Question 1

BREXIT is the term used for Great Britain leaving which international organization?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks knowledge of a major recent international political and economic development known as BREXIT. The term BREXIT is a combination of British and exit, coined to refer to the decision of the United Kingdom to leave a particular regional organization. Understanding what BREXIT stands for is important for current affairs, economics, international relations, and general awareness because it affects trade, migration, financial markets, and political relationships across Europe and beyond. Given Data / Assumptions: BREXIT is a short form meaning British exit. The question asks from which international organization Great Britain decided to withdraw. The options include the International Monetary Fund, the Commonwealth of Nations, the World Trade Organization, and the European Union. Great Britain remains a member of several global and regional bodies even after BREXIT. Concept / Approach: The key concept is to recall that the 2016 referendum in the United Kingdom was specifically about membership in the European Union, a political and economic union of European states. The decision to leave this union is what is popularly called BREXIT. The other organizations mentioned are separate bodies in which the United Kingdom continues to participate. Therefore, the correct answer is the European Union. Distinguishing between different international organizations and their functions is crucial to avoid confusion among similar sounding entities. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Remember that BREXIT expands to British exit, relating to a withdrawal. Step 2: Recall that the 2016 referendum in the United Kingdom was on leaving the European Union. Step 3: Note that the United Kingdom is still a member of the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and the Commonwealth of Nations. Step 4: Conclude that BREXIT refers to Great Britain leaving the European Union. Verification / Alternative check: News reports, official statements, and analyses around June 2016 clearly describe BREXIT as the planned withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. The term has been used consistently in that sense in academic articles, media coverage, and policy papers. None of these sources associate BREXIT with leaving institutions like the International Monetary Fund or the World Trade Organization, confirming that the European Union is the intended organization. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The International Monetary Fund is a global financial institution providing financial assistance and policy advice; the United Kingdom continues to be a member. The Commonwealth of Nations is an association of countries that were mostly former territories of the British Empire; there has been no British withdrawal from it. The World Trade Organization governs global trade rules, and Britain remains within it. Only the European Union has been the subject of the BREXIT process. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates confuse the European Union with the Council of Europe, the euro zone, or NATO, even though these are separate organizations. Another mistake is to think that BREXIT involves all European or transnational institutions, which is not correct. Failing to differentiate between economic, monetary, and political organizations can also cause errors. Careful reading of the options and understanding of each body helps to avoid these issues. Final Answer: BREXIT refers to Great Britain leaving the European Union.

Question 2

Consider the following two statements about the Coercive Acts and the Stamp Act in the American colonial context and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about key events in the history of the American colonies and their relationship with Britain. The Coercive Acts and the Stamp Act are often discussed in the context of the causes of the American Revolution. Statement type questions of this form test not only factual recall, but also the logical relationship between two historical statements. Candidates must judge whether each statement is true and then decide if the second statement correctly explains the first. Given Data / Assumptions: Statement I says that the passing of the Coercive Acts made reconciliation between Britain and its American colonies virtually impossible. Statement II says that the British Parliament, having issued the Stamp Act in 1765, later repealed it. The options describe different combinations of truth and explanatory relationship between the two statements. We assume that the question refers to the established historical understanding of these events. Concept / Approach: First, we examine each statement on its own merits. The Coercive Acts, also known as the Intolerable Acts, were punitive laws passed after the Boston Tea Party and are widely regarded as a major tipping point that made compromise difficult, so Statement I is historically accurate. The Stamp Act of 1765 imposed taxes on printed materials, and due to strong colonial protests it was indeed repealed in 1766, so Statement II is also true. However, the repeal of the Stamp Act is not the direct explanation for why the Coercive Acts made reconciliation impossible. Therefore, both statements are true but Statement II does not explain Statement I. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Evaluate Statement I. The Coercive Acts were harsh measures against Massachusetts and contributed strongly to colonial unity against Britain, making reconciliation very difficult. Step 2: Evaluate Statement II. The Stamp Act was passed in 1765 and repealed in 1766 after widespread colonial protests, so this statement is also factually correct. Step 3: Examine the relationship. The repeal of the Stamp Act occurred earlier and does not directly explain why the later Coercive Acts made reconciliation almost impossible. Step 4: Conclude that both statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. Verification / Alternative check: Standard history textbooks on the American Revolution describe a clear chronological sequence: the Stamp Act controversy, its repeal, and then later the Boston Tea Party followed by the Coercive Acts. The Coercive Acts were intended to punish Massachusetts and assert British authority, which intensified colonial resistance. The repeal of the Stamp Act is often cited as an earlier example of colonial victory through protest, not as a reason for the later collapse of reconciliation. This confirms the analysis of both truth and the lack of explanatory connection. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A claims that Statement II explains Statement I, which is incorrect because the repeal of the Stamp Act did not cause the Coercive Acts to make reconciliation impossible. Options C and D both assert that one of the statements is false, but historical evidence shows that both statements are factually accurate. Hence, only the option that keeps both statements true but denies an explanatory connection is acceptable. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to think that whenever both statements are true, the option with explanation must be chosen. This is not always correct; the second statement must specifically explain the first in a cause and effect sense. Another pitfall is mixing up the chronology of the Stamp Act and the Coercive Acts, leading to confusion about their relationship. Careful reading and separate evaluation of truth and explanation are essential for this type of question. Final Answer: Both statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.

