Question 1

The following question consists of four labelled sentences P, Q, R and S about the interdependence of the food and labour markets. Select the most logical order of these sentences to form a coherent paragraph.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence arrangement question deals with economic interdependence between the food market and the labour market. The four statements P, Q, R and S are parts of a short explanatory paragraph. The learner must arrange them in an order that makes sense logically and grammatically, showing how the idea of interdependence is introduced, explained and illustrated. Understanding the meaning of each fragment and the function of connectors such as similarly is essential to find the correct sequence. Given Data / Assumptions: - Q states that interdependence of food and labour market is important for the development process. - P explains that the magnitude of this interdependence depends on the technique of production causing shifts in the food supply curve. - S says that an upward shift in the food supply curve results in an upward shift in the labour demand curve. - R begins with similarly and states that an upward shift in the food supply curve shifts up the food demand curve. - We need a smooth flow from general statement to detailed explanation and then to illustrations. Concept / Approach: In jumbled paragraph questions, the usual pattern is to start with a broad theme sentence, follow with an explanation of factors or mechanisms, and then present specific consequences or examples. Also, cohesive markers like similarly are used to link two parallel points, so the sentence that uses such a marker should follow another sentence with a similar structure. We identify the sentence most suitable as an opening and then place the others so that each new idea flows naturally from the one before. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Sentence Q is clearly introductory. It states in general that interdependence of the food and labour markets is important for development. It does not refer back to any earlier idea, so Q should be the first sentence. Step 2: Sentence P explains what determines the magnitude of that interdependence. It speaks about the technique of production and how it causes shifts in the food supply curve. This explanation logically follows the general claim in Q. Step 3: Sentence S describes a specific consequence of an upward shift in the food supply curve: an upward shift in the labour demand curve. This shows one channel through which interdependence works. Therefore S should come after P. Step 4: Sentence R begins with similarly and talks about another consequence of the same upward shift in the food supply curve, namely a shift in the food demand curve. The word similarly signals that it should follow another sentence describing a similar effect, that is, S. Step 5: Combining these links gives the order Q P S R, which corresponds to option B, written as QPRS. Verification / Alternative check: Read the reconstructed paragraph: Interdependence of food and labour market is important for the development process. The magnitude of the interdependence depends on the technique of production causing the shifts in the food supply curve. An upward shift in the food supply curve would simultaneously result in an upward shift in the labour demand curve. Similarly, an upward shift in the food supply curve shifts up the food demand curve. This paragraph is logically consistent and grammatically smooth. Any other arrangement would either place similarly without a prior parallel statement or would present examples before the general idea is stated. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (QSPR): Placing S directly after Q and then P breaks the natural flow from explanation to example and separates S from its parallel sentence R. Option C (PSRQ): Beginning with P ignores the need for an introductory sentence that explains why interdependence matters, and putting Q last makes the paragraph end with a general statement instead of a specific effect. Option D (SPQR): Starting with S and then P is not logical because S uses the shift in food supply without first explaining why or how it matters, and R without S immediately before makes the connector similarly less meaningful. Common Pitfalls: Students often focus only on technical terms like food supply curve and labour demand curve and ignore the discourse markers. The word similarly is a strong clue that two adjacent sentences must describe parallel results of the same cause. Another pitfall is to pick an order that keeps all technical details together but starts with an explanation instead of a clear topic sentence, which reduces coherence. Always identify the broad topic sentence and then use logical connectors to guide the remaining order. Final Answer: The most coherent sequence is QPRS, so option B is correct.

Question 2

In the following question, the sentence is given in the active voice. Select the option that expresses the same idea in the passive voice: Who teaches you Mathematics?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks understanding of the transformation from active voice to passive voice in English grammar, specifically in interrogative sentences. The original sentence is a present simple question about the person who performs the action of teaching. To answer correctly, we must preserve the tense, meaning and sense of enquiry while changing the structure from active to passive. This is a common type of question in competitive examinations and language tests. Given Data / Assumptions: - Active voice sentence: Who teaches you Mathematics? - Subject in the active sentence is the unknown person referred to by who. - Object in the active sentence is you, and Mathematics is the direct object of the verb teach. - The tense is present simple, indicating a regular or habitual action. Concept / Approach: To change an active sentence to passive, we promote the object of the active sentence to the subject position in the passive sentence. The main verb is changed to a form of be followed by the past participle of the original verb. The original subject is usually introduced by the preposition by. In interrogative sentences, we must also maintain correct question word order. For present simple passive, the structure is: am or is or are plus past participle. Since the subject in the passive will be you, we will use are taught. The question also uses who as a subject, which in passive form becomes by whom, placed at the beginning of the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the object that will become the new subject. In the active sentence, you is the indirect object receiving the teaching. In the passive form, you will come to the subject position. Step 2: Retain the tense. The present simple of teach becomes are taught when used in the passive with subject you. So the core passive structure is you are taught Mathematics. Step 3: Convert the question pattern. The active question begins with who because the doer is unknown. In the passive question, the doer becomes an agent introduced with by, so who changes to by whom at the start of the sentence. Step 4: Combine the elements in proper interrogative order: By whom are you taught Mathematics? This keeps the auxiliary are before the subject you, which is required in questions. Step 5: Check that the meaning remains the same. The new sentence still asks for the identity of the person who teaches you Mathematics, but now expressed in passive voice. Verification / Alternative check: We can confirm by reversing the passive sentence back to the active. From By whom are you taught Mathematics? we can reconstruct the active form as Who teaches you Mathematics? This matches the original question exactly in meaning and tense. Also note that the tense has not changed to past or future, and no extra words have been added that alter the sense of regular teaching. This confirms that the chosen option correctly represents the passive form. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: By whom were you taught Mathematics? changes the tense from present simple to past simple, which changes the meaning to a question about previous teaching, not current or habitual teaching. Option C: By whom will you be taught Mathematics? shifts the tense to future, which again does not match the original meaning. Option D: Mathematics is taught by whom? is grammatically awkward and does not follow the standard pattern for polite questions in English. It also fails to show that you is the person being taught. Common Pitfalls: Learners often forget to maintain tense when changing voice and may choose a past or future form simply because it sounds natural. Another frequent mistake is placing by whom at the end rather than at the beginning in formal English, which can sound incorrect or very informal. It is important to remember that interrogative passive forms require the auxiliary before the subject and the question phrase at the start. Practising transformations both from active to passive and back helps to fix these patterns in memory. Final Answer: The correct passive form of the sentence is By whom are you taught Mathematics?, so option A is correct.

