Question 1

In psychology and literary theory, the term "racial unconscious" is used to suggest which of the following ideas about memory and the human mind?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question touches on concepts found in psychology and sometimes in literary interpretation, especially in the context of works that explore instinct, heredity and deep memory. The term "racial unconscious" is closely related to ideas about a collective or inherited unconscious, where certain patterns of behaviour, images and memories are thought to be shared by a group, race or species beyond individual experience. Given Data / Assumptions: The term in focus is "racial unconscious". Several options connect it with survival instincts, prejudice, natural selection and shared ancient memories. The question asks which statement best captures the meaning of the term. We assume a basic familiarity with psychoanalytic and literary interpretations of collective memory. Concept / Approach: The "racial unconscious" is often used in a way similar to Carl Jung's idea of the collective unconscious, where archetypes and primordial images are inherited by members of a group. In this context, "racial" does not only refer to race in the modern sociological sense but more broadly to species, culture or lineage. The key idea is that individuals can exhibit patterns of thought and behaviour arising from deep, shared memories rather than from personal experience alone. Therefore, the option that speaks of species and cultures sharing ancient memories stored in the unconscious mind best reflects this meaning. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Focus on the central phrase "racial unconscious" and relate it to "collective unconscious". Step 2: Recognise that the term points toward something stored in the unconscious part of the mind. Step 3: Among the options, look for one that directly mentions shared or inherited memories. Step 4: Option B states that each species and culture shares ancient memories stored in the unconscious, which matches the concept. Step 5: The other options refer to prejudice, survival rules or natural selection, which are related ideas but do not define "racial unconscious" itself. Verification / Alternative check: In psychological and literary discussions, the "racial unconscious" is typically defined as the layer of the unconscious mind where archetypal memories and experiences of the group or race are stored. It parallels the notion that myths, symbols and instinctive responses may come from a deeper inherited layer rather than individual learning. This aligns closely with option B and not with the other, more behaviour based statements. Why Other Options Are Wrong: That one must learn the law of club and fang to survive: This phrase evokes a law of brutal survival, but it describes a rule of behaviour rather than a definition of racial unconscious as shared deep memory. That everyone is prejudiced to some degree, even if unaware of it: While unconscious bias is a real concept, it does not capture the full notion of inherited, shared memories that "racial unconscious" refers to. That nature always weeds out the weakest and most unfit: This expresses a version of natural selection or survival of the fittest, a biological idea, not a psychological concept about collective unconscious memory. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to associate "racial unconscious" only with racism or prejudice because of the word "racial". Another error is to connect it solely with the harsh laws of nature described in literature, ignoring the deeper psychological meaning. To avoid confusion, students should remember that in this context "racial" points to a group level or species level layer of the unconscious that contains ancestral memories and archetypal patterns. Final Answer: The term "racial unconscious" means that each species and culture shares ancient memories stored in the unconscious part of the mind.

Question 2

In early twentieth-century United States politics, what was one important way in which Progressives differed from Populists as reform movements?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question shifts from Indian history to United States history and asks about the relationship between two major reform movements: Populism and Progressivism. Both responded to the problems created by rapid industrialisation, but they differed in social base, style and priorities. Understanding at least one clear difference between them helps students organise a complex period of American political history in a comparative way. Given Data / Assumptions: The question concerns the Populist movement of the late nineteenth century and the Progressive movement of the early twentieth century. We are asked for one way in which Progressives differed from Populists. Options mention class and regional bases, attitudes to regulation, currency policies and policy focus. We assume a broad overview of these movements from standard US history sources. Concept / Approach: The Populist movement (People's Party) grew mainly out of agrarian discontent among farmers in the South and West, who felt squeezed by railroads, banks and falling crop prices. In contrast, the Progressive movement was more urban and middle class, including professionals, journalists and reform minded politicians seeking to regulate big business, clean up politics and address urban social problems. While there were overlaps in some policy goals, their social bases were distinct. Therefore, the key difference highlighted in option A, which contrasts the rural farmer base of the Populists with the urban middle class base of the Progressives, correctly expresses an important distinction. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Populists mainly represented farmers and small producers in rural America, especially in the South and West. Step 2: Recall that Progressives emerged later and were often journalists, professionals, urban middle class reformers and some politicians. Step 3: Recognise that both groups sought reforms, but their social composition and immediate concerns were different. Step 4: Option A directly identifies this difference: Progressives as middle-class urban reformers versus Populists as rural farmer based. Step 5: Examine other options and see that they misrepresent or oversimplify the movements, confirming that option A is most accurate. Verification / Alternative check: Standard US history texts emphasise that the Populist Party grew from farmers' alliances and agrarian protests, while Progressives were more likely to be urban professionals, social workers, investigative journalists and political leaders. Although there was some overlap in goals such as regulation of big business, the core social base differed. This confirms that the difference described in option A captures a widely accepted scholarly view. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Progressives opposed any government regulation of business, while Populists strongly supported regulation: This is incorrect because Progressives actually favoured regulation of big business, including antitrust laws and regulation of railroads and food safety. Progressives wanted to return to the gold standard, while Populists demanded free and unlimited coinage of silver: Populists indeed pushed for free silver, but Progressives did not define their movement by a desire to return to a rigid gold standard in the way this option suggests. Progressives focused only on foreign policy issues, while Populists focused only on cultural issues: This is a clear distortion. Progressives were heavily concerned with domestic reforms such as labour laws, urban housing and political corruption, and Populists were mainly focused on economic issues affecting farmers. Common Pitfalls: Students may lump together all reformers of the period as one single group or may remember only one issue such as free silver and wrongly apply it to both movements. Another pitfall is to oversimplify Progressivism as just another agrarian protest movement, ignoring its urban, middle class character. To avoid confusion, it is useful to remember the Populist farmer in the countryside and the Progressive reformer in the city as shorthand images for their differing social bases. Final Answer: One important difference was that Progressives were mainly middle-class urban reformers, while Populists drew most of their support from rural farmers.

