Question 1

Improve the following sentence, if necessary, by choosing the most appropriate option: "This book is the more interesting of the three."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of comparative and superlative forms of adjectives. When we compare three or more items, English normally uses the superlative degree, not the comparative. The original sentence uses "more interesting" even though it clearly talks about three books. You must select the correct degree of comparison and the correct article usage. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: "This book is the more interesting of the three." - There are exactly three books being compared. - The speaker wants to say that one specific book stands out as the best or most interesting among them. - We need to choose the option that expresses this idea correctly and naturally. Concept / Approach: In English grammar, the comparative form (for example "more interesting") is used to compare two items. The superlative form (for example "most interesting") is used when comparing more than two items and identifying the highest or lowest degree among them. With the phrase "of the three", the appropriate choice is the superlative "the most interesting". The definite article "the" is required before a superlative when it refers to a specific item in a group. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the sentence refers to "the three" books, so more than two items. Step 2: Recall the rule: two items require comparative, three or more items require superlative. Step 3: Replace "more interesting" with "most interesting". Step 4: Keep the article "the" because we are pointing to one specific book in a definite group: "the most interesting of the three." Step 5: The improved sentence is "This book is the most interesting of the three." Verification / Alternative check: Option A "the interesting of the three" is wrong because it lacks any comparative or superlative form and sounds incomplete. Option C "most interesting of the three" omits the article "the", which is normally required in this structure, although it might appear occasionally in informal speech. "No improvement" is invalid because the use of "more interesting" with "of the three" breaks the common degree of comparison rule. Therefore, option B is both grammatically correct and stylistically standard. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "the interesting of the three": does not show comparison and is unidiomatic. - "most interesting of the three": missing "the" makes the sentence sound incomplete in formal English. - "No improvement": fails to correct the misuse of the comparative degree. Common Pitfalls: A typical error is to add "more" or "most" without checking how many items are being compared. Remember the pattern: for one syllable adjectives, use "-er" and "-est" (tall, taller, tallest). For longer adjectives, use "more" and "most" (interesting, more interesting, most interesting). Always pair the superlative with "the" when it refers to a specific member of a group, such as "the tallest of the three" or "the most intelligent in the class". Final Answer: The correct improved sentence is This book is the most interesting of the three.

Question 2

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: Georgian loyalists and rebel forces P: after a week of fighting Q: agreed to R: a ceasefire today S: in which 51 people were kille…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to arrange sentence parts logically to form a meaningful news style statement. The subject involves Georgian loyalists and rebel forces agreeing to a ceasefire. You must decide how to place the time phrase, the main action, and the descriptive clause about casualties in correct order so that the sentence reads smoothly and clearly. Given Data / Assumptions: The jumbled parts are: - P: after a week of fighting - Q: agreed to - R: a ceasefire today - S: in which 51 people were killed The fixed beginning of the sentence is "Georgian loyalists and rebel forces". Concept / Approach: In news reporting, the natural pattern is subject followed by the main verb and its object, and then by time or additional descriptive clauses. The core action here is "agreed to a ceasefire today". The information about time and casualties "after a week of fighting in which 51 people were killed" logically follows this core. Therefore, we expect the order to be: subject + Q + R + P + S. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Join the subject with the main verb phrase. "Georgian loyalists and rebel forces agreed to" comes from placing Q immediately after the subject. Step 2: Attach the direct object of the agreement. R gives "a ceasefire today", so "agreed to a ceasefire today" becomes the core statement. Step 3: Add the time frame of the fighting before the ceasefire. P adds "after a week of fighting". Step 4: Finally, specify what happened during that week. S adds "in which 51 people were killed". Step 5: The full sentence becomes "Georgian loyalists and rebel forces agreed to a ceasefire today after a week of fighting in which 51 people were killed." Verification / Alternative check: Check this against the answer choices. The sequence we derived is Q R P S, which corresponds to option D. Other orders either break the core verb object sequence or interrupt phrases that should be kept together. For example, Q P S R would yield "agreed to after a week of fighting in which 51 people were killed a ceasefire today", which is clearly ungrammatical. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - P Q R S: places "after a week of fighting" immediately after the subject, resulting in a clumsy structure and delaying the main verb. - Q R S P: puts "in which 51 people were killed" before "after a week of fighting", which breaks the logical order of fight then casualties. - Q P S R: separates "agreed to" from its direct object "a ceasefire today", which makes the sentence incoherent. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake in sentence arrangement questions is to focus only on meaning and ignore grammatical patterns like verb object order. Always identify the central verb phrase and keep the verb and its object together. After establishing the core sentence, place time expressions and relative clauses either at the beginning or end, whichever gives a more natural flow. In news style English, the action is usually stated early, with details added afterwards. Final Answer: The correct sequence is Q R P S, forming the sentence "Georgian loyalists and rebel forces agreed to a ceasefire today after a week of fighting in which 51 people were killed."