Question 3

In the following question, the sentence is given in direct speech. Select the option that best expresses the same meaning in indirect (reported) speech: I do not know the answer. Do you? she asked.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines the rules of changing direct speech into indirect or reported speech. The original direct speech consists of two sentences: a statement and a question. The speaker admits that she does not know the answer and then asks another person whether he or she knows it. In reported speech, both parts must be combined in a grammatically correct way that keeps tense, pronouns and meaning consistent. The correct option will show accurate tense backshift and appropriate linking. Given Data / Assumptions: - Direct speech: I do not know the answer. Do you? she asked. - Speaker is she, who is talking to another person, the listener. - Reporting verb can be said or asked, and indirect speech will likely join the two sentences. - The reporting is in the past, so present tense forms will normally move one step back. Concept / Approach: Key rules for converting direct speech to indirect speech include tense backshift, change of pronouns and adjustment of question structure. When the reporting verb is in the past tense, present simple usually becomes past simple in reported speech. Pronoun I becomes she and you becomes I or he or she depending on who is being spoken to. In reporting a question, the auxiliary do is dropped and the order changes to normal statement order, introduced by if or whether. Here we must join the statement I do not know the answer with the question Do you? into one smooth reported sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Report the statement I do not know the answer. Since the reporting verb is in the past, do not know changes to did not know. The pronoun I refers to she, so it becomes she. This gives she said that she did not know the answer. Step 2: Report the follow up question Do you? This is a short form of Do you know the answer. In indirect speech, the auxiliary do is removed and normal statement order you knew the answer is used. The pronoun you refers to the listener, that is, me in the indirect version. Step 3: Introduce the reported question with if or whether. With pronoun change, the question becomes asked me if I did or asked me if I knew the answer. Both preserve the sense of asking whether the listener knew the answer. Step 4: Combine both parts into one sentence: She said that she did not know the answer and asked me if I did. This option uses correct tense, pronoun change and question reporting. Step 5: Verify that no unnecessary colloquial expressions such as was not knowing or present tense forms like I know remain, since they would break standard reported speech rules. Verification / Alternative check: Check option C carefully: She said that she did not know the answer and asked me if I did. We can reconstruct the direct speech: She said, I do not know the answer. Do you? This matches the original sentence in both content and intention. The tense backshift is correct, and the sequence of reporting her own lack of knowledge followed by her question to the listener is preserved. There are no tense inconsistencies or grammatically incorrect progressive forms such as was not knowing. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: She asked me whether I knew the answer which she did not. This structure is clumsy and slightly unclear. It suggests that she did not know which answer, and it does not clearly convey that she said she did not know the answer before asking. Option B: She said that she did not know the answer and asked if I know it. The second clause keeps know in present simple after a past reporting verb, which breaks the tense backshift rule. Option D: She told me that she was not knowing the answer but wondered if I know. The phrase was not knowing is ungrammatical in standard English for a state verb, and again know remains in present simple, making the sentence incorrect. Common Pitfalls: Learners often forget to adjust the tense in the second clause of a combined reported sentence or they use progressive forms with state verbs like know, which is not standard usage. Another frequent error is to omit the reporting of the question completely or to use wrong connectors such as and did I know instead of asked me if I knew. To avoid these issues, always apply tense backshift consistently to every clause and use if or whether when reporting yes or no questions. Final Answer: The correct indirect speech version is She said that she did not know the answer and asked me if I did., so option C is correct.

Question 4

In the following passage, a suitable word is needed to complete the blank: As long as we are unmindful of this _____, the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate. Select the m…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is part of a cloze passage about the real purpose of education. The passage states that education is for life, not merely for a livelihood, and then remarks that as long as we are unmindful of this something, the quality of the curriculum, teachers and students will remain inadequate. The blank requires a noun that captures the central idea about education expressed in the opening sentence. Choosing the right word depends on understanding both the meaning of the passage and the collocation patterns of English. Given Data / Assumptions: - The passage begins with the statement: Education is for life, not merely for a livelihood. - The sentence containing the blank is: As long as we are unmindful of this _____, the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate. - Options provided are: measure, resource, story and truth. - We assume the writer is making a serious philosophical point about the nature of education. Concept / Approach: To fill a blank in a comprehension passage, we rely on context, grammar and collocation. The word following this refers back to the key idea in the previous sentence. That idea, that education is for life and not just for earning, is a fundamental principle or reality. Among the options, the word that best captures a basic principle is truth. Measure, resource and story do not naturally refer to a deep guiding principle in this context. The chosen noun must also fit grammatically after this and collocate well with the phrase be unmindful of this. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify what this refers to. It clearly points to the earlier statement about education being for life rather than just for livelihood. Step 2: Decide what type of word that earlier statement represents. It is a fundamental reality or principle that the author believes we should remember. Step 3: Evaluate each option. Measure means a unit of quantity or an action taken; resource refers to something used to meet needs; story refers to a narrative. None of these naturally describe a deep principle. Step 4: The word truth, however, is commonly used to refer to a basic principle or fact that people should recognise. The phrase unmindful of this truth is a natural and idiomatic expression. Step 5: Insert truth into the sentence: As long as we are unmindful of this truth, the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate. The sentence now reads smoothly and conveys a clear meaning. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by checking if the other options produce natural sentences. Unmindful of this measure sounds awkward because measure here would need a specific reference, such as a policy measure. Unmindful of this resource is also odd, since a resource is usually something we use, not a principle we keep in mind. Unmindful of this story would suggest a particular narrative, not a deep idea about education. Only unmindful of this truth fits both the serious tone of the passage and the idea that forgetting the real purpose of education harms the entire system. Thus truth is confirmed as the best answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Measure refers to a step or arrangement, but the passage is talking about a basic principle, not a specific policy step. Option B: Resource usually means a supply or asset, such as money or materials, and does not match the abstract idea described here. Option C: Story would make the opening philosophy about education sound like a mere tale, which conflicts with the serious tone of the passage. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake in cloze passages is to choose a word that fits grammatically but not conceptually. Candidates may focus only on the local sentence and ignore the key idea in the previous line. Another pitfall is to overthink and look for rare words, when the correct answer is often a common and simple term like truth. Always connect the blank to the central message of the passage and prefer words that preserve the tone and depth of that message. Final Answer: The suitable word to complete the blank is truth, so option D is correct.