Question 3

Which of the following was not a characteristic feature of the Indus Valley (Harappan) Civilization?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question deals with the material culture of the Indus Valley or Harappan Civilization, one of the earliest urban civilisations in the Indian subcontinent. Archaeological findings tell us what materials, metals, building techniques and town planning methods the Harappans used. Identifying which feature does not belong to this civilisation requires a basic understanding of its chronological position in relation to the Bronze Age and the later Iron Age. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on characteristic features of the Indus Valley Civilization. Options include use of iron, town planning, drainage system and use of bronze. The question asks which one was not a feature. We assume knowledge that the Harappans flourished during the Bronze Age. Concept / Approach: The Indus Valley Civilization is generally dated to about 2600–1900 BCE for its mature phase, a period firmly within the Bronze Age. Excavations show extensive use of baked bricks, carefully laid out streets and advanced drainage systems. Copper and bronze tools, weapons and ornaments are common. By contrast, iron appears in the subcontinent much later, in the early Iron Age, after the Harappan urban centres had already declined. Therefore, the use of iron cannot be considered a feature of the Indus Valley Civilization. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Harappan Civilization belongs to the Bronze Age, not the Iron Age. Step 2: Recognise that town planning with a grid pattern of streets and organised housing is a well known feature of Harappa and Mohenjo daro. Step 3: Remember that an advanced drainage system, with covered drains and soak pits, is one of the most striking features of Harappan cities. Step 4: Note that bronze objects, made from copper and tin, have been unearthed in large numbers at Harappan sites. Step 5: Conclude that "use of iron tools and weapons" is the one option that does not match Harappan characteristics. Verification / Alternative check: Archaeological reports on Harappan sites consistently refer to copper and bronze artefacts, but iron objects are absent in the mature Harappan layers. Iron becomes common only in later cultures such as the Painted Grey Ware and early historic periods. Textbooks also emphasise town planning and drainage as signature achievements of the Indus cities. These consistent findings confirm that the use of iron was not a feature of the Indus Valley Civilization. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Carefully planned town layouts: Harappan cities like Mohenjo daro and Harappa are famous for their grid pattern streets, zoning and planned layout, so this is indeed a feature. Well organised drainage system: Covered drains along streets and sophisticated waste disposal arrangements are a hallmark of Harappan urban life. Extensive use of bronze: The civilisation is classified as Bronze Age precisely because bronze tools, weapons and artefacts are common in excavations. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes assume that any advanced civilisation must have used iron, overlooking the chronological distinction between the Bronze and Iron Ages. Another common mistake is to underestimate how advanced Harappan town planning and drainage were, and to think they might be later features. Keeping a clear timeline of copper bronze culture followed by iron usage helps avoid these misunderstandings in exam questions. Final Answer: The feature that did not belong to the Indus Valley Civilization was the use of iron tools and weapons.

Question 4

Who among the following historical figures was Mihirakula?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question concerns the foreign invasions and political developments in early medieval India. Mihirakula is often mentioned in historical narratives as a fierce ruler associated with the Hunas (or Huns), whose incursions disturbed the post Gupta political order in north western India. Recognising his identity helps place the Huna invasions on the timeline of Indian history. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks who Mihirakula was. The options include different types of rulers and a pilgrim: Indo Greek, Huna, Chinese pilgrim and Saka. We assume that Mihirakula is a specific personal name linked to one of these groups. The task is to match him correctly with his historical affiliation. Concept / Approach: The main concept is to recall that the Hunas or Huns invaded north western India during the late Gupta period and afterwards. Mihirakula is described in some sources as a powerful and harsh Huna ruler who persecuted Buddhists in certain regions. He is not an Indo Greek or Saka king, nor a Chinese pilgrim; those labels belong to other historical figures. Therefore, the correct identification is that he was a Huna invader and ruler. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise the name Mihirakula as belonging to the period of Huna invasions. Step 2: Recall that Hunas entered India in the fifth and sixth centuries CE and challenged the Gupta Empire. Step 3: Historical accounts mention Toramana and his son Mihirakula as notable Huna rulers. Step 4: Compare this with the options: Indo Greek and Saka rulers belong to earlier centuries; Chinese pilgrims such as Fa Hien and Hiuen Tsang have very different names. Step 5: Conclude that Mihirakula was a Huna invader and ruler. Verification / Alternative check: Histories of the Gupta decline and early medieval north India routinely list Mihirakula as a Huna king. They describe his campaigns, his reputed cruelty and his defeat by Indian powers, including the rulers of Kashmir and Malwa. Indo Greek rulers, by contrast, have names like Menander or Demetrius, and Chinese pilgrims like Fa Hien or Xuanzang are clearly very different personalities. This confirms that the Huna identity is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: An Indo-Greek ruler: Indo Greek kings ruled parts of north western India much earlier, around the second to first centuries BCE, and had different names and cultural affiliations. A Chinese Buddhist pilgrim: Well known Chinese pilgrims include Fa Hien and Xuanzang, who visited India to study Buddhism and record their travels, not Mihirakula. A Saka (Scythian) ruler: Saka or Scythian rulers also controlled parts of western India earlier, but Mihirakula is specifically associated with the Hunas, not the Sakas. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes lump together various foreign groups such as Indo Greeks, Sakas, Kushanas and Hunas, treating them as one broad category and mixing up individual names. Another pitfall is confusing foreign rulers with Chinese pilgrims, simply because both appear in the same historical chapters. A good strategy is to link Mihirakula with the late Gupta period and Huna invasions, keeping Indo Greek and Saka rulers in separate, earlier brackets in your mental timeline. Final Answer: Mihirakula was a Huna (Hunnic) invader and ruler in early medieval India.

