Question 1

Choose the correct one word substitution for the following description: A thing that is no longer in use.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests your knowledge of one word substitutions and your ability to distinguish between similar looking words. The phrase given is a thing that is no longer in use. In everyday and technical English, an item, idea, or system that has fallen out of use because it is old fashioned or has been replaced is called obsolete. Identifying the correct word here is essential for precise expression in writing and speaking. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase is: The thing no longer in use. The context is general and can apply to objects, methods, or ideas. The options share a similar starting spelling ob but have different meanings. We are looking for the word that exactly matches the idea of not being used any more. Only one option should be fully correct. Concept / Approach: The important words in the phrase are thing and no longer in use. In standard English, obsolete is an adjective that means out of date, no longer used, or no longer produced. Obstacle refers to something that blocks progress, obstruction has a similar meaning of blockage, obsidian is a volcanic glass, and obligation means duty or responsibility. None of these except obsolete contains the idea of being out of use. Even though the question says the thing, exams often use the describing adjective obsolete in such one word substitution questions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key idea: something that used to be used but is not used now. Step 2: Examine option a, obstacle. This is anything that blocks progress or makes movement difficult; it does not mean out of use. Step 3: Examine option b, obsolete. Dictionaries define obsolete as no longer produced or used, out of date. This exactly fits the phrase. Step 4: Examine option c, obsidian. This is a type of natural volcanic glass, often black and shiny; it has no connection with usage. Step 5: Examine option d, obstruction. This is again something that blocks or prevents passage, like an obstacle. Step 6: Examine option e, obligation. This refers to a moral or legal duty, not the state of an item being outdated. Step 7: Select option b, obsolete, as the only correct match. Verification / Alternative check: We can compare with example sentences: Many old computer systems have become obsolete or The cassette tape is now considered obsolete technology. In both cases, obsolete describes things that are no longer in common use. Substituting obstacle, obstruction, or obligation would not make sense in these sentences. This confirms that obsolete captures the intended meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a, obstacle, focuses on a barrier to progress, not on being outdated. Option c, obsidian, names a specific natural material and is unrelated to usage or modernity. Option d, obstruction, again means blockage and does not express the idea of something having fallen out of use. Option e, obligation, expresses duty or something you are required to do, which is very different from the state of an unused object. Common Pitfalls: A common trap in such questions is to be guided by the first few letters of the word rather than the full dictionary meaning. Because obstacle, obstruction, and obsolete all begin with ob and may have been encountered by students in similar contexts, they may be confused. The correct strategy is to focus on the exact phrase no longer in use and recall that obsolete is the standard technical and everyday term for this concept. Final Answer: The correct one word substitution is Obsolete.

Question 2

Choose the correct one word substitution for the following description: Misappropriation of money, especially by someone in a position of trust.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests legal and financial vocabulary, specifically the distinction between different types of dishonest behaviour involving money. The phrase misappropriation of money indicates that funds have been used wrongly, usually by someone who was entrusted with them. The precise legal term for such conduct is embezzlement. Candidates must differentiate embezzlement from broader terms like robbery, theft, or fraud to choose the most accurate one word substitution. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase is: Misappropriation of money. We assume that the person handling the money had lawful access but used it dishonestly. The options are legal or semi legal terms linked with dishonest gain. We must select the term that best fits the specific idea of misappropriation. Only one option must be considered the most precise match. Concept / Approach: Misappropriation means using something, especially money, dishonestly or for an unauthorised purpose. When someone in a position of trust, such as a cashier, treasurer, or employee, diverts funds for personal use, the technical term is embezzlement. Robbery refers to taking property by force or threat, theft is a general word for stealing, and fraud refers to deceit for advantage. Extortion means obtaining something, often money, through threats or pressure. Among these, embezzlement is the term most closely tied to misappropriation of money entrusted to a person. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that misappropriation suggests wrongful use of money that was initially under someone's control lawfully. Step 2: Consider option a, embezzlement. This is defined as the theft or misappropriation of funds placed in one's trust or belonging to one's employer. Step 3: Consider option b, robbery. This is taking property from a person or place by force or threat and does not require prior lawful possession. Step 4: Consider option c, theft. This is a broad term for stealing but does not emphasise misuse by a trusted holder. Step 5: Consider option d, fraud. This involves cheating or deception to secure gain but is not limited to funds already entrusted. Step 6: Consider option e, extortion. This is obtaining money or favours through force, threats, or blackmail. Step 7: Conclude that embezzlement is the exact one word substitution for misappropriation of money. Verification / Alternative check: Example sentences confirm this: The accountant was arrested for embezzlement after diverting company funds to his personal account or The committee discovered embezzlement of charity money. The word misappropriation is frequently used in definitions of embezzlement, which reinforces that they are closely related concepts. Substituting robbery or extortion would change the nature of the crime described. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option b, robbery, focuses on force or the threat of force and not on misuse of entrusted funds. Option c, theft, is too general and could apply to any stealing, even when the thief never had authorised access. Option d, fraud, involves deception but may not specifically involve misusing money already in one's care. Option e, extortion, centres on obtaining something through threats or intimidation rather than misusing money that was already under one's control. Common Pitfalls: Students may be tempted to select fraud or theft because these words appear often in news reports and seem to match any financial wrongdoing. However, one word substitution questions usually demand precision. It is important to pay attention to whether the phrase hints at force, deception, or wrongful use of something entrusted, and then choose the narrow term that fits that situation. Final Answer: The correct one word substitution is Embezzlement.

Question 3

In the following sentence improvement question, choose the correct prepositional phrase to replace the underlined part or select the no improvement option: The Vice Chancellor congratulated the blind student for his success in the examination.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of prepositions used with the verb congratulate. In English, certain verbs form fixed combinations with particular prepositions, known as collocations. The common and correct expression is congratulate someone on something. Exams frequently present slightly incorrect prepositions such as for, in, or over to check whether candidates recognise the correct combination in standard usage. Given Data / Assumptions: The base sentence is: The Vice Chancellor congratulated the blind student for his success in the examination. The underlined part involves the preposition and the object of congratulations. We must choose the best version of this phrase, or decide that no change is needed. All options preserve the general meaning but vary in prepositions or structure. The context is formal academic communication. Concept / Approach: In standard English, the usual pattern is congratulate someone on something, not congratulate someone for something when referring to achievements or success. Therefore, we must look for the option that uses on in the correct position. In, for, and over either sound unidiomatic or have different nuances. We also need to ensure that there is no unnecessary preposition after congratulate, such as congratulate to, which would be grammatically wrong. The goal is to pick the sentence which a proficient speaker would naturally use in formal speech or writing. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Review the original sentence: The Vice Chancellor congratulated the blind student for his success in the examination. Step 2: Recall the collocation congratulate someone on something for achievements like success, promotion, or good results. Step 3: Examine option a: congratulated the blind student in his success in the examination. The preposition in is incorrect here; we do not say congratulate in success. Step 4: Examine option b: congratulated the blind student on his success in the examination. This matches the standard collocation congratulate on and sounds natural. Step 5: Examine option c: congratulated to the blind student for his success in the examination. The addition of to after congratulated is wrong; we do not say congratulate to someone. Step 6: Examine option d: No improvement is needed. This would keep for his success, which is less correct for formal exam English. Step 7: Examine option e: congratulated the blind student over his success in the examination. Over is sometimes used in casual speech, but on is preferred and more standard in exam contexts. Step 8: Choose option b as the best and most accepted form. Verification / Alternative check: We can cross check with familiar examples: The teacher congratulated her on her excellent marks, They congratulated him on his promotion, and I congratulated them on their marriage. In each case, the preposition on links the verb congratulate with the achievement. This confirms that on his success is the correct phrase here, and that a change from for to on is required. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a uses in his success, which is not idiomatic with congratulate. Option c adds to after congratulated, which is grammatically wrong in this pattern. Option d suggests no improvement, but the current use of for does not match the most accepted form with this verb. Option e uses over his success, which is less common and sounds awkward compared to the standard on his success. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse congratulate someone for something and congratulate someone on something because for is used with thank and blame. While congratulate for is occasionally heard, the form congratulate on is the established exam standard. To avoid mistakes, it is useful to memorise expressions like congratulate on success, condole with someone, and comment on something as fixed groups. Final Answer: The improved and grammatically standard sentence is: The Vice Chancellor congratulated the blind student on his success in the examination.

