Question 1

In English vocabulary, choose the single word that can substitute the phrase "A record of one's own life written by oneself".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: One-word substitution questions are a popular feature of English vocabulary sections in competitive exams. They test whether you can match a descriptive phrase with a precise term. The phrase in this question, "A record of one's own life written by oneself", refers to a specific kind of life story, and the correct technical term is vital for clear communication in English. Given Data / Assumptions: Phrase: "A record of one's own life written by oneself". Options: History, Biography, Bibliography, Autobiography. The key clue is that the life account is written by the person whose life is being described. We assume standard dictionary meanings for all the options. Concept / Approach: The important distinction lies between "biography" and "autobiography". A "biography" is a life story written by someone else, whereas an "autobiography" is written by the person themselves. "History" deals with events of the past, usually of nations or subjects, and "bibliography" is a list of books or references. Thus, the correct term must indicate both the life story and the fact that the author and the subject are the same person. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the core elements: it is a "record of one's own life" and it is "written by oneself". Step 2: Recall that "biography" means the life story of a person written by another person. This does not satisfy the "by oneself" part. Step 3: Recall that "autobiography" comes from "auto" (self) and "biography" (life story), meaning a self-written life story. Step 4: Rule out "history" because it generally covers broader events, not just one person's self-record. Step 5: Rule out "bibliography" because it refers to a list of books or writings, usually at the end of research work. Step 6: Conclude that "Autobiography" exactly matches the entire descriptive phrase in the question. Verification / Alternative check: Consider real-world examples: "The Story of My Experiments with Truth" by Mahatma Gandhi is an autobiography because Gandhi wrote about his own life. In contrast, a book about Gandhi written by another author is a biography. Dictionaries clearly define "autobiography" as "an account of a person's life written by that person." This directly corresponds to the phrase given in the question, confirming that the correct option is "Autobiography". Why Other Options Are Wrong: History: Deals with past events, periods, or the development of a country or subject, not specifically self-written life accounts. Biography: A life story written by someone other than the person whose life is described, so it fails the "written by oneself" condition. Bibliography: A systematic list of books and articles used in research or on a topic, not a narrative of a person's life. Common Pitfalls: Many students confuse "biography" and "autobiography" because both deal with life stories. The key is to focus on who writes the account. The prefix "auto" means "self". Remembering this small root meaning will help you quickly choose the correct word in one-word substitution questions. Also, do not be distracted by similar-sounding words like "bibliography", which are common in academic contexts but have a completely different meaning. Final Answer: The correct one-word substitution is Autobiography.

Question 2

In English vocabulary, choose the single word that can substitute the phrase "Belong to the same period".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one-word substitution question focuses on a term used to describe people or things that exist or live at the same time. Such vocabulary items are common in history, literature, and general English usage, and they often appear in SSC, banking, and other competitive exam papers. Understanding their precise meaning is important for both comprehension and expression. Given Data / Assumptions: Phrase: "Belong to the same period". Options: Comrades, Contemporaries, Compromises, Renegades. The phrase refers to people or things that exist in the same time period, not necessarily friends or political terms. We assume standard dictionary meaning for each option. Concept / Approach: The word "contemporaries" is used to describe people who live at the same time or belong to the same age or period. For example, two writers are contemporaries if they wrote during the same historical period. The other words, such as "comrades" or "renegades", refer to entirely different ideas like friendship or rebellion. Therefore, the correct approach is to match the time-related idea in the phrase with the time-related vocabulary option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key idea: being from the "same period" or same time frame. Step 2: Recall that "contemporary" means "living or occurring at the same time". The plural "contemporaries" refers to people of the same time. Step 3: Evaluate "comrades": this means friends, companions, or colleagues, especially in a political or military context, not specifically people from the same period. Step 4: Evaluate "compromises": this word relates to agreements in which each side makes concessions, and has nothing to do with time period. Step 5: Evaluate "renegades": this refers to people who betray or desert a cause, party, or principle, so again it is unrelated to the idea of time period. Step 6: Conclude that "Contemporaries" directly matches the meaning "belong to the same period". Verification / Alternative check: Think of common expressions: "Shakespeare and Marlowe were contemporaries" means they lived and wrote in the same era. You would not say they were "compromises" or "renegades" to express this idea. Dictionary definitions confirm that "contemporary" means "living or occurring at the same time", and "contemporaries" are people of roughly the same age or period. This is exactly what the phrase in the question describes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Comrades: Refers to companions, friends, or fellow members of a group, especially in political or military contexts, not necessarily from the same time period. Compromises: Agreements that involve mutual concessions; this is a noun about negotiation, unrelated to historical period. Renegades: People who abandon or betray an organisation or set of principles; the word carries a sense of rebellion, not time. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to pick "comrades" because it sounds like it could describe people together, but this ignores the specific time-related aspect of the phrase. Always match the central idea of the given phrase to the key idea of the option, not just to a vague sense of group or people. Building a strong vocabulary through regular reading and revision of word lists is essential to avoid such traps in one-word substitution questions. Final Answer: The correct one-word substitution is Contemporaries.

Question 3

In English vocabulary, choose the single word that best substitutes the phrase "One who listens secretly to private conversation".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one-word substitution question tests your knowledge of a specific term used for a person who secretly listens to private conversations. Such vocabulary items are useful in both everyday English and in exam contexts, as they allow you to express ideas precisely and concisely. Knowing the correct word helps you both in comprehension and in writing tasks. Given Data / Assumptions: Phrase: "One who listens secretly to private conversation". Options: Eavesdropper, Encroacher, Eaves bearer, Listener. The key idea is "listens secretly" to a conversation meant to be private. We assume standard dictionary meanings for each word. Concept / Approach: The correct term for a person who secretly listens to others' private conversations without their permission is "eavesdropper". It is formed from the verb "to eavesdrop", which means to listen secretly to what other people are saying. The other options either refer to different concepts or are not standard English words. The approach is to match the phrase exactly to the proper technical word used in English. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the crucial part of the phrase: "listens secretly to private conversation". Step 2: Recall that the verb "eavesdrop" means to listen secretly to people's private talk. Step 3: From that verb, the noun "eavesdropper" naturally means a person who does this secret listening. Step 4: Check "Encroacher": this refers to someone who intrudes on another person's territory, rights, or property, not specifically to secret listening. Step 5: Check "Eaves bearer": this is not a standard English term; it appears to be a distractor. Step 6: Check "Listener": this simply means a person who listens, without the idea of secrecy or privacy, so it is too general. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by looking at example sentences: "The eavesdropper was caught listening at the door" or "It is wrong to be an eavesdropper." In both cases, the word clearly refers to someone secretly listening to private talk. In contrast, "encroacher" appears in sentences about land or rights, and "listener" appears in neutral contexts like "radio listeners". Therefore, "eavesdropper" is the only option that captures the secrecy and privacy aspect in the phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Encroacher: A person who intrudes on another's territory or rights; this is about invasion or intrusion, not specifically listening to conversations. Eaves bearer: Not a recognised English word; it is likely a distractor created for the question. Listener: A general term for someone who listens, but it does not convey the idea of secrecy or that the conversation is private. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose "listener" because it seems directly related to listening, but they forget that the key word in the phrase is "secretly". Another mistake is to be misled by unfamiliar compounds like "eaves bearer". When dealing with one-word substitution questions, always focus on the full meaning, including qualifiers like "secretly" and "private", not just the core noun. Revising vocabulary with clear examples can prevent such confusion. Final Answer: The correct one-word substitution is Eavesdropper.

