Question 1

Read each sentence to find out whether there is any error in any part. Select the part that contains an error, or choose No error if the sentence is grammatically correct: Coleridge as well as Wordsworth were of the opinion that the opposite of poet…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error detection question examines your understanding of subject verb agreement when two nouns are joined by as well as. The sentence talks about the poets Coleridge and Wordsworth and their shared opinion about poetry and science. While the meaning may seem clear, there is a subtle grammatical issue related to the verb that must be identified and corrected. Given Data / Assumptions: - The sentence is divided into parts: (a) Coleridge as well as Wordsworth were, (b) of the opinion that the opposite of poetry is, (c) not prose but science, and (d) No error. - The subject phrase uses as well as between two names. - We need to find whether the verb were is correct for this subject construction. Concept / Approach: When two nouns are linked by as well as, along with, together with, and similar expressions, the verb usually agrees with the first noun, which is treated as the main subject. In this sentence, the first noun is Coleridge, which is singular. The phrase as well as Wordsworth adds extra information but does not turn the subject into a true compound plural. Therefore, the verb must also be singular and should be was instead of were. This means that part a is where the error lies. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the subject phrase Coleridge as well as Wordsworth and identify Coleridge as the main subject. Step 2: Recall the rule that as well as does not change the number of the grammatical subject; the verb must agree with the first noun. Step 3: Note that Coleridge is singular and conclude that the verb should be singular was, not plural were. Step 4: Recognise that the rest of the sentence of the opinion that the opposite of poetry is not prose but science is grammatically correct, so the only error is in part a. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence with the correct verb: Coleridge as well as Wordsworth was of the opinion that the opposite of poetry is not prose but science. This version follows the subject verb agreement rule and still clearly communicates that both poets shared the same opinion. The structure is consistent with exam level grammar rules, which treat as well as as an additive phrase rather than a pure coordination creating a plural subject. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Part b: of the opinion that the opposite of poetry is is correct; the verb is properly matches the singular noun opposite. - Part c: not prose but science correctly completes the comparison and contains no grammatical error. - Part d and option e suggesting no error are both incorrect because we have identified a clear subject verb agreement problem in part a. Common Pitfalls: Many exam takers see two names separated by as well as and instinctively choose a plural verb, assuming there is a compound subject. However, exam grammar rules treat this structure differently from simple coordination with and. A good practice is to temporarily remove the as well as phrase and read the sentence with only the first noun. If Coleridge was of the opinion sounds correct and Coleridge were of the opinion sounds wrong, you have a clear hint that the singular verb is required. Final Answer: The error is in Part a; the verb should be singular was, not plural were.

Question 2

Read each sentence to find out whether there is any error in any part. Select the part that contains an error, or choose No error if the sentence is grammatically correct: The boy s parents pleaded with the Principal that they were too poor to pay h…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error detection question presents a sentence that appears slightly awkward at first glance, and you must decide whether there is any grammatical mistake in any part. The sentence describes the parents of a boy speaking to the Principal about their inability to pay the tuition fee. The challenge is to distinguish between slightly formal but acceptable structures and genuinely incorrect grammar. Given Data / Assumptions: - Part a: The boy s parents. - Part b: pleaded with the Principal. - Part c: that they were too poor to pay his tuition fee. - Part d: No error. - The context is a polite request made to a school Principal regarding fees. Concept / Approach: In English, the verb plead can be followed either by with plus a person or by that plus a clause, depending on the structure. In this sentence, we have pleaded with the Principal that they were too poor to pay his tuition fee. This combines both patterns but remains grammatically acceptable in formal reported speech, because the that clause explains the content of their plea. The pronouns they and his are also acceptable, since they refers to the parents and his to the boy. Therefore, although the sentence is somewhat long, it does not actually violate standard grammar rules and is treated as correct in exam keys. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part a and confirm that The boy s parents correctly expresses whose parents they are. Step 2: Check part b, pleaded with the Principal, and note that plead with someone is a valid and common pattern. Step 3: Look at part c, that they were too poor to pay his tuition fee, and recognise this as a that clause giving the reason for their plea, which is acceptable in this context. Step 4: Since no part contains a clear grammatical error, select Part d, No error, as the answer. Verification / Alternative check: Read an alternative but equally correct version of the sentence: The boy s parents pleaded with the Principal that they were too poor to pay his tuition fee. Many standard grammar explanations accept this combination of pleaded with and a that clause, because the with phrase specifies whom they addressed and the that clause reports what they said. The overall tense sequence and pronoun reference are consistent and clear, so the sentence functions properly in formal English. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Part a: correctly identifies the parents by referring to the boy; there is no error in number or case. - Part b: uses pleaded with the Principal, which is an acceptable verb preposition combination. - Part c: properly introduces a reason clause with that they were too poor to pay his tuition fee and maintains correct tense and pronoun use. - Part e suggesting errors in more than one part is clearly incorrect, because we have not found any genuine grammatical violation in any section. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates feel uneasy about combining pleaded with and a that clause and therefore assume there is an error. However, exam questions sometimes include sentences that are fully correct to test whether you can confidently choose No error instead of forcing a correction. A good strategy is to check subject verb agreement, preposition use, pronoun reference, and tense consistency systematically. If all of these are in order, it is often safe to accept the sentence as correct even if the wording feels slightly formal or old fashioned. Final Answer: The sentence is grammatically correct, so the right choice is Part d: No error.

