Question 1

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word similar in meaning to the word given. Belligerent.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a word that is similar in meaning to belligerent. Such items are common in general English sections of competitive examinations. The term belligerent often appears in news reports and essays describing people, groups, or nations that are hostile, aggressive, or inclined toward conflict. To answer correctly, we must recall the core sense of the word and select the option that most closely aligns with this idea. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is belligerent. The options are Antagonistic, Co operative, Dandy, Delightful, and Friendly. We are explicitly asked for a similar meaning, that is, a synonym. Belligerent is often used to describe someone who is warlike or eager to fight or argue. We assume the exam expects standard dictionary meanings, not rare or idiomatic uses. Concept / Approach: The concept tested is semantic similarity. Belligerent derives from a Latin root related to war and has meanings like hostile, aggressive, or inclined to fight. A good strategy is to mentally replace belligerent with each option and check if the resulting phrase sounds natural. For instance, belligerent attitude can be replaced comfortably by antagonistic attitude, but not by delightful attitude. Options that express positive or neutral feelings can be discarded as antonyms, not synonyms. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of belligerent as aggressive, hostile, or ready to fight. Step 2: Examine Antagonistic. This word means opposed, hostile, or unfriendly in attitude. Step 3: Note that both belligerent and antagonistic suggest opposition and conflict, so they are close in meaning. Step 4: Consider Co operative. This word suggests helpfulness and willingness to work together, which is the opposite of being aggressive. Step 5: Dandy is an informal term referring to someone who cares a lot about their appearance, not about aggression. Step 6: Delightful means very pleasant or charming, again opposite in tone to belligerent. Step 7: Friendly, like co operative, is positive and indicates kindness, which contradicts hostility. Step 8: Conclude that Antagonistic is the only option that truly matches the sense of belligerent. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification step is to use example phrases. A belligerent nation and an antagonistic nation both describe a country that behaves aggressively toward others. A belligerent customer and an antagonistic customer also both suggest someone picking arguments. Replacing belligerent with delightful, dandy, or friendly would completely change the tone. This context test confirms that antagonistic is the closest synonym among the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Co operative is wrong because it implies helpfulness and willingness to work with others, which is the opposite of a combative attitude. Dandy is incorrect because it refers to a person who is excessively concerned about style or dress, which has nothing to do with aggression. Delightful means highly pleasing and is emotionally positive, conflicting with the negative sense of belligerent. Friendly is also a positive word describing warmth and goodwill, again the opposite of hostility or warlike behaviour. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates confuse belligerent with words like diligent or benevolent, simply because they share some letter patterns, but their meanings are quite different. Another pitfall is to guess based on familiarity with a word rather than actual meaning. In vocabulary questions, it is safer to recall a typical sentence where the tested word appears and then substitute each option. Regular reading of newspapers and quality articles helps fix such words in context and makes synonym questions much easier. Final Answer: The correct answer is Antagonistic.

Question 2

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word similar in meaning to the word given. Indiscreet.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary problem asks for a synonym of indiscreet. Words like discreet and indiscreet appear often in formal writing and are important for competitive exams. Indiscreet usually describes someone who does not show good judgment in speech or action, especially by revealing secrets or acting without proper caution. The key is to recall this negative sense of lacking care and choose the option that best matches it. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is indiscreet. The options are Careless, Accurate, Attentive, Choosy, and Meticulous. We need the word with similar meaning, not the opposite. Indiscreet implies a lack of prudence, tact, or caution. We assume standard dictionary meanings for all options. Concept / Approach: The basic strategy in synonym questions is to think of a simple definition of the tested word and then look for the option closest to that definition. Indiscreet can be simplified to not careful, especially about what one says or does. Careless fits this basic idea very well. In contrast, accurate, attentive, choosy, and meticulous suggest carefulness or precision, which are closer to the opposite of indiscreet. Therefore, they cannot be synonyms. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate the meaning of indiscreet as not being careful, especially in speech or behaviour. Step 2: Examine Careless. This word means not giving sufficient attention or thought to avoiding harm or mistakes. Step 3: Recognise that someone who is indiscreet and someone who is careless both fail to exercise proper caution. Step 4: Consider Accurate, which means correct and exact, the result of careful attention, not a lack of it. Step 5: Attentive means paying close attention, the opposite of being careless. Step 6: Choosy refers to being very selective, usually in a careful or fussy way, which again implies attention, not indiscretion. Step 7: Meticulous means very careful and precise, which is clearly contrary to being indiscreet. Step 8: Conclude that Careless is the only word matching the negative, incautious meaning of indiscreet. Verification / Alternative check: Use example situations. If a person carelessly reveals confidential details in public, we can call that behaviour indiscreet. On the other hand, a person who is accurate, attentive, choosy, or meticulous would generally avoid such mistakes, because these traits involve careful thought. This real world reasoning confirms that Careless is the best synonym here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Accurate is wrong because it refers to correctness and exactness, qualities reached through careful work. Attentive is incorrect because it denotes focused observation or listening, which guards against indiscreet behaviour. Choosy implies a fussy, selective attitude, which is not directly linked to a lack of caution. Meticulous means extremely careful about details, exactly the opposite of careless or indiscreet. All these options are therefore antonyms or unrelated in meaning. Common Pitfalls: Some learners mix up indiscreet with indiscrete. Indiscrete in technical usage can mean not separated, but in exams the word almost always tested is indiscreet, related to lack of caution. Another mistake is to treat all negative sounding words as synonyms. However, negative words can express very different kinds of problems, such as laziness, dishonesty, or confusion, so you must always tie the word back to its core idea. In this case the core is carelessness in judgment and behaviour. Final Answer: The correct answer is Careless.

Question 3

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word opposite in meaning to the word given. Incentive.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of antonyms by asking for the opposite meaning of the word incentive. Words connected with motivation, encouragement, and obstacles occur frequently in news and economics passages, so understanding these shades of meaning is important. Incentive usually refers to something that motivates a person to act, such as a reward or benefit. To find the antonym, we need a word that reflects an obstacle or discouraging factor rather than a motivating one. Given Data / Assumptions: The word given is incentive. The options are Impetus, Stimulus, Enticement, Hindrance, and Encouragement. We are asked specifically for the opposite in meaning. Incentive is a positive motivator that encourages people to do something. The antonym should therefore express something that blocks, delays, or discourages action. Concept / Approach: The core concept is to contrast motivation with obstruction. Incentive is something that pushes a person forward toward a goal. Words like impetus, stimulus, enticement, and encouragement all share this motivating nature. Hindrance, however, is different because it refers to something that gets in the way and makes progress more difficult. By grouping words according to whether they promote action or obstruct it, we can easily identify the correct antonym. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define incentive as a reward, benefit, or condition that encourages more effort or desired behaviour. Step 2: Consider Impetus, which means a driving force or motivation that causes something to happen more quickly. Step 3: Recognise that Impetus is similar in meaning to incentive and is therefore not an antonym. Step 4: Stimulus is also something that provokes activity or response, another near synonym of incentive. Step 5: Enticement refers to attraction or temptation that lures someone into an action, again very close to incentive. Step 6: Encouragement clearly supports or gives confidence to do something, which corresponds to incentive. Step 7: Hindrance means a barrier, obstacle, or factor that delays or prevents progress. Step 8: Since hindrance blocks action instead of promoting it, it stands as the opposite of incentive. Verification / Alternative check: Insert each option into a sample sentence. If there is no incentive, there is a hindrance to productivity makes logical sense, showing a contrast between presence and absence of motivation. If there is no incentive, there is no impetus or stimulus or enticement or encouragement changes the sentence but does not introduce an opposite; it only shows a lack of the same kind of force. This confirms that hindrance is the best antonym among the given choices. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Impetus is wrong because it means driving force and, like incentive, it pushes an action forward. Stimulus is incorrect because it is something that arouses activity, interest, or energy, again motivational in nature. Enticement is a tempting offer or lure, closely related to incentive as it draws a person toward an action. Encouragement provides support and confidence, also promoting action rather than blocking it. None of these words express obstruction or difficulty. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to treat any word that simply looks different as an opposite, especially under time pressure. Some students also confuse antonym questions with synonym questions and mistakenly choose options that feel similar to the stem word. To avoid this, always pause to form a quick explanation of the target word in your own language or simple English, then look for the option that clearly contradicts that explanation. This habit reduces confusion and improves accuracy in vocabulary sections. Final Answer: The correct answer is Hindrance.