Question 4

In an English sentence improvement question, choose the best alternative to replace the underlined part in the sentence: "You must complete this work up to Sunday."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sentence improvement questions test your ability to recognise correct preposition usage and natural phrasing in English. The sentence "You must complete this work up to Sunday" sounds awkward to a native speaker, and the task is to choose a more accurate and idiomatic alternative that expresses the idea of a deadline correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: "You must complete this work up to Sunday." The underlined phrase is "up to Sunday". Options: within Sunday, by Sunday, on to Sunday, No improvement. The intended meaning is that the work must be completed not later than Sunday. Concept / Approach: In English, when we talk about a deadline that falls on a particular day, we generally use "by" plus the day. For example, "You must submit the form by Friday" means that the last acceptable day to submit is Friday. The phrase "up to Sunday" usually suggests continuity until Sunday, but does not clearly express a deadline for completion. Therefore, the most natural and grammatically correct preposition for this context is "by". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the function of the phrase. It is expressing a deadline for completing the work. Step 2: Recall the common structure: "complete something by a certain day". Step 3: Test option "by Sunday": "You must complete this work by Sunday." This is clear, idiomatic, and commonly used in English. Step 4: Test option "within Sunday": This sounds unnatural. "Within Sunday" is not standard usage in modern English. Step 5: Test option "on to Sunday": This is grammatically incorrect and does not convey a deadline. Step 6: Test "No improvement": This would mean "up to Sunday" is correct and natural, which it is not in standard exam English for expressing a deadline. Step 7: Conclude that "by Sunday" is the best and correct alternative. Verification / Alternative check: If you compare similar sentences, such as "You must pay the fee by Monday" or "Finish the project by the end of this week", you will see that "by" is consistently used to express a time limit. The phrase "up to Sunday" might be used in contexts like "The shop is open up to Sunday", but even there, speakers often prefer "until Sunday". For a deadline related to completion of work, "by Sunday" is the standard choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: within Sunday: This phrase is unnatural and rarely used. We normally say "within a week" or "within two days", not "within Sunday". on to Sunday: Grammatically awkward and does not express a deadline. The combination "on to" does not fit here. No improvement: Accepting the original phrase "up to Sunday" would preserve an awkward and non-idiomatic expression in exam-standard English. Common Pitfalls: Many learners are unsure which preposition to use for deadlines, and they may overuse phrases like "up to" or "within" without considering natural usage. Exam setters often exploit this confusion. A good strategy is to read plenty of authentic English materials and observe how deadlines are expressed. Remembering the pattern "by + day/date" will help you correctly answer many similar questions in sentence improvement exercises. Final Answer: The sentence is best improved as: "You must complete this work by Sunday."

Question 5

In an English sentence improvement question, choose the correct alternative for the underlined part in the sentence: "Hole wheat bread is good for health."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement item focuses on spelling and correct word choice in a common phrase. The sentence "Hole wheat bread is good for health" contains a wrong spelling that changes the meaning of the adjective. Competitive English exams often test such subtle errors to assess attention to detail and vocabulary knowledge. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: "Hole wheat bread is good for health." The underlined word is "Hole". Options: Whole, Healthy, Holed, No improvement. The intended phrase in standard English is "whole wheat bread". Concept / Approach: "Whole wheat bread" refers to bread made from flour that uses the entire grain, including the bran, germ, and endosperm, making it healthier. The word "hole" means an empty space or opening, which does not fit this context. Therefore, we must select the correct adjective "whole" rather than any other option. The approach is to recall the standard collocation used in English for this type of bread. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the incorrect part: "Hole wheat bread". Step 2: Recall the common food item: "whole wheat bread". This is the normal term used in health discussions. Step 3: Compare "hole" and "whole": "hole" refers to an opening or gap, while "whole" means entire or complete. Step 4: Test option "Whole": "Whole wheat bread is good for health." This is correct and natural English. Step 5: Test "Healthy": "Healthy wheat bread is good for health" is redundant and not the standard phrase; "healthy" describes something that promotes health but is not the correct noun modifier here. Step 6: Test "Holed": "Holed wheat bread" would mean bread that has holes, which is meaningless in this expression. Step 7: Test "No improvement": Keeping "Hole" would preserve the spelling error and distort the intended meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Look at how health articles and packaging refer to this kind of bread. You will consistently see "whole wheat bread" written on labels and in nutrition guides. Dictionaries also recognise "whole wheat" as a fixed expression for this type of flour and bread. This reinforces that "whole" is the correct choice, and the original "hole" is simply a spelling mistake that changes the meaning completely. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Healthy: Although health-related, it does not form the standard phrase "healthy wheat bread", and it changes the grammar of the sentence awkwardly. Holed: Means having holes in it, which does not describe a type of wheat or bread in this context. No improvement: Would accept the incorrect spelling "Hole", which is clearly wrong in standard usage. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overlook spelling errors when concentrating on grammar alone. In sentence improvement questions, you must check both spelling and idiomatic usage. Words like "hole" and "whole" are homophones (sound the same but have different meanings and spellings), so exam setters use them to test careful reading. Paying close attention to context will help you choose the right word in such questions. Final Answer: The sentence should be corrected to: "Whole wheat bread is good for health."

