Question 1

Which of the following was the codename of the main Indian military offensive against Pakistan during the Kargil War of 1999?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Kargil War of 1999 was a limited conflict between India and Pakistan in the Kargil sector of Jammu and Kashmir. The Indian armed forces launched a coordinated military operation to evict intruders from high altitude positions. Knowing the codename of this offensive is important in modern Indian history and defence related general knowledge, as it is frequently asked in exams to test awareness of recent historical events and military terminology. Given Data / Assumptions: The question refers specifically to the Kargil War of 1999. It asks for the codename of the main Indian military offensive against Pakistan. Options list several operations with similar sounding names. Exactly one codename is officially linked to the Kargil War offensive. Concept / Approach: The approach is to match the correct codename with the correct conflict. Operation Vijay is widely known as the codename for the Indian military campaign in the Kargil War. Other operations like Operation Meghdoot refer to different military actions, such as securing the Siachen Glacier. By linking each codename with the correct historical event, students can accurately identify the one associated with Kargil. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Kargil War took place in 1999 along the Line of Control in the Kargil sector. Step 2: Remember from news archives and history summaries that India launched Operation Vijay to drive out infiltrators from the occupied heights. Step 3: Look at the options and identify Operation Vijay as one of the choices. Step 4: Recognise that Operation Meghdoot is associated with Siachen and not Kargil, while names like Operation Kargil or Operation LOC are not official codenames. Step 5: Select Operation Vijay as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Verification can be done by consulting official reports, defence ministry publications, or reliable history and current affairs books. All of these sources describe Operation Vijay as the codename of the Indian campaign in the Kargil War. Media coverage from that time and subsequent commemorations of Kargil Vijay Diwas also support this identification. No credible source uses the other option names for the main offensive of 1999. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Operation Kargil and Operation LOC sound plausible but are not actual official codenames used by the Indian armed forces for the 1999 conflict. They are included as distractors. Operation Meghdoot refers to the military action launched in 1984 to occupy key positions on the Siachen Glacier and is unrelated to Kargil. Operation Success is a generic sounding phrase without a specific well known link to Kargil. Thus, none of these options correctly answers the question. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to choose an option simply because it contains the word Kargil or LOC, under the assumption that it must refer to the Kargil conflict. Another pitfall is to confuse multiple operations in the Himalayan region, especially Operation Meghdoot and Operation Vijay. To avoid such confusion, students should maintain a small list connecting each major post independence conflict with its correct operation names and key facts. Final Answer: The correct answer is Operation Vijay.

Question 2

Which national leader is widely credited with giving Sarojini Naidu the popular title “Nightingale of India”?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sarojini Naidu was a prominent Indian poet and freedom fighter whose lyrical poetry earned her the affectionate title “Nightingale of India.” Exam questions often ask which leader gave her this famous title, because it connects literary contributions with the national movement and highlights how leaders viewed each other. Knowing this detail helps students remember how cultural and political roles were intertwined in the freedom struggle. Given Data / Assumptions: The question focuses on Sarojini Naidu and her popular title “Nightingale of India.” It asks which national leader is widely credited with giving her this title. Options list several major leaders from the freedom movement. Only one of them is commonly associated with coining or popularising this title. Concept / Approach: The approach is to recall standard associations made in history and general knowledge books. Mahatma Gandhi is widely credited with referring to Sarojini Naidu as the Nightingale of India, appreciating both her oratory and her poetry. Though other leaders also admired her, exam oriented literature consistently links this particular title with Gandhi. Recognising this typical pairing enables a quick and confident answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Sarojini Naidu was both a poet and a political activist, participating in key movements led by Gandhi. Step 2: Remember that Gandhi often gave affectionate nicknames to fellow leaders and admirers, such as Nightingale of India for Naidu. Step 3: Look at the options and identify Mahatma Gandhi among the listed leaders. Step 4: Confirm that popular exam guides and biographies attribute the title to Gandhi rather than to other leaders. Step 5: Select Mahatma Gandhi as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Verification can be done through short biographies of Sarojini Naidu and compilations of freedom struggle personalities. Most such sources explicitly state that Gandhi called her the Nightingale of India, emphasising her melodious voice and poetic talent. While some discussions may mention that the title was widely used and popularised, exam conventions treat Gandhi as the leader who gave or at least firmly established the nickname. This makes him the expected answer in competitive exams. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Jawaharlal Nehru greatly respected Sarojini Naidu but is not commonly credited with coining this title. Rabindranath Tagore was a Nobel winning poet but did not give this particular nickname to Naidu. Rajendra Prasad was the first President of India but is not associated with this phrase. Annie Besant was an important freedom movement leader and theosophist, yet there is no standard reference linking her to this specific title. Therefore, these alternatives do not match the widely accepted attribution. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes assume that because Tagore was also a famous poet, he must have given the title to Sarojini Naidu. Others may randomly guess among the famous names listed, without recalling the specific association. To avoid such mistakes, learners should memorise a list of famous titles and epithets, such as Nightingale of India, Frontier Gandhi, and Iron Man of India, along with the correct personalities and, where relevant, who gave them these titles. Final Answer: The correct answer is Mahatma Gandhi.

Question 3

Which school of Indian art is also known as the Greco Roman Buddhist school because of its blend of Indian and Hellenistic styles?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The study of Indian art history includes several important regional schools that developed distinctive styles of sculpture and iconography. One of these schools is famous for combining Indian Buddhist themes with strong Greco Roman artistic influence, leading to the label Greco Roman Buddhist art. Knowing which school had this blended style helps students understand cultural interactions between India and the Hellenistic world following the campaigns of Alexander and subsequent contacts. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks which school of Indian art is also known as the Greco Roman Buddhist school. It highlights the blend of Indian and Hellenistic styles. Options list several art schools or periods, including Gandhara and Mathura. Only one school is consistently described in art history as Greco Roman Buddhist. Concept / Approach: The Gandhara school of art arose in the northwestern region of the Indian subcontinent, in areas that are now parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan. It developed under Kushana patronage and shows clear influence of Hellenistic and Roman sculpture, especially in the realistic drapery, curly hair, and physical features of Buddha images. Because of this mixture, it is often called the Greco Roman Buddhist school. By recalling this unique combination, students can identify Gandhara as the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Gandhara art developed in regions such as present day Peshawar and Taxila under Kushana rulers. Step 2: Remember that this art used stucco, schist, and other materials to create realistic sculptures with strong influence from Greek and Roman styles. Step 3: Note that Buddha figures in Gandhara art often show wavy hair, detailed drapery, and naturalistic body proportions, all reminiscent of classical Western sculpture. Step 4: Recognise that because of this mixture of Hellenistic and Buddhist elements, Gandhara is often described as Greco Roman Buddhist art. Step 5: From the options, select Gandhara and reject schools that do not have this specific label. Verification / Alternative check: Art history textbooks and exam preparation guides on Indian culture explicitly describe the Gandhara school as being influenced by Greco Roman art. They highlight its location near ancient trade routes and the legacy of Greek kingdoms in the region as key reasons for this fusion. In contrast, other schools such as Mathura or Gupta are associated with more indigenous Indian stylistic developments. This repeated emphasis on Gandhara as Greco Roman Buddhist art confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The Mauryan art tradition is known for polished stone pillars and early sculpture but does not display the strong Greco Roman influence of Gandhara. The Shunga period is associated with reliefs and railings at sites like Bharhut and Sanchi, emphasising more indigenous stylistic features. Gupta art is described as a classical Indian style with spiritual expression rather than a Greco Roman blend. The Mathura school, although important for early images of Buddha and Jain Tirthankaras, is considered more purely Indian in style. None of these are labelled Greco Roman Buddhist in the way Gandhara is. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse Gandhara with Mathura because both are important for Buddhist sculpture, or they may incorrectly think that all early Buddhist art had similar foreign influence. Others might choose Gupta because it is called a classical age, misinterpreting classical as Greco Roman. To avoid such errors, learners should clearly associate Gandhara with Greco Roman Buddhist art and Mathura with an indigenous Indian style, revising a simple comparison table between these schools. Final Answer: The correct answer is Gandhara.

