Question 1

In the cloze test based on the novel “War and Peace”, choose the word that best completes the sentence: “The _____ of war, however, is _____ to the story of family existence …”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is part of a passage describing “War and Peace”, the famous novel by Leo Tolstoy. The passage explains that the book is a detailed study of Russian society and that the war serves a particular role in relation to the family stories. The blank asks for a noun that logically fits in the phrase “The _____ of war, however, is _____ to the story of family existence”. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage talks about an “epic historical novel” and mentions its treatment of war and family life. The blank is in the phrase “The _____ of war, however, is _____ to the story …”. Options are: case, prisoner, perperator, and theme. We must pick the word that naturally combines with “of war” in this literary context. Concept / Approach: In literary criticism, when we talk about the main subject or idea running through a work, we use the word “theme”. Expressions like “the theme of war”, “the theme of love”, or “the theme of sacrifice” are very common. The other options do not collocate well with “of war” in this context. “Case of war” does not sound natural here, “prisoner of war” is a fixed phrase but refers to a person, and “perperator” is a misspelt form of “perpetrator” and does not fit the meaning. Therefore, the correct word should be “theme”. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Observe the grammatical structure: “The _____ of war, however, is …” which calls for a singular noun. Step 2: Consider common academic phrases: “theme of war” is a standard expression in literature discussions. Step 3: Check Option D: “theme”. The phrase “the theme of war” is meaningful and matches the context of literary analysis. Step 4: Check Option A: “case”. “The case of war” is vague and not typically used in this type of description. Step 5: Check Options B and C, which relate to war in different ways but not in this abstract, literary sense. They do not fit well with “is _____ to the story of family existence”. Verification / Alternative check: Reading the full sentence with “theme” gives: “The theme of war, however, is _____ to the story of family existence which involves Tolstoy's optimistic belief in the life asserting power of human existence.” This is a natural and coherent description: war is a theme that is secondary to or woven into family stories. No other option creates such a smooth and meaningful sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: “case” does not clearly convey any literary idea and feels out of place. Option B: “prisoner” would form the phrase “the prisoner of war”, which refers to people captured in war, not a concept in a novel. Option C: “perperator” is not even the correct spelling of “perpetrator”, and even if corrected, “the perpetrator of war” would refer to someone causing war, which does not fit the sentence structure. Common Pitfalls: Students may attempt to force familiar phrases like “prisoner of war” into the blank without checking whether the rest of the sentence makes sense. It is important to look at the complete sentence and the overall topic. Since the passage is about a novel and its detailed study of society, the vocabulary is that of literary analysis, where words like “theme”, “plot”, and “character” are common. Final Answer: The phrase that best fits the literary context is theme, so the correct answer is “The theme of war, however, is …”.

Question 2

From the passage on Mahatma Gandhi, choose the option that best answers the question: “Which of the following can help one to ‘take on’ an empire?”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a passage describing Mahatma Gandhi and his leadership of the Indian independence movement. The passage emphasises his non violent methods and moral strength. It states that Gandhi showed the world that a single person could challenge a powerful empire with certain qualities. The phrase “take on an empire” means to oppose and confront a mighty colonial power. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage calls Gandhi a peaceful political dissident. It mentions that he faced down British colonialists with stirring speeches and non violent protest. It notes that he proved one person can take on an empire using both ethics and intelligence. The question asks what can help one take on an empire, according to this passage. Concept / Approach: To answer correctly, we must focus on the exact qualities the passage highlights as Gandhi's tools against the empire. While he did speak and protest, the core message is that he used ethics and intelligence rather than violence or power. The answer should therefore mention both moral and intellectual strength, not just oratory skills or gentle speech. We must select the option that captures this combined idea accurately. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the key line from the passage which states that Gandhi showed how one person can take on an empire using ethics and intelligence. Step 2: Compare this idea with Option A, “By acting ethically and intelligently.” This directly matches the qualities mentioned in the passage. Step 3: Consider Option B, which suggests using violence. This contradicts the passage, which constantly describes Gandhi as non violent. Step 4: Consider Option C, “By being a good orator.” While Gandhi was a powerful speaker, the passage states that more than anything else, he used ethics and intelligence, not just speeches. Step 5: Consider Option D, “By speaking softly.” The passage does mention that he spoke softly, but it emphasises that the real power came from his values and thinking, not simply the volume of his voice. Verification / Alternative check: If we read the passage again, the narrator praises Gandhi as someone who proved that an empire can be challenged through moral and intellectual strength. It describes his non cooperation movement and his willingness to suffer in prison, all guided by ethical beliefs rather than hatred or aggression. This confirms that ethics and intelligence are central to his method, making Option A the best summary of what can help someone take on an empire. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: Advocating violence is completely opposite to Gandhi's philosophy of non violence and therefore cannot be correct. Option C: Being a good orator is only a part of his influence and does not fully capture how he confronted the empire. Option D: Speaking softly is mentioned, but it is not the main factor that allowed him to challenge colonial power. Common Pitfalls: Some students may focus on surface details like “stirring speeches” and choose the option about being a good orator. Others might misunderstand “take on an empire” as requiring violence. The passage clearly suggests a different model of leadership based on moral courage and clear thinking. Always look for statements in the passage that directly answer the question instead of relying on general knowledge or assumptions. Final Answer: According to the passage, the way to “take on” an empire is through the combination of moral values and clear thought. Hence, the correct answer is By acting ethically and intelligently.