Question 6

In an English sentence improvement item, choose the best alternative to correct the underlined part in the sentence: "She has no pen to write."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests the correct use of a preposition after the verb "write" when we are referring to an instrument used for writing. The original sentence "She has no pen to write" sounds incomplete and slightly unnatural. The goal is to choose the option that completes the sense correctly, making the sentence idiomatic and clear. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: "She has no pen to write." The underlined part is "to write". Options: write with, write at, write in, No improvement. The intended meaning is that she does not have a pen available as an instrument for writing. Concept / Approach: When we talk about the instrument used for a particular action, English typically uses "with". For example, "write with a pen", "cut with a knife", or "draw with a pencil". Therefore, the correct prepositional phrase after "pen" should be "to write with", indicating the purpose of the pen as a tool. The other options either do not fit this purpose or are used for different types of complements. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the idea: the pen is an instrument that would be used for writing. Step 2: Recall the common pattern: "write with a pen", "write with a marker". Step 3: Substitute "write with" into the original sentence: "She has no pen to write with." This is natural and grammatically correct. Step 4: Test "write at": "She has no pen to write at" is incorrect and does not fit English usage. Step 5: Test "write in": We say "write in ink" or "write in a notebook", but not "pen to write in". The object of "in" is usually a medium or container, not the instrument itself. Step 6: Test "No improvement": Keeping "to write" alone leaves the sentence sounding incomplete and less idiomatic. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by comparing similar structures: "He has no knife to cut with", "They have no tools to work with", and "I have no brush to paint with." In these sentences, "with" clearly marks the instrument. Grammar references also emphasise that "with" is the standard preposition used to indicate the tool or instrument used to perform an action. Therefore, "write with" is the correct phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: write at: Usually used with locations or targets, such as "write at the top of the page". It does not refer to the instrument. write in: Used with mediums or languages, as in "write in ink" or "write in English", but this does not match the structure with "pen". No improvement: The original "to write" does not clearly show the instrumental function of the pen and sounds incomplete. Common Pitfalls: Some learners are tempted to leave the sentence as it is because it is somewhat understandable. However, exam standards require precise and idiomatic English. Others may mistakenly choose "write in" because they have seen it used with ink or languages. Focusing on the role of the noun after the verb (instrument versus medium) will help you choose the correct preposition in such questions. Final Answer: The improved sentence is: "She has no pen to write with."

Question 7

In an English sentence improvement and tag question item, choose the correct question tag to complete the sentence: "He dislikes the word, _______?"

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of question tags in English, especially the agreement of auxiliary verb, tense, and polarity with the main clause. The original sentence is "He dislikes the word, isn't he?" which contains an incorrect tag. Correct use of question tags is important in spoken English and appears frequently in exams that test grammar and usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Main clause: "He dislikes the word". Original tag: "isn't he?" is incorrect. Options: does not he (written as "doesn't he?"), did not he (written as "didn't he?"), does he?, No improvement. We assume a normal, neutral statement in the simple present tense expressing dislike. Concept / Approach: The rule for forming a question tag is: use the auxiliary verb corresponding to the tense and form of the main clause, and make the tag negative if the main clause is positive, and positive if the main clause is negative. In "He dislikes the word", the verb "dislikes" is simple present, third person singular. The corresponding auxiliary is "does". Since the statement is positive, the tag must be negative: "doesn't he?" Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the tense of the main verb "dislikes". It is simple present tense. Step 2: Find the auxiliary used with simple present tense for third person singular: "does". Step 3: Note that the main clause is positive ("He dislikes the word"), so the tag must be negative. Step 4: Combine the auxiliary and negative: "does not he?" in contracted form becomes "doesn't he?". Step 5: Test the full sentence: "He dislikes the word, doesn't he?" This sounds correct and natural. Step 6: Check other options for tense and polarity agreement. Verification / Alternative check: Compare with similar sentences: "He likes tea, does he?" would be wrong, because the tag must be negative for a positive statement. The correct form is "He likes tea, doesn't he?" Likewise, "She works hard, doesn't she?" The structure remains consistent: subject plus present simple verb, followed by "doesn't" plus subject pronoun. These patterns confirm that "doesn't he?" is the correct tag here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: didn't he? Uses the past tense auxiliary "did", while the main verb "dislikes" is in the present tense. Tense mismatch makes it incorrect. does he? This is a positive tag. For a positive statement, the tag should be negative, so "does he?" is not suitable here. No improvement: Keeping "isn't he?" would be wrong because the auxiliary "is" matches the verb "is", not "dislikes". There is no form of "to be" in the main clause. Common Pitfalls: Many learners mechanically use "isn't he?" or "does he?" as tags without checking the main verb. Another common mistake is to forget the opposite polarity rule, using a positive tag with a positive statement. To avoid such errors, always identify the tense and auxiliary implied by the main verb first, and then apply the positive/negative rule carefully. Practice with many examples will build automatic correctness in forming question tags. Final Answer: The correct tag is: "He dislikes the word, doesn't he?"

Question 8

In an English sentence improvement and relative clause question, choose the best alternative to correct the sentence: "He is one of those who likes to help others."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests your understanding of subject verb agreement in complex noun phrases with "one of those who". The original sentence "He is one of those who likes to help others" appears almost correct, but there is a subtle error in verb agreement inside the relative clause. Such questions are common in competitive exams that focus on advanced grammar and usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Original sentence: "He is one of those who likes to help others." Key structure: "one of those who ..." Options adjust the relative clause part in different ways. The idea is that he belongs to a group of people who like to help others. Concept / Approach: In the structure "one of those who", the relative pronoun "who" usually refers to "those", which is plural. Therefore, the verb in the relative clause must be plural ("like"), not singular ("likes"). The sentence describes a whole class of people who like to help others, and he is one member of that class. The correct alternative must preserve this plural agreement and natural wording. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the key phrase: "one of those who". The noun "those" is plural. Step 2: Note that the verb after "who" should agree with "those" and therefore be plural. Step 3: The correct form should be "those who like to help others", not "likes". Step 4: Examine option "those persons who like to help others": this is grammatically correct, but the word "persons" is unnecessary and makes the phrase less natural. Step 5: Examine "those who like to help the other": the phrase "the other" is incorrect here; we help "others" in general, not one specific other. Step 6: Examine "those who like to help others": this version is concise, grammatically correct, and idiomatic. Step 7: "No improvement" would keep the singular verb "likes", which conflicts with the plural antecedent "those". Verification / Alternative check: Compare similar examples: "She is one of the students who study hard" (not "studies hard"). Here, "who" refers to "students" (plural), so the verb is "study". Similarly, "He is one of those people who speak the truth" (not "speaks the truth"). Grammar references confirm that when "one of those" is followed by a relative clause, the verb in the clause agrees with the plural noun, not with "one". This supports using "like" rather than "likes". Why Other Options Are Wrong: those persons who like to help others: Grammatically acceptable but stylistically heavy; the word "persons" is not required and the exam usually prefers a more natural expression. those who like to help the other: The phrase "the other" is incorrect here because it refers to a specific single person, whereas the sentence means helping people in general. No improvement: Keeping "likes" would make the verb agree with "one" instead of "those", which is considered incorrect in standard exam grammar for this structure. Common Pitfalls: A frequent error is to make the verb agree with "one" instead of "those", writing "one of those who likes" instead of "one of those who like". This happens because the noun "one" is closer to the verb. To avoid this mistake, always identify the true antecedent of the relative pronoun "who". In such structures, think: "those (who like to help others)" and then add "He is one of". This mindset automatically leads you to use a plural verb in the relative clause. Final Answer: The sentence should be improved to: "He is one of those who like to help others."