Question 3

Read each sentence to find out whether there is any error in any part. Select the part that contains an error, or choose No error if the sentence is grammatically correct: That Brutus, who was his trusted friend had attacked on him caused heartbreak…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This error detection question is based on a sentence about Julius Caesar and Brutus. It tests your understanding of verb and preposition combinations, especially in the phrase attacked on him. The sentence is intended to describe that Brutus, who was a trusted friend, attacked Caesar, and this betrayal broke Caesar s heart. You must find the part that is grammatically incorrect. Given Data / Assumptions: - Part a: That Brutus, who was his trusted friend. - Part b: had attacked on him. - Part c: caused heartbreak to Julius Caesar. - Part d: No error. - The structure describes a past action that deeply hurt Julius Caesar emotionally. Concept / Approach: The main grammatical issue lies in the use of the verb attack. In standard English, attack is a transitive verb that takes a direct object without a preposition. We say attacked him, not attacked on him. The presence of on after attacked is incorrect. The correct phrase should be had attacked him. The rest of the sentence, while slightly heavy, is grammatically acceptable in exam English and clearly expresses that this act of betrayal caused heartbreak. Therefore, the error is in part b. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read part a and confirm that That Brutus, who was his trusted friend is a correct relative clause giving background about Brutus. Step 2: Examine part b and notice the phrase had attacked on him, where the preposition on seems unnecessary. Step 3: Recall that attack is used directly with a person or object, so the correct form is had attacked him. Step 4: Check part c and see that caused heartbreak to Julius Caesar is grammatically fine, so the only clear error is in part b. Verification / Alternative check: Rewrite the sentence correctly: That Brutus, who was his trusted friend, had attacked him caused heartbreak to Julius Caesar. For even better style, commas can be added for clarity, but the key grammatical correction is the removal of on. With this change, the sentence follows standard transitive verb usage. No other part of the sentence breaks basic rules of tense or agreement, so it is reasonable to identify part b as the sole error for exam purposes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Part a: correctly introduces Brutus and gives a relative clause who was his trusted friend; this structure is acceptable. - Part c: caused heartbreak to Julius Caesar appropriately uses the verb caused with the noun heartbreak and the preposition to to mark the person affected. - Part d and option e both suggesting no error are incorrect because the incorrect preposition on after attacked is a clear and standard grammatical mistake in exam level English. Common Pitfalls: Some learners become distracted by the overall complexity of the sentence and do not examine each verb phrase carefully. Others may feel that attack on is justified by analogy with similar sounding expressions. However, you should remember that many English verbs have fixed patterns and must be memorised. In practice, a quick test is to ask whether the verb normally appears with that preposition in reliable written sources. In the case of attack, the correct pattern is always attack someone or attack something without on. Final Answer: The error is in Part b; the phrase should be had attacked him, not had attacked on him.

Question 4

Convert the following direct speech into indirect speech by choosing the most appropriate option: The old man said, "Thanks, I shall never forget this kindness, Ankit."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to change a sentence from direct speech to indirect speech. The original sentence shows an old man expressing gratitude to Ankit and adding a promise that he will never forget the kindness. To convert it correctly, you must change the reporting verb, adjust the pronouns and tenses, and preserve both the thanks and the assurance in a clear and natural indirect form. Given Data / Assumptions: - Direct speech: The old man said, Thanks, I shall never forget this kindness, Ankit. - The speaker is the old man and the listener is Ankit. - The message contains two parts: a thank you and a promise never to forget the kindness. - We must choose the option that reports both elements accurately in indirect speech. Concept / Approach: In reported speech, the reporting verb said often changes to a more specific verb like thanked when the content of the speech is clearly an expression of gratitude. Also, when converting from shall in direct speech to indirect speech, with a third person subject, we generally use would. The pronoun I in direct speech refers to the old man, so in indirect speech it becomes he. The word this, referring to the kindness just experienced, becomes that in indirect speech. A correct answer should therefore read that the old man thanked Ankit and assured him that he would never forget his kindness. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Replace the reporting verb said with thanked, which accurately reflects the act of expressing gratitude. Step 2: Transform the sentence I shall never forget this kindness into he would never forget his kindness, changing I to he, shall to would, and this to his or that, depending on the structure. Step 3: Join the two ideas by adding assured him that to report the promise part of the speech. Step 4: Check the option that contains all these elements in a clear and grammatically correct indirect form. Verification / Alternative check: Option B reads: The old man thanked Ankit and assured him that he would never forget his kindness. This version correctly captures the act of thanking, uses assured to convey the promise, and applies the standard tense change from shall to would in reported speech. It also maintains correct pronoun reference, with he referring to the old man and him to Ankit. No other option includes both the thanks and the assurance in such an accurate and complete way. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - The old man applauded Ankit for his kindness and he shall never forget Ankit: applauded is not the right verb for giving thanks, and the clause he shall never forget Ankit changes the meaning from gratitude for kindness to not forgetting the person, which is different. - Ankit was being thanked by the old man for his kindness towards an old man: this passive construction is clumsy and fails to express the promise about never forgetting the kindness. - The old man said thank you to Ankit for his kindness: this reports the thanks but omits the assurance that he would never forget the kindness. - The old man told Ankit that thanks would never be forgotten: this is awkward and changes the focus from the old man s memory to an abstract thanks, losing the original sense. Common Pitfalls: Students often focus only on the first part of the direct speech and ignore additional clauses such as promises or threats. In such questions, always identify all components of the original message and ensure that the chosen indirect speech option preserves them. Also, be careful with pronoun and tense changes. The form shall in direct speech very often becomes would when reported, especially with first or third person subjects in past reporting. Final Answer: The correct indirect speech is: The old man thanked Ankit and assured him that he would never forget his kindness.

Question 5

In the following question, four spellings are given. Select the correctly spelt word related to careful and persistent effort.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This spelling question tests your ability to recognise the standard English spelling of a common abstract noun. The word in focus means careful and persistent effort or hard work, especially in tasks that require attention to detail. Correct spelling is important in formal writing, examinations, and professional communication, and confusing vowels or consonant patterns is a frequent source of errors. Given Data / Assumptions: - The task is to choose the correct spelling of the word meaning steady, careful effort. - The options are deligence, diligence, delegence, dilegence, and dilligence. - Only one of these forms is recognized in standard dictionaries. Concept / Approach: The correct English word is diligence, spelled d i l i g e n c e. It comes from the Latin word diligentia, meaning attentiveness or carefulness. Many incorrect spellings arise because learners misplace the vowel i or insert extra consonants. A good strategy is to break the word into parts: dil i gence. Only this pattern matches dictionary usage. All other options either alter the vowels, double consonants unnecessarily, or rearrange letters in a way that is not accepted. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the standard form of the word used in phrases like due diligence and hard work and diligence. Step 2: Compare each option with the remembered pattern d i l i g e n c e. Step 3: Identify option b, diligence, as exactly matching the correct arrangement of letters. Step 4: Confirm that all other options contain at least one incorrect vowel or consonant arrangement. Verification / Alternative check: You can test your memory by placing the word in a common phrase: He completed the project with great diligence. In this context, the spelling diligence looks familiar and correct. Checking a standard dictionary will also confirm that diligence is the accepted spelling. None of the other forms appear as headwords in reliable references, which reinforces that they are simply distractors designed to confuse people who are unsure of the exact order of letters. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - deligence: uses e instead of i after d, which does not match the standard spelling pattern. - delegence: changes both internal vowels and differs from any recognised English form of the word. - dilegence: mixes the order of vowels and does not exist as a standard word. - dilligence: doubles the consonant l unnecessarily; the correct form has only one l. Common Pitfalls: Spelling mistakes often come from hearing a word and trying to guess its letters without having seen it in print often enough. Words derived from Latin or French can be particularly tricky, because their spellings do not always match their pronunciation exactly. To avoid such errors, it helps to read widely, note down difficult words, and revise them regularly. Paying attention to common exam words like diligence can significantly boost your spelling accuracy in competitive tests. Final Answer: The correctly spelt word is diligence.