Question 5

Which poet is generally credited with first popularising the sonnet form in European literature?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the field of European literary history and focuses on the development of the sonnet, a short fourteen line poem with a specific rhyme scheme. While several famous poets wrote sonnets, one early Italian poet is especially credited with popularising the form and influencing later writers across Europe, including English poets. Given Data / Assumptions: The literary form in question is the sonnet. We are asked which poet first popularised this form. The options include Edmund Spenser, Francesco Petrarch, William Shakespeare and "None of the above". We assume basic knowledge of how the sonnet evolved from Italian to English traditions. Concept / Approach: The sonnet originated in Italy, and Francesco Petrarch is widely recognised as the poet who brought the form to high artistic development and popularity in the fourteenth century through his love sonnets addressed to Laura. Later poets, including Shakespeare and Spenser in England, took inspiration from this tradition and adapted the sonnet into their own languages and rhyme schemes. Therefore, although Shakespeare and Spenser are extremely famous sonneteers in English, Petrarch is the correct answer when we discuss the first major populariser of the sonnet form in European literature more broadly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the sonnet originated as an Italian poetic form. Step 2: Recall that Francesco Petrarch's sonnet sequence about Laura became highly influential across Europe. Step 3: Recognise that Shakespeare and Spenser wrote later, in Elizabethan England, and built on an already established sonnet tradition. Step 4: Compare the options and match "first popularised" with the early Italian master, rather than with later English poets. Step 5: Conclude that Francesco Petrarch is the poet who fits this description. Verification / Alternative check: Literary histories typically refer to "Petrarchan sonnets" as the model that influenced Renaissance poets all over Europe. When discussing sonnet origins, they list Giacomo da Lentini as an early innovator but highlight Petrarch as the poet who truly popularised and refined the form. Shakespeare and Spenser are described as major figures in the English sonnet tradition, not as the earliest popularisers of the sonnet overall. This confirms Petrarch as the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Edmund Spenser: Known for "The Faerie Queene" and also for his sonnet sequence "Amoretti", but he came later and did not originate or first popularise the sonnet in Europe. William Shakespeare: Perhaps the most famous sonneteer in English, author of 154 sonnets, but he wrote after the sonnet had already been well established and popularised by Petrarch. None of the above: This is incorrect because one of the listed poets, Francesco Petrarch, clearly matches the description given in the question. Common Pitfalls: Candidates may instinctively choose Shakespeare because his sonnets are very famous and widely studied in English courses, forgetting that the sonnet form itself is older and came from Italy. Others may see Edmund Spenser's name and recall his "Amoretti" sequence, again overlooking the earlier Italian tradition. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to remember the label "Petrarchan sonnet" as a clue that points directly to Petrarch's central role in popularising the form. Final Answer: The poet who first popularised the sonnet form is Francesco Petrarch.

Question 6

Who among the following Indian leaders attended all three Round Table Conferences held in London to discuss India’s constitutional future?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question relates to the constitutional discussions between British officials and Indian representatives during the early 1930s, known as the Round Table Conferences. These conferences were held in London to discuss reforms for India's future government. Knowing which leaders attended which sessions is important for understanding the roles they played in shaping constitutional debates and representing different social groups. Given Data / Assumptions: There were three Round Table Conferences held in London between 1930 and 1932. Different Indian leaders attended different sessions. The question asks who attended all three. The options include M. K. Gandhi, M. M. Malviya, B. R. Ambedkar and Annie Besant. Concept / Approach: The key is to recall attendance patterns. Gandhi attended only the second Round Table Conference as the sole representative of the Indian National Congress after the Gandhi Irwin Pact. Madan Mohan Malviya was present at the second and third conferences but not all three. Annie Besant, an earlier theosophist and nationalist leader, was not a central representative in all three conferences of this period. Dr B. R. Ambedkar, representing the depressed classes, participated in all three conferences, arguing strongly for safeguards and separate representation for marginalised communities. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that there were three Round Table Conferences: first (1930–31), second (1931) and third (1932). Step 2: Gandhi attended only the second Round Table Conference as the main Congress representative. Step 3: Malviya participated in more than one conference but not in all three. Step 4: Ambedkar is well known for his presence at all three conferences as a spokesperson for the depressed classes. Step 5: Annie Besant was not a regular central delegate at all three conferences during this specific period. Verification / Alternative check: Biographical accounts of Ambedkar and histories of the Round Table Conferences repeatedly highlight that he attended all three sessions and engaged in vigorous debates with Gandhi and others over communal representation and safeguards for the depressed classes. Lists of delegates for each conference confirm his name in all three, while Gandhi's name appears only in the second. This corroborates B. R. Ambedkar as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: M. K. Gandhi: Attended only the second Round Table Conference, not the first and third, so he did not attend all three. M. M. Malviya: A respected Congress leader and educationalist, but he did not serve as a delegate at all three conferences. Annie Besant: A significant figure in earlier phases of the national movement and the Home Rule League, but not a central participant in all three Round Table Conferences held in the early 1930s. Common Pitfalls: Examinees often assume that because Gandhi is the most famous nationalist leader, he must have attended every important conference, which is incorrect in this case. Others may not clearly distinguish between leaders active in the 1910s and those central in the 1930s. Remembering Ambedkar's sustained presence across all three conferences, especially in relation to the Poona Pact and the question of separate electorates, provides a reliable anchor for answering such questions. Final Answer: The only leader among the options who attended all three Round Table Conferences was B. R. Ambedkar.

Question 7

In which present day region is the ancient Indus Valley site of Mohenjo daro located?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Mohenjo daro is one of the most famous urban centres of the ancient Indus Valley Civilization. It is often mentioned in school and competitive examinations as a key archaeological site that helps historians understand early urban planning, drainage, and social life in South Asia. Many learners confuse its location with other regions of India, so this question checks whether you know the present day political region where Mohenjo daro is situated. Given Data / Assumptions: Mohenjo daro was a major city of the Indus Valley or Harappan Civilization. The question asks about its present day location, not ancient territorial names. Options mention Indian states as well as neighbouring countries and regions. Concept / Approach: To answer this question, you need basic knowledge of the geography of the Indus Valley Civilization and how modern national boundaries overlay those ancient regions. Many major Harappan sites like Harappa and Mohenjo daro now lie in present day Pakistan, while others such as Dholavira are in India. The key concept is to link the ancient site of Mohenjo daro with the modern province in which archaeologists found it. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Mohenjo daro is located on the banks of the Indus River. Step 2: Remember that the Indus River today flows mainly through Pakistan. Step 3: Mohenjo daro is situated near the lower course of the Indus River. Step 4: This region corresponds to the Sindh province in present day Pakistan. Step 5: Therefore, among the options, Sindh province of Pakistan is the correct choice. Verification / Alternative check: A quick way to verify is to recall the list of famous Harappan sites and their modern locations. Harappa is in Punjab province of Pakistan, Mohenjo daro is in Sindh province of Pakistan, and Dholavira and Lothal are in modern India. If you remember this trio, you can confidently assign Mohenjo daro to Sindh. Atlas maps and school textbooks on ancient India also show Mohenjo daro within the boundaries of Sindh, which confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Gujarat in India: Gujarat has important Harappan sites such as Dholavira and Lothal, but not Mohenjo daro, so this option is incorrect. Punjab region of India: Harappa is in the Punjab region of Pakistan, not India, and Mohenjo daro is even further south in Sindh, so this option is misleading. Afghanistan: Some ancient sites related to Indus culture exist near Afghanistan, but Mohenjo daro is not among them, so this option is also wrong. Common Pitfalls: Learners often mix up Harappa and Mohenjo daro or assume that all Indus Valley sites are in India because they study them in Indian history. Another common mistake is confusing Sindh with Gujarat due to the shared Arabian Sea coastline. It is important to separate the different key sites in memory and tie each one to a specific present day state or province. Final Answer: The ancient site of Mohenjo daro is located in the Sindh province of Pakistan.