Question 4

Who was the founder of the Indian Reform Association, established in 1870 to promote social and educational reforms?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Indian Reform Association, founded in 1870, was an important organisation that aimed to promote social, educational, and religious reforms in colonial India. It emerged from debates within the Brahmo movement and reflected the growing desire among Indian elites to modernise society. Knowing who founded this association helps students understand the network of reformers active in the nineteenth century and the evolution of reform movements beyond a single individual. Given Data / Assumptions: The association mentioned is the Indian Reform Association. It was established in 1870 as a reform oriented body. We are asked to identify its founder. Options list several prominent nineteenth century reform leaders. Concept / Approach: The approach is to recall the role of Keshab Chandra Sen in the Brahmo movement and his efforts to expand reform activity through a broader, more inclusive platform. Keshab Chandra Sen founded the Indian Reform Association to carry forward social and educational reforms that went beyond purely religious questions. Although he was influenced by earlier reformers like Rammohan Roy and worked alongside figures such as Debendranath Tagore, the specific organisational initiative of the Indian Reform Association is attributed to him. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Keshab Chandra Sen was a prominent leader within the Brahmo Samaj in the later nineteenth century. Step 2: Remember that he sought to extend reform work into areas like education, women's rights, and social practices through a broad based organisation. Step 3: Note from history that in 1870 he founded the Indian Reform Association with these objectives. Step 4: Examine the options and identify Keshab Chandra Sen among the listed leaders. Step 5: Choose Keshab Chandra Sen as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Verification can be done by consulting books on nineteenth century social and religious reform movements. These texts usually discuss the Indian Reform Association in the context of the Brahmo Samaj and credit Keshab Chandra Sen as its founder. While other leaders like Debendranath Tagore and Rammohan Roy played crucial roles in the broader reform tradition, they are not identified as founders of this particular association. This repeated attribution in multiple sources supports the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Debendranath Tagore was a key Brahmo Samaj leader and spiritual figure, but he did not found the Indian Reform Association. Rammohan Roy was the pioneering reformer behind the early Brahmo movement and social reforms such as the abolition of sati, yet he died decades before 1870. Dayanand Saraswati founded the Arya Samaj, a different reformist organisation with Vedic revivalist aims. Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar worked for widow remarriage and education but did not create the Indian Reform Association. Therefore, these options do not match the specific organisational role mentioned in the question. Common Pitfalls: Students may assume that any famous reformer from the period must have founded every major association, leading them to pick Rammohan Roy or Vidyasagar by default. Others might confuse the Brahmo Samaj itself with the Indian Reform Association and choose Debendranath Tagore. To avoid such errors, learners should carefully differentiate between various organisations, their founding years, and their key founders, keeping a concise chart of reform societies and associated leaders. Final Answer: The correct answer is Keshab Chandra Sen.

Question 5

In the history of the Delhi Sultanate, which ruling dynasty was founded by Khizr Khan as its first Sultan?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Khizr Khan is an important name in the later phase of the Delhi Sultanate. After the decline of the Tughlaq power and the brief rule of Timur's nominee, he established a new ruling house at Delhi. Many competitive examinations test which dynasty he founded, because it helps candidates remember the sequence of the last Delhi Sultanate dynasties before the Mughals appeared on the scene. Given Data / Assumptions: - The question asks about the dynasty started by Khizr Khan. - The setting is the Delhi Sultanate after the weakening of the Tughlaqs. - The options mention the Sayyid, Lodi, Rajput and Khalji houses. - We assume standard textbook chronology of Delhi Sultanate dynasties. Concept / Approach: The last four main ruling houses of the Delhi Sultanate were the Khalji, Tughlaq, Sayyid and Lodi dynasties, followed later by the Mughal conquest. Khizr Khan was a former governor under the Tughlaqs who, after Timur's invasion, was installed as a ruler in Delhi. He did not take the full title of Sultan but effectively founded a new line that historians call the Sayyid dynasty. The Lodis came later, and Rajputs are a broader group of ruling clans rather than a specific Delhi Sultanate dynasty in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the chronological order of dynasties: Slave (Mamluk), Khalji, Tughlaq, Sayyid, and Lodi. Step 2: Note that Khizr Khan emerged after the collapse of effective Tughlaq control and after Timur's raid on Delhi in 1398. Step 3: Understand that Khizr Khan ruled from Delhi and laid the foundations of a new ruling house recognised as the Sayyid dynasty. Step 4: Remember that the Lodi dynasty was founded later by Bahlul Lodi, not by Khizr Khan. Step 5: Match the correct name from the options with this information, which clearly points to the Sayyid dynasty. Verification / Alternative check: Standard histories of the Delhi Sultanate list Khizr Khan (reigning from 1414) as the founder of the Sayyid dynasty, which lasted until 1451. Only after the Sayyids did the Afghan Lodi rulers take power. The Khalji dynasty had already ended with the rise of the Tughlaqs much earlier. This cross check of names and dates confirms that Khizr Khan cannot be associated with the Lodi or Khalji dynasties and that the label applied to his line is Sayyid. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The Lodi dynasty: Founded later by Bahlul Lodi; it replaced the Sayyids rather than being founded by Khizr Khan. The Rajput dynasties: Rajputs as a group ruled many regions, but there is no single Rajput dynasty of Delhi founded by Khizr Khan. The Khalji dynasty: This was an earlier ruling house beginning with Jalal ud din Khalji and Ala ud din Khalji, not linked to Khizr Khan. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the sequence of the last Delhi Sultanate dynasties, especially Sayyid and Lodi, because both ruled in the fifteenth century. Another common mistake is to associate any new ruler after the Tughlaqs directly with the Lodi dynasty. A simple way to remember is that Khizr Khan equals Sayyid dynasty, and Bahlul Lodi equals Lodi dynasty. Final Answer: The dynasty started by Khizr Khan was the Sayyid dynasty.