Question 3

In this one word substitution question, select the term that means “delusion of suffering from a disease”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests knowledge of medical or psychological one word substitutions that end with “mania”. Such words usually refer to abnormal obsessions or delusions. The phrase in the question is “delusion of suffering from a disease”, which points to an unreasonable and persistent belief of being ill even without real medical evidence. Given Data / Assumptions: The description is about a delusion related to disease. All options end with “mania”, meaning an abnormal obsession or mental condition. The prefixes differ: “Lype”, “Noso”, “Naruo”, and “Phago”. We must choose the word that clearly connects to disease. Concept / Approach: In such technical vocabulary, Greek or Latin roots help identify the meaning. The root “noso” or “nos” refers to disease, as seen in words like “nosology” (study of diseases). Therefore, “nosomania” refers to an obsession or delusion about disease. The other prefixes relate to different ideas: “lype” is linked with sorrow, and “phago” is linked with eating. So, the correct word must be “Nosomania”. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key idea: the delusion of suffering from a disease. Step 2: Recall that “noso” is a root that means disease. Step 3: Connect “noso” with “mania”. The resulting word “Nosomania” refers to an abnormal obsession with disease. Step 4: Compare with other options: “Lypemania” relates to extreme sadness, “Phagomania” to obsession with eating, and “Naruomania” does not correspond to any standard known root linked to disease. Step 5: Conclude that Option B is the only term that logically and etymologically matches the definition. Verification / Alternative check: You can cross check the meaning of “Nosomania” in a medical or psychological dictionary. It will be defined as a morbid obsession with disease or a delusion that one is constantly ill. This meaning fits exactly with the phrase given in the question. None of the other options match this idea when checked against reliable sources. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: “Lypemania” is related to excessive sadness or melancholy and is not directly connected with fear of illness. Option C: “Naruomania” does not have a recognised meaning in standard English medical vocabulary. Option D: “Phagomania” describes an abnormal craving for eating or food, not a delusion about disease. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose answers by guessing from the sound of the word without understanding the roots. Learning basic Greek and Latin roots such as “noso” for disease, “cardio” for heart, and “phago” for eating can greatly improve accuracy in such questions. Also, remember that “mania” on its own only indicates obsession; the root before it decides the specific type of obsession. Final Answer: The correct one word substitution for “delusion of suffering from a disease” is Nosomania.

Question 4

In the passage about truth and moral principles, choose the word that best completes the sentence: “Truth is indeed a controversial aspect of ______.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze test question comes from a passage discussing truth, moral principles, and the right to know. The first sentence states that truth is a controversial aspect of something, and we must decide which abstract noun makes the best sense. The topic clearly belongs to the field of ethics and moral philosophy. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is “Truth is indeed a controversial aspect of ______.” The passage then talks about moral principles, feelings for others, and rights to knowledge. Options given are: morality, ability, civility, and debility. We must choose the word that naturally connects with truth as a principle. Concept / Approach: The word “morality” refers to principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour. Discussions about whether one should always speak the truth, or whether truth should be withheld to avoid hurt, belong to moral philosophy. Therefore, it is natural to say that truth is a controversial aspect of morality. The other options relate to skill, politeness, or weakness, which do not fit the ethical focus of the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the central topic of the passage. It talks about speaking the truth, the moral basis for truth telling, and the right to know. Step 2: Connect this to a general area of study. These issues fall under moral philosophy or ethics, which are part of “morality”. Step 3: Insert Option A into the sentence: “Truth is indeed a controversial aspect of morality.” This sounds natural and meaningful. Step 4: Test Option B, “ability”. The sentence becomes “a controversial aspect of ability”, which does not convey a clear or relevant idea. Step 5: Test Options C and D, “civility” and “debility”. Neither word relates directly to moral questions about truth telling in the way the rest of the passage does. Verification / Alternative check: Read further sentences of the passage in your mind: it speaks about truth as a moral principle, about feeling for others, and about denying someone the knowledge they ought to have. All these are clearly moral issues, not issues of skill or physical weakness. That consistency across the passage supports “morality” as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: “ability” refers to competence or skill, and truth is not normally called an aspect of ability. Option C: “civility” means politeness and social courtesy, which is related to behaviour but is not the central focus of the passage. Option D: “debility” means physical or mental weakness, which does not fit the idea of discussing truth as a moral question. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students may focus only on the idea of “controversial” and choose words randomly, without reading the rest of the passage carefully. Cloze test blanks should always be answered by considering the entire paragraph, not just a single sentence. Identifying the general theme, such as morality, education, or economics, often makes the correct choice obvious. Final Answer: The word that best completes the sentence in the context of the passage is morality.

Question 5

Continuing the passage on truth and moral principles, choose the word that best completes the phrase: “amounts to ______ another soul of its right”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the same passage discussing truth, moral responsibility, and the right to know. The specific sentence says that keeping a person in the dark or denying them knowledge “amounts to ______ another soul of its right to know”. We must choose the verb that expresses the idea of taking away a rightful claim. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase is “amounts to ______ another soul of its right”. The context is that hiding truth from someone can be morally wrong. Options are: destroying, disturbing, sustaining, depriving. The missing word must mean taking away or denying a right. Concept / Approach: The standard expression in English is “to deprive someone of a right”, meaning to take that right away. The structure “depriving another soul of its right” is idiomatic and fits the idea that the person should have that knowledge but has been denied it. The other options do not fit as well with “of its right” and do not express the same sense of denial or removal. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the object phrase “another soul of its right”. This suggests that a right is being taken away. Step 2: Review common collocations in English such as “depriving someone of a right”, “destroying someone's right”, “disturbing someone's right”. Step 3: “Depriving” is the verb that naturally pairs with “of its right”, forming the phrase “depriving another soul of its right”. Step 4: Check the sentence with Option D inserted: “amounts to depriving another soul of its right to know that with which it has a connection”. This is meaningful and correct. Step 5: Notice that the other verbs either change the meaning or sound awkward: “destroying another soul of its right” is not idiomatic; “disturbing” or “sustaining” do not describe removal of a right. Verification / Alternative check: In legal and moral discussions, phrases like “depriving a citizen of rights” or “deprived of liberty” are standard. They always involve someone being denied something they are entitled to. The passage argues that withholding truth denies a person the knowledge they deserve, which matches the sense of “depriving”. This confirms that Option D is the correct and natural choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: “destroying” focuses on complete damage or ruin, and the phrase “destroying another soul of its right” is not a standard English expression. Option B: “disturbing” means upsetting or interrupting and does not involve removing a right. Option C: “sustaining” means supporting or maintaining, which is opposite to the idea of taking away a right. Common Pitfalls: Some students may select a verb that sounds intense, like “destroying”, without checking if it forms an idiomatic phrase with “of its right”. Whenever there is a pattern like “verb + someone + of + right”, “depriving” is usually the correct verb. Learning such collocations greatly helps in cloze tests and error spotting questions. Final Answer: Keeping someone in ignorance about a truth that concerns them “amounts to” depriving another soul of its right. Therefore, the correct answer is “depriving”.

