Question 1

The word "pageant" is most similar in meaning to which of the following options?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your vocabulary, specifically your understanding of the noun "pageant". The word appears in news reports, historical descriptions, and cultural discussions. Knowing its meaning helps you understand contexts such as cultural festivals, beauty contests, and historical parades. Given Data / Assumptions: - We need the word closest in meaning to "pageant". - Options given are show, gallant, beauty, sovereign, and victory. - The question focuses on similarity of meaning, not on sound or spelling. Concept / Approach: A "pageant" is a kind of public show. It may be a colourful parade, a staged event, or a spectacular display, often with costumes, performances, or ceremonial elements. Modern usage also includes "beauty pageant" for beauty contests, but the core idea remains that of a show or spectacle. Therefore, the word "show" captures the general meaning best. Other options refer to bravery, beauty, kingship, or success, which are related ideas in some contexts but not direct synonyms. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall typical contexts where "pageant" is used, such as historical pageant, cultural pageant, or beauty pageant. Step 2: Notice that in all these examples, people watch a display or performance. Step 3: Compare this with the options and see that "show" is the broad term that fits all these scenarios. Step 4: Reject options that describe qualities (like bravery or beauty) rather than the event itself. Verification / Alternative check: You can test the synonym in a sentence: "The city organised a grand pageant to celebrate the festival." Changing this to "The city organised a grand show to celebrate the festival" preserves the meaning very well. However, "The city organised a grand beauty" or "a grand sovereign" does not make sense. This confirms that "show" is the closest match. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - gallant: usually an adjective meaning brave or noble, not a type of event. - beauty: refers to a pleasing quality or a beautiful person or thing. - sovereign: refers to a ruler or supreme authority, not a show. - victory: means success or winning, not a public display. Common Pitfalls: Because of the phrase "beauty pageant", some students choose "beauty". However, in that phrase, beauty describes what the pageant is about, not what the word pageant itself means. The core meaning of pageant points to the event, show, or spectacle, not to the quality being judged. Final Answer: "Pageant" is most similar in meaning to "show".

Question 2

In English idiom, the expression "burning the candle at both ends" most nearly means which of the following?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of a common English idiom: "burning the candle at both ends". Idioms are fixed expressions whose overall meaning cannot always be guessed from the literal meanings of the individual words. Knowing them is important for understanding newspapers, literature, and conversations, especially in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: - The idiom is "burning the candle at both ends". - We need to pick the option that best conveys its figurative meaning. - Options describe overwork, electricity use, racing, careful saving, or none of these. Concept / Approach: The image behind the idiom is of a candle that is lit at both ends. It will give a lot of light for a short time but will also burn out much faster. Figuratively, this refers to a person who works or parties very late at night and then also starts very early in the morning, not allowing enough rest. Over time, such a lifestyle leads to exhaustion. So the idiom means overworking or overstraining oneself, usually due to long hours and lack of sleep. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the idea of both ends, which suggests using up energy from two sides at once. Step 2: Recall that candles represent time or life in many cultures, so burning them faster symbolises heavy use of time and energy. Step 3: Compare the options and identify the one that talks about overwork and exhaustion through long hours. Step 4: Choose "to overwork and exhaust oneself by staying up late and getting up early" as the correct meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a typical usage: "He has been burning the candle at both ends preparing for the exam and working a full time job." This clearly describes someone who is putting in too many hours and not resting enough. It has nothing to do with electricity, overtaking in races, or saving money. Therefore, the explanation involving overwork and exhaustion fits perfectly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - to consume a lot of electricity: this is a modern concern but has no connection with the traditional candle metaphor. - to overtake someone in a race: involves speed, but the idiom does not refer to competition or winning. - to save money carefully: is almost opposite in spirit, since burning the candle at both ends suggests careless use of personal energy, not careful saving. - none of the above: incorrect because one option does match the idiom well. Common Pitfalls: Some learners misinterpret the phrase and think it refers to wealth or resources in general. However, in actual usage it nearly always refers to a person's lifestyle and work schedule. Remember the image of a candle burning faster because it is lit at both ends, and connect that image with lack of sleep and continuous activity. Final Answer: "Burning the candle at both ends" means to overwork and exhaust oneself by staying up late and getting up early.

Question 3

The verb "expedite" means to speed up or make a process happen more quickly. Which of the following words is most nearly its opposite in meaning?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of antonyms, focusing on the verb "expedite". This word is often used in business, administration, and logistics to talk about making processes faster. Knowing its opposite helps you in vocabulary sections and in reading professional documents. Given Data / Assumptions: - "Expedite" means to make something happen more quickly or to speed up progress. - We must choose the word that most nearly expresses the opposite meaning. - Options are hasten, quicken, hinder, step up, and accelerate. Concept / Approach: If "expedite" means to speed something up, then the opposite must mean to slow something down, delay it, or create obstacles. Among the options, "hinder" clearly carries this idea. It means to obstruct, to make something more difficult or slower, or to hold back progress. The other options all suggest movement in the same direction as "expedite", that is, making things faster. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate the meaning of "expedite" as "to speed up" or "to move something along faster". Step 2: Look for a word that expresses slowing down or obstructing a process. Step 3: Recognise that "hinder" means to delay, block, or make progress difficult. Step 4: Confirm that "hasten", "quicken", "step up", and "accelerate" all reflect speeding up and therefore cannot be antonyms of "expedite". Verification / Alternative check: Consider an example sentence: "The manager asked the team to expedite the shipment." The opposite idea would be "to hinder the shipment" by causing delays or adding obstacles. Replacing "expedite" with "hasten" or "accelerate" makes the sentence nearly synonymous, so those cannot be opposites. Only "hinder" reverses the direction of action from faster to slower. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - hasten: means to hurry or move faster, similar to expedite. - quicken: also means to speed up, not to slow down. - step up: means to increase the rate or intensity of something. - accelerate: to increase speed or rate; this is a close synonym, not an antonym. Common Pitfalls: Because all the words except "hinder" sound energetic and active, some candidates choose them without carefully recalling the definition of "expedite". Always focus on the direction of meaning. When the question asks for an opposite, check whether the candidate word reverses the main idea rather than repeating it in different wording. Final Answer: The opposite of "expedite" is "hinder".