Question 4

In the following sentence improvement question, choose the correct verbal form or select the no improvement option: I am sorry but I will not believe the story you have told me.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests the correct tense and aspect for expressing a present state of belief. The original sentence uses will not believe, which is possible but less natural when we are talking about a present refusal to accept something as true. Competitive exams often check whether candidates can select the most appropriate present simple form for states of mind, especially with verbs like believe, know, understand, and like. Given Data / Assumptions: The original sentence is: I am sorry but I will not believe the story you have told me. The speaker is expressing disbelief in a story that has already been told. The event of telling is in the past (you have told me). The focus is on the speaker's present state of mind about that story. We must choose the version that sounds most natural in standard English. Concept / Approach: Stative verbs like believe, know, and understand usually take the simple present to express current states, not the future with will or progressive forms like am believing. When someone wants to say that they do not accept something as true at this moment, the correct form is I do not believe it. The future use I will not believe can suggest a deliberate decision or strong refusal with a future sense, which is not necessary here. Therefore we look for an option using do not believe in the present simple. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the state verb believe, which describes a mental state rather than a physical action. Step 2: Examine option a: I am sorry but I do not believe the story you have told me. This uses the present simple do not believe, which correctly describes the current state of disbelief. Step 3: Examine option b: I am sorry but I am not believed the story you have told me. This is ungrammatical, mixing passive and progressive forms incorrectly. Step 4: Examine option c: I am sorry but I have not believed the story you have told me. Present perfect have not believed is awkward here and is not the usual way to state current disbelief about a specific story. Step 5: Examine option d: No improvement is needed. This would keep will not believe, which sounds slightly off for a present state. Step 6: Examine option e: I am sorry but I am not believing the story you have told me. Progressive aspect is rarely used with believe and sounds unnatural. Step 7: Conclude that option a provides the clearest and most idiomatic sentence. Verification / Alternative check: We can compare with similar sentences: I do not believe your explanation or I do not believe what he says. In these examples, the simple present is used to express disbelief. Native speakers rarely say I am not believing your explanation. Likewise, in exam style corrections, replacing will not believe with do not believe is a standard improvement when the context is current and not about future refusal. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option b is grammatically incorrect because believed cannot follow am in this way. Option c uses present perfect have not believed, which does not sound natural for belief about a specific, recently told story. Option d keeps the less appropriate future will not believe, which suggests a deliberate future choice rather than a present state. Option e incorrectly uses the progressive form am not believing with a stative verb. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often overlook the difference between stative and dynamic verbs and may accept progressive forms with verbs like believe, know, or understand. Another pitfall is assuming that will not always indicates a strong negative and is therefore more emphatic. Exam setters expect awareness that everyday statements of opinion and belief usually use the present simple. Practising with common verbs of thought and feeling helps avoid such errors. Final Answer: The best improved sentence is: I am sorry but I do not believe the story you have told me.

Question 5

In the following sentence improvement question, choose the correct form of the verb phrase or select the no improvement option: Due to the fall in real estate prices builders have stopped from constructing multi storeyed office buildings.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem checks your knowledge of verb patterns after stop. In English, stop can be followed by a gerund (verb plus ing) to indicate ending an action, or by an infinitive (to plus verb) to indicate stopping some other activity in order to do the new one. The original sentence incorrectly uses stopped from constructing, which is not the standard pattern. The task is to identify and correct this structure. Given Data / Assumptions: The original sentence is: Due to the fall in real estate prices builders have stopped from constructing multi storeyed office buildings. The context is a change in construction activity caused by lower real estate prices. The intended meaning is that builders no longer construct such buildings. We must check which option provides the correct verb pattern after stopped. The tense have stopped is present perfect indicating a recent change. Concept / Approach: When stop is used to express that an activity has ended, it is followed directly by a gerund without any preposition: stop doing something, stopped smoking, stopped attending classes. We do not say stopped from doing in standard English. Therefore, we look for an option that removes from and uses constructing after stopped. We should also keep the tense have stopped because it correctly shows an effect that continues till now. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the incorrect phrase stopped from constructing, which violates the usual pattern stop plus gerund. Step 2: Examine option a: have stopped at constructing multi storeyed office buildings. The phrase stopped at constructing sounds wrong; stop at is used with places or sometimes with limits, not with this meaning. Step 3: Examine option b: have stopped to constructing multi storeyed office buildings. After stop, to is followed by the base verb, not ing, so to constructing is incorrect. Step 4: Examine option c: have stopped constructing multi storeyed office buildings. This follows the correct pattern stop plus gerund and clearly means they no longer construct such buildings. Step 5: Examine option d: No improvement is needed. This would keep stopped from constructing, which is wrong. Step 6: Examine option e: had stopped from constructing multi storeyed office buildings. This still keeps the incorrect from and also unnecessarily changes the tense. Step 7: Conclude that option c is the grammatically correct and contextually accurate improvement. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by using similar examples: The factory has stopped producing toys or Due to the ban, they stopped selling that product. In each of these, stop is directly followed by the ing form without any preposition. Also note that stop to produce toys would mean they stopped some other activity in order to produce toys, which is a different meaning. Our sentence clearly aims to say that the activity of constructing has ended, so have stopped constructing is the right form. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a misuses stopped at, which does not express ending an activity here. Option b uses an incorrect structure stopped to constructing instead of stopped to construct. Option d incorrectly claims that the original stopped from constructing is acceptable. Option e retains from constructing and also changes the time reference by using had stopped, which is not indicated by the context. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse stop doing with stop to do and may wrongly use prepositions such as from before the gerund. It is important to remember the distinction: stop doing means end an activity, while stop to do means pause a different activity in order to start a new one. In exam settings, whenever you see stop followed by from plus ing, you should suspect an error. Final Answer: The improved sentence should read: Due to the fall in real estate prices builders have stopped constructing multi storeyed office buildings.