Question 6

In the following Direct and Indirect speech question, select the option that correctly converts the sentence “He said to the principal, ‘I have made a mistake.’” into indirect speech.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks understanding of rules for changing direct speech into indirect speech in English. The original sentence reports what a person said to the principal about a mistake. We must preserve the sense while correctly shifting tense, pronouns, and removing quotation marks. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct speech: “He said to the principal, ‘I have made a mistake.’” Reporting verb: “said to”, which will usually become “told”. Reported clause: “I have made a mistake.” Speaker: “He”, and listener: “the principal”. Concept / Approach: When converting from direct to indirect speech with a past reporting verb like “said”, we normally backshift the tense in the reported clause. Present perfect (“have made”) changes to past perfect (“had made”). The pronoun “I” in the original refers to the subject “He”, so it must change to “he”. The phrase “said to the principal” changes to “told the principal”, followed by “that” introducing the reported clause. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Replace “said to the principal” with “told the principal”. Step 2: Introduce the reported clause with “that”. Step 3: Change the pronoun “I” to “he”, because the speaker is the same person as the subject “He”. Step 4: Backshift the tense from present perfect “have made” to past perfect “had made”. Step 5: Combine everything to get: “He told the principal that he had made a mistake.” This matches Option B. Verification / Alternative check: Check the standard rule: when the reporting verb is in the past tense, present perfect in the quoted speech becomes past perfect in indirect speech. Also, the content of the message stays the same: he is admitting a past mistake. There is no change in meaning, only in form. The resulting sentence is smooth and grammatically correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: “I have had made a mistake” is ungrammatical and keeps “I”, which does not match the subject in indirect speech. Option C: “He tells the principal that he has made a mistake.” uses present tense “tells” and “has made”, which does not correspond to the past reporting verb “said”. Option D: “He told the principal this that he has made a mistake.” is awkward, retains present perfect, and adds an unnecessary “this”. Common Pitfalls: Learners often forget to backshift the tense when the reporting verb is in the past, or they keep the pronoun “I” instead of converting it according to the subject in the reporting clause. Another issue is mixing tenses within the same sentence. For exam purposes, follow a clear sequence: adjust pronouns, then adjust tenses, then adjust time expressions if present. Final Answer: The correct indirect version is He told the principal that he had made a mistake.

Question 7

In the following sentence completion question, choose the word that best fits the blank: “As the improvement in his situation was ______________, the doctor did not discharge him.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests vocabulary and the ability to choose a word that fits both the grammar and meaning of a sentence. The sentence is about a patient's condition and the doctor's decision not to discharge him because the improvement was not good enough. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: “As the improvement in his situation was ______________, the doctor did not discharge him.” Options: marginal, tiny, microscopic, negated. The blank describes the level of improvement in the patient's situation. The doctor's decision suggests that the progress was slight or insufficient. Concept / Approach: We need an adjective that collocates well with “improvement” and expresses that the change was too small to be considered adequate. While “tiny” and “microscopic” both mean very small, “marginal improvement” is a standard phrase in medical, academic, and general contexts meaning only a slight or minimal positive change. “Negated” would mean cancelled or made zero, which does not fit smoothly as an adjective describing “improvement” in this structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the logic: because the improvement was not significant, the doctor did not discharge the patient. Step 2: Insert Option A: “marginal”. The sentence becomes “As the improvement in his situation was marginal, the doctor did not discharge him.” This is natural and idiomatic. Step 3: Insert Option B: “tiny”. While the general meaning is similar, the phrase “tiny improvement” is less common in formal reports compared to “marginal improvement”. Step 4: Insert Option C: “microscopic”. This sounds exaggerated and usually refers to things that literally require a microscope, so it is stylistically odd here. Step 5: Insert Option D: “negated”. The phrase “improvement was negated” would require a different sentence structure and suggests that any improvement was cancelled out, not that it was small. It does not fit the given sentence pattern. Verification / Alternative check: In medical and technical language, people commonly use “marginal improvement”, “significant improvement”, or “no improvement”. Among the options, “marginal” clearly fits this established pattern. Newspaper health reports and case studies also use this word frequently to signal slight progress, confirming our choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: “tiny” conveys small size but is more informal and less idiomatic with “improvement” in such a professional context. Option C: “microscopic” overstates the metaphor and is usually used in scientific discussions of very small physical objects. Option D: “negated” functions as a verb participle meaning cancelled; it does not sit well directly after “was” to describe “improvement” in this sentence. Common Pitfalls: Students may choose words purely based on similarity of meaning without considering collocation and register. Sentence completion questions are often about choosing the word that native or advanced speakers naturally use with a certain noun. Learning common combinations, such as “marginal improvement”, “substantial loss”, or “gross error”, is helpful for scoring well in such questions. Final Answer: The best word to fill the blank is marginal, giving “As the improvement in his situation was marginal, the doctor did not discharge him.”

Question 8

In this synonym question, select the option that is closest in meaning to the word “aground”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a synonym of the word “aground”. The term is often used in connection with ships or boats, but can also be used metaphorically. Understanding such words is useful in reading news reports, especially about accidents at sea or difficult situations. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: “aground”. Options: stranded, higher, afloat, buoyant. We must pick the word closest in meaning. No sentence is given, but the common maritime sense is assumed. Concept / Approach: “Aground” means that a ship or boat has run onto the shore or into shallow water and is stuck on the bottom, no longer freely floating. A general English synonym for this situation is “stranded”. When someone or something is stranded, it is left without the ability to move from its place or without help. The other options, such as “afloat” and “buoyant”, describe the opposite condition: staying above water or able to float. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the definition of “aground”: resting on the bottom or shore, unable to move in the water. Step 2: Examine Option A: “stranded”. This means stuck or left in a difficult position without the means to move, which matches the idea of a ship aground. Step 3: Examine Option B: “higher”. This is too general and does not relate to ships or being stuck. Step 4: Examine Option C: “afloat”. This actually means floating on the surface of water, which is the opposite of being aground. Step 5: Examine Option D: “buoyant”. This means able to float or cheerful, again opposite in sense to being stuck on the bottom. Verification / Alternative check: Think of a news headline such as “Cargo vessel runs aground near the harbour”. It could also be reported as “Cargo vessel stranded near the harbour”. Both descriptions show the ship stuck and unable to move. In contrast, a ship that is “afloat” is still on the water without touching the bottom. This comparison confirms that “stranded” is the closest synonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: “higher” has no specific connection to the state of a ship in water and is too vague. Option C: “afloat” is the opposite, indicating that something is freely floating on the water. Option D: “buoyant” describes the ability to float or a cheerful mood, again opposite to being stuck. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse directions and conditions, mistakenly thinking that “aground” refers to being above water in a positive way. It helps to remember that “ground” in the word points to the bottom or shore, suggesting contact with land rather than free movement in the water. Knowing basic maritime vocabulary like “afloat”, “aground”, and “adrift” can prevent such confusion. Final Answer: The synonym that best matches “aground” is stranded.

