Question 1

Tool and profession analogy: “Garden is to Trowel as Seamstress is to ______”. Choose the tool that is most closely associated with a seamstress.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy links places or professions with the tools most commonly used in them. A garden is associated with a trowel, a small hand tool used for digging and planting. The question then asks you to select the tool that has a similar professional relationship with a seamstress, who is a person that sews clothes and fabric. Recognising correct tool–profession pairings is essential here. Given Data / Assumptions: • First pair: Garden and Trowel. • Second profession: Seamstress. • Options: Scissors, Sneakers, Crowbar, Saw. • We assume familiar understanding of basic tools used in gardening and sewing. Concept / Approach: In the given pair, a garden is not a tool but a place or setting where a trowel is used. A trowel is a typical hand tool for a gardener. Thus, the structure of the analogy is “place or worker : typical tool”. For a seamstress, who sews and alters clothes, key tools include needles, thread, and scissors. Among the options, scissors is the only sewing related tool, while sneakers, crowbar, and saw belong to different areas of work. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Clarify “Garden : Trowel”. In a garden, a gardener uses a trowel to scoop soil, plant seeds, and move small plants. So trowel is a tool associated with garden work. Step 2: Consider the work of a seamstress. A seamstress sews garments, alters fit, cuts cloth, and performs other tailoring tasks. Step 3: Look at each option as a possible tool for a seamstress. Scissors are used by a seamstress to cut fabric, thread, and patterns accurately, and they are a core sewing tool. Sneakers are shoes, not a working tool in tailoring. Crowbar is a heavy tool used for prying or demolition, not related to sewing. Saw is a cutting tool for wood or metal in carpentry, not for fabric. Step 4: Only scissors match the professional tool relationship needed in the analogy. Verification / Alternative check: We can write both pairs in sentence form: “A trowel is a tool used in a garden; scissors are tools used by a seamstress.” Both connect a working environment or worker with a typical essential tool. None of the other options can form such a reasonable professional sentence with seamstress without sounding absurd. That is a quick reality check of whether the analogy truly fits real world usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Sneakers: Footwear, not a specialised tool for doing seamstress work. • Crowbar: Tool for prying and demolition in construction work, unrelated to sewing tasks. • Saw: Tool for cutting wood or metal in carpentry, not for cutting fabric. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes test takers overthink and look for a very clever association, when the exam setter only wants a simple and realistic profession–tool link. If you consistently imagine what physical tool a worker actually holds in their hand during a typical day, it becomes straightforward: a gardener holds a trowel, a seamstress often holds scissors. Final Answer: The tool that correctly completes the analogy is Scissors.

Question 2

Cause–effect analogy: “Thunder is to Lightning as Grape is to ______”. Choose the option that stands to “Grape” as thunder stands to lightning.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy links a phenomenon to its cause or to the process that produces it, and then applies a similar pattern to an agricultural product. Thunder and lightning occur together in storms, but one is a result of the other. Grapes are fruits that can be processed into a widely known product. The question tests whether you understand both pairs as examples of effect or product arising from a cause or source. Given Data / Assumptions: • First pair: Thunder and Lightning. • Second given word: Grape. • Options: Wine, Soil, Seed, Water. • We assume standard school level understanding that lightning is a powerful electrical discharge in the atmosphere and that thunder is the sound produced as a result. Concept / Approach: Lightning is the flash of electricity in the sky during a storm. Thunder is the sound created by the rapid expansion of air caused by lightning. In simple terms, lightning is the cause and thunder is the effect. Similarly, grapes are the raw material or source fruit used to produce wine through fermentation. So grape stands to wine as lightning stands to thunder if we focus on the idea of “source or cause” and “product or effect”. The correct option for the second pair must be a well known product made from grapes, which is wine. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand “Thunder : Lightning”. Although people often say “thunder and lightning” together, scientifically lightning comes first and creates the conditions that produce thunder. Thus, thunder is the result of lightning. Step 2: Apply the pattern to grapes. Grapes are not only eaten as fruit but also processed to produce wine. Wine is an alcoholic beverage made by fermenting the juice of grapes. Step 3: Check each option. Wine is a direct processed product of grapes. Soil is the medium in which grapevines grow, not the product of grapes. Seed is a part inside the grape, not the outcome produced from grapes. Water is used in irrigation and present in grapes but is not a derived product in the same sense. Step 4: The only option that clearly stands as a product produced from grapes, just as thunder is a result of lightning, is wine. Verification / Alternative check: We can phrase both relationships as “effect of a cause” or “product from a source”. Thunder is the audible effect of lightning. Wine is the processed product of grapes. Soil, seed, and water all relate to grapes in some way, but not in the same product relationship. They are either inputs or components of the growing process rather than outputs made from grapes. This confirms wine as the correct analogy partner. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Soil: Necessary for growing grapevines but not something produced by grapes. • Seed: A part of the grape, not a product that grapes give rise to in the world. • Water: Involved in the life of the plant and present in the fruit but not the specific product of grapes in the way wine is. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may misinterpret the first pair and think of thunder and lightning as simply things that happen together, without noting the cause–effect direction. Another mistake is to pick soil or water because they relate to plants in general but ignore that the first pair is not about environment; it is about what one phenomenon produces. Matching that pattern carefully leads directly to grapes producing wine. Final Answer: The correct word that completes the analogy is Wine.

Question 3

In this verbal analogy related to mineral ores, Chromite is an ore of Chromium. Ilmenite is an ore of which metal in the same way?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question tests basic general knowledge of minerals and their associated metals. In many competitive aptitude and government examinations, students are expected to know the important ores of common metals such as iron, aluminium, chromium, and titanium. The pair Chromite : Chromium is given as an example, and the task is to identify which metal has Ilmenite as a major ore. Understanding such ore mineral relationships is helpful for questions in general science, geography, and basic metallurgy. Given Data / Assumptions: Chromite is given as an ore of the metal Chromium. Ilmenite is another ore mineral whose associated metal must be identified. The options list several possible metals or substances: Cobalt, Titanium, Limestone, and Manganese. We assume standard school level general science information about ores and metals. Concept / Approach: The core idea behind the analogy is that the relationship between the first pair must be the same as the relationship between the second pair. Chromite is a well known ore of the metal Chromium. In a similar way, Ilmenite is a well known ore of the metal Titanium. By recalling this standard association, we can complete the analogy correctly. The distractor options include other metals and one non metal substance to test whether the learner really remembers which metal comes from Ilmenite. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Observe the structure of the analogy Chromite : Chromium. Step 2: Recognise that Chromite is not a metal but a mineral ore, while Chromium is the extracted metal. Step 3: Apply the same pattern to the second pair Ilmenite : ? where Ilmenite must be an ore and the missing term must be the corresponding metal. Step 4: Recall from basic chemistry and geography that Ilmenite is a major ore of Titanium, used to produce titanium dioxide and other titanium compounds. Step 5: Check the options and confirm that Titanium appears as one of the choices, so Ilmenite : Titanium completes the analogy correctly. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification method is to remove the options and rely on independent memory. Most school level textbooks list important ores: Bauxite for aluminium, Hematite and Magnetite for iron, Chromite for chromium, and Ilmenite and Rutile for titanium. This confirms that Ilmenite is associated with Titanium. Another check is to note that Limestone is not a metal at all but a sedimentary rock mainly composed of calcium carbonate, so it cannot be the required metal. Cobalt and Manganese have their own typical ores, such as Cobaltite and Pyrolusite, rather than Ilmenite. Therefore Titanium remains the only correct metal linked with Ilmenite. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Cobalt: Cobalt is a metal, but its important ores include Cobaltite and Erythrite, not Ilmenite, so this option does not match the given analogy. Manganese: Manganese is usually obtained from ores like Pyrolusite and Manganite, not Ilmenite, so this option is incorrect. Limestone: Limestone is not a metal but a rock. It is mainly calcium carbonate and serves as a raw material in cement and metallurgy, so it cannot complete the ore to metal pattern. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to pick any familiar sounding metal without properly recalling the actual ore mineral relationship. Another pitfall is to get confused by the presence of Limestone, which learners may recognise from cement industry topics and might wrongly connect with metals. Also, some students may recall that Ilmenite contains iron and titanium together and become unsure about which metal is the important one in this analogy. The correct focus should be on the main metal commonly extracted for industrial purposes, which is Titanium. Final Answer: The correct completion of the analogy is that Ilmenite is an ore of the metal Titanium, just as Chromite is an ore of Chromium.