Question 8

Which Indian states celebrate their Statehood Day on 21 January every year?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Several Indian states celebrate a Statehood Day to mark the date on which they were formed or received full state status within the Indian Union. This question focuses on the states that share the same Statehood Day date, 21 January. Knowing such dates is important for general knowledge, government exams, and understanding the political evolution of the North Eastern region of India. Given Data / Assumptions: The question specifies the date 21 January as Statehood Day. The options list North Eastern states Manipur, Tripura, and Meghalaya. The task is to pick the correct combination of states that celebrate on this date. Concept / Approach: To answer, you need to remember that several North Eastern states were given full statehood through the North Eastern Areas Reorganisation Act in the early nineteen seventies. Manipur, Tripura, and Meghalaya attained statehood around the same time, and the date 21 January is common to all three. The approach is to recall the historical reorganisation of the North East and identify which states share this common anniversary. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Manipur became a full fledged state of India in January nineteen seventy two. Step 2: Remember that Tripura also attained statehood on the same date in January nineteen seventy two. Step 3: Note that Meghalaya, which was earlier an autonomous state within Assam, also achieved full state status on 21 January nineteen seventy two. Step 4: Therefore all three states Manipur, Tripura, and Meghalaya celebrate Statehood Day on 21 January every year. Step 5: From the options, the combination that includes all three is Manipur Tripura and Meghalaya. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by remembering that the North Eastern Areas Reorganisation Act came into force in nineteen seventy one, leading to statehood from 21 January nineteen seventy two. Government celebrations, news reports, and state level functions are regularly held in these three states on 21 January to mark their formation day. No other Indian state shares this exact date with them, which confirms that the combination of all three is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Manipur and Meghalaya: This option excludes Tripura, which also became a state on the same date, so it is incomplete. Tripura and Meghalaya: This option leaves out Manipur, which also celebrates on 21 January, so it is not correct. Manipur and Tripura: This option omits Meghalaya, which has the same Statehood Day, so it is also incomplete. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume that only two of these states share the date while the third has a different Statehood Day. Another pitfall is confusing Statehood Day with cultural or foundation days that can fall on different dates. Some learners also mix these dates with those of other North Eastern states like Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram, which celebrate statehood on different days in February. Final Answer: The states that celebrate Statehood Day on 21 January are Manipur Tripura and Meghalaya.

Question 9

Who founded the Maratha Empire in the seventeenth century in western India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Maratha Empire played a crucial role in early modern Indian history, especially in resisting Mughal power and later influencing British expansion. Knowing the founder of the Maratha state is a basic requirement for exams on Indian history. This question checks whether you can correctly identify the leader who laid the political and military foundations of the Maratha power in the seventeenth century. Given Data / Assumptions: The topic is the foundation of the Maratha Empire. The time frame is the seventeenth century in western India. The options include famous rulers from different dynasties. Concept / Approach: To solve this, remember that the Marathas emerged as a regional power in the Deccan region. The person associated with this rise is Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, who carved out an independent kingdom by challenging the Adil Shahi rulers of Bijapur and confronting Mughal forces. The other names in the options belong to Maurya and Mughal dynasties and are not linked with the Maratha Empire. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Shivaji Maharaj was born at Shivneri in the seventeenth century and grew up in the Deccan region. Step 2: He organized local Maratha chiefs and soldiers, captured forts, and established his own administration in western India. Step 3: In sixteen seventy four he was crowned as Chhatrapati at Raigad, symbolizing the formal establishment of the Maratha kingdom. Step 4: Over time, this kingdom expanded and came to be known as the Maratha Empire. Step 5: Therefore Shivaji Maharaj is recognized as the founder of the Maratha Empire. Verification / Alternative check: Standard history textbooks on medieval and modern India clearly state that Shivaji Maharaj founded the Maratha kingdom which evolved into a larger Maratha Empire under his successors and the Peshwas. Akbar and Jahangir were Mughal emperors based in North India, while Ashoka was an ancient Mauryan emperor from an entirely different period. This confirms that only one option matches both the region and the time frame of the Maratha rise. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Akbar: He was a Mughal emperor who expanded the Mughal Empire but did not found the Maratha power, so this option is incorrect. Ashoka: He was a Mauryan emperor from ancient Indian history, many centuries earlier than the Marathas, therefore this cannot be correct. Jahangir: Another Mughal emperor, son of Akbar, who ruled North India but had no role in founding the Maratha Empire. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse different dynasties due to repeated names in history, such as mixing up Mughal and Maratha leaders. Another mistake is to think that an older and more famous ruler such as Ashoka might have founded several empires. It is important to link each leader with the correct region, time period, and dynasty to avoid such confusion. Final Answer: The founder of the Maratha Empire was Shivaji Maharaj.