Question 6

In the following sentence improvement question, choose the best phrase or select the no improvement option: Not having practised his lines, he cut an angry figure on the stage.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This item tests knowledge of a set phrase in English: to cut a sorry figure. The original sentence describes someone who did not practise his lines and therefore did not perform well on stage. The phrase an angry figure is not standard in this context. The aim is to see whether candidates recognise the conventional expression that conveys a poor or pitiable impression. Given Data / Assumptions: The original sentence is: Not having practised his lines, he cut an angry figure on the stage. The context implies that his performance was weak or embarrassing. The underlined part concerns the phrase following cut. We need the most natural and idiomatic English expression. All options keep the same basic structure but change the descriptive phrase. Concept / Approach: In English, the phrase cut a sorry figure means present an unhappy, pathetic, or unimpressive appearance, especially in public. This fits a situation where someone has not prepared and therefore performs badly. The use of angry figure is unusual and does not convey the idea of failure or embarrassment. Similarly, cut a sorry face is not a standard idiom. Therefore, the correct improvement is the well known phrase cut a sorry figure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the context: because he did not practise his lines, his performance likely looked poor or pitiable. Step 2: Examine option a: cut a confused figure on the stage. This expresses confusion but is not a recognised set phrase. Step 3: Examine option b: cut a sorry face on the stage. This is also not the standard idiom and sounds awkward. Step 4: Examine option c: cut a sorry figure on the stage. This is a common expression in English and means he presented a pathetic or unimpressive image. Step 5: Examine option d: No improvement is needed. This would keep angry figure, which does not match standard usage. Step 6: Examine option e: cut an upset figure on the stage. This again is not an established idiom. Step 7: Select option c as the best and most idiomatic choice. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences: After forgetting his speech, he cut a sorry figure in front of the audience or The team cut a sorry figure in the final match after making many mistakes. In all such examples, cut a sorry figure is used to describe a poor impression. This is exactly the effect created by not practising lines before a stage performance. Therefore, the phrase matches the context and typical usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a introduces confused figure, which may describe his state but does not reflect a common idiom. Option b uses sorry face, which is not the usual collocation with cut. Option d claims that angry figure is acceptable; however, cut an angry figure is not standard in describing poor performance. Option e uses upset figure, which again is not a recognised phrase and sounds forced. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes ignore fixed expressions and try to interpret each word literally. Because sorry and figure might appear strange together, they may wrongly reject the correct idiom. The safest method in sentence improvement questions is to recall frequent combinations used in reading and listening practice. Recognising patterns like cut a sorry figure, bear in mind, and bring to light is vital for success. Final Answer: The improved sentence should be: Not having practised his lines, he cut a sorry figure on the stage.

Question 7

In the following sentence improvement question, choose the correct conditional form or select the no improvement option: My brother would gladly given you his car if you had asked him.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks whether you understand the correct form of the third conditional in English, which is used for unreal situations in the past. The sentence describes something that did not actually happen: the person did not ask, so the brother did not give the car. The standard structure is would have plus past participle in the main clause and had plus past participle in the if clause. The original sentence incorrectly uses would gladly given, which is not a valid form. Given Data / Assumptions: The original sentence is: My brother would gladly given you his car if you had asked him. The context is a hypothetical past situation. The if clause you had asked him is correctly in the past perfect. The main clause needs the appropriate form of would plus have plus past participle. We must choose the option that makes the entire conditional sentence grammatically correct. Concept / Approach: Third conditional sentences talk about unreal situations in the past and their imaginary results. The basic pattern is: If plus subject plus had plus past participle, subject plus would have plus past participle. In this sentence, if you had asked him is the condition and the result should be my brother would have gladly given you his car. Therefore, we look for the option using would have gladly given with the correct verb form given. Options that omit have or misuse tenses must be rejected. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the sentence talks about a missed opportunity in the past, signalled by if you had asked him. Step 2: Recognise that the main clause must be in the form would have plus past participle for third conditional. Step 3: Examine option a: would gladly give you his car if you had asked him. This mixes present conditional with past perfect and is not standard for a purely past hypothetical. Step 4: Examine option b: would have gladly given you his car if you had asked him. This matches the correct structure: would have given. Step 5: Examine option c: would gladly gave you his car if you had asked him. Gave is simple past and cannot follow would. Step 6: Examine option d: No improvement is needed. This keeps would gladly given, which is grammatically wrong. Step 7: Examine option e: had gladly given you his car if you would have asked him. This reverses the order and misuses would have in the if clause. Step 8: Conclude that option b is the correct and fully grammatical conditional sentence. Verification / Alternative check: We can compare with model sentences: If you had studied harder, you would have passed the exam or If they had left earlier, they would have caught the train. In each case, the structure matches that in option b. Using would give or would gave or would have asked in the if clause would all be considered incorrect in formal grammar tests. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a uses would give with a past perfect condition, which suggests a mixed conditional and does not accurately represent a fully unreal past situation. Option c combines would with gave, which is ungrammatical because would must be followed by the base form give. Option d leaves the original error would gladly given unchanged. Option e misplaces had and uses would have asked in the if clause, which is not standard for conditional clauses. Common Pitfalls: Learners frequently confuse the structures of second and third conditionals and sometimes mix them unintentionally. Another common error is forgetting the auxiliary have in the main clause after would, leading to forms like would given or would went. Practising the basic pattern and reading many examples helps fix the correct structure in memory. Final Answer: The correct sentence is: My brother would have gladly given you his car if you had asked him.