Question 4

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the word opposite in meaning to the word given. Benediction.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary item asks the learner to select the antonym of benediction. The word benediction appears in religious and formal contexts and usually refers to a blessing, especially a spoken blessing. To find its opposite, we must look for a word that conveys disapproval, censure, or some harmful statement rather than a positive, holy wish. Understanding such words is useful not only in exams but also when reading literature and religious texts. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is benediction. Options given are Criticism, Invocation, Beatitude, Approbation, and Blessing. We are asked for the opposite in meaning. Benediction means blessing, usually a formal or divine blessing. The antonym must therefore express negative judgment, curse, or disapproval, although the exact word curse does not appear in the list. Concept / Approach: The central concept is to distinguish positive words that express approval or divine favour from negative words that express disapproval. Benediction, Invocation, Beatitude, Approbation, and Blessing are all associated with positive or sacred ideas. Criticism, however, stands apart as a word that usually indicates disapproval or pointing out faults. Therefore, by grouping the options into positive and negative sets, we can quickly identify criticism as the opposite of benediction. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Define benediction as a blessing, especially a prayer asking for divine help, protection, or favour. Step 2: Consider Invocation, which is a call for help or guidance, often addressed to a deity, and is therefore related to prayer. Step 3: Recognise Beatitude as a state of blessedness or supreme happiness, again connected with blessing. Step 4: Approbation means approval or praise, which is another positive, supportive term. Step 5: Blessing is almost a direct synonym for benediction and cannot be its opposite. Step 6: Criticism, in contrast, refers to the expression of disapproval or the pointing out of faults or mistakes. Step 7: Since benediction is a positive, approving prayer and criticism is a negative judgment, they form an opposite pair within the given choices. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a public speech. If at the end the speaker receives a benediction, it means people offer a blessing or good wishes. If instead the speaker receives criticism, it means people point out problems and faults. These two outcomes are clearly contrasting in tone and effect. Using invocation, beatitude, or approbation in place of benediction would preserve a positive atmosphere and therefore would not express an opposite meaning. This scenario confirms that criticism is the best antonym available in the list. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Invocation is wrong because it is a prayer calling upon a deity or higher power, which is closely related to benediction. Beatitude describes blessed happiness, especially spiritual joy, and therefore shares the positive, holy mood of benediction. Approbation refers to approval or praise, which again cannot be an opposite of a blessing. Blessing is almost identical in meaning to benediction, so it is clearly a synonym, not an antonym. None of these three negative options contradict the idea of a blessing. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse benediction with malediction, which does mean a curse. This confusion can cause them to misjudge the emotional tone of the word. Another pitfall is getting attracted to long or formal sounding words without checking their meanings. To avoid such mistakes, try to break the word into parts. Bene suggests good, as in benefit or benevolent, which hints that benediction is a positive term. Remembering such roots can make both synonym and antonym questions easier to handle. Final Answer: The correct answer is Criticism.

Question 5

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase. To go off the air.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks understanding of the English idiom to go off the air. Idioms are fixed expressions whose meanings cannot always be guessed from the literal meanings of the individual words. This particular idiom appears frequently in contexts involving radio and television. Examinations often include such phrases to test whether the learner is familiar with common media related expressions in modern English. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom is to go off the air. The options give several possible meanings, some literal and some related to broadcasting. The phrase is commonly used with radio and television channels. We assume the exam expects the standard idiomatic meaning used in media reports. The correct answer should relate to the idea of stopping or ending a broadcast. Concept / Approach: The phrase on the air refers to a programme that is currently being broadcast live or is in transmission. Therefore, to go on the air means to start broadcasting. By contrast, to go off the air naturally means to stop broadcasting or to end the transmission. The method here is to recall how the phrase is used in real news or announcements and match that usage with the closest option. Options that talk about food, medical ventilators, or travel are clearly unrelated to this media context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that broadcasters say We are on the air to indicate that a programme is live. Step 2: Understand that if a station or show goes off the air, it stops broadcasting, either temporarily or permanently. Step 3: Examine Option C, which explains the idiom as to stop broadcasting a radio or television programme. Step 4: Notice that this exactly matches the media based understanding of the phrase. Step 5: Option A about removing a ventilator relates to hospital care, not to broadcasting. Step 6: Option B about not eating food for a long period has no connection with being on the airwaves. Step 7: Option D about wasting time on silly things is another unrelated everyday phrase. Step 8: Option E about travelling by aeroplane introduces a new meaning for air, but idiomatically to go off the air does not describe flying. Step 9: Conclude that Option C is the only correct interpretation. Verification / Alternative check: Consider an example announcement: Due to technical problems, the channel went off the air for two hours. In this sentence, the only plausible interpretation is that the channel stopped broadcasting for that period. None of the alternative meanings involving food or medical devices fit into such a statement. This contextual test confirms that the idiomatic meaning is related to stopping a broadcast, exactly as given in Option C. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To remove the ventilator of a patient on his death bed is incorrect because the expression off the air does not appear in medical terminology in that sense. To not eat food for a very long period is an attempt to link air with breathing or fasting, but English does not use off the air to describe fasting. To waste time on silly or trivial activities refers to killing time or fooling around, not going off the air. To travel by aeroplane for the first time confuses air with air travel, but again, this is not how the idiom is used in real life. Common Pitfalls: A frequent pitfall in idiom questions is to interpret the phrase word by word rather than as a fixed unit. Learners may also be distracted by options that have strong emotional content, such as a patient on his death bed, even though they do not match the typical usage environment of the idiom. The best approach is to recall or imagine sentences where native speakers would use the phrase and then test which option fits naturally in that setting. Final Answer: The correct answer is To stop broadcasting a radio or television programme.