Question 6

In Indian religious philosophy, the term "Kaivalya" meaning complete isolation and liberation of the soul is especially associated with which religion?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Indian philosophical traditions often use technical terms for liberation or final release from the cycle of birth and death. The word "Kaivalya" literally means aloneness or isolation and refers to the soul attaining a state of pure, independent existence. Although similar ideas occur in several schools, examination questions usually test with which religion this term is most strongly and specifically associated. Given Data / Assumptions: - The key term is "Kaivalya", understood as complete liberation of the soul. - The options given are Buddhism, Jainism, Hinduism and Sikhism. - We assume the standard usage of doctrinal vocabulary in Indian religions as presented in textbooks. - The question expects the religion that treats Kaivalya as a central technical term for liberation. Concept / Approach: In Jainism, the term "Kevala jnana" or perfect knowledge and "Kaivalya" are closely linked with the highest spiritual state of the soul. When a Jaina soul destroys all karmic coverings, it attains omniscience and then final release, called Kaivalya. The liberated soul exists in complete isolation, free from attachment and karma. While some schools of Hindu philosophy and classical Yoga also use the word Kaivalya, standard general knowledge questions usually connect the term most directly and characteristically with Jainism, where it is central to the doctrine of the Tirthankaras and liberated beings. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Jainism teaches that every soul is bound by karma and moves through many births. Step 2: Understand that when all karmic matter is removed, the soul attains Kevala jnana, or perfect knowledge. Step 3: This state of complete purity and omniscience is associated with Kaivalya, the soul's final isolation from bondage. Step 4: Compare with Buddhism, which more often uses terms such as Nirvana or Nibbana for liberation. Step 5: Recognise that although some Hindu and Yoga texts also mention Kaivalya, the examination pattern usually highlights Jainism as the religion that treats it as a core technical concept. Step 6: Conclude that Jainism is the most appropriate answer among the given options. Verification / Alternative check: Introductions to Jain philosophy emphasise that the ultimate goal is the attainment of Kevala, meaning pure and perfect knowledge, which coincides with liberation. The soul in this state is described as existing at the top of the universe in complete isolation, free from all karmic bonds. Descriptions of Tirthankaras such as Mahavira use this language repeatedly. In contrast, Buddhism focuses on the extinction of craving and the concept of anatta, and Sikhism stresses union with the divine through remembrance and grace, without using Kaivalya as a primary term. This comparison confirms the association with Jainism. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Buddhism: Uses Nirvana as the main term for liberation and does not foreground Kaivalya as its key doctrinal label. Hinduism: Certain philosophical schools speak of Kaivalya, but the question aims at the religious tradition where the term is most distinctive, which is Jainism. Sikhism: Centred on devotion to the one God and concepts like mukti and nam simran; Kaivalya is not a central technical term in Sikh teachings. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume that any Sanskrit philosophical term must belong primarily to Hinduism or general "Indian philosophy". Another pitfall is to confuse Buddhist and Jaina vocabulary because both discuss liberation and karma. Remembering the specific pairing of Jainism with concepts like Kevala jnana and Kaivalya helps avoid this confusion in multiple choice questions. Final Answer: The term "Kaivalya" as complete liberation and isolation of the soul is especially associated with Jainism.

Question 7

During British colonial rule in Bengal, the authorities often persuaded or forced local cultivators to grow which major commercial crop for export instead of food crops?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Under British colonial rule, many regions of India were drawn into global markets through the cultivation of commercial crops. Bengal, with its fertile alluvial plains and river systems, became a key area where peasants were encouraged or compelled to shift from subsistence agriculture to cash crops needed by British industries. Understanding which crop dominated this process in Bengal helps students see how colonial economic policies reshaped rural life. Given Data / Assumptions: - The region named is Bengal under British rule. - The question mentions cultivators being persuaded or forced to grow a particular crop. - The options are jute, tea, sugarcane and wheat. - We assume standard associations of crops with Indian regions in colonial economic history. Concept / Approach: Jute is a long, soft, shiny fibre that can be spun into coarse, strong threads and was in great demand to make sacks and gunny bags during the age of industrial expansion. Bengal, especially areas around the Ganga and Brahmaputra river systems, offered ideal conditions for jute cultivation and easy transport to mills and ports. British policies and middlemen encouraged peasants to grow jute as a lucrative cash crop, often at the cost of food security. Tea plantations were concentrated mainly in Assam and parts of North Bengal, sugarcane is grown in several regions including Uttar Pradesh, and wheat is a staple grain rather than a specialist cash crop in this context. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the geographic focus: Bengal, not the entire subcontinent. Step 2: Recall from history that Bengal became a major centre of jute cultivation for export to European industries. Step 3: Recognise that tea is more strongly associated with plantation economies in Assam and Darjeeling rather than with ordinary cultivators in most of Bengal. Step 4: Note that sugarcane and wheat are important crops but do not match the specific colonial export boom that Bengal experienced with jute. Step 5: Conclude that jute is the only option that fits both the region and the description of a commercial crop promoted by the British. Verification / Alternative check: Textbooks and historical studies on colonial India highlight the jute boom in Bengal, mentioning how peasants were drawn into cycles of credit and fluctuating world prices. The demand for raw jute from mills in and around Calcutta and from industries abroad made it extremely valuable. Accounts of rural distress also point out how dependence on cash crops like jute made peasants vulnerable when world prices crashed. Tea, by contrast, was produced mostly on European owned plantations and did not rely on peasant cultivation in the same way. This evidence confirms that jute is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Tea: Mainly associated with plantations in Assam and specific hill tracts, not with widespread peasant cultivation in Bengal in the way jute was. Sugarcane: An important crop in regions like the Ganga plain, but the question emphasises the colonial export drive in Bengal, where jute dominated. Wheat: A staple foodgrain without the same export driven colonial pattern in Bengal that jute experienced. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes select tea because they associate British rule in eastern India with tea gardens, forgetting that tea is strongly tied to Assam and hill areas. Another pitfall is to think of any major crop as a colonial cash crop, without checking which one had a special export oriented boom in a particular region. Remembering the simple pairing of Bengal and jute helps to answer many economic history questions correctly. Final Answer: During British rule in Bengal, cultivators were widely encouraged or compelled to grow jute as a commercial crop for export.

Question 8

The Mongols under which famous leader invaded Transoxiana and regions of north-east Iran in 1219 during their westward expansion?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Mongol conquests of the thirteenth century reshaped the history of Asia and Europe. One major phase of this expansion was the invasion of Transoxiana and north-east Iran in the early 1200s, which opened the way for Mongol influence from Central Asia into the Islamic world. This question tests knowledge of which specific leader directed the Mongols during the invasion of 1219. Given Data / Assumptions: - The year mentioned is 1219. - The region named is Transoxiana and north-east Iran. - The options are Timur Lang, Nadir Shah, Ahmed Shah Abdali and Genghis Khan. - We assume standard chronology of major Central Asian conquerors. Concept / Approach: Transoxiana, the region between the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers, was one of the first major targets of the western campaigns of Genghis Khan. In 1219 he launched an invasion against the Khwarazmian Empire after a series of diplomatic and commercial disputes. Timelines of world history place Timur Lang, Nadir Shah and Ahmed Shah Abdali several centuries after Genghis Khan. Therefore, by matching the date and region with the correct conqueror, we can confidently identify the Mongol leader responsible for the 1219 invasion. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Genghis Khan founded and led the early Mongol Empire in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. Step 2: Note that the westward campaigns against Central Asian Islamic states, including the Khwarazmian Empire, began around 1219. Step 3: Understand that Timur Lang (Tamerlane) lived in the fourteenth century and led later Central Asian campaigns, long after Genghis Khan. Step 4: Nadir Shah and Ahmed Shah Abdali were eighteenth century rulers from Iran and Afghanistan respectively, associated with raids on India, not with the early Mongol conquests. Step 5: Therefore, the only leader in the options who fits both the date 1219 and the Mongol invasion of Transoxiana is Genghis Khan. Verification / Alternative check: World history surveys highlight that in 1219 Genghis Khan attacked the Khwarazmian ruler Muhammad II, whose domains included Transoxiana and parts of Iran. The Mongol armies captured cities like Bukhara and Samarkand and devastated large areas. In contrast, Timur, although often confused with the Mongols, ruled much later and sometimes claimed legacy from Genghis, which can mislead readers. Nadir Shah and Ahmed Shah Abdali are linked more to eighteenth century invasions of India from the north-west. This comparison confirms Genghis Khan as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Timur Lang: A Turko-Mongol conqueror of the fourteenth century, famous for campaigns in Persia and India, but not the leader of the 1219 Mongol invasions. Nadir Shah: An eighteenth century Iranian ruler known for the 1739 sack of Delhi, not a thirteenth century Mongol leader. Ahmed Shah Abdali: Founder of the Durrani Afghan Empire and an eighteenth century invader of India, again far removed in time from 1219. Common Pitfalls: Because Timur Lang and Genghis Khan were both Central Asian conquerors and sometimes linked in legends, students may confuse their periods. Another pitfall is to associate any attack on Iran or Central Asia with later invaders like Nadir Shah. Keeping a simple chronological order in mind Genghis Khan (thirteenth century), Timur (fourteenth century), Nadir and Abdali (eighteenth century) helps avoid these errors. Final Answer: The Mongols who invaded Transoxiana and north-east Iran in 1219 were led by Genghis Khan.

