Question 1

Human life stages (earliest to latest): Arrange— a. Birth, b. Death, c. Childhood, d. Infancy, e. Adolescence, f. Adulthood, g. Old age.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Reasoning exams often test knowledge of natural sequences like human development. The order proceeds from birth through growth and maturity to old age and death. Given Data / Assumptions: Standard developmental stages: Infancy → Childhood → Adolescence → Adulthood → Old age. Birth initiates life; death concludes it. Concept / Approach: Place the fixed endpoints first (birth, death), then insert intermediate stages in pedagogically accepted order. Step-by-Step Solution: Birth (a) → Infancy (d) → Childhood (c) → Adolescence (e) → Adulthood (f) → Old age (g) → Death (b). Verification / Alternative check: Matches common biology/social science curricula. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They misplace adolescence/adulthood or position death earlier. Common Pitfalls: Swapping childhood and infancy; placing old age before adulthood. Final Answer: a, d, c, e, f, g, b

Question 2

Basic document workflow on a computer (logical operations): Arrange— a. Type, b. Print, c. Open (or create), d. Save, e. Close.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This order reflects standard operations when working on a document: start, compose, save, optionally print, and then close. Given Data / Assumptions: “Open” may include creating a new document. Users normally save before printing to preserve the current state. Closing ends the session. Concept / Approach: Arrange by real-world usage while ensuring data safety (save before print/close). Step-by-Step Solution: Open → c.Type → a.Save → d.Print → b.Close → e. Verification / Alternative check: Saving before printing/closing is best practice to avoid data loss. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They print/close prematurely or misplace typing. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting to save before printing or closing. Final Answer: c, a, d, b, e

Question 3

Water course (source to sink): Arrange— a. Ocean, b. Rivulet, c. Sea, d. Glacier, e. River.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Hydrological reasoning: mountain ice gives rise to tiny streams, which form rivers that drain to seas and finally the global oceans. Given Data / Assumptions: Glacier melt → rivulets → rivers. Rivers often empty into seas, which are marginal parts of the oceans. Concept / Approach: Order by natural flow from source to ultimate sink. Step-by-Step Solution: Glacier (d) → Rivulet (b) → River (e) → Sea (c) → Ocean (a). Verification / Alternative check: Consistent with drainage basins and global ocean connectivity. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They place ocean/sea before upstream sources. Common Pitfalls: Confusing sea vs ocean; reversing source and mouth. Final Answer: d, b, e, c, a

Question 4

Honey production chain (cause to product): Arrange— (A) Honey, (B) Flower, (C) Honey Bee, (D) Wax.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Bees collect nectar from flowers and process it into honey; wax is secreted by worker bees and used to build comb, often associated with stored honey. Given Data / Assumptions: Flowers provide nectar/pollen. Honey bees process nectar into honey. Bees also produce wax to construct honeycombs. Concept / Approach: Arrange the causal chain from source (flower) to agent (bee) to product (honey) to associated material (wax). Step-by-Step Solution: Flower (B) → Honey Bee (C) → Honey (A) → Wax (D). Verification / Alternative check: Aligned with apiculture basics. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They put products before sources or agents. Common Pitfalls: Assuming wax precedes honey; confusing roles of flower vs bee. Final Answer: (B), (C), (A), (D)

Question 5

From ecosystem to product: Arrange— (a) Furniture, (b) Forest, (c) Wood, (d) Tree.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a resource-to-product chain. A forest contains trees; trees yield wood; wood is crafted into furniture. Given Data / Assumptions: Hierarchical containment: forest ⊃ tree. Transformation: tree → wood → furniture. Concept / Approach: Move from largest natural set to finished product. Step-by-Step Solution: Forest (b) → Tree (d) → Wood (c) → Furniture (a). Verification / Alternative check: Matches supply chain logic from raw ecosystem to manufactured goods. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They break containment or transformation order. Common Pitfalls: Placing furniture before wood. Final Answer: (b), (d), (c), (a)

Question 6

Social units by scale/aggregation (smallest to larger): Arrange— a. Members (individuals), b. City, c. Village, d. Family, e. Community.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This ordering uses social aggregation: individuals cluster into families; families into communities; communities constitute villages and cities. Given Data / Assumptions: Member (individual) is the atomic unit. Family is the smallest stable social group. Community spans multiple families. Settlements: village then city (broader scale). Concept / Approach: Order by increasing scope/scale. Step-by-Step Solution: Members (a) → Family (d) → Community (e) → Village (c) → City (b). Verification / Alternative check: Consistent with common civics/GE reasoning items. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They invert aggregation (e.g., placing city before family). Common Pitfalls: Confusing community with administrative units. Final Answer: a, d, e, c, b

Question 7

Hiring workflow (earliest to latest): Arrange— a. probation, b. advertisement, c. application, d. selection, e. interview, f. appointment.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Standard HR recruitment proceeds from announcing positions to onboarding and probation. Given Data / Assumptions: Advertisement attracts candidates. Applications are submitted; shortlisted applicants are interviewed. Selection decision precedes appointment (offer/joining). Probation follows appointment. Concept / Approach: Place each stage where it logically occurs in corporate workflows. Step-by-Step Solution: Advertisement (b) → Application (c) → Interview (e) → Selection (d) → Appointment (f) → Probation (a). Verification / Alternative check: Matches common organizational practices. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They swap selection/appointment or put probation first. Common Pitfalls: Confusing offer (appointment) with selection decision. Final Answer: b, c, e, d, f, a

Question 8

Indian Nobel laureates (chronological order of award): Arrange— a. Amartya Sen, b. Mother Teresa, c. Rabindranath Tagore, d. Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, e. Sir C.V. Raman.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: General knowledge chronology checks both memory and ordering skills. Here we list Indian Nobel Prize winners by year of award. Given Data / Assumptions: Rabindranath Tagore — 1913 (Literature). Sir C.V. Raman — 1930 (Physics). Mother Teresa — 1979 (Peace). Amartya Sen — 1998 (Economic Sciences). Venkatraman Ramakrishnan — 2009 (Chemistry). Concept / Approach: Order strictly by award year from earliest to latest. Step-by-Step Solution: Tagore (c) → Raman (e) → Mother Teresa (b) → Amartya Sen (a) → V. Ramakrishnan (d). Verification / Alternative check: Years are well known and appear in standard GK references. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They misplace recipients relative to their award years. Common Pitfalls: Confusing Raman (1930) with Ramakrishnan (2009). Final Answer: c, e, b, a, d

Question 9

Human development micro-stages (earliest to latest): Arrange— (a) Infancy, (b) Childhood, (c) Adulthood, (d) Babyhood, (e) Adolescence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Some syllabi distinguish babyhood and infancy as very early stages. After these come childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. Given Data / Assumptions: Babyhood and infancy are both pre-childhood; several boards place “babyhood” (newborn/toddler) before a broader “infancy”. Adolescence is the transition to adulthood. Concept / Approach: Sequence early micro-stages before broader childhood, then adolescence, then adulthood. Step-by-Step Solution: Infancy (a) and Babyhood (d) are the earliest; with this item’s framing, list them consecutively.Adolescence (e) follows childhood and leads to adulthood (c).A reasonable pedagogic order offered in options is: a, d, e, b, c. Verification / Alternative check: Among provided sequences, this preserves early stages first and adult last. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They place adulthood before adolescence/childhood or scatter the early micro-stages. Common Pitfalls: Treating babyhood and infancy as identical and ignoring option constraints. Final Answer: a, d, e, b, c

Question 10

Plant parts (functional/structural order from support to reproduction): Arrange— (a) Leaf, (b) Fruit, (c) Stem, (d) Roots, (e) Flower.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Reasoning about plant morphology: support and transport organs precede foliage; reproductive organs (flowers) precede fruits. Given Data / Assumptions: Roots → Stem → Leaf → Flower → Fruit is the natural conceptual order. Concept / Approach: Arrange from anchorage to reproductive product. Step-by-Step Solution: Roots (d) → Stem (c) → Leaf (a) → Flower (e) → Fruit (b). Verification / Alternative check: Fruits develop from flowers; stems carry leaves and flowers. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They invert reproduction or place leaves after flowers. Common Pitfalls: Assuming fruits can appear before flowers. Final Answer: (d), (c), (a), (e), (b)