Question 6

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase. To make a fuss about.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This idiom based question asks for the meaning of the phrase to make a fuss about. The expression is common in everyday English and often appears in conversations, stories, and articles. It typically describes a situation where a person reacts too strongly, complains a lot, or pays more attention to something than is really necessary. Understanding such idioms is important for both comprehension and natural expression in English. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom is to make a fuss about. The answer choices describe different kinds of behaviour, such as being delighted, working hard, or being strict. We need the option that best captures the usual meaning of the idiom. In normal usage, making a fuss has a slightly negative connotation of overreacting or being unnecessarily anxious. The context does not suggest joy or quiet hard work; it suggests an exaggerated reaction. Concept / Approach: The concept tested is interpretation of idiomatic language. A fuss is an unnecessary or excited display of attention, worry, or activity. Therefore, when someone makes a fuss about something, they place too much emphasis on it, often complaining or worrying openly. The correct option must include the idea of excessive behaviour rather than reasonable concern. Options that describe positive feelings or simple diligence do not match the usual negative shade of the idiom. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that a fuss usually means unnecessary or noisy excitement, complaint, or anxiety. Step 2: Understand that to make a fuss about something means to react more strongly than the situation requires. Step 3: Examine Option D, which states an excessive display of attention, worry, or activity over something. Step 4: Notice that this exactly corresponds to the sense of the idiom in ordinary usage. Step 5: Option A, to be extremely delighted, is incorrect because making a fuss is more often associated with complaining or worrying than with pure joy. Step 6: Option B, to work very hard for eventual success, describes diligence, not fussiness. Step 7: Option C, to be very strict or to have very high standards, suggests firmness but not necessarily overreaction. Step 8: Option E, to ignore something important, is actually the opposite of paying excessive attention. Step 9: Conclude that Option D is the only option that fully captures the idiomatic meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Place the idiom in an example sentence. The teacher asked the parents not to make a fuss about small mistakes. Here, the teacher is asking them not to overreact or not to show too much worry. Replacing make a fuss with be extremely delighted or work hard would make no sense. Replacing it with show an excessive display of attention, worry, or activity would keep the meaning intact. This confirms that Option D is the best fit. Why Other Options Are Wrong: To be extremely delighted implies strong positive emotion but does not include the idea of needless complaint or anxiety. To work very hard for eventual success describes perseverance and effort, which is quite different from fussing. To be very strict or to have very high standards may lead to some fussing in certain contexts, but it is not the direct meaning of the phrase. To ignore something important and move on quickly is almost the opposite of making a fuss, because it implies too little attention instead of too much. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse making a fuss with celebrating, especially when they hear phrases like making a fuss of someone, which can mean paying extra attention in a positive way. However, in exam contexts, the idiom typically carries a negative or critical tone. Another pitfall is to forget the idea of excess, which is central to the meaning. If you remember that fuss means unnecessary excitement or worry, you can reliably choose the correct interpretation in such questions. Final Answer: The correct answer is To show an excessive display of attention, worry, or activity over something.

Question 7

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the bracketed part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select "no improvement". I should (has to be) with them tonight.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence improvement question tests knowledge of English verb forms with modal verbs. The given sentence is I should (has to be) with them tonight. The bracketed phrase is ungrammatical, and we must choose the best replacement from the options. Correct handling of modals like should, must, and might with perfect aspects such as have been is a common grammar area in competitive exams. Here the sense is of an obligation or expectation in the past regarding being with them tonight. Given Data / Assumptions: The original sentence uses the modal should followed by a bracketed verb phrase has to be that we need to correct. The subject is I and the time reference is tonight, which may be understood as present or near future from the speaker point of view. The intended meaning is likely to express regret or obligation that was not fulfilled, which is commonly expressed using should have been. Options include has been, have been, been, no improvement, and had been. We assume the exam expects standard, modern British or Indian English usage. Concept / Approach: The phrase should have been is the correct form when we want to express that it would have been proper or desirable for something to happen, often implying that it did not happen. Should must be followed by the base form of the verb, and when we want the perfect aspect, we use have plus the past participle. Therefore, I should have been with them tonight is the standard structure. Has been and had been cannot directly follow should because modals always take the bare infinitive form, not third person singular or past perfect forms. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that should is a modal verb and must be followed by a base verb, not has, had, or is forms. Step 2: To express an expectation or obligation related to an event that did not occur, English uses should have plus the past participle. Step 3: The past participle of be is been, so the correct structure is should have been. Step 4: Compare this with the options. Option B is have been, which when combined with should gives I should have been. Step 5: Option A, has been, would make I should has been, which is wrong because has is never used after should. Step 6: Option C, been, would give I should been, which is incomplete and grammatically incorrect. Step 7: Option D, no improvement, would keep has to be, which does not follow should in normal usage in this meaning. Step 8: Option E, had been, would give I should had been, which is also incorrect, since had is a finite verb and cannot follow should. Step 9: Therefore, replacing the bracketed part with have been produces the correct sentence I should have been with them tonight. Verification / Alternative check: Consider similar examples. We say I should have gone, not I should has gone or I should had gone. Likewise, we say You should have been more careful. The structure is should plus have plus past participle. The sentence I should have been with them tonight clearly expresses a sense of regret about not being there. This consistent pattern confirms that have been is the right choice for the bracketed part. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Has been is wrong because should has been is never used in standard grammar; has is used for present perfect with a subject like he or she, not as a complement to should. Been alone does not include the auxiliary have and therefore cannot form the perfect aspect. No improvement would leave a non standard phrase has to be, which would need a different structure such as I have to be with them tonight to be correct. Had been is a past perfect form that would require a different subject and auxiliary pattern, and cannot directly follow should in this sentence. Common Pitfalls: Learners often confuse have to, which expresses obligation, with should have, which expresses expectation or regret. In this question, the presence of should shows that we are in the realm of modal usage and that the perfect form must be built with have been. Another pitfall is to choose no improvement when the original phrase sounds somewhat familiar but is actually incorrect. Always test the sentence mentally against other examples you know before choosing no improvement. Final Answer: The correct improvement is have been, so the sentence becomes I should have been with them tonight.

Question 8

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which will improve the bracketed part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select "no improvement". He must not (to be left) like this.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This grammar question checks correct use of modal auxiliary verbs with passive voice. The sentence is He must not (to be left) like this. The phrase in brackets is incorrect, and we must choose the correct form from the options. Modal verbs such as must, can, may, and should are always followed by the base form of the main verb, not by a to infinitive in this structure. The sentence also uses a passive construction, because something must not be done to him. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is He. The modal is must, showing strong necessity or prohibition. The sentence has a passive idea: he must not be left like this, meaning people should not leave him in such a condition. The bracketed phrase is to be left, which needs correction. Options include being left, been left, be left, no improvement, and to have left. Concept / Approach: The rule is that after a modal auxiliary such as must, the next word is the base form of a verb, not to plus verb, not ing form, and not past participle alone. For passive voice, the base form of be is used, followed by the past participle of the main verb. Therefore, must not be left is the correct pattern: must (modal) plus not (negation) plus be (base form) plus left (past participle). Recognising this structure allows us to identify be left as the only grammatically correct replacement for the bracketed part. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the structure after must is must plus base verb. Step 2: To form the passive voice of leave we use be left. Step 3: Therefore the correct string after must not should be be left, giving He must not be left like this. Step 4: Check Option C, be left. When inserted, it produces a sentence that is grammatically correct and natural. Step 5: Option A, being left, would give He must not being left like this, which is ungrammatical because being is not the base form. Step 6: Option B, been left, equally fails because been cannot come directly after must without a form of have before it. Step 7: Option D, no improvement, would keep to be left, which is not correct after must in this kind of sentence. Step 8: Option E, to have left, changes the meaning and tense and also breaks the passive structure. Step 9: Therefore, be left is the correct improvement. Verification / Alternative check: Consider similar sentences. We say He must not be disturbed, not He must not to be disturbed. We also say They must not be allowed to enter, not They must not to be allowed to enter. In every case, the modal must is followed directly by be and a past participle. By analogy, He must not be left like this is the correct pattern. This comparison with common structures confirms that Option C is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Being left suggests a continuous form and would require an auxiliary like is or was before it, as in He is being left, which is not the structure here. Been left is part of a perfect passive form and would need have before it, leading to He must have been left, which changes the tense and not the prohibition. No improvement keeps the ungrammatical to be left directly after must not. To have left is an active perfect infinitive and would describe his action of leaving, not the passive idea that others might leave him. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think that any form of be is acceptable after a modal, but the rule requires the base form, not participles. Another pitfall is thinking that the original phrase must be correct because it looks similar to other structures like have to be left. However, must and have to behave differently, and must not to be left is not standard usage. Careful attention to typical patterns such as must be done or must not be done greatly improves accuracy in such questions. Final Answer: The correct improvement is be left, so the sentence becomes He must not be left like this.

