Question 1

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the option that best expresses the meaning of the given idiom or phrase and mark your answer. To go to somebodys head.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is an idiom based question. The expression to go to somebodys head appears frequently in everyday English, often in relation to success, praise, power, or sometimes alcohol. The candidate must choose the option that captures the core figurative meaning of the idiom rather than a literal interpretation. Accurate understanding of such idioms is important for reading comprehension and spoken fluency. Given Data / Assumptions: Idiom: to go to somebodys head. Options: have a huge ego, complain to the highest authority, make someone dizzy or slightly drunk, arrive at the central point of the topic. No specific sentence is provided, so the general meaning is tested. We consider the most common figurative sense used in exams. Concept / Approach: In standard idiomatic usage, if praise, power, fame, or success goes to a persons head, it means the person becomes proud, arrogant, or conceited. The individual starts to overestimate personal importance and develops a huge ego. While there is also a more literal use where strong drink goes to the head and makes someone feel dizzy, exam questions with no context usually target the figurative ego based meaning. Therefore, we must focus on changes in attitude and pride rather than physical effects. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall typical sentences: Success went to his head, The sudden fame went to her head, and similar examples.Step 2: Understand that in these sentences the person becomes conceited, not dizzy, and starts behaving as if more important than others.Step 3: Compare this idea with option To have a huge ego, which matches the sense of inflated self importance.Step 4: Examine the other options. Complaining to the highest authority, feeling slightly drunk, or reaching the central point of a topic are unrelated to arrogance developed after success.Step 5: Conclude that the intended exam meaning is captured best by To have a huge ego. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, consider a short narrative: A young actor received awards early in his career and the sudden praise went to his head. Here, the natural interpretation is that he became arrogant and difficult, not that he became physically dizzy. Similarly, a manager may tell a promoted employee, Do not let this promotion go to your head, clearly warning against ego. Thus, in everyday and exam oriented usage, the idiom is strongly linked with ego and pride. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To complain to the highest authority: This describes a different idiom, go over somebodys head, which means to bypass a person and approach a superior authority. It is not the same as go to somebodys head. To make someone dizzy or slightly drunk: This is a literal physical effect of alcohol going to the head, but without context, competitive exams generally emphasise the figurative meaning related to arrogance. To arrive at the central point of the topic: This sounds like get to the point or get to the heart of the matter, which is another idiom entirely and does not match the given phrase. Common Pitfalls: Many students confuse go to somebodys head with go over somebodys head because both involve authority or hierarchy. Careful attention to prepositions and typical sentence patterns avoids this confusion. Another pitfall is to focus only on the literal idea of head and choose the dizziness related option, especially if one remembers alcohol related usage. In exam settings, however, unless alcohol is explicitly mentioned, the default interpretation is ego inflation after success or praise. Final Answer: The idiom to go to somebodys head means to have a huge ego or to become arrogant due to success or praise.

Question 2

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the option that best expresses the meaning of the given idiom or phrase and mark your answer. To make amends.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines understanding of a very common English idiom. The phrase to make amends is frequently used in both spoken and written communication to describe what a person does after committing a mistake or causing harm. Accurately grasping this meaning helps candidates interpret narratives, dialogues, and moral discussions in comprehension passages and conversations. Given Data / Assumptions: Idiom: to make amends. Options: make new friends, feel guilty for something you have not done, compensate, make flimsy excuses. No surrounding sentence is given, so the standard dictionary meaning is tested. We assume neutral context where someone has done wrong and wants to correct it. Concept / Approach: To make amends means to do something to correct a mistake, to repair damage, or to compensate for a wrong or injury. It involves taking positive action to restore balance, such as apologising sincerely, paying for damage, or performing a kind act to offset harm. The word amends itself suggests reparation. Among the options, only to compensate captures the idea of correcting or offsetting a wrong. The other options deal with unrelated feelings, new relationships, or weak excuses rather than actual restorative action. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the usual collocations: make amends for one's behaviour, make amends for a mistake, make amends to a neighbour.Step 2: Understand that in all these examples the subject actively tries to repair harm through apology, payment, or helpful acts.Step 3: Compare this concept with the options. To compensate means to make up for something bad by giving something good in return or by paying damages, which fits well.Step 4: Check other options: making new friends, feeling guilty unnecessarily, or offering flimsy excuses do not involve genuine reparation.Step 5: Conclude that to compensate is the best expression of the idiom to make amends. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a sentence: After breaking the window, the boy decided to make amends. We can sensibly replace this with After breaking the window, the boy decided to compensate by paying for the repairs. The meaning remains consistent. However, replacing with make new friends, feel guilty for something you have not done, or make flimsy excuses breaks the logical connection and changes the nature of the action. This substitution test confirms compensate as the correct interpretation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To make new friends: This may be a positive act but it does not inherently correct a past wrong to a particular person or situation. To feel guilty for something you have not done: This describes an incorrect sense of guilt, whereas making amends concerns correct action after real guilt. To make flimsy excuses: This refers to avoiding responsibility, which is the opposite attitude to making amends. The idiom emphasises sincere correction, not excuses or avoidance. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates confuse feeling sorry with making amends. Feeling sorry is internal emotion, whereas making amends requires external action. Exam setters exploit this confusion by offering options related to guilt or apology without action. Another pitfall is misreading amends as friends due to quick reading. Careful attention to spelling and prior exposure to the idiom in context can prevent such mistakes. Final Answer: The idiom to make amends means to compensate or to do something to correct a wrong.

Question 3

In the following question, a sentence is given with a bracketed part that may contain an error. Choose the alternative that will best replace the bracketed part. In case no improvement is needed, select the option no improvement. Why should we (both…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks knowledge of correct verb forms after modal auxiliaries in English grammar. The sentence uses the modal verb should, and the bracketed word must be adjusted to match the required structure. Mastery of bare infinitives after modals such as can, could, may, might, shall, should, will, and would is essential for error spotting questions in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: Why should we (bothered)? Options: bother, bothering, to bother, no improvement. The auxiliary verb in the sentence is should. We assume standard modern English grammar rules for modal verbs. Concept / Approach: Modal auxiliaries such as should are followed by the base form of the main verb, also called the bare infinitive. We say should go, should study, should help, not should to go or should going. The word bothered is a past participle or simple past form, so it is incorrect here. The correct base form is bother. The approach is to identify the modal and then choose the bare infinitive that agrees with it, ensuring that the structure aligns with standard patterns like Why should we bother. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the modal auxiliary in the sentence. The word should is a modal.Step 2: Recall the rule that modals are followed by the bare infinitive, without to and without -ing or -ed endings.Step 3: List the bare infinitive of the verb in question. The main verb is bother, so the base form is bother.Step 4: Replace the bracketed word with each option: should we bother, should we bothering, should we to bother, should we bothered. Only should we bother is grammatically correct and natural.Step 5: Therefore, the correct improvement is to choose bother as the replacement for bothered. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify the structure by comparing with other familiar sentences: Why should we worry, Why should we care, Why should we try. In each case, the verb after should is in its base form. Also, if we rewrite the sentence without the modal, we can say We are bothered, but that is a different tense and meaning. In the question form with should, the only acceptable pattern is should plus bare infinitive, confirming that bother is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bothering: This is a present participle and would require an auxiliary such as are if it were to be used, as in Why are we bothering. It cannot directly follow should. To bother: The structure should to bother is incorrect because modals do not take to before the next verb. No improvement: Keeping bothered would keep the sentence ungrammatical because should we bothered is not a correct combination in this context. Therefore all three alternatives are unacceptable. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the patterns used with ordinary auxiliaries and modal auxiliaries. For example, they know forms like are bothering or were bothered and then mistakenly extend similar forms after should. Another pitfall is to think that to must follow every auxiliary, which is not true for modals. The safest strategy is to memorise that can, could, may, might, shall, should, will, would, must, and ought to (special case) are followed directly by the base form of the main verb, without additional markers, except for ought to which already contains to inside the modal phrase itself. Final Answer: The correct replacement for the bracketed part is bother, so the sentence reads, Why should we bother.

