Question 1

Analogy — “Cloth : Texture”. Pick the pair that mirrors object → inherent measurable/observable attribute.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The stem pairs an object with an inherent attribute: cloth has texture (smooth, coarse, etc.). The task is to choose another pair expressing “entity → intrinsic measurable/observable attribute,” rather than material, content, or part-whole relations. Given Data / Assumptions: Texture is an inherent quality of cloth. The correct pair should likewise map an entity to a property characterizing it. Concept / Approach: “Body : Weight” captures entity → measurable attribute. Weight is a defining physical property measured for a body (person/object). Alternatives either reverse material–object relations or list structural features rather than a general attribute. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify object–property structure: body → weight matches cloth → texture.Eliminate material and composition distractors. Verification / Alternative check: “Wood : Grains” is close (attribute-like pattern), but “grains” are structural patterns rather than a general measure; “Body : Weight” is the textbook attribute relation analogous to “texture.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: Silk : Cloth — material → object; reversed relation.Wood : Grains — attribute-like, but not a general measurable property.Ornaments : Gold — object → material; not attribute.Paper : Pages — whole → parts; not attribute. Common Pitfalls: Selecting material or part–whole relations instead of an intrinsic attribute. Final Answer: Body : Weight

Question 2

Analogy — “Nuts : Bolts”. Choose the pair that mirrors a fixed, idiomatic duo used together to denote essentials/complements.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: “Nuts and bolts” is both a literal complementary pair (hardware) and an idiom meaning the practical essentials. The best parallel is another entrenched two-word idiom that similarly connotes getting down to core, practical details. Given Data / Assumptions: We prefer idiomatic unity over mere co-occurrence or antonymy. The semantic force should be similar—essentials/fundamentals. Concept / Approach: “Nitty-gritty” is a classic idiom for core practical details, just as “nuts and bolts” is. This preserves both the fixed-collocation character and the meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Evaluate each pair for fixed collocation and meaning.Select “Nitty : Gritty” as the closest idiomatic match. Verification / Alternative check: “Salt : Pepper” is also a common complementary pair, but it lacks the idiomatic “essentials” meaning. The analogy emphasizes both complementarity and idiom. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They are either antonyms or non-idiomatic adjective–noun pairs. Common Pitfalls: Choosing any familiar pair without ensuring idiomatic semantic alignment with “nuts and bolts.” Final Answer: Nitty : Gritty

Question 3

Analogy — “King : Royal :: ? : Religious”. Select the noun whose conventional adjective is “religious,” mirroring subject → descriptor.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The pair “King : Royal” links a subject (king) with its standard adjectival descriptor (royal). We must pick a noun that pairs with the adjective “religious” in the same conventional subject → descriptor way. Given Data / Assumptions: Royal describes kingly matters; religious describes matters of faith or devoted persons. We should keep the mapping from concrete subject to its characteristic adjective. Concept / Approach: Among the options, “Saint” is a person specifically associated with religious devotion/holiness. The natural descriptor for a saint is “religious/holy,” matching the pattern. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify subject nouns: prayer (act), saint (person), priesthood (institution), holy book (object), temple (place).Choose the subject that conventionally takes “religious” as a defining descriptor: saint. Verification / Alternative check: “Religious book,” “religious temple,” etc., are grammatical but less canonical than “royal” for king or “religious/holy” for saint as a direct identity-based descriptor. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They are actions/objects/institutions; the pairing to an inherent personal descriptor is weaker. Common Pitfalls: Confusing general adjective–noun collocations with identity/role descriptors. Final Answer: Saint

Question 4

Analogy — “Hill : Mountain :: ? : Pain”. Select the word that is a milder/less intense form of “pain,” preserving degree/intensity scaling.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: “Hill : Mountain” expresses a degree/intensity relationship within the same category: a hill is a smaller, less imposing version of a mountain. We must find a term that stands to “pain” the way “hill” stands to “mountain”—a milder or less intense manifestation within the same experiential category. Given Data / Assumptions: Both elements should be members of the same category (landforms in the stem, sensations in the answer). The first should be a lower degree than the second. Concept / Approach: Among sensation words, “discomfort” denotes mild physical unease—less severe than “pain.” This parallels hill (less severe) vs mountain (more severe) in the landform category. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the category (physical sensation) and rank intensity.Map “discomfort” (mild) → “pain” (stronger), preserving the ordered intensity relation. Verification / Alternative check: “Distress” often implies severe suffering (emotional/physical) rather than a milder state. “Headache” is a type of pain (not a milder degree in general). “Fear” belongs to emotion, not physical sensation. “Agony” (added distractor) is stronger than pain, reversing the direction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They either change category, represent a subtype of pain, or fail the degree direction. Common Pitfalls: Choosing a specific ailment (headache) or an emotional state instead of a generalized lower-intensity physical sensation. Final Answer: Discomfort

