Question 1

From the Oscar themed passage about La La Land and other films, answer the following question:  Why was it assumed that La La Land would win many awards during that year, according to the passage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question again draws on the passage that describes the Oscar year in which La La Land was widely expected to dominate. The passage offers a specific reason why many believed La La Land would sweep the awards, and it relates to the composition of the voting body and the themes of the film. Your task is to identify the central reason the author highlights, rather than any secondary features. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage states that a majority of Oscar voters are actors. It suggests that because of this, there was a tendency to think they would reward La La Land. La La Land is described as a celebration of creation. The heroine wants to make movies and the hero wants to make jazz. The film uses retro revival Technicolor style clothing designed by Mary Zophres. Concept / Approach: The key is to distinguish between descriptive details about La La Land and the direct cause of the expectation that it would win many awards. The passage specifically links the majority of voters being actors to their likely sympathy for a film that celebrates artistic creation. This causal link is more important than stylistic details like Technicolor or even the simple fact that the movie is about movies and jazz. Thus, the answer must emphasise the makeup of the voting group. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the line that explains the assumption: As a majority of voters are actors, there was the tendency to think they would reward La La Land. Step 2: Recognise that this statement explains the expectation in one clear cause effect sentence. Step 3: Compare each option with this line and look for the one that directly reflects the cause cited. Step 4: Select Because the majority of the Oscar voters are actors as the best match. Verification / Alternative check: Read the relevant portion of the passage again in your mind. The author mentions the majority of voters being actors immediately before mentioning La La Land as a celebration of creation, implying that actors would naturally be drawn to such a film. This is a logical explanation of the general expectation. Other details in the passage add flavour but are not presented as the main cause of the expectation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Because the movie celebrates creation in a very artistic way, expresses a true description of the film but does not directly explain why awards were assumed. Option C, Because it is a movie about making movies and jazz at the same time, again describes content but not the primary reason tied to the voters. Option D, Because it is a retro revival Technicolor movie, focuses only on the visual style and costume design, which is not described as the main factor behind the assumption that it would win many awards. Common Pitfalls: Students often choose an option that restates interesting facts from the passage but does not answer the why question. It is important to recognise causal phrases like as a majority of voters are actors, which signal reasons rather than simple descriptions. Another pitfall is being drawn to the glamour of the film description instead of attending to the logic of why people expected it to dominate the awards. Final Answer: It was assumed that La La Land would win many awards mainly because the majority of the Oscar voters are actors.

Question 2

In the same passage about the Oscars and the surprising results, answer the following question:  Which one of the listed movies definitely won two awards, according to the author of the passage?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This comprehension question asks you to identify which film the passage specifically states won two awards. The passage lists several movies and mentions the categories some of them won. You need to focus on the wording around each film and pick the one clearly described as winning in two categories. Given Data / Assumptions: The passage notes that Arrival won for Best Sound Editing. It states that Hacksaw Ridge, which is an anti guns movie, won in two categories. Fences, about an African American father, took home the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress. Moonlight won for Best Supporting Actor and later for Best Picture, but in the passage excerpt provided in the question, the clear phrase with two categories is used for Hacksaw Ridge. Concept / Approach: The most reliable strategy is to rely on the exact wording of the passage. The phrase won in two categories is a direct clue that should guide your answer. Even if you know from outside knowledge that some films won multiple awards, the exam expects you to answer based only on the information in the passage. Therefore, you must choose the film that the passage explicitly associates with winning in two categories, which is Hacksaw Ridge. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall which film is linked to the phrase won in two categories. Step 2: Identify that Hacksaw Ridge is described as an anti guns movie and is followed by the statement that it won in two categories. Step 3: Note that Arrival is linked only with the single award for Best Sound Editing. Step 4: Observe that Fences is mentioned in connection with Best Supporting Actress and Moonlight with Best Supporting Actor, without the phrase about two categories in the quoted part. Verification / Alternative check: Run through the passage details again mentally. Only one sentence mentions a film and immediately adds won in two categories, and that sentence names Hacksaw Ridge. None of the other films in the options is presented in exactly the same way in the text. This direct match confirms that Hacksaw Ridge is the correct answer for this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Arrival, is associated with a single award in the passage and therefore cannot be the answer. Option B, Fences, is linked with Best Supporting Actress only. Option C, Moonlight, is noted for Best Supporting Actor in the portion of the passage cited in the question. Even if you know it won more awards in reality, that is not specified in the given text segment. Thus, only Hacksaw Ridge fits the requirement of the question. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to rely on outside knowledge of the full Oscar results instead of focusing strictly on the passage. Another pitfall is to misread the text and think that any film that won at least one award might have won multiple awards. Careful reading of precise phrases like won in two categories is crucial to answering such questions correctly. Final Answer: The passage clearly states that Hacksaw Ridge won in two categories, so it is the correct answer.