Question 6

Select the best one word substitute for the following description: Having a limited or narrow outlook or scope.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks you to choose the most appropriate one word substitute for a descriptive phrase. The phrase having a limited or narrow outlook or scope is often used in discussions of attitudes, policies, or ways of thinking. In competitive exams, you are frequently tested on precise adjectives that summarise such descriptions in a single word. Given Data / Assumptions: - The description is having a limited or narrow outlook or scope. - Options: Indulgent, Parochial, Egotistical, Liberal, Expansive. - We need a word commonly used to criticise a restricted or narrowly focused viewpoint, especially in social or political contexts. Concept / Approach: The word parochial is often used to describe an outlook that is limited, narrow, or concerned only with local or small scale interests. It originally relates to a parish but has gained a broader figurative meaning. Indulgent means overly lenient, egotistical means self centred, liberal suggests open mindedness, and expansive means wide or extensive. None of these captures the specific idea of a narrow outlook. Therefore, parochial is the most accurate one word substitute. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key idea in the description: limited or narrow outlook or scope. Step 2: Recall adjectives used in criticism of narrow minded policies or attitudes; parochial is one such term. Step 3: Compare the meaning of parochial with the definitions of indulgent, egotistical, liberal, and expansive. Step 4: Confirm that only parochial directly expresses narrowness of perspective, while the others point to different personality traits or attitudes. Verification / Alternative check: If you place the candidate words in a test sentence such as The committee took a very narrow view on this issue, the best replacement is The committee took a very parochial view on this issue. Using indulgent, egotistical, liberal, or expansive here either changes the meaning or produces an unnatural sentence. Standard dictionaries describe parochial as having a limited or narrow outlook, which exactly matches the question phrase. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Indulgent: means being overly generous or lenient, especially with someone s faults; it does not imply narrowness of outlook. - Egotistical: describes someone who is excessively self centred or self important, which is different from having a limited scope of interest in the world. - Liberal: usually means open minded, tolerant, or favouring reform; this is actually closer to the opposite of narrow outlook. - Expansive: suggests wide, open, or extensive, again the opposite of limited or narrow. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse parochial with provincial or local without realising that in modern usage it often carries a critical tone about restricted thinking. It is important to associate such words with example sentences and contexts so that you can quickly recall their connotations. Also, note that exam setters often include one or two options that are near opposites of the right answer to test whether you are paying attention to the exact direction of meaning. Final Answer: The best one word substitute is Parochial.

Question 7

Select the best one word substitute for the phrase: Very rude or coarse; vulgar.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks your understanding of precise adjectives that describe behaviour and language. The phrase given is very rude or coarse; vulgar, which is commonly used in social and literary discussions. You must select the word that most accurately captures this sense of something being offensive in taste or manners rather than simply referring to physical size or appearance. Given Data / Assumptions: - The phrase to be replaced is very rude or coarse; vulgar. - Options: gross, adipose, porcine, corpulent, boisterous. - Only one of these is primarily used to describe behaviour or language that is crude or offensive. Concept / Approach: The adjective gross has several meanings, one of which refers to something that is very unpleasant, rude, or vulgar, especially in taste, behaviour, or language. It can also mean total or overall, but in the context of this question, the behavioural meaning is clearly intended. The other options all relate more to body fat, animals, or noisy behaviour and do not match the specific idea of vulgarity. Therefore, gross is the most suitable one word substitute. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the core idea of the phrase: rude, coarse, and vulgar behaviour or language. Step 2: Recall the meanings of gross, adipose, porcine, corpulent, and boisterous. Step 3: Match gross to this meaning, noting that it is often used to describe crude jokes or offensive behaviour. Step 4: Eliminate words that refer mainly to fatness, animals, or loud energy rather than vulgarity. Verification / Alternative check: Consider a test sentence: His remarks at the meeting were very rude and vulgar. We can rewrite this as His remarks at the meeting were gross, which is natural and widely used. Replacing with adipose, porcine, or corpulent is meaningless here because those words describe physical fatness. Boisterous describes noisy and energetic behaviour and does not necessarily carry the idea of vulgar or coarse language. Therefore, only gross fits well. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - adipose: refers to fatty tissue; it is a biological term and has no connection with manners or speech. - porcine: means relating to or resembling a pig; it is sometimes used metaphorically but does not specifically mean vulgar in the sense used here. - corpulent: describes someone who is very fat or obese, again purely physical and not about rudeness. - boisterous: means noisy, energetic, and cheerful; someone boisterous may be loud, but the word does not inherently mean vulgar or coarse. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse words that appear frequently in one context with broader meanings than they actually have. For example, knowing that corpulent and adipose relate to fatness may tempt you to choose them if you overlook the focus on rudeness and vulgarity. Vocabulary questions require paying close attention to the context implied by the descriptive phrase. Always ask yourself whether the candidate word would comfortably fit into a natural sentence about behaviour or speech, not just any property. Final Answer: The best one word substitute for very rude or coarse; vulgar is gross.

Question 8

Rearrange the parts of the sentence in correct order to form a meaningful sentence: In Tamil Nadu, P: cows and bulls are worshipped and celebrated Q: on Maattu Pongal, R: and the finale is Jallikattu.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence rearrangement question deals with a cultural description from Tamil Nadu. You are given three parts P, Q, and R, and you must place them after the introductory phrase In Tamil Nadu to create a clear and grammatically correct sentence. The sentence describes how cows and bulls are honoured on Maattu Pongal and mentions Jallikattu as the finale. Given Data / Assumptions: - Introductory phrase: In Tamil Nadu, - P: cows and bulls are worshipped and celebrated. - Q: on Maattu Pongal, - R: and the finale is Jallikattu. - We need to find the order that produces a smooth, natural sentence about the festival. Concept / Approach: The sentence structure should first state what happens, then when it happens, and finally add the detail about the finale. After the introductory phrase In Tamil Nadu, it makes sense to introduce the main subject and verb: cows and bulls are worshipped and celebrated. This is part P. Next we specify the occasion or time: on Maattu Pongal, which is part Q. Finally, we add the additional information about the finale event: and the finale is Jallikattu, which is part R. Hence, the most logical order is P R Q or P Q R, depending on how you want to place the finale clause. However, the smoothest and widely accepted sequence is PRQ, giving a sentence where the finale information directly follows the main clause and the time phrase closes the sentence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Place P after the opening phrase to get In Tamil Nadu, cows and bulls are worshipped and celebrated, which introduces the main idea. Step 2: Decide whether to add the finale clause or the time clause next. Adding R immediately keeps the focus on the cultural practices, reading and the finale is Jallikattu. Step 3: Attach Q at the end, on Maattu Pongal, to specify the festival day when all this takes place. Step 4: Read the full sentence: In Tamil Nadu, cows and bulls are worshipped and celebrated and the finale is Jallikattu on Maattu Pongal, and confirm that it is meaningful and coherent. Verification / Alternative check: Test other orders quickly. Starting with Q after the introduction gives In Tamil Nadu, on Maattu Pongal, cows and bulls are worshipped and celebrated and the finale is Jallikattu, which is also grammatically possible, but does not match the option tags exactly. Among the given coded options, PRQ best reflects a smooth narrative: activity, finale, and then the festival name. The alternatives like QRP or QPR break the natural introduction of the main subject and may sound less direct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - QRP: starting with on Maattu Pongal immediately after In Tamil Nadu places the time phrase too early and separates it from the main clause in an unnatural way when combined with the remaining parts. - QPR and RPQ: these orders disturb the simple flow from who is celebrated, to what special event happens, to when it all occurs. - PQR (not marked as correct in this key) would also be possible in real language but is not the encoded correct option in this set; the test expects PRQ based on the provided answer scheme. Common Pitfalls: When rearranging sentences, students sometimes focus only on grammatical correctness and forget about natural information flow. A good approach is to introduce the main actor and action immediately after any introductory phrase, then add time or place and finally any additional detail. For cultural descriptions, this approach usually produces the clearest and most exam friendly sentence order. Final Answer: The correct sequence according to the options is PRQ.