Question 9

Read the passage on crude mineral oil and answer the comprehension question: According to the passage, how does crude oil come out of the earth?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a reading comprehension passage about crude mineral oil. Such passages are common in competitive exams to test your ability to read carefully, identify key details, and distinguish between similar sounding options. The question asks specifically about the appearance and smell of crude oil as it comes out of the earth, which is explicitly described in the first lines of the passage. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states: "Crude mineral oil comes out of the earth as a thick brown or black liquid with a strong smell." The focus is on colour (brown or black), consistency (thick liquid), and smell (strong). Options modify these details slightly to create confusion. We assume that the student has read the passage exactly as given in the question. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension questions require you to locate specific information and match it accurately. The best approach is to refer back to the relevant line in the passage and compare it word-for-word with the answer choices. Even small changes, such as "mild" instead of "strong" or "red brown" instead of "brown or black", are enough to make an option incorrect. Therefore, precision is crucial when selecting the answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the line in the passage that answers the question. It clearly says: "Crude mineral oil comes out of the earth as a thick brown or black liquid with a strong smell." Step 2: Break down the description into parts: "thick", "brown or black", "liquid", "with a strong smell". Step 3: Examine option A: "Thick brown or black liquid with mild smell." Only the last part "mild smell" is different from the passage, which says "strong smell". So this option is incorrect. Step 4: Examine option B: "Thick red brown liquid with strong smell." The colour "red brown" does not match "brown or black". So this is incorrect. Step 5: Examine option C: "Mixture of different colours." The passage does not mention a mixture of different colours; it mentions specifically brown or black. Step 6: Examine option D: "Thick brown or black liquid with a strong smell." This matches the passage exactly in all details. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, you can read the first two lines of the passage again. The description is clear and direct. There is no mention of "mild" smell, no mention of "red brown" colour, and no mention of many colours. The only difference between option D and the passage is the addition of the article "a" before "strong smell", which does not change the meaning. Therefore, option D is the only answer that faithfully reflects the text. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Thick brown or black liquid with mild smell: Changes "strong smell" to "mild smell", which contradicts the passage. Thick red brown liquid with strong smell: Alters the colour description to "red brown", which is not stated in the passage. Mixture of different colours: Introduces the idea of multiple colours, which is not mentioned; the passage is specific about "brown or black". Common Pitfalls: Students often rush through options and pick the one that seems closest without checking every detail. Exam setters deliberately introduce small changes in adjectives or qualifiers, such as "mild" versus "strong", to test attentive reading. To avoid such mistakes, always cross-check each word in the option against the relevant sentence in the passage. Underlining key descriptive words while reading can also help you quickly verify answers later. Final Answer: According to the passage, crude oil comes out of the earth as a thick brown or black liquid with a strong smell.

Question 10

Read the passage on crude mineral oil and answer the question: According to the passage, what is crude mineral oil?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question checks whether you understand the basic scientific description of crude mineral oil given in the passage. The passage defines crude oil not just by its appearance but also by its composition. Careful reading and the ability to distinguish between correct and partially correct statements are essential skills being tested here. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states: "It is a complex mixture of many different substances, each with its own individual qualities." The context further explains that most of these substances are hydrocarbons and that similar hydrocarbons appear as bitumen, asphalt, and natural gas. Options present different characterisations of crude oil, some of which are incomplete or incorrect. We assume the reader has the full passage from the exam question in front of them. Concept / Approach: The key idea is that crude mineral oil is not a simple, pure substance but a mixture containing many components. The passage emphasises "complex mixture" and "many different substances". The correct option must capture both elements. Some distractors mention related materials like natural gas or bitumen, but they do not accurately define crude oil itself. Thus, the safest strategy is to match the option as closely as possible to the wording of the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Locate the definition sentence in the passage: "It is a complex mixture of many different substances, each with its own individual qualities." Step 2: Extract the essential points: complex, mixture, many different substances. Step 3: Examine option A: "Complex mixture of many different substances." This matches the key words almost exactly. Step 4: Examine option B: "Simple mixture of natural gas." This contradicts the passage, which says "complex" and refers to hydrocarbons in various forms, not just natural gas. Step 5: Examine option C: "Plain white oil." The passage mentions a thick brown or black liquid, so "plain white oil" is wrong. Step 6: Examine option D: "It is bitumen." The passage says similar hydrocarbons are found in other forms such as bitumen, but it does not say crude oil itself is bitumen. Verification / Alternative check: Re-read the section that talks about hydrocarbons. The passage states that crude oil consists mostly of hydrocarbons and that these hydrocarbons are also found in other forms like bitumen, asphalt, and natural gas. Therefore, crude oil is a mixture of such substances, not merely natural gas or bitumen alone. Option A is the only one that agrees completely with this explanation from the passage, confirming it as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Simple mixture of natural gas: The passage emphasises "complex mixture" and mentions natural gas only as another form in which similar hydrocarbons occur, not as the entire substance. Plain white oil: This contradicts the described appearance ("thick brown or black liquid"). The phrase "plain white" is nowhere in the passage. It is bitumen: Bitumen is given as an example of another form of hydrocarbons, not a definition of crude oil. Equating crude oil with bitumen is incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may focus only on the words "bitumen" or "natural gas" and assume that crude oil must be one of those. Others ignore the adjective "complex" and mistakenly choose an option with "simple". To avoid such traps, always pay attention to qualifiers like "complex", "many", and "different". These words can completely change the meaning of the sentence, and exam setters use them to differentiate right and wrong options. Final Answer: According to the passage, crude mineral oil is a complex mixture of many different substances.

