Question 1

In this passage about booth capturing and rigging in elections, choose the most appropriate word to complete the first blank in the sentence "It is not _____ to ignore all allegations of booth capturing and rigging as murmurs of disgruntled losers."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage discusses serious allegations of booth capturing and rigging in elections. It criticises the attitude of dismissing such allegations as mere complaints by people who have lost. The first blank requires a word that describes whether it is sensible or grounded in reality to ignore these allegations. The correct choice must fit both the tone and logical meaning of the sentence. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence starts with It is not and ends with to ignore all allegations of booth capturing and rigging as murmurs of disgruntled losers. The overall tone is critical of ignoring serious electoral malpractice. The missing word must describe the rationality or sensibleness of ignoring such allegations. The options include realistic, reliable, required, essential and practical. We assume that the author wants to say that such an attitude does not match reality. Concept / Approach: To solve passage completion questions, we look at the idea suggested by the sentence as a whole, not just the blank. The phrase murmurs of disgruntled losers shows that some people dismiss complaints as excuses by those who lost an election. The writer, however, wants to argue that doing so does not match reality because there are genuine problems. Therefore, the word in the blank should convey that ignoring these allegations is not grounded in reality, that is, it is not realistic. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the core meaning of the sentence. The author says that ignoring allegations of booth capturing and rigging is wrong. Step 2: Match each option with the phrase it is not and see whether the sentence remains logically consistent. Step 3: Test realistic. The sentence becomes it is not realistic to ignore all allegations, which clearly implies that such behaviour does not reflect reality and sounds natural. Step 4: Test reliable. It is not reliable to ignore all allegations is awkward because reliable usually describes data, methods or people, not actions like ignoring allegations. Step 5: Test required and essential. Both give the sense of necessity, which is not the focus here. The author is not saying that it is not necessary to ignore allegations but that it is unwise or inaccurate to do so. Step 6: Test practical. It is not practical to ignore all allegations suggests inconvenience, not a lack of connection to reality. This does not match the tone of concern about democracy and fairness. Verification / Alternative check: Consider the surrounding sentences in the passage. They mention intimidation of voters, pressure on whole villages and communities, and election officials who are influenced by unscrupulous politicians. This context reinforces that the problems are real and serious, so it makes sense for the writer to criticise an unrealistic attitude that dismisses all complaints as mere excuses. Thus the word realistic fits both the immediate sentence and the broader argument of the passage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Reliable is unsuitable because ignoring allegations is not something that can be described as reliable; reliability is about trustworthiness of sources or systems. Required does not fit because the idea is not about obligation to ignore allegations, but about whether doing so reflects reality. Essential is also wrong because it suggests that ignoring allegations is absolutely necessary or fundamental, which is the opposite of what the passage argues. Practical focuses on convenience and ease of action, not on truth, fairness or reality, and therefore does not express the intended criticism. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to pick a word that sounds vaguely formal or serious without checking its exact meaning and usual usage. Another error is to focus only on the local grammar pattern it is not plus adjective and ignore the larger context, including the topic of electoral malpractice. Always ensure that the chosen word aligns with the writer attitude and the logical direction of the argument. Final Answer: The most suitable word for the first blank is realistic.

Question 2

In this passage on booth capturing and rigging, choose the word that best completes the second blank in the phrase "as murmurs of _____ losers."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage criticises the tendency to dismiss complaints about booth capturing and rigging as nothing more than excuses made by people who have lost an election. The second blank describes the losers whose voices are being ignored. The chosen adjective must reflect their emotional state in a way that supports the author argument. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase containing the blank is murmurs of _____ losers. The topic is allegations of electoral malpractice. The passage suggests that these allegations may be serious, not just excuses. The adjective should indicate a mood or attitude typical of those who have lost, according to people who dismiss them. Options include rational, disgruntled, huge, idealist and optimistic. Concept / Approach: In English, the term disgruntled loser is common and refers to someone who is unhappy or dissatisfied after losing, often complaining or protesting. People who want to ignore complaints may label them as the murmurs of disgruntled losers, implying that the complaints are emotional reactions rather than genuine concerns. Therefore, the correct adjective should capture this idea of dissatisfaction and resentment. The word must also agree grammatically and collocate naturally with losers. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the complete phrase with each option and test which one sounds idiomatic and meaningful. Step 2: Insert disgruntled. The phrase murmurs of disgruntled losers is natural and vividly describes people who are unhappy and complaining after defeat. Step 3: Insert rational. Murmurs of rational losers is odd because rational suggests calm and logical thinking, which does not usually match a dismissive description. Step 4: Insert huge. Murmurs of huge losers is incorrect; huge describes size or degree, not an emotional state, and does not fit the context. Step 5: Insert idealist. Murmurs of idealist losers sounds forced. Idealist refers to people who have high principles, not necessarily those grumbling after loss. Step 6: Insert optimistic. Murmurs of optimistic losers is contradictory because optimistic people are hopeful, not necessarily complaining about defeat. Verification / Alternative check: In political commentary, disgruntled workers, disgruntled customers and disgruntled voters are common collocations for people who are dissatisfied. The word disgruntled clearly supports the criticism made in the passage, which is that serious allegations are dismissed as mere grumbling. Considering the entire sentence, the combination realistic and disgruntled in the first two blanks creates a strong contrast between the seriousness of the issue and the attitude of those who ignore it. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rational does not fit because the passage is talking about allegations treated as mere emotional complaints, not calm reasoning. Huge cannot describe losers in terms of emotional state and does not match the idea of murmurs or complaints. Idealist changes the meaning toward people who have strong ideals, which is not the focus of the criticism. Optimistic is inconsistent with the negative emotional tone suggested by murmurs and with the usual pattern of speech about defeated candidates or parties. Common Pitfalls: A typical mistake is to choose a word just because it feels high level or positive, without checking whether it matches the logic and tone of the passage. Another problem is ignoring common collocations like disgruntled losers that are widely used in political and journalistic language. Always read the full phrase and think about how the writer wants to describe the people in question. Final Answer: The word that best completes the second blank is disgruntled.