Question 5

In the following passage about the purpose of education, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: the _____ of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question continues the same passage about education being for life and not merely for livelihood. After stressing the importance of remembering this truth, the passage comments that something about the educational curriculum, teachers and students will remain inadequate if this truth is ignored. The blank requires a noun that logically connects with inadequate and summarises what aspect of curriculum and people in education is being judged. Understanding the usual collocations in educational discourse is key to answering correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: - The sentence is: As long as we are unmindful of this truth, the _____ of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate. - Options given are efficiency, effectiveness, quality and quantity. - The tone is evaluative and critical of the current state of education. - In educational debates, quality of education is a very common phrase. Concept / Approach: We need to choose the noun that most naturally takes inadequate as a descriptor and that is widely used in the context of education. While all four options are abstract nouns, some are more appropriate than others. Efficiency refers to how well resources are used; effectiveness refers to how well goals are achieved; quantity refers to amount or number. Quality refers to the standard or excellence of something. When we talk about educational curriculum, teachers and students together, the most usual phrase is quality of education or quality of curriculum and teaching. Therefore, quality is the strongest candidate. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Observe the structure with inadequate. The expression inadequate quality is common and natural, whereas inadequate quantity or inadequate efficiency are used in narrower technical contexts. Step 2: Consider the collocation with educational curriculum, teachers and students. All three are aspects of the educational system, and we normally talk about raising their quality. Step 3: Insert quality into the sentence: the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate. This reads smoothly and expresses a clear criticism. Step 4: Check other options in the same slot. The efficiency of our educational curriculum sounds odd, because curriculum itself is a plan, not a process immediately judged for efficiency. Step 5: The effectiveness of our educational curriculum may sound possible, but adding teachers and students to the same phrase makes quality a more comprehensive and natural choice, as we rarely speak of the effectiveness of students in this direct way. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, think of common education policy slogans. Campaigns talk about quality education, improving quality of teaching, and quality of learning outcomes. Reports often state that the quality of curriculum and teaching is inadequate. This confirms that quality is the most idiomatic term here. Quantity would change the meaning toward numbers of students or schools, which is not suggested by the passage. Also, if quantity were intended, the author would more likely mention numbers directly rather than teachers and students together in this way. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Efficiency suggests how well time or resources are used. While efficiency matters, the sentence is making a broader moral and educational judgment, not a technical one. Option B: Effectiveness refers to achievement of objectives, but when combined with teachers and students, the more comprehensive term quality is preferred in standard educational writing. Option D: Quantity refers to how much or how many. The sentence criticises the standard of education, not the number of teachers, students or courses, so quantity does not fit the context. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overcomplicate cloze questions by choosing less common academic terms like efficiency or effectiveness because they sound technical. However, the best choice is often the simplest word that matches usual collocations in that domain. Another pitfall is ignoring the full list of items linked by as well as that of our teachers and students and focusing only on curriculum. Always read the entire phrase around the blank to ensure the selected word fits every part of the sentence. Final Answer: The most appropriate word is quality, so option C is correct.

Question 6

In the following passage about the purpose of education, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our _____ and students is likely to remain inadequate.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is another part of the same passage discussing education. The writer talks about the quality of the educational curriculum and then adds a reference to a group of people along with students. The blank asks for the most suitable noun to complete the phrase our _____ and students so that the whole expression makes sense in the context of education and quality. Recognising typical collocations in educational discourse again helps to find the correct answer. Given Data / Assumptions: - The relevant sentence is: the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our _____ and students is likely to remain inadequate. - Options are friends, ideals, parents and teachers. - The writer is evaluating the state of education and the people directly involved in it. - Curriculum is an institutional element, while students are learners. Concept / Approach: To complete the blank, we look at which group naturally pairs with students in discussions about education. The three main stakeholders are teachers, students and parents. In most policy and philosophy texts, the phrase teachers and students is very common. Friends and ideals do not fit because they do not refer to a clear stakeholder group whose quality is being assessed. Parents are important, but the phrase quality of our parents is unusual, whereas quality of our teachers is a standard expression. Thus teachers is the most likely answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that curriculum, teachers and students form a meaningful trio representing the educational system: content, deliverers and receivers. Step 2: Insert teachers into the blank: the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate. This is a natural and common phrasing in educational writing. Step 3: Test friends in the blank. The quality of our friends and students is logically odd and does not reflect standard educational vocabulary. Step 4: Test ideals. The quality of our ideals and students mixes an abstract concept with a group of people and sounds unbalanced. Step 5: Test parents. The quality of our parents and students is also an unusual phrase. Writers would more likely talk about support of parents, not quality of parents. Verification / Alternative check: We can confirm by comparing with common phrases used in education policy documents and reports, which frequently mention teacher quality and student quality. For example, one often reads about raising the quality of teachers and improving student learning outcomes. This pattern strongly supports teachers as the missing word. Also, when the curriculum is mentioned along with people, the natural triad is curriculum, teachers and students, not curriculum, parents and students or curriculum, friends and students. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Friends are not a formal part of the education system in this context. Referring to the quality of our friends does not match the serious tone of the passage. Option B: Ideals are abstract principles. The quality of our ideals is a possible phrase, but combining it with students as if both are being graded together is stylistically awkward. Option C: Parents are stakeholders in education, but writers do not usually talk about the quality of parents. Instead they speak of parental support or involvement, so this option is less natural. Common Pitfalls: A typical mistake is to select parents because they are strongly associated with children and education in everyday life. However, exam passages often reflect the formal language of policymakers and educational thinkers, who usually focus on teachers and students as the central human elements. Always check that the noun fits both grammatically and stylistically with the rest of the sentence and the broader context. Final Answer: The word that best completes the phrase is teachers, so option D is correct.