Question 9

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best substitute of the given group of words. Free from disturbance.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of one word substitutes. The phrase free from disturbance needs to be replaced by a single word that captures the same meaning. Such questions are common in English sections of competitive exams because they assess vocabulary depth and the ability to compress an idea into a precise word. Recognising the correct term helps in both reading comprehension and writing with clarity and style. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase to be replaced is free from disturbance. The options given are Tranquil, Agitated, Chaotic, Violent, and Restless. We must choose the word that expresses calmness and absence of disturbance. We assume standard meanings for all options, as found in general English dictionaries. The positive, peaceful sense of the phrase should guide our selection. Concept / Approach: To be free from disturbance is to be calm, peaceful, and undisturbed. The word tranquil directly expresses this state. It can describe a place, such as a tranquil village, or a mental state, such as a tranquil mind. In contrast, words like agitated, chaotic, violent, and restless signal strong movement, disorder, or emotional turmoil. Thus, the basic approach is to group the options by whether they suggest peace or unrest and then choose the peaceful one. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Restate the phrase free from disturbance as calm and peaceful, with no noise or trouble. Step 2: Examine Tranquil. This word means calm, quiet, and peaceful, which is a direct match. Step 3: Consider Agitated, which describes someone who is disturbed, upset, or nervous, the opposite of tranquil. Step 4: Chaotic refers to complete disorder and confusion, which is again far from being free from disturbance. Step 5: Violent indicates forceful and often harmful physical action, suggesting great disturbance. Step 6: Restless means unable to relax or be still, showing inner disturbance rather than peace. Step 7: Conclude that Tranquil is the only option that matches the given definition. Verification / Alternative check: Use example sentences. A tranquil lake and a lake free from disturbance both paint a picture of still water with no waves or noise. An agitated lake, chaotic lake, or violent lake would suggest storms or strong currents, which contradicts the idea. Similarly, a tranquil mind is free from disturbance, while an agitated or restless mind is disturbed. These examples confirm that tranquil is the best one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Agitated is incorrect because it indicates emotional or physical disturbance, the exact opposite of calm. Chaotic suggests a situation full of confusion, which is a strong form of disturbance. Violent is associated with aggression and physical force, which disturbs peace. Restless refers to someone or something that cannot stay calm or still, again implying disturbance. None of these can substitute for free from disturbance without completely reversing the meaning. Common Pitfalls: A pitfall in such questions is to mistake familiar words with positive connotations for correct choices. However, even positive words can have meanings unrelated to the given phrase. It is important to focus on the core idea. In this case, the absence of disturbance suggests calmness and stillness. Developing the habit of thinking in simple synonyms first, such as calm for free from disturbance, and then mapping to the more advanced word tranquil can help resolve such items quickly. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute is Tranquil.

Question 10

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best substitute of the given group of words. An arrangement of flowers fastened in a ring and used for laying on a grave.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on a specific one word substitute related to funerals and floral arrangements. The phrase to be replaced is an arrangement of flowers fastened in a ring and used for laying on a grave. Many languages have distinct words for ceremonial objects, and English uses a particular term for a circular floral tribute placed on graves or memorials. Recognising it is important for vocabulary building and for understanding descriptions in literature and news reports about ceremonies and commemorations. Given Data / Assumptions: The description mentions flowers fastened in a ring. It is used for laying on a grave, which places it in a funeral or memorial context. Options include Brier, Prickle, Wreath, Splint, and Garland. We assume standard dictionary definitions for each option. We must pick the word that exactly fits the shape and purpose described. Concept / Approach: The key concept is to link the circular shape and the funeral use. A wreath is a circular arrangement of flowers, leaves, or other materials, often used as a decoration or a symbol of honour, particularly placed on graves or war memorials. A garland is also a decorative chain or string of flowers, but it is usually not specifically ring shaped or restricted to graves. Brier and prickle relate to thorny plants or sharp points, and splint is a medical support for broken bones. Therefore, only wreath matches both the ring shape and the grave association. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Note the two important features in the definition: ring shaped arrangement and use on a grave. Step 2: Recall that a wreath is a ring of flowers, leaves, or similar items used as a decoration or tribute. Step 3: Confirm that wreaths are commonly placed on graves and memorials during funerals and remembrance ceremonies. Step 4: Examine Brier, which refers to a thorny plant and is not an arrangement of flowers. Step 5: Consider Prickle, which is simply a small sharp point or thorn, again unrelated to floral rings. Step 6: Splint is a rigid support used in medicine to immobilise broken bones, so it is irrelevant here. Step 7: Garland is a chain or string of flowers worn around the neck or hung as decoration, not necessarily ring shaped or specifically placed on graves. Step 8: Therefore, Wreath is the only precise match for the description. Verification / Alternative check: Visualise a military ceremony at a war memorial. Officials often lay a wreath at the monument as a mark of respect. The news report might say A wreath was laid at the memorial, which is exactly the usage highlighted in the question. A garland might be used in cultural or wedding events and is often worn, not laid flat on a grave. This comparison between real world usage and the description confirms that wreath is the appropriate one word substitute. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Brier is a type of thorny shrub and has no connection to formal floral arrangements laid on graves. Prickle denotes a sharp point, like a thorn, and does not refer to any organised arrangement. Splint is a device used by doctors to support broken limbs and belongs to medical vocabulary, not funeral customs. Garland, while related to flowers, usually refers to a string or chain, not a ring specifically used on graves. It might be used in celebrations rather than in mourning contexts. Common Pitfalls: Learners may wrongly choose garland because it is a familiar word associated with flowers. However, the question includes two special constraints: the arrangement must be ring shaped and must be used for laying on a grave. Keeping such details in mind helps avoid confusion. In one word substitute questions, always pay close attention to shape, purpose, and context mentioned in the definition rather than focusing on just one element such as flowers. Final Answer: The correct one word substitute is Wreath.