Question 3

Regarding the Poona Pact and reserved seats for Dalits, consider the following two statements and select the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question deals with the Poona Pact of 1932, an important milestone in the history of Dalit representation and Indian constitutional development. The Pact emerged from a disagreement between Mahatma Gandhi and Dr B R Ambedkar over separate electorates for the Depressed Classes. Statement type questions on this topic test both factual details such as the number of reserved seats, and broader understanding of Ambedkar's political role and activities after the agreement. Given Data / Assumptions: Statement I mentions that the Poona Pact provided for 151 reserved seats for the Scheduled Castes, to be elected by a joint electorate. Statement II claims that Dr B R Ambedkar withdrew from active politics for almost a decade when the Communal Award was revoked. We assume that the question follows the common exam convention that the number 151 represents reserved seats associated with the Pact. We also consider Ambedkar's documented activities after 1932 when assessing his political engagement. Concept / Approach: The Poona Pact replaced the idea of separate electorates with reserved seats for the Depressed Classes in provincial legislatures, to be filled by a joint electorate with a system of primary elections among Dalit voters. The total number of seats associated with this arrangement is commonly given as 151 in many exam sources, so Statement I is treated as true in this context. Statement II, however, does not match historical facts. Ambedkar did not withdraw from politics for a decade; instead, he remained deeply involved in political and social movements, later becoming a key architect of the Constitution of India. Therefore, Statement I is true and Statement II is false. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the main features of the Poona Pact, which replaced separate electorates with reserved seats in a joint electorate for the Depressed Classes. Step 2: Note that exam literature often cites that around 151 reserved seats were provided under the Pact, aligning with Statement I. Step 3: Review Dr Ambedkar's political career after 1932, including his leadership of Dalit organizations, later ministerial roles, and work in the Constituent Assembly. Step 4: Recognize that he did not withdraw from active politics for a decade, making Statement II incorrect. Step 5: Conclude that Statement I is true while Statement II is false. Verification / Alternative check: Historical accounts of the Poona Pact detail that seats reserved for the Depressed Classes increased significantly compared to the Communal Award and would be filled by joint electorates. Ambedkar's biography shows continuous engagement in social reform, law, and politics from the 1930s through the 1950s. He formed political parties, contested elections, and later chaired the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly. There is no extended period of withdrawal from politics after the revocation of the Communal Award, contradicting Statement II. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A assumes both statements are true and that the second explains the first, which is incorrect because Statement II is factually wrong. Option B again treats both statements as true, which conflicts with the historical record concerning Ambedkar's political activities. Option D states that Statement I is false and Statement II is true, which also reverses the correct evaluation. Only the option that accepts Statement I and rejects Statement II matches the established history used for examination purposes. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may be confused by varying figures for reserved seats in different sources, leading them to doubt Statement I. Another pitfall is insufficient familiarity with Ambedkar's long and active political career, which can cause some to accept the incorrect idea that he withdrew from politics. It is important to cross check both factual details and broader historical narratives when dealing with such statement based questions. Final Answer: Statement I is treated as true in the exam context, while Statement II is false, so the correct option is that Statement I is true but Statement II is false.

Question 4

Who among the following served as the President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar in the mid twenty ten decade?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests knowledge of recent political history in Myanmar, also known as Burma. After decades of military rule, Myanmar experienced a transition toward a civilian government in the mid twenty ten decade. Recognizing who held formal positions such as President is important for understanding Southeast Asian politics and for current affairs relevant to international relations and regional diplomacy, especially because India shares a long border with Myanmar and engages with it in strategic initiatives. Given Data / Assumptions: The country is officially called the Republic of the Union of Myanmar. The options include prominent political figures such as Aung San Suu Kyi, Htin Kyaw, Myint Swe, and Henry Van Thio. The question specifically refers to the person who served as President in the mid twenty ten decade. It assumes understanding of the roles played by these leaders in Myanmar's political system. Concept / Approach: The key concept is to distinguish between formal constitutional offices and de facto leadership. In 2016, following democratic elections, Htin Kyaw became the first civilian President of Myanmar in many decades. Aung San Suu Kyi, though the most prominent political leader, could not become President due to constitutional restrictions and instead served as State Counsellor. Myint Swe and Henry Van Thio have served as Vice Presidents or acting leaders but were not the primary civilian President at the time in question. Therefore, the correct choice is Htin Kyaw. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that after the 2015 elections in Myanmar, a civilian government was formed under the National League for Democracy. Step 2: Note that Htin Kyaw was elected as President in 2016, becoming the formal head of state. Step 3: Recognize that Aung San Suu Kyi, though the main leader of the ruling party, became State Counsellor rather than President. Step 4: Remember that Myint Swe and Henry Van Thio served as Vice Presidents or in other constitutional roles, not as the primary President during that period. Step 5: Conclude that Htin Kyaw is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Reliable news archives and political profiles of Myanmar clearly state that Htin Kyaw assumed office as President in March 2016. They also explain that Aung San Suu Kyi, constrained by constitutional provisions, took the role of State Counsellor. Myint Swe is mentioned as a Vice President and later as acting President after political upheavals, while Henry Van Thio has served in a vice presidential capacity. These details confirm that Htin Kyaw was the President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar in the mid twenty ten decade. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Aung San Suu Kyi is the most famous democratic leader of Myanmar but did not hold the office of President due to constitutional restrictions. Myint Swe was a Vice President and later acting President in a different context, rather than the original civilian President after the 2015 elections. Henry Van Thio has also been a Vice President. Only Htin Kyaw fits the description of the President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar at that time. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates mistakenly choose Aung San Suu Kyi because of her international fame, without recalling the specific constitutional bar that prevented her from being President. Others may confuse later political developments and acting positions with the original appointment in 2016. To avoid such mistakes, it is important to distinguish between official titles and overall influence, and to pay attention to time frames mentioned in questions. Final Answer: Htin Kyaw served as the President of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar in the mid twenty ten decade.

Question 5

Which one of the following statements about the Justice Party in colonial India is not correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question examines knowledge of the Justice Party, an important Non Brahmin political organization in the Madras Presidency during the colonial period. The Party played a key role in the politics of representation, communal reservations, and provincial government. Understanding which statement about its activities is not correct requires awareness of both its social base and its stance toward the Indian National Congress, especially during the Non Cooperation Movement and the elections of the early nineteen twenties. Given Data / Assumptions: The Justice Party was a Non Brahmin organization that emerged in the Madras region. The statements mention its demand for separate communal representation, its social support base, its success in obtaining reserved seats, and its position on the 1920 elections. The question asks specifically which statement is not correct. We assume standard historical accounts of the Party's activities and ideology. Concept / Approach: The Justice Party was formed by Non Brahmin elites who felt disadvantaged under Brahmin dominance in administration and politics. It indeed demanded communal representation for Non Brahmins similar to the separate representation concept used for Muslims. Its social base consisted largely of richer landowners and urban middle class Non Brahmins. The Montagu Chelmsford Reforms and the subsequent Government of India Act helped institutionalize reservations, which the Party supported. However, when the Indian National Congress decided to boycott the 1920 elections as part of the Non Cooperation Movement, the Justice Party chose to contest those elections and form a government in Madras. Therefore, the statement that it supported the Congress boycott is not correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Confirm that the Justice Party did seek communal representation for Non Brahmins similar to what Muslims had received earlier, which matches option A. Step 2: Recognize that the Party drew much of its support from wealthier landowning and urban Non Brahmin groups, making option B correct. Step 3: Note that provisions for reserved seats for Non Brahmins in the new constitutional arrangements were one of the achievements that favoured the Party's agenda, so option C is substantially correct. Step 4: Recall that the Justice Party contested the 1920 elections when the Congress boycotted them and subsequently formed the government in Madras, meaning it did not support the boycott; thus option D is incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: Histories of the Madras Presidency and studies of the Non Brahmin movement describe the Justice Party as contesting the 1920 elections, winning a majority, and forming the first ministry under the dyarchy system. These accounts clearly contrast its approach with that of the Congress, which stayed away from the elections. The same sources also discuss its communal representation demands and its elite Non Brahmin base. This confirms that option D is the only statement that does not align with established historical facts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A correctly describes the Party's demand for communal representation, mirroring the earlier concessions granted to Muslims. Option B accurately captures the social groups supporting the Party. Option C reflects the Party's success in influencing the pattern of reserved seats in the reformed constitutional framework. These three statements are in harmony with standard historical narratives, so they cannot be the incorrect one requested by the question. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to assume that all anti colonial political forces acted in the same way as the Congress, leading to the wrong guess that the Justice Party also boycotted elections. Another pitfall is overlooking regional movements and assuming that only national level parties mattered. Careful study of provincial politics shows that some groups chose to work within the constitutional framework offered by the British rather than join mass civil disobedience campaigns. Final Answer: The incorrect statement is that the Justice Party supported the Congress call to boycott the elections in 1920; in reality, it contested those elections.

