the past participle of lie in the sense of recline and is used with have or had, not directly with an object. Lay is wrong here because the simple past of lay in the transitive sense is laid, and lay would be interpreted as past of lie, which does not fit a direct object. Lie is wrong because it is present tense and intransitive, unsuitable for a sentence that clearly refers to a past completed action involving an object. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse lay and lie because speakers sometimes use lay instead of lie in casual speech. Examination questions often test this area to check precise knowledge. To avoid confusion, remember the simple pattern: lay, laid, laid (always with an object) and lie, lay, lain (no direct object). Practice making small example sentences such as I lay the book on the table and Yesterday I laid the book on the table. These patterns will help you remember the correct forms during the exam. Final Answer: The correct sentence is: He laid his camera on the table.

Question 9

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is similar in meaning to the given word Monotonous.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a vocabulary question that asks you to find a synonym, or word with similar meaning, for the adjective monotonous. This word is often used in descriptions of work, speech, music or daily routines. To answer correctly, you need to recall what monotonous means and then match it with the option that best captures that sense. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Monotonous. - Options: Dull, Timid, Unfriendly, Lusty. - Only one option should reflect the core meaning of monotonous in common usage. Concept / Approach: Monotonous refers to something that is repetitive, lacking variety and therefore boring or tiresome to experience. For example, a monotonous job or a monotonous lecture does not change much and quickly becomes dull. The synonym we choose should therefore convey the idea of boredom, lack of variety or uninteresting quality. Words related to fear, social behaviour or energy levels will not match this meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define monotonous as repetitive and lacking variety, so that it becomes boring or tedious. Step 2: Examine Dull. Dull can mean boring, not exciting, and lacking interest or brightness. This matches the sense of monotonous closely. Step 3: Examine Timid. Timid means shy or lacking courage. It describes personality or behaviour, not the repetitive quality of an activity. Step 4: Examine Unfriendly. Unfriendly refers to a cold or hostile attitude, again unrelated to repetition or boredom. Step 5: Examine Lusty. Lusty means strong, healthy and full of energy, which is almost the opposite of dullness. Verification / Alternative check: Use the word in a typical context. A monotonous lecture can be described as a dull lecture, and the meaning remains almost the same. However, calling it a timid lecture, unfriendly lecture or lusty lecture would change the meaning completely and would not sound natural. Similarly, a monotonous routine is a dull routine, not a timid or unfriendly routine. This context based check confirms that dull is the closest synonym among the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Timid is wrong because it focuses on fear and shyness, not on boredom or repetition. Unfriendly is wrong because it refers to a lack of warmth in social relations, not to a lack of variety. Lusty is wrong because it suggests energy and vigour, which is quite different from the flat and boring sense of monotonous. Common Pitfalls: Some students may confuse monotonous with words that sound similar but are different in meaning, such as monotheist or monotone. It helps to remember typical phrases like monotonous routine, monotonous work and monotonous voice. In all these cases, you can safely replace monotonous with dull, boring or repetitive. Building such mental associations between words and common contexts is extremely useful for answering synonym questions in competitive exams. Final Answer: The word that is similar in meaning to Monotonous is Dull.