Question 4

Wine is produced from Grapes. In the same type of analogy for alcoholic beverages, Vodka is traditionally produced from which raw material?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This verbal analogy question tests basic general awareness about how common alcoholic drinks are produced. The pair Wine : Grapes shows a drink and its usual raw material. In the second pair, Vodka is given and the missing term is the agricultural product from which it is commonly made. Such questions are popular in aptitude and reasoning sections because they combine simple world knowledge with the pattern recognition skill needed to handle analogies correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: Wine is prepared by fermenting Grapes. Vodka is another alcoholic drink used in the analogy. We must identify the raw material most closely associated with Vodka. The answer choices are Flour, Apples, Potatoes, and Oranges. Standard general awareness about alcoholic beverages is assumed. Concept / Approach: In an analogy A : B :: C : D, the relationship between A and B must be the same as the relationship between C and D. Here Wine : Grapes represents a drink and its raw material. Wine is primarily associated with Grapes because most wines are grape based. Similarly, Vodka is widely known as a distilled spirit traditionally made from Potatoes, although in modern times it is also produced from grains. The test expects the candidate to recall this conventional connection and therefore choose Potatoes to complete the analogy correctly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the first pair Wine : Grapes. Wine is a beverage and Grapes are the fruit used to make it. Step 2: Recognise the pattern drink to raw material. Step 3: Apply the same pattern to the second pair Vodka : ?. Vodka must relate to its primary raw material. Step 4: Recall that traditional Vodka, especially in Eastern Europe, is famous for being produced from Potatoes, even though other sources like grains also exist. Step 5: Among the given options, Potatoes clearly match this relationship, so we select Potatoes. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can briefly review how other drinks are made. Cider commonly comes from apples, wine from grapes, and beer from grains. Vodka is known in general awareness books as a distilled liquor prepared mainly from Potatoes or grains. Examination questions normally highlight the traditional or textbook association, which is Potatoes. Also, flour is a processed form of grain rather than a root crop and is not directly used as the classic raw material for Vodka. Oranges are more commonly connected with juice and some liqueurs, not Vodka itself. Therefore the standard matching pair is Vodka and Potatoes, which confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Flour: Flour is made from grains and is mainly used for baking bread or pastries. It is not the typical source ingredient named in connection with Vodka in general awareness questions. Apples: Apples are associated with drinks such as cider and apple juice, not with Vodka as the main ingredient, so this option does not fit the pattern. Oranges: Oranges are used for juices and flavouring in some cocktails, but they are not the primary raw material used to produce Vodka. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may overthink and get distracted by the idea that modern Vodka can be produced from many different sources including grains. This can cause confusion if they expect a more detailed technical answer. In such reasoning questions, the focus is on the most widely taught association in general knowledge books. Another pitfall is randomly choosing a fruit like Apples or Oranges because Wine comes from a fruit. The analogy is not fruit to fruit but beverage to its typical raw material. Remembering the standard pair Vodka and Potatoes avoids these mistakes. Final Answer: The correct completion of the analogy is that Vodka is traditionally produced from Potatoes, just as Wine is produced from Grapes.

Question 5

In this analogy from basic general science, Wood is converted into Charcoal. In the same pattern Coal is converted into which product?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the analogy type in aptitude tests and also uses knowledge from basic chemistry and general science. The pair Wood : Charcoal describes a familiar industrial transformation. Wood, when heated strongly in limited air, is converted to Charcoal. In the second pair, Coal is given and the task is to identify the main product that stands in the same relationship, commonly introduced in school level chemistry. Understanding the processes of destructive distillation and carbon based fuel processing helps in solving this question accurately. Given Data / Assumptions: Wood can be processed by heating in limited supply of air to produce Charcoal. The analogy expects a similar relation between Coal and its processed product. The answer choices are Fire, Smoke, Coke, and Ash. We assume standard chemistry facts about coal processing from school textbooks. Concept / Approach: The analogy is based on the process of destructive distillation. When wood is heated in the absence or near absence of air, volatile substances escape and the residue is Charcoal, a nearly pure form of carbon used as fuel. Coal, when similarly subjected to destructive distillation in industries, yields a solid residue known as Coke along with several by products such as coal gas and coal tar. Coke is a very important fuel in metallurgical processes, especially in blast furnaces for iron extraction. Recognising that Wood relates to Charcoal and Coal relates to Coke allows us to complete the analogy correctly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret Wood : Charcoal as a raw material and the solid carbon product formed by heating. Step 2: Remember that Wood gives Charcoal after destructive distillation. Step 3: Apply the same idea to Coal. When Coal is destructively distilled in industries, it produces a solid residue. Step 4: Recall that this solid residue is called Coke, which is used as a fuel and as a reducing agent in blast furnaces. Step 5: Compare this with the options and select Coke, since it matches the required relationship. Verification / Alternative check: To double check, we can recall the list of products obtained from Coal in standard chemistry chapters. The three main products are Coke, coal tar, and coal gas. Fire and Smoke are more like phenomena of burning, not stable products from destructive distillation. Ash is the non combustible residue left after complete burning of fuel in air, not the desired industrial product similar to Charcoal. Both Charcoal and Coke are porous, almost pure carbon fuels that result from heating carbonaceous materials in limited oxygen. Therefore selecting Coke maintains a parallel relationship with the first pair and verifies the correctness of the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Fire: Fire is a visible effect of combustion and is not a distinct substance or industrial product. It does not correspond to the way Charcoal relates to Wood. Smoke: Smoke is a mixture of gases and fine particles produced during incomplete combustion, not a solid processed product like Charcoal or Coke. Ash: Ash is what remains after complete burning of fuel, but the analogy focuses on useful carbon products obtained by controlled heating, not on waste residue. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse burning with destructive distillation and may choose Fire or Ash because they are commonly seen when coal is burned. Another pitfall is to treat Smoke as a product, forgetting that the analogy compares solid fuels derived from raw materials. Remember that Charcoal and Coke both serve as fuel and reducing agents and come from similar processing of different raw materials. Keeping this scientific context in mind prevents confusion and guides you towards the correct option Coke. Final Answer: Wood is converted into Charcoal, and in a similar industrial process Coal is converted into Coke, so the correct option is Coke.