Question 8

Based on the given passage about ants, choose the option that best explains why ants are described as Earth's most successful species.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a reading comprehension question based on a passage that describes ants, their history, and their characteristics. The passage states that ants have been living on earth for more than one hundred million years and that they can be found almost anywhere on the planet. These two facts combine to support the statement that ants are Earth's most successful species. To answer correctly, you must recall these details and select the option that includes both reasons. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage explains that ants have lived on earth for more than one hundred million years. It also states that they can be found almost anywhere on the planet. The passage mentions that there are about twenty thousand different species of ants. The phrase Earth's most successful species is used in the passage. We must choose the option that reflects the reason given in the passage, not our own guess. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension questions often test your ability to connect statements explicitly made in the passage. Here, the key is to identify which facts are directly linked with the claim that ants are the most successful species. The passage explicitly connects their long survival time and their widespread distribution to this label. Therefore, the correct answer will combine those two features: great age on earth and presence in almost all locations. Options that mention only one reason or that give incorrect numbers must be rejected as partial or wrong. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the sentence from the passage that explains why ants have been called Earth's most successful species. Step 2: Note that the passage first states their age on earth (more than one hundred million years) and their almost universal presence on the planet. Step 3: Examine option a: Because they have been on earth for more than a hundred million years. This includes only one part of the reason, their age. Step 4: Examine option b: Because they can be found almost anywhere on earth. This includes only their distribution, missing the time factor. Step 5: Examine option c: Because they have been on earth for more than a hundred million years and because they can be found almost anywhere on earth. This combines both key points and matches the explanation in the passage. Step 6: Examine option d: Because there are two thousand different species of ants on earth. The passage mentions about twenty thousand species, so this number is wrong. Step 7: Examine option e: Because they are larger than most other insects. This is not stated in the passage and is false. Step 8: Conclude that option c correctly summarises the reasons given in the passage. Verification / Alternative check: If you go back to the passage and reread the lines around the phrase Earth's most successful species, you will see that the writer gives the long period of existence and the wide geographical spread immediately before or after that claim. No other reason is directly linked with the phrase. This cross check confirms that option c uses exactly those two features, therefore it matches the passage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a is incomplete because it mentions only the time factor and ignores the distribution. Option b is also incomplete because it mentions only the distribution and ignores the time factor. Option d gives the wrong number of species and does not match the passage. Option e introduces a new idea about size which is not stated at all. Common Pitfalls: Many students select answers that are partially true or that sound impressive without checking whether all parts of the option are supported by the passage. In such questions, paying attention to the words because and for this reason in the passage can help you locate the exact sentence that explains the claim. It is important not to add your own extra knowledge about ants, and instead to base your answer only on the information given. Final Answer: According to the passage, ants are called Earth's most successful species because they have been on earth for more than a hundred million years and because they can be found almost anywhere on earth.

Question 9

Based on the passage about ants, choose the option that correctly states what ants use their antennae for.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question comes from a passage that explains how ants live, communicate, and build their homes. One part of the passage specifically describes how ants use their antennae. Many students confuse the role of antennae with the role of chemicals called pheromones. Understanding exactly what the passage says about each is essential for answering accurately. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that ants communicate by touching each other with their antennae. It also explains that ants use chemicals called pheromones to leave scent trails for other ants. No special mention is made of antennae being used for digging tunnels. The question asks what antennae are used for according to the passage. We must distinguish the function of antennae from the function of pheromones. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension requires careful separation of similar looking ideas. In the passage, there are two distinct means of communication: physical contact using antennae and chemical signals using pheromones. Antennae are sensory organs that ants use to touch and detect signals from other ants, and this touching is described as a form of communication. While antennae do help ants sense their surroundings, the passage emphasises the communication function. Therefore, we must choose the option that best reflects the passage wording. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the exact sentence about antennae: ants communicate by touching each other with their antennae. Step 2: Examine option a: To leave a trail for other ants to follow. The passage attributes this function to pheromones, not antennae. Step 3: Examine option b: To communicate with each other. This matches the description that ants communicate through touching with antennae. Step 4: Examine option c: To find direction by looking at the sun. The passage does not mention this behaviour in connection with antennae. Step 5: Examine option d: To touch and sense their surroundings only. While antennae do have a sensory role, the passage stresses their role in communication, not only sensing surroundings. Step 6: Examine option e: To dig tunnels in the soil. The passage clearly attributes tunnel digging to the ants in general, not specifically to antennae. Step 7: Conclude that option b is the most accurate summary of the passage. Verification / Alternative check: Return to the relevant lines of the passage and read them again. The author carefully separates two methods: touching each other with antennae for communication and using pheromones to create scent trails. No other function is highlighted for antennae. Therefore, any option that mentions trail making or digging must be rejected as mixing up separate facts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a wrongly assigns the function of leaving a trail to antennae instead of pheromones. Option c introduces a new idea involving the sun that is not present in the passage. Option d is incomplete, as it ignores the explicit statement that touching with antennae is a form of communication; it focuses only on sensing. Option e connects antennae with digging, which has no basis in the passage. Common Pitfalls: Students often mix the details of pheromones and antennae because both appear in the same paragraph. They may choose an answer that sounds generally true about ants but is not actually stated in the text. The correct approach is to match each phrase in the options with the exact wording of the passage rather than relying on outside knowledge or guesses. Final Answer: According to the passage, ants use their antennae primarily to communicate with each other.

Question 10

From the passage about ants, choose the option that correctly states what Western Harvester ants do during winter.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on a specific detail from the passage about the behaviour of Western Harvester ants. The passage describes how different ant species build their homes and survive harsh weather. Western Harvester ants are noted for building a small mound on top and tunnelling deep down to hibernate during winter. Remembering this exact description is essential for answering correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that Western Harvester ants make a small mound on top. It further explains that they then dig tunnels up to fifteen feet straight down. The purpose of these tunnels is to hibernate during winter. Other ants in the passage have different behaviours, such as travelling in large groups or living in wood. The question asks specifically what Western Harvester ants do in winter. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension questions of this type test detailed recall rather than general ideas. The key words here are Western Harvester, tunnels up to fifteen feet, and hibernate during winter. The correct option must combine the depth of tunnels and the act of hibernating. Options that focus on travel, migration, or building many different homes confuse Western Harvester ants with other species described in the passage, such as army ants. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the relevant sentence: Western Harvester ants make a small mound on top, but then tunnels up to fifteen feet straight down to hibernate during winter. Step 2: Examine option a: They travel continuously in search of food. This behaviour describes army ants, not Western Harvester ants. Step 3: Examine option b: They build many different types of homes. The passage generally states that ants build many types of homes, but this is not specifically their winter activity. Step 4: Examine option c: They hibernate in deep tunnels below the ground. This matches the idea of tunnels up to fifteen feet deep used for hibernation. Step 5: Examine option d: They search for new colonies to attack. This is not mentioned in the passage for Western Harvester ants. Step 6: Examine option e: They fly to warmer countries for the season. The passage does not mention migration or flying to other countries. Step 7: Conclude that option c is the only option that accurately summarises the passage. Verification / Alternative check: Re reading the section on Western Harvester ants confirms that their notable feature is a small mound on the surface and deep vertical tunnels for winter hibernation. No other species in the passage is associated with this specific behaviour. The question asks what they do in winter, and the passage directly answers this by mentioning hibernation in deep tunnels. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a repeats information related to army ants, which do not build permanent homes and travel in large groups searching for food. Option b states a general fact about ants building different homes but does not describe their winter behaviour. Option d introduces attacking new colonies, which is never mentioned in the passage. Option e suggests seasonal migration like birds, which the passage does not attribute to ants. Common Pitfalls: Students often pick options that sound plausible based on general knowledge, rather than strictly following the text. For example, they may know that some animals migrate in winter and therefore choose an option mentioning travel. However, in reading comprehension, the safest strategy is always to base your choice strictly on what is written in the passage, not on outside knowledge or assumptions. Final Answer: According to the passage, Western Harvester ants hibernate in deep tunnels below the ground during winter.