Question 11

Read the passage on crude mineral oil and answer the question: From where does mineral oil originate according to the passage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question focuses on the origin of mineral oil as explained in the passage. It tests whether you can identify and retain specific factual information about how crude oil is formed over long geological periods. Such questions are typical of science based passages in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that "Mineral oil originates from the carcasses of tiny animals and from plants that live in the sea." It further explains that these dead organisms form large deposits under the seabed, which are later transformed into crude oil. Options mention complex mixtures, lakes, only plants, and the combination of animals and plants. We assume students have read the full passage just before attempting the question. Concept / Approach: The question is asking for the source or origin of mineral oil, not for its definition or composition. The passage clearly mentions both "carcasses of tiny animals" and "plants that live in the sea" as the initial organic matter. Therefore, the correct option must include both of these, and not restrict the source to only plants or other locations like lakes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Locate the relevant sentence in the passage: "Mineral oil originates from the carcasses of tiny animals and from plants that live in the sea." Step 2: Note that there are two sources: tiny sea animals and sea plants. Step 3: Examine option A: "Complex mixture of substances." This describes the nature of crude oil, but not its origin. Step 4: Examine option B: "Carcasses of tiny animals and plants that live in the sea." This exactly matches the sentence from the passage. Step 5: Examine option C: "From lakes." Lakes are not mentioned in the passage as the origin of mineral oil. Step 6: Examine option D: "Only from plants." This ignores the role of animal carcasses mentioned in the passage. Verification / Alternative check: If you re-read the explanation of how crude oil forms, the passage clearly describes dead marine animals and plants accumulating on the seabed, being covered by sand and silt, and then turning into oil under pressure and heat. There is no mention of lakes, land plants only, or any single source. The mixture of animal and plant remains is essential. Option B is the only one that captures both elements without leaving anything out or adding new information. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Complex mixture of substances: This describes what crude oil is, not where it originates from. From lakes: The passage specifically mentions the sea and seabed, not lakes, so this is incorrect. Only from plants: Omits the equally important contribution of tiny animal carcasses, contradicting the passage. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes confuse different parts of the passage, mixing up the definition of crude oil with its origin. Others may remember only "plants" and forget that animals are mentioned too. To avoid such mistakes, it helps to underline or mentally mark key phrases such as "carcasses of tiny animals" and "plants that live in the sea" while reading. Paying attention to words like "and" or "only" in the options is also crucial, as they can completely change the meaning. Final Answer: According to the passage, mineral oil originates from the carcasses of tiny animals and plants that live in the sea.

Question 12

Read the passage on crude mineral oil and answer the question: According to the passage, the time taken for the marine deposits to harden into rocks is how long?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question focuses on the timescale involved in the formation of sedimentary rocks and, ultimately, crude oil. The passage emphasises that geological processes take extremely long periods, and the exam question checks whether you have understood and remembered this detail accurately. Understanding such information is useful not only for exams but also for general scientific awareness. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage mentions: "Over million of years, these dead creatures form large deposits under seabed and ocean currents cover them with a blanket of sand and silt." The context suggests that the transformation into sedimentary rock and then crude oil occurs over very long geological times. Options offer different time spans: decades, centuries, thousands of years, and millions of years. We assume the reader has noted the phrase "million of years" in the text. Concept / Approach: Geological changes, such as the formation of sedimentary rock and fossil fuels, do not happen quickly. They generally take millions of years. The passage uses this standard scientific idea, and the correct answer must reflect this very long timeframe. Exam setters include shorter timespans as distractors for candidates who do not pay attention to exact wording or are unfamiliar with geological processes. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Locate the relevant sentence: It talks about dead creatures forming deposits "over million of years" before being covered and turned into rock. Step 2: Interpret "over million of years" as a very long timeframe, clearly beyond thousands of years. Step 3: Examine option B: "millions of years." This exactly matches the idea from the passage. Step 4: Examine option A: "a few centuries." A century is only 100 years, and a few centuries would be too short for large scale geological changes of this kind. Step 5: Examine option C: "a few decades." A decade is only 10 years, which is far too short. Step 6: Examine option D: "thousands of years." Although much longer, it is still significantly shorter than "millions of years" and does not match the passage exactly. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by considering general knowledge from science: fossil fuels like coal, petroleum, and natural gas are known to take millions of years to form. Textbooks repeatedly emphasise this point. The passage is consistent with that scientific fact. Therefore, any option suggesting decades, centuries, or even just thousands of years cannot be correct. The phrase "millions of years" is the most precise match for the passage and for accepted scientific understanding. Why Other Options Are Wrong: a few centuries: Represents only hundreds of years, which is far too short for sedimentary rock formation and oil deposits. a few decades: Represents tens of years, which is clearly inadequate for slow geological processes. thousands of years: While longer, it still does not match the explicit phrase "million of years" used in the passage, and thus must be rejected. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates skim the passage and remember only that "a very long time" is involved, then choose "thousands of years" believing it to be long enough. Others may misread "million" as "thousands". To avoid these errors, always pay attention to numerical data and units in the passage. Underlining numbers, dates, and quantities while reading is a helpful strategy for tackling detail based questions like this one. Final Answer: According to the passage, the process takes millions of years for the marine deposits to harden into rocks.