Question 10

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is similar in meaning to the given word Elusive.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your knowledge of synonyms for the adjective elusive. The word elusive is often used in discussions of ideas, criminals, solutions or goals that are hard to understand, find, catch or achieve. To get the correct answer, you need to recall what elusive implies and match it with the option whose meaning is closest. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Elusive. - Options: Baffling, Enticing, Directing, Soothing. - Only one option should capture the central idea of something that is hard to grasp or understand. Concept / Approach: Elusive describes something that escapes easy detection, understanding or capture. For example, an elusive criminal is hard for the police to catch, and an elusive concept is hard for students to understand. The word baffling also means puzzling or difficult to understand. Therefore, it is a strong candidate for the synonym. The other options describe attractive, guiding or calming qualities, which are not what elusive expresses. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define elusive as difficult to find, catch or understand; something that keeps slipping away. Step 2: Examine Baffling. Baffling means puzzling, confusing or difficult to understand. This aligns well with the idea of elusive when used about ideas or explanations. Step 3: Examine Enticing. Enticing means tempting or attractive. Although an elusive object might also be attractive, enticement is not the main idea of elusive. Step 4: Examine Directing. Directing means guiding or controlling, which does not match the sense of something that is hard to catch or understand. Step 5: Examine Soothing. Soothing means calming or comforting, which again is unrelated to difficulty in catching or understanding. Verification / Alternative check: Consider some common phrases. An elusive explanation can be called a baffling explanation because it leaves the listener confused. An elusive solution to a problem is one that is baffling or difficult to discover. However, calling such an explanation enticing, directing or soothing would distort the meaning. In contexts where elusive describes a criminal or animal, it means hard to catch, and this also creates confusion and difficulty for the pursuer, which is close to baffling. Thus, baffling is the best synonym in this list. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Enticing is wrong because it emphasises attraction or temptation rather than difficulty in being caught or understood. Directing is wrong because it relates to giving instructions or guidance, not to slipping away or causing confusion. Soothing is wrong because it refers to calming or relaxing effects, which are opposite to the frustration often associated with elusive things. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes focus on the sound of the word rather than its meaning. For example, they may associate elusive with illusive and think only about illusions. While illusions can be elusive, the core idea to remember is the difficulty of catching, defining or fully understanding something. Creating personal example sentences such as The solution remained elusive and His motives were elusive and baffling will help connect the word with its true meaning and avoid confusion with unrelated options. Final Answer: The word that is similar in meaning to Elusive is Baffling.

Question 11

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is opposite in meaning to the given word Colossal.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for an antonym, or word opposite in meaning, for the adjective colossal. Colossal is frequently used to describe things that are extremely large in size, scale or importance. To answer correctly, you must choose the option that expresses the idea of very small, not very large. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Colossal. - Options: Epic, Rust, Teeny, Vast. - We seek the word that is closest to very small in contrast to colossal. Concept / Approach: Colossal means huge, enormous or gigantic. Its direct opposite would be tiny or extremely small. Among the options, teeny is an informal or colloquial term that means very small. Epic and vast both suggest large scale, and rust refers to corrosion of metal. Therefore, teeny is the only word that clearly stands as an opposite in meaning to colossal. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define colossal as extremely large, gigantic or of massive size. Step 2: Examine Epic. Epic usually refers to something grand, heroic or of great length or scale, not something small. Step 3: Examine Rust. Rust is a reddish brown substance formed on iron and steel due to corrosion. It does not relate to size at all. Step 4: Examine Teeny. Teeny is an informal word that means very small, tiny or minute. Step 5: Examine Vast. Vast means extremely big or extensive, which is similar in meaning to colossal, not opposite. Verification / Alternative check: Try using the words in parallel sentences. A colossal building is extremely big; a teeny building would be extremely small. This contrast works well. A colossal mistake is a huge mistake; a teeny mistake would be a very small one. But calling a building epic or vast does not reverse the meaning, and rust does not fit at all in such contexts. Comparing these possibilities confirms that teeny is the correct antonym for colossal among the given options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Epic is wrong because it often suggests something large, long or heroic, which is aligned with greatness rather than smallness. Rust is wrong because it is a noun related to chemical corrosion and does not express anything about size. Vast is wrong because it is very close in meaning to colossal and also describes something extremely large or extensive. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may choose epic or vast simply because they look sophisticated, without checking whether they are true opposites. It is important to first restate the meaning of the target word in your own simple words, such as colossal means huge, and then deliberately look for a word that means tiny or very small. Remembering pairs like gigantic and tiny, massive and minute, colossal and teeny helps you respond quickly and accurately in antonym questions. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to Colossal is Teeny.