Question 11

According to the passage about ants, choose the option that correctly describes the kind of homes army ants make.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of a particular detail in the passage about different types of ants and their homes. The passage contrasts ants that build mounds or live in wood with army ants that behave quite differently. Army ants are described as not building permanent homes at all; instead, they move in large groups in search of food. Correctly identifying this special behaviour is the key to answering the question. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that many ants build simple mounds out of dirt or sand. Other ants use small sticks mixed with dirt and sand to make stronger mounds. Western Harvester ants build a small mound and then dig deep tunnels for winter hibernation. Some ants live in wood like termites. The passage specifically notes that army ants do not make a home at all but travel in large groups searching for food. Concept / Approach: To solve this question, you must carefully distinguish between the behaviours of different ant types described in the passage. The phrase do not make a home at all clearly refers only to army ants, not to the others. Any option that attributes mound building, wood dwelling, or other kinds of home construction to army ants is therefore incorrect. Only the option that describes constant movement in large groups while searching for food matches the information given. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the exact line about army ants: Army ants do not make a home at all but travel in large groups searching for food. Step 2: Examine option a: They make simple little mounds out of dirt or sand. This behaviour refers to many other ants, not army ants. Step 3: Examine option b: They make stronger mounds of sticks mixed with dirt and sand. This describes another type of ant that reinforces its mound for protection from rain. Step 4: Examine option c: They make small mounds on top with tunnels up to fifteen feet below. This behaviour belongs to Western Harvester ants. Step 5: Examine option d: They do not make homes but travel in large groups searching for food. This exactly matches the passage description of army ants. Step 6: Examine option e: They build nests inside wood like termites. This is stated about some ants in general, not specifically about army ants. Step 7: Conclude that option d is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: If you reread the paragraph about ant homes, you will see that each type of dwelling or behaviour is linked to a particular phrase: simple mounds, stronger mounds, deep tunnels, living in wood, and travelling in groups. Only the description of army ants contains the strong phrase do not make a home at all. This makes it easy to match with the correct option once you pay attention to that unique feature. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a describes a general category of ants that build simple mounds, not army ants. Option b applies to those that use sticks mixed with dirt and sand for stronger mounds. Option c is specific to Western Harvester ants and their deep tunnels. Option e refers to ants that live in wood like termites, which are again different from army ants. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may confuse the behaviours because all descriptions occur in a single paragraph. They might select an option mentioning mounds or wood simply because they remember these words from the passage. To avoid such errors, it is useful to mentally group each description with its specific subject and to notice words like some ants, other ants, and army ants that signal a change of focus. Final Answer: According to the passage, army ants do not make homes but travel in large groups searching for food.

Question 12

From the passage about ants, choose the option that correctly states the main purpose served by male ants.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question focuses on the role of male ants within a colony. The passage clearly states that male ants have a very limited purpose and do not live long. Many exam takers may confuse the roles of male ants and worker ants, so understanding this distinction is important for both biology knowledge and comprehension practice. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage mentions three types of ants in each species: the queen, the sterile female workers, and males. It states that the male ants only serve one purpose. This single purpose is to mate with future queen ants. The passage adds that male ants do not live very long. Tasks such as food collection and nest defence are associated with worker ants, not male ants. Concept / Approach: To answer this question, you need to recall the specific sentence about male ants in the passage. It emphasises their reproductive role and their short lifespan. Any answer choice that adds duties like protecting the colony or gathering food is incorrect because it contradicts the passage. The correct option must mention mating with future queen ants and only this, since the passage says they serve only one purpose. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the line: The male ants only serve one purpose, to mate with future queen ants and do not live very long. Step 2: Examine option a: To lay eggs for the colony. In ant colonies, the queens lay eggs, not the males. Step 3: Examine option b: To protect the colony from enemies. This protective role is usually carried out by workers. Step 4: Examine option c: To mate with future queen ants. This exactly repeats the role described in the passage. Step 5: Examine option d: To live a long life and guide the workers. The passage states the opposite; male ants do not live very long. Step 6: Examine option e: To collect food for the nurseries. Food collection is the task of worker ants. Step 7: Conclude that option c is the only option that fully matches the passage. Verification / Alternative check: Reviewing the paragraph that discusses the types of ants will show that only the queen is responsible for laying eggs, the workers carry out duties such as building, cleaning, and gathering food, and the males have the single role of mating with future queens. No other functions are assigned to male ants in that section. This confirms that mating with future queen ants is their primary and only purpose. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a wrongly assigns egg laying to male ants, contradicting basic biology and the passage. Option b invents a protective duty for males that is not mentioned in the text. Option d directly contradicts the passage by claiming that males live a long life. Option e misattributes the food gathering role of worker ants to males. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes rely on general knowledge about animal behaviour or guess which role seems important instead of returning to the passage. Since the question uses the phrase according to the passage, the answer must be based strictly on the text. Learning to separate the roles of queens, workers, and males in social insects also strengthens science knowledge for other exams. Final Answer: According to the passage, the main purpose of male ants is to mate with future queen ants.

Question 13

In the following analogy question, choose the pair of letters that bears the same relationship to each other as JK does to QR: JK : QR :: ____ : ____?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a letter analogy question commonly found in reasoning sections of competitive exams. You are given a pair of letters JK and QR and asked to find another pair that shows the same pattern. To solve such questions, you must examine the alphabetical positions of the letters and identify the transformation that converts the first letter of the pair into the second. Then you must apply the same transformation to a new pair from the options. Given Data / Assumptions: The given pair is JK : QR. We consider J and Q, K and R, and note their positions in the English alphabet. Alphabet positions are: A 1, B 2, C 3, ..., J 10, K 11, Q 17, R 18. We assume that the same operation is applied to both letters in each pair. Exactly one of the options should follow this pattern. Concept / Approach: The strategy is to convert letters to numbers using their positions in the alphabet and then compute the difference between each pair. For JK : QR, we check how far Q is from J and how far R is from K. If both differences are the same, that difference becomes the rule. Then we search among the options for a pair of letters where the second letter is formed by adding or subtracting the same number to the first letter's position. This systematic approach avoids guesswork. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Assign numerical positions to the letters: J is 10, K is 11, Q is 17, and R is 18. Step 2: Compute the differences: from J (10) to Q (17) the difference is +7, and from K (11) to R (18) the difference is also +7. Step 3: Conclude that the pattern for the given pair is: second letter equals first letter plus 7 positions in the alphabet, applied to both letters in the pair. Step 4: Now test each option to see which follows the same +7 pattern for both letters. Step 5: Option a: ST. S is 19, T is 20; UV: U is 21, V is 22. From S to U is +2, from T to V is +2. This is +2, not +7, so it does not match. Step 6: Option b: WX : ZY. W is 23, X is 24, Z is 26, Y is 25. From W to Z is +3, from X to Y is +1; the differences are not equal, so the pattern is inconsistent. Step 7: Option c: BC : IJ. B is 2, C is 3, I is 9, J is 10. From B to I is +7 and from C to J is also +7. This matches the pattern of adding 7. Step 8: Option d: MN : OR. M is 13, N is 14, O is 15, R is 18. From M to O is +2, from N to R is +4; these differences do not match each other and do not equal 7. Step 9: Option e: AB : CD. From A to C is +2 and from B to D is +2, so this is also +2, not +7. Step 10: Conclude that only BC : IJ matches the +7 pattern. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can write out the alphabet and manually count: After B (2) come C (3), D (4), E (5), F (6), G (7), H (8), and I (9), so I is 7 steps ahead of B. Similarly, after C (3) we count up seven positions to reach J (10). This confirms that BC : IJ uses the same transformation as JK : QR, where each second letter is seven positions ahead of the first. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a has a consistent pattern but with a difference of +2 instead of +7. Option b does not even maintain a consistent difference between letters in the pair. Option d also shows inconsistent differences between letters. Option e again uses a +2 pattern, not +7. Common Pitfalls: Some students may pick an option simply because letters look similar or because they notice that both pairs are in alphabetical order. However, analogy questions demand that you identify the exact numerical relationship, not just a vague similarity. Failing to convert letters to numbers often leads to careless mistakes. Always calculate the differences carefully for both letters of the pair to ensure that the pattern truly matches. Final Answer: The pair of letters that follows the same pattern as JK : QR is BC : IJ.