Question 4

In academic writing, which of the following can be valid types or approaches of a research paper?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your basic awareness of academic writing genres, especially research papers. At school and university, you may be asked to write different kinds of research based assignments, and each has a slightly different purpose and structure. Recognising these types helps you read and write academic texts more effectively. Given Data / Assumptions: - The question asks which of the listed options can be types of a research paper. - Options include argumentative papers, definition papers, interpretive papers, and combined options "All of the above" and "None of the above". - The phrase "can be" suggests that more than one type may be acceptable, and we must choose the option that best covers the range. Concept / Approach: In academic contexts, a research paper is not limited to one strict format. It can argue a position based on evidence, which makes it argumentative. It can explore and clarify the meaning of a concept in depth, which makes it a definition paper. It can also interpret a text, event, or data set, which makes it interpretive. All of these rely on research, citations, and critical analysis. Therefore, a research paper may take any of these forms, so the best answer is "All of the above". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider option a. An argumentative paper presents a claim or thesis and supports it with research and reasoning. Many research essays are of this type. Step 2: Consider option b. A definition paper explores the meaning, history, and uses of a term or concept in depth, often using research sources to support the discussion. Step 3: Consider option c. An interpretive paper analyses and interprets a text, event, or data, again using research to support interpretations. Step 4: Since each of these can be a genuine research paper form, choose "All of the above" as the most complete answer. Verification / Alternative check: Think of typical university assignments. A paper arguing that social media has a measurable effect on exam performance is an argumentative research paper. A paper that carefully defines and distinguishes terms like "globalisation" and "localisation" is a definition research paper. A paper that interprets the themes of a novel using literary theory is an interpretive research paper. All require research, references, and academic style, so they fall under the broad category of research papers. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Argumentative papers: can be research papers, but this option alone ignores other valid forms. - Definition papers: again, possible, but not the only form. - Interpretive papers: also possible, but not the only form. - None of the above: clearly incorrect because all three examples can involve research and academic writing. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes think that a research paper must always be argumentative or always follow one fixed structure. In reality, research writing is flexible and may include different purposes such as explanation, definition, interpretation, or evaluation. When an option like "All of the above" is present and each listed item is genuinely compatible with the concept, that combined option is usually the best choice. Final Answer: A research paper can be argumentative, definition based, or interpretive, so "All of the above" is correct.

Question 5

In English grammar, when the auxiliary "did" is used in a sentence, which form of the main verb (V1, V2, V3, etc.) should follow it?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This grammar question tests your knowledge of auxiliary verbs and verb forms. The auxiliary "did" is used in simple past tense questions, negatives, and emphatic statements in English. Knowing which main verb form should follow "did" is essential for forming correct sentences and for spotting errors in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: - The auxiliary verb is "did", which is the past form of "do". - We must select the correct form of the main verb that follows "did". - The choices are V1 (base form), V2 (simple past), V3 (past participle), V+ing (present participle), and infinitive with "to". Concept / Approach: In English, when "did" is used as an auxiliary, it already carries the past tense. Therefore, the main verb that comes after "did" must remain in its base form (V1). For example, we say "Did you go", not "Did you went". The same rule applies to negatives like "did not go" and emphatic statements like "I did go". The base form is the dictionary form of the verb without "to". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall standard patterns: "Did + subject + V1" for questions and "Subject + did not + V1" for negatives in simple past tense. Step 2: Check some examples: "Did he finish the work", "She did not attend the meeting", "I did see him yesterday". In each case, the verb after "did" is the base form. Step 3: Understand that using V2 after "did" would repeat the past marking and create incorrect forms like "Did you went". Step 4: Conclude that the correct option is V1 (base form of the verb). Verification / Alternative check: Test each option in a sentence. With V1: "Did you eat", "Did they work", "Did she sing". All are correct. With V2: "Did you ate", "Did they worked" are clearly wrong. With V3: "Did you eaten" is also wrong. With V+ing: "Did you eating" is ungrammatical. With infinitive: "Did you to eat" is not acceptable. This systematic check confirms that only V1 works correctly after "did". Why Other Options Are Wrong: - V2 (simple past): duplicates the past tense already expressed by "did" and creates errors like "Did he went". - V3 (past participle): used with "have" or "had" for perfect tenses, not directly after "did". - V+ing: used with "be" in continuous tenses, not with "did". - Infinitive with "to": used after some verbs and adjectives, not immediately after "did" in simple past questions or negatives. Common Pitfalls: Many learners mistakenly say or write "Did you went" or "Did she came" because they are thinking in simple past forms. A good rule to remember is: whenever you use "do", "does", or "did" as auxiliaries, the main verb always stays in the base form. This applies to both present and past tense questions and negatives. Final Answer: The verb form used with "did" is V1, the base form of the verb.