Question 3

In the following sentence, identify the part that contains a grammatical error:  "The sailors divided his money around themselves and the ship sailed on."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question asks you to find the part of the sentence that is grammatically or idiomatically incorrect. The sentence is about sailors sharing someone else's money. Such questions typically test collocations, prepositions, and fixed expressions used with common verbs like divide. Mastering these patterns is important for clear and natural English usage in both written and spoken contexts. Given Data / Assumptions: Complete sentence: The sailors divided his money around themselves and the ship sailed on. The verb is divided, used with the object his money. The phrase around themselves is used after divided. We know standard English collocations use among or between with divide when sharing something. Concept / Approach: The correct idiom is divide something among people or between two specific persons, not divide something around people. The preposition around suggests physical movement or surrounding, which does not fit the sense of sharing. Therefore, the phrase money around themselves is wrong. The other parts of the sentence The sailors divided his and the ship sailed on are grammatically acceptable and convey a clear meaning. The error must therefore lie in part B. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the sentence part by part and focus on the verb phrase divided his money. Step 2: Recall that the usual expression is divided his money among themselves, meaning they shared it among all the sailors. Step 3: Notice that the sentence has around themselves instead of among themselves, which sounds unnatural. Step 4: Confirm that parts A and C, The sailors divided his and the ship sailed on, are grammatically fine. Verification / Alternative check: Replace around with among: The sailors divided his money among themselves and the ship sailed on. This new sentence is completely natural and captures the intended meaning that they shared his money. No other changes are needed. This confirms that the original problem was with the preposition in part B. Parts A and C do not need correction because The sailors divided his clearly sets up the subject and verb, and the ship sailed on correctly describes what happened next. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is grammatically correct because it correctly uses the subject and verb form. Option C is also correct as it is a simple past tense clause with a clear subject and verb. Option D, No error, is incorrect because we have clearly identified an idiomatic error in part B. Therefore, the only segment that contains the error is money around themselves and. Common Pitfalls: Many learners overlook preposition errors because they focus mainly on verb forms and obvious subject verb agreement mistakes. Some may even assume around themselves is acceptable because they see around used frequently in other contexts. However, accurate collocation is vital in formal English. Always check whether a verb has a preferred preposition or pattern in fixed expressions. Final Answer: The incorrect segment is part money around themselves and, so option 2 is the correct choice and the phrase should be money among themselves.

Question 4

In the following sentence, identify the part that contains a grammatical or idiomatic error:  "Thank you for getting me of the hook."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error spotting question is based on a common English idiom that uses a specific preposition. The sentence expresses gratitude using the phrase get someone off the hook, which means to rescue someone from a difficult situation or from blame. In such questions, the key is to know the correct idiomatic expression and to notice when a preposition has been changed incorrectly. Given Data / Assumptions: Complete sentence: Thank you for getting me of the hook. The intended idiom is get someone off the hook. The preposition used in the sentence is of instead of off. The rest of the sentence structure Thank you for getting me is grammatically correct. Concept / Approach: The well established idiom is off the hook, not of the hook. The preposition off conveys the idea of being freed from something, such as responsibility or trouble. The preposition of does not convey this meaning and is incorrect here. Therefore, the error lies in the phrase of the hook. Identifying idiomatic expressions and knowing their exact form is essential for solving such questions correctly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the speaker is thanking someone for helping them escape a difficult situation. Step 2: Recall the idiom get someone off the hook, meaning to free someone from blame or trouble. Step 3: Compare the idiom to the given sentence and notice that the preposition is of instead of off. Step 4: Conclude that the mistake is in the phrase of the hook, which should be off the hook. Verification / Alternative check: Replace the incorrect phrase with the correct idiom and read the entire sentence: Thank you for getting me off the hook. This now sounds natural and idiomatically correct. No other part of the sentence requires adjustment, which confirms that the only error was the preposition in part C. Parts A and B follow normal English patterns and do not contain grammatical mistakes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Thank you for, is a standard polite expression and needs no change. Option B, getting me, correctly uses the gerund after for and connects smoothly to the idiom. Option D, No error, is wrong because we have clearly identified a preposition error in part C. Thus, the only incorrect segment is of the hook, making option 3 the correct choice. Common Pitfalls: Many learners may read quickly and miss small preposition errors, since of and off look similar. Others may not be familiar with the exact wording of the idiom and might think that of the hook is acceptable. Developing a good ear for common idioms and paying close attention to prepositions can greatly reduce such mistakes in competitive exams. Final Answer: The error is in part of the hook. The correct idiom is off the hook, so part 3 is the segment that needs correction.

Question 5

Choose the most appropriate verb to complete the sentence correctly:  "It took several men to ________ the fallen tree out of our yard."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary and usage question asks you to choose the verb that best completes the sentence in a natural and meaningful way. The sentence describes an action involving several men and a fallen tree that must be moved out of a yard. You need to select a verb that fits both the physical context and the grammar of the sentence. Such questions test your knowledge of word meanings and collocations. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: It took several men to ________ the fallen tree out of our yard. The action involves moving a heavy object, namely a fallen tree. Options are: erect, establish, haul, rivet. We assume the aim is to remove the tree from the yard, not to build or fix something. Concept / Approach: The key verb in such a physical scenario is one that means pull or drag something heavy, often with difficulty. The word haul means pull or drag something with effort, especially a heavy object, which fits perfectly here. Erect means set something upright, such as erect a building or statue. Establish means set up an organisation or prove something. Rivet means fasten or hold something firmly in place. Only haul naturally describes moving a fallen tree out of a yard. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Visualise the scene: several men working together to move a heavy fallen tree. Step 2: Match this mental picture with the meaning of each option. Step 3: Note that haul describes the effortful pulling or dragging of a heavy object. Step 4: Insert haul into the sentence and confirm that it sounds natural: It took several men to haul the fallen tree out of our yard. Verification / Alternative check: Test each of the other options in the sentence. It took several men to erect the fallen tree out of our yard sounds wrong because erect usually takes an object that is to be raised, not removed. It took several men to establish the fallen tree out of our yard is clearly incorrect. It took several men to rivet the fallen tree out of our yard also does not make sense because rivet means to fix or fasten. Only haul produces a clear and realistic sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, erect, does not match the idea of moving a fallen tree out of a yard and would instead suggest making something stand upright. Option B, establish, is used for organisations, facts, or systems, not for physically moving objects. Option D, rivet, refers to fastening or holding something firmly, which is the opposite of removing a tree. Therefore, they all fail in this context. Common Pitfalls: A learner who does not know the exact meanings of all options might guess randomly, or be misled by familiarity with words like erect or establish. It is important to build a broad vocabulary and to pay attention to how words are used in real sentences. Associating words with mental images and example sentences helps in remembering appropriate contexts. Final Answer: The verb that best completes the sentence is haul, so the correct option is haul.