Question 6

Courier service, which transports parcels and documents for clients, belongs to which sector of the economy?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on basic economic classification of activities into primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors. Courier services are widely used in modern economies to move parcels, documents, and goods between locations. Classifying these services correctly helps in understanding economic structure, national income accounting, and questions related to development and employment patterns. Many exam questions ask candidates to categorize different activities into the correct sector based on the nature of output. Given Data / Assumptions: Courier services involve the collection, transportation, and delivery of letters, parcels, and goods for clients. Options given are primary, secondary, tertiary, and a combination of secondary and tertiary. Primary activities are usually extraction based, such as agriculture, mining, and fishing. Secondary activities involve manufacturing and processing of goods, while tertiary activities provide services. Concept / Approach: The primary sector deals with extraction of natural resources. The secondary sector processes raw materials into finished goods through manufacturing activities. The tertiary sector includes a wide range of services such as transport, communication, banking, trade, and education. Courier service does not extract natural resources or manufacture products. Instead, it offers transportation and delivery of items as a service to customers. Therefore, it clearly falls under the tertiary sector. There is no significant manufacturing element involved that would justify classifying it as secondary. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the definitions of economic sectors: primary for extraction, secondary for manufacturing, and tertiary for services. Step 2: Identify that a courier company mainly picks up parcels, transports them, tracks them, and delivers them to recipients. Step 3: Note that this activity is a service provided to households and businesses and does not involve producing a physical good through manufacturing. Step 4: Conclude that courier service belongs to the tertiary sector of the economy. Verification / Alternative check: Economic textbooks and national income classification schemes list transport, postal, and courier services under the service sector. National accounts often group these under trade, hotels, transport, communication, and related services. No classification places courier activities under primary or pure manufacturing categories. Exam syllabi for economics and social science also present courier and logistics services as standard examples of tertiary sector activities. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A is wrong because courier work does not involve extraction of raw materials such as crops, minerals, or fish. Option B is incorrect because there is no transformation of raw materials into new products as in a factory. Option D, which suggests both secondary and tertiary, would apply only if an activity combined significant manufacturing with services, which is not the case here. Courier companies may use manufactured vehicles and facilities, but their core activity is service oriented transportation and delivery. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse the use of manufactured goods, such as vehicles and sorting equipment, with belonging to the secondary sector. Another error is to focus on the physical movement of goods and assume that any physical activity must be manufacturing. It is important to remember that transport and communication are classic examples of tertiary activities even though they involve handling physical objects. Final Answer: Courier service is a service activity and is therefore classified under the tertiary sector of the economy.

Question 7

On which date was the central Pregnancy Aid Scheme launched to provide Rs 6000 financial assistance to pregnant women?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the area of Indian government welfare schemes and focuses on the Pregnancy Aid Scheme, which aims to support pregnant women financially. Under this scheme, eligible women receive a cash incentive of Rs 6000 to help cover costs related to pregnancy, nutrition, and child care. Examinations frequently ask about launch dates of major schemes, as these dates help link policies with specific budgets, announcements, or events such as national addresses by leaders. Given Data / Assumptions: The scheme mentioned is popularly associated with direct financial support of Rs 6000 to pregnant women. The options list four close dates around the end of 2016 and the beginning of 2017. We assume the question refers to the formal announcement of the scheme by the central government for national implementation. The task is to select the exact date on which the scheme was launched. Concept / Approach: The Pregnancy Aid Scheme, which later came to be associated with the Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana framework, was announced by the Prime Minister in a national address toward the end of 2016. It was part of a package of measures focusing on financial inclusion and welfare. Specifically, the announcement was made on 31 December 2016. The other dates in December and early January may be associated with preparatory steps or separate schemes but do not match the nationally publicized launch announcement, so they are distractors. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Pregnancy Aid Scheme for providing Rs 6000 to pregnant women was announced by the central government around the end of 2016. Step 2: Connect this announcement with the speech delivered by the Prime Minister on 31 December 2016, which included several welfare measures. Step 3: Compare the given options and identify 31 December 2016 as the date that matches the major public announcement. Step 4: Eliminate the other dates as they do not correspond to this widely reported announcement of the scheme. Verification / Alternative check: Official press releases and news reports relating to the Prime Minister's address at the end of December 2016 confirm that the Pregnancy Aid Scheme, offering Rs 6000 to pregnant women, was announced on 31 December 2016. Government documents describing the evolution of maternity benefit schemes also refer back to this announcement as the point from which this central initiative was expanded nationwide. These references reinforce 31 December 2016 as the correct launch date. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options A and B, which give earlier dates in December 2016, may be tempting because they are close to the correct time frame, but they do not match the headline national announcement. Option D, 1 January 2017, is just one day later and might confuse those who think of the scheme as part of New Year measures; however, the announcement in the speech took place on 31 December 2016, not on the first of January. Therefore, these dates are incorrect in the context of the question. Common Pitfalls: Candidates often confuse the date of announcement with the date of actual implementation or subsequent renaming and integration of schemes. Another pitfall is misremembering whether the scheme was announced as a New Year measure on 1 January or as part of a speech the previous evening. Careful reading of the question and precise recall of current affairs reports are needed to avoid such small but important errors. Final Answer: The Pregnancy Aid Scheme offering Rs 6000 to pregnant women was announced on 31 December 2016.