Question 6

In English vocabulary, what do we call a person who does not believe in any religion or in the existence of God?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks you to identify the correct English term for a person who does not believe in any religion or in the existence of God. Such one-word substitution questions are very common in competitive exams, and they test how accurately you understand fine differences between similar sounding words like atheist and rationalist. Given Data / Assumptions: The description is: a person who does not believe in any religion or in the existence of God. Option A: Atheist. Option B: Rationalist. Option C: Pagan. Option D: Philatelist. We assume standard dictionary meanings for all words. Concept / Approach: The key is to pick the word whose definition precisely matches the idea of not believing in God or in any religion. An atheist is someone who does not believe in the existence of God or gods. A rationalist values reason and evidence, but may or may not reject religion completely. A pagan historically refers to someone who follows a polytheistic or nature based religion, not someone with no religion. A philatelist is totally unrelated to belief; it is a person who collects postage stamps. Therefore, atheist is the only word that directly fits the description in the question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the critical phrase does not believe in any religion or in the existence of God.Step 2: Recall that atheist means a person who believes that God does not exist or rejects belief in God.Step 3: Check rationalist; this refers to someone who relies on reason as the main source of knowledge, but a rationalist can still follow a religion, so it is not an exact match.Step 4: Check pagan; this is a follower of a non mainline religion, often worshipping many gods, so this actually implies having a religion, not rejecting it.Step 5: Check philatelist; this clearly means stamp collector and has nothing to do with religious belief. Thus, atheist perfectly matches the description. Verification / Alternative check: If we rewrite the stem using the word atheist, we get: An atheist is a person who does not believe in any religion or in the existence of God. This is a standard textbook style definition and appears in dictionaries and exam books. By contrast, a rationalist is usually defined as someone who emphasises reason, often critical of superstition but not necessarily completely without religion. Pagan is used for worshippers of old or non Abrahamic religions, and philatelist appears in hobby contexts only. So only atheist satisfies the exact wording given in the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rationalist focuses on method of thinking, not directly on belief in God; a rationalist might still be religious. Pagan refers to a follower of a particular kind of religion and therefore cannot describe someone without any religion. Philatelist is obviously unrelated to belief systems and only describes a collector of stamps; it is included only to distract you. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to confuse rationalist with atheist because rationalists often criticise blind faith. However, exam questions are precise. Atheist refers specifically to disbelief in God, while rationalist highlights reliance on reason. Remembering these subtle distinctions will help you in many one word substitution questions where more than one option seems loosely related to the stem. Final Answer: The correct one word term for a person who does not believe in any religion or in the existence of God is Atheist, so option A is correct.

Question 7

Which verb in English means "to be the embodiment or perfect example of a particular quality or idea"?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks you to choose the verb that best matches the definition be the embodiment or perfect example of. Such questions focus on subtle differences between verbs like signify, personify, and characterise. Knowing which one is used in standard English when we say that someone is the perfect example of a quality is essential for vocabulary based exams. Given Data / Assumptions: The definition in the stem is: be the embodiment or perfect example of a quality, idea, or type. Option A: Signify. Option B: Personify. Option C: Characterise. Option D: Idol. We assume standard modern English dictionary meanings. Concept / Approach: The verb personify is used when we say that a person or thing embodies a particular quality. For example, She personifies kindness means she is the perfect example of kindness. Signify means to mean or to represent, not necessarily to be a living embodiment. Characterise means to describe the special qualities of something. Idol is a noun meaning an object of worship or a greatly admired person, not a verb. Therefore, personify is the precise verb that fits the definition in the question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key idea in the definition: be the embodiment or perfect example of a quality.Step 2: Recall typical usage: We say She personifies courage or He personifies dedication, meaning they are ideal examples of these traits.Step 3: Check signify: this is used when something stands for or indicates something else, as in Red often signifies danger; it is about meaning, not about embodying a quality in a person.Step 4: Check characterise: this verb is used when we say What characterises him is his honesty, meaning What marks him out is honesty, but this is different from being the perfect example of honesty itself.Step 5: Check idol: idol is a noun, not a verb, and so cannot grammatically fit the given definition as it is written. Therefore, personify is the only verb that exactly matches the given meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into a sample sentence: She ______ patience. Only She personifies patience sounds natural and closely matches the idea that her whole behaviour is a model of patience. She signifies patience is odd; patience is usually not something that is signified by a single person. She characterises patience is ungrammatical. She idol patience is also grammatically wrong. The test confirms that personify is the correct verb to express embodiment. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Signify deals with meaning or indication, not living embodiment. Characterise is closer, but it describes qualities rather than turning a person into a perfect example of them. Idol is not a verb in normal usage and even as a noun refers to an object or person of worship, not the act of embodying. None of these words gives the precise sense the question is targeting. Common Pitfalls: The most common confusion is between signify and personify because both relate to representation. A quick memory trick: personify is linked to person; it usually talks about a person showing a quality so strongly that they almost become that quality. Signify is about signs and symbols. Keeping that difference clear in your mind will help you choose correctly in similar questions. Final Answer: The verb that means to be the embodiment or perfect example of a quality or idea is Personify, so option B is correct.

Question 8

In formal English, which adjective best describes something that is of outstanding significance or immense importance?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about choosing the adjective that best matches the phrase of outstanding significance. In academic and formal writing, we often use specific adjectives to emphasise that something is extremely important or on a grand scale. Your task is to match this meaning with the most appropriate word from the given options. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase in the stem is of outstanding significance, suggesting great importance and large impact. Option A: Ominous. Option B: Monumental. Option C: Evident. Option D: Rational. Concept / Approach: Monumental is commonly used to describe events, achievements, or decisions that are extremely important or massive in scale. For example, a monumental decision or a monumental achievement. Ominous means giving the impression that something bad is going to happen. Evident means obvious or clearly seen. Rational means reasonable or based on logic. Among these, only monumental clearly carries the idea of outstanding significance. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand that of outstanding significance refers to something extremely important or impactful.Step 2: Recall that monumental is used for things of very great size, importance, or difficulty, such as a monumental task or a monumental victory.Step 3: Examine ominous; it refers to a sense of danger or bad omen, not to importance itself.Step 4: Examine evident; it just means clear or obvious, which says nothing about how important something is.Step 5: Examine rational; it means based on reason and logic, which again is unrelated to scale or significance. Thus, monumental is the only option that fits the phrase in the question. Verification / Alternative check: Try substituting each word into a sample sentence: The reform was of outstanding significance. It was a ______ change in policy. The sentence It was a monumental change in policy sounds natural and expresses extraordinary importance. It was an ominous change in policy focuses on a negative feeling of foreboding, not on significance. It was an evident change in policy merely indicates that the change was obvious, while it was a rational change in policy only says the change was sensible. Only monumental preserves the idea of outstanding significance. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ominous is about threatening signs, not importance. Evident is about clarity and visibility, not greatness or significance. Rational is about logical thinking. None of these captures the grandeur or exceptional importance that of outstanding significance implies. They may describe different aspects of a situation but do not answer what the question is actually asking. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates might pick evident because something very significant usually becomes obvious. However, obviousness and importance are different concepts. A small but obvious error is not monumental; likewise, a monumental event may not be evident at first. Always focus on the direct meaning being tested rather than on side associations. Final Answer: The adjective that best matches of outstanding significance is Monumental, so option B is correct.