Question 11

Problem-solving/research workflow (logical order): Arrange— (i) Take action, (ii) Collect data, (iii) Select problem, (iv) Analyse and interpret data.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Standard inquiry proceeds from defining a problem to gathering evidence, analysing it, and then acting on results. Given Data / Assumptions: Action comes last, after analysis. Concept / Approach: Map to the research cycle. Step-by-Step Solution: Select problem (iii) → Collect data (ii) → Analyse/interpret (iv) → Take action (i). Verification / Alternative check: Consistent with PDCA/empirical workflows. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They act before analysing or select problem late. Common Pitfalls: Jumping to action without data. Final Answer: (iii), (ii), (iv), (i)

Question 12

Mother–infant routine events (plausible sequence): Arrange— a. Mother, b. Infant, c. Milk, d. Crying, e. Smiling.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This common-sense sequencing problem models how a caregiver responds to an infant’s needs. Given Data / Assumptions: Infant expresses need (crying) → caregiver provides milk → infant is satisfied (smiling). Concept / Approach: Order by cause (need) to response (care) to outcome (contentment). Step-by-Step Solution: Infant (b) → Crying (d) → Mother (a) → Milk (c) → Smiling (e). Verification / Alternative check: Matches typical caregiving flow. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They place smiling before feeding or omit the caregiver response order. Common Pitfalls: Starting with mother instead of infant’s need. Final Answer: b, d, a, c, e

Question 13

Planets by distance from the Sun (inner to outer among the set): Arrange— 1. Venus, 2. Earth, 3. Mars, 4. Mercury, 5. Jupiter.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Basic astronomy: ordering planets by heliocentric distance within the listed group. Given Data / Assumptions: Inner planets in order: Mercury → Venus → Earth → Mars; then gas giant Jupiter. Concept / Approach: Map names to their ordinal positions from the Sun and transcribe the provided indices. Step-by-Step Solution: Mercury (4) → Venus (1) → Earth (2) → Mars (3) → Jupiter (5). Verification / Alternative check: Matches standard solar system order. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They misplace Venus/Earth or put Jupiter before Mars. Common Pitfalls: Confusing Earth and Venus order. Final Answer: 4, 1, 2, 3, 5

Question 14

Hospital patient care sequence: Arrange— Diagnosis, Operation, Post-operational care, Discharge.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Surgical episodes follow a predictable order: assessment, procedure, recovery, release. Given Data / Assumptions: Diagnosis precedes any surgery. Post-operative care occurs before discharge. Concept / Approach: Arrange by clinical chronology. Step-by-Step Solution: Diagnosis → Operation → Post-operational care → Discharge. Verification / Alternative check: Standard across hospitals. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They discharge or operate at illogical times. Common Pitfalls: Skipping recovery care. Final Answer: Diagnosis, Operation, Post operational care, Discharge

Question 15

Food chain (producer to apex predator): Arrange— 1. Frog, 2. Eagle, 3. Grasshopper, 4. Snake, 5. Grass.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Food chains begin with producers (plants), followed by primary consumers (herbivores), then secondary/tertiary consumers up to apex predators. Given Data / Assumptions: Grass = producer. Grasshopper = herbivore (primary consumer). Frog = insectivore (secondary consumer). Snake = predator of frogs (tertiary level). Eagle = apex predator. Concept / Approach: Arrange by trophic levels. Step-by-Step Solution: Grass (5) → Grasshopper (3) → Frog (1) → Snake (4) → Eagle (2). Verification / Alternative check: Matches typical textbook chains. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They start with consumers or misplace apex predator. Common Pitfalls: Switching frog and snake. Final Answer: 5, 3, 1, 4, 2

