Question 1

In the following sentence error spotting question, identify the part of the sentence that contains an error: He flowed into a rage at the very sight of that man.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks knowledge of idiomatic usage in English. The sentence He flowed into a rage at the very sight of that man sounds odd because the verb choice does not match the standard idiom. Error spotting questions of this type require recognition of fixed expressions where only certain verbs collocate naturally with certain nouns. Inaccurate but similar sounding verbs are used to trick hurried candidates. Given Data / Assumptions: Full sentence: He flowed into a rage (A)/ at the very (B)/ sight of that man (C)/ No error (D). Part A: He flowed into a rage. Part B: at the very. Part C: sight of that man. Part D: No error. We assume standard idiomatic usage as accepted in competitive exam English. Concept / Approach: The standard idiom in English is to fly into a rage, not to flow into a rage. The verb fly is used metaphorically to suggest a sudden and violent change of temper. Flow is associated with liquid movement and does not form this idiom. Therefore, the error lies in part A, where flowed must be replaced by flew to read He flew into a rage. The rest of the sentence, at the very sight of that man, is natural and grammatically correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part A: He flowed into a rage. This expression does not sound familiar as a standard English idiom. Step 2: Recall that the common phrase is He flew into a rage, which means he suddenly became extremely angry. Step 3: Recognise that the wrong past tense verb, flowed, has been used in place of flew, creating the error. Step 4: Examine part B: at the very. This is acceptable, as at the very sight is a common phrase emphasizing immediacy. Step 5: Examine part C: sight of that man. This correctly completes the prepositional phrase and does not show any grammatical or idiomatic error. Step 6: Conclude that only part A is faulty and should be corrected to He flew into a rage. Verification / Alternative check: Substitute the correct idiom into the sentence: He flew into a rage at the very sight of that man. This version is standard English and appears frequently in literature and newspapers. Using flowed instead of flew changes the meaning and sounds unnatural, as emotions are not described as flowing into a rage. There are other idioms such as flew off the handle or flew into a passion that also support the correctness of the verb fly in this type of expression. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part B, at the very, is correct when combined with sight to form at the very sight, which is a natural emphasis phrase. Part C, sight of that man, is a normal noun phrase and does not contain any grammatical mistake. Part D, No error, is incorrect because we have already detected a clear idiomatic error in part A. Thus, only part A can be marked as containing the error in this sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some students may not recognise the fixed idiom and may accept flowed into a rage as poetic or stylistic variation. Others may quickly scan for tense or article mistakes in later parts of the sentence and overlook the real issue. To excel in this type of question, candidates should familiarise themselves with common idioms like fly into a rage, blow one's top, or lose one's temper, so that incorrect substitutions stand out immediately in an exam setting. Final Answer: The error is in part A, because flowed should be replaced with flew to form the correct idiom He flew into a rage.

Question 2

In the following sentence completion question, choose the most appropriate preposition to complete the sentence: After retirement Surti lived _______ Australia.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Preposition questions test whether a learner knows which prepositions naturally collocate with particular nouns, especially place names. The sentence After retirement Surti lived _______ Australia refers to living in a country. English uses in with large areas such as countries and big cities to indicate residence. The other options in the question either misuse common prepositions of place or combine them in unnatural ways, making them incorrect for standard written English. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: After retirement Surti lived _______ Australia. Options: in, at, over in, over at. We assume the context is permanent or long term residence in a country. We follow standard grammatical conventions for prepositions of place. Concept / Approach: The general rule for geographical locations is that we use in with countries, large cities, and enclosed spaces; we use at for specific points such as addresses, events, or small locations; and on for surfaces. With the name of a country such as Australia, the idiomatic and grammatical choice is in. Expressions like over in or over at can appear in informal speech to add emphasis to distance, but they are not used in the simple, neutral pattern of a sentence like this in exam English. Therefore, in is the correct preposition to complete the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the type of place in the sentence. Australia is a country, a large geographical area. Step 2: Recall the rule that for countries we normally say live in a country, for example live in India or live in Canada. Step 3: Insert in: After retirement Surti lived in Australia. This sounds natural and correct. Step 4: Test at: After retirement Surti lived at Australia. This is ungrammatical because at is used for specific addresses or locations, not whole countries. Step 5: Test over in: After retirement Surti lived over in Australia. Although possible in very informal conversation, it adds an unnecessary over and is not the simple, standard form expected in exams. Step 6: Test over at: After retirement Surti lived over at Australia. This is not idiomatic in standard English and sounds incorrect. Step 7: Conclude that in is the only appropriate choice. Verification / Alternative check: Consider similar correct sentences: She lives in Germany, They settled in New Zealand, My uncle lives in Japan. In each case, in is used with a country. The only time at might be used is with a small local landmark or exact address, such as at 12 Park Street or at the station. Over in and over at may occasionally appear in spoken English to hint at distance, as in He lives over in Canada, but exam standards favour the simple and grammatically clear form, which is in. This confirms in as the correct preposition for this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: At is wrong because one does not normally say live at plus a country name. It would be appropriate with a small, precise location. Over in is wrong in the neutral, simple style expected in competitive exams, even though it may be heard in informal speech. Over at is also wrong because it is used for specific locations, not for countries, and sounds awkward in combination with Australia. None of these alternatives fits standard written English usage for describing residence in a country. Common Pitfalls: Some students may be tempted by over in because they have heard it in conversation, but exam questions usually expect clean, standard forms without extra informal particles. Another pitfall is confusion between in and at, especially for city names, but remembering that both countries and cities typically take in for residence is helpful. Practising with many examples like live in Mumbai, live in France, and live in London helps to fix the pattern in memory. Final Answer: The correct preposition is in, so the sentence should read: After retirement Surti lived in Australia.