Question 4

In the following question, a sentence is given with a bracketed part that may contain an error. Choose the alternative that will best replace the bracketed part. In case no improvement is needed, select the option no improvement. I absolutely must (…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This grammar question again focuses on the correct verb form after a modal auxiliary. The sentence contains the modal must followed by a bracketed verb form. The candidate must know that modals are followed by the bare infinitive and choose the correct form accordingly. This structure is very common in spoken and written English, especially when expressing strong obligation or necessity. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: I absolutely must (seen) him, however painful it may be for me. Options: saw, seeing, see, no improvement. The modal auxiliary is must. We assume simple present modal usage expressing strong personal obligation. Concept / Approach: Modal verbs such as must always take the base form of the main verb, without to and without any tense marking. Therefore we say must go, must leave, must study, and must see. The word seen is a past participle, used in perfect constructions with have or had, not directly after must. The goal is to identify the bare infinitive of see that follows must correctly in the sentence. The approach is to pair must with each option and choose the grammatically and semantically correct one. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify must as the modal auxiliary expressing obligation.Step 2: Recall the rule: must is followed by the base form of the verb, without to and without ed or ing endings.Step 3: Check the options. Saw is the simple past form, seeing is the ing form, and see is the base form.Step 4: Substitute each into the sentence: must saw, must seeing, must see, must seen. Only must see is grammatically correct and widely used.Step 5: Therefore, the correct improvement is see. Verification / Alternative check: To double check, compare with similar sentences: I must meet him, I must call her, I must talk to them. In all cases the verb that follows must is in the base form. If we wanted to use seen correctly, we would say I have seen him, which is a different tense and does not include must. This comparison confirms that see is the correct complement of must in this structure and that the original bracketed form seen is wrong. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Saw: This is the simple past tense and cannot follow must directly. The combination must saw is ungrammatical. Seeing: This participle form would require a helping verb like am or was if it were to be used, as in I am seeing him. No improvement: Keeping seen would produce must seen, which is also ungrammatical because seen must be preceded by have or had. Hence all other options fail to follow the rule that a modal is followed by the base verb. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse the perfect modal form must have seen with the simple modal form must see. In fast reading, they forget that in the question the auxiliary have is missing and therefore mistakenly accept seen. Another frequent error is to think that a more complex form like seeing or seen sounds more advanced, when actually the simplest base form after a modal is correct. Remembering that modals strip the main verb down to its basic shape is a reliable way to avoid such mistakes. Final Answer: The correct replacement for the bracketed part is see, so the sentence should read, I absolutely must see him, however painful it may be for me.

Question 5

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the one word which is the best substitute for the given definition and mark your answer. To move back and forth or sideways.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One word substitute questions test a candidate's ability to match concise definitions to precise vocabulary items. The given definition here describes a pattern of movement, specifically moving back and forth or sideways. The options include several nouns related to time, rest, and travel, so the candidate must identify which term best captures the idea of repeated or directional movement across space. Given Data / Assumptions: Definition: To move back and forth or sideways. Options: Sojourn, Tarriance, Traverse, Breather. We assume standard dictionary meanings of these relatively formal words. The answer must relate directly to the concept of motion. Concept / Approach: The key idea in the definition is movement across an area, often repeatedly or in different directions. The verb traverse means to travel across, over, or through something, and it can involve moving back and forth along a path. The options sojourn and tarriance refer to temporary stays in a place, and breather refers to a short rest or pause. These three are connected with time and rest, not with the physical act of moving across or sideways. Therefore, the approach is to filter out non motion words and select the only option that implies spatial movement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Break the definition into clues: move, back and forth, sideways.Step 2: Examine Sojourn. This word means a temporary stay in a place and does not describe movement itself.Step 3: Examine Tarriance. This refers to delay or lingering in a place, again focusing on staying, not moving.Step 4: Examine Breather. This is an informal word for a short rest or pause, usually to catch one's breath, not for movement.Step 5: Examine Traverse. This word means to move across, over, or through an area, often implying covering ground and possibly going to and fro. Thus Traverse best matches the idea of movement back and forth or sideways. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences. A hiker may traverse a mountain range, meaning move across it. A robot may traverse the warehouse floor, moving back and forth to collect items. You would not say a traveller sojourned a field or tarrianced a room to express motion. Nor would you call the act of movement a breather. These usage examples confirm that traverse is the only word that naturally pairs with the physical movement described in the definition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sojourn: This refers to a temporary stay in a place, such as a short stay in a city, and does not describe the act of moving. Tarriance: This is a rare word meaning delay or lingering, again focusing on time spent, not spatial movement. Breather: This is an informal term for a short rest, often taken after strenuous activity, and is almost the opposite of motion. None of these convey the image of crossing or moving back and forth across an area. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be unfamiliar with the less common words sojourn and tarriance and may guess among them randomly. Others may overthink the idea of back and forth and mistakenly believe a word related to resting or staying fits better. A sound strategy for one word substitutes is to memorise the core meaning of high frequency formal verbs like traverse and to group stay related nouns separately. Understanding that traverse is linked to crossing or covering ground helps eliminate distractors quickly. Final Answer: The one word that best substitutes the given definition is Traverse.