Question 6

Select the correct word to complete the sentence meaningfully:  "If you write a forty page essay in one night, you will accomplish a huge _______."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks you to select the word that best completes the sentence in a way that matches both the context and the collocation. The sentence talks about writing a forty page essay in one night, which is clearly a demanding task. The blank should therefore be filled with a word that conveys the idea of a remarkable achievement rather than something unrelated like a vehicle group or a type of sound. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: If you write a forty page essay in one night, you will accomplish a huge _______. The action is difficult and impressive. Options: treat, feat, fleet, beat. We assume that the speaker wants to praise the scale of the achievement. Concept / Approach: The noun feat means a very impressive act or achievement that requires great courage, skill, or strength. This fits perfectly with the idea of completing a long essay in a single night. Treat usually refers to something that gives pleasure, such as a pleasant surprise or special food. Fleet refers to a group of vehicles or ships. Beat as a noun refers to rhythm or a journalist's assigned area. None of these match the intended meaning in this context, so feat is the correct choice. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the phrase accomplish a huge, which suggests a significant achievement. Step 2: Recall the meaning of feat as an impressive or difficult achievement. Step 3: Insert feat into the sentence: you will accomplish a huge feat, which sounds natural and appropriate. Step 4: Check that the other options do not fit the sense of achievement in this context. Verification / Alternative check: Try each option in place of the blank. Accomplish a huge treat does not work because we do not usually accomplish a treat. Accomplish a huge fleet is meaningless because fleet is not an achievement. Accomplish a huge beat does not capture the idea of success either. Only accomplish a huge feat accurately conveys that writing the essay is a difficult and notable achievement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, treat, is associated with giving pleasure, not with performing a challenging task. Option C, fleet, refers to a group of vehicles or ships and has nothing to do with completing work. Option D, beat, is used for rhythm or sometimes in slang, but not in the formal sense of a major achievement in this sentence. Therefore, these options are semantically inappropriate. Common Pitfalls: Learners may confuse feat and treat because they sound similar, or might choose beat because they have heard phrases like that is hard to beat. However, the collocation accomplish a huge feat is the standard one in English. Paying attention to how words pair with verbs like accomplish helps in avoiding these errors. Final Answer: The correct word is feat, so the sentence should read you will accomplish a huge feat.

Question 7

In the following vocabulary question, choose the word which is most similar in meaning to the given word:  Whine.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary item asks for a synonym of the word whine. Whine is commonly used to describe a particular way of complaining, often in a high pitched or annoying manner. The correct option should therefore also relate to complaining or expressing dissatisfaction, not to pleasure, enjoyment, or excitement. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: whine. Options: Gratification, Luxury, Thrill, Gripe. We assume the sense of whine as complain in an irritating or drawn out way. Concept / Approach: The verb gripe means to complain in a persistent or irritating way. This overlaps strongly with the meaning of whine, which involves repeated and often irritating complaints. By contrast, gratification indicates satisfaction or pleasure, luxury refers to great comfort and expensive enjoyment, and thrill is a feeling of excitement. These three words are positive or neutral in connotation and do not match the negative idea of complaining. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that whine means to complain in a high pitched or nagging manner. Step 2: Examine the meaning of each option and see which one has a related sense. Step 3: Recognise that gripe is another verb that means complain persistently and usually negatively. Step 4: Match whine with gripe and select Gripe as the correct synonym. Verification / Alternative check: Use both words in similar sentences. For example, Children often whine when they are tired. Children often gripe when they are tired. Both sentences convey the idea of repeated complaining. In contrast, Children often gratification or luxury or thrill does not make sense in this context. This quick test confirms that gripe is the only option that shares the core meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Gratification, refers to satisfaction or pleasure gained from fulfilling a desire. Option B, Luxury, means great comfort, wealth, or expensive lifestyle. Option C, Thrill, means a sudden strong feeling of excitement or joy. None of these words involve complaining or an unpleasant tone, so they are not synonyms of whine. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students confuse the emotional tone of words and may choose a word simply because they recognise it as emotional. However, it is important to match the direction of the emotion. Whine is negative and annoying, whereas gratification, luxury, and thrill are positive or pleasant. Learning clear definitions and using example sentences helps in choosing the right synonym. Final Answer: The word that is closest in meaning to whine is Gripe.

Question 8

In the following vocabulary question, choose the word which is closest in meaning to the given word:  Requisite.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks you to identify a synonym for the word requisite. In examination English, requisite is often used as an adjective meaning necessary or required for a particular purpose. Therefore, the correct option should express the idea of something that must be present or fulfilled before something else can happen. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: requisite. Options: Peripheral, Deadwood, Trivial, Precondition. We interpret requisite as something that is essential or required. Concept / Approach: Precondition means a condition that must be fulfilled before other things can happen or be possible. This meaning closely matches requisite when used as a noun or in the sense of required condition. The other options describe things that are unimportant, unnecessary, or marginal, which are opposite to what requisite suggests. So Precondition is the best synonym here. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that requisite refers to something that is necessary or essential. Step 2: Compare that meaning with each option. Step 3: Notice that precondition describes a necessary condition for something else to occur. Step 4: Select Precondition as the word closest in meaning to requisite. Verification / Alternative check: Use both words in a similar sentence. For example, Experience in accounting is a requisite for this job. Experience in accounting is a precondition for this job. Both sentences communicate that experience is required, not optional. In contrast, Experience in accounting is peripheral or deadwood or trivial changes the meaning in the wrong direction, as those words suggest something unimportant or useless. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Peripheral, means on the edge or not central, often implying that something is of minor importance. Option B, Deadwood, refers to people or things that are no longer useful or productive. Option C, Trivial, means unimportant or insignificant. All of these words indicate the opposite of necessary or required, so they are not correct synonyms for requisite. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to focus only on rough associations, such as thinking of any formal sounding word as a synonym. However, you must match the core meaning carefully. Requisite deals with necessity, whereas peripheral and trivial deal with lack of importance. Learning words in meaningful groups, such as required, essential, necessary, and precondition, can help avoid such confusion. Final Answer: The word that is closest in meaning to requisite is Precondition.