Question 9

Select the synonym that best matches the phrasal meaning to alight (in the sense of getting down from a vehicle).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question tests your understanding of phrasal verbs and their synonyms. The word to alight, in the context of travel, means to get down from a bus, train, or other vehicle. Many competitive exams ask you to select a word that closely matches such meanings, so it is important to know which verbs are commonly used in connection with passengers and vehicles. Given Data / Assumptions: - The phrase to alight is used here in the sense of getting down from a vehicle. - Options: to escalate, to clamber, to disembark, to astride, to ascend. - Only one of these is a standard verb for getting off a boat, bus, train, or aircraft. Concept / Approach: The verb disembark is commonly used to mean get off a ship, aircraft, or other vehicle. It is a formal equivalent of get down or get off. The other options have different meanings: escalate relates to increase or intensify, clamber describes climbing with difficulty, astride refers to sitting or standing with a leg on each side, and ascend means to go up. Therefore, the only word that correctly matches alight in this transport context is disembark. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the specific meaning of alight intended here, which is getting down from a vehicle, not catching fire or shining. Step 2: Recall which verb among the options is used in formal English to mean get off a means of transport. Step 3: Identify disembark as the standard term for passengers leaving a ship, aircraft, or other vehicle. Step 4: Eliminate verbs that describe climbing up, increasing, or sitting astride something rather than getting down. Verification / Alternative check: Consider an example: Passengers are requested to alight at the next stop. We can rewrite this as Passengers are requested to disembark at the next stop, which keeps the same meaning. Using escalate, clamber, astride, or ascend in this sentence would produce nonsense or a very different meaning. Standard dictionaries confirm that disembark means leave a ship, aircraft, or other vehicle, and is therefore the closest synonym to alight in this sense. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - to escalate: means to increase or intensify a situation, for example, a conflict can escalate; it has nothing to do with movement from a vehicle. - to clamber: describes climbing or moving with difficulty using both hands and feet, usually up or over something, not simply getting off a bus or train. - to astride: refers to positioning oneself with a leg on each side of something, as when sitting on a horse or rail; it is not about getting down from a vehicle. - to ascend: means to go up or rise, which is the opposite direction of getting down from a vehicle. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse alight with words that involve climbing or mounting because they associate journeys with both boarding and leaving. The key is to focus on down versus up. To alight in this context is close to get off or get down, so you should look for a verb that clearly expresses downward or outward movement from a vehicle. Disembark is a useful formal synonym to remember for ships and aircraft, and it often appears in exam passages about travel or tourism. Final Answer: The best synonym for to alight in this context is to disembark.

Question 10

In the following question, select the option that best expresses the meaning of the given word: Lucrative.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question focuses on the adjective lucrative. The word is frequently used in business, finance, and career related discussions. Understanding it helps you interpret passages about jobs, investments, and opportunities in newspapers or exam texts. You must select the option that is closest in meaning to the word as it is commonly used in such contexts. Given Data / Assumptions: - Target word: lucrative. - Options: Impoverished, Worthwhile, Useless, Inconsiderable, Costly. - We assume the standard meaning of lucrative in relation to money or profit, not emotional reward. Concept / Approach: Lucrative describes something that produces a lot of money or profit. Typical collocations include lucrative job, lucrative business, or lucrative contract. Among the options, worthwhile comes closest in sense, because a worthwhile activity is rewarding and often profitable, especially in financial contexts. The other options describe poverty, lack of value, insignificance, or high expense, none of which captures the idea of generating profit. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that lucrative is used to talk about things that make a good amount of money. Step 2: Examine each option and check whether it carries a positive sense of profit or value. Step 3: Note that worthwhile indicates something that gives benefits or returns that justify the effort or cost, which matches the profitable aspect. Step 4: Confirm that all other options either have negative meanings or refer to unrelated ideas. Verification / Alternative check: Test the word in a sentence: He left his low paying job for a more lucrative career in technology. If we replace lucrative with worthwhile, the sentence becomes He left his low paying job for a more worthwhile career in technology, which still suggests better returns and a more rewarding path. Replacing it with impoverished, useless, inconsiderable, or costly would distort the meaning completely. Although in strict dictionary terms lucrative is closest to profitable, in the given options worthwhile is the best available match because it suggests strong value and benefit. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Impoverished: means very poor, lacking money or resources; this is almost the opposite of lucrative and cannot describe a job or deal that yields good profit. - Useless: means of no use or value; a useless job or investment certainly does not suggest profit. - Inconsiderable: describes something insignificant or unimportant; it fails to capture any idea of strong profit or reward. - Costly: focuses on high expense and does not necessarily indicate good returns; something can be costly and still not be lucrative. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes learners confuse lucrative with expensive or high status, and may be tempted by options like costly. However, lucrative primarily refers to returns, not costs. A good memory trick is to link lucrative with lucrative profits or lucrative returns. In exam preparation, group words like profitable, remunerative, and lucrative together so that you remember their shared association with financial gain. Final Answer: The option that best expresses the meaning of lucrative is Worthwhile.

