Question 1

The following question consists of four labelled sentences P, Q, R and S about public sector banks and systemic reform. When arranged correctly, they form a coherent paragraph. Select the option that gives the best order.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This para jumble concerns economic policy and the governance structure of public sector banks. The four sentences talk about the need for systemic reform, the basic reform required in holding structures, a possible holding company solution, and the limited role given to the Banks Board Bureau. Your task is to arrange them to form a logically consistent paragraph. Understanding the flow from general reform need to specific structural suggestions and critique of current arrangements is key to solving this question correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: Q states that public sector banks need systemic reform to overhaul their current decision making structure and culture. P says that the basic reform they need is to change their holding structure to give them autonomy and accountability, rather than just promising no government interference. R suggests that if the government does not want to free the banks from majority state ownership, it could create a holding company that would own equity, appoint boards and supervise functioning. S notes that it is surprising that after appointing the Banks Board Bureau, it has been given little role in reforming public sector banks. The paragraph must describe the need, the structural solution, and a related critique. Concept / Approach: In such policy based paragraphs, the author usually begins with a broad statement of the problem or reform need. Then come more detailed proposals that describe the basic reform and specific mechanisms to implement it. Finally, the author may comment on present instruments such as the Banks Board Bureau and their limitations. By following this structure, we can identify which sentence introduces the issue, which ones expand it, and which one provides a critical observation about actual practice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Sentence Q is the natural starting point because it makes a general claim that public sector banks need systemic reform to change their decision making structure and culture. This sets the theme for the rest of the paragraph. Step 2: Sentence P follows logically, as it specifies what the basic reform should be. It states that the banks need a change in holding structure to gain autonomy and accountability instead of mere promises of no interference. Step 3: Sentence R then offers a concrete mechanism to achieve what P proposes. It suggests that if the government wishes to retain majority ownership, it can still create a holding company to hold equity, appoint boards and supervise functioning, keeping banks at arm's length. Step 4: Sentence S is best placed at the end because it comments on the Banks Board Bureau, which was meant to help in such reforms. The sentence criticises the fact that it has been given little role, implying a gap between the needed reform and current practice. Step 5: Putting the pieces together yields Q P R S, which corresponds to option QPRS. Verification / Alternative check: Reading QPRS as a single paragraph, it flows smoothly: it begins by identifying the need for systemic reform, then describes the basic change in holding structure, then suggests a practical holding company model, and finally points out that the existing Banks Board Bureau has not been empowered adequately. This order takes the reader from the problem through potential solutions to a criticism of existing arrangements, which is the natural course of an analytical argument about policy reform. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option PRQS opens with P, which dives into a particular reform about holding structure without first stating that broader systemic reform is required, making the context less clear. Option RQSP begins with R, which mentions the government and a holding company without explaining why such a change is even needed. Option RSPQ is even less coherent, as it puts the holding company proposal before the background and ends with P instead of the Banks Board Bureau critique, disrupting the argument's rhythm. These sequences fail to provide as clear a progression as QPRS. Common Pitfalls: Many examinees misplace sentences containing striking proposals at the beginning, ignoring the importance of a general statement of the problem. Others do not notice that critical comments regarding existing bodies such as the Banks Board Bureau naturally belong near the end of a paragraph. When dealing with policy arguments, always look for this pattern: statement of need, basic description of reform, specific structural proposal, and then commentary on current implementation gaps. Following this pattern will guide you to the correct ordering in similar questions. Final Answer: The most logical order of the sentences is QPRS, so the correct answer is option QPRS.

Question 2

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A person employed to drive a private or hired car.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks you to choose a single English word that accurately replaces a descriptive phrase. Such questions are known as one word substitution items. Here, the phrase describes “a person employed to drive a private or hired car.” To answer correctly, you must know the precise meanings and typical usage of the options. These items are very common in competitive exams and help check whether you can use concise, precise vocabulary instead of longer descriptive phrases. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase defines someone whose job is to drive a private or hired car. Option Chauffeur refers to a professional driver, usually employed to drive a private car or hired vehicle for another person. Amateur usually refers to someone who engages in an activity for pleasure rather than as a profession. Connoisseur refers to a person with expert knowledge and refined taste, often in food, art or wine. Provocateur refers to a person who provokes, often politically, and is not related to driving. The task is to identify which single word best matches the given definition. Concept / Approach: One word substitution questions require you to map a descriptive phrase to a single lexical item from the options. The correct option should not only roughly fit but should be the standard dictionary term that native speakers would use in formal and semi formal contexts. Meanwhile, the distractor options are often real words with very different meanings. Eliminating options that are obviously unrelated helps narrow the choices. The key is to focus on both the core activity described in the phrase and whether it is a professional or casual role. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the core meaning of the phrase. It clearly talks about a person whose job is to drive someone else's private or hired car. Step 2: Consider the option Chauffeur. A chauffeur is a person employed to drive a private or hired car or limousine for another individual or organisation. This definition matches the phrase almost word for word. Step 3: Examine the distractor options. Amateur is someone who does an activity as a hobby, not as paid employment. That does not match the sense of an employed driver. Step 4: Connoisseur is an expert judge of taste, usually in food, wine or art, which has nothing to do with driving. Step 5: Provocateur refers to a person who deliberately provokes others, often to cause political or social agitation. Again, this has no connection to the driving profession. Step 6: Since only Chauffeur matches the given phrase exactly, it is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify your choice by imagining example sentences. For instance, “He works as a chauffeur for a wealthy family” fits the idea of being employed to drive a private car. The other words do not sensibly fit if you replace the phrase in such sentences. Additionally, standard dictionaries and everyday usage consistently use chauffeur to describe drivers employed for private cars or taxis in many formal contexts. This confirms that Chauffeur is the precise one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Amateur describes the level of professionalism and implies someone is not paid or is unskilled, but it does not tell you anything about driving. Connoisseur is an expert in appreciating quality, not a driver. Provocateur is associated with provoking events or emotions, especially in politics, and has no relationship to operating a vehicle for hire. Because the question specifically focuses on an employed driver of a private or hired car, none of these other words can replace the phrase without changing the meaning. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes select words simply because they sound sophisticated or French, as Chauffeur and Connoisseur both do. However, relying only on sound can be misleading. Always recall or quickly deduce the actual meanings of the options. Another pitfall is overlooking the word employed, which signals a professional role and rules out terms related to hobbies. Training yourself to break the phrase into key ideas, such as profession plus driving, will help you answer one word substitution questions more accurately. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute is Chauffeur, so the correct answer is option Chauffeur.

Question 3

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “Costing nothing.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks you to replace a descriptive phrase with a single word in English. The phrase is “costing nothing.” The goal is to identify the standard word that means something is free of charge. Such one word substitution questions check whether you can connect clear definitions to concise terms that occur frequently in formal reading passages and instructions, such as on tickets, advertisements or notices. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase “costing nothing” means something is provided free of charge with no payment required. Gratis is an English word borrowed from Latin which means “free” or “without charge.” Fortis generally refers to being strong and is used in specialised linguistic or medical contexts, not about price. Glottis refers to a part of the larynx in anatomy, connected with the vocal cords. Abatis refers to a field fortification made of felled trees, not a monetary idea. We must select the word that directly expresses the idea of being free of cost. Concept / Approach: To solve one word substitution questions, break the phrase into its core concept and check which option is the standard concise term. The phrase here contains the idea of cost and the fact that the cost is zero. Therefore, the correct word must be one that speakers use to describe “free of charge” conditions. The other options are deliberately chosen technical or unrelated words set as distractors. Knowing basic roots and common Latin borrowings like gratis can significantly improve performance in such vocabulary items. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the phrase. “Costing nothing” clearly indicates that you do not have to pay for the item or service. Step 2: Evaluate the option Gratis. This word is widely used to mean “for free,” “without payment,” or “free of charge,” for example, “The brochures were given gratis to visitors.” It therefore matches the phrase exactly. Step 3: Check Fortis. This word does not relate to price. In linguistics, it can refer to strong articulation of a consonant, while in Latin it simply means strong. It does not mean free. Step 4: Check Glottis. This is an anatomical term describing part of the voice box, dealing with sound production in the throat. It has no connection with money or cost. Step 5: Check Abatis. This word denotes military obstacles or fences made from felled trees. Again, it is unrelated to the idea of cost or price. Step 6: Since only Gratis expresses the idea of costing nothing, it is the correct option. Verification / Alternative check: To verify your choice, imagine replacing the phrase in a sentence. “Entry to the museum is gratis” clearly means entry is free. Substituting Fortis, Glottis or Abatis would make the sentence nonsensical. You can also recall that many shops or services use the phrase “items are given gratis” in notices, clearly meaning given without payment. This confirms that Gratis is standard usage for “costing nothing.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: Fortis, Glottis and Abatis are all technical terms from different fields. Fortis is related to strength or strong articulation, Glottis is connected to anatomy of the throat, and Abatis is a military fortification of felled trees. None of these words carry the meaning of something being free of charge. Choosing any of them would therefore completely change the sense of any sentence in which they replaced the phrase “costing nothing.” Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes misread such questions and look for a word that merely sounds similar to English “gratis” or “grateful.” It is important to focus on the meaning provided by the phrase, not on the sound patterns of the options. Another common pitfall is unfamiliarity with borrowed Latin terms used in English. Building a small mental list of common Latin words such as gratis, per annum, and versus can give a helpful advantage in vocabulary questions across exams. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “costing nothing” is Gratis, so the correct answer is option Gratis.

Question 4

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “Any new participant in some activity.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question asks you to identify the correct word for “any new participant in some activity.” The focus is on a person who is new to a field, activity or subject. Such words are commonly tested because they are useful in academic and professional writing to describe beginners, novices or learners. Recognising the correct option also involves knowing that several distractor choices are scientific terms ending with the same suffix but belonging to botany rather than general English vocabulary for people. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase describes someone who is new to a particular activity, field or skill. Neophyte is a word that means a beginner or someone who is new to a subject or activity. Holophyte, Mesophyte and Epiphyte are technical terms used mainly in botany to describe types of plants based on environmental conditions or growth patterns. The task is to choose the word that refers specifically to a new human participant, not to a plant type. Concept / Approach: The key concept in the phrase is newness in participation. In English, several words denote beginners, such as novice, rookie, and neophyte. The suffix phyte literally refers to plant in Greek, which offers a hint that words like Holophyte and Epiphyte are likely botanical. Therefore, by combining knowledge of meaning and etymology, we can quickly eliminate the distractors and select the word that is regularly used to describe a person who has recently started doing something. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the phrase. It clearly refers to a new participant in an activity, such as a new student, new member of a club or someone just starting a hobby. Step 2: Consider Neophyte. This word is commonly defined as a beginner or novice, especially someone who has recently joined a religion, organisation or field of activity. It precisely matches the idea of a new participant. Step 3: Check Holophyte. This is a botanical term for an organism that obtains its food by photosynthesis, essentially an autotrophic plant. It has nothing to do with human beginners. Step 4: Check Mesophyte. This refers to a plant that grows in environments with moderate water supply, again unrelated to a person or participation. Step 5: Check Epiphyte. This means a plant that grows on another plant for support without taking nutrients from it, such as some orchids and ferns. It also does not describe human participants. Step 6: Since only Neophyte describes a new participant in an activity, it is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, imagine using each option in a sentence. “She is a neophyte in the stock market” correctly communicates that she is a newcomer. Substituting any of the botanical terms would make the sentence nonsensical. Dictionaries and academic texts also explicitly define neophyte as a beginner or novice, which confirms the match with the phrase. The others appear almost exclusively in scientific discussions of plant life. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Holophyte, Mesophyte and Epiphyte all contain the root phyte related to plants. They label categories of plants rather than human roles. Since the phrase refers to “any new participant in some activity,” it clearly describes a person, not a plant or organism type. Choosing any of these botanical terms would fail to capture the intended meaning and would misrepresent the subject of the sentence. Common Pitfalls: A common trap in such questions is that all options share a similar sound or suffix, so students may guess randomly without checking meaning. Another pitfall is assuming that rare sounding words must all be equally unfamiliar, leading to confusion. To avoid these problems, build a basic vocabulary of terms for people, such as neophyte, recluse, connoisseur and fugitive, and also learn a few Greek and Latin roots. Recognising that phyte refers to plants can quickly eliminate three of the four options here. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “any new participant in some activity” is Neophyte, so the correct answer is option Neophyte.

Question 5

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A person who lives by himself.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of one word substitutions for descriptions of people. The phrase provided is “a person who lives by himself.” Many competitive exams include such items to check whether you know concise words for social roles and personality types. The correct term here must refer to someone who deliberately lives in seclusion away from social life. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase describes a person who lives alone and is socially withdrawn or isolated. Recluse means a person who lives a solitary life and tends to avoid other people. Bemuse means to confuse or puzzle someone, and is a verb, not a noun describing a person type. Applause refers to clapping or approval from an audience, not a kind of person. Abstruse means difficult to understand, describing ideas, not people who live alone. The answer must be a noun that directly refers to a solitary person. Concept / Approach: For one word substitution questions, focus on the core concept in the phrase. Here the concept is a person who lives alone as a way of life. Words like bachelor or widower describe marital status, while recluse describes a person who chooses seclusion. The distractor options are either other parts of speech or unrelated nouns. By checking the part of speech and meaning of each option, we can quickly eliminate those that cannot substitute the phrase in a sentence without changing grammar or meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the phrase. It implies not simply living alone by chance, but a more general idea of a solitary person. Step 2: Examine Recluse. This word is defined as a person who lives a solitary life and avoids the company of others. This fits closely with the idea of living by himself in a withdrawn manner. Step 3: Consider Bemuse. This is a verb meaning to bewilder or confuse someone. It cannot replace a noun phrase like “a person who lives by himself.” Step 4: Consider Applause. This noun refers to public clapping or praise after a performance. It does not describe a person. Step 5: Consider Abstruse. This adjective describes something that is difficult to understand, such as an abstruse theory. It is not a label for a person type. Step 6: Since only Recluse describes a person who lives in solitude, it is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Try substituting each option into a sentence. “He is a recluse who rarely leaves his house” makes sense and matches the phrase exactly. Using Bemuse, Applause or Abstruse in the same sentence would fail grammatically or semantically. Standard dictionaries also define recluse as a solitary person who avoids social contact, confirming that it is the best one word substitute for the phrase given. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bemuse is a verb, not a noun, and refers to confusing someone. Applause is an action by a crowd, not an individual life style. Abstruse modifies abstract concepts, not social habits. None of these options carries the idea of a person living alone by choice. Consequently, choosing any of them would result in grammatically incorrect or meaningless sentences when substituted for the phrase. Common Pitfalls: Some students may be unfamiliar with the word Recluse and feel tempted by options that simply sound complex. Others may not pay attention to part of speech and mistakenly select adjectives or verbs in place of required nouns. To avoid such errors, build a small mental bank of words that describe personal roles and habits, such as recluse, extrovert, introvert and connoisseur, and always test whether the candidate word can grammatically replace the phrase as it appears in the sentence. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “a person who lives by himself” is Recluse, so the correct answer is option Recluse.

Question 6

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “Not allowing fluid to pass through.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary item checks your ability to choose a single word that replaces the descriptive phrase “not allowing fluid to pass through.” This concept is common in physics, engineering and everyday situations where we describe materials as waterproof or resistant to liquids. The correct term in the options uses a root that means “not able to be passed through or affected by something.” Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase defines a property of a material that blocks fluid from passing through it. Impervious means not allowing fluid to pass through or not being affected by something. Envious means feeling or showing envy, which is an emotion, not a physical property. Conscious refers to being aware of and responding to one's surroundings. Nauseous means feeling sick, especially as if about to vomit. The answer should be an adjective describing resistance to fluid flow. Concept / Approach: In one word substitution questions, pay attention to the scientific or physical dimension of the phrase. Here, the phrase is clearly about permeability to fluids. The root pervious suggests allowing passage, while the prefix im indicates negation. Impervious thus literally means not pervious. The other adjectives refer to emotions or mental states and have nothing to do with material properties. Eliminating those options allows you to focus on the one that correctly encodes the physical meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the phrase as describing something similar to waterproof or impermeable. Step 2: Look at Impervious. It is defined as not permitting the passage of fluid and can also mean not being affected by something. This aligns exactly with the given phrase. Step 3: Evaluate Envious. It describes a person who feels jealousy or envy; it does not relate to fluid movement. Step 4: Consider Conscious. This adjective describes awareness, which is a mental condition, not a material property. Step 5: Consider Nauseous. It describes feeling sick to the stomach, also unrelated to permeability. Step 6: Therefore, Impervious is the only word that correctly matches the phrase. Verification / Alternative check: Try using the word in a sentence similar to the phrase: “This jacket is impervious to water” means water cannot penetrate it, which matches “not allowing fluid to pass through.” Sentences such as “this jacket is envious” or “this wall is nauseous” clearly make no sense. You can also recall that in science, impermeable or impervious layers are those that block fluid flow, confirming that Impervious is the precise match. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Envious is an emotional description, Conscious is about awareness and Nauseous relates to physical discomfort or sickness. None of them expresses any idea about permeability or resistance to fluid. Using any of these words to replace the phrase in technical or everyday descriptions of materials would distort the meaning and sound incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse Impervious with Impervious to criticism in a figurative sense and forget that its basic meaning is physical. Remember that many adjectives used metaphorically retain their original literal meanings. Another pitfall is focusing only on the negative prefix im and treating any adjective with that prefix as a potential answer. Always cross check that the core of the word, here pervious, relates to passage or permeability. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “not allowing fluid to pass through” is Impervious, so the correct answer is option Impervious.

Question 7

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A place where animals are slaughtered for consumption as food.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question asks you to find a single term that replaces the phrase “a place where animals are slaughtered for consumption as food.” The correct term is a specific noun used in agriculture, meat industry regulation and public health contexts. Knowing such words helps in understanding news reports and formal documents relating to food production and regulation. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase describes a physical place where animals are killed and processed to provide meat for human consumption. Abattoir is a noun that means a slaughterhouse, specifically a place where animals are killed for meat. Reservoir refers to a large natural or artificial lake used as a water supply. Memoir is a written account of someone's personal experiences. Peignoir refers to a type of loose dressing gown or negligee worn by women. Only one of these words refers to a killing place for animals used as food. Concept / Approach: To solve this item, identify that the key idea is a location where slaughter for food occurs. Words related to water, clothing or writing clearly do not fit. Abattoir, borrowed from French, is the technical English term for slaughterhouse. If you know that reservoir connects to water and memoir to memories, it becomes easy to eliminate those choices and select the only term associated with animal slaughter. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the phrase “animals are slaughtered for consumption as food.” This indicates the meat industry and a slaughterhouse. Step 2: Consider Abattoir. It is defined as a place where animals are killed for their meat, exactly matching the idea of a slaughterhouse. Step 3: Evaluate Reservoir. It describes a storage area for water, such as a lake or artificial pond, not a place for slaughter. Step 4: Examine Memoir. This is a literary term meaning a written narrative of personal experiences. It is unrelated to places or animals. Step 5: Check Peignoir. This refers to a woman's loose dressing gown, which clearly does not describe any kind of building for animal slaughter. Step 6: Since only Abattoir accurately describes the place in question, it is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine the word being used in a news report: “The city council inspected the abattoir to ensure hygiene standards.” This aligns perfectly with the concept of animals being killed for food. Substituting Reservoir, Memoir or Peignoir in this sentence would make the statement absurd. Dictionary definitions also confirm that Abattoir is synonymous with slaughterhouse. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Reservoir is a water storage facility, Memoir is a book of memories, and Peignoir is an item of clothing. None of these words contains any meaning related to killing animals or processing meat. Correct professional or legal usage requires the term Abattoir when referring to such facilities, so picking any other option would misrepresent the phrase given. Common Pitfalls: Because Abattoir is less frequently used in everyday speech, students sometimes confuse it with Reservoir, which is a more familiar term. A helpful strategy is to remember that the syllable ab in Abattoir is related to the French verb abattre meaning to strike down or kill. Linking this root to the idea of slaughter will help you recall the correct word in future questions. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “a place where animals are slaughtered for consumption as food” is Abattoir, so the correct answer is option Abattoir.

Question 8

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “One who runs away from justice.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question asks you to replace the phrase “one who runs away from justice” with a single accurate term. Such words are common in news reports, legal documents and crime related stories. Knowing the precise vocabulary for people who escape or avoid legal punishment helps you understand and summarise such texts correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase describes a person who runs away to avoid arrest, prosecution or punishment from legal authorities. Fugitive refers to a person who has escaped from captivity, justice or persecution and is in hiding. Plaintive is an adjective describing a sound that is sad or mournful. Accretive refers to growth by gradual addition, used mainly in finance and geology. Adventives refers to foreign plants or organisms that are not native to an area. The required answer must clearly denote a person escaping justice. Concept / Approach: Focus on the concept of escape from law. Terms such as convict, accused and fugitive are linked to legal contexts, but here the specific phrase “runs away from justice” points directly towards someone who has fled and is actively avoiding legal consequences. Among the options, only Fugitive refers to a person in that situation. The other choices are adjectives or technical nouns with entirely different meanings. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the phrase as describing someone who escapes from the police or court system to avoid punishment. Step 2: Examine Fugitive. It is defined as a person who has run away or is in hiding, especially to avoid arrest or persecution. This exactly matches the idea of running away from justice. Step 3: Consider Plaintive. It is an adjective, not a noun, and describes a sound that is sorrowful, like a plaintive cry. Step 4: Evaluate Accretive. This word relates to growth or addition over time. It is used in technical contexts and does not refer to people fleeing law. Step 5: Evaluate Adventives. This relates to non native species introduced to an area. Again, it has nothing to do with legal escape. Step 6: Therefore, Fugitive is the only option that correctly captures “one who runs away from justice.” Verification / Alternative check: Visualise a typical news headline: “Police continue to search for the fugitive after the prison break.” Replacing Fugitive with any of the other options would make the sentence meaningless. Additionally, standard dictionaries use similar definitions for Fugitive, confirming that it is the precise word used in legal and journalistic contexts for people who have escaped justice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Plaintive is an adjective about sad sounds, Accretive describes gradual growth, and Adventives describes introduced species. None of them refers to a person or legal status. They cannot be substituted into sentences about criminals escaping from custody without making the sentences grammatically incorrect or semantically absurd. Hence, they are all distractors and only Fugitive fits. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse Fugitive with Refugee, which refers to a person who has left their country due to war or persecution, not necessarily someone fleeing criminal justice. Remember that Fugitive is closely linked to the justice system and avoidance of arrest. Creating such mental associations will help you answer similar questions quickly and accurately. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “one who runs away from justice” is Fugitive, so the correct answer is option Fugitive.

Question 9

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A slight fault that can be forgiven.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question asks you to identify the correct term for “a slight fault that can be forgiven.” Many English words classify wrong acts as serious or minor. Knowing such distinctions is useful in moral, legal and religious discussions. The correct word here labels a minor offence that is not considered very serious and is therefore easily excused. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase describes a small, pardonable fault or sin. Venial means not serious and therefore forgivable, often used in the context of minor sins. Bovial, Areial and Xenial are not established standard English words used for this sense in common vocabulary questions and appear as distractors. The answer must clearly classify the fault as slight and forgivable rather than grave. Concept / Approach: In many religious and ethical traditions, faults are divided into serious (often called mortal) and minor (often called venial). The word Venial specifically refers to offences that are slight and pardonable. The other options may resemble real words but do not carry this meaning. In such questions, it helps to recall standard pairs like venial sin and mortal sin to trigger the correct choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the phrase “slight fault that can be forgiven,” which clearly refers to a fault of low seriousness. Step 2: Consider Venial. This adjective is defined as denoting a sin or offence that is slight and therefore forgivable. It exactly matches the phrase given. Step 3: Check the other options. Bovial, Areial and Xenial do not have accepted definitions in mainstream English that match the idea of a minor and forgivable fault. They function as distractors. Step 4: Because Venial alone carries the correct semantic content, it must be selected. Verification / Alternative check: Test the word in context: “It was only a venial error and the teacher quickly forgave it.” This sentence clearly conveys that the error was minor and pardonable. Replacing Venial with any of the fabricated distractors would either be meaningless or misunderstood. Dictionary entries also explicitly define Venial as a term for slight, pardonable faults or sins, confirming the match. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The other options have no recognised meaning that fits the phrase in the context of standard English vocabulary tested in exams. They are designed only to look similar in form. Choosing them would result in sentences that native speakers would not understand. Since the question asks for the best substitute that captures both “slight” and “forgivable,” Venial is the only appropriate choice. Common Pitfalls: Because the other options look unfamiliar, some students may hesitate to pick Venial, assuming that the exam must test a more obscure word. However, in recognised exam syllabi, Venial is exactly the classic word paired with mortal in the common phrase venial sin. It is important to trust well known vocabulary pairings instead of overthinking and suspecting trick options. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “a slight fault that can be forgiven” is Venial, so the correct answer is option Venial.

Question 10

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A paradise with perfect bliss.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution item asks you to find a word that means “a paradise with perfect bliss.” Many literary and poetic texts use mythological or symbolic names to describe idealised places of happiness. Knowing these terms helps you interpret advanced reading passages and appreciate figurative language used in poetry and prose. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase clearly refers to an ideal place of happiness and bliss, similar to heaven or paradise. Elysium is a term from classical mythology referring to Elysian fields, a place of perfect happiness and blessed afterlife, now used in English for an ideal blissful paradise. Epineurium is a medical term for the outer connective tissue of a nerve. Encomium means a speech or piece of writing that praises someone highly. Eulogium is a similar term for a speech or writing that praises a person, often after death. The correct answer must name a place or state of perfect happiness, not a speech or anatomical structure. Concept / Approach: The phrase “paradise with perfect bliss” suggests a location or realm, not an action or speech. Among the given options, only Elysium names such a paradise. The others are derived from roots connected with nerves or praise and refer to either body structures or speeches. Separating terms for places from terms for actions or texts quickly narrows the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the phrase as describing something like heaven, an idealised realm of joy. Step 2: Examine Elysium. In classical mythology, Elysium or the Elysian fields is the final resting place of the souls of the heroic and virtuous. In modern English, it denotes a place or condition of ideal happiness or paradise. Step 3: Evaluate Epineurium. This is a specialised medical term relating to nerves and carries no meaning of bliss or paradise. Step 4: Consider Encomium. This is a formal expression of high praise, such as a speech or written tribute. It does not describe a place. Step 5: Consider Eulogium. This also refers to praise, especially in honour of someone who has died. Again, it is not a location of happiness. Step 6: Therefore, Elysium is the only word that correctly captures the idea of a blissful paradise. Verification / Alternative check: Use the word in context: “For the poet, the island was an Elysium far from the troubles of the world.” This sentence clearly treats Elysium as a paradise. If you replace Elysium with Encomium or Epineurium, the sentence breaks down completely. Consulting dictionaries also shows that Elysium has extended into general English as a common word for a state or place of ideal bliss. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Epineurium belongs to medical anatomy, while Encomium and Eulogium belong to rhetoric and literature of praise. None of these terms refers to a place of eternal happiness. They cannot logically substitute for “paradise with perfect bliss” without changing the entire context of the sentence. They are included only to test whether you can distinguish between different word families beginning with similar sounds. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes confuse Encomium and Eulogium with religious terms because they are used at ceremonies, but both words refer to speeches, not places. Remember that the suffix -ium is used in many contexts and does not always signal a similar meaning. Always match the grammatical role and semantic content of the phrase with the candidate word before answering. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “a paradise with perfect bliss” is Elysium, so the correct answer is option Elysium.

Question 11

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A story that expresses ideas through symbols.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question tests your knowledge of literary terms. The phrase “a story that expresses ideas through symbols” refers to a specific narrative technique in which characters, events and objects stand for deeper meanings. Knowing this term is important for analysing fiction, poetry and religious writings where symbolic narratives are common. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase clearly points to a story in which concrete elements symbolise abstract ideas or moral principles. Allegory is a literary device in which characters and events represent ideas and concepts, so the entire story works on two levels, literal and symbolic. Armoury is a place where weapons are kept. Amatory relates to love or sexual desire. Aleatory refers to something depending on chance. The correct answer must be a literary term for symbolic storytelling. Concept / Approach: In literary studies, an allegory is a narrative where nearly every element has a symbolic meaning, such as in some fables and moral tales. Words like Amatory, Aleatory and Armoury belong to completely different semantic fields. Matching the phrase “expresses ideas through symbols” with the known definition of Allegory yields the answer. Recognising common literary terminology like allegory, metaphor and fable is valuable for exam passages and analysis questions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand that the phrase describes a kind of story, not a place or emotion. Step 2: Consider Allegory. It is defined as a story, poem or picture that can be interpreted to reveal hidden meanings, typically moral or political, through symbolic figures or actions. Step 3: Examine Armoury. This word denotes a storehouse for weapons or armour, clearly unrelated to stories or symbolism. Step 4: Examine Amatory. This adjective describes something related to love making or romantic desire, not symbolic stories. Step 5: Examine Aleatory. This term means depending on the throw of a die or on chance, used in law, music or philosophy. Step 6: Only Allegory matches the phrase about expressing ideas through symbols, so it is the correct option. Verification / Alternative check: Think of classic examples. Stories such as “The Pilgrim's Progress” or “Animal Farm” are often described as allegories because their characters and events symbolise broader social or moral realities. When critics say “This novel is an allegory of war,” they mean that its story is symbolic. Using Armoury, Amatory or Aleatory in such sentences would be incorrect. Dictionary definitions of Allegory confirm that it is precisely the term for symbolic storytelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Armoury describes a physical storehouse of weapons, Amatory describes love related matters, and Aleatory describes randomness. None of these concepts has anything to do with narratives that represent ideas through symbols. Therefore, they cannot substitute for the phrase without changing the subject entirely. Common Pitfalls: Because several of the options end in -ory, students may confuse them. A good strategy is to link Allegory with the more familiar word Allegation or with the root allegor which relates to speaking in another way, hinting at hidden meaning. Building small associations like this helps you retain the correct term for exam use. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “a story that expresses ideas through symbols” is Allegory, so the correct answer is option Allegory.

Question 12

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A period of interval between two regimes or governments.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question focuses on a political term. The phrase “a period of interval between two regimes or governments” describes a specific situation in governance, often involving a transition of power. The correct word captures the idea of this gap when there is no firmly established ruling authority. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase refers to a time interval between the end of one government and the beginning of another. Interregnum is a political term for a period when normal government is suspended, especially between successive reigns or regimes. Polygonum is a botanical term for a plant genus. Magnum means great in Latin and is often used in phrases like Magnum opus. Presternum refers to part of the sternum in anatomy. Only one term connects directly to government and time gaps. Concept / Approach: The core concept is a gap in governance. The prefix inter means between, and the root regnum refers to reign or rule. So Interregnum literally means between reigns. Recognising Latin roots is helpful here. The other options belong to unrelated domains: botany, general Latin adjectives and human anatomy. By matching the political context of the phrase with this root analysis, the correct answer stands out. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the phrase carefully as a time when one government has ended and the next has not yet fully begun. Step 2: Consider Interregnum. It is defined as a period when normal government is suspended, especially between successive reigns or political regimes. Step 3: Evaluate Polygonum. This is a plant genus that includes knotweeds and is unrelated to politics or time intervals. Step 4: Evaluate Magnum. While it means great, it does not denote any interval or government context. Step 5: Evaluate Presternum. This is part of the breastbone, not a political term. Step 6: Since only Interregnum accurately describes the interval between reigns or governments, it is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Use the word in a sentence: “The country passed through a chaotic interregnum before the new constitution came into force.” This sentence clearly portrays a gap in governance. Substituting Polygonum, Magnum or Presternum would make no sense at all. Dictionaries confirm that Interregnum is a standard term in political history and constitutional law for such intervals. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Polygonum is botanical, Magnum is a general descriptor meaning large or great, and Presternum is anatomical. None of these words involve political rule or time gaps. Using them for the phrase given would misrepresent the intended meaning and confuse the reader. Common Pitfalls: Because the word Interregnum looks long and somewhat complex, students may doubt it and look for a simpler choice. However, exam questions in general knowledge and English often use classical Latin terms in precisely this way. A helpful memory trick is to link the reg in Interregnum with reign or regime, reinforcing the connection to government rule. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “a period of interval between two regimes or governments” is Interregnum, so the correct answer is option Interregnum.

Question 13

In the following question, select the one word that best substitutes the given phrase: “A decision made by public voting.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests your knowledge of political terms for forms of public decision making. The phrase “a decision made by public voting” refers to an official vote in which the entire electorate is asked to accept or reject a proposal. The specific term for such nationwide or region wide votes is often seen in news about constitutional changes or independence movements. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase describes a formal decision where the people vote directly on a question. Plebiscite is a direct vote by the electorate on an important public question, such as a change in constitution or sovereignty. Anthracite is a hard type of coal. Chalcocite is a mineral consisting of copper sulphide. Reincite is not a standard term in political science and generally would mean to incite again. The answer must match the democratic process of decision by public vote. Concept / Approach: The core idea is direct decision by citizens. The correct term Plebiscite comes from Latin plebs meaning the people. It is closely related to the idea of referendums. The other words clearly belong to geology or describe actions of incitement rather than formal democratic processes. Matching the political context of the phrase with the recognised term ensures the correct choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the phrase as describing a formal public vote on an issue. Step 2: Consider Plebiscite. It is defined as a direct vote of all the members of an electorate on an important public question, which exactly matches a decision made by public voting. Step 3: Examine Anthracite. This is a type of coal and has nothing to do with votes or decisions. Step 4: Examine Chalcocite. This is a mineral name and not related to governance or public participation. Step 5: Examine Reincite. This would mean to incite again, and is not a technical term for any constitutional process. Step 6: Therefore, Plebiscite is the only option that correctly substitutes the phrase. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a news sentence: “The government decided to hold a plebiscite on the independence question.” This clearly shows that the decision is made by public voting. Using Anthracite or Chalcocite would produce absurd statements. Dictionaries and political science textbooks consistently use Plebiscite for decisions made through direct vote of the people. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Anthracite and Chalcocite belong entirely to the field of geology and mining. Reincite is not a term associated with elections or referendums. None of these words involve voting, public decisions or constitutional processes. Selecting them would disconnect the phrase from its political meaning. Common Pitfalls: Some students may confuse Plebiscite with words like Parasite or Precipitate because of similar sounds and spellings. To remember correctly, link pleb in Plebiscite to people or plebeians and cite to voting or decision. This association firmly places the word in the context of public voting. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute for “a decision made by public voting” is Plebiscite, so the correct answer is option Plebiscite.

Question 14

In the following sentence, the part in brackets may need improvement. Choose the best alternative to replace the bracketed part: “My sister (has ordered for) a new mobile phone.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question checks your understanding of correct verb usage and prepositions in standard English. The sentence “My sister (has ordered for) a new mobile phone” contains a bracketed phrase that may be grammatically incorrect or redundant. Your task is to choose the option that makes the sentence idiomatic and grammatically accurate. Such questions are common in competitive exams to test both grammar and usage. Given Data / Assumptions: The base sentence is: “My sister has ordered for a new mobile phone.” The options are: “has ordered,” “order,” “has ordered to,” and “No improvement.” In standard English, the verb order when used with a direct object does not take the preposition for before that object. We want the sentence to mean that the sister placed an order to buy a new mobile phone. Concept / Approach: The verb order can be used in two patterns: order something (direct object) or order for someone (indirect object). When the thing ordered is the object, we usually say “order something,” not “order for something.” Therefore, “has ordered a new mobile phone” is correct, while “has ordered for a new mobile phone” is redundant and incorrect. We also need to keep the tense appropriate, which in this context is the present perfect because the action has recently taken place and has current relevance. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check the existing phrase “has ordered for.” The verb order already implies that something is requested or bought, so adding for before the direct object is unnecessary in this structure. Step 2: Evaluate option “has ordered.” If we replace the bracketed part with “has ordered,” the sentence becomes “My sister has ordered a new mobile phone,” which is grammatically correct and idiomatic. Step 3: Evaluate option “order.” Using “My sister order a new mobile phone” is incorrect because the verb form does not match the subject and tense; we need present perfect, not base form. Step 4: Evaluate option “has ordered to.” The structure “has ordered to a new mobile phone” is ungrammatical because order to is used with verbs, as in “ordered him to go,” not with nouns like mobile phone. Step 5: Evaluate the “No improvement” choice. Keeping “has ordered for” is not idiomatic; we should remove for when the object directly follows. Step 6: Thus, the best replacement is “has ordered,” which gives a correct and natural sentence. Verification / Alternative check: Compare with other examples: “He has ordered a pizza” and “She ordered a taxi.” In both cases, there is no for before the object. However, we do say “He has ordered a pizza for his friend,” where for introduces an indirect beneficiary. In the question sentence, we are not specifying for whom the phone is bought, only that it has been ordered, so adding for is unnecessary. This confirms that “has ordered” is the correct, idiomatic form. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The base form “order” does not match the subject and tense. “Has ordered to” misuses the preposition to and is not used with inanimate objects. The “No improvement” option would leave the unidiomatic and grammatically awkward phrase “has ordered for,” which is not standard when the noun directly follows as the object. Only “has ordered” removes the incorrect preposition and preserves both correct tense and clear meaning. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to overuse prepositions such as for after verbs that already take direct objects, especially when translating from languages where an equivalent preposition is mandatory. Another pitfall is not recognising the role of tense and subject verb agreement in sentence improvement questions. To avoid such errors, remember typical patterns of common verbs and read examples from authentic English sources. In this case, always think “order something” unless you explicitly mention “order something for someone.” Final Answer: The improved sentence should read “My sister has ordered a new mobile phone,” so the correct replacement is has ordered, and the correct answer is option has ordered.

Question 15

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence to make it grammatically correct: On a holiday, Priya (prefers reading than going) for shopping with her friends.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of how to use the verb "prefer" correctly in English when comparing two activities. Competitive exams often check whether candidates know the correct preposition and form of the verb that follows "prefer." The sentence talks about Priya and what she likes doing on a holiday, so we must choose the option that makes the sentence natural, grammatical, and idiomatic. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is about Priya's choice on a holiday. The original bracketed part is "prefers reading than going." The comparison is between "reading" and "going for shopping." We must select the grammatically correct and most natural expression. Concept / Approach: In English, when we use "prefer" to compare two nouns or activities in the form of gerunds (verb plus ing), the standard pattern is "prefer A to B." That is, we use "to" rather than "than." For example, we say "I prefer tea to coffee" or "She prefers reading to watching television." The verb forms after "prefer" are usually gerunds when we talk about general preferences. Therefore, "reading" and "going" are both correct gerund forms, but the preposition must be "to." Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the core structure. The sentence has "Priya prefers X than Y for shopping." Step 2: Recognise that "prefers reading than going" is ungrammatical because "than" does not collocate correctly with "prefer" in this pattern. Step 3: Recall the correct structure: "prefer A to B" when both A and B are nouns or gerunds. Step 4: Replace the bracketed part with "prefers reading to going," which follows the pattern "prefer gerund to gerund." Step 5: Check the full sentence: "On a holiday, Priya prefers reading to going for shopping." This now sounds natural and grammatically correct. If desired, "for shopping" could be rephrased as "shopping," but the test focuses only on the bracketed part. Verification / Alternative check: We can test the structure with other examples. For instance, "He prefers playing cricket to watching football" is correct, while "He prefers playing cricket than watching football" is incorrect. Similarly, "They prefer staying at home to going out" is correct, not "than going out." Applying the same logic here confirms that "prefers reading to going" is the appropriate replacement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: "prefers reading rather going" is incorrect because "rather" needs "than" or should appear in the pattern "would rather do A than do B." As written, it is incomplete and ungrammatical. Option C: "preferred reading to go" is wrong because it changes the tense from present "prefers" to past "preferred" and also uses the bare infinitive "go" instead of a gerund "going," which breaks the parallel structure. Option D: "No improvement" is wrong because the original phrase "prefers reading than going" does not follow the standard "prefer A to B" rule and is grammatically faulty. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse "prefer" with comparative structures using "than" and try to say "prefer A than B." Another common error is mixing different patterns like "prefer A to B" and "would rather A than B." Remember that "prefer" normally takes "to," while "rather" in the phrase "would rather" goes with "than." Another pitfall is failing to keep parallel form; if the first item is a gerund, the second should also be a gerund for smooth and clear expression. Final Answer: The correct improvement is "prefers reading to going," so the right option is: prefers reading to going.

Question 16

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence by choosing the correct word: In an industry where programmers search in (vain) for fresh ideas, it is no wonder that attention spans are short and cliché is king.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of vocabulary and commonly confused words in English. The bracketed word "vain" appears in a fixed expression "in vain." The task is to decide whether the original word is correct or whether it should be replaced by one of the alternatives. Such questions are very common in competitive exams because they test both word meaning and spelling awareness. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase in the sentence is "search in vain for fresh ideas." The given options are "vein," "wain," "wane," and "No improvement." The sentence describes an industry where programmers struggle to find new ideas. We assume the context is about unsuccessful or fruitless searching. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the idiomatic phrase "in vain." When someone does something "in vain," it means that the action is unsuccessful or produces no useful result. The words "vein," "wain," and "wane" are homophones or near homophones of "vain," but they carry completely different meanings. Therefore, we must match the meaning required by the context. If the existing word fits both meaning and grammar, then "No improvement" is the correct choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the complete clause: "programmers search in vain for fresh ideas." Step 2: Understand the context. The sentence suggests that even though programmers are looking for fresh ideas, they are not finding any. This implies an effort that does not bear fruit. Step 3: Recall the definition of "in vain." It means "without success," "fruitlessly," or "to no avail." Step 4: Check if "in vain" matches the context of unsuccessful searching. It clearly does, because it indicates that the search does not yield fresh ideas. Step 5: Compare the alternatives. None of the other words can create a meaningful and idiomatic expression comparable to "in vain" in this sentence. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by substituting each option. "Search in vein for fresh ideas" would incorrectly use "vein," which refers to blood vessels or metaphorical lines of thought like "a vein of humour," and does not fit the idiom. "Search in wain" is meaningless because "wain" is an old word for a wagon. "Search in wane" is also incorrect because "wane" is a verb or noun related to decline, not used with "in" in this way. Only "search in vain" forms a natural, widely accepted idiomatic phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: "vein" refers to tubes in the body that carry blood, or figuratively to a particular style or mood. It does not create the idiom "in vein" in standard English. Option B: "wain" means a wagon, especially a farm wagon. It has no connection to the idea of searching unsuccessfully and does not make sense in the given sentence. Option C: "wane" refers to a decrease, such as "enthusiasm begins to wane." It cannot be used with "in" to form "in wane" in this context. Option D: "No improvement" is correct because "in vain" is the proper idiomatic expression meaning "without success." Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse words that sound similar but have different meanings and spellings. This is particularly true for "vain," "vein," and "wane." Another pitfall is ignoring idiomatic usage and trying to force literal meanings into fixed phrases. In exam questions, always consider whether the expression is an established idiom. If the existing word already forms a correct and meaningful idiom, there is usually no need to change it. Final Answer: The phrase "search in vain for fresh ideas" is already correct, so the correct choice is: No improvement.

Question 17

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence by selecting the correct article phrase: The famous Dr. Gupta (is only) physician in our village.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of articles and the correct use of the phrase "the only" before a singular noun. In English, when we talk about a unique person or thing in a particular context, we use the definite article "the" before "only." The sentence is about Dr. Gupta, who is the single physician in the village, so we must select the correct structure to express this uniqueness. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is "The famous Dr. Gupta." The bracketed part is "is only" followed by the noun "physician." The intended meaning is that there is just one physician in the village. We need a grammatically and idiomatically correct phrase to show that uniqueness. Concept / Approach: In English, when "only" is used as an adjective before a singular countable noun, it is almost always preceded by the definite article "the," not "a" or "an." Thus, we say "the only doctor," "the only student," or "the only book." The structure "is the only physician" correctly indicates that Dr. Gupta is the single person with that role in the village. Our task is to choose the option that forms this standard pattern. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the noun that "only" modifies. Here, it modifies "physician." Step 2: Recognise that "physician" is a singular countable noun referring to a specific role. Step 3: Recall the rule that usually we say "the only" plus singular noun when we refer to a unique person or thing in a given group. Step 4: Construct the correct phrase: "is the only physician." Step 5: Place it back in the sentence: "The famous Dr. Gupta is the only physician in our village." The sentence now clearly expresses that there is no other physician there. Verification / Alternative check: We can compare similar sentences. For example, "She is the only child in the family" sounds correct, whereas "She is a only child" does not. Likewise, "He is the only teacher who lives in this area" is right, not "an only teacher." Following this pattern, "is the only physician" is the appropriate phrase for Dr. Gupta. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: "is a only" is ungrammatical because the indefinite article "a" does not combine with "only" in this way. We do not say "a only doctor." Option B: "is an only" is also incorrect. Although "an" is used before vowel sounds, the structure "an only physician" is not idiomatic English in this context. Option D: "No improvement" is wrong because "is only physician" lacks an article before "physician," which makes the noun phrase incomplete and ungrammatical. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to forget the article before "only" or to use the wrong article. Students may focus on the meaning of "only" and ignore the need for a proper article before a singular countable noun. Another pitfall is overusing "a" or "an" without checking whether the noun is meant to be unique or one of many. Remember that "the only" emphasises that there is just one, which is exactly the idea of the sentence given in the question. Final Answer: The correct improvement is "is the only," so the full sentence should read: The famous Dr. Gupta is the only physician in our village.

Question 18

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence by choosing the best prepositional phrase: My cousins insisted that I should watch the documentary (from beginning to the end).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines your understanding of fixed prepositional phrases that show the starting point and finishing point of an action. The expression "from the beginning to the end" is a common and natural phrase in English. The sentence talks about watching a documentary completely, without missing any part. We must choose the option that best expresses this idea in correct and idiomatic English. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is about watching a documentary. The original bracketed phrase is "from beginning to the end." The intended meaning is to watch the documentary completely. We need to choose the most grammatically correct and natural-sounding expression. Concept / Approach: In English, when we refer to the entire length of something, such as a film, book, or event, a common fixed phrase is "from the beginning to the end." Both "beginning" and "end" are specific points, so they usually take the definite article "the." The word "from" marks the starting point, and "to" introduces the ending point. Our task is to ensure both nouns are properly determined and that the phrase sounds natural in standard English. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the original phrase: "from beginning to the end." Step 2: Notice that "beginning" is a singular countable noun referring to a specific start, so it normally takes the definite article "the" in this context. Step 3: "End" already has the article "the," making it "the end." Step 4: Correct the imbalance by adding "the" before "beginning," giving "from the beginning to the end." Step 5: Check the full sentence: "My cousins insisted that I should watch the documentary from the beginning to the end." This clearly conveys that the documentary should be watched completely. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by comparing with common examples: "Read the book from the beginning to the end," or "The event was interesting from the beginning to the end." These follow the same pattern. While "from the beginning to end" is sometimes used in less formal contexts, competitive exam questions usually expect the fully balanced form with articles before both nouns, that is, "from the beginning to the end." Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: "from a beginning to end" is wrong because "a beginning" sounds vague and is not typically used when referring to a specific, known start of the same documentary. It also omits "the" before "end." Option C: "from the beginning to end" is closer to correct, but it misses "the" before "end," creating an imbalance between the two parts of the phrase. Option D: "No improvement" is incorrect because the original phrase "from beginning to the end" lacks "the" before "beginning" and is therefore incomplete in a formal standard context. Common Pitfalls: Learners often overlook the repetition of articles in parallel structures. When there is a "from X to Y" pattern and both X and Y are singular countable nouns used in a specific sense, both usually need the article "the." Another pitfall is accepting semi colloquial or shortened expressions as exam standard. For formal writing and exams, it is safer to follow the fully balanced structure with proper articles on both sides. Final Answer: The correct improvement is "from the beginning to the end," which makes the sentence fully grammatical and clear.

Question 19

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence by selecting the correct verb form: I would not abase myself (by get) into an argument with him in public.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on the correct verb form after a preposition, especially in a phrase that shows manner or means. The sentence talks about not lowering oneself by entering into an argument. The bracketed phrase "by get" is clearly awkward and ungrammatical, so we must select the option that uses the appropriate form of the verb after the preposition "by." Given Data / Assumptions: The main clause is "I would not abase myself." The bracketed phrase is "by get." The intended meaning is "by getting into an argument." The structure uses the preposition "by" plus another verb that must be in correct form. Concept / Approach: In English grammar, when a verb follows a preposition such as "by," "in," "on," or "with," the verb is usually in the gerund form (verb plus ing). The pattern is "by doing," not "by do" or "by did." Here, "get" must therefore become "getting" to form "by getting." Also, the preposition "by" is the one that naturally shows the means or action through which the abasement would happen. Our goal is to choose the option that respects both the correct preposition and the gerund form. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the preposition in the phrase. It is "by." Step 2: Recall the rule: after a preposition, use the gerund form of the verb, for example "by reading," "by writing," or "by getting." Step 3: Change "get" to "getting" to satisfy this rule. Step 4: Check which option combines "by" with "getting." The correct combination is "by getting." Step 5: Place it into the full sentence: "I would not abase myself by getting into an argument with him in public." This sentence now sounds natural and grammatically accurate. Verification / Alternative check: We can compare with similar structures: "He improved his pronunciation by listening to radio programmes," or "She saved money by cooking at home." In each case, the preposition "by" is followed by a gerund. If we replaced "getting" with another gerund, such as "arguing," we would still keep the same grammatical pattern, which confirms that "by getting" is the correct form here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: "on get" is wrong because "on" is not the natural preposition for means in this sentence, and "get" is not in gerund form. The phrase "on get" is ungrammatical. Option B: "in getting" uses a correct gerund form but the preposition "in" does not fit the meaning of "by means of" or "through the act of" as effectively as "by." Option D: "No improvement" is incorrect because the original phrase "by get" violates the rule that a preposition must be followed by a gerund or noun. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to forget that verbs after prepositions must normally be in the ing form. Learners may focus on the meaning and overlook the structure "preposition plus gerund." Another pitfall is not paying attention to which preposition best fits a particular context. In expressions that show the method used to do something, "by" is the most appropriate choice, as in "by working hard" or "by speaking clearly." Final Answer: The correct improvement is "by getting," so the complete sentence should be: I would not abase myself by getting into an argument with him in public.

Question 20

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence by choosing the correct preposition: Kanika accepted the invitation (on) alacrity and happiness.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question examines your knowledge of fixed prepositional combinations in English, particularly with the noun "alacrity." The sentence describes the manner in which Kanika accepted an invitation. The correct expression must connect "accepted the invitation" with the attitude or manner described by "alacrity." Given Data / Assumptions: The verb phrase is "accepted the invitation." The bracketed preposition is "on." The noun that follows is "alacrity." The intended meaning is that Kanika accepted the invitation eagerly and promptly. Concept / Approach: Certain nouns in English regularly combine with specific prepositions. The standard and idiomatic expression is "with alacrity," which means "with cheerful readiness" or "with eager willingness." We do not say "on alacrity" or "in alacrity" in standard English. Therefore, our task is to replace the incorrect preposition with the correct one while keeping the meaning intact. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that "alacrity" refers to eager and prompt willingness. Step 2: Recall the common collocation: "with alacrity." Step 3: Identify that "on" is not the appropriate preposition to connect "accepted the invitation" with "alacrity." Step 4: Replace "on" with "with" to form the expression "with alacrity." Step 5: Check the revised sentence: "Kanika accepted the invitation with alacrity and happiness." The sentence now sounds natural and grammatically correct. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify this by looking at other common examples of usage: "He agreed with alacrity," "They responded with alacrity," or "She took on the task with alacrity." In all these examples, the preposition "with" is consistently used. No standard dictionary or grammar guide supports "in alacrity" or "on alacrity" for this meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: "in" does not form a standard collocation with "alacrity." The phrase "in alacrity" is not idiomatic and would sound incorrect to a native speaker. Option C: "from" completely changes the relationship and suggests origin, as in "from a friend," which is not intended here. Option D: "No improvement" is incorrect because "on alacrity" is not a valid expression in English and clearly needs correction. Common Pitfalls: A common difficulty for learners is collocation, where certain words habitually occur together. It is not enough to know the meaning of individual words; one must also know the prepositions and structures that they prefer. Words like "interest in," "similar to," and "afraid of" are classic examples. "Alacrity" almost always appears with "with," so remembering this pairing is useful for both examinations and natural communication. Final Answer: The correct improvement is "with," so the sentence should read: Kanika accepted the invitation with alacrity and happiness.

English Questions