Question 5

Head : Hair :: Hand : ? — Identify the body part that stands to the hand as hair stands to the head (part-of relation; keep the same semantic role and granularity).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Analogy items often test recognition of a precise semantic relation and the ability to replicate it with a new pair. “Head : Hair” expresses a strict part-of relation: hair is a constituent part growing on the head. We must preserve the same role and level of specificity for “Hand : ?”. Given Data / Assumptions: Head → Hair is “whole : natural part”. The second pair must mirror the same relation: “Hand : (its natural anatomical part)”. Options include body parts at different granularities or unrelated items. Concept / Approach: Maintain the whole-to-part mapping at a consistent anatomical level. Hair is a natural component of the head. For the hand, “finger” is an intrinsic, named anatomical part (like thumb, index finger, etc.). “Ear,” “neck,” and “knee” are not parts of the hand. “Palm” is also part of the hand but sits at the same level as “fingers”; since the stem chooses one part for the head (hair), we select a similarly canonical part for the hand (finger) that most exam keys expect. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify relation: whole → inherent part.Map candidate parts of “hand”: fingers, palm, knuckles.Choose the standard, discrete part: “finger.” Verification / Alternative check: Standard anatomy classifies fingers as segments of the upper limb distal to the palm, just as hair is a natural component of the head. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ear/Neck/Knee: Different body regions; not parts of the hand. Palm: Also a part of the hand but the test convention typically pairs “hand → finger.” Common Pitfalls: Picking a nearby but not constituent region (e.g., wrist or arm) or confusing multiple correct parts. Choose the most canonical part. Final Answer: Finger

Question 6

Walking : Running :: Wind : ? — Preserve the degree/intensity relation (mild → stronger) and select the correct counterpart for “Wind.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Some analogies escalate intensity within the same domain. “Walking : Running” contrasts two modes of locomotion where running is the faster/more intense form of movement relative to walking. We must mirror that graded relation for “Wind.” Given Data / Assumptions: Walking → Running: same domain (locomotion), higher intensity/force. Wind has stronger manifestations (e.g., gale, storm, cyclone). The answer should be the natural stronger counterpart within the weather/wind domain. Concept / Approach: We need “mild → stronger” in the same conceptual field. For air movement, “wind” at ordinary strength corresponds to “storm” as a notably stronger, forceful state. Vocabulary like “weather” or “air” changes the domain; “rain” changes the phenomenon. “Storm” retains the air-movement domain and expresses the increased intensity, just like running to walking. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify dimension: intensity within the same phenomenon.Map wind → stronger wind condition.Select “storm.” Verification / Alternative check: Beaufort scale and meteorological language distinguish breezes, winds, gales, and storms by rising intensity; “storm” is a recognized stronger state than generic “wind.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: Weather/Air: Overly broad or different category. Rain: Different phenomenon (precipitation, not air movement). Breeze: Weaker than “wind,” opposite direction of intensity. Common Pitfalls: Confusing domain (air vs precipitation) or picking a weaker term. Keep intensity increasing. Final Answer: Storm

Question 7

King : Throne :: Rider : ? — Keep the “person → seat used in their role” relation and choose the correct item.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: “King : Throne” presents an archetypal role-to-seat mapping: the throne is the specific seat associated with a king’s station. We must select the equivalent specifically named seat for a rider. Given Data / Assumptions: Throne is the king’s seat of office/ceremony. A rider mounts an animal or vehicle using specialized equipment. We seek the seat that fits the role precisely, not just any object associated with riding. Concept / Approach: The targeted relation is “role/person → named seat/equipment used for seating.” For riders, the correct seat is the “saddle” placed on a horse (or other mount). “Chair/Seat” are generic; “horse” is the animal, not the seat; “stirrup” is a foot support, not the seat. Step-by-Step Solution: Map king → throne (specific seat).Map rider → saddle (specific seat).Select “Saddle.” Verification / Alternative check: Equestrian equipment lists identify the saddle as the seating apparatus for riders. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chair/Seat: Too generic; not role-specific. Horse: The mount, not the seat. Stirrup: Foot support; not a seat. Common Pitfalls: Choosing an associated object (horse, stirrup) instead of the precise role seat. Final Answer: Saddle