Question 7

In the following passage about the purpose of education, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain _____.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This item completes the same critical sentence about the state of education. After mentioning the quality of the curriculum, teachers and students, the writer predicts that this quality is likely to remain something negative as long as society forgets the real purpose of education. The blank needs an adjective that naturally follows likely to remain and describes a standard that is not good enough. The best answer will match both the grammatical structure and the tone of criticism. Given Data / Assumptions: - The sentence is: the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain _____. - Options are inadequate, indifferent, represented and unmeasurable. - The context is that people are unmindful of the truth that education is for life, not only for livelihood. - The writer is pointing out a deficiency in the education system. Concept / Approach: We need an adjective that expresses deficiency. The word inadequate directly means not good enough, insufficient in quality or quantity. This is a frequent collocation with quality. Indifferent can mean unconcerned or mediocre, represented simply means shown or symbolised, and unmeasurable suggests something that cannot be measured. Among these, inadequate is the most precise and common term for poor quality in formal evaluation, especially in education. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert inadequate in the blank: the quality of our educational curriculum as well as that of our teachers and students is likely to remain inadequate. This sentence clearly states that the current standard is not good enough. Step 2: Try indifferent in the same place. The quality is likely to remain indifferent is grammatically possible, but indifferent as an adjective for quality is less common and weaker in criticism than inadequate. Step 3: Try represented. The quality is likely to remain represented does not make sense, because represented does not describe a level of quality. Step 4: Try unmeasurable. The quality is likely to remain unmeasurable suggests that we cannot measure quality, which is not the intended criticism. The writer is clearly saying that the quality itself is not sufficient, not that it cannot be measured. Step 5: Conclude that inadequate is the only option that fits perfectly in meaning and common usage. Verification / Alternative check: We can confirm by looking at how similar sentences appear in other texts. Policy reports frequently state that the quality of education remains inadequate, or that standards are inadequate to meet modern needs. This supports our choice. Also, the sequence truth, quality, teachers and students, inadequate forms a coherent argumentative chain: by ignoring the truth about education, we keep the quality of core elements of the system at an inadequate level. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: Indifferent is more commonly used to describe attitudes, such as indifferent students or indifferent public, rather than the quality itself, and therefore sounds less precise here. Option C: Represented does not describe quality; it is about showing or symbolising something and so does not fit the sentence. Option D: Unmeasurable shifts the meaning to an inability to measure, which does not match the writer's focus on poor standards. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes choose indifferent because they associate it with lack of concern and therefore with a problem in education. However, the phrase indifferent quality is much rarer than inadequate quality in formal writing. Another pitfall is to overlook subtle differences between adjectives and to assume that any negative sounding word will fit. It is important to test each option in the sentence and ask whether it clearly conveys the author's intended criticism. Final Answer: The adjective that best completes the sentence is inadequate, so option A is correct.

Question 8

In the following passage about the value of books, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: So we should _____ only good books and read them.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to a passage that praises books as our friends and guides. The passage explains that books help us learn and find answers and then advises that we should read as many books as possible, but that not all books are good. Therefore, we should do something only with good books. The blank requires a verb that expresses the action of carefully selecting those books that are worth reading. Understanding the overall message of the passage helps to identify the correct word. Given Data / Assumptions: - The relevant lines are: We should read as many books as we can. But all books are not good. So we should _____ only good books and read them. - Options provided are remove, looking, steel and choose. - The passage emphasises that books are our real friends and guides. - The writer wants to instruct readers on how to handle the fact that some books are not good. Concept / Approach: We look for a verb that collocates naturally with only good books and with the idea of making a conscious decision. Among the options, choose clearly expresses the idea of selecting something from among many. Remove means take away, looking is a present participle and does not fit directly after should, and steel is a different verb meaning to harden yourself mentally. The correct collocation is choose only good books, which is a common way of advising people to be selective in reading. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert choose in the sentence: So we should choose only good books and read them. This sounds natural and matches the intended advice. Step 2: Test remove. So we should remove only good books and read them is logically wrong, because we do not remove the good ones, we pick them up to read. Step 3: Test looking. So we should looking only good books and read them is grammatically incorrect, since should must be followed by the base form of the verb, not a continuous form. Step 4: Test steel. So we should steel only good books and read them does not make sense, because steel is not used with books in this way. Step 5: Conclude that choose is the only verb that is both grammatically correct and conceptually appropriate. Verification / Alternative check: We can further verify by thinking about how teachers and authors often advise students. They frequently say choose good books, select good reading material, or pick only good books. This is exactly the advice the passage is giving. The presence of only emphasises that from the large number of available books, we must select a smaller subset that are good in content and quality. Therefore, choose is perfectly aligned with the message. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Remove suggests taking something away or eliminating it. It would make sense to remove bad books, not good ones, so it contradicts the meaning. Option B: Looking cannot follow should without to and does not fit with only good books as an object, so it fails grammatically. Option C: Steel is not used for selecting books and therefore does not fit semantically in this sentence. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students focus only on whether a word is grammatically possible after should and overlook whether it makes sense in the context. Another pitfall is to read quickly and miss the word only, which signals selection. Paying careful attention to the entire sentence, including words like only, helps you see that the intended action is to make a selection, which leads directly to choose as the best option. Final Answer: The verb that best completes the blank is choose, so option D is correct.

Question 9

In the following passage about the value of books, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: We should read as _____ books as we can.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of quantifiers much and many and their correct use with countable and uncountable nouns. In the passage, books are described as our friends and guides, and the writer encourages us to read as a large number of books as possible. The blank appears in the expression as _____ books as we can, and we must choose the quantifier that agrees with the plural countable noun books and conveys the intended encouragement. Given Data / Assumptions: - The sentence is: We should read as _____ books as we can. - Options are much, many, few and less. - Books is a plural countable noun. - The writer is advising us positively, not warning us to reduce reading. Concept / Approach: In English, many is used with plural countable nouns, while much is used with uncountable nouns. Few indicates a small number, often with a negative or limiting sense, and less is generally used with uncountable nouns, or in some informal contexts with countable nouns, to indicate a smaller quantity. The phrase as many books as we can is a fixed and common expression, meaning as large a number of books as is possible for us to read. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that books can be counted one by one, so it is a countable noun. Therefore, we should expect many rather than much or less. Step 2: Insert many in the sentence: We should read as many books as we can. This is a standard pattern used to encourage extensive reading. Step 3: Test much. We should read as much books as we can is incorrect because much does not agree with countable plural nouns like books. Step 4: Test few. We should read as few books as we can suggests that we should restrict reading to a small number, which contradicts the positive message of the passage. Step 5: Test less. We should read as less books as we can is not grammatically standard, and it again gives an undesired meaning of minimising reading. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by comparing with familiar expressions like as many questions as possible, as many examples as you can find and as many friends as you can make. In all such cases, many appears with plural countable nouns. Similarly, you will see as much water as you can drink or as much information as possible with uncountable nouns. Books belongs clearly to the first group, so as many books as we can is the correct structure. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Much is used with uncountable nouns like water, sugar and information, not with plural countable nouns like books. Option C: Few expresses a small quantity and would communicate the opposite of what the writer intends. Option D: Less is not idiomatic in this expression and also suggests reduction rather than expansion of reading. Common Pitfalls: A frequent error is to confuse much and many, especially when reading quickly. Learners may also ignore the wider context and choose few or less without noticing that the author is encouraging more reading, not less. To avoid these mistakes, always identify whether the noun is countable or uncountable and check whether the overall message is to increase or decrease the quantity mentioned. Final Answer: The correct quantifier is many, so option B is correct.