Question 3

In the following sentence completion question, choose the most appropriate verb phrase to complete the sentence: He ________ the low pay.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on verb collocations and tense consistency in English. The sentence He ________ the low pay refers to a typical reaction to an unsatisfactory salary. In standard English, certain verbs naturally combine with particular prepositions and objects, forming fixed or semi fixed phrases. At the same time, the form of the verb must match the tense of the sentence, which in this case appears to be simple past. The correct option must satisfy both collocation and tense requirements. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: He ________ the low pay. Options: moan at, complain about, grumbled at, ran after. We assume a simple past narrative about his reaction. We must choose the phrase that is both idiomatic and correctly inflected. Concept / Approach: Several verbs can be used to indicate dissatisfaction, such as complain, grumble, or moan. However, in this question, only grumbled at is already in the correct past tense form that agrees with He in a past description. Complain about is in base form and would need complained to be correct in the past. Moan at is also a base form. Ran after is unrelated in meaning, because to run after something means to pursue it, not to express dissatisfaction. The collocation grumbled at the low pay is idiomatic, and the past tense grumbled fits with the implied narrative context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the sentence structure He ________ the low pay suggests a completed action in past time and requires a past tense verb or phrase. Step 2: Examine moan at. The dictionary form would need to be He moaned at the low pay in past tense, but the option is not correctly inflected for simple past. Step 3: Examine complain about. Again, in past tense we would expect He complained about the low pay, but the option remains in base form. Step 4: Examine grumbled at. This is already in simple past and combines naturally with the object, giving He grumbled at the low pay, which means he expressed discontent. Step 5: Examine ran after, which would produce He ran after the low pay, an illogical meaning implying he pursued the low pay rather than objected to it. Step 6: Conclude that grumbled at is both grammatically and semantically appropriate. Verification / Alternative check: Consider natural sentences: He grumbled at the low pay is a standard way of describing someone complaining in a quiet or bad tempered way about salary. In contrast, He complain about the low pay is ungrammatical, and He moan at the low pay would require moaned to be correct. Dictionaries list grumble at something as a normal collocation meaning to mutter discontent. Therefore, grumbled at not only fits the meaning but is also in the correct tense and form for the subject He in a past context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Moan at is wrong because it is given in base form, and using it directly would break tense consistency in the sentence. Complain about is also wrong because the option is not in the correct past tense, and the exam expects a ready made phrase that can fit directly into the sentence. Ran after is wrong because it means to pursue physically or metaphorically, which does not match the idea of objecting to the low pay. Only grumbled at satisfies both the grammatical and semantic requirements of the question. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be tempted to choose complain about because they know that complain about low pay is common, but they overlook the tense mismatch in the option. Others may not pay attention to collocations and incorrectly think that ran after the low pay simply means he tried to get more, which is not how the phrase is used. The safest approach is to check both meaning and form, and to remember common pairings such as grumble at, complain about, and moan about, then choose the one that matches the sentence structure exactly. Final Answer: The correct phrase to complete the sentence is grumbled at, giving He grumbled at the low pay.

Question 4

In each of the following questions on idioms and phrases, choose the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom Pros and Cons.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Idioms and fixed phrases form an important part of English vocabulary, and understanding them is essential for doing well in competitive exams. The expression Pros and Cons is frequently used in discussions, debates, and written arguments. It does not literally refer to professional people and criminals, even though the words pros and cons can have those meanings in other contexts. Instead, it has a fixed idiomatic sense related to evaluating both sides of a question. Given Data / Assumptions: Idiom: Pros and Cons. Options: Professionals, Con artists, Professionals and con artists, Advantages and disadvantages. We must select the option that correctly conveys the established idiomatic meaning. We assume exam level knowledge of common discussion phrases. Concept / Approach: In idiomatic usage, Pros and Cons means the positive and negative points of a suggestion, plan, or situation. The word pros refers to arguments in favour, and cons refers to arguments against. Together, they invite a balanced evaluation. The option Advantages and disadvantages summarises this meaning accurately. The other options play on the literal sense of pro as professional and con as criminal, which is not relevant in this idiom. Recognising when words are used as parts of idioms rather than literal vocabulary items is crucial here. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that when people say Let us weigh the pros and cons, they mean Let us consider the good points and bad points. Step 2: Examine option Advantages and disadvantages, which directly expresses the idea of positive and negative aspects. Step 3: Examine Professionals, which refers to people with expert skills and has nothing to do with negative points or arguments against something. Step 4: Examine Con artists, which refers to criminals who cheat others, again unrelated to balancing arguments for and against. Step 5: Examine Professionals and con artists, which combines the two literal senses but still does not capture the idea of evaluating both sides of a proposal. Step 6: Recognise that only Advantages and disadvantages matches the idiomatic meaning. Step 7: Conclude that the correct interpretation of Pros and Cons is Advantages and disadvantages. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a sentence from a meeting: Before buying this new machine, we should discuss the pros and cons. If we substitute Advantages and disadvantages, the sentence remains natural and clear: we should discuss the advantages and disadvantages. Using Professionals or Con artists would make the sentence nonsensical. Dictionaries and phrase books also define Pros and Cons as arguments for and against or the good and bad aspects of something. This confirms that the fourth option is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Professionals is wrong because pro in this idiom does not refer to professional, but to pro as the Latin prefix meaning for. Con artists is wrong because con in this context does not stand for confidence trickster but for the Latin prefix meaning against. Professionals and con artists is clever but incorrect, as it mixes up unrelated meanings and completely misses the idiomatic sense of the phrase. None of these options reflect the balanced evaluation implied by Pros and Cons. Common Pitfalls: A few learners may overthink and look for clever connections between words rather than relying on familiar idiomatic usage. They may also be misled by the modern use of pro and con in other contexts. To avoid this, it is important to memorise common idioms like Pros and Cons as fixed units with fixed meanings. When an expression is often heard as a set phrase in decision making discussions, the safest interpretation is usually that idiomatic one rather than any creative literal interpretation. Final Answer: The idiom Pros and Cons means Advantages and disadvantages.

Question 5

In each of the following questions on idioms and phrases, choose the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom Once in a blue moon.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests understanding of a very common English idiom used in everyday conversation as well as in literature. The expression Once in a blue moon does not refer to an actual blue coloured moon, but to how rarely an event takes place. It is often used in exam passages and dialogues to describe something that hardly ever happens. Knowing this idiom is useful both for comprehension and for expressing ideas about frequency in a colourful way. Given Data / Assumptions: Idiom: Once in a blue moon. Options: Very rarely, Common, Predictable, Ordinary. We must select the option that matches the established idiomatic meaning. We assume standard conversational English usage. Concept / Approach: Once in a blue moon is based on the idea that a so called blue moon, a second full moon in a calendar month, is a rare event. The idiom therefore means something that happens very rarely, almost never. The correct choice must express this sense of infrequency. Very rarely does exactly that. The other options, Common, Predictable, and Ordinary, all suggest regularity or normalness, which is the opposite of what the idiom implies. Recognising the contrast between rare and common is key to answering correctly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the typical usage: He visits us once in a blue moon, which clearly means he hardly ever visits. Step 2: Examine option Very rarely. This phrase directly expresses extremely low frequency. Step 3: Examine option Common, which suggests something that happens often or is widespread, the opposite of rare. Step 4: Examine option Predictable, which focuses on whether something can be foreseen, not on how frequently it occurs. Step 5: Examine option Ordinary, which suggests something typical or average, again unrelated to frequency. Step 6: Observe that only Very rarely matches the meaning of Once in a blue moon. Step 7: Conclude that the correct interpretation is that the event happens very rarely. Verification / Alternative check: Use the idiom in different sentences: She eats sweets once in a blue moon or Opportunities like this come once in a blue moon. In both cases, replacing the idiom with very rarely preserves the meaning and tone. Replacing it with common or ordinary would completely change or even reverse the meaning. Similarly, predictable does not fit because something can be rare yet predictable, such as a scheduled event every five years. Therefore, the idiomatic sense clearly matches Very rarely. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Common is wrong because it suggests that something happens frequently or is found everywhere, which contrasts sharply with the idea of rarity. Predictable is wrong because it addresses whether an event can be expected or foreseen, not how often it happens. Ordinary is wrong because it describes something that is normal or average rather than rare or exceptional. None of these options conveys the key idea of infrequent occurrence that defines Once in a blue moon. Common Pitfalls: Because the idiom contains the word once, some learners may confuse it with phrases about single events rather than focusing on rarity. Another trap is to overanalyse the phrase as something mysterious or unusual and then choose options like ordinary or predictable simply because they look different. The safest method is to recall how native speakers use the idiom in common examples, where it clearly means almost never. Practising frequency related idioms such as once in a blue moon and every now and then helps solidify these meanings. Final Answer: The idiom Once in a blue moon means Very rarely.

