Question 1

From the following options, select the word that is correctly spelt according to standard English usage.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions require you to distinguish between correct and incorrect forms of familiar words. Three of the options in this question contain deliberate spelling errors, while one matches accepted dictionary usage. Accurate spelling is important for exams, professional communication, and academic writing. Given Data / Assumptions: - Options: preecher, hygenic, paralel, blotting. - Only one option is spelled correctly. - The other options are near approximations of common words. Concept / Approach: The word blotting is correctly formed from the verb blot, meaning to soak up liquid or to stain. Adding the suffix t t i n g follows normal consonant doubling rules after a short vowel. The other options correspond to common words but are misspelt: preecher should be preacher, hygenic should be hygienic, and paralel should be parallel. Recognising the familiar base words helps to identify which spelling is correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine preecher. The intended word is preacher, referring to a person who preaches, and is spelled p r e a c h e r, so preecher is incorrect. Step 2: Look at hygenic. The correct word is hygienic, with i e in the middle and an extra letter, so hygenic is wrong. Step 3: Inspect paralel. The usual spelling of the related adjective is parallel, with double l in the middle and at the end. Step 4: Consider blotting. This is a known word, as in blotting paper, and follows proper spelling rules. Step 5: Conclude that blotting is the only correctly spelt option. Verification / Alternative check: Use each word in a simple sentence to see how it feels. Blotting paper is used to absorb ink is correct, and blotting is a familiar term in stationery. Preecher, hygenic, and paralel, however, will look suspicious to anyone who has seen their proper versions in books or on reliable websites. A mental spell checker developed through reading will reject these forms. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Preecher incorrectly doubles the e and replaces the a in preacher. Hygenic drops a key letter and does not match the standard spelling hygienic. Paralel fails to double the l correctly, which is necessary in parallel. All three are examples of typical learner mistakes in spelling. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes trust how a word sounds and try to reproduce it phonetically. In English, however, many spellings are influenced by historical forms and are not purely phonetic. A helpful habit is to pay attention to spellings while reading and to write down new or tricky words with correct forms. Over time, this builds strong visual memory and reduces confusion in exam questions. Final Answer: blotting is the correctly spelt word among the options.

Question 2

Select the synonym, that is, the word closest in meaning to "bedevilment", from the options given below.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This synonym question focuses on the noun bedevilment, which is related to the verb bedevil. In general usage, to bedevil means to cause persistent trouble, difficulty, or confusion. To answer correctly, you need to recognise which option expresses a similar idea of harassment or persistent difficulty, even if the part of speech is slightly different. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: bedevilment. - Options: delight, beset, facilitate, contentment. - The correct option must convey the idea of constant trouble or harassment. Concept / Approach: Bedevilment refers to a state of being plagued, tormented, or troubled again and again by problems. The verb beset means to surround and attack or to trouble persistently. Although one is a noun and the other is a verb, in vocabulary questions they are considered close enough in meaning, since both describe ongoing harassment or difficulty. The other options, delight, facilitate, and contentment, all have positive or helpful connotations, which are opposite to the sense of bedevilment. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that bedevilment suggests being tormented or disturbed repeatedly by problems. Step 2: Examine beset, which is used in sentences like The project was beset by delays, meaning it was constantly troubled by delays. Step 3: Compare this with delight, which describes great pleasure and is the opposite of being troubled. Step 4: Consider facilitate, which means to make something easier, again contrary to causing difficulty. Step 5: Contentment refers to happiness and satisfaction, which is the emotional opposite of the frustration implied by bedevilment. Step 6: Therefore, beset is the closest in meaning to bedevilment. Verification / Alternative check: Write example sentences. Bedevilment by financial problems ruined their peace of mind describes constant trouble. The family was beset by financial problems expresses a very similar idea. If we try to use delight, facilitate, or contentment in the same sentence, the meaning changes completely and no longer matches the negative tone of bedevilment. This test confirms that beset is the best semantic match. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Delight denotes joy or great pleasure, which conflicts with the idea of trouble. Facilitate means to make an action or process easier, which is the opposite of causing difficulty. Contentment describes a state of peaceful happiness, far from the unrest and bother suggested by bedevilment. Because all three convey positive or helpful conditions, they cannot be synonyms of a word that describes persistent harassment. Common Pitfalls: In synonym questions, some candidates select an option simply because it is less familiar, assuming that the difficult word must be the right answer. This strategy often fails. A better approach is to focus on the emotional tone, whether the word is positive or negative, and on the type of situation it describes. Bedevilment clearly has a negative tone and is associated with repeated problems, which aligns neatly with beset. Final Answer: beset is the option that best matches the meaning of bedevilment.

Question 3

The sentence "Someone gave the old man a push" is in the active voice. Out of the following options, select the passive voice sentence that best expresses the same meaning.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests the ability to change a sentence from active voice to passive voice without changing the tense or the basic meaning. The active sentence Someone gave the old man a push has a simple past tense verb and two objects. The aim is to form a passive sentence that keeps the simple past and correctly promotes one of the objects to the subject position. Given Data / Assumptions: - Active sentence: Someone gave the old man a push. - Verb: gave (simple past). - Objects: the old man and a push. - The doer (subject) is an indefinite pronoun, someone, which is often omitted or left vague in passive constructions. Concept / Approach: When converting a sentence with two objects into passive voice, either object can become the subject of the new sentence, provided the meaning remains clear. Here, a common and grammatically correct passive form is A push was given to the old man. This retains the simple past passive structure was given and clearly indicates the action received by the old man. The indefinite subject someone can be omitted because it is not important who exactly did the action. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the verb and tense in the active sentence: gave in simple past. Step 2: Choose one of the objects to promote to subject position in the passive sentence; here, a push is chosen. Step 3: Form the passive verb in simple past: was given. Step 4: Attach the other object with an appropriate preposition: to the old man. Step 5: Combine to get: A push was given to the old man. Step 6: Confirm that this matches option D exactly. Verification / Alternative check: Compare the meanings explicitly. Someone gave the old man a push and A push was given to the old man both describe the same event: the old man received a push from an unspecified person. The tense is preserved, and no extra information is introduced. Therefore, option D is a faithful passive transformation of the original sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, The old man got a push from someone, is close in meaning but uses got in place of was given, which is less formal and not a direct grammatical transformation. Option B, Somebody had given a push to the old man, shifts the tense to past perfect, which does not match the simple past of the original. Option C, The old man was being pushed by someone, suggests continuous action rather than a single push and changes the aspect to past continuous passive. Common Pitfalls: Learners often change the tense unintentionally when converting between active and passive, or they prefer informal verbs like got, which are not ideal in exam contexts. Another frequent issue is misunderstanding continuous versus simple aspects. Remember that was given is the standard simple past passive form of gave and that this should be used unless the original sentence clearly indicates ongoing action. Final Answer: A push was given to the old man. is the correct passive voice version of the given active sentence.