Question 8

The Prime Minister of which neighbouring country attended the river festival Namami Brahmaputra in India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks knowledge of regional diplomacy and cultural events involving India and its neighbours. Namami Brahmaputra was a large river festival organized in Assam to celebrate the cultural, ecological, and economic importance of the Brahmaputra river. The presence of foreign leaders at such events reflects diplomatic ties and symbolic gestures of friendship. Identifying which neighbouring country's Prime Minister attended the festival tests awareness of India's relations with South Asian neighbours. Given Data / Assumptions: Namami Brahmaputra was organized as a major river festival in Assam. The options are Bhutan, China, Nepal, and Bangladesh, all neighbouring countries of India. The question asks specifically which country's Prime Minister attended the festival. We assume standard reporting of diplomatic visits in connection with the festival. Concept / Approach: Bhutan and India share close and friendly relations, and Bhutanese leaders often participate in significant events in India. For the Namami Brahmaputra festival, the Prime Minister of Bhutan, Tshering Tobgay, was invited as a special guest and attended the inauguration. While Bangladesh and Nepal also share river systems and cultural ties with India, their leaders did not play that specific ceremonial role at this event. China is not represented by its Prime Minister in such state level cultural festivals in India in this manner. Therefore, Bhutan is the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Namami Brahmaputra was held in Assam as a celebration of the Brahmaputra river. Step 2: Remember that India invited a foreign head of government to underline regional friendship and shared Himalayan river systems. Step 3: Identify that the visiting leader was the Prime Minister of Bhutan, Tshering Tobgay. Step 4: Eliminate China, Nepal, and Bangladesh as their leaders did not attend the opening of this particular festival in the role mentioned. Verification / Alternative check: News reports and official state government releases from the time of the festival mention that the President of India inaugurated the festival and that the Prime Minister of Bhutan attended as a distinguished guest. There is no mention of the Prime Ministers of China, Nepal, or Bangladesh playing an equivalent role in this specific event. This corroborates that Bhutan is the correct answer for which neighbour's Prime Minister attended. Why Other Options Are Wrong: China, while an important regional power, does not typically have its Prime Minister attend state level cultural festivals in India like Namami Brahmaputra. Nepal and Bangladesh maintain close relations with India and share river systems, but their Prime Ministers did not attend this particular festival in the capacity indicated in the question. Therefore, selecting any of these countries would not match the documented diplomatic participation. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume that Bangladesh, because of shared river issues and the Brahmaputra basin, must necessarily be the answer. Another error is guessing Nepal due to its Himalayan connection. Candidates may also overthink the strategic implications of China. To avoid these pitfalls, one should rely on specific memories of news coverage rather than general geographic logic alone. Final Answer: The Prime Minister of Bhutan attended the Namami Brahmaputra river festival in India.

Question 9

With which Australian university did Indian Railways sign an agreement related to the Dedicated Freight Corridor project?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on an international collaboration between Indian Railways and an overseas educational institution. The Dedicated Freight Corridor is a major infrastructure project aimed at improving freight movement and railway efficiency in India. Ties with foreign universities are often established for research, training, and capacity building. Knowing which Australian university is associated with this project reflects awareness of infrastructure development and international cooperation in the transport sector. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is an agreement signed by Indian Railways with an Australian university. The agreement relates to the Dedicated Freight Corridor project. The options include Monash University, Victoria University, University of Canberra, and University of Sydney. Only one of these universities is correctly associated with the agreement. Concept / Approach: The Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited has engaged with academic and research institutions to develop expertise in railway operations, logistics, and related technologies. In this context, Monash University in Australia is known for its involvement in railway and transport research and was selected as a partner. The other universities listed are prominent institutions but are not the ones connected with this specific agreement as reported in railway and government announcements. Therefore, Monash University is the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognize that the question is about a specific agreement concerning the Dedicated Freight Corridor. Step 2: Recall news reports mentioning that Indian Railways or the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation tied up with Monash University for research and training. Step 3: Compare each option and confirm that Monash University is the named partner in this railway collaboration. Step 4: Eliminate Victoria University, University of Canberra, and University of Sydney, as they are not associated with this particular agreement. Verification / Alternative check: Official railway press releases and reliable news articles covering the Dedicated Freight Corridor mention the signing of an agreement with Monash University to benefit from its transport research expertise. These sources do not associate the other listed universities with this project. Academic collaboration details often highlight Monash University's contributions in rail technology, which supports the identification of the correct option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Victoria University, University of Canberra, and University of Sydney are all respected Australian institutions but are not cited in connection with the Dedicated Freight Corridor agreement. Choosing any of these would conflict with documented reports of the actual partnership. The question is specific to the named project and agreement, not to general academic ties or student exchanges that might involve other universities. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may guess based on the perceived popularity of a university or its city, such as Sydney, rather than recalling exact information. Another pitfall is confusing this agreement with different collaborations in other sectors. To avoid this, aspirants should maintain updated notes on major infrastructure projects and associated international partnerships, paying attention to the exact names mentioned in official announcements. Final Answer: Indian Railways signed the agreement related to the Dedicated Freight Corridor project with Monash University.

Question 10

The Mahila Police Volunteer scheme was first launched on a pilot basis in which Indian state?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question relates to a social security and women safety initiative known as the Mahila Police Volunteer scheme. The scheme aims to create a link between the police and the local community, especially women, by appointing trained volunteers at the village or ward level. It is important in the context of gender based violence and community policing reforms. Knowing where the scheme was first launched on a pilot basis is part of current affairs and governance awareness. Given Data / Assumptions: The scheme is called Mahila Police Volunteer and focuses on women volunteers. It was to be implemented in all states but started on a pilot basis in one state first. The options given are Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, and Rajasthan. We assume that the question refers to the officially announced pilot state at the time of launch. Concept / Approach: The Mahila Police Volunteer scheme is a joint initiative of the Ministry of Women and Child Development and the Ministry of Home Affairs. The first pilot implementation was launched in Haryana, specifically in districts such as Karnal and Mahendragarh, before being extended to other states. The scheme positions volunteers as a contact point between the police and the community for reporting crimes against women. While other states may later adopt the scheme, the pilot state was Haryana, making it the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the scheme was launched to strengthen community policing and women safety. Step 2: Remember that Haryana was selected for the pilot implementation, with volunteers identified at the village level. Step 3: Note that Delhi, Gujarat, and Rajasthan, though important states, were not the first to launch the scheme on a pilot basis. Step 4: Conclude that Haryana is the correct option. Verification / Alternative check: Government communications and press releases on the Mahila Police Volunteer scheme specify that it was launched initially in Haryana. The documents mention that the pilot districts were in Haryana and that the scheme would then be scaled up to other parts of the country. No similar mention is made for Delhi, Gujarat, or Rajasthan as pilot states at the time of launch, which supports the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Delhi, while being a union territory with a high focus on women safety, was not the first state or region chosen as the pilot implementation area. Gujarat and Rajasthan also introduced various women safety measures but did not host the first pilot for this specific scheme. Therefore, none of these options match the description of the initial pilot launch state for Mahila Police Volunteers. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may assume that Delhi must be the pilot location because of media attention to women safety issues there. Others might guess Rajasthan or Gujarat based on regional news. These guesses arise from association rather than precise recall. Maintaining a separate list of schemes and their pilot states or districts can help aspirants avoid such errors in examinations. Final Answer: The Mahila Police Volunteer scheme was first launched on a pilot basis in the state of Haryana.