Question 6

In each of the following questions, four alternatives are given for the Idiom or Phrase. Choose the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the Idiom or Phrase and click the button corresponding to it. Here the expression is: "fish out of wa…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The idiom fish out of water is a common English expression used in spoken and written language. Competitive exams frequently test such idioms because they reveal how well a candidate understands natural, figurative English rather than just literal meanings. This question asks you to select the option that best captures the figurative sense of the phrase, not the literal picture of an actual fish outside water. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom given is "fish out of water". The context is general English usage, not biology or environmental science. We must choose the meaning that reflects how native speakers use this phrase in everyday conversation. Only one option should capture the idea of feeling out of place or uncomfortable. Concept / Approach: Literally, a fish out of water is in danger and cannot survive comfortably. English uses this image metaphorically for a person who is in an unfamiliar environment, situation, or social group and therefore feels awkward, uneasy, or out of place. The correct answer must express this sense of discomfort and unfamiliarity, rather than anything about actual thirst, aquariums, or physical dehydration. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Visualise the image of a fish out of water: it is struggling, not in its natural environment, and clearly uncomfortable. Step 2: Translate this image into human experience: a person who is in a situation where they do not know how to behave or do not fit in. Step 3: Read option C: Being in an unfamiliar and uncomfortable situation. This matches the figurative idea exactly. Step 4: Check option A: Feeling dehydrated or lacking water is a purely physical meaning and ignores the idiomatic, figurative sense. Step 5: Check option B: Being in a very comfortable and familiar position is the opposite of what the idiom suggests. Step 6: Options D and E focus on literal fish or natural environments and therefore miss the idiomatic usage for people. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences. If someone says, "At my first job in a foreign country, I felt like a fish out of water," we immediately understand that the person felt uncomfortable and out of place, not thirsty or safe. Similarly, "He is a fish out of water at formal parties" means he does not know how to behave and feels awkward. These contexts strongly support option C as the only correct interpretation of the idiom in standard English. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A confuses the metaphor with a literal physical condition and ignores the social or emotional aspect of feeling out of place. Option B reverses the meaning by suggesting comfort and familiarity rather than awkwardness and unfamiliarity. Option D simply describes a fish in an aquarium and has no idiomatic meaning for people or situations. Option E talks about being happy in one’s natural environment, which again is the opposite of being out of place. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to treat idioms word by word and look for literal meanings instead of the established figurative sense. Another pitfall is to choose an option that sounds pleasant or safe without asking whether it truly reflects the emotional feeling described by the idiom. When you see idioms involving animals or body parts, remind yourself that they often describe feelings or attitudes rather than physical states. Final Answer: The idiom "fish out of water" means being in an unfamiliar and uncomfortable situation.

Question 7

Out of the four alternatives, choose the one word that can be substituted for the given phrase "a remedy for all diseases". This vocabulary item tests your knowledge of precise one-word substitutions used in general English and medical or metaphoric…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One-word substitution questions are designed to test how precisely you understand and can use English vocabulary. The phrase given here is "a remedy for all diseases". The task is to find the single English word that means exactly this, a concept that often appears in literature, discussions about medicine, and even in political or economic debates as a metaphor. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase is "a remedy for all diseases". The correct word should refer to a cure or solution for every possible problem or illness. We are working in standard English vocabulary used in exams and textbooks. Some options are genuine medical terms but do not indicate a cure for everything. Concept / Approach: The word panacea comes from Greek roots and literally refers to a universal remedy, a cure-all. In modern English, panacea is used both literally (in older medical ideas) and metaphorically (for any supposed solution to all problems). Antiseptic is a substance that kills germs on the surface of the body or objects. An antibiotic fights bacterial infections, and a vaccine prevents specific diseases. Narcotic refers to a drug that dulls the senses or relieves pain but is not a universal cure. Therefore, only panacea matches the idea of a remedy for all diseases. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key part of the phrase: for all diseases. This means not just many diseases but every disease. Step 2: Recall that panacea is a well known word meaning cure-all or universal remedy. Step 3: Compare antiseptic and antibiotic. Both are important medical terms but are used only against certain germs rather than every possible disease. Step 4: Note that narcotic is mainly related to pain relief and sedation, not curing all illnesses. Step 5: Realise that vaccine refers to prevention of particular diseases and is not used as a general cure for everything. Step 6: Conclude that panacea is the only option that exactly fits the phrase given in the question. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, place the word in a sentence. The politician claimed that his new policy was a panacea for all economic problems uses panacea in a clearly metaphorical way, meaning a cure for all issues. If we replace panacea with antibiotic or antiseptic, the sentence becomes illogical because these words do not carry the idea of solving every problem. Similarly, in older medical theories, people sometimes looked for a panacea that would cure all diseases, which directly matches the phrase in the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Antiseptic prevents the growth of germs on the skin or objects but is not a universal cure for all diseases. Option B Antibiotic works against bacteria but not against viruses or every possible illness, so it cannot be called a cure-all. Option C Narcotic is a drug that dulls pain and may induce sleep; it does not cure underlying diseases and is certainly not a universal remedy. Option E Vaccine helps the body develop immunity to specific diseases; it prevents rather than cures and is always disease-specific, not universal. Common Pitfalls: Many students are tempted by technical-sounding medical words when they see the phrase remedy for disease. However, examiners often use this type of question to see if you know special literary or classical words like panacea. A good strategy is to remember that panacea is almost always used with phrases like for all problems or for all diseases. When you see a phrase that mentions all or every in this context, panacea is a strong candidate. Final Answer: The one word that means "a remedy for all diseases" is panacea.