Question 12

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is opposite in meaning to the given word Opprobrium.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of advanced vocabulary and your ability to find antonyms. The given word is opprobrium, which is often used in high level English to describe strong public criticism or disgrace. To choose the correct answer, you must know that we are looking for a word that conveys the opposite idea, such as praise or admiration. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Opprobrium. - Options: Adulation, Ignominy, Mystical, Preclude. - One option should represent the opposite of public disgrace or harsh criticism. Concept / Approach: Opprobrium refers to harsh, abusive criticism or the state of being publicly disgraced. It is strongly negative. The direct opposite would be high praise or admiration, especially enthusiastic praise. Adulation means excessive admiration or flattery. Ignominy is similar in meaning to opprobrium, because it also means public shame or disgrace. Mystical and preclude belong to very different meaning fields. Therefore, adulation stands as the correct antonym here. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define opprobrium as very strong disapproval, censure or disgrace in the eyes of others. Step 2: Examine Adulation. Adulation refers to excessive praise, admiration or flattery, which is clearly opposite to harsh criticism. Step 3: Examine Ignominy. Ignominy means deep shame or public disgrace, which is very close to the idea of opprobrium, not opposite. Step 4: Examine Mystical. Mystical relates to mystery, spirituality or the supernatural and has nothing to do with criticism or praise. Step 5: Examine Preclude. Preclude means to prevent something from happening, which again is unrelated to the scale of praise or blame. Verification / Alternative check: Think of typical uses. A leader might face opprobrium for corruption, meaning that the leader faces heavy public criticism and disgrace. The opposite situation would be that the leader receives adulation for honesty and service, meaning enthusiastic praise. Replacing opprobrium with adulation in such sentences reverses the meaning. But replacing it with ignominy would not reverse it; it would keep it negative. Mystical and preclude do not fit this context at all. This comparison confirms that adulation is the correct antonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ignominy is wrong because it is nearly a synonym of opprobrium, both indicating shame and disgrace. Mystical is wrong because it refers to spiritual or mysterious aspects and has no relation to public praise or blame. Preclude is wrong because it means to prevent or make impossible and belongs to a completely different semantic field. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to pick ignominy because exam takers know it is a difficult word and assume that such words are often correct. However, in an antonym question, ignominy is too close to the original meaning and therefore cannot be the opposite. To avoid such mistakes, always restate the target word in simpler language first, for example opprobrium means severe criticism or disgrace, and then search for a word expressing the opposite sentiment, such as praise or admiration. Linking opprobrium with disgrace and adulation with excessive praise in your mind will help you remember this pair. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to Opprobrium is Adulation.

Question 13

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase “All agog”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of English idioms. Idioms are fixed expressions whose meanings cannot always be guessed from the individual words. The phrase all agog is used to describe a mental or emotional state. To answer correctly, you need to select the option that best captures this overall meaning rather than translating each word literally. Given Data / Assumptions: - Idiom: All agog. - Options: Avoid, Contentment, Amazed, Unsystematically. - The correct option should reflect the emotional state denoted by the idiom. Concept / Approach: All agog traditionally means very eager, excited, full of curiosity or expectation. When people are all agog, they are intensely interested in something that is about to happen or that they are hearing for the first time. This emotional state includes wonder and excitement, which is close in spirit to being amazed or thrilled. Words that suggest calm satisfaction, avoidance or lack of order do not match this meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that all agog describes someone who is highly excited, full of curiosity or bursting with interest. Step 2: Examine Avoid. Avoid is a verb meaning to keep away from something. It does not describe a state of excitement or curiosity. Step 3: Examine Contentment. Contentment is a calm feeling of satisfaction and peace, not a feeling of excited interest. Step 4: Examine Amazed. Amazed describes a state of great surprise, wonder or admiration, which is close to being very excited or eager. Step 5: Examine Unsystematically. This describes doing things without order or system. It has nothing to do with eagerness or astonishment. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine typical situations where the idiom is used. We can say The children were all agog to hear the story, meaning they were very excited and full of eager curiosity. Replacing all agog with amazed in such sentences gives The children were amazed to hear the story, which still expresses strong emotional reaction. Using avoid, contentment or unsystematically in that position would not make sense. Therefore, among the given choices, amazed is the best match in meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Avoid is wrong because it refers to staying away from something, the opposite of the interest implied by all agog. Contentment is wrong because it suggests calm satisfaction, not the heightened excitement of all agog. Unsystematically is wrong because it refers to a method of doing work, not to an emotional state. Common Pitfalls: Students who have not seen this idiom before may try to guess from the individual word agog and may mistake it for something related to confusion or disorder. However, idioms must be learned as whole expressions. A good strategy is to create mental or written notes of idioms with short explanations, for example all agog equals very excited and eager. Regular reading of stories, novels and editorials where such idioms appear will slowly build your familiarity and prevent guessing errors. Final Answer: The idiom “All agog” is best explained by the word Amazed, in the sense of being full of excited wonder or eager curiosity.