Question 4

Rearrange the following sentence parts to form a coherent and meaningful sentence about the white American underclass: "The white American underclass is in thrall P – and used heroin needles Q – to a vicious, selfish culture R – whose main products …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This jumbled sentence question tests understanding of logical and grammatical order in complex English sentences. The sentence describes how the white American underclass is controlled by a harmful culture. The parts labelled P, Q, and R must be arranged so that the sentence flows smoothly and the relative clause and objects attach to the correct nouns. Given Data / Assumptions: - Fixed beginning: The white American underclass is in thrall - Part P: and used heroin needles - Part Q: to a vicious, selfish culture - Part R: whose main products are misery - Exactly one ordering will produce a clear, grammatically sound sentence. Concept / Approach: The phrase in thrall usually takes a prepositional phrase with to, explaining what someone or something is enslaved or addicted to. Therefore, Q, to a vicious, selfish culture, should come immediately after in thrall. The relative clause introduced by whose must refer back to a noun phrase that makes sense as a possessor. Here, whose main products are misery naturally describes the vicious, selfish culture mentioned in Q. Finally, the phrase and used heroin needles should attach to the list of products of that culture, forming misery and used heroin needles. Thus the most logical order is Q followed by R followed by P. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Attach Q after the opening: The white American underclass is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture. Step 2: Add the relative clause R to describe the culture: whose main products are misery. Step 3: Join P to complete the list of products: and used heroin needles, so the phrase becomes whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Step 4: The complete sentence reads: The white American underclass is in thrall to a vicious, selfish culture whose main products are misery and used heroin needles. Step 5: This arrangement corresponds to the sequence QRP, which matches option B. Verification / Alternative check: Read the full reconstructed sentence aloud. It smoothly moves from the subject, to the prepositional phrase describing what the group is in thrall to, and then to a relative clause that names the main products of that culture. If you try an alternative order such as PQR, you would get in thrall and used heroin needles to a vicious, selfish culture, which is clearly ungrammatical. RPQ and RQP similarly break the natural links between the culture and its products. Why Other Options Are Wrong: PQR forces the phrase and used heroin needles directly after in thrall, leaving to a vicious, selfish culture in an awkward position and breaking the strong connection between in thrall and to. RPQ begins with whose, but the relative pronoun whose would then lack a clear antecedent, as the culture is only introduced later. RQP separates whose main products are misery from the noun culture and produces an odd pattern that does not follow standard English syntax. Common Pitfalls: Many learners attempt to connect the fragments purely by looking for pronouns and conjunctions, without focusing on which word each phrase naturally describes. A better strategy is to first identify the core verb phrase and its required prepositions, then place relative clauses next to the nouns they qualify, and finally attach additional phrases that expand lists or give extra details. This disciplined method makes rearrangement questions much easier to handle. Final Answer: QRP is the correct order of the parts, so option B is the right answer.

Question 5

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate verb phrase: "She deserved the accolades as she ____________________ for it."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze test question examines understanding of verb tense and aspect, particularly the past perfect tense. The sentence describes a situation where a person deserved praise or awards because of effort made earlier. The correct answer must express the idea that hard work took place before the time when she received the accolades. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: She deserved the accolades as she ____________________ for it. - Options: hardly worked, had hard worked, was working hard, had worked hard. - Deserved is in simple past, referring to a completed action in the past. - The blank describes prior effort that justifies her deserving the accolades. Concept / Approach: When one past action causes or explains another past result, English often uses the past perfect tense for the earlier action and simple past for the later action. Here, the later action is deserved the accolades. The earlier action is her sustained effort, so the correct form is had worked hard. This clearly marks the hard work as having been completed before the time at which she received the praise. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main clause: She deserved the accolades. Step 2: Recognise that the clause as she ______ for it explains the cause or reason. Step 3: Since the hard work occurred before the moment of recognition, past perfect is appropriate. Step 4: Form the past perfect of work hard: had worked hard. Step 5: Insert option D into the sentence: She deserved the accolades as she had worked hard for it. Step 6: Confirm that this version is grammatically correct and expresses the intended relation between effort and reward. Verification / Alternative check: Test the other options in context. She deserved the accolades as she hardly worked completely reverses the meaning and suggests she did almost no work, which conflicts with the idea of deserving praise. She had hard worked is not correct English word order and does not follow any standard pattern. She was working hard describes an ongoing action in the past but does not clearly mark it as completed before the recognition; it also sounds less natural in this cause and effect context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, hardly worked, is both grammatically correct and logically wrong here, as it implies lack of effort rather than effort. Option B, had hard worked, breaks natural collocation; the adverb hard must follow the verb worked, not stand between had and worked. Option C, was working hard, focuses on a continuous past action without indicating completion, which is weaker in a sentence that summarises a past achievement and its reward. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overlook the time relationship between clauses and select any past form that sounds familiar. A better approach is to ask whether the action in the blank clearly happened before the action in the main clause. If it did, past perfect is usually the best choice, especially in formal exam sentences. Practising with similar patterns, such as He succeeded because he had prepared well, will strengthen this understanding. Final Answer: had worked hard is the correct phrase to complete the sentence.

