Question 1

In this sentence improvement question, decide whether the sentence "I am very much interested in your story" needs any correction, and if so, choose the option that gives the most appropriate improved form.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is from the sentence improvement section of English grammar. The sentence given is "I am very much interested in your story". You must decide whether this sentence is grammatically and idiomatically correct, or whether one of the alternatives provided improves it. Sentence improvement questions test your ear for natural English as well as your understanding of tenses and adjective forms. Given Data / Assumptions: The original sentence is "I am very much interested in your story". Three alternative versions are offered, plus a "No improvement" option. The speaker is expressing a strong level of interest at the present time. The aim is to check the correct use of "interested" versus "interesting" and the choice of tense. Concept / Approach: In English, "interested" describes how a person feels, while "interesting" describes the thing that causes that feeling. For example, "I am interested" and "The story is interesting". The present continuous form "I am very much interested in your story" is acceptable to express a present state, especially in polite conversation. The adverb "very much" intensifies the feeling of interest appropriately. Therefore, you must check whether any alternative makes the sentence clearer without introducing grammatical or meaning errors. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Analyse the original sentence and identify the main verb and adjective: "am interested".Step 2: Confirm that "interested" is the correct adjective to describe the speaker's feeling about the story.Step 3: Evaluate whether "very much" is correctly placed to emphasise the level of interest. It is idiomatic and acceptable here.Step 4: Compare the suggested alternatives with the original sentence and check whether they introduce tense errors or wrong adjective forms.Step 5: Conclude that the original sentence is already both grammatically correct and natural, so "No improvement" is the best option. Verification / Alternative check: Consider standard patterns like "I am very interested in your work" or "She is very much interested in music". These are correct and common expressions. The given sentence follows the same pattern. If we replace it with "I have been very interested in your story", it may suggest interest over a period, but that nuance is not required by the question. Using "am much more interested" needs a comparison that is not present. Thus the original sentence is appropriate as it stands. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "have been very interested", changes the tense to present perfect continuous or present perfect like usage, implying a duration which the question does not specify. Option B, "am much more interested", is incomplete because "more" normally needs a comparison (for example, more than someone else or more than before). Option C, "am very interesting", is incorrect because "interesting" would describe the speaker as a person who causes interest in others, which changes the meaning completely. None of these represent a clear improvement. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes think that any use of "very much" sounds wrong or old fashioned and therefore must be changed, but in standard English it is perfectly acceptable. Another common mistake is confusion between "interested" and "interesting". Always remember that "interested" describes a feeling of a person and "interesting" describes the quality of a thing or person that causes interest. Final Answer: The correct choice is No improvement, because "I am very much interested in your story" is already a grammatically correct and idiomatic sentence in English.

Question 2

In this sentence improvement question, choose the most appropriate word to replace the underlined verb in the sentence "He refused the charge brought against him" so that the sentence accurately expresses that he said the accusation was not true.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to select the most precise verb in a sentence improvement setting. The sentence given is "He refused the charge brought against him". In legal and formal English, there is a standard verb used when a person says that an accusation is not true. The aim is to identify and choose that verb so that the sentence becomes more accurate in meaning and style. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is "He". The object is "the charge brought against him", which refers to an accusation or allegation. The original verb is "refused". The suggested alternatives are "disagreed", "disowned", "denied", and "No improvement". Concept / Approach: Sentence improvement questions often check for collocations and precise legal or formal usage. In legal language, when an accused person states that a charge is not true, the correct verb is "deny". Expressions such as "deny the charge", "deny the allegation", or "deny the accusation" are standard. The verb "refuse" usually relates to turning down an offer, request, or invitation, not to stating that an accusation is false. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the context: someone has been accused and is saying that the accusation is not true.Step 2: Note the phrase "the charge brought against him", which clearly suggests a legal or formal charge.Step 3: Recall standard verbs used with "charge" in this context: "deny a charge" is the usual expression.Step 4: Compare the meaning of each option with the required idea of rejecting the truth of an accusation.Step 5: Recognise that "denied" is the only option that fits perfectly, changing the sentence to "He denied the charge brought against him". Verification / Alternative check: After substitution, the sentence becomes "He denied the charge brought against him", which is a common and natural sentence in news reports and legal documents. If we try "disagreed the charge" it is ungrammatical. "Disowned the charge" is also unnatural, because "disown" is used with relationships or responsibility, as in "disown a son" or "disown responsibility". "Refused the charge" is not standard, since one refuses a request or offer, not an allegation. Thus "denied" is clearly the best choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Disagreed" cannot take "charge" directly as an object in this way. One can disagree with a person or an opinion but not "disagree a charge". "Disowned" suggests rejecting a relation or ownership, such as disowning a property or child, and is not used with allegations. "No improvement" would preserve the incorrect collocation "refused the charge", which does not match standard English usage in legal or formal reporting. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to think that "refuse" works whenever someone does not accept something, but remember that different verbs are tied to specific objects and contexts. Another pitfall is to choose "disagreed" because it feels like saying "I do not agree", but grammatically and collocationally it does not work with "charge" in this sentence. In legal contexts, always remember "deny a charge" as the correct pattern. Final Answer: The correct answer is denied, so the improved sentence reads "He denied the charge brought against him", which is grammatically correct and idiomatically appropriate in standard English.

Question 3

In this sentence improvement question, decide which option best improves the sentence "Working hard students always achieve good results" so that it is grammatically correct and clearly describes students who put in a lot of effort.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines your understanding of adjectives and sentence structure in English. The sentence given is "Working hard students always achieve good results". The wording is awkward and suggests that the examiner wants you to choose a more appropriate adjective that correctly describes students who work hard. You must choose the best word that, when substituted, gives a natural and grammatically sound sentence. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is "students". The intended description is "students who work hard". The sentence aims to say that such students achieve good results. Options suggest various adjectives: "Energetic", "Industrious", "Talented", or no change. Concept / Approach: Sentence improvement items test your ability to select the most appropriate word in context. Here the phrase "Working hard students" is ungrammatical because the participle phrase "working hard" has been placed directly before the noun without clear structure. English often uses adjectives like "hardworking" or "industrious" to describe such students. In exam vocabulary, "industrious" is the formal word used to mean "hardworking and diligent". So you must pick the adjective that matches this idea best. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the intended meaning: students who work hard generally achieve good results.Step 2: Recognise that "Working hard students" is awkward and could confuse the reader.Step 3: Check each option to see which adjective directly and accurately means "hardworking".Step 4: Observe that "Industrious" is widely used in exam English to mean diligent and hardworking.Step 5: Substitute "industrious" and read the sentence as "Industrious students always achieve good results", which is clear and grammatically correct. Verification / Alternative check: After substitution, the new sentence is "Industrious students always achieve good results". This clearly expresses the idea that students who are diligent and hardworking perform well. If you try "Energetic students always achieve good results", the meaning changes to students who are physically active or lively, which is not the same as hardworking. "Talented students" focuses on natural ability, not effort. Therefore "Industrious" is the only option that directly matches the intended sense of "working hard". Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "Energetic", suggests that students are full of energy but does not necessarily mean that they work steadily and carefully. Many energetic people may still lack discipline. Option C, "Talented", points to natural aptitude or giftedness rather than effort. Option D, "No improvement", keeps the ungrammatical phrase "Working hard students", which is not acceptable formal English. Only "Industrious" properly conveys the idea of hardworking students. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes pick words that sound positive without matching the exact meaning demanded by the sentence. It is important to distinguish between energy, talent, and diligence. Another pitfall is ignoring the structural problem and marking "No improvement". When a sentence sounds awkward, examine whether a standard adjective exists that can replace the clumsy phrase and convey the idea more directly, as "industrious" does here. Final Answer: The correct answer is Industrious, since the improved sentence "Industrious students always achieve good results" is grammatically correct and clearly communicates that hardworking students tend to succeed.