Question 11

India signed an agreement to renew the supply of petroleum for five years up to 2022 with which neighbouring country?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question relates to India's energy and trade relations with neighbouring countries. Petroleum supply agreements are critical for landlocked neighbours that rely on India's refining and distribution network. Renewing such an agreement for a fixed period indicates stable cooperation and planning for long term energy security. Recognizing which country entered into a five year petroleum supply agreement with India, valid up to 2022, is part of current affairs knowledge concerning regional economics and diplomacy. Given Data / Assumptions: The agreement concerns the supply of petroleum products by India to another country. The agreement renews this supply for five years up to 2022. The options are Nepal, United Arab Emirates, Iran, and Bhutan. The question focuses on a bilateral arrangement where India is the supplier. Concept / Approach: Nepal is a landlocked country that imports petroleum products through India. Historically, Indian Oil Corporation has supplied fuels to Nepal through a long standing agreement. This agreement has been periodically renewed for multi year periods. In the relevant time frame, India and Nepal signed a petroleum products supply agreement extending the arrangement for five years, up to 2022. The United Arab Emirates and Iran are major oil exporters themselves, and Bhutan has a different pattern of energy cooperation with India primarily involving hydropower, not a five year petroleum import agreement of this type. Therefore, the correct answer is Nepal. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the beneficiary of the agreement is likely to be a landlocked or energy deficit neighbour of India. Step 2: Recall that Nepal imports most of its petroleum products from India under a formal supply agreement. Step 3: Connect the reference to a five year agreement up to 2022 with the renewal of the India Nepal petroleum products supply deal. Step 4: Eliminate the United Arab Emirates and Iran, which are exporters, and Bhutan, where the focus is more on hydropower cooperation. Verification / Alternative check: Reports on India Nepal bilateral relations and official announcements from Indian Oil Corporation describe the renewal of the petroleum products supply agreement for five years, extending its validity up to 2022. They emphasise that the agreement ensures uninterrupted fuel supplies to Nepal through Indian refining and distribution infrastructure. No similar five year, up to 2022, petroleum supply renewal description is associated with the United Arab Emirates, Iran, or Bhutan as importers in the same way. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The United Arab Emirates is a major exporter of crude oil and petroleum products and does not depend on India for basic fuel supplies, so the direction of trade is largely opposite. Iran is also a significant oil producer and exporter and would not be described as having India renew a five year petroleum supply agreement in this specific context. Bhutan cooperates with India mainly in hydropower projects and energy exchange, not through a headline petroleum supply deal of this kind. Hence, these options do not match the situation described. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to look only at which countries are associated with petroleum in general, without considering whether they are importers or exporters in relation to India. Another mistake is ignoring the landlocked status of Nepal and its dependence on Indian infrastructure. To avoid these pitfalls, candidates should consider geography, trade patterns, and the direction of energy flows in regional relationships. Final Answer: India renewed the petroleum products supply agreement for five years up to 2022 with Nepal.

Question 12

According to the Constitution of India, how many times can a person be elected to the office of the President of India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic constitutional knowledge regarding the office of the President of India. Competitive examinations frequently ask about eligibility, term, and re election provisions for constitutional posts such as the President, Vice President, and Governors. Understanding whether there is a limit on the number of terms is important because it affects how one interprets continuity and change in the highest constitutional office of the country. Given Data / Assumptions: The office in question is the President of India. The options propose limits of one, two, three, or no limit on the number of times a person may be elected. We assume the standard provisions of the Constitution without considering hypothetical future amendments. The focus is on the legal possibility, not on what has happened in practice so far. Concept / Approach: Article 56 of the Constitution provides that the President holds office for a term of five years and is eligible for re election. It does not impose a numerical limit on how many times a person may be re elected. Therefore, as long as the candidate continues to meet eligibility criteria and is elected by the Electoral College, the person can theoretically serve multiple terms. In contrast, some other countries, such as the United States, have term limits for their Presidents. Since no such limit exists in the Indian Constitution, the correct answer is that there is no bar on the number of times a person can be elected President. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the term of office for the President of India is five years. Step 2: Remember that the Constitution clearly states that the President is eligible for re election. Step 3: Note that no article sets a specific maximum number of terms such as two or three. Step 4: Conclude that there is no constitutional bar on the number of times a person can be elected President. Verification / Alternative check: A reading of the relevant constitutional provisions confirms that while the term is fixed at five years, the phrase used is that the President is eligible for re election, without mentioning any upper limit. Commentaries on the Constitution and standard polity textbooks also highlight that there is no term limit for the Indian President, in contrast to certain presidential systems with explicit restrictions on the number of terms. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options A, B, and C introduce limits of one, two, or three terms that are not found in the constitutional text. These options may be influenced by knowledge of other countries where presidents can serve only a limited number of terms, but such restrictions do not apply in India. Therefore, any answer suggesting a maximum number of terms is incorrect in the Indian context. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates project the two term limit of the United States presidency onto the Indian system and mistakenly choose the option that allows at most two terms. Others may assume that an unwritten convention exists where most Presidents serve only one term and interpret that as a formal rule. It is important to distinguish between constitutional provisions and actual political practice when answering such questions. Final Answer: There is no constitutional bar on the number of times a person can be elected as President of India.