Question 11

In the passage about transformational technical skills, which word best completes the sentence: "In the first place, he must know ______ skill and what level of skill should be applied on a particular student"?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is taken from a passage about technical skill and transformational teaching. The line being tested describes a teacher who needs to choose the correct technical skill and level of that skill for each student. The blank tests knowledge of relative interrogative words such as which, when, while, and who, and how they fit into a complex noun clause in formal English. Given Data / Assumptions: The key sentence is: He must know ______ skill and what level of skill should be applied on a particular student. The teacher is choosing between different possible skills. The four options are when, which, while, and who. The blank must complete a noun phrase that functions as the object of must know. Concept / Approach: In English, when we select from a known set or range of items, we use the word which. The clause which skill and what level of skill should be applied describes exactly what the teacher must know. The word when is used for time, while for contrast between two clauses, and who for people. None of those words correctly introduces a choice among different skills. The structure must know which skill and what level of skill is grammatically and logically correct, because which directly refers to selection among alternatives. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the verb and its object: must know (something). That something is a complex noun phrase beginning with the blank.Step 2: Notice that skill is a countable noun here, implying a choice from several possible skills.Step 3: Recognise that which is the standard determiner used when choosing between known or limited options, as in which book or which method.Step 4: Test when in the blank: when skill and what level sounds wrong because when introduces time, not selection.Step 5: Test while and who; while skill is not grammatical, and who skill is impossible because who refers to persons, not to skills. Therefore, which is the only word that yields a natural, meaningful clause: which skill and what level of skill should be applied. Verification / Alternative check: Read the completed sentence aloud: There are two things a teacher should understand regarding transformational technical skills. In the first place, he must know which skill and what level of skill should be applied on a particular student. This sounds like clear, standard academic English. If we insert any of the other options, the sentence becomes either ungrammatical or illogical. For example, must know when skill is impossible; must know who skill wrongly personifies skill; must know while skill cannot function as a noun phrase at all. Only which fits both grammatically and semantically. Why Other Options Are Wrong: When introduces clauses of time, such as when the lesson begins, and cannot be used as a determiner with skill in this way. While is used to contrast two actions or situations and does not modify nouns directly. Who is a pronoun used for people, not for abstract things like skills, so it cannot stand before skill. None of these words can introduce a meaningful object for must know in this sentence. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse which and what in complex noun phrases. Here, however, the exam does not even offer what, forcing you to focus on the clear choice. Another pitfall is reading too quickly and thinking when might fit because teaching and timing are connected, but the grammar of the phrase immediately rules that out. Training yourself to check both meaning and sentence structure will help you avoid such traps. Final Answer: The sentence should read he must know which skill and what level of skill should be applied, so the correct option is which (option B).

Question 12

In the sentence "The first and decisive step in the expansion of Europe overseas was the conquest of Atlantic Ocean", which part contains the grammatical error?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is an error-spotting question that checks your understanding of correct article usage in English, especially with geographical names such as oceans and seas. The sentence describes a historical step in the expansion of Europe overseas and is divided into three numbered parts plus a No error option. Your task is to identify which part contains the grammatical or usage error. Given Data / Assumptions: Part 1: The first and decisive step Part 2: in the expansion of Europe overseas Part 3: was the conquest of Atlantic Ocean. Part 4: No error. The noun phrase Atlantic Ocean is a proper geographical name. Concept / Approach: In standard English, when naming oceans and seas, we normally use the definite article the. For example, the Atlantic Ocean, the Indian Ocean, the Pacific Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea. In the given sentence, the phrase of Atlantic Ocean lacks the definite article and therefore sounds incomplete and ungrammatical. The rest of the sentence is structurally sound: the subject, verb, and prepositional phrases are correctly formed. Thus, the error is confined to part 3, where the article the is missing before Atlantic Ocean. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Examine part 1: The first and decisive step. This phrase uses correct adjectives and article for step; there is no issue.Step 2: Examine part 2: in the expansion of Europe overseas. This prepositional phrase is grammatically correct and idiomatic.Step 3: Examine part 3: was the conquest of Atlantic Ocean. Here, the structure requires the conquest of the Atlantic Ocean.Step 4: Recall the rule: we normally say the Atlantic Ocean, not simply Atlantic Ocean, except in certain shortened headings or labels.Step 5: Conclude that part 3 contains the error because it omits the definite article the before Atlantic Ocean. Verification / Alternative check: If we correct part 3, the sentence becomes: The first and decisive step in the expansion of Europe overseas was the conquest of the Atlantic Ocean. This is a smooth and grammatically correct sentence. If we attempted to adjust any of the other parts, we would either break correct structures or lose the original meaning. The phrase expansion of Europe overseas is a standard historical expression, and the first and decisive step is a proper noun phrase. Therefore, the only correction needed is the insertion of the in part 3. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option 1 contains a clear and correct noun phrase with appropriate adjectives. Option 2 is a balanced prepositional phrase with no article or preposition errors. Option 4, No error, cannot be correct because we have identified a specific and well known rule violation in part 3. Thus, options 1, 2, and 4 do not contain the error the examiner is testing. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes overlook fixed rules about articles with geographical names, focusing instead on more complex grammar like tenses or subject verb agreement. Another common mistake is to suspect expansion of Europe overseas or first and decisive step because they sound more abstract. To avoid such pitfalls, remember that large water bodies like oceans and seas almost always take the article the in full sentences. Final Answer: The error lies in the phrase of Atlantic Ocean, which should be of the Atlantic Ocean, so the incorrect part is 3, making option C correct.

Question 13

In the sentence "Success is achieved twice, once in the mind and the second time in the ______ world", which word best completes the blank?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sentence completion question comes from a motivational context that contrasts inner preparation with outer achievement. It suggests that success first happens in imagination or planning and then occurs again when goals are actually accomplished. The blank at the end of the sentence asks you to choose which type of world best contrasts with the mind and fits standard motivational language. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence reads: Success is achieved twice, once in the mind and the second time in the ______ world. The options are real, virtual, fantasy, and artificial. Success in the mind refers to mental rehearsal, planning, or visualisation. The second success is meant to indicate practical, outward achievement. Concept / Approach: In motivational and self help writing, there is a very common contrast between the mind and the real world. First you see success in your thoughts, then you work and see it in real life. Real world is a fixed phrase used to describe actual conditions, responsibilities, and results outside imagination. Virtual, fantasy, and artificial refer to non actual or simulated environments, which would not reflect the intended message about concrete achievement. Therefore, real is the only option that produces a natural and meaningful expression: in the real world. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the sentence sets up a clear contrast: inner world of the mind versus an outer, practical world.Step 2: Recall the common phrase real world, which is widely used to describe life outside theory or imagination.Step 3: Test the option real in the blank: Success is achieved twice, once in the mind and the second time in the real world. This sounds fully idiomatic.Step 4: Test virtual, fantasy, and artificial; each of these suggests something unreal or simulated, contradicting the idea of actual fulfilment of goals.Step 5: Conclude that real is the only option that matches the message and standard English usage. Verification / Alternative check: When people talk about education, careers, or personal development, they often say that something must work in the real world, or that students are not ready for the real world. The same kind of language appears in motivational statements about success: you imagine success and then create it in the real world. If we insert virtual world, the meaning shifts to a computer generated or online environment, which is not the general idea here. Fantasy world suggests daydreaming rather than genuine achievement. Artificial world describes something unnatural or man made, again not the normal phrase in this context. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Virtual typically refers to computer simulations or online spaces, such as virtual reality or virtual classrooms. Fantasy suggests imagination, unreality, or fiction, which would mean success never leaves the mind, contradicting the intended contrast. Artificial often implies fake or unnatural, which clashes with the positive idea of true success. None of these words produces the established phrase that matches how this idea is usually expressed. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes exam takers overthink and are tempted by more unusual words like virtual because they feel modern or technical. However, questions in this section usually rely on standard phrases. When you see a familiar motivational structure like once in the mind and the second time in the..., recalling the very common expression real world will quickly guide you to the correct answer. Final Answer: The blank should be filled with real, giving the sentence: Success is achieved twice, once in the mind and the second time in the real world (option A).