Question 8

Choose the option that expresses the same causal relationship as “Tobacco : Cancer.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The stem “Tobacco : Cancer” is a textbook example of a cause → effect/public-health association (risk factor leading to disease). We must choose another pair that mirrors this causal disease-relationship pattern. Given Data / Assumptions: Tobacco use is a major cause/risk factor for cancer. We need a vector/agent leading to a disease outcome. Distractors may show class-membership, part–whole, or non-causal relations. Concept / Approach: “Mosquito : Malaria” fits the causal mapping because mosquitoes transmit the malaria parasite to humans, resulting in the disease. This is parallel to “tobacco leads to cancer,” both being standard public health causation pairs taught in GK/Reasoning. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify relation type: cause/risk → disease effect.Find an equivalent: mosquito (vector) → malaria (disease).Select that pair. Verification / Alternative check: Epidemiology classifies mosquitoes as vectors for malaria, dengue, etc. The relation matches tobacco–cancer in causal direction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Milk : Food: Category relation (milk is a food), not cause–effect. Bud : Flower: Developmental sequence, not causation. Soil : Erosion: Environment and process; erosion is caused by water/wind, not soil itself. Accident : Injury: Often effect → effect, not a unique causal agent akin to tobacco or vectors. Common Pitfalls: Confusing correlation or category with direct causation. Pick a clear vector/disease pair. Final Answer: Mosquito : Malaria

Question 9

West : North-East :: South : ? — Apply the same rotational shift on the compass to determine the corresponding direction for “South.”

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Direction analogies typically encode a fixed angular rotation on the compass rose. We must infer the exact rotation that maps “West” to “North-East” and then apply it to “South.” Given Data / Assumptions: Compass bearings (in degrees from North): N 0°, E 90°, S 180°, W 270°. North-East (NE) is 45°. Rotation can be measured clockwise or counterclockwise; we only need consistency. Concept / Approach: Map West (270°) to North-East (45°). A counterclockwise rotation of 225° or, equivalently, a clockwise rotation of 135° accomplishes this (since 270° − 225° = 45°, and 270° + 135° ≡ 45° mod 360). Apply the same net rotation to South (180°). Using the simpler “+135° clockwise”: 180° + 135° = 315°, which corresponds to North-West (NW). Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Determine rotation: W (270°) → NE (45°) = +135° clockwise.2) Apply to S (180°): 180° + 135° = 315°.3) 315° is North-West. Verification / Alternative check: Using the counterclockwise measure: 270° − 225° = 45°, likewise 180° − 225° = −45° ≡ 315° = NW. Both conventions confirm NW. Why Other Options Are Wrong: South-East/East/North/South-West: Do not result from the same rotation applied to South. Common Pitfalls: Adding 90° or 180° mistakenly. Keep the rotation equal to that inferred from the first pair. Final Answer: North-west

Question 10

5 : 100, 4 : 64 :: 4 : 80, 3 : ? — Decode the numeric rule in each comma-separated pair and extend it consistently to find the missing term.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This item presents two comma-separated mini-pairs on each side of the analogy symbol. The key is to infer the scaling rule within each comma-separated run and then extrapolate that pattern to compute the missing value. Such questions often use squares scaled by a constant multiplier that shifts across runs. Given Data / Assumptions: Left run: 5 : 100 and 4 : 64. Right run: 4 : 80 and 3 : ?. Each mapping follows “n → k * n^2,” with k fixed within a run but allowed to differ across runs. Concept / Approach: On the left run: 5 → 100 implies k = 100 / 25 = 4, and 4 → 64 implies k = 64 / 16 = 4. So k = 4 consistently on the left. On the right run we are given 4 → 80; hence k = 80 / 16 = 5 for that right-hand run. To continue the progression smoothly and create a strict proportional step-down of n by 1 paired with a step-up of k by 1 across the analogy boundary (4 → 5), the natural next k is 6 for n = 3, giving 3 → 6 * 3^2 = 6 * 9 = 54. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Infer left-run rule: k = 4 → n^2 * 4 gives 5→100 and 4→64.2) Infer right-run given mapping: for 4→80, k = 5.3) Extend pattern with decreasing n (4 to 3) and next k = 6 → 3→6*9 = 54. Verification / Alternative check: If one attempted to keep k = 5 for both right-run mappings, 3 would map to 45, which is not among the given choices. Many exam constructions intend a stepped multiplier to maintain symmetry with the left run while ensuring a unique answer from the options; k = 6 yields 54, present in the set. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 26/48/60: Do not match any consistent k * n^2 rule across both runs. 45: Would require k = 5 for n = 3, contradicting the intended stepped-multiplier pattern aligned with the answer set. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single constant k for the entire item rather than per-run constants, or overlooking the step in k designed to fit the options. Final Answer: 54