Question 6

Loiter means to move slowly or dawdle. In the same style of analogy, which word has a similar relationship with Impugn?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question checks knowledge of English vocabulary and the ability to connect synonyms. The pair Loiter : Dawdle describes two words that are very close in meaning. Loiter means to move slowly or to waste time, and Dawdle also means to move slowly or spend time idly. In the second pair we have Impugn : ?, where we must find the option that is similar in meaning to Impugn in the same way that Dawdle is similar to Loiter. Such questions are common in verbal ability sections of aptitude tests. Given Data / Assumptions: Loiter and Dawdle are near synonyms that both describe slow, idle movement or wasting time. Impugn is an English verb used in formal writing. The options given are Revenge, Confiscate, Gamble, and Challenge. We assume standard dictionary level meanings of these words. Concept / Approach: In a synonym based analogy, the relationship is that both words in each pair have similar meanings. Therefore, after recognising that Loiter and Dawdle are synonyms, we must identify the word that is closest in meaning to Impugn. The verb Impugn means to call into question, to attack as false, or to challenge the truth or validity of something. Among the options, Challenge is the word that best conveys the idea of questioning or disputing. Thus Impugn : Challenge is the parallel pair. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the first pair Loiter : Dawdle and recall that both words describe slow movement and time wasting behaviour. Step 2: Conclude that the first pair is based on a synonym relationship. Step 3: Examine the second pair Impugn : ?. We must now find a synonym for Impugn. Step 4: Remember that Impugn means to dispute, question, or attack the truth, motive, or honesty of something or someone. Step 5: Compare this meaning with the options and see that Challenge also means to question, dispute, or call into doubt something like authority or a statement. Step 6: Select Challenge as the correct completion of the analogy. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can quickly summarise the core meanings of the options. Revenge means the act of retaliating for a wrong. Confiscate means to take away something, especially by legal authority. Gamble means to play games of chance or take risky actions in hope of advantage. Challenge, on the other hand, clearly includes the idea of questioning or disputing, which is very close to the meaning of Impugn. Dictionary definitions confirm that Impugn can be paraphrased as to challenge the truth or validity of a statement. Therefore the synonym based relationship is consistent and confirms Challenge as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Revenge: Revenge is about retaliating or paying back for some injury or insult. It does not mean to question the truth of a statement, so it does not match Impugn. Confiscate: Confiscate refers to taking away property, usually by authority. This has no direct link to the idea of verbally challenging or questioning something. Gamble: Gamble involves risk taking or betting and is unrelated to the act of disputing or attacking an argument or statement. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to pick a word only because it sounds strong or negative, such as Revenge or Confiscate. However, vocabulary questions demand attention to the precise meaning rather than emotional tone. Another pitfall is confusion between Impugn and words like Impose or Imprison due to similar starting letters. Candidates should read the full word carefully and link it with the correct meaning. Focusing on the idea of questioning or attacking an argument guides you directly to the option Challenge. Final Answer: Loiter and Dawdle are synonyms, and in the same way Impugn is closely related in meaning to Challenge, which makes Challenge the correct option.

Question 7

Modern is the opposite of Antiquated. In a similar antonym based analogy, Weak is opposite to which of the following words?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question tests basic understanding of antonyms in English vocabulary. The pair Modern : Antiquated shows a clear opposite relationship. Modern refers to something current or up to date, while Antiquated means old fashioned or out of date. In the second pair, Weak is given and we must choose the word that stands in the same opposite relation. Such antonym based analogies are common in verbal ability tests and help assess a candidate s sense of word meanings and contrasts. Given Data / Assumptions: Modern and Antiquated are antonyms; one means new and current, the other old and outdated. Weak is the first word in the second pair. The options provided are Strong, Fragile, Inadequate, and Puny. We assume standard dictionary meanings of these English adjectives. Concept / Approach: The structure of the analogy is A : B :: C : D, where A and B are opposites and C and D must also be opposites. Modern and Antiquated form an antonym pair based on time or style. For the second pair, we look for the word that is the semantic opposite of Weak. Weak indicates low strength, low power, or lack of physical or mental force. Strong is the direct opposite because it indicates great strength, power, or firmness. The other options may sometimes appear related to weakness but they do not represent the clear, general antonym. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the relationship in the first pair: Modern and Antiquated are opposites in meaning. Step 2: Conclude that the analogy is based on antonyms. Step 3: For the second pair, consider the word Weak and look for its direct opposite. Step 4: Recall that the natural everyday antonym of Weak is Strong. Step 5: Check the remaining options. Fragile means easily broken, Inadequate means not enough, and Puny means small or feeble. Although they suggest weakness, they are not the general opposite used in most contexts. Step 6: Select Strong as the correct answer, completing the pattern Weak : Strong. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can think of common collocations and usage. We often say strong body, strong mind, strong argument, and we use weak body, weak mind, weak argument as direct opposites. In basic vocabulary exercises, the pair taught is Weak and Strong. Words like Fragile and Puny are more specific and narrower. Fragile relates to ease of breaking, while Puny relates to small size and poor development. Inadequate refers to insufficiency, often in quantity or quality. None of these are as direct an antonym of Weak as Strong, which covers both physical and abstract strength. This confirms Strong as the correct option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Fragile: Fragile means delicate and easily broken. It is related to the idea of weakness but is not the general all purpose opposite of Weak. Inadequate: Inadequate means not sufficient or not up to the required standard. It refers to quantity or quality rather than strength versus weakness. Puny: Puny means very small and weak, but it is actually closer in meaning to Weak rather than being its opposite, so it cannot complete the analogy. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates get distracted by words that merely suggest a negative quality and may mistakenly think that any negative word will serve as an antonym. However, analogies usually expect the most direct and widely accepted opposite. Another pitfall is to treat Puny as an opposite due to its strong emotional tone, but it actually intensifies the idea of weakness rather than reversing it. Keeping a clear sense of basic antonym pairs such as high and low, hot and cold, weak and strong will help avoid such errors. Final Answer: Modern is the opposite of Antiquated, and in the same way Weak is opposite to Strong, so Strong is the correct answer.

Question 8

In English vocabulary, which of the following words gives the closest meaning to the word Bleak?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks knowledge of English vocabulary by asking for a synonym of the word Bleak. Synonym questions measure how well a learner understands shades of meaning and usage rather than only dictionary definitions. The word Bleak is often used to describe something that is exposed, empty, without warmth, or cheerless. It may describe a physical landscape, weather, or even a situation or future that seems hopeless. Recognising the closest meaning among the given choices is the key to solving this item. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is Bleak. The answer options are bare, lush, warm, and verdant. We assume standard dictionary level meanings of these words. The task is to choose the word whose meaning is most similar to Bleak. Concept / Approach: A synonym is a word that has the same or nearly the same meaning as another word in at least some contexts. Bleak commonly describes something that is cold, exposed, and without pleasant features. A bleak landscape has little vegetation and looks empty. A bleak prospect means a future that appears gloomy and without hope. Among the given options, bare is the word that best captures the sense of emptiness and lack of comfort. The other options describe positive or rich conditions, which are opposite to the feeling conveyed by Bleak. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the general meaning of Bleak. It suggests cold, cheerless, and empty conditions or prospects. Step 2: Consider physical usage. A bleak hillside often means a hillside without trees or plants. Step 3: Look at the option bare. Bare means without covering, empty, or lacking decoration, which fits well with the idea of a bleak place. Step 4: Examine the other options. Lush and verdant both mean rich in vegetation and are positive words. Warm suggests comfort, friendliness, or high temperature. Step 5: Since Bleak clearly belongs to a negative, cold, and empty group of words, bare is the closest synonym among the choices. Verification / Alternative check: An alternative way to verify is to think of example phrases. A bleak winter day is cold and cheerless, not warm or lush. A bleak landscape is treeless and exposed, which is similar to bare land. Bare branches and bleak branches both give the impression of trees without leaves. In contrast, lush vegetation and verdant fields suggest green richness, which is the opposite of bleak emptiness. Therefore bare remains the only option that consistently matches Bleak in the context of both physical description and emotional tone. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lush: Lush means rich, abundant, and often refers to thick and healthy vegetation. This is almost the opposite of the empty feeling suggested by Bleak. Warm: Warm relates either to physical temperature or to emotional friendliness, while Bleak suggests cold and comfortless conditions, so warm does not match. Verdant: Verdant describes green and leafy landscapes. A verdant field is the opposite of a bleak, bare field, so this option cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may focus only on emotional connotations like sadness and pick a word that feels negative without considering the full meaning. Others may confuse Bleak with Black or Bleach due to similar sounds and make incorrect associations. The correct strategy is to think of example sentences and images related to the word Bleak and then compare those images with each option. Visualising an empty, cold, windswept place naturally leads to the synonym bare. Final Answer: The word that is closest in meaning to Bleak among the given options is bare.

Question 9

Convent and Cloister are closely related religious places. In the same type of analogy, Eyrie is related to which of the following?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This reasoning question is an analogy based on vocabulary related to places and dwellings. The first pair Convent : Cloister connects two related words that both refer to religious buildings or communities, particularly those associated with nuns and monks. The second pair Eyrie : ? requires us to identify a word that has a similar relationship with Eyrie. Questions like this help test how well a candidate understands specialised vocabulary, especially words dealing with places where people or animals live. Given Data / Assumptions: Convent is a community or building where nuns live, and Cloister is a religious residence or monastery. This suggests a relationship of similar type of place or related dwelling. Eyrie is the second word in the analogy, and we must choose a related word from the options. The options are Show, Open, Hide, and Nest. We assume standard meanings from English dictionaries. Concept / Approach: The analogy is based on equivalence or close association. Convent and Cloister both refer to religious living places, particularly for members of religious orders. Eyrie is a term used for the high nest or dwelling place of a bird of prey, such as an eagle or hawk, often located on a cliff or high tree. The English word Nest is the general term for the home of birds. Hence, Eyrie is a specific kind of Nest. So the correct analogy is Eyrie : Nest, which parallels Convent : Cloister as place to similar type of place. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the relationship in Convent : Cloister. Both words denote religious residences. Step 2: Conclude that the first pair is based on similar type of place and function. Step 3: Recall the meaning of Eyrie. It refers to the nesting place of a bird of prey, typically high up and difficult to reach. Step 4: Look for a word in the options that is closely related in meaning to Eyrie. Step 5: Recognise that Nest is the general term for the home of any bird, which matches the concept of Eyrie as a special kind of nest. Step 6: Select Nest as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we should inspect the other options. Show is an act of displaying something, Open is a verb or adjective expressing lack of closure or accessibility, and Hide is a verb meaning to conceal. None of these words describe a place or dwelling. Only Nest fits the category of a place where an animal lives. Additionally, in many vocabulary guides, Eyrie is defined explicitly as a Nest, especially the Nest of an eagle. This confirms that Eyrie and Nest form a conceptual pair similar to Convent and Cloister. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Show: This word refers to display or performance and has no connection with the idea of a dwelling or resting place. Open: This relates to the state of something not being closed and does not describe a structure or home. Hide: This is an action meaning to conceal and is not a synonym or related term for Eyrie. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to focus on letters or sounds rather than meaning and to overthink whether Eyrie could be a verb or adjective. Another pitfall is unfamiliarity with the word Eyrie itself, which can lead to guessing. Candidates who recall even vaguely that Eyrie is connected with birds or heights can still reason that Nest is the only option related to birds and thus must be correct. Building a habit of connecting new words to broader categories, like types of homes or habitats, can prevent such confusion in future questions. Final Answer: Convent is related to Cloister as religious residences, and in the same way Eyrie is related to Nest as a specific kind of bird nest.

Question 10

A Biography is the written life story of a person. In the same way, what is to a Nation as Biography is to a Man?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question tests the ability to relate abstract ideas and written records. The pair Man : Biography shows that a Biography is the written account of a person s life. The second pair, Nation : ?, asks for the corresponding term that represents the written account of the life or development of a nation. Such analogies are common in verbal reasoning and general knowledge sections, because they connect vocabulary with basic social science concepts. Given Data / Assumptions: Man refers to an individual human being. Biography is a detailed written account of a person s life. Nation refers to a country or a large group of people with a shared identity. The options are History, Leader, Story, and Nationalism. We assume standard textbook definitions from history and literature. Concept / Approach: The relationship in the first pair is subject and written record. A person may have a Biography that records his or her experiences, actions, and achievements. For a Nation, the parallel idea is History. History is the systematic, written record of events that have occurred in the life and development of a country or people. Thus the analogy completes as Man : Biography :: Nation : History. The other options are related to nations but do not express the idea of a written record describing the nation s past. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the link between Man and Biography. A Biography is a written life story of a man or woman. Step 2: Recognise that this is a relationship of subject to written account. Step 3: Apply the same pattern to Nation. We must find the term that stands for the written record of a nation s life and events. Step 4: Recall that History is the study and written record of past events, particularly regarding human societies and nations. Step 5: Check all options and confirm that History uniquely fits this description, while the other options do not. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by looking at standard descriptions. History of India, History of France, and History of a particular region all refer to written narratives and analysis of events affecting the nation. A Leader is a person who guides people, not a record. Story is a broad term for any narrative, often fictional, and does not specifically mean a factual account of a country s past. Nationalism is a political and emotional belief or ideology related to pride and attachment to the nation, not a written account. Therefore, only History stands in the same type of relationship to Nation as Biography does to Man. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Leader: A Leader is an individual who leads a nation or group, not the written record of the nation itself. Story: Story can be fictional or factual, and it is too general. The question expects the specific term used for factual records of national events, which is History. Nationalism: Nationalism refers to a feeling or ideology of strong support for one s nation and is not a written chronicle of events. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may choose Story because Biography is also a story of a life. However, Biography is a specific genre of factual writing, just as History is a specific discipline and record related to nations. Another pitfall is confusion between History and Nationalism because both are associated with nations. Remember that the pattern is subject and record, not subject and emotion. Keeping track of the exact role each word plays helps avoid such errors in future analogies as well. Final Answer: A Biography is the written life story of a person, and similarly the written record of a Nation is its History.