Question 6

Rearrange the following sentence parts to form a meaningful and emotionally complete sentence: "But the most important thing is, P – I will always be Q – even if we are apart R – with you."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This jumbled sentence question focuses on natural word order and meaning in a short, emotional statement. The speaker wants to emphasise that they will remain with someone in spirit, even if they are physically apart. The parts must be arranged so that the final sentence is grammatical and conveys this clear message. Given Data / Assumptions: - Fixed beginning: But the most important thing is, - Part P: I will always be - Part Q: even if we are apart - Part R: with you - Only one arrangement will produce a natural, meaningful sentence. Concept / Approach: In English, the normal order in such a sentence is subject, auxiliary, and complement, followed by an adverbial clause of condition or concession. The core declaration is I will always be with you. The clause even if we are apart is best placed at the end as a subordinate clause expressing the condition under which the main statement remains true. Therefore, the correct internal order after the introductory phrase is P then R then Q, yielding the sequence PQR. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main clause in the jumbled parts: I will always be with you. Step 2: This core statement requires combining P (I will always be) with R (with you). Step 3: Place P immediately after the introductory phrase: But the most important thing is, I will always be. Step 4: Follow with R to complete the main idea: But the most important thing is, I will always be with you. Step 5: Add Q at the end as a concessive clause: even if we are apart. Step 6: The full sentence is: But the most important thing is, I will always be with you even if we are apart. Step 7: This order corresponds to option C, PQR. Verification / Alternative check: Read the completed sentence and check for naturalness and clarity. It expresses a clear emotional assurance and has correct clause order. If you try QPR, you get even if we are apart I will always be with you, which breaks the intended rhythm after the introductory phrase. Other orders such as RPQ or RQP either start with with you or place the conditional clause in illogical positions, resulting in awkward or incomplete sequences. Why Other Options Are Wrong: QPR begins directly with a subordinate clause, even if we are apart, which might stand alone but does not fit smoothly immediately after the phrase But the most important thing is. RPQ starting with with you leaves the subject I hidden until later, making the sentence temporarily confusing. RQP similarly misplaces the prepositional phrase and conditional clause and does not create a natural flow. Common Pitfalls: Many learners focus only on local connections, such as joining apart with with you, without considering where the main clause should appear. A good tactic is to first construct a simple main sentence, then add extra parts like conditions or reasons around it. Here, identifying the central message I will always be with you allows you to place even if we are apart correctly as supporting information. Final Answer: PQR is the correct order of the parts and forms a clear, meaningful sentence.

Question 7

Improve the bracketed verb phrase in the following sentence by choosing the most appropriate option: "The passengers (were waited) for the flight at the emigration lobby, for long."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests correct use of verb forms and aspects in English, especially the distinction between active and passive structures and between simple and continuous tenses. The sentence describes passengers spending a considerable period in the emigration lobby while waiting for a flight. The bracketed phrase were waited is ungrammatical and must be replaced with a natural and accurate verb phrase. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: The passengers (were waited) for the flight at the emigration lobby, for long. - Subject: the passengers, who are the ones doing the waiting. - The context suggests an action that continued over a period of time in the recent past. - The bracketed phrase must be in the active voice, not passive. Concept / Approach: Passengers wait for flights, so the verb should be active, not passive. The phrase were waited incorrectly suggests that someone else was waiting for the passengers, which is not the intended meaning. To express an action that started in the past and continued for a noticeable duration up to a recent point, present perfect continuous, have been waiting, is appropriate, especially in descriptive contexts. The correct structure is therefore The passengers have been waiting for the flight at the emigration lobby for long. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the doer of the action. The passengers are the ones performing the action of waiting. Step 2: Recognise that were waited is a passive construction and does not fit the meaning. Step 3: Decide that the verb must be in active voice, with passengers as the subject performing the action. Step 4: Because the action lasted for quite some time, choose a continuous form, and since it relates to a recent time frame, use present perfect continuous: have been waiting. Step 5: Insert have been waiting into the sentence: The passengers have been waiting for the flight at the emigration lobby, for long. Step 6: Confirm that this version now correctly reflects an ongoing action and is grammatically well formed. Verification / Alternative check: Test the other options. had wait does not follow any correct English pattern because the verb after had should be in past participle form, not base form. had been waited is a passive past perfect continuous form and still wrongly suggests that another agent has been waiting for the passengers. no improvement would keep the incorrect phrase were waited, which is unacceptable. Only have been waiting gives the correct active and continuous sense. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, had wait, breaks basic rules for auxiliary verbs and verb forms. Option B, had been waited, maintains the incorrect passive pattern and even changes the tense without necessity. Option D, no improvement, ignores the clear grammar error in the phrase were waited. These options either introduce new errors or fail to correct the original one. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overuse passive forms or mix forms like had been with an incorrect main verb, hoping that a longer structure is automatically more correct. A better strategy is first to determine who performs the action and then select an appropriate tense and aspect based on the time relationship in the sentence. In many real life descriptions of ongoing waiting, present perfect continuous is a very natural choice. Final Answer: have been waiting is the correct improvement of the bracketed verb phrase.

Question 8

Change the following direct speech sentence into indirect (reported) speech: Geetal said, "I bought a Honda City yesterday."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests reported speech, specifically the conversion of a simple past tense statement with a time reference, yesterday, into indirect speech. The original sentence has Geetal as the speaker, I as the first person pronoun inside the quote, and a specific time marker that shifts in indirect speech. The correct answer must handle the change of pronoun, tense, and time expression while keeping the meaning intact. Given Data / Assumptions: - Direct speech: Geetal said, "I bought a Honda City yesterday." - Reporting verb: said, in the past tense. - Reported clause verb: bought (simple past). - Time expression: yesterday, which must be adjusted in indirect speech. Concept / Approach: When the reporting verb is in the past, English usually moves the tense in the reported clause one step back: simple past becomes past perfect. In addition, first person pronouns inside the quote must be changed to match the subject of the reporting clause. Here, I becomes she, referring to Geetal. Time adverbials like yesterday change to the previous day or the day before in indirect speech to keep reference clear. The resulting structure is Geetal said that she had bought a Honda City the previous day. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Replace the quotation structure with a that clause after said: Geetal said that. Step 2: Change the pronoun I to she to reflect that Geetal is speaking about herself. Step 3: Backshift the verb from simple past bought to past perfect had bought, because the reporting verb is in past tense. Step 4: Replace the time word yesterday with the previous day to fit indirect speech conventions. Step 5: Combine all parts: Geetal said that she had bought a Honda City the previous day. Step 6: Confirm that this matches option D exactly. Verification / Alternative check: Check whether the final reported sentence accurately reflects the original meaning: at some time one day before the day of speaking, Geetal purchased a Honda City. The backshifted tense and changed time expression preserve this meaning in a grammatically acceptable indirect speech form. This is the pattern that competitive exams expect for such transformations. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A uses I have bought, which wrongly keeps I and uses present perfect instead of past perfect, and still contains yesterday, which is not normally retained in reported speech. Option B introduces told me, adding a listener not mentioned in the original sentence, and keeps yesterday unchanged. Option C omits that, which is not a serious error, but more importantly it lacks that after said in a formal exam pattern and does not fully mirror the standard expected transformation, although its core structure is close. Option D, however, is the most complete and formally correct answer. Common Pitfalls: Students often forget to adjust time adverbials or pronouns and may only change the verb tense. Others insert additional objects like told me without evidence from the original sentence. A useful revision technique is to memorise common change pairs, such as yesterday to the previous day and I to he or she depending on the speaker, and then apply them systematically whenever converting direct to indirect speech. Final Answer: Geetal said that she had bought a Honda City the previous day. is the correct indirect speech form.