Question 10

In the following passage about the value of books, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: The books help us find _____ to our questions.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This item is another blank from the passage that praises books. The sentence states that books help us find something to our questions. The missing word should complete a very familiar collocation in English: find something to our questions. The options all describe types of information or ideas, but only one fits the fixed phrase naturally and matches the simple, general tone of the passage. Given Data / Assumptions: - The sentence is: The books help us find _____ to our questions. - Options are answers, solutions, relations and opinions. - The passage is aimed at general readers and uses simple language. - Questions can be factual, conceptual or personal. Concept / Approach: In English, the most common collocation is find answers to questions. While solutions to problems is also common, we usually talk about solutions to problems rather than solutions to questions. Relations to our questions and opinions to our questions are not standard expressions. Therefore, we look for the word that is most frequently used with questions in everyday and academic language, which is answers. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert answers into the sentence: The books help us find answers to our questions. This is a familiar and natural phrase. Step 2: Test solutions. The books help us find solutions to our questions is less idiomatic, because we normally say solutions to problems. Step 3: Test relations. The books help us find relations to our questions does not make sense, because relations refer to connections between things, not direct responses to questions. Step 4: Test opinions. The books help us find opinions to our questions is again incorrect, as opinions are usually held about issues rather than given to questions in this wording. Step 5: Confirm that answers is both grammatically and collocationally correct and matches the intended sense. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, recall common classroom and exam language: teachers say find the answer to this question, not find the solution to this question, unless they are speaking about a specific mathematical problem. The passage is general and refers to any kind of questions we may have about life or knowledge. In that broad sense, answers is the appropriate term. Books indeed help us find answers to our questions about the world, history, science and many other topics. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: Solutions is more often used with problems, puzzles or equations. Using it with questions in this generic context sounds less natural. Option C: Relations does not describe direct responses or information that satisfies a question, so it does not fit the sentence. Option D: Opinions refers to personal views, and while books may present opinions, the phrase opinions to our questions is not idiomatic. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes candidates are attracted to solutions because it sounds more technical or formal. However, cloze passages often prefer the most common everyday collocation instead of a rare one. Another pitfall is to ignore the preposition to and focus only on whether the word is positive or negative. Always think about how words typically combine with their neighbours in natural English. Final Answer: The word that best completes the phrase is answers, so option A is correct.

Question 11

In the following passage about the value of books, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: The books contain all the great _____ of the leaders of the world.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on another blank in the passage that praises books as our friends and guides. It states that books contain all the great something of the leaders of the world. The missing noun must represent what books preserve from great leaders. In educational and motivational writing, authors usually say that books preserve the ideas or thoughts of great leaders. The correct answer should reflect this sense and fit grammatically with the structure great _____ of the leaders. Given Data / Assumptions: - The relevant portion is: The books contain all the great _____ of the leaders of the world. - Options are feel, thoughts, idle and money. - The passage is positive and respectful about books and leaders. - Books are known to preserve ideas, experiences and knowledge. Concept / Approach: We must choose a noun in plural form that can be described as great and that leaders are known for. Thoughts is an obvious candidate because leaders are remembered for their thoughts, ideas and philosophies. Feel in this form does not work as a noun in this position, idle is an adjective that does not match the structure, and money is not what the passage is likely to highlight about leaders in a moral context. The phrase great thoughts of the leaders of the world is a common expression in moral science and value education texts. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert thoughts: The books contain all the great thoughts of the leaders of the world. This makes logical sense and reads smoothly. Step 2: Test feel. The books contain all the great feel of the leaders of the world is ungrammatical, because feel is not used as a countable noun here. Step 3: Test idle. The books contain all the great idle of the leaders of the world is incorrect because idle is an adjective, not a noun, and great idle does not express a clear idea. Step 4: Test money. The books contain all the great money of the leaders of the world sounds strange and contradicts the moral tone; books are valued for preserving wisdom, not wealth. Step 5: Conclude that thoughts is the only option that fits both meaning and grammar. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by thinking about how school textbooks and moral lessons usually speak about leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela or Abraham Lincoln. They are praised for their great thoughts and ideals. Collections of quotations are often titled as great thoughts of world leaders. This reinforces that thoughts is the natural choice. No standard phrase talks about great money of leaders in the context of reading books for moral growth. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Feel is primarily a verb. As a noun, feeling is used instead, and it would still not be ideal in this context. Option C: Idle is an adjective meaning lazy or inactive and cannot fill the blank in this structure. Option D: Money shifts the focus from wisdom to wealth, which does not match the passage's emphasis on books as guides and friends. Common Pitfalls: A few learners might be tempted to think of feeling or ideals, but those words are not offered in the options. It is important not to invent new words, but to work only with the list given and choose the best match from it. Paying attention to part of speech and common collocations will quickly point you to thoughts as the correct answer. Final Answer: The missing noun is thoughts, so option B is correct.

Question 12

In the following passage about the value of books, choose the most appropriate word to complete the blank: Books are our _____ friends.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This final blank from the passage introduces the central metaphor that books are like friends. The writer wants to stress that books are not artificial or temporary companions but faithful and dependable ones. The blank in Books are our _____ friends needs an adjective that emphasises the genuineness and reliability of books as companions. The options offer several adjectives, but only one matches this common metaphor and the moral tone. Given Data / Assumptions: - The sentence is: Books are our _____ friends. - Options are fake, original, real and majestic. - The passage praises books as guides that never fail us. - The author wants to show that books are true and dependable companions. Concept / Approach: In moral and educational writing, the standard phrase is books are our real friends. This highlights that unlike some human friends who may leave us, books remain with us and help us without selfish motives. Fake friends would contradict the message. Original and majestic do not typically pair with friends in this metaphorical sense. Therefore, we should select real as the adjective that fits both the idiom and the sentiment. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Insert real in the sentence: Books are our real friends. This statement is widely used in essays about reading and clearly communicates the intended idea. Step 2: Test fake. Books are our fake friends completely reverses the meaning, suggesting that books pretend to be helpful but are not, which is opposite to the author's praise. Step 3: Test original. Books are our original friends is an unusual phrase and does not carry the meaning of faithful or genuine companionship. Step 4: Test majestic. Books are our majestic friends sounds poetic but does not directly convey the idea of true and loyal friendship that the passage stresses. Step 5: Conclude that real is the only option that fits the metaphor correctly. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this by recalling essays and speeches about reading that you may have studied in school. Many of them contain the line books are our real friends or books are our best friends. This well known expression confirms that real is the appropriate word. The rest of the passage, which describes how books never fail us and help us find answers, supports this interpretation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Fake means not genuine or false. Calling books fake friends would be a criticism, which contradicts the positive description in the passage. Option B: Original does not collocate naturally with friends in this context and would confuse the reader. Option D: Majestic suggests grandeur or impressive beauty, which is not the primary idea here. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to overinterpret the term majestic because it sounds impressive. However, examination passages often rely on simple and familiar phrases, especially in moral lessons. Learners should remember commonly used proverbs and expressions like books are our real friends to quickly recognise the correct word in such blanks. Final Answer: The adjective that best completes the sentence is real, so option C is correct.