Question 16

House construction (logical build order): Arrange— a. Plastering, b. Painting, c. Foundation, d. Walls, e. Ceiling.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Building construction proceeds from structural base to finishes. Given Data / Assumptions: Foundation first; then walls; then ceiling/roof structure; then internal finishes like plastering; finally painting. Concept / Approach: Arrange by structural dependency and finish sequencing. Step-by-Step Solution: Foundation (c) → Walls (d) → Ceiling (e) → Plastering (a) → Painting (b). Verification / Alternative check: Matches typical site workflows. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They attempt finishing before structure. Common Pitfalls: Painting before plastering. Final Answer: c, d, e, a, b

Question 17

Arrange the following words in a meaningful logical order representing the flow of a formal meeting or event: 1. Presentation 2. Recommendation 3. Arrival 4. Discussion 5. Introduction. Which sequence is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is from logical sequence of words. You are given five stages commonly associated with a formal meeting or event: Arrival, Introduction, Presentation, Discussion, and Recommendation. The task is to arrange these in the most sensible chronological order. Such questions test your understanding of real life processes and your ability to structure events logically from start to finish. Given Data / Assumptions: The words are: 1. Presentation, 2. Recommendation, 3. Arrival, 4. Discussion, 5. Introduction. A typical formal meeting begins when participants arrive and then proceed through introductory and main content stages. Recommendations usually come after all major points have been presented and discussed. Concept / Approach: To build the logical order, we think about how meetings unfold in practice. First, people reach the venue. Then they are introduced. After that, the main content or presentation is delivered. Once the presentation is over, participants discuss the ideas. Based on that discussion, they form recommendations or conclusions. Thus we place the words along this natural timeline and then select the option that matches it. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Arrival must come first because no process can start before people reach the venue. So 3 comes first. Step 2: After people arrive, they are introduced to each other or to the agenda. So Introduction, which is 5, comes next. Step 3: Once introductions are complete, the main Presentation, numbered 1, is delivered. Step 4: After the presentation, participants engage in Discussion, numbered 4, to analyse and clarify the points. Step 5: Finally, after a thorough discussion, they form a Recommendation, numbered 2, which summarises their decisions or advice. Step 6: The correct chronological sequence is therefore 3, 5, 1, 4, 2. Verification / Alternative check: We can test the chosen sequence by narrating a short story. First, the audience arrives at the meeting place. Next, there is an introduction of the participants and the topic. Then, a detailed presentation is given. After the presentation, everyone enters into a discussion phase. Finally, the group arrives at a recommendation. This narrative follows common real life practice, confirming the logical flow of 3, 5, 1, 4, 2. No other option preserves this realistic order of events from beginning to end. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (5, 3, 4, 1, 2) wrongly places Introduction before Arrival, which is not possible. Option B (3, 5, 4, 2, 1) puts Discussion and Recommendation before the Presentation, which is illogical because people must first see the content before discussing and recommending. Option D (5, 3, 1, 2, 4) again starts with Introduction before Arrival and also puts Recommendation before Discussion, which goes against the usual decision process. Hence these alternatives do not match practical meeting behaviour. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes focus on what sounds important, such as Presentation or Recommendation, and place these earlier than they should, ignoring the necessary preceding steps. Another pitfall is to misinterpret Introduction as an opening separate from Arrival and assume it can occur independently. It is vital to think about real world sequences and imagine the actual order in which events normally happen, rather than only trusting the numerical labels or the order in which the words are listed. Final Answer: The correct meaningful sequence is 3, 5, 1, 4, 2, which corresponds to option C.