Question 9

Select the synonym, that is, the word closest in meaning to "deprive", from the options given below.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests understanding of the verb deprive. To deprive someone of something means to take it away from them or prevent them from having it. The correct synonym must express this idea of removal or loss, not giving or adding. Recognising this helps in reading legal, social, and literary texts where such verbs are commonly used. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target verb: deprive. - Options: bestow, confer, dispossess, endow. - Only one option should express the idea of taking something away or denying it. Concept / Approach: Dispossess means to deprive someone of land, property, or other possessions. It aligns directly with the notion of taking away something that someone previously had. The other options move in the opposite direction: bestow, confer, and endow all mean to give or grant something. Therefore, dispossess is the only option that matches the core meaning of deprive. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that deprive is used in sentences like The new law will deprive people of their rights. Step 2: Examine dispossess, which is used in contexts such as The tenants were dispossessed of their homes, meaning their homes were taken away. Step 3: Check bestow, which means to give an honour or gift, such as bestow an award. Step 4: Consider confer, which means to grant a degree, title, or right. Step 5: Look at endow, which means to provide with a quality, resource, or income. Step 6: Notice that bestow, confer, and endow are all about giving, while dispossess is about taking away. Verification / Alternative check: Substitute each option into example sentences. The government decided to dispossess the illegal occupants matches the idea of depriving them of property. The government decided to bestow the illegal occupants does not make sense and reverses the direction of action. Similar problems appear with confer and endow. These checks confirm that dispossess is the only viable synonym for deprive in a negative, removal sense. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bestow expresses the act of giving something valuable, usually honour or gifts, so it is conceptually opposite to deprive. Confer means to grant something like a degree or status. Endow involves providing someone or something with a quality or resource, often in a permanent way, such as endowing a college with funds. All of these verbs imply adding to someone's possession rather than removing it. Common Pitfalls: Some learners pay attention only to the general context of importance or value and ignore the direction of action, picking any formal sounding verb. A more precise approach is to ask whether the verb involves giving or taking. Deprive and dispossess both involve removing or withholding, while bestow, confer, and endow involve giving. Keeping such pairs in mind will help in both synonym and antonym questions. Final Answer: dispossess is the correct synonym of deprive.

Question 10

In the following idiom and phrase question, select the option that best expresses the meaning of the word "Scapegoat".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This idiom question focuses on the word scapegoat, which has a specific figurative meaning in modern English. While the word has religious and historical origins, in everyday usage it refers to a person who is unfairly blamed for problems or failures that are actually the responsibility of others. Understanding this meaning helps in reading news reports, office stories, and political commentary. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Scapegoat. - Options describe various possible roles of a person or animal. - The correct option must match the modern idiomatic meaning. Concept / Approach: In present day usage, a scapegoat is a person who is made to bear the blame for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others, often to protect more powerful or guilty individuals. This sense developed from an older religious ritual, but in exams the focus is on the general meaning, not the ritual itself. The correct option is the one that explicitly states that someone is blamed for the mistakes of others. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall common usage, such as The intern became the scapegoat for the management's poor decisions. Step 2: Read option D: A person who is blamed for the mistakes of others. This matches the remembered usage exactly. Step 3: Examine option A, which refers to an animal sacrifice as an offering to God. This describes a religious ritual but not the modern everyday idiom. Step 4: Consider option B, the most useful animal or person. This has a positive sense and does not involve blame. Step 5: Check option C, a lucky person who is forgiven for his crimes, which again misinterprets the idea, focusing on forgiveness rather than unjust blame. Step 6: Conclude that option D is the only one consistent with contemporary idiomatic meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Try replacing scapegoat with each option in a typical sentence, for example, In the scandal, the junior officer was used as a scapegoat. If we replace it with option D, we get The junior officer was used as a person who is blamed for the mistakes of others, which preserves the sense. Using options A, B, or C leads to either religious or positive interpretations that do not match the original, confirming that they are incorrect. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A refers to historical practice but does not represent the way the word is normally used in everyday English now. Option B imagines a most useful person or animal, which contradicts the negative and unfair nature of blame in scapegoating. Option C mentions forgiveness and luck, which again miss the central idea of unjustly taking the blame for others. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates are distracted by the original religious meaning or assume that questions with animal related words must be about literal animals. It is important in idiom questions to focus on current figurative meanings, which are revealed by how the word appears in newspapers and conversation. Remembering a few examples of scapegoat being used to describe unfair blame will stop you from choosing answers that only hint at its historical origin. Final Answer: A person who is blamed for the mistakes of others is the correct meaning of scapegoat in modern English.

Question 11

Complete the following idiom by choosing the correct word: "Let the cat out of the ______."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of a very common English idiom: let the cat out of the bag. Idioms are fixed expressions whose words usually cannot be changed without losing the established meaning. Here, you must know which noun completes the expression so that it retains its accepted figurative sense, which is to reveal a secret. Given Data / Assumptions: - Incomplete idiom: Let the cat out of the ______. - Options: house, well, bag, cart. - Only one noun forms a standard, widely recognised idiom in English. Concept / Approach: The complete idiom is let the cat out of the bag, which means to reveal a secret, often by mistake. It does not literally refer to cats or bags in most contexts, but rather to information being released. Therefore, the correct word to fill the blank is bag. Tried with house, well, or cart, the phrase loses its idiomatic identity and becomes either nonsensical or merely literal, which is not what idiom questions are testing. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the fixed phrase from everyday usage: Someone let the cat out of the bag about the surprise party. Step 2: Compare each option. Let the cat out of the bag matches the remembered expression exactly. Step 3: Try house: Let the cat out of the house simply describes a physical action, not an idiom about secrets. Step 4: Try well: Let the cat out of the well sounds odd and has no recognised figurative meaning. Step 5: Try cart: Let the cat out of the cart is also not an established phrase in English. Step 6: Conclude that bag is the only option that completes the idiom correctly. Verification / Alternative check: Consider how people explain the idiom in dictionaries or language guides. It is always presented as let the cat out of the bag, meaning reveal a secret, usually accidentally. This consistent form confirms that bag is the required noun. In exam situations, you can also recall whether you have seen the complete phrase previously in books, subtitles, or conversations; if so, that remembered version is almost always the correct one. Why Other Options Are Wrong: House, well, and cart are perfectly valid nouns, but they do not combine with let the cat out of the in any idiomatic or widely accepted way. Using them changes the phrase into an ordinary literal description instead of an idiom about secrets, and such changes defeat the purpose of the question, which is to test knowledge of fixed expressions. Common Pitfalls: Some learners overthink idiom completion questions and try to create novel images, imagining that a cat might be stuck in a well or a cart. However, idioms are conventional, not creative, in exam contexts. The safest strategy is to memorise common idioms and recall them exactly, without trying to invent new versions. This prevents you from being distracted by options that seem imaginative but are not standard English. Final Answer: bag is the correct word, giving the complete idiom let the cat out of the bag.