Question 9

Fill in the blank with the most appropriate word: “Corruption is an evil generally more ______ in the underdeveloped and developing countries of the world.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence completion question deals with the spread of corruption in different types of countries. The blank must be filled with an adjective that describes how widespread or common corruption is in underdeveloped and developing nations. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: “Corruption is an evil generally more ______ in the underdeveloped and developing countries of the world.” Options: reluctant, distant, rampant, extravagant. The context suggests that corruption is frequent or widely present. Concept / Approach: The adjective “rampant” is commonly used with negative phenomena such as corruption, disease, crime, or rumours. It means widespread, growing without control, or very common. The other choices do not express this idea. “Reluctant” means unwilling, “distant” means far away, and “extravagant” means spending too much or being showy. Thus, “rampant” fits both the meaning and typical collocation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand that the sentence is describing how common corruption is in certain countries. Step 2: Insert Option C: “rampant”. The sentence becomes “Corruption is an evil generally more rampant in the underdeveloped and developing countries of the world.” This is natural and meaningful. Step 3: Test Option A: “reluctant”. “More reluctant” describes people, not an evil like corruption. Step 4: Test Option B: “distant”. “More distant” refers to physical or emotional distance, which does not match “corruption”. Step 5: Test Option D: “extravagant”. “More extravagant” refers to spending habits or styles, not the frequency of corruption. Verification / Alternative check: Read the final sentence with “rampant” and compare it with common newspaper language. News reports often say “corruption is rampant”, “crime is rampant”, or “inflation is rampant”. This confirms that “rampant” is the correct collocation and appropriately captures the idea of an evil spreading freely without control. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: “reluctant” indicates unwillingness and is usually used for people, not an abstract evil like corruption. Option B: “distant” indicates separation or remoteness and does not go with corruption in this context. Option D: “extravagant” describes lavishness, which is not the intended sense here. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes get confused by attractive sounding adjectives without checking if they normally appear with the noun in question. Learning common adjective and noun pairs such as “rampant corruption”, “severe shortage”, or “acute crisis” helps in quickly identifying the correct answer in such questions. Final Answer: The correct word to complete the sentence is rampant.

Question 10

In the following antonym question, select the option that is opposite in meaning to the word “Sordid”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for an antonym, that is, a word opposite in meaning to “sordid”. The word appears frequently in descriptions of immoral or dirty situations, both physically and morally. Recognising it and its opposite helps in interpreting editorial language and literary passages. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: “sordid”. Options: Dirty, Black, Corrupt, Reputable. We must choose the word that expresses the opposite meaning. Concept / Approach: “Sordid” usually means morally dirty, shameful, or involving low motives, such as in the phrases “sordid affair” or “sordid motives”. It can also suggest physical filth, but the main sense in formal writing is moral ugliness. An antonym would therefore describe someone or something with a good name, honourable behaviour, or high moral standards. Among the options, “Reputable” means having a good reputation, which is the opposite of being sordid. The other words are either similar in meaning to sordid or unrelated. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define “sordid” as dirty, morally low, or shameful. Step 2: Identify which option has an opposite meaning. Step 3: Option D, “Reputable”, means respected, honourable, or of good reputation, which contrasts directly with the negative sense of “sordid”. Step 4: Option A, “Dirty”, is actually close in meaning to “sordid” rather than opposite. Step 5: Option C, “Corrupt”, again is similar to “sordid”, describing moral decay instead of opposing it. “Black” is too vague and does not clearly convey an opposite moral quality. Verification / Alternative check: Think of example sentences. A “sordid scandal” is something shameful and damaging. The opposite would be a “reputable record” or “reputable firm”, which suggests honesty and clean behaviour. No one would call a reputable organisation sordid, or vice versa. This contrast shows that “reputable” is a suitable antonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: “Dirty” describes physical or moral uncleanliness and is close to the meaning of “sordid”. Option B: “Black” can symbolise evil or darkness but is not a standard antonym here, and in some contexts it may even overlap with negative meanings. Option C: “Corrupt” also describes moral decay, which is again similar, not opposite. Common Pitfalls: When asked for an antonym, students sometimes mistakenly choose a synonym because they focus only on recognising the base word and latch onto the first similar option they see. Always remember to check whether the question demands “same meaning” (synonym) or “opposite meaning” (antonym). Here, only “reputable” reverses the moral sense of “sordid”. Final Answer: The word opposite in meaning to “sordid” is Reputable.

Question 11

In the following question, out of the given four alternatives, select the one word which is opposite in meaning to the word Relationship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The word Relationship is a very common English vocabulary item that appears frequently in competitive examinations. Questions that ask for the opposite in meaning, or antonym, test a learner's grasp of nuance in word meanings. In this question, the task is to choose the word that most clearly expresses an idea that is opposed to the meaning of Relationship, which usually refers to a connection, association, or bond between people, groups, ideas, or things. Given Data / Assumptions: The given word is Relationship. Four alternatives are provided: Affinity, Member, Leaning, and Opposition. The correct option must be opposite in meaning, not merely different. We assume standard dictionary meanings used in general English and competitive exams. Concept / Approach: To solve antonym questions, we first recall the core sense of the target word and then compare it to the meanings of the options. Relationship suggests a state in which two or more people or things are connected. An antonym will express a state where such a connection is absent, denied, or contradicted. We also have to ignore options that are simply related in topic but do not express an opposite idea. Therefore, we look for the choice that indicates separation, conflict, or lack of connection when compared to Relationship. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Relationship means a connection, association, or bond between people, things, or ideas. Step 2: Consider Affinity, which means a natural liking or attraction, and is actually a positive form of closeness or connection. Step 3: Consider Member, which simply refers to an individual belonging to a group and does not reverse the idea of Relationship. Step 4: Consider Leaning, which means a tendency or preference towards something and is again related to inclination, not the opposite of a bond. Step 5: Consider Opposition, which conveys resistance, hostility, or being against someone or something, and therefore reflects a conflicting or antagonistic position rather than a harmonious connection. Step 6: Conclude that Opposition best represents the opposite of a positive or neutral Relationship. Verification / Alternative check: If Relationship expresses being connected or aligned with someone or something, then its opposite should capture the idea of being in conflict or being set against that person or thing. Opposition clearly means resistance or disagreement. Affinity and Leaning both suggest closeness or attraction, which are actually related to Relationship in a positive sense rather than being opposites. Member is neutral and does not reverse the meaning. Therefore, Opposition remains the only truly opposite concept here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Affinity is wrong because it means a natural liking or sympathy, which reinforces the idea of closeness rather than opposing it. Member is wrong because it denotes a person belonging to a group, which is connected to the idea of a Relationship, but not its opposite. Leaning is wrong because it expresses a tendency or inclination toward something and again suggests some form of connection or preference, not opposition. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake in such questions is to choose a word that is simply not a synonym, instead of focusing on a true opposite. Another pitfall is to be distracted by words that often appear in similar contexts and assume that contextual association equals antonymy. Test takers may also rush past the subtle difference between absence of a relationship and presence of active resistance, but here the exam setter clearly intends a strong opposite sense, which is captured by Opposition. Final Answer: The word that is most opposite in meaning to Relationship is Opposition.