Question 3

In this election passage, choose the correct word for the blank in the sentence "_____ have come to light of intimidation of whole villages and communities to make them vote for a particular candidate or party."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage explains that ignoring allegations of booth capturing and rigging is unwise, because there are concrete examples of malpractice. The third blank introduces these examples by saying that certain things have come to light. The correct word must refer to concrete cases of wrongdoing that have been discovered and reported. Given Data / Assumptions: The relevant sentence is _____ have come to light of intimidation of whole villages and communities to make them vote for a particular candidate or party. The phrase have come to light indicates that previously hidden information or events are now known. The actions described are intimidation and pressure on entire villages and communities. The word in the blank must agree in number with have and make sense with the rest of the phrase. The options are instances, sources, reasons, ideas and reports. Concept / Approach: When we talk about misconduct or corruption, we often say that instances or cases of such behaviour have come to light. This expression refers to specific occurrences that have been discovered. The passage needs a noun meaning examples of the wrongdoing described. While reports might seem possible, the full expression instances have come to light is more precise and is the standard collocation in formal English for concrete examples of wrongdoing. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Substitute instances into the sentence so that it reads instances have come to light of intimidation of whole villages and communities. This is a natural and idiomatic expression. Step 2: Check grammatical agreement. Instances is plural and matches the plural verb have. Step 3: Test sources. Sources have come to light of intimidation of whole villages is less natural because sources usually refer to people or documents that provide information, not the acts of intimidation themselves. Step 4: Test reasons. Reasons have come to light of intimidation does not fit, because reasons do not directly describe acts of intimidation. Step 5: Test ideas. Ideas have come to light of intimidation is clearly illogical in this context. Step 6: Test reports. Reports have come to light could be grammatically correct, but the phrase reports of intimidation have come to light is more precise. Since the question expects the most accurate option, instances is better. Verification / Alternative check: Look at the overall aim of the passage. The writer wants to stress that there are real, concrete cases of wrongdoing, not only rumours. The word instances captures exactly the meaning of specific occurrences of intimidation and fits the formal tone of the passage. The combination realistic, disgruntled and instances across the first three blanks builds a consistent picture of real malpractice and dismissive attitudes toward honest complaints. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sources shifts the meaning toward the people or documents that provide information, which is not the focus of the sentence. Reasons would explain why something happens, but here the writer is describing what has happened, namely acts of intimidation. Ideas is completely out of place, as the passage is describing actual behaviour during elections, not abstract thoughts. Reports could work in a different wording but does not fit as neatly in the current sentence as instances, which directly refers to specific cases of malpractice. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes pick a word that seems close in meaning, such as reports, without considering which collocation is most accurate in formal writing. Another issue is ignoring the subject verb agreement and the underlying logical structure. Always think about what exactly has come to light in such contexts; in matters of wrongdoing, specific instances are usually the focus. Final Answer: The word that best completes the third blank is instances.

Question 4

In the passage on electoral malpractice, choose the most suitable word for the blank in the sentence "At times election officials have been _____ by unscrupulous politicians into turning a blind eye to unjust practices."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage describes how dishonest politicians sometimes influence election officials so that they ignore malpractice. The blank in this sentence must express the way in which election officials are pressured. This pressure is clearly negative and harmful, not helpful or protective. The correct word must therefore convey fear or intimidation. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence reads At times election officials have been _____ by unscrupulous politicians into turning a blind eye to unjust practices. Unscrupulous politicians indicates people who have no moral principles. Turning a blind eye to unjust practices means deliberately ignoring wrongdoing. The method used by these politicians is implied to be coercive rather than supportive. Options include decided, safeguarded, rejuvenated, threatened and rewarded. Concept / Approach: When people in power want officials to ignore wrongdoing, they often use threats or bribes. Given that the politicians are described as unscrupulous and that the result is officials pretending not to see malpractices, the more likely method is intimidation. In standard English, officials are threatened into doing something. Therefore, the word threatened is the most natural and accurate choice for the blank, as it conveys coercion and fear. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert threatened into the sentence: At times election officials have been threatened by unscrupulous politicians into turning a blind eye to unjust practices. Step 2: Check the logic. Threatened by unscrupulous politicians matches the idea of officials being forced to ignore malpractice against their better judgment. Step 3: Test decided. Officials have been decided by politicians is grammatically wrong because decided cannot take this structure. Step 4: Test safeguarded. Safeguarded by unscrupulous politicians implies the politicians are protecting the officials, which contradicts the criticism in the passage. Step 5: Test rejuvenated. Rejuvenated means made fresh or energetic and has no connection to pressure or coercion. Step 6: Test rewarded. Rewarded by unscrupulous politicians into turning a blind eye implies officials are paid or bribed to ignore malpractice. While bribery does happen, the common collocation rewarded into is awkward compared with threatened into, and the tone of the passage stresses fear. Verification / Alternative check: Consider how similar sentences are phrased in news reports. It is common to read phrases like officials were threatened into silence, which describes coercion to stop people from speaking up. The word threatened fits smoothly with into turning a blind eye, forming a clear cause effect relationship. The other options either distort the meaning or produce ungrammatical structures, confirming that threatened is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Decided cannot be used in this passive pattern; officials are not decided by politicians in this sense. Safeguarded contradicts the phrase unjust practices and the negative portrayal of unscrupulous politicians. Rejuvenated is a positive word related to energy and freshness, which is unsuitable in a context of fear and malpractice. Rewarded does not collocate naturally with into turning a blind eye and would suggest a different style of influence from the one suggested by the tone of the passage. Common Pitfalls: Students may be tempted by rewarded because bribery is common in corrupt systems. However, good comprehension requires attention to collocations and tone. Threatened into is a much more natural expression when talking about forcing someone to ignore wrongdoing, whereas rewarded into sounds strange and less idiomatic. Always check how the verb works with the following preposition and phrase. Final Answer: The word that best completes the fourth blank is threatened.