Question 11

Choose the correct antonym of the English word Jettison from the following options.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for the antonym of the word Jettison. In English, Jettison is commonly used in maritime or aircraft contexts and in general situations where something is thrown away or discarded. Antonym questions help measure how well a learner understands not only the primary meaning of a word but also its opposites, which is important for precise communication and comprehension in exams, reading, and writing. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is Jettison. The options are Salvage, Submerge, Repent, and Descend. We assume standard dictionary meanings for all the choices. The task is to choose the word that is most opposite in meaning to Jettison. Concept / Approach: Jettison means to throw something from a ship, aircraft, or vehicle, especially in order to lighten the load. By extension, it also means to discard or abandon something, such as an idea or plan. The antonym must therefore express the idea of saving, keeping, or retrieving rather than throwing away. Salvage means to save something from loss or destruction, especially property at risk. This is directly opposite to throwing it away. The other options do not capture this sense of preserving or retrieving something that would otherwise be lost. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of Jettison. It means to throw overboard or to discard. Step 2: Understand that an antonym must express the opposite action or intention. Step 3: Consider the option Salvage. Salvage means to save, rescue, or recover something from loss, damage, or destruction. Step 4: Note that the action of salvaging an item is the conceptual opposite of jettisoning it. Step 5: Compare this with Submerge, Repent, and Descend, which do not involve the idea of saving an object from being thrown away. Step 6: Therefore choose Salvage as the correct antonym. Verification / Alternative check: As a double check, we can imagine a ship during a storm. To stay afloat, the crew may jettison cargo, meaning they throw goods into the sea. If later divers recover those goods, they salvage them. The two actions clearly oppose each other in purpose and effect. Submerge means to put under water, but one may jettison or salvage something that is submerged; it is not inherently opposite to Jettison. Repent is about feeling sorrow for a wrong action and relates to emotions and morality, not to handling cargo or objects. Descend means to move downward, which again has no necessary connection with throwing away or saving things. This confirms Salvage as the only proper antonym. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Submerge: Submerge means to put something under water. One can submerge an object intentionally or accidentally, but it is not necessarily the opposite of discarding it. Repent: Repent is an emotional and moral term about feeling remorse for past actions. It is unrelated to the physical act of discarding items. Descend: Descend simply means to move downward, as in going down stairs or falling. It does not reflect the idea of preserving or discarding objects. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may be tempted by Submerge because ships and sea water are often mentioned in the same context as Jettison. However, the question asks for an opposite meaning, not an associated idea. Another pitfall is choosing Repent because it is a strong action word, but it is semantically unrelated. The best strategy is to focus directly on the core definition of Jettison and then look for the word that reverses that action, which is Salvage. This approach helps in similar antonym questions as well. Final Answer: The correct antonym of Jettison from the given options is Salvage.

Question 12

Paw is the soft foot of a Cat. In the same animal body part analogy, a Hoof belongs to which animal among the following?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question examines basic general knowledge about animals and their body parts. The first pair Paw : Cat indicates that a paw is the type of foot that a cat has. In the second pair Hoof : ?, the task is to identify which animal usually has a hoof. Questions of this type are straightforward if the learner clearly recalls basic science and everyday observations about animals, and they appear frequently in elementary level reasoning sections. Given Data / Assumptions: Paw is a soft, padded foot typical of cats, dogs, and similar animals. Hoof is a hard covering at the end of the leg of certain animals. The options are Donkey, Lion, Elephant, and Horse. We assume standard knowledge of common domestic and wild animals. Concept / Approach: The analogy structure is animal body part to animal. Paw belongs to Cat. Hoof is the hard foot found in animals such as horses, donkeys, cows, and deer. Among the given options, both Donkey and Horse are hoofed animals, but the most classic and widely recognised association in general knowledge and textbooks is Hoof and Horse. Lion and Elephant have different types of feet and are not normally described with hooves. Therefore, we choose the animal that most strongly represents hoofed animals in general awareness, which is Horse. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the first pair Paw : Cat as body part to animal. Step 2: Recognise that a paw is typical of cats and similar animals. Step 3: Identify Hoof as a hard, protective covering at the end of the leg in certain animals like horses and cows. Step 4: Examine the options Donkey, Lion, Elephant, and Horse to see which are characteristically hoofed. Step 5: Note that Lion has paws, Elephant has large padded feet, while Horse has hooves and is the most common example of a hoofed animal in basic science lessons. Step 6: Select Horse as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can recall how children s books label body parts. Pictures of cats and dogs label their feet as paws. Pictures of horses label their feet as hooves. Donkeys do have hooves but general knowledge questions typically use Horse as the standard example because it is very familiar and strongly associated with hooves. Lions, like cats, walk on paws, and elephants have thick, round feet that are not usually described by the word Hoof. Therefore the cleanest and most standard match for Hoof is Horse, which confirms the selection. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Donkey: Although donkeys have hooves, the analogy in simple textbooks commonly uses Horse as the default hoofed animal, and Paw is already matching Cat, another familiar pet. The expected tested pair is Paw and Cat, Hoof and Horse. Lion: A lion has paws similar to those of a cat but larger. It is not associated with hooves, so this option is incorrect. Elephant: An elephant has thick, padded feet rather than typical hooves, and the word Hoof is not used as its standard body part in basic descriptions. Common Pitfalls: The main confusion can arise from knowing that both horses and donkeys are hoofed animals. However, exam questions usually prefer the most iconic example, which is the horse. Another pitfall is to ignore the relationship type and guess based on random association. Remembering that Paw clearly matches Cat and Hoof clearly matches Horse in basic science illustrations will guide you correctly in such analogy questions. Final Answer: Paw belongs to a Cat and, in the same way, Hoof is most commonly associated with a Horse.

Question 13

Complete the number analogy: 25 : 37 :: 49 : ?. Identify the number that follows the same pattern as the first pair.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a numerical analogy question where the candidate must identify the hidden pattern relating the first pair of numbers and then apply that pattern to the second pair. The pair 25 : 37 is given, and the question asks for the number that should correspond to 49 in the same way. Such questions are common in quantitative aptitude tests and measure a student s ability to detect patterns involving squares, simple operations, or combinations of operations on integers. Given Data / Assumptions: The given pair is 25 and 37. The second first term is 49, and the missing number is represented by a question mark. The options are 65, 69, 79, and 81. We can assume common number patterns such as squares, cubes, and small arithmetic operations are being used. Concept / Approach: A good approach is to look for relationships involving squares because both 25 and 49 are perfect squares. We notice that 25 is 5^2. Now, if we take the next integer, which is 6, and square it, we get 6^2 = 36. If we then add 1, we obtain 37. So 37 can be expressed as (5 + 1)^2 + 1. We can test the same pattern on 49. Since 49 is 7^2, the next integer is 8. Squaring 8 gives 8^2 = 64, and adding 1 produces 65. This matches one of the options, suggesting that 49 should pair with 65 under the same rule. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that 25 is 5^2 and 49 is 7^2, which suggests a pattern involving squares. Step 2: For the first pair, take the square root of 25, which is 5. Step 3: Add 1 to this root to get 6, and then square the result: 6^2 = 36. Step 4: Add 1 to this squared value to obtain 36 + 1 = 37, which matches the second number in the first pair. Step 5: Apply the same rule to 49. Its square root is 7. Step 6: Add 1 to the root: 7 + 1 = 8, then square it: 8^2 = 64. Step 7: Finally, add 1: 64 + 1 = 65. This number appears in the options. Verification / Alternative check: We can quickly test whether any simpler rules might apply, such as adding a fixed number to 25 to get 37. That would require adding 12, but 49 plus 12 gives 61, which is not among the options. Another possibility is to look at digit patterns, but they do not provide a consistent rule. The square based rule we discovered is elegant and consistent, and it gives the value 65, which exactly matches option 65. No other option satisfies the discovered pattern. Therefore, the analogy 25 : 37 :: 49 : 65 remains stable under verification. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 69: This number does not arise from the pattern of taking the next integer after the square root and then using the expression n^2 + 1. It is only a random larger number. 79: Similar to 69, this number does not fit the derived rule and seems unrelated to the squares of nearby integers. 81: Although 81 is itself a square, equal to 9^2, the pattern requires (7 + 1)^2 + 1, not an unrelated square. So 81 does not parallel the relation between 25 and 37. Common Pitfalls: A typical pitfall is to look only for simple addition or subtraction patterns and ignore higher level structures like squares. Candidates may incorrectly believe that adding a constant to both 25 and 49 will solve the problem. Another common error is to choose 81 simply because it is a square and seems mathematically significant, even though it does not fit the specific rule used for the first pair. The correct strategy is to notice that both 25 and 49 are squares and to explore patterns involving their square roots, which leads naturally to the rule used above. Final Answer: Using the pattern (square root of the first number plus one) squared plus one, the number that completes the analogy 25 : 37 :: 49 : ? is 65.