Question 6

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the one word which is the best substitute for the given definition and mark your answer. The remains of something that has been badly damaged.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests recognition of a common noun used to describe the remains of destroyed objects, especially in reports of accidents, natural disasters, and attacks. The given definition points directly to a situation where an object or structure has been badly damaged, and only scattered parts remain. Candidates often see this term in news headlines, so it is a high value vocabulary item for competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: Definition: The remains of something that has been badly damaged. Options: Pristine, Immaculate, Wreckage, Sterile. We assume everyday usage as in damaged vehicles, buildings, or aircraft. The answer must describe broken remains, not cleanliness or purity. Concept / Approach: The word wreckage refers to the parts of something that are left after it has been seriously damaged or destroyed. Examples include the wreckage of a car after a crash or the wreckage of a building after an explosion. The other options all denote forms of cleanliness or purity. Pristine and immaculate describe things that are clean and perfect, while sterile refers to the absence of germs or ability to reproduce. These meanings are almost opposite to the idea of damage and scattered remains. Therefore the approach is to connect the definition to the typical disaster or accident vocabulary and choose wreckage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on key ideas in the definition: remains and badly damaged.Step 2: Examine Wreckage. This directly means the broken pieces of something that has been destroyed.Step 3: Examine Pristine. This means in original, pure condition, unspoiled, which contradicts damage.Step 4: Examine Immaculate. This means perfectly clean or faultless, again opposite to damaged.Step 5: Examine Sterile. This means germ free or unable to produce offspring, which is related to cleanliness or medical contexts, not to broken remains. Therefore Wreckage matches perfectly. Verification / Alternative check: Think of typical news sentences: Rescuers searched the wreckage of the plane or Crews cleared the wreckage from the highway. If we substitute pristine, immaculate, or sterile in these sentences, the meaning becomes absurd, because those words suggest purity and cleanliness. Only wreckage naturally collocates with search, clear, and remains in such contexts. This confirms that wreckage is the correct one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Pristine: This describes something fresh, new, or untouched, such as pristine forest or pristine white snow. Damaged remains are far from pristine. Immaculate: This signifies complete cleanliness or perfection, for example immaculate clothes or an immaculate performance. Again, this is the opposite of damaged remains. Sterile: This is used mainly in medical or biological contexts to indicate lack of germs or inability to reproduce, such as sterile instruments. It has no natural link to broken pieces left after destruction. Common Pitfalls: Because three options are positive sounding adjectives, some candidates may be misled by word tone instead of meaning. Another pitfall is confusion between wreck and wreckage. Wreck is the noun or verb referring to the destroyed object or the act of destroying, while wreckage chiefly refers to the collection of remains. For exam purposes, however, remembering that wreckage points to scattered, damaged parts is enough to select it confidently. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute is Wreckage.

Question 7

In the following question, four words are given, out of which one word is spelt correctly. Select the correctly spelt word and mark your answer.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions test attention to detail and familiarity with common but sometimes tricky English words. The word here relates to people who take part in a mutiny, often described in history, naval stories, and reports of rebellion. The candidate must identify the standard spelling among several near lookalike variants that have vowel substitutions or rearrangements. Given Data / Assumptions: Target meaning: people who take part in a mutiny. Options: Mutiniers, Muteneers, Muteniers, Mutineers. We assume British or international standard spelling as used in dictionaries and exams. The correct form should match the noun derived from mutiny. Concept / Approach: The noun for people who revolt or rise in mutiny is mutineers. It is formed by taking the base word mutiny, changing y to i, and adding the suffix eers. This pattern is similar to many English words where the y at the end of a base word changes before a suffix. The incorrect options replace or rearrange vowels to create non standard spellings. Thus the approach is to recall the correct dictionary form and ignore misleading variants that merely look plausible. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the base word mutiny, which means a rebellion against authority.Step 2: Form the noun for the people involved. Mutiny plus the suffix -eer gives mutineer, and the plural is mutineers.Step 3: Compare mutineers with the options. Option D exactly matches the standard spelling M U T I N E E R S.Step 4: Check that the other options all have incorrect vowel patterns: Mutiniers, Muteneers, and Muteniers do not follow the correct formation from mutiny.Step 5: Conclude that Mutineers is the correctly spelt word. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, think of typical phrases used in stories or history books: naval mutineers, the mutineers were punished, or mutineers seized the ship. In all such contexts, standard sources print mutineers. A quick mental check of pronunciation also helps. The ee sound in the second syllable is represented by the double e in -neers, which is present only in the correct spelling. The other options do not produce the familiar sound pattern and look visually odd to a trained eye. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Mutiniers: This changes the internal vowels and does not correspond to accepted English. Muteneers: This uses e instead of i in the second syllable and does not align with the base word mutiny. Muteniers: This mixes vowels in a way that is not supported by standard spelling rules for this word. None of these forms are listed in dictionaries, and they would be treated as spelling errors in exams and formal writing. Common Pitfalls: A common difficulty in spelling questions is that all options appear similar, and candidates who have only heard the word but not seen it in print may be unsure. Another pitfall is over relying on sound, since several incorrect spellings may appear to match the pronunciation roughly. Building the word mentally from the root mutiny plus suffix -eer and then plural -s is a good strategy that reduces confusion and highlights the correct pattern mutineers. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Mutineers.

Question 8

In the following question, four words are given, out of which one word is spelt correctly. Select the correctly spelt word and mark your answer.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks knowledge of the correct spelling of a formal English noun that appears in literature and ceremonial descriptions. The word refers to a gesture of respect, such as a bow or deep courtesy, especially one that shows obedience or honour. Because the pronunciation contains several vowel sounds, exam setters often test it with confusing variations of vowels and consonant clusters. Given Data / Assumptions: Meaning: a gesture or act of respect or homage. Options: Obeisance, Obeisanse, Obesance, Obesanse. We assume standard dictionary spelling. The correct word is commonly found in formal writing and religious or royal contexts. Concept / Approach: The standard spelling of the word is obeisance. It is derived from Old French and ultimately from a Latin root connected with obedience. The key features of the spelling are the sequence o b e i s a n c e. Many incorrect variants drop the i, change the order of a and n, or replace c with s at the end. Hence the approach is to recall the fixed pattern obeis plus ance and eliminate forms that deviate from it. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the correct word used in literature: pay obeisance to the king or show obeisance before the deity.Step 2: Visualise the spelling as obeis plus ance, forming obeisance.Step 3: Compare option A, Obeisance, with this mental model and see that it matches exactly.Step 4: Examine other options. Obeisanse ends with anse instead of ance, which is incorrect. Obesance omits the letter i after e, altering the sound pattern. Obesanse removes the i and also changes c to s at the end, creating a double error.Step 5: Thus Obeisance is the only correctly spelt option. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, think of similar abstract nouns ending in ance: acceptance, tolerance, and allegiance. Obeisance fits this family with the same final sequence a n c e. Checking a mental sentence like Citizens showed obeisance at the ceremony also helps fix the spelling. None of the incorrect variants would look appropriate in a formal printed document where spelling conventions are strict. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Obeisanse: The final s e combination does not match standard usage; most such nouns use c e rather than s e. Obesance: Removing the i alters both the pronunciation and the link to the root obey or obedience, making this form non standard. Obesanse: This combines both previous errors and is far removed from the recognised spelling. These options are designed to mislead candidates who rely only on approximate sound rather than firm visual familiarity with the word. Common Pitfalls: Because obeisance is not used in everyday speech by many learners, some candidates may never have seen it written and try to guess based on similar sounding words. A frequent mistake is to confuse it with obedience or obeisant and then to project that pattern incorrectly. The best preparation strategy is to read widely, especially literary and editorial material, and to create mental flashcards for high frequency exam words like obeisance, acquiesce, and benevolent, which often appear in spelling and synonym sections. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Obeisance.