Question 5

In the passage on booth capturing, select the best word for the last blank in the phrase "into turning a blind eye to _____ practices."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage deals with unethical and illegal practices during elections. The final blank appears in the phrase turning a blind eye to _____ practices. The adjective in the blank must describe the nature of these practices in a way that matches the negative tone of the passage and the idea of corruption and malpractice. Given Data / Assumptions: The full context is that election officials are threatened by unscrupulous politicians into turning a blind eye to certain practices. Turning a blind eye means deliberately ignoring something wrong. Unscrupulous politicians and booth capturing already carry negative connotations. The adjective must therefore describe practices that are morally or legally wrong. The options are significant, rare, unjust, usual and occasional. Concept / Approach: The phrase unjust practices clearly conveys unfair, morally wrong or illegal actions. In any discussion about electoral malpractice, unjust practices is a common and suitable expression. Words like significant, rare, usual or occasional describe frequency or importance, not moral character, and therefore do not match the context of wrongdoing. Thus, unjust is the adjective that best completes the phrase. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert unjust into the sentence. The phrase becomes turning a blind eye to unjust practices, which is idiomatic and meaningful. Step 2: Confirm that unjust aligns with the negative tone established by words such as booth capturing, rigging and intimidation. Step 3: Test significant. Turning a blind eye to significant practices is unclear because significant does not say anything about right or wrong. Step 4: Test rare. Turning a blind eye to rare practices puts the focus on how often these practices occur, not on their ethical nature. Step 5: Test usual and occasional. Both again refer to frequency; usual practices are common and occasional practices happen sometimes, but neither word carries the necessary moral judgement. Step 6: Compare unjust with other moral adjectives such as unfair or illegal. Unjust is broad enough to cover both unfair and unlawful behaviour and fits well in this formal context. Verification / Alternative check: Read the entire passage: it stresses that ignoring allegations is not realistic because there are real instances of intimidation and rigging. The author wants to highlight that these are morally wrong and harmful practices, which matches the word unjust. Other adjectives in the options do not emphasise moral wrongness and therefore fail to capture the intended meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Significant describes importance but does not indicate whether something is fair or unfair. Rare focuses on how frequently something occurs and is not directly linked to moral criticism. Usual simply means common or typical, and using it here would weaken the strong negative message of the passage. Occasional also refers only to frequency and does not tell the reader anything about the ethical nature of the practices. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may choose significant because political malpractice is important and serious. However, the author is not just talking about importance but about fairness and legality. Others may get distracted by the usual collocation usual practices, but in this passage the central concern is justice. Carefully identifying the moral dimension of the issue helps avoid such mistakes. Final Answer: The best adjective for the last blank is unjust.

Question 6

Choose the option that best expresses the meaning of the English word "jubilant" by selecting its closest synonym.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Vocabulary questions that ask for a synonym test a learner grasp of word meanings, shades of emotion and common usage. The word jubilant is often used in news reports and literature to describe people who are extremely happy and celebrating. To answer correctly, we must find the option that conveys a similar level and type of happiness. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is jubilant. The options are sombre, dejected, jocular, rejoicing and indifferent. We need the nearest synonym, that is, the word that most closely matches jubilant in meaning. Jubilant typically describes people who are very happy, often after a success or victory. The question belongs to general English vocabulary, not technical usage. Concept / Approach: In English, jubilant means extremely joyful, triumphant or filled with great happiness, especially in response to a positive event. The key idea is intense joy and celebration. We must compare each option with this meaning. Words that express sadness or lack of emotion cannot be synonyms. The word rejoicing directly expresses joy and celebration and usually appears in contexts very similar to those in which jubilant is used. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the dictionary sense of jubilant as feeling or expressing great happiness and triumph. Step 2: Examine rejoicing. It comes from the verb rejoice, which means to feel or show great joy or delight. People who are rejoicing are clearly jubilant. Step 3: Examine jocular. Jocular refers to someone who is fond of joking or humorous. That person may be cheerful but the focus is on humour, not necessarily on triumphant joy. Step 4: Examine sombre and dejected. Both of these words relate to sadness or low spirits. Sombre means serious, dark or gloomy, and dejected means depressed or miserable. Step 5: Examine indifferent. Indifferent refers to lack of interest or concern, the opposite of an intense emotional response. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a sentence from a news report: The crowd was jubilant after the team victory. Substitute rejoicing: The crowd was rejoicing after the team victory. The sentence remains natural and meaningful. Now try substituting jocular: The crowd was jocular after the team victory. This sounds strange and does not capture the atmosphere of triumphant celebration. Using sombre, dejected or indifferent would completely reverse the meaning, proving that they cannot be correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sombre describes a serious or sad mood, often used for funerals or serious occasions, the opposite of jubilant. Dejected denotes sadness and disappointment, again the emotional opposite of great joy. Jocular involves joking, which may include light humour but not the strong sense of triumphant celebration that jubilant carries. Indifferent expresses lack of interest or concern and therefore does not convey any positive emotion at all. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse jocular with words for happiness because jokers often make people laugh. However, jubilant is stronger and linked to celebration or triumph, not simply to making jokes. Others may be misled by partial similarity in sound or by not reading all options carefully. Always focus on the intensity and type of emotion expressed by the word. Final Answer: The closest synonym of jubilant is rejoicing.

Question 7

Select the option that is opposite in meaning to the English word "courage" and best expresses its antonym.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Antonym questions test understanding of word meanings and the ability to distinguish between related but different concepts. Here, we are given the word courage, which refers to the quality of being brave and facing fear or danger. We must identify the option that expresses the direct opposite character quality. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is courage. The options are bravery, weakness, cowardice, fear and daring. Courage is a positive trait involving firm resolve in the face of difficulty. The correct answer must be a noun naming the opposite character trait, not simply a related feeling. We focus on standard dictionary meanings used in general English. Concept / Approach: Courage is the mental or moral strength to venture, persevere and withstand danger or hardship. The well known opposite character trait is cowardice, which is the lack of courage and a tendency to be excessively afraid or to avoid danger. While fear is an emotion that can exist even in a courageous person, cowardice is the quality of being controlled by fear. Therefore, cowardice is the precise antonym. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify bravery and daring as near synonyms of courage because they also describe bold and fearless behaviour. Step 2: Examine cowardice, which is defined as failure to show courage when facing danger or difficulty. Step 3: Examine weakness. Weakness refers broadly to lack of strength, whether physical, emotional or moral, and may or may not involve fear. Step 4: Examine fear. Fear is a feeling of anxiety or dread but not a character trait by itself; a courageous person can still experience fear yet overcome it. Step 5: Conclude that cowardice is the clearest opposite character quality to courage. Verification / Alternative check: Use the words in similar sentence structures. For example, His courage impressed everyone and His cowardice disappointed everyone show parallel use of nouns. Replace courage with bravery: His bravery impressed everyone. Replace with daring: His daring impressed everyone. These are still positive traits, confirming that they are synonyms, not antonyms. Fear does not fit in the same way as a stable trait; we would normally say he was full of fear, not he had great fear as a character quality. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bravery has almost the same meaning as courage and therefore cannot be an antonym. Weakness is too broad and may refer to physical limits or minor faults; it is not the standard word for the opposite of courage. Fear is an emotion that courageous people may also feel and overcome, so it is not necessarily the opposite of courage as a trait. Daring is another word for boldness and risk taking, very close to courage rather than opposite. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to choose fear because it seems naturally opposed to courage. However, language often distinguishes between temporary emotions and lasting personality traits. Courage opposes cowardice at the level of character, while fear is simply a feeling that may be present even when someone acts bravely. Careful reading of definitions can avoid this confusion. Final Answer: The correct antonym of courage is cowardice.

Question 8

Four spellings of the word meaning "in correct proportion" are given. Choose the correctly spelt word "commensurate" from the options.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Spelling questions test familiarity with standard English forms, especially for words used in formal writing. The word in focus here is commensurate, which means in correct proportion or corresponding in size or degree. Only one of the given spellings matches the standard dictionary form. Given Data / Assumptions: The intended word is commensurate, used in phrases such as salary commensurate with experience. Five spellings are offered, each slightly different. We must recognise the standard spelling used in formal English. The correct spelling has one m after the first o and one s after the second m. The ending is surate, not sarate or surate with extra letters. Concept / Approach: The word commensurate is derived from Latin roots meaning equal measure. In English, it is spelt c o m m e n s u r a t e. The pattern is com plus mens plus urate, with double m and a single s. When solving spelling questions, it helps to recall common usage and to break the word into smaller meaningful parts so that added or missing letters can be detected easily. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine option A, Commensurate. It follows the pattern com mens urate with double m and a single s, and matches dictionary usage. Step 2: Examine option B, Commensarate. The sequence sarate is incorrect; the correct part is surate with a u before rate. Step 3: Examine option C, Commansurate. This form shifts the second m to n, producing mans instead of mens, and therefore breaks the root. Step 4: Examine option D, Comansurate. This spelling drops one m and changes mens to mans; it is clearly non standard. Step 5: Examine option E, Commenssurate. It uses a double s, which is not found in the correct spelling. Verification / Alternative check: Recall common phrases such as pay will be commensurate with skills and experience, where commensurate is spelt as in option A. Check a dictionary mentally: the stress falls on men, and the letters m e n s appear together, which option A preserves. If you have seen the word in print, the pattern double m single s stands out, supporting option A. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B alters the vowel pattern in the final syllables and creates a non existent form commensarate. Option C confuses m and n, changing the central root from mens to mans, and so is incorrect. Option D removes one m and changes the shape of the word, which is not acceptable. Option E adds an extra s, which does not appear in the standard spelling. Common Pitfalls: Learners often struggle with words that contain double consonants and the sequence surate or serate. A helpful strategy is to memorise example phrases with correct spelling and to notice the root mens that appears inside commensurate. Breaking words into meaningful parts reduces confusion caused by inserted or omitted letters. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Commensurate.

Question 9

In this sentence error question, identify whether any part of the sentence has an error: "He was not able to concentrate because of the continual music being played next door."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Error spotting questions check understanding of grammar, usage and collocation. The sentence given here describes someone who cannot concentrate because of music coming from a neighbouring place. We must judge whether any part of the sentence is grammatically or idiomatically incorrect, or whether the sentence is error free. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence parts are: He was not able to concentrate (A), because of the continual music (B), being played next door (C), and No error (D). The tense used is past continuous situation with a focus on ability. The phrase continual music is used instead of continuous music. The structure being played next door functions as a reduced relative clause describing music. We assume standard formal English usage. Concept / Approach: To solve such questions, we examine verb forms, prepositions, article usage and choice of adjectives. The phrase was not able to concentrate is correct and common. Because of is the correct preposition to express cause. Continual music means music that happens frequently or repeatedly, which makes sense in a disturbance context. The phrase being played next door correctly describes the music in a passive continuous sense. There is no grammatical or idiomatic error in any part. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Analyse part A. He was not able to concentrate correctly combines subject, past tense of be, and infinitive of concentrate to express inability. Step 2: Analyse part B. Because of the continual music correctly uses because of plus noun phrase to express reason. Step 3: Analyse part C. Being played next door is a reduced form of which was being played next door and correctly modifies music. Step 4: Check subject verb agreement and any missing articles or prepositions; all are correct. Step 5: Conclude that the sentence is grammatically sound and choose the no error option. Verification / Alternative check: Replace continual with continuous to see whether the original adjective is wrong. Both continual music and continuous music are acceptable, but continual music emphasises repetition rather than an unbroken sound, which fits well with repeated disturbance. Consider whether any comma is wrongly placed. The comma before because of is optional and does not create a grammar error in this context. Reading the sentence aloud reveals natural rhythm and meaning, confirming there is no error. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A suggests that part A has an error, which is incorrect because was not able to concentrate is perfectly standard. Option B claims that the phrase because of the continual music is wrong, but it uses the correct preposition and a suitable adjective. Option C marks being played next door as wrong, but this is a valid reduced passive construction modifying music. Option E introduces confusion by mentioning part D having an error, but part D simply labels the no error choice. Common Pitfalls: Some students wrongly believe that continual is always incorrect when describing sounds and that only continuous is acceptable. Others may think that a reduced relative clause like being played next door must always use which before it. Both beliefs are oversimplifications. English allows a range of adjectives and reduced clauses when meaning is clear and structure is correct. Final Answer: The sentence is grammatically correct, so The sentence has no error in any part. is the right choice.

Question 10

In the proverb based sentence "Still waters run deep", determine whether any part of the sentence contains an error or whether it is error free.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question uses the well known English proverb Still waters run deep. Error spotting with proverbs checks whether the learner recognises standard expressions that should not be altered. We need to decide if any part of the sentence has a grammatical error or if the proverb is used correctly as it stands. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is split into parts: Still (A), waters (B), run deep (C), and No Error (D). Still waters run deep is a fixed proverb in English. The proverb means quiet or calm people often have very strong feelings or deep thoughts. The grammatical subject is waters, which is plural. The verb is run, which agrees with the plural subject. Concept / Approach: Proverbs and idiomatic expressions often follow set patterns. Still waters run deep is one such idiom. Grammatically, still functions as an adjective meaning calm or motionless, modifying the plural noun waters. The verb run matches the plural noun, and deep is an adverbial complement describing how the waters run. There is no error in any part of this proverb. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check part A. Still correctly works as an adjective before waters, meaning calm. Step 2: Check part B. Waters is a plural noun often used in poetic or literary expressions for stretches of water. Step 3: Check part C. Run deep is a verb phrase describing the behaviour of water; the verb run is plural and matches waters. Step 4: Confirm that the proverb as a whole is standard and appears in dictionaries and phrase books. Step 5: Conclude that there is no grammatical or idiomatic error. Verification / Alternative check: Compare the sentence with common reference sources or recall that this exact expression is frequently used without any change. Attempting to alter it, for example to still water runs deep, would change both the grammar and the accepted wording. Since proverbs are generally memorised in fixed form, matching the known form confirms that the sentence is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because still is correctly placed and correctly used as an adjective here. Option B is wrong because waters is a valid plural noun used in literary expressions about rivers, seas and lakes. Option C is wrong because the plural verb run correctly agrees with waters and deep functions correctly as a complement. Option E is irrelevant since part D contains only the label for the no error option. Common Pitfalls: Some learners misinterpret still as an adverb of time, expecting a different structure. Others may think that water cannot be pluralised in formal English, but waters is standard in poetic or descriptive contexts. Remember that idioms and proverbs often preserve older forms and should be learned as complete units. Final Answer: The proverb is correct as written, so The sentence has no error in any part. is the correct choice.

Question 11

In the sentence "The job is under the direct of Mrs Jones", identify which part contains a grammatical error or whether the sentence is error free.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question focuses on a common noun form mistake after the phrase under the direct. The sentence tries to express that the job is under the authority or supervision of a person. We have to find which part of the sentence is grammatically incorrect and choose the option that correctly identifies the faulty segment. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is divided as follows: The job is (A), under the direct (B), of Mrs Jones (C), No Error (D). The intended meaning is that Mrs Jones directly supervises the job. In standard English, the phrase should be under the direction of someone. Part B currently contains the phrase under the direct without a proper noun following direct. We assume that the rest of the sentence is left unchanged in the test format. Concept / Approach: The adjective direct needs a noun like control, supervision or direction to form a correct phrase. When talking about work or responsibility, the usual expression is under the direction of or under the direct supervision of. The fragment under the direct by itself is incomplete and ungrammatical. Therefore, the error lies in part B, and we should mark that part as wrong. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Analyse part A, The job is. This correctly introduces the subject and linking verb and has no error. Step 2: Analyse part B, under the direct. Here, direct appears as an adjective with no noun after it, which makes the phrase incomplete. Step 3: Analyse part C, of Mrs Jones. This prepositional phrase is fine and correctly indicates whose authority is involved. Step 4: Decide which part must be changed to correct the sentence. Part B must be rewritten as under the direction or under the direct supervision for full correctness. Step 5: Select the option indicating Part B has an error. Verification / Alternative check: Consider the corrected sentence: The job is under the direction of Mrs Jones. This is natural and grammatically sound. Compare with other collocations such as under the control of or under the charge of, which all use a noun after the preposition under the. The only broken part of the original sentence is the fragment under the direct, confirming the error location. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because the phrase The job is uses correct subject verb agreement and linking verb usage. Option C is wrong because of Mrs Jones is correctly formed with the preposition of and a proper noun. Option D claiming no error is incorrect because there is clearly a structural problem in part B. Option E referring to part D is irrelevant since part D only labels the no error choice. Common Pitfalls: Students may sometimes overlook this type of error because direct sounds like a strong word and they mentally supply the missing noun. It is important to check that adjectives such as direct actually modify a noun. Collocation knowledge, such as recognising under the direction of as a fixed phrase, is very useful in such questions. Final Answer: The error lies in Part B has an error., because under the direct should be under the direction or under the direct supervision.

Question 12

Fill in the blank with the correct preposition in the sentence "Pour the juice _____ the glass."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Preposition questions test correct usage in everyday situations. The sentence describes the act of transferring juice from a container into a glass. We must select the preposition that accurately shows movement from one place to another and results in the juice being inside the glass. Given Data / Assumptions: The base sentence is Pour the juice _____ the glass. The action involves movement of liquid from one container to another. We want to express movement toward an interior space. The options are in, into, onto, on and within. Standard English has specific preposition patterns with verbs like pour. Concept / Approach: In English, into is used to express movement from outside to inside, especially when something crosses a boundary and ends up within a container or enclosed space. The preposition in typically indicates position, not movement. With the verb pour, the usual pattern is pour something into a glass, bottle or cup. Therefore, into is the correct choice for this sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Replace the blank with into. The sentence becomes Pour the juice into the glass, which clearly expresses the movement of juice into the glass. Step 2: Test in. Pour the juice in the glass may sometimes be heard, but it can also be interpreted as pour the juice while you are in the glass, and is not as precise in formal English. Step 3: Test onto. Pour the juice onto the glass suggests pouring on the outer surface of the glass, which is not what we want. Step 4: Test on. Pour the juice on the glass again suggests pouring on the outside, not inside. Step 5: Test within. Pour the juice within the glass sounds archaic and is not the normal modern collocation. Verification / Alternative check: Think of similar sentences: pour milk into the cup, pour water into the bottle, pour tea into the mug. All use into with containers. Replace juice and glass with other objects; the pattern still remains pour something into something, confirming that into is the standard preposition. Grammatically, into clearly marks direction and movement toward the interior, which is exactly what is intended. Why Other Options Are Wrong: In can indicate location and is sometimes used in casual speech but does not clearly emphasise the movement into the container. Onto and on indicate contact with a surface, not movement inside a container. Within is used to mean inside something but is normally not used directly after pour in this context. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse in and into because both involve the idea of inside. The key difference is that in describes state, while into describes movement. Remember to use into after verbs that involve movement from one place to another, such as go, jump, throw and pour, when the destination is an interior space. Final Answer: The correct preposition is into, so the sentence should read Pour the juice into the glass.

Question 13

Complete the sentence "I have been _____ this problem since noon" by choosing the correct phrasal verb.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of phrasal verbs and preposition choice with the verb work. The speaker wants to say that they have been spending time dealing with or trying to solve a particular problem since noon. The correct preposition must show this close, focused effort on a task. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence pattern is I have been _____ this problem since noon. The verb is work in the form working. The object is this problem, which indicates a task or issue to be solved. The preposition following working must form a standard phrasal verb. Options include working into, working on, working for, working after and working around. Concept / Approach: In English, the normal expression for spending time dealing with a problem or project is work on something. The phrasal verb work on means attempt to solve, improve or develop. Other combinations like work for, work into or work around have different meanings and are not used in this particular sentence pattern. Therefore, working on is the correct choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Substitute working on into the sentence: I have been working on this problem since noon. This clearly states that the speaker has been trying to solve or handle the problem for a period of time. Step 2: Test working into. I have been working into this problem sounds unnatural and does not match standard usage. Step 3: Test working for. I have been working for this problem is wrong because work for is used with organisations or people, not with problems. Step 4: Test working after. This phrase does not form a recognised phrasal verb in this context. Step 5: Test working around. Work around a problem means to avoid it or find a way that does not directly solve it, so it changes the intended meaning and would require a different sentence structure. Verification / Alternative check: Consider similar sentences: She is working on her project, they are working on the new design, and he has been working on his presentation all day. In all cases, work on is used for tasks. Replace this problem with another task, such as this report, and working on still fits naturally. Check that the present perfect continuous form have been working on correctly expresses an action that began in the past and continues till now. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Working into does not combine naturally with this problem and has no standard meaning here. Working for normally takes a person or organisation as object, as in working for a company, not a problem. Working after is not a recognised phrasal verb in this type of sentence and sounds incorrect. Working around a problem has a different meaning, implying avoidance rather than directly dealing with the issue. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overgeneralise prepositions, assuming that any preposition can follow a verb. In reality, phrasal verbs are often fixed expressions, and work on is one such pattern that must be memorised. It helps to learn common verb plus preposition combinations in groups, such as depend on, insist on, and work on. Final Answer: The correct phrasal verb is working on, so the sentence should read I have been working on this problem since noon.

Question 14

Choose the correct noun to complete the sentence "Sushma has a deep _____ for drunkards."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of correct noun forms after adjectives such as deep. The sentence describes a strong negative feeling that Sushma has toward drunkards. We must choose the appropriate noun to follow the phrase has a deep, which requires a suitable abstract noun. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is Sushma has a deep _____ for drunkards. The structure is has a deep plus noun plus for. The feeling is clearly negative and strong. The options are hatred, hate, hated, hating and hatings. We assume standard educated English usage. Concept / Approach: In standard English, hatred is the abstract noun that describes a strong dislike or intense hostility. The phrase deep hatred is very common and fits the pattern adjective plus noun. Hate is also a noun in some contexts, but it is less common in this pattern. Hated and hating are verb forms or participles, and hatings is not a standard word. Therefore, hatred is the best and grammatically correct choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert hatred into the sentence. Sushma has a deep hatred for drunkards reads naturally and clearly conveys strong dislike. Step 2: Test hate. Sushma has a deep hate for drunkards is possible in very informal language but sounds less idiomatic than deep hatred in formal usage. Step 3: Test hated. Hated is a past participle and does not work as a noun in this position. Step 4: Test hating. Hating is a gerund form and would require a different structure, such as Sushma is hating, which is still awkward here. Step 5: Test hatings. Hat ings is not used as a standard plural noun in English. Verification / Alternative check: Compare with similar expressions: deep love, deep respect, deep admiration. All use abstract noun forms. The phrase deep hatred is frequently encountered in books and articles and is widely accepted. Deep hate can occur as a collocation but is less formal and less common in examination English. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Hate as a noun is less idiomatic in this structure and is not the preferred form in standard examination contexts. Hated is primarily used as a past participle and cannot function as the object noun of has a deep. Hating is a participle or gerund and sounds incorrect after a deep in this pattern. Hatings is not a standard English word and therefore cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse verb and noun forms, especially with words that can serve in both roles, like love and hate. Recognising that deep usually modifies an abstract noun in such expressions helps to avoid errors. It is useful to memorise common pairs such as deep hatred, deep sorrow and deep gratitude. Final Answer: The correct noun is hatred, so the complete sentence is Sushma has a deep hatred for drunkards.

Question 15

In the idiom question, choose the option that best expresses the meaning of the phrase "couch potato".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Idioms are expressions whose meanings cannot always be guessed from the literal meanings of their individual words. The expression couch potato is a humorous idiom in modern English. To answer correctly, we must know how this expression is used in everyday language and media. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom given is couch potato. The options describe different types of people and behaviours. The literal image is of a potato lying on a couch, suggesting inactivity. We are asked for the best explanation of the idiom meaning. We assume general conversational English usage. Concept / Approach: Couch potato refers to a person who spends many hours sitting or lying on a couch, usually watching television and doing very little physical activity. It implies laziness or a sedentary lifestyle. Among the given options, the one that most directly reflects this sense is a person who prefers to watch television. The other options mention friendliness, emotional calmness, traditional ideas or constant travel, none of which match the central idea. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the idiom is frequently used to criticise someone who sits all day in front of a television. Step 2: Examine option B, a person who prefers to watch television. This matches the image of someone who spends much time on the couch. Step 3: Examine option A, an old person who has oldfashioned ideas. This describes a conservative person but says nothing about their level of physical activity. Step 4: Examine option C, a person who does not seem very friendly. This has no connection to couches or television. Step 5: Examine option D, someone who stays calm and does not show their emotions, which refers to emotional control, again unrelated to the idiom. Step 6: Examine option E, a person who travels constantly for work. This would describe an active person who moves a lot, almost the opposite image. Verification / Alternative check: Consider common usage: advertisements and news reports often talk about reducing couch potato habits and encouraging exercise, clearly associating the phrase with inactivity and television watching. The idea of a vegetable like a potato lying motionless on a sofa reinforces the association with physical laziness. None of the other options mention inactivity or television, confirming that only option B fits. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A misdirects attention to age and beliefs rather than lifestyle. Option C describes a social trait of being unfriendly, not a habit of sitting and watching television. Option D focuses on emotional control, which is completely different from the idea of passively watching television. Option E depicts someone who travels for work and is therefore not a couch potato. Common Pitfalls: Some learners overthink idioms and try to create complex meanings instead of remembering the simple, common image. In this case, remembering that couch potato appears in health campaigns about reducing screen time makes the meaning easy to recall. Visualising the literal image also helps. Final Answer: The idiom couch potato means a person who prefers to watch television, usually in a very inactive way.

Question 16

In the idiom question, select the option that best represents the meaning of the phrase "carry the ball".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The idiom carry the ball originates from team sports, where the person with the ball has responsibility for advancing the play. In business and everyday speech, the expression is used to talk about taking responsibility for a project, task or situation. The question asks for the option that captures this figurative meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom is carry the ball. The options refer to different roles and actions, such as decorating a ball, being in charge, taking a decision, being a hostess and acting as a messenger. The phrase comes from sports but is now used metaphorically. We must choose the meaning that is closest to being responsible for something important. We assume standard American and international English usage. Concept / Approach: In its idiomatic sense, carry the ball means to take primary responsibility for completing a task, making progress on a project or leading an effort. It is not about physically carrying an object or making a single decision. Among the options, be in charge best matches this sense of ongoing responsibility and leadership. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that in sports, the player who carries the ball is the one taking active responsibility for moving the team forward. Step 2: Translate that idea into everyday work situations: the person who carries the ball on a project is the one who leads or manages it. Step 3: Examine option B, be in charge. This means to have control and responsibility over something, which closely matches the idiom. Step 4: Examine option C, take the decision. Although decision making is a part of leadership, the idiom emphasises ongoing responsibility, not only a single act of deciding. Step 5: Examine options A, D and E. None of these relate to responsibility or leadership; they describe unrelated actions. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a sentence: She is the one who really carries the ball on this project. Substituting be in charge gives She is the one who is really in charge of this project, which has nearly the same meaning. Replacing with take the decision gives an unnatural reading, because carrying the ball implies more than simply making decisions. Thus, be in charge is the closest and most accurate paraphrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Decorate the ball refers to a physical act and has no connection to project responsibility. Take the decision focuses only on making a choice at a single point in time and does not reflect the continuous responsibility suggested by the idiom. Be the hostess describes a social role at a party, which is completely unrelated. Act as a messenger suggests carrying messages, not carrying responsibility or leading. Common Pitfalls: Learners may be distracted by options that sound vaguely important, such as take the decision, and ignore the fuller sense of responsibility implied by the idiom. It is helpful to think of the sports origin and visualise the player who must protect and advance the ball as a symbol of leadership and responsibility. Final Answer: The idiom carry the ball means be in charge, especially of a project or important task.

Question 17

In the phrasal verb question, choose the option that best expresses the meaning of "turned down".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Phrasal verbs often have idiomatic meanings that are different from the sum of their parts. The phrase turned down can be used in several contexts, but in examination English it frequently appears in the sense of rejecting an offer, request or application. We must choose the option that captures this meaning most accurately. Given Data / Assumptions: The target phrase is turned down. The options are subject, object, reject, deject and reduce in volume. The question is about general meaning, not a specific sentence. We assume the common context of rejecting a proposal, invitation or request. We need the closest one word substitute for the phrasal verb. Concept / Approach: In everyday English, to turn down an offer means to refuse or reject it politely or firmly. For example, someone can turn down a job offer or a proposal. Therefore, the single word that best replaces turned down in this sense is reject. The words subject and object are grammatical terms and do not match. Deject refers to making someone sad, and reduce in volume describes a different meaning of turn down as used with radios or televisions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall common sentences such as He turned down the offer or She turned down the invitation. In all such examples, turned down means refused or rejected. Step 2: Examine option C, reject. This is a direct and accurate one word substitute for refuse. Step 3: Examine option D, deject. Deject means to make someone unhappy or disappointed, which is different from refusing something. Step 4: Examine option E, reduce in volume. Turning down the volume is another meaning of the phrasal verb, but examination questions without context usually refer to the more common idiomatic sense of refusal. Step 5: Recognise that subject and object are unrelated grammatical terms and cannot represent the meaning of the phrasal verb. Verification / Alternative check: Replace turned down with reject in typical sentences: The committee turned down his proposal becomes The committee rejected his proposal, which preserves the meaning. If we used deject instead, The committee dejected his proposal is ungrammatical and would require a different structure. Reduce in volume only fits sentences about sounds or devices, not offers or requests, so it cannot be the default meaning here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Subject and object are completely unrelated to the idea of refusal and do not connect with the phrasal verb at all. Deject expresses an emotional effect on a person and not the act of refusing a proposal or request. Reduce in volume describes another meaning of turn down but is not the intended sense in this phrasal verb vocabulary question. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may remember that turn down can refer to lowering volume and be tempted by that meaning. It is important to note that vocabulary questions usually target the more general or often examined sense, which in this case is the refusal of offers or requests. Always think of example sentences with people and offers to select the right meaning. Final Answer: The phrasal verb turned down most commonly means reject.

Question 18

In English vocabulary, which one-word substitution refers to the scientific study of elections?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In English vocabulary and general knowledge questions for competitive exams, you are often asked to identify one-word substitutions for longer definitions. The phrase in this question is “the scientific study of elections”, which is a standard topic in political science and current affairs. Knowing the precise term used by political scientists and media commentators helps you understand news articles, editorials, and exam passages that discuss voting patterns, election forecasts, and democratic processes around the world. Given Data / Assumptions: We are given the definition: “the scientific study of elections”. We must pick the correct one-word substitution from the four alternatives. Only one option is correct; the other three are real English words but refer to different fields of study. We assume a standard general-knowledge and English-vocabulary exam context. Concept / Approach: The key idea is to link specific Greek or Latin roots to the fields they describe. Many academic disciplines end with the suffix “-logy”, meaning “the study of”. The prefix gives a clue to the subject. For example, “paleo-” refers to ancient things, “patho-” relates to disease, and “psepho-” is linked to pebbles used for voting in ancient Greece. Therefore, understanding word roots can quickly guide you to the correct answer without memorising every term separately. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the core meaning of the phrase: it clearly talks about a field that scientifically studies elections and voting behaviour. Step 2: Examine option C “Psephology”. It is formed from the Greek “psephos”, meaning pebble, because the ancient Greeks used pebbles for voting. Hence “psephology” literally means the study of voting and elections. Step 3: Check option A “Pathology”. That is the study of diseases and their causes, which is unrelated to elections. Step 4: Check option B “Palaeontology”. That is the study of fossils and prehistoric life forms, usually found in geology and biology, not in political science. Step 5: Check option D “Philology”. That refers to the study of language in written historical sources, combining linguistics and literary studies. Step 6: Only option C matches the required definition, so it must be the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this by recalling how political analysts are sometimes introduced as “psephologists” on television during election seasons. Their job is to analyse opinion polls, exit polls, vote shares, swing percentages, and historical election data. They belong to the discipline of psephology. None of the other three options are ever associated with elections, voting, constituencies, or polling data, so cross-checking with real-life usage strongly confirms that “Psephology” is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Pathology: deals with the nature, causes, and effects of diseases; associated with medical labs and hospitals, not elections. Palaeontology: focuses on fossils and prehistoric life; connected to dinosaurs and rock strata, not voters and constituencies. Philology: examines historical texts, languages, and literature; important for understanding old manuscripts, not for interpreting election results. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse “psephology” with “psychology” or “sociology” because all three can be involved in understanding voter behaviour. However, psychology is the broader study of the mind, and sociology is the study of society in general. Another common error is to pick an option simply because it “sounds scientific” without analysing its root meaning. In vocabulary questions, relying only on sound is risky; instead, you should connect prefixes and suffixes to their meanings through regular practice. Final Answer: The correct one-word substitution for “the scientific study of elections” is Psephology.