Question 13

The scheme called Dulari Kanya, launched to reduce infant mortality among girl children, belongs to which Indian state?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about a state level welfare scheme named Dulari Kanya, targeted at improving the survival and well being of girl children. Many Indian states have launched specific schemes to tackle issues such as high infant mortality, malnutrition, and gender based discrimination. Identifying which state launched Dulari Kanya is a matter of current affairs and social welfare awareness, particularly for exams that focus on governance and public policy. Given Data / Assumptions: The scheme is named Dulari Kanya, which literally suggests beloved daughter. It aims to bring down infant mortality and support girl children. The options given are Arunachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh. The question asks which state government launched this particular scheme. Concept / Approach: Arunachal Pradesh, a state in the northeastern part of India, launched the Dulari Kanya scheme to provide financial assistance at the birth of a girl child and to encourage institutional deliveries and proper care. The scheme is designed to address infant mortality and gender bias. While Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh have their own programmes to support girls and improve health outcomes, they do not use the specific name Dulari Kanya for their flagship schemes. Therefore, the correct answer is Arunachal Pradesh. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognize that Dulari Kanya is a scheme concerned with girl child welfare and infant mortality reduction. Step 2: Recall that Arunachal Pradesh announced Dulari Kanya as a scheme providing financial incentives to families with girl children. Step 3: Note that other states in the options have different scheme names for similar objectives, such as separate girl child and health programmes. Step 4: Conclude that the state associated with Dulari Kanya is Arunachal Pradesh. Verification / Alternative check: Reports on state budget announcements and official state government releases from Arunachal Pradesh describe Dulari Kanya as a scheme for girl children. These sources highlight cash incentives and its link to reducing infant mortality. There is no parallel reference to Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, or Madhya Pradesh using this exact scheme name in their welfare portfolios, confirming the association with Arunachal Pradesh. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh have launched various schemes focusing on girl child education, nutrition, or financial support, but these programmes have different names such as Ladli schemes or state specific initiatives. None of them is known as Dulari Kanya. Selecting any of these states would therefore not match the specific scheme mentioned in the question. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may guess based on states that are more often in the news for gender based initiatives in northern India and overlook the northeastern states. Another pitfall is assuming that similar sounding schemes in different states share the same name, which is usually not the case. Keeping a separate list of schemes by state, especially those with unique names, can help avoid such confusion. Final Answer: Dulari Kanya is a girl child welfare scheme launched by the state of Arunachal Pradesh.

Question 14

A 7500 mile direct rail freight link was launched on 10 April 2017 between China and which country?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question deals with a major development in international freight transport and the modern rail based Silk Road. The 7500 mile direct rail link launched in April 2017 connected China with a European country as part of efforts to increase trade, reduce transit time, and support the Belt and Road Initiative. Understanding these long distance freight links is important for current affairs, economic geography, and international trade questions. Given Data / Assumptions: The rail link is described as a 7500 mile direct connection. It was launched on 10 April 2017. The options are Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Great Britain, and France. The question asks which country at the western end of this route is connected to China. Concept / Approach: The rail link in question is the freight train service between cities in China and London in the United Kingdom. This service is often described as connecting China and Great Britain and forms part of the overland trade corridors being developed across Eurasia. It is much longer than most regional routes and is promoted as a modern Silk Road connection. Pakistan, Kazakhstan, and France are either regions on other routes or have different types of connectivity but are not the end point of the specific 7500 mile link launched on 10 April 2017. Great Britain is therefore the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that in 2017 China started a rail freight service to London as part of its Belt and Road Initiative. Step 2: Note that this link covers more than seven thousand miles, connecting Chinese cities with Great Britain. Step 3: Compare the options and recognize that Great Britain is the European country at the western end of this specific route. Step 4: Eliminate Pakistan and Kazakhstan, which are intermediate or unrelated in this context, and France, which is not the terminus of the 7500 mile route launched on that date. Verification / Alternative check: News articles on the Belt and Road rail services highlight the inaugural freight trains running between China and London, often quoting the distance as about twelve thousand kilometres or 7500 miles. The service is described as connecting China with Great Britain directly by rail, reducing transit time compared to sea routes. These reports confirm that Great Britain is the country referred to in the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Pakistan is an important partner in the China Pakistan Economic Corridor, but the flagship 7500 mile rail freight link launched in April 2017 was not to Pakistan. Kazakhstan is a landlocked Central Asian country through which trains may transit but it is not the end point of this specific service. France, while part of European rail networks, is not the country highlighted in this particular route. Hence, these options do not match the description in the question. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may associate China's Belt and Road Initiative mainly with Pakistan due to coverage of the China Pakistan Economic Corridor and therefore guess Pakistan. Others may think of Kazakhstan because it lies along overland routes. Without recalling the specific news about freight trains to London, such guesses can be misleading. Focusing on the exact date and distance helps to connect the question to the China Great Britain rail service. Final Answer: The 7500 mile direct rail freight link launched on 10 April 2017 connected China with Great Britain.

Question 15

Which country was scheduled to host the 19th SAARC Summit planned for November 2016 but later postponed?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question concerns regional cooperation in South Asia through the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, commonly known as SAARC. Summits are hosted by member countries in rotation and are important for discussing trade, security, and development issues. The 19th SAARC Summit, scheduled for November 2016, became notable because it was postponed after several countries decided not to attend. Knowing which country was to host that summit is part of regional political awareness. Given Data / Assumptions: The 19th SAARC Summit was planned for November 2016. It was postponed after some members withdrew. The options for the host country are Nepal, Bhutan, India, and Pakistan. We assume knowledge of SAARC membership and the normal summit rotation process. Concept / Approach: The 19th SAARC Summit was scheduled to be held in Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan. Following tensions and security concerns, India and some other member states announced that they would not attend, leading to the postponement of the summit. Nepal, Bhutan, and India have hosted earlier summits but were not the designated hosts for the 2016 meeting. Therefore, the correct answer is Pakistan, which was to serve as the host country before the event was called off. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that SAARC summits rotate among member countries. Step 2: Remember that the 19th SAARC Summit was scheduled for Islamabad in Pakistan in November 2016. Step 3: Note that rising tensions led India and some other countries to pull out, resulting in postponement. Step 4: From the given options, select Pakistan as the host country that had been scheduled for this summit. Verification / Alternative check: Media coverage and official SAARC related communications from 2016 consistently identify Islamabad, Pakistan, as the planned venue for the 19th SAARC Summit. Reports also mention that India, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Bhutan decided not to attend, citing concerns that led to postponement. There is no reference to any other member country having been designated as host for this particular summit, confirming Pakistan as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Nepal is a SAARC member and has hosted summits in the past, but not the planned 19th summit of 2016. Bhutan, while a member, was not the scheduled host for this meeting. India has hosted several summits at other times, but in this specific case it was among the countries boycotting the summit, not the host. Therefore, none of these options match the description provided in the question. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may confuse different summit numbers or years and choose a country that hosted an earlier SAARC meeting. Others may associate SAARC primarily with India and Nepal and select one of them without recalling the specific controversy surrounding the 2016 summit in Pakistan. To avoid such errors, it is useful to connect summit numbers with their venues and notable events. Final Answer: The 19th SAARC Summit planned for November 2016 was scheduled to be hosted by Pakistan.