Question 12

In the passage about guru dakshina, choose the correct word to complete the blank in the sentence: "The ______________ of gurudakshina is very ancient and it is unique to the Indian culture and tradition."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze test item belongs to a passage discussing the idea of guru dakshina in Indian culture. The blank appears before the phrase of gurudakshina and describes something that is ancient and deeply rooted in tradition. The correct answer must be a noun that naturally combines with of and refers to an idea or principle rather than a simple habit or viewpoint. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence fragment: The ______________ of gurudakshina is very ancient and it is unique to the Indian culture and tradition. - Options: habit, approach, perception, concept. - Gurudakshina refers to the traditional offering made by a student to a guru. Concept / Approach: The noun that best introduces an abstract practice as something that belongs to a culture is concept. The concept of gurudakshina is a standard phrase in discussions of Indian educational and spiritual traditions. Habit normally refers to a repeated personal behaviour, approach refers to a method, and perception refers to a way of seeing or understanding, none of which fit as smoothly with of gurudakshina in this cultural context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the phrase structure: The ______ of gurudakshina. Step 2: Recall typical collocations. We commonly say the concept of, the idea of, or the practice of when referring to culturally significant traditions. Step 3: Check option D, concept, in the full sentence: The concept of gurudakshina is very ancient and it is unique to the Indian culture and tradition. This sounds natural and accurate. Step 4: Try option A, habit: The habit of gurudakshina suggests a personal routine, which is too narrow and does not match the cultural and spiritual depth implied. Step 5: Try option B, approach: The approach of gurudakshina is awkward and does not match normal usage. Step 6: Try option C, perception, which focuses on mental viewpoints rather than a tradition itself. Step 7: Conclude that concept is the best fit for both grammar and meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Consider how similar passages in books and essays describe cultural practices. Authors often write about the concept of dharma, the concept of karma, or the concept of namaste. The pattern of the concept of followed by a culturally important term is very common. Applying the same pattern to gurudakshina produces a fluent and idiomatic sentence that would be expected in a reading comprehension passage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Habit implies an individual's repeated action, such as the habit of waking up early, and lacks the cultural and philosophical weight that guru dakshina carries. Approach usually describes a method or strategy, for example a scientific approach, not a ritualised offering. Perception is about how something is seen or understood, rather than about the practice itself. These words therefore do not capture the intended cultural and conceptual nature of gurudakshina. Common Pitfalls: Because several of the options are abstract nouns, candidates may select them without considering collocation and context. A reliable strategy is to check whether the noun commonly appears with of plus an important cultural or philosophical term in reading materials. Concept is frequently used in this way, so it stands out as the most appropriate choice here. Final Answer: concept correctly completes the phrase The concept of gurudakshina is very ancient.

Question 13

In the same passage about guru dakshina, choose the correct word to complete the blank in the sentence: "The concept of gurudakshina is very ancient and it is ________________ to the Indian culture and tradition."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze question continues from the passage on guru dakshina and asks you to choose an adjective that describes how this concept relates to Indian culture and tradition. The passage suggests that gurudakshina is deeply characteristic of India and not shared in the same way by other cultures, so the correct word must reflect exclusive association. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence fragment: The concept of gurudakshina is very ancient and it is ________________ to the Indian culture and tradition. - Options: unique, rare, different, particular. - The blank describes the relationship between gurudakshina and Indian culture. Concept / Approach: The phrase unique to is a standard collocation used to indicate that something exists only in or is characteristic only of a particular place, group, or culture. Saying that the concept is unique to the Indian culture and tradition therefore means that this practice is distinctively Indian. Rare simply indicates low frequency, different expresses contrast without exclusivity, and particular is too vague without additional detail. Thus, unique is the most appropriate choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider the standard expression unique to, which is used widely in descriptive writing. Step 2: Insert option A into the sentence: it is unique to the Indian culture and tradition. This sounds fluent and meaningful. Step 3: Try option B: it is rare to the Indian culture and tradition. This is not a standard phrase and does not clearly state exclusivity. Step 4: Try option C: it is different to the Indian culture and tradition. This is grammatically awkward and does not describe a concept that belongs to that culture. Step 5: Try option D: it is particular to the Indian culture and tradition. Although particular to can sometimes be used, unique to is more natural and stronger in meaning. Step 6: Conclude that unique gives the best collocation and captures the intended idea. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine similar sentences you may have read in textbooks: Yoga is a practice unique to Indian tradition or This festival is unique to this region. The pattern unique to followed by a culture or region is familiar and idiomatic. In comparison, rare to or different to in such sentences would sound unusual or incorrect, which confirms that unique fits best in the passage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rare focuses on frequency and does not indicate that something belongs specifically to a culture. Gurudakshina is not just rare; it is characteristic of a tradition. Different simply suggests that one thing is not the same as another, but does not express the idea of being closely associated with a particular culture. Particular can sometimes mean specific, but particular to is weaker and less idiomatic than unique to in this context, and exam keys normally favour the more common collocation. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse rare with unique, assuming both mean special. However, rare means uncommon, while unique means one of a kind or exclusively associated. Keeping this distinction clear is important for reading and cloze tests. Paying attention to common phrases like unique to, endemic to, or typical of in reading practice will help in similar questions. Final Answer: unique correctly completes the sentence, giving the phrase it is unique to the Indian culture and tradition.