Question 9

In psychology and everyday English, what do we call a person who enjoys experiencing pain or suffering themselves?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question comes from basic psychology vocabulary. It asks for the term used to describe a person who takes pleasure in their own pain or suffering. It is important to distinguish between two related but opposite words: sadist and masochist. Exams often test these as a pair, so understanding the difference is crucial. Given Data / Assumptions: The stem describes a person who enjoys experiencing pain or suffering themselves. Option A: Sadist. Option B: Dipsomania. Option C: Masochist. Option D: Blogomaniac. Concept / Approach: A masochist is a person who derives pleasure, sometimes even sexual pleasure, from their own pain, suffering, or humiliation. In contrast, a sadist takes pleasure in inflicting pain or suffering on others, not on themselves. Dipsomania refers to an uncontrollable craving for alcohol. Blogomaniac is an informal term for someone obsessed with blogging or reading blogs. Therefore, for enjoying one own pain, the only accurate term is masochist. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key phrase in the question: a person who enjoys pain.Step 2: Clarify whether the pain is their own or someone else pain. The question specifies experiencing pain themselves.Step 3: Recall that masochist refers to someone who takes pleasure in their own pain or humiliation.Step 4: Check sadist; a sadist enjoys causing pain to other people, so it does not match the stem, which is about self directed pain.Step 5: Check dipsomania and blogomaniac; both are about obsessions or addictions (alcohol and blogging respectively) and have nothing to do with enjoying pain. Therefore, masochist is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Use each option in a sample sentence. He is a masochist; he seems to seek out situations where he is hurt, yet he smiles through them. This fits the definition in the stem. He is a sadist; he enjoys hurting others clearly does not show enjoyment of his own pain. Dipsomania is used in contexts like He suffers from dipsomania and cannot control his drinking. Blogomaniac would appear as She is a blogomaniac, constantly writing and reading blogs. Only masochist consistently matches enjoying one own pain. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sadist describes the opposite direction of pleasure and pain: the sadist hurts others for gratification. Dipsomania is a form of alcohol addiction, unrelated to pain preference. Blogomaniac is just a humorous way to describe someone addicted to blogs. None of these gives the self directed pain seeking behaviour described in the question. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse sadist and masochist because they are frequently mentioned together. A simple memory trick is: S in sadist for someone who inflicts Suffering on others; M in masochist for someone who accepts Misery or pain on themselves. Remembering this contrast will help you answer such questions quickly in any exam. Final Answer: The correct term for a person who enjoys experiencing their own pain or suffering is Masochist, so option C is correct.

Question 10

In everyday English, which word most accurately describes a person, habit, or method that saves money by avoiding waste?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to choose the most accurate vocabulary item for the idea of saving money. While more than one option may seem close, the correct choice must best match the idea of using money carefully and avoiding waste, in line with the wording of the stem. Understanding the difference between economical and cost effective is important here. Given Data / Assumptions: The stem asks for something that saves your money, focusing on careful use and avoidance of waste. Option A: Cost-effective. Option B: Economical. Option C: Both A & B. Option D: None of the above. We interpret saves your money as using less money than usual or avoiding unnecessary spending. Concept / Approach: Economical is the adjective most directly used to mean using money, resources, or fuel carefully, without waste. For example, an economical car uses less fuel, and an economical lifestyle avoids unnecessary spending. Cost effective, on the other hand, means providing good results for the cost involved, giving good value for money. Something may be cost effective without strictly saving money in an absolute sense; it simply gives good return for what you spend. Because the question stresses saving your money, economical is the more accurate and focused choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the core idea in the stem: saving your money by not wasting it.Step 2: Recall that economical means not spending more money than is necessary and avoiding waste.Step 3: Compare this with cost-effective, which emphasises efficiency and value for money, but may involve high cost if the results justify it.Step 4: Recognise that option C Both A & B would only be correct if both words had exactly the same meaning, which they do not.Step 5: Reject None of the above because economical clearly fits the definition in standard dictionaries. Therefore, economical is the best and most precise choice. Verification / Alternative check: Consider two examples. Example 1: She lives an economical life, cooking at home and avoiding unnecessary luxuries. Here economical clearly means saving money and avoiding waste. Example 2: The treatment is expensive but cost effective; it cures the disease quickly. In the second example, cost effective does not necessarily save money; it might be expensive but still worth the cost because of the result. This contrast shows that economical is closer to the idea in the question, while cost effective is related but not identical. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Cost-effective is not wrong in all contexts, but it describes value for money rather than simple saving. The option Both A & B is incorrect because the question asks you to select the single word that best fits the idea of saving money, and the two words are not perfectly interchangeable. None of the above is wrong because economical is a standard word for saving money. Common Pitfalls: Many students see cost in cost-effective and quickly assume it is the correct answer. However, good exam technique requires you to choose the option that is closest in meaning to the exact wording of the stem. When a question mentions saving money or using little money, economical is the safest and most accurate choice. Keeping such fine distinctions in mind will help you handle many subtle vocabulary questions. Final Answer: The word that most accurately describes something that saves money by avoiding waste is Economical, so option B is correct.