Question 10

Who was the Viceroy of India at the time of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in 1919?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Jallianwala Bagh massacre in April nineteen nineteen is one of the most tragic events in the history of the Indian freedom struggle. British troops under General Dyer fired on an unarmed crowd in Amritsar, causing hundreds of deaths. For many examinations, it is important to know which British Viceroy was in office at that time, because this event had major political consequences and intensified the demand for independence. Given Data / Assumptions: The event is the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar. The year of the incident is nineteen nineteen. The question asks for the Viceroy of India who was in office during that period. Concept / Approach: To answer, you need a timeline of British Viceroys. Lord Chelmsford served as Viceroy of India from nineteen sixteen to nineteen twenty one. This period includes the time of the massacre. The other names belong to earlier or different time periods and do not match the date of the event. Matching the year of the incident with the tenure of each Viceroy is the core approach. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Jallianwala Bagh massacre occurred on thirteen April nineteen nineteen. Step 2: Identify the tenure of Lord Chelmsford as Viceroy from nineteen sixteen to nineteen twenty one. Step 3: Note that this tenure covers the year nineteen nineteen, the year of the massacre. Step 4: Check other Viceroys. Lord Curzon served earlier, at the beginning of the twentieth century. Lord Ripon and Lord Canning also served in the nineteenth century. Step 5: Therefore, only Lord Chelmsford matches the required time frame. Verification / Alternative check: You can cross verify by remembering that the Montagu Chelmsford Reforms, which led to the Government of India Act nineteen nineteen, are named after Edwin Montagu and Lord Chelmsford. These reforms were introduced at almost the same time as the massacre, which confirms that Chelmsford was the Viceroy then. Standard history references on the non cooperation movement also mention Lord Chelmsford as Viceroy when public outrage over Jallianwala Bagh grew. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lord Curzon: He served as Viceroy from eighteen ninety nine to nineteen five, long before the massacre, so this option is incorrect. Lord Ripon: He was Viceroy in the eighteen eighties and is remembered for liberal policies, so he cannot be connected with Jallianwala Bagh. Lord Canning: He was Viceroy during the revolt of eighteen fifty seven and the transfer of power to the Crown, not during nineteen nineteen. Common Pitfalls: A common error is confusing the roles of General Dyer and the Viceroy. Many students remember Dyer as responsible for issuing the firing order and mistakenly choose his name if it appears as a Viceroy in some questions. It is essential to distinguish between military officers on the ground and the Viceroy who was the head of the colonial administration at that time. Final Answer: The Viceroy of India at the time of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre was Lord Chelmsford.

Question 11

In Indian economic history, the term White Revolution is primarily related to which sector?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: India has seen several major revolutions in the agricultural and allied sectors, each associated with a particular colour. The White Revolution is one of the most important among them because it transformed India from a milk deficient country into one of the largest milk producers in the world. This question checks whether you can correctly connect the White Revolution with the economic sector it transformed. Given Data / Assumptions: The phrase used is White Revolution, not Green or Blue Revolution. The question is about Indian economic and agricultural history. The options include different sectors such as cotton, flood control, milk, and peace. Concept / Approach: White Revolution in India is associated with the rapid increase in milk production and the expansion of dairy cooperatives. It is closely linked with Operation Flood and the efforts of leaders like Dr Verghese Kurien. Other revolutions are known by different colours, for example Green Revolution for food grains and Blue Revolution for fish production. The approach is to recall which colour matches which sector. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Remember that Operation Flood was a national dairy development programme. Step 2: This programme focused on increasing milk production and improving distribution through cooperative networks. Step 3: The success of Operation Flood created a major rise in milk availability, called the White Revolution. Step 4: Therefore the term White Revolution is directly linked with milk production and dairy development. Step 5: Option listing milk production and dairy development is the only one that correctly reflects this association. Verification / Alternative check: A simple way to verify is to recall the colour coding of other revolutions. Green Revolution relates to wheat and rice production, Blue Revolution refers to fisheries and aquaculture, and Yellow Revolution concerns oilseeds. Cotton production is more closely associated with fibre or textiles but is not described as a White Revolution in the Indian context. Official government literature and school textbooks clearly state that White Revolution refers to a surge in milk production. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Cotton production: Although cotton is white in colour, the term White Revolution in India is not officially used for cotton, so this option is misleading. Flood control projects: Flood control relates to dams, embankments, and drainage, and there is no commonly accepted White Revolution for this field. Promotion of peace movements: Peace missions may be linked metaphorically with white flags, but in economic history White Revolution is a dairy centred term. Common Pitfalls: Some learners guess cotton production because cotton appears white. Others mix up the different colour revolutions due to similar sounding names. To avoid confusion, link each revolution with the scheme or programme that drove it and with the key commodity involved. This will help you quickly recall that White Revolution stands for dairy growth. Final Answer: The White Revolution in India is related to milk production and dairy development.

Question 12

Who was the first Governor General of Bengal, often regarded as the first Governor General of India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The post of Governor General of Bengal was an important milestone in the establishment of British rule in India. The person who first held this office is often treated in exams as the first Governor General of India because authority gradually extended from Bengal to other regions. This question checks whether you can correctly identify that pioneering office holder. Given Data / Assumptions: The question is limited to the office of Governor General of Bengal. The holders of this post later came to be seen as Governor Generals of India. The options include four well known British administrators. Concept / Approach: The Regulating Act of seventeen seventy three created the post of Governor General of Bengal and made the governors of Bombay and Madras subordinate to him in certain matters. Warren Hastings was appointed as the first Governor General of Bengal under this Act. Later figures such as Lord William Bentinck and Lord Dalhousie also served as Governor Generals, but they came after Hastings in the chronological order. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Regulating Act seventeen seventy three restructured East India Company administration. Step 2: Under this Act, the Governor of Bengal was elevated to the rank of Governor General of Bengal. Step 3: Warren Hastings, who had already been Governor of Bengal, became the first person to hold the new title. Step 4: Later, Lord William Bentinck and Lord Dalhousie also became Governor Generals but only after Hastings. Step 5: Lord Canning was even later, known for the revolt of eighteen fifty seven and the title Viceroy after Crown rule, so he cannot be first. Verification / Alternative check: History references on the evolution of British administration in India clearly list Warren Hastings as Governor General from seventeen seventy three to seventeen eighty five. Many objective type summaries mention him as the first Governor General of India, even though the formal title specified Bengal. This is because Bengal was the main base from which British authority expanded. This consistent listing across exam guides confirms the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lord Canning: He was Governor General and later Viceroy during the revolt of eighteen fifty seven, far later than Hastings, so he is not the first. Lord William Bentinck: He introduced many social and administrative reforms but served after Hastings, so he cannot be the first. Lord Dalhousie: Known for the doctrine of lapse and expansionist policies, but his tenure was in the mid nineteenth century, again much later. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse different administrative titles such as Governor, Governor General, and Viceroy. Others quickly pick a more familiar name like Lord Canning without considering chronological order. It is helpful to memorize the first few office holders in sequence so that these fact based questions become straightforward. Final Answer: The first Governor General of Bengal was Warren Hastings, who is often regarded as the first Governor General of India.

