Question 1

In the following sentence, some part may have an error. The sentence is divided into four labelled parts. Find out which part contains an error and select the correct option. If the sentence is free from error, select the “No Error” option. Inspite …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is an error spotting question that tests your knowledge of standard English usage. The sentence describes Latika continuing a habit in spite of a doctor's stern warning. You must examine each labelled part and decide which segment contains a grammatical or idiomatic error. Only one part should be considered wrong for the purpose of this question. Given Data / Assumptions: - Full sentence with labels: (1) Inspite of the doctor's stern warning (2) Latika continued taking (3) sugars in her milk. (4) No Error. - You must choose the part with the clearest, exam relevant error. Concept / Approach: The key issue here is the correct use of uncountable nouns. The word sugar, when used to refer to the substance that people add to tea, coffee or milk, is normally treated as an uncountable noun. Therefore, we say sugar in her milk, not sugars in her milk. Although the string Inspite in part 1 would usually be written as in spite in formal English, exam questions of this pattern generally focus on one intended error. The more prominent and unambiguous grammatical mistake for learners here is the plural sugars in part 3. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part 1: Inspite of the doctor's stern warning. In formal writing, this is better expressed as In spite of the doctor's stern warning, but many learners and exam keys treat Inspite as a spelling variant. Step 2: Examine part 2: Latika continued taking. This is grammatically fine and leads naturally to an object like sugar in her milk. Step 3: Examine part 3: sugars in her milk. The noun sugar, when referring to the sweet substance, is an uncountable noun, so the plural form sugars is incorrect in this context. Step 4: A corrected version of this part would be sugar in her milk or sugar with her milk. Step 5: Part 4 claims that there is no error, which is not true because part 3 definitely contains incorrect usage. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence in correct English to confirm the error. In spite of the doctor's stern warning, Latika continued taking sugar in her milk. This version sounds natural and standard. Only one change is required in meaning carrying words: sugars becomes sugar. The rest of the sentence keeps the same structure and intention. This shows that the problematic portion is clearly part 3. For exam purposes, that is the part you should identify as containing the error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Inspite of the doctors stern warning: Although in spite is the more standard spelling, many exam patterns focus on other issues instead. The grammatical structure of the clause is otherwise acceptable. Latika continued taking: This is grammatically correct and appropriately uses the continuous sense of continued taking. The sentence is grammatically correct; No Error: This is wrong because there is indeed an error in part 3. Common Pitfalls: Test takers sometimes overlook uncountable noun errors because they are used to hearing non standard plural forms in everyday speech. Words like furniture, information, luggage, and sugar are very often misused in the plural. In competitive exams, however, such errors are deliberate traps. To avoid them, keep in mind that when you talk about these items in general, you do not add an s. If you need to count, you use expressions like pieces of furniture or spoonfuls of sugar instead of pluralising the uncountable noun itself. Final Answer: The error lies in part sugars in her milk., where the uncountable noun sugar has been wrongly used in the plural.

Question 2

In the following sentence, some part may have an error. The sentence is divided into four labelled parts. Find out which part contains an error and select the correct option. If the sentence is free from error, select the “No Error” option. Myself a…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question checks your understanding of correct pronoun usage in English, especially the difference between subject pronouns and reflexive pronouns. The sentence talks about two people who will manage an event, and the first part of the sentence uses the word myself in a position where a normal subject pronoun is required. You must identify which labelled part contains the error. Given Data / Assumptions: - The sentence is divided as follows: (1) Myself and Roshni (2) will take care of (3) the event on Sunday. (4) No Error. - The structure is a simple future tense statement about responsibility for an event. Concept / Approach: In standard English, reflexive pronouns such as myself, yourself, herself, himself and themselves are not used as simple subjects. They are used when the subject and object of the verb are the same person, as in I hurt myself. When you want to refer to yourself as part of the subject, you should use the subject pronoun I. Therefore, the correct subject phrase should be Roshni and I, not Myself and Roshni. This is a common exam favourite because many speakers use myself in casual conversation even though it is grammatically incorrect in this position. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the role of Myself and Roshni in the sentence. They together form the subject, the doers of the action will take care. Step 2: Recall that subject pronouns in English are I, you, he, she, it, we and they, while myself is a reflexive pronoun. Step 3: Recognise that a reflexive pronoun cannot stand alone as part of the subject unless it reflects back to a noun or pronoun mentioned earlier, which is not the case here. Step 4: Replace Myself and Roshni with the correct subject phrase Roshni and I. The order is usually to mention the other person first, which is considered more polite. Step 5: The remaining parts will take care of and the event on Sunday are grammatically correct and do not need any change. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the entire sentence in correct English: Roshni and I will take care of the event on Sunday. This version sounds completely natural and follows standard grammar rules. If you try to keep the original phrase Myself and Roshni, the sentence sounds incorrect in formal English, especially in written form and in examinations. This confirms that the error is limited to part 1 and that the rest of the sentence is fine. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Will take care of is a correct future tense verb phrase indicating responsibility and does not contain any error. The event on Sunday correctly specifies what will be taken care of and when, so there is no issue in part 3. The sentence is grammatically correct; No Error is clearly wrong because the misuse of myself in part 1 shows there is an error. Common Pitfalls: Many learners use myself and other reflexive pronouns incorrectly in speech because they believe it sounds more formal or polite. This habit can lead to mistakes in exams, where the grammar rules are stricter. A good rule to remember is that you should use I when the pronoun is part of the subject and me when it is part of the object, for example, Roshni and I will go or This is between Roshni and me. Reflexive forms such as myself should be reserved for cases where the subject and object are the same person, like I blame myself. Final Answer: The incorrect part is Myself and Roshni; it should be replaced by Roshni and I.

Question 3

In the following sentence, a blank is given which must be filled with the most appropriate conjunction. Select the correct alternative out of the four given options. ______ the rain stopped, the concert had to be suspended.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a sentence completion question that tests your understanding of subordinating conjunctions related to time and condition. The sentence describes a concert that could not continue during a period of rain and suggests that the suspension lasted for a certain duration. You need to choose the conjunction that best expresses this time relationship in clear and natural English. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: ______ the rain stopped, the concert had to be suspended. - Options: Until, Unless, Till, while. - The situation is that rain forced the concert to remain suspended for a length of time. Concept / Approach: The structure of the sentence indicates that the suspension of the concert continued up to the time when the rain stopped. In English, we commonly express this idea with the conjunctions until or till, which show that one state or action continues up to a particular point in time. Among the given options, until is the more formal form and fits neatly at the beginning of the sentence. The conjunction unless expresses condition rather than duration, and while usually describes something happening during the time another action is in progress, not the end point of a suspension. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the meaning: The concert remained suspended for the entire period during which it was raining and only stopped being suspended when the rain stopped. Step 2: Test until: Until the rain stopped, the concert had to be suspended. This means that up to the moment when the rain ceased, the concert could not continue, which fits the intended sense. Step 3: Test unless: Unless the rain stopped, the concert had to be suspended. This sounds like a conditional rule and suggests a different structure. It would be more natural as The concert had to be suspended unless the rain stopped, and even there the emphasis shifts. Step 4: Test till: Till the rain stopped, the concert had to be suspended. This is grammatically possible and close in meaning, but until is generally preferred at the beginning of a formal sentence. Step 5: Test while: While the rain stopped, the concert had to be suspended is incorrect because while would normally refer to an ongoing action, not to the moment when the rain stops. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a simpler example to confirm the pattern: Until the storm passed, the match had to be stopped. The structure is identical and clearly expresses duration until a particular point in time. Replacing until with unless in such examples changes the meaning from duration to condition, which does not match the original sentence. Also, using while the storm passed feels wrong, because the word while suggests simultaneous actions, not an end point. This reasoning confirms that until is the most appropriate option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Unless is wrong here because it expresses a condition (if not) rather than a time span that continues up to a specific moment. Till is a near synonym of until, but in formal contexts and at the beginning of a sentence, until is usually preferred and more standard. While is wrong because it suggests that two actions occur at the same time, whereas here the focus is on the period leading up to the stopping of the rain. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse unless and until, especially when translating from their first language. A helpful rule is that unless usually equals if not and introduces a condition, while until relates to time and shows the point up to which something happens. When you see a sentence that clearly describes an activity or state continuing up to a specific time, such as the rain stopped, until is usually the safest choice. Practising with similar sentences will help differentiate these conjunctions quickly in exam situations. Final Answer: The conjunction that best completes the sentence is Until.

Question 4

In the following sentence, a blank is given which must be filled with the most appropriate preposition or adverbial particle. Select the correct alternative out of the four given options. The elephant stampeded and tore ______ the streets.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of phrasal verbs and common collocations in English. The sentence describes a frightening situation where an elephant stampedes, that is, runs wildly in panic or rage. You must choose the particle that correctly combines with tore to express the idea of moving rapidly and violently along the streets. Given Data / Assumptions: - Sentence: The elephant stampeded and tore ______ the streets. - Options: on, out, off, down. - The context is frantic movement through a city or town area. Concept / Approach: In English, we often use the phrasal verb tear down in the sense of move very fast or rush violently along a surface or route, especially when describing cars, animals or people running in panic. The phrase tore down the streets describes fast, uncontrolled movement along the streets. Other combinations like tore on the streets or tore out the streets are not idiomatic. Therefore, the correct particle to complete the expression is down. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the verb tore. In this context, it is used in a figurative sense meaning moved very fast or charged. Step 2: Recall common collocations: we say cars tear down the highway or children tear down the corridor when they run very fast. Step 3: Insert down into the sentence: The elephant stampeded and tore down the streets. This clearly describes the animal rushing through the streets. Step 4: Test on: The elephant stampeded and tore on the streets sounds awkward and does not reflect a natural phrasal verb. Step 5: Test out and off. Tore out the streets would suggest removing the streets, which is illogical. Tore off the streets suggests leaving the streets rather than rushing along them, which again does not match the intended meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Consider similar examples to cross check. We normally say The bull tore down the lane, The motorbike tore down the road, and The children tore down the hall. In each case, down the road or down the hall describes rapid movement along a path. Using on, out or off in these sentences would sound unnatural. The same pattern applies to The elephant tore down the streets, confirming that down is the correct and idiomatic choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: On is wrong because tore on the streets does not form a standard phrasal verb and fails to capture the idea of rushing along a path. Out is wrong because tore out the streets would mean pulled the streets out, which is nonsensical in this context. Off is wrong because tore off the streets suggests leaving the streets rather than moving through them, which is not what the sentence is describing. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes treat particles like on, off, out and down as interchangeable because many languages express direction differently. However, in English, phrasal verbs often have fixed combinations that must be learned. A useful strategy is to note common patterns such as run down the road, drive along the street and rush through the crowd. These patterns will guide you when you face similar questions in exams and help you avoid choosing particles that are grammatically possible but not idiomatic. Final Answer: The correct completion is: The elephant stampeded and tore down the streets.

Question 5

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is similar in meaning to the given word Scuttle.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a synonym, or word with a similar meaning, for the noun scuttle. The difficulty here is that scuttle has more than one meaning in English. As a verb, it can mean to run quickly or to deliberately sink a ship. As a noun, however, it can refer to a special container used for holding coal. You need to identify which option is closest in meaning to this container sense of scuttle. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Scuttle. - Options: Solitary, Superficial, Soothing, Brazier. - The question comes from a typical exam pattern where lesser known noun meanings are tested. Concept / Approach: When scuttle is used as a noun in British English, a coal scuttle is a metal container or bucket used to carry and pour coal. A brazier is a metal receptacle or stand used for burning coal or charcoal to provide heat. Although the two objects are not exactly the same, a brazier is the only item among the options that is related to coal and heating. The other options refer to qualities such as being alone, shallow or calming and cannot be linked to scuttle in this concrete noun sense. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the noun meaning of scuttle as a container for holding and carrying coal, often used near fireplaces. Step 2: Examine Solitary. This adjective means alone or single, and has no connection with containers or coal. Step 3: Examine Superficial. This adjective means shallow or concerned only with surface appearances, which again is unrelated to the noun scuttle. Step 4: Examine Soothing. This refers to something that calms or comforts, and cannot be a synonym for a physical coal container. Step 5: Examine Brazier. A brazier is a metal container used to burn coal or charcoal. It belongs to the same semantic field as coal scuttle, making it the closest match among the options. Verification / Alternative check: Think of practical examples. In an old fashioned living room you might find both a coal scuttle beside the fireplace and a brazier used in an outdoor courtyard. Both are associated with coal and its handling, whereas none of the other options describes any kind of vessel or tool. In many exam oriented word lists, scuttle in the sense of coal scuttle is explained exactly as a kind of container connected with braziers, buckets and other heating equipment. This confirms that brazier is the best available synonym here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Solitary is wrong because it is an adjective describing a state of being alone and has nothing to do with objects or coal. Superficial is wrong because it describes shallow depth or lack of seriousness and does not refer to a container or device. Soothing is wrong because it relates to calming or comforting effects, not to any physical container for fuel. Common Pitfalls: A frequent pitfall is to think only of the more common verb meaning of scuttle, which is to hurry or scurry. Since none of the options match that meaning, students sometimes get confused and attempt to guess. Another mistake is to assume that because the question appears in a synonym section, scuttle must be used as a verb. Exam setters often test secondary noun meanings for exactly this reason. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to learn multiple senses of words and pay attention to clues in the options; here, the presence of brazier strongly hints at the coal related meaning. Final Answer: The word that is similar in meaning to Scuttle (in the coal container sense) is Brazier.

Question 6

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is similar in meaning to the given word Loquacious.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks you to choose a synonym for the adjective loquacious. This word appears often in reading passages and word lists used for competitive exams. It describes a certain kind of personality or speaking habit. To answer correctly, you must recall or infer what loquacious means and then select the option that best matches that meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Loquacious. - Options: Talkative, Foolishness, Graceful, Entertainer. - Only one option is an adjective that directly refers to speech or talking habits. Concept / Approach: Loquacious comes from a Latin root related to speaking. It is used for people who talk a great deal, often very freely. In everyday English, we would describe such a person as talkative or very chatty. Therefore, the correct synonym must capture the idea of talking a lot, not being foolish, graceful or connected with entertainment as a profession. Matching part of speech is also a useful clue: loquacious is an adjective, so a synonym is likely to be another adjective. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of loquacious: someone who tends to talk a great deal, often at length. Step 2: Examine Talkative. Talkative is an adjective that describes someone who likes to talk a lot. This directly matches the meaning of loquacious. Step 3: Examine Foolishness. This is a noun that refers to silly behaviour or lack of sense, and does not specifically describe talking a lot. Step 4: Examine Graceful. Graceful is an adjective describing elegance of movement or style and has no direct connection with speaking habits. Step 5: Examine Entertainer. This is a noun that describes a person whose job is to entertain others, often by singing, acting or telling jokes, but it does not simply mean talkative. Verification / Alternative check: Consider example sentences. We can say She is very loquacious in meetings or She is very talkative in meetings with essentially the same meaning. However, replacing loquacious with graceful or foolishness does not make sense: She is very graceful in meetings speaks about her movement or behaviour, and She is very foolishness in meetings is grammatically wrong. Calling someone an entertainer describes a role, not a speaking habit. These checks confirm that talkative is the only option that works as a synonym in typical contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Foolishness is wrong because it is a noun and refers to lack of wisdom rather than an active habit of talking a lot. Graceful is wrong because it relates to elegance and physical poise, not to verbal output or conversation. Entertainer is wrong because it is a noun naming a profession or role and does not indicate that a person simply talks a lot. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may be tempted by entertainer because they associate people who entertain with talking or joking. However, the word loquacious focuses on quantity of speech rather than occupation. Another common mistake is ignoring part of speech and choosing a noun to match an adjective. When facing synonym questions, always check that the grammatical role of the option matches that of the target word, and then confirm the meaning by thinking of example sentences you might read in an article or hear in conversation. Final Answer: The word that is similar in meaning to Loquacious is Talkative.

Question 7

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is opposite in meaning to the given word Obfuscate.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question tests your understanding of the verb obfuscate. The word is often used in formal writing, especially to criticise writing or speech that makes things harder to understand. To find the correct opposite, you must first know what obfuscate means and then choose the option that expresses the reverse action. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Obfuscate. - Options: Envelop, Puzzle, Haze, Clarify. - We are looking for a verb that does the opposite of making something unclear. Concept / Approach: To obfuscate means to make something unclear, confusing or difficult to understand, often deliberately. For example, a speaker might obfuscate the real issue by using complicated language. Therefore, the antonym we want must convey the idea of making something clear and easy to understand. Of the given options, only clarify directly expresses this sense of making things clear. The others describe surrounding, confusing or clouding something, which are closer in spirit to obfuscate. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate obfuscate in simple terms: to cloud understanding, to make things confusing or vague. Step 2: Examine Clarify. Clarify means to make something clear or easier to understand. This is the precise opposite of obfuscate. Step 3: Examine Envelop. Envelop means to wrap or cover completely, often hiding something from view, which is metaphorically similar to hiding clarity. Step 4: Examine Puzzle. Puzzle means to confuse or cause someone to be uncertain, which is almost the same effect as obfuscate. Step 5: Examine Haze. Haze refers to making something misty or vague, which again suggests a loss of clarity and therefore is close in meaning rather than opposite. Verification / Alternative check: Use the words in parallel sentences. A dishonest politician may obfuscate the facts about a policy. The opposite situation would be that a responsible politician clarifies the facts about a policy. Replacing obfuscate with clarify reverses the meaning of the sentence while preserving its structure. However, replacing obfuscate with envelop or haze would still give the sense of hiding or clouding, not clearing things up. Puzzle is also about causing confusion, not removing it. This confirms that clarify is the correct antonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Envelop is wrong because it suggests covering or surrounding something, which fits better with the idea of hiding clarity than restoring it. Puzzle is wrong because it means to confuse, which is essentially what obfuscate also does. Haze is wrong because it implies making something blurry or indistinct, again reinforcing rather than opposing obfuscation. Common Pitfalls: Exams sometimes include near synonyms of the target word among the options to trick test takers who have only a vague sense of the meaning. Here, puzzle and haze may look attractive if you only remember that obfuscate has something to do with difficulty. To avoid such mistakes, always restate the target word clearly in your own words and then look for the choice that truly reverses that meaning, not one that simply sounds similar or negative. Keeping a mental pair like obfuscate versus clarify will be especially useful. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to Obfuscate is Clarify.

Question 8

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word that is opposite in meaning to the given word Triumph.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question asks you to find the word that is opposite in meaning to triumph. Triumph is commonly used in everyday English as both noun and verb to describe a major victory or a great feeling of joy due to success. To find the antonym, you must identify a word that expresses the emotional or situational opposite of victory and exultation. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: Triumph. - Options: Establish, Sorrow, Disdain, Elation. - We are dealing here with the emotional result of success versus its opposite. Concept / Approach: Triumph, as a noun, typically refers to a great victory or success, and by extension, to the intense joy and pride that come with such success. The opposite of triumph, in emotional terms, would be sadness or grief, especially following failure or loss. Among the options, sorrow directly expresses sadness and emotional pain, making it a natural antonym. The other words describe establishing something, looking down on something or feeling joy, none of which are the true opposite of triumph. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate the meaning of triumph: a big victory and the joy associated with that success. Step 2: Examine Sorrow. Sorrow means deep sadness or grief, often in response to loss or failure, which stands in direct contrast to joy and victory. Step 3: Examine Establish. Establish means to set up, create or prove something, and does not relate directly to winning or losing. Step 4: Examine Disdain. Disdain means a feeling of contempt or scorn toward someone or something and is not the opposite of success or joy. Step 5: Examine Elation. Elation means great happiness, which is actually very close in meaning to the emotional side of triumph. Verification / Alternative check: Consider simple examples. After the team won the championship, the stadium was full of triumph and joy. The opposite scene, after a crushing defeat, would be one of sorrow and disappointment, not of disdain or establishment. Elation clearly belongs on the same positive side as triumph. In exam style questions, you should always try to imagine such simple scenarios and ask which option gives the emotional mirror image of the original word. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Establish is wrong because it refers to setting something up or proving something, a neutral verb unrelated to emotional responses to victory or defeat. Disdain is wrong because it expresses contempt, which is a different kind of negative feeling and not the opposite of success itself. Elation is wrong because it describes a strong positive feeling of happiness and is therefore close to, not opposite to, triumph. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose words that simply feel negative rather than truly opposite. For example, disdain may attract some test takers because it is a negative feeling, but it does not match the specific victory versus loss axis on which triumph lies. A useful method is to think of what you would feel if you did not triumph. In most cases, especially in sports or competitive exams, the opposite feeling is sadness, disappointment or sorrow. Linking triumph with joy and sorrow with sadness makes the antonym pair easy to remember. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to Triumph is Sorrow.

Question 9

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase “Chicken-hearted”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of English idioms. The idiom chicken-hearted uses an animal image to describe a human character trait. To answer correctly, you must recognise that this expression has a fixed figurative meaning and choose the option that captures that meaning most accurately, rather than taking it literally. Given Data / Assumptions: - Idiom: Chicken-hearted. - Options: Coward, Short tempered, Composed, Bold. - The idiom is used as an adjective describing a person. Concept / Approach: In English, chickens are stereotypically associated with timidity or fearfulness. Phrases like do not be a chicken are common ways of telling someone not to be scared. Therefore, chicken-hearted is a vivid way of saying that someone has a heart full of fear, that is, the person is extremely timid or lacking in courage. The synonym that best expresses this sense is coward, which refers to a person who lacks bravery and is easily frightened. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that chicken in informal English often symbolises cowardice or fear. Step 2: Understand that hearted in such idioms refers to the nature of the person's heart, for example lion-hearted for very brave and kind-hearted for very kind. Step 3: Combine the two ideas: a chicken-hearted person is someone whose heart is like that of a scared chicken, meaning very timid and afraid. Step 4: Examine the options. Coward is a noun that directly names a person who lacks courage. Step 5: Short tempered, Composed and Bold describe emotional control and bravery in different ways but do not match the idea of being extremely timid and fearful. Verification / Alternative check: Use the idiom in a sentence: He was too chicken-hearted to stand up to the bully. Rewriting this sentence with the word coward or cowardly gives He was too cowardly to stand up to the bully, which has the same essential meaning. Replacing chicken-hearted with bold reverses the meaning and replacing it with short tempered or composed changes it to completely different personality traits. This confirms that coward is the correct equivalent. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Short tempered is wrong because it refers to someone who gets angry very quickly, not someone who is especially fearful. Composed is wrong because it means calm and self controlled, which does not indicate fear or lack of courage. Bold is wrong because it means brave and confident, which is almost the opposite of being chicken-hearted. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may mistakenly think that chicken-hearted could relate to nervous energy or quick temper, but idioms often have conventional meanings that cannot be deduced from the individual words alone. A good way to remember such idioms is to group them: lion-hearted for very brave, chicken-hearted for very cowardly, and faint-hearted for lacking courage. Recalling these pairs will help you quickly identify the correct meaning in exam questions. Final Answer: The idiom “Chicken-hearted” means a Coward, that is, a person who lacks courage.

Question 10

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase “Red letter day”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on the idiom red letter day, a phrase that has its roots in older calendars where important festivals and saints days were marked in red ink. Today it is still used in spoken and written English to describe days that are especially important or memorable. Your task is to choose the option that best captures this figurative meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: - Idiom: Red letter day. - Options: Starting day, Holiday, Significant day, Ending day. - The idiom describes the character of a particular day. Concept / Approach: Historically, red letters in calendars marked special dates that stood out from ordinary days, such as religious festivals or major events. Over time, red letter day has come to mean any day that is special, important or highly memorable in a positive sense. Therefore, the correct explanation among the options is the one that generalises this idea as a significant day, not necessarily the first or last day of something, and not just any holiday. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the general meaning: a red letter day is one that stands out in memory because something very good or important happens. Step 2: Examine Significant day. A significant day is an important, notable or memorable day, which directly matches the idiom. Step 3: Examine Starting day. This simply means the first day of an activity or event and is not always memorable in a special way. Step 4: Examine Holiday. While some red letter days may be holidays, not every holiday is especially significant or personally memorable, and not every significant day is a public holiday. Step 5: Examine Ending day. This is the last day of some period or event and does not necessarily have special positive significance. Verification / Alternative check: Use the idiom in a sentence: The day I received my first job offer was a real red letter day in my life. Rewriting this sentence with significant day gives The day I received my first job offer was a significant day in my life, which preserves the meaning. Replacing red letter day with holiday or starting day would not be accurate, because the day might not be a public holiday or the beginning of anything. This shows that significant day is the correct interpretation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Starting day is wrong because the idiom has nothing to do with the first day of an event; it is about importance and memorability. Holiday is wrong because the phrase red letter day emphasises special significance rather than legal or public holiday status. Ending day is wrong because finishing something does not automatically make that day special or joyous. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to link red letter day with calendar holidays only, because of its historical origin. However, modern usage is much broader and includes any personally or historically important day, such as a wedding day, graduation day or victory day, whether or not it is a public holiday. To avoid confusion, remember that the essence of the idiom is importance and happy memorability, which is well expressed by the phrase significant day. Final Answer: “Red letter day” means a Significant day, that is, a day of special importance or happy memory.

Question 11

In the following sentence, the bracketed part is incorrect. Choose the option that best improves the bracketed part so that the sentence is grammatically correct. He jumped off the train while it (had been running).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question examines your understanding of the correct tense and aspect to describe two actions happening at the same time in the past. The sentence talks about a person jumping off a train at the time when the train was in motion. The bracketed phrase uses an incorrect tense, and you must select the option that gives a natural and grammatically correct expression of this simultaneous action. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: He jumped off the train while it (had been running). - Options: has been running, ran, was running, No improvement. - The jump is a completed action in the past, and the train was in motion at that time. Concept / Approach: When one action happens in the middle of another continuous action in the past, English generally uses the simple past for the shorter action and the past continuous for the longer background action. Here, the short action is he jumped, and the ongoing background action is the train moving. Therefore, the correct structure is while it was running. The past perfect continuous had been running suggests a state that was already finished before another past reference point, which does not match the idea of the train running at the moment of the jump. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify actions and timing. The jump happened at a specific moment, and the train's running is the ongoing background event. Step 2: Apply the rule: simple past for the shorter, interrupting action (jumped) and past continuous for the longer action in progress (was running). Step 3: Test was running. He jumped off the train while it was running sounds natural and correctly describes the situation. Step 4: Test had been running. He jumped off the train while it had been running suggests that the train's running had already ceased before the jump, which is illogical. Step 5: Test ran. He jumped off the train while it ran is grammatically possible but not idiomatic; native speakers normally say while it was running. Step 6: No improvement cannot be correct because had been running is clearly an inappropriate tense here. Verification / Alternative check: Compare with similar, familiar structures. We say He broke his leg while he was playing football and She called me while I was driving. Replacing was playing or was driving with had been playing or had been driving would change the meaning to something that had finished before the incident. In the same way, while it was running fits the pattern, while it had been running distorts the sequence of events. This comparison confirms that was running is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Has been running is wrong because it is present perfect continuous, which connects the action to the present, while the entire sentence is clearly about a completed past event. Ran is wrong because, although it is past tense, it does not emphasise the ongoing nature of the action during the jump and sounds less natural than was running. No improvement is wrong because the original phrase had been running misrepresents the timing and is not how native speakers describe this situation. Common Pitfalls: Learners often overuse the past perfect and past perfect continuous because they seem more complex and therefore more suitable for exams. However, these tenses are only appropriate when you need to show that one past action was completed before another past reference point. When two actions happen simultaneously, with one acting as background, the simple past plus past continuous pattern is usually correct. Remembering this pattern will help you in many sentence improvement questions similar to this one. Final Answer: The correct improvement is: He jumped off the train while it was running.

Question 12

In the following sentence, the bracketed part is incorrect. Choose the option that best improves the bracketed part so that the sentence is grammatically correct. I (didn't see) him since we met two years ago.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests your understanding of present perfect tense in English, especially when used with since and a specific time reference in the past. The sentence describes an action that has not happened from a point in the past up to the present. You must choose the option that correctly expresses this continuous period of non occurrence. Given Data / Assumptions: - Original sentence: I (didn't see) him since we met two years ago. - Options: am not seeing, have not seen, had not seen, No improvement. - The meeting happened two years ago, and from that time until now the speaker has not seen him. Concept / Approach: When we talk about a situation that started in the past and continues up to the present, especially with since and a definite past time, English normally uses the present perfect tense. The pattern is have or has plus past participle. Therefore, the correct form for this context is I have not seen him since we met two years ago. The simple past did not see would suggest a finished action in the past, not a state continuing up to now, and so it is not appropriate with since in this meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the time structure: since we met two years ago clearly indicates a starting point in the past from which the non seeing continues to the present. Step 2: Recall the rule: present perfect (have or has plus past participle) is used for actions or states that began in the past and continue up to now, often with since or for. Step 3: Test have not seen. I have not seen him since we met two years ago correctly expresses that the speaker still has not seen him up to the present moment. Step 4: Test am not seeing. I am not seeing him since we met two years ago is ungrammatical, because present continuous does not combine naturally with since in this pattern. Step 5: Test had not seen. I had not seen him since we met two years ago would require another past reference point to make sense in past perfect and is therefore not correct in isolation. Step 6: No improvement is wrong because did not see does not match the ongoing time relationship expressed by since. Verification / Alternative check: Compare with similar structures: I have not spoken to her since last year and He has not visited us since he moved abroad are both standard usages of present perfect with since. Replacing the present perfect in these sentences with simple past would distort the meaning and suggest something different. In the same way, I did not see him since we met two years ago sounds incorrect to native speakers. The correct form, I have not seen him since we met two years ago, fits the well established pattern. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Am not seeing is wrong because present continuous describes actions happening right now or around the present, not a long period from a past point until now. Had not seen is wrong because past perfect is used to relate two past times, and here the sentence is clearly anchored to the present. No improvement is wrong because did not see conflicts with the use of since to mean from that time up to now. Common Pitfalls: Many learners are tempted to use simple past in all negative statements, especially after the subject I. However, time expressions like since two years ago and since we met demand present perfect if we want to include the present moment. A quick check is to ask whether the situation is still true now. If it is, present perfect is usually the right choice. Practising with pairs like I did not see him yesterday versus I have not seen him since yesterday will help you choose correctly in exams. Final Answer: The correct improvement is: I have not seen him since we met two years ago.

Question 13

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best one word substitute for the phrase: One who is new to a profession.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question focuses on vocabulary used to describe a person's level of experience. The phrase one who is new to a profession describes someone just beginning in a particular line of work, still learning the basics and lacking long term experience. Your task is to choose the single word that most accurately expresses this idea. Given Data / Assumptions: - Phrase: One who is new to a profession. - Options: Nuance, Pun, Tyro, Vandal. - We are looking for a noun that describes a beginner in a field. Concept / Approach: Tyro (also spelled tiro) is a word that means a beginner or novice in some activity, profession or field of study. It is commonly used in exam vocabulary lists to refer to someone who is just starting out. The other options refer to very different ideas: nuance is a subtle difference in meaning, pun is a play on words, and vandal is someone who deliberately damages property. Only tyro fits the description of a newcomer to a profession. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate the phrase in simple words: a beginner, novice or someone newly joined to a profession. Step 2: Examine Tyro. Tyro is a noun that means a person who is new to a skill, subject or profession, exactly matching the phrase. Step 3: Examine Nuance. Nuance means a subtle difference in meaning, tone or colour, which is an abstract concept, not a person. Step 4: Examine Pun. Pun is a humorous use of words that sound similar or have more than one meaning, again not a description of a person. Step 5: Examine Vandal. Vandal refers to someone who intentionally destroys or damages property, which has nothing to do with being new to a profession. Verification / Alternative check: Use the correct word in a sentence: As a tyro in journalism, she still had much to learn about investigative reporting. Replacing the phrase one who is new to a profession with tyro preserves the intended meaning and makes the sentence concise. If you try to insert nuance, pun or vandal, the sentence completely changes meaning or becomes nonsensical. This confirms that tyro is the only suitable one word substitute among the options provided. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Nuance is wrong because it refers to a subtle shade of meaning or variation, not to a person at all. Pun is wrong because it is a type of wordplay, not a label for a beginner. Vandal is wrong because it describes someone who damages property and has no connection with professional experience level. Common Pitfalls: Some students may confuse tyro with similar sounding words or may not have encountered it often in daily conversation. One word substitution questions often use such words that appear more in written than in spoken English. To prepare effectively, it helps to create small groups of related terms, such as novice, tyro, beginner and neophyte, and review them regularly. Associating tyro with new recruit or trainee in a profession will help you recall it quickly during exams. Final Answer: The best one word substitute for “One who is new to a profession” is Tyro.

Question 14

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best one word substitute for the phrase: A speech or a presentation made without previous preparation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one word substitution question concerns types of speech. The phrase describes a situation where a person gives a speech or presentation without any prior preparation or written notes. This is a common concept in public speaking and debate, and English has a standard term for it. Your task is to select that single word from the options. Given Data / Assumptions: - Phrase: A speech or a presentation made without previous preparation. - Options: Euphemism, Obituary, Extempore, Soliloquy. - We are looking for a noun or adjective commonly used to describe unprepared speech. Concept / Approach: Extempore (often used as an adverb or adjective, as in speaking extempore or an extempore speech) refers to speaking without pre planning or rehearsal, relying on one's knowledge and quick thinking. The other options describe very different types of language use: euphemism is a mild expression used instead of a harsh one, obituary is a notice of someone's death, and soliloquy is a speech by a character in a play, typically alone on stage, expressing inner thoughts. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate the phrase: a speech that is delivered on the spot, without any written script or advance preparation. Step 2: Examine Extempore. Extempore directly refers to speaking without preparation and is used exactly in exam contexts such as extempore speaking competitions. Step 3: Examine Euphemism. Euphemism is a mild or indirect word used instead of one that might be harsh, not a type of speech situation. Step 4: Examine Obituary. Obituary is a published notice of a person's death, sometimes including a brief biography. Step 5: Examine Soliloquy. Soliloquy is a type of dramatic monologue, usually prepared and scripted, where a character speaks internal thoughts aloud, often on stage. Verification / Alternative check: Use the correct word in a sentence: The candidate was asked to give an extempore speech on environmental conservation. This sentence clearly indicates that the speech is spontaneous and unprepared. Replacing extempore with obituary, euphemism or soliloquy would either make no sense or drastically alter the meaning. For instance, an obituary is written, not a spontaneous speech, and a soliloquy is carefully scripted in drama. This confirms that extempore is the intended one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Euphemism is wrong because it refers to a choice of mild words, not to a mode of delivering a speech without preparation. Obituary is wrong because it is a written or printed notice concerning someone's death, not a spontaneous talk. Soliloquy is wrong because it describes a planned and scripted dramatic speech, usually delivered alone on stage in a play. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse extempore with soliloquy because both involve a single speaker. However, the key difference is preparation and context. Extempore is about spontaneity and lack of preparation in real life speaking, whereas soliloquy belongs to theatre and literature as a carefully written device. To remember this, associate extempore with debate competitions and interviews, where candidates are asked to speak without prior notice on a topic. Final Answer: The best one word substitute for “A speech or a presentation made without previous preparation” is Extempore.

Question 15

In the following question, four words are given out of which one word is incorrectly spelt. Select the word that is spelt incorrectly.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question checks whether you can recognise incorrect spellings among common English words. You are given four words, three of which are spelled according to standard dictionary forms and one of which contains a spelling mistake. Your task is to identify the incorrectly spelt word based on your knowledge of correct English orthography. Given Data / Assumptions: - Options: Millionaire, Omission, Foreign, Proprietry. - Only one of these is spelled incorrectly. - You must choose the incorrect one, not the correct ones. Concept / Approach: The key is to check each word against the standard spelling you have seen in books, articles and dictionaries. Millionaire, omission and foreign are all common words used in everyday writing, and their given forms are correct. The word related to ownership or property is correctly spelled proprietary, with the letters a r y at the end, not r y. The option Proprietry reverses or omits letters in the final syllable and is therefore the misspelt word. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check Millionaire. The correct spelling for someone who has at least one million units of currency is millionaire, with double l and double n. The option matches this spelling. Step 2: Check Omission. Omission is spelled o m i s s i o n, with double s and ending in sion. The option matches this recognised spelling. Step 3: Check Foreign. Foreign is spelled f o r e i g n, with the characteristic e i g n sequence, and the option Foreign is correct. Step 4: Check Proprietry. The related adjective is proprietary, spelled p r o p r i e t a r y. The option uses r y instead of a r y and is therefore incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: Think about typical contexts. Proprietary software is a common phrase in computing, and you may also see proprietary medicine or proprietary rights in newspapers and textbooks. In all such uses, the word appears as proprietary, not proprietry. A quick online check in a dictionary or your memory of printed texts should recall this correct pattern. On the other hand, the spellings of millionaire, omission and foreign are very familiar and standard, confirming that they are not the erroneous ones. Why Other Options Are Wrong (as answers): Millionaire is not the wrongly spelt word because its double l and double n pattern matches the dictionary form. Omission is not wrong because it correctly uses double s and the sion ending. Foreign is not wrong because it retains the correct sequence e i g n found in many authentic texts. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes struggle with words that contain e i or i e, or with endings like ary and ery. Exam setters often exploit this by subtly changing the last syllable of a word. To strengthen your spelling, pay special attention to common endings such as ary, ery, ory and patterns like e i g n in foreign and sovereign. Writing these words out a few times or keeping a personal list of frequently tested spellings can greatly improve accuracy in such questions. Final Answer: The incorrectly spelt word is Proprietry; the correct spelling is proprietary.

Question 16

In the following question, four words are given out of which one word is incorrectly spelt. Select the word that is spelt incorrectly.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is another spelling recognition question. You are given four words, and your job is to identify the one that is not spelled according to standard English. The others are common words that appear frequently in academic and general reading. Spotting the error requires familiarity with the correct forms or careful observation of typical letter patterns. Given Data / Assumptions: - Options: Acquaintence, Appeasement, Abnormality, Accentuate. - Only one option is incorrectly spelt. - The focus is on recognising correct vowel and consonant placements. Concept / Approach: The noun meaning a person you know slightly but who is not a close friend is spelled acquaintance, with the sequence a i n t a n c e at the end. The option Acquaintence incorrectly uses e n c e instead of a n c e. The other three words, appeasement, abnormality and accentuate, are spelled correctly. Therefore, Acquaintence is the wrongly spelt word. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine Appeasement. Appeasement is spelled a p p e a s e m e n t and the option Appeasement matches this correct form. Step 2: Examine Abnormality. Abnormality is spelled a b n o r m a l i t y, and the given option is correctly spelled. Step 3: Examine Accentuate. Accentuate is spelled a c c e n t u a t e, and the option has the correct sequence and double c. Step 4: Examine Acquaintence. The standard spelling is acquaintance, with a n c e at the end, not e n c e. Therefore Acquaintence is incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: Recall common usage: You might say She is just an acquaintance, not a close friend, or He has a wide circle of acquaintances. In both cases the word appears with the a n c e ending. The incorrect form acquaintence does not appear in recognised dictionaries. Meanwhile, the other words occur commonly: political appeasement, mental abnormality, and to accentuate the problem, all matching the provided spellings. This comparison confirms that Acquaintence is the misspelt option. Why Other Options Are Wrong (as answers): Appeasement is correctly spelled with double p and ea in the middle. Abnormality is correctly formed from abnormal plus ity and does not contain any misplaced letters. Accentuate is correctly spelled with the c c e n t u a t e pattern, and is a standard dictionary form. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse the endings ance and ence, because both are pronounced similarly. Exam setters frequently test this confusion with pairs like attendance versus dependence and acquaintance versus sentence. A practical tip is to make a personal list of ance and ence words and review them regularly. Over time, your visual memory of these words from reading will guide you to the correct spelling more reliably than trying to apply a simple rule. Final Answer: The incorrectly spelt word is Acquaintence; the correct spelling is acquaintance.

Question 17

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentences. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the sentences to form a coherent paragraph. P: And the victims are likely to be the poorest of the poor as well as the very s…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a sentence arrangement question that evaluates your ability to organise ideas into a logical and coherent paragraph. You are given four labelled sentences about water and conflict. Your task is to determine the sequence that best develops the topic from a general introduction to more specific points and a logical conclusion, using clues such as reference words, transitions and the scope of statements. Given Data / Assumptions: - P: And the victims are likely to be the poorest of the poor as well as the very sources of water – rivers, wetlands and aquifers. - Q: In India, water conflicts are likely to worsen before they begin to be resolved. - R: Till then they pose a significant threat to economic growth, security and health of the ecosystem. - S: Water is radically altering and affecting political boundaries all over the world, between as well as within countries. - Options for order: SQPR, PRQS, QRPS, PSQR. Concept / Approach: A coherent paragraph usually starts with a broad statement introducing the main topic, then narrows down to specific instances, consequences and details. Among the sentences, S clearly provides a global overview of how water is changing political boundaries worldwide and therefore functions well as an opening sentence. The next likely step is to focus on a particular country, which Q does by talking about water conflicts in India. R uses the pronoun they, referring to these conflicts, and describes the threats they pose until they are resolved. Finally, P, introduced by And, runs naturally after this explanation by identifying likely victims. This leads to the sequence S Q P R or S Q R P, so we must check which is better supported by connectors and logic. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Choose a suitable opening. S mentions water altering political boundaries all over the world, which is a broad introductory statement. None of the other sentences match this global scope, so S is the best opening. Step 2: Move to a specific context. Q begins In India, water conflicts, which narrows the focus from global to national, a natural next step after S. Step 3: Look for referents and connectors. R begins with Till then they pose, where they clearly refers to the water conflicts mentioned in Q, and Till then connects to the idea that conflicts will worsen before resolution. Step 4: Examine P. It starts with And the victims are likely to be, clearly adding extra information about who suffers from these conflicts and tying back to the threats mentioned in R. Step 5: Therefore the sequence S Q P R or S Q R P must be tested against the options. Only SQPR appears as an option and maintains the logical flow from global to India, then victims, then threats. Verification / Alternative check: Read the sequence SQPR as a continuous paragraph: Water is radically altering and affecting political boundaries all over the world, between as well as within countries. In India, water conflicts are likely to worsen before they begin to be resolved. And the victims are likely to be the poorest of the poor as well as the very sources of water – rivers, wetlands and aquifers. Till then they pose a significant threat to economic growth, security and health of the ecosystem. The ideas move smoothly from global to national, then to who suffers and finally to overall threats, making a coherent and meaningful paragraph. Why Other Options Are Wrong: PRQS is wrong because it starts with And the victims, which cannot logically begin a paragraph and uses And without any prior statement. QRPS is wrong because it opens with a sentence about India without the global context and ends with S, which then suddenly broadens the discussion again. PSQR is wrong for the same reason as PRQS; it starts with And and introduces victims before even mentioning conflicts. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake in ordering questions is to focus only on content without paying attention to linking words like And, Till then and pronouns such as they. These small clues often indicate whether a sentence can start or must follow another. A good strategy is to first identify the global or most general statement for the opening, then look for sentences with connectors like And, But, Till then or pronouns that must refer back to something. Arranging sentences around these anchors usually leads to the correct order. Final Answer: The most logical order of the sentences is SQPR.

Question 18

In the following question, a sentence is given in direct speech: Rohan said, "Where shall I be this time next month?" Out of the four alternatives, select the option that best expresses this sentence in indirect speech.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of how to change a sentence from direct speech to indirect or reported speech, especially when the original sentence is a WH question about the future. The direct sentence contains a first person subject, a modal verb, and a time expression, all of which must be handled correctly when we report the sentence in indirect speech. Given Data / Assumptions: Direct speech: Rohan said, "Where shall I be this time next month?" There is no object after said, so a neutral reporting verb such as wondered or asked is appropriate. The question is an information seeking WH question, not a yes or no question. The reporting verb is in the past tense, so back shifting of tense and change of time expressions is generally required. Concept / Approach: When we report a WH question in indirect speech, we remove the question mark and the auxiliary subject inversion and turn the clause into a normal statement word order after the WH word. The pattern is reporting verb plus WH word plus subject plus verb. Because said is in the past, shall in the direct speech usually changes to would in reported speech to indicate a future viewed from the past. In addition, this time next month changes to that time the following month to reflect the shift in point of reference from the time of speaking to the time of reporting. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the reporting verb and the quoted question. The reporting verb is said and the quoted words form a WH question starting with where. Step 2: Select a suitable reporting verb for an indirect WH question. Since there is no object, verbs such as wondered or asked are natural. Wondered is especially common for questions that someone asks themselves. Step 3: Remove the question order shall I be and convert it to normal statement order subject plus modal plus verb, that is he would be. The pronoun I becomes he because Rohan is male and we report from an outside point of view. Step 4: Apply back shifting: shall normally becomes would after a past reporting verb, so we use would be rather than shall be or should be. Step 5: Change the time expression this time next month to that time the following month so that it is correctly referenced from the reporting moment. Step 6: Combine all parts to obtain the final sentence: Rohan wondered where he would be that time the following month. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify the structure by comparing with the standard rule: subject plus reporting verb plus WH word plus subject plus modal plus base verb plus shifted time expression. The final sentence, Rohan wondered where he would be that time the following month, follows this pattern exactly. It has no question mark because indirect speech embeds the question inside a statement. The meaning matches the original: Rohan was thinking about his location at a particular time in the future relative to his moment of speaking. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A uses contemplated which is acceptable, but then wrongly keeps the question order shall he be instead of he would be, so the clause remains ungrammatical as reported speech. Option B has the awkward structure asked that where should be that time next month and even omits the subject he, so it is grammatically incorrect. Option C uses wondered but keeps should be, which suggests obligation or duty rather than a simple future position in time, so the meaning is slightly changed and the tense shift is not handled correctly. Common Pitfalls: Learners often forget to change pronouns and modals when converting to indirect speech, or they mistakenly keep the original question order after the WH word. Another common error is to ignore time expression changes, leaving phrases like this time next month unchanged in reported speech. To avoid these mistakes, always check pronouns, modals, word order, and time markers one by one whenever you transform direct speech into indirect speech. Final Answer: The correct indirect speech form is Rohan wondered where he would be that time the following month.

Question 19

In the following passage, the opening sentence reads: "The modes of action are _____ in science and religion." Read the passage carefully and select the word that best completes this blank so that the contrast between science and religion is clear.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a passage that compares science and religion. The author describes how each field operates and emphasises that they function in contrasting ways. The very first sentence sets up this contrast by talking about the modes of action in science and religion. Choosing the correct word in the blank is crucial because it frames the reader's understanding of the whole passage. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: The modes of action are _____ in science and religion. The passage goes on to state that science relies on experiment, whereas religion is based on experience. It also contrasts objectivity in science with personal, subjective religious experience. Options include equal, relevant, similar, and different. Concept / Approach: The key idea of the passage is contrast, not similarity. The author emphasises that science depends on objective experiments and verifiable proof, while religion depends on personal and subjective experience. The conjunction whereas in the second sentence highlights this contrast. Therefore, the blank must be filled by a word that directly expresses difference and not sameness. Among the options, different is the only word that fits this purpose and accurately anticipates the explanation that follows. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read beyond the sentence with the blank to understand the author's argument. The next lines clearly contrast experiment with experience, and objectivity with subjectivity. Step 2: Note the presence of the word whereas, which is a strong signal that two things are being contrasted rather than equated. Step 3: Evaluate the meaning of each option. Equal suggests having the same value or importance, similar suggests resemblance, and relevant suggests being related to the topic. Step 4: Ask whether the passage is saying that science and religion act in the same way or in opposite ways. The explanation of experiments versus personal experience shows that the author sees them as operating on very different principles. Step 5: Conclude that the best word to capture the writer's intention is different, as it directly expresses that contrast in the modes of action. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into the sentence and read it together with the next lines. If you say The modes of action are similar in science and religion, the sentence conflicts with the rest of the passage which stresses how science relies on experiment and religion on personal experience. Using equal or relevant also fails to predict the sharp contrast that follows. In contrast, The modes of action are different in science and religion fits smoothly with the later explanation and prepares the reader to expect a comparison of opposing approaches. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Equal would suggest that science and religion operate in the same way or on the same level, which is not the author's claim. Similar would suggest resemblance rather than difference, again contradicting the clear contrast with whereas. Relevant does not describe how actions differ; it only tells you whether something is connected to a topic, which makes it an illogical choice here. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake in cloze tests is to choose words that fit the grammar of the single sentence without checking the entire passage. Another error is to rely only on vague positive words like similar or equal because they sound neutral. To score well, you must pay attention to discourse markers like whereas and carefully track whether the author is emphasising contrast or similarity. Once you notice that the passage is about differences, the choice of different becomes straightforward. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with different, giving: The modes of action are different in science and religion.

Question 20

In the same passage on science and religion, consider the sentence: "Science relies on experiment, whereas religion is based on experience. Any religious _____ whether it is that of Christ or of Ramakrishna is personal and subjective." Select the mo…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This cloze test sentence belongs to a passage that contrasts scientific and religious ways of knowing. The author has already stated that science relies on experiment and that religion is based on experience. The blank in this sentence continues that idea and focuses on what exactly is personal and subjective in religion. Choosing the correct word requires you to track key ideas and repeated terms inside the passage. Given Data / Assumptions: Relevant lines: "Science relies on experiment, whereas religion is based on experience. Any religious _____ whether it is that of Christ or of Ramakrishna is personal and subjective." Options: experience, thought, festival, activity. The passage is discussing how religious knowledge comes from personal internal states. Names of spiritual figures such as Christ and Ramakrishna are mentioned as examples of religious lives or experiences. Concept / Approach: The passage draws a parallel between experiment in science and experience in religion. The first sentence already pairs religion with experience, so it is natural and cohesive for the next sentence to continue using the same key word. In a religious context, the experience of a saint or mystic is typically described as highly personal and subjective. Words such as thought, festival, or activity do not match this philosophical focus and do not echo the earlier phrase religion is based on experience. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note the line immediately before the blank: religion is based on experience. This suggests that religious experience is the central idea. Step 2: Examine the structure of the sentence with the blank. It speaks of any religious something, whether it belongs to Christ or to Ramakrishna, being personal and subjective. Step 3: Evaluate the option experience. The expression religious experience is very common in religious studies and philosophy, and it naturally fits with the comment that it is personal and subjective. Step 4: Check thought. While religious thought is a valid phrase, it does not show the same strong contrast with scientific experiment, and thoughts are not always described as personal and subjective in the same way as mystical experiences. Step 5: Check festival and activity. Both words relate to external events or actions, whereas the passage is clearly discussing inner, personal encounters with the divine, rather than public celebrations or outward activities. Step 6: Conclude that experience is the only option that correctly matches the earlier line and the description personal and subjective. Verification / Alternative check: Insert experience into the sentence and read it with the surrounding lines: Science relies on experiment, whereas religion is based on experience. Any religious experience whether it is that of Christ or of Ramakrishna is personal and subjective. This reading is coherent and logically consistent with the author's point that religious knowledge rests on inward experience rather than outward experiment. Replacing experience with thought, festival, or activity either weakens the contrast or changes the meaning entirely. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Thought points to intellectual processes, but the passage emphasises direct inner encounters rather than theological ideas or doctrines. Festival would move the emphasis to public celebrations, which contradicts the description of something deeply personal. Activity is too vague and usually refers to outward actions, not inner states that can be described as subjective experiences. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes ignore earlier lines in a passage and try to solve each blank in isolation, which leads them to choose plausible sounding words like thought or activity. However, cloze tests are designed to reward careful tracking of repeated key terms. When a passage introduces a word such as experience as central to an argument, it is very common for the same word to appear again in subsequent blanks. Always scan the wider context before deciding on the final answer. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with experience, giving: Any religious experience whether it is that of Christ or of Ramakrishna is personal and subjective.

English Questions