Question 9

In India, the so called "Black Revolution" is commonly associated with the increased production and refining of which natural resource?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In discussions of India's economic development, different colour based revolutions are used as shorthand for growth in particular sectors: Green Revolution for food grains, White Revolution for milk, and so on. The "Black Revolution" is one such term that appears in examinations and refers to a specific resource that is dark in colour and strategically crucial for modern industry and transport. Given Data / Assumptions: - The phrase used is "Black Revolution" in the Indian context. - The options are charcoal, crude petroleum, diamond and black gram. - We assume standard usage of colour revolutions in Indian economic and agriculture related questions. Concept / Approach: The Black Revolution refers to the effort to increase domestic production of crude oil and petroleum products in order to reduce dependence on imports. Crude petroleum is often described as "black gold" because of its colour and high economic value. The term is therefore linked to policies, discoveries and technological improvements that expand India's oil output and refining capacity. Charcoal and black gram, although dark in colour, do not have a revolution named after them in this sense, and diamond is a mineral associated with other industries rather than with the Black Revolution label. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall common pairings: Green Revolution with wheat and rice, White Revolution with milk, Blue Revolution with fisheries and aquaculture. Step 2: Recognise that Black Revolution is used in policy and exam language to describe growth in petroleum production. Step 3: Identify crude petroleum as a dark coloured, highly valued fuel resource, sometimes called black gold. Step 4: Check each option: charcoal is a derived fuel from wood, diamonds are gemstones, and black gram is a pulse crop; none of these match the specific revolution terminology. Step 5: Conclude that crude petroleum is the only option that fits the phrase Black Revolution in India. Verification / Alternative check: Lists of various agricultural and economic revolutions in India consistently state that the Black Revolution relates to petroleum based energy. They connect it to efforts to explore new oil fields, improve extraction technologies and strengthen refining capacity. Charcoal has no such large scale national campaign around it. Pulses and diamonds are important commodities, but examinations use different terms for initiatives related to them and do not label them as Black Revolution. This confirms the identification with crude petroleum. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Charcoal: Although black in appearance, it is not associated with a named national revolution in Indian economic terminology. Diamond: A precious gemstone with its own mining industry, but the colour based revolution vocabulary does not link it with Black Revolution. Black gram: A major pulse crop, sometimes linked with pulse related schemes, but not described formally as the focus of Black Revolution. Common Pitfalls: The main confusion comes from taking the term Black Revolution too literally and picking any black coloured substance, such as charcoal or black gram, instead of recalling established policy terminology. Another pitfall is to mix up colour revolutions, for example confusing Blue Revolution (fish) with petroleum because offshore drilling takes place in the sea. Memorising a small table of colours and sectors helps avoid such errors. Final Answer: In India, the Black Revolution is associated with increased production and refining of crude petroleum.

Question 10

The Swadeshi and Boycott Movement at the beginning of the twentieth century was launched in response to which British decision regarding Bengal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Swadeshi and Boycott Movement was one of the earliest mass based agitations against British rule in India in the twentieth century. It combined economic boycott of foreign goods with promotion of indigenous products and institutions. Understanding what specific colonial decision triggered this movement is crucial for tracing the evolution of the Indian national movement from moderate petitioning to more active resistance. Given Data / Assumptions: - The question refers to the Swadeshi and Boycott Movement. - It asks which British decision this movement was related to. - Options include the 1905 Partition of Bengal, the 1947 partitions of Bengal and Punjab, and the Non-Cooperation Movement of 1921. - We assume standard chronology of major events in the Indian freedom struggle. Concept / Approach: In 1905, Lord Curzon, the Viceroy of India, implemented the partition of Bengal, ostensibly for administrative convenience but widely seen by Indian leaders as an attempt to divide and weaken the growing nationalist movement by separating largely Muslim eastern districts from Hindu majority western districts. This decision sparked widespread protests, leading to the Swadeshi and Boycott Movement in Bengal and later in other parts of India. The movement encouraged people to refuse foreign goods and promote Indian industry and education. The later partitions of 1947 and the Non-Cooperation Movement belong to different phases and cannot be the correct triggers for Swadeshi in 1905. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Swadeshi and Boycott Movement began around 1905 and 1906. Step 2: Connect this time period with Lord Curzon's decision to partition Bengal in 1905. Step 3: Note that the Non-Cooperation Movement was launched in 1920–1921, more than a decade later, so it cannot be the cause of Swadeshi in 1905. Step 4: The partitions of Bengal and Punjab in 1947 were part of the final division of British India and are outside the time frame of this early movement. Step 5: Therefore, the correct answer is the Partition of Bengal in 1905. Verification / Alternative check: All standard histories of the national movement emphasise that the immediate cause of the Swadeshi and Boycott Movement was the announcement and implementation of the partition of Bengal in 1905. Public meetings, processions, burning of foreign cloth and promotion of indigenous industry are all described in this context. The slogan of Swadeshi is repeatedly linked with this specific event, confirming that none of the later partitions or movements can be the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Partition of Bengal in 1947: This refers to the final division of Bengal between India and Pakistan and occurred decades after the Swadeshi Movement. Non-Cooperation Movement in 1921: A separate nationwide movement under Mahatma Gandhi that came later and responded to different issues, including the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the Khilafat question. Partition of Punjab in 1947: Also a part of the 1947 division of British India, chronologically and politically separate from the Swadeshi upsurge in 1905. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the two partitions of Bengal, one in 1905 and the other linked with 1947, especially when reading quickly. Another pitfall is to associate all major mass movements with Gandhi, leading them to pick Non-Cooperation by mistake. Carefully matching dates and leaders with each phase of the freedom struggle helps maintain clarity in such questions. Final Answer: The Swadeshi and Boycott Movement was launched in response to the Partition of Bengal in 1905.

Question 11

During the period of the Delhi Sultanate, which language served as the main official language of administration and court records?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Delhi Sultanate brought new ruling elites and administrative practices to northern India. One important change was the adoption of a particular language for royal correspondence, revenue records and court literature. Knowing which language functioned as the official administrative medium sheds light on cultural influences and the spread of certain scripts and literary traditions in medieval India. Given Data / Assumptions: - The question concerns the official language of the Delhi Sultanate. - The options are Urdu, Arabic, Persian and Hindi. - We assume standard descriptions of Sultanate administrative practice from history textbooks. Concept / Approach: Although the rulers of the Delhi Sultanate were of Turkic and Afghan origin, their court culture was deeply influenced by Persian traditions. Persian became the primary language of administration, high culture and historiography under the Sultans and continued under the early Mughals. Many chronicles, farmans and revenue records were written in Persian script. Arabic was the sacred language of Islam, but it was not the usual language of day to day administration in India. Urdu developed later as a contact language in north Indian cities, and Hindi (in its modern sense) emerged over time, not as the official language of the Sultanate court. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Persian was widely used by Muslim courts across Central and South Asia as a language of governance and literature. Step 2: Recognise that chronicles of the Delhi Sultans, such as works by Ziauddin Barani and Minhaj us Siraj, were written in Persian. Step 3: Understand that Arabic, while important for religious texts like the Quran, did not become the routine administrative language in the Delhi Sultanate. Step 4: Note that Urdu as a developed literary language took shape more fully in later centuries and was not the formal language of the early Sultanate state. Step 5: Modern Hindi in its standardised form is a much later development and cannot be the answer for a medieval Muslim dynasty. Step 6: Conclude that Persian was the main official language of the Delhi Sultanate. Verification / Alternative check: Historical documents preserved from the Sultanate period, including revenue manuals, court histories and royal orders, are predominantly in Persian. Even under the Mughals, Persian continued as the high language of governance until the nineteenth century. Administrative reforms, legal digests and literary patronage all confirm the dominance of Persian in official contexts, whereas Arabic remained largely restricted to religious scholarship and Quranic studies. This evidence strongly supports Persian as the correct option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Urdu: Developed as a camp and city language mixing Persian, Turkish and local dialects, but it was not the formal administrative language of the early Sultanate. Arabic: A sacred religious language of Islam, important in theology and law, but not the primary language of state administration in Delhi. Hindi: Refers to later standardised forms of north Indian speech and was not adopted as the official court language under the Sultans. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse Arabic and Persian because both use similar scripts and are associated with Islamic cultures. Another mistake is to project modern linguistic situations backwards, assuming that Hindi or Urdu must have been official simply because they are widespread today. Remembering the specific historical role of Persian as a court language across many Islamic empires helps avoid these errors. Final Answer: The official language of administration under the Delhi Sultanate was Persian.

Question 12

The famous Vishnu temple complex of Angkor Wat in present day Cambodia was constructed under the rule of which Khmer king?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Angkor Wat in present day Cambodia is one of the largest religious monuments in the world and a masterpiece of Khmer temple architecture. It is dedicated primarily to Vishnu and reflects strong Indian cultural and religious influence in Southeast Asia. Many examinations test which ruler commissioned this temple, because it links regional history with the wider spread of Indian civilisation beyond the subcontinent. Given Data / Assumptions: - The monument in question is the Vishnu temple at Angkor Wat in Cambodia. - The options are Shrutavarman, Suryavarman II, Indravarman and Aniruddha. - We assume the standard identification of Angkor Wat with a particular Khmer king. Concept / Approach: Angkor Wat was built in the early twelfth century during the reign of the Khmer king Suryavarman II. It originally functioned as a Hindu temple dedicated to Vishnu and later also acquired Buddhist associations. The temple's orientation, bas reliefs and iconography all reflect the royal and religious ideas of Suryavarman II's period. Shrutavarman and Indravarman are names of other Southeast Asian rulers, but they are not credited with this specific temple. Aniruddha does not match the historically established builder of Angkor Wat in standard references. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Remember that Angkor Wat is associated most closely with the Khmer Empire at its height. Step 2: Recall that Suryavarman II ruled in the early twelfth century and is credited with commissioning this grand temple complex. Step 3: Shrutavarman and Indravarman may appear in broader lists of rulers, but they are not linked in textbooks as the founders of Angkor Wat. Step 4: The name Aniruddha is more commonly associated with Indian mythological or other contexts and is not the correct Khmer king in this question. Step 5: Therefore, Suryavarman II is the accurate choice that fits both the monument and the historical period. Verification / Alternative check: Art history and world heritage descriptions of Angkor Wat consistently state that it was built in the first half of the twelfth century during the reign of Suryavarman II. Inscriptions and later chronicles testify to his patronage of Vishnu worship and the symbolic design of the temple complex as a representation of Mount Meru and the Hindu cosmos. No reputable source attributes the foundation of Angkor Wat to the other names listed in the options, confirming that Suryavarman II is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Shrutavarman: Not recognised in standard histories as the builder of Angkor Wat and not the central Khmer ruler associated with this monument. Indravarman: Although the name appears among Southeast Asian monarchs, he is not regarded as the patron of Angkor Wat. Aniruddha: The name is not linked with the Khmer king who commissioned this temple and is therefore incorrect for this question. Common Pitfalls: Because several Khmer rulers have names ending in "varman", candidates may confuse them under exam pressure. Some also select any name that sounds vaguely familiar without recalling the specific association. Focusing on the pair Angkor Wat and Suryavarman II helps fix this fact in memory, along with the idea that this monument symbolises the peak of Khmer temple building inspired by Indian religious models. Final Answer: The Vishnu temple at Angkor Wat in Cambodia was built under the rule of Suryavarman II.

Question 13

In the context of the Indian national movement, the "Red Shirts" or Khudai Khidmatgar movement in the North West Frontier Province was led by which freedom fighter?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Khudai Khidmatgar movement, popularly known as the "Red Shirts" because of the distinctive red uniforms worn by its volunteers, was a powerful non violent movement in the North West Frontier Province during the Indian freedom struggle. It championed both social reform and opposition to British rule. Knowing who led this movement helps connect regional struggles on the frontier with the wider all India campaign directed by the Congress and Mahatma Gandhi. Given Data / Assumptions: - The movement referred to is the "Red Shirts" or Khudai Khidmatgar. - It operated in the North West Frontier Province (now in Pakistan). - The options include Maulana Azad, Mohammed Ali, Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan and Asfaqulla Khan. - We assume standard accounts of the provincial and national leadership of the freedom struggle. Concept / Approach: Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, also known as Frontier Gandhi, founded and led the Khudai Khidmatgar movement among the Pashtun population. He promoted education, social uplift and strict adherence to non violent resistance, aligning his movement with the principles advocated by Mahatma Gandhi. Maulana Azad was a national level Congress leader, Mohammed Ali was associated with the Khilafat Movement, and Asfaqulla Khan was a revolutionary involved in the Kakori conspiracy. None of these were the main leaders of the Red Shirts in the frontier region. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the Khudai Khidmatgar movement was centred in the North West Frontier Province. Step 2: Recall that Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, nicknamed Frontier Gandhi, worked among the Pashtuns there for reform and national awakening. Step 3: Remember that his volunteers wore red shirts, which gave the movement its popular name. Step 4: Maulana Azad played a major role at the national level but is not credited as the specific organiser of this frontier based movement. Step 5: Mohammed Ali is linked more with the Khilafat Movement, and Asfaqulla Khan with revolutionary activities, not with Khudai Khidmatgar. Step 6: Therefore, the leader of the Red Shirts movement was Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan. Verification / Alternative check: Histories of the Indian national movement consistently identify Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan as the founder and chief of the Khudai Khidmatgar. Accounts describe how he organised Pashtun villagers into disciplined non violent squads in red uniforms, which stood up to repression and supported civil disobedience campaigns. Photographs and contemporary reports repeatedly link his name with this movement, while the other personalities listed in the options are discussed in very different contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Maulana Azad: A prominent Congress leader and scholar, but not the organiser of the frontier based Red Shirts movement. Mohammed Ali: Associated with the Khilafat and pan Islamic politics rather than with the Khudai Khidmatgar in the Frontier Province. Asfaqulla Khan: Remembered as a revolutionary martyr involved in the Kakori train conspiracy, not as a non violent mass movement leader in this region. Common Pitfalls: Because several leaders shared similar names and were involved in Muslim related political causes, students sometimes mix up Mohammed Ali and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan. Another mistake is to assume that any major movement must be led by national figures like Maulana Azad, overlooking important regional leaders. Linking the words "Frontier Gandhi" and "Red Shirts" mentally with Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan is a useful memory aid. Final Answer: The "Red Shirts" or Khudai Khidmatgar movement was led by Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan.

Question 14

In Maratha history, who is popularly known as the "second founder of the Maratha Empire" for reorganising and strengthening Maratha power after Shivaji?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: After the death of Shivaji, the Maratha state faced internal conflicts, Mughal pressure and a period of instability. A later leader played a crucial role in reorganising the state, establishing the hereditary Peshwaship and laying the foundations for renewed expansion. Because of this contribution, many historians and exam books refer to him as the "second founder of the Maratha Empire". Identifying this figure helps clarify how Maratha power revived after its initial formation under Shivaji. Given Data / Assumptions: - The question asks who is known as the second founder of the Maratha Empire. - The options are Balaji Bishwanath, Balaji Baji Rao, Baji Rao I and Madhav Rao. - We assume standard school level interpretations of Maratha political history. Concept / Approach: Balaji Vishwanath (spelt here as Balaji Bishwanath) became Peshwa to Shahu and is credited with negotiating with the Mughals, securing recognition of Maratha rights and transforming the Peshwa from a royal minister into a powerful hereditary office. His work restored confidence and cohesion in the Maratha state after a troubled phase. Thus he is often called the second founder of the Maratha state or empire. Baji Rao I, his son, expanded Maratha power further, and Madhav Rao later revived it after the Third Battle of Panipat, but the specific title second founder is generally attached to Balaji Vishwanath in competitive exam literature. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Shivaji is widely accepted as the founder of the Maratha Empire. Step 2: Recognise that after his death, succession disputes and Mughal campaigns weakened Maratha authority. Step 3: Remember that Balaji Vishwanath, as Peshwa to Shahu, reorganised revenue, administration and military arrangements, and negotiated favourable terms with the Mughals. Step 4: This reorganisation earned him the description second founder of the Maratha state in many books. Step 5: Baji Rao I and Madhav Rao also strengthened Maratha power, but they are described with different titles and roles. Step 6: Therefore, Balaji Bishwanath is the correct choice from the given options. Verification / Alternative check: Summaries of Maratha history often state that Balaji Vishwanath consolidated the Maratha kingdom, obtained the right to collect Chauth and Sardeshmukhi in Maharashtra and neighbouring regions, and built a firm base for later expansion. For this reason, they explicitly call him the second founder of the Maratha Empire. While some authors praise Madhav Rao for restoring Maratha power after the disaster of Panipat, the examination oriented phrase second founder is most consistently linked to Balaji Vishwanath, not to his successors. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Balaji Baji Rao: This name combines two separate Peshwas Balaji Vishwanath and Baji Rao and is not the standard figure referred to by this title. Baji Rao I: A brilliant Peshwa who expanded Maratha influence into north India, but textbooks usually credit his father Balaji Vishwanath as the second founder. Madhav Rao: Known for reviving Maratha fortunes after the Third Battle of Panipat, yet usually described as a restorer rather than as the second founder. Common Pitfalls: Because several Peshwas had similar family names and all played important roles, students may confuse who did what. Another pitfall is to associate the term second founder with the most spectacular military expansion and therefore pick Baji Rao I or Madhav Rao. Keeping in mind the distinction between political reconstruction after chaos (Balaji Vishwanath) and later territorial expansion or revival helps identify the correct answer. Final Answer: The leader popularly known as the second founder of the Maratha Empire is Balaji Bishwanath.

Question 15

In Gandhian political thought, the ideal of "Ram Rajya" referred to which type of social and political order?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Mahatma Gandhi often used the expression "Ram Rajya" to describe his vision of an ideal social and political order for India. This phrase can be misunderstood if it is taken merely as a call for religious rule or a literal return to a mythological past. In fact, Gandhi attached a specific meaning to Ram Rajya that emphasised moral governance, self rule and minimisation of coercive state power. This question asks which description among the options best captures that Gandhian ideal. Given Data / Assumptions: - The concept under discussion is Gandhi's idea of Ram Rajya. - The options describe different forms of political order: centralised government, totalitarian state, stateless society and rule by religious leaders. - We assume the interpretation of Ram Rajya found in Gandhi's writings and speeches. Concept / Approach: For Gandhi, Ram Rajya did not mean a theocracy run by priests or a highly centralised modern state. Instead, it referred to a society where moral values, truth and non violence guided conduct, and where power was decentralised to self sufficient villages. In his later writings, Gandhi even described the ideal as a form of enlightened anarchy or stateless society, where people were so self disciplined and ethically motivated that the need for a coercive state would almost disappear. Among the options, the description that comes closest to this vision is a stateless society characterised by voluntary adherence to dharma and self rule. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall Gandhi's frequent statement that by Ram Rajya he meant the rule of righteousness, not rule by any particular religious group. Step 2: Note that he supported decentralisation, village republics and reduced reliance on centralised authority. Step 3: In works like "Hind Swaraj", Gandhi envisaged an ideal order where people were so committed to non violence and truth that external compulsion would hardly be needed. Step 4: Such a society, with minimal coercive state apparatus, approximates the idea of a stateless or near stateless order. Step 5: A centralised government or a totalitarian state contradicts Gandhi's preference for decentralisation and non violence. Step 6: Power solely in the hands of religious leaders also misrepresents his emphasis on ethical principles rather than clerical rule. Verification / Alternative check: Gandhi repeatedly clarified that Ram Rajya stood for sovereignty of the people based on moral authority, not for a Hindu theocracy. Commentators on his thought explain that he saw the ideal state as one where individuals voluntarily follow dharma, making heavy governmental control unnecessary. Experts often describe this as a vision approaching enlightened anarchy or a stateless society, precisely because coercive institutions would wither away in the presence of self disciplined citizens. This matches option c much better than the other descriptions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A centralised government: Gandhi warned against excessive centralisation and preferred village based self rule; this option does not reflect that preference. A totalitarian state: Totalitarianism implies intense control over all aspects of life, which is fundamentally opposed to Gandhi's ideals of freedom and non violence. Power in the hands of religious leaders: Gandhi respected religion but did not advocate clerical rule; Ram Rajya was about ethical governance, not domination by priests. Common Pitfalls: A frequent misunderstanding is to equate Ram Rajya with a purely religious or sectarian state, leading to the wrong choice of rule by religious leaders. Another error is to assume that any modern ideal of governance must involve strong central authority, encouraging the selection of a centralised or totalitarian model. Carefully reading Gandhi's emphasis on self rule, moral autonomy and minimal coercion shows that his ideal is much closer to a stateless or lightly governed society. Final Answer: Gandhi's concept of Ram Rajya is best described as an aspiration toward a stateless society based on moral self rule and non violence.

Question 16

During British rule in India, which Viceroy was assassinated while on a visit to the Andaman Islands, making him the only Viceroy of India to be killed in office?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The office of the Viceroy of India was the highest representative of the British Crown in the subcontinent. Although many Viceroys faced political crises and occasional violence, only one was actually assassinated while still in office. Knowing the identity of this Viceroy and the circumstances of his death is a standard factual question in modern Indian history. Given Data / Assumptions: - The question asks for the only Viceroy of India who was assassinated. - It mentions that the incident occurred during a visit to the Andaman Islands. - The options are Lord Harding, Lord Northbrook, Lord Ellenborough and Lord Mayo. - We assume standard timelines for Viceroys of India in the nineteenth century. Concept / Approach: Lord Mayo served as Viceroy of India from 1869 to 1872. During an inspection tour of the penal settlement in the Andaman Islands, he was assassinated by a convict at Port Blair in 1872. This incident is unique in the history of the viceroyalty; no other Viceroy was killed in similar circumstances. Lord Ellenborough and Lord Northbrook were earlier nineteenth century governors general and Viceroys, and Lord Hardinge refers to different incumbents who faced attacks but survived. Only Lord Mayo died as a result of an assassination while in office. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Andaman Islands housed a penal settlement where convicts were transported from mainland India. Step 2: Lord Mayo, as Viceroy, decided to inspect this settlement and travelled to Port Blair. Step 3: During this visit in 1872, he was stabbed by a convict and died from his wounds, becoming the only Viceroy to be assassinated while in office. Step 4: Check the other options: Lord Ellenborough and Lord Northbrook completed their terms and returned to Britain without being assassinated. Step 5: Lord Hardinge of Penshurst was injured in a bomb attack in Delhi in 1912 but survived; he was therefore not assassinated. Step 6: Conclude that Lord Mayo uniquely fits the description in the question. Verification / Alternative check: Chronological lists of Viceroys consistently note next to Lord Mayo's name that he was assassinated at Port Blair in 1872. Descriptions of the Andaman penal colony frequently mention this episode as a dramatic moment in its history. There is no similar annotation for any of the other Viceroys listed, which confirms that Lord Mayo was the only one killed in office. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lord Harding: Usually referring to Lord Hardinge of Penshurst, who survived a bomb attack in Delhi; he was not killed. Lord Northbrook: Served as Viceroy in the 1870s and left office normally without assassination. Lord Ellenborough: An earlier Governor General in the 1840s, who also completed his term and returned to Britain safely. Common Pitfalls: Because there was a serious attack on Lord Hardinge in 1912, some students mistakenly believe he was the assassinated Viceroy. Another pitfall is to confuse different British officials who were attacked, such as district officers or governors, with the Viceroy. The key memory aid is to pair Port Blair and the Andaman penal colony with Lord Mayo as the only assassinated Viceroy. Final Answer: The only Viceroy of India who was assassinated in office was Lord Mayo.

Question 17

The famous call "Do or Die" was given by Mahatma Gandhi in connection with which major movement of India’s freedom struggle?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Slogans and calls to action often become symbols of particular phases of the Indian freedom struggle. "Do or Die" is one of the most famous phrases associated with Mahatma Gandhi and is frequently asked about in competitive examinations. It marks a turning point when the national leadership demanded complete independence and prepared the people for intense struggle against colonial rule. Given Data / Assumptions: - The phrase in question is "Do or Die". - It is known to have been used by Mahatma Gandhi. - The options are Dandi March, Non-Cooperation Movement, Khilafat Movement and Quit India Movement. - We assume standard chronology of Gandhian movements. Concept / Approach: "Do or Die" was the dramatic phrase used by Gandhi in his address on the eve of the Quit India Movement in August 1942. The movement called for the British to leave India immediately and urged people to be ready for sacrifice in a final non violent struggle. The Dandi March (1930) and the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–1922) belonged to earlier phases, and the Khilafat Movement related to pan Islamic concerns after the First World War. Matching the year 1942 and the intensification of the demand for independence clearly points to the Quit India Movement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Quit India Movement was launched in August 1942 with the slogan "Quit India" and a call for British withdrawal. Step 2: Gandhi addressed the nation and used the phrase "Do or Die" to convey the seriousness of the struggle and the need for total commitment. Step 3: The Dandi March was associated with the Civil Disobedience Movement against the salt tax in 1930, with different slogans. Step 4: The Non-Cooperation and Khilafat Movements belong to the early 1920s and focused on different issues and forms of protest. Step 5: Since "Do or Die" is specifically tied to the 1942 call for mass action, the only correct answer is Quit India Movement. Verification / Alternative check: Histories of the freedom struggle frequently quote from Gandhi's speech delivered on 8 August 1942 at the Bombay session of the All India Congress Committee. In this address he appealed to the people with the words that they must "do or die" in their effort to end British rule. The next day the Quit India Movement was formally launched and repression followed. There is no equivalent prominence of this phrase in accounts of the other movements listed, confirming that it belongs to Quit India. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Dandi March: Famous for breaking the salt law and for the phrase connected with salt tax and civil disobedience, not for "Do or Die". Non-Cooperation Movement: Linked with boycotts of foreign goods and institutions in the early 1920s, before the phrase was coined. Khilafat Movement: A movement to support the Caliph and protest the terms of the peace settlement after the First World War, without this specific slogan. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes candidates loosely associate all striking phrases with Gandhi's earliest mass movements and pick Non-Cooperation or Dandi March without recalling the timeline. Another pitfall is to think of "Do or Die" as a purely military style slogan and therefore not connect it with a non violent movement like Quit India. Remembering that 1942 represents the final all India push for independence under Gandhi helps anchor this phrase to the correct event. Final Answer: The call "Do or Die" is associated with the Quit India Movement of 1942.

Question 18

In Jainism, what is the collective term used for the sacred canonical texts that record the teachings of the Tirthankaras?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Every major religious tradition has a canon or group of sacred texts that are seen as authoritative sources of doctrine and practice. In Jainism, the earliest body of scripture preserving the teachings of the Tirthankaras and their disciples is known by a particular collective name. This question checks whether the learner can correctly identify that term among several similar sounding literary labels. Given Data / Assumptions: - The focus is on Jain sacred canonical texts. - The question asks for the collective term used for these texts. - The options are Prabandhas, Angas, Nibandhas and Charits. - We assume the standard terminology used in introductions to Jain religion. Concept / Approach: In Jainism, the earliest scriptural texts that systematise the teachings of Mahavira and earlier Tirthankaras are called the Angas. The word "Anga" literally means limb, suggesting that these texts are limbs or parts of the total body of doctrine. Traditional accounts speak of twelve Angas, although not all are preserved in every Jain sect. Other literary terms like Prabandha, Nibandha or Charita refer to different genres of narrative, commentary or biography and are not the canonical label for the sacred scriptures themselves. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Jain canonical literature is often described as consisting of Angas and various auxiliary texts. Step 2: Recognise that the Angas are thought of as the central limbs of Jain scriptural teaching. Step 3: Understand that Prabandhas usually refer to later narrative collections or chronicles, not the core canon. Step 4: Nibandhas generally mean essays, treatises or commentarial works in Sanskrit and other languages. Step 5: Charits or Charitas are biographies or life stories of saints and rulers, again different from the canonical Angas. Step 6: Therefore, the correct collective term for Jain sacred canonical texts is Angas. Verification / Alternative check: Standard reference works on Jainism describe the Jain canon, especially in the Shvetambara tradition, as consisting of eleven or twelve Angas, each dealing with different aspects of doctrine, discipline and stories. Auxiliary texts are grouped separately as Upangas and other categories. When competitive exam books summarise world religions, they consistently list Angas as the canonical scriptures of the Jains, and they do not use the other words in the options as substitutes for this term. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Prabandhas: A general term for narrative collections or historical anecdotes, not the canonical scriptures of Jainism. Nibandhas: Refers to treatises or essays and may apply to many literary traditions, but is not the Jain technical term for sacred canon. Charits: Biographical or narrative works, often about saints or kings, again distinct from the core doctrinal Angas. Common Pitfalls: Because all the options sound like Sanskrit derived literary labels, candidates sometimes guess at random or choose the one that feels most familiar. Another pitfall is to confuse Jain terminology with Buddhist or general Sanskrit literature. A reliable memory hook is that Jains speak of Angas as the scriptural limbs of their tradition, while the other words mainly refer to broader literary genres. Final Answer: The collective term used by Jains for their sacred canonical books is Angas.