Question 14

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase “Not to mince matters”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of the idiom not to mince matters. Idioms are fixed expressions whose overall meaning is different from simply adding up the meanings of individual words. In this case, the phrase is related to how someone speaks when they are being very direct. To answer, you must select the option that best captures the accepted idiomatic meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: - Idiom: Not to mince matters. - Options include meanings related to ease, confusion, interference, and frank speech. - We must pick the option that reflects speaking plainly and directly. Concept / Approach: The idiom to mince words means to soften what one says, often to avoid hurting someone or to be polite. Therefore, not to mince words or not to mince matters means to speak plainly and bluntly, without softening the truth and without hiding unpleasant facts. This involves straightforward, frank speech that may sometimes sound harsh. Any option that suggests politeness, confusion, comfort or interference in other people affairs will not match this core idea. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that mince means to cut or soften something into very small parts. In speech, to mince words means to soften or sugarcoat hard truths. Step 2: Understand that not to mince matters is a variant that implies the speaker will not soften or hide the reality, but will present it directly. Step 3: Examine option A, To be at ease. This refers to comfort and relaxation, not to the manner of speaking frankly. Step 4: Examine option B, To confuse others. This is the opposite of clear and direct speech and therefore cannot be the correct meaning. Step 5: Examine option C, To interfere in others affairs. This describes behaviour regarding involvement, not the style of speaking. Step 6: Examine option D, To speak very frankly and directly, without softening the truth. This precisely matches the idiomatic use of not to mince matters. Verification / Alternative check: Consider an example sentence. A manager might say, I will not mince matters; your performance has been unsatisfactory. Here the manager signals that the feedback will be very direct and perhaps unpleasant. Replacing the idiom with to speak very frankly and directly, without softening the truth leaves the meaning unchanged. Trying to replace it with any of the other options destroys the sense. For example, I will not mince matters; I will confuse you does not make sense. This confirms option D as the correct interpretation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To be at ease is wrong because it describes a relaxed feeling, not an approach to speaking honestly. To confuse others is wrong because the idiom actually involves clarity, not confusion. To interfere in others affairs is wrong because that concerns involvement in situations, not style of communication. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may guess that not to mince matters means not to get involved or not to interfere, because the word matters can suggest issues or affairs. However, the idiom is built on the older phrase to mince words and is about how we express those matters. To avoid confusion, it is helpful to learn idioms in small groups with examples, such as not to mince words, to get to the point and to speak one mind. Seeing these together strengthens your understanding that this idiom refers to frank, straightforward speech. Final Answer: “Not to mince matters” means to speak very frankly and directly, without softening the truth.