Question 11

In the sentence "It is easy to fall victim not only to those who may hurt or mistreats us but also to our own anger", which numbered part contains the grammatical error?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is an example of error spotting in English grammar. The sentence describes how we can fall victim to others and to our own anger. It is divided into four numbered parts, and you must identify which part contains a grammatical mistake. Paying close attention to subject verb agreement within the relative clause is the key here. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: It is easy to fall victim Part 2: not only to those who may hurt or mistreats us Part 3: but also to our own anger Part 4: No error The structure who may hurt or mistreats us is the area likely to contain the problem. Concept / Approach: Inside the clause who may hurt or mistreats us, the subject is who, referring to those. The auxiliary verb may requires the base form of the main verb, not the -s form. Therefore, after may, both verbs should appear in the base form: may hurt or mistreat us. Using mistreats after may is incorrect because the -s ending indicates simple present third person singular without a modal. The rest of the sentence is grammatically sound. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the complete sentence and focus on the verb phrase may hurt or mistreats.Step 2: Recall the rule that modal verbs like may, can, must, and should are followed by the base form of the main verb, without -s, -ed, or -ing endings.Step 3: Check hurt; it is already in the base form and is correct after may.Step 4: Check mistreats; this is the third person singular simple present form and violates the rule after may.Step 5: Conclude that part 2, which contains may hurt or mistreats us, has the error and should be corrected to may hurt or mistreat us. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence correctly: It is easy to fall victim not only to those who may hurt or mistreat us but also to our own anger. Now the verbs hurt and mistreat are parallel in form and correctly follow the modal may. Parts 1 and 3 do not show any tense, agreement, or preposition errors. Part 4 cannot be correct because we have clearly identified a grammar rule violation in part 2. This confirms that option 2 is the one with the mistake. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 1 It is easy to fall victim is grammatically sound and uses the infinitive fall correctly. Part 3 but also to our own anger correctly completes the not only... but also construction. Part 4 No error is wrong because we have found a definite error in part 2. Therefore, none of the other sections need correction. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes get distracted by the phrase fall victim and suspect it is incorrect, but it is actually a standard English expression. The real error lies in a much smaller detail: the -s ending on mistreats after may. A helpful exam strategy is to pay special attention to verbs after modal auxiliaries and to ensure parallel structure when two verbs share the same auxiliary, as they do here. Final Answer: The grammatical error occurs in part 2, where mistreats should be mistreat, so option B is correct.

Question 12

In the sentence "She does not agree, and ______ does Anita", which word correctly completes the negative agreement?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This fill in the blank question tests your understanding of how to express agreement with a negative statement in English. The sentence states that one person does not agree and then adds that Anita also does not agree. The correct word must match this negative agreement pattern. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: She does not agree, and ______ does Anita. The meaning clearly is that Anita also does not agree. Options: also, even, neither, so. We need a structure that fits English patterns for negative agreement, like neither do I. Concept / Approach: In English, to agree with a negative statement, we typically use neither or nor followed by an auxiliary verb and the subject: She does not agree, and neither does Anita. The words also and even do not create correct negative agreement structures in this position. So is used for positive agreement, as in She agrees, and so does Anita. Therefore, neither is the correct choice to complete the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the meaning: both the original subject and Anita do not agree.Step 2: Recall the standard negative agreement pattern: neither + auxiliary verb + subject.Step 3: Apply this to the sentence: She does not agree, and neither does Anita is perfectly grammatical.Step 4: Test also and even; She does not agree, and also does Anita is ungrammatical. Even does Anita is also incorrect in this structure.Step 5: Recognise that so is used for positive sentences, not negative ones, so it cannot be correct here. Therefore, neither is the only suitable option. Verification / Alternative check: Compare positive and negative examples. Positive: She agrees, and so does Anita. Negative: She does not agree, and neither does Anita. Notice how the auxiliary does moves before the subject Anita in both cases, and the choice of so or neither depends on whether the first clause is positive or negative. Rewriting the sentence with neither gives us a well known pattern taught in grammar books, confirming it as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Also is usually placed after the auxiliary or at the end of clauses and not used to introduce the subject directly in cases of negative agreement. Even indicates emphasis and usually appears before the word it modifies, not before does Anita in this way. So used in agreement means too or as well, but it is reserved for positive statements. Using so here would imply that Anita does agree, contradicting the negative sense of does not agree. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes overuse also or so whenever they see a second clause that repeats information. However, English has specific fixed patterns for agreeing with positive or negative statements. Remembering pairs like So do I for positive and Neither do I for negative will help you avoid such mistakes, especially under exam pressure. Final Answer: The correct word to express that Anita also does not agree is neither, so option C is correct.