Question 8

Out of the four alternatives, choose the one word that can be substituted for the phrase "of the highest quality". This tests your understanding of vocabulary related to very high standards and excellence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is a one-word substitution problem focusing on vocabulary used to describe quality and standards. The phrase "of the highest quality" is common in advertisements, reviews, and academic writing. You are asked to choose the single word that best captures the sense of something being of the very best or highest degree when compared with others. Given Data / Assumptions: We need a word that expresses the idea of the very best or highest degree of quality. The context is general English usage, including grammar and descriptive writing. Some options are unrelated to quality and instead relate to production or reaction. The correct option must clearly indicate excellence or the highest level. Concept / Approach: In English grammar and general vocabulary, the word superlative is used to refer to the highest degree of comparison, as in tallest or most intelligent. Outside grammar, superlative can also describe something that is of the highest possible quality. For example, we may speak of superlative workmanship or superlative performance, meaning extremely good or the best. Productive and reactive relate to output or responsiveness, relative indicates comparison but not necessarily the highest level, and moderate suggests average rather than the best. Therefore, superlative is the only option that matches the phrase given. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the core idea: "of the highest quality" means better than all others or at the maximum level of excellence. Step 2: Recall that superlative is used for the highest degree of comparison and is also used more generally to mean excellent or of the highest quality. Step 3: Examine option C Superlative and see that it directly aligns with this concept. Step 4: Consider option A Productive, which means producing a lot or being efficient, not necessarily of the highest quality. Step 5: Recognise that option B Reactive describes how something responds to stimuli, not how good the quality is. Step 6: Options D Relative and E Moderate both suggest comparison or middle level, not excellence or the top position. Verification / Alternative check: Use the words in example sentences. A superlative performance by the athlete impressed everyone clearly suggests the very highest quality. In contrast, a productive performance sounds odd and does not clearly mean highest quality; it would refer more to output or quantity. Similarly, a moderate performance suggests average ability, not excellence. Observing how these words are used in real contexts confirms that superlative is the only correct answer when we want to describe something as being of the highest quality. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Productive focuses on output or usefulness, but something can be productive without being the very best in quality. Option B Reactive means responsive to changes or stimuli and has nothing to do with quality levels. Option D Relative indicates something that is considered in relation to something else; it does not indicate the top level or highest quality. Option E Moderate describes a middle or average level, the opposite of what is suggested by the phrase of the highest quality. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse words connected with comparison. While comparative and relative suggest some kind of comparison, they do not guarantee that something is the best. Superlative is the term reserved for the highest degree among three or more items. Remember that in grammar we say positive, comparative, superlative, and that the superlative form represents the topmost degree. This memory aid will help you in both grammar and vocabulary questions like this one. Final Answer: The one word that means "of the highest quality" is superlative.

Question 9

Out of the four alternatives, choose the one word that can be substituted for the phrase "a place of shelter for ships". This tests your knowledge of vocabulary related to transport, geography, and maritime locations.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one-word substitution question focuses on geographical and transport-related vocabulary. The phrase given is "a place of shelter for ships". You must select the word that most accurately describes a sheltered area of water where ships can anchor safely and find protection from rough seas and bad weather. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is ships, so the location is connected with the sea or large bodies of water. The key phrase is "place of shelter", indicating protection rather than simply a landing place or building. Some options refer to other kinds of transport (helicopters, planes) or military housing. The correct word must be commonly used in geography and shipping contexts. Concept / Approach: A harbour (also spelled harbor in American English) is a sheltered body of water where ships can anchor safely. It often has natural or artificial barriers that protect vessels from waves and storms. A port is a broader term that usually refers to a town or city with facilities for loading and unloading ships, which may or may not emphasise shelter. A helipad is a landing area for helicopters, a barrack is a building for soldiers, and a runway is used by aircraft in airports. Therefore, harbour is the best match for a place of shelter for ships. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on ships and shelter, which clearly places us in the context of maritime geography. Step 2: Recall that a harbour is defined as a sheltered area of water, often next to the coast, where ships are protected. Step 3: Examine option A Harbour and see that it fits the description exactly. Step 4: Consider option C Port. Although many ports are located in harbours, the word port emphasises the town and commercial facilities, not shelter itself. Step 5: Options B Helipad and E Runway refer to aviation and therefore do not relate to ships. Step 6: Option D Barrack refers to soldiers’ accommodation and is clearly unrelated to the sea. Verification / Alternative check: Think of real examples: Sydney Harbour, Mumbai Harbour, or Pearl Harbor. These names refer to sheltered water areas where ships can anchor. The associated cities may be called ports because commerce takes place there, but the physical shelter is provided by the harbour itself. For instance, we say Ships took shelter in the harbour during the storm. This sentence would be less natural with port because the emphasis is on safety from weather. This confirms that harbour is the precise term the question is looking for. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B Helipad is designed for helicopters and may be on land or on a ship, but it is not a water shelter for ships. Option C Port focuses on a commercial town or facility where ships load and unload goods; some ports may be less sheltered, and shelter is not the defining feature. Option D Barrack is a military building for soldiers’ accommodation, unrelated to ships or the sea. Option E Runway is associated with airports and aircraft taking off and landing, not with ships. Common Pitfalls: Because harbour and port are closely related, candidates often confuse the two. A helpful distinction is that harbour refers primarily to the sheltered water area, while port refers to the urban and commercial infrastructure associated with shipping. In one-word substitution questions, pay close attention to the exact phrase: here, "place of shelter" clearly points to harbour, not port. Final Answer: The one word that best describes "a place of shelter for ships" is harbour.

Question 10

A sentence, or part of the sentence, is underlined in the actual question. Four alternatives are given for the underlined part which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative and click the button corresponding to it. In case no improv…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a sentence improvement question testing your understanding of comparison structures in English. The sentence compares the height of "his wife" with "him". The original structure "His wife is as tall if not, taller than him" is awkward and grammatically incomplete. You must choose the option that correctly and smoothly completes the comparison while maintaining the intended meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: The intended meaning is that his wife is at least as tall as he is, and possibly even taller. The phrase should use the standard comparative pattern as tall as ... if not taller than .... The underlined portion in the original is "as tall if not," which is incomplete because it omits as after tall. We must avoid double comparatives such as more taller and incorrect word orders. Concept / Approach: In English, when we say that one person is at least as tall as another and perhaps taller, we often use the pattern: X is as tall as Y, if not taller (than Y). The as ... as construction must be complete: as tall as, not just as tall. Any option that fails to include the second as after tall or that adds unnecessary words like more taller is ungrammatical. Therefore, the best improvement will insert as after tall and position the phrase if not correctly within the comparison. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the standard comparison structure: as tall as + person, if not taller than + person. Step 2: Notice that the original underlined phrase "as tall if not," is missing the second as, so it should be "as tall as, if not". Step 3: Examine option A: as tall as, if not. This directly supplies the missing as and fits the pattern. Step 4: Option B: as taller if not is wrong because it breaks the as ... as pattern and uses taller wrongly after as. Step 5: Option C: not as tall but as is incomplete and confusing; it does not express the idea of being possibly taller. Step 6: Option E: as tall as if not more taller is ungrammatical because more taller is a double comparative and should not be used. Verification / Alternative check: Construct the corrected sentence with option A: His wife is as tall as, if not taller than, him. This sounds natural and clearly communicates that she is at least equal in height and maybe taller. If we try option B, His wife is as taller if not ... the structure collapses and sounds wrong to a native speaker. Option E with more taller is clearly incorrect because standard English does not combine more and the -er ending. Comparing these versions confirms that inserting "as tall as, if not" is the only acceptable improvement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B breaks the as ... as pattern and uses taller incorrectly, making the sentence ungrammatical. Option C changes the logic and fails to express that she may be taller; it also leaves the sentence sounding incomplete. Option D No improvement is incorrect because the original wording is missing as and is stylistically awkward. Option E introduces the incorrect double comparative "more taller", which is not acceptable in standard English grammar. Common Pitfalls: Many learners struggle with comparison structures and may overlook small words like as. They also sometimes create double comparatives such as more better or more taller, which are always wrong in formal English. When you see as + adjective, check carefully whether a second as is needed. In patterns like as tall as, if not taller, remember that the first part uses the as ... as structure and the second part switches to the simple comparative without repeating as. Final Answer: The correct improvement of the underlined part is "as tall as, if not", giving the sentence: His wife is as tall as, if not taller than, him.