Question 11

In the following question, four words are given out of which one word is correctly spelt. Select the correctly spelt word.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question asks the candidate to identify the correctly spelt form of a word meaning owns or has something. Spelling questions reward careful observation of common patterns in English words, especially when they contain double consonants and suffixes like es or ing. Here the challenge is to recognise the correct sequence of s letters in the word possesses, a verb related to possession. Given Data / Assumptions: Four similar looking variants of the word are given. The base form is possess, which already contains a double s. The question likely refers to the third person singular form possesses. We assume standard British or Indian spelling, which matches the general English spelling here. The correct answer will maintain the double s from the root and add the appropriate ending. Concept / Approach: The root word is possess, spelled p o s s e s s. To form the third person singular present tense, English usually adds es when the verb ends in s, x, ch, sh, or o with certain conditions. Therefore, possess becomes possesses. The main focus is to keep both pairs of s letters in place and then add e s. Any option that drops an s or misplaces letters is incorrect. By mentally writing and pronouncing the root possess, we can build the correct extended form. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Remember the base verb possess, which is spelled p o s s e s s. Step 2: For he, she, or it, we add es to form possesses. Step 3: This gives p o s s e s s e s as the full spelling. Step 4: Option A, possesses, follows this pattern exactly. Step 5: Option B, posseses, drops one s from the middle part, giving only one s before e s, which is wrong. Step 6: Option C, posesses, has only one s in the first pair and two in the second pair, which does not match the root possess. Step 7: Option D, poseses, changes the vowel structure and omits a necessary s. Step 8: Option E, posessess, repeats letters incorrectly and does not follow the verb plus es rule. Step 9: Therefore, possesses in Option A is the only correctly spelt word. Verification / Alternative check: Think of related forms. The noun possession contains the same double s pattern before the ion ending. Also consider sentences like He possesses great talent and She possesses many books. In printed texts, the word consistently appears with the double s from possess plus the es ending. If you imagine removing the es ending, you should clearly see the base word possess intact, which confirms that Option A is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Posseses does not preserve the double s pattern from the root and so breaks the base spelling. Posesses wrongly shifts the double consonant to the later part of the word, showing that the writer did not maintain the original structure. Poseses drops the double s entirely and produces a different word sound. Posessess looks like a duplicated error and does not correspond to any correct English form. None of these variants match the standard spelling. Common Pitfalls: Many learners struggle with words that contain double consonants followed by suffixes. They may add too many letters or drop one consonant. A useful technique is always to identify the base word first, ensure it is spelt correctly, and then add the required ending without altering the internal pattern. With practice, the visual memory of frequent words like possess, success, and address becomes strong enough to guide quick and accurate choices in spelling questions. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is possesses.

Question 12

In the following question, four words are given out of which one word is correctly spelt. Select the correctly spelt word.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling item tests the correct form of the word murmuring, which describes a soft, low sound such as that of a stream or people speaking quietly. The options intentionally introduce extra r letters to confuse the learner. Recognising the base word murmur and the correct pattern when adding the ing ending is the key to identifying the correct spelling. Such questions help exam takers sharpen their visual memory of common English words. Given Data / Assumptions: Four similar looking spellings are offered for a word that sounds like murmuring. The base form is murmur, spelled m u r m u r. The continuous or participle form adds ing to that base. We assume that the question expects the standard spelling used in literature and conversation. The correct spelling will not introduce extra consonants beyond those in the root word. Concept / Approach: The pattern is simple: murmur plus ing equals murmuring. There is no duplication of r beyond what the base word already contains. Incorrect spellings often trick learners by doubling consonants unnecessarily or by altering the vowel sequence. By mentally writing murmur and then adding ing, we can arrive at the right answer. Any option that shows double r in the first or second syllable is suspicious and should be checked against the original base word. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the base word is murmur, spelled m u r m u r. Step 2: To form the present participle, add ing to get murmuring. Step 3: This gives m u r m u r i n g, with only one r in each position from the base word, not doubled. Step 4: Option A, murmuring, matches this exact pattern. Step 5: Option B, murmurring, introduces a double r before ing, which does not follow from murmur. Step 6: Option C, murrmuring, doubles the r after the first syllable mur, breaking the root spelling. Step 7: Option D, murrmurring, combines both types of doubling and is highly incorrect. Step 8: Option E, murmering, changes the central vowel from u to e, altering the root pronunciation and spelling. Step 9: Therefore, murmuring is the only correctly spelt word. Verification / Alternative check: Think of example sentences. The murmuring of the brook soothed her and The crowd was murmuring softly both use murmuring in its correct spelling. None of the incorrect spellings would look natural in printed books or articles. Also, if we remove ing from murmuring, we get murmur, a valid word. Removing ing from the other options produces forms like murmur or murrmur, which show that extra r letters have been inserted wrongly. This check confirms our answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Murmurring doubles the r without any rule based reason. English sometimes doubles consonants when adding ing to words ending in a single consonant after a short vowel, like run becoming running, but murmur does not follow that pattern. Murrmuring and murrmurring both distort the base spelling by inserting another r, which changes both appearance and sound. Murmering introduces the wrong vowel and is based on a mispronunciation, not on the true root murmur. Common Pitfalls: A common problem in spelling questions is overgeneralising rules, such as doubling consonants whenever ing is added, without checking whether the rule applies. Another issue is reliance on how a word sounds rather than on how it is written, which may lead to spellings like murmer. To avoid these issues, practice breaking words into root and suffix and memorise the correct base forms of frequently used words. Reading widely and paying attention to word forms also strengthens visual recognition of correct spellings. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is murmuring.

Question 13

The question below consists of a set of labelled sentence parts. Out of the four options given, select the most logical order of the parts to form a coherent sentence: There was no need to X – set a watch, for we had nothing Y – to fear from anybody…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about sentence arrangement using labelled parts. The candidate is given a sentence with three fragments marked X, Y, and Z and must determine the correct sequence to produce a smooth, grammatically correct, and meaningful sentence. Questions of this type test understanding of sentence structure, logical flow, and natural word order in English. Here the full sense describes having no need to set a watch because there was nothing to fear from anybody or anything in a large empty plain. Given Data / Assumptions: The base sentence is There was no need to X, for we had nothing Y or Z in that vast untenanted plain. Fragment X is set a watch. Fragment Y is to fear from anybody or. Fragment Z is anything in that vast untenanted plain. We must assemble these fragments to produce a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence. Concept / Approach: The correct approach is to treat the sentence as having two main parts. The first part explains what there was no need to do, and the second part explains the reason. The phrase no need to must be followed by a verb phrase such as set a watch, which is fragment X. The reason clause begins with for we had nothing and must then take an object phrase that describes what there was nothing of. In natural English, this would be nothing to fear from anybody or anything in that vast untenanted plain, which is formed by fragments Y and Z in that exact order. Therefore, the full logical order of fragments is X followed by Y and then Z, corresponding to option XYZ. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Place fragment X after no need to because it gives the required verb phrase: no need to set a watch. Step 2: Observe the next clause for we had nothing and decide what should follow. Step 3: Fragment Y begins with to fear from anybody or, which fits immediately after nothing, forming nothing to fear from anybody or. Step 4: Fragment Z begins with anything in that vast untenanted plain, which naturally follows the preposition or in fragment Y. Step 5: Combine them to get for we had nothing to fear from anybody or anything in that vast untenanted plain. Step 6: Put both parts together to reconstruct the full sentence: There was no need to set a watch, for we had nothing to fear from anybody or anything in that vast untenanted plain. Step 7: Note that this arrangement corresponds to the order XYZ, which matches Option D. Verification / Alternative check: Test a different order, such as YZX. This would produce There was no need to to fear from anybody or, which is clearly ungrammatical because no need to must be followed by a base form verb like set, not by to fear. Similarly, ZXY or ZYX would place anything in that vast untenanted plain directly after no need to, producing no need to anything, which is incorrect. Only the sequence XYZ yields a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence, confirming our choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: ZYX would start the reason clause with anything in that vast untenanted plain from anybody or to fear, which is ill formed and confusing. ZXY would break the necessary pair to fear from anybody or anything, thus disrupting natural English word order. YZX starts with to fear from anybody or after no need to, which forces two infinitive markers together and destroys the grammar. XZY would make the second clause read nothing anything in that vast untenanted plain to fear from anybody or, again a chaotic and incorrect structure. Common Pitfalls: Some students ignore grammar and rely only on a rough sense of meaning, which can lead them to place fragments in an order that feels possible but is not correct in standard English. Another common pitfall is to focus only on the first part of the sentence and not carefully reconstruct the whole. The best way to solve such problems is to build the sentence steadily from left to right, checking each step for subject verb agreement and logical connectors like to, from, and or, and confirming that every fragment fits smoothly. Final Answer: The most logical order of the sentence parts is XYZ.