Question 13

In the sentence "Many lost dogs ______ been given back to their owners", which auxiliary verb correctly completes the present perfect passive?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This grammar question checks your understanding of subject verb agreement and tense formation in the present perfect passive. The sentence talks about lost dogs that have already been returned to their owners. You must choose the auxiliary verb that agrees in number with the subject and completes the present perfect passive structure correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: Many lost dogs ______ been given back to their owners. The subject is Many lost dogs, which is clearly plural. We want a present perfect passive construction: have/has been + past participle. Options: have, is, has, would. Concept / Approach: In present perfect passive, the auxiliary have or has is used according to whether the subject is plural or singular. Plural subjects take have and singular third person subjects take has. The passive form of the verb give is been given. Therefore, the correct combination for a plural subject is have been given. Is would form present simple passive, and would would shift the sentence into a different, hypothetical mood. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the subject: Many lost dogs. This is clearly plural.Step 2: Recognise that the rest of the verb phrase is been given back, which indicates a passive construction.Step 3: For present perfect passive with a plural subject, use have been given.Step 4: Test have: Many lost dogs have been given back to their owners. This is grammatically correct.Step 5: Test has, is, and would; each one leads to disagreement or incorrect tense and must be rejected. Verification / Alternative check: Replace Many lost dogs with a singular subject to compare forms. With a singular subject we would say The lost dog has been given back to its owner. With a plural subject this becomes The lost dogs have been given back to their owners. Our sentence structure matches the plural pattern. Using is would create Many lost dogs is been given back, which is ungrammatical. Using has gives Many lost dogs has been given back, which breaks subject verb agreement. Would been given is also incorrect because would must be followed by be, not been, in such a construction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Is is the third person singular form of the verb be in the present simple and does not match plural subject many lost dogs. Has is the third person singular form of have and cannot agree with a plural subject. Would is a modal that would require a different structure, such as would be given, and would change the meaning from a completed action to a possibility or hypothetical case. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes focus so much on the nearest noun dogs that they forget to check the entire verb phrase, or they may be confused between passive and active forms. A good strategy is always to identify the subject first (singular or plural) and then match the auxiliary have/has accordingly before worrying about the rest of the sentence. Final Answer: The correct auxiliary verb is have, giving the sentence Many lost dogs have been given back to their owners, so option A is correct.

Question 14

In English vocabulary, which of the following words best expresses the meaning of the adjective "Empirical" (based on observation or experience)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of the adjective empirical, a very important term in science, philosophy, and research. Empirical is often contrasted with theoretical or purely hypothetical. Competitive exams commonly ask whether you can connect empirical to ideas of observation, experience, and practice. Given Data / Assumptions: The word given is Empirical. Options: Practical, Unproved, Hypothetical, Theoretical. Empirical usually refers to knowledge or evidence based on observation or experiment, not on pure theory. Concept / Approach: Empirical describes knowledge, findings, or methods founded on real world observation, measurement, or experience. Practical is the closest among the options because it relates to actual use and practice rather than abstract speculation. Hypothetical and theoretical both refer to ideas that exist in theory or imagination rather than being tested in experience. Unproved simply means not yet shown to be true, which is different from empirical, where we do rely on proof from observation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that empirical evidence is data gathered by observing, experimenting, or directly experiencing something.Step 2: Compare this with practical, which refers to something concerned with actual doing, use, or practice rather than abstract ideas.Step 3: Observe that both empirical and practical share the notion of real world experience.Step 4: Examine hypothetical; this refers to something assumed for the sake of argument, not yet tested or observed.Step 5: Examine theoretical; this describes ideas based on theory, models, or principles without necessarily having been applied or observed. Therefore, practical is the best available synonym. Verification / Alternative check: Think of a pair often used in research: empirical data versus theoretical predictions. Empirical data comes from experiments, while theoretical predictions come from models. In simpler language, empirical approaches are practical or hands on, and theoretical approaches are more abstract. If you imagine replacing empirical with each option in a phrase like empirical studies in education, the phrase practical studies in education still makes reasonable sense; unproved, hypothetical, or theoretical studies do not match the idea of observation based research. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Unproved means not yet demonstrated to be true; empirical studies may actually prove or support something, so they are not necessarily unproved. Hypothetical refers to something imagined or assumed, precisely what empirical is not. Theoretical is the opposite contrast class to empirical in many contexts, so it cannot be a synonym. Thus, these three options are conceptually different from and often opposed to empirical. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be tempted by theoretical because they recognise it from science classes, but empirical and theoretical are opposites, not synonyms. Others might think unproved fits because empirical research often tests unproved ideas, but the adjective then would describe the ideas, not the method. Remember: empirical is grounded in observation and experience, which aligns best with practical. Final Answer: The word that best expresses the meaning of Empirical among the options given is Practical, so option A is correct.

Question 15

In English vocabulary, which of the following words best expresses the meaning of "Austerity" (strict and plain way of life or severe self-discipline)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Austerity is a word that appears in discussions about personal lifestyle, government budgets, and moral behaviour. It usually refers to severe simplicity, strictness, and avoidance of luxury or excess. This question asks you to choose the word that is closest in meaning from the given options. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is Austerity. Option A: Strict. Option B: Moist. Option C: Tolerant. Option D: Kindness. We take austerity in its common sense of severe simplicity or strict self discipline. Concept / Approach: Austerity refers to strictness, severity, or extreme simplicity, especially in lifestyle or economic policy. For example, government austerity measures involve tight spending controls. A person living in austerity avoids luxuries and comforts. Among the options, strict is closest to this idea of severe discipline and lack of indulgence. Moist refers to slight wetness, tolerant means accepting and not strict, and kindness is about being gentle and considerate, which are not close to austerity. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall definitions: Austerity often means strict and simple living, with little comfort or luxury.Step 2: Compare with strict, which means demanding firm discipline or following rules very closely.Step 3: Recognise that a strict lifestyle, especially in moral or financial terms, strongly overlaps with an austere lifestyle.Step 4: Note that moist simply describes something that is slightly wet and has nothing to do with discipline or lifestyle.Step 5: Tolerant and kindness both suggest softness and leniency, qualities that are almost the opposite of austerity strict and severe flavour. Verification / Alternative check: Think of phrases such as an austere monk or austerity measures. An austere monk follows a strict, simple life, so strict is quite close in meaning. Austerity measures usually refer to strict economic policies that cut spending and reduce public benefits. Moist, tolerant, and kindness cannot be substituted in these phrases without destroying the meaning. This confirms that strict is the best available synonym here, even though austerity also includes ideas of simplicity and lack of decoration. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Moist is a physical description about wetness and is totally unrelated. Tolerant suggests leniency or a willingness to allow differences, which is the opposite of strictness. Kindness emphasises warmth and compassion, again opposite in tone to the severity implied by austerity. None of these options reflects the idea of hard, disciplined, simple living or policy. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students overthink and look for extremely sophisticated synonyms instead of straightforward ones like strict. Remember that standard exam questions often expect you to match everyday words with more formal ones. If you keep the phrase austere lifestyle in mind, it becomes easier to see that strict and simple is the core meaning you are looking for. Final Answer: The word that best expresses the meaning of Austerity in this context is Strict, so option A is correct.