Question 11

A sentence, or part of the sentence, is underlined in the actual question. Four alternatives are given to improve the underlined part. Choose the correct alternative and click the button corresponding to it. In case no improvement is needed, click t…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests sentence improvement with a focus on natural, idiomatic English. The sentence describes a cricket bowler's performance on the previous day: "He is a fast bowler of repute, but his yesterday's performance was not up to the mark." You must decide whether the underlined phrase is correct or if one of the alternatives provides a better, more grammatical expression. Given Data / Assumptions: The key phrase under examination is "his yesterday's performance". The sentence contrasts his general reputation with his performance on a particular day. We assume this is standard exam English and that the focus is on idiomatic usage rather than highly informal speech. Any replacement must preserve the meaning that the performance took place the previous day. Concept / Approach: In English, the genitive form yesterday's performance is a natural and accepted way to refer to performance on the previous day. The possessive 's attaches to yesterday to form an attributive phrase. When combined with his, the phrase his yesterday's performance is slightly formal but acceptable in exam-style English, especially because it mirrors structures like his Monday's performance. The suggested alternatives either drop the possessive incorrectly or create unidiomatic expressions such as performance for yesterday. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the meaning: the sentence wants to say that the fast bowler's performance on the previous day was poor. Step 2: Check the original phrase "his yesterday's performance". It uses his to show whose performance and yesterday's to show when. Step 3: Examine option A "performance for yesterday". This sounds awkward and is not standard; we usually say yesterday's performance. Step 4: Option B "yesterday performance" omits the possessive 's and sounds incorrect; the usual form is yesterday's performance. Step 5: Option C "performances for yesterday" is plural and changes the meaning, making it sound as if several performances belonged to yesterday. Step 6: Option E "performance of yesterday" is clumsy and less natural than yesterday's performance in modern usage. Verification / Alternative check: Consider how we speak about events on specific days: yesterday's match, yesterday's news, yesterday's meeting. We rarely say news of yesterday or meeting for yesterday in normal conversation. Therefore, yesterday's performance is the idiomatic pattern. Adding his simply shows possession: his yesterday's performance, although slightly wordy, is grammatically acceptable in exam English. None of the alternatives improves the sentence; in fact, they all sound less natural. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A performance for yesterday wrongly uses the preposition for, making the phrase sound like a schedule or allocation rather than a description of an event that has already occurred. Option B yesterday performance lacks the possessive 's, which is needed for natural phrasing; we say yesterday's performance instead. Option C performances for yesterday changes the number and complicates the meaning by implying multiple performances on that day. Option E performance of yesterday is grammatically possible but stiff and unidiomatic compared with yesterday's performance, which examiners prefer. Common Pitfalls: Test takers sometimes overcorrect natural expressions, thinking that Common exam sentences must be changed even when they are already correct. Always check whether the original expression is genuinely wrong before selecting another option. Remember that genitive forms like yesterday's, last year's, or Monday's are very common in English and should not be replaced with awkward prepositional phrases unless clearly required. Final Answer: The original phrasing is acceptable and idiomatic, so the correct choice is No improvement.

Question 12

A sentence, or part of the sentence, is underlined in the actual question. Four alternatives are given to improve the underlined part. Choose the correct alternative and click the button corresponding to it. In case no improvement is needed, click t…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests your understanding of English tenses, especially the present perfect continuous. The sentence "He is suffering from fever for a week" attempts to describe an illness that started in the past and has continued up to the present. You must select the option that expresses this idea correctly and naturally in standard English. Given Data / Assumptions: The illness began one week ago and is still ongoing now. The phrase "for a week" indicates duration from past to present, not a single point in time. We need a tense that connects the past with the present and emphasises continuity. The subject is singular: "He". Concept / Approach: In English, the present perfect continuous tense (has been + verb-ing) is used to describe actions or states that started in the past and are still continuing. For example, "He has been working here for a year" or "She has been studying since morning." Therefore, for an illness lasting one week and still present, "He has been suffering from fever for a week" is the correct structure. The simple present "is suffering" with "for a week" is not idiomatic for this meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the phrase "for a week" signals a period starting in the past and continuing to now. Step 2: Choose the present perfect continuous tense for such situations: has been suffering. Step 3: Examine option C: "has been suffering". This matches the required tense and fits naturally with "for a week". Step 4: Option A "was suffering" describes a past continuous action, not one that continues into the present. Step 5: Option B "had suffering" is grammatically wrong; we do not say had suffering in this way. Step 6: Option D "No improvement" would keep the incorrect structure "is suffering ... for a week", so it cannot be correct. Step 7: Option E "is suffered" is also incorrect; it tries to use a passive form that does not make sense here. Verification / Alternative check: Compare similar sentences: "He has been living in Delhi for five years", "She has been reading this book for two days". In each case, the present perfect continuous is used with "for" plus a period of time. If we tried "He is living in Delhi for five years", it would sound wrong. Therefore, "He has been suffering from fever for a week" is the correct and standard form, confirming that option C is right. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A was suffering shifts the action entirely to the past and does not show that he is still ill now. Option B had suffering is ungrammatical; had is not used with suffering in this pattern. Option D No improvement is wrong because the original tense "is suffering ... for a week" is not standard English in this context. Option E is suffered is a passive structure and does not fit with the subject "He" and the verb suffering here. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overuse the present continuous "is ... -ing" even when a longer duration is clearly indicated. A useful rule is: when you see "for" or "since" with a time period leading up to now, think of the present perfect or present perfect continuous. Practice recognising these time expressions so that you automatically choose "has been suffering" instead of "is suffering" in such questions. Final Answer: The correct improved form is "has been suffering", giving the full sentence: He has been suffering from fever for a week.