Question 14

In the same passage about guru dakshina, choose the correct word to complete the blank: "If you are absolutely ______________ about India, then it is advisable that you first try to understand the meaning of a guru."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze test item asks for a word that describes someone who lacks knowledge about India. The sentence suggests that such a person should first learn about the concept of a guru in order to understand guru dakshina. Thus, the correct answer must directly express ignorance or lack of knowledge, rather than general innocence or metaphorical blindness. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence fragment: If you are absolutely ______________ about India, then it is advisable that you first try to understand the meaning of a guru. - Options: unknowing, unknowledgeable, naive, blind to. - The blank describes the reader's level of knowledge about India. Concept / Approach: The adjective unknowledgeable directly indicates that a person does not know much about a subject. The preposition about naturally follows it, as in unknowledgeable about Indian culture. Unknowing is more literary and usually appears with of rather than about. Naive refers to lack of worldly experience and sophistication, not specifically lack of information. Blind to is a phrasal expression, but it suggests wilful ignorance or refusal to see, rather than simple lack of knowledge. Therefore, unknowledgeable is the best fit. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the phrase pattern in English: absolutely ______ about India. Step 2: Insert option B: absolutely unknowledgeable about India. This phrase is grammatically correct and clearly means lacking knowledge about India. Step 3: Try option A: absolutely unknowing about India. This sounds unusual; unknowing usually takes of and is less commonly used to describe factual ignorance in modern English. Step 4: Try option C: absolutely naive about India. Naive about can appear in usage, but naive focuses on innocence or lack of sophistication, which is not as precise as lacking knowledge. Step 5: Try option D: absolutely blind to India. This suggests deliberate refusal to notice or appreciate India, which does not match the explanatory tone of the passage. Step 6: Conclude that unknowledgeable most clearly and directly fits the context. Verification / Alternative check: Read the full sentence with the chosen option: If you are absolutely unknowledgeable about India, then it is advisable that you first try to understand the meaning of a guru. The sentence now clearly addresses readers who do not yet know much about India and offers them sensible advice. With naive, the focus subtly shifts from factual ignorance to general simplicity, which is not the main idea of the passage. With blind to, the tone becomes accusatory, suggesting unwillingness to see facts, which again does not match the teaching tone. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Unknowing is less natural with about and is often used of people who are unaware of specific actions or events, not entire countries or cultures. Naive is broader and refers to innocence or lack of sophistication, which may not describe someone who simply has not studied India yet. Blind to suggests that the person consciously ignores India or its culture, which is stronger and more negative than what the passage implies. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes choose words like naive because they have seen them used with about, without considering whether the nuance matches the passage. When answering cloze questions, it is important to check both grammatical fit and subtle meaning. Asking whether the author is criticising the reader or simply describing lack of information can guide you; here, the author is gently describing ignorance, so unknowledgeable is the most accurate match. Final Answer: unknowledgeable is the correct word to complete the sentence.

Question 15

In the following passage some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of the four alternatives. The ______________ of gurudakshina is very ancient and it is ________________ t…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is part of a passage-based cloze test that talks about the traditional Indian concept of gurudakshina and the role of a guru. The specific sentence you must complete is "the ________________ of his presence in the lives of those around him." The task is to choose the option that best expresses the idea of how important or meaningful the guru's presence is in people's lives. This tests your understanding of subtle differences in vocabulary and the ability to match words to context. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage discusses gurudakshina, Indian culture, and the idea of a guru as a spiritual guide. The incomplete phrase is "the ________________ of his presence in the lives of those around him". Options: connotation, implication, understanding, significance. We assume the writer wants to emphasise how important the guru's presence is. Concept / Approach: In this context, the passage is not asking about the hidden meaning of a word or a symbol, but about how meaningful or important the guru's presence is in people's lives. The most suitable word for this is "significance", which directly expresses importance or value. The other options look attractive but belong more to the field of meanings of words or logical consequences, not the value of someone's presence. The approach is to carefully match the nuance of each option to the idea of the influence or importance of a person's presence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the sentence: "… try to understand the meaning of a guru and the ________________ of his presence in the lives of those around him." Step 2: Notice that "meaning of a guru" is followed by a second phrase describing how important his presence is. Step 3: "Connotation" usually refers to the emotional or implied meaning of a word, not the importance of a person's presence. Step 4: "Implication" refers to something that is suggested or inferred, often in logic or argument, which does not fit well with presence. Step 5: "Understanding" suggests comprehension in the mind, but the sentence already speaks about "understand the meaning of a guru", so repeating the same idea sounds clumsy. Step 6: "Significance" clearly means the importance or meaningful impact of something, which matches "his presence in the lives of those around him". Step 7: Therefore, "significance" is the best and most natural choice. Verification / Alternative check: Re-read the full line with "significance": "… understand the meaning of a guru and the significance of his presence in the lives of those around him." This reads smoothly and logically: first we understand what a guru is, then we appreciate how significant his presence is. None of the other words can replace "significance" here without making the sentence awkward or slightly off in meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: connotation: Refers to the associated meaning of a word or phrase, not to the real-life importance of a person's presence. implication: Suggests a consequence or inference, often in arguments; it does not naturally collocate with "presence in the lives of those around him". understanding: Would create repetition and does not express importance; it refers to mental comprehension already mentioned earlier. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often confuse "connotation" and "implication" with any deeper meaning, but both are more technical and linked to language or logical consequences. In contrast, "significance" is the standard word used for importance or value of a person's role or presence. To avoid such mistakes, always read the entire sentence and see which word collocates naturally with the nouns around it—in this case, "presence in the lives of those around him". Final Answer: The blank should be filled with significance.