Question 9

In the following vocabulary question, choose the word which is opposite in meaning to the given word:  Dominate.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This antonym question tests your understanding of the verb dominate. Dominate means to control, to have power over, or to rule something or someone. To answer correctly, you must select the option that expresses the opposite idea of giving up control, not maintaining or increasing it. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: dominate. Options: Surrender, Prevail, Dictate, Command. We interpret dominate as exercise power or control over someone or something. Concept / Approach: Surrender means to give up control, power, or possession to someone else, often in a conflict or competition. This is the direct opposite of dominate, which implies maintaining or exerting control. Prevail means to win or be successful. Dictate means control or lay down rules. Command also has the sense of directing or controlling. Therefore, Surrender is the only option that reverses the meaning of dominate. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Clearly define dominate as exercise control or rule over. Step 2: Examine each option and decide whether it expresses taking control or giving it up. Step 3: Notice that surrender means to yield or give up power or control. Step 4: Select Surrender as the correct antonym. Verification / Alternative check: Use both words in similar sentences and compare. For example, The team dominated the match means they controlled the game. The team surrendered in the match means they gave up or were defeated. These two sentences represent opposite situations. If we try the other options, The team prevailed means they won, which is similar to dominating, not opposite. The team dictated the match and The team commanded the match also suggest control rather than submission. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, Prevail, means to win or gain victory, which is close to dominate in many contexts. Option C, Dictate, means to lay down rules or control actions, again similar to dominate. Option D, Command, also implies having authority and control. None of these words reverse the meaning of dominate, so they cannot be its antonym. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes misread antonym questions as synonym questions, particularly when all the options appear strong or authoritative. Another pitfall is not pausing to think of a precise definition of the target word before looking at the options. By first clarifying that dominate is about holding power, it becomes much easier to see that surrender is about giving that power up. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to dominate is Surrender.

Question 10

In the following vocabulary question, choose the word which is opposite in meaning to the given word:  Squander.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks for an antonym of the verb squander. Squander means to waste money, time, opportunities, or resources in a foolish or careless way. The correct opposite should describe the act of saving or carefully keeping resources rather than throwing them away or spending them freely. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: squander. Options: Frivol, Dissipate, Hoard, Expend. We interpret squander as waste something recklessly. Concept / Approach: Hoard means to collect and store something, often in large amounts and secretly, instead of using or spending it. This is the opposite of wasting resources. Frivol and dissipate both describe wasteful or irresponsible spending or use of resources. Expend means to use up, spend, or consume, which is not the direct opposite of squander. Therefore, the antonym must be Hoard, which involves keeping resources instead of wasting them. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define squander as waste money or resources in a careless way. Step 2: Look for a word that expresses careful keeping or saving of resources. Step 3: Recognise that hoard means accumulate and store, often without spending. Step 4: Select Hoard as the antonym that best reverses the action of squandering. Verification / Alternative check: Use both words in similar contexts. For example, He squandered his inheritance on luxuries means he wasted it. He hoarded his inheritance and never spent it means he saved it in an extreme way. These two sentences describe opposite behaviours. By contrast, He dissipated his inheritance and He frivolously spent his inheritance are similar to squander, and He expended his inheritance simply means he used it up, without necessarily implying waste. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, Frivol, suggests acting in a light and irresponsible way and is related to wasteful behaviour. Option B, Dissipate, can mean spread or scatter and is commonly used to describe wasting energy or money. Option D, Expend, means to spend or use up and can describe simple usage, not necessarily careful saving. None of these options signal the protective behaviour that opposes squandering. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may be tempted by Expend because they see it as neutral and think the opposite of waste is simply use. However, squander already includes the idea of excessive use, so the opposite should be to store or save. Failing to grasp this nuance leads to wrong choices. Understanding that hoard refers to accumulation and saving makes it the correct opposite. Final Answer: The word that is opposite in meaning to squander is Hoard.

Question 11

In the following idiom question, choose the option that best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase:  "Go for a song."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of the idiomatic phrase go for a song. Idioms are fixed expressions whose meanings are not obvious from the individual words. Go for a song is a common phrase in English related to prices and buying or selling. To answer correctly, you must know how this idiom is used in everyday language, especially in relation to bargains. Given Data / Assumptions: Target idiom: go for a song. Options: a persons favourite music, happy go lucky attitude, sold cheaply, something which is prohibitively expensive. We assume a context like a car or a house going for a song. Concept / Approach: Go for a song means to be sold at a very low price, much cheaper than the real value. The image is that you could almost pay only a song for it, instead of real money. It is therefore associated with bargains and cheap purchases. The other options relate either to personal taste in music, a carefree attitude, or very high cost, none of which match the idiom's actual meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the standard usage: The old house went for a song means it was sold very cheaply. Step 2: Identify which option refers to being sold at a low price. Step 3: Recognise that Sold cheaply is the only option that fits this meaning. Step 4: Select Sold cheaply as the correct interpretation of the idiom. Verification / Alternative check: Use the idiom in sentences similar to common usage. For example, The car went for a song at the auction means the car was sold for a very low price. If you try to replace the idiom with any of the other options, such as The car was a persons favourite music or The car had a happy go lucky attitude, the sentence becomes absurd. Only the idea of a low price preserves the meaning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, A persons favourite music, relates to the songs someone likes but does not reflect pricing. Option B, Happy go lucky attitude, describes a carefree personality and has nothing to do with selling or buying. Option D, Something which is prohibitively expensive, is the direct opposite of the idiom, because go for a song implies cheapness, not high cost. These are all distractors. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes interpret idioms literally and think go for a song must be related to music. Others may overthink and choose the most complicated option. Remember that idioms have established meanings in real usage, and you should rely on those rather than guessing from the words alone. Reading widely and noting idiomatic expressions in context is the best way to master them. Final Answer: The idiom go for a song means sold cheaply.