Question 4

Read the short passage about Namita from Kerala working as a governess in Dubai, and then answer this comprehension question: Which word from the given options best describes Namita's relationship with her employers in the beginning of the story, wh…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a reading comprehension passage about Namita, who travels from Kerala to Dubai to work as a governess for the only child of the Nair family, and about Gopal, who goes abroad to work for a construction contractor. The passage describes Namita's situation in some detail and then asks you to choose the word that best describes her relationship with her employers at the beginning, when everything appears to be fine. This tests your ability to interpret tone and implied meaning from context. Given Data / Assumptions: Namita comes from Kerala to Dubai to serve as a governess. The Nairs are described as nice and gentle. The passage clearly mentions that Namita has no cause to complain in the beginning. You are given four adjectives and must select the one that describes this early relationship accurately. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension questions involving words like "cordial", "friendly", and "sympathetic" check your understanding of subtle differences in meaning. You must read the description carefully and then choose a word that captures the emotional tone and formality of the situation. The phrase "no cause to complain" indicates that the relationship is pleasant and harmonious. "Cordial" is often used to describe a polite, warm, and respectful relationship, which fits the employer employee situation described. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the exact lines from the passage: the Nairs are nice and gentle, and Namita has no cause to complain.Step 2: Understand that this means there is no conflict, mistreatment, or unhappiness in the beginning.Step 3: Compare the options and think about their meanings. "Cordial" means warm but respectful, "friendly" suggests informal closeness, "sympathetic" suggests pity, and "complaining" is negative.Step 4: Consider the social context: a governess employed by a family usually has a respectful and professional relation rather than a purely friendly one.Step 5: Conclude that "Cordial" best describes a pleasant and respectful professional relationship between Namita and her employers. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a sentence: "Her relations with her employers were cordial." This sounds natural in a formal passage, especially about working abroad. If you write "Her relations with her employers were sympathetic", it suggests her employers pitied her, which is not mentioned. "Friendly" might be possible, but it often implies a more informal closeness than the passage suggests. The passage focuses on the fact that there is no reason for complaint, not necessarily on deep personal friendship. This subtlety supports choosing "Cordial". Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, "Friendly", is close in meaning but slightly less appropriate given the formal employer employee setting. The passage does not say that they are her personal friends, only that they are nice and gentle. Option C, "Sympathetic", would imply that the employers feel sorry for her or share her suffering, which is not hinted at in the text. Option D, "Complaining", clearly contradicts the statement that she has no cause to complain, so it is completely incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Students may rush and choose "Friendly" simply because it is a positive word they recognise, without considering the tone of the passage and the typical register of exam English. Another pitfall is ignoring the specific phrase "no cause to complain", which signals a peaceful and respectful relationship rather than emotional sympathy or casual friendship. Always match the word not only to the basic meaning but also to the situation and level of formality in the passage. Final Answer: The correct answer is Cordial, because Namita's initial relationship with her employers is pleasant, peaceful, and respectful, with no cause for complaint, which is best captured by the word "cordial".

Question 5

After reading the passage about Namita in Dubai and the illegal nature of Mr. Nair's work, answer this comprehension question: What does the phrase "makes her jittery" imply about Namita's emotional state when she overhears the truth about her emplo…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is drawn from a reading comprehension passage that describes Namita working as a governess in Dubai and discovering that her employer is involved in illegal business activities. The phrase "makes her jittery" is used in the passage to describe her reaction to this discovery. The question tests whether you can infer the emotional meaning of this informal expression from its context in the story. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that Namita overhears something about Mr. Nair's job. She learns that he is not working in an American company, but in illegal business. The passage says this discovery "makes her jittery". You are given options that suggest different emotional states. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension often includes idiomatic or informal expressions like "jittery". To answer correctly, you need to interpret the phrase using context clues and general vocabulary knowledge. "Jittery" usually describes a state of nervousness, unease, or anxiety. It suggests that a person cannot remain calm and may feel shaky or unsettled. Given the serious nature of Namita's discovery, the emotion most consistent with the situation is anxiety rather than simple sadness or anger. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the key event: Namita overhears that the nature of Mr. Nair's business is illegal.Step 2: Think about how a normal person in her position would feel: probably worried about safety, status, and future, not merely sad.Step 3: Consider the word "jittery" and any related words you know, such as "jitters", which often refers to nervousness or stage fright.Step 4: Match each option with this idea: sadness, anger, trauma, or anxiety.Step 5: Conclude that "Anxiety" is the best match, because she becomes uneasy and nervous about her situation and what might happen next. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine replacing "makes her jittery" in the passage with "makes her anxious" and see if the narrative still flows naturally. It would read smoothly as "She overhears something that makes her anxious", which clearly fits the context of discovering illegal activity. If you substitute "sad", it does not capture the tension and fear. If you insert "angry", it shifts focus to anger which is not emphasised. "Trauma" suggests a deeper and possibly long lasting psychological injury, which is much stronger than the original phrase. Therefore "Anxiety" is the best fit. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sadness is a feeling of sorrow and is less likely to be the immediate dominant emotion in a situation involving potential danger and illegality. Anger may arise later, but the passage does not describe any outburst or resentment. Trauma refers to a deep psychological wound and is far too strong and technical for this informal phrase. Only "Anxiety" matches the sense of nervousness and unease suggested by "jittery". Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes over interpret words like "jittery" and confuse it with extreme conditions such as psychological trauma. Another pitfall is to ignore context and simply choose a negative emotion at random. Always link the expression to real life reactions in such situations and ask which emotion best describes a person who feels unsettled, worried, and uncomfortable, as Namita does after hearing about her employer's illegal work. Final Answer: The correct answer is Anxiety, because the phrase "makes her jittery" in the passage implies that Namita becomes nervous, uneasy, and worried about her safety and position after discovering the illegal nature of her employer's business.

Question 6

Based on the passage describing Namita working in Dubai and Gopal working for a construction contractor in the Emirates, answer this question: Namita and Gopal are said to be in a similar situation mainly because they share what common condition?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is drawn from a reading comprehension passage that presents parallel stories of Namita and Gopal. Namita leaves Kerala to work as a governess in Dubai, while Gopal leaves his village to work in the Emirates for a construction contractor. The passage highlights certain similarities and differences between their experiences. The question asks you to identify the main reason why their situations are described as similar. Given Data / Assumptions: Namita works abroad in Dubai as a governess for the Nair family. She later discovers that her employer is involved in illegal business and wants to go back home. Gopal sells his family land to travel abroad for work and then has his passport confiscated by the contractor. Gopal lives in cramped conditions with many others and does not know what to do. You must choose which shared condition best explains their similar situation. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension often tests your ability to identify main ideas and parallels between characters. While both Namita and Gopal care about their families and come from modest backgrounds, the key similarity highlighted here is their vulnerability in a foreign land. They are both away from their home country and dependent on employers whose actions put them at risk, leaving them feeling trapped or stranded with limited options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Summarise Namita's situation: she is in Dubai, initially treated well, but later discovers that her employer's business is illegal and she becomes frightened and wants to go home.Step 2: Summarise Gopal's situation: he travels to the Emirates for work, has to sell family land, then loses control of his passport and is forced into poor living conditions.Step 3: Identify what is common: both are away from home, under the control of others, and unsure about how to protect themselves.Step 4: Evaluate each option to see which captures this shared vulnerability most directly.Step 5: Recognise that the option "are stranded in a foreign country" best summarises the critical similarity in both stories. Verification / Alternative check: If you ask, "What is the main problem for both Namita and Gopal at this stage of the story?" the answer is that they are stuck in a foreign country in troubling circumstances. Both feel helpless and are unable to easily return home. Other options, like loving their families or being from poor backgrounds, may be partly true but are not emphasised as the key parallel that defines their similar situation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "love their families", is likely true but is not the main focus of the narrative at the moment of crisis. Option B, "are happy with their situations", is clearly wrong because both are uncomfortable and disturbed. Option C, "are from impoverished families", is more closely associated with Gopal, whose family sells land to send him abroad, while Namita's economic background is not stressed in the same way. Option D, "are stranded in a foreign country", precisely captures their shared condition of being far from home and feeling trapped or uncertain due to employer behaviour and legal risks. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes answer based on general sympathy, picking "love their families" or "are from impoverished families" because these sound emotional and important. However, comprehension questions usually have one option that directly addresses what the passage presents as the central parallel. Always look for the key problem both characters are facing at the same narrative point, which, in this case, is being stranded and vulnerable in a foreign land. Final Answer: The correct answer is are stranded in a foreign country, because both Namita and Gopal are away from home, dependent on employers, and facing worrying circumstances that make them feel trapped and uncertain about their future abroad.

Question 7

According to the passage describing Namita's employment with the Nairs in Dubai and Gopal's work with a contractor, Namita's situation is considered better than that of Gopal mainly for which of the following reasons?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question continues from the same passage about Namita and Gopal working abroad. Namita works as a governess in Dubai, while Gopal works for a construction contractor in the Emirates. The passage highlights differences in their circumstances. The question asks why Namita's situation is described as better compared to Gopal's, which tests your ability to compare and contrast characters using the details given. Given Data / Assumptions: Namita is employed by the Nair family, who are described as nice and gentle. She has no cause to complain about their behaviour, at least in the beginning. Gopal, on the other hand, has his passport confiscated and lives in crowded, uncomfortable conditions. It is implied that Gopal is being exploited, whereas Namita is treated fairly well in terms of daily life. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension comparison questions require careful attention to the details used by the author to portray each character's situation. Namita is anxious about the illegal nature of her employer's work, but her personal treatment is decent. Gopal faces both economic hardship and direct exploitation by the contractor. The better situation for Namita is linked primarily to how she is treated by the family she works for. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Revisit Namita's part of the passage: the Nairs are nice and gentle, and at first she has no cause to complain.Step 2: Revisit Gopal's part: his family sells land, his passport is taken away, and he is forced to live in a small place with many others, which shows a high level of exploitation.Step 3: Identify the main contrast: Namita has a humane and polite employer, while Gopal is under a harsh contractor.Step 4: Review the options to see which one exactly captures this key difference.Step 5: Recognise that "has a well behaved employer" is the most accurate summary of why her position, although risky, is still better than Gopal's. Verification / Alternative check: Ask yourself, if Namita and Gopal exchanged employers, whose daily life would likely be worse? Clearly, living under Gopal's contractor would be more difficult, so Namita's current employer, being gentle and considerate, gives her a comparatively better situation. The passage stresses that she has no cause to complain about personal treatment, which supports option A over the others. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, "knows what she wants to do", is not emphasised. She may want to go home, but that is not the reason her situation is better. Option C, "loves the new place and the child", is not explicitly stated; the passage focuses more on treatment by the employer rather than emotional attachment to the place. Option D, "now knows about her employer", actually increases her worry rather than improving her situation. The central positive difference is that her employers behave decently towards her in everyday life. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes over focus on the illegal business aspect and think that Namita's situation becomes worse than Gopal's. However, the question is about why her situation is still better overall. Another pitfall is choosing an option that is partially true but not the main reason. Always focus on what the passage clearly states or strongly implies as the main contrast between two characters. Final Answer: The correct answer is has a well behaved employer, because Namita is treated kindly and respectfully by the Nair family, whereas Gopal faces direct exploitation and poor living conditions under his contractor, making her situation comparatively better.

Question 8

After reading the passage about Namita and Gopal going abroad for work, answer this comprehension question: What conclusion can be drawn from both situations about what people should do before accepting such employment opportunities?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question asks you to draw a general conclusion from the experiences of Namita and Gopal, two characters who leave their homes for work abroad. Both face serious difficulties because of incomplete or misleading information about their employers and working conditions. The examiner wants to see whether you can extract the broader lesson that the passage is implying about such employment decisions. Given Data / Assumptions: Namita is told that Mr. Nair is employed in an American company, but she later learns that his business is illegal. Gopal's family sells their small piece of land to pay for his travel to the Emirates. On arrival, Gopal finds that his passport is confiscated and that he has to live in crowded conditions with many others. Both characters realise that the reality of their work situation is different from what they expected. Concept / Approach: Comprehension questions about "conclusions" test your ability to generalise from specific stories. You should look at what both cases have in common and then see which advice or lesson logically follows. Here, the common factor is that both Namita and Gopal accept jobs without fully checking the truth about the employer or the working conditions. Hence, a reasonable conclusion is that people should verify all important details before agreeing to such offers, especially when they involve travel to foreign countries and big sacrifices. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Summarise Namita's experience: she discovers that her employer's business is illegal and feels anxious about remaining in that environment.Step 2: Summarise Gopal's experience: he and his family take a big financial risk, but on arrival he loses his passport and control over his life.Step 3: Identify the shared problem: neither of them had complete and reliable information before making the decision to go abroad.Step 4: Examine the options to see which one expresses a general lesson that applies logically to both stories.Step 5: Recognise that "verify details before accepting any job" is the common sense conclusion suggested by both cases. Verification / Alternative check: If Namita had checked the true nature of Mr. Nair's business, she might have refused the job. If Gopal's family had verified the contractor's reputation and the legal protections for workers, they might have avoided selling their land so easily. For both, careful verification would have reduced the risk. The other options either go beyond the passage (for example, advising never to travel) or conflict with the characters' motives and realities. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "stay in their own countries and villages", is too extreme and not justified by the passage, which does not say that all migration is bad. Option B, "feel contented and satisfied with their lot", ignores the genuine economic pressures and aspirations that push people to seek better opportunities. Option D, "not travel to these regions of the world", unfairly targets certain places and again is stronger than what the passage suggests. Only Option C, "verify details before accepting any job", is a balanced conclusion that follows directly from what went wrong in both stories. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to choose options that sound moralistic or safe without checking whether the passage truly supports them. Another pitfall is to overlook the shared factor and focus only on one character. When answering conclusion questions, always ask what the author seems to be warning about or advising against in a general sense that fits both examples. Final Answer: The correct answer is verify details before accepting any job, because both Namita and Gopal face difficulties as a result of not having full and accurate information about their employers and working conditions before deciding to go abroad.

Question 9

In this vocabulary question on synonyms, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word "EMANCIPATE" from among the four alternatives.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the synonyms section of English vocabulary. You are asked to select, from four alternatives, the word that is closest in meaning to "EMANCIPATE". Such questions are very common in competitive exams because they test your ability to match formal or literary words with their everyday equivalents. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is "emancipate". Four options are given: "LIFT", "RISE", "RAISE", and "LIBERATE". You must pick the option that is most nearly similar in meaning to the given word. The spelling and capitalisation of the options are not important; the focus is on meaning. Concept / Approach: To solve synonym questions, you need to recall the core meaning of the target word and then choose an option that matches it most closely in context. "Emancipate" means to set free from legal, social, or political restrictions. It is often used with slaves, oppressed groups, or people freed from strict control, as in "emancipate slaves" or "emancipate women". The simple everyday equivalent is "liberate", which also means to set free. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of "emancipate": to free someone from bondage, control, or restrictions.Step 2: Look at each option and think about its main sense in typical sentences.Step 3: "LIFT" can mean to raise something physically or remove a restriction but is not the primary synonym here.Step 4: "RISE" and "RAISE" mainly indicate upward movement or increase in level, not the act of freeing another person.Step 5: "LIBERATE" directly means to set free, often in a social, political, or military context, which matches "emancipate". Verification / Alternative check: Create sample sentences and test substitution. Original: "The new law will emancipate the workers from unfair contracts." If we replace "emancipate" with "liberate", the sentence becomes "The new law will liberate the workers from unfair contracts", which keeps the sense of freeing them. If we use "rise" or "raise", the sentence does not make sense. If we use "lift", it could work in limited contexts, such as lifting restrictions, but it does not clearly refer to freeing people themselves. Therefore "LIBERATE" is the best synonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "LIFT" usually refers to physically lifting an object or lifting a ban or rule, but it is not the direct synonym used with people being freed from oppression. "RISE" is an intransitive verb, meaning to go up or get up, and does not take an object like "emancipate" does. "RAISE" means to lift something or increase it, for example raising salaries or raising a flag, not freeing someone from domination. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes focus on secondary meanings and think "lift" is the best answer because it can be used with restrictions. However, exam setters expect you to choose the closest and most direct synonym, especially in contexts involving freeing people from injustice. Remember that "emancipate" and "liberate" often appear together in discussions of human rights, civil rights, and social reform. Final Answer: The correct answer is LIBERATE, because both "emancipate" and "liberate" mean to set someone free from control, bondage, or unjust restrictions.

Question 10

In this antonyms question, choose the word which is opposite in meaning to the given word "TREACHERY" from among the four alternatives.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a vocabulary question on antonyms, where you must choose the word that has the opposite meaning of the given word. The given word is "TREACHERY". Antonym questions are frequently used in exams to test whether you know not just the meaning of a word but also its opposite, which is very important for nuanced understanding and usage. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is "treachery". Options include "BETRAYAL", "MULING", "LOYALTY", and "REBELLION". You must identify which of these is opposite in meaning to "treachery". The context is general English, often used in discussions of trust and relationships. Concept / Approach: To find an antonym, you must first be clear about the meaning of the original word. "Treachery" means betrayal of trust, disloyal or deceitful behaviour, often against a friend, country, or leader. Therefore the opposite of treachery would be faithful or loyal behaviour, that is, "loyalty". Once you know this, it becomes straightforward to pick the correct option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of "treachery": an act of betrayal, disloyalty, or cheating someone who trusted you.Step 2: Look at each option and recall its basic meaning.Step 3: "BETRAYAL" is almost a direct synonym of "treachery".Step 4: "REBELLION" means an uprising or resistance against authority, which is related to opposition, not necessarily betrayal of trust.Step 5: "LOYALTY" means faithfulness and strong support, which is clearly the opposite of treachery. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a pair of sentences: "His treachery shocked everyone" and "His loyalty impressed everyone". In the first case, he betrayed trust; in the second, he remained faithful. These two sentences show opposite evaluations of a person's behaviour. If you replace "treachery" with "betrayal", the meaning hardly changes, so "betrayal" is not an antonym but a synonym. Similarly, "rebellion" may or may not be treacherous depending on context, so it is not a direct opposite. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "BETRAYAL" is essentially the same as treachery, since both involve breaking trust. "MULING" is not a standard English word in this context and appears incorrect or irrelevant. "REBELLION" refers to rising against authority and does not necessarily express loyalty or treachery in itself. None of these options represent the direct opposite of deceitful betrayal as clearly as "loyalty" does. Common Pitfalls: Students who misread the question as asking for a synonym may quickly choose "BETRAYAL". Always check whether the question demands a synonym (same meaning) or antonym (opposite meaning). Another mistake is trying to infer meaning from word sound alone, which can be misleading. Focus on the definition and then think of the opposite behaviour or quality. Final Answer: The correct answer is LOYALTY, because "treachery" involves betrayal of trust, while "loyalty" is the opposite quality of remaining faithful and trustworthy.

Question 11

In this spelling question, four different spellings of a word are given. Choose the correctly spelt word from the options provided.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of correct English spelling. You are given four similar looking words, all attempting to spell the word that means "a suspension or postponement of a meeting, court, or session". The correct spelling is important in formal writing, legal documents, and academic communication. You must identify which option is correctly spelt. Given Data / Assumptions: The intended word is "adjournment". Four variants are presented, with differences in vowels and consonants. Only one spelling matches the standard dictionary form. You are expected to have basic familiarity with common legal and formal terms. Concept / Approach: Spelling questions often test words that are used in official contexts but can be confusing due to silent letters or unusual letter combinations. "Adjournment" comes from the verb "adjourn", which includes the "dj" combination and the "ourn" sequence. The noun "adjournment" simply adds "ment". Understanding the root verb helps in remembering the correct spelling of the noun. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the common expression used in courts and meetings: "The meeting is adjourned" and "The adjournment will be until tomorrow".Step 2: Focus on the root "adjourn" spelled A D J O U R N, and then add "ment" to form the noun "adjournment".Step 3: Examine each option and compare it with this structure.Step 4: See that "Adjournment" in option D follows the pattern exactly: A D J O U R N M E N T.Step 5: Note that the other options either miss letters or rearrange them incorrectly. Verification / Alternative check: A simple way to confirm is to split the correct spelling into root plus suffix: "adjourn" plus "ment". If an option cannot be neatly divided this way, it is likely wrong. For example, "Ajournment" lacks the letter "d", so it cannot come from "adjourn". "Adjournmant" has an extra "a" before "nt", which is incorrect. Any form that distorts the root "adjourn" is not acceptable. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "Ajournment", omits the "d" after "a", so it does not match the verb "adjourn". Option B, "Adjournmant", inserts an extra "a" before the ending, giving "mant" instead of "ment". Option C is another incorrect arrangement of letters and does not reflect the correct root spelling. Only option D accurately preserves "adjourn" and adds the proper suffix "ment". Common Pitfalls: Many learners misplace or drop the "d" in "adjourn" or misremember the exact order of vowels. Another common issue is confusion between similar sounding endings like "ment" and "mant". To overcome such pitfalls, it helps to remember example sentences from reliable sources, such as "The court ordered a short adjournment". Visual exposure to correct spelling in books and articles strengthens memory over time. Final Answer: The correct answer is Adjournment, which is the standard and correctly spelt noun formed from the verb "adjourn".

Question 12

In this English error spotting question, you must read the sentence "Some of the richest (A) / business magnate (B) / live in Mumbai. (C) / No Error (D)" and identify which part, if any, contains a grammatical error.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a typical English error spotting question found in competitive exams. The sentence is divided into parts marked (A), (B), and (C), and you must decide which part contains a grammatical or usage error. The sentence is "Some of the richest (A) / business magnate (B) / live in Mumbai. (C) / No Error (D)". Such questions test your understanding of subject verb agreement, singular plural usage, and correct phrase formation. Given Data / Assumptions: Part (A): "Some of the richest" Part (B): "business magnate" Part (C): "live in Mumbai." Part (D): "No Error" implies that the sentence might be error free. The intended meaning is that many very rich business people live in Mumbai. Concept / Approach: The key concept here is correct singular and plural usage. The phrase "Some of the richest" indicates that we are talking about more than one person, so the noun that follows should also be in the plural form. The expression should be "business magnates", not "business magnate". In addition, the plural verb "live" in part (C) is already consistent with a plural subject, confirming that the subject is plural and the noun must be plural too. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Combine the parts mentally: "Some of the richest business magnate live in Mumbai."Step 2: Notice that "Some of the richest" refers to several individuals, not just one.Step 3: Check the noun that follows: "business magnate". A single magnate would require a singular verb such as "lives".Step 4: Observe that the sentence uses the plural verb "live", which correctly matches a plural subject.Step 5: Conclude that the noun should therefore be plural as "business magnates", making the error located in part (B). Verification / Alternative check: Correcting the sentence, we get "Some of the richest business magnates live in Mumbai." Now the subject phrase "Some of the richest business magnates" is clearly plural and agrees with the plural verb "live". There is no conflict between subject and verb. If we kept "business magnate" singular, the sentence would read oddly unless we also changed the verb to "lives", which would then conflict with "Some of the". Thus the only logical correction is to pluralise the noun in part (B). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (A) "Some of the richest" is correct as a phrase introducing a group of very rich people. Part (C) "live in Mumbai." is also correct because "live" is the proper plural verb for a plural subject. Option (D), "No error", is wrong because we have clearly identified a number agreement problem in part (B). Hence only part (B) contains the mistake. Common Pitfalls: Many students focus only on the verb and ignore the noun form, or they accept "business magnate" as a fixed phrase without checking number agreement. Another common error is to think that the presence of "some" automatically makes the verb or noun correct, without actually checking singular versus plural consistency. Always ensure that the noun and verb reflect the same number throughout the sentence. Final Answer: The correct choice is Part (B): "business magnate", because it should be in the plural form "business magnates" to agree with "Some of the richest" and the plural verb "live".

Question 13

In this English error spotting question, examine the sentence "This is an urgent (A) / matter which may admit (B) / of few delays. (C) / No error (D)" and identify which part of the sentence contains a grammatical or usage error.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is another error spotting question from English grammar. The sentence is split into parts labelled (A), (B), and (C), and there is an option (D) for "No error". The sentence reads: "This is an urgent (A) / matter which may admit (B) / of few delays. (C) / No error (D)". Your task is to identify the part that contains an error in phrase structure or idiomatic usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Part (A): "This is an urgent" Part (B): "matter which may admit" Part (C): "of few delays." The intended meaning is that this is an urgent matter that does not allow much delay. Option (D) suggests that there might be no error. Concept / Approach: The expression "admit of" in English can mean "allow" or "permit". With urgent matters, the idiomatic pattern is usually "admits of no delay" or "admits of very little delay", which emphasises that delay is not acceptable. The phrase "of few delays" is incorrect because "few" suggests a small number of delays, but the construction with "admit of" and "delay" normally uses an uncountable noun like "delay" without "s". Therefore, the problem lies in the phrase "of few delays". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the full sentence mentally: "This is an urgent matter which may admit of few delays."Step 2: Understand the intended meaning: urgent matters usually do not allow delays.Step 3: Recognise that the usual idiom is "admits of no delay" or "admits of very little delay", not "of few delays".Step 4: Note that "delays" as a plural countable noun is awkward with "admit of" in this fixed phrase.Step 5: Conclude that the error is in part (C), where the noun phrase should be corrected to "of no delay" or "of very little delay". Verification / Alternative check: Try correcting the sentence: "This is an urgent matter which admits of no delay." This version is standard and frequently seen in formal writing. Another acceptable variation is "admits of very little delay." In both cases, the phrase in part (C) is different from the original "of few delays". Parts (A) and (B) then work smoothly with the corrected phrase, showing that the original issue was specifically in part (C). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (A), "This is an urgent", naturally connects with "matter" in part (B), so together they form "This is an urgent matter", which is correct. Part (B), "matter which may admit", is acceptable as a lead in to the idiom "admit of". The problem arises only when we reach the phrase "of few delays". Option (D), "No error", is incorrect because the sentence clearly misuses the idiomatic pattern. Common Pitfalls: Many learners focus on individual words and miss fixed expressions like "admits of no delay". Another pitfall is misunderstanding "few" and "little". "Few" is used with countable nouns and has a different nuance, while "little" is used with uncountable nouns like "delay". For urgent matters it is more common to speak of "no delay" or "little delay" rather than "few delays". Recognising set phrases is very important in such questions. Final Answer: The correct option is Part (C): "of few delays.", because the phrase should be something like "admits of no delay" or "admits of very little delay" instead of the incorrect and unidiomatic expression "of few delays".

Question 14

In this English error spotting question, read the sentence "Outside, the rain beats down (A) / in floods and the sea gives forth (B) / a sound like an alarm bells. (C) / No error (D)" and identify which part contains the grammatical error.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is another example of an error spotting item where a sentence is divided into labelled parts. The sentence given is "Outside, the rain beats down (A) / in floods and the sea gives forth (B) / a sound like an alarm bells. (C) / No error (D)". You must decide which segment contains a grammatical mistake, typically involving articles, number agreement, or word form. Given Data / Assumptions: Part (A): "Outside, the rain beats down" Part (B): "in floods and the sea gives forth" Part (C): "a sound like an alarm bells." The intended overall meaning is that the rain is heavy and the sea is making a loud sound similar to an alarm bell. Option (D) suggests there might be no error. Concept / Approach: The key concept here is number agreement between the article and the noun. The phrase "an alarm bells" is incorrect because "an" is a singular article used before a singular noun starting with a vowel sound, while "bells" is plural. The sentence should use either "an alarm bell" (singular) or "alarm bells" (plural without "an"). Since the structure is "a sound like an alarm bell", the intended comparison is likely with a single bell, so the error lies in the plural noun following the singular article. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the whole sentence to understand the imagery: heavy rain and a loud sea.Step 2: Focus on the phrase in part (C): "a sound like an alarm bells".Step 3: Notice that "an" is used before "alarm", and the noun is "bells" in the plural form.Step 4: Recall the rule that a singular article "a" or "an" cannot be used with a plural noun.Step 5: Conclude that either the article or the noun needs to change; the correct expression is "a sound like an alarm bell". Verification / Alternative check: Correct the expression and read the sentence again: "Outside, the rain beats down in floods and the sea gives forth a sound like an alarm bell." This corrected version is grammatically sound and clearly expresses the intended comparison. Parts (A) and (B) fit smoothly with this correction and do not show any obvious errors, confirming that the mistake lies only in part (C). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (A) "Outside, the rain beats down" is a perfectly acceptable way to describe heavy rain. Part (B) "in floods and the sea gives forth" may be slightly poetic, but it is not grammatically incorrect. Option (D), "No error", is invalid because of the clear mismatch between "an" and "bells" in part (C), which violates basic rules of article–noun agreement. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may be distracted by the slightly unusual phrase "gives forth" and think it is wrong, but this expression is acceptable in literary English. The real issue is subtler: the number disagreement in "an alarm bells". Always check carefully for article usage before singular and plural nouns, as this is a favourite point of exam setters. Final Answer: The correct choice is Part (C): "a sound like an alarm bells.", because the phrase should be "a sound like an alarm bell" to maintain correct agreement between the singular article and the singular noun.

Question 15

The following sentence contains a blank that must be filled with the most appropriate phrasal verb in standard English usage. Four alternatives are given. Choose the option that correctly completes the sentence. I hope you know that, once you have s…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of common English phrasal verbs used in everyday formal and informal communication. In particular, it focuses on the expression used when a person withdraws from an agreement or obligation after initially accepting it. Understanding such phrasal verbs is important for both spoken and written English because they carry meanings that are often not obvious from the individual words alone. The sentence about signing a contract is a realistic business context where precise language is necessary. Given Data / Assumptions: • The action described happens after a person has already signed a formal contract. • Once signed, the person is not allowed to withdraw from the agreement. • The blank must be filled with a phrasal verb beginning with the word back. • The sentence should sound natural and grammatically correct in standard English. Concept / Approach: Phrasal verbs are formed by combining a verb with one or more particles such as prepositions or adverbs. The meaning of the whole expression is often idiomatic. The phrase back out is commonly used to mean withdraw from an agreement, promise, or arrangement. Other combinations with back in, back up, and back at have different meanings that do not fit the context of cancelling a contractual commitment. Therefore, we need to select the phrasal verb whose established meaning matches the idea of withdrawing from a contract. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the complete sentence and identify the situation, which is signing a contract and then trying to avoid fulfilling it. Step 2: Recall the meaning of back out, which is to withdraw from a promise, arrangement, or agreement after agreeing to it. Step 3: Check the meaning of back in, which usually relates to reversing a vehicle or returning to a place, and see that it does not fit the contractual context. Step 4: Consider back up, which normally means support, move backward, or create a copy of data, and note that it does not express withdrawal from a contract. Step 5: Evaluate back at, which is not a standard phrasal verb expressing cancellation of an agreement. Step 6: Conclude that only back out accurately completes the sentence with the intended meaning. Verification / Alternative check: A good way to verify is to replace the blank with each option and read the full sentence. I hope you know that, once you have signed the contract, you will not be able to back out sounds natural and clearly means you will not be able to withdraw. The other combinations sound strange or change the meaning completely. Additionally, dictionaries and exam preparation materials frequently use back out in examples involving cancellation of agreements, which supports this choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Back in usually refers to reversing a vehicle into a space or returning to a previous position, so it has no connection with cancelling a contract. Back up means to move backward, give support, or make a copy of data, none of which match the idea of withdrawing from a signed agreement. Back at is not a standard phrasal verb with a clear meaning here, so it does not fit the blank in a natural way. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes select phrasal verbs based only on individual word meanings. Seeing back, they may think of the physical direction behind them and ignore idiomatic usage. Another common mistake is to confuse back out with back up because both begin with the same base verb. To avoid this, always learn phrasal verbs as complete units with their meanings and example sentences rather than guessing from the separate words. Final Answer: The correct phrasal verb that completes the sentence is back out.

Question 16

The following sentence tests your understanding of vocabulary and collocations used in professional and academic writing. Your opening paragraph should __________ the reader attention. Choose the option that best completes the sentence in natural an…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks whether you know the standard verb used with attention in the context of writing and communication skills. In introductions, teachers and style guides often say that the first paragraph must catch or draw the attention of the reader. The correct collocation is attract attention, which is widely used in English. Choosing the right verb here shows familiarity with natural sounding expressions in written English. Given Data / Assumptions: • The subject is an opening paragraph, which is part of a piece of writing. • The object is the reader attention, meaning the concentration of the person reading. • The task is to choose a verb that expresses capturing or drawing interest. • Options are attest, address, attract, and affect. Concept / Approach: In English, attention typically combines with verbs like attract, draw, catch, grab, and hold. The phrase attract attention means cause people to notice something. The other verbs in the options have different meanings. Attest means to provide evidence or proof of something. Address often means to speak to someone or deal with a problem. Affect means to influence. While affect attention is grammatically possible, it does not express the idea of drawing attention in the way that is used when talking about writing introductions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the standard phrase used in writing advice: an introduction should catch the reader attention or attract the reader attention. Step 2: Compare each option with common collocations: attract attention is a very frequent and natural expression. Step 3: Consider attest, which means to certify, confirm, or give evidence. It does not combine naturally with attention in this context. Step 4: Consider address, which is usually used with an audience, issue, or problem, for example address a meeting or address a concern, not address attention. Step 5: Consider affect, which means to influence, but affect the reader attention sounds awkward and does not match standard writing advice. Step 6: Conclude that attract is the only verb that forms a common and correct phrase with attention in this sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Try reading the sentence with each option inserted. Your opening paragraph should attract the reader attention sounds smooth and matches what textbooks on effective writing say. The versions with attest, address, or affect either sound unnatural or change the meaning. For example, Your opening paragraph should address the reader attention is not a normal expression in English. Therefore, attract is clearly the best choice and fits both grammar and usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Attest is wrong because it relates to proving or confirming something, not drawing interest. Address is wrong because it usually takes an object such as audience, issue, or envelope, and does not collocate with attention in this way. Affect is wrong because although a paragraph can affect the reader, the usual phrase is affect the reader, not affect the reader attention, and it still does not express the key idea of attracting interest at the beginning of a text. Common Pitfalls: Exam candidates sometimes focus only on dictionary meanings and ignore typical combinations of words. Another pitfall is translating literally from the first language, which may use a different verb with attention. To improve, learners should notice frequent patterns like attract attention, pay attention, draw attention, and hold attention in English reading materials and copy these patterns in their own writing. Final Answer: The correct verb that completes the sentence naturally is attract.

Question 17

The following sentence contains a blank for a particle that completes a phrasal verb. When I visited him last evening, we talked the matter ________. Choose the option that forms the most natural and meaningful expression in English.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines your understanding of phrasal verbs connected with discussion and problem solving. In English, when people discuss an issue carefully in order to understand it or decide what to do, they often use the phrasal verb talk something over. The sentence describes a visit during which the speaker and another person discussed a matter. You are asked to choose the correct particle to complete the phrasal verb talk over. Given Data / Assumptions: • The speaker visited someone last evening. • During the visit, they discussed a specific matter. • The verb talk is already present, and a suitable particle must complete the expression. • The options are through, away, off, and over. Concept / Approach: Phrasal verbs with talk change meaning depending on the particle. Talk over means discuss a problem or plan thoroughly, often before taking a decision. Talk through can mean explain something step by step, but talk the matter through is less common in exam contexts and changes the nuance slightly. Talk away means keep talking continuously, often without much purpose. Talk off is not a standard collocation with matter in this sense. Therefore, we must select the phrasal verb that best matches the idea of discussing an issue during a visit. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the core of the sentence: we talked the matter ________ and identify that it refers to discussing something. Step 2: Recall that talk something over is a common phrase meaning to discuss something carefully and fully, often before making a decision. Step 3: Substitute over into the sentence and check the sound: we talked the matter over is a natural and widely used phrase. Step 4: Test through: we talked the matter through is understandable but less standard in many exam patterns, and the more typical expression in such questions is talked the matter over. Step 5: Test away and off and notice that we talked the matter away and we talked the matter off do not make idiomatic sense. Step 6: Decide that over is the best choice because it forms the standard phrasal verb talk over. Verification / Alternative check: One way to verify is to think of similar example sentences from textbooks or conversations. For instance, Let us talk the plan over before we start or They talked the problem over for hours. These standard uses confirm that over is the correct particle. Reference materials for English exams also regularly include talk over as the correct phrasal verb for discussing matters in detail. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Through can fit in some contexts, but the more typical exam answer with matter is talk over, so through is considered less appropriate here. Away means continuously or without stopping, as in talk away happily, which does not match discussing a specific matter. Off does not form a common phrasal verb with talk and matter in this sense, so talk the matter off sounds incorrect and unnatural. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to assume that any particle can be used if the general idea seems close. Another mistake is to rely on literal meanings and ignore idiomatic patterns. Learners improve accuracy with phrasal verbs by studying them as fixed combinations and noting which objects they usually take, such as talk something over, think something over, and mull something over. Final Answer: The correct particle to complete the phrasal verb is over, giving talked the matter over.