Question 19

Which one of the following literary and cultural figures was not primarily known for active participation in social and religious reform movements in nineteenth century India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The nineteenth century in India saw a series of social and religious reform movements that attempted to challenge harmful customs, promote education and reinterpret religious traditions. Several leaders became famous for their reformist work, while others were known more for literary and cultural contributions. This question asks you to pick the name that does not belong mainly to the category of active social and religious reformers, even though that person may still have held progressive views. Given Data / Assumptions: - The focus is on social and religious reform in nineteenth century India. span style="display:block;">- The names listed are Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar, Jotiba Phule and Bharatendu Harish Chandra. - We assume standard classifications of these personalities in history and literature. Concept / Approach: Raja Ram Mohan Roy is well known as the founder of the Brahmo Samaj and a pioneer in campaigns against sati and for modern education. Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar worked for widow remarriage and against child marriage in Bengal. Jotiba Phule fought caste oppression, especially in Maharashtra, and promoted education for lower castes and women. Bharatendu Harish Chandra, by contrast, is celebrated mainly as the "father of modern Hindi literature" and a key figure in Hindi theatre and journalism. While he supported social awareness through his writings, he is not classed first as a social or religious reformer on the level of the other three. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify Raja Ram Mohan Roy as a central figure in religious reform, opposing practices such as sati and founding the Brahmo Samaj. Step 2: Recognise Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar as a reformer who campaigned for widow remarriage and women's education in Bengal. Step 3: Recall that Jotiba Phule organised movements against caste discrimination and started schools for girls and lower castes in Maharashtra. Step 4: Note that Bharatendu Harish Chandra is mostly remembered for his plays, essays and work in modern Hindi, and is often described as the father of modern Hindi literature. Step 5: While Bharatendu engaged with contemporary issues, his primary identity in textbooks is as a literary figure rather than as a major social or religious reform leader. Step 6: Therefore, he is the one among the four who was not primarily engaged in organised social and religious reform movements. Verification / Alternative check: Biographical sketches in history and literature books clearly distinguish between these individuals. The first three appear in chapters on social reform, and their organisations and specific reform campaigns are discussed in detail. Bharatendu appears mainly in chapters on the growth of modern Indian languages, print culture and theatre. While his writings sometimes promoted awareness about social issues, he did not lead reformist organisations like the Brahmo Samaj or the Satyashodhak Samaj. This confirms that Bharatendu Harish Chandra is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Raja Ram Mohan Roy: A central reformer in Bengal, key in banning sati and modernising Hindu religious thought. Pandit Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar: Famous for campaigns that led to the Hindu Widows Remarriage Act and other social reforms. Jotiba Phule: Founder of the Satyashodhak Samaj and a major anti caste and pro education reformer in Maharashtra. Common Pitfalls: Because Bharatendu Harish Chandra wrote about social themes, some candidates mistakenly consider him a reform leader on the same level as Roy, Vidyasagar or Phule. Another pitfall is not distinguishing between people who wrote reformist literature and those who directly organised movements and lobbied for specific legal and social changes. Remembering Bharatendu mainly as a literary pioneer helps to avoid confusion. Final Answer: The person who was not primarily engaged in social and religious reform movements was Bharatendu Harish Chandra.

Question 20

In the history of British expansion in India, after which battle did the English East India Company effectively secure political power that laid the foundation for its rule in India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The rise of British power in India was not the result of a single event but of a series of military victories and political treaties. However, some battles are recognised as turning points that transformed the English East India Company from a trading corporation into a territorial power. This question asks which battle most clearly marked the achievement of consolidated political power in India. Given Data / Assumptions: - The question refers to the English East India Company achieving political power in India. - The options are the battles of Plassey, Panipat, Buxar and Wandiwash. - We assume standard interpretations of these battles in modern Indian history textbooks. Concept / Approach: The Battle of Plassey in 1757 gave the Company decisive influence over Bengal by defeating Siraj ud Daulah, but it was still formally operating under the authority of local nawabs. The Battle of Buxar in 1764, where the Company defeated the combined armies of the Nawab of Awadh, the Nawab of Bengal and the Mughal Emperor, is widely seen as the moment when Company supremacy was firmly established in north India. The subsequent Allahabad Treaty granted the Company the Diwani (revenue collecting rights) of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. Thus, Buxar is often identified as the battle after which the British achieved real political power. Panipat relates to Maratha and Afghan struggles, and Wandiwash mainly decided Anglo French rivalry in the south. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Understand that political power means more than just influence; it implies control over revenue and administration. Step 2: Recall that the Battle of Plassey made the Company a kingmaker in Bengal but still operating through puppet nawabs. Step 3: Recognise that the Battle of Buxar led directly to the grant of Diwani rights over large and rich provinces. Step 4: This grant meant that the Company now collected revenue and could maintain its own army and administration, a clear sign of political power. Step 5: The Battle of Panipat involved Indian and Afghan forces and did not directly improve British political control. Step 6: The Battle of Wandiwash was crucial in eliminating the French as a serious rival but did not by itself confer Diwani in Bengal. Verification / Alternative check: Most history texts state that while Plassey laid the foundation of British supremacy in Bengal, it was the Battle of Buxar and the subsequent arrangements with the Mughal emperor that gave the East India Company direct revenue rights. These rights allowed it to finance armies and expand power across India. Therefore, exam oriented summaries often identify Buxar as the battle after which the Company became a significant political power rather than just a trading body. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Battle of Plassey: An important earlier victory that changed the Nawab of Bengal but did not itself confer comprehensive political power through Diwani. Battle of Panipat: Fought between Indian and Afghan forces in various years, not directly involving the Company as the main victor. Battle of Wandiwash: Decisive in the Anglo French struggle in the Carnatic, but not the key event for political control in Bengal and north India. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes pick Plassey because it is the more famous battle and they remember it as the starting point of British rule. Another confusion arises from not distinguishing between military victory and formal political authority through revenue rights. By linking Buxar with the Allahabad Treaty and the Diwani grant, one can clearly see why it is the more accurate answer for the achievement of political power. Final Answer: The English East India Company effectively secured political power in India after the Battle of Buxar.

Indian History Questions