Question 12

In the following idiom question, choose the option that best expresses the meaning of the phrase:  "Make an ass out of" someone.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on the informal idiom make an ass out of someone or oneself. The phrase uses ass in its older sense of donkey and metaphorically refers to someone looking foolish. It is often used to describe a situation in which a person acts in such a way that others see them as silly or ridiculous. The question asks you to select the option that best captures this meaning. Given Data / Assumptions: Idiom: make an ass out of. Options: cause someone or oneself to look foolish or stupid, work very hard like a donkey, be smart but act dumb, make a mistake. We assume the phrase is used in everyday informal English conversation. Concept / Approach: Make an ass out of someone means to make that person seem silly, ridiculous, or foolish in front of others. When used reflexively, such as make an ass out of myself, it means the speaker recognises that their behaviour made them appear stupid. While making a mistake may be part of the situation, the core idea is public embarrassment or foolish appearance, which is best captured by the first option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall typical usage: He made an ass out of himself at the party. Step 2: Note that this does not mainly mean he worked hard or simply made a minor error, but that he looked ridiculous in front of others. Step 3: Compare this meaning with each option. Step 4: Choose cause someone or oneself to look foolish or stupid as the closest match. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine someone telling a story: I tried to impress everyone with my speech, but I made an ass out of myself. This clearly means the person ended up looking foolish, not that they worked hard. Replacing the phrase with the full definition gives I caused myself to look foolish or stupid, which preserves the meaning. None of the other options can be substituted without changing the sense of embarrassment. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, Work very hard like a donkey, is a different expression, sometimes covered by phrases like work like a donkey, but that is not the meaning here. Option C, Be smart but act dumb, partially overlaps with pretending to be less intelligent, but make an ass out of does not necessarily involve pretending; it is about ending up looking foolish. Option D, Make a mistake, is too general and does not imply public embarrassment or ridicule, which are central to the idiom. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes focus on the word ass and associate it only with hard labour or with any insult. It is important to consider the entire phrase and the way it appears in real sentences. Idioms often carry specific emotional tones, such as shame or ridicule, that must be preserved when selecting the meaning. Final Answer: The idiom make an ass out of means to cause someone or oneself to look foolish or stupid.

Question 13

Choose the option that best improves the bracketed part of the sentence. If no improvement is needed, select the no improvement option:  "I would love to come to your party! Thank you for (invites) me."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests correct verb form after a preposition. The sentence uses the phrase Thank you for followed by a verb. In English, verbs that follow prepositions like for are usually in the gerund form, which is the ing form of the verb. The question asks you to choose the verb form that makes the sentence grammatically correct and natural. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: I would love to come to your party! Thank you for (invites) me. The preposition is for. The base verb is invite. Options: invited, invite, inviting, no improvement. Concept / Approach: In English grammar, when a verb follows a preposition, it should normally be in the gerund form, which looks like a noun but is formed with ing. The correct pattern is thank you for inviting me, where inviting functions as a gerund. Using invited or invite after for does not follow the standard rule and sounds incorrect in this structure. Therefore, the correct choice is inviting. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the preposition for in the phrase thank you for. Step 2: Recall that a verb coming after a preposition must take the ing form. Step 3: Transform the base verb invite into its gerund form: inviting. Step 4: Insert inviting into the sentence: Thank you for inviting me, which is the standard expression. Verification / Alternative check: Test each option in the sentence. Thank you for invited me is ungrammatical because invited is a past participle and requires a different structure, such as thank you for having invited me. Thank you for invite me lacks the required ing form and sounds incorrect. The original Thank you for invites me is clearly wrong. Thank you for inviting me is the only version that sounds natural and conforms to standard grammar. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, invited, does not follow a preposition correctly in this context without additional auxiliary verbs. Option B, invite, is the base form and is not used directly after for in such expressions. Option D, no improvement, is incorrect because the bracketed form invites does not match any correct pattern. Only inviting fits the grammatical rule and produces a natural phrase. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to focus on the sense of past action and think that invited must be used because the invitation was given earlier. However, the pattern thank you for inviting me focuses on the act as a noun phrase, not strictly on its tense. Another pitfall is overlooking the rule that verbs after prepositions must be in the ing form. Remembering this rule helps in many similar questions. Final Answer: The correct improvement is inviting, so the sentence should read Thank you for inviting me.

Question 14

Choose the option that best improves the bracketed part of the sentence. If no improvement is needed, select the no improvement option:  "It must (being) quite an exciting time to be alive."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of modal verbs combined with perfect aspect in English. The sentence expresses a strong logical conclusion about a past situation using the modal must. The phrase must being in the original sentence is incorrect. You need to choose the correct auxiliary verb form that combines with must to describe a completed state in the past. Given Data / Assumptions: Sentence: It must (being) quite an exciting time to be alive. Modal verb: must, used to express logical deduction. The sentence refers to a time period in the past that was exciting. Options: has been, have been, been, no improvement. Concept / Approach: When we use must to talk about a conclusion about the past, we normally use the pattern must have been. The structure is must plus have plus past participle. In this sentence, been is the past participle of be. Therefore, It must have been quite an exciting time to be alive is the correct form. The phrase must has been or must been does not follow standard English grammar. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that must is being used for deduction about a past situation. Step 2: Recall the structure must have plus past participle for such deductions. Step 3: Combine must with have been to form must have been. Step 4: Replace being with have been to obtain the correct sentence: It must have been quite an exciting time to be alive. Verification / Alternative check: Test each option. It must has been quite an exciting time is incorrect because must already serves as a modal and does not combine with has in that way. It must have been quite an exciting time is perfect for past deduction. It must been quite an exciting time is ungrammatical because have is missing. No improvement is wrong because must being is not acceptable in standard English. Therefore, have been is the only correct form to insert after must. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, has been, does not fit directly after must because must already serves as a modal auxiliary and requires the base form have, not has. Option C, been, leaves out the necessary auxiliary have, which is required in this pattern. Option D, no improvement, cannot be correct because must being is clearly ungrammatical. Only have been forms part of the standard expression must have been. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse has been and have been, or they forget that modal verbs such as must, can, and should are always followed by the base form of the verb, not by a third person singular form like has. Another common mistake is to treat must like a simple present form and not add have for past situations. Remembering the pattern must have done for past deduction will help in many similar questions. Final Answer: The correct improvement is have been, so the sentence should read It must have been quite an exciting time to be alive.