Question 14

In the following question, a sentence has been given in Active/Passive voice. Out of the four alternatives suggested, select the one which best expresses the same sentence in Passive/Active voice. He mailed his application for a new job.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks the ability to transform a sentence from active voice to passive voice while preserving tense and meaning. The original sentence is He mailed his application for a new job. We must find the passive version that correctly changes the focus from the doer of the action, he, to the receiver of the action, the application. Voice change questions are common in grammar tests because they require understanding of tense, object, and subject relationships. Given Data / Assumptions: The active sentence is in simple past tense, indicated by mailed. The subject is He. The object is his application for a new job. In passive voice, the object should become the subject of the new sentence. The tense must remain simple past in the passive form. Concept / Approach: To convert a simple past tense active sentence into passive voice, the pattern is: Subject plus mailed plus object becomes Object plus was or were plus mailed plus by plus subject. Thus, His application for a new job (object) must move to the subject position, and we must use was mailed because application is singular. The agent can optionally be expressed using by him. The key is to keep the verb mailed as past participle and use the correct auxiliary was for simple past passive. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the object of the active sentence, which is his application for a new job. Step 2: Place this phrase in the subject position in the passive sentence. Step 3: Because the active verb mailed is in simple past, choose the simple past form of be, which is was for a singular subject. Step 4: Follow was with the past participle mailed to form was mailed. Step 5: Add the preposition by and then the original subject him to show the agent, giving by him. Step 6: The full passive sentence becomes The application for a new job was mailed by him. Step 7: Compare this with the given options and note that Option B matches exactly. Verification / Alternative check: Check each alternative quickly. Option A uses is mailed, which is present tense, not simple past, so it changes the time of the action. Option B keeps the tense in the past with was mailed and includes by him, preserving meaning. Option C, He is the mailer of the application for a new job, changes both structure and focus and is not a direct passive transformation. Option D, He was the mailer, again does not follow the standard passive voice pattern with was mailed. Option E, His application for a new job was mailed, is grammatically correct but omits the agent by him; while acceptable as a passive, the question typically prefers the full agent expressing option given, which is Option B. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The application for a new job is mailed by him is wrong because the verb is in the present tense is mailed, which does not match the original past tense mailed. He is the mailer of the application for a new job uses a noun form mailer and changes the structure entirely, so it is not a straightforward voice change. He was the mailer of the application for a new job does the same in past tense but still does not follow the expected passive construction. His application for a new job was mailed, although grammatically fine, omits the explicit agent by him that the exam usually expects when offering direct active passive pairs side by side. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes forget to maintain the tense when changing from active to passive, resulting in errors like is mailed in place of was mailed. Another common mistake is to use an incorrect auxiliary such as has mailed or is mailing, which changes the aspect. Some candidates also struggle with placing the object correctly in the subject position. Practising with a simple pattern Subject plus verb plus object becomes Object plus form of be plus past participle plus by plus subject helps internalise the process. Final Answer: The correct passive voice form is The application for a new job was mailed by him.

Question 15

In the following question, a sentence is given in direct speech. Choose the option that best expresses the same idea in indirect speech: "Ooh! What a dirty child!" said my aunt.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of changing a sentence from direct speech to indirect or reported speech, especially when the original sentence is an exclamation that expresses a strong feeling such as disgust. Exclamatory sentences in direct speech often use an exclamation mark and words like "oh", "ah", or interjections such as "Ooh". When such a sentence is reported indirectly, the tone of feeling is usually conveyed through the reporting verb and the exclamatory structure is converted into a normal statement clause. Recognising the correct tense change and the appropriate use of conjunctions is essential for scoring well in reported speech questions in English grammar. Given Data / Assumptions: • Direct speech: "Ooh! What a dirty child!" said my aunt. • Reporting verb: said, which expresses an exclamation of disgust. • The reporting verb is in the past tense. • The aim is to convert an exclamatory sentence into an indirect statement. Concept / Approach: In indirect speech, exclamatory sentences are converted into statements using reporting verbs like exclaimed, exclaimed with disgust, or exclaimed with joy to show emotion. The exclamation "What a dirty child!" is changed into a statement using a conjunction such as "that" followed by a normal clause. Because the reporting verb "said" is in the past tense, the verb inside the reported clause also usually shifts one step back in time, for example from "is" to "was". The focus is on preserving the meaning, the feeling of disgust, and the correct tense sequence, rather than copying the punctuation of the direct sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Identify the speaker: the sentence is spoken by "my aunt". 2. Recognise that the sentence is an exclamation expressing disgust about a dirty child. 3. Replace the neutral reporting verb "said" with an expressive one such as "exclaimed with disgust". 4. Introduce the reported clause with "that" to convert the exclamation into a statement. 5. Convert "is very dirty" to "was very dirty" to follow the backshift of tense from present to past because the reporting verb is in the past. 6. Form the final reported sentence: "My aunt exclaimed with disgust that the child was very dirty." Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification method is to ask if the reported sentence sounds like a natural past report of a previous reaction. The statement "My aunt exclaimed with disgust that the child was very dirty" clearly sounds like something said about a situation that already happened. It preserves the strong negative emotion and correctly expresses the content without using the original exclamation structure. The use of "that" plus a complete clause shows correct grammar. The tense consistency between the past reporting verb and the past form "was" confirms that the standard rules for indirect speech are correctly applied. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B uses "is very dirty", which is present tense and breaks the usual backshift rule after a past reporting verb. Option C keeps "it is", which again wrongly keeps the present tense in the reported clause and also follows a more direct exclamatory pattern, so it does not fully convert to indirect speech. Option D uses "had been very dirty", which suggests an earlier time before another past reference point and introduces an unnecessary past perfect aspect that changes the sense of a simple observation. Therefore those options are less accurate than the standard reported version in option A. Common Pitfalls: Students often forget to change the tense of the verb inside the reported clause from present to past when the reporting verb is in the past. Another common mistake is to keep the exclamatory structure and punctuation instead of turning it into a simple statement. Many learners also ignore the emotional content and use a flat verb like "said" without any expression such as "exclaimed with disgust", which can make the reported speech sound weak or incomplete. Careful attention to tense, conjunctions, and tone will help avoid these problems in exam questions. Final Answer: The correct indirect speech form is My aunt exclaimed with disgust that the child was very dirty.