Question 13

Choose the word which is nearest in meaning to the given word. The target word is "nebulous", used here in the sense of describing something unclear or not sharply defined.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests synonym vocabulary. The word nebulous is often used in formal English to describe ideas, plans, or memories that are not clearly formed or sharply defined. Understanding this word helps in reading comprehension, especially in editorials and academic texts where writers talk about vague or unclear concepts. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to be defined is "nebulous". We assume the context of abstract ideas or statements rather than astronomy, although the root refers to a cloud or mist. The correct synonym should convey lack of clarity rather than small size or unimportance. Only one option should closely match this meaning. Concept / Approach: Nebulous comes from a root meaning cloud or mist. In modern English, it is used metaphorically to describe something that is vague, indistinct, or unclear, as if hidden in a fog. It does not primarily refer to smallness, insignificance, or inadequacy. Therefore, the best synonym in the list is vague. Tiny refers to size, insignificant to importance, inadequate to insufficiency, and transparent to something very clear, which is actually the opposite of nebulous in this sense. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that nebulous is used for ideas, descriptions, or plans that are not clearly defined. Step 2: Connect nebulous with words like cloudy, hazy, or unclear in a figurative sense. Step 3: Examine option B Vague, which directly means not clearly expressed or not having a definite form, matching nebulous. Step 4: Option A Tiny refers to very small size and has nothing to do with clarity. Step 5: Option C Insignificant talks about importance; something can be clearly explained yet unimportant. Step 6: Option D Inadequate refers to not being enough in quantity or quality, again unrelated to clarity. Step 7: Option E Transparent is actually nearly the opposite of nebulous because transparent things are easy to see through or understand. Verification / Alternative check: Test the word in example sentences: The company's future plans are still nebulous means that the plans are not clearly defined. If we substitute vague, the sentence remains correct: The company's future plans are still vague. But if we insert tiny or insignificant, the meaning changes to size or importance instead of clarity. Transparent would reverse the meaning entirely: transparent plans would be clear and easy to understand. This confirms that vague is the correct synonym for nebulous in this context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Tiny misdirects you toward size and does not capture the idea of unclear or hazy meaning. Option C Insignificant relates to importance, not to whether something is clearly defined or not. Option D Inadequate is about insufficiency, which is different from vagueness or lack of definition. Option E Transparent is wrong because it refers to something easy to see or understand, the opposite of nebulous. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes rely on vague memory of Latin or scientific roots and think of nebulae in astronomy, which are clouds of gas. This can still help if you remember that clouds obscure clear shape and boundaries. A practical strategy is to focus on how the word is usually used in sentences: nebulous idea, nebulous concept, nebulous memories—all describe things that are unclear or fuzzy, making vague the safest synonym. Final Answer: The word nearest in meaning to "nebulous" is vague.

Question 14

Choose the word which is nearest in meaning to the given word. The target word is "debilitate", commonly used to describe making someone or something weak.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests your understanding of the verb debilitate, a word often used in medical, health, and general contexts. To answer correctly, you must know what effect debilitation has on a person, organisation, or system, and choose the option that captures the same meaning in simpler language. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to be defined is "debilitate". We assume the usual meaning: to make someone weak, either physically or mentally, or to reduce the strength of a system. The correct synonym must express weakening, not total destruction or overcoming challenges. The options include verbs connected with attack, overcoming, and motivation, but only one matches the sense of weakening. Concept / Approach: To debilitate is to make weak. For example, a long illness can debilitate a patient, or corruption can debilitate an institution. The key idea is reduction in strength, energy, or effectiveness, not necessarily complete destruction. Weaken fits this meaning well. Attack simply means to take aggressive action against someone or something; it may or may not result in debilitation. Surmount means to overcome a difficulty, which is almost the opposite in spirit, and destroy implies total ruin rather than just weakening. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that debilitate means to make someone or something weak, less able, or less effective. Step 2: Look for an option that directly captures the idea of reducing strength or power. Step 3: Option A Weaken matches this meaning exactly; it is the natural, simpler synonym. Step 4: Option B Attack focuses on the act of aggression, not the final condition of weakness. Step 5: Option C Surmount means to overcome or rise above a difficulty, which is more about strength than weakness. Step 6: Option D Destroy is stronger than debilitate; it suggests complete ruin, while debilitate often means partial weakening. Step 7: Option E Motivate is unrelated; it means to encourage or inspire, which often strengthens rather than weakens. Verification / Alternative check: Check with example sentences: The long war debilitated the nation makes sense because the war made the nation weaker. If we substitute weaken, The long war weakened the nation also makes perfect sense. But using destroy would change the idea to total ruin, which may not be accurate. Debilitating illness and weakening illness are nearly interchangeable, while motivating illness or surmounting illness clearly do not fit. This confirms that weaken is the best synonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B Attack refers to an action taken; it may lead to debilitation but is not itself a synonym for the condition of becoming weak. Option C Surmount means to overcome or defeat obstacles, which is positive and strength-based, unlike debilitate. Option D Destroy usually implies complete ruin, whereas debilitate can describe partial or temporary loss of strength. Option E Motivate strengthens or encourages, which is the opposite effect of debilitation. Common Pitfalls: Some exam takers choose attack or destroy because they sound strong and dramatic, but these words describe different aspects of conflict than debilitate does. Always separate the action from the effect. Debilitate is about the effect—weakness—so you should look for words like weaken, drain, or enfeeble, not those that focus on acts of aggression or total annihilation. Final Answer: The word nearest in meaning to "debilitate" is weaken.

Question 15

Choose the word which is nearest in meaning to the given word. The target word is "anathema", which is often used for something or someone that is strongly disliked or cursed.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This synonym question tests your understanding of the word anathema, which is frequently used in formal English, theology, and literature. Originally a religious term, anathema has come to describe something or someone that is intensely disliked or formally cursed. Recognising this meaning helps in understanding strong negative opinions expressed in newspapers, essays, and novels. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to be defined is "anathema". We assume the common modern sense: something or someone hated or cursed, rather than a neutral religious object. The correct synonym should capture the idea of a curse or something regarded with deep hatred or loathing. The options include religious chant, pun, musical subject, and curse, with one clear match. Concept / Approach: In religious history, anathema referred to a formal curse or excommunication pronounced by a church against a person or doctrine. In modern general English, it is used more broadly to describe something that a person strongly detests or rejects, almost as if it were cursed. Thus, curse is the nearest straightforward synonym among the options. Religious chant, pun, and musical subject have completely different meanings, and blessing is actually the opposite of anathema in a religious sense. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that anathema is used for something that is hated, accursed, or formally condemned. Step 2: Look for an option that expresses the idea of a curse or something viewed as utterly unacceptable. Step 3: Option D Curse matches this meaning well; anathema can refer both to the act of cursing and to the thing cursed. Step 4: Option A Religious chant is misleading; although anathema is a religious word historically, it does not mean chant. Step 5: Option B Pun refers to a play on words, which has nothing to do with cursing or hatred. Step 6: Option C Musical subject is unrelated to the idea of condemnation or dislike. Step 7: Option E Blessing is almost the direct opposite of anathema, signifying approval rather than condemnation. Verification / Alternative check: Consider this sentence: "For environmentalists, the idea of burning more coal is anathema." Here, anathema clearly means something completely unacceptable or detested. If we substitute curse, "the idea is a curse to them" roughly preserves the negative sense. However, replacing it with religious chant, pun, or musical subject would make the sentence meaningless. In older texts, you may see phrases like "to pronounce an anathema on someone", which is very close to saying "to curse someone". This confirms that curse is the best synonym among the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Religious chant confuses the religious origin of the word with a completely different religious practice. Option B Pun refers to humorous wordplay and has no connection with hatred or formal condemnation. Option C Musical subject belongs to the vocabulary of music theory, not theology or strong disapproval. Option E Blessing means favour or approval, which is nearly the opposite of anathema and therefore cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes focus on the word's religious origin and pick the first religious-sounding option they see, such as religious chant. Always remember to match the meaning, not just the domain. A good trick is to recall that anathema is often used in contexts where someone strongly opposes an idea: "X is anathema to Y." In such contexts, the idea is treated like a curse or something accursed, not like a chant or blessing. Final Answer: The word nearest in meaning to "anathema" is curse.