Question 15

In this one word substitution question, choose the single English word that best replaces the description "full of twists and turns", a phrase often used for a winding road, path, river or a complicated plot.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This English vocabulary question is from the topic of one word substitution. Instead of using a long description such as "full of twists and turns", you are asked to choose a single precise English word that carries the same meaning. Such questions are very common in competitive exams because they test how well you know exact, high level words that are frequently seen in reading comprehension passages, editorials and descriptive writing. Given Data / Assumptions: The descriptive phrase is "full of twists and turns". You must select one word that can replace this entire phrase. Four alternatives are given, and exactly one is correct. The context can be a road, a path, a river or even a story line that bends and changes direction many times. Concept / Approach: The key to one word substitution questions is to understand the central idea of the phrase and then recall the single word that expresses that idea most accurately. "Full of twists and turns" suggests something that is winding, complicated or highly curved. In standard English, the adjective "tortuous" is used to describe roads, routes, arguments or procedures that are very twisty, indirect and difficult to follow. It is different from "torturous", which relates to torture or great physical suffering. Keeping this distinction in mind prevents confusion between similar looking words. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the phrase "full of twists and turns" and imagine a road or path that curves again and again in different directions.Step 2: Recall English adjectives used for such roads or arguments, such as winding, twisting, zigzag or tortuous.Step 3: Look at the options and identify which one actually means "winding and highly curved".Step 4: Notice that "Tortuous" is the word that describes something with many hairpin bends, curves or indirect turns.Step 5: Confirm that the remaining options "Smooth", "Straightforward" and "Easy" do not carry any idea of twisting or turning and therefore cannot be correct. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, place the candidate word into a sample sentence. For example: "The hikers followed a tortuous mountain path to reach the village." If you mentally expand "tortuous", it becomes "full of twists and turns", and the sentence still makes perfect sense. If you replace it with "smooth path" or "easy path", the idea of many bends disappears. This simple substitution test confirms that "Tortuous" is the most accurate one word substitute for the given phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Smooth" refers to a surface that is even and without roughness, the opposite of difficult or twisty. "Straightforward" describes something that is simple, direct and easy to understand, which is again the opposite of twisting and complicated. "Easy" merely indicates low difficulty and has nothing to do with physical curves or changes in direction. None of these express the idea of many bends or turns, so they cannot substitute the given phrase correctly. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to confuse "tortuous" with "torturous" because they look and sound similar. "Torturous" relates to torture and severe pain, while "tortuous" relates to twisting, winding paths or complex arguments. Another pitfall is to choose a word that gives a general positive feeling, like "smooth" or "easy", without matching the specific meaning. Always focus on the exact image created by the phrase and then choose the word that recreates that image most accurately. Final Answer: The correct answer is Tortuous, because it is the standard English adjective used for something that is full of twists and turns and highly winding or indirect.

Question 16

In this one word substitution question, choose the single English word that best replaces the description "the practice of magic", especially in the sense of using spells, charms or supernatural powers.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the English vocabulary area of one word substitution. You are given a descriptive phrase, "the practice of magic", and asked to identify the single word that best conveys this meaning. Such questions are common in examinations because they test whether you can connect everyday descriptive language with the more precise and sometimes literary words that appear in books, articles and advanced reading passages. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase to be replaced is "the practice of magic". Four options are provided and exactly one is correct. The context is neutral: no specific religion or culture is mentioned, only a general idea of using magical powers. You must pick the word which directly refers to using magic, spells or supernatural arts. Concept / Approach: One word substitution questions work by condensing a descriptive explanation into a concise, recognised term. The phrase "the practice of magic" points to activities like spell casting, enchantment, sorcery and supernatural manipulation. Several words exist in English for this: "witchcraft", "sorcery", "wizardry" and "witchery". Among the given options, "Witchery" is the only word that directly relates to magical practices. The other options describe qualities such as being tangible or related to the body, which do not match the idea of magic. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the core idea in the phrase: it is about actually practising magic, not just believing in it.Step 2: Recall terms used in stories and discussions about magic, such as witchcraft, sorcery and witchery.Step 3: Examine the options and ask which one belongs to the semantic field of magic and supernatural powers.Step 4: Recognise that "Witchery" refers to magical practices, enchantment and the art of witches.Step 5: Confirm that the remaining words are adjectives for physical qualities and are therefore unrelated to the practice of magic. Verification / Alternative check: Test the correctness by forming example sentences. If we say, "The villagers believed she practised witchery in the forest", we clearly mean that she practised magic. Now try substituting other options: "practised palpable", "practised substantial" or "practised corporal" do not make sense in English. This simple check shows that only "Witchery" naturally fits as a noun phrase describing magical activity, confirming that it is the right one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Palpable" means something that can be touched or felt; it describes physical tangibility or strong feelings, not magic. "Substantial" relates to something having substance or being considerable in quantity or importance, again unrelated to magic. "Corporal" means bodily or relating to the body (for example, corporal punishment), which has nothing to do with the practice of magic. None of these capture the idea of casting spells or using supernatural powers. Common Pitfalls: One common mistake is to choose a word that simply sounds impressive without checking its meaning carefully. Another is to confuse "witchery" with "witchcraft" and think that only one of them is correct English, when in fact both are recognised words. In this question, however, you must choose from the options given, and "Witchery" is the only meaningful match for "the practice of magic". Remember always to focus on exact meanings rather than general impressions of strangeness or mystery. Final Answer: The correct answer is Witchery, because it is the only option that directly refers to the practice of magic and the use of supernatural powers.

Question 17

In this spelling question, four similar looking words are given. Choose the correctly spelt word for the verb that means "to move in waves or with a wavy motion".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a spelling based question from English vocabulary. You are asked to identify the correctly spelt word among four options that all look similar. The intended word is the verb meaning "to move in waves or with a wavy motion", which is commonly used in descriptions of water, flags, grass or even sound waves. Spelling questions test your visual memory of correct English forms, which is especially important for writing and formal exams. Given Data / Assumptions: Four options are given, all variants of a similar sounding word. The correct verb should mean "to move or cause to move with a smooth, wavelike motion". Only one option matches the standard dictionary spelling. No additional context sentence is provided, so recognition must come from prior knowledge. Concept / Approach: The word you are looking for is "undulate". It comes from the Latin root "unda", meaning "wave". In English, "undulate" is spelled with "un" followed by "dulate". Knowing roots and common English spelling patterns helps you quickly reject incorrect variants that add or remove letters randomly. In spelling questions, the strategy is to recall how you have seen the word in books, articles or dictionaries and compare that internal image with the options offered. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the target meaning: the word used to describe something moving in smooth waves is "undulate".Step 2: Visualise the correct spelling: U N D U L A T E.Step 3: Examine option B "undulate" and see that it matches exactly: un + dul + ate, with the letters in the right order.Step 4: Check option A "andulate" and notice that it starts with "an" instead of "un", which is incorrect.Step 5: Examine options C "undulete" and D "andulete" and see extra letters and misplaced vowels that do not match the standard form. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification method is to put the candidate spelling into a sample sentence: "Tall grasses undulate in the wind." If you have read similar lines in literature or nature descriptions, the spelling "undulate" should feel familiar. If you attempt "andulate" or "undulete", the word looks strange and unfamiliar, which is a strong sign that the spelling is wrong. Also, checking a dictionary in real practice will always confirm that the standard spelling is "undulate". Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "andulate", incorrectly replaces the first syllable "un" with "an". There is no common English verb "andulate". Option C, "undulete", adds an extra "e" and mixes up the internal vowel sounds, creating a nonstandard form. Option D, "andulete", combines both errors, changing the first syllable and adding unnecessary letters. None of these incorrect variants appear in standard English usage. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose misspellings that look fancy or complex, assuming that the longest or most unusual option must be correct. This is not a reliable strategy. Another pitfall is relying only on pronunciation; since several of the options may sound similar when spoken, you must rely on visual familiarity. To improve spelling skills, it helps to read widely and pay attention to how words look on the page, especially in high quality printed material. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is undulate, which means to move with a smooth, wave like motion.

Question 18

In this spelling question, four similar looking words are given. Choose the correctly spelt word for the noun meaning "people who celebrate noisily or take part in lively festivities".

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is another spelling question from English vocabulary. You are given four similar looking words and must choose the correctly spelt form of the noun that refers to people who celebrate, party or enjoy a festival enthusiastically. Such words often appear in news reports and literature describing New Year celebrations, carnivals or street festivals. Accurate spelling is essential for clear written communication and for scoring well in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: The intended word is the plural noun for people who revel and celebrate. Four alternative spellings are given. Only one meets the standard dictionary form. You are expected to recognise or recall the correct double consonant pattern. Concept / Approach: The correct English word is "revellers" in British spelling, formed from the verb "revel" meaning to celebrate or enjoy oneself in a lively way. The typical pattern is "revel" plus the suffix "ler" for a person, with an extra "l" added in British usage, giving "reveller", and then an "s" for plural, producing "revellers". Many spelling questions test knowledge of double consonants in such words, which can be confusing if you rely only on how the word sounds when spoken quickly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the base word "revel", which means to celebrate or enjoy in a noisy and lively way.Step 2: Form the noun for a person who does this: "reveller". In British spelling, this uses a double "l".Step 3: Make the plural by adding "s", giving "revellers".Step 4: Compare this with the options and identify which option exactly matches R E V E L L E R S.Step 5: See that option C "revellers" is the only spelling that follows this pattern; the others change vowels or consonants incorrectly. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by thinking of a common sentence: "The streets were full of New Year revellers." This is a typical phrase in newspapers. Reading it mentally, the spelling "revellers" looks familiar and natural if you have seen it before in authentic texts. By contrast, "revelars", "rewellers" or "rewelers" do not match any standard pattern for English spelling and look obviously incorrect when inspected carefully. Checking a dictionary in real life would confirm that "revellers" is the accepted British spelling. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, "revelars", incorrectly uses "ar" instead of "er" and loses the double "l". Option B, "rewellers", changes the vowel "e" to "we" after "re", which does not follow from the base word "revel". Option D, "rewelers", again uses "we" and drops the double "l", which breaks the pattern formed from "revel". None of these spellings represent the standard form of the noun for people who revel. Common Pitfalls: Many learners struggle with double "l" spellings in English because American and British conventions differ. For example, American English sometimes uses "revelers" with a single "l", while British English prefers "revellers" with two "l"s. In most competitive exams based on British usage, you should expect the double "l" form. Another pitfall is ignoring the base word and simply guessing from the sound; always start from the known verb "revel" and then logically add suffixes. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is revellers, which is the standard British English plural noun for people who celebrate joyfully or take part in noisy festivities.

Question 19

In this sentence arrangement question, three labelled parts X, Y and Z must be arranged to complete the main sentence: "We drank a little and flung ____". Choose the most logical order of X, Y and Z to form a coherent and grammatically correct sente…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to arrange jumbled parts of a sentence into a coherent and grammatically correct order. You are given a main clause, "We drank a little and flung", followed by three labelled segments X, Y and Z. Your task is to choose the order in which these segments should appear to complete a clear, logical sentence. Such sentence arrangement questions check your understanding of narrative flow, grammar and punctuation. Given Data / Assumptions: The fixed beginning is: "We drank a little and flung". X = "soon were all asleep" Y = "sand, thoroughly tired out, and" Z = "ourselves down on the" You must pick one of the given sequences (ZXY, YZX, YXZ, ZYX) to form a correct and natural sentence. Concept / Approach: To solve jumbled sentence questions, you should look for logical connectors, subject verb order and natural phrase groupings. Here, the pronoun "ourselves" in Z clearly refers back to "We drank a little and flung", giving "flung ourselves down on the ...". This suggests that Z must come immediately after the main clause. The word "sand" in Y obviously completes "down on the sand" and is followed by a descriptive phrase "thoroughly tired out, and". Finally, X beginning with "soon were all asleep" logically comes at the end as the final result of lying down. Therefore, the natural sequence is Z → Y → X. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Attach each segment mentally to the main clause and check which one fits directly after "We drank a little and flung".Step 2: Notice that "ourselves down on the" (Z) fits perfectly: "We drank a little and flung ourselves down on the ...".Step 3: Next, see that Y "sand, thoroughly tired out, and" completes the phrase "down on the sand" and adds a participial phrase describing their tiredness.Step 4: Finally, X "soon were all asleep" describes what happened after lying down on the sand, so it should close the sentence.Step 5: Put it all together: "We drank a little and flung ourselves down on the sand, thoroughly tired out, and soon were all asleep." The sequence is therefore Z Y X. Verification / Alternative check: Check the other possible orders briefly. If you start with Y or X directly after the main clause, you get "We drank a little and flung sand, thoroughly tired out, and ..." or "We drank a little and flung soon were all asleep", both of which are obviously wrong in terms of sense and grammar. Only Z can follow the verb "flung" logically, because "flung ourselves" is a natural reflexive construction in English. The correct flow of action is: lie down on the sand, be very tired, then fall asleep. This matches the ZY X order. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, ZXY, would give "We drank a little and flung ourselves down on the soon were all asleep sand, thoroughly tired out, and", which is chaotic and ungrammatical. Option B, YZX, starts with "sand, thoroughly tired out, and", which cannot directly follow "flung" and breaks the phrase "down on the sand". Option C, YXZ, similarly puts "sand" right after "flung" without "down on the", making the sentence confusing and grammatically incorrect. None of these maintain a smooth narrative order of actions. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to rely only on the letters or on guesswork rather than reading the full reconstructed sentence. Another pitfall is ignoring small linking words like "on the" and "sand" that clearly belong together, or ignoring the reflexive pronoun "ourselves". Always look for natural pairs, such as verb + object ("flung ourselves") and preposition + object ("on the sand"), and then add descriptive or result clauses afterwards. This method makes sentence arrangement much easier. Final Answer: The most logical and grammatically correct order of the segments is ZYX, giving the complete sentence: "We drank a little and flung ourselves down on the sand, thoroughly tired out, and soon were all asleep.".

Question 20

In this sentence arrangement question, three labelled parts X, Y and Z must be arranged to complete the main sentence about aqueous rocks: "Aqueous rocks of equal ____". Choose the most logical order of X, Y and Z to form a coherent and grammaticall…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a sentence arrangement question that focuses on scientific style English. You are given the beginning of a sentence, "Aqueous rocks of equal", and three labelled segments X, Y and Z that must be arranged in the correct order. Your goal is to form a clear, grammatically correct sentence that makes sense from a geology or physical geography point of view. Such questions test both language sense and your ability to follow logical description in technical topics. Given Data / Assumptions: The fixed start is "Aqueous rocks of equal". X = "exhibit in like manner a stratification nearly undisturbed" Y = "over the lake-district of North America, and" Z = "antiquity extend for hundreds of miles" You must select one of the sequences (ZYX, ZXY, YZX, YXZ) that produces a meaningful statement. Concept / Approach: The phrase "Aqueous rocks of equal antiquity" is a familiar collocation in geology, where "antiquity" refers to age. Therefore, the first priority is to match "equal" with "antiquity" to form "of equal antiquity". After that, the verb phrase "extend for hundreds of miles" must follow to state what these rocks do. Next, we need to indicate where this extension takes place, which is "over the lake-district of North America, and". Finally, we describe what these rocks "exhibit in like manner", namely the "stratification nearly undisturbed". This leads naturally to the order Z → Y → X. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Attach Z to the opening: "Aqueous rocks of equal antiquity extend for hundreds of miles". This sounds complete and grammatical.Step 2: Ask where they extend, and see that Y "over the lake-district of North America, and" answers that location question.Step 3: Add Y after Z to get: "Aqueous rocks of equal antiquity extend for hundreds of miles over the lake-district of North America, and".Step 4: Finally, include X: "exhibit in like manner a stratification nearly undisturbed", which describes what these rocks show.Step 5: Combine everything: "Aqueous rocks of equal antiquity extend for hundreds of miles over the lake-district of North America, and exhibit in like manner a stratification nearly undisturbed." This corresponds to the order ZYX. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, try an alternative sequence and see how it fails. If you start with Y, you get "Aqueous rocks of equal over the lake-district of North America, and ...", which is grammatically incomplete because "equal" has no noun like "antiquity" immediately after it. If you place X early, you would get "Aqueous rocks of equal exhibit in like manner ...", which leaves "equal" unqualified. These odd starts demonstrate that Z must follow "equal" to provide "equal antiquity". The rest then follows naturally as location and description. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, ZXY, would place "over the lake-district of North America, and" after "exhibit in like manner a stratification nearly undisturbed", which breaks the natural flow from extension (extend for hundreds of miles over a region) to descriptive property (exhibit a certain stratification). Option C, YZX, and option D, YXZ, both begin with Y, leading to "Aqueous rocks of equal over the lake-district ...", which is grammatically wrong because "equal" needs "antiquity" before we talk about where the rocks extend. Therefore, these orders do not produce a smooth scientific statement. Common Pitfalls: Students often focus only on matching conjunctions like "and" without checking the meaning of nearby words. Another common pitfall is ignoring the noun that an adjective belongs to; here "equal" should clearly modify "antiquity" rather than "rocks" directly in this structure. When solving such questions, always look for natural collocations ("equal antiquity", "extend for hundreds of miles", "over the lake-district") and arrange segments so that these collocations remain intact. Final Answer: The most logical and grammatically correct order is ZYX, forming the complete sentence: "Aqueous rocks of equal antiquity extend for hundreds of miles over the lake-district of North America, and exhibit in like manner a stratification nearly undisturbed."

English Questions