Question 14

In the following vocabulary question, choose the word that is closest in meaning to INNOCUOUS.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is a synonym problem from the English vocabulary section. You are asked to select the word that is closest in meaning to innocuous. The word innocuous is commonly used in written English to describe something that is not harmful or likely to offend. Confusing it with innocent or innovative is a frequent mistake, so it is important to know its precise meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is INNOCUOUS. The options are INNOCENT, INNOVATIVE, INOFFENSIVE, INNERMOST, and INEFFECTIVE. We must choose the word whose meaning is closest to that of innocuous in general English usage. We assume the context is neutral and not limited to any specialised field. The word innocuous usually describes remarks, substances, or actions. Concept / Approach: Innocuous means harmless or not likely to cause offence or injury. It is often used for harmless comments, medicines, or behaviours. Inoffensive is very close in meaning, since it describes something that does not offend or upset. Innocent relates more to guilt or purity, innovative refers to something new or original, innermost to position, and ineffective to lack of effect. By comparing these meanings, we can see that inoffensive is the best synonym. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the definition of innocuous: not harmful, not likely to cause damage, or not likely to offend anyone. Step 2: Examine option a, INNOCENT. This usually means not guilty of a crime or having no knowledge of something bad. Although it sometimes overlaps with harmless, it is not the usual synonym in formal usage. Step 3: Examine option b, INNOVATIVE. This means new, creative, or involving original ideas and has no relation to harmlessness. Step 4: Examine option c, INOFFENSIVE. This means not likely to offend or upset anyone, and by extension, harmless. Step 5: Examine option d, INNERMOST. This refers to the deepest or most central position, unrelated to the idea of harm. Step 6: Examine option e, INEFFECTIVE. This means not producing any significant effect, which is different from being harmless or non offensive. Step 7: Conclude that INOFFENSIVE is the closest in meaning to INNOCUOUS. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences: The comedian's jokes were innocuous and did not offend anyone or The doctor assured us that the medicine was innocuous. Replacing innocuous with inoffensive retains a very similar meaning in contexts involving comments or behaviour. The word innocent could fit in some emotional contexts, but it is less precise. Innovative, innermost, and ineffective clearly do not fit these sentences. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option a, INNOCENT, focuses on lack of guilt or experience rather than harmlessness in the sense of not causing offence. Option b, INNOVATIVE, relates to creativity and new ideas and is semantically unrelated. Option d, INNERMOST, describes physical or metaphorical depth, not safety or harmlessness. Option e, INEFFECTIVE, highlights lack of effect, which could be harmful or harmless; it does not mean safe or non offensive. Common Pitfalls: Because innocuous and innocent share the same prefix inno, many learners assume they are synonyms. However, innocuous is more often used for remarks or substances, while innocent is used for people or actions judged morally or legally. Paying attention to common collocations like innocuous remark or innocuous drug can help fix the correct meaning in your memory. Final Answer: The word that is closest in meaning to INNOCUOUS is INOFFENSIVE.

Question 15

In the following question, choose the word which is opposite in meaning to the given word INFIRM. The word infirm is often used to describe someone who is physically weak, feeble, or lacking in strength, especially due to age or illness. Select the …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests the concept of antonyms in English. The word given is INFIRM, which commonly appears in descriptions of people who are physically weak, frail, or lacking bodily strength, often due to age or long illness. To answer correctly, the learner must recall or infer the meaning of the word and then select the option that is opposite in sense, not merely unrelated. Such questions are frequent in competitive examinations, where a clear understanding of word meanings, usage, and nuances helps to build strong language skills and improves reading comprehension as well as written expression. Given Data / Assumptions: Word given: INFIRM. Task: choose the word that is opposite in meaning to INFIRM. Options: Strong, Weak, Supporter, Believer. Assumption: infirm is used in its common meaning related to physical weakness or frailty. Concept / Approach: An antonym is a word that has the opposite meaning to another word. The word infirm is usually used to describe someone who is not physically robust, who is weak or feeble in body or health. Therefore, we must look for an option that describes the quality of being physically robust, firm, or powerful in contrast to that weakness. It is important to distinguish between words related to strength or weakness and words that describe totally different ideas, such as beliefs or roles. This ensures that the chosen option directly contrasts with the given word rather than merely being unrelated vocabulary. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall or deduce the meaning of INFIRM. It means weak, feeble, or lacking physical strength. Step 2: Identify the sense we need for the antonym: the opposite of weak, that is strong or firm. Step 3: Examine the options: Strong refers to having great physical power or firmness, which is a direct opposite. Step 4: Weak is actually similar in meaning to infirm, so it is a synonym, not an antonym. Step 5: Supporter and Believer refer to roles or attitudes and do not relate to physical strength, so they are not opposites. Step 6: Conclude that Strong is the only word that meaningfully expresses the opposite of infirm. Verification / Alternative check: A simple way to verify the answer is to form example sentences. Consider the phrase infirm old man, which clearly describes someone who is physically weak. The opposite kind of description would be strong young athlete or strong healthy man. If we replaced infirm with strong in a sentence, the meaning would reverse. On the other hand, replacing infirm with weak would not change the sense of the sentence, which confirms that weak is similar rather than opposite. Supporter and believer would not fit naturally in the same descriptive structure because they refer to a person's role or mental attitude, not health or strength. This quick substitution test confirms that Strong is the correct antonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Weak: This word is similar in meaning to infirm and is therefore a synonym, not an antonym. Supporter: This refers to a person who supports a cause or another person and has no opposite relationship to infirm. Believer: This indicates someone who believes in a particular idea or faith and again does not contrast with physical weakness. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse synonyms and antonyms, especially when both are present among the options. Some candidates may rush and choose weak because it feels familiar and close to the word infirm, without carefully reading that an opposite is required. Another pitfall is to select an unrelated word simply because it seems sophisticated or uncommon, even though it does not express the opposite meaning. To avoid this, it is important always to confirm whether the question is asking for a similar meaning (synonym) or an opposite meaning (antonym). Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to INFIRM is Strong.