Question 16

In the context of English vocabulary, which of the following words is the opposite in meaning (antonym) of "Guile" (deceit or cunning intelligence)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks for the antonym of guile. Guile is a common English noun used especially in literature and exam passages to indicate deceitful cleverness or cunning. To answer correctly, you must know what guile means and then pick the word that is opposite in meaning, not just different. Given Data / Assumptions: Guile means deceitful cleverness, crafty behaviour, or cunning used to trick others. Option A: Cleverness. Option B: Suspicious. Option C: Dishonesty. Option D: Honesty. Concept / Approach: Since guile is about trickery and dishonest cunning, its opposite must be truthfulness, openness, and straightforwardness. Honesty directly expresses these qualities. Cleverness is neutral and can be used in honest or dishonest ways. Dishonesty is actually very close in meaning to guile and cannot be its antonym. Suspicious describes a state of mind (being doubtful of others), not a moral quality opposite to guile. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Fix the meaning of guile as deceptive or tricky cleverness used to mislead others.Step 2: Ask what traits are opposite to such deceit. The answer is truthfulness and straightforward dealing.Step 3: Notice that honesty perfectly captures the idea of being truthful, fair, and free from deceit.Step 4: Evaluate cleverness; it can belong to both honest and dishonest people, so it is not the opposite of guile.Step 5: Evaluate suspicious and dishonesty; suspicious is an attitude of distrust, and dishonesty actually shares the element of deceit with guile. Therefore, honesty is the only true antonym here. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences. A man full of guile will lie and cheat to get his way describes someone who is not honest. In contrast, a man of complete honesty will never use guile to gain advantage. You can see that these two descriptions oppose each other. If we replaced guile with dishonesty, the sentence would still make sense as a near synonym. But if we replaced it with honesty, the meaning would reverse, which is what we expect from an antonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Cleverness refers to mental sharpness and quick thinking; someone can be clever and also honest or dishonest, so it is not opposite to guile. Suspicious refers to being wary or distrustful of others and is not the opposite of deceit; in fact, suspicious people are often cautious about guile. Dishonesty overlaps strongly with guile in its sense of lack of truthfulness and cannot be its antonym. Common Pitfalls: Some exam takers confuse the task of finding a synonym with that of finding an antonym and may pick dishonesty because it seems close to guile. Always read the question carefully: if it says opposite in meaning, you must look for a word that reverses the meaning, not one that reinforces it. Keeping that distinction clear is critical in vocabulary sections. Final Answer: The antonym of Guile is Honesty, so option D is correct.

Question 17

Which of the following passive constructions correctly expresses the sentence "The teacher should check the homework"?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to convert a sentence from active to passive voice while keeping the tense and meaning intact. The original sentence uses a modal verb should and is in the active voice with the teacher as the subject and the homework as the object. You must choose the option that correctly transforms this into passive voice. Given Data / Assumptions: Active sentence: The teacher should check the homework. Subject: The teacher. Object: The homework. Modal + main verb: should check. We need a passive structure: modal + be + past participle, with the homework as subject. Concept / Approach: To form the passive voice with a modal verb, we keep the modal and follow it with be + past participle. The object becomes the subject, and the original subject is introduced by by if it is mentioned. Thus, The teacher should check the homework becomes The homework should be checked by the teacher. Options that change the modal, the tense, or the structure are not correct conversions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the active structure: Subject (teacher) + modal (should) + base verb (check) + object (the homework).Step 2: Move the object to the subject position: The homework...Step 3: Use the passive pattern with a modal: should be checked.Step 4: Add the original subject with by: by the teacher.Step 5: Combine to form: The homework should be checked by the teacher, which matches option A. Verification / Alternative check: Compare each option to the original sentence. Option A preserves the modal should and the meaning that it is a duty or recommendation that the teacher checks the homework. Option B The homework is checked by the teacher shifts the meaning to a general present fact and loses the idea of obligation. Option C describes responsibility in general terms but is not a direct active passive transformation. Option D The homework will be checked by the teacher changes should to will and moves from advisability to future certainty, altering the meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B uses is checked, which corresponds to a simple present passive, not should check. Option C paraphrases the idea but does not maintain the exact structure or modal verb, so it is not a strict voice transformation. Option D uses will, changing the sense to future action instead of duty or recommendation, so it cannot be considered equivalent to the original sentence. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often forget the be in passive constructions with modals and sometimes produce should checked, which is incorrect. Others may accidentally change the modal verb and hence the meaning. Always remember the pattern: modal + be + past participle for passive voice when a modal is involved. Final Answer: The correct passive form of The teacher should check the homework is The homework should be checked by the teacher, so option A is correct.