Question 15

In the following sentence, the bracketed part is incorrect. Choose the option that best improves the bracketed part so that the sentence is grammatically correct. The doctor (has advice) him to take proper diet.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sentence improvement questions test your knowledge of correct verb forms and tenses in actual usage. In this sentence, the bracketed phrase has advice is wrong and needs to be replaced. Your job is to choose the option that makes the sentence correct and natural in standard English while keeping the intended meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: The doctor (has advice) him to take proper diet. - Options: has advised, had been advised, was advised, No improvement. - The subject is the doctor and the object is him, and the sentence refers to a recent action with present relevance. Concept / Approach: The error arises from confusing the noun advice with the verb advise. The doctor gives advice, but the doctor advises someone. In present perfect tense, we use has or have plus the past participle of the verb. The correct past participle of advise is advised. Therefore, the doctor has advised him is the right structure. Options that change the voice or tense inappropriately will not convey the same meaning. We need an active voice present perfect construction to show that the doctor has already given the advice, and the effect remains relevant. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the intended meaning: the doctor has already given him advice about following a proper diet. Step 2: Recognise that has advice is incorrect because has requires a noun, but the rest of the sentence structure calls for a verb phrase. Step 3: Examine option A, has advised. This forms the present perfect tense, indicating that the advising has happened at some time before now with present relevance. Step 4: Examine option B, had been advised. This is past perfect passive voice and would mean that someone had advised him earlier, not necessarily the doctor mentioned as subject. Step 5: Examine option C, was advised. This is simple past passive and changes the focus from the doctor as subject to him as recipient. Step 6: Examine option D, No improvement. This cannot be correct, since has advice is clearly ungrammatical in this structure. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into the sentence. The doctor has advised him to take proper diet is grammatically correct and communicates that the doctor has given advice at some point before now. The doctor had been advised him is impossible because of the clash between active subject and passive form. He was advised to take proper diet removes the doctor as clear agent unless we rewrite the whole sentence. No improvement would keep the incorrect phrase has advice. Hence, has advised is the only choice that both corrects the grammar and keeps the original meaning with the doctor as subject. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Had been advised is wrong because it is in passive voice and past perfect, which does not fit with the doctor as the active subject in the given sentence. Was advised is wrong because it is simple past passive and would require restructuring of the subject and object to sound natural. No improvement is wrong because the original phrase has advice is not a valid verb construction and mixes noun and auxiliary incorrectly. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse advice and advise because they sound similar. Advice is a noun, while advise is a verb. Examiners use this confusion to create traps. To avoid errors, remember simple sentences like My parents advise me and their advice is helpful. Also note typical structures like the doctor has advised me to rest, which use the present perfect tense correctly. Practising such patterns will help you quickly spot and correct mistaken forms in sentence improvement questions. Final Answer: The correct improvement is: The doctor has advised him to take proper diet.

Question 16

In the following sentence, the bracketed part is incorrect. Choose the option that best improves the bracketed part so that the sentence is grammatically correct. (Being a pleasant evening), we went out for a long drive on a highway.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question examines whether you can correct a common error in the use of participial phrases. The sentence tries to show a reason or circumstance for going out for a long drive. However, the beginning phrase is grammatically incomplete and creates what is often called a dangling participle. You must choose the option that introduces the sentence correctly and clearly. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: (Being a pleasant evening), we went out for a long drive on a highway. - Options: As a pleasant evening, It being a pleasant evening, With a pleasant evening, No improvement. - The idea is that the evening was pleasant, so we decided to go for a drive. Concept / Approach: A participial phrase like being a pleasant evening must be logically connected to a noun that it describes. In the original structure, it seems to describe we, which is incorrect because people are not evenings. To avoid this dangling participle, we introduce a dummy subject it to stand for the time or weather, and make the phrase it being a pleasant evening, which correctly links the description to the situation. This construction is standard in English when giving a reason based on time or weather. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that being a pleasant evening is not attached to any clear subject in the original sentence and therefore hangs loosely. Step 2: Recognise that the intended meaning is because it was a pleasant evening we went out for a long drive. Step 3: Examine option A, As a pleasant evening. This does not form a complete clause and sounds unnatural, because an evening cannot by itself act as a subject doing something. Step 4: Examine option B, It being a pleasant evening. This introduces it as the subject for being, clearly referring to the time or weather, and sets a proper causal background for the action we went out. Step 5: Examine option C, With a pleasant evening. This suggests some kind of accompaniment and does not express the causal idea properly. Step 6: Examine option D, No improvement, which is not acceptable because the original phrase is grammatically faulty. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into the sentence and read it aloud. As a pleasant evening, we went out for a long drive is incorrect, because the phrase wrongly describes we. With a pleasant evening, we went out also sounds awkward and unclear. It being a pleasant evening, we went out for a long drive on a highway sounds natural and properly connects the pleasant evening with the decision to go out. This confirms that option B is the best improvement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: As a pleasant evening is wrong because it treats the evening as if it were acting like a person in the main clause. With a pleasant evening is wrong because it does not clearly introduce the cause and is not the usual way to express this idea in English. No improvement is wrong because the original sentence contains a dangling participle and is not acceptable in formal writing. Common Pitfalls: Dangling participles are a frequent source of errors in exams. Learners sometimes begin sentences with phrases like walking down the road or being a pleasant evening without providing a clear subject for these actions or states. To avoid this, always check that the noun immediately following the participial phrase is the one logically performing the action or being described. In time and weather expressions, using structures like it being a pleasant evening or as it was a pleasant evening is a safe and standard choice. Final Answer: The correct improvement is: It being a pleasant evening, we went out for a long drive on a highway.