Question 14

In the passage about mastery of words and effective speaking, the sentence "Every speaker's aim is to be heard and _________" is best completed by which word?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question comes from a passage on the power of words and effective oral communication. The line being tested describes the basic goal of any speaker addressing an audience. It states that every speaker wants not only to be heard but also something more. You must choose the word that logically and grammatically completes this idea in standard English. Given Data / Assumptions: The target sentence is: Every speaker's aim is to be heard and ________. The options are understand, understandable, understood, and understandably. The structure to be heard and ________ calls for a parallel form after and. Heard is a past participle used in a passive infinitive: to be heard. Concept / Approach: In English, when we join two passive infinitives with and, we normally repeat the past participle form: to be heard and understood, to be seen and appreciated, and so on. The word understand is a base form verb and does not fit this pattern. Understandable is an adjective meaning easy to understand, and understandably is an adverb. Neither of those continues the passive structure that started with heard. The aim of a speaker is clearly to be heard and understood by the audience, so understood is the only grammatically and logically correct option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the grammatical pattern: is to be heard and ________.Step 2: Notice that heard is a past participle used with be in a passive infinitive construction.Step 3: Maintain parallel structure. The phrase should read to be heard and understood, with both participles matching in form.Step 4: Test each option. Understand yields to be heard and understand, which breaks the grammatical pattern.Step 5: Understandable and understandably are an adjective and an adverb; they cannot directly follow and after be heard without changing the structure. Understood is a past participle and completes the passive infinitive correctly. Verification / Alternative check: Read the full passage idea with the correct choice: The most powerful and perfect expression of thought and feeling through oral language comes from mastery of words. Nothing is better suited to lead speakers and readers into control of English than the command of phrases that exactly express thought. Every speaker's aim is to be heard and understood. This version is clear and idiomatic. Substituting understandable would produce to be heard and understandable, which describes the speaker as understandable but breaks the passive verb pattern. Using understandably would suggest to be heard and understandably, which is not meaningful. Only understood preserves the natural collocation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Understand is a bare infinitive and cannot simply follow and in this structure; the sentence would need a different construction, such as to be heard and to understand others, which is not what the passage says. Understandable and understandably change the part of speech and create awkward phrasing that does not match the original focus on what happens to the speaker words in the minds of listeners. The passage is clearly concerned with whether the audience grasps the meaning, that is, whether the words are understood. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse the past participle understood with the base verb understand, especially in passive constructions. A simple trick is to check if the first verb in the pair is a past participle; if so, the second usually should be too. Recognising patterns like heard and understood, seen and admired, or respected and remembered can speed up your decision in exam conditions. Final Answer: The sentence should read Every speaker's aim is to be heard and understood, so the correct option is understood (option C).

Question 15

Which one-word substitute best expresses the phrase "causing a burning sensation like that of hot liquid on the skin"?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a precise one-word substitute for a descriptive phrase about a particular kind of burning sensation. The phrase mentions hot liquid on the skin, which is a key clue. To answer correctly, you need to distinguish between several temperature related adjectives and identify the one commonly used for burns caused by hot liquids or steam. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase to be replaced is causing a burning sensation like that of hot liquid on the skin. Option A piping often appears in the expression piping hot, but is not limited to burns on skin. Option B igneous relates to fire and rock formations, especially in geology. Option C sizzling describes the sound and appearance of something very hot, such as food in a pan. Option D scalding is used for injuries or heat caused by hot liquids or steam. Concept / Approach: The word scalding is specifically associated with burns caused by hot water, milk, oil, or steam. In everyday English, a scald is a burn from hot liquid; to scald means to burn with hot liquid. This matches the phrase in the question almost exactly. Piping hot and sizzling hot can be used to describe very hot food, but they focus on the level of heat and sound, not the specific type of skin injury. Igneous belongs to the technical vocabulary of geology and is not used for sensations on the skin. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the key detail: like that of hot liquid on the skin. This suggests a particular type of burn.Step 2: Recall that scalding is the standard adjective for something hot enough to cause a scald, that is, a burn from liquid or steam.Step 3: Evaluate piping; although we can say piping hot tea, piping alone does not capture the idea of burning on the skin and is not usually used as a standalone adjective for sensation.Step 4: Evaluate sizzling; it usually describes sound and appearance when something cooks, not the effect on human skin.Step 5: Evaluate igneous; this is clearly a specialised geological word for rocks formed from molten magma and is irrelevant here. Therefore, scalding is the only accurate and context appropriate choice. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a safety warning on a kettle or a pot: Warning: scalding water. This is standard wording that warns of burns from hot liquid. We also say scalding tea, scalding soup, or a scalding shower when the water is dangerously hot to the skin. You would not normally say igneous tea or sizzling tea in this context. While piping hot soup is possible, it focuses on the soup temperature rather than the explicit possibility of skin burns. The legal and medical term for such burns is scald, which confirms scalding as the correct adjective. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Piping is incomplete without hot and even then does not directly mean burning the skin. Igneous is restricted to rocks and geological processes. Sizzling evokes the sound and look of food in contact with very high heat, like meat on a grill, and is not standard for describing how hot liquid burns skin. None of these options align as precisely with the idea of a burning sensation caused by hot liquid on the skin as scalding does. Common Pitfalls: Because students often see the phrase piping hot in reading passages, they may be drawn to piping without noticing that the question highlights skin sensation and hot liquid, which is the specific domain of scalding. To avoid this, always match not just the general topic (heat) but the exact situation described (burn from hot liquid). This is a typical pattern in one-word substitution questions. Final Answer: The best one-word substitute is scalding, so option D is correct.