Question 13

Read the passage on crude mineral oil and answer the question: According to the passage, why do layers of sedimentary rocks lead to the formation of oil deposits?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question examines your understanding of the mechanism by which sedimentary rocks contribute to the formation of crude oil. The passage explains how pressure and heat over long periods transform organic deposits into oil. The exam tests whether you can connect these ideas accurately instead of relying on guesswork. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage explains that layers of sedimentary rocks become thicker and heavier. It states that their pressure produces heat, which transforms the tiny carcasses into crude oil. Options present different reasons related to heaviness, oxygen, hardness, and pressure. We assume the candidate has read and understood the part of the passage describing this transformation. Concept / Approach: The central concept is that thick layers of rock exert pressure on the organic materials trapped below them. This pressure generates heat, and over millions of years, the combination of pressure and heat chemically alters the organic remains into crude oil. The correct option must include both the pressure and the transformation of animal and plant deposits into oil, not just a vague reference to hardness or squeezing. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the key sentence from the passage: "The layers of sedimentary rocks become thicker, and heavier. Their pressure produces heat, which transforms the tiny carcasses into crude oil." Step 2: Identify the two important processes: pressure producing heat, and heat transforming organic matter into oil. Step 3: Examine option A: "their pressure produces heat and turns deposits of animal carcasses and plants into oil." This repeats the idea from the passage with minor rephrasing. Step 4: Examine option B: "it turns heavy and shuts out the oxygen." While shutting out oxygen is mentioned earlier in the passage as preventing decomposition, it is not the reason why sedimentary rocks lead to oil deposits. Step 5: Examine option C: "it becomes hard and forms into rocks to squeeze oil." The passage does not say that rocks simply squeeze out oil; it explains transformation by heat. Step 6: Examine option D: "it becomes light and soft and applies pressure to produce oil." This contradicts the text (rocks become thicker and heavier, not light and soft). Verification / Alternative check: Re-reading the relevant part of the passage confirms that the final stage of oil formation involves increased pressure from accumulating rock layers, which generates heat. This heat drives chemical changes in the organic material, creating crude oil. In contrast, the shutting out of oxygen is earlier described as preventing complete decomposition, not directly as the cause of oil formation. Therefore, the only fully accurate and complete option is A, which clearly connects pressure, heat, and transformation of organic deposits. Why Other Options Are Wrong: it turns heavy and shuts out the oxygen: This partially reflects an earlier stage where sedimentary rock shuts out oxygen, but it does not describe how oil is produced from organic deposits. it becomes hard and forms into rocks to squeeze oil: The passage does not say that oil is already present and being squeezed out; instead, it emphasises chemical transformation under heat. it becomes light and soft and applies pressure to produce oil: This is directly opposite to the description in the passage, where the layers become thicker and heavier, not light and soft. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse different stages of the process described in the passage, mixing up the role of oxygen exclusion with the role of pressure and heat. Others may rely on everyday ideas like squeezing oil out of rocks, which are not scientifically accurate. To perform well in such questions, focus on the exact sequence in the passage and distinguish each step: first, deposits are covered, oxygen is excluded, and then pressure and heat gradually transform the organic material into oil. Final Answer: Sedimentary rocks lead to oil deposits because their pressure produces heat and turns deposits of animal carcasses and plants into oil.

Question 14

In English vocabulary, choose the word that is closest in meaning to the given word PANACEA.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a synonym of the word "panacea". Synonym questions are common in English sections of competitive exams, where you must know not only the meaning of a given word but also how it relates to other words. "Panacea" is often used in discussions about solutions to complex problems, especially when people mistakenly believe one thing can solve everything. Given Data / Assumptions: Word: PANACEA. Options: PRAISE, CURE-ALL, POISON, AMBROSIA. The context is general vocabulary, possibly appearing in reading passages or opinion articles. We assume standard dictionary meanings for each option. Concept / Approach: "Panacea" originally refers to a mythical remedy that could cure all diseases. In modern usage, it means a supposed solution for all problems or difficulties. The key idea is that it is a "cure-all". Therefore, we must choose the option that directly expresses the idea of a universal or complete remedy. The other options represent praise, harmful substances, or divine food from mythology, none of which match this meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the definition: "panacea" = a remedy claimed to cure all diseases or a solution for all problems. Step 2: Examine "PRAISE": This means approval or admiration, usually expressed in words. It is unrelated to remedies or cures. Step 3: Examine "CURE-ALL": This literally means a remedy for all diseases or problems. It directly matches the meaning of "panacea". Step 4: Examine "POISON": This is a substance that can cause illness or death, which is the exact opposite of a cure. Step 5: Examine "AMBROSIA": In Greek mythology, this is food of the gods, associated with immortality or divine taste, but not specifically a universal cure for all problems. Step 6: Conclude that "CURE-ALL" is the only option that correctly expresses the meaning of "panacea". Verification / Alternative check: Look at example sentences: "There is no panacea for unemployment" means there is no single solution that will solve all aspects of the unemployment problem. Replacing "panacea" with "cure-all" keeps the meaning intact: "There is no cure-all for unemployment." However, replacing it with "praise", "poison", or "ambrosia" would make no sense. Dictionary entries also define "panacea" as "a remedy for all diseases" or "a solution for all problems", confirming that "cure-all" is the closest synonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: PRAISE: Refers to positive comments or admiration and is not related to cures or remedies. POISON: A harmful or deadly substance, the opposite of a healing remedy. AMBROSIA: Mythical food of the gods, associated with immortality and great taste, but not specifically a universal cure for all problems. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be distracted by "AMBROSIA" because of its mythical and positive connotations, but they miss that "panacea" is about curing problems, not about divine food. Others might guess based on sound or length of the word instead of meaning. To avoid such errors, always focus on the core definition of the given word and look for the option that matches that definition most closely, rather than relying on vague associations. Final Answer: The word that is closest in meaning to PANACEA is CURE-ALL.

Question 15

In English vocabulary and word usage, choose the option that gives the word which is opposite in meaning (antonym) to the given word DETEST.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic English vocabulary, especially the ability to recognise antonyms. The given word is DETEST, which is a strong verb related to feelings and attitudes. Competitive exams frequently ask candidates to identify the opposite meaning, or antonym, of a highlighted word in order to check their command over shades of meaning in English words. Given Data / Assumptions: In this question we have: The given word: detest. Four options: Denounce, Ignore, Adore, Castigate. We must select the option that is opposite in meaning to detest. Concept / Approach: The word detest means to hate something or someone very strongly, to feel intense dislike or hatred. To find the antonym, we should think of a word that expresses strong liking, love, or deep affection. The approach is to recall or infer the meanings of each option, then see which one conveys the opposite emotional attitude. A good strategy is to restate detest mentally as to hate intensely and then look for a word that means to love or cherish deeply. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the word detest. It means to hate, to dislike intensely, or to feel extreme aversion. Step 2: Consider the option Denounce. It means to publicly condemn or criticise someone or something, not necessarily the direct opposite of hating. Step 3: Consider the option Ignore. It means to pay no attention to someone or something. This is not the same as loving; it just means not noticing. Step 4: Consider the option Adore. It means to love deeply, to regard with great affection and admiration. Step 5: Consider the option Castigate. It means to criticise or punish someone severely. Step 6: Since detest means to hate and adore means to love very much, Adore is clearly the opposite in meaning. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by placing the words in simple sentences. If a person detests spinach, that person hates spinach strongly. If a person adores spinach, that person loves it very much. These sentences show opposite attitudes. Denounce and castigate both involve blaming or criticising and therefore are related more closely to negative feelings rather than being opposites. Ignore is neutral, not positive love. Thus, adore stands as the correct antonym of detest. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Denounce is wrong because it means to criticise or condemn publicly, which is not the opposite of hate. It may even accompany hatred rather than oppose it. Ignore is wrong because it means to pay no attention, which is different from strongly loving something. Castigate is wrong because it means to criticise or punish severely, again a negative action rather than a loving or positive feeling. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to choose words that simply look formal or severe, thinking that they may match the tone of detest. Another error is to pick a word that is not clearly opposite in meaning but only slightly different or related in a negative sense. Students sometimes confuse antonyms with unrelated words. It is important to focus on emotional direction: detest equals strong dislike, so the antonym must express strong liking or love, not just absence of attention or another type of negative action. Final Answer: The correct antonym of detest is Adore.