Question 14

Four words are given: Soft, Fatiguing, Discordant, Force. Which pair among the options shows the strongest relationship of being most nearly opposite or clearly contrasted in meaning?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question provides four words and asks which pair is most nearly the same or opposite in meaning. The words are labelled as A for Soft, B for Fatiguing, C for Discordant, and D for Force. The options present different pairings like A B, A C, A D, and B C, and we must choose the pair that shows the clearest strong relationship in terms of similarity or contrast. Such questions test the candidate s sense of nuances in English vocabulary and ability to detect antonym or synonym relationships among a small group of words. Given Data / Assumptions: A stands for Soft. B stands for Fatiguing. C stands for Discordant. D stands for Force. The answer options specify pairs of these letters: A B, A C, A D, and B C. We assume standard dictionary meanings of these words. Concept / Approach: First we clarify each word. Soft generally means gentle, not hard, or mild. Fatiguing means tiring, causing fatigue. Discordant refers to lack of harmony, especially of sounds or opinions. Force refers to strength, power, or physical energy. Among these, the clearest relationship is between Soft and Force. Soft suggests gentleness or lack of hardness, while Force suggests strong power or energy. They are strongly contrasted in common usage, for example soft approach versus use of force. The other pairs do not show such a clear synonym or antonym structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret the meaning of each word. Soft means gentle or not hard, Fatiguing means causing tiredness, Discordant means not in harmony, and Force means strength or power. Step 2: Check each option pair. Step 3: For A B, Soft and Fatiguing, the meanings are unrelated; softness does not necessarily cause fatigue. Step 4: For A C, Soft and Discordant, the meanings are again not directly connected. Step 5: For A D, Soft and Force, we see a strong contrast: Soft suggests a gentle approach, Force suggests a strong or aggressive approach. Step 6: For B C, Fatiguing and Discordant, the connection is weak. Something discordant may be unpleasant but is not necessarily fatiguing. Step 7: Therefore the pair with the clearest strong contrast is A D, that is Soft and Force. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by thinking about how the words appear in phrases. We say soft tone and forceful tone, soft music and forceful music, soft approach and use of force. In each case, soft indicates mildness and lack of strong impact, while force indicates strong impact or power. This repeated pattern of contrast in common expressions confirms that Soft and Force form an opposite or at least strongly contrasting pair. The other words do not show such common paired usage. Fatiguing relates to tiredness, and Discordant relates to lack of harmony, so pairing them would be arbitrary rather than a well recognised relationship. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A-B (Soft and Fatiguing): Soft does not mean tiring, and they do not naturally appear as opposites or close synonyms. A-C (Soft and Discordant): Soft tends to relate to gentle or quiet, whereas Discordant means harsh or not harmonious. They can appear together but are not standard antonyms in this context. B-C (Fatiguing and Discordant): Fatiguing relates to tiredness, while Discordant relates to harshness or disagreement. These are different ideas and do not form a clear pair of same or opposite meanings. Common Pitfalls: One pitfall is to search only for exact synonyms and miss strong antonym or contrast pairs. The question wording allows for either same or opposite meaning, so a clearly opposite pair is valid. Another mistake is to over analyse rare possible connections between words instead of focusing on the most obvious and commonly recognised relationship. Keeping in mind everyday phrases like soft words versus forceful words makes it easier to spot that Soft and Force are strongly contrasted and thus form the best answer. Final Answer: The pair that shows the strongest clear relationship of contrast is Soft and Force, which corresponds to option A-D.

Question 15

Fossil is associated with Extinction. In a similar cause and result analogy, a Puddle is associated with which of the following?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question uses a relationship from natural science to test reasoning ability. The pair Fossil : Extinction suggests that fossils are remains or impressions of organisms that have become extinct. The second pair, Puddle : ?, requires us to identify a word that stands in a similar causal or indicative relation. Analogy questions of this type often involve cause and effect, evidence and event, or object and its origin. They help evaluate how well candidates see logical connections beyond direct definitions. Given Data / Assumptions: Fossils are traces of ancient life forms preserved in rock. Extinction refers to the permanent disappearance of a species. Puddle is a small pool of liquid, typically water, on the ground. The options given are Wet, Rain, Lake, and Dry. We assume basic understanding of natural phenomena like rain and puddles. Concept / Approach: The relationship in the first pair is evidence and event. A fossil serves as physical evidence that certain organisms once lived and have now become extinct. Similarly, a puddle often serves as evidence that rain has recently occurred. After a rain shower, water collects in small depressions on roads and ground surfaces, forming puddles. Therefore, just as Fossil points to past Extinction, Puddle strongly suggests recent Rain. The other options either describe conditions or objects that do not match this cause and effect relationship as directly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand Fossil : Extinction. Fossils indicate that an organism lived long ago and is often extinct now. Step 2: Recognise that the relationship is that of evidence to the event or process that produced it. Step 3: Consider Puddle, which is a small accumulation of water on the ground. Step 4: Recall that puddles are typically formed after a rainfall as water collects in small depressions. Step 5: Among the given options, Rain is the natural event that leads directly to the formation of puddles. Step 6: Select Rain as the correct completion of the analogy. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify this by thinking about scenes after rainfall. Streets and playgrounds often have puddles of water that slowly evaporate. Without recent rain or artificial water flow, puddles are unlikely to appear. Wet is a state or condition that can happen for many reasons, such as washing or spilled water, and does not uniquely indicate a specific event. Lake is a much larger permanent or semi permanent water body and is not usually created by one episode of rain. Dry is actually the opposite of wet and clearly does not match the relationship. Therefore Puddle as a sign of Rain most closely parallels Fossil as a sign of past Extinction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Wet: Wet is a general condition and does not specifically identify the event that created the puddle. Many different actions can make a surface wet. Lake: A lake is a relatively large and stable body of water, not a small temporary collection formed after showers. The relationship to Puddle is not analogous to Fossil and Extinction. Dry: Dry is a state in which there is no moisture. It is almost the opposite of Puddle, so it cannot be the correct associated event or cause. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may choose Wet because it seems directly connected to water. However, the key in analogies is to identify the type of relationship, not just topical similarity. Fossil does not simply mean something old; it specifically indicates past life and often extinction. In the same way, the puddle is a sign or consequence of rainfall rather than just a wet spot. Keeping track of cause and effect patterns helps avoid confusion and leads to the correct answer Rain. Final Answer: Fossil is evidence of Extinction, and in a similar way a Puddle usually indicates recent Rain.

Question 16

Porcupine belongs to the group of Rodents. In the same way, Mildew belongs to which biological group?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question connects animals and organisms to their biological groups. The pair Porcupine : Rodent shows that a porcupine is a member of the rodent group of mammals. The second pair Mildew : ? requires us to identify the group to which mildew belongs. Understanding basic biological classification at a school level is enough to answer this type of analogy question accurately, and such items are common in general science based reasoning sections. Given Data / Assumptions: Porcupine is named as the first organism and Rodent as its group. Rodents are a group of mammals including rats, mice, squirrels, and porcupines. Mildew is the second organism for which we must find the correct group. The options are Insect, Fungus, Pathogen, and Germ. We assume basic knowledge from school biology about fungi and other microorganisms. Concept / Approach: The relationship is clearly organism to biological group. A porcupine is classified within the rodent order. Mildew is a type of fungus that grows on damp surfaces, plants, or organic materials and appears as a whitish or greyish coating. Among the options, Fungus is the proper biological group name. The words Pathogen and Germ are more general, describing disease causing agents and microscopic life, and Insect refers to a completely different animal group. Therefore, Mildew : Fungus completes the analogy in the same way as Porcupine : Rodent. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the relationship in the first pair. Porcupine is an animal, and Rodent is its biological group. Step 2: Conclude that the pattern is organism to its group or category. Step 3: Recall that Mildew is a mould like growth commonly seen on plants, walls, or cloth under damp conditions. Step 4: Recognise that Mildew is classified as a fungus. Step 5: Check the options. Only Fungus names a specific biological kingdom that includes mildew. Step 6: Select Fungus as the correct completion of the analogy. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can review common school examples. Fungi include mushrooms, moulds, and mildews. All are non green, spore producing organisms that often decompose organic matter. Mildew in particular is a surface fungus that thrives in damp conditions. Insect, on the other hand, refers to animals like ants, beetles, and butterflies. Pathogen is any agent that can cause disease, including certain bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Germ is a general term for a micro organism, often a harmful one. These do not specify the biological kingdom or group of mildew, whereas Fungus does so clearly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Insect: Mildew is not an insect and does not have the features of insects such as segmented bodies, legs, or wings. Pathogen: Although some forms of mildew can cause disease in plants, Pathogen is a broad functional description, not the taxonomic group to which mildew belongs. Germ: Germ is a non technical term for small organisms, usually harmful ones. It does not identify the organism as part of the fungal kingdom. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse functional labels like Pathogen or Germ with taxonomic categories like Fungus or Rodent. The key in analogies is to maintain the same level of classification. Since Porcupine pairs with the group Rodent, the corresponding pair must be Mildew with its biological group, which is Fungus, not a general label. Keeping aware of whether a word names a group, an individual, or a function prevents such errors in similar questions. Final Answer: Porcupine is a Rodent, and in the same way Mildew belongs to the group Fungus.

Question 17

Choose the English word that has a meaning most similar to the word Autopsy.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This vocabulary question asks for a synonym of the word Autopsy. Such questions are standard in verbal ability sections to assess how well candidates know specialised English terms, particularly those borrowed from medicine and science. Autopsy is a word commonly encountered in news, crime stories, and medical contexts, and knowing its meaning helps in understanding those texts accurately. Given Data / Assumptions: The target word is Autopsy. The options are Diagnosis, Rebuild, Manufacture, and Postmortem. We assume standard dictionary meanings of these English words. The task is to choose the word closest in meaning to Autopsy. Concept / Approach: Autopsy refers to a detailed examination of a dead body to determine the cause of death, to study disease or injury, or for legal purposes. It can involve surgical procedures and careful inspection of organs and tissues. Another widely used word for the same process is Postmortem, which literally means after death in Latin and is used to describe examinations of a body after death. Diagnosis, on the other hand, is the identification of a disease or condition in a living person, and Rebuild and Manufacture relate to construction or production, not medical examination. Thus Postmortem is the exact or closest synonym. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the meaning of Autopsy as a medical and legal examination of a dead body. Step 2: Review each option in turn. Step 3: Diagnosis is identifying a disease, usually in a living patient, which does not match the after death focus of Autopsy. Step 4: Rebuild means to build again, and Manufacture means to produce goods; both are unrelated to medical examinations. Step 5: Postmortem is used directly to describe an examination of a body after death and is often interchangeable with Autopsy. Step 6: Therefore, choose Postmortem as the correct synonym. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, we can recall common expressions in news reports. When a suspicious death occurs, authorities may order an Autopsy or a Postmortem examination. Both phrases describe the same activity. Diagnosis is used in sentences such as the doctor made a diagnosis of diabetes, which refers to identifying a condition in someone alive. Rebuild bridges, manufacture cars, and similar phrases clearly show that Rebuild and Manufacture belong to engineering or industry, not medicine. Therefore only Postmortem matches Autopsy in meaning and usage, confirming our answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Diagnosis: Involves identifying disease in a living patient through tests, symptoms, and medical history, not dissecting a dead body to find cause of death. Rebuild: Means to construct again or repair something physical. It does not relate to examining a body or medical investigation. Manufacture: Refers to producing goods or items in factories. It has no connection with medical or legal investigation of deaths. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may confuse Diagnosis and Autopsy because both appear in medical contexts. However, careful reading shows that diagnosis happens during a person s life while Autopsy and Postmortem are strictly after death. Another pitfall is not noticing the literal meaning of Postmortem as after death, which directly aligns with Autopsy. Remembering this link can help in both vocabulary and reading comprehension tasks that involve medical or legal topics. Final Answer: The English word that has a meaning most similar to Autopsy is Postmortem.

Question 18

Complete the analogy: Grain is stored as Stock. In a similar way, a Stick collected with many other sticks becomes what?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question uses everyday objects and their group forms to test reasoning ability. The first pair Grain : Stock indicates that individual grains, when accumulated, form a stock or store of grain. The second pair has Stick : ?, and we must identify the collective form that corresponds to a group of sticks. Such questions encourage candidates to think about how individual items combine into grouped or organised forms in common language and usage. Given Data / Assumptions: Grain represents individual units of harvested crops like rice or wheat. Stock refers to the stored quantity of goods, particularly grain or inventory. Stick represents a single piece of wood, usually thin and long. Options are Bundle, String, Collection, and Heap. We assume basic familiarity with everyday English terms for groupings of objects. Concept / Approach: The relationship in the first pair is that many grains together, usually organised for storage, form a stock. It is not just a random pile but a maintained quantity for future use. For sticks, the most natural grouped form is a Bundle of sticks tied together. The phrase bundle of sticks is common in language and appears in moral stories and daily life. String is a material used for tying, not the group itself. Collection and Heap are generic terms, but they do not capture the specific, tied grouping that is characteristic of sticks. Bundle therefore parallels Stock as an organised group of individual units. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Grain : Stock describes individual units forming an organised store. Step 2: Understand that we need a word describing the grouped form of many sticks. Step 3: Recall the common phrase bundle of sticks, where many sticks are tied together to form a convenient unit for carrying or storage. Step 4: Examine the options. Bundle names this specific grouping, while String is only the material used to tie objects. Step 5: Collection and Heap are general grouping words and do not convey the particular image used in the well known expression. Step 6: Select Bundle as the correct completion of the analogy Stick : Bundle. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by looking at how these words are used in everyday phrases. People talk about a stock of grain, a stock of goods, or stock in a warehouse. Similarly, they speak of bundles of sticks, bundles of newspapers, or bundles of clothes, especially when these items are tied together. String is used to create a bundle but is not itself the bundle. Collection and Heap may be grammatically possible but do not mirror the specific nature of the first pair, which focuses on a recognised form of storage or grouping. Therefore, Grain : Stock is matched best by Stick : Bundle. Why Other Options Are Wrong: String: String is a material used for tying objects, not the name of the grouped sticks themselves. Collection: Collection is a generic term and does not reflect the specific, tied grouping associated with sticks in common phrases. Heap: Heap suggests a disorderly pile, which does not parallel the more organised sense of Stock or the tied grouping implied by Bundle. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to select Collection because it seems related to many items gathered together. However, analogy questions often depend on common fixed expressions, and here bundle of sticks is the standard phrase. Another pitfall is to look only at loose similarity and not at the precise parallel structure of the analogy. Remembering typical collocations, such as stock of grain and bundle of sticks, helps in answering this and similar questions correctly. Final Answer: Grain gathered for storage forms a Stock, and in the same way, sticks gathered and tied together form a Bundle.