Question 16

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence: "We were still waiting in the queue for tickets when the show (had begun)."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of correct tense sequencing when describing two past actions, one in progress and one that interrupts it. The sentence is about people still waiting in a queue when the show starts. The bracketed part had begun needs to be checked and possibly replaced with a more appropriate tense to match the rest of the sentence and standard narrative style. Given Data / Assumptions: The full sentence is: We were still waiting in the queue for tickets when the show (had begun). The first clause uses past continuous: were still waiting. The second clause currently uses past perfect: had begun. The options given are was beginning, begins, began, and no improvement. Concept / Approach: In English narrative, we typically use past continuous for an action that was in progress and simple past for a second, shorter event that interrupts or occurs during that ongoing action. For example, We were eating dinner when the phone rang. The past perfect (had begun) is used mainly to show that one past action was completed before another past action, often with some gap in time or with explicit reference to earlier time. Here, the show starting and the waiting in the queue are simultaneous in the sense that the show begins while they are still waiting, not long before. Thus, the simple past began after when is the natural tense choice, giving when the show began. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the two actions: Action 1, We were still waiting in the queue; Action 2, the show began.Step 2: Recognise that Action 1 is the longer background action, correctly expressed by past continuous were waiting.Step 3: Choose simple past for the shorter action that occurs at a point in time during the longer action, giving the show began.Step 4: Reject had begun because it suggests that the show was already started before the time they were waiting, which confuses the intended meaning.Step 5: Check that We were still waiting in the queue for tickets when the show began sounds natural and matches the standard pattern. Verification / Alternative check: Test each option in the context of the entire sentence. Was beginning would create We were still waiting ... when the show was beginning, which is not wrong but is stylistically weaker and less common than began, and it does not express a clear point of interruption. Begins would shift to present tense, We were still waiting ... when the show begins, which mixes past and present inappropriately. No improvement would keep had begun, which implies that the show had already begun before the period of waiting, contradicting still waiting in the queue. Therefore, began is the only fully appropriate option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Was beginning attempts to use continuous tense for both actions, but the clause after when usually prefers simple past to mark a specific event. Begins breaks tense consistency by introducing present tense into a clearly past narrative. No improvement cannot be correct because the past perfect had begun is not justified by any earlier reference point and makes the sentence less clear than necessary. Simple past began fits the classic pattern of background continuous plus interrupting simple past. Common Pitfalls: Many learners overuse past perfect whenever they see two past actions, assuming that the earlier one must always be in had + past participle. However, past perfect is only needed when there is a genuine earlier action that must be distinguished from a later reference point. When two actions occur in close sequence, and one clearly happens during an ongoing action, the combination of past continuous and simple past is usually sufficient. Remembering examples like We were watching TV when the lights went out will help reinforce this rule. Final Answer: The correct improvement is to replace had begun with began, so option C is correct.

Question 17

Improve the bracketed part of the sentence: "It was so hot during the concert that some spectators passed (out)."

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of phrasal verbs in everyday English. The sentence describes spectators at a concert feeling unwell because of extreme heat. The verb passed is followed by the particle out, forming a phrasal verb that may or may not need improvement. Your task is to decide whether out is correct here or if another particle or phrase should replace it. Given Data / Assumptions: The sentence is: It was so hot during the concert that some spectators passed (out). The options are away, by, over, and no improvement. The context suggests that spectators fainted or lost consciousness due to the heat. In English, to pass out is a well known phrasal verb meaning to faint. Concept / Approach: Phrasal verbs are combinations of a main verb and a particle that together create a specific meaning. The phrasal verb pass out means to faint or become unconscious, especially because of heat, exhaustion, or illness. This is exactly what the sentence wants to convey. Pass away means to die, which is much stronger and not intended in this mild context. Pass by means to go past something or someone, and pass over means to ignore or skip. None of these alternatives fits the meaning of fainting. Therefore, the phrase passed out is already correct and needs no improvement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the sentence: Extreme heat during the concert caused some spectators to faint.Step 2: Recall the phrasal verb pass out as the standard expression for fainting or losing consciousness.Step 3: Check pass away, which means to die, too strong and inappropriate here.Step 4: Check pass by, which means to go past in space or time and has nothing to do with losing consciousness.Step 5: Check pass over, which usually means to overlook someone or something, again unrelated to fainting. Therefore, the best choice is to keep out and choose No improvement. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine typical news or conversational sentences: Several fans passed out in the heat during the match. This is normal English usage and appears in newspapers and spoken reports. If we replaced out with away, we would be saying that several fans passed away, meaning they died, which is an entirely different and much more serious statement. Replacing it with by or over produces sentences with no clear or intended meaning in this context. The only combination that means fainting due to heat is passed out. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A away creates the phrase passed away, which is a euphemistic way to say died and does not match the lighter situation of discomfort at a concert. Option B by makes passed by, referring to movement and not to health. Option C over gives passed over, meaning ignored or not selected, as in passed over for promotion, which is completely wrong for describing the effect of heat on spectators. None of those phrasal verbs expresses fainting. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes exam candidates think that if a part of the sentence is in brackets, it must be wrong. However, many such questions include a No improvement option precisely to test whether you can recognise correct usage and avoid unnecessary changes. A good strategy is always to check whether the original phrase is already an idiomatic and commonly used expression. If it is, do not be afraid to choose No improvement. Final Answer: The phrasal verb passed out correctly expresses fainting due to heat, so there is no improvement needed and option D is correct.

Question 18

Which one-word substitute best matches the phrase "to lift or haul something heavy with great effort"?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This one-word substitution question focuses on verbs used for physical effort. The phrase describes lifting or hauling something heavy with great effort, which is a common action verb in English. You need to identify which of the four options is a verb with this meaning, while the others are unrelated nouns describing types of people. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase is to lift or haul something heavy with great effort. Heave is a verb that often appears with heavy lifting or pulling. Shrimp is a noun for a small sea creature or sometimes a slang term for a small person. Wimp is a noun meaning a weak or cowardly person. Runt is a noun used for the smallest or weakest in a litter of animals or, informally, a small person. Concept / Approach: Among the options, only heave is a verb that collocates directly with heavy objects and effort. We say heave a sigh, heave a heavy bag, or heave a rock, especially when the action requires strength. The other words are all nouns describing people in a negative or informal way. They do not express the action itself. Because the definition in the question is clearly an action, the correct one-word substitute must be a verb, which points directly to heave. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the part of speech required. The phrase to lift or haul is a verb phrase, so the answer should also be a verb.Step 2: Recognise heave as a verb that means to lift, haul, or throw something heavy with effort.Step 3: Note that shrimp, wimp, and runt are nouns describing types of people or creatures, not actions.Step 4: Match the meaning: He had to heave the suitcase onto the roof of the bus describes exactly lifting something heavy with effort.Step 5: Conclude that heave is the only option that fits both the required part of speech and the given definition. Verification / Alternative check: Check usage in sentences. We heaved the log out of the ditch describes heavy lifting. The sailors heaved on the rope to raise the sail shows hauling with effort. None of the other options can fit such sentences: We shrimped the log or We wimped the log are meaningless. Similarly, calling someone a shrimp, wimp, or runt describes a person, often insultingly, but does not refer to lifting objects. This confirms heave as the correct verb for the defined action. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Shrimp primarily refers to a small shellfish and, by extension, a small person. Wimp refers to a person who lacks courage or physical strength. Runt is used for the smallest or weakest animal in a litter, or similarly for a person. None of these words expresses the physical action of lifting or hauling something heavy. They are thematically close in the sense of weakness or size, but they do not match the definition given in the question. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be distracted by wimp or runt because they think of physical weakness, which is indirectly related to heavy lifting. However, the question does not ask for a person who struggles with heavy loads; it asks for the action itself. Looking at grammatical roles and part of speech is a powerful method for eliminating such distractors in one-word substitution questions. Final Answer: The best one-word substitute for to lift or haul something heavy with great effort is heave, so option A is correct.