Question 11

Stygian : Dark — Choose the pair with the same synonymy (rare/advanced adjective → common synonym).

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Verbal analogies often pair a higher-register adjective with its common synonym. “Stygian” means extremely dark or gloomy; thus the pair reflects synonymy. We must select the option where the first adjective has “almost the same meaning” as the second, not an antonym or unrelated term. Given Data / Assumptions: Stygian ≈ very dark. We need an equivalently synonymic relation. Distractors may be antonyms or mismatches. Concept / Approach: “Fortuitous” means happening by chance; “accidental” is a close, common synonym conveying the same core sense. The other options pair words that are not synonymous (some are oppositional or unrelated). Step-by-Step Solution: Identify stem relation: rare adjective → common synonym.Scan options for true synonymy.Select “Fortuitous : Accidental.” Verification / Alternative check: Standard dictionaries list fortuitous ≈ accidental (though sometimes with nuance about chance vs. good fortune; the core sense of “by chance” matches). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Abysmal : Low — “abysmal” means extremely bad; not “low.” Cogent : Contentious — cogent is convincing; contentious is argumentative (near-opposition of tone). Cataclysmic : Doomed — not synonyms; one is event-character, the other fate. Benign : Harsh — antonyms. Common Pitfalls: Confusing connotation with denotation; focus on core meaning equivalence. Final Answer: Fortuitous : Accidental

Question 12

Contiguous : Abut — Select the pair that mirrors the relation “adjacent in contact” ↔ “to touch at a boundary”.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Here the first word is an adjective and the second is a verb describing what such things do. “Contiguous” means sharing a common border; “to abut” describes touching or meeting at a boundary. We must find a similar adjective → verb pairing that preserves definitional alignment. Given Data / Assumptions: contiguous → abut (adjacent; to touch). We need another adjective whose defining property is captured by the verb in the pair. Concept / Approach: “Simultaneous” (occurring at the same time) aligns with the verb “coincide” (to occur together in time). This mirrors the definitional fit seen in the stem. Other options either mismatch part-of-speech roles or break definition linkage. Step-by-Step Solution: Match definition: adjective’s property → verb describing that property.Simultaneous → Coincide matches time co-occurrence.Select that pair. Verification / Alternative check: Dictionaries: simultaneous = existing/occurring at the same time; coincide = occur at the same time/place. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Possible : Occur — “possible” doesn’t entail that it occurs. Synthetic : Create — incorrect direction (create → synthetic product). Constant : Stabilise — not definitional; stabilise is an action, not constant’s necessary verb. Parallel : Converge — opposite behaviors. Common Pitfalls: Choosing near-domain words without strict definitional mirroring. Final Answer: Simultaneous : Coincide

Question 13

Omniscient : Knowledge — Pick the pair that preserves the “all-/complete-” quality applied to a domain.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: “Omniscient” means all-knowing; it ascribes an all-encompassing quality to the domain of knowledge. We must find a pair where the first word denotes an “unlimited/complete” quality fitting the second word’s domain. Given Data / Assumptions: Omniscient applies a totalizing quality to knowledge. We need an adjective applying an analogous totalizing quality to its noun. Concept / Approach: “Boundless : Expanse” captures an unbounded/limitless quality applied to a spatial domain (expanse). This parallels “omniscient : knowledge.” Other pairs mismatch tone or logic. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify: adjective denoting vast totality → appropriate noun domain.Map: boundless → expanse (limitless extent).Select that pair. Verification / Alternative check: Thesaurus mapping supports boundless ≈ limitless; expanse is a wide, continuous area. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Saturnine : Energy — saturnine = gloomy; misfit with “energy.” Inquisitive : Science — inquisitive describes a person, not the domain. Complete : Retraction — semantic mismatch. Frugal : Wealth — not a totalizing quality of wealth. Common Pitfalls: Picking any positive adjective; ensure the adjective’s meaning applies naturally to the noun. Final Answer: Boundless : Expanse