Question 16

In the following passage some of the words have been left out. Read the passage carefully and select the correct answer for the given blank out of the four alternatives. The ______________ of gurudakshina is very ancient and it is ________________ t…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze test question continues the same passage on gurudakshina and the traditional role of the guru in Indian culture. The line you must complete is "In ancient India, a teacher or a guru was a spiritually _____________ guide." The focus here is on finding an adjective that naturally describes a guru's level of spiritual development, fitting both grammar and meaning. This tests your sense of collocation and subtle vocabulary usage. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence describes a guru as a spiritual guide in ancient India. The blank is preceded by "spiritually" and followed by "guide". Options: enlarged, evolved, grown, enhanced. The idea is that the guru had a high level of spiritual development or maturity. Concept / Approach: When we talk about a person's spiritual state, we commonly use the expression "spiritually evolved" to mean advanced in spiritual growth, wisdom or enlightenment. This is a set phrase in English and religious or philosophical writing. Words like "enlarged", "grown" and "enhanced" do not fit naturally between "spiritually" and "guide" when describing a person. The approach is to identify which adjective collocates correctly with "spiritually" and makes sense in describing a guru as a developed spiritual teacher. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the target phrase: "a teacher or a guru was a spiritually _____________ guide." Step 2: Think about common expressions: people often talk about "spiritually evolved souls" or "a highly evolved spiritual master". Step 3: Test "enlarged": "spiritually enlarged guide" sounds odd; we enlarge objects or areas, not usually a person's spirituality. Step 4: Test "evolved": "spiritually evolved guide" sounds natural and widely used; it clearly conveys advanced spiritual development. Step 5: Test "grown": "spiritually grown guide" is grammatically possible but not idiomatic; we say "he has grown spiritually" rather than using "grown" as an adjective here. Step 6: Test "enhanced": "spiritually enhanced guide" also sounds technical or mechanical, as though spirituality were a feature on a device. Step 7: Conclude that "evolved" is the best-fitting and most idiomatic word. Verification / Alternative check: The phrase "spiritually evolved" appears frequently in spiritual discourses, books and lectures to describe gurus, sages and enlightened beings. It suggests that the person has progressed through inner growth and transformation. Re-reading the full sentence with "evolved"—"In ancient India, a teacher or a guru was a spiritually evolved guide"—shows that it is both grammatically smooth and semantically precise. No other option offers such a good fit. Why Other Options Are Wrong: enlarged: Typically used for physical size, pictures, or organs; "spiritually enlarged" is not a standard expression for a person. grown: While one can "grow spiritually", using "grown" directly as an adjective in this position is awkward and unidiomatic. enhanced: More suited to features, abilities, or products that are improved; it does not naturally describe a guru's spiritual state. Common Pitfalls: Students may be tempted by words that indicate improvement, such as "enhanced" or "grown", because they vaguely suggest development. However, English often uses specific fixed combinations, and "spiritually evolved" is a recognised collocation, especially in religious or philosophical contexts. Always consider not just the dictionary meaning of a word, but also how it commonly appears with other words in real usage. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with evolved, giving "a spiritually evolved guide".

Question 17

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word "REVILE".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of the word "revile", which often appears in newspapers, literature and exam passages. It is especially important in contexts where people speak harshly about others, for example in politics, social media, or criticism. You must select the option that is closest in meaning to "revile". Notice that several options look similar in spelling (revive, review, reveal), so this also tests your ability to distinguish words that share prefixes but have very different meanings. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: REVILE. Options: REVIVE, REVIEW, ABUSE, REVEAL. We must choose the synonym, that is, the word with a similar meaning. We assume standard dictionary meanings for all options. Concept / Approach: "Revile" means to speak about someone or something in an abusive, angry or insulting way. It implies strong verbal attacks and harsh criticism. The correct synonym should carry the idea of verbally abusing or insulting. Many of the options are distractors whose meanings are totally different but look similar because they begin with "re-". The safest approach is to recall or check the precise meaning of each option before deciding. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of "revile": to criticise in an abusive or insulting manner, often using harsh language. Step 2: Consider "REVIVE": this means to bring back to life, energy or consciousness, for example reviving a patient or reviving an old custom. It has nothing to do with verbal abuse. Step 3: Consider "REVIEW": this means to examine, assess or look over something again, such as reviewing a book or reviewing one's notes. Again, there is no sense of insult. Step 4: Consider "ABUSE": this can be a noun or verb meaning cruel, insulting or violent treatment, especially in words or actions. Verbal abuse exactly matches the idea of reviling someone. Step 5: Consider "REVEAL": this means to make known or show something that was hidden, as in revealing a secret. It involves disclosure, not insult. Step 6: Among the four options, only "ABUSE" carries the sense of harsh, insulting speech and therefore matches "revile". Verification / Alternative check: A dictionary definition of "revile" is "to assail with contemptuous or opprobrious language; to address or speak of abusively." Common example sentences include "He was reviled by the press for his remarks." If we replace "reviled" with "abused verbally", the meaning remains essentially the same. Trying to replace it with "revived", "reviewed" or "revealed" completely changes the meaning of such sentences, confirming that "ABUSE" is the only correct synonym here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: REVIVE: Means to bring back to life, energy, or activity; it has no relation to insulting language. REVIEW: Means to examine or evaluate, often in a neutral or analytical way, not to insult. REVEAL: Means to disclose or show; it does not mean to criticise abusively. Common Pitfalls: The main trap in this question is visual similarity. Many exam-takers quickly assume that similar-looking words have similar meanings. However, in English, the prefix "re-" can be attached to many roots with completely different meanings. To avoid such mistakes, always focus on the root meaning of the word and recall example sentences where you have seen it used. For "revile", thinking of "verbal abuse" is a helpful memory link. Final Answer: The word that best expresses the meaning of "REVILE" is ABUSE.

Question 18

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, choose the word which is opposite in meaning to the given word "SQUANDER".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your knowledge of antonyms. The key word is "squander", which is frequently used in discussions about money, time and resources. Knowing its opposite helps in understanding financial, social and even environmental texts where resource management is discussed. Your task is to pick the word that is opposite in meaning to "squander". Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: "SQUANDER". Options: SPEND, REDUCE, SLANDER, SKIMP. We must choose the antonym (opposite in meaning). We assume standard dictionary meanings for all options. Concept / Approach: "Squander" means to waste something, especially money, time or opportunity, in a careless, foolish or extravagant way. An antonym should express the idea of using resources carefully, sparingly or economically. It is not enough for the option to simply relate to money or action; it must reverse the wasteful aspect of squandering. The approach is to recall each option's core meaning and see which one emphasises saving or economising rather than wasting. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of "squander": to spend or use something wastefully and extravagantly, for example "squander money" or "squander an opportunity". Step 2: Examine "SPEND": this simply means to pay out money or use time. One can spend wisely or squander; spending itself is neutral, not the opposite of wasting. Step 3: Examine "REDUCE": this means to make something smaller in amount, degree, or size. While it can be used about expenses, it does not directly describe a careful attitude to resources. Step 4: Examine "SLANDER": this is a completely different word meaning to make false and damaging statements about someone; it has nothing to do with money or resources. Step 5: Examine "SKIMP": this means to use or give too little of something, to economise excessively, or to spend as little as possible. It clearly indicates using resources very sparingly. Step 6: Since "squander" means to waste extravagantly and "skimp" means to be extremely economical, they stand on opposite ends of the spending spectrum. Step 7: Conclude that "SKIMP" is the best antonym for "SQUANDER" among the given options. Verification / Alternative check: Consider the phrases "squander money" versus "skimp on expenses". The first suggests careless overspending, while the second suggests spending too little. In everyday language, if a person is criticised for squandering resources, the opposite praise would be for someone who does not waste resources and perhaps even cuts back too much, which is very close to skimping. This confirms that "skimp" functionally works as an antonym for "squander" in typical contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: SPEND: Neutral term; one can spend wisely or squander. It does not automatically imply careful or wasteful use, so it cannot be the opposite of squander. REDUCE: Simply means to lessen. It does not directly express an attitude of carefulness or thrift, and may be applied in many contexts unrelated to money. SLANDER: Unrelated in meaning, dealing with defamation and speech, not resources. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes pick "SPEND" because they remember the phrase "squander money" and think that "squander" is just a strong form of "spend". But squandering is specifically wasteful spending, so the opposite should stress saving or stinging use, not just the act of spending itself. Always pay attention to the emotional or evaluative tone of the key word when searching for an antonym. Final Answer: The word opposite in meaning to "SQUANDER" is SKIMP.