Question 12

Rearrange the parts of the sentence in the correct order to form a meaningful statement about the art of effective presentation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Rearrangement questions test a learner's understanding of sentence structure, logical flow, and coherence. In this question, three labeled parts of a sentence must be placed in the correct order to form a meaningful and grammatically correct statement about the art of effective presentation. Mastery of connectors, subject verb continuity, and clause order is essential for such items in English examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence begins with The art of. Part P: efforts and practice. Part Q: fruit of persistent. Part R: effective presentation is the. We must select the correct sequence from QPR, RPQ, RQP, or PRQ. Concept / Approach: A grammatically sound English sentence needs the subject, verb, and complement in a natural order. The phrase The art of must be followed by a noun phrase that names the art. The part that can complete The art of is effective presentation, so R is likely to come immediately after the introductory phrase. Next, we expect a verb phrase, is the fruit of persistent, followed by a complement like efforts and practice. We therefore look for a sequence that reads smoothly as ordinary English and conveys a logical idea about effort and practice leading to effective presentation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Attach R to the opening: The art of effective presentation is the. This gives a clear and grammatical subject phrase. Step 2: Try placing Q after R: The art of effective presentation is the fruit of persistent. This reads naturally and introduces a noun phrase that needs completion. Step 3: Complete the thought by placing P at the end: efforts and practice. The full sentence becomes: The art of effective presentation is the fruit of persistent efforts and practice. Step 4: Check the alternative sequences (QPR, RPQ, PRQ) and note that they either break the grammar or produce awkward, incomplete ideas. Step 5: Confirm that the correct logical and grammatical order is R Q P, which corresponds to option RQP. Verification / Alternative check: Reading the complete sentence aloud is a simple way to verify correctness: The art of effective presentation is the fruit of persistent efforts and practice. The subject is The art of effective presentation, the verb phrase is is the fruit of, and the final object phrase is persistent efforts and practice. This structure follows natural English word order and clearly expresses that effective presentation results from continued effort and practice, which confirms that RQP is the right sequence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: QPR would give The art of fruit of persistent efforts and practice effective presentation is the, which is grammatically broken. RPQ leads to The art of effective presentation is the efforts and practice fruit of persistent, which again disrupts normal word order. PRQ produces The art of efforts and practice fruit of persistent effective presentation is the, which is even more jumbled. None of these alternatives yields a correct or meaningful English sentence. Common Pitfalls: Many learners try to solve rearrangement questions only by looking at the first and last parts and guessing the rest. This can be risky. The better strategy is to identify which segment logically follows the introductory phrase and which sequence maintains subject verb agreement and natural collocations such as fruit of persistent efforts and practice. Ignoring these clues often leads to selecting a grammatically incorrect order. Careful reading and quick mental reassembly prevent such mistakes. Final Answer: The correct order of the parts is R Q P, so the correct option is RQP.

Question 13

A sentence has been given in the Active Voice. Out of the four given alternatives, select the option that correctly expresses the same sentence in the Passive Voice: The girl caught the kite.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Voice transformation is a core area of English grammar tested in many competitive exams. The question asks the learner to convert an active sentence into its correct passive form. The original sentence is in the simple past tense: The girl caught the kite. We must keep the meaning and tense the same while switching focus from the subject to the object in the passive construction. Given Data / Assumptions: Active sentence: The girl caught the kite. Subject: the girl. Verb: caught (simple past of catch). Object: the kite. We require a passive voice sentence that preserves simple past tense and meaning. Concept / Approach: The basic rule for converting active to passive in simple past tense is: object + was / were + past participle of main verb + by + subject. Here, the object the kite will become the new subject in the passive sentence. The auxiliary verb was is used with a singular subject in simple past passive, and the main verb catch must be used in its past participle form caught. Finally, the original subject the girl is introduced after by to complete the passive structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the object in the active sentence, which is the kite. Step 2: Bring the object to the front to serve as the new subject of the passive sentence: The kite. Step 3: Determine the correct auxiliary verb for simple past passive with a singular subject. This is was. Step 4: Use the past participle form of catch, which is caught, to build the passive verb phrase was caught. Step 5: Add the agent phrase by the girl to show who performed the action. Step 6: Combine all parts to get the passive sentence: The kite was caught by the girl. Verification / Alternative check: Check tense and meaning. The original simple past caught is reflected as was caught in the passive, which is correct. The doer of the action, the girl, remains present as the object of the preposition by. The sentence still describes the same event, only with the focus shifted to the kite. Hence, The kite was caught by the girl accurately mirrors the original sentence in passive voice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The kite is caught by the girl uses present tense is caught instead of past tense, so it does not match the original time reference. The kite was catch by the girl is grammatically incorrect because catch is not in past participle form. The kite is catch by the girl is wrong both in tense and in verb form. Therefore, all three alternatives are ungrammatical or mismatched in tense when compared with the source sentence. Common Pitfalls: Learners frequently forget to maintain the original tense when changing voice, or they confuse past and past participle forms, particularly with irregular verbs like catch. Another mistake is leaving out the preposition by before the agent, or rearranging the words so that the sentence no longer reads naturally. Focusing on the formula for passive construction and carefully checking tense and verb form helps avoid these errors. Final Answer: The correct passive form is The kite was caught by the girl.