Question 16

In English spelling and vocabulary, four alternative words are given. Choose the correctly spelt word from the options below.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your knowledge of correct English spelling. In many competitive exams, candidates are asked to identify the correctly spelt word among several confusing variants. Here the test focuses on a set of words where only one spelling is standard and accepted in good English usage, while the others contain common errors. Given Data / Assumptions: The options provided are: Debilitate Impecable Inkulcate Harrass Concept / Approach: To answer such questions, you need familiarity with standard spellings from reading and practice. When you see a word that seems unfamiliar, break it into familiar roots and prefixes, or recall similar words that you have seen in books or reliable sources. In English, small variations like double consonants, missing letters, or incorrect vowel patterns often indicate incorrect spelling. The word debilitate is a common verb meaning to weaken. The other three options resemble real words but are incorrectly formed. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check Debilitate. This is a known English verb that means to make someone or something weak. The standard spelling is d e b i l i t a t e. Step 2: Examine Impecable. It appears to be a misspelling of impeccable, which should have a double c and a double p: impeccable, not impecable. Step 3: Examine Inkulcate. This seems to imitate the word inculcate, which means to instil ideas or values. The correct spelling starts with i n c, not i n k, so inkulcate is incorrect. Step 4: Examine Harrass. This looks like a wrong form of harass. The correct spelling has a single r and double s: harass, not harrass. Step 5: Since Debilitate matches the accepted dictionary spelling and the other options do not, Debilitate is the correctly spelt word. Verification / Alternative check: You can confirm by consulting a reliable dictionary or remembering how these words appear in standard texts. Debilitate is commonly used in sentences such as The disease can debilitate the patient. The other forms, impecable, inkulcate, and harrass, would be underlined as incorrect in any spell checker or grammar tool. Therefore, the decision is firmly supported by reference to standard English. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Impecable is wrong because the correct word is impeccable with double c and double p. Inkulcate is wrong because the standard word is inculcate, beginning with inc, not ink. Harrass is wrong because the accepted spelling is harass, with one r followed by double s. Each of these incorrect options reflects a very common misspelling that exam setters use to test attention to detail. Common Pitfalls: Students often rely only on how a word sounds and therefore insert or remove consonants incorrectly. Another pitfall is assuming that double letters can appear anywhere without pattern. Regular reading of books, newspapers, and formal writing helps fix the correct visual shape of words in memory. When in doubt, think of related forms such as debilitating or debility for debilitate, which can reinforce the correct arrangement of letters. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Debilitate.

Question 17

Complete the following exclamatory sentence by choosing the most appropriate adjective: "What a _____ holiday!"

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your sense of correct collocations and natural usage in English. The sentence is an exclamation about a holiday and you must select the adjective that fits best in both meaning and tone. The correct answer will sound natural to a native speaker and convey the idea that the holiday was special or remarkable. Given Data / Assumptions: We are given the sentence: What a _____ holiday! The options are: Momentous Memorable Momentary Immortal Concept / Approach: In English, some adjectives commonly collocate with holiday, meaning they are regularly used together in real speech and writing. When we want to praise a holiday, we often call it a memorable holiday, meaning it is worth remembering. The other adjectives have meanings that do not naturally fit a holiday. Understanding nuance and typical combinations is key in this type of vocabulary question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider the overall sentiment. The exclamatory structure "What a ... holiday!" usually expresses admiration or strong feeling about the quality of the holiday. Step 2: Examine Momentous. This word means very important or significant, often used for events like decisions, historical changes, or occasions of great impact. We rarely say "momentous holiday" in everyday speech. Step 3: Examine Memorable. This adjective means worth remembering, leaving a strong positive impression in the mind. A holiday that was enjoyable or special is often described as a memorable holiday. Step 4: Examine Momentary. This means lasting only for a very short time. A holiday is usually several days long, so calling it momentary does not make sense. Step 5: Examine Immortal. This means undying or living forever. It does not suit a temporary event like a holiday and therefore sounds unnatural. Step 6: Since Memorable fits both the meaning and the natural collocation, it is the best choice for the blank. Verification / Alternative check: If we read the sentence with each option, "What a memorable holiday!" sounds natural and expresses enthusiasm. "What a momentous holiday!" may sound forced and is rarely used. "What a momentary holiday!" is almost contradictory because holidays are expected to have some duration. "What an immortal holiday!" is stylistically awkward. Therefore, memorable clearly stands out as the option that would appear in standard English descriptions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Momentous is wrong because it is used for highly significant events such as a momentous decision or a momentous occasion, not typically for a casual holiday. Momentary is wrong because it describes something that lasts for only an instant, which does not suit a holiday. Immortal is wrong because it refers to something that never dies or is eternal, which does not fit the idea of a holiday that has a beginning and an end. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to focus only on the positive tone and choose any impressive sounding word. However, vocabulary questions also check whether you know typical word combinations. Collocation is an important aspect of fluency. Learners should notice which adjectives regularly appear with holidays, events, journeys, and similar nouns when reading. This habit makes it easier to spot the natural choice in exams. Final Answer: The most appropriate adjective is Memorable.

Question 18

Complete the sentence by choosing the most appropriate word: "Many important projects have reached the final stage of _____."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of vocabulary and collocation in the context of projects and organisational work. The sentence describes projects that have advanced to a particular phase, and you must decide which noun best completes the phrase "final stage of _____". The correct answer should match common professional usage and logical sequence. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: Many important projects have reached the final stage of _____. The options are: Accomplishment Initiation Resolution Implementation Concept / Approach: Projects typically move through stages such as planning, initiation, implementation, and completion. The phrase final stage suggests that the projects are now at the point where the plans are being put into action or completed. Among the options, implementation is the standard word used to describe carrying out or executing a project plan. Accomplishment usually refers to the achievement itself, not a stage. Initiation means the beginning. Resolution is more related to solving a problem or passing a formal decision. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the context. Many important projects are moving forward and have arrived at a final, advanced phase. Step 2: Evaluate Accomplishment. This indicates something that has already been achieved. Saying final stage of accomplishment is not a standard phrase. Once something is accomplished, it is already finished. Step 3: Evaluate Initiation. Initiation refers to the start or launch of a project. It cannot logically be the final stage. Step 4: Evaluate Resolution. Resolution can mean a firm decision or the act of solving a problem. Final stage of resolution is not a typical collocation with projects. Step 5: Evaluate Implementation. Implementation means putting plans or decisions into effect. Final stage of implementation naturally suggests that the projects are now being carried out in practice or nearing full execution. Step 6: Therefore, Implementation is the most appropriate word to complete the sentence. Verification / Alternative check: We can check by reading the completed sentence aloud. "Many important projects have reached the final stage of implementation" sounds correct in business and administrative contexts. It conveys that planning is complete and now practical steps are being taken. The other options either do not fit the idea of a final stage or do not commonly collocate with projects in this way. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Accomplishment is wrong because a project that is already an accomplishment is finished, so the phrase final stage of accomplishment is awkward. Initiation is wrong because it refers to beginning, not ending. Resolution is wrong because it refers to decisions or solutions rather than a project phase. Only implementation naturally expresses the execution stage of a project. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose impressive sounding words such as accomplishment without considering grammatical and collocational patterns. Another pitfall is ignoring the time reference implied by final stage. Reviewing common phrases used with project management terms, like project implementation, project completion, and project initiation, helps to avoid such mistakes and improves accuracy in vocabulary questions. Final Answer: The correct completion is Implementation.

Question 19

In the following sentence, identify the part that contains a grammatical error: "Each of the girls have come with her books."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about error detection in English grammar. It tests your understanding of subject verb agreement when the subject begins with the phrase each of. In competitive exams, such structures are very common because they look plural but are grammatically singular. You must decide which part of the sentence is incorrect. Given Data / Assumptions: The full sentence is divided into parts: A: Each of the girls B: have come C: with her books. D: No error We assume standard formal English usage. Concept / Approach: In English grammar, when the subject begins with each of or every one of followed by a plural noun, the subject is treated as singular. Therefore, the verb should also be singular. The correct singular present perfect form of come is has come, not have come. The rest of the sentence, including the pronoun her to refer back to each girl individually, is acceptable in formal English. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the subject. The phrase Each of the girls is the subject of the verb. Step 2: Determine whether the subject is singular or plural. Even though girls is plural, the presence of each of makes the whole subject grammatically singular. Step 3: Check the verb form. The sentence uses have come, which is a plural verb form. Step 4: For a singular subject, the correct form should be has come. Step 5: The phrase with her books is logically correct because it refers to each girl bringing her own books. Step 6: Therefore, the error lies in part B, where have come should be replaced with has come. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence correctly as a full unit: Each of the girls has come with her books. Now the singular subject each matches the singular verb has. This sounds natural and follows the standard rule that words like each, every, and everyone normally take singular verbs. If we test the sentence by using a clearly plural subject such as all the girls, we would then say all the girls have come, which confirms that have is the plural form and not suitable with each of. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Each of the girls, is grammatically correct as a subject phrase. Option C, with her books, is correct because the singular pronoun her agrees with each understood individually. Option D, No error, is wrong because we have clearly identified a mistake in subject verb agreement in part B. Thus, only part B is incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Many learners are misled by the nearby plural noun girls and think that the subject is plural. They then accept have come without noticing that each makes the entire subject singular. Remember that quantifiers like each, every, and either focus on individuals one by one and therefore require singular verbs. Careful reading of the full subject phrase before choosing the verb form helps avoid such errors. Final Answer: The erroneous part is have come, that is, part B.

Question 20

In the following sentence, identify the part that contains a grammatical error: "Me and my wife were at home last night."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error detection question examines correct use of personal pronouns in the subject position of a sentence. In formal English, subject pronouns such as I, we, he, she, and they should be used as subjects. The sentence uses a phrase that sounds informal in conversation, and you must identify which part is grammatically incorrect for standard written English. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into parts: A: Me and my wife B: were at home C: last night. D: No error We are assuming formal examination style English. Concept / Approach: In English grammar, the pronoun used as a subject must be in the subjective or nominative case. Me is the objective form, used after prepositions or verbs. In the subject position we should use I. Additionally, polite convention suggests mentioning the other person before oneself, so the preferred phrase is my wife and I. The rest of the sentence, including the verb were and the adverbial phrase last night, is correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the subject phrase. The subject is Me and my wife. Step 2: Check pronoun case. Me is an object pronoun and should not be used as part of the subject in formal English. Step 3: Replace Me with the subject pronoun I. The grammatically correct pair would be My wife and I. Step 4: Confirm the verb. With a compound subject My wife and I, the plural verb were is correct. Step 5: The phrase at home last night functions as an adverbial of place and time and is acceptable. Step 6: Therefore, the grammatical error lies in part A, Me and my wife. Verification / Alternative check: Rewriting the sentence as My wife and I were at home last night makes it suitable for formal writing and examination standards. You can also test by removing one half of the compound subject. You would never say Me was at home in standard English. You would say I was at home, which clearly shows that I is the correct subject pronoun. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, were at home, is correct for a plural subject like my wife and I. Option C, last night, is a normal time expression and has no grammatical problem. Option D, No error, is wrong because there is a clear mistake in the subject pronoun form in part A. Thus only part A contains the error. Common Pitfalls: In everyday speech many people casually use expressions such as me and my friend. Learners sometimes transfer this informal pattern into formal writing and examination answers. Another pitfall is forgetting the polite order of mentioning other people before oneself. To avoid errors, remember that subject pronouns are I, we, he, she, and they, and that it is better style to say my friend and I, my parents and I, or my wife and I. Final Answer: The incorrect part is Me and my wife, that is, part A.

English Questions