Question 16

Four words are given, and only one of them is correctly spelt in standard English. Carefully read each option and choose the word whose spelling is correct and appropriate in formal writing.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on correct English spelling, an essential skill for accurate communication in exams, professional writing, and everyday use. Learners often confuse similar looking words, especially those that contain repeated consonants or unstressed vowels. Here, the task is to identify the correctly spelt form of a common English word among four very similar alternatives. Such items are designed to sharpen the eye for detail and to reinforce familiar word patterns in English spelling. Given Data / Assumptions: The question provides four similar words: Correspondent, Correspondant, Correspendent, and Corespondent. Only one option reflects the correct standard spelling of a real English word. The intended word is the noun that means a person who writes letters or reports, for example, a news correspondent. We assume standard British or international English spelling conventions. Concept / Approach: The key concept is knowledge of the correct spelling of correspondent, which refers to someone who corresponds or reports, especially a journalist reporting for a newspaper, television channel, or other media. The word is formed from the root correspond plus the suffix ent. Spelling questions often test familiarity with standard suffixes such as ant, ent, and related changes in the root word. The approach is to recall the correct spelling from memory, or to use knowledge of word formation and common patterns in English, and then eliminate options that violate these patterns through extra letters, missing letters, or incorrect suffixes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the common noun for a person who sends reports or letters is correspondent. Step 2: Break the word into parts: correspond + ent. Step 3: Compare each option with this pattern and look for errors in vowels, consonants, or doubled letters. Step 4: Option A, Correspondent, exactly matches the correct pattern correspond + ent. Step 5: Option B, Correspondant, uses the suffix ant instead of ent, which is wrong for this noun. Step 6: Option C, Correspendent, introduces an extra p and changes the vowel pattern, which is incorrect. Step 7: Option D, Corespondent, drops one r after co and does not match the usual spelling of correspond. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can recall familiar phrases such as foreign correspondent, special correspondent, or war correspondent as they appear in newspapers. In all these cases, the spelling uses ent at the end, not ant. Dictionaries and reliable style guides also confirm the form correspondent. Another simple internal check is to compare the base verb correspond, which always has double r after co. Any spelling that breaks the pattern of correspond at the beginning is likely to be invalid. With these checks, we confirm that Correspondent is the correct spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Correspondant: Uses the suffix ant, which is used in some other words but not in correspondent, so it is incorrect here. Correspendent: Contains the extra letter p and changes the internal structure of the word, making it nonstandard. Corespondent: Drops one r and does not maintain the root correspond, so it does not match the correct spelling of the word. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse ent and ant endings because there is no simple universal rule, and both occur in English words. Relying only on sound can be misleading because different spellings may sound similar. Another pitfall is ignoring doubled consonants; missing or adding a single letter can change a word from correct to incorrect. Building a habit of noticing root words, common suffixes, and checking familiar phrases in reading material helps reduce such spelling errors over time. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Correspondent.

Question 17

In the following sentence, one part may contain a grammatical error. Read the sentence and the labelled parts carefully and identify which segment is incorrect, if any. The sentence is: Computers give us (A) / the easier access (B) / to information.…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic grammar and usage, especially the correct use of articles with comparative adjectives. Learners must read the full sentence, understand the structure, and then decide which labelled part contains an error. Error spotting items like this one require close attention to small words such as articles and prepositions, because these are frequent sources of mistakes in English sentences used in exams and formal communication. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: Computers give us (A) / the easier access (B) / to information. (C) / No error. (D) The sentence is divided into four labelled parts: A, B, C, and D. Part D represents the option that there is no error in the sentence. The task is to identify the segment that contains the grammatical error. Concept / Approach: The concept involved here is the use of comparative adjectives such as easier with or without the definite article the. English usually uses the with a comparative adjective when we are comparing two specific things or groups, as in the easier task of the two. When we speak in a general sense, we normally omit the article and say easier access rather than the easier access. In the given sentence, computers are being talked about in a general way, and there is no direct comparison between two specific types of access. Therefore, the phrase should be easier access, not the easier access. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the entire sentence for overall meaning: computers in general provide access to information. Step 2: Examine Part A, Computers give us. This is grammatically correct and makes sense as the subject and verb. Step 3: Examine Part C, to information. This correctly uses the preposition to to show what we obtain. Step 4: Focus on Part B, the easier access. The combination of the with easier suggests a specific comparison that is not actually stated. Step 5: In a general statement, we should say computers give us easier access to information, without the. Step 6: Conclude that Part B contains the grammatical error because of the unnecessary definite article. Verification / Alternative check: We can check by rewriting the sentence in a natural way: Computers give us easier access to information. This sounds smooth and standard in English. If we keep the article the and make the sentence fully comparative, we would need a phrase such as than before, as in computers give us the easier access than earlier methods, which is not provided in the question. Because the original sentence does not make a complete or logical comparison, the with the comparative is unjustified. Therefore, correcting Part B by removing the results in a grammatically sound sentence that expresses the intended meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Computers give us: This part correctly states the subject and verb and does not contain an error. to information: This prepositional phrase is correct because we say give access to something in standard usage. No error: Choosing this would incorrectly suggest that the original sentence is perfectly correct, which it is not due to the extra article in Part B. Common Pitfalls: Many learners overlook small words like articles and assume that if a sentence sounds somewhat acceptable, it must be correct. Another common confusion arises from the fact that the is used with superlative adjectives like the easiest, but comparative adjectives such as easier usually need a clear comparison to justify the article. Remember that in general statements about improvement or convenience, expressions like easier access, better service, or greater comfort typically do not use the unless a very specific comparison is explicit in the sentence. Final Answer: The erroneous segment is the easier access, which appears in Part B.