Question 14

A sentence has been given in Direct Speech. Out of the four given alternatives, select the option that best expresses the same sentence in Indirect Speech: Tina said to him, "Please wait here till I return."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Reported speech or indirect speech questions test the learner's ability to convert a sentence from direct quotation form into a narrative form. This includes changes in pronouns, verb tenses, and time or place adverbs. In this item, Tina speaks politely using the word Please, which indicates a request. We must therefore preserve both the meaning and the sense of politeness while forming the correct indirect speech. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct speech: Tina said to him, "Please wait here till I return." Reporting verb: said to. Request marker: Please. Place adverb: here. Time clause: till I return. We assume the reporting verb is in past tense and that normal backshifting rules apply. Concept / Approach: When converting requests from direct to indirect speech, said to is usually replaced by requested or asked, depending on the tone. The word Please is dropped and the infinitive form to plus the base verb is used. Pronouns and adverbs change according to the new point of view: I becomes she because Tina is female, here becomes there because of the shift in reference point, and the present tense verb return is typically backshifted to returned in indirect speech introduced by a past reporting verb. The sentence must remain grammatically correct and preserve the polite request. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Replace said to with an appropriate reporting verb of request. Since the original uses Please, we choose requested. Step 2: Remove the quotation marks and the word Please, and introduce the infinitive phrase to wait. Step 3: Change the adverb here to there to reflect the indirect speaker's perspective. Step 4: Change the pronoun I to she, referring back to Tina. Step 5: Backshift the verb return to returned because the reporting verb is in the past tense. Step 6: Combine all elements to form: Tina requested him to wait there till she returned. Verification / Alternative check: The resulting sentence preserves the meaning of the original: Tina makes a polite request that he wait in the same place until she comes back. The reporting verb requested reflects politeness, the infinitive structure to wait is correct for a reported request, and all pronoun and adverb changes follow standard rules of reported speech. Tense backshift is also maintained. Therefore the sentence is a faithful and grammatically correct indirect version of the direct speech. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Tina asked him to stay there is incomplete because it omits the time condition till she returned. Tina request him to wait until she comes is ungrammatical because request should be requested and comes does not reflect correct backshift. Tina says he should wait there till her returned is wrong due to tense mismatch, incorrect pronoun her instead of she, and incorrect verb form returned in this position. Thus, these alternatives are not acceptable indirect speech transformations. Common Pitfalls: Students often forget to adjust adverbs like here, now, and today or to change pronouns according to the new subject. Another frequent error is neglecting tense backshift when the reporting verb is in the past. Finally, many learners keep the word Please inside indirect speech even though it should be replaced by a polite reporting verb such as requested. Reviewing these rules and practising several examples helps avoid such mistakes in exams. Final Answer: The correct indirect speech form is Tina requested him to wait there till she returned.

Question 15

In the following question, a word has been written in four different ways. Out of the given options, select the correctly spelt form of the word meaning a close bond or connection between people or organisations.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions in English tests check a learner's familiarity with commonly confused words, especially those borrowed from other languages. The word examined here is liaison, which is frequently used in formal and professional contexts to mean a link, coordination, or communication between individuals or groups. In such questions, three distractor options are given with small spelling changes that can confuse an unprepared candidate. Given Data / Assumptions: Four spelling variants are presented: Laison, Liaison, Lieison, and Liaisone. Only one represents the correct standard English spelling. The test follows standard British and international English usage. We assume the word refers to a person or activity that facilitates communication between parties. Concept / Approach: The word liaison comes from French and retains a somewhat unusual pattern of vowels. In standard English, the word is spelled liaison with the sequence l i a i s o n. The key is to remember that there are two consecutive vowel groups, ia and io, inside the word, and that it does not contain an additional final e. When dealing with such items, it helps to visualize the word as it appears in formal documents, news articles, and professional communication. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the common usage of the word as in liaison officer or to maintain liaison with clients. Step 2: Visualize the correct pattern of letters: l i a i s o n. Step 3: Examine option A, Laison, which omits one letter i and therefore does not match the standard pattern. Step 4: Examine option B, Liaison, which matches the remembered pattern exactly. Step 5: Examine option C, Lieison, where the vowel group e i is incorrect and differs from the established spelling. Step 6: Examine option D, Liaisone, which incorrectly adds an extra final e and does not correspond to the accepted spelling. Step 7: Conclude that Liaison is the only correctly spelt variant. Verification / Alternative check: A quick dictionary or memory check confirms that formal documents and reputable sources always use liaison when referring to a communications link or intermediary person. The double vowel pattern ia and io is typical of its French origin, and no extra letters are inserted at the end. This confirmation further supports the selection of Liaison as the correct spelling, while the other options are simply distractions created by rearranging or modifying the vowel cluster. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Laison is wrong because it drops the second i and so does not follow the original spelling. Lieison replaces the ia pattern with ei, which is not standard for this word. Liaisone adds an unnecessary final e, which is not present in the accepted English form. Each incorrect option shows a common type of spelling error: omission of a vowel, substitution of vowel sequence, or addition of an unnecessary letter. Common Pitfalls: Learners often confuse liaison with other words that use the pattern ea or ei and may assume that English does not use such a sequence as ia i in the middle of a word. Additionally, because the pronunciation of liaison may not clearly signal every vowel, some letters are easily forgotten. To avoid these mistakes, students should note that many French derived words keep unusual vowel arrangements and should be memorized as whole shapes rather than sounded out purely phonetically. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Liaison.