Question 19

Heed means to pay careful attention, while Neglect means to ignore. In a similar antonym based analogy, Pacify is opposite to which of the following words?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question tests knowledge of antonyms and the ability to spot opposite relationships. The pair Heed : Neglect shows that Heed means to pay attention, whereas Neglect means to ignore or fail to care for something. The second pair Pacify : ? asks for a similar contrast. Pacify means to calm, soothe, or bring peace. We must therefore find the word that represents the opposite idea of stirring up trouble or excitement. Such questions are common in verbal reasoning sections and require a clear understanding of the emotional or action based meanings of words. Given Data / Assumptions: Heed means to pay attention or take notice of. Neglect means to ignore, fail to care for, or pay insufficient attention. Pacify means to calm, reduce anger, or bring peace. The options are Allay, War, Victory, and Incite. We assume standard dictionary meanings for all choices. Concept / Approach: The first pair is clearly an antonym pair. Heed and Neglect stand in opposition regarding attention. For the second pair, Pacify is a verb that means to make someone calm or peaceful. The antonym must therefore express the act of arousing anger, excitement, rebellion, or conflict. Among the options, Incite is a verb that means to stir up, urge, or provoke people to act, often in a negative or violent way. War and Victory are nouns, and Allay means to reduce fear or worry, which is similar to Pacify rather than its opposite. Hence Pacify : Incite completes the analogous opposite relationship. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Heed and Neglect form an antonym pair: paying attention versus failing to attend. Step 2: Assume that the second pair must also contain antonyms. Step 3: Recall that Pacify means to calm or soothe a person or situation, reducing anger or tension. Step 4: Examine the options. Allay also means to reduce fear or worry and is close in meaning to Pacify, so it cannot be the opposite. Step 5: War is a state of conflict, and Victory is success in such conflict, but neither is a verb directly opposite to Pacify. Step 6: Incite means to provoke, stir up, or encourage people to act, often creating disturbance or violence. This is directly opposite to calming them. Step 7: Therefore, select Incite as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify by imagining sentences. Leaders may pacify a restless crowd by speaking calmly and making concessions. In contrast, irresponsible leaders may incite a crowd to violence with provocative words. The actions are opposite: one reduces unrest and the other increases it. Allay fear means to reduce fear, which is again a calming action similar to pacifying, not the reverse. War is a state that may arise, but Pacify is an action verb, so matching a verb with a noun breaks the parallel structure of the analogy. Victory is also a noun describing success in battle or contest, not an act that opposes Pacify. Hence Incite remains the only verb that stands in clear opposition to Pacify, confirming the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Allay: Allay means to relieve or reduce fear, pain, or worry, which is similar in effect to calming or pacifying, not opposite. War: War is a noun meaning large scale armed conflict. It is not a verb opposite Pacify and does not fit the grammatical pattern of the analogy. Victory: Victory is a noun referring to success in a struggle, again not an action verb that directly opposes the act of calming or pacifying. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to choose War because it appears opposite to peace, and peace is associated with pacification. However, the analogy compares actions, not states, and Pacify is a verb. The direct opposite action is to Incite. Another pitfall is to overlook the meaning of Allay and think that any unfamiliar word is likely opposite. Understanding that Allay also means to calm or reduce negative feelings prevents this error. Focusing on both meaning and part of speech helps to correctly match Pacify with Incite. Final Answer: Heed is the opposite of Neglect, and similarly Pacify is opposite to Incite, so Incite is the correct option.

Question 20

In the following verbal analogy, Food is to Stomach as Fuel is to which mechanical component or part?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy question tests your understanding of functional relationships between everyday objects and the parts that use or process them. Food goes into the stomach, where it is processed and converted into energy for the body. In the same way, fuel is used by a mechanical part in a vehicle or machine to produce power. The task is to identify which option stands in the same relation to fuel as stomach stands to food. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair in the analogy: Food : Stomach. Second pair pattern: Fuel : ? Available options: Truck, Plane, Engine, Automobile. We assume food is the input and the stomach is the organ that processes this input. We assume fuel is the input for a mechanical system and we must find the processing or consuming part, not the entire vehicle. Concept / Approach: In standard analogy questions, the relationship in the first pair must match the relationship in the second pair. Here, the relationship is not of location alone, but of consumption and processing. The stomach is the specific part of the body that receives and processes food. Similarly, we look for the specific mechanical part that receives and burns fuel to generate power. A whole vehicle uses fuel, but the direct processor is its engine. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand the first pair. Food is the substance taken in by the body, and the stomach is the organ that digests and processes food. Step 2: Translate this functional link. The pattern is input material to processing unit. Step 3: Consider fuel. Fuel is the substance that provides energy for a vehicle or machine. Step 4: Identify where fuel is actually burned or converted into useful work. Inside vehicles, fuel is burned in the internal combustion engine or used by some type of engine. Step 5: Compare each option with this functional role and see which describes the processing unit rather than the whole machine. Verification / Alternative check: If we make the pattern explicit, we get: Food : Stomach :: Fuel : X. Stomach is not the whole body but a specific internal part that processes food. Likewise, the correct X must be a specific internal part that processes fuel. Engine perfectly fits this role. Trucks, planes, and automobiles are complete vehicles, not the processing components themselves, so they are less precise matches for the required analogy. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Truck: A truck uses fuel, but it is the entire vehicle, not the internal part that burns the fuel. Plane: A plane also uses fuel, but again, it is the whole aircraft, not the consuming component. Automobile: Similar to truck and plane, this describes the whole vehicle rather than the specific mechanism that converts fuel into motion. Common Pitfalls: Many learners focus only on objects that are associated with fuel and overlook the key idea that the second term in the pair should be a component, not a whole system. Another common mistake is to treat fuel as if it must match any type of vehicle without checking the role parallel to stomach. Always align the function: what exactly does the processing or conversion in each case. Final Answer: The mechanical part that stands to fuel as the stomach stands to food is the Engine.

Analogy Questions