Question 17

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best one word substitute for the given phrase: A roundabout way of speaking.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One word substitution questions ask you to replace a descriptive phrase with a single precise word. This tests both your vocabulary and your ability to match meanings accurately. Here, the phrase is a roundabout way of speaking, which describes a particular style of communication where someone does not speak directly but uses many words to express a simple idea. Given Data / Assumptions: - Phrase: A roundabout way of speaking. - Options: Centipede, Circumlocution, Coercion, Concentric. - We need the single word that captures this indirect and wordy manner of speaking. Concept / Approach: Circumlocution is a noun that refers to the use of many words where fewer would do, especially in a deliberate attempt to be vague, indirect or evasive. It is built from Latin roots meaning around and speak. This exactly matches the idea of a roundabout way of speaking. The other options describe completely different concepts: an insect, forced persuasion and a geometric arrangement. Recognising the root circum helps to connect the word with going around the main point instead of speaking straight. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the phrase a roundabout way of speaking as indirect, wordy speech that avoids direct expression. Step 2: Examine Centipede. A centipede is a type of insect or arthropod with many legs. It has nothing to do with speaking. Step 3: Examine Circumlocution. This word combines circum, meaning around, with a root relating to speaking, and means the use of too many words to say something, especially when avoiding the direct point. Step 4: Examine Coercion. Coercion refers to forcing someone to do something by pressure or threats, which is unrelated to the style of speaking. Step 5: Examine Concentric. Concentric is used in geometry for circles or figures that share the same centre. It does not address communication at all. Verification / Alternative check: Insert circumlocution back into a sentence. For example, Instead of stating the truth clearly, he indulged in circumlocution. This sentence means that he spoke in a roundabout, indirect manner. Replacing circumlocution with a roundabout way of speaking keeps the meaning almost unchanged. The same replacement with centipede, coercion or concentric is impossible. Therefore, circumlocution is a perfect one word substitute for the given phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Centipede is wrong because it names a creature and has no relation to language or communication. Coercion is wrong because it refers to forcing someone, not to speaking indirectly. Concentric is wrong because it is a geometric term and does not describe a way of speaking. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes pick options based on unfamiliarity, assuming the most unusual word must be correct. While circumlocution may sound unfamiliar, it is the only option that actually fits the meaning of the phrase. To avoid confusion, it is helpful to learn common word formation patterns, such as circum meaning around in words like circumference and circumnavigate. This helps you remember that circumlocution is speech that goes around the point instead of addressing it directly. Final Answer: The best one word substitute for “A roundabout way of speaking” is Circumlocution.

