Question 1

In medieval Indian history, which Mughal emperor founded the syncretic religious order known as Din e Ilahi (Divine Faith)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The religious policy of the Mughal emperor Akbar is famous for its tolerance and experimentation. Among his many initiatives was the attempt to create a new syncretic religious order called Din e Ilahi, or Divine Faith, which tried to bring together elements from different religions and ethical systems. This question asks you to identify which emperor founded this order, a fact that is frequently examined in questions on Mughal history. Given Data / Assumptions: The religious order is Din e Ilahi, meaning Divine Faith. It was created at the Mughal court. Options list Alauddin Khalji, Akbar, Muhammad bin Tughlaq, and Ibrahim Lodi. Concept / Approach: Din e Ilahi was introduced by Akbar in the later part of his reign. It drew from Islam, Hinduism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, and ethical traditions, aiming at loyalty to the emperor and a high moral code rather than a mass religion. Alauddin Khalji and Muhammad bin Tughlaq were Delhi sultans of earlier centuries, and Ibrahim Lodi was the last Lodi Sultan defeated by Babur. None of them were associated with this syncretic religious experiment. Therefore, the answer must be Akbar. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Akbar is known for his policy of Sulh i Kul or universal peace and for inviting scholars of many religions to his court. Step 2: Remember that it was in this context that he formulated Din e Ilahi as a personal spiritual order. Step 3: Note that this order emphasised ethical living, loyalty to the emperor, and elements drawn from different religions. Step 4: Recognise that Alauddin Khalji, Muhammad bin Tughlaq, and Ibrahim Lodi belong to the Delhi Sultanate, and their policies did not include such a syncretic order. Step 5: Conclude that Akbar was the founder of Din e Ilahi. Verification / Alternative check: Standard textbooks on Mughal history clearly state that Akbar introduced Din e Ilahi around 1582. Descriptions of his religious debates at the Ibadat Khana and subsequent policy experiments consistently link this order with his reign alone. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Alauddin Khalji is remembered for military campaigns and economic regulations, not for religious syncretism. Muhammad bin Tughlaq is known for his bold but often impractical administrative experiments. Ibrahim Lodi s reign ended at the First Battle of Panipat and had no such religious innovation. None of them are connected with Din e Ilahi. Common Pitfalls: Most students recognise Akbar s name in this context, so major confusion is unlikely. However, one must avoid mixing up Din e Ilahi with Sulh i Kul, which is a broader principle of tolerance rather than a specific order. Final Answer: The emperor who founded the religion Din e Ilahi was Akbar.

Question 2

What was Akbar s principal purpose in adopting a policy of befriending powerful Rajput chiefs and seeking their cooperation in his empire?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Akbar s policy towards Rajput chiefs is a classic example of how diplomacy and alliance building can support imperial consolidation. Instead of pursuing a purely hostile line, he offered honour, high mansabs, and in some cases matrimonial ties, integrating Rajputs into the Mughal ruling elite. This question asks you to identify the principal purpose behind this approach, which was strategic rather than purely personal. Given Data / Assumptions: Akbar entered into alliances with many Rajput chiefs. He employed them in his administration and army. Options suggest different possible motives, such as matrimonial alliances, destroying Afghan power, or preventing foreign invasions. Concept / Approach: While marriages and the weakening of rival Afghan groups were side benefits, Akbar s main goal was to stabilise his rule by winning over local power holders and reducing resistance. By making Rajputs stakeholders in the Mughal system, he transformed potential enemies into allies. This broadened the social base of the empire, especially in north and west India, and helped establish long lasting peace and cooperation. Therefore, the best answer is that his main purpose was to strengthen the foundations of the Mughal Empire. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Akbar invited Rajput rulers to accept Mughal suzerainty, offering them autonomy in internal matters and high positions at court. Step 2: Note that he married Rajput princesses, but these marriages were a part of a wider political strategy. Step 3: Understand that incorporation of Rajputs into the nobility and army ensured their loyalty and reduced rebellions. Step 4: Recognise that although this policy indirectly weakened Afghan groups, that was not its sole or primary objective. Step 5: See that checking future foreign invasions was a broader concern, but alliances with Rajputs mainly served internal consolidation. Step 6: Conclude that the principal purpose was to strengthen and stabilise the Mughal Empire in India. Verification / Alternative check: Historians often describe Akbar s Rajput policy as a master stroke that broadened the social and regional base of the Mughal state. Accounts of his reign highlight how Rajput chiefs like Raja Man Singh played crucial roles in administration and military campaigns, reflecting the success of this strategy. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Securing matrimonial alliances was a means, not an end in itself. Wiping out Afghan power and checking foreign invasions were secondary outcomes, not the main purpose. Choosing these options would narrow down Akbar s strategy to a single dimension and miss the broader picture of empire building. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes focus too much on the romanticised aspect of royal marriages and assume they were the primary objective. Keeping in mind the larger context of political consolidation helps avoid this simplistic view. Final Answer: Akbar s principal purpose was to strengthen and stabilise the foundations of the Mughal Empire in India by winning Rajput cooperation.

Question 3

In Mauryan period sources and Greek accounts, whom did the Greeks refer to as Amitraghata, meaning slayer of foes?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Greek writers who came into contact with ancient India often rendered Indian names and titles into Greek forms. These Greek versions sometimes preserve valuable clues about how Indian rulers were known in their own times. Amitraghata or Amitrochates in Greek, meaning slayer of foes, is one such title. This question asks which Indian ruler was referred to by this epithet, connecting textual evidence with royal personalities of the Mauryan period. Given Data / Assumptions: The Greek epithet is Amitraghata or Amitrochates. It means slayer of foes. Options include Chandragupta Maurya, Bimbisara, Bindusara, and Vasudeva. Concept / Approach: Greek sources, such as the writings of classical historians, mention a Mauryan king they call Amitrochates. Scholars generally identify this ruler with Bindusara, son of Chandragupta Maurya and father of Ashoka. The title Amitraghata matches the Sanskrit phrase meaning destroyer of enemies. Bimbisara belonged to an earlier Magadhan dynasty, while Vasudeva is associated with later periods. Chandragupta has other Greek associations as Sandrokottos, not Amitrochates. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Sandrokottos is the Greek name for Chandragupta Maurya, so Amitrochates must refer to another ruler. Step 2: Recall that Bindusara was the immediate successor of Chandragupta and controlled a vast empire. Step 3: Note that Greek writers describe a king Amitrochates, whose name can be translated as Amitraghata, meaning slayer of foes. Step 4: Understand that historians match this description with Bindusara, based on chronology and title meaning. Step 5: Rule out Bimbisara, who lived in an earlier era, and Vasudeva, who belongs to later dynasties. Step 6: Conclude that Amitraghata refers to Bindusara. Verification / Alternative check: Standard histories of the Mauryan empire and Indo Greek contacts consistently identify Amitrochates with Bindusara. This identification is grounded in linguistic analysis and chronological alignment with known Mauryan rulers. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chandragupta Maurya is recorded in Greek sources as Sandrokottos, not Amitrochates. Bimbisara is associated with the Haryanka dynasty long before the Mauryas, and Vasudeva does not fit the relevant time frame and context. Choosing any of these would ignore the specific linguistic match between Amitraghata and Bindusara. Common Pitfalls: Because Chandragupta is the most famous Mauryan name and also has a Greek equivalent, many learners pick him by default. Remembering that his Greek name is Sandrokottos, not Amitrochates, helps distinguish between the two. Final Answer: The Greeks referred to Bindusara as Amitraghata, the slayer of foes.

Question 4

Which one of the following was not a characteristic feature of Indian society during Mauryan times?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Mauryan period, especially under Ashoka, is one of the earliest times in Indian history for which we have relatively detailed administrative and social information from inscriptions and texts like Arthashastra. Understanding the nature of society in this period involves evaluating which institutions were present and how rigid or flexible they were. This question asks you to identify which feature was not typical or fully developed in Mauryan society. Given Data / Assumptions: We are dealing with social features in the Mauryan age. Options include slavery, rigidity of caste, prostitution, and widow remarriage. We have to pick the feature that was not characteristic of that time. Concept / Approach: Sources suggest that forms of slavery and bonded labour existed in Mauryan India, and prostitution or courtesan culture was known and even regulated in some treatises. Widow remarriage was not universally accepted but did occur among certain communities and social groups. However, the highly rigid, elaborate caste system with strictly enforced hereditary barriers and innumerable sub castes is more characteristic of later periods. In Mauryan times, varna distinctions existed, but they had not yet hardened into the kind of rigid caste hierarchy seen in later classical and medieval periods. Therefore, extreme rigidity of caste is the least characteristic feature for this era. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that slavery is directly mentioned in Arthashastra and other sources as a known institution. Step 2: Note that prostitution and the presence of courtesans are also described, sometimes with regulations and taxes. Step 3: Understand that widow remarriage, while not universally encouraged among higher varnas, certainly existed in some communities. Step 4: Evaluate the notion of rigid caste: the varna system existed, but its extreme hereditary rigidity and complex jati structure developed more fully later. Step 5: Therefore, conclude that strict rigidity of caste is the one feature that was not yet a defining characteristic of Mauryan society. Verification / Alternative check: Social histories of ancient India often emphasise that while social stratification existed, the caste system in Mauryan times was still evolving. Later dharmashastra texts and medieval practices show a far more rigid and complex caste order compared to the Mauryan era. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Slavery, prostitution, and the possibility of widow remarriage among certain groups are all attested in the literature and inscriptions of the period, so they cannot be regarded as absent. Only the fully rigid caste system with very strict hereditary barriers is more appropriately associated with later centuries. Common Pitfalls: Students may assume that caste rigidity has always been the same throughout Indian history and therefore mistakenly accept it as a timeless feature. It is important to recognise that institutions evolve, and the Mauryan period was earlier in this evolution. Final Answer: The feature that was not a characteristic of Mauryan society is rigidity of caste with very strict hereditary barriers.

Question 5

Which one of the following can be regarded as the single most important feature of Mauryan administration compared to earlier Indian states?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Mauryan administration marked a new level of centralisation and complexity in ancient India. Under Chandragupta and Ashoka, the empire extended across large parts of the subcontinent, requiring a more elaborate system for governance, revenue, justice, and intelligence. This question asks you to identify the single most important feature of Mauryan administration that stands out when compared with earlier states like the Mahajanapadas and smaller kingdoms. Given Data / Assumptions: The focus is on a distinguishing administrative feature of the Mauryan empire. Options mention provincial governors, a council of ministers, a powerful bureaucracy, and a spy system. We must choose the most important hallmark of Mauryan governance. Concept / Approach: While other states also had ministers and spies to some extent, the Mauryan empire took bureaucratic organisation and central control to a much higher scale. Arthashastra and Ashokan inscriptions hint at a large number of officials, inspectors, and record keepers operating at various levels of the empire. This extensive bureaucracy, with defined roles and powers, is routinely cited by historians as a key feature of Mauryan administration. Provincial governors were important, but wide provincial power was not unique to the Mauryans, and spy systems existed earlier as well. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that councils of ministers existed in earlier kingdoms too, so this is not exclusive to the Mauryans. Step 2: Understand that spy systems were recommended even in earlier treatises and were not unique to the Mauryan empire. Step 3: Consider provincial governors: although they had responsibilities, the overall system remained centrally supervised. Step 4: Examine the evidence for bureaucracy: multiple departments, official posts, and detailed regulations found in Arthashastra and Ashokan records indicate a very large administrative machinery. Step 5: Conclude that the presence of a vast and numerous bureaucracy with extensive powers best captures the distinctiveness of Mauryan administration. Verification / Alternative check: Historians often describe the Mauryan state as one of the earliest examples of a highly organised imperial bureaucracy in world history. Comparisons with earlier Indian polities show that no previous state had such a wide network of officials, making this the most appropriate answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Provincial governors were important but did not alone define the administrative system. Councils of ministers and spies were present in many other kingdoms. Only the scale, variety, and power of the bureaucratic apparatus stand out as a defining feature of Mauryan rule. Common Pitfalls: Learners may be tempted by the spy system option because Arthashastra dedicates considerable attention to it. However, spies were part of a broader pattern, whereas the extensive bureaucracy permeated everyday governance and is thus more central. Final Answer: The most important feature of Mauryan administration was the presence of a vast and numerous bureaucracy with extensive powers.

Question 6

Which social evil or custom was conspicuously absent from ancient Indian society and became more prominent only in later historical periods?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Various social practices and evils developed gradually over the long span of Indian history. Some, like polygamy or certain forms of temple service, existed in ancient times, while others emerged or became widespread only in the medieval or early modern periods, often due to changing political and cultural influences. This question asks you to identify which specific social evil was conspicuously absent in ancient India and is more associated with later eras. Given Data / Assumptions: The question concerns social evils or customs in ancient Indian society. Options include polygamy, sati system, Devadasi system, and purdah system. We need to pick the one that was not characteristic of ancient India. Concept / Approach: Evidence from ancient texts and inscriptions suggests that polygamy existed among royalty and certain higher classes. References to women dedicated to temples, which later evolved into the Devadasi system, also appear in ancient sources. The practice of sati is debated, but there are sporadic references in some ancient contexts. In contrast, the purdah system, involving strict veiling and seclusion of women, is generally considered to have become prominent only in the later medieval period, influenced partly by certain Islamic court customs and changing notions of honour. Therefore, purdah is the least characteristic of ancient Indian society. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that polygamy among kings and nobles is described in many ancient epics and texts, indicating its presence. Step 2: Note that forms of temple dedication of women existed in ancient times, laying the base for what later became the Devadasi system. Step 3: Recognise that sati, while not widespread, is occasionally referred to in early sources, suggesting it was at least known. Step 4: Consider the purdah system, which involves strict veiling and seclusion of women from public view. Step 5: Understand that purdah became significant only in later centuries, especially in some royal and aristocratic circles, and is not a defining feature of ancient society. Step 6: Therefore, identify the purdah system as the social evil conspicuously absent from ancient India. Verification / Alternative check: Social histories of India typically trace the rise of purdah to the medieval period, highlighting its association with the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal court practices, as well as with changing ideas of honour and security. Ancient Vedic and early classical texts, by contrast, depict women participating more openly in rituals and social life. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Polygamy clearly existed in ancient India, especially among rulers. Some form of temple dedication and sacred prostitution, linked to the later Devadasi system, is attested in inscriptions and literary sources. Sati had sporadic occurrences even if it was not yet common. Thus, these cannot be described as conspicuously absent. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes treat all listed practices as equally ancient without considering their historical development. Distinguishing between practices with ancient roots and those shaped by later cultural influences is essential. Final Answer: The social evil conspicuously absent in ancient India was the purdah system (female seclusion and veiling).

Question 7

Harsha, the great ruler of north India in the seventh century CE, was finally defeated by which contemporary ruler, marking a check to his further southward expansion?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Harsha, also known as Harshavardhana, was one of the most powerful rulers of north India in the early seventh century CE. His empire stretched over large parts of the Gangetic plain, and he is remembered for his patronage of religion, literature and culture. However, his ambition to extend his rule further towards the Deccan was checked by a strong contemporary ruler in the south. This question tests knowledge of the political geography of early medieval India and the conflict that limited Harsha expansion. Given Data / Assumptions: • The question is about Harsha, a seventh century CE north Indian ruler. • We are asked to identify who defeated him and blocked his southern advance. • The options list Sasanka, King of Valabhi, Bhaskarvarman and Pulkesin II. • We assume awareness of major contemporary kingdoms, especially in the Deccan. Concept / Approach: To answer this, we recall that Harsha tried to expand his influence southward beyond the Narmada River. At that time, the most powerful Deccan kingdom was the Chalukya dynasty of Badami. Its famous ruler, Pulakeshin II (often written as Pulkesin II in older texts), successfully resisted Harsha invasion. An important inscription, the Aihole inscription, describes how Pulakeshin II checked Harsha on the banks of the Narmada River and forced him to retreat. Other rulers listed in the options either supported Harsha or were his rivals in the east but did not inflict this decisive defeat. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Place Harsha in time and space as a ruler of north India around the early seventh century CE. 2. Recall that his northern and eastern influence extended widely, but his attempt to move southwards faced resistance. 3. Identify the main Deccan power of the period as the Chalukyas of Badami under Pulakeshin II. 4. Remember that Pulakeshin II is famous for defeating Harsha on the banks of the Narmada River, a battle that marked the southern limit of Harsha influence. 5. Compare the options: Sasanka of Gauda and Bhaskarvarman of Kamarupa were eastern rulers, while the generic king of Valabhi does not match the well recorded Deccan conflict. 6. Therefore, Pulkesin II (Pulakeshin II) is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Standard history texts on early medieval India clearly state that the Narmada River became the boundary between Harsha empire in the north and Pulakeshin II Chalukya kingdom in the south. The Aihole inscription celebrates Pulakeshin II victory over Harsha. This supports the identification of Pulkesin II as the ruler who defeated Harsha and checked his southern campaign. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sasanka: Ruler of Gauda in Bengal, often an adversary of Harsha in the east, but he is not known for defeating Harsha in a major battle that limited Harsha southern expansion. King of Valabhi: A regional ruler in western India without a famous recorded direct defeat of Harsha similar to the Narmada battle against Pulakeshin II. Bhaskarvarman: Ruler of Kamarupa in Assam, an ally of Harsha rather than his adversary. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse the different regional rivals of Harsha and may think that because Sasanka opposed him in Bengal, he must also be the one who defeated him. Another mistake is to overlook the specific Deccan context and the significance of the Narmada frontier. It is important to remember that Harsha major military check came from the Chalukya king Pulakeshin II in the south, not from his eastern rivals. Final Answer: Harsha was defeated and his southward expansion checked by Pulkesin II, the powerful Chalukya ruler of the Deccan.

Question 8

During the rule of which Indian dynasty did architectural developments in India manifest themselves in their full classical glory, especially in art, sculpture and temple building?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Indian art and architecture evolved over many centuries, but historians often identify specific periods when aesthetic forms matured and reached a classical balance. This question asks during which dynasty architectural developments in India manifested themselves in their full classical glory, particularly in terms of harmony, proportion and refinement seen in sculpture and early temple architecture. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is on a peak phase or classical age of Indian architecture and art. • The options list four dynasties: Guptas, Nandas, Mauryas and Cholas. • We assume awareness that different dynasties contributed in different ways to architecture and sculpture. Concept / Approach: The period of the Gupta dynasty is often described as the golden age of classical Indian culture. Under the Guptas, there was a remarkable flourishing of religion, literature, sculpture and early temple architecture. Iconic images of Hindu deities and Buddha from this period are considered ideal examples of balance and grace. The Guptas developed the structural temple form using stone and brick, with simple but elegant shikharas. Earlier dynasties like the Mauryas produced impressive buildings and pillars, and later dynasties like the Cholas built grand temples, but the classical style that many textbooks highlight for its purity and harmony is specially associated with the Gupta period. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that the Gupta dynasty ruled roughly from the fourth to the sixth centuries CE in north India. 2. Recognise that this period is frequently referred to as the golden age of Indian art and culture. 3. Note that Gupta sculptural art, such as images from Sarnath, Mathura and other sites, shows a high level of refinement and spiritual expression. 4. Remember that some of the earliest surviving structural temples, like those at Deogarh and Sanchi, belong to or are influenced by Gupta times. 5. Compare this with the Nandas, who were mainly early political rulers before such mature artistic development. 6. The Mauryas did create monumental architecture and polished stone pillars under Ashoka, but the fully developed classical temple and sculptural style is more closely linked with the later Gupta period. 7. The Cholas built grand and magnificent temples later in south India, but many exam questions reserve the phrase classical glory of Indian art for the Gupta period. 8. Therefore, the best answer in this context is the Guptas. Verification / Alternative check: Most standard art history and Indian history textbooks speak of Gupta art as classical, emphasising the calm expressions, idealised human forms and elegant drapery in sculpture. They call this period the classical age of Indian art, distinguishing it from earlier experimental phases and later more elaborate styles. This supports the choice of the Gupta dynasty as the time when architectural and artistic developments manifested in full classical glory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Nandas: They were pre Mauryan rulers mainly remembered for political expansion and wealth, not for a distinctive, mature school of architecture. Mauryas: Known for monumental palaces, rock cut caves and Ashokan pillars, but the fully developed classical style of temple architecture and sculpture is more firmly associated with the later Gupta period. Cholas: Famous for massive Dravida style temples and bronze images in south India, representing a different high point of architecture, but not usually described as the first manifestation of classical all India architectural glory. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the term golden age and apply it to any period with impressive buildings, especially the Chola era with its grand temples. Others may think only of Ashoka when they think of ancient monuments. The key is to remember that when textbooks talk about classical Indian art and the perfect balance of form and spirit, they almost always highlight the Gupta period. Keeping this association clear helps avoid confusion in multiple choice questions. Final Answer: Architectural and artistic developments in India manifested their full classical glory during the period of the Guptas.

Question 9

Which early ruler of Magadha murdered his own father to ascend the throne and was later murdered by his own son, creating a tragic cycle of patricide and revenge in the royal family?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The early history of Magadha is full of dramatic events involving royal power struggles. One tragic episode involves a ruler who seized the throne by killing his own father and was later killed by his own son. This story shows how succession conflicts could turn violent in ancient Indian monarchies. The question asks you to identify this ruler, which is a common fact tested in ancient Indian history sections of exams. Given Data / Assumptions: • The setting is early Magadha, an important kingdom in ancient north India. • The ruler in question killed his father to become king. • He was later murdered by his own son, completing a cycle of patricide. • The options include Bimbisar, Ajatasatru, Udayan and Nagadashak. Concept / Approach: Bimbisara was a powerful ruler of Magadha and a contemporary of the Buddha. His son Ajatasatru is widely known in Buddhist and Jain texts for imprisoning and ultimately causing the death of his father to seize power. Later traditions state that Ajatasatru himself was murdered by his son Udayin or Udayabhadra. This means Ajatasatru both killed his father and was in turn killed by his son. The other rulers listed do not match both parts of this pattern together. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Bimbisara was a king of Magadha who expanded the kingdom through marriages and conquests. 2. Remember that his son Ajatasatru, influenced by ambition and perhaps external advisors, rebelled against Bimbisara. 3. Traditional accounts suggest that Ajatasatru imprisoned his father and caused his death, effectively murdering him to gain the throne. 4. Later, the same sources mention that Ajatasatru was himself murdered by his son Udayin, creating a cycle of violence in the royal family. 5. Check the options against this narrative: Ajatasatru is the one who fits both conditions, not Bimbisara, Udayan or Nagadashak. 6. Therefore the correct answer is Ajatasatru. Verification / Alternative check: Buddhist and Jain texts such as the Buddhist chronicles refer to Ajatasatru as the son who killed or caused the death of Bimbisara. They also narrate how Ajatasatru later regretted his actions and turned to the Buddha for guidance. Historical summaries of Magadha early history confirm that Ajatasatru was eventually killed by his own son, which reinforces his identification as the ruler described in the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bimbisar: He was the victim in this story, killed by his son Ajatasatru, rather than the murderer of his own father. Udayan: Also written as Udayin, he is described as the son who killed Ajatasatru, not the ruler who both killed his father and was killed by his son. Nagadashak: A later ruler of the Haryanka dynasty with no widely known story matching this exact pattern of patricide and retaliation. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse which member of the family committed which act, especially because names like Udayin and Ajatasatru can be less familiar. Another mistake is to select Bimbisara because he is the more famous early ruler, forgetting that he was the victim, not the perpetrator. Keeping the simple chain in mind helps: Bimbisara was killed by Ajatasatru, and Ajatasatru was killed by his own son Udayin. Thus Ajatasatru is the ruler who both murdered his father and was later murdered by his son. Final Answer: The early ruler of Magadha who killed his father and was later killed by his own son was Ajatasatru.

Question 10

In the teachings of Buddhism, which of the following is not included in the Noble Eightfold Path that guides a person towards the end of suffering?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Noble Eightfold Path is a central teaching in Buddhism and outlines the practical steps an individual should follow to end suffering and attain enlightenment. Many competitive exams test familiarity with the correct components of this path. This question asks you to identify which listed item is not actually part of the Eightfold Path, even though it may sound similar or related in ordinary language. Given Data / Assumptions: • The topic is the Noble Eightfold Path of Buddhism. • The options are Right speech, Right contemplation, Right desire and Right conduct. • We assume knowledge of the standard eight elements of the path. Concept / Approach: The Noble Eightfold Path consists of: Right view, Right intention, Right speech, Right action or conduct, Right livelihood, Right effort, Right mindfulness and Right concentration. Some textbooks use slightly different English words, such as Right thought for Right intention or Right meditation for Right concentration. However, the key ideas remain the same. Desire in Buddhism is usually seen as a cause of suffering. While wholesome aspirations are encouraged, the term Right desire is not a formal member of the Eightfold Path. The other options closely match standard components of the path when translated into English. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. List the eight parts of the Noble Eightfold Path from memory or notes: Right view, Right intention, Right speech, Right action, Right livelihood, Right effort, Right mindfulness and Right concentration. 2. Compare each option with this list. 3. Right speech clearly appears in the standard list as one of the ethical guidelines. 4. Right conduct matches the idea of Right action, that is, behaving morally and avoiding harmful deeds. 5. Right contemplation is often used as an alternative translation for aspects of Right mindfulness and Right concentration, and therefore connects to genuine parts of the path. 6. Right desire is not listed as a separate limb of the path and does not correspond directly to any of the standard eight elements. 7. Therefore, Right desire is the item that is not included in the Noble Eightfold Path. Verification / Alternative check: Any standard introduction to Buddhism or school textbook that explains the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path will list the eight components. None of them use the phrase Right desire as a technical term. Instead they refer to Right intention and Right effort, which guide wholesome motivations. Confirming with such a list shows that Right desire is not part of the path, while the other options can be reconciled with common translations of actual steps. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Right speech: An essential limb of the path, referring to speaking truthfully, kindly and responsibly. Right contemplation: Though wording varies, this can relate to deep mindful awareness or concentration, and it is consistent with the meditative limbs of the path. Right conduct: Corresponds closely to Right action, which is definitely one of the eight components. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to be misled by the positive sound of the phrase Right desire and assume that Buddhist teaching must include guidance on how to desire correctly. However, Buddhism usually emphasises letting go of craving rather than formalising desire as a separate noble path factor. Another pitfall is to be confused by variation in English translations, but remembering the core eight elements and matching the meaning rather than exact words can help avoid mistakes. Final Answer: The item not included in the Noble Eightfold Path of Buddhism is Right desire.

Question 11

The Fourth Buddhist Council, which played an important role in the development of later Buddhist schools, was convened during the reign of which king?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Buddhist councils were important gatherings of monks held after the life of the Buddha to recite, preserve and sometimes interpret the teachings. Several councils are mentioned in Buddhist tradition, and each is associated with a particular ruler and period. The Fourth Buddhist Council is particularly significant for the development of Mahayana Buddhism and for the spread of Buddhism beyond India. This question asks which king convