Q: A typical patient-care timeline includes the following stages. Arrange them in the most logical order from onset to outcome: 1) Consultation 2) Illness (onset of symptoms) 3) Doctor (visiting the physician) 4) Treatment (tests/medication/procedure)…

Introduction / Context: Sequencing in healthcare scenarios hinges on real-life chronology. A person first becomes ill, then engages with healthcare (doctor/consultation), receives treatment, and finally recovers. Some terms like “doctor” and “consultation” can overlap; exam logic treats them as consecutive steps within the clinical encounter before treatment begins. Given Data / Assumptions: 2) Illness: symptoms appear. 3) Doctor: the patient visits/contacts the physician. 1) Consultation: clinical history/examination/discussion with the doctor. 4) Treatment: investigations/medications/procedures follow. 5) Recovery: improvement and return to health. Concept / Approach: We must reconcile overlapping terms by placing “doctor” (the act of seeking care) immediately followed by “consultation” (the structured clinical interaction) and then “treatment.” Though some might write “consultation with the doctor” as one, the intended test key splits them in this order to preserve a clear before→during→after progression. Step-by-Step Solution: Onset: 2 (Illness).Access care: 3 (Doctor).Clinical interaction: 1 (Consultation).Intervention: 4 (Treatment).Outcome: 5 (Recovery).Therefore: 2, 3, 1, 4, 5. Verification / Alternative check: Swapping treatment before consultation breaks standard care flow; placing recovery earlier contradicts causality. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2, 3, 4, 1, 5: treatment cannot precede consultation. 4, 3, 1, 2, 5: starts with treatment; illogical. 5, 1, 4, 3, 2: starts with recovery; impossible. None of these: Not applicable since a coherent sequence exists. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “doctor” and “consultation” are synonymous and skipping one; the problem intends a fine-grained sequence. Final Answer: 2, 3, 1, 4, 5

Question 1

Arrange the causal chain related to urban challenges.  1. Pollution 2. Population 3. Death 4. Disease  Choose the most logical progression.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This logical chain links demographic pressure to health outcomes via environmental quality. Given Data / Assumptions: Higher population tends to increase pollution; pollution elevates disease risk; severe disease can lead to death. Concept / Approach: Order by cause → intermediate ←→ effect sequence. Step-by-Step Solution: Population (2) rises.Pollution (1) increases as a consequence.Disease (4) incidence rises due to pollution.Death (3) occurs in severe cases. Verification / Alternative check: Epidemiological models often include pollution as a risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Starting with death or disease as causes reverses the chain; placing pollution after disease misses the mediator role. Common Pitfalls: Assuming linearity in all contexts; here, the simplified model is appropriate for reasoning. Final Answer: 2, 1, 4, 3

Question 2

Arrange the early-life interaction sequence logically.  a) Mother b) Infant c) Milk d) Cryinge) Smiling  Choose the order that best reflects typical cause-and-effect.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This causal sequence tracks a common infant-care interaction: infant need → signal → caregiver response → feeding → contentment. Given Data / Assumptions: Infant cries to signal need; mother responds; milk is provided; infant then smiles/content. Concept / Approach: Order by stimulus–response chain. Step-by-Step Solution: Infant (b) experiences need.Crying (d) signals caregiver.Mother (a) responds.Milk (c) is given (feeding).Smiling (e) reflects satisfaction. Verification / Alternative check: Behavioral observations of infant care match this flow. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sequences starting with milk or smiling ignore the cause that triggers caregiver action. Common Pitfalls: Assuming quiet infants are already content; here “crying → response → feed → smile” is the prototypical cycle. Final Answer: b, d, a, c, e

Question 3

Arrange typical life milestones in a modern education-to-employment pathway.  a) Salary b) Child c) Employment d) Schoole) College

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This sequence reflects a common educational and professional trajectory from childhood through schooling to earning. Given Data / Assumptions: Child → School → College → Employment → Salary. Concept / Approach: Order by institutional progression then economic outcome. Step-by-Step Solution: Child (b) is the person at start.School (d).College (e).Employment (c).Salary (a) as earnings from job. Verification / Alternative check: While alternative paths exist, this is the conventional order in aptitude questions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any order paying salary before employment or placing college before school is inconsistent. Common Pitfalls: Assuming salary equals employment start instantly; onboarding/payroll cycles mean earnings follow employment. Final Answer: b, d, e, c, a

Question 4

Arrange major life events logically from birth to career.  a) Child b) Profession c) Marriage d) Infante) Education

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The task is to place human life milestones in logical chronological order. Given Data / Assumptions: Infant → Child → Education → Profession → Marriage (ordering may vary culturally for the last two; we use the conventional aptitude-test order that places profession before marriage). Concept / Approach: Use age progression with schooling preceding work, work preceding marriage per common exam convention. Step-by-Step Solution: Infant (d).Child (a).Education (e).Profession (b).Marriage (c). Verification / Alternative check: Many reasoning books adopt this order; alternative cultural sequences exist but are not typical in such tests. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Placing marriage before education or profession contradicts the mainstream order used in aptitude contexts. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “child” and “infant” are interchangeable; infant is the earlier sub-stage. Final Answer: d, a, e, b, c

Question 5

Arrange building activities from foundation to finishing.  a) Plastering b) Painting c) Foundation d) Wallse) Ceiling

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Construction follows a structural-to-finish sequence to ensure safety and quality. Given Data / Assumptions: Foundation supports walls; ceiling/roofing comes after walls; plaster precedes painting. Concept / Approach: Arrange by prerequisite: structure → enclosure → finishing. Step-by-Step Solution: Foundation (c).Walls (d).Ceiling (e).Plastering (a).Painting (b). Verification / Alternative check: Site schedules and method statements reflect this order. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Painting cannot precede plastering; walls must exist before ceilings in most builds. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring drying/curing times between plastering and painting; though not listed, the order still holds. Final Answer: c, d, e, a, b

Question 6

Arrange the family generations from oldest to youngest, placing same-generation relation appropriately.  (a) Grandfather (b) Brother (c) Father (d) Son (e) Grandson

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The task is to order relatives by generation. Grandfather is two generations older, father is one generation older, brother is the same generation as “self,” son is one generation younger, and grandson is two generations younger. Given Data / Assumptions: “Brother” is placed alongside the self-generation. We order by generational distance from oldest to youngest. Concept / Approach: Map each relation to a generation index: grandfather (+2), father (+1), brother (0), son (−1), grandson (−2). Sort descending by index. Step-by-Step Solution: Grandfather (a) — oldest.Father (c) — next.Brother (b) — same generation as self.Son (d) — younger.Grandson (e) — youngest. Verification / Alternative check: Family trees consistently place these in precisely this generational order. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any order putting grandson ahead of son or father after brother misplaces generations. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting that “brother” is not older or younger by generation; age can vary, but generation does not. Final Answer: a, c, b, d, e

Question 7

Healthcare workflow — Arrange the five items into a logical sequence from problem to resolution: Disease (patient develops a health problem) → Doctor (seeks professional help) → Diagnosis (identify the condition) → Medicine (prescribed treatment) → …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In routine healthcare, events usually proceed from a patient's health problem to a professional consultation, clinical evaluation, treatment, and finally recovery. The five given terms — Disease, Doctor, Diagnosis, Medicine, and Cure — can be organized into a cause-to-effect chain that mirrors real clinical practice for most non-emergency, non-surgical cases. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider a typical outpatient pathway without emergency interventions. Terms are interpreted in their plain meanings: Disease (illness), Doctor (qualified clinician), Diagnosis (identification of illness), Medicine (therapeutic drug regimen), Cure (resolution or remission sufficient to consider the patient recovered). Ignore follow-ups, referrals, or advanced procedures not named in the list. Concept / Approach: The sequence should respect dependency: the existence of a disease precedes any medical visit; a doctor visit precedes a formal diagnosis; treatment (medicine) is generally prescribed based on the diagnosis; cure is the intended outcome that can only follow effective treatment. Placing any later step before its prerequisite breaks real-world logic and clinical workflow. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Disease: The patient first experiences illness or symptoms; this creates the need for care.2) Doctor: The patient consults a clinician to evaluate those symptoms.3) Diagnosis: Using history, examination, and tests, the doctor identifies the condition.4) Medicine: Based on the diagnosis, the doctor prescribes an appropriate drug regimen.5) Cure: After taking medicine as directed, the patient recovers; the condition resolves. Verification / Alternative check: This ordering aligns with standard clinical pathways, medical guidelines, and basic patient education: diagnosis guides therapy; therapy aims at cure. While in some cases empirical therapy may start before a final diagnosis, a working diagnosis still precedes definitive treatment plans in structured care. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options that put Doctor before Disease assume care without a problem arising. Sequences that place Medicine before Diagnosis ignore evidence-based practice where treatment follows diagnostic reasoning. Orders that start with Diagnosis or Cure are illogical because both require a preceding clinical context and intervention. Common Pitfalls: Confusing screening with diagnosis; screening can occur in healthy people, but the list here specifies Disease → Doctor → Diagnosis. Also, assuming cure can logically occur before treatment contradicts medical causality. Final Answer: Disease, Doctor, Diagnosis, Medicine, Cure

Question 8

Arrange the given items into a logically coherent sequence that mirrors real-world cause–effect and administrative response. Provide the most sensible order:  1) Protect (preparedness and mitigation) 2) Pressure (atmospheric change) 3) Relief (aid a…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a reinforcement entry mirroring the same reasoning in disaster chronology problems. Atmospheric drivers precede weather events, which may lead to hazards; actions are then staged around the hazard window (mitigation and emergency protection) and followed by relief once impacts occur. Given Data / Assumptions: Pressure changes can precede and drive Rain. Heavy Rain can result in Flood. Protection measures are mobilized around impending/immediate hazard. Relief efforts follow once damages occur. Concept / Approach: Maintain logical causality and real-world emergency management flow. Step-by-Step Solution: Start with 2 → then 4 → then 5 → deploy 1 → conclude with 3. Verification / Alternative check: Any sequence putting relief before flood is untenable; any that places flood before rain is illogical. Why Other Options Are Wrong: They violate basic cause–effect or timing of actions. Common Pitfalls: Confusing long-term mitigation with event-time protection. Final Answer: 2, 4, 5, 1, 3

Question 9

Arrange the following social units from the smallest/most specific to the largest/most inclusive grouping:  1) Caste 2) Family 3) Newly married couple 4) Clan 5) Species (human species as the broadest biological category)  Select the order that best…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sequence-of-words problems often ask you to arrange entities by size, inclusiveness, or hierarchy. Here the items represent social/biological groupings. The task is to move from the narrowest unit to the broadest category logically and consistently. Given Data / Assumptions: A newly married couple (3) is a dyad—two individuals. A family (2) is a household unit that includes the couple and possibly children/elders. Caste (1) is a larger social category spanning multiple families. Clan (4) is a broader lineage grouping that can encompass many families/castes depending on cultural definition; for exam logic it is placed broader than a single caste unit. Species (5) denotes the entire human species, the broadest category here. Concept / Approach: We rank from smallest to largest by typical inclusiveness: individual dyad → household → socio-cultural grouping(s) → entire biological species. Where terms overlap in real anthropology, standardized exam convention still expects a clear progression from micro to macro. Step-by-Step Solution: Smallest: 3 (Newly married couple).Next: 2 (Family) as the immediate larger unit.Then: 1 (Caste) as a wider social category of many families.Then: 4 (Clan) as an even broader lineage grouping.Largest: 5 (Species) encompassing all humans.Hence: 3, 2, 1, 4, 5. Verification / Alternative check: Switching caste and clan can be debated culturally, but typical reasoning test keys place clan as equal or broader than caste to preserve a strict micro→macro chain ending at species. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2, 3, 1, 4, 5: Puts family before the couple; we want increasing scope from smallest upwards. 3, 4, 5, 1, 2 or 4, 5, 3, 2, 1: Break the logical nesting by mixing social and biological categories and misplacing the micro units. None of these: Not needed, as a valid micro→macro chain exists. Common Pitfalls: Overthinking anthropological nuances or reversing micro units. Stick to exam-standard inclusiveness. Final Answer: 3, 2, 1, 4, 5

Question 10

Arrange the following geographic/cosmic locations from the smallest/specific to the largest/most inclusive:  1) Andhra Pradesh (state) 2) Universe 3) Tirupati (city) 4) World (Earth) 5) India (country)  Choose the correct increasing-order sequence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Ordering by scale is a frequent theme. We move from local to global to cosmic. Understanding political geography (city → state → country) and then planetary/cosmic scale helps quickly eliminate wrong orders. Given Data / Assumptions: Tirupati (3) is a city within Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Pradesh (1) is a state within India. India (5) is a country on Earth. World (4) represents planet Earth. Universe (2) is the totality of space–time, the largest scale. Concept / Approach: Apply containment logic: city ⊂ state ⊂ country ⊂ world ⊂ universe. This yields a single clear path from smallest to largest. Step-by-Step Solution: City first: 3 (Tirupati).Then state: 1 (Andhra Pradesh).Then country: 5 (India).Then planet: 4 (World).Finally all-encompassing: 2 (Universe).Sequence: 3, 1, 5, 4, 2. Verification / Alternative check: Any option that places Universe before World or state before city contradicts containment and can be discarded. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1, 5, 3, 2, 4 and others: misplace the city vs state, or swap world/universe. None of these: Not applicable because a correct chain exists. Common Pitfalls: Reading speed traps or misreading indices; always re-map numbers to names before judging order. Final Answer: 3, 1, 5, 4, 2

Question 11

Arrange the following number names in increasing order of magnitude:  1) Trillion 2) Thousand 3) Billion 4) Hundred 5) Million  Select the correct ascending sequence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Questions about ordering number names require familiarity with the standard short scale used in English: hundred < thousand < million < billion < trillion. Being comfortable with place values helps avoid mix-ups between similarly sounding magnitudes. Given Data / Assumptions: 4) Hundred = 10^2. 2) Thousand = 10^3. 5) Million = 10^6. 3) Billion = 10^9. 1) Trillion = 10^12. Concept / Approach: Convert each term to its power-of-ten representation and then arrange in strictly increasing order. This avoids confusion and ensures a unique solution. Step-by-Step Solution: Order by powers: 10^2 (Hundred) → 10^3 (Thousand) → 10^6 (Million) → 10^9 (Billion) → 10^12 (Trillion).Mapping indices gives: 4, 2, 5, 3, 1. Verification / Alternative check: Check any proposed sequence against the exponents; any drop (e.g., 10^9 before 10^6) invalidates it immediately. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 4, 2, 3, 5, 1: puts billion (10^9) before million (10^6). 1, 5, 3, 2, 4 and 1, 2, 4, 3, 5: start with trillion; not ascending. None of these: Not necessary as a correct ascending order exists. Common Pitfalls: Confusing million/billion or thinking in long scale; stick to powers of ten to be safe. Final Answer: 4, 2, 5, 3, 1

Question 12

A typical patient-care timeline includes the following stages. Arrange them in the most logical order from onset to outcome:  1) Consultation 2) Illness (onset of symptoms) 3) Doctor (visiting the physician) 4) Treatment (tests/medication/procedure)…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sequencing in healthcare scenarios hinges on real-life chronology. A person first becomes ill, then engages with healthcare (doctor/consultation), receives treatment, and finally recovers. Some terms like “doctor” and “consultation” can overlap; exam logic treats them as consecutive steps within the clinical encounter before treatment begins. Given Data / Assumptions: 2) Illness: symptoms appear. 3) Doctor: the patient visits/contacts the physician. 1) Consultation: clinical history/examination/discussion with the doctor. 4) Treatment: investigations/medications/procedures follow. 5) Recovery: improvement and return to health. Concept / Approach: We must reconcile overlapping terms by placing “doctor” (the act of seeking care) immediately followed by “consultation” (the structured clinical interaction) and then “treatment.” Though some might write “consultation with the doctor” as one, the intended test key splits them in this order to preserve a clear before→during→after progression. Step-by-Step Solution: Onset: 2 (Illness).Access care: 3 (Doctor).Clinical interaction: 1 (Consultation).Intervention: 4 (Treatment).Outcome: 5 (Recovery).Therefore: 2, 3, 1, 4, 5. Verification / Alternative check: Swapping treatment before consultation breaks standard care flow; placing recovery earlier contradicts causality. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2, 3, 4, 1, 5: treatment cannot precede consultation. 4, 3, 1, 2, 5: starts with treatment; illogical. 5, 1, 4, 3, 2: starts with recovery; impossible. None of these: Not applicable since a coherent sequence exists. Common Pitfalls: Assuming “doctor” and “consultation” are synonymous and skipping one; the problem intends a fine-grained sequence. Final Answer: 2, 3, 1, 4, 5

Question 13

Arrange the following words in strict alphabetical (dictionary) order. Each word begins with the letter Z:  1) Zephyr 2) Zodiac 3) Zoonomy 4) Zenith 5) Zig-zag  Choose the correct sequence from earliest (alphabetically) to latest.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Alphabetical-order problems require comparing words letter by letter (lexicographic order). With all words starting with Z, you must move to the next letters and continue until a difference appears. Hyphens are typically ignored for ordering in such exam questions; treat “Zig-zag” as “Zigzag.” Given Data / Assumptions: Words: Zenith, Zephyr, Zig-zag, Zodiac, Zoonomy. Compare letter by letter; if one word ends, the shorter word comes first. Treat “Zig-zag” as “Zigzag” for ordering. Concept / Approach: Compare based on the second, third, etc., letters after the initial Z, following standard dictionary rules. Step-by-Step Solution: Compare “Zenith” vs “Zephyr”: at third letter, “n” (110) < “p” (112) ⇒ Zenith precedes Zephyr.“Zigzag” starts with “Zi”, and “i” comes after “e”, so words with “Ze” come first.Among the remaining “Zo…” words: “Zodiac” (Zod…) comes before “Zoonomy” (Zoo…).Final alphabetical order: Zenith → Zephyr → Zig-zag → Zodiac → Zoonomy.Map back to indices: 4, 1, 5, 2, 3. Verification / Alternative check: Quick scan by second letters: e, e, i, o, o; within each letter group, compare next positions to confirm final order. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 4, 2, 1, 3, 5 etc.: misplace “Zodiac” among the “Ze…” and “Zi…” words. 5, 3, 2, 4, 1: starts with “Zig-zag” which cannot precede the “Ze…” words. None of these: Not needed because a correct sequence exists. Common Pitfalls: Being distracted by the hyphen in “Zig-zag” or comparing only the second letter without resolving ties at later letters. Final Answer: 4, 1, 5, 2, 3

Question 14

Arrange the following “Che…” words in correct alphabetical (dictionary) order:  1) Chemistry 2) Chamber 3) Cheap 4) Cheerful  Choose the correct ascending sequence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: When several words share initial letters, alphabetical ordering depends on the first position where they differ. Here, all begin with “Ch…”, so we must compare subsequent letters carefully and follow standard dictionary rules. Given Data / Assumptions: Words: Chamber, Cheap, Cheerful, Chemistry. Alphabetical comparison is lexicographic (left to right). Concept / Approach: Break ties progressively: compare third letter, then fourth, etc. If one word is a prefix of another, the shorter word comes first, but here none is a strict prefix of another. Step-by-Step Solution: “Chamber” (Cham…) vs others that start “Che…”. Since “a” < “e”, Chamber comes first.Among “Che…” words: compare the next letters.“Cheap” (Chea…) vs “Cheerful” (Chee…): “a” (97) < “e” (101), so Cheap precedes Cheerful.“Chemistry” (Chem…) follows Cheerful because “m” comes after “e”.Final order: Chamber → Cheap → Cheerful → Chemistry → indices 2, 3, 4, 1. Verification / Alternative check: Write the four words and mark the first index where letters differ; confirm the relative order by ASCII/letter sequence. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2, 1, 3, 4: places Chemistry before Cheap/Cheerful incorrectly. 3, 4, 2, 1 or 2, 4, 3, 1: misorder the “Che…” group. None of these: Not applicable as a correct sequence is present. Common Pitfalls: Judging only by the third letter and forgetting to continue comparisons when initial segments match. Final Answer: 2, 3, 4, 1

Question 15

Arrange the following “Gen…” words in true alphabetical order:  1) Genuine 2) Genesis 3) Gender 4) Gentle 5) General  Choose the correct dictionary sequence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: With words sharing a long common prefix (“Gen…”), you must compare the entire strings lexicographically. Alphabetical ordering proceeds character by character until a difference decides the order, and this must be repeated for each pair in the set. Given Data / Assumptions: Words: Genuine, Genesis, Gender, Gentle, General. All begin with “Gen-”, so the 4th/5th letters become decisive. Concept / Approach: Compare using the smallest index where letters differ. Among “Gen…”, evaluate the letter right after “gen”. Step-by-Step Solution: “Gender” (gende…) vs “General” (gener…): “d” < “r” ⇒ Gender precedes General.“Genesis” (genes…) must follow General (gener… vs genes… → “r” (114) < “s” (115)).“Gentle” (gent…) follows Genesis because “t” (116) > “s” (115).“Genuine” (genu…) comes last among these since “u” (117) is after “t”.Final order: Gender → General → Genesis → Gentle → Genuine → indices 3, 5, 2, 4, 1. Verification / Alternative check: Write all five and underline the first differing letter after “gen”; verify pairwise order to avoid slips. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 4, 5, 3, 2, 1 and others: place Gentle or Genuine too early. 1, 5, 4, 3, 2: starts with Genuine which alphabetically trails the rest. None of these: Not necessary since a correct sequence exists. Common Pitfalls: Stopping at “gene-” and not checking the next letter; also, misplacing “Genesis” vs “General.” Final Answer: 3, 5, 2, 4, 1

Question 16

Arrange the following “Bi…” words in dictionary order:  1) Billian (assume as printed) 2) Bifurcate 3) Bilateral 4) Bilirubin  Choose the correct alphabetical sequence.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Alphabetical ordering among similar-looking “Bi…” words requires careful comparison beyond the initial shared letters. We proceed lexicographically, character by character. Given Data / Assumptions: Words: Bifurcate, Bilateral, Bilirubin, Billian (left as printed). All begin with “Bi”. Concept / Approach: Compare the third letter onward. If two words share longer prefixes, continue comparing the next letters until a difference appears. Step-by-Step Solution: “Bifurcate” (bif…) vs “Bilateral” (bil…): “f” (102) < “l” (108) ⇒ Bifurcate comes first.For the “bil…” set: compare “Bilateral” (bila…) vs “Bilirubin” (bili…): “a” (97) < “i” (105) ⇒ Bilateral precedes Bilirubin.“Billian” (bill…) must follow Bilirubin (bili…) because “l” (108) > “i” (105) at the fifth position.Final order: Bifurcate → Bilateral → Bilirubin → Billian → indices 2, 3, 4, 1. Verification / Alternative check: List the four words stacked and compare vertical columns to see where each diverges. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 2, 1, 3, 4 or 2, 3, 1, 4: place “Billian” too early. 4, 3, 2, 1: inverts much of the order. None of these: Not needed since a correct order exists. Common Pitfalls: Assuming all “bil…” words stay grouped without evaluating the fourth and fifth letters, where the decision is made. Final Answer: 2, 3, 4, 1

Question 17

Choose the word that is most closely related in meaning or usage to the given word:  Given word: CORRESPONDING  Options are semantically related words; pick the best fit.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Vocabulary questions may ask for the word most closely related in meaning to a given term. “Corresponding” has two common senses: (1) matching in character or function (as an adjective), and (2) communicating by exchange of letters or messages (as a verb, “to correspond”). Among the options, we must select the closest, contextually reasonable association. Given Data / Assumptions: Target word: Corresponding. Options: DISCERN, RESPONSE, REPENT, CORRECT. We treat this as a general-usage question (no special domain specified). Concept / Approach: Evaluate each option’s core meaning against the likely senses of “corresponding.” “Response” naturally links to the communicative sense of “correspond” (message → reply). “Correct” overlaps with “appropriate” or “accurate,” which loosely touches the adjective sense “corresponding to,” but is less direct. The other two are semantically distant. Step-by-Step Solution: Sense match (communication): correspond ↔ send/receive messages ↔ get a response.Thus, “RESPONSE” is the most directly related outcome of correspondence.The adjective sense “corresponding” meaning “matching/analogous” does not make “CORRECT” the best synonym; “matching” or “equivalent” would be closer than “correct.” Verification / Alternative check: Test the pair in sentences: “We corresponded about the issue and received a response.” The relationship is natural. “We checked the corresponding figures to ensure they were correct” shows “correct” is not equivalent to “corresponding.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: DISCERN: means perceive or recognize; not tightly linked to “corresponding.” REPENT: means feel remorse; unrelated. CORRECT: means accurate/right; not a synonym for “corresponding.” None of these: incorrect because one option (RESPONSE) is suitably related. Common Pitfalls: Overfitting the adjective sense and forcing “correct.” Always check which sense yields a stronger, more natural linkage. Final Answer: RESPONSE

Question 18

From the given options, choose the word that CAN be formed using all letters only from the word “IMMEDIATELY” (each letter can be used at most as many times as it appears in the source):  Source word: IMMEDIATELY

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Word-formation puzzles check whether a candidate word can be constructed using the letters of a given source word, obeying frequency limits. You may use a letter only as many times as it occurs in the source. The task is to verify letter-by-letter availability, not merely the presence of all distinct letters. Given Data / Assumptions: Source: IMMEDIATELY → letters: i, m, m, e, d, i, a, t, e, l, y. Options to test: DIALECT, LIMITED, DIAMETER, DICTATE. Each letter’s multiplicity matters (e.g., two “m”s are available; only one “l” is available, etc.). Concept / Approach: Tally the frequency of each letter in the source; then, for each option, check whether every letter and its required count appear in the source pool. If any letter is missing or needed more times than available, that option is invalid. Step-by-Step Solution: Source counts: a(1), d(1), e(2), i(2), l(1), m(2), t(1), y(1); plus letters present once: (others 0).DIALECT requires c (not present) → invalid.LIMITED requires letters l, i, m, i, t, e, d → all present with sufficient counts (l1, i2, m1≤2, t1, e1≤2, d1).DIAMETER requires r (absent) → invalid.DICTATE requires c (absent) → invalid.Therefore, only LIMITED is formable. Verification / Alternative check: Physically cross out letters of IMMEDIATELY while spelling LIMITED to confirm counts never go negative. Why Other Options Are Wrong: DIALECT: needs “c,” which IMMEDIATELY does not contain. DIAMETER: needs “r,” not in IMMEDIATELY. DICTATE: needs “c,” not in IMMEDIATELY. None of these: incorrect because LIMITED is valid. Common Pitfalls: Ignoring multiplicity constraints (e.g., using two “l”s when only one exists) or overlooking a missing consonant like “c” or “r.” Final Answer: LIMITED

Question 19

Word formation using specific letters From the word "TECHNOLOGY", use its 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th letters only to form a meaningful English word. If exactly one such word exists, what is the 3rd letter of that word? (If no word can be formed, answer …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This verbal-reasoning task asks you to isolate specific letters from a longer word and determine whether they can form exactly one standard English word. The focus is on careful position picking and checking uniqueness of the formed word. The question finally asks for the third letter of that uniquely determined word, or instructs to choose special placeholders if zero or multiple valid words exist. Given Data / Assumptions: Base word: TECHNOLOGY. Required positions: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 5th letters. Special rules: If no word is possible → X; if more than one word is possible → Y; otherwise, report the third letter of the unique word. Concept / Approach: Extract the specified letters and consider all permutations that form standard English words. We must verify uniqueness to decide whether to output a letter or X/Y. The exercise trains precision in indexing and elimination of near matches that are not valid dictionary words. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Write TECHNOLOGY with indices: 1 T, 2 E, 3 C, 4 H, 5 N, 6 O, 7 L, 8 O, 9 G, 10 Y.2) Pick letters at 1,2,3,5 → {T, E, C, N}.3) Check meaningful anagrams: "CENT" is a valid English word; alternatives like "CNET", "ETCN", "TENC" are invalid.4) Uniqueness holds since only "CENT" qualifies.5) The third letter of "CENT" is N. Verification / Alternative check: Confirm that none of the other permutations (e.g., TENC, ENCT, CNTE) are recognized as standard English words in general vocabulary use. This preserves the uniqueness condition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: C and T: These would be the first or fourth letters in plausible sequences; they are not the third letter of the unique valid word. X: Not applicable since at least one valid word exists. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting to index correctly (off-by-one errors), accepting abbreviations or names as valid words, or overlooking the uniqueness criterion. Final Answer: N

Question 20

Arrange insect life-cycle stages in correct chronological order Stages: (i) Pupa (ii) Larva (iii) Moth (iv) Eggs

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Biology-based sequencing questions test understanding of natural life cycles. For holometabolous insects (e.g., moths), there is a well-known ordered progression from egg to adult via larval and pupal stages. Given Data / Assumptions: Stages provided: Eggs, Larva, Pupa, Moth. We must produce the biologically correct chronological order. Concept / Approach: The moth life cycle follows the complete metamorphosis model: Egg → Larva (caterpillar) → Pupa (chrysalis/cocoon) → Adult (moth). Any departure from this order breaks developmental dependencies. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) The cycle begins with Eggs (iv).2) Eggs hatch into Larva (ii).3) The larva pupates to become Pupa (i).4) The adult emerges as Moth (iii). Verification / Alternative check: This order aligns with standard entomological references for Lepidoptera and many other insects exhibiting complete metamorphosis. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any sequence that places Pupa before Larva or the Adult (Moth) before Pupa contradicts developmental biology. Common Pitfalls: Confusing incomplete metamorphosis terms (e.g., nymph) with complete metamorphosis stages, or swapping larva and pupa. Final Answer: (iv), (ii), (i), (iii)

Logical Sequence of Words Questions