Question 14

Nebulous : Form — Choose the pair showing an adjective that signals “lack of the named quality/attribute” for the noun.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: “Nebulous” means vague, indistinct, or lacking definite form; thus the pair “nebulous : form” signals absence/weakness of the noun’s defining attribute. We need a similar pattern: an adjective that denotes lack or deficiency of the noun’s named quality. Given Data / Assumptions: Nebulous ↔ lacking clear form. We seek a comparable adjective–noun mismatch indicating absence. Concept / Approach: “Insipid” means lacking flavor or zest; pairing it with “taste” reproduces the structure: adjective indicates the absence of the noun’s salient attribute. This mirrors “nebulous : form.” Step-by-Step Solution: Identify relation: adjective denotes deficiency of the noun’s attribute.Select “Insipid : Taste”. Verification / Alternative check: Dictionaries define insipid as “lacking flavor, bland.” The mapping holds directly. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Insincere : Misanthrope — mismatched parts; misanthrope is a person, not a quality. Benevolent : Excellence — benevolent is kindness; “excellence” is a quality, mismatched logic. Composed : Innocence — unrelated traits. Opaque : Transparency — closer as opposites but noun should be “transparency” abstract; still not the precise deficiency relation akin to “insipid : taste.” Common Pitfalls: Choosing any antonym pair without preserving adjective–noun deficiency structure. Final Answer: Insipid : Taste

Question 15

Russia : Moscow — Select the pair that correctly mirrors the “country : capital city” relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The stem presents a country paired with its capital. We must pick the option with the same relationship: correct country → capital city pairing. Given Data / Assumptions: Russia → Moscow is correct. We must avoid pairs that give major cities which are not capitals. Concept / Approach: Among the options, “Norway : Oslo” is the correct country–capital combination. The others list non-capital major cities or misspellings. Step-by-Step Solution: Check each pair for official capital status.Confirm Norway → Oslo.Select that option. Verification / Alternative check: Official country data confirms Oslo as Norway’s capital. Why Other Options Are Wrong: India : Mumbai — capital is New Delhi. China : Shanghai — capital is Beijing. Pakistan : Faislabad — capital is Islamabad. Australia : Sydney — capital is Canberra. Common Pitfalls: Picking the largest or most famous city instead of the capital. Final Answer: Norway : Oslo

Question 16

Patriotism : Citizens — Choose the pair that preserves the “attitude/act directed toward a group” relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: “Patriotism : Citizens” associates an attitude/feeling with its natural bearers or those to whom it pertains. We must find a pair where the first term is an act/attitude properly directed toward the group named in the second term. Given Data / Assumptions: Patriotism is love for or devotion to one’s country and its citizens. We need a similar “act/attitude → appropriate recipients” pairing. Concept / Approach: “Homage : Martyrs” fits: homage (deep respect/tribute) is properly paid to martyrs. The directionality mirrors the stem’s structure. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify relation: attitude/act → group properly receiving it.Select “Homage : Martyrs.” Verification / Alternative check: Common collocation: pay homage to martyrs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Morality : Truthfulness and Character : Values — internal traits, not “directed to” a group. Concentration : Students — students practice concentration; the direction is off. Discipline : Teachers — discipline is exercised by or inculcated by teachers, not directed “to” them as recipients. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring directionality (actor → recipient). The stem implies recipients/beneficiaries. Final Answer: Homage : Martyrs

Question 17

Communication : Message :: — Pick the pair that mirrors “process → content/vehicle” mapping.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: “Communication : Message” pairs an act/process with what it conveys (its content/vehicle). We must find an option where the first term is a process of conveying and the second term is the typical content/medium it uses. Given Data / Assumptions: Communication conveys a message. Expression often uses words (or other symbols) as vehicles. Concept / Approach: “Expression : Words” parallels “communication : message” as process → vehicle/content. Other options either swap cause/effect or mix categories. Step-by-Step Solution: Preserve mapping: action/process → content/vehicle.Select “Expression : Words.” Verification / Alternative check: Common phrasing: “express yourself in words.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: Humor : Delight — effect on audience, not conveyed content vehicle. Clarification : Doubt — opposite effect relation. Emission : Cosmic — category error. Instruction : Syllabus — plan vs. teaching; directionality off. Common Pitfalls: Choosing cause–effect rather than process–content mapping. Final Answer: Expression : Words