Question 13

The question below consists of three labelled fragments P, Q and R that complete the sentence beginning with ‘‘Integrating diversity’’. Select the most logical order of P, Q and R to form a coherent statement.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question involves arranging three sentence fragments P, Q and R to complete the opening phrase Integrating diversity. The fragments describe how integrating diversity relates to governance and international human rights law. The learner must choose the order that produces a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence. Understanding how phrases like goes hand in hand with and which is firmly grounded in international human rights law work together is essential. Given Data / Assumptions: - The initial words provided are: Integrating diversity. - Fragment P: governance which is firmly grounded. - Fragment Q: in international human rights law. - Fragment R: goes hand in hand with. - We must arrange P, Q and R after Integrating diversity to form a clear statement. Concept / Approach: We look for a logical predicate to follow the subject phrase Integrating diversity. The fragment goes hand in hand with is a verbal phrase that naturally follows a subject, giving us Integrating diversity goes hand in hand with. This suggests that R should come immediately after the opening. The expression goes hand in hand with must then be followed by a noun phrase describing what it accompanies. Governance which is firmly grounded in international human rights law is such a noun phrase, and Q completes the prepositional phrase in international human rights law started by P. Therefore, the sequence after Integrating diversity should be R P Q. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the predicate. Since Integrating diversity is the subject like element, we need a verb phrase. Fragment R, goes hand in hand with, provides this verb phrase and fits directly after the subject. Step 2: After R, we need the object of the preposition with. Fragment P begins with governance which is firmly grounded, which can function as the noun phrase following with. Step 3: Fragment P ends with firmly grounded, which requires a complement introduced by in. Fragment Q supplies this complement by giving in international human rights law. Step 4: Combine them: Integrating diversity goes hand in hand with governance which is firmly grounded in international human rights law. This is grammatically correct and conveys a complete idea. Step 5: Map this order of fragments R, P, Q to the options and note that it corresponds to option B, RPQ. Verification / Alternative check: Check the sentence formed by the chosen sequence: Integrating diversity goes hand in hand with governance which is firmly grounded in international human rights law. The message is clear: real integration of diversity is closely connected with governance based on human rights. Now test one of the other options, for example QPR: Integrating diversity in international human rights law governance which is firmly grounded goes hand in hand with. This is grammatically broken, as the verb phrase appears at the end and with has no clear object. This comparison confirms that RPQ is the only sequence that yields a natural sentence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (QPR): Starting with Q after Integrating diversity produces Integrating diversity in international human rights law, which could be acceptable, but placing governance which is firmly grounded next and goes hand in hand with at the end results in an incomplete clause. Option C (PRQ): Beginning with governance which is firmly grounded immediately after Integrating diversity gives Integrating diversity governance which is firmly grounded, which is not grammatical. Option D (QRP): The sequence leads to a sentence where in international human rights law goes hand in hand with governance which is firmly grounded, leaving Integrating diversity hanging at the start, which is awkward. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes ignore verb placement and choose an order that sounds impressive but is not grammatically correct. Another pitfall is to focus only on meaning and not on the function words with and in, which show how phrases fit together. Always identify the subject, verb and object pattern first, then see how the remaining fragments supply necessary complements to verbs and adjectives. Final Answer: The most logical order of fragments is RPQ, so option B is correct.

Question 14

In the following question, a word has been written in four different ways. Only one spelling is correct. Select the correctly spelt word.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests spelling recognition of a common English adjective meaning without interruption. Four different spellings are given, and only one matches the standard spelling found in good dictionaries. Such items check whether candidates have paid attention to written forms while reading and writing English, and they are frequently used in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: - The four variants are Continuous, Continous, Contenuous and Countionuous. - The intended word means ongoing, without a break. - Only one of these options is correctly spelt. - Knowledge of the base word continue may help. Concept / Approach: The correct adjective derived from the verb continue is continuous. The root is c o n t i n u and the suffix is o u s. Any extra letters inserted or letters omitted produce misspellings. The approach is to recall the spelling of continuous from familiar phrases like continuous assessment, continuous rain or continuous process, and then visually match it with the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the base word continue. Adding the suffix ous gives continuous, with the letters arranged as c o n t i n u o u s. Step 2: Compare option A: Continuous. It matches the pattern exactly and is a familiar form. Step 3: Compare option B: Continous. This version misses one u and is therefore incorrect. Step 4: Compare option C: Contenuous. This introduces an extra e and changes the vowel pattern, which is not standard. Step 5: Compare option D: Countionuous. This rearranges letters in a way that does not reflect any known English word. Thus A is the only correctly spelt option. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by recalling the related noun continuity and the verb to continue. Both contain the sequence c o n t i n u. When we add the suffix ous to this sequence, we obtain continuous. A dictionary check will show continuous as the correct adjective meaning without interruption, whereas the other given forms do not appear as valid words. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: Continous omits one u and breaks the link with the base word continue. Option C: Contenuous alters both vowel and consonant positions and does not correspond to the correct root. Option D: Countionuous is a jumbled form that does not match any standard English spelling. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes misplace vowels when adding common adjective endings such as ous or ious. They may write continous by analogy with words like famous, which have only one u. Paying attention to the exact spelling of base words and practising word families avoids such errors. Reading widely and noticing spellings in context is one of the best long term strategies for improvement. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Continuous, so option A is correct.