Question 13

During which approximate period did the Indus Valley or Harappan Civilization flourish?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Indus Valley or Harappan Civilization is one of the earliest urban civilizations in the world. Examinations often ask about its time span because it provides context for comparing Harappan culture with contemporary civilizations such as Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt. This question asks you to identify the approximate period during which the Indus Valley Civilization flourished. Given Data / Assumptions: The time periods are given in ranges of years before Christ. The question is about the mature or flourishing phase of the civilization, not the earliest village stage. The options offer overlapping time ranges, so you must select the best match. Concept / Approach: Archaeologists usually divide the Indus culture into early, mature, and late phases. The mature urban phase, when cities like Harappa and Mohenjo daro were at their peak, is commonly placed roughly between twenty six hundred and nineteen hundred BC. Among the given ranges, the one that most closely matches this widely accepted period is twenty five fifty to nineteen hundred BC. The other ranges either start too early or end too late and do not match the standard interpretation. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that many history books state the mature Harappan phase as approximately twenty six hundred to nineteen hundred BC. Step 2: Compare this with the given options. Step 3: Option twenty five fifty to nineteen hundred BC is the closest to the textbook range. Step 4: Option nineteen hundred to sixteen fifty BC covers mostly the late or post Harappan phase, not the peak urban phase. Step 5: The ranges thirty six hundred to twenty eight seventy BC and thirty three hundred to three thousand BC start much earlier and do not reflect the mature city centred period. Verification / Alternative check: If you remember even an approximate two thousand years band for the Harappan cities, such as around twenty five hundred BC, then you can discard options that do not include that central value. Archaeological timelines, museum information panels, and standard exam guides all mention that the civilization flourished around twenty six hundred to nineteen hundred BC. Therefore, the range twenty five fifty to nineteen hundred BC is a reasonable approximation and the best available choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1900 to 1650 BC: This period is too late and is often associated with the decline and transformation of Harappan culture rather than its flourishing stage. 3600 to 2870 BC: This range starts much earlier than the widely accepted mature phase, overlapping more with pre Harappan developments. 3300 to 3000 BC: This also refers mainly to the early Harappan stage and does not include the height of city development. Common Pitfalls: Students may try to memorize exact dates instead of understanding that archaeology uses approximate ranges. Another error is confusing early and mature phases or mixing Harappan dates with those of other civilizations. It is safer to remember that the peak of Indus urban life was around twenty five hundred BC and lasted several centuries until about nineteen hundred BC. Final Answer: The Indus Valley Civilization flourished approximately between 2550 to 1900 BC.

Question 14

Which of the following statements about the Reconstruction era in United States history is false?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Reconstruction era followed the American Civil War and aimed to rebuild the Southern states and integrate formerly enslaved people into political and social life. Several important constitutional amendments were passed during this period. This question asks you to identify which statement about Reconstruction is false, which requires a basic understanding of how constitutional law and actual state practice often differed. Given Data / Assumptions: The topic is the Reconstruction era after the American Civil War. The Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments are specifically mentioned. The options contrast changes in law with actual practice in the states. Concept / Approach: To answer, you should know the content of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments and the reality of life for African Americans in the post war South. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, and the Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship and equal protection under law. However, Southern states often used discriminatory laws and customs to undermine these amendments. Therefore the false statement will be the one that incorrectly claims that state laws and customs fully supported the new rights. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Thirteenth Amendment formally ended slavery throughout the United States, so that statement is true. Step 2: The Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, including African Americans, so that statement is also true. Step 3: Federal law and constitutional amendments did abolish slavery and attempt to protect civil rights, which matches option mentioning federal law changes. Step 4: However state laws and customs in many Southern states created Black Codes and later Jim Crow laws that restricted African American rights. Step 5: Therefore the statement that state laws and customs upheld the amendments in full is false. Verification / Alternative check: History accounts describe how, despite the new amendments, African Americans faced segregation, disenfranchisement, and violence. Supreme Court decisions of the late nineteenth century upheld segregated facilities and weakened federal enforcement. This shows that state practice often violated the spirit of the amendments. Thus any claim that state laws and customs fully upheld the constitutional changes cannot be correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The Fourteenth Amendment made African Americans citizens of the United States: This is historically accurate, so it is not the false statement. The Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery in all American states: This is correct and considered a landmark change in United States history. Federal law was changed to abolish slavery in states where it still existed: This correctly reflects the effect of the Thirteenth Amendment and related legislation and is therefore true. Common Pitfalls: Some learners mistakenly assume that because conditions were poor for African Americans, the amendments must not have existed or must be the false statements. In reality, the amendments were real, but enforcement was weak and state level resistance was strong. The trick in this question is to distinguish between constitutional law and everyday practice. When a statement claims that state laws and customs fully upheld equal rights, it ignores the well documented history of discrimination. Final Answer: The false statement is that state laws and customs fully upheld the new constitutional amendments.

Question 15

In the geological time scale, eras are divided into which smaller units?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Geology uses a hierarchical time scale to describe the long history of Earth. Understanding this structure is helpful not only in geology but also in competitive exams where basic scientific literacy is tested. This question asks how eras fit into the geological time scale and specifically which smaller units are used to subdivide an era. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on the geological time scale. The unit we start from is an era, not an eon. The options list ages, epochs, periods, or a combination of periods and epochs. Concept / Approach: The commonly accepted hierarchy in geological time is: eon, era, period, epoch, and age. This means that an eon is divided into eras, an era is divided into periods, each period is divided into epochs, and epochs may be further divided into ages. Therefore, when the question asks how an era is divided, the correct answer must include periods and, indirectly, epochs which are nested within those periods. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the order of units from largest to smallest in geological time. Step 2: Identify that eon is larger than era. Step 3: Note that an era contains several periods, such as the Cenozoic era containing the Paleogene, Neogene, and Quaternary periods. Step 4: Recognize that each period may then be divided into epochs, for example the Quaternary period includes the Pleistocene and Holocene epochs. Step 5: Thus, eras are divided into periods and those periods are further subdivided into epochs, so the most accurate option is periods and epochs. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by looking at any standard geological time scale chart, where eras such as Paleozoic, Mesozoic, and Cenozoic are clearly split into well named periods. Within the Cenozoic era, for instance, you see periods like Paleogene and Neogene, and each of those is further broken down into epochs. Ages generally appear as smaller divisions at the bottom of the hierarchy, not directly next to eras. This confirms the combined answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ages only: Ages are the smallest commonly used units and do not directly divide eras, so this option is not correct. Epochs only: Epochs exist within periods, not directly under eras, so saying eras are divided only into epochs ignores the period level. Periods only: This is partially true but incomplete, because periods themselves are subdivided into epochs, and the question points to both levels of smaller units. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to remember only some of the hierarchy and assume that eras move directly to epochs, skipping periods. Another issue is general confusion between similar sounding terms, especially when students memorize them without context. Visualizing the time scale as a tree from large to small units can help fix the correct order in memory. Final Answer: In the geological time scale, eras are divided into periods and epochs.