Question 16

Which of the following products is not recognized as a geographical indication in India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about geographical indications, often abbreviated as GI, which are a form of intellectual property right. A geographical indication identifies products that originate from a specific region and possess qualities or a reputation due to that origin. India maintains a register of GI tagged products, including textiles, agricultural goods, and handicrafts. The question asks which of the listed products is not recognized as a GI in India, testing awareness of correct product names and locations. Given Data / Assumptions: The options include Kani Shawl, Naga Mircha, Mysore Silk, and Darjeeling Basmati. Some of these are well known traditional products associated with specific regions. The question asks which product name is not a valid geographical indication. We assume familiarity with commonly cited GI examples from exam resources. Concept / Approach: Kani Shawl is a traditional handloom shawl from Jammu and Kashmir and has been recognized as a geographical indication. Naga Mircha, also known as Naga chilli, has been granted GI tag due to its unique characteristics in Nagaland. Mysore Silk, associated with Karnataka, is another famous GI protected textile. Darjeeling, on the other hand, is associated with Darjeeling Tea, which holds the distinction of being the first Indian GI. The combination Darjeeling Basmati does not correspond to a recognized product or GI. Basmati rice itself is subject to separate GI claims, but not under the name Darjeeling Basmati. Therefore, Darjeeling Basmati is not a recognized GI product. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify Kani Shawl as a traditional shawl from Jammu and Kashmir with GI protection. Step 2: Recognize Naga Mircha as a chilli variety from Nagaland that has received GI status. Step 3: Recall Mysore Silk as a well known GI registered textile from Karnataka. Step 4: Observe that Darjeeling Basmati is not a recognized product; Darjeeling is linked with tea, not a basmati rice GI. Verification / Alternative check: The official list of Indian geographical indications includes entries such as Kani Shawl, Naga Mircha or Naga chilli, and Mysore Silk. It also lists Darjeeling Tea as a GI product. There is no entry for any product called Darjeeling Basmati, confirming that this name does not correspond to a recognized GI. This absence in the official registry is sufficient to identify Darjeeling Basmati as the incorrect product in the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Kani Shawl, Naga Mircha, and Mysore Silk are all established products whose origins and special qualities are tied to specific regions in India and are therefore protected under the GI regime. These products are regularly cited in exam materials as examples of geographical indications. Selecting any of these as not being a GI would contradict the official registry and common learning resources. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to be misled by the word Darjeeling, which is strongly associated with GI protection, and overlook that the product here is labelled as Basmati. Some candidates may see the term Basmati and assume that any combination involving it is protected, without paying attention to the actual registered name. Careful reading of the full product name and comparison with known GI examples helps avoid such confusion. Final Answer: Darjeeling Basmati is not a recognized geographical indication product in India.

Question 17

What is the official capital city of Sri Lanka under its present constitutional arrangement?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic political geography by asking for the official capital of Sri Lanka. Many countries designate different cities for administrative, legislative, and commercial functions. Sri Lanka is one such example where popular perception and formal constitutional designation differ. Colombo is widely known as the largest city and commercial hub, while another city is recognized as the official capital under the constitution. Given Data / Assumptions: The options include Colombo, Sri Jayewardenepura, Ceylon, and Kandy. Colombo is the main commercial city, Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte is the official capital, Ceylon is the former colonial name for the country, and Kandy is an important historical city. The question asks specifically for the official capital city. We assume the current constitutional arrangement remains the reference point. Concept / Approach: Sri Lanka's official capital, where the national legislature is located, is Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte, often shortened to Sri Jayewardenepura. Colombo functions as the commercial and sometimes administrative centre but is not the designated capital under the constitution. Ceylon is the former name of the country and not a city, while Kandy is a major cultural centre but not the capital. Therefore, the correct answer from the options is Sri Jayewardenepura, which refers to Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Sri Lanka declared Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte as its official capital and seat of Parliament. Step 2: Recognize that Colombo, although economically important and internationally known, is considered the commercial capital. Step 3: Note that Ceylon is an old name for the country itself, not a city, and Kandy is a historic city famous for cultural and religious sites. Step 4: Choose Sri Jayewardenepura as the official capital city from the options. Verification / Alternative check: Reference works on world capitals, atlases, and official Sri Lankan government information consistently list Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte as the legislative and official capital of Sri Lanka. They also explain that Colombo remains the principal city for business, foreign missions, and many administrative offices. No reputable source presents Ceylon or Kandy as the current capital, confirming the choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Colombo, although central to Sri Lanka's economy and governance, is not the officially designated capital in the constitutional sense. Ceylon is an outdated colonial name for the nation and is not a city. Kandy is an important inland city known for the Temple of the Tooth and cultural heritage but does not serve as the national capital. Thus, none of these options match the requirement of being the official capital city. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates instinctively choose Colombo because it is the most familiar Sri Lankan city and is often referred to as the capital in casual conversation. Others may be unfamiliar with the name Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte and hesitate to select it. To avoid such mistakes, it is helpful to study world capitals carefully, including cases where legislative and commercial capitals differ. Final Answer: The official capital city of Sri Lanka is Sri Jayewardenepura Kotte, represented in the options as Sri Jayewardenepura.

Question 18

What is the name of the new upgraded version of the indigenous transport aircraft SARAS developed in India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about an indigenous transport aircraft project in India known as SARAS. The aircraft has undergone design improvements and developmental flights, leading to upgraded versions with new designations. Knowing the exact name of the upgraded version reflects awareness of Indian efforts in aviation technology, self reliance in defence and civil aviation, and achievements of national research institutions. Given Data / Assumptions: The aircraft in question is the Indian indigenous transport aircraft SARAS. The question asks for the name of the new upgraded version. The options are SARAS PT1N, SARAS ML 3S, SARAS AL 5C, and SARAS FF 1F. Only one of these reflects the designation used in official communications about the upgraded aircraft. Concept / Approach: The upgraded version of the SARAS aircraft that successfully completed test flights is referred to as SARAS PT1N. This designation indicates an improved prototype with numerous design refinements such as weight reduction and better performance. The other letter and number combinations provided in the options are distractors that do not correspond to actual designations used in public documents or test flight reports. Therefore, the correct answer is SARAS PT1N. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognize that the base aircraft is called SARAS and that the upgraded prototype is identified with an additional code. Step 2: Recall news reports and official statements mentioning successful test flights of SARAS PT1N, the upgraded version. Step 3: Compare each option and see that only SARAS PT1N matches the widely reported designation. Step 4: Eliminate SARAS ML 3S, SARAS AL 5C, and SARAS FF 1F as these combinations do not appear in authentic reports on the aircraft. Verification / Alternative check: Press releases from India's aerospace research organizations and news coverage of the test flights explicitly name the improved aircraft as SARAS PT1N. They describe the modifications and performance improvements associated with this version. There is no record of variants called ML 3S, AL 5C, or FF 1F in relation to SARAS, confirming that PT1N is the correct and recognized designation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options B, C, and D use plausible sounding combinations of letters and numbers but do not correspond to any officially known version of the SARAS aircraft. They are intended only as distractors. Selecting any of them would show a lack of precise recall of the actual upgraded version name, which examinations are designed to test. Common Pitfalls: A common pitfall is to focus only on the base name SARAS and overlook the exact suffix used for upgraded prototypes. Candidates may guess based on how technical codes sound, rather than recalling the specific PT1N designation. To avoid this, it is useful to take note of both the base name and the exact variant name when studying defence and science news. Final Answer: The new upgraded version of the indigenous transport aircraft SARAS is named SARAS PT1N.