Question 16

In the following passage based question, select the correct form of the verb to complete the blank: The phrase consists usually of a few words which denote a single idea that ________ a separate part of a sentence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is drawn from a passage that explains the grammatical concept of a phrase. It asks the learner to select the correct form of the verb that best completes the sentence: The phrase consists usually of a few words which denote a single idea that ________ a separate part of a sentence. The focus is on subject verb agreement and on choosing the grammatically appropriate form for a relative clause in formal English. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence subject is a single idea that acts as a unit. The blank follows the clause a single idea that, which introduces a relative clause about the idea. The options are form, forms, formation, and forming. We assume standard present tense description in a general statement about grammar. Concept / Approach: In English, verbs must agree in number with their subjects. Here, the subject of the embedded clause is idea, which is singular. The relative pronoun that refers to this singular noun and therefore requires a singular verb. Among the options provided, forms is the singular present tense verb form that agrees with idea. The other options either reflect plural verb form or non finite or noun forms and cannot correctly complete a simple present tense statement defining a phrase. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the subject of the clause after that. It is the noun idea. Step 2: Note that idea is a singular noun, so any present tense verb that follows must also be singular for correct subject verb agreement. Step 3: Examine option A, form, which is the base or plural form and therefore does not agree with the singular subject idea in a simple present context. Step 4: Examine option B, forms, which is the third person singular present form and therefore agrees with the singular subject. Step 5: Examine option C, formation, which is a noun and cannot serve as a finite verb in this position. Step 6: Examine option D, forming, which is a present participle or gerund and would require an auxiliary verb to fit grammatically. Step 7: Conclude that forms is the only verb form that correctly completes the sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Read the full sentence with the chosen option: The phrase consists usually of a few words which denote a single idea that forms a separate part of a sentence. This reads smoothly and clearly, reflecting a general definition. Substituting any of the other options makes the sentence ungrammatical or awkward. For example, that form a separate part creates a number mismatch, while that formation or that forming a separate part distorts the structure of the clause. Hence, forms is verified as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Form is incorrect in this position because a singular subject like idea requires the singular verb forms, not the base form used with plural subjects or modal verbs. Formation is wrong because it is a noun and does not function as the predicate verb. Forming is wrong because, without an auxiliary such as is, it cannot serve as the main verb for the clause. Each of these wrongly changes either the grammatical function or breaks subject verb agreement within the sentence. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes focus only on the words closest to the blank and may mistakenly match the verb to words like words, which is plural, rather than to the correct subject idea. Another frequent mistake is choosing participle or noun forms simply because they sound similar. The best way to avoid such errors is to identify the true grammatical subject of the clause and always check number agreement and verb type before selecting an answer. Final Answer: The correct verb is forms, giving the sentence: a single idea that forms a separate part of a sentence.

Question 17

In the following question, four spellings of the same word are given. Select the correctly spelt form of the verb meaning to make a person or animal protected against a disease.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling accuracy is an important aspect of written communication, especially for scientific or medical terms that are often used in exams and professional contexts. This question focuses on the correct spelling of the verb meaning to make a person or animal resistant to a disease by giving a vaccine. The standard English spelling of this verb is immunize, and the distractor options present common errors in vowel quantity and sequence. Given Data / Assumptions: Four variants are given: imunize, immunaize, imunaize, immunize. Only one is an accepted dictionary spelling in standard English. The word refers to the process of making someone immune through vaccination. We follow general international usage where immunize is the usual spelling. Concept / Approach: The correct spelling of the verb comes from the base word immune combined with the suffix ize. The word immune itself has two m letters: i m m u n e. When the suffix ize is added, the spelling becomes immunize with the double m preserved. The vowel sequence u n i remains intact. Any option that either drops one m or adds extra vowels that do not belong is incorrect. Recognizing the root word immune makes it easier to verify the spelling. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the base word immune and note that it contains double m. Step 2: Understand that the verb form is created by adding the suffix ize to immune, resulting in immunize. Step 3: Examine option A, imunize, which contains only one m and therefore loses the link to the base word immune. Step 4: Examine option B, immunaize, which inserts an unnecessary a after n and does not reflect the standard pattern of suffixation. Step 5: Examine option C, imunaize, which both uses a single m and adds the extra ai vowel combination, creating multiple deviations from the correct form. Step 6: Examine option D, immunize, which preserves the double m and follows the logical pattern immune plus ize. Step 7: Conclude that immunize is the correctly spelt verb. Verification / Alternative check: The spelling immunize is widely used in medical literature, vaccination campaigns, and health policy documents. When checked against reliable dictionaries, immunize always appears as the correct form, sometimes accompanied by the British variant immunise with s instead of z. None of the distractor options match any recognized standard variant. Thus, comparing with the base word immune and with dictionary usage confirms immunize as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Imunize drops one m and does not reflect the double m that is an essential part of the root, making it a typical under spelling error. Immunaize is incorrect because of the extra vowel a, which distorts the word structure and does not match any accepted spelling. Imunaize combines both errors by using a single m and inserting ai, creating a word that is far from the original. None of these appear as valid entries in standard references. Common Pitfalls: Learners often mis spell words with double consonants and confusing vowel sounds, particularly in the field of medicine where many words are derived from Latin or French. They may overgeneralize patterns from other words ending in ize that do not contain a double consonant. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to remember the root immune and then simply attach ize, keeping the original consonants unchanged. Repeated exposure to correct spelling in context also strengthens memory. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is immunize.

Question 18

Select the option that is closest in meaning (synonym) to the word proximity, which refers to nearness or closeness in space, time, or relationship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Vocabulary questions that ask for synonyms help to assess how well a learner understands shades of meaning in English words. The target word in this question is proximity, which generally refers to nearness or closeness in space, time, or relationship. The task is to pick the option that most closely captures this idea of nearness from among four given words that differ in their usual meanings. Given Data / Assumptions: Given word: proximity. Options: futile, preposterous, absurd, imminent. The context suggests that we consider common exam usage, where approximate semantic similarity is often tested. We assume no additional sentence context, so we rely on dictionary meanings and frequent collocations. Concept / Approach: Proximity is a noun that means state of being near. It is related to words like closeness and nearness. Among the options, most words describe something unreasonable or pointless, while one word suggests an event that is near in time. Even though there is a grammatical difference between noun and adjective forms, vocabulary questions of this type focus primarily on semantic closeness. The idea of something that is imminent, that is about to happen soon, is conceptually related to nearness, especially temporal nearness. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that proximity means the state of being close, often in space or time. Step 2: Examine the meaning of futile, which refers to something pointless or without useful result. This has no connection to closeness. Step 3: Consider preposterous, which means ridiculous, completely unreasonable, or absurd, again unrelated to nearness. Step 4: Examine absurd, which means illogical, senseless, or laughably unreasonable, and is very similar in meaning to preposterous. Step 5: Examine imminent, which refers to something that is about to happen very soon, indicating closeness in time. Step 6: Observe that only imminent carries a sense of nearness, even if it specifically refers to time rather than space. Step 7: Conclude that imminent is the closest in meaning to proximity among the given choices. Verification / Alternative check: Although proximity is a noun and imminent is an adjective, many exam questions accept a shift in part of speech when the underlying core idea is preserved. In everyday usage, we might speak of the proximity of a deadline or say that a deadline is imminent. Both expressions suggest that the point in time is near. On the other hand, futile, preposterous, and absurd all share the idea of foolishness or pointlessness and have no semantic overlap with proximity. Thus, imminent remains the only plausible synonym in the given set. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Futile is wrong because it deals with lack of effectiveness rather than any kind of nearness. Preposterous is wrong because it means irrational or laughably unreasonable, and again does not connect with the concept of distance or time. Absurd is similarly incorrect because it emphasizes silliness or extreme unreasonableness. All three are therefore semantically distant from the idea of proximity and serve as distractors in this vocabulary question. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to look for words that simply feel familiar or appear frequently in exam papers rather than carefully recalling definitions. Another pitfall is ignoring the possibility that the best available option may be only indirectly related in part of speech but still closest in meaning. Students should train themselves to think in terms of core concepts, in this case nearness, and then select the choice that best fits that concept. This strategy helps in handling synonym questions that provide tricky or imperfect matches. Final Answer: The word that is closest in meaning to proximity is imminent, as it conveys nearness, especially in time.