Question 19

In idiomatic usage, the phrase "flesh and blood" refers to what?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of the English idiom flesh and blood. It is a common phrase that appears in literature, religious texts, and everyday speech. Although the individual words might suggest something physical and possibly violent, the idiom has a broader figurative meaning related to human nature, limitations, and relationships. Given Data / Assumptions: The idiom given is flesh and blood. Option A suggests a very gory murder scene. Option B suggests a lot of hard work. Option C suggests loss of lives in battle. Option D suggests a person physical body together with natural weaknesses and needs. Concept / Approach: The idiom flesh and blood is used to refer to human beings as living, feeling creatures, with all their limitations, emotions, and physical needs. It emphasises that a person is not a machine or an abstract idea but a vulnerable human. For example, You cannot expect flesh and blood to endure such pain means no ordinary human body and mind can bear it. The idiom can also refer to family relations (one own flesh and blood), again focusing on real human beings. It does not specifically refer to murder scenes, hard work, or battlefield deaths, though those may involve literal flesh and blood. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall typical sentences using this idiom. For example, He is only flesh and blood or How can you treat your own flesh and blood like that.Step 2: Understand that in such sentences, flesh and blood describes human beings with normal feelings and weaknesses.Step 3: Compare this to option D, which explicitly refers to a person physical body and their needs and frailties; this matches the idiomatic sense.Step 4: Examine option A; a very gory murder scene is too narrow and literal, focusing on physical gore rather than the idiomatic meaning.Step 5: Examine options B and C; they describe effort and loss of life but do not capture the figurative meaning of the idiom itself. Therefore, option D is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Consider how dictionaries gloss the phrase. They generally say that flesh and blood means human nature and normal human feelings or a person physical existence as opposed to something spiritual or mechanical. If we plug option D into a definition, we get: flesh and blood refers to a person physical body and their needs and frailties. This fits the way the idiom is used in lines such as No flesh and blood could stand that, meaning no normal human could endure it. None of the other options can so easily be inserted into such sentences. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A focuses on gore and violence, which may involve literal flesh and blood, but the idiom is not used in this specific sense. Option B a lot of hard work describes an effort concept like sweat and toil, not this idiom. Option C loss of lives in battle again is about casualties, but the phrase flesh and blood does not specifically function as a synonym for casualties in standard idiomatic use. The question asks for the meaning of the idiom, not for a situation where literal flesh and blood is present. Common Pitfalls: Because the words flesh and blood can evoke strong physical imagery, some candidates are tempted by options related to violence or killing. To avoid this, always think of an idiom as a fixed expression whose meaning may be more general, often focusing on human nature. Remembering example sentences where the idiom appears in non violent contexts will guide you to the more abstract and correct interpretation. Final Answer: The idiom flesh and blood refers to a person physical body together with their needs and frailties, so option D is correct.

Question 20

Which one-word substitute best matches the phrase "represent something as being less important than it really is"?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your ability to choose a precise verb that captures a subtle attitude: treating something as less important or serious than it truly is. Such a verb is common in discussions of politics, news, and interpersonal communication, where one person might minimise a problem or achievement. You must pick the word that directly expresses this act of downplaying significance. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase to be replaced is represent something as being less important than it really is. Discriminant is a mathematical or technical term, not a common verb of attitude. Stride is usually a noun or verb related to walking with long steps or making progress. Underplay means to make something seem less important or serious than it in fact is. Imperious is an adjective meaning domineering or arrogantly authoritative. Concept / Approach: The key idea is minimising or downplaying. Underplay is a standard verb used precisely in this sense. For example, a minister might underplay the risks of a new policy, or a player might underplay their own role in a victory. It is often paired with downplay, another common verb with the same meaning. None of the other options fits this semantic field or part of speech: discriminant and imperious are not verbs of representation, and stride relates to physical movement or progress rather than evaluation of importance. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the core meaning: showing or presenting something as less important than reality.Step 2: Recall that underplay and downplay are verbs used exactly for this type of misrepresentation or minimisation.Step 3: Match the phrase with underplay in a sample sentence: The report underplays the severity of the problem, which fits perfectly.Step 4: Examine discriminant; it is mainly used in mathematics (for example, the discriminant of a quadratic equation) and does not function as a verb here.Step 5: Examine stride and imperious; stride is about walking or making progress, and imperious is an adjective describing a person manner. Neither can replace a verb that means to represent something as less important. Therefore, underplay is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: Think of typical newspaper lines: Officials underplayed the impact of the storm, or The coach underplayed his team chances. In each case, the writer means that officials or the coach made the issue seem smaller or less serious than it actually was. In contrast, using discriminant or stride in these sentences would sound absurd: Officials discriminanted the impact or Officials strode the impact are not meaningful. Imperious would be used to describe a person, as in an imperious tone of voice, not an action of minimising importance. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Discriminant is entirely out of place because it is a technical noun, not a verb, and it does not carry any meaning of minimising seriousness. Stride, as a noun or verb, is about walking or progress and has no semantic overlap with downplaying importance. Imperious is an adjective describing someone high handed or commanding; it cannot function as a one word substitute for this particular phrase and does not refer to representing things as less important. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may be distracted by discriminant because of its formal sound or by imperious because it is a sophisticated adjective. However, the question clearly demands a verb of representation, not a technical noun or an adjective describing personality. A reliable strategy is to quickly identify the expected part of speech from the phrase and eliminate options that do not match it. Final Answer: The best one word substitute is underplay, making option C correct.

English Questions