Question 16

Around 2500 BC, the Harappan Civilization flourished mainly in which present day regions?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Harappan Civilization, also called the Indus Valley Civilization, was a Bronze Age civilization that developed along the Indus and its tributaries. For general knowledge and history exams, it is important to know which present day countries and regions contain the major Harappan sites. This question focuses on the approximate location around twenty five hundred BC. Given Data / Assumptions: The time period mentioned is around twenty five hundred BC, the mature Harappan phase. The options combine different modern regions and countries such as Pakistan, western India, Afghanistan, and China. The question asks which areas broadly correspond to the heartland of Harappan sites. Concept / Approach: Most major Harappan cities such as Harappa and Mohenjo daro are in present day Pakistan, while several other important sites like Dholavira, Lothal, and Kalibangan are in northwestern and western parts of India. There is limited Harappan relevance deep inside Afghanistan or China. Therefore, the best description of the core Harappan region is western India and Pakistan taken together. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the locations of key Harappan sites: Harappa and Mohenjo daro are now in Pakistan. Step 2: Remember other major sites like Dholavira and Lothal in modern Gujarat and Kalibangan in Rajasthan, which lie in western India. Step 3: Note that while there were trade links with regions like Mesopotamia, there is no strong evidence for core Harappan cities inside China. Step 4: Some cultural traces appear near Afghanistan, but the densest concentration of cities is clearly in Pakistan and western India. Step 5: Therefore the option that best describes the Harappan heartland is western India and Pakistan. Verification / Alternative check: Any map of Harappan sites shows clusters along the Indus River system across present day Pakistan and into the states of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Haryana, and Punjab in India. Afghanistan has very few related sites and China lies outside the main Indus basin. Because the question uses the phrase what we call today, it is asking about modern political geography, which confirms western India plus Pakistan as the correct combination. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Pakistan and Afghanistan: This excludes western India, despite many important sites in Gujarat and Rajasthan, so it underrepresents the civilization. Afghanistan and Western India: This option leaves out the Indus heartland in Pakistan, which is central to Harappan culture, so it is incorrect. India and China: China is not part of the Indus Valley region, so this pairing is historically inaccurate. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes focus only on Harappa and Mohenjo daro and assume the civilization was limited to modern Pakistan. Others may include too many surrounding regions because of knowledge of trade contacts. The best strategy is to visualize the Indus basin on a modern map, which quickly shows that the main Harappan zone spans Pakistan and western India. Final Answer: Around twenty five hundred BC, the Harappan Civilization flourished mainly in western India and Pakistan.

Question 17

To curb black money in the Indian economy, which committee headed a special investigation into unaccounted income?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Black money refers to income that has not been declared to tax authorities and therefore remains outside the formal economy. The Government of India has formed several committees and panels to study black money, recommend measures, and conduct investigations. This question asks you to identify the committee associated directly with the issue of black money among the listed options. Given Data / Assumptions: The subject is black money and unaccounted income in the Indian economy. Four different committees are listed, each known for a particular policy area. The task is to match the correct committee with the black money issue. Concept / Approach: Each of the named committees had a specific mandate. The committee headed by Justice B M Shah is well known as a Special Investigation Team on black money, set up following directions of the Supreme Court. Deepak Mohanty Committee studied financial inclusion, Nachiket Mor Committee focused on small customer financial services, and Suresh Prabhu has been associated more with sectors like railways and infrastructure policy. The approach is to recall which committee dealt with unaccounted wealth and related enforcement issues. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the question directly mentions the aim of curbing black money in the economy. Step 2: Recall that the Supreme Court directed the Government of India to form a Special Investigation Team on black money. Step 3: This team was headed by former Supreme Court judge Justice B M Shah. Step 4: Recognize that Deepak Mohanty Committee and Nachiket Mor Committee dealt mainly with financial inclusion and banking services, not black money as their primary focus. Step 5: Therefore, the Justice B M Shah Committee is the correct match for the black money issue. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by associating each committee with its main report. Nachiket Mor is connected with recommendations on small customer banking, deepening access to finance, and differentiated bank licenses. Deepak Mohanty Committee discussed comprehensive financial inclusion plans. In contrast, the Justice B M Shah panel is routinely described in news reports as the Special Investigation Team on black money, confirming that only this choice directly suits the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Deepak Mohanty Committee: This committee focused on financial inclusion and not directly on the investigation of black money, so it is not correct here. Suresh Prabhu Committee: Suresh Prabhu has chaired several panels, but none of the widely known ones had black money as the central subject in this context. Nachiket Mor Committee: Its mandate was to propose a framework for financial services for small businesses and low income households, not for tracing unaccounted money. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to identify any committee linked with economic or financial reforms as being related to black money. Another pitfall is to confuse the timeline of various committees set up around the time of major policy moves such as demonetisation. To avoid this, clearly connect the black money topic with the Justice B M Shah led investigation team in your memory. Final Answer: The committee associated with curbing black money in the Indian economy is the Justice B M Shah Committee on black money.

