Question 1

Choose the one-word substitute that correctly completes the sentence: "An abattoir is _____."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests your knowledge of a specific English noun often used in agriculture, food industry, and animal welfare discussions. You are asked to identify the correct definition of the word "abattoir" by choosing the option that completes the sentence accurately and precisely. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: "abattoir". - Sentence: "An abattoir is _____." - Options include different possible places related to animals or abbots. - Only one option matches the standard dictionary meaning. Concept / Approach: "Abattoir" is a French derived word used in English to mean "slaughterhouse". It refers to a place where animals are killed, usually for meat production. It does not refer to religious titles, places for abbots, or locations of animal worship. Therefore, the option that states "a place where animals are slaughtered" is the correct completion of the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of an abattoir from news reports, animal welfare articles, or basic vocabulary lists. It is synonymous with "slaughterhouse". Step 2: Match this meaning with option A: "a place where animals are slaughtered". This is a direct and accurate definition. Step 3: Examine option B: "a place where abbots stay". This might tempt some candidates because of the similarity between "abattoir" and "abbot", but it is incorrect; abbots live in monasteries or abbeys, not abattoirs. Step 4: Examine option C: "a title of respect given to a priest or abbot". This confuses "abattoir" with forms like "abbé" or "abbot" and is completely unrelated to killing animals. Step 5: Examine option D: "a place where animals are worshipped". This describes a temple or sanctuary, again the opposite of a slaughterhouse. Step 6: Confirm that only option A matches the real world usage and dictionary definition of "abattoir". Verification / Alternative check: Think of typical sentences: "The government introduced stricter hygiene rules for abattoirs" or "Animal rights activists protested outside the abattoir". In both examples, animals are being killed for meat, not worshipped or sheltered. Replacing "abattoir" with "a place where animals are slaughtered" preserves the sense, while substituting any of the other options makes the sentence illogical or contradictory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options B and C incorrectly associate the word with religious roles or residences of abbots; this is likely included to test whether you are relying only on spelling similarity. Option D provides the opposite of the real meaning, since an abattoir is a place of killing, not worship. None of these three options match standard English usage or dictionary definitions of "abattoir". Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes guess based on partial resemblance between words instead of checking the exact meaning. For instance, "abattoir" sounds somewhat like "abbot", but the origins and meanings are different. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to connect technical words to mental images: when you hear "abattoir", picture a slaughterhouse with animals being processed for meat. This mental image will block the wrong choices related to priests or worship. Final Answer: a place where animals are slaughtered is the correct completion for the definition of "abattoir".

Question 2

Choose the one-word substitute that best completes the sentence: "A man with abnormal habits is called _____."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one-word substitute question checks your knowledge of adjectives used to describe personality traits and behavioural patterns. The phrase "a man with abnormal habits" refers to someone whose behaviour is unusual or unconventional compared to what society expects. Your job is to select the word that most accurately captures this meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: - Descriptive phrase: "A man with abnormal habits". - Options: "Eccentric", "Frantic", "Idiotic", "Sulky". - The word should focus on unusual, peculiar behaviour rather than short term emotions. - The tone is descriptive, not necessarily insulting. Concept / Approach: "Eccentric" is used in English to describe a person who behaves in odd, unusual, or unconventional ways. An eccentric person may have strange habits, but this term is often neutral or mildly humorous rather than purely negative. The other options refer either to panic, stupidity, or moodiness and do not match the general idea of abnormal or peculiar habits. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Break down the phrase "abnormal habits" as behaviour patterns that are different from the usual, often in a noticeable or peculiar way. Step 2: Recall the meaning of "eccentric": a person who is odd or unconventional, often with distinctive habits or tastes. Step 3: Match this to the description given. An eccentric man is precisely one whose habits are unusual or outside normal expectations. Step 4: Examine "frantic". This word describes someone who is wildly excited, anxious, or panicked, often in a short term crisis. It does not describe long term habits. Step 5: Consider "idiotic". This is a strong, rude term meaning very foolish or stupid. It attacks intelligence rather than describing abnormal habits. Step 6: Evaluate "sulky". This describes a person who is gloomy, silent, or resentful, often because they are upset. Again, it is about mood rather than unusual behaviour. Verification / Alternative check: Use the options in example sentences: "He is an eccentric old man who collects clocks and talks to his plants" sounds natural and reflects unusual habits. If we say "He is a frantic old man" or "He is a sulky old man", we shift the meaning to emotional state. "Idiotic old man" focuses on intelligence, not habits. Only "eccentric" preserves the sense of ongoing odd behaviour that the question describes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Frantic" relates to extreme, temporary emotional agitation, not stable patterns of behaviour. "Idiotic" is an offensive synonym for very foolish and does not specifically mean abnormal habits. "Sulky" describes a person who is pouting or silent because of some grievance, which is just one mood, not a broad description of unusual daily habits. Thus, these words do not correctly substitute for the phrase given. Common Pitfalls: Because all four options describe people negatively in some way, students may be tempted to choose at random. However, precision matters in one-word substitutes. It is useful to group adjectives by categories: words like "eccentric", "odd", and "quirky" relate to unusual behaviour; "frantic", "agitated", "panicky" relate to emotional states; "sulky", "moody", "morose" relate to moodiness; and "idiotic", "foolish" relate to intelligence. Remembering these groupings makes such questions much easier. Final Answer: Eccentric is the correct one-word substitute for "a man with abnormal habits".

Question 3

Choose the one-word substitute that best completes the sentence: "Words inscribed on the tomb are called _____."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one-word substitute question distinguishes between several similar looking literary terms related to writing and inscriptions. The phrase "words inscribed on the tomb" refers to short text carved or engraved on a grave or tombstone. You must identify the correct technical term used in English for such writing. Given Data / Assumptions: - Phrase: "Words inscribed on the tomb". - Options: "Epigraph", "Epigram", "Epitaph", "Elegy". - The context is a burial place and the writing found on a tombstone. - Only one term specifically refers to writing on a grave. Concept / Approach: "Epitaph" is the correct term for an inscription on a tomb or gravestone in memory of the person buried there. An epitaph can be a brief statement of praise, a short poem, or simple information about the deceased. The other words, though similar in spelling, have different meanings related to literature and poetry and do not specifically refer to tomb inscriptions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that tombstones often have short texts like "Beloved father" or "Gone but not forgotten". These are examples of epitaphs. Step 2: Match this with option C, "Epitaph", which dictionaries define as "a phrase or form of words written in memory of a person who has died, especially as an inscription on a tombstone". Step 3: Examine "Epigraph". This usually means a short quotation or motto at the beginning of a book or chapter, not on a grave. Step 4: Examine "Epigram". This refers to a short, clever, and often witty poem or saying, usually not connected to tombs. Step 5: Examine "Elegy". An elegy is a mournful poem, often written to lament the dead, but it is not the carved inscription on the tomb itself. Step 6: Conclude that only "Epitaph" directly matches the phrase "words inscribed on the tomb". Verification / Alternative check: Use each option in an example sentence. "The epitaph on his gravestone read, 'A loving friend to all'" makes perfect sense. "The epigraph on his gravestone" or "the epigram on his gravestone" sound unusual or wrong; while a witty epigram could theoretically be used as an epitaph, the technical term for tomb writing remains "epitaph". An "elegy" is usually recited or written, not carved, so saying "the elegy on his gravestone" is also inaccurate. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Epigraph" belongs mainly to books and literary works. "Epigram" focuses on clever, concise expressions and is not tied to graves or tombs. "Elegy" refers to a type of poem expressing sorrow, usually more extended than the short lines carved on a tombstone. None of these options accurately represents the specific concept of tomb inscriptions. Common Pitfalls: Because "epi" and "graph" both relate to writing, learners often confuse epigraph, epigram, and epitaph. A helpful memory trick is to link "taph" with "tomb": both start with the letter t sound. In contrast, "graph" suggests writing more generally, and "gram" suggests something written or drawn but not specifically on a grave. Building such associations will help you answer many similar vocabulary questions quickly and confidently. Final Answer: Epitaph is the correct one-word substitute for "words inscribed on the tomb".

Question 4

A part of the sentence is underlined. Choose the alternative that best improves the underlined part, or select "No improvement" if the sentence is already correct: "Sunita's sister had ribbons on her hair."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question checks your understanding of correct preposition use in English, especially with body parts and items of decoration. The original sentence "Sunita's sister had ribbons on her hair" sounds slightly unnatural. You must select the preposition that native speakers typically use in this common context, or confirm that no change is needed. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: "Sunita's sister had ribbons on her hair." - Underlined preposition: "on". - Options: "in", "over", "through", "No improvement". - The intended meaning is that ribbons were used to decorate or tie her hair. Concept / Approach: In English, when talking about accessories that are worn as part of the hair style, the preposition "in" is preferred: ribbons in her hair, flowers in her hair, clips in her hair. The preposition "on" is more common with surfaces or wearable items placed on top of something, such as "a hat on her head". Therefore, the natural expression here is "ribbons in her hair", indicating that the ribbons are woven into or attached within the hair. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Think of common collocations: "bows in her hair", "clips in his hair", "flowers in her hair". Step 2: Apply this pattern to the given sentence: "Sunita's sister had ribbons in her hair." This sounds smooth and idiomatic. Step 3: Compare it with the original "ribbons on her hair". While not impossible, "on her hair" is less natural and is rarely used in standard modern English for this meaning. Step 4: Examine "over". "Ribbons over her hair" suggests ribbons covering the hair as a sheet, which does not describe normal decoration and feels awkward. Step 5: Examine "through". "Ribbons through her hair" could be understood in a poetic sense but is not the standard collocation tested in exams. Step 6: Therefore, the best improvement of the underlined part is "in", giving "ribbons in her hair". Verification / Alternative check: Test the improved sentence in a broader context: "On her birthday, Sunita's sister had ribbons in her hair and a smile on her face." Here, "in her hair" and "on her face" follow common usage patterns, making the sentence sound natural. If we keep "on her hair", the contrast with "on her face" becomes slightly confusing, because hair is not treated as a flat surface where objects simply rest. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Over" would imply coverage or something hanging above, which does not match the idea of decorative ribbons placed among strands of hair. "Through" implies movement or penetration, not the final position of decoration. "No improvement" would keep the less natural "on her hair" and ignore the common idiomatic use of "in" with hair decorations. Hence, these options are not appropriate. Common Pitfalls: Prepositions are often influenced by direct translations from a learner's first language, leading to choices like "on the hair" or "on the head". To improve accuracy, memorise typical pairs such as "in her hair", "on his head" (for a hat), and "around her neck" (for a necklace). Regular reading and listening will make these combinations feel familiar, reducing the need to guess in exam conditions. Final Answer: in is the correct improvement, giving the sentence "Sunita's sister had ribbons in her hair."

Question 5

A part of the sentence is underlined. Choose the alternative that best improves the underlined part, or select "No improvement" if the sentence is already correct: "She has an ability for Mathematics."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question focuses on choosing the most appropriate noun to express natural talent or suitability for a subject. The sentence "She has an ability for Mathematics" is understandable but not the most idiomatic expression in standard English. You must select the word that native speakers commonly use to describe natural talent for subjects like Mathematics, music, or languages. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: "She has an ability for Mathematics." - Underlined phrase: "an ability for". - Options: "attitude", "aptitude", "altitude", "No improvement". - The intended meaning is that she is naturally good at Mathematics. Concept / Approach: The noun "aptitude" refers to a natural ability or talent for learning something, especially a subject or skill. We regularly use the phrase "aptitude for Mathematics" to describe someone who easily understands and performs well in that subject. While "ability" is not wrong as a general word, the set expression "an aptitude for Mathematics" is more precise and is the usage exam setters expect. The other options either refer to different concepts or are unrelated. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Clarify the intended meaning: the sentence wants to say that she is naturally good at Mathematics, not just that she occasionally does well. Step 2: Recall the word "aptitude", which means natural talent or capacity for learning, as in "aptitude for languages" or "aptitude test". Step 3: Replace the underlined part with "an aptitude for": "She has an aptitude for Mathematics." This sounds formal, precise, and idiomatic. Step 4: Examine "attitude". This refers to a person's feelings or mindset, not their talent. "Attitude for Mathematics" would incorrectly shift the focus to her feelings rather than her ability. Step 5: Examine "altitude". This word refers to height above sea level and is completely irrelevant in this context. Step 6: Consider "No improvement". While "an ability for Mathematics" is understandable, exam patterns and standard collocations strongly favour "aptitude for Mathematics". Therefore, "aptitude" is the best improvement. Verification / Alternative check: Compare similar expressions: "He has a natural aptitude for chess" or "Students with an aptitude for science". In each case, "aptitude" emphasises natural talent. If we say "He has an ability for chess", it sounds less natural, and we would more likely say "He has the ability to play chess well". The phrase "ability for" is not as fixed or idiomatic as "aptitude for", confirming that the latter is preferred. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Attitude" relates to a person's way of thinking or feeling, for example "a positive attitude", and does not directly describe talent. "Altitude" has a geographical and physical meaning about height and has nothing to do with academic skill. "No improvement" would leave an acceptable but weaker phrase in place instead of upgrading to the precise and common collocation "aptitude for Mathematics". Common Pitfalls: Because "ability" and "aptitude" are both associated with skill, many learners confuse them. A good rule is that "ability" is a general term, while "aptitude" is used especially for natural talent, often measured in "aptitude tests". Additionally, "attitude" is frequently misused by people who see it in similar contexts. Remember that "attitude" is about how someone feels or behaves, not about how skilful they are. Final Answer: aptitude is the correct improvement, giving the sentence "She has an aptitude for Mathematics."

Question 6

A part of the sentence is underlined. Choose the alternative that best improves the underlined part, or select "No improvement" if the sentence is already correct: "I was impressed of it."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question focuses on correct prepositional usage after certain adjectives, in this case the adjective "impressed". The sentence "I was impressed of it" contains a preposition that does not collocate properly with "impressed". You must choose the preposition that is normally used in standard English or decide that no change is needed. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: "I was impressed of it." - Underlined preposition: "of". - Options: "by", "on", "for", "No improvement". - The intended meaning is that something made a strong positive impact on the speaker. Concept / Approach: In standard English, the usual pattern is "impressed by" someone or something, or "impressed with" someone or something. The preposition "of" is not used after "impressed" in this sense. Therefore, "I was impressed by it" is the correct and idiomatic way to express that "it" created a good impression on the speaker. The other prepositions do not match the typical collocation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall examples of correct usage: "I was impressed by her performance" or "We were impressed by the speech". Step 2: Apply this pattern to the given sentence: "I was impressed by it." This is grammatically correct and natural. Step 3: Test "on": "I was impressed on it" does not form a recognised collocation and sounds incorrect. Step 4: Test "for": "I was impressed for it" also sounds unnatural and does not carry the intended meaning. Step 5: Consider "No improvement". Keeping "of" would leave the sentence in a nonstandard form, which is not acceptable for exam level English. Step 6: Therefore, the best improvement is to replace "of" with "by" to obtain "I was impressed by it". Verification / Alternative check: Think of similar sentences: "The judges were impressed by the dancers" or "Everyone was impressed by the new technology". In all these examples, "by" introduces the cause of the impression. Using "of" would be wrong: "impressed of the dancers" is never used in standard English. A quick search in good quality reading material will confirm that "impressed by" and "impressed with" are the correct patterns. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "On" is used with verbs like "depend on" or "insist on", but not with "impressed". "For" is used in patterns like "famous for", "known for", "responsible for", but not with "impressed" in this sense. "No improvement" would incorrectly accept "impressed of", which is nonstandard. Therefore, these three options do not provide the necessary correction. Common Pitfalls: Many learners choose prepositions based on their first language, leading to mistakes like "impressed of" or "impressed on". A good strategy is to memorise common adjective plus preposition pairs, such as "afraid of", "good at", "interested in", and "impressed by". Regular exposure to native level writing and listening will reinforce these patterns and reduce confusion during exams. Final Answer: by is the correct improvement, giving the sentence "I was impressed by it."

Question 7

A part of the sentence is underlined. Choose the alternative that best improves the underlined part, or select "No improvement" if the sentence is already correct: "Only high officials have access with the President."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests your knowledge of fixed prepositional phrases in English. The expression "access with the President" sounds incorrect. You must identify the preposition that properly completes the common phrase "have access ___ someone" and thus makes the sentence grammatical and idiomatic. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: "Only high officials have access with the President." - Underlined preposition: "with". span style="display:block;">- Options: "to", "for", "from", "No improvement". - Meaning: Only high officials are able to approach or meet the President. Concept / Approach: The standard phrase is "have access to" something or someone. It means to have the ability or permission to approach, use, or communicate with that person or thing. We say "access to the internet", "access to information", or "access to the manager". The preposition "with" is not used after "access" in this structure. Therefore, the sentence should read "have access to the President". Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall common collocations: "access to information", "access to the building", "access to the files". Step 2: Apply this pattern to the sentence: "Only high officials have access to the President." This is both grammatically correct and natural. Step 3: Test "for": "have access for the President" does not make sense; "for" would suggest purpose rather than the object of access. Step 4: Test "from": "have access from the President" incorrectly suggests that the President is the source or starting point of access, which is not the intended meaning. Step 5: Consider "No improvement". Keeping "with" would preserve an incorrect combination "access with", which is not idiomatic. Step 6: Conclude that "to" is the correct preposition, giving the correct phrase "have access to the President". Verification / Alternative check: Use the phrase in similar contexts: "Only authorised staff have access to the laboratory" or "Students have access to the library". In all such cases, the preposition following "access" is "to". If we attempted "access with the laboratory", the phrase would immediately sound strange. This consistency reinforces that "access to" is the only acceptable pattern here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "For" is used in expressions like "work for someone" or "responsible for something", but not with "access". "From" indicates origin, as in "come from the city", which is unrelated to being allowed to approach a person. "No improvement" would highlight "access with" as correct, but standard English grammar strongly prefers "access to". Therefore, these options must be rejected. Common Pitfalls: Students often overgeneralise the preposition "with" because it is used in phrases like "meet with" or "talk with". This leads to mistakes such as "access with". To avoid this, learn and memorise fixed expressions: "access to", "relationship with", "agreement with", "permission to". Flashcards or example sentences can help build this memory, improving both written and spoken accuracy. Final Answer: to is the correct improvement, giving the sentence "Only high officials have access to the President."

Question 8

A part of the sentence is underlined. Choose the alternative that best improves the underlined part, or select "No improvement" if the sentence is already correct: "No other snake is as poisonous as this one."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question examines your understanding of comparative structures and the use of "as...as" in English. The sentence "No other snake is as poisonous as this one" uses a negative combined with the positive "as...as" construction to make a comparison. You must determine whether this structure is already correct or whether one of the alternatives improves it. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: "No other snake is as poisonous as this one." - Underlined part: "is as poisonous as this one". - Options: "are as poisonous as this one", "is more poisonous as this one", "is poisonous than this one", "No improvement". - The intended meaning is that this snake is at least as poisonous as any other snake, implying that no other snake exceeds it in poisonousness. Concept / Approach: The pattern "No other + singular noun + is as + adjective + as + this one" is a standard way to express that something is the highest in degree for that quality. The singular subject "No other snake" correctly takes the singular verb "is". The double "as" construction is correct; problems arise only if we mix it with "more" or "than". Therefore, the original structure is grammatically sound and consistent with typical comparative usage. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check subject verb agreement. The subject is "No other snake" (singular), so the correct verb is "is". Option A, "are as poisonous as this one", would be wrong because "are" is plural. Step 2: Examine the comparative structure. "As poisonous as" is the correct form for equality comparison. It should not be combined with "more" or "than". Step 3: Evaluate option B: "is more poisonous as this one". This incorrectly mixes "more" with "as"; the proper pattern is "more poisonous than", not "more poisonous as". Step 4: Evaluate option C: "is poisonous than this one". This omits "more" before "poisonous" and incorrectly uses "than" with a positive adjective only. Step 5: Review the original: "No other snake is as poisonous as this one." It maintains subject verb agreement and uses "as...as" correctly. Step 6: Conclude that there is no grammatical or structural error, so "No improvement" is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Compare similar sentences that express the highest degree: "No other city is as crowded as this one", "No other student is as diligent as Rohan". These are standard and grammatically correct. The pattern expresses that the named item is at the top level of that quality. If we tried "No other city is more crowded as this one", it would sound wrong for the same reasons that make option B unacceptable. This confirms that the original structure is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A introduces a plural verb "are" for a singular subject, breaking subject verb agreement. Option B mixes two different comparative patterns, "more...than" and "as...as", which is incorrect; we never say "more poisonous as". Option C uses "than" without "more" or "less", which is also incorrect; "poisonous than" must be preceded by a comparative word like "more". Hence, all three alternatives contain clear grammatical errors. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes feel that a negative and a positive comparison structure together must be wrong and try to "improve" sentences that are already correct. For superlative meaning, both "No other snake is as poisonous as this one" and "This snake is more poisonous than any other snake" are acceptable. The exam often tests whether you can recognise a correct structure and confidently select "No improvement" instead of changing it unnecessarily. Final Answer: No improvement is required; the sentence "No other snake is as poisonous as this one" is correct.

Question 9

Read the passage about the history of steam powered vehicles and answer the question: "The first full scale, working steam powered tricycle was built by whom?"

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question focuses on careful extraction of factual information from a historical passage about the development of steam powered vehicles. The passage mentions several inventors and their contributions. You are asked specifically about the person who built the first full scale, working steam powered tricycle, which is an important step in automotive history. Given Data / Assumptions: - The passage mentions Ferdinand Verbiest designing a small steam powered model for the Chinese Emperor. - Nicolas Joseph Cugnot is described as building the first full scale, self propelled mechanical vehicle and also creating a steam powered tricycle. - Richard Trevithick built the "Puffing Devil" road locomotive. - Nicephore Niepce and his brother Claude created an early internal combustion engine called the Pyreolophore. - The question asks: "The first fullscale, working steam powered tricycle was built by:" Concept / Approach: For such factual questions, the correct approach is to locate the specific sentence in the passage that contains the key phrase. The relevant line states that Nicolas Joseph Cugnot is credited with building the first full scale, self propelled mechanical vehicle or automobile, and that he also created a steam powered tricycle. This clearly associates Cugnot, not the other inventors, with the first working steam tricycle. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify key words in the question: "first fullscale", "working", "steam powered tricycle". Step 2: Scan the passage for "steam powered tricycle". The sentence about Nicolas Joseph Cugnot mentions that he "also created a steam powered tricycle". Step 3: Note that this sentence appears in the context of describing Cugnot's work around 1769 on full scale, self propelled vehicles. Step 4: Confirm that none of the other inventors are linked to a steam powered tricycle in the passage. Verbiest made a small model vehicle, not a full scale tricycle. Trevithick built a road locomotive. Niepce worked on an internal combustion engine. Step 5: Therefore, the inventor of the first full scale, working steam powered tricycle mentioned is Nicolas Joseph Cugnot. Step 6: Match this to option B, "Cugnot". Verification / Alternative check: Re read the relevant part of the passage: it states that Cugnot is widely credited with building the first full scale, self propelled mechanical vehicle or automobile and that he also created a steam powered tricycle. The phrase "full scale" appears in direct connection with Cugnot, not with Verbiest, whose model was only 65 cm long and possibly never even built. This reinforces that Cugnot's work is the answer to the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Verbiest (or Verbiest/Verbies) designed a small model steam vehicle which could not carry a driver or passenger; it was not a full scale tricycle. Trevithick built the "Puffing Devil" locomotive, which is a different type of steam vehicle. Niepce is mentioned in connection with the first internal combustion engine, not a steam engine or a tricycle. None of these inventors are described as building the first full scale, working steam powered tricycle, so their options are incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Passage based questions with many names and inventions can cause confusion if you rely on memory alone instead of checking the text. A frequent mistake is to associate the "first" label with the first inventor mentioned (Verbiest) or with someone known for other firsts (Niepce and the internal combustion engine). To avoid such errors, always match the exact wording of the question with the specific phrase in the passage, especially when it includes qualifiers like "fullscale", "working", or "steam powered tricycle". Final Answer: Cugnot built the first full scale, working steam powered tricycle according to the passage.

Question 10

Read the passage about early steam vehicles and answer the question: "Cugnot built steam tractors for whom?"

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is another factual detail test from the same passage on the development of steam vehicles. It specifically asks about the group or institution for which Nicolas Joseph Cugnot constructed steam tractors. Such details are common in reading comprehension tests and require careful attention to who did what for whom. Given Data / Assumptions: - The passage says that Cugnot built the first full scale, self propelled mechanical vehicle and also created a steam powered tricycle. - It further states that he "constructed two steam tractors for the French Army". - One of these tractors is preserved in the French National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts. - The question: "Cugnot built steam tractors for:" followed by several options. Concept / Approach: The correct approach is to locate the exact sentence in the passage that names the recipient of Cugnot's steam tractors. The text clearly states that the two steam tractors were constructed for the French Army. The French National Conservatory is mentioned only as the place where one tractor is preserved, not as the customer. The Chinese Emperor and the Jesuit mission refer to Verbiest's earlier model, not to Cugnot's work. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the key phrase "steam tractors" in the passage. Step 2: Find the sentence: "He constructed two steam tractors for the French Army, one of which is preserved in the French National Conservatory of Arts and Crafts." Step 3: Note that the direct beneficiary named here is "the French Army". Step 4: Compare this with each option: The Chinese Emperor is associated with Verbiest's small model vehicle, not Cugnot's tractors. Step 5: The Jesuit mission refers to Verbiest's role as a member of a mission in China, not Cugnot's work. Step 6: The French Conservatory is simply the institution preserving one tractor, not the original client. Therefore, "The French Army" is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Re read the relevant part of the passage slowly, paying attention to prepositions. The phrase "for the French Army" clearly indicates purpose and client, while "in the French National Conservatory" describes the current location. This distinction between "for" and "in" helps confirm that the tractors were built for military use, not for a museum or conservatory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "The Chinese Emperor", is linked to Verbiest's toy like model steam vehicle from 1672, which could not carry passengers. Option C, "The Jesuit mission", again relates to Verbiest's role as a Jesuit in China. Option D, "The French Conservatory", is the modern home of one of the tractors, not the organisation for which the tractors were originally built. Therefore, these three options misinterpret the relationships described in the passage. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse "for" with "in" or "at" when reading quickly. They may notice the phrase "French National Conservatory" and assume that Cugnot built the tractors for that institution. To avoid such mistakes, always pay attention to the prepositions used: "for" indicates the beneficiary or purpose, while "in" indicates location. If you train yourself to underline such small but important words while practising, you will handle similar questions more accurately in real exams. Final Answer: The French Army is the correct answer; Cugnot built steam tractors for the French Army.

Question 11

Read the passage about early steam vehicles and answer the question: "What was the main problem with Trevithick's Puffing Devil road locomotive?"

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question asks you to identify the specific weakness of Richard Trevithick's "Puffing Devil" road locomotive, as described in the passage. Such questions test your ability to distinguish between issues faced by different inventors and to link the right problem with the right machine. Given Data / Assumptions: - The passage states that Trevithick built and demonstrated his "Puffing Devil" road locomotive in 1801. - It then notes that many people consider this the first demonstration of a steam powered road vehicle. - Immediately afterwards, the passage explains that "It was unable to maintain sufficient steam pressure for long periods." - Other problems in the passage relate to water supply issues with Cugnot's inventions and passenger carrying capability for Verbiest's model, not to Trevithick. Concept / Approach: To answer correctly, you must match the phrase "Puffing Devil road locomotive" to the sentence that describes its limitation. The passage clearly states that the problem was maintaining enough steam pressure for long periods. This distinguishes Trevithick's challenge from other inventors who had different issues, such as water supply or small scale models. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the part of the passage discussing Trevithick: "In 1801, Richard Trevithick built and demonstrated his Puffing Devil road locomotive..." Step 2: Read the following sentence carefully: "It was unable to maintain sufficient steam pressure for long periods." Step 3: Recognise that "It" refers to the Puffing Devil road locomotive. Step 4: Match this explanation to option C: "Its inability to maintain sufficient steam pressure." Step 5: Check option A, which describes Verbiest's small model that could not carry a driver or passenger, not Trevithick's machine. Step 6: Check option B, "Problems with the water supply system", which the passage associates generally with Cugnot's inventions, not with the Puffing Devil. Option D mentions a combustion engine, which refers to Niepce's Pyreolophore, not a steam locomotive. Thus, option C is correct. Verification / Alternative check: Re read where the passage mentions "His inventions were however handicapped by problems of water supply and maintaining steam pressure." This sentence applies to Cugnot, not Trevithick. A separate sentence for Trevithick's Puffing Devil explicitly states the issue: "It was unable to maintain sufficient steam pressure for long periods." This separation of details between inventors helps verify that each problem belongs to a specific machine. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A ("Its incapability to carry a driver or a passenger") is taken from the description of Verbiest's 65 cm long model vehicle for the Chinese Emperor. Option B generalises water supply problems, which the passage attributes to Cugnot's tractors and vehicles, not specifically to the Puffing Devil. Option D ("Its combustion engine design") is wrong because the Puffing Devil is described as a steam powered road locomotive; the combustion engine is discussed later with respect to Niepce's Pyreolophore. Common Pitfalls: When passages describe several inventors and multiple technical issues, students often mix up which problem belongs to which inventor. A good strategy is to underline or mentally tag each inventor's name with a brief keyword (for example, "Verbiest model", "Cugnot tractors water/pressure", "Trevithick Puffing Devil steam pressure", "Niepce internal combustion"). This mental mapping helps you quickly return to the correct sentence when answering detail based questions. Final Answer: Its inability to maintain sufficient steam pressure was the main problem with Trevithick's Puffing Devil road locomotive.

Question 12

Read the passage about steam powered road vehicles and answer the vocabulary question: In the sentence "Sentiment against steam powered road vehicles led to the Locomotive Acts of 1865", what does the word "Sentiment" most nearly mean?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to infer the meaning of a word from context. The passage describes how people reacted to steam powered road vehicles, and it uses the word "Sentiment" in the sentence "Sentiment against steam powered road vehicles led to the Locomotive Acts of 1865." You must choose the word that best captures the feeling expressed by "sentiment against" in this context. Given Data / Assumptions: - Key sentence: "Sentiment against steam powered road vehicles led to the Locomotive Acts of 1865." - Options: "Depression", "Fascination", "Celebration", "Resentment". - The phrase "against" indicates a negative attitude or opposition. - The Locomotive Acts imposed restrictions, suggesting public or political pressure against such vehicles. Concept / Approach: "Sentiment" in this context refers to the prevailing public opinion or feeling. Because the sentence talks about "sentiment against" something, the feeling is clearly negative, not positive. The most appropriate synonym among the options that expresses a negative, hostile, or disapproving attitude is "resentment". The other options either describe positive feelings or a different kind of negative feeling unrelated to opposition. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the phrase "sentiment against". The preposition "against" shows that the feeling is directed oppositely towards steam powered road vehicles. Step 2: Understand that such negative sentiment was strong enough to influence legislation, leading to the Locomotive Acts, which were restrictive laws. Step 3: Examine "resentment". This word means a feeling of anger or displeasure about something one perceives as unfair or undesirable, often leading to opposition. Step 4: Compare "resentment" with the context: people likely resented steam powered vehicles because of noise, danger, or disruption, and this resentment could drive restrictive laws. Step 5: Examine "depression". This refers to a low mood or economic downturn, not a feeling "against" a specific technology. Step 6: Examine "fascination" and "celebration", which are clearly positive feelings of admiration or joy, contradicting the idea of being "against" something. Thus, "resentment" is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Try substituting each option into the sentence: "Resentment against steam powered road vehicles led to the Locomotive Acts of 1865" is logical; public resentment could push lawmakers to act. "Depression against" makes no sense. "Fascination against" and "Celebration against" are self contradictory, because fascination and celebration would create support, not opposition, and would not normally lead to restrictive acts. This substitution test confirms that "resentment" fits both grammatically and logically. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Depression" is about sadness or economic decline, not about opposition to something. "Fascination" means strong interest or attraction, which would encourage the development of steam vehicles rather than lead to restrictive laws. "Celebration" refers to joyful acknowledgement of something, again opposite to the negative tone signalled by "against". None of these words match the idea of negative public opinion driving regulation. Common Pitfalls: Some students may focus only on the word "Sentiment" and recall that it can refer to emotions in general, then choose "depression" because it is a type of emotion. However, the presence of "against" is crucial; it clearly indicates a hostile or disapproving feeling directed at something. Always pay attention to the words immediately around the target vocabulary item, especially prepositions and outcome clauses, to determine the best synonym in context. Final Answer: Resentment is the correct meaning of "Sentiment" in the context of "Sentiment against steam powered road vehicles".

Question 13

Read the passage about early engines and answer the question: "What was the Pyreolophore?"

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reading comprehension question asks about the specific invention called the "Pyreolophore", mentioned toward the end of the passage. The question checks whether you have noted not only names and dates, but also the type of technology associated with each inventor. The Pyreolophore marks an important shift from steam power to internal combustion. Given Data / Assumptions: - The passage says that in 1807, Nicephore Niepce and his brother Claude probably created the world's first internal combustion engine. - It states that they called this engine the "Pyreolophore". - Earlier parts of the passage deal with steam powered models, tricycles, tractors, and locomotives. - The question asks directly: "The Pyreolophore was?" with options describing different types of vehicles and engines. Concept / Approach: The key is to recall that the Pyreolophore is explicitly named as the early internal combustion engine created by Niepce and his brother. It is not described as a vehicle, but as the engine itself. While other options mention vehicles or steam tractors, only the option describing it as "the name of the world's first internal combustion engine" matches the passage accurately. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Find the relevant sentence in the passage: "In 1807 Nicephore Niepce and his brother Claude probably created the world's first internal combustion engine which they called Pyreolophore." Step 2: Note that the sentence clearly identifies the Pyreolophore as the engine's name, not as a vehicle. Step 3: Option D restates this information: "The name of the world's first internal combustion engine". Step 4: Examine option A, which describes "a self propelled mechanical vehicle", but that description in the passage refers to Cugnot's work, not to Niepce's Pyreolophore. Step 5: Examine option B, "a steam powered tricycle", which applies to Cugnot's vehicle as well, not to the Pyreolophore. Step 6: Examine option C, "a steam tractor", also associated with Cugnot. Therefore, only option D correctly identifies the Pyreolophore. Verification / Alternative check: Re read the lines on Niepce carefully: they clearly introduce a new type of engine, distinct from the steam powered devices discussed earlier. The phrase "first internal combustion engine" shows that this is about a new power source, not another steam vehicle. Because the passage states that this engine was called "Pyreolophore", the best answer is the one that names it as such. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options A, B, and C are all types of vehicles or tractors described earlier in the passage in connection with Cugnot and others, but the Pyreolophore is specifically named as an engine, not as a vehicle. Confusing the power source (engine) with the vehicles it might drive would lead to a wrong answer. None of those descriptions match the role assigned to the Pyreolophore in the passage. Common Pitfalls: Because the passage discusses many different inventions in quick succession, students sometimes associate the most recent name they remember with the wrong description. Another common mistake is to assume that every named invention is a vehicle, whereas here the Pyreolophore is clearly an engine. To avoid this, pay attention to the exact wording: note where the passage says "vehicle", "tricycle", "tractor", "locomotive", or "engine", and mentally classify each accordingly. Final Answer: The name of the world's first internal combustion engine is the correct description of the Pyreolophore.

Question 14

Out of the following options, choose the word which best expresses the meaning of the given word "INDOLENT".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests your knowledge of English synonyms. The word "indolent" is used to describe a person or behaviour that shows a dislike of work or effort. Your task is to pick the option that has essentially the same meaning as "indolent" from the given choices. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: "INDOLENT". - Options: "LAZY", "EXPENSIVE", "ACTIVE", "HAPPY". - The word refers to attitude towards work or activity, not to cost or emotional state. Concept / Approach: "Indolent" means "habitually lazy" or "disliking activity or effort; slow to act". It is often used in slightly formal or written English, but the underlying idea is the same as "lazy". The other options describe completely different concepts: costliness, energy level in a positive sense, and emotional happiness. Therefore, "LAZY" is the correct synonym. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the definition of "indolent": unwilling to work, disliking activity, or showing a tendency to avoid effort. Step 2: Examine "LAZY". This word directly describes someone who does not like to work or exert himself or herself. It matches the core idea of "indolent". Step 3: Examine "EXPENSIVE". This word refers to something that costs a lot of money. It has no connection with a person's willingness to work. Step 4: Examine "ACTIVE". This is almost the opposite of "indolent"; an active person is energetic and busy, not lazy. Step 5: Examine "HAPPY". This describes an emotional state of joy or contentment and is unrelated to work habits. Step 6: Conclude that "LAZY" is the only option that shares both context and meaning with "indolent". Verification / Alternative check: Consider sample sentences: "His indolent attitude annoyed his employer" and "His lazy attitude annoyed his employer" both suggest that he is not willing to put in effort. If you replace "indolent" with "expensive", "active", or "happy", the sentences become meaningless or contradictory. This comparison confirms that "LAZY" is the appropriate synonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "EXPENSIVE" relates to price, not to behaviour. "ACTIVE" describes someone who has energy and engages in many activities, which is the opposite of indolent. "HAPPY" refers to a positive mood and cannot be used to describe laziness or reluctance to work. These words belong to entirely different semantic fields and cannot be synonyms of "indolent". Common Pitfalls: Some students might confuse "indolent" with "insolent" (disrespectful or rude) due to similar spelling, leading them to think of emotional or social meanings instead of work related ones. To avoid such confusion, pay attention to context and remember that "indolent" comes from Latin roots relating to pain and effort, suggesting a desire to avoid exertion. Linking it firmly with "lazy" in your memory will help you recall the meaning quickly in exams. Final Answer: LAZY is the word that best expresses the meaning of "INDOLENT".

Question 15

In this English vocabulary question, choose the word that is opposite in meaning (antonym) to the given word INSOLENT.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In competitive English vocabulary, questions on antonyms test how well you understand fine shades of meaning in common adjectives. The given word here is INSOLENT. To answer correctly, you must know what this word means and then select the option that expresses the opposite quality, not merely a different or unrelated one. Given Data / Assumptions: - Given key word: INSOLENT. - You must choose one option that is opposite in meaning. - Options: SCRUPULOUS, EMOLLIENT, COURTEOUS, LAZY. - Standard dictionary meanings of these words are assumed. Concept / Approach: The word INSOLENT describes a person who is rude, disrespectful, and often openly insulting, especially toward someone who deserves respect. An antonym must therefore describe a person who behaves with politeness, respect, and good manners. While some distractor options may be positive qualities, only one will directly contrast with the idea of rude or disrespectful behaviour. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that INSOLENT means rude, boldly disrespectful, or impertinent. Step 2: Consider SCRUPULOUS. This means extremely careful, honest, and attentive to moral details. It refers mainly to moral conscience, not politeness. Step 3: Consider EMOLLIENT. This usually means soothing or softening, especially a substance used to soften the skin. It does not directly relate to manners. Step 4: Consider COURTEOUS. This means polite, respectful, and considerate in behaviour and speech, which is the direct opposite of rude and disrespectful. Step 5: Consider LAZY. This means unwilling to work or lacking energy. Laziness is unrelated to politeness versus rudeness. Step 6: Therefore, COURTEOUS is the only word that clearly expresses the opposite quality to INSOLENT. Verification / Alternative check: A quick way to verify is to imagine example sentences. An insolent student talks back rudely to a teacher. A courteous student speaks respectfully and uses polite language. When two adjectives can be used in clearly opposite behaviour descriptions, they are good antonyms. None of the other options create such a clear contrast when used in similar contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: SCRUPULOUS is about moral integrity and carefulness, not specifically about respectful or polite speech. EMOLLIENT refers mostly to soothing or softening qualities, often for substances, and has no direct connection with rude or polite behaviour. LAZY describes energy level and willingness to work, which is unrelated to manners or respect. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose a generally positive word, assuming any positive word is an antonym of a negative one. However, antonyms must contrast along the same dimension. Insolent describes manners, so the opposite must also be about manners. Another common error is guessing based on familiarity and not checking the exact sense of the word. Always compare the core idea, in this case rude versus polite. Final Answer: The correct antonym of INSOLENT is COURTEOUS.

Question 16

In this English spelling question, choose the correctly spelt form of the word beneficiary from the following options.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions in English aim to check whether you can recognise the correct written form of commonly used words. The word beneficiary appears frequently in legal, financial, and everyday contexts, so knowing its spelling is useful for both exams and real life communication. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: beneficiary. - Four possible spellings are provided. - Only one option matches the standard dictionary spelling. - Pronunciation of all options is assumed to be similar, which can make the choice confusing. Concept / Approach: Beneficiary is derived from the base word benefit. To spell such words, it helps to identify the root and then the typical suffix pattern. Here, benefit plus the suffix iary produces beneficiary. Many distractor options introduce extra letters or swap vowels, which are common spelling errors that exam setters use deliberately. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that benefit is spelt b e n e f i t. Step 2: The word beneficiary means a person who receives benefit, for example money or advantage from a will or policy. Step 3: Attach the suffix iary to the base, giving b e n e f i c i a r y. Step 4: Option A spells the word exactly as beneficiary, matching the standard dictionary form. Step 5: Options B, C, and D introduce wrong vowel combinations such as i c i a r y or rearrange letters incorrectly. Step 6: Therefore, option A is the only correctly spelt word. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify using word structure. Many words that refer to a person receiving something end with iary, such as legatee or beneficiary. Saying the word slowly in syllables, be ne fi cia ry, confirms the position of vowels. The sequence e after b, then ne, then fi, then cia, then ry fits the conventional spelling pattern found in dictionaries and reading materials. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Benificiary in option B wrongly replaces the first e after b with i, breaking the connection with the word benefit. Beneficeary in option C adds an extra e after c, creating an incorrect and unnatural sequence. Benefeciary in option D rearranges vowels in the second half of the word, again not matching the standard form. Common Pitfalls: Learners often rely only on how a word sounds, which can be misleading in English due to irregular spelling. Another pitfall is focusing on the middle letters and overlooking the root benefit. To avoid these issues, always identify the base word and then check common suffix patterns such as ary, ery, or ory. Knowing that beneficiary is linked to benefit makes the correct spelling much easier to remember. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Beneficiary.

Question 17

In the following English sentence, identify the part that contains an error, or choose No error if the sentence is correct: Had I been in the position of my brother, I would have refused the offer.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Error spotting questions in English grammar test your understanding of tense, conditional structures, and sentence patterns used in formal writing. The sentence here uses a conditional construction beginning with Had I been, which is a slightly formal, inverted form of a third conditional clause. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: Had I been in the position of my brother, I would have refused the offer. - Part A: Had I been. - Part B: in my brother s position. - Part C: I would have refused the offer. - Part D: No error. Concept / Approach: This sentence expresses an unreal past condition and its possible past result. English uses the third conditional for such situations. The standard form is If I had been in my brother s position, I would have refused the offer. In formal usage, the if clause can be inverted by dropping if and placing had at the beginning: Had I been in my brother s position. Both forms are grammatically correct. The main idea is that the speaker was not actually in that position but imagines what would have happened if he were. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check Part A, Had I been. This matches the correct inverted third conditional form. Step 2: Check Part B, in my brother s position. This correctly describes a hypothetical role and follows the verb been. Step 3: Check Part C, I would have refused the offer. This is the correct form of the result clause in a third conditional, would have plus past participle. Step 4: Since all three parts follow correct grammar rules, there is no error in any segment. Step 5: Therefore, the correct choice is the option that states No error. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence using if to verify: If I had been in my brother s position, I would have refused the offer. This structure is clearly correct for unreal situations in the past. When we invert the clause to Had I been in my brother s position, the meaning and tense remain exactly the same, so the grammar must still be correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is correct because Had I been is a valid inversion of If I had been. Option B is correct because in my brother s position properly follows the verb been and uses a natural expression. Option C is correct because would have refused is the right verb form in the result part of a third conditional sentence. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes think that any sentence starting with Had must be wrong because they are more familiar with if clauses. Another common mistake is to try to change would have refused to would refuse or will refuse, which would break the time reference and conditional type. Remember that third conditional sentences describing unreal past situations use had plus past participle in the condition clause and would have plus past participle in the result clause. Final Answer: The sentence is correct, so the right choice is D, No error.

Question 18

In the following English sentence, identify the part that contains an error, or choose No error if the sentence is correct: His parents usually spent their summer in Ooty, but this year they are spending it in Darjeeling.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of tense consistency and the use of present versus past forms to describe habitual actions. In English, general habits or routines are usually expressed in the simple present tense, while specific completed actions in the past use the simple past. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: His parents usually spent their summer in Ooty, but this year they are spending it in Darjeeling. - Part A: His parents usually spent. - Part B: their summer in Ooty. - Part C: but this year they are spending it in Darjeeling. - Part D: No error. Concept / Approach: The adverb usually describes a regular habit over many years. In standard English, we use the simple present for such habits, for example, His parents usually spend their summer in Ooty. The second clause but this year they are spending it in Darjeeling describes an ongoing or special action this year, and uses the present continuous, which is correct. The error therefore lies in the mismatch between usually and spent in the first clause. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the time markers. Usually indicates a general habit, and this year indicates the current specific case. Step 2: For general habits, English uses the simple present: spend, not spent. Step 3: Examine Part A, His parents usually spent. This wrongly combines usually with a simple past verb. Step 4: The correct form should be His parents usually spend. Step 5: Part C, but this year they are spending it in Darjeeling, correctly uses present continuous for a special action this year. Step 6: Therefore, the error is in Part A. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence with corrected tense: His parents usually spend their summer in Ooty, but this year they are spending it in Darjeeling. Now the first clause states a general habit, and the second clause describes an exception in the present. Both parts fit naturally with the time expressions usually and this year, confirming that the correction is valid. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part B their summer in Ooty is a correct and natural phrase indicating place of vacation. Part C but this year they are spending it in Darjeeling correctly uses present continuous to describe what is happening this year. Part D No error is wrong because we have already identified an error in the verb tense in Part A. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to match the tense of both clauses mechanically, for example using spent in both, without noticing the role of usually and this year. Another pitfall is to think that usually can be freely used with past forms. While this is possible if you speak about past habits that no longer continue, here the second clause clearly refers to this year, so the habit is still current, and the simple present spend is required. Final Answer: The error is in Part A, which should read His parents usually spend.

Question 19

In the following English sentence, identify the part that contains an error, or choose No error if the sentence is correct: He lost heart because he could not cope with the difficulties in life.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on the correct use of English phrasal verbs. Many learners confuse combinations such as cope up with and cope with. Examiners often test this by inserting a wrong preposition or an extra particle in an otherwise correct sentence. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: He lost heart because he could not cope up with the difficulties in life. - Part A: He lost heart. - Part B: because he could not cope up with. - Part C: the difficulties in life. - Part D: No error. Concept / Approach: The correct idiomatic expression in standard English is cope with something, meaning to manage, handle, or deal successfully with a difficult situation. The phrase cope up with is non standard and considered incorrect in formal writing. Therefore, the error lies in the extra particle up, which should not be present. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main phrasal verb: cope up with. Step 2: Recall the correct standard form: cope with. Step 3: Observe that the word up is unnecessary and ungrammatical in this context. Step 4: Replace cope up with by cope with to form a correct expression. Step 5: The rest of the sentence, He lost heart and the difficulties in life, is grammatically and idiomatically correct. Step 6: Therefore, the error occurs in Part B. Verification / Alternative check: Check standard usage: We say cope with pressure, cope with stress, cope with exams, and cope with loss. In each case, the pattern is cope with plus noun. Native speaker usage and grammar references do not list cope up with as correct. Replacing the phrase in the sentence gives He lost heart because he could not cope with the difficulties in life, which sounds natural and correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Part A He lost heart is a standard idiom meaning he became discouraged or lost courage. Part C the difficulties in life is grammatically correct and expresses the object of the verb cope with. Part D No error is not correct because there is clearly an error with the phrasal verb in Part B. Common Pitfalls: A very common pitfall for learners is to add up to many phrasal verbs, influenced by expressions like give up or pick up. However, not every verb plus preposition can be extended in this way. Another error is to ignore small preposition changes, even though they often decide whether an expression is standard. Always memorise common phrasal verbs exactly as they are used in reliable sources. Final Answer: The error is in Part B; the correct phrase is could not cope with.

Question 20

Fill in the blank with the correct phrasal verb: Due to heavy rains, the match was called _____.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of common English phrasal verbs, especially those used with events like matches, meetings, or functions. Choosing the correct particle can completely change the meaning of the verb, so you must be familiar with idiomatic combinations rather than translating word by word. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: Due to heavy rains, the match was called _____. - Options: of, off, down, out. - Context: the match did not take place because of heavy rain. - Passive voice is used, was called plus particle. Concept / Approach: The phrasal verb call off means to cancel something that was planned, such as a match, strike, or meeting. When we say the match was called off, it means the organisers decided not to conduct the match. The other particles with call either have different meanings or are not standard in this context. Therefore, the correct particle is off. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the sentence describes cancellation because of heavy rains. Step 2: Recall the phrasal verb call off, which means to cancel. Step 3: Fit it into the passive form: the match was called off. Step 4: Test other options. Called of is ungrammatical and has no recognised meaning here. Step 5: Called down usually means to criticise or scold someone, which does not fit the sentence. Step 6: Called out means to shout or summon someone, again not suitable for cancelling a match. Step 7: Thus, off is the only correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Check with similar sentences: The strike was called off after negotiations, The meeting was called off due to lack of quorum. In all these examples, call off clearly means cancel. Replacing it in the original sentence as Due to heavy rains, the match was called off produces a natural and grammatically correct result, confirming the choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Of in option A does not form a standard phrasal verb with call in this sense and makes the sentence incorrect. Down in option C would suggest a different meaning, such as criticise, and is not idiomatic with match as object. Out in option D suggests making a public announcement or challenging someone, but not cancelling an event. Common Pitfalls: Many learners look at the literal meaning of the particle and guess, for example, thinking that out might mean outside and thus associate it with rain. However, phrasal verbs are idiomatic, and literal guesses often fail. It is important to learn common collocations like call off, put off, and break up as fixed expressions with their specific meanings. Final Answer: The correct phrasal verb is was called off, so the answer is off.

English Questions