Question 19

In the following question on English idioms, select the option which best expresses the meaning of the phrase graveyard shift.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: English idioms and phrases often use vivid or exaggerated images to convey an idea that is not obvious from the literal words. The expression graveyard shift is widely used in workplace contexts and appears frequently in competitive exams. Candidates need to know that this idiom does not literally refer to working in a graveyard, but to a particular time of work that is considered difficult and unusual. Given Data / Assumptions: Idiom: graveyard shift. Options describe different types of workplaces or working conditions. The question asks specifically for the meaning of the phrase, not a literal interpretation. We assume a general employment context where shifts can be morning, afternoon, evening, or night. Concept / Approach: In many industries, especially manufacturing, security, and healthcare, work is divided into shifts. The graveyard shift is commonly used in English to describe the late night or very early morning shift, typically when most people are asleep and the surroundings can feel lonely or quiet like a graveyard. The origin of the phrase is linked to the eerie quietness of the time rather than the physical location. So we look for an option that clearly states the idea of working during the deep night or early morning hours. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the standard meaning of graveyard shift in workplace vocabulary: the late night work period. Step 2: Examine option A, to work in a very scary place, which focuses on location rather than time and is a literal misreading of graveyard. Step 3: Examine option B, a place where one is forced to work so hard that it almost kills you, which exaggerates the word grave and wrongly connects it to physical danger or exhaustion. Step 4: Examine option C, to work with a team where everybody else is very lazy, which has no logical connection to the image of a graveyard. Step 5: Examine option D, a work shift that runs through the early morning hours, which matches the standard definition that graveyard shift is a late night or early morning work period. Step 6: Conclude that option D correctly explains the idiom. Verification / Alternative check: Usage examples confirm this meaning. For instance, one might say, He works the graveyard shift at the hospital, meaning he works during the night while most people sleep. The focus is on the time frame of the shift rather than on any physical graveyard or danger. Dictionaries also define graveyard shift as a work shift that goes through the late night and early morning, reinforcing that option D is accurate. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because a scary place is not necessary for a graveyard shift; an office or factory can have such a shift without being frightening. Option B misinterprets graveyard as something that almost kills you through hard work, but this is not part of the idiom's meaning. Option C introduces laziness of colleagues, which is unrelated to the timing of the shift and so is not relevant. All these interpretations confuse the literal meaning of graveyard with the established idiomatic usage. Common Pitfalls: Learners often over interpret the vivid image in an idiom and create meanings that are too dramatic or literal. For graveyard shift, they might focus on death or fear rather than on the quiet, late timing. To handle idiom questions effectively, it is important to rely on known usage or exposure from reading and listening, rather than guessing based on individual word meanings. Repeated practice with common workplace and everyday idioms will improve accuracy in such items. Final Answer: The idiom graveyard shift means a work shift that runs through the early morning hours.

Question 20

In the following passage based item, choose the best word to complete the phrase limiting appeal procedures to the ______ required.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is taken from a passage discussing judicial or administrative reforms. The phrase limiting appeal procedures to the ______ required describes how many levels or stages of appeal should exist in a legal or bureaucratic system. The task is to select the word that naturally and precisely completes the phrase in formal English. Understanding typical collocations and the logical sense of the sentence is essential. Given Data / Assumptions: We have the partial phrase: limiting appeal procedures to the ______ required. Options: minimum, bottom, lower, negligible. The context is about streamlining processes and making procedures more efficient. We assume standard formal written English typical of policy or committee reports. Concept / Approach: The phrase limiting something to the minimum required is a standard collocation in administrative and policy language. It conveys the idea that procedures should be kept as few as necessary without becoming excessive. Among the options, minimum is a noun that pairs naturally with required. Bottom, lower, and negligible do not fit grammatically or collocationally in this formal structure. Therefore, we must look for the word that best expresses the idea of the smallest amount or number that is still sufficient. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the phrase as a whole: limiting appeal procedures to the ______ required. Step 2: Consider minimum, which refers to the smallest possible or permissible amount. Step 3: Insert minimum into the phrase: limiting appeal procedures to the minimum required. This feels natural and grammatically correct. Step 4: Consider bottom, which usually refers to the lowest part of something physical, such as the bottom of a container, and does not normally collocate with required in this abstract sense. Step 5: Consider lower, which is a comparative adjective and would require a different structure, such as lower than before, not directly followed by required. Step 6: Consider negligible, which is an adjective meaning so small as to be unimportant, and again does not fit directly after the with required. Step 7: Conclude that minimum is the only option that completes the phrase correctly. Verification / Alternative check: The full reconstructed sentence in the passage is likely to say something like limiting appeal procedures to the minimum required, reflecting the idea that only the essential levels of appeal should remain. This phrasing is common in discussions of efficiency and reform. Trying to read the sentence with bottom, lower, or negligible shows that those choices disturb normal English usage and make the sentence awkward or incorrect. Therefore, minimum remains the only acceptable solution. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bottom is wrong because it primarily describes a physical location or the worst position in ranking, and does not combine well with required in this context. Lower is wrong because it is a comparative form that does not match the noun phrase structure after the. Negligible is wrong because it is an adjective that needs a noun after it to form a sensible expression, and also changes the meaning towards almost zero appeal procedures rather than just the necessary minimum. None of these alternatives align with the passage's likely intention. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may pick negligible because they associate it with very small quantity, but they overlook the grammatical mismatch and the slightly different nuance of meaning. Others may not pay attention to the fixed phrase the minimum required, which is widely used in formal writing. To avoid such mistakes, it is important to read the entire phrase, not just the blank, and to think about how words commonly combine in real language use, especially in legal or policy contexts. Final Answer: The phrase should read limiting appeal procedures to the minimum required.

English Questions