Question 19

What was the real birth name of Gautama Buddha before he attained enlightenment and became known as the Buddha?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests basic knowledge of ancient Indian religious history, specifically the early life of Gautama Buddha. Competitive examinations often ask about the original or birth names of important spiritual leaders and reformers. Knowing that Gautama Buddha was born as Prince Siddhartha helps learners place Buddhism correctly in the timeline of Indian history and understand that he began life as a royal prince before renouncing worldly life. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks about the real birth name of Gautama Buddha. Four main options are provided: Siddhartha, Mahendra, Shree Dutt, and Vishal Dutt, along with one extended form option in the list. We assume standard school level history information about Buddhism and its founder. Concept / Approach: The approach is purely factual recall. Learners need to know that the person who later became famous as Gautama Buddha was originally born as Siddhartha. His full traditional name is often given as Siddhartha Gautama or Siddhattha Gotama in Pali. After achieving enlightenment at Bodh Gaya, he became known as the Buddha, meaning the Enlightened One. The task is simply to match this historical fact with the correct option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Buddhism was founded by Gautama Buddha, who was born as a prince in the Shakya clan. Step 2: Remember that the birth name of this prince was Siddhartha, often written as Siddhartha Gautama. Step 3: Compare this remembered fact with the given options in the question. Step 4: Identify that the option which exactly matches the birth name is Siddhartha. Step 5: Conclude that Siddhartha is the correct answer and mark that option. Verification / Alternative check: You can cross check this information from any standard history text book on ancient India, from NCERT style resources, or from introductions to Buddhism. All reliable sources state that Buddha was born as Siddhartha, son of King Suddhodana and Queen Maya, in Lumbini. Later he came to be called Gautama Buddha based on his family lineage and his status as the Enlightened One. No reputable historical reference ever uses Mahendra, Shree Dutt, or Vishal Dutt as his birth name, so this confirms the correctness of Siddhartha. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Mahendra: This is a common Indian name but has no standard historical link as the birth name of Gautama Buddha, so it is incorrect. Shree Dutt: This name suggests a person devoted to a deity but is not mentioned in Buddhist texts as the original name of the Buddha, so it is wrong. Vishal Dutt: Again, this is a generic sounding name without any historical basis in Buddhist literature, therefore it is not correct. Siddhartha Gautama: This extended form includes the correct core name Siddhartha, but the question usually expects the simple birth name, which is commonly written as Siddhartha alone. The most precise single word answer among the options is Siddhartha. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse the title Buddha with a personal name. Buddha is a title meaning the Enlightened One, not the given name at birth. Learners may also be distracted by long or impressive sounding names that look formal. Another pitfall is to overthink and choose a longer variant like Siddhartha Gautama when the question simply asks for the real name. Examinations often use similar sounding Indian names to confuse students, so one must stick to what standard history clearly states rather than guessing based on how attractive an option appears. Final Answer: The real birth name of Gautama Buddha was Siddhartha.

Question 20

Which country launched the world's largest amphibious aircraft on 24 December 2017 as a major aviation and defence milestone?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks awareness of recent developments in aviation technology and defence capability. Amphibious aircraft can take off and land on both land and water, and they are strategically important for search and rescue, maritime patrol, and military logistics. In December 2017, one particular country attracted global attention by flying what was then described as the world's largest amphibious aircraft, and this fact is frequently tested in general knowledge and current affairs sections. Given Data / Assumptions: The event took place on 24 December 2017. The aircraft is referred to as the world's largest amphibious aircraft at that time. The options list four technologically advanced countries: United States of America, China, Japan, and Germany, plus one extra distractor in the list. Concept / Approach: The approach here is to recall news about the Chinese AG600, a large amphibious aircraft developed by China. The AG600 was widely reported in late 2017 when it completed its maiden flight from Zhuhai in Guangdong province. It was highlighted in media as the world's largest amphibious aircraft, designed for roles such as sea rescue, firefighting, and strategic transport. Recognising this name and event allows us to connect it directly to China among the given options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall important aviation news from late 2017 that involved record breaking aircraft. Step 2: Identify the AG600 amphibious aircraft, which featured prominently in news reports as the world's largest amphibious aircraft. Step 3: Remember that AG600 was designed and built by China and made its maiden flight from Zhuhai on 24 December 2017. Step 4: Match this recollection with the options United States of America, China, Japan, Germany, and Russia. Step 5: Conclude that China is the correct answer because it is the country that launched the AG600 aircraft. Verification / Alternative check: Verification can be done by checking any credible current affairs compilation for 2017 or by referring to reliable news sources from that period. They consistently report that the Chinese state owned aircraft manufacturer Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) developed the AG600 and that it took off for its first flight in December 2017. No similar record breaking amphibious aircraft event from the United States of America, Japan, Germany, or Russia is associated specifically with that date and description, so the cross check confirms China as the correct option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: United States of America: Although it has a very advanced aviation industry, there was no widely reported launch of the world's largest amphibious aircraft on 24 December 2017 by this country, so this is incorrect. Japan: Japan has a maritime focused aircraft industry but did not launch a record breaking amphibious aircraft on that specific date in 2017, so this option is wrong. Germany: Germany is known for engineering excellence but has not been associated with the particular AG600 amphibious aircraft, hence it is not the right answer. Russia: Russia develops many military aircraft, but the news of the largest amphibious aircraft in December 2017 relates specifically to China, not Russia. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to assume that the most advanced or well known aviation power such as the United States of America must be responsible for any record breaking aircraft. Another pitfall is to confuse heavy transport aircraft or large passenger jets with amphibious aircraft, which have a very specialised role. Some learners may also forget the date or the specific type of aircraft and guess based only on general impressions of national capability. To avoid these errors, it is important to remember the key association: AG600, amphibious aircraft, and China. Final Answer: The country that launched the world's largest amphibious aircraft on 24 December 2017 is China.

Basic General Knowledge Questions