Question 19

In this sentence improvement question, choose the correct form of the verb after 'enjoys': He enjoys _____ with his children.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of verb patterns in English, especially the verbs that are followed by a gerund (the -ing form) rather than an infinitive (to + verb). The sentence talks about a father spending leisure time with his children: “He enjoys to go on tours with his children.” Your task is to pick the grammatically correct and most natural-sounding alternative. Given Data / Assumptions: Base sentence: “He enjoys to go on tours with his children.” The underlined part in the original exam would be “to go on tours”. We must choose the best replacement from four alternatives plus a “No improvement” option. Standard rules of modern English grammar and usage apply. Concept / Approach: English verbs can be followed by either a gerund (verb + ing), an infinitive (to + verb), or both, depending on the verb. The verb “enjoy” is special because it is almost always followed by a gerund, not an infinitive. We say “enjoy swimming”, “enjoy reading”, “enjoy going out”, and not “enjoy to swim” or “enjoy to go”. Therefore, we need an option that keeps “enjoy” followed directly by an -ing form. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the main verb: “enjoys”. It indicates a regular habit or preference in the simple present tense. Step 2: Recall the rule: “enjoy” is followed by a gerund (verb + ing). Step 3: Examine option B “going for tours”. It uses the gerund “going” but the preposition “for” does not collocate as naturally as “on” with “tours”. Step 4: Examine option C “going on tours”. This uses the gerund “going” and retains the natural collocation “go on a tour”. The complete sentence becomes “He enjoys going on tours with his children”, which is grammatically correct and idiomatic. Step 5: Option A “to go for tours” still uses the infinitive “to go”, which is incorrect after “enjoys”. Step 6: “No improvement” would keep the ungrammatical “enjoys to go”, so we must reject it. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify the rule by thinking of similar sentences: “She enjoys listening to music”, “They enjoy playing cricket”, “I enjoy cooking new recipes”. In all of these, the verb after “enjoy” is in the -ing form, not in the “to + verb” form. Replacing “going on tours” with a different activity like “reading books” keeps the pattern intact and sounds natural, which confirms that the correct structure has been chosen. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “to go for tours”: wrong because “enjoys” should not be followed by an infinitive; also “for tours” is less natural than “on tours”. “to go on tours”: still uses the infinitive “to go”, so the basic pattern remains incorrect even though the preposition “on” is correct. “No improvement”: keeps the original ungrammatical structure and therefore cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: Many learners assume that “to + verb” is always correct after any verb that expresses a desire or preference, because verbs like “want”, “hope”, and “plan” take the infinitive (for example, “want to go”, “hope to win”). However, a separate group of verbs including “enjoy”, “avoid”, “consider”, and “finish” takes a gerund instead. Confusing these patterns leads to frequent exam errors. It helps to memorise common verb + gerund combinations through repeated exposure and practice questions. Final Answer: The correct improvement is going on tours, so the full sentence is “He enjoys going on tours with his children.”

Question 20

Choose the best tense to complete the sentence: Sita was cooking in the kitchen when her husband _____ the bell.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This grammar question checks your understanding of tense consistency in complex sentences with two actions happening in the past. The sentence is about an ongoing action being interrupted by another action: “Sita was cooking in the kitchen when her husband was ringing the bell.” You must select the best replacement for the underlined part to make the sentence natural and correct in standard English. Given Data / Assumptions: Main clause: “Sita was cooking in the kitchen …” (past continuous tense, describing an action in progress in the past). Subordinate clause: “when her husband was ringing the bell.” Only one answer choice provides the appropriate tense and aspect for the second action. We assume a typical competitive exam pattern where the focus is on correct tense usage in narrative sentences. Concept / Approach: In English narratives, the past continuous tense is often used for an action that was already in progress, and the simple past tense is used for an action that suddenly occurred and interrupted or happened during that ongoing activity. The standard pattern is “was/were doing something when something happened”. Therefore, one clause remains in the past continuous, while the other uses the simple past. Using past continuous in both clauses usually sounds unnatural and is rarely required unless both actions are parallel and continuous. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the ongoing action. Sita was cooking in the kitchen. This is an action in progress, properly expressed by “was cooking”. Step 2: Identify the second action. Her husband rang the bell at a specific moment in time. This is a shorter, completed action that interrupts the ongoing activity. Step 3: Apply the rule: ongoing past action + sudden past action is usually written as “was/were + verb-ing” in one clause, and simple past (verb in past form) in the other clause. Step 4: Replace “was ringing” with a simple past form. Option C “rang” is the correct simple past form of “ring”. Step 5: The improved sentence becomes “Sita was cooking in the kitchen when her husband rang the bell.” This is grammatically correct and idiomatic. Verification / Alternative check: Compare with similar examples: “I was reading when the phone rang”, “They were playing when it started to rain”, “We were having dinner when the lights went out”. In each case, the structure is past continuous + simple past. If we change the second verb to past continuous (“was ringing”, “was starting”, “were going out”), the sentences sound awkward and suggest a long, drawn-out action instead of a brief event. This confirms that “rang” is the right choice here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “would have been ringing”: suggests a hypothetical or conditional past, which does not fit the simple narrative context. “had rung”: indicates past perfect, usually used to show that one past action happened before another past action; however, here the bell ringing occurs during the cooking, not before it. “No improvement”: keeps “was ringing”, which is grammatically possible but stylistically wrong for this typical exam pattern and does not express the momentary interruption clearly. Common Pitfalls: Learners often get confused between past continuous and past perfect tenses. They sometimes overuse past perfect (“had rung”) whenever there are two past actions, even when the relationship is not “earlier vs later” but “ongoing vs interrupting”. Another common mistake is to put both verbs into past continuous when exam questions specifically test the interrupted-action pattern. Remember: if one continuous activity is interrupted by a short action, the continuous form stays for the longer action and the simple past is typically used for the shorter one. Final Answer: The correct improvement is rang, giving the sentence “Sita was cooking in the kitchen when her husband rang the bell.”

English Questions