Question 16

Choose the word which is nearest in meaning to the given word. The target word is "penchant", which is commonly used to describe a strong liking or preference for something.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a synonym question focused on the word penchant. The word appears frequently in essays, biographies, and opinion pieces to describe a person's strong and often habitual preference for something, such as a penchant for music or a penchant for punctuality. To answer correctly, you need to connect penchant with the idea of liking, rather than urgency, inability, or lack of interest. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to define is "penchant". We assume the standard meaning: a strong, sometimes unusual liking or fondness for something. The correct synonym must clearly express preference or liking, not disability or awkward behaviour. Some options are negative or unrelated traits deliberately included as distractors. Concept / Approach: Penchant comes from French and is used in English to indicate a strong inclination, fondness, or liking for something. For example, someone may have a penchant for classical music or a penchant for sweets. Liking fits this meaning well. Eagerness suggests enthusiasm to act but does not always mean a stable, ongoing preference. Disability refers to a limitation, awkwardness to clumsiness or social discomfort, and indifference to lack of interest, which is the opposite of liking. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that a penchant is a strong preference or fondness, not just a momentary desire. Step 2: Identify option A Liking as the one that directly expresses a positive feeling or fondness towards something. Step 3: Option B Eagerness expresses energy or impatience to do something now, which is slightly different from a stable preference. Step 4: Option C Disability refers to a limitation in physical or mental ability and is completely unrelated in meaning. Step 5: Option D Awkwardness relates to clumsiness or social discomfort, not to having a strong preference. Step 6: Option E Indifference is almost the opposite: it means a lack of interest or concern, not a fondness. Verification / Alternative check: Use the word in an example: "She has a penchant for spicy food" clearly means she likes spicy food a lot. If we say, "She has a liking for spicy food", the sentence still makes sense with nearly the same meaning. But "She has an eagerness for spicy food" sounds less natural and suggests excitement rather than preference. Likewise, replacing penchant with disability or indifference completely changes the meaning and contradicts the original sense. This confirms that liking is the best synonym among the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B Eagerness focuses on enthusiasm or keenness at a particular time, not necessarily a long-term liking. Option C Disability is a serious and specific term for physical or mental limitations and has nothing to do with preferences. Option D Awkwardness describes clumsiness or social unease, which is unrelated to fondness or liking. Option E Indifference describes a lack of interest or concern, which is the opposite of the positive interest that a penchant implies. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates associate penchant with eagerness because both can appear in contexts where someone does something often. However, the subtle difference is that penchant is about what someone tends to like or choose, while eagerness is about how strongly they want to act at a given moment. When you see penchant in exam passages, think of it as stable liking or preference, which will guide you to synonyms like liking or fondness. Final Answer: The word nearest in meaning to "penchant" is liking.

Question 17

Choose the word which is nearly opposite in meaning to the given word. The target word is "refractory", often used to describe someone or something that is stubborn, unmanageable, or difficult to control.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question tests your understanding of the word refractory, which describes people, animals, or materials that are difficult to manage, control, or work with. You are asked to choose the word that expresses the opposite idea, that is, something or someone easy to handle or control. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to be contrasted is "refractory". We assume the commonly tested meaning: stubborn, resistant, or unmanageable. The correct antonym must express being easy to manage, handle, or control. Some options are included as distractors and relate to other qualities like being refreshing or privileged. Concept / Approach: Refractory is often applied to children, patients, or materials that resist control, treatment, or influence. For example, a refractory child does not obey easily, and a refractory disease does not respond to treatment. The opposite idea would be something manageable, obedient, or responsive. Among the options, manageable clearly expresses this meaning. Refreshing, burdensome, privileged, and obstinate describe different qualities and do not form a direct opposite to refractory in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that refractory means stubborn, disobedient, or difficult to manage. Step 2: Look for an option that means easy to control or handle. Step 3: Option D Manageable directly expresses being capable of being managed or controlled without much difficulty. Step 4: Option A Refreshing refers to something that is pleasant or invigorating, not the opposite of stubborn. Step 5: Option B Burdensome means heavy or difficult in terms of effort or responsibility but does not directly mean easy to manage. Step 6: Option C Privileged describes having special advantages or rights, not manageability. Step 7: Option E Obstinate is actually similar in meaning to refractory, describing stubbornness, and is therefore a synonym, not an antonym. Verification / Alternative check: Consider the phrases refractory student and manageable student. The first suggests a child who refuses to follow rules, while the second suggests a child who cooperates and is easy to handle. If we tried refreshing student or privileged student, we would be describing something entirely different. Additionally, obstinate student has almost the same meaning as refractory student, confirming that obstinate cannot be the opposite. Thus, manageable is the only option that clearly reverses the meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Refreshing describes something that makes you feel fresh or lively and has nothing to do with obedience or control. Option B Burdensome refers to something that is heavy or difficult to bear, which can sometimes overlap with refractory situations but does not express the opposite of easy to manage. Option C Privileged is about having special advantages and is unrelated to the idea of manageability or stubbornness. Option E Obstinate is a near synonym of refractory and therefore cannot serve as its antonym. Common Pitfalls: Exam takers sometimes choose synonyms by mistake when asked for antonyms because they focus only on whether the word sounds familiar. A good habit is to first restate the original word in your own simple language—here, stubborn or unmanageable—and then consciously look for its opposite: easy to manage or obedient. This will guide you toward options like manageable and away from synonyms like obstinate. Final Answer: The word nearly opposite in meaning to "refractory" is manageable.

Question 18

Choose the word which is nearly opposite in meaning to the given word. The target word is "insolent", used to describe behaviour that is rude, disrespectful, or boldly impolite.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question checks your understanding of the adjective insolent, a word used to describe speech or behaviour that is rude, disrespectful, or openly insulting, especially towards someone in authority. To choose the correct opposite, you must think of a word that describes polite, friendly, and respectful behaviour. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to be contrasted is "insolent". We assume the usual exam meaning: boldly rude or disrespectful. The correct antonym should convey politeness, friendliness, or courteous behaviour. The options include emotional states (sullen), personality traits (affable, determined), wealth (rich), and hostility. Concept / Approach: Insolent people speak or act in a way that shows they have little respect for others. The opposite type of person would be affable: friendly, good-natured, and easy to talk to, usually showing basic politeness. Sullen means gloomy or silently resentful, determined refers to firmness of decision, and rich is about wealth; none of these directly express the opposite of rude. Hostile suggests active unfriendliness or aggression, which is similar in tone to insolent rather than opposite. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate insolent in simpler words: rude, disrespectful, impudent. Step 2: Look for an option that describes someone who is pleasant, courteous, or friendly. Step 3: Option B Affable means friendly, pleasant, and easy to approach, which contrasts well with arrogant rudeness. Step 4: Option A Sullen describes someone who is gloomy or silently resentful, which is not necessarily polite or rude. Step 5: Option C Determined expresses a strong will, not politeness or rudeness. Step 6: Option D Rich refers to wealth and is unrelated to behaviour or manners. Step 7: Option E Hostile means unfriendly or antagonistic and is close in negativity to insolent, not opposite. Verification / Alternative check: Consider typical collocations: insolent child, insolent reply, insolent tone. Now imagine the opposite: an affable child, an affable reply, an affable tone. While we more often say polite reply or respectful tone, affable comes closest among the given options to portraying a pleasant manner. A sullen reply might be quiet but still unfriendly; a determined reply describes firmness, not courtesy. This shows that affable is the best available opposite to insolent in this list. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Sullen conveys a moody silence or resentment rather than courteous friendliness; the person may still be unfriendly or rude. Option C Determined describes willpower and persistence, not a person's politeness or rudeness. Option D Rich is about financial status and has nothing to do with manners or respect. Option E Hostile suggests open unfriendliness or aggression, which is similar in tone to insolent rather than the opposite. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes pick a word that is simply not negative, assuming it must be the opposite. But opposites should mirror the key dimension of meaning: here, the dimension is politeness vs rudeness, not happy vs sad or rich vs poor. Always ask: along which scale is this word placed? Once you recognise that insolent belongs on the polite–rude scale, you can confidently choose a word like affable, which lies toward the polite, friendly end of that scale. Final Answer: The word nearly opposite in meaning to "insolent" is affable.

