Question 1

This one word substitution question asks you to select the most appropriate term for the given description: Chief of a group of workmen.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One word substitution questions measure your vocabulary and your familiarity with specific technical or occupational terms. Here, the description Chief of a group of workmen refers to a person who directly supervises labourers or workers, especially in factories, construction sites, or workshops. The aim is to find the term used in industrial and labour contexts for such a supervisor. Given Data / Assumptions: • The phrase describes a leader or supervisor of workmen. • The setting is likely industrial, mechanical, or construction related. • Options are chieftain, engineer, foreman, and middleman. • We assume standard modern English usage in business and engineering environments. Concept / Approach: In factories, construction sites, and similar workplaces, the term foreman is used for the person in charge of a group of workers. The foreman supervises tasks, ensures safety, and reports to higher management. Chieftain usually describes the head of a tribe or clan, not industrial workers. Engineer is a professional who designs, plans, or maintains systems, but is not defined specifically as chief of workmen. A middleman is an intermediary in trade or business transactions, not a supervisor on a work site. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the phrase group of workmen as industrial or manual workers. Step 2: Recall the common job title for the leader who directly supervises such workers, which is foreman. Step 3: Examine option c, foreman, and note that dictionaries define it as a worker who supervises and directs other workers. Step 4: Consider chieftain, which is mostly used in historical or tribal contexts and does not match modern industrial workplaces. Step 5: Consider engineer, which refers to a qualified professional involved in technical design or maintenance, not specifically the chief of a group of workmen. Step 6: Consider middleman, which is a person who acts as an intermediary in trade, making this option unrelated to supervising workmen. Step 7: Conclude that foreman is the only word that exactly matches the given description. Verification / Alternative check: Check usage in example sentences: The foreman assigned tasks to each worker on the site or The factory foreman ensures that the production line runs smoothly. These clearly refer to a supervisor of workmen. No one would use chieftain, engineer, or middleman in such contexts. This verifies that foreman is the correct one word substitution. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chieftain is wrong because it is associated with tribes, clans, and traditional leadership, not modern work groups. Engineer is wrong because it describes a professional occupation that can exist without supervising workmen and does not specifically mean chief of workers. Middleman is wrong as it refers to an agent between producer and consumer in trade, completely different from supervising workers on a job site. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes choose engineer because they associate engineering sites with workmen, but the definition in the question focuses on direct supervision, not on technical qualification. Others may choose chieftain due to the word chief, but ignoring the tribal context. Always match the exact setting and description rather than picking a word that only partly overlaps in meaning. Final Answer: The correct one word substitution for Chief of a group of workmen is foreman.

Question 2

Choose the one word that best replaces the given description: Bitter quarrel between two families existing for a long period.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of one word substitutions related to conflict and relationships. The description mentions a bitter quarrel between two families that lasts for a long period. Such conflicts may span generations and involve deep resentment. English has a specific word for this type of prolonged hostility between families or groups, and recognising it is important for precise vocabulary use. Given Data / Assumptions: • The quarrel is described as bitter, indicating strong hostility. • It involves two families, suggesting a social or personal conflict, not entire nations. • The quarrel continues for a long period, which implies long term hostility, sometimes across generations. • Options given are siege, feud, battle, and war. Concept / Approach: The word feud refers to a long lasting and bitter quarrel or hostility between families, clans, or groups. Famous examples include historical family feuds. Siege, battle, and war are terms from military language. A siege is a military operation surrounding a place. A battle is a single fight between armed forces. War is prolonged armed conflict between countries or large groups, but not limited to two families. Therefore, feud is the only word that matches the personal, long term, family based conflict described in the question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note that the conflict involves families, not countries or armies. Step 2: Note that it is bitter and long lasting, which suggests deep, personal resentment. Step 3: Recall that feud is defined as a prolonged and bitter quarrel or conflict between families or clans. Step 4: Examine siege and observe that it is a military term for surrounding a place to force surrender. Step 5: Examine battle, which means a single armed conflict or fight between forces, usually brief compared with a long family quarrel. Step 6: Examine war, which refers to overall armed conflict between nations or large groups, not typically used for personal family disputes. Step 7: Conclude that only feud fits all aspects of the description given in the question. Verification / Alternative check: Think of example sentences: The two families have been locked in a feud for decades describes exactly the situation in the question. In contrast, it would be unusual to say The two families are in a war or a battle in normal social contexts. Dictionaries also emphasise that feud often refers to long standing hostility between families or clans, which matches perfectly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Siege is wrong because it is a specific military tactic and requires forces surrounding a fortified place. Battle is wrong because it generally refers to a single engagement in war, which is short in duration. War is wrong because it denotes large scale armed conflict between nations or large groups, not personal family quarrels. None of these express long term, family based hostility as accurately as feud. Common Pitfalls: Some students pick war or battle because they associate bitterness with violent conflict and ignore the family context. Others may not notice the long period aspect, which is crucial for the word feud. To avoid mistakes, read all parts of the description carefully, especially clues about who is involved and how long the conflict lasts. Final Answer: The correct one word substitution for a bitter, long lasting quarrel between two families is feud.

Question 3

Choose the one word that can correctly replace the description: Animals without a backbone.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question tests basic biology terminology. In zoology, animals are broadly divided into vertebrates and invertebrates based on the presence or absence of a backbone or vertebral column. Knowing these terms helps in school science as well as in general knowledge exams. The question asks for the scientific term for animals that lack a backbone. Given Data / Assumptions: • The animals described do not have a backbone or vertebral column. • The options are marsupials, mammals, vertebrate, and invertebrates. • The term must be applicable to a wide range of animals such as insects, worms, and many sea creatures. • We assume standard school level biology definitions. Concept / Approach: Vertebrates are animals with a backbone. The prefix in invertebrates indicates absence. Therefore, invertebrates are animals without a vertebral column. Marsupials are a special group of mammals that carry their young in a pouch. Mammals form a class of vertebrate animals with features like hair and milk production. The option vertebrate is clearly the opposite of what is described. Hence, invertebrates is the correct scientific term. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the key feature mentioned is absence of a backbone. Step 2: Remember that vertebrate animals have a backbone and form a specific group including fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Step 3: Apply the negative prefix in to vertebrate to form invertebrate, meaning animals without a backbone. Step 4: Look at option d, invertebrates, and see that it exactly matches this definition. Step 5: Reject marsupials because they are a subgroup of mammals that carry offspring in a pouch and still possess backbones. Step 6: Reject mammals because they are vertebrate animals and therefore do have backbones. Step 7: Reject vertebrate because it directly contradicts the description of animals without a backbone. Verification / Alternative check: Think of examples. Insects, spiders, earthworms, starfish, and jellyfish do not have backbones. These are called invertebrates in school textbooks. On the other hand, dogs, cows, and humans have backbones and are vertebrates. This comparison confirms that invertebrates is the correct term for animals without a backbone. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Marsupials is wrong because it refers to a specific group of mammals like kangaroos and koalas, which possess backbones. Mammals is wrong since mammals are vertebrates and the question specifically mentions absence of a backbone. Vertebrate is wrong because it states the opposite condition, namely presence of a backbone. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse vertebrates and invertebrates due to the similar spelling. Another mistake is not paying attention to the negative prefix in and mixing up the two terms. A simple memory aid is to remember that vertebrate and vertebra share the same root, while invertebrate simply adds a negative prefix indicating absence of a vertebral column. Final Answer: The correct one word term for animals without a backbone is invertebrates.

Question 4

In the following sentence improvement question, the underlined part is grammatically incorrect. Choose the option that improves the sentence. Original sentence: Can you be able to please tone down your excitement?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of polite requests and correct use of modal verbs in English. The original sentence combines can with be able to, which is unnecessary and awkward. In standard English, we do not normally use can and be able to together in this way. The task is to choose the option that expresses a polite request in a clear and grammatically correct form. Given Data / Assumptions: • The original sentence is Can you be able to please tone down your excitement. • The intention is to request someone to reduce the intensity of their excitement. • The structure should be polite and natural in modern spoken English. • Options include different combinations of can, are you able to, and word order changes. Concept / Approach: Can is a modal verb used for ability and also for making informal requests. Be able to is another way of expressing ability and already contains the idea of can. Using can you be able to together is redundant. A polite request usually uses can you or could you followed by the base form of the verb. Therefore, the most natural form is Can you please tone down your excitement, which removes the unnecessary be able to and keeps the polite please. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify redundancy in the phrase can you be able to, since can and be able to both express ability. Step 2: Recall that for polite requests, can you or could you plus base verb is standard and sufficient. Step 3: Examine option c, Can you please tone down your excitement, which uses can plus base form tone without be able to. Step 4: Check option a, Can you please be able to tone down your excitement, and see that the redundant be able to remains. Step 5: Check option b, Are you able to please tone down your excitement, which is grammatical but much less natural as a request than can you please tone down. Step 6: Check option d, No improvement, and note that the original construction is considered incorrect or at least very clumsy. Step 7: Conclude that option c provides the clearest and most polite form of the sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Compare typical polite requests: Can you please close the door and Could you please help me with this are standard forms. Native speakers do not usually say Can you be able to close the door. Replacing the object, we see that Can you please tone down your excitement follows the same natural pattern. It is concise, polite, and free from redundancy. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a keeps the redundancy by using can and be able to together. Option b, Are you able to please tone down your excitement, sounds like a question about ability rather than a straightforward polite request. Option d is wrong because the original sentence is stylistically poor and not considered standard exam level English. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes believe that longer expressions sound more polite and add be able to unnecessarily. Another mistake is to confuse questions of ability with polite requests. For examinations, remember that Can you please plus base verb is a simple and accepted way to make polite requests without awkward repetitions of ability markers. Final Answer: The improved and grammatically correct sentence is Can you please tone down your excitement.

Question 5

In this sentence improvement item, you must choose the correct relative pronoun to complete a well known proverb. Original sentence: Uneasy lies the head which wears the crown.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a famous proverb that comments on the troubles of leadership. The correct traditional wording is Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. The test checks whether you know the appropriate relative pronoun in this fixed expression and whether you can recognise the most standard form. Correct use of relative pronouns also reflects good grammar in complex sentences. Given Data / Assumptions: • The sentence talks about the head that wears the crown, a metaphor for a ruler or leader. • The version given uses which as the relative pronoun. • Options provide who, that, what, and no improvement. • We assume that examination boards prefer the most idiomatic and widely accepted form of the proverb. Concept / Approach: In restrictive relative clauses referring to things or people, English often uses that. In traditional phrasing, the proverb uses that and appears in many literary and exam sources as Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. While some might argue other pronouns are possible in normal sentences, in a fixed proverb the established form is what matters most. Therefore, substituting that for which gives the correct and recognised version. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the sentence is a proverb and recall its standard wording. Step 2: Note that the clause that wears the crown restricts and identifies which head is being talked about, so it is a defining relative clause. Step 3: Check option b, that, which matches the traditional version Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. Step 4: Examine option a, who, and observe that although it may refer to persons, the grammatical subject here is head, a thing, not a person. Step 5: Examine option c, what, which does not function as a relative pronoun in this construction and would make the sentence wrong. Step 6: Consider option d, No improvement, and recall that examination keys usually require the well known form with that, not which. Step 7: Select that as the best improvement for accuracy and idiomatic use. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by checking common references or remembering how you have seen this proverb in books and articles. Nearly all reliable sources phrase it as Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. Changing that to which sounds less natural and less faithful to the established proverb. This confirms that that is the preferred relative pronoun here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Who is wrong because the immediate antecedent is head, which is an inanimate noun, even though it symbolises a person. What is wrong since it cannot introduce a relative clause that specifies a noun in this way. No improvement is wrong because the given version with which does not reflect the standard proverb as taught and tested in English exams. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes pick who because they think of the person wearing the crown rather than the head as the grammatical subject. Others may think that which is acceptable for things, forgetting that the proverb is traditionally fixed with that. In sentence improvement questions based on famous sayings, always try to recall the exact wording used in literature and exam materials. Final Answer: The improved sentence is Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown.

Question 6

In this sentence improvement question, choose the correct idiomatic expression. Original sentence: The cities are bursting on the seams with people.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of a common English idiom used to describe overcrowded places. When a city, room, or container is extremely full, we say it is bursting at the seams. The original sentence uses an incorrect preposition and article, which makes the expression non standard. You need to select the option that restores the idiom to its correct form. Given Data / Assumptions: • The sentence describes cities that are very crowded with people. • The phrase given is bursting on the seams, which sounds wrong. • Options include different combinations of on, at, and the. • We assume the test is based on standard idiomatic English usage. Concept / Approach: The fixed expression is bursting at the seams, not on the seams or at seams. It originally refers to clothing that is so tight that the seams might break, and later it extended to describe any place that is overcrowded. Idioms often have fixed prepositions and articles. Changing them usually makes the expression incorrect or unnatural. Therefore, we must choose the option that exactly matches the established idiom with at and the. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the sentence aims to use an idiom about being extremely full or crowded. Step 2: Recall that the correct idiom is bursting at the seams. Step 3: Compare each option with the known idiom. Option c, bursting at the seams, matches exactly. Step 4: Note that option a, bursting on seams, replaces at with on and omits the article, which is incorrect. Step 5: Note that option b, bursting at seams, misses the article the, which also makes it non standard. Step 6: Observe that No improvement cannot be correct because the original uses on the seams instead of at the seams. Step 7: Select option c as it reproduces the idiom accurately. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify the expression by recalling familiar usage. Newspapers, stories, and conversations often contain sentences like The stadium was bursting at the seams or The train was bursting at the seams during rush hour. You will rarely, if ever, see bursting on the seams in standard English writing. This confirms that at the seams is the correct and idiomatic phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bursting on seams is wrong because on is not the standard preposition for this idiom and the missing article the makes it incomplete. Bursting at seams is closer but still incorrect because idioms usually require specific articles, and here the is part of the fixed phrase. No improvement is wrong because it accepts the non idiomatic version from the original sentence. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes think prepositions are interchangeable and accept bursting on the seams because it seems logical. However, with idioms, logic is less important than established usage. It is important to memorise common expressions exactly as native speakers use them. Practising such idioms will help in error spotting and sentence improvement sections of competitive exams. Final Answer: The correct idiomatic expression is The cities are bursting at the seams with people.

Question 7

In this sentence improvement item, you must choose the version that sounds the most natural in standard English. Original sentence: Let his failure be a lesson to you all.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on natural phraseology in English when addressing a group. The sentence aims to say that everyone in the group should learn from his failure. While the original version Let his failure be a lesson to you all is understandable, examinations often prefer more standard wording such as to all of you. Your task is to identify the option that best improves the sentence while keeping the meaning unchanged. Given Data / Assumptions: • The main structure Let his failure be a lesson is acceptable. • The phrase to you all can be improved in formal written English. • Options provide different ways of referring to the whole group. • The goal is smooth, grammatically standard, and natural expression. Concept / Approach: In formal English, the phrase to all of you is widely used to address every member of a group politely. The expression you all appears more in some dialects of spoken English and is less common in formal exam level writing. Option a, to all of you, maintains the plural reference and improves the stylistic quality of the sentence. Other options either sound awkward or add unnecessary words. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the part of the sentence that can be improved, namely to you all. Step 2: Consider the standard phrase to all of you, which is commonly used in speeches and formal writing. Step 3: Check option a, to all of you, and mentally substitute it into the sentence to get Let his failure be a lesson to all of you. Step 4: Evaluate option b, to all you people, which sounds informal and slightly redundant. Step 5: Evaluate option c, to all you, which is incomplete and sounds unnatural. Step 6: Consider option d, No improvement, and recognise that although the original is understandable, examination standards usually choose the smoother alternative. Step 7: Select to all of you as the best and most standard improvement. Verification / Alternative check: Test the sentence in a formal context, such as a teacher addressing a class: Let his failure be a lesson to all of you. This version reads smoothly and is typical in textbooks and formal speeches. The alternatives To all you people and To all you sound less polished and are rarely found in high quality written material. This confirms option a as the correct improvement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To all you people adds the word people unnecessarily and gives a slightly informal or even patronising tone. To all you is grammatically incomplete and does not match standard patterns. No improvement is not ideal because a better expression exists and is provided among the options. Examinations generally expect candidates to choose the most correct and natural sounding version available. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates leave the sentence unchanged because it feels familiar in casual speech. Others select option b as it appears emphatic, but they overlook the redundancy. To perform well in sentence improvement sections, always look for options that maintain the original meaning but provide greater clarity, formality, and grammatical correctness. Final Answer: The improved sentence is Let his failure be a lesson to all of you.

Question 8

In this sentence improvement question, you must choose the best substitute for the underlined description. Original idea: A foolish person is someone who is easily taken in and tricked by others.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks for a precise adjective that describes a person who is easily deceived. The sentence explains that such a person is easily taken in and tricked by others. English has a specific word for this characteristic. Your task is to choose the word that expresses this idea accurately in a single term, which is a common type of one word substitution in exams. Given Data / Assumptions: • The described person is easily taken in by others. • The key idea is that this person believes things too quickly and is easy to cheat. • Options given are sober, stupid, gullible, and no improvement. • The examination expects a precise vocabulary choice rather than a general insult. Concept / Approach: The adjective gullible refers to a person who is easily persuaded to believe something and is easy to deceive. It is widely used in psychological and social contexts to describe vulnerability to being tricked. Stupid is a general term for low intelligence but does not specifically focus on being easily deceived. Sober relates to not being drunk or being serious, which is unrelated. Therefore, gullible is the exact word that matches the explanation in the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the essential description easily taken in and tricked by others. Step 2: Recall that gullible means easily deceived or too ready to believe what other people say. Step 3: Compare this definition with stupid, which refers more broadly to lack of intelligence and does not always imply being easily tricked. Step 4: Examine sober, which usually means not drunk or serious, and clearly has no link to being deceived. Step 5: Consider No improvement and note that the original wording is long and descriptive, whereas a single precise adjective is preferred. Step 6: Conclude that gullible is the best fit for the given description. Verification / Alternative check: Use the word in sample sentences. For example, Children are often gullible and may believe everything they see on television. This sentence conveys exactly the idea of being easily tricked. Substituting stupid would change the focus from being deceived to general intelligence, which is not the main point in the original description. This confirms that gullible is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sober is wrong because its main meanings relate to not being under the influence of alcohol and to seriousness. Stupid is wrong because it is a broad insult about intelligence and does not specifically capture the nuance of being easy to deceive. No improvement is wrong because the sentence clearly defines a concept for which a standard adjective exists, and good style prefers concise and precise wording when possible. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may choose stupid due to its negative sense, but examiners usually look for the most accurate word, not the most insulting one. Others may ignore the clue easily taken in and focus only on foolish person, missing the subtle meaning. When solving such questions, always match the definition in the stem with the dictionary meaning of the options rather than relying only on emotional tone. Final Answer: The correct adjective for a person who is easily taken in and tricked is gullible.

Question 9

Read the following passage about modern civilisation and energy carefully. Then answer the question that follows by choosing the best option. Passage summary: Modern civilisation depends heavily on energy from oil, coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro,…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question assesses your ability to identify the central theme of a passage, rather than focusing on isolated facts. The passage describes the heavy dependence of modern civilisation on various energy sources, explains that oil and other fossil fuels are finite, and warns that as these resources decline, a global energy crisis will arise. It then stresses the urgent need to move towards sustainable energy sources such as wind and solar power. The theme is therefore about the approaching energy crisis and the need to respond wisely. Given Data / Assumptions: • Modern civilisation depends on energy that must be abundant and economical. • Around eighty five percent of world energy currently comes from fossil fuels like oil, coal, and natural gas. • Oil is described as uniquely versatile but finite and approaching depletion within a limited number of years. • Natural gas and coal are also finite and will eventually become scarce. • As these resources become rare, they will become expensive, leading to a worldwide energy crisis. • The passage calls for a planned transition to sustainable sources such as wind and solar power. Concept / Approach: To identify the theme, you must ask what overall message the author is trying to communicate. The passage is not simply listing energy resources. Instead, it builds an argument: current reliance on fossil fuels is unsustainable, depletion is approaching, costs will rise, and the world faces a serious crisis unless it shifts to sustainable energy. The mention of possible extinction of human beings highlights the seriousness of the crisis. Thus, the phrase that best captures this central concern is looming energy crisis. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Skim the passage to see what it discusses most frequently: dependence on energy, finite fossil fuels, and future crisis. Step 2: Note the numerical estimates for how long oil, gas, and coal will last, which emphasise the limited nature of these resources. Step 3: Pay attention to sentences stating that scarcity will lead to high costs and a worldwide energy crisis. Step 4: Observe the warning that the transition to sustainable energy can be planned or forced and that the coming era of limited energy will be very difficult. Step 5: Compare each option with this overall message. Changing lives is too general and does not clearly express the crisis. Step 6: Energy resources describes a topic but does not capture the urgent warning about crisis. Step 7: Power in today world is vague and fails to express the focus on depletion and danger. Looming energy crisis accurately reflects the passage focus on an approaching global problem. Verification / Alternative check: Rephrase the passage in one sentence: Modern civilisation depends on finite fossil fuels that are running out, which will cause a severe energy crisis unless we shift to sustainable sources. This summary clearly matches the idea of a looming energy crisis. None of the other options captures both dependence and impending danger as clearly. Therefore, option b is the best summary of the theme. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Changing lives is too broad and does not reference energy at all. Energy resources is merely a neutral label and could describe a passage that only lists different sources without highlighting the crisis. Power in today world is also generic and does not focus on depletion, rising prices, and crisis. Only looming energy crisis communicates the sense of an approaching global problem that runs through the entire passage. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the topic with the theme. The topic here is energy resources and modern civilisation, but the theme is the author perspective on that topic, namely that a major crisis is approaching. Another mistake is focusing on the first line of the passage and ignoring later warnings. Always read the whole passage and pay attention to any concluding remarks that reveal the author main message. Final Answer: The main theme of the passage is a looming energy crisis caused by the depletion of finite fossil fuels.

Question 10

Based on the passage about energy and modern civilisation, answer the following question. According to the passage, biomass is an energy source used in which place or context?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your ability to pick out a specific factual detail from the passage. The passage explains how different energy sources are used. It notes that coal, nuclear, and hydro power mainly generate electricity, natural gas is used widely for heating, and biomass is used for heating and cooking. Heating and cooking are activities most closely associated with homes and domestic life, so the correct answer reflects that context. Given Data / Assumptions: • The passage lists several energy sources and their typical uses. • Coal, nuclear, and hydro power are used primarily for electricity generation. • Natural gas is widely used for heating in many regions. • Biomass is used both for heating and for cooking. • Heating and cooking are daily household activities. Concept / Approach: The key is to interpret the phrase used both for heating and cooking in terms of location. Heating and cooking are essential domestic functions. While some industrial contexts also need heat, the pairing of heating and cooking together usually points to home use. Therefore, homes is the most accurate match among the options provided. Agriculture, industry, and offices are not mentioned in connection with biomass in the passage, and they do not naturally match the combination of heating and cooking. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the sentence from the passage that mentions biomass specifically, which states that biomass is used both for heating and cooking. Step 2: Consider the everyday context in which both heating and cooking are central, namely household life. Step 3: Look at the options agriculture, industry, homes, and offices and match them with the idea of heating and cooking. Step 4: Note that agriculture deals with crops and livestock, not primarily with cooking. Step 5: Observe that industry focuses on manufacturing and heavy processes; while it does use heat, it is not typically described in terms of cooking. Step 6: Offices are workplaces where heating may be needed but cooking is usually minimal or separate. Step 7: Conclude that homes is the correct answer because it fits both heating and cooking as domestic uses of biomass. Verification / Alternative check: In many countries, biomass in the form of wood, crop waste, or animal dung is burned in stoves for domestic cooking and space heating. This real world observation matches the description in the passage. The passage does not connect biomass with agriculture, industry, or offices as its primary context. This confirms that homes is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Agriculture is wrong because the passage does not say biomass is used as energy specifically in agriculture; rather, it focuses on end uses like heating and cooking. Industry is wrong because the passage assigns coal, nuclear, and hydro power mainly to electricity generation rather than linking biomass to industrial processes. Offices is wrong because offices usually rely on electricity and central heating, not biomass for cooking and heating. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to overthink and select industry because it sounds technical. Another mistake is not connecting heating and cooking with domestic life and instead treating them as separate ideas. To avoid such errors, always ask where these activities most naturally occur in everyday life when matching passage statements to options. Final Answer: According to the passage, biomass is an energy source used in homes, mainly for heating and cooking.

Question 11

From the same passage on energy and civilisation, answer the vocabulary based question. The word ubiquitous is used to describe oil powered machines. Which option gives the closest meaning of ubiquitous as used in the passage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on advanced vocabulary. In the passage, oil powered machines are described as ubiquitous, meaning they are present everywhere in modern life. You see them in transport, factories, agriculture, and daily activities. The options all begin with omni, but each has a different meaning. You must choose the one that correctly matches ubiquitous in this context. Given Data / Assumptions: • The word ubiquitous appears in the passage in relation to oil powered machines. • The context suggests that such machines are seen in many places and situations. • Options provided are omnipotent, omnifarious, omniscient, and omnipresent. • All options share the prefix omni, meaning all or everywhere, but their suffixes change the meaning. Concept / Approach: Ubiquitous means existing or being present everywhere at the same time or very widely encountered. Omnipresent also means present everywhere at once. Omnipotent means all powerful, a term often used for divine power. Omniscient means all knowing. Omnifarious refers to having many forms or varieties. Since the passage emphasises that oil powered machines can be found everywhere in modern civilisation, omnipresent is the closest synonym. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the sentence from the passage: Oil powered machines are ubiquitous. Step 2: Understand from context that the author means such machines are found in almost every area of life. Step 3: Consider the meaning of omnipresent, which is present everywhere at the same time. Step 4: Compare this with omnipotent, which means all powerful and does not relate to being everywhere. Step 5: Compare with omniscient, which means all knowing and is used for knowledge, not physical presence. Step 6: Compare with omnifarious, which refers to many kinds or varieties, not simply being present everywhere. Step 7: Conclude that omnipresent matches the sense of ubiquitous in this passage. Verification / Alternative check: You can replace ubiquitous with each option in the original sentence to check the meaning. Oil powered machines are omnipresent makes sense and conveys the idea that they are found everywhere. Oil powered machines are omnipotent or omniscient sound strange, because machines are neither all powerful nor all knowing. Omnifarious would suggest many kinds of machines, which is not the main idea in the passage. This confirms omnipresent as the correct synonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Omnipotent is wrong because it describes unlimited power, often attributed to deities, not to machines spread across the world. Omniscient is wrong because it means having complete knowledge and is used in philosophical or religious contexts. Omnifarious is wrong because it emphasises variety rather than widespread presence. Only omnipresent correctly conveys the sense of being everywhere that ubiquitous carries in the passage. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may pick omnipotent or omniscient simply because they are more familiar from religious or philosophical discussions. Others may guess based on the shared prefix omni without paying attention to the full word. To avoid mistakes, learn the most common omni words along with their precise meanings and compare them carefully with the passage context. Final Answer: The word ubiquitous in the passage is closest in meaning to omnipresent.

Question 12

Using the information in the passage on energy, choose the correct answer to this question: According to the passage, which energy sources represent the hope for the future because they are sustainable?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question tests your ability to identify a specific claim in the passage about future energy sources. The passage contrasts finite fossil fuels like oil, coal, and natural gas with renewable sources. It explicitly highlights wind and solar power as the hope for the future because they are sustainable. You must choose the option that reflects this statement accurately. Given Data / Assumptions: • Fossil fuels such as oil, coal, and natural gas supply the majority of current energy but are finite and will run out. • Nuclear and hydro power are used primarily to generate electricity and are part of the current mix. • Biomass is used for heating and cooking. • The passage states that wind and solar power are the future hope as sustainable energy sources. • Sustainable means they can be renewed naturally and will not be exhausted in the way fossil fuels are. Concept / Approach: Wind and solar energy are classified as renewable because they come from natural processes that are continuously replenished. The passage calls them the future hope and emphasises the need to transition to sustainable energy sources. The other options focus on sources that are finite or are not presented as the main hope for the future in the passage. Therefore, the correct answer is the pair that the passage itself labels as the future hope. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the exact wording in the passage that mentions future hope and sustainable energy. Step 2: Note that the passage says wind and solar power is the future hope as they are sustainable energy sources. Step 3: Examine option c, wind and solar power, and see that it matches the wording and idea directly. Step 4: Examine option a, nuclear and hydro power, which are important but are not named as the main future hope in the passage. Step 5: Examine option b, coal and natural gas, which are specifically mentioned as finite fossil fuels that will eventually run out. Step 6: Examine option d, oil and biomass, where oil is again a finite fossil fuel and is described as drawing to a close. Step 7: Conclude that wind and solar power is the only option that matches the author language about sustainable hope for the future. Verification / Alternative check: You can summarise the relevant part of the passage as follows: Although fossil fuels dominate current energy supply, they are limited. Wind and solar power are described as sustainable and therefore represent future hope. When you compare this summary with the options, wind and solar power stand out as the clear match. This confirms that option c is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Nuclear and hydro power are not labelled as the main hope for the future in the passage, even though they are important. Coal and natural gas are explicitly given as finite resources that will last a limited number of years and will lead to crisis. Oil and biomass group together one finite resource and one domestic energy source, but the passage does not present them as future hope. Only wind and solar power are clearly described as sustainable and as the main future hope. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to overthink and choose nuclear and hydro power because they sound advanced or powerful, ignoring the passage wording. Another error is to rely on outside knowledge instead of focusing strictly on what the passage says. In such questions, always prefer the option that directly repeats or closely paraphrases the author statements about the future and sustainability. Final Answer: According to the passage, the energy sources of the future are wind and solar power because they are sustainable.

Question 13

According to the passage on energy and civilisation, what will the survival of humankind mainly depend on in the coming era of limited and expensive energy?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks you to identify the key solution proposed in the passage for dealing with the global energy crisis. The passage warns that fossil fuel reserves are finite and that their depletion will lead to scarcity and high prices. It clearly states that, for humans to survive on this planet, there must be a transition to sustainable energy sources. The question tests whether you have grasped this central recommendation rather than focusing only on the description of the problem. Given Data / Assumptions: • Oil, natural gas, and coal supplies are limited and will eventually be exhausted. • As these fuels become scarce, they become expensive, causing a worldwide energy crisis. • The passage explicitly states that if humans are to survive, they must move to sustainable energy sources. • It contrasts a planned transition with a forced, chaotic one and stresses that understanding the crisis is crucial for survival. Concept / Approach: The central idea is not simply to maximise use of existing resources, which would accelerate depletion, nor to keep production constant, which is impossible as wells and mines run dry. Regulation of consumers might help temporarily but does not solve the root problem of finite resources. Instead, the passage emphasises switching from finite fossil fuels to renewable, sustainable sources such as wind and solar power. Therefore, the survival of humankind depends mainly on managing this transition successfully. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main recommendation in the passage, which is to make a transition to sustainable energy sources. Step 2: Note that the author states clearly that if humans are to survive, this transition is necessary. Step 3: Examine option b, transition to sustainable energy resources, and see that it exactly matches this recommendation. Step 4: Check option a, maximum use of available energy resources, which would worsen depletion and is not suggested as a solution. Step 5: Check option c, regulation placed on energy consumers, which may be part of policy but is not presented as the central condition for survival. Step 6: Check option d, keeping the level of energy production constant, which the passage itself says will be impossible as resources decline. Step 7: Conclude that option b is the only one consistent with the passage argument. Verification / Alternative check: Summarise the author solution in one sentence: To avoid extinction and survive the coming energy crisis, humans must shift from finite fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources, preferably in a planned way. This summary clearly matches the wording of option b. None of the other options captures both the idea of transition and the emphasis on sustainability. This confirms the correctness of option b. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Maximum use of available energy resources would speed up depletion and is contrary to the warning in the passage. Regulation placed on energy consumers may have some effect but is never presented as the main condition for survival. Keeping the level of energy production constant is unrealistic given declining resource output and does not address the need to change the type of energy sources used. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates focus only on conserving current resources and choose options about regulation or maximum use without thinking about long term sustainability. Others may misread the passage and assume that simple efficiency is enough. To avoid such mistakes, always pay attention to explicit statements about what must be done in the future and look for words like transition, sustainable, or long term in the text. Final Answer: According to the passage, the survival of humankind will depend mainly on a transition to sustainable energy resources.

Question 14

In the following vocabulary question, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word IMPECCABLE in standard English usage.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of high level adjectives used to describe quality or behaviour. The word impeccable is often used to describe something that is perfect, without any fault or error, such as impeccable manners or impeccable performance. You must choose the option that most closely matches this meaning. The options include several adjectives with different senses, so careful comparison is required. Given Data / Assumptions: • The target word is impeccable. • The context is general English vocabulary for competitive exams. • Options are inoffensive, harmless, important, and faultless. • The correct answer should convey the idea of perfection and absence of faults. Concept / Approach: Impeccable describes something that is so good that it cannot be criticised. Faultless describes something that has no faults or mistakes, which is a direct match. Inoffensive means not likely to offend, harmless means not causing harm, and important means significant. None of these three captures the idea of being perfect or error free. Therefore, faultless is the most accurate synonym among the given options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the definition of impeccable as perfect or without flaws. Step 2: Examine option d, faultless, which means having no faults or errors. Step 3: Compare impeccable and faultless in sample phrases, such as impeccable service and faultless service, noticing that both convey the same idea. Step 4: Consider inoffensive, which focuses on not causing offence rather than on being perfect. Step 5: Consider harmless, which emphasises lack of harm, not absence of flaws. Step 6: Consider important, which refers to significance or influence, not to quality or flawlessness. Step 7: Decide that faultless is the best synonym for impeccable in this context. Verification / Alternative check: Test the options in a simple sentence: Her impeccable performance impressed everyone can be rewritten as Her faultless performance impressed everyone without changing the essential meaning. However, saying her harmless performance or her inoffensive performance sounds odd and does not convey excellence. Her important performance shifts the meaning entirely. This confirms that faultless is the closest match. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Inoffensive is wrong because something may be inoffensive yet still be mediocre or flawed. Harmless is wrong because it refers to safety, not to perfection. Important is wrong because it measures significance, not quality. None of these words describe something that is perfect and cannot be criticised, which is what impeccable conveys. Common Pitfalls: Learners may confuse impeccable with impressive or important because it often appears in praise, but the key idea is absence of faults, not mere significance. Another common error is to choose inoffensive because it sounds formal, but its meaning is narrower and unrelated to perfection. Always focus on the core meaning of the target word and check which option preserves that meaning most completely. Final Answer: The word that best expresses the meaning of IMPECCABLE is FAULTLESS.

Question 15

In this English vocabulary question on antonyms, choose the option that is opposite in meaning to the given word DISAVOWAL (which means denial or refusal to acknowledge).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of English vocabulary, specifically antonyms. You are given the word disavowal and asked to choose the word that expresses the opposite meaning. Such questions are very common in competitive exams because they check how well you know shades of meaning and usage rather than just dictionary definitions. Given Data / Assumptions: We are given: Target word: disavowal. Options: Rebuttal, Repeal, Approval, Appeal. Task: Select the option that is opposite in meaning (the antonym) of disavowal. Concept / Approach: Disavowal means denial, rejection, or refusal to accept responsibility or connection with something. If someone issues a disavowal, they say that they do not support or own a statement, belief, or action. The opposite idea would be accepting, agreeing with, or officially approving something. The best way to proceed is to recall or infer the meanings of each option and then identify the one that directly contrasts with denial or rejection. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand disavowal. It refers to the act of denying any responsibility for, or connection with, something. It implies strong refusal. Step 2: Consider Rebuttal. A rebuttal is a counter-argument or refutation of a statement. While it may involve disagreement, it focuses on arguing against something, not the broader act of accepting or rejecting responsibility. Step 3: Consider Repeal. Repeal is used mainly for laws and regulations. It means to cancel or revoke a law formally. This is not the direct opposite of disavowal. Step 4: Consider Approval. Approval means accepting, agreeing to, or officially sanctioning something. This is conceptually opposite to disavowal, which is denial and refusal. Step 5: Consider Appeal. Appeal usually means a request for help, support, or a legal review. It does not express the opposite of denial. Step 6: Therefore, Approval is the correct antonym because it directly opposes the idea of refusing or denying and instead indicates acceptance or agreement. Verification / Alternative check: We can test the meanings in simple example sentences. If a government issues a disavowal of a statement, it denies that it supports that statement. If it issues an approval of a statement, it officially accepts or supports it. These are opposite actions. Rebuttal is just arguing against a claim, repeal is cancelling a law, and appeal is asking for something. None of those are as directly opposed to disavowal as approval is. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rebuttal is wrong because it focuses on argument and refutation, not on accepting or endorsing something. Repeal is wrong because it applies specifically to overturning laws or rules, which is a different concept. Appeal is wrong because it is associated with requests or legal reviews, not with approving or disapproving. Only approval captures the opposite core idea of denying or refusing connection. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to pick a word that sounds formal or negative without checking if it is truly opposite in meaning. Another error is to confuse related but not opposite words, such as thinking that rebuttal is opposite to disavowal just because both appear in argument contexts. Always ask: does this option express the reverse attitude or action? Here, the reverse of denial is clear acceptance or approval. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to disavowal is Approval.

Question 16

In this English spelling question, four similar looking words are given; choose the correctly spelt word from the options below.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your command of correct English spelling. The word in focus is hierarchy, a commonly used term in organisational and social contexts. In competitive exams, examiners often give several similar looking spellings with rearranged vowels or doubled consonants. You must identify which spelling is accepted in standard English. Given Data / Assumptions: We are provided with four alternatives: Heirrarchy Hierrarchy Hierarchy Heirarchy We must choose the correctly spelt word. Concept / Approach: Hierarchy is the correct English word that refers to a system in which people or things are arranged according to their importance or authority. The standard spelling is h i e r a r c h y. The distractor options change the positions of vowels or introduce extra letters. A good approach is to mentally break the word into syllables and compare them with the familiar correct form, or recall how it appears in textbooks and articles. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the word hierarchy from common usage, for example organisational hierarchy or social hierarchy. Step 2: Write the mental pattern h i e r a r c h y, paying attention to the order of i and e after h and the placement of a. Step 3: Examine Heirrarchy. This has double r after hei and also misplaces the vowels, so it does not match the known pattern. Step 4: Examine Hierrarchy. Here the letter order suggests h i e r r a r c h y with double r together, which is incorrect. Step 5: Examine Hierarchy. This exactly matches the standard spelling: h i e r a r c h y, with no extra letters and vowels in the correct order. Step 6: Examine Heirarchy. This variant begins with h e i r, resembling heir, and then continues wrongly as archy. This is not the correct spelling of the word for a graded system of ranks. Step 7: Since only Hierarchy corresponds to the accepted spelling, it is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can quickly verify by thinking of related forms like hierarchical. In that form, we clearly see hier- and -arch, pointing back to the same spelling in hierarchy. Spell checkers in word processors also recognise hierarchy as correct and underline the other forms as mistakes. The etymology from Greek hieros (sacred) and archos (leader) is visible in the sequence hier + arch + y, again confirming the chosen spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Heirrarchy is wrong because it adds an extra r and scrambles the vowels. Hierrarchy is wrong for the same reason: the cluster -err- is incorrect. Heirarchy is wrong because the initial hei part turns the word into something closer to heir, and the following letters do not match the standard form. None of these variants appear in dictionaries as accepted spellings of hierarchy. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse the order of i and e in hierarchy and are misled by patterns like receive or believe. Another problem is inserting extra r letters because the word sounds like it has a slight extra r sound in some accents. The safest method is to learn hierarchy visually as a whole word and reinforce it through reading and writing. Frequent exposure fixes the correct shape of the word in your memory. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Hierarchy.

Question 17

In this English grammar error-spotting question, identify the part of the sentence that contains an error in the sentence "I waited for you but you never turned up." If there is no error, choose the "No Error" option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is an English grammar error detection question. The sentence I waited for you but you never turned up is divided into parts, and you must decide whether any part contains a grammatical or idiomatic mistake. If every part is correct according to standard English usage, the answer should be the No Error option. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is broken into: Part A: I waited for you Part B: but you never Part C: turned up. Part D: No Error We assume standard conversational and written English. Concept / Approach: The sentence describes a past action and uses a common phrasal verb turned up, meaning appeared or arrived. The structure I waited for you but you never turned up is a normal way to express disappointment about someone not coming. The task is to check subject verb agreement, tense consistency, preposition usage, and idiomatic phrasal verbs. If all elements are correct, there is no grammatical error. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine Part A, I waited for you. The verb waited is in simple past tense, which is correct for a completed action, and the preposition for is correctly used to show that the speaker spent time expecting the listener. Step 2: Examine Part B, but you never. This portion introduces contrast using but and the adverb never, preparing for the completion of the clause. It is structurally sound and sets up the next verb phrase. Step 3: Examine Part C, turned up. Turned up is a phrasal verb meaning arrived or appeared. In past tense, you never turned up is a perfectly natural phrase. Step 4: Combine the parts: I waited for you but you never turned up. The sentence as a whole is grammatically correct, idiomatic, and complete. Step 5: Since none of the three content parts show error, the correct choice must be Part D, No Error. Verification / Alternative check: We can rephrase the sentence slightly: I waited for you, but you did not come. This is clearly correct. The original sentence uses the more informal and idiomatic turned up instead of came, which is acceptable in both speech and many forms of writing. There is no mismatch of tenses, and the conjunction but is correctly used to join two clauses. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Choosing Part A as the error would wrongly suggest that waited for you is incorrect, but it is a standard phrase. Part B is also correct because the use of never with a past tense verb is common and accurate. Part C is correct because turned up is a valid phrasal verb in past tense. Therefore, marking any of A, B, or C as erroneous would be unjustified. Only D, No Error, correctly reflects that the sentence is fine. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes suspect an error just because a phrasal verb like turned up sounds slightly informal. Others think that never must be replaced with not, but both are acceptable here. Overthinking can lead to falsely detecting an error where none exists. In error-spotting questions, always check whether the sentence genuinely violates a grammar rule before rejecting the No Error option. Final Answer: The sentence has no grammatical mistake, so the correct choice is D (No Error).

Question 18

In this English grammar error-spotting question, identify the part of the sentence that contains an error in "He learnt the alphabets at the age of four."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of correct noun usage in English, particularly with the word alphabet. The sentence He learnt the alphabets at the age of four is split into parts, and you need to find which part is grammatically incorrect. Such questions are common in competitive exams to check fine points of standard usage. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided as: Part A: He learnt Part B: the alphabets Part C: at the age of four. Part D: No Error We assume a neutral context in which a child is learning letters of a language. Concept / Approach: In standard English, when we refer to the complete set of letters in a language (like A to Z in English), we usually use the singular noun alphabet, not alphabets. The plural alphabets is used only when talking about the writing systems of different languages together, for example Indian scripts use many alphabets. Here, the sentence clearly refers to the letters of one language that a child learns, so the singular form the alphabet should be used. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine Part A, He learnt. The verb learnt is the past tense of learn and is correct in British usage. Step 2: Examine Part B, the alphabets. In this context the child is learning the basic letters of one language. Therefore, we should use the singular form the alphabet. Step 3: Examine Part C, at the age of four. This phrase correctly indicates the time when the learning took place. Step 4: Combine the corrected elements: He learnt the alphabet at the age of four. This sentence is grammatically correct and natural. Step 5: Therefore, the error lies in Part B, where alphabets should be replaced with alphabet. Verification / Alternative check: We can cross-check by considering general descriptions: Children usually learn the alphabet in kindergarten. Here, nobody says the alphabets unless they are referring to several different languages, such as He is studying the alphabets of five different languages. In the question, it is clearly about one child and a single language, so the singular form is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part A is correct because He learnt is an acceptable past tense form. Part C is also correct and does not contain any grammatical or idiomatic error. Part D, No Error, is wrong because there is a clear mistake in Part B. Hence the only problematic part is the phrase the alphabets. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes assume that because there are many letters, the noun must be plural. However, alphabet denotes the entire set as a single unit. Similar patterns appear in words like furniture or luggage, which remain singular collective nouns. Remembering that we say learn the alphabet when referring to the basic letters of one language will help avoid this repeated mistake. Final Answer: The incorrect part is B (the alphabets); it should be the alphabet.

Question 19

Complete the sentence by choosing the most appropriate verb: "By a single mean act, he _____ out all his good deeds."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence completion question checks your knowledge of phrasal verbs and collocations in English. The sentence describes how one cruel or mean act can cancel the effect of many good deeds. You must choose the verb that forms a natural and meaningful phrase with out in this moral context. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: By a single mean act, he _____ out all his good deeds. The options are: wiped whipped worked whisked We assume we want to express the idea of cancelling or destroying the effect of the good deeds. Concept / Approach: In English, the phrasal verb wipe out means to destroy, cancel, or remove completely. It can be used in both literal and figurative situations, such as wiping out a village or wiping out past achievements. In this context, the sentence suggests that one bad action cancelled all earlier good actions, so wiped out is the natural collocation. The other verbs do not form a meaningful phrase with out in this sense. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the meaning of the sentence. It says that because of one mean act, the value or memory of all his good deeds was cancelled. Step 2: Consider the phrasal verb wiped out. It means completely destroyed or removed, which matches the moral message. Step 3: Examine whipped out. This usually means took something out very quickly, such as whipped out a phone, which does not fit the idea of cancelling good deeds. Step 4: Examine worked out. It generally means solved or exercised, and would require an object or a different structure. Worked out all his good deeds does not make sense in context. Step 5: Examine whisked out. Whisked means moved quickly or stirred, and whisked out is not a common collocation for cancelling actions. Step 6: Therefore, wiped is the only verb that forms the correct phrasal verb wiped out, giving the sentence a clear and idiomatic meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Read the full sentence with the chosen verb: By a single mean act, he wiped out all his good deeds. This clearly conveys that the moral balance of his actions was cancelled by one cruel action. In moral or ethical discussions, it is common to say that one bad deed can wipe out many good ones. None of the other options produce a well known phrase that expresses this idea. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Whipped out is wrong because it implies taking something out quickly, not erasing previous actions. Worked out is wrong because it usually means solved (a problem) or exercised, which does not relate to good deeds being cancelled. Whisked out is wrong because whisked means moved quickly or stirred, and does not form a standard phrasal verb in this context. Only wiped out accurately captures the meaning of total removal. Common Pitfalls: Students can be misled by similar sounding verbs or by familiarity with words like whipped. It is important to think not only about the single verb but also about the complete phrasal verb and its typical usage. Learning common phrasal verbs such as wipe out, break down, and turn up helps in recognising correct combinations quickly during exams. Final Answer: The correct completion is wiped, forming the phrasal verb wiped out.

Question 20

Complete the sentence by choosing the correct preposition: "I was conscious _____ a break in my voice."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of prepositions that commonly follow particular adjectives. The sentence describes a speaker who becomes aware that there is a break in his or her voice. You must choose the preposition that naturally follows conscious in standard English usage. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: I was conscious _____ a break in my voice. The options are: to of over for We assume the speaker is aware of some change or disruption in his or her voice. Concept / Approach: In English, the adjective conscious is normally followed by the preposition of when it means aware of something. For example, we say conscious of a problem, conscious of his mistake, or conscious of a noise. The other prepositions do not form standard combinations with conscious in this sense. Therefore, conscious of is the correct collocation and fits naturally in the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the meaning of conscious in this context. It means aware, not unconscious or unaware. Step 2: Recall common expressions: conscious of danger, conscious of being watched, conscious of her own abilities. Step 3: Insert of into the sentence: I was conscious of a break in my voice. This sounds correct and natural. Step 4: Test to: I was conscious to a break in my voice. This is not standard usage. Step 5: Test over: I was conscious over a break in my voice. Over does not convey the meaning of awareness. Step 6: Test for: I was conscious for a break in my voice. For does not link conscious correctly to what is being observed. Step 7: Therefore, of is the only preposition that completes the sentence correctly. Verification / Alternative check: We can compare with similar adjectives: aware of, sure of, doubtful of. Conscious behaves like aware; in all such structures, of is used to introduce the object of awareness. Reference to dictionaries and grammar books confirms that conscious of something is the normal pattern. Any other preposition would sound unusual or incorrect to a fluent speaker. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To is wrong because conscious to is not a recognised phrase when expressing awareness. Over is wrong because it usually indicates physical position or control, as in over the table or rule over, which does not apply here. For is wrong because it indicates purpose or benefit and does not link the adjective conscious to its object. None of these alternatives convey the right relational meaning. Common Pitfalls: Preposition questions are tricky because learners sometimes rely on translation from their own language instead of English collocations. Another pitfall is to overgeneralise patterns like to be known to or grateful for and incorrectly apply them to conscious. The safest way to avoid errors is to memorise common adjective plus preposition pairs such as conscious of, afraid of, fond of, and interested in. Final Answer: The correct preposition is of, giving the sentence: I was conscious of a break in my voice.

English Questions