Question 18

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best one word substitute for the phrase: An old unmarried woman.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Here you are asked to choose a single word that can replace the descriptive phrase an old unmarried woman. One word substitution questions test your ability to recall precise vocabulary for common definitions. Although some of these terms may be old fashioned or sensitive in modern usage, they are still tested in many competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: - Phrase: An old unmarried woman. - Options: Masochist, Septuagenarian, Sniper, Spinster. - We must select the word that refers to an older woman who has never married. Concept / Approach: Spinster is a traditional term for a woman who is unmarried, especially one who is past the usual age for marriage according to older social expectations. Although the word can sound negative or outdated in everyday conversation today, it remains a standard answer in exam oriented English. The other options describe completely different ideas, such as enjoying pain, being in a certain age group or being a shooter, and therefore cannot fit the given definition. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the phrase an old unmarried woman as a woman who has remained unmarried beyond the typical marriage age. Step 2: Examine Masochist. A masochist is someone who derives pleasure from suffering pain or humiliation. This is a psychological term, not related to marital status. Step 3: Examine Septuagenarian. A septuagenarian is a person who is between seventy and seventy nine years of age. This term indicates age but not marital status and can apply to both men and women. Step 4: Examine Sniper. A sniper is a person who shoots at targets from a hidden position, usually in military or police contexts. This has no link to being unmarried. Step 5: Examine Spinster. Spinster is used to refer to an unmarried woman, typically older and beyond the usual marrying age. Verification / Alternative check: Use the word in context. Older novels and legal documents may refer to a woman as a spinster to indicate that she is unmarried. If we replace the phrase an old unmarried woman with spinster in a sentence like The property was left to an old unmarried woman, it becomes The property was left to a spinster, which conveys the same essential information. The other options cannot be used in that way without changing the meaning entirely. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Masochist is wrong because it describes a person who enjoys pain or humiliation and does not refer to marriage. Septuagenarian is wrong because it only tells us that the person is in their seventies, not whether they are married or not. Sniper is wrong because it denotes a skilled shooter and has nothing to do with age or marital status. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may hesitate to choose spinster because they know it can be considered old fashioned or even impolite in normal conversation. However, exam questions are often based on traditional dictionary definitions rather than current social preferences. It is important to separate real life politeness from exam oriented vocabulary. Knowing words like bachelor and spinster and understanding where they are still used is useful for scoring well in one word substitution questions. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “An old unmarried woman” is Spinster.

Question 19

In the following question, four words are given out of which one word is incorrectly spelt. Select the word that is spelt incorrectly.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions assess your familiarity with standard English spellings for common words. Here, you are given four words and must identify the one that is spelt incorrectly. The other three are spelt correctly. This type of question is common in competitive exams because many English words have tricky letter sequences that learners often confuse. Given Data / Assumptions: - Options: Autumn, Desperate, Reciept, Traffic. - Exactly one of these spellings is incorrect. - We must recognise the standard dictionary spelling of each word. Concept / Approach: The words autumn, desperate and traffic are all common and have fixed spellings. The word related to a written acknowledgment for money paid is spelled receipt, with the letters e i after c. The option Reciept reverses the order of i and e, which is a frequent mistake by learners. The approach is to check each word against the form you have seen in reading, keeping in mind that misplacing i and e is a common trick in exam questions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine Autumn. Autumn is correctly spelt a u t u m n, with a silent n at the end. The given option matches this spelling. Step 2: Examine Desperate. Desperate is correctly spelt d e s p e r a t e, and the option Desperate is written in this way, so it is correct. Step 3: Examine Reciept. The standard spelling for this word is receipt, r e c e i p t. The option swaps the positions of e and i, giving r e c i e p t, which is wrong. Step 4: Examine Traffic. Traffic is correctly spelt t r a f f i c, and the option Traffic matches this spelling. Step 5: Since only Reciept differs from the correct form, it is the incorrectly spelt word. Verification / Alternative check: Think about where you have seen these words. Autumn appears in seasons of the year, desperate in phrases like desperate attempt, and traffic in daily news. Their spellings in newspapers, books and signs match the given options. The word for the written acknowledgment of payment appears on bills and slips as receipt, never as reciept. Visual memory of actual receipts and printed forms reinforces that the correct form has e before i after c in this word. Therefore, Reciept is confirmed as the incorrect spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong (as answers): Autumn is not the wrong spelling because it correctly includes the silent n at the end. Desperate is not the wrong spelling because it correctly uses e before r and a before t in its last syllables. Traffic is not the wrong spelling because it correctly doubles the f and ends with ic. Common Pitfalls: Many learners struggle with the i and e combination, especially after c. A famous guideline is the rule i before e except after c, although there are exceptions. Receipt follows this pattern and is spelled r e c e i p t. Exam setters exploit this confusion by presenting wrong forms like reciept. To reduce errors, pay special attention to such patterns while reading and make a note of frequently used but commonly misspelt words like receipt, believe, friend and ceiling. Final Answer: The incorrectly spelt word is Reciept; the correct spelling is receipt.