Question 3

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: The ultimate hope P: will force the nations Q: that the destructive nature of weapons R: to give up war S: has not been fulfilled.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Here you must arrange four parts of a complex sentence dealing with the destructive nature of weapons and hope for peace. The question tests how well you recognise relative clauses and the position of that clauses introduced by "that". A natural reading of the sentence will begin with "The ultimate hope that the destructive nature of weapons will force the nations to give up war has not been fulfilled." Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are: - P: will force the nations - Q: that the destructive nature of weapons - R: to give up war - S: has not been fulfilled The basic subject is "The ultimate hope". Concept / Approach: The key is to identify the relative clause starting with "that". In English, "that" often introduces a clause which describes the content of a hope, belief, or idea. Here, "that the destructive nature of weapons will force the nations to give up war" is one long clause describing what the ultimate hope is. After that clause, the main verb phrase "has not been fulfilled" completes the sentence. Therefore, the structure is: The ultimate hope + Q + P + R + S. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Start with the subject "The ultimate hope". Step 2: Attach Q: "that the destructive nature of weapons", which begins the content of this hope. Step 3: Continue the clause with P: "will force the nations". Now we have "that the destructive nature of weapons will force the nations". Step 4: Add R: "to give up war", completing the idea of what the nations will be forced to do. Step 5: Finish with S: "has not been fulfilled", which tells us that this hope has not come true. Step 6: The complete sentence is "The ultimate hope that the destructive nature of weapons will force the nations to give up war has not been fulfilled." Verification / Alternative check: Compare this arrangement with the options. The sequence Q P R S corresponds to option C. Options starting with P place the verb phrase "will force the nations" directly after "The ultimate hope", which would produce "The ultimate hope will force the nations", a wrong meaning. Instead, the hope is about what destructive weapons will cause nations to do. The chosen sequence preserves this meaning smoothly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "P S Q R": implies "The ultimate hope will force the nations has not been fulfilled that the destructive nature of weapons to give up war", which is ungrammatical and confused. - "P Q R S": wrongly suggests the "ultimate hope will force the nations", with "that the destructive nature of weapons" awkwardly added later. - "P R Q S": again attaches the verb phrase directly to "hope" and loses the idea that "the destructive nature of weapons" is the real subject of the inner clause. Common Pitfalls: Students often ignore the function of "that" as a clause introducer and attempt to start directly with verb phrases like "will force the nations". A good strategy in para jumbles is to locate subordinating words such as "that", "which", and "who", and then attach them immediately after the noun they relate to. Here "that" very clearly belongs with "hope", giving the content of that hope. Final Answer: The correct arrangement is Q P R S, giving "The ultimate hope that the destructive nature of weapons will force the nations to give up war has not been fulfilled."

Question 4

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: The leader of the opposition, P: who had a reputation for speech making Q: on realising that he had failed to convince the assembl…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This jumbled sentence describes the emotional reaction of the leader of the opposition after failing to convince the assembly. The question tests understanding of how relative clauses, participial phrases, and the main clause should be ordered for clarity. You must reconstruct a sentence that reads naturally and preserves the cause and effect relationship between his failure and his disappointment. Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are presented as follows: - P: who had a reputation for speech making - Q: on realising that he had failed to convince the assembly - R: in the manner he had planned to convince them - S: was very much disappointed The sentence begins with "The leader of the opposition," and these parts need to be arranged after it. Concept / Approach: A natural English sentence about a known public figure often starts by describing the person, then presents the outcome, and finally explains circumstances or reasons. Here, first we describe the leader with a relative clause "who had a reputation for speech making". The main clause should then state "was very much disappointed". After that, we can attach the detail "in the manner he had planned to convince them" and finally the explanation "on realising that he had failed to convince the assembly". This order gives a clear and controlled build up of information. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Attach P after the subject to describe the leader: "The leader of the opposition, who had a reputation for speech making". Step 2: Follow with the main verb phrase S: "was very much disappointed". Now we have a complete core sentence. Step 3: Add R to explain the particular aspect of his disappointment: "in the manner he had planned to convince them". Step 4: Finally, add Q to state the occasion when his disappointment arose: "on realising that he had failed to convince the assembly". Step 5: The complete sentence reads: "The leader of the opposition, who had a reputation for speech making, was very much disappointed in the manner he had planned to convince them, on realising that he had failed to convince the assembly." Verification / Alternative check: Now compare with the answer choices. The sequence P S R Q corresponds exactly to option A. Other sequences either break the connection between the subject and verb or misplace the explanatory phrases. For instance, if we start with Q directly after the subject, we would delay the important description of his reputation and the main clause, making the sentence harder to follow. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "Q S R P": inserts the realisation clause immediately after the subject and leaves the descriptive relative clause "who had a reputation for speech making" at the end, which is awkward. - "R S Q P": starts with "in the manner he had planned", which seems to float without a clear connection before the leader is properly introduced. - "S P R Q": places "was very much disappointed" right after the subject without first inserting the essential descriptive relative clause. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes ignore the natural position of relative clauses, which usually follow the noun they describe. Another frequent mistake is to break the main subject verb relationship too early by inserting long participial phrases. A safe strategy is to first complete a clean main clause, then add modifying phrases that explain details of time, manner, or reason. Final Answer: The most coherent sequence is P S R Q, giving a clear sentence about the leader of the opposition and his disappointment.

Question 5

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: We can think of P: often confused in the public minds R: two factors Q: which suggest the need for S: an international language.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This item is about reordering a sentence that discusses reasons for adopting an international language. It tests your sensitivity to logical flow and the usual placement of noun phrases and relative clauses. The opening "We can think of" must be followed by a clear object, after which descriptive information and a relative clause are attached. Given Data / Assumptions: The pieces are: - P: often confused in the public minds - Q: which suggest the need for - R: two factors - S: an international language The sentence starts with "We can think of". Concept / Approach: After the phrase "We can think of", English normally expects a direct object, usually a noun phrase. Among the parts, "two factors" is the most suitable noun phrase and must therefore come first. "Often confused in the public minds" is a descriptive phrase that should immediately follow "two factors". Next, the relative clause "which suggest the need for an international language" completes the idea. This means the overall order after the introduction is R P Q S. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Place R "two factors" after "We can think of" to get "We can think of two factors". Step 2: Add P "often confused in the public minds" so that it describes "two factors". The sentence now reads "We can think of two factors, often confused in the public minds". Step 3: Attach Q "which suggest the need for". This sets up what those factors imply. Step 4: Finish with S "an international language", giving the object of that need. Step 5: The final sentence is "We can think of two factors, often confused in the public minds, which suggest the need for an international language." Verification / Alternative check: Check the chosen order against the options. The sequence R P Q S corresponds to option B. If you try alternative orders such as P R Q S, you get "We can think of often confused in the public minds two factors", which is ungrammatical, because the descriptive phrase P should not come before the noun it describes. Similarly, starting with Q or S would leave "We can think of" without a proper direct object for too long. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "P R Q S": begins with an adverbial phrase "often confused in the public minds" immediately after "We can think of", leaving the sentence without a clear object until later. - "R Q S P": would result in "two factors which suggest the need for an international language often confused in the public minds", where the descriptive phrase appears at the end and makes the sentence clumsy. - "S Q R P": starts with "an international language" after "We can think of", which changes the meaning and does not suit the phrase "two factors often confused". Common Pitfalls: Many learners overlook that descriptive phrases like "often confused in the public minds" must be attached directly to the noun they describe, which is "two factors" in this case. A good rule of thumb is that adjectives and descriptive phrases should not be separated from the nouns they modify by unrelated clauses. Also, when you see "which", it usually starts a relative clause that should follow the noun it refers to. Final Answer: The correct sequence is R P Q S, producing the sentence "We can think of two factors, often confused in the public minds, which suggest the need for an international language."

Question 6

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: The man P: is generally the one Q: who can work very hard when he must work R: and who can play most heartily S: when he has the c…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence arrangement question describes the qualities of a balanced person who can both work hard and enjoy play. The challenge is to organise the clauses so that the sentence flows logically from the defining relative clauses to the main clause. Good arrangement requires careful attention to how "who", "and who", and the main verb phrase are positioned. Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are: - P: is generally the one - Q: who can work very hard when he must work - R: and who can play most heartily - S: when he has the chance of playing The sentence begins simply with "The man". Concept / Approach: We need to build a descriptive structure that first tells us what sort of man we are talking about, and then brings in the main clause. The natural pattern is: "The man who can work very hard when he must work, and who can play most heartily when he has the chance of playing, is generally the one." This arrangement first lists the two abilities in parallel, then concludes with the main clause P. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Attach Q after "The man" to specify the first characteristic: "The man who can work very hard when he must work". Step 2: Connect the second characteristic with R: "and who can play most heartily", keeping parallel structure between the two "who" clauses. Step 3: Add S: "when he has the chance of playing" to complete the description of how he plays. Step 4: Finally, bring in the main clause P: "is generally the one", which summarises or evaluates the person being described. Step 5: The complete sentence becomes "The man who can work very hard when he must work, and who can play most heartily when he has the chance of playing, is generally the one." Verification / Alternative check: Now match the derived order with the options. The sequence Q R S P corresponds to option A. Alternative orders either place the main clause too early or break the parallelism between the two "who" clauses. For instance, putting P immediately after the subject would make the sentence "The man is generally the one who can work very hard", which reduces the smooth build up of characteristics. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "P S Q R": results in "The man is generally the one when he has the chance of playing who can work very hard when he must work and who can play most heartily", which is confusing and badly ordered. - "S P Q R": starting with "when he has the chance of playing" leaves the subject hanging and creates a sentence fragment at the beginning. - "Q R P S": puts the main clause "is generally the one" before the final time phrase, breaking the natural grouping of the complete playing description. Common Pitfalls: A frequent issue in para jumbles is failure to recognise parallel structures such as "who can work" and "who can play". Keeping parallel clauses together is important for style and clarity. It is also helpful to finish long descriptive segments before closing with the main clause, especially when the main clause is relatively short, as in "is generally the one". Final Answer: The correct sequence is Q R S P, producing a smooth and grammatically sound sentence about the qualities of the man described.

Question 7

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: Dear Lodger, I agree, the roof is leaking; but P: there would be no need Q: while it is raining R: and when the Sun shines S: I ca…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This humorous sentence arrangement question presents a landlord's excuse for not repairing a leaking roof. The logic is that the landlord cannot repair the roof while it is raining, and when the weather is fine, repair seems unnecessary. To solve it, you must arrange the parts so that the excuse is clear and the time clauses are correctly placed. Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are: - P: there would be no need - Q: while it is raining - R: and when the Sun shines - S: I cannot get it repaired The sentence begins: "Dear Lodger, I agree, the roof is leaking; but". Concept / Approach: The landlord wants to say something like: "I cannot get it repaired while it is raining, and when the Sun shines, there would be no need." The structure therefore requires the main clause "I cannot get it repaired" to come first, followed by the time clause "while it is raining", then the second time clause "and when the Sun shines", and finally the conclusion "there would be no need". This order preserves both logic and humour. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Choose S "I cannot get it repaired" as the first fragment after "but", since it contains the main statement of inability. Step 2: Attach Q "while it is raining" to explain when the repair work cannot be done. Step 3: Add R "and when the Sun shines" to introduce the contrasting time situation. Step 4: Conclude with P "there would be no need", giving the punchline that in good weather the repair seems unnecessary. Step 5: The full sentence becomes "Dear Lodger, I agree, the roof is leaking; but I cannot get it repaired while it is raining, and when the Sun shines, there would be no need." Verification / Alternative check: Compare this logical structure with the answer choices. The sequence S Q R P corresponds to option B. If you try option A, Q R S P, the sentence would start with "while it is raining and when the Sun shines I cannot get it repaired there would be no need", which is clumsy and confuses the order of explanation. The chosen sequence emphasises the excuse in a natural conversational style. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "Q R S P": begins with time clauses and delays the main clause "I cannot get it repaired", leading to a confusing and heavy opening. - "R S P Q": starts with "and when the Sun shines", which cannot logically follow "but" without a preceding clause. - "P R Q S": puts the statement "there would be no need" immediately after "but", which ruins the joke by stating the conclusion before the explanation. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes start with adverbial clauses like "while it is raining" because they seem vivid. However, in English narrative and dialogue, it is usually clearer to present the main clause first and then add the time or condition. Also, when you see "and when", it often joins a second time clause that should follow the first one for smooth rhythm and meaning. Final Answer: The correct arrangement is S Q R P, forming a humorous and coherent excuse from the landlord.

Question 8

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: There is no reason P: that life may exist Q: in great profusion R: why we should not be willing to think S: in other worlds.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This para jumble discusses the possibility of life existing elsewhere in the universe. The sentence must be arranged so that it forms a logical philosophical statement. Recognising the role of "why" in introducing a clause after "There is no reason" is crucial to putting the fragments in proper order. Given Data / Assumptions: The pieces are: - P: that life may exist - Q: in great profusion - R: why we should not be willing to think - S: in other worlds The fixed beginning is "There is no reason". Concept / Approach: The phrase "There is no reason why" is a standard English pattern. So R "why we should not be willing to think" must follow the opening. This clause then needs a content clause introduced by "that", supplied by P "that life may exist". Additional adverbial phrases "in great profusion" and "in other worlds" then specify the extent and location of that life. Together, the natural order of ideas is: R P Q S. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Combine the start with R: "There is no reason why we should not be willing to think". Step 2: Attach P: "that life may exist", which tells us what we are willing to think. Step 3: Add Q: "in great profusion", explaining that life might be present in large quantities. Step 4: Finish with S: "in other worlds", which tells us where this abundant life may exist. Step 5: The full sentence becomes "There is no reason why we should not be willing to think that life may exist in great profusion in other worlds." Verification / Alternative check: Match this with the options. The sequence R P Q S fits option C. If we try option A, R S P Q, we would get "why we should not be willing to think in other worlds that life may exist in great profusion", which misplaces the phrase "in other worlds". Option B, starting with P, fails to connect properly to "There is no reason", because "There is no reason that life may exist" is not the intended structure. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "R S P Q": disrupts the natural link between "think" and the clause "that life may exist". - "P Q S R": beginning directly with content and postponing "why we should not be willing to think" makes the sentence awkward and breaks the standard pattern "no reason why". - "R Q S P": inserts adverbial phrases before the content clause "that life may exist", which leads to confusion about what exactly is being thought. Common Pitfalls: Many learners forget that "There is no reason why" is a fixed expression and try to start a sentence with "that life may exist" after "There is no reason". Always look for classic English patterns like "no reason why", "the fact that", or "it is believed that" as strong clues for sentence order. These often guide you to the correct initial combination of fragments. Final Answer: The correct sequence is R P Q S, giving a clear statement about the possibility of life in other worlds.

Question 9

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: The Regent P: released Voltaire Q: having discovered that he had imprisoned R: an innocent man S: and gave him a pension.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence refers to a historical event involving the Regent and the writer Voltaire. The structure combines a participial phrase explaining the reason for an action, the central action itself, and an additional action. The test is whether you can correctly position the participial clause "having discovered that he had imprisoned an innocent man" before the main clause that tells us what the Regent did. Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are: - P: released Voltaire - Q: having discovered that he had imprisoned - R: an innocent man - S: and gave him a pension The sentence starts with "The Regent". Concept / Approach: In English, a common pattern is to place a reason giving participial phrase before the main clause. Here, "having discovered that he had imprisoned an innocent man" explains why the Regent acted as he did. That phrase must be built from Q and R. It should then be followed by the main verb phrase "released Voltaire" and then by "and gave him a pension" to add the further action. So the logical order is Q R P S. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Begin with the subject: "The Regent". Step 2: Attach Q "having discovered that he had imprisoned". This introduces the cause in participial form. Step 3: Add R "an innocent man" to complete the object of "had imprisoned". Now we have "The Regent, having discovered that he had imprisoned an innocent man". Step 4: Follow with P "released Voltaire", the first main action taken after this discovery. Step 5: Add S "and gave him a pension" to mention the second action. Step 6: The full sentence reads "The Regent, having discovered that he had imprisoned an innocent man, released Voltaire and gave him a pension." Verification / Alternative check: Check this sequence against the options. Q R P S is listed as option D. If we instead tried P Q R S, the sentence would start "The Regent released Voltaire having discovered that he had imprisoned an innocent man and gave him a pension", which is not wrong but makes the cause effect relationship less clear and is stylistically weaker. The exam question, however, points you toward placing the participial clause near the beginning for better clarity. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "P Q R S": delays the explanation of why Voltaire was released and can cause ambiguity over whether the Regent or Voltaire discovered the error. - "P R S Q" and "Q R S P": both result in orderings where either the participial phrase is split unnaturally or the main verb is postponed too long. Common Pitfalls: A typical difficulty with participial phrases is misplacing them so that they appear to modify the wrong subject. Placing "having discovered that he had imprisoned an innocent man" right after "The Regent" makes it clear that the Regent made the discovery, not Voltaire. Always try to position such phrases next to the noun they logically modify to avoid dangling modifiers. Final Answer: The best sequence is Q R P S, which produces a clear and well structured sentence about the Regent and Voltaire.

Question 10

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: R: the Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers Q: for its horn P: which is sold S: at high prices.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This jumbled sentence concerns poachers hunting rhinoceroses for commercial gain. The grammar pattern is fairly straightforward: a main clause followed by a reason, and then a relative clause explaining more about that reason. The question tests how to keep related phrases together so that the sentence is both logical and grammatically correct. Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are: - R: the Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers - Q: for its horn - P: which is sold - S: at high prices There is no extra introductory text; one of the fragments must start the sentence. Concept / Approach: The natural starting point is the subject and main verb, which appear in R: "The Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers". The phrase Q "for its horn" explains why they hunt it and should immediately follow. The relative clause "which is sold at high prices" then gives more detail about the horn. That clause is formed by combining P and S. Therefore a clear and coherent sentence will follow the order R Q P S. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Choose R as the first fragment: "The Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers". This introduces the main idea. Step 2: Add Q "for its horn" to indicate the purpose of the hunting: "The Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers for its horn". Step 3: Use P "which is sold" to begin a relative clause referring back to "its horn". Step 4: Complete the clause with S "at high prices", giving "which is sold at high prices". Step 5: The final sentence is "The Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers for its horn, which is sold at high prices." Verification / Alternative check: Compare this step by step construction with the options given. The sequence R Q P S is provided as option C. Alternatives like Q R S P would start with "For its horn the Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers at high prices which is sold", which is awkward and clumsy. Beginning with S or P would make the sentence fragmentary because they contain neither the main subject nor the main verb. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "S Q P R": starts with "at high prices", which cannot work as a meaningful beginning of the sentence here. - "Q R S P": interrupts logical order and moves the reason before the main statement, and then misorders the relative clause. - "Q P S R": similarly produces a disjointed sentence in which the subject and verb appear too late. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes feel that phrases starting with prepositions such as "for" or "at" can begin sentences in para jumbles, but while that is sometimes possible, you should first look for the complete subject verb fragment which forms an independent clause. Here, R clearly provides that core, and the other pieces naturally attach to it as reason and relative clause. Final Answer: The correct order is R Q P S, giving the sentence "The Rhinoceros is hunted by poachers for its horn, which is sold at high prices."

Question 11

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: S: the world's fastest computers initially conceived Q: for military purpose R: are finding various new uses P: as environmental t…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence arrangement problem is about the changing uses of supercomputers. The statement explains that very fast computers, originally built for military purposes, are now used as environmental tools. The challenge is to order the fragments so that the descriptive and main clauses appear in their natural positions. Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are: - S: the world's fastest computers initially conceived - Q: for military purpose - R: are finding various new uses - P: as environmental tools One of these fragments will start the sentence, and all must be used. Concept / Approach: The logical beginning is S, which introduces the subject "the world's fastest computers initially conceived". The phrase Q "for military purpose" completes the idea of initial design. After that, the main verb phrase R "are finding various new uses" tells us what is happening now, and P "as environmental tools" describes one of those uses. The natural progression is subject and original purpose, followed by present uses. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Begin with S: "The world's fastest computers initially conceived". This sets the subject and hints at their original design goal. Step 2: Add Q: "for military purpose", completing the thought "initially conceived for military purpose". Step 3: Continue with R: "are finding various new uses". This introduces the contrast between original intention and current applications. Step 4: Conclude with P: "as environmental tools", specifying the kind of new uses that are being found. Step 5: The full sentence is "The world's fastest computers, initially conceived for military purpose, are finding various new uses as environmental tools." Verification / Alternative check: Now map this sequence to the options. S Q R P appears as option A. If we tried option C, R P S Q, we would start with "are finding various new uses as environmental tools the world's fastest computers initially conceived for military purpose", which is extremely awkward and does not follow normal English word order. Starting with Q or P also fails because they are dependent phrases lacking subject and verb. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "P Q R S": begins with "as environmental tools", which cannot serve as the main subject and makes the sentence fragmentary. - "R P S Q": starts with the verb phrase "are finding various new uses" without a clear subject, and then strings together the remaining phrases in an unnatural way. - "Q P S R": moves the purpose phrase to the front, causing confusion about which computers are being discussed until much later. Common Pitfalls: In para jumbles with technical or scientific content, candidates sometimes focus too much on individual words like "military" or "environmental" and forget to look for the subject verb core. Always look for the fragment that provides a clear noun phrase subject plus some descriptive material. Then, ensure that verb phrases follow in a way that maintains logical time order: original purpose before current use in this case. Final Answer: The correct sequence is S Q R P, producing a clear and meaningful sentence about how supercomputers are being repurposed as environmental tools.

Question 12

The parts P, Q, R, and S of the following sentence have been jumbled. Choose the order that forms a coherent sentence: R: the sense of inferiority in others Q: without this indirect appeal to our self love S: is a painful feeling P: and not an exalt…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This philosophical sentence reflects on how the sense of inferiority can affect people. The idea is that when a sense of inferiority arises in others, and when it is not softened by an indirect appeal to our self love, it becomes a painful feeling rather than an uplifting one. The question requires you to put the fragments into a grammatically correct and logically flowing order. Given Data / Assumptions: The fragments are: - R: the sense of inferiority in others - Q: without this indirect appeal to our self love - S: is a painful feeling - P: and not an exalting one There is no additional fixed text outside these four parts. Concept / Approach: The subject of the sentence is clearly "the sense of inferiority in others". After that subject, we can place a phrase that modifies or limits it: "without this indirect appeal to our self love". Then we require the main verb "is a painful feeling" and finally the closing contrast "and not an exalting one". This gives a sentence that reads smoothly and expresses the contrast between pain and exaltation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Start with R, the subject: "The sense of inferiority in others". Step 2: Attach Q: "without this indirect appeal to our self love", which provides a condition modifying the subject. Step 3: Add S: "is a painful feeling", supplying the main verb and complement. Step 4: Conclude with P: "and not an exalting one", presenting the contrast that this feeling does not elevate but rather hurts. Step 5: The full sentence reads "The sense of inferiority in others, without this indirect appeal to our self love, is a painful feeling and not an exalting one." Verification / Alternative check: We derived the sequence R Q S P, which corresponds to option D. Examine other possible sequences: R S P Q would read "The sense of inferiority in others is a painful feeling and not an exalting one without this indirect appeal to our self love", which is understandable but makes the conditional phrase appear at the very end, less clearly modifying the subject. The option R Q S P places the condition immediately after the subject, which is considered better style and more precise. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - "P R S Q": begins with "and not an exalting one", which cannot stand at the start of a sentence because "and" implies a previous clause. - "R S P Q": postpones the condition so much that it may be misread as modifying the entire clause instead of mainly the subject. - "S R Q P": starts with the verb "is a painful feeling", leaving the reader momentarily puzzled about the subject. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to ignore the function of conjunctions like "and" and prepositions like "without". "And" usually joins two similar grammatical units and rarely begins a sentence in formal writing. Prepositional phrases like "without this indirect appeal to our self love" are often placed close to the words they describe. Keeping these small signals in mind helps greatly in solving sentence arrangement questions. Final Answer: The correct sequence is R Q S P, forming the meaningful sentence "The sense of inferiority in others, without this indirect appeal to our self love, is a painful feeling and not an exalting one."

Question 13

Read the following sentence and identify the part that contains an error in standard English usage: "I am senior than him by two years."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question focuses on correct comparative structures with adjectives like "senior", "junior", "inferior", and "superior". These adjectives behave differently from regular comparative forms because they do not use "than" and instead take the preposition "to". Many learners incorrectly say "senior than" or "junior than" by analogy with "older than". The exam tests whether you know this special rule. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into parts: - Part (a): "I am senior" - Part (b): "than him" - Part (c): "by two years" - Part (d): "No error" We must locate the portion containing the grammatical error, if any. Concept / Approach: Certain adjectives that express rank or status traditionally take "to", not "than", when making comparisons. These include "senior", "junior", "superior", "inferior", "prior", and a few others. Therefore, the correct expression is "I am senior to him by two years", not "senior than him". The rest of the sentence, including the phrase "by two years", is acceptable and common in English when describing the age or service difference between two people. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the adjective and comparison pattern: "senior than him". Step 2: Recall the special rule that "senior" takes "to", not "than". Step 3: Replace "than him" with "to him" to form "I am senior to him by two years". Step 4: Check whether any other part of the sentence is incorrect. "I am senior" and "by two years" are both fine. Step 5: Conclude that the error is in part (b), which reads "than him". Verification / Alternative check: Compare with similar examples: "She is junior to me by three years", "This post is superior to that one in rank". None of these take "than". On the other hand, adjectives like "older" or "taller" do take "than": "I am older than him by two years". The mixture of these rules often causes confusion, but for adjectives such as "senior", "to" is required in formal usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Part (a) "I am senior": forms the beginning of a correct comparative expression and is not wrong by itself. - Part (c) "by two years": correctly expresses the margin of difference and is standard in English. - "No error": is incorrect because we have clearly identified an error in part (b). Common Pitfalls: Many examinees mechanically apply the "adjective plus than" pattern learned for simple comparatives without remembering that there are exceptions. A helpful memory trick is to group these special adjectives together: senior to, junior to, superior to, inferior to, prior to. If you see any of these followed by "than", it should immediately signal a likely error in error spotting questions. Final Answer: The incorrect portion is than him, that is, part (b). The corrected sentence is "I am senior to him by two years."

Question 14

Read the following sentence and identify the part that contains an error in standard English usage: "When I finished writing the letter, I could not help admiring myself to have achieved the impossible."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question tests idiomatic usage with the expression "could not help" and the correct construction to describe feeling pleased about an achievement. The sentence conveys self satisfaction after completing a difficult task, but uses an unnatural combination "admiring myself to have achieved". Examinations often check whether you can recognise such subtle idiomatic errors. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is broken into parts: - Part (a): "When I finished writing the letter," - Part (b): "I could not help admiring myself to have" - Part (c): "achieved the impossible." - Part (d): "No error" We need to identify which part contains the incorrect phrase or structure. Concept / Approach: The phrase "could not help" is typically followed by a gerund: "could not help laughing", "could not help admiring". That part is fine. The problem is the construction "admiring myself to have achieved". To express the reason for the admiration, English normally uses a preposition plus gerund pattern, such as "for having achieved the impossible". Thus the natural sentence would be "I could not help admiring myself for having achieved the impossible" or "I could not help admiring myself for achieving the impossible". The use of "to have achieved" here is non idiomatic. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check the time clause "When I finished writing the letter," in part (a). It is grammatically correct. Step 2: Examine part (b) "I could not help admiring myself to have". The phrase "to have" looks suspicious in this position. Step 3: Recall that we usually say "admiring myself for having achieved" rather than "admiring myself to have achieved". Step 4: Note that part (c) "achieved the impossible." is a correct phrase completing the idea of achievement. Step 5: Conclude that the error lies in part (b), specifically in the combination "admiring myself to have". Verification / Alternative check: Construct a corrected version of the sentence: "When I finished writing the letter, I could not help admiring myself for having achieved the impossible." Now each segment flows properly. The preposition "for" introduces the reason, and "having achieved" correctly refers to a completed action that has just occurred. This confirms that the problematic zone is in part (b) and that the intended grammar requires a preposition and a gerund, not the bare infinitive "to have". Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Part (a): "When I finished writing the letter," is a standard time clause and is error free. - Part (c): "achieved the impossible." correctly completes the thought and does not contain any grammatical mistake. - "No error": is incorrect because we have identified a clear idiomatic error in part (b). Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overuse the structure "to have plus past participle" in formal contexts, assuming it always sounds advanced or correct. In reality, English has many fixed collocations where certain prepositions and verb forms are preferred. With verbs such as "admire", "criticise", "praise", and emotional reactions, it is common to use "for doing" or "for having done" rather than "to have done". Paying attention to patterns you see in well edited texts can help you avoid these subtle mistakes. Final Answer: The incorrect portion is I could not help admiring myself to have, that is, part (b). A correct version would be "I could not help admiring myself for having achieved the impossible."

Question 15

Read the following sentence and identify the part that contains an error in standard English usage, or mark No error if the sentence is correct: "I am glad that you are here."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In this error spotting question you must decide whether the sentence "I am glad that you are here." contains any grammatical or usage error. Often, exams include some perfectly correct sentences to check whether candidates can distinguish false errors from real ones. It is important not to over correct a sentence that is already standard and natural. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is broken into parts as follows: - Part (a): "I am" - Part (b): "glad" - Part (c): "that you are here." - Part (d): "No error" The task is to identify which part, if any, is incorrect in terms of grammar or standard English usage. Concept / Approach: The expression "I am glad that you are here" is a normal and polite English sentence. The linking verb "am" correctly connects the subject "I" to the predicative adjective "glad". The clause "that you are here" functions as a noun clause explaining the cause of the speaker's gladness. There is no tense mismatch, no preposition error, and no word order problem. Therefore, the sentence is fully acceptable as it stands. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check subject verb agreement in part (a). The subject "I" takes the first person singular form "am", which is correct. Step 2: Check the use of the adjective "glad" in part (b). It is correctly placed after the linking verb "am". Step 3: Examine the clause "that you are here" in part (c). It states a present situation and uses the present tense "are" correctly. Step 4: Confirm that punctuation and word order are normal for conversational English. Step 5: Since no part contains an error, select "No error" as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Try replacing the sentence with other well known patterns: "I am happy that you are here", "I am surprised that you are here". All of these follow the same structure and are accepted without question. There is no hidden rule that prohibits "that" after "glad". In fact, both "I am glad you are here" and "I am glad that you are here" are widely used. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Part (a): "I am" is correct in both grammar and usage. - Part (b): "glad" is the appropriate adjective to express happiness or satisfaction. - Part (c): "that you are here." is a properly formed subordinate clause explaining the cause of the emotion. Thus none of these parts contains an error, so choosing any of them would be incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Some students feel compelled to find an error in every question and therefore question correct structures such as "glad that", "happy that", or "afraid that". Remember that in error spotting sections, some sentences are intentionally error free. It is a good practice to first ask whether a sentence sounds natural and matches structures you have seen in good sources. If it clearly does, you should confidently mark "No error". Final Answer: The sentence is correct, so the right choice is No error, that is, part (d).

Question 16

Read the following sentence and identify the part that contains an error in standard English usage: "He will be cured from his fever."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of the correct preposition used with the verb "cure". While the sentence looks nearly correct, the preposition "from" does not collocate naturally with "cured" in standard English medical expressions. Examinations frequently target such preposition errors in very short sentences. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided into four parts: - Part (a): "He will be" - Part (b): "cured from" - Part (c): "his fever." - Part (d): "No error" We must decide which part contains an error, if any. Concept / Approach: The verb "cure" is usually followed by the preposition "of" when referring to diseases or ailments, as in "cured of cancer", "cured of his illness", "cured of the habit". The combination "cured from" is not standard in such contexts. Therefore the phrase should be "He will be cured of his fever", not "cured from his fever". The rest of the sentence correctly uses the future passive construction "will be cured". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (a) "He will be". This is a proper beginning for a future passive sentence. Step 2: Look at part (b) "cured from". This is where the verb and preposition combination appears. Step 3: Recall the correct collocation "cured of a disease", not "cured from a disease". Step 4: Check part (c) "his fever." It is a normal noun phrase naming the illness. Step 5: Conclude that the only incorrect portion is "cured from" in part (b). Verification / Alternative check: Form the corrected sentence: "He will be cured of his fever." Now compare this with common usage: doctors often say "cured of malaria", "cured of pneumonia". The preposition "from" is used differently, for example "recover from an illness" rather than "cure from". The parallel is "recover from" and "cure of". Confusing these two verb preposition patterns leads to errors like the one in the original sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Part (a): "He will be" correctly sets up the future passive and contains no grammatical mistake. - Part (c): "his fever." is a straightforward object of the preposition and is fully acceptable. - "No error": cannot be correct because the combination "cured from" deviates from standard medical English usage. Common Pitfalls: Learners often generalise prepositions from one verb to another. They know "recover from a fever" and mistakenly form "cured from a fever". To avoid this, it helps to memorise collocations in pairs such as "suffer from", "recover from", and "cure of". When you see a health related verb in an exam question, pay close attention to the following preposition because it is a favourite testing area. Final Answer: The erroneous portion is cured from, that is, part (b). The correct sentence should read "He will be cured of his fever."

Question 17

Error spotting in an English grammar sentence: Though he is a gifted comedian, he prefers spend his spare time watching horror movies. Identify the part of the sentence which contains the grammatical error or decide that there is no error.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic English grammar through an error spotting sentence. The sentence is divided into four labelled parts, and the learner is asked to find out which specific segment contains a grammatical mistake. Such questions are very common in competitive examinations because they check the candidate's understanding of verb patterns and infinitive usage in real life like sentences about hobbies and preferences. Given Data / Assumptions: - The full sentence reads: Though he is a gifted comedian, he prefers spend his spare time watching horror movies. - Part (a): Though he is a gifted comedian - Part (b): he prefers spend his spare time - Part (c): watching horror movies - Part (d): No error We assume standard modern English usage appropriate for competitive exams and formal writing. Concept / Approach: The key grammatical area here is the verb pattern that follows the verb prefer. In English, prefer is normally followed either by a noun or by the structure prefer to plus base form of the verb. For example, we say prefer tea, prefer coffee, or prefer to watch movies. When prefer is followed by another verb, the infinitive marker to is required before the base form. Therefore prefers spend is not acceptable; it must become prefers to spend. The other clauses in the sentence follow correct patterns for a complex sentence introduced by though. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (a): Though he is a gifted comedian. This is a correct concessive clause using though followed by subject, verb, and complement. Step 2: Examine part (b): he prefers spend his spare time. Here the verb prefers is immediately followed by the bare infinitive spend without the marker to. Step 3: Recall the correct pattern: prefer to do something. So the correct phrase should be he prefers to spend his spare time. Step 4: Examine part (c): watching horror movies. This is a correct participial phrase that describes how he spends his spare time. Step 5: Since parts (a) and (c) are correct and only part (b) has a verb pattern error, the error is confined to part (b) only. Verification / Alternative check: We can rewrite the whole sentence in a corrected form: Though he is a gifted comedian, he prefers to spend his spare time watching horror movies. This corrected version reads smoothly and follows the standard rule for prefer. No other changes are required for sense or grammar. The meaning remains that in spite of being a comedian, his free time activity is watching horror movies. This cross check supports the conclusion that the only necessary correction is in part (b). Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Error in part (a) only: Part (a) is grammatically correct; the structure though he is a gifted comedian is standard. - Error in part (c) only: Watching horror movies is a correct expression functioning as an object complement; there is no error here. - No error in the sentence: This is incorrect because prefers spend is not an accepted standard pattern. - Error in more than one part: Only one part needs correction, so this option is also incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Many learners read quickly and focus only on vocabulary, overlooking small structural errors in verb patterns. Another common mistake is to think that prefer can be followed directly by a bare verb because similar verbs like like or love sometimes allow a gerund. It is also easy to assume that the long phrase about spare time may contain an article or preposition error, but the real issue is the missing to before spend. Candidates should consciously check verb plus infinitive patterns in error spotting questions. Final Answer: Correct option: Error in part (b) only.

Question 18

Error spotting in an English grammar sentence: The writer of this poetry is Wordsworth. Identify which part of the sentence is grammatically incorrect or decide that there is no error.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks the learner's knowledge of countable and uncountable nouns as well as appropriate collocations in English. The sentence talks about a famous English poet, Wordsworth, and asks you to decide if the expression used for his work is grammatically and stylistically correct in standard English. Error spotting items like this are common in competitive exams to test subtle points of noun usage. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: The writer of this poetry is Wordsworth. - Part (a): The writer - Part (b): of this poetry - Part (c): is Wordsworth - Part (d): No error We assume that the question aims at standard British or international English rather than highly informal speech. Concept / Approach: The noun poetry is generally uncountable and refers to the literary art in general. When we refer to a specific piece, we normally say poem, not poetry. Therefore, the phrase writer of this poetry sounds unnatural and incorrect in formal English. The natural expressions are writer of this poem, author of this poem, or writer of this piece of poetry. Parts (a) and (c) are structurally sound. The focus must therefore be on the noun phrase in part (b). Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check part (a) The writer. This is a simple noun phrase and is correct. Step 2: Check part (b) of this poetry. Here, this is a demonstrative determiner that normally points to a single countable item. Step 3: Recall that poetry is usually uncountable and refers to the art form as a whole. To refer to one item we say poem. Step 4: Therefore, the correct expression should be of this poem or of this piece of poetry. Step 5: Check part (c) is Wordsworth. This link between subject and complement with the verb be is grammatically correct. Step 6: Since only the noun choice in part (b) is unacceptable, the error lies in part (b) only. Verification / Alternative check: A corrected sentence can be written as: The writer of this poem is Wordsworth. This is idiomatic English and clearly states that Wordsworth composed the particular poem in question. Another possible correction is: The writer of this piece of poetry is Wordsworth, which still treats poetry as uncountable but inserts an extra quantifying phrase piece of. Both alternatives confirm that the original phrase of this poetry is faulty and needs correction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Error in part (a) only: The writer is a correct and natural phrase; there is no error here. - Error in part (c) only: Is Wordsworth is a grammatically perfect predicate and uses the correct proper noun, so it is correct. - No error in the sentence: This would be correct only if of this poetry were acceptable, but in formal exam English it is not. - Error in more than one part: Only part (b) needs to change, so claiming multiple errors is wrong. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse poem and poetry, treating both as interchangeable. They may also ignore subtle collocation issues if the overall meaning is clear. However, competitive exams reward precision. Whenever a demonstrative like this or that is directly followed by a normally uncountable noun, it is worth checking whether a countable form such as piece, bit, or a different noun like poem should be used instead. Final Answer: Correct option: Error in part (b) only.

Question 19

Error spotting in an English grammar sentence: The jug is made out of china clay. Choose which part of the sentence contains the grammatical or usage error, or state that there is no error.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on the correct preposition and phrase used with the verb made when describing the material of an object. The sentence talks about a jug and the substance from which it is formed. Such questions teach learners to distinguish between similar patterns like made of, made from, and made out of, and to recognise which is most natural in standard written English. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: The jug is made out of china clay. - Part (a): The jug - Part (b): is made - Part (c): out of china clay - Part (d): No error We assume that the exam expects the standard material expression used in formal grammar books. Concept / Approach: English distinguishes between made of, made from, and made out of. In many everyday situations, made out of is informal but acceptable. However, when we describe the basic material of an object whose form clearly shows the material, the preferred expression is made of. For example, the ring is made of gold, the table is made of wood. A jug whose material is china clay is best described as made of china clay. Therefore, out of in part (c) is considered incorrect in a formal error spotting question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part (a) The jug. This is a simple subject noun phrase and is correct. Step 2: Examine part (b) is made. The passive form is appropriate because the focus is on the result, not on the maker, so this part is also correct. Step 3: Examine part (c) out of china clay. Here, out of is used with the material name china clay. Step 4: Recall the standard rule: when the original material can still be recognised in the final product, use made of plus the material, such as made of metal or made of glass. Step 5: Therefore, the correct phrase should be of china clay, not out of china clay. Step 6: Since parts (a) and (b) are correct and only part (c) requires change, the error is located in part (c) only. Verification / Alternative check: We rewrite the sentence in corrected form: The jug is made of china clay. This version is idiomatic and matches typical textbook examples. Another check is to substitute a different material: The cup is made of porcelain, not made out of porcelain in careful writing. These comparisons confirm that out of in the original sentence is stylistically wrong for an exam context, and it should be replaced with of. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Error in part (a) only: The subject phrase The jug is fine, so this is incorrect. - Error in part (b) only: The passive is made is the correct form and tense here, so there is no reason to change it. - No error in the sentence: There is in fact a prepositional error in part (c), so this option is not acceptable. - Error in more than one part: Only one segment needs correction, therefore this option is wrong. Common Pitfalls: Learners often overuse made out of because they hear it in casual conversation. They may also believe that made out of and made of are always interchangeable, which is not true in formal contexts. When facing such questions in an exam, it is safer to use made of for the basic material that remains visible in the finished object, and to reserve made from or made out of for special cases where the original material changes form or where very informal style is acceptable. Final Answer: Correct option: Error in part (c) only.

Question 20

Error spotting in subject verb agreement: Sita with all her sisters were here. Identify which part of the sentence is grammatically wrong or state that there is no error.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question checks subject verb agreement in a sentence where a singular noun is followed by an additional phrase beginning with with. Candidates must decide whether the verb should be singular or plural, focusing on who or what is the real subject of the sentence. Such structures are common in English and often cause confusion because there seems to be more than one person in the subject phrase. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: Sita with all her sisters were here. - Part (a): Sita - Part (b): with all her sisters - Part (c): were here - Part (d): No error We assume we are following the usual rule that prepositional phrases beginning with with do not change the number of the main subject. Concept / Approach: When a singular noun is followed by a phrase beginning with with, along with, together with, or as well as, the verb agrees with the first noun, not with the phrase that follows. So in the subject Sita with all her sisters, the true grammatical subject is Sita, which is singular. Therefore, the verb must be singular was, not the plural were. The extra information with all her sisters simply adds detail and does not control verb agreement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main subject: Sita is a singular proper noun referring to one person. Step 2: Recognise that the phrase with all her sisters is a prepositional phrase adding additional information about company. Step 3: Apply the rule of agreement: The verb must agree with Sita, not with sisters. Step 4: Examine part (c) were here. Were is the plural past form of be, which does not agree with the singular subject Sita. Step 5: The correct form should be was here, so part (c) is grammatically wrong. Step 6: Parts (a) and (b) are structurally correct and need no change. Verification / Alternative check: We can rewrite the sentence correctly as: Sita, with all her sisters, was here. Now the sentence clearly shows that Sita is the main subject and that the verb was matches this singular subject. Another way to check is to temporarily remove the with phrase and read Sita was here, which is clearly correct. This simple deletion test is a powerful technique to verify agreement in such questions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Error in part (a) only: The name Sita is correct and capitalised, so there is no error in part (a). - Error in part (b) only: The phrase with all her sisters is acceptable and correctly formed, so this option is wrong. - No error in the sentence: This would ignore the subject verb disagreement, so it cannot be chosen. - Error in more than one part: Only the verb in part (c) needs correction, so this option is incorrect. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to make the verb plural because the nearer noun sisters is plural. This is known as attraction of proximity, where the verb wrongly agrees with the noun nearest to it instead of the true subject. Learners should train themselves to identify the real subject first, especially when phrases such as with, together with, or as well as appear in the subject. Ignoring the extra phrase and checking agreement with the main noun is a reliable strategy in competitive exam questions. Final Answer: Correct option: Error in part (c) only.

English Questions