Question 18

In October 2015, more than 350 landmarks in over 90 countries were lit blue to mark which United Nations occasion?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The United Nations often organises global campaigns using its official colour blue to promote important milestones and international observances. In October twenty fifteen, a large number of famous landmarks around the world were illuminated in blue. Examinations may ask which anniversary or event this illumination was meant to celebrate, so this question tests your awareness of world organisations and special commemorations. Given Data / Assumptions: The year mentioned is twenty fifteen. More than three hundred fifty landmarks in over ninety countries were lit blue. The options list various anniversaries of the United Nations. Concept / Approach: The United Nations was founded in nineteen forty five after the Second World War. Therefore, its significant anniversaries can be calculated from that year. The seventieth anniversary falls in twenty fifteen. The lighting of global landmarks in blue was part of the celebrations for seventy years of the organisation. Thus, by simple date calculation and recall of current affairs, you can pick the correct option. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Start from the founding year of the United Nations, which is nineteen forty five. Step 2: Calculate the seventieth anniversary by adding seventy years to nineteen forty five, giving twenty fifteen. Step 3: Notice that the question mentions October twenty fifteen and a special blue lighting campaign. Step 4: Match this information with the known global campaign to light landmarks blue for the seventieth anniversary of the United Nations. Step 5: Therefore, the correct answer is the seventieth anniversary, not any of the other anniversaries listed. Verification / Alternative check: A quick check is to compute other anniversaries in the options. The fiftieth anniversary would have been in nineteen ninety five, the sixtieth in two thousand five, and the ninetieth in twenty thirty five. None of these match twenty fifteen. News reports and official United Nations releases from twenty fifteen highlight the blue illumination campaign using the slogan Turn the world UN blue to mark seventy years of the organisation, which confirms the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ninetieth anniversary of the United Nations: This would occur in twenty thirty five and is in the future relative to twenty fifteen, so it cannot be correct. Fiftieth anniversary of the United Nations: This took place in nineteen ninety five, long before the events in twenty fifteen, so this option is incorrect. Sixtieth anniversary of the United Nations: This would have been in two thousand five, again not matching the year of the blue lighting campaign. Common Pitfalls: Some students may not recall the founding year of the United Nations and might try to guess based on recent news. Another common error is to miscalculate the difference between nineteen forty five and twenty fifteen. To avoid mistakes, remember the founding year as a fixed fact and practise simple anniversary calculations, which frequently appear in general knowledge questions. Final Answer: The blue illumination campaign in October twenty fifteen marked the seventieth anniversary of the United Nations.

Question 19

Mahatma Gandhi left South Africa and returned to India in which year?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Mahatma Gandhi spent many years in South Africa, where he developed the methods of satyagraha and non violent protest that later became central to the Indian freedom movement. Knowing when he returned to India helps place his political career in proper chronological order. This question asks you to identify the year in which Gandhi left South Africa and came back to India. Given Data / Assumptions: The topic is the return of Mahatma Gandhi from South Africa. Four possible years are given as options: nineteen eleven, nineteen fifteen, nineteen seventeen, and nineteen nineteen. The correct answer should match standard biographical timelines. Concept / Approach: Gandhi first went to South Africa in eighteen ninety three and stayed for about two decades, returning to India only after his work with the Indian community there. The exact year of his final return is nineteen fifteen. By then, he was already known for his leadership in civil rights struggles, and Indian leaders invited him to participate in the national movement. Linking his South African period with later campaigns in India like Champaran and Kheda helps fix this year in memory. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Gandhi left for South Africa in the late nineteenth century and spent around twenty years there. Step 2: Remember that he finally returned to India in the early twentieth century, before launching major satyagraha movements in India. Step 3: Biographical accounts state that Gandhi returned to India in January nineteen fifteen. Step 4: After his return, he travelled across India to understand conditions before taking up local struggles like Champaran in nineteen seventeen. Step 5: Among the options given, nineteen fifteen is therefore the correct year. Verification / Alternative check: You can confirm by linking later events with his presence in India. For example, the Champaran satyagraha took place in nineteen seventeen, which means Gandhi had to be in India before that. Hence dates like nineteen seventeen or nineteen nineteen cannot be the year of return. Nineteen eleven is too early because he was still active in South African politics then. Biographies and exam guides consistently mention nineteen fifteen as his year of return. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1911: Gandhi was still engaged in South African campaigns around this time, so he had not yet returned to India. 1917: This is the year of the Champaran satyagraha in India, but Gandhi had already been in India since nineteen fifteen by then. 1919: This year is famous for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the Rowlatt Satyagraha, long after Gandhi had returned. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse the year of return with the year of his first major movement in India. Another common error is to place his return too close to events such as Jallianwala Bagh. To avoid this, remember a simple sequence: Gandhi returns in nineteen fifteen, Champaran in nineteen seventeen, and nationwide agitation strengthens by the end of the decade. Final Answer: Mahatma Gandhi left South Africa and returned to India in 1915.

Question 20

Which of the following Delhi Sultans died while playing polo, also known as chaugan?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Medieval Indian history includes many interesting biographical facts about rulers, some of which are often asked in competitive exams. One such fact concerns a Delhi Sultan who died as a result of a fall while playing polo, or chaugan. This question checks your recall of that specific historical detail regarding the early rulers of the Delhi Sultanate. Given Data / Assumptions: The question is about Delhi Sultans and the game of polo or chaugan. Four rulers of the early Sultanate period are provided as options. Only one of these rulers is historically linked with the polo accident. Concept / Approach: Qutbuddin Aibak was the founder of the Slave or Mamluk dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate. He is historically recorded to have died due to injuries sustained after falling from a horse while playing chaugan. The other rulers listed, such as Iltutmish and Balban, are known for administrative and military actions but not for dying during a game. Recognising this specific incident allows you to select the correct name. Step by Step Solution: Step 1: Recall who Qutbuddin Aibak was, including his role as the first ruler of the Slave dynasty. Step 2: Remember that sources describe his death in Lahore after a fall from a horse while playing chaugan. Step 3: Consider the other names: Iltutmish and Balban ruled later and are not associated with death during polo. Step 4: Nasiruddin Muhammad also does not have this specific story attached to his death. Step 5: Based on this, identify Qutbuddin Aibak as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: History texts on the Delhi Sultanate often include a short note about Aibak's death, mentioning the polo accident. This story is repeated in many exam oriented summaries because it is an easy fact based question. The absence of a similar anecdote for other rulers further confirms that Aibak is the only correct option here. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Balban: He is remembered for his strong monarchy and harsh measures, not for dying in a sports accident, so this option is incorrect. Iltutmish: He consolidated the Slave dynasty and expanded the empire but did not die while playing polo. Nasiruddin Muhammad: His reign is less famous, and there is no widely accepted account of him dying in a polo related incident. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students mix biographies of early Sultans because many of them belong to the same dynasty. Another mistake is to guess a more familiar name like Iltutmish instead of recalling the specific story. To remember this fact, visualise Qutbuddin Aibak as the ruler who met an accidental death while engaged in a royal game. Final Answer: The Sultan who died while playing polo or chaugan was Qutbuddin Aibak.

Indian History Questions