Question 16

Read the following passage about black rhinoceros and genetic variation, and then answer the question: according to the passage, what is described as the cornerstone and most important factor for evolution?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is based on a reading comprehension passage about black rhinoceros populations in sub Saharan Africa and the role of genetic diversity in evolution. The passage explains how many genetic lineages of black rhinoceros have been lost and links this loss to the idea of genetic erosion. A key line in the passage explicitly states which factor is considered the cornerstone of evolution. To answer correctly, you must recognise this key statement and distinguish it from other general ideas related to evolution and conservation biology. Given Data / Assumptions: • The passage states that genetic variation is the cornerstone of evolution. • It also explains that without genetic variation, there can be no natural selection. • The passage mentions that low genetic diversity reduces the ability of a species to survive and reproduce. • Several countries where black rhinoceros lived are listed, and their genetic lineages are discussed. Concept / Approach: Reading comprehension questions like this often ask directly about a phrase that appears in the text. The phrase "cornerstone of evolution" is a strong signpost. The strategy is to locate the sentence containing that phrase and read it carefully. Since the passage is about genetics and conservation, you might be tempted by related ideas such as survival of the fittest or large population, but the correct choice must match the wording and meaning of the passage. Therefore, the key is to rely on what the passage explicitly states rather than general knowledge alone. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Skim the passage to find the sentence that contains the important phrase "cornerstone of evolution". 2. Read that sentence in full, noting that it states that genetic variation is the cornerstone of evolution. 3. Note the supporting explanation: without genetic variation there can be no natural selection, and low genetic diversity harms survival and reproduction. 4. Compare this information with the options and look for the choice that exactly matches this wording. 5. Recognise that option A, "Genetic variation", repeats the phrase used in the passage. 6. Confirm that none of the other options use exactly the same idea as the passage for the cornerstone of evolution. Verification / Alternative check: To verify the answer, imagine covering the options and asking yourself, based only on the passage, what is described as the most important factor for evolution. The passage author states that genetic variation is the cornerstone of evolution. When you later reveal the options, option A clearly matches this phrase. Although other ideas like survival of the fittest are related to evolution, the passage does not call them the cornerstone. This check helps confirm that you are choosing based on the text instead of outside assumptions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, "A large population size", can help conservation efforts, but the passage never calls it the cornerstone of evolution. Option C, "Mixing of different species", is not mentioned in the passage and is biologically inaccurate as a general rule because evolution mainly works within species. Option D, "Survival of the fittest alone", is part of the process of natural selection, but the passage explains that without genetic variation there can be no natural selection. Therefore, survival of the fittest depends on genetic variation and cannot be the cornerstone itself. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to rely on prior textbook knowledge and assume that phrases like survival of the fittest must be the most important concept in evolution. However, reading comprehension questions always want the answer that aligns with the passage, not with general beliefs. Another pitfall is skimming too quickly and missing key signalling phrases such as "is the cornerstone of". Training yourself to notice and underline such phrases can significantly improve your accuracy in similar questions. Final Answer: The passage clearly states that the cornerstone of evolution is Genetic variation.

Question 17

Read the passage about black rhinoceros and genetic lineages in sub Saharan Africa, and then answer: over the last two hundred years, how many black rhinoceros genetic lineages have been lost?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your ability to extract a specific numerical detail from a reading passage about conservation biology. The passage describes how many distinct genetic lineages of the black rhinoceros once existed in sub Saharan Africa and how many remain today. From this information, you must calculate the number of lineages that have been lost over approximately two centuries. Such questions combine careful reading with basic arithmetic, and they are very common in competitive examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: • Two centuries ago, black rhinoceros in sub Saharan Africa had 64 different genetic lineages. • At present, only 20 genetic lineages remain. • The question asks for the number of lineages that have been lost, not the number remaining. • Loss is calculated as original number minus current number. Concept / Approach: The approach is straightforward: identify the two key numbers mentioned in the passage and then compute the difference. You must be careful not to confuse the number of lineages that remain with the number lost. A reading trap is that one of the answer options simply repeats each of the numbers from the passage. Therefore you must perform the subtraction 64 minus 20 and choose the correct result. This type of question tests both precise reading and accurate use of basic arithmetic operations. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. From the passage, note that there were 64 different genetic lineages two centuries ago. 2. Also note that only 20 genetic lineages remain today. 3. Understand that the number of lineages lost is equal to original lineages minus remaining lineages. 4. Perform the subtraction: 64 minus 20. 5. Compute 64 - 20 = 44. 6. Match this result with the answer choices and locate "44 genetic lineages". Verification / Alternative check: A quick check is to reason whether the answer seems realistic: if 64 lineages existed and only 20 survive, more than half must have been lost. Half of 64 is 32, so the loss must be greater than 32. That eliminates numbers like 20 and 30. Since 44 is greater than 32 and the difference calculation supports it, it is a sensible answer. You can also recheck the subtraction by reversing it: 20 remaining plus 44 lost equals 64 original, which confirms that the arithmetic is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, 64 genetic lineages, is the original number and does not represent the loss. Option B, 20 genetic lineages, is the current number remaining, not the number lost. Option D, 30 genetic lineages, is a distractor that might tempt someone who subtracts incorrectly or works only roughly. None of these values equal the difference between 64 and 20. Only option C correctly represents the number of lineages that have disappeared over the two hundred year period. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes misread the question and directly pick a number that is explicitly mentioned in the passage, forgetting that the task requires a calculation. Another common error is to reverse the subtraction and compute 20 minus 64, which would give a negative number that does not make sense in this context. To avoid such mistakes, always restate the question in your own words, such as "How many are missing now compared to the original number", and then set up the calculation accordingly. Final Answer: The number of black rhinoceros genetic lineages lost over two centuries is 44 genetic lineages.

Question 18

Read the passage about black rhinoceros populations in Africa, and then answer: genetically unique black rhinoceros populations have been lost in all of the following countries, except which one?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question comes from a reading passage describing how genetically unique populations of black rhinoceros have disappeared from many African countries. The passage then lists five countries where the species still survives. The phrase "all of the following countries, except" indicates that you must identify which option still has black rhinoceros populations and therefore did not lose them completely. This is a typical reading comprehension question that tests careful attention to lists and contrasts inside the text. Given Data / Assumptions: • The passage lists countries where black rhinoceros are now restricted: South Africa, Namibia, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Tanzania. • It also lists countries where genetically unique populations once existed but have disappeared: Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Mozambique, Malawi, and Angola. • The options include Tanzania, Nigeria, Chad, and Malawi. • The question asks for the country where genetically unique populations have not been lost completely. Concept / Approach: The passage clearly separates current range countries from former range countries where unique populations have been lost. The best strategy is to identify which of the options appears in the list of current range countries rather than the list of countries that have lost these populations. The word "except" signals that three options will belong to the lost list and only one will belong to the current range list. This reversal often confuses students, so you must read slowly and maybe underline both lists in the original passage. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Locate in the passage the sentence that says the species is now restricted to five countries. 2. Note the five countries: South Africa, Namibia, Kenya, Zimbabwe, and Tanzania. 3. Next, locate the sentence that lists countries where genetically unique populations have disappeared. 4. Note that Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Mozambique, Malawi, and Angola are in that lost list. 5. Compare the options with these two lists. 6. Observe that Nigeria, Chad, and Malawi are explicitly part of the disappeared list, whereas Tanzania is part of the current range list. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, you can quickly classify each option: Nigeria is in the disappeared group, Chad is also in the disappeared group, and Malawi is again named as a country where genetically unique populations have vanished. Only Tanzania appears among the countries where black rhinoceros are still found today. Since the question asks for the exception, Tanzania must be the correct choice. If you reverse the logic and ask, "In which of these countries do black rhinoceros still survive," the answer would again be Tanzania, confirming the result. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, Nigeria, is named as a country where genetically unique populations that once existed have disappeared. Option C, Chad, is again listed among those where such populations have vanished. Option D, Malawi, is also in the same lost group in the passage. Since the question asks for the country which has not lost its genetically unique black rhinoceros populations, all three of these are incorrect. They are examples of the problem that the passage is highlighting rather than exceptions to it. Common Pitfalls: Many learners ignore the small but critical word "except" and accidentally choose a country where loss actually occurred. Another common error is mixing up current range countries with the list of countries that have lost their populations, especially when reading quickly. To avoid these mistakes, it helps to underline or mentally separate lists when reading passages full of names and numbers. Paying attention to contrast words like "but today", "however", and "disappeared" also helps in identifying how the author organises information. Final Answer: Genetically unique black rhinoceros populations have been lost in Nigeria, Chad, and Malawi, but they still survive in Tanzania.