Question 15

In the following question, a word has been written in four different ways out of which only one is correctly spelt. Select the correctly spelt word.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question focuses on the adjective that means helpful or producing good results. The term is frequently used in academic and professional contexts. The learner is presented with four similar looking spellings and must pick the standard correct one. Mastery of such words is important for clear writing in examinations and formal communication. Given Data / Assumptions: - Four variants are given: Beneficial, Benfical, Benaficial and Beneficle. - The intended word means helpful, advantageous or producing benefits. - Only one option follows standard dictionary spelling. Concept / Approach: The word beneficial is derived from benefit. When forming the adjective, the root e is retained and the ending changes to icial, giving beneficial. Recognising the pattern b e n e f i c i a l helps distinguish the correct spelling from incorrect variations that drop or change vowels and consonants. The best strategy is to recall familiar phrases like beneficial effects, beneficial impact or mutually beneficial agreement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the spelling of benefit and consider how adjectives are formed with the suffix icial, as in artificial or superficial. Step 2: Combine benefit with icial to get beneficial, spelt b e n e f i c i a l. This matches option A exactly. Step 3: Option B, Benfical, drops vowels and rearranges letters, making it an incorrect form. Step 4: Option C, Benaficial, incorrectly uses a in place of e after ben, breaking the link with benefit. Step 5: Option D, Beneficle, replaces the ending icial with icle, which is not how the word is formed. Therefore, Beneficial is the only correct option. Verification / Alternative check: We can confirm by checking other related words: beneficially and beneficiary both keep the bene root that comes from Latin for good. This supports the bene spelling at the start of beneficial. A dictionary or spell checker will recognise Beneficial as valid and mark the other forms as incorrect, which verifies our choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B: Benfical removes necessary vowels and does not reflect the standard pattern of the word family based on benefit. Option C: Benaficial wrongly introduces a where e should be, making the root unclear. Option D: Beneficle changes the ending, which alters the word and produces a non standard form. Common Pitfalls: Because beneficial contains several vowels, students often misplace or omit one of them. Another pitfall is confusing similar endings such as icial, ical and icle. Learning words in families, such as benefit, beneficial, beneficiary and benevolent, helps to reinforce the correct spelling patterns and reduces such confusion. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is Beneficial, so option A is correct.

Question 16

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best one-word substitute for the phrase: A system that favours progress and gradual improvement through reforms.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a one word substitute that summarises a descriptive phrase. The phrase describes a system that favours progress and gradual improvement through reforms. Many political and social systems can be either conservative, resisting change, or reformist, supporting change through lawful and gradual means. Recognising the correct abstract noun that names such a belief or system is essential here. Given Data / Assumptions: - The phrase to be replaced is: A system that favours progress and gradual improvement through reforms. - Options are Violation, Impairing, Preservation and Reformism. - The system described values change in a constructive and lawful manner. - We are expected to know common political and social terms. Concept / Approach: The word reforms refers to changes made to improve a system, and a doctrine or movement that supports governing by such reforms is called reformism. Reformism is the belief in gradual change rather than sudden revolution. The other options do not match this idea. Violation relates to breaking rules or laws, impairing means damaging and preservation is about keeping things unchanged. None of these expresses favouring progress through reform. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key elements in the phrase: favours progress, gradual improvement and through reforms. Step 2: Recall that ism often signifies a doctrine, belief or system, such as socialism, capitalism and nationalism. Step 3: Recognise reformism as the doctrine or practice of supporting reforms to achieve progress. Step 4: Compare with other options: Violation means breaking a rule, which is negative; Impairing suggests harming something; Preservation emphasises keeping the existing state. Step 5: Conclude that only Reformism aligns with support for progress through structured reforms. Verification / Alternative check: In political science and history, reformism is used to describe movements that seek change within existing legal and institutional frameworks, for example, reformist wings of political parties that push for welfare policies or administrative improvements. This exactly reflects favouring progress and gradual improvement through reforms. By contrast, a preservationist approach would resist change and aim to conserve existing conditions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Violation concerns breaking or disregarding laws, which has no connection to a system that supports reforms. Option B: Impairing means making something worse, the opposite of improvement. Option C: Preservation refers to protecting something from change, so it conflicts with the idea of progress through reforms. Common Pitfalls: Some students may confuse reformism with revolution or may not distinguish between preserving traditions and reforming them. Another pitfall is to choose preservation because it seems like a formal noun, but its meaning does not match the phrase given. Always break down the descriptive phrase into core ideas and then map those ideas to the nearest technical term or abstract noun. Final Answer: The best one word substitute is Reformism, so option D is correct.

Question 17

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which is the best one-word substitute for the phrase: That which cannot be put out or extinguished.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a one word substitute for the description that which cannot be put out or extinguished. The phrase is often used in relation to flames, lights or even abstract things like hope and spirit. The correct answer should reflect the idea that something cannot be extinguished, that is, it continues to burn or exist. Given Data / Assumptions: - The descriptive phrase is: That which cannot be put out. - Options are Illusion, Indigenous, Incentive and Inextinguishable. - We are looking for an adjective that expresses impossibility of extinguishing. - The prefix in often signals negation in English. Concept / Approach: The verb extinguish means to put out a fire or light, or to bring something to an end. By adding a negative prefix and appropriate adjective ending, we obtain inextinguishable, meaning incapable of being extinguished. The other options belong to completely different semantic fields: illusion relates to false perception, indigenous refers to something native to a place and incentive means a motive or encouragement. Only inextinguishable directly encodes the idea of not being able to be put out. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise the core verb extinguish in the phrase be put out. We need an adjective that negates this capability. Step 2: Check option D, Inextinguishable. It is formed from extinguish with the prefix in and suffix able, meaning not capable of being extinguished. Step 3: Verify that this word is used in contexts like inextinguishable flame or inextinguishable hope, which match the description. Step 4: Compare other options: Illusion is a false idea or perception, Indigenous describes origin, and Incentive refers to a reason to act. None of these link to the idea of being put out. Step 5: Conclude that Inextinguishable is the only option that corresponds directly to the given phrase. Verification / Alternative check: Consider the literal image of a lamp or fire. If it cannot be put out, we might call it an everlasting or inextinguishable flame. In literature and speeches, people also talk about inextinguishable faith or inextinguishable love. These uses confirm that inextinguishable is the standard adjective for that which cannot be extinguished. The stem extinguish provides a clear link between the phrase and the one word answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A: Illusion describes a deceptive appearance or false belief and has nothing to do with extinguishing. Option B: Indigenous refers to something native to a region and does not match the given description. Option C: Incentive means a stimulus or motive, often financial, and again bears no relation to the idea of putting out a flame. Common Pitfalls: Most candidates will find this question straightforward, but some may be distracted by the similar prefixes in indigenous and incentive and choose based on familiarity rather than meaning. To avoid such errors, always connect the descriptive phrase to a root word you know, in this case extinguish, and then look for the correct negative form built from that root. Final Answer: The appropriate one word substitute is Inextinguishable, so option D is correct.