Question 9

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentence parts X, Y and Z. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the labels to form a coherent sentence and mark your answer. Our only enemies were X - heat, thirst, and flie…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a sentence rearrangement question involving three labelled parts X, Y, and Z that must be placed correctly within a given frame. The opening phrase Our only enemies were is fixed, and the candidate must choose the order of X, Y, and Z that produces a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence. Such questions test understanding of sentence structure, connectors, and logical flow. Given Data / Assumptions: Fixed frame: Our only enemies were ... Label X: heat, thirst, and flies, but far Label Y: from man or beast than that awful trinity Label Z: rather would I have faced any danger Options: XYZ, ZYX, XZY, ZXY. Concept / Approach: The sentence aims to contrast enemies like heat, thirst, and flies with possible dangers from man or beast. The phrase but far rather would I have faced any danger from man or beast than that awful trinity is a stylistic way of saying the speaker would prefer danger from man or beast over suffering from heat, thirst, and flies. The logical structure requires the list of enemies first, then the contrasting preference far rather would I have faced any danger, followed by the phrase from man or beast than that awful trinity to complete the comparison. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Attach X after the opening: Our only enemies were heat, thirst, and flies, but far. This is a natural continuation because heat, thirst, and flies directly follow enemies.Step 2: Decide which phrase can follow but far. In formal English, far rather would I have faced any danger is a known comparative expression, so Z is a good candidate.Step 3: Attach Z: Our only enemies were heat, thirst, and flies, but far rather would I have faced any danger. This remains grammatically sound.Step 4: Finally attach Y: from man or beast than that awful trinity. Now the full sentence becomes: Our only enemies were heat, thirst, and flies, but far rather would I have faced any danger from man or beast than that awful trinity.Step 5: This yields the order X Z Y, which corresponds to option XZY. Verification / Alternative check: Test the other orders briefly. XYZ would produce ...but far from man or beast than that awful trinity rather would I have faced any danger, which is ungrammatical because far normally precedes rather in this classical structure. ZYX would start directly with rather would I have faced any danger, leaving the list of enemies awkwardly placed later. ZXY breaks the obvious logical link between enemies and the list heat, thirst, and flies. Only XZY preserves both the initial list and the standard comparative phrase far rather would I have faced any danger from man or beast than that awful trinity. Why Other Options Are Wrong: XYZ: Places from man or beast than that awful trinity immediately after but far, creating an incomplete comparative and leaving Z stranded at the end in a clumsy way. ZYX: Begins with a preference before naming the enemies, which breaks the natural flow from enemies to their description. ZXY: Moves rather would I have faced any danger ahead of the enemy list, causing a logical mismatch and an odd sentence rhythm. These orders do not read like fluent English sentences. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates focus only on local grammatical connections like from man or beast and forget about overall sentence rhythm, resulting in incorrect ordering. Others may overlook the classical phrase far rather would I have faced, which signals that far and rather should be adjacent. Reading the full sentence aloud mentally and checking where natural pauses occur can help identify the most coherent order more reliably than relying on intuition alone. Final Answer: The most logical and grammatically correct order of the labels is XZY.

Question 10

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentence parts X, Y and Z. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the labels to form a coherent sentence and mark your answer. Thus, I stand on a X - hill and watch a labourer…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence rearrangement question involves placing three labelled parts X, Y, and Z into a partially given sentence so that it becomes grammatically correct and meaningful. The sentence describes a speaker standing on a hill and watching a labourer working on a distant railway line. The test checks understanding of natural word order and the logical sequence of location and action. Given Data / Assumptions: Fixed frame: Thus, I stand on a ... and watch a labourer ... Label X: hill and watch a labourer Label Y: upon the distant railway Label Z: striking with his sledge Options: XYZ, XZY, ZYX, ZXY. Concept / Approach: The sentence will be most natural if it first completes the phrase stand on a hill, then goes on to describe where the labourer is, and finally describes what the labourer is doing. In English, we often mention place before action, as in a man on the road walking quickly. Therefore, after introducing the labourer, the phrase upon the distant railway should come before striking with his sledge. This indicates that the order should be X Y Z rather than X Z Y. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert X after the opening: Thus, I stand on a hill and watch a labourer. This correctly completes the phrase stand on a hill.Step 2: Decide what should follow a labourer. We usually say a labourer upon the distant railway to describe location, so Y is the logical next part.Step 3: Attach Y: Thus, I stand on a hill and watch a labourer upon the distant railway.Step 4: Finally add Z: striking with his sledge, which describes what the labourer is doing.Step 5: The complete sentence becomes: Thus, I stand on a hill and watch a labourer upon the distant railway striking with his sledge. This corresponds to order XYZ. Verification / Alternative check: If we try XZY, we would obtain: Thus, I stand on a hill and watch a labourer striking with his sledge upon the distant railway. Though not impossible, this ordering is less smooth because upon the distant railway logically modifies labourer, not striking. The most natural grouping is labourer upon the distant railway followed by striking, which XYZ provides. The other orders ZYX and ZXY disrupt the basic subject location action sequence and quickly sound wrong when read aloud. Why Other Options Are Wrong: XZY: Places striking with his sledge immediately after labourer, leaving upon the distant railway at the very end where it sounds slightly misplaced. ZYX and ZXY: Both start with striking with his sledge, which breaks the natural flow from I stand on a hill to I watch a labourer. These sequences fragment the sentence and make it less coherent. Only XYZ preserves the clear progression from observer, to location, to observed person, to action. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may think that any sequence that is not completely wrong is acceptable, but exam setters usually choose the most natural and fluent order as the key. An effective strategy is to first identify mandatory word groups such as stand on a hill and upon the distant railway and then to ensure that modifiers like striking with his sledge attach to the correct noun. Reading the candidate sentence quickly in your mind helps detect unnatural breaks in meaning. Final Answer: The most logical and grammatically correct order of the labels is XYZ.