Question 18

In this question, you are given an English idiom. You must choose the alternative that best expresses the meaning of the idiom. Idiom: A man of letters.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The question tests knowledge of English idioms that use metaphorical language. The phrase a man of letters does not refer literally to a person who handles mail or letters of the alphabet. Instead, it is a traditional expression used to describe someone who is highly educated, especially in literature and scholarly writing. Knowing such idioms is important for competitive exams, reading comprehension, and advanced vocabulary use. Given Data / Assumptions: • The idiom given is A man of letters. • The task is to choose the option that represents its meaning, not its literal wording. • The options are letter writer, proof reader, postman, and scholar. • We assume the idiom is used in a standard British or international English context. Concept / Approach: Idioms often cannot be translated word for word. The phrase a man of letters comes from an older usage where letters means literature, learning, or written works. Thus, a man of letters is a literary or scholarly person, usually an author, critic, or academic. The options letter writer, proof reader, and postman all focus on the physical handling of letters in the modern sense, but the idiom uses letters in the sense of literary studies. Therefore, the correct meaning is scholar. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the expression a man of letters is a fixed idiom in English. Step 2: Recall that in older usage, letters refers to literature, learning, and written knowledge, not postal mail. Step 3: Use this understanding to interpret the phrase as a person deeply involved in literature and study. Step 4: Compare this with the options. Letter writer is someone who writes letters, but this does not imply deep scholarship. Step 5: Proof reader is a person who checks printed material for errors, a technical role rather than a symbol of broad scholarship. Step 6: Postman is someone who delivers mail, clearly unrelated to scholarship or literary learning. Step 7: Scholar accurately describes a learned person, especially in literature or academic disciplines, which matches the idiomatic meaning. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by remembering sentences where this idiom is used. For example, He was a distinguished man of letters who wrote many critical essays clearly refers to an intellectual or academic figure, not a mail carrier. Dictionaries and literary criticism also use man of letters to describe celebrated writers and scholars. This confirms that scholar is the correct interpretation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Letter writer is wrong because it refers only to the mechanical act of writing personal or business letters. Proof reader is wrong because it is a technical occupation focused on correcting text rather than representing general scholarship. Postman is wrong because this job involves delivering mail, which is completely unrelated to the literary sense of letters in the idiom. Common Pitfalls: One common mistake is to interpret idioms literally and assume letters must mean postal letters. Another pitfall is not recognising that some English expressions preserve older meanings of words that have changed in everyday usage. To avoid such errors, learners should study idioms in context and note their figurative meanings rather than relying on the surface interpretation of each word. Final Answer: The idiom A man of letters means a scholar, that is, a highly learned literary or academic person.

Question 19

In this idiom based question, you must choose the alternative that best expresses the meaning of the expression Under a cloud as used in standard English.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The idiom under a cloud is a commonly tested phrase in competitive exams. It does not refer to actual weather or a literal cloud in the sky. Instead, it describes a situation where a person is not trusted, is suspected of wrongdoing, or is in disgrace in the eyes of others. Correctly interpreting idioms like this is essential for understanding newspapers, novels, and formal English passages. Given Data / Assumptions: • The idiom is under a cloud. • The context is general English usage, especially in exam and media language. • The task is to select the meaning of the idiom, not a literal description. • Options describe different emotional and social states, such as happiness, protection, or suspicion. Concept / Approach: In idiomatic English, clouds are often associated with doubt, trouble, or sadness, as in under a cloud, a cloud of suspicion, or dark clouds gathering. The phrase under a cloud specifically means that a person is suspected of something wrong or is in disgrace. It often appears when someone faces allegations, investigations, or loss of reputation. Therefore, the correct choice must include the idea of suspicion or disfavor, not joy or safety. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the phrase a cloud of suspicion, which directly connects clouds with doubt and mistrust. Step 2: Relate this idea to under a cloud, which suggests living or functioning under a shadow of suspicion or blame. Step 3: Examine option a, under suspicion or in disgrace, and notice that it matches this meaning exactly. Step 4: Examine option b, extremely happy and carefree, which is the opposite of the negative image created by a cloud. Step 5: Examine option c, protected from any difficulty, which would correspond more to under a protective shield, not under a cloud. Step 6: Examine option d, surrounded by close friends, which also has a positive feel and does not connect with suspicion or disgrace. Step 7: Conclude that option a is the only one that preserves the negative emotional and social sense implied by the idiom. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences. For instance, After the corruption scandal, the minister was under a cloud for several years clearly means he was suspected and not trusted. If the idiom meant happy or protected, such sentences would not make sense. Dictionaries and exam guides also define under a cloud as being suspected or in disgrace, which confirms that under suspicion or in disgrace is accurate. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Extremely happy and carefree conflicts with the negative symbolism of a cloud. Protected from any difficulty suggests safety and comfort, while the idiom actually indicates social or moral trouble. Surrounded by close friends describes a positive supportive environment, which again does not match being in disgrace or mistrusted by others. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes associate cloud only with sadness and pick options related to feeling sad, ignoring the aspect of suspicion and blame. Others guess from partial memory and confuse this idiom with under the weather, which means feeling unwell. It is important to learn idioms in full and notice the typical contexts where they appear, such as legal troubles, scandals, or disciplinary action for under a cloud. Final Answer: The idiom Under a cloud means being under suspicion or in disgrace.

Question 20

In this question, you must choose the option that best expresses the meaning of the idiom Bear in mind, which appears frequently in spoken and written English.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The expression bear in mind is a common idiom used in instructions, warnings, and polite requests. It is often seen in formal writing, speeches, and everyday conversation. The phrase does not refer to physically carrying something, but rather to mentally keeping something important in memory or consideration. The question asks you to identify the closest meaning among the given options. Given Data / Assumptions: • The idiom given is Bear in mind. • The context is general English and exam level usage. • The meaning must relate to mental activity, not physical action. • Options include respect, observe, remember, and pretend to listen. Concept / Approach: To bear something in mind means to remember it and consider it when making decisions or forming opinions. For example, a teacher may say Bear in mind that the test will be difficult, which means Remember and consider this fact. Respect, observe, and pretend to listen each carry different meanings and do not fully capture the idea of holding something in memory and consideration. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the structure bear in mind is a fixed phrase used to give advice or reminders. Step 2: Recall that it is usually followed by information that should be remembered, such as deadlines or important conditions. Step 3: Compare this with the idea of remember, which also means keep something in memory and think about it when needed. Step 4: Look at respect, which means show regard or consideration for a person or rule, not simply remember information. Step 5: Consider observe, which can mean watch carefully or follow a rule, again different from remembering a fact. Step 6: Evaluate pretend to listen, which is clearly negative and unrelated to the idea of sincere mental attention. Step 7: Decide that remember is the only option that matches the idiom bear in mind. Verification / Alternative check: Test the meaning in a sample sentence. Bear in mind that this road is very narrow can be paraphrased as Remember that this road is very narrow. The sentence still makes perfect sense. However, replacing with respect, observe, or pretend to listen changes the meaning or makes the sentence odd. This confirms that bear in mind and remember are close synonyms in such contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Respect focuses on attitudes toward people, laws, or customs, not on remembering information. Observe often refers to watching something carefully or obeying rules, which is not the same as keeping something in memory. Pretend to listen is incorrect because bear in mind involves genuine attention and consideration, not pretending or acting. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse observe with remember because both appear in formal contexts. Another mistake is to think bear in mind relates to respecting elders or customs due to cultural translations. To avoid confusion, focus on how the phrase is used in sentences. It always introduces information that should be kept in memory for later decision making or understanding. Final Answer: The idiom Bear in mind means remember.

English Questions