Question 19

Choose the word which is nearly opposite in meaning to the given word. The target word is "acrimonious", usually used to describe speech, arguments, or relationships that are bitter and full of anger.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question focuses on the adjective acrimonious, which describes situations, especially arguments or discussions, that are bitter, angry, and full of hostility. To choose the correct opposite, you need a word that suggests peace, friendliness, or pleasant relations instead of bitterness and conflict. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to be contrasted is "acrimonious". We assume the standard meaning: bitter in tone, full of resentment or harsh feelings, especially in arguments. The correct antonym must express a positive, peaceful, or friendly relationship or atmosphere. The options include technical or unrelated words such as legal and cursive, as well as adjectives like severe and harmonious. Concept / Approach: If an argument is acrimonious, it is marked by anger, harsh words, and personal attacks. The opposite type of relationship or discussion would be harmonious: peaceful, friendly, and without serious disagreement. Legal simply means related to law, severe means very harsh or strict, cursive refers to a style of writing, and harsh again is close in meaning to acrimonious. Therefore, harmonious clearly stands out as the correct opposite. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate acrimonious in simple terms: bitter, angry, and filled with resentment. Step 2: Look for a word that suggests the absence of bitterness and the presence of peace and cooperation. Step 3: Option D Harmonious describes friendly relations, agreement, and pleasant unity, which is the natural opposite of bitter conflict. Step 4: Option A Legal relates to law and tells us nothing about whether something is bitter or pleasant. Step 5: Option B Severe describes strictness or harshness, which is close to the negative tone of acrimonious, not its opposite. Step 6: Option C Cursive refers to a style of handwriting and is irrelevant to emotional tone. Step 7: Option E Harsh again supports the idea of severity or cruelty, similar in tone to acrimonious, and so is not an antonym. Verification / Alternative check: Compare the phrases acrimonious divorce and harmonious marriage. An acrimonious divorce suggests a bitter, hostile separation with many arguments. A harmonious marriage implies peace, understanding, and friendly cooperation. These two phrases clearly sit at opposite ends of the relationship-quality spectrum. If we tried legal divorce, severe divorce, or cursive divorce, the expressions would either miss the emotional tone or sound ridiculous. This confirms that harmonious is the correct opposite of acrimonious in this context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Legal refers to law and could describe a legal dispute or legal contract, but it does not indicate bitterness or friendliness by itself. Option B Severe expresses high degree of strictness or harshness, which is associated with negative tone and therefore nearer to acrimonious than to its opposite. Option C Cursive is about writing style and has no connection to emotional tone or relationships. Option E Harsh is clearly negative and can be almost synonymous with acrimonious when describing criticism or treatment. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to treat unfamiliar words as neutral and pick the first familiar term that appears positive or technical. However, an antonym question requires you to think specifically in terms of emotional or descriptive opposites. Once you see that acrimonious is about bitter tone and hostility, it becomes easier to recognise that a peaceful or friendly term like harmonious is the correct choice, even if other options are also adjectives. Final Answer: The word nearly opposite in meaning to "acrimonious" is harmonious.

Question 20

Choose the word which is nearly opposite in meaning to the given word. The target word is "sceptic", used for a person who habitually doubts or questions accepted beliefs or claims.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question focuses on the noun sceptic (also spelled skeptic), referring to someone who doubts, questions, or is reluctant to accept claims without strong evidence. To find the opposite, you must think of a word that describes a person who accepts or has faith in particular ideas or doctrines rather than constantly doubting them. Given Data / Assumptions: The word to be contrasted is "sceptic". We assume the standard meaning: a person inclined to doubt or question accepted opinions, beliefs, or reported facts. The correct antonym should describe someone who accepts or believes, especially without persistent doubt. The options contain words of different parts of speech and meanings, including cryptic, believer, support, eminent, and follower. Concept / Approach: A sceptic questions whether claims are true, while a believer accepts them, often based on faith, trust, or confidence. Thus, believer is the natural opposite in everyday English. Cryptic means mysterious, not a type of person; support is usually a verb or noun indicating backing, not the person themself; eminent describes greatness or high status; follower describes someone who follows another person but does not necessarily indicate belief. Among the options, believer most directly contrasts with sceptic as a label for a person. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate sceptic as one who doubts or questions beliefs or claims. Step 2: Look for a word that names a person inclined to accept or believe rather than to doubt. Step 3: Option B Believer clearly refers to someone who believes, especially in a doctrine, religion, or idea. Step 4: Option A Cryptic is an adjective meaning mysterious or difficult to understand, not a person. Step 5: Option C Support is generally a verb or an abstract noun and does not directly label a person opposite to sceptic. Step 6: Option D Eminent refers to someone famous, respected, or distinguished; this is unrelated to belief or doubt. Step 7: Option E Follower may describe someone who follows a leader or trend, but a sceptic can also be a follower; it is not the clear opposite of doubter. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a debate about a new theory. On one side, you have sceptics, who demand more evidence; on the other side, you might have believers, who already accept the theory or have faith in it. If we describe someone as a strong believer in astrology, we mean the opposite of a sceptic of astrology. Meanwhile, calling someone a follower of astrology does not necessarily say whether they are critical or unquestioning. This reinforces that believer is the correct antonym of sceptic in this context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Cryptic describes language or signals, not a person, and does not relate to doubt or belief. Option C Support is not a person-type label and can even be given by both sceptics and believers in different situations. Option D Eminent indicates high status or recognition, which can apply equally to sceptics or believers and does not express an opposite meaning. Option E Follower indicates someone who follows a leader or fashion and could be either critical or uncritical; it is not the precise opposite of a doubter. Common Pitfalls: Some test takers pick follower because they think of sceptics as independent minds and followers as the opposite. However, the question is asking for a word that contrasts belief with doubt, not independence with dependence. The closest direct opposite of sceptic in this sense is believer. Keeping the core dimension of meaning in mind—doubt versus belief—will help you avoid such traps. Final Answer: The word nearly opposite in meaning to "sceptic" is believer.

English Questions