Question 11

In the following question, a sentence is given in Direct speech. Out of the four alternatives, select the one which best expresses the same sentence in Indirect speech and mark your answer. The teacher said, "Nobody can solve the problem."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of converting Direct speech into Indirect or Reported speech. The original sentence contains a reporting verb in the past tense (said) and a reported clause with the modal can. The candidate must choose the transformation that preserves meaning while following standard backshifting rules for modals in reported speech. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct speech: The teacher said, Nobody can solve the problem. Reporting verb: said, in simple past. Reported clause: Nobody can solve the problem. Options contain various combinations of nobody, somebody, can, could, and should. Concept / Approach: When converting from Direct to Indirect speech with a past tense reporting verb, modals like can usually change to their past forms, such as could. We also remove quotation marks and introduce a conjunction such as that. The negative and subject remain the same unless there is a change in meaning. Therefore can in the original clause should become could in reported speech, while nobody remains unchanged. The approach is to apply backshifting systematically without altering the core message that no person is able to solve the problem. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Drop the quotation marks and introduce that after the reporting verb: The teacher said that ...Step 2: Keep the subject and negative as they are, since nobody already expresses universal impossibility.Step 3: Change the modal can to could because the reporting verb said is in the past tense.Step 4: The reported clause becomes that nobody could solve the problem.Step 5: The final sentence is: The teacher said that nobody could solve the problem, which matches option D. Verification / Alternative check: Compare each option quickly with the rules. Option A keeps can instead of changing it to could, which may be acceptable only when the fact is permanently true, but exam patterns usually prefer backshifting when the reporting verb is past. Option B introduces should, which changes the meaning from ability to obligation. Option C replaces nobody with somebody, which is the complete opposite of the original statement. Therefore only option D accurately follows the rule and preserves the original sense of universal inability to solve the problem. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: The teacher said that nobody can solve the problem fails to show backshift of the modal, and many exam keys treat this as incomplete transformation. Option B: That nobody should solve the problem switches the meaning from cannot to should not, implying prohibition rather than inability. Option C: That somebody can solve the problem directly contradicts the original that nobody can. These options either break grammatical rules or distort the message. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to ignore backshifting and simply copy can into indirect speech after a past reporting verb. Another pitfall is confusion between can and should in exam choices, especially when students rush and focus only on the presence of a modal. To avoid mistakes, remember the general pattern: can to could, may to might, will to would when reporting with a past tense verb, unless the statement describes a permanent universal truth like two and two make four. Here, the problem is a specific one, so backshifting to could is expected. Final Answer: The correct Indirect speech form is The teacher said that nobody could solve the problem.

Question 12

Read the passage carefully and then choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives. Manja, the glass coated string used for flying kites, poses a threat not only to humans, animals and birds but also to trees. A study by the ol…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a short reading comprehension passage about manja, the glass coated string used for kite flying, and its impact on the environment. The passage describes an unexpected and harmful relationship between abandoned kite strings and trees. The specific question here asks which entity benefits from torn kite strings stuck in trees. This tests the candidate's ability to locate direct information and understand cause and effect in a scientific description. Given Data / Assumptions: Manja is described as glass coated string used for flying kites. It poses threats to humans, animals, birds, and trees. The research paper explains that abandoned kite strings become support for tender climbers or creepers. The climbers use these strings to reach and cover the treetop, which ultimately harms the tree. The question: Abandoned, torn kite strings stuck in trees benefit whom. Concept / Approach: The passage clearly states that the torn kite strings act as an excellent primary supporting platform for tender climbers, giving them an easy passage to reach the tree top. Climbers or creepers are plants that normally need external support to grow upwards. In this context, the benefit goes to the creepers, not to trees, animals, birds, or humans. Although the tree is physically used as a host, it does not benefit; in fact, it suffers because its treetop is covered and sunlight is blocked. The approach is to distinguish between the organism that uses the string positively and the organisms that are harmed. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the sentence in the passage that mentions how torn strings interact with other organisms.Step 2: Note the key phrase: abandoned kite strings act as a primary supporting platform for tender climbers.Step 3: Understand that tender climbers are creepers, which are a type of climbing plant.Step 4: Recognise that the trees are harmed when the climbers, supported by the strings, cover the treetop and block sunlight.Step 5: Conclude that the entity that gains a benefit from the presence of the torn strings is the creepers. Verification / Alternative check: If we quickly test each option against the passage, humans, animals, and birds are already stated as being under threat from manja, which means they are harmed, not benefited. Trees are described as being at great risk because the climbers, supported by the strings, eventually block sunlight and can kill the tree. Only creepers gain an advantage, since the strings allow them to reach the treetop more easily than they otherwise could. This analysis confirms that creepers are the beneficiaries in the described interaction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Humans: The passage explicitly states that manja threatens humans, especially in accidents involving neck or hand injuries, so humans do not benefit. Birds: Birds are also mentioned as victims, often injured or killed by the sharp strings, so they are not beneficiaries. Trees: Trees are harmed when their crowns are covered and sunlight is blocked, so the trees definitely do not benefit. Only creepers receive support and a growth advantage from the abandoned strings. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates might quickly assume that trees benefit because the strings are attached to them, or they may misread benefit as affect. Others may pick birds or humans because they recall earlier parts of the passage mentioning threats, without focusing on the line about who uses the strings as support. Reading carefully and distinguishing between harm and benefit is crucial. Whenever a question asks who benefits, it is important to identify the organism that gains an advantage, not simply the one that is in contact with the object. Final Answer: The abandoned, torn kite strings stuck in trees benefit Creepers, which use the strings as support to climb.

Question 13

Read the passage carefully and then choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives. Manja, the glass coated string used for flying kites, poses a threat not only to humans, animals and birds but also to trees. A study by the ol…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a factual detail question from the same passage about environmental damage caused by manja, the glass coated kite string. Instead of asking about general concepts, the question focuses on a specific numeric fact: the number of scientists involved in the study that documented how manja can kill trees. Such questions test accurate reading and memory of exact figures mentioned in the passage. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage mentions a research paper from Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden. It explicitly states how many scientists authored or contributed to that paper. The question asks: How many scientists contributed to the study on how manja can kill a tree. Options: Two, Three, Five, Four. Concept / Approach: Since the question asks for a direct factual detail, no interpretation or inference is required. The correct approach is to recall or quickly locate the sentence in the passage that specifies the number of scientists and then match that number with the options. This is an example of a detail based comprehension question, where careful attention to numeric information is key. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Remember the exact line from the passage that talks about the research paper.Step 2: The passage states that a research paper by three scientists of the Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden describes how manja and climbers damage trees.Step 3: Focus on the phrase by three scientists, which clearly gives the number of contributors.Step 4: Compare this number with the options given: Two, Three, Five, Four.Step 5: Select Three as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, mentally reconstruct the relevant sentence: A research paper by three scientists of the Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden illustrates in detail how the manja, in collusion with climbers, does the damage. The number three is directly mentioned and is not implied or estimated. None of the other numbers appear anywhere in that part of the passage. This confirms that the correct choice is Three. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Two: The passage never mentions two scientists; this is a distractor for candidates who misremember or guess. Five: This number also does not appear and would likely correspond to a larger research team than described. Four: Again, the passage specifies three scientists, not four, so this option is incorrect. Any answer other than three would contradict the explicit information given in the passage. Common Pitfalls: In detail oriented questions, candidates sometimes skim passages too quickly and later confuse numbers like three and four. Another pitfall is relying on general knowledge, such as a belief that most research papers are written by multiple scientists, and then guessing a larger number without checking the text. A reliable strategy is to underline or mentally note all numbers and dates while reading, so that such specific questions can be answered confidently without confusion. Final Answer: The study on how manja can kill a tree was conducted by three scientists.