Question 18

In the following question, select the alternative which will best improve the bracketed part of the sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select "No improvement": (Up to) the time he was not here, we were not sure if he would actually come.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of correct prepositions and conjunctions used to express time in English, particularly when we want to say that something continued up to a certain point. It also indirectly checks your sense of tense sequence in complex sentences where one action happens before or up to another action in the past. Given Data / Assumptions: The original sentence uses the bracketed word “Upto”, which is a very common incorrect spelling in Indian English. The structure of the sentence is: “(Up to) the time he was not here, we were not sure if he would actually come.” We are only asked to improve the bracketed part; the rest of the sentence remains as it is. We assume a formal written English context, like an exam or official passage. Concept / Approach: To talk about something continuing up to a point in time, English normally uses “till” or “until”. “Up to” is also possible in some structures, but here the combination “Up to the time he was not here” is awkward and non-standard. Between “till” and “until”, “until” is considered slightly more formal and fits very naturally before “the time he was not here”. Therefore, replacing “Upto” with “Until” gives the most grammatically correct and idiomatic sentence in a formal context. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the function of the bracketed word: it introduces the time up to which we were not sure.Recognise that “Upto” is incorrect; the standard spelling is “up to” (two words).Check the options: “Till”, “To”, “Until”, and “No improvement”.“To the time he was not here” is ungrammatical and incomplete for this meaning.“Till the time he was not here” is understandable but slightly less formal.“Until the time he was not here” is smooth, correct, and formally appropriate.Therefore, “Until” is the best replacement for the bracketed part. Verification / Alternative check: Read the improved sentence: “Until the time he was not here, we were not sure if he would actually come.” A better modern version would be, “Until he arrived, we were not sure if he would actually come,” but within the limits of the question, simply changing “Upto” to “Until” corrects the obvious error and preserves the intended meaning. “No improvement” cannot be correct, because “Upto” itself is wrong in spelling and usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Till” is not wrong in meaning, but exams usually expect the more formal “until” in such structures. “To” does not work here as a time conjunction. “No improvement” would leave us with the incorrect “Upto”, which is non-standard. Only “Until” fully satisfies the requirements of formal grammar and idiomatic usage. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often treat “upto” as one word and assume it is acceptable; however, the correct form is “up to”, and in many exam questions it is deliberately replaced by “till” or “until” to create a more standard structure. Also, remember that “until” is usually preferred in formal writing over “till”. Final Answer: The bracketed part should be replaced with Until.

Question 19

In the following question, out of the four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase “cry in the wilderness”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of idioms in English. The expression “cry in the wilderness” is often used in newspapers, literature and speeches to describe a situation where someone is trying to warn others or draw attention to an important issue, but nobody listens. Knowing idiomatic meanings helps you understand the deeper tone of passages in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom given is “cry in the wilderness”. Four explanatory options are provided. You have to choose the option that captures the established idiomatic meaning, not the literal one. The context is general English usage, especially public warnings or appeals. Concept / Approach: Literally, a “cry in the wilderness” would be a shout or call made in a remote, empty place where nobody is present to hear it. Figuratively, it refers to a warning, request, or complaint that is ignored or not taken seriously by others. The speaker may be right, but the society, authorities, or audience simply do not pay attention. So the emphasis is on “being unheard or unnoticed” rather than on the emotion of the cry itself. Step-by-Step Solution: Focus on the figurative idea: a voice that goes unheard or unheeded.Option A: “A complaint or warning that no one pays attention to” – this directly matches the figurative meaning.Option B: “A loud expression of personal sorrow” – this emphasises volume and sadness, but says nothing about being ignored by others.Option C: “A deliberate attempt to create panic among people” – that would describe fear-mongering, not an ignored warning.Option D: “A sudden but minor disappointment” – this is unrelated to the idea of speaking out without being heard.Thus, Option A correctly expresses the idiom's meaning. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a sample sentence: “Her early climate warnings were a cry in the wilderness; only years later did governments finally listen.” Here, she was warning, but no one paid attention at the time. Replacing “a cry in the wilderness” with “a complaint or warning that no one pays attention to” keeps the meaning intact and makes the sentence fully clear. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B focuses on private sorrow, not public warnings. Option C introduces the idea of intentionally creating panic, which is the opposite of being ignored. Option D talks about minor disappointment, which has nothing to do with calling out to an unresponsive audience. None of these capture the sense of being unheard that defines the idiom. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes misinterpret idioms by sticking too closely to the literal words. With “cry in the wilderness”, they imagine only a sad, lonely person and choose options related to sorrow, but the real focus is on the cry not reaching anyone. Always recall how the phrase is used in real-world contexts like editorials and speeches. Final Answer: The idiom “cry in the wilderness” means a complaint or warning that no one pays attention to.

Question 20

In the following question, out of the given four alternatives, select the alternative which best expresses the meaning of the idiom or phrase “break the ice”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This idiom question tests your understanding of common social expressions in English. “Break the ice” is frequently used in everyday speech, office meetings, interviews and social gatherings. Knowing its meaning helps you understand conversations and passages that talk about initial awkwardness between people who do not know each other well. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom is “break the ice”. Four possible meanings are given. You must choose the option that corresponds to its standard idiomatic use. The context is social interaction where people may feel shy or tense at first. Concept / Approach: Literally, breaking ice means cracking frozen water. Figuratively, “break the ice” means to overcome initial shyness, formality or silence between people and begin friendly conversation. It often refers to the first joke, activity, or remark that makes people relaxed and willing to talk. Therefore, the meaning is very close to “to break the silence” and start interacting with others in a friendly way. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall the figurative meaning: to start a conversation in a tense or unfamiliar situation.Option A: “Bad intention” – has no connection with conversation or social comfort.Option B: “To escape” – describes running away, not starting to talk.Option C: “To break the silence” – matches the idea of starting to talk after an awkward or quiet period.Option D: “To fail” – used in phrases like “breakdown” or “fall through”, not “break the ice”.Thus, Option C is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Use the idiom in a sentence: “The trainer told a funny story at the beginning of the workshop to break the ice.” If we replace it with the chosen meaning, we get: “...to break the silence,” which carries the right idea that he wanted to make participants comfortable and start a friendly interaction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Bad intention” suggests a negative motive, which is not part of this idiom. “To escape” is about leaving a place or situation, not about starting conversation. “To fail” is unrelated; when something fails, we might say it “fell flat” or “collapsed”, but not “broke the ice”. None of these options capture the social context and friendly purpose of “breaking the ice”. Common Pitfalls: Students may overthink and look for deeper metaphors like “bad intention” or “to fail”, but idioms like this are very common in spoken English with straightforward meanings. Remember that “break the ice” almost always appears where two people or groups meet for the first time and someone must start a conversation. Final Answer: The idiom “break the ice” means to break the silence and begin friendly conversation.

English Questions