Question 19

Read the passage about genetic erosion in black rhinoceros populations, and then answer: from the second half of the twentieth century, what factor has caused a dramatic fall in black rhinoceros population and genetic diversity?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question again draws on the reading passage about black rhinoceros in sub Saharan Africa, but now focuses on identifying the main cause for the dramatic fall in population from the second half of the twentieth century. The passage distinguishes between earlier historical influences, such as colonial rule and big game hunting, and more recent pressures. Understanding this timeline and the specific wording used by the author is essential for choosing the correct answer. Given Data / Assumptions: • The passage says that the origins of genetic erosion coincided with colonial rule in Africa and the popularity of big game hunting. • It then states that from the second half of the twentieth century, poaching for horns has dramatically depleted black rhinoceros population and genetic diversity. • The question asks specifically about the second half of the twentieth century. • Several options echo phrases from the passage, but they refer to different time periods or concepts. Concept / Approach: The key reading strategy here is to pay attention to time markers. The phrase "from the second half of the twentieth century" narrows the relevant part of the passage. You must then identify what the author mentions as happening in that time frame. Although colonial rule and big game hunting are linked to the beginnings of genetic erosion, the dramatic depletion in more recent decades is specifically connected to poaching for horns. Recognising and respecting these chronological distinctions is a common theme in reading comprehension questions about history and science. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Re read the part of the passage that mentions the second half of the twentieth century. 2. Note the exact wording: from that period onward, poaching for horns has dramatically depleted population and genetic diversity. 3. Contrast this with the earlier line that links genetic erosion to colonial rule and big game hunting. 4. Understand that colonial rule and big game hunting are historical roots of the problem but are not described as the main recent cause. 5. Compare each option with these observations. 6. Identify "Poaching for horns" as the only option that exactly matches the factor named for the second half of the twentieth century. Verification / Alternative check: One useful check is to ask what specific activity continues to be a threat to black rhinoceros in modern times. Conservation reports and general knowledge also confirm that illegal hunting for horns is one of the biggest dangers for rhinos. This outside understanding agrees with what the passage states. When you align this with the text that says poaching for horns has dramatically depleted population and genetic diversity, it confirms that option A is correct and that the other options describe older or less precise influences. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B, colonial rule in Africa, is mentioned as part of the historical context that coincided with the beginning of genetic erosion, but it is not given as the main recent cause for dramatic loss from the second half of the twentieth century. Option C, big game hunting, again belongs to an earlier period and is not the key modern factor specified in the passage. Option D, a natural fall in genetic diversity, misrepresents the text, because the passage emphasises human pressures rather than natural processes as the main cause. None of these options captures the time specific activity identified in the question. Common Pitfalls: A common trap is to pick a phrase that appears early in the passage without taking careful note of time markers. Students might remember "colonial rule" and "big game hunting" more easily because they appear in a prominent sentence but forget that the question asks about the second half of the twentieth century. Another error is to assume that genetic diversity falls naturally over time, whereas the passage points to human actions. Always match the question words, such as time expressions, with the relevant part of the text before selecting an answer. Final Answer: From the second half of the twentieth century onward, the dramatic fall in black rhinoceros population has been caused mainly by poaching for horns.

Question 20

Read the passage about genetic diversity in black rhinoceros populations, and then answer: genetic diversity is directly proportional to which of the following?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is again built on the same passage about black rhinoceros but now focuses on the relationship between genetic diversity and other biological outcomes. The author explains that low genetic diversity decreases the ability of a species to survive and reproduce. Therefore, high genetic diversity supports better survival and reproduction. Questions like this test your understanding of cause and effect relationships as described in the text, rather than only your raw memory of numbers or names. Given Data / Assumptions: • The passage states that genetic variation is the cornerstone of evolution. • It clarifies that without genetic variation there can be no natural selection. • It explicitly says that low genetic diversity decreases the ability of a species to survive and reproduce. • From this logic, higher genetic diversity improves the ability of a species to survive and reproduce. Concept / Approach: The concept here is proportionality. If low genetic diversity harms survival and reproduction, then high genetic diversity should support them. You can think of genetic diversity and the ability to survive and reproduce as moving in the same direction. The more diverse the gene pool, the better the chances that some individuals will tolerate diseases, environmental changes, and other stresses. In exam terms, you must pick the option that summarises this positive relationship, not one that describes an inverse or unrelated link. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall from the passage that "a low genetic diversity decreases the ability of a species to survive and reproduce". 2. Translate this into proportional language: as genetic diversity decreases, ability to survive and reproduce decreases. 3. Therefore, as genetic diversity increases, the ability to survive and reproduce increases. 4. Check the options and identify which one describes this supportive or positive relationship. 5. Option B mentions "the ability of a species to survive and reproduce", which matches the passage. 6. Confirm that no other option correctly expresses this same positive proportional relationship. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, imagine two species: one with very high genetic diversity and one with extremely low diversity. The species with high diversity should be more adaptable and resilient, whereas the one with low diversity is more vulnerable to disease and environmental change. This thought experiment fits perfectly with the passage. When you link this reasoning back to the options, only option B fits both the passage and general biological understanding, making it a reliable choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A, species population size alone, is not always directly proportional to genetic diversity, because a large but inbred population may still have low diversity. Option C, the degree of inbreeding, generally moves in the opposite direction: high inbreeding usually reduces genetic diversity. Option D, the risk of extinction, is inversely related: as genetic diversity decreases, extinction risk increases, so they do not rise or fall together. None of these alternatives correctly describe the direct positive proportional link described by the passage. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse correlation and causation or fail to notice whether two factors move in the same or opposite directions. Others may try to reason from general ideas rather than returning to the exact sentence in the passage. A safer method is to rewrite the key sentence from the passage in your own words and then match that restated idea with the options. Doing so helps prevent you from being distracted by plausible but incorrect statements about population size or extinction risk. Final Answer: Genetic diversity is directly proportional to the ability of a species to survive and reproduce.

English Questions