Question 19

Four words are given, out of which only one word is spelt correctly. Choose the correctly spelt word from the alternatives given.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions are a common feature of English language sections in competitive exams. They test your familiarity with standard written forms of words, especially those that have tricky vowel sequences or consonant clusters. In this question, you are asked to identify the correctly spelt word among four similar-looking options related to the word "sanctuary". Given Data / Assumptions: The instruction is to find the correctly spelt word. Options: Sanctaries, Sanctauries, Santuaries, Sanctuaries. All options appear to be plural forms of "sanctuary". We assume standard British/International English spelling. Concept / Approach: The singular word "sanctuary" (a safe place, especially for animals or worship) has the plural form "sanctuaries". The tricky part is the sequence of letters "ctu" and the vowel pattern "aries" at the end. Several wrong options deliberately alter these parts to confuse you. The logical approach is to recall the correct spelling of "sanctuary" and then apply the regular plural formation, changing "y" to "ies" after a consonant. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the singular form "sanctuary": s a n c t u a r y. Step 2: Form the plural of a noun ending in consonant + y by changing "y" to "ies": sanctuary → sanctuaries. Step 3: Check option D: "Sanctuaries". This matches the expected pattern: sanctu + aries. Step 4: Check option A: "Sanctaries". It drops the "u" after "ct", producing an incorrect form. Step 5: Check option B: "Sanctauries". Here, the order of vowels "u" and "a" is disturbed; correct spelling is "tua", not "tau". Step 6: Check option C: "Santuaries". This loses the "c" and changes "sanct" to "sant", again incorrect. Step 7: Conclude that only "Sanctuaries" is correctly spelt. Verification / Alternative check: In many contexts, for example wildlife sanctuaries and bird sanctuaries, you will see signs and articles using the spelling "sanctuaries". Dictionaries and spell-check tools recognise "sanctuaries" as the correct plural form and mark "Sanctaries", "Sanctauries" and "Santuaries" as errors. This cross-check confirms that option D is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sanctaries: Missing the letter "u" after "ct"; correct cluster is "ctu". Sanctauries: Uses "tau" instead of the correct "tua", distorting the base word "sanctuary". Santuaries: Drops the "c", changing "sanct" to "sant"; this no longer reflects the original word. Common Pitfalls: Learners often rely on approximate sound when choosing spellings, but English orthography is not strictly phonetic. In "sanctuary", the "ctu" combination is easy to mis-hear and miswrite, leading to forms like "santuary" or "sanctary". To avoid such mistakes, mentally break the word into meaningful parts: "sanct" (holy) + "uary". Once you know the correct singular, applying standard plural rules becomes straightforward. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Sanctuaries.

Question 20

In the following question, one part of the sentence may have an error. Find out which part of the sentence has an error and select the option corresponding to it. If the sentence is free from error, select "No error". Sentence: "He had already sent …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Error-spotting questions test your grasp of grammar and standard English usage. This sentence deals with a common structure involving verbs of communication ("sent") followed by indirect objects and direct objects ("me a message"). It checks whether you know when to use articles such as "a" before singular countable nouns. Recognising missing articles is a frequent source of marks in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into parts: (A) He had already sent me message (B) that his arrival (C) was scheduled for Thursday (D) No error. We must identify which part contains the grammatical error. "Message" is a singular countable noun. Concept / Approach: In English, singular countable nouns generally require an article (a, an, the) or another determiner (my, his, some, etc.). The structure "send someone a message" is standard: subject + sent + indirect object + direct object. The phrase "sent me message" is missing the article "a". The other parts of the sentence are grammatically acceptable: "that his arrival" correctly introduces a clause, and "was scheduled for Thursday" is properly formed. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (A): "He had already sent me message". Step 2: Identify the pattern: "sent me message" should be "sent me a message", since "message" is a singular countable noun. Step 3: Recognise that the article "a" is missing before "message", making part (A) ungrammatical. Step 4: Examine part (B): "that his arrival". This correctly introduces a noun clause: "that his arrival was scheduled for Thursday". Step 5: Examine part (C): "was scheduled for Thursday." This is a correct passive construction in the past tense. Step 6: Since parts (B) and (C) are fine, and (D) "No error" conflicts with the error found in (A), the only incorrect segment must be (A). Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence correctly: "He had already sent me a message that his arrival was scheduled for Thursday." This now sounds natural and grammatically correct. Another acceptable way to express the same idea would be "He had already sent me a message informing me that his arrival was scheduled for Thursday." In all such versions, the article "a" before "message" is necessary. None of the other parts require change, confirming that only part (A) has the error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B (that his arrival): This correctly introduces a clause specifying the content of the message. C (was scheduled for Thursday): Proper passive structure indicating a scheduled event; no error here. D (No error): Incorrect because we have already identified a definite error in part (A), so the sentence is not error-free. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overlook missing articles because they focus mainly on verb forms and tenses. Another common mistake is to think that the indirect object ("me") makes an article unnecessary for the direct object ("message"), which is not true for singular countable nouns. To improve, pay attention to patterns like "give me a book", "send her a letter", "offer us an opportunity" and apply them consistently. Final Answer: The error is in part (A), which should read "He had already sent me a message".

English Questions