Question 18

Arrange the following in a meaningful logical sequence showing a realistic chain of social problems and outcomes: 1. Poverty 2. Population 3. Death 4. Unemployment 5. Disease. Which order is most appropriate?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a logical sequence of words problem involving social and economic conditions. The words Population, Unemployment, Poverty, Disease, and Death are related as causes and effects in a realistic scenario. The task is to arrange them so that they form a sensible causal chain from the starting factor to the final outcome. Such questions test your understanding of real world cause effect relationships and your ability to structure them logically. Given Data / Assumptions: 1. Poverty 2. Population 3. Death 4. Unemployment 5. Disease We assume typical socio economic conditions where excessive population strain resources and lead to various problems. Concept / Approach: We need to begin with the root cause and progress through intermediate conditions to a final severe outcome. In many societies, rapid growth in population can lead to insufficient jobs, resulting in unemployment. Unemployment often leads to Poverty. In poor conditions, people face inadequate nutrition, sanitation, and healthcare, which promotes Disease. Finally, uncontrolled disease can lead to Death. We place the given words along this natural causative chain. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Population is the starting point, since it represents the total number of people and is listed as item 2. Step 2: High population can create pressure on available jobs, which leads to Unemployment, item 4. Step 3: Unemployment often produces Poverty, item 1, because individuals do not have a steady income. Step 4: Poverty in turn contributes to poor living conditions, resulting in Disease, item 5. Step 5: If diseases are not controlled, they can ultimately result in Death, item 3. Step 6: Thus the logical sequence is 2, 4, 1, 5, 3. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify this ordering by reading it as a story: a large Population (2) causes Unemployment (4), which leads to widespread Poverty (1). Due to poverty, people are vulnerable to Disease (5). Severe or widespread disease results in many cases of Death (3). This narrative is realistic and flows naturally. No other option among those provided offers such a clear causal chain. For example, beginning with Death or Disease would ignore obvious prior social causes, and ending with Population would be illogical. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (2, 3, 4, 5, 1) jumps from Population directly to Death without explaining intermediate mechanisms. Option B (3, 4, 2, 5, 1) begins with Death, which cannot logically be the starting point of the chain. Option D (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) simply lists the words in the given order and does not reflect realistic causal relationships. These orders fail to reflect a well motivated progression from cause to effect. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to arrange the words purely by intuition without carefully considering cause and effect. Some learners also confuse the relative positions of Poverty and Disease, placing Disease before Poverty. However, economic hardship and lack of basic resources typically precede and contribute to health problems. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to think through a simple real world story that connects each word to the next in a rational way. Final Answer: The correct logical sequence is 2, 4, 1, 5, 3, corresponding to Population, Unemployment, Poverty, Disease, and then Death.

Question 19

Arrange the following human arm parts in a logical anatomical order moving from the tip of the limb towards the body: 1. Shoulder 2. Wrist 3. Elbow 4. Palm 5. Finger. Which sequence is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This logical sequence of words problem involves parts of the human upper limb. You must arrange Finger, Palm, Wrist, Elbow, and Shoulder in a meaningful sequence. The question does not explicitly state whether to move from body to extremity or from extremity to body, but in many reasoning questions of this type, the order from the tip of the limb towards the body is preferred, as it illustrates the path of movement or connection. Given Data / Assumptions: 1. Shoulder 2. Wrist 3. Elbow 4. Palm 5. Finger We assume the parts lie along the same limb in a standard anatomical arrangement. Concept / Approach: To form the logical sequence, we recall the physical arrangement of these parts. At the outermost end are the Fingers, attached to the Palm. The Palm connects to the Wrist, which leads to the Forearm and Elbow. The upper arm then connects to the Shoulder near the body. Therefore, moving from the tip of the limb back towards the torso, the order is Finger, Palm, Wrist, Elbow, Shoulder. We then map these words to their given numbers and choose the option that matches this progression. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the outermost part: Finger is number 5. Step 2: The Finger is connected to the Palm, which is number 4. Step 3: The Palm leads to the Wrist, which is number 2. Step 4: Moving further up the arm, the Wrist is followed by the Elbow, which is number 3. Step 5: Finally, the Elbow is connected to the Shoulder, which is the part closest to the torso and is number 1. Step 6: The correct anatomical sequence from extremity to body is therefore 5, 4, 2, 3, 1. Verification / Alternative check: We can visualise a simple diagram of the arm. Starting from the tip, we see Finger, then Palm, then Wrist, then Elbow, and finally Shoulder. This matches general anatomical knowledge and everyday experience. No other option captures this continuous path in the right order. For example, starting from the Shoulder and moving outwards would give 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, which is not among the answer choices. Therefore the only option that respects the true structure, 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (2, 4, 5, 3, 1) begins with Wrist, then Palm, then Finger, which does not follow a clear directional progression from either end. Option B (3, 1, 4, 2, 5) places the Elbow before the Shoulder and mixes distal and proximal parts in an inconsistent way. Option C (3, 4, 5, 2, 1) begins at Elbow, jumps to Palm and Finger, and then moves back inland, which is not a natural linear path. These orders do not represent a smooth physical progression along the limb. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to assume that the sequence must always start from the body, ignoring the possibility of moving from extremity to body, or vice versa. Another pitfall is to think in terms of importance rather than actual physical arrangement. Visualising the arm and mentally tracing from the fingers to the shoulder (or the other way around) helps avoid such errors. Drawing a quick mental or rough sketch of the limb can also clarify the correct order. Final Answer: The meaningful sequence is 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, corresponding to Finger, Palm, Wrist, Elbow, Shoulder, which matches option D.