Question 20

In the following question, four words are given, out of which only one word is spelt incorrectly in standard English. Carefully read all four options and select the incorrectly spelt word.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions in competitive examinations test how familiar you are with the standard, dictionary approved forms of common English words. Here you are given four everyday words and asked to identify the one that is spelt incorrectly. Such questions look simple, but they are designed to catch very common spelling mistakes that people make in regular writing, especially with similar sounding vowels. Given Data / Assumptions: You are given four options: Century, Finance, Remember, Sponser. Three of these words are correctly spelt in standard English. Exactly one word contains an incorrect spelling and must be selected as the answer. No tricky or rare meanings are involved; only the normal spellings of these common words are tested. Concept / Approach: The idea is to compare the spellings in the options with the spellings you have seen in books, newspapers and dictionaries. Century, Finance and Remember are very common and, as written here, match the standard spellings. The word related to someone who supports an event, a team or a person financially is sponsor, not sponser. The error lies in the vowel combination in the final syllable. Exam setters often test such near correct forms to check whether candidates have visually stored the right spelling in memory. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Look at the word Century. You frequently see it used for one hundred runs in cricket or one hundred years in history. The spelling C E N T U R Y is correct. Step 2: Check Finance. This is a basic word in economics and business English, and the spelling F I N A N C E is the accepted form. Step 3: Check Remember. The spelling R E M E M B E R is very common and is correctly written in the option. Step 4: Check Sponser. You should recall that the standard word is sponsor, with O R at the end, not E R. The form S P O N S E R is wrong. Step 5: Because Century, Finance and Remember are correctly spelt while Sponser is not, Sponser is the incorrectly spelt word and is therefore the correct answer to mark in the exam. Verification / Alternative check: If you are in doubt, try forming common collocations in your mind: match sponsor, event sponsor, official sponsor. You will naturally visualise sponsor with O R. If you type Sponser into a word processor with spell check, it is usually underlined as an error, and suggestions like sponsor appear. No such red underline appears for Century, Finance or Remember, which shows those spellings are accepted. This provides an indirect verification that Sponser is wrong. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Century correctly represents the word for a period of one hundred years or a score of one hundred runs in cricket; there is no standard alternative spelling here. Finance is correctly formed and appears in phrases like finance department, personal finance and finance minister; the spelling in the option is standard. Remember is a basic verb of everyday English, and the given spelling is exactly the one you will find in any reputable dictionary, so it is not the incorrect option. Common Pitfalls: Many students rush through spelling questions and pick words that simply look unfamiliar, instead of carefully recalling where they have seen them in print. Another trap is to overthink common words such as finance and remember and start doubting correct spellings. Always calm down, recall real contexts in which you have read these words, and watch especially for subtle vowel changes near the end of the word, as in sponser versus sponsor. These little changes are where exam setters hide the error. Final Answer: The incorrectly spelt word is Sponser, which should correctly be written as sponsor.

English Questions