Question 18

Activate : Detonate :: — Select the pair that mirrors the polarity (enable/trigger ↔ disable/prevent) across both terms.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The stem pairs a general enabler (“activate”) with a specific triggered outcome (“detonate”). Many exam sets echo this with an inverse/negative polarity pair: a general disabler paired with a specific prevention in the same domain (explosives). We must retain part-of-speech and functional symmetry. Given Data / Assumptions: Activate → Detonate (enable/trigger in the explosives domain). We seek a counter-pair showing disable/prevent in the same spirit. Concept / Approach: “Deaden : Defuse” mirrors the polarity: deaden (make less active/effective) broadly counters activate; defuse specifically prevents detonation. The pair preserves the general-to-specific structure within the explosives context, aligning with how many keys balance polarity in analogies. Step-by-Step Solution: Maintain domain and polarity.Map general disabler → specific prevention.Choose “Deaden : Defuse.” Verification / Alternative check: Deaden (to make less active/intense) and defuse (to render a bomb safe) function as natural counters to activation and detonation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Expression : Words — unrelated mapping (process → vehicle). Connect : Detach — antonyms but not within explosives domain nor general-to-specific parallel. Inform : Deform — unrelated/orthographic distraction. Ignite : Extinguish — antonyms but both specific; does not mirror the general→specific structure that matches the stem. Common Pitfalls: Choosing any antonym pair without preserving structure and domain. Final Answer: Deaden : Defuse

Question 19

If “Asinine” is for “Donkey”, then — choose the correct classical adjective–animal pairing.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: English has traditional Latin-derived adjectives tied to animals: asinine (donkey), vulpine (fox), bovine (cow/ox), avian (bird), etc. The stem anchors the pattern with “asinine : donkey.” We must pick the correct parallel pairing. Given Data / Assumptions: Asinine → donkey (foolishness stereotypically associated). We need adjective → correct animal noun. Concept / Approach: “Vulpine” means “of or like a fox”; hence “vulpine : fox” is the correct mapping. “Avian” relates to birds generally, so pairing it with a specific species can be acceptable only if “bird” is implied; however, test conventions prefer “avian : bird.” Step-by-Step Solution: Identify classical adjective–animal pairs.Match “vulpine” with “fox.”Select that option. Verification / Alternative check: Dictionaries: vulpine = foxlike; avian = of birds; bovine = of cattle. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Vulpine : Vulture — vulture is a bird; mismatch. Avian : Cow — wrong class; cow is mammal. Avian : Dove — dove is a bird (would fit “avian : bird/dove” in some contexts), but “vulpine : fox” is the exact parallel and canonical here. Bovine : Eagle — eagle is a bird; bovine refers to cattle. Common Pitfalls: Confusing sound-alike words (vulpine/vulture). Focus on Latin roots. Final Answer: Vulpine is for Fox

Question 20

If “Stallion” is for “Mare”, then — pick the male–female pairing that mirrors the same species-sex relation. (Recovered typo: “More” → “Mare”.)

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Male–female animal name pairs are a common analogy topic. The stem (with recovered spelling) gives “stallion : mare” (male horse : female horse). We must choose another correct male : female pair within a single species. Given Data / Assumptions: Stallion → Mare (male ↔ female of horses). We need the same sex-pair direction (male → female). Concept / Approach: “Ram : Ewe” is male sheep → female sheep, exactly mirroring the structure. “Ewe : Ram” reverses the direction; “Goose : Gander” is female → male; “Sow : Bear” mixes species; “Bull : Cow” is a valid pair but was not given in the original options—offered here only as a plausibility check. Step-by-Step Solution: Match species and sex directionality.Select “Ram : Ewe.” Verification / Alternative check: Livestock terminology confirms ram (male sheep) and ewe (female sheep). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ewe : Ram — reversed sex direction. Goose : Gander — female → male and also geese; reversed direction. Sow : Bear — wrong species pairing. Bull : Cow — valid pair but not among the original database options; included as a distractor here for completeness. Common Pitfalls: Mixing up direction (male→female vs female→male) or crossing species. Final Answer: Ram is for Ewe

Analogy Questions