Question 20

Arrange the following in a meaningful logical order representing the growth of social groupings: 1. Caste 2. Family 3. Newly married couple 4. Clan 5. Species. Which sequence is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This logical sequence of words question concerns levels of social and biological grouping: Newly married couple, Family, Caste, Clan, and Species. The task is to arrange them from the smallest unit to the broadest category in a meaningful order. Questions like this test your understanding of hierarchy in human relationships and broader classifications. Given Data / Assumptions: 1. Caste 2. Family 3. Newly married couple 4. Clan 5. Species We consider both social and biological structures, moving from very specific units to very general groups. Concept / Approach: We start with the smallest and most specific unit and then move outward to increasingly larger groupings. A Newly married couple is the smallest unit here, consisting of two individuals. A Family is next, since it includes parents, children, and possibly other relatives. Multiple families form a Caste or social grouping with a shared identity. Several castes are related in a broader Clan, and finally, many clans and related groups belong to the same Species, which is the broadest category in this list. We map these units back to their numbers to determine the correct sequence. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: The smallest group is the Newly married couple, which is item 3. Step 2: Several couples along with their children and elders make up a Family, item 2. Step 3: Many families together form a Caste or social group with common customs, which is item 1. Step 4: Multiple castes may be part of a larger social unit called a Clan, which is item 4. Step 5: At the highest level, many clans and related groups of organisms together belong to a Species, which is item 5. Step 6: Therefore, the logical order from smallest to largest is 3, 2, 1, 4, 5. Verification / Alternative check: We can verify this by reading it as a hierarchy. A Newly married couple is part of a Family. That family belongs to a Caste. The caste is contained within a broader Clan, and the clan is part of the overall Species. The direction is clearly from specific to general. None of the other options match this sensible progression: any option that places Species earlier or Newly married couple later contradicts the intended hierarchical relationship. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A (2, 3, 1, 4, 5) places Family before Newly married couple, which is not fully logical, as the couple is the starting unit for forming a family. Option B (3, 4, 5, 1, 2) jumps quickly from couple to clan and species, then returns to caste and family, breaking the hierarchical flow. Option D (4, 5, 3, 2, 1) starts with clan and species and then moves downwards inconsistently, which does not represent a gradual growth from small to large. These sequences do not reflect a coherent building up of social and biological units. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to place Family first because it is a familiar word, without considering the fact that a couple is an even smaller unit. Some learners also confuse Caste and Clan or do not think carefully about how broad the term Species is in comparison. To avoid such confusion, always ask which group can contain another, and then arrange them from the smallest container to the largest, or vice versa, depending on the question requirement. Final Answer: The correct logical sequence is 3, 2, 1, 4, 5, corresponding to Newly married couple, Family, Caste, Clan, and Species, which matches option C.

Logical Sequence of Words Questions