Question 14

Read the passage carefully and then choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives. Manja, the glass coated string used for flying kites, poses a threat not only to humans, animals and birds but also to trees. A research paper …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question focuses on the mechanism described in the passage by which creepers, helped by manja, can harm and eventually kill trees. The passage explains how abandoned kite strings act as support for creepers, which then grow over the treetops. The question asks what specific process leads to the death of the tree, testing the candidate's ability to identify cause and effect as explained by the authors of the study. Given Data / Assumptions: Manja strings get stuck in trees and provide a support system for tender climbers or creepers. The creepers climb up the tree using the strings and then spread across the treetop. The passage notes that the climbers and their accessory branches completely cover the treetop. It specifically mentions that this coverage inhibits the penetration of sunlight to the tree. The question: How can a tree be killed by a creeper, according to the passage. Concept / Approach: The passage explains a simple but powerful biological principle. Trees need sunlight for photosynthesis, the process by which they produce food. If creepers cover the treetop densely, they act like a shade or blanket that prevents sunlight from reaching the leaves of the host tree. Without enough light, the tree cannot produce sufficient food, weakens over time, and may die. Therefore, the specific mechanism mentioned is the blocking of sunlight, not mechanical strangling, nutrient theft, or chemical poisoning. The correct approach is to pick the option that reflects this shading effect described in the text. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the key phrase from the passage: the climbers completely cover the treetop, thus inhibiting the penetration of sunlight.Step 2: Understand that inhibiting sunlight means the tree receives less light than required.Step 3: Recognise that lack of light prevents efficient photosynthesis, which is essential for the tree's survival.Step 4: Compare this explanation to the options. Blocking its access to sunlight matches exactly.Step 5: Confirm that other options (wrapping tentacles, sucking nutrients, secreting toxic chemicals) are not mentioned in the passage and are therefore incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: Test each option against the wording of the passage. The text does not mention tentacle like structures choking the tree, nor does it describe creepers as parasite plants that suck nutrients in the way some parasitic species do. It also does not mention any toxic chemical secretion. Instead, it clearly emphasises that the complete covering of the treetop inhibits sunlight. Therefore, the only option that directly reflects the passage is blocking its access to sunlight. This is a straightforward case of matching the phrase inhibition of sunlight with its practical implication. Why Other Options Are Wrong: By wrapping its tentacles around its branches: Although some creepers physically wrap around branches, the passage does not highlight this as the killing mechanism. By sucking away the nutrients: This describes a parasitic mode of life for some plants, but the passage does not state that these climbers feed directly on the tree's nutrients. By secreting toxic chemicals: No mention of toxins or chemicals exists in the text. Selecting any of these options would be guessing beyond the information given, which is not allowed in detail based comprehension questions. Common Pitfalls: Students may bring outside biological knowledge and assume that all creepers or parasites kill trees by sucking nutrients or strangling them. In exams, however, answers must be grounded strictly in the passage. Another pitfall is overlooking the key sentence about sunlight because it appears in the middle of a complex description. Training oneself to underline or mentally note clear cause and effect statements, especially those starting with thus or therefore, helps avoid such errors. Final Answer: According to the passage, a tree can be killed by a creeper by blocking its access to sunlight when the creeper completely covers the treetop.

Question 15

Read the following passage about manja, or glass coated string used for flying kites, and the role it plays in harming trees in the Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden in West Bengal. The passage explains how abandoned kite strings he…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question tests how carefully you extract factual details from a descriptive passage. The passage talks about manja, the glass coated string used for flying kites, and its harmful effect on trees in a famous Indian botanical garden. The exam focus is on checking whether you can correctly form and recognise an acronym created from a long institutional name that appears in the passage. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage mentions the Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden. This garden is described as the oldest botanical garden in the country. The question asks for the correct acronym for this garden based on its full name. Each option is a different ordering of the initials of the words in the name. Concept / Approach: To answer acronym questions correctly, you must break the full name into its individual words and take the first letter of each important content word in the correct sequence. Small connecting words like of, for, in or and are usually ignored unless they are part of an official style, but here all words given are content words. Once you list the initials in the proper order, you simply match that string of letters with the given options. Careful attention to the exact order of words is crucial, because similar looking options are designed to confuse you in competitive examinations. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note the full institutional name from the passage: Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden. Step 2: Split this name into separate main words: Acharya, Jagdish, Chandra, Bose, Indian, Botanic, Garden. Step 3: Take the first letter of each of these seven words in order. That gives the sequence A, J, C, B, I, B, G. Step 4: Combine these initials into one continuous acronym without spaces, which gives AJCBIBG. Step 5: Compare this acronym with the options. Option A is AJCBIBG, which exactly matches our derived acronym, so that is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: As a quick check, go through the full name again and make sure no word has been skipped. There are four personal name components which correspond to Acharya, Jagdish, Chandra and Bose. Then come three descriptive words Indian, Botanic and Garden. That again confirms the seven letters A J C B I B G in that order. It is also useful to look at where some options shift the positions of the letters B or I, because such rearrangements would not match the original order of words. Since the order we have followed directly reflects the name as given in the passage, our acronym AJCBIBG is fully verified. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, AJCBBGI, changes the sequence of the letters at the end and does not match the pattern for Indian Botanic Garden. Option C, AJBCIBG, swaps the positions of C and B in the middle, which breaks the correct order of Chandra and Bose. Option D, AJBCBGI, again scrambles the middle and ending letters and fails to reflect the proper positions of Indian, Botanic and Garden. None of these alternatives preserve the original sequence of words from the passage, so they are incorrect acronyms. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to rush through long names, assume the pattern, and pick the first option that looks familiar without consciously mapping each letter. Another pitfall is ignoring one of the middle names such as Chandra or Bose, which leads to an acronym with missing letters. Under exam pressure, students sometimes confuse similar looking patterns like AJBCIBG and AJCBIBG, which is why systematic stepwise checking of each word and its initial is very important. Remember that comprehension questions often hide simple factual tasks inside a dense descriptive passage, so you benefit from reading carefully rather than skimming. Final Answer: The correct acronym for the Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden is AJCBIBG.