Question 18

In the following set of spellings of the word meaning "helping, providing support, or supplementary", which one is correctly spelt?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks you to identify the correct spelling of the word auxiliary, which is often used in grammar (auxiliary verb) and in general English to mean helping, supporting, or additional. Many exam questions test spelling of commonly confused words by presenting several incorrect variants along with one correct form. Given Data / Assumptions: The intended word is auxiliary. Option A: Auixiliary. Option B: Auxiliary. Option C: Auxiliarry. Option D: Auixliary. We assume the standard English spelling is required. Concept / Approach: The correct spelling is auxiliary, with the sequence a u x i l i a r y and a single r near the end. The options include common types of spelling errors: misplaced letters, extra letters, and missing letters. By carefully comparing each option with the known correct form, you can identify the accurate spelling. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the correct dictionary form: auxiliary.Step 2: Compare Option B: Auxiliary. This matches exactly: a u x i l i a r y.Step 3: Check Option A: Auixiliary, where the sequence u i x is incorrect; it should be a u x, not a u i x.Step 4: Check Option C: Auxiliarry, which contains a double r (r r) that does not appear in the standard spelling.Step 5: Check Option D: Auixliary, which again jumbles the order of letters and is not a recognised form. Therefore, only Auxiliary is correctly spelt. Verification / Alternative check: Think of common phrases: auxiliary verb, auxiliary nurse, auxiliary engine. In all of these, the spelling never changes: a u x i l i a r y. If you try to write auxiliarry or auixliary in a text editor with spell check, it will be marked wrong. This strongly confirms that Auxiliary is the correct standard spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Auixiliary and Auixliary both have the letters u and i in the wrong order and insert x in an incorrect position, making them non standard forms. Auxiliarry adds an extra r, which is not present in the word. Spelling questions often introduce such minor but damaging changes to test careful attention. Common Pitfalls: Because auxiliary has several vowels and consonants close together, students sometimes misplace the i or add extra r. A good way to remember the spelling is to break it into parts: aux (like auxiliary power) + i + l + iary (same ending as in unitary, fiduciary, etc.). Visualising it in these chunks can reduce errors. Final Answer: The correctly spelt form of the word is Auxiliary, so option B is correct.

Question 19

In the sentence "Cybercrime cases pose various kinds of challenges which requires strengthening of the institutional mechanism", which numbered part contains the grammatical error?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question is about subject verb agreement in a relative clause. The sentence describes how cybercrime cases present various challenges and the need to strengthen the institutional mechanism. You must identify which numbered part of the sentence contains the grammatical mistake. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: Cybercrime cases pose various kinds of Part 2: challenges which requires strengthening of Part 3: the institutional mechanism. Part 4: No error. The antecedent of which is challenges, which is plural. Concept / Approach: The verb in the relative clause which requires must agree with its antecedent challenges. Since challenges is plural, the verb should also be plural: require, not requires. The rest of the sentence is grammatically sound, so the error lies in the second part, where a singular verb has been used for a plural subject. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main structure: Cybercrime cases pose various kinds of challenges...Step 2: Recognise that the relative pronoun which refers back to challenges, a plural noun.Step 3: Look at the verb inside the clause: which requires strengthening of.Step 4: Apply subject verb agreement: a plural subject (challenges) needs a plural verb (require), not requires.Step 5: Conclude that part 2 has the error and should read challenges which require strengthening of. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence correctly: Cybercrime cases pose various kinds of challenges which require strengthening of the institutional mechanism. Now the plural subject challenges matches the plural verb require. Parts 1 and 3 are grammatically fine: pose is correct for the plural subject cybercrime cases, and the institutional mechanism is a proper noun phrase. Part 4 No error cannot be right because we have found a clear subject verb disagreement in part 2. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part 1 uses the verb pose with a plural subject and is correct. Part 3 simply provides the object of strengthening and does not contain any verb that might disagree. Part 4 suggests no error, but the agreement problem in part 2 shows that there is indeed an error in the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some students focus only on the main clause and miss agreement issues in relative clauses beginning with which, who, or that. A good exam strategy is always to check each clause separately, making sure that the verb agrees with the noun it really refers to, not with a closer but unrelated noun. Here, the proximity of which to requires may distract you from checking its connection with challenges. Final Answer: The grammatical error occurs in part 2, where requires should be require, so option B is correct.

Question 20

In the sentence "She must ______ a great time at her birthday party", which option correctly completes the idea that she is very probably enjoying herself right now?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of modal verbs and aspect in English. The sentence She must ______ a great time at her birthday party suggests a strong guess about what is happening at the present moment. The correct answer must therefore combine the modal must with an appropriate verb form that expresses an ongoing action now. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: She must ______ a great time at her birthday party. The context suggests that the party is happening now and the speaker is inferring that she is enjoying herself. Options: be having, has, be had, is having. Concept / Approach: When we use must to express a logical conclusion about what is happening at this moment, we often use must be + present participle (verb + ing). This pattern indicates a strong assumption about a current ongoing action. So, She must be having a great time means the speaker is almost sure that she is right now enjoying the party. Forms like must has or must is having are grammatically incorrect, and be had is the wrong combination. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that must here expresses strong probability, not obligation.Step 2: To indicate an action happening now, combine must with be + verb-ing: must be having.Step 3: Test option A: She must be having a great time at her birthday party. This is a natural and correct sentence.Step 4: Test has and is having; must has and must is having would both be ungrammatical combinations, since must must be followed by the base form of a verb (be, have, go, etc.).Step 5: Test be had; She must be had a great time is incorrect both in tense and structure. Therefore, be having is the only valid option. Verification / Alternative check: Compare structures with a similar meaning: She is probably having a great time at her birthday party. She must be having a great time at her birthday party. In both, the idea is an ongoing action combined with a degree of certainty. Replacing be having with has would make She must has a great time, which is ungrammatical, or She must have a great time, which describes a general habit, not a present ongoing event. The progressive form matches the immediate context of the party. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Has is the third person singular of have and cannot directly follow must; the correct base form is have or be. Be had is a passive like structure that does not fit here and would also require different context. Is having cannot follow must because must is already the modal; you cannot stack two auxiliaries in that way without using the base form after must. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes forget that modals must be followed by the base form of the verb and try to use has or is after must. A helpful rule is: must + be + -ing for strong guesses about what is happening now, and must + have + past participle for strong guesses about what happened in the past. Remembering these patterns will help you avoid such errors in tense and aspect questions. Final Answer: The correct way to express that she is probably enjoying the party right now is be having, giving She must be having a great time at her birthday party, so option A is correct.

English Questions