Question 18

In the following sentence, one part may contain a grammatical error. Read the sentence and the labelled parts carefully and identify which segment is incorrect, if any. The sentence is: I do not have (A) / any money to (B) / spend for luxuries. (C) …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question focuses on the correct use of prepositions in English, particularly in common verb plus preposition combinations. The sentence describes a person who lacks money to use on non essential comforts. While the meaning is clear, one part of the sentence uses an incorrect preposition, which is a frequent area of difficulty for learners. Recognising and correcting such subtle prepositional errors is vital for accurate and natural English usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: I do not have (A) / any money to (B) / spend for luxuries. (C) / No error. (D) The sentence is divided into four labelled parts: A, B, C, and D. Part D indicates the choice that there is no error in the sentence. The task is to identify which specific part contains incorrect usage. Concept / Approach: The central point here is the correct preposition to use with the verb spend in the sense of using money on something. In standard English, we usually say spend money on luxuries, spend money on food, or spend money on travel. The preposition for does appear in some structures, but in this particular pattern with the infinitive spend and a direct object, the natural and idiomatic preposition is on, not for. Therefore, the phrase spend for luxuries is incorrect and should be spend on luxuries. The rest of the sentence segments follow normal grammar rules and do not create issues. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the full sentence: I do not have any money to spend for luxuries. Step 2: Check Part A, I do not have, which correctly uses the helping verb and subject with no grammatical error. Step 3: Check Part B, any money to, which is acceptable as a lead into the infinitive verb spend. Step 4: Check Part C, spend for luxuries. This is where the verb spend is followed by the preposition for, which sounds unnatural. Step 5: Recall the correct collocation: spend money on luxuries, not spend money for luxuries, in this sentence structure. Step 6: Conclude that Part C contains the error and should be corrected to spend on luxuries. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, substitute the phrase with common expressions. Native speakers and standard grammar references consistently use spend on when money is used for a particular purpose, for example, I spend a lot on books or they spend too much on entertainment. The use of for is more appropriate in different structures such as money for books, but not in the pattern spend for books. By applying this check, we reconfirm that spend for luxuries is incorrect and that the correct phrase is spend on luxuries, pinpointing the error in Part C. Why Other Options Are Wrong: I do not have: This fragment is grammatically correct and uses a standard negative construction in English. any money to: This segment correctly links the object money with the infinitive verb spend and does not contain any mistake. No error: Selecting this would state that the sentence is entirely correct, which ignores the incorrect preposition in Part C. Common Pitfalls: Learners often confuse prepositions because they do not always follow strict logical rules and can vary between languages. A common mistake is to translate directly from a mother tongue in which a different preposition is natural. Another pitfall is believing that for and on are interchangeable whenever a purpose is involved. In English, however, certain verbs form fixed collocations, such as spend on, depend on, and insist on. Building familiarity with these standard combinations by reading and practice is essential to avoid such errors. Final Answer: The incorrect segment is spend for luxuries, which appears in Part C and should be changed to spend on luxuries.

Question 19

In the following sentence, one part may contain a grammatical error. Read the sentence and the labelled parts carefully and identify which segment is incorrect, if any. The sentence is: I was first (A) / to reach the school (B) / today. (C) / No err…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This grammar question examines the correct use of articles with ordinal numbers in English. The sentence describes someone being the earliest person to arrive at school on a particular day. The key issue is whether the phrase uses the correct article with the ordinal adjective first. Many learners omit necessary articles in front of ordinal numbers, which leads to unnatural or incorrect English, especially in formal writing and competitive examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: I was first (A) / to reach the school (B) / today. (C) / No error. (D) The sentence is divided into four labelled parts A, B, C, and D. Part D indicates the option that no segment contains an error. The task is to identify the segment that has incorrect or incomplete grammar. Concept / Approach: In English, ordinal numbers like first, second, and third often need the definite article the before them when they refer to a specific position in an ordered group. When the speaker means that among all students arriving at school that day, this person occupied the earliest position, the usual expression is I was the first to reach the school today. Without the, the phrase I was first to reach the school sounds incomplete and less natural in standard English. Therefore, the error lies in the omission of the definite article in Part A. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the full sentence in one flow: I was first to reach the school today. Step 2: Focus on Part A, I was first. This contains the ordinal first but does not include an article. Step 3: Recall the correct expression I was the first to do something when we talk about a specific act among a group. Step 4: Check Part B, to reach the school, which functions correctly as an infinitive of purpose and is grammatically sound. Step 5: Check Part C, today, which is an adverb of time and correctly placed at the end of the sentence. Step 6: Decide that only Part A has the error and that it should read I was the first. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can compare similar sentences. For example, I was the first to finish the exam, she was the second to arrive, and he was the last to leave. All of these use the before the ordinal number. If we remove the article, the sentences sound grammatically weaker and less natural. Similarly, sentence patterns in textbooks and exam material consistently include the in such cases. Therefore, adding the before first in Part A is the correct correction, and this confirms that Part A is the only erroneous segment. Why Other Options Are Wrong: to reach the school: This phrase correctly explains the action and does not contain any error in structure or preposition use. today: This adverb of time is properly used at the end of the sentence and is grammatically acceptable. No error: Selecting this would incorrectly state that the sentence has no mistake, even though Part A omits a necessary definite article. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes omit articles in English because many other languages do not use them in the same way, or because they assume that short sentences without articles are acceptable. Another pitfall is not recognising the special behaviour of ordinal numbers, which often require the definite article the when they specify a particular place in an order. To avoid these mistakes, it is useful to remember set patterns such as the first to arrive, the second highest, and the last one in line, and to apply these patterns in new sentences. Final Answer: The incorrect segment is I was first, which should be corrected to I was the first.

Question 20

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate preposition. The sentence is: The President will finally have a national memorial _____ his honour.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests the correct use of prepositions in a common English expression. The sentence talks about a national memorial created as a tribute to the President. In such contexts, English often uses fixed phrases, also called collocations, where only one specific preposition sounds natural and correct. Selecting the right option requires familiarity with the phrase in somebody's honour, which appears frequently in formal writing, speeches, and descriptions of commemorations or dedications. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: The President will finally have a national memorial _____ his honour. Options: at, upon, in, on. We assume that the sentence refers to building or dedicating a memorial as a mark of respect to the President. The task is to choose the preposition that completes the standard expression correctly. Concept / Approach: The core concept is recognition of the fixed phrase in someone's honour, which means as a tribute to that person or to show respect for them. Prepositions in English are often not chosen by pure logic but by established usage. While at, upon, and on are valid prepositions in other contexts, the natural and idiomatic collocation with honour in this tribute sense is in his honour. The approach is to recall the phrase from reading and listening experience or to eliminate options that do not form a familiar or grammatically sound combination with honour in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the full sentence with each option to see which sounds natural. Step 2: Try at: a national memorial at his honour sounds incorrect and does not express tribute. Step 3: Try upon: a national memorial upon his honour is also unnatural and not used idiomatically. Step 4: Try in: a national memorial in his honour is a familiar and standard phrase indicating a memorial created as a mark of respect. Step 5: Try on: a national memorial on his honour also sounds wrong and is not a recognised expression. Step 6: Conclude that in is the only option that forms the correct phrase in his honour. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, consider other sentences that describe events or objects dedicated to people. For example, they organised a concert in her honour, a scholarship was created in his honour, and the dinner was held in their honour. In each case, the preposition in is used before honour to show that the event or object is meant as a tribute. By comparing these standard expressions with the sentence in the question, we confirm that in his honour is the correct and natural choice. No other preposition from the options matches established usage in this context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: at: This preposition is often used for locations or points in time, such as at the station or at five o clock, and does not fit the phrase with honour here. upon: This is a more formal version of on used in certain structures, but the expression upon his honour is not used to describe a memorial dedicated as a tribute. on: This might be used in other collocations like based on or depend on, but on his honour in this context does not express the intended meaning of tribute. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is trying to apply direct translation from a mother tongue, where a different preposition may be used with a similar noun. Another pitfall is relying purely on what sounds formal without checking whether the combination is actually used in standard English. Prepositions in fixed phrases must often be memorised as whole units, such as in honour of, in memory of, or in recognition of. Regular reading and listening to formal English helps learners internalise these collocations and avoid incorrect combinations. Final Answer: The correct preposition is in, so the sentence should read: The President will finally have a national memorial in his honour.

English Questions