Question 16

Read the passage about the harmful effect of manja, or glass coated kite string, on trees in the Acharya Jagdish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden. The passage explains that abandoned torn kite strings form a support for climbers and help them reac…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question continues the reading comprehension passage about manja and its negative impact on trees in a famous botanical garden. The focus here is not on general environmental knowledge but on careful reading of the specific lines in the passage. You are asked to identify which element actually gives easy passage to the climbers so they can reach the top of the trees and eventually cover the treetop, blocking sunlight. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage mentions abandoned and torn kite strings that get stuck in trees. It also talks about tender climbers and creepers in the garden. The research paper quoted in the passage states that the strings act as a primary supporting platform. The question asks: what gives easy passage to climbers to the top of the trees, according to that explanation. Concept / Approach: The main skill tested here is detailed reading and accurate extraction of information from the given text. You must locate the sentence that describes how the climbers manage to reach the top of the trees. Then you must understand which noun in that sentence is performing the function of giving easy passage. It is essential to distinguish between the climbers themselves, the trees, and the manja or kite strings that help them climb. The correct option will use wording that is closest to the phrase that appears in the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the key sentence from the passage: the abandoned, torn kite strings act as an excellent primary supporting platform for the tender climbers. Step 2: The same sentence goes on to say that these strings give easy passage to the climbers to reach the top of the trees. Step 3: Notice that the subject performing the action is the abandoned torn kite strings, not the trees or the climbers themselves. Step 4: In the options, the closest expression that represents abandoned torn kite strings is Torn kites, which refers to the strings attached to the torn kites stuck in the branches. Step 5: Therefore, the correct answer is Torn kites, because these provide the easy passage as described in the research paper quoted in the passage. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this by substituting each option back into the sentence and testing whether it matches the explanatory idea. If you read the line as The abandoned torn kite strings act as an excellent primary supporting platform and give easy passage, you can see that creepers are actually the plants that climb, not the supports, and lateral branches are additional structures that come later. The key described support at the beginning of the process is the torn kite string. This matches the option Torn kites perfectly and confirms that this is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Creepers, are the climbers themselves and therefore cannot be the object that gives them easy passage, since they use some other support. Option C, Lateral branches, appear later in the process and are described as branches that extend and cover the treetop; they are not the primary initial support. Option D, Manja, is a generic term for the glass coated string, but the passage specifically points to abandoned torn kite strings as the direct support. The wording Torn kites reflects the exact description more accurately than the broader word Manja in this context, so Torn kites is preferred. Common Pitfalls: Many students simply see the word manja repeatedly and immediately choose Manja without revisiting the key sentence. Others may confuse creepers and climbers with the supporting platform and believe that climbers somehow give themselves easy passage. Another pitfall is to misread lateral branches as the main support when, in fact, they are growth that appears later and contributes to blocking sunlight. To avoid these errors, always return to the precise sentence that answers the question and identify who is doing the action or providing the support. Final Answer: The element that gives easy passage to the climbers to reach the top of the trees is Torn kites.

Question 17

In the following English grammar question, a sentence is divided into three underlined parts and you must choose which part contains a grammatical error. The sentence is: "At this moment that terrible door burst noisily open and banged for the wall.…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the common error spotting type that appears in many English language competitive exams. You are given a sentence broken into three labelled parts, and you must identify the part containing a grammatical or idiomatic error. The sentence describes a dramatic moment when a terrible door bursts open and hits a wall. The key test here is of preposition use and natural English phrasing rather than complex grammar rules. Given Data / Assumptions: The given sentence is: At this moment that terrible door burst noisily open and banged for the wall. Part (1) is: At this moment that. Part (2) is: terrible door burst noisily open and. Part (3) is: banged for the wall. Part (4) corresponds to No Error, which is chosen only if all three parts are correct. Concept / Approach: Error spotting questions often involve incorrect prepositions or words that sound almost right but are not idiomatic in standard English. When something hits a wall, we say it bangs against the wall, not bangs for the wall. Therefore, the approach is to read each part carefully and ask whether that word choice would be used by a fluent speaker. If a part sounds unnatural, you evaluate whether there is a more correct standard construction, and that part is likely to contain the error. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read part (1): At this moment that. This may feel slightly wordy but it is acceptable in narrative style as a way of setting the scene, as in At this moment that terrible door... Step 2: Read part (2): terrible door burst noisily open and. This phrase is grammatically acceptable; doors can burst open noisily and the conjunction and continues the action. Step 3: Read part (3): banged for the wall. The preposition for is not idiomatic here. When something strikes a surface, English uses against, on or upon, not for. Step 4: The correct phrasing should be banged against the wall or banged on the wall rather than banged for the wall. Step 5: Since part (3) clearly contains the incorrect preposition, the error lies in segment 3 and that is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: To double check, you can try to rewrite the entire sentence in standard English. A natural version would be: At this moment that terrible door burst noisily open and banged against the wall. Here, against clearly expresses the idea of contact with the wall. You can also search your own reading experience: English speakers say He ran into the door, not He ran for the door, when they mean impact. This confirms that for is the wrong preposition in this context, and part (3) is indeed faulty. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part (1) uses a narrative style phrase At this moment that terrible door..., which is acceptable even if slightly dramatic. Part (2) has correct verb usage; burst is the past tense of burst and noisily open describes how the door opened, which is fine. Part (4), No Error, is incorrect because we have already identified a clear mistake in part (3). Therefore options 1, 2 and 4 do not represent the error and cannot be selected as correct answers. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes focus so strongly on tenses and subject verb agreement that they ignore small function words such as prepositions. Another frequent error is to think that if a phrase sounds unusual it must be completely wrong, even when it is just a stylistic choice. In this sentence, the unusual but acceptable phrase At this moment that may distract you, while the real error hides in the short phrase banged for the wall. Always pay attention to prepositions after verbs of motion or impact, because they are a common testing point in English exams. Final Answer: The part containing the grammatical and idiomatic error is segment 3, which uses the incorrect phrase banged for the wall instead of banged against the wall.

Question 18

In the following English grammar error spotting question, a sentence is divided into three labelled parts and you must identify which part, if any, contains a mistake. The sentence is: "While an electron carries a negative electrical charge, a neutr…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your ability to evaluate a scientific statement written in English and decide whether it is grammatically correct and logically consistent. The sentence compares the charge carried by an electron with the neutrality of a neutron. Error spotting questions like this require a combination of language sense and basic subject knowledge so that you can confirm the statement is meaningful and correctly structured. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: While an electron carries a negative electrical charge, a neutron is neutral. Part (1): While an electron. Part (2): carries a negative electrical. Part (3): charge, a neutron is neutral. Part (4): No Error, which is chosen only if parts 1, 2 and 3 are all correct. Basic science fact: electrons are negatively charged, neutrons have no charge. Concept / Approach: The conjunction while is commonly used to introduce a contrast between two clauses. The structure While X, Y is correct if both X and Y are full clauses with subject and verb. You must check subject verb agreement, article usage, word order, and also verify that the scientific content is reasonable. Since English grammar questions often use scientific context, recognising accurate science helps eliminate doubts about meaning. If no grammatical problem exists in any segment, the correct choice is No Error. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (1): While an electron. This begins a dependent clause, and the word an before electron is the correct article because electron starts with a vowel sound. Step 2: Examine part (2): carries a negative electrical. This segment includes the verb carries and the adjectives negative electrical, which properly describe the type of charge. The noun charge appears in the next part. Step 3: Examine part (3): charge, a neutron is neutral. The noun charge correctly completes the phrase a negative electrical charge. The comma introduces the main clause a neutron is neutral, which is grammatically correct. Step 4: Put the full sentence together: While an electron carries a negative electrical charge, a neutron is neutral. The structure While clause, clause is correct and clearly expresses a contrast. Step 5: Confirm that the science is accurate: electrons are indeed negatively charged and neutrons have no charge. Therefore the sentence makes sense and there is no error in any part. Verification / Alternative check: You can rephrase the sentence to check its structure. A similar version is An electron carries a negative electrical charge, whereas a neutron is neutral. This confirms that while is being used correctly to introduce a contrast. There is no tense disagreement, no misplaced modifier, and no article error. Since all segments are correct, you cannot choose any of the parts 1, 2 or 3 as the error. In such cases, the correct answer is always the option that marks No Error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 1 would be correct only if the phrase While an electron were grammatically wrong, but it is not. Option 2 would be correct only if carries a negative electrical were incorrect, but that phrase properly begins the predicate. Option 3 would be correct only if charge, a neutron is neutral contained a problem, yet both charge and the clause a neutron is neutral are accurate in grammar and meaning. Therefore options 1, 2 and 3 cannot be chosen, leaving option 4, No Error, as the only valid choice. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake in such questions is assuming that every sentence in an error spotting exercise must contain a mistake. This expectation may push students to manufacture errors where none exist, such as thinking while cannot appear in scientific statements or doubting the description of charges. Another trap is to overanalyse the phrase negative electrical charge and imagine it should be written in a different way, even though it is perfectly acceptable technical language. Always remember that some questions deliberately include a fully correct sentence to test whether you can confidently choose No Error when appropriate. Final Answer: The sentence is grammatically correct and scientifically accurate, so the correct choice is 4 (No Error).

Question 19

In the following vocabulary based sentence completion question, you must choose the most appropriate word to fill in the blank so that the sentence makes clear sense in context: "The big stone monument was the only __________ the lost traveller reme…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of English vocabulary in the context of travel and location. The sentence describes a lost traveller who remembers only one feature, a big stone monument, that can help him or her identify a place. You must select the word that best expresses the idea of a noticeable feature used for finding or recognising a location. Such questions are very common in general English sections of competitive examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence given is: The big stone monument was the only __________ the lost traveller remembered. The traveller is described as lost, which suggests difficulty in orientation. The big stone monument is the specific object that stands out in memory. The options are specimen, souvenir, piece and landmark. Concept / Approach: To solve vocabulary completion questions, you must focus on the key idea of the sentence. Here, the important clues are big stone monument, only and lost traveller. Together they point to something used for way finding or recognition, such as a reference point on a route. In English, the standard word for a prominent object used as a point of reference is landmark. Other words like specimen, souvenir and piece do not carry this meaning and therefore are not suitable in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify what role the big stone monument plays in the sentence. It is the only thing the traveller remembers in order to recognise the place. Step 2: Recall the meaning of landmark. A landmark is a building, monument or natural feature that is easily seen and recognised, often used to navigate or remember a location. Step 3: Test the word landmark in the blank: The big stone monument was the only landmark the lost traveller remembered. This sounds natural and clearly describes a navigational reference point. Step 4: Test other options. Specimen refers to a sample that represents a group, souvenir is a small item kept as a memory of a visit, and piece is too general to express the idea of a notable reference point. Step 5: Since only landmark fits both meaning and tone, option D is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Think about how you speak in real life. When giving directions, you say things like Take a left at the monument, it is a well known landmark. You do not normally call such a monument a specimen or a souvenir in the context of navigation. Moreover, the traveller is lost in the area, so the memory of a landmark helps orient or guide him. This real world use reinforces that landmark is the intended word. Reading the sentence aloud with each option further confirms that only landmark produces a smooth, meaningful and idiomatic sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Specimen means an individual example of something, often used in scientific or biological contexts, such as a specimen of rock or plant. That meaning does not connect naturally to the idea of helping a lost traveller find the way. Souvenir means a small object kept as a reminder of a visit or event, usually something carried away in a bag, not a large stone monument still at the site. Piece is too vague and does not convey the idea of recognisable significance or navigational help. Therefore options A, B and C fail to capture the specific sense required by the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overthink such questions and look for uncommon or fancy words, even though the most straightforward word like landmark is exactly right. Others may be distracted by the idea of memory and choose souvenir because it is linked to remembrance, without considering that the traveller is thinking of a structure in the environment, not an object carried home. Always connect the word choices to the complete scenario described in the sentence rather than only to one part of it. This helps you avoid selecting a word that fits loosely but does not truly match the context. Final Answer: The big stone monument is best described as a landmark that the lost traveller remembered.

Question 20

In this sentence completion question, you must choose the word that best completes the following sentence so that it is meaningful and grammatically correct: "The airline was unable to give us a reason for the ______________ departure delay." Which …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of adjectives that describe the nature of an event, particularly when there is or is not a clear explanation. The sentence is about an airline that cannot provide a reason for a departure delay. The correct word must convey that the delay cannot be explained, not that it cannot be seen, divided or defeated. Vocabulary precision is important in competitive examinations because similar sounding words often have very different meanings. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: The airline was unable to give us a reason for the ______________ departure delay. The airline cannot give a reason, so the delay lacks a clear explanation. The options are indivisible, invincible, invisible and inexplicable. The correct word needs to describe something that cannot be explained. Concept / Approach: The key is to match the context give a reason for with a word that semantically fits. In English, when no explanation is possible, we say something is inexplicable. Indivisible means not able to be divided, invincible means too powerful to be defeated, and invisible means not able to be seen. Only inexplicable directly describes an event that defies explanation. By aligning meaning with the phrase give us a reason for, you can easily eliminate the other options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the main idea. The airline was unable to give us a reason indicates that the delay cannot be explained satisfactorily. Step 2: Recall that the word inexplicable means impossible or very difficult to explain. Step 3: Insert inexplicable into the sentence: The airline was unable to give us a reason for the inexplicable departure delay. This sounds natural and accurately describes a delay with no clear cause. Step 4: Test indivisible. It means not able to be divided, which relates to mathematics or unity, not to delays or reasons. Step 5: Test invincible and invisible. Invincible relates to strength in battle or competition, and invisible relates to sight, neither of which connect to reasons or explanations for a delay. Therefore they are not suitable. Verification / Alternative check: Good exam technique involves paraphrasing the sentence. You could say The airline was unable to give us a reason for the delay, which seemed impossible to explain. The phrase impossible to explain is almost a direct definition of inexplicable. This confirms that inexplicable is the only option that correctly captures the idea. Reading the sentence aloud with each alternative further shows that only inexplicable creates a coherent and natural expression in standard English usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Indivisible is typically used in contexts like indivisible by two, or an indivisible nation, and refers to something that cannot be separated into parts. It does not describe a delay. Invincible is often used for warriors, teams or forces that cannot be defeated, as in an invincible army, and has nothing to do with reasons or explanations. Invisible refers to something that cannot be seen, such as invisible ink or an invisible object, which again does not fit the context of a departure delay that lacks an explanation. None of these words pair well with the phrase reason for the delay. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse words that share similar prefixes like in or im and assume that their meanings are interchangeable. However, English vocabulary is full of such false friends, and each word must be understood independently. Another common pitfall is rushing through the options and focusing only on sound rather than meaning. Because these are all formal sounding words, it is important to connect each one to a simple definition in your mind before making a choice. Slowing down for a moment to recall meanings can greatly improve accuracy in vocabulary questions. Final Answer: A delay for which no clear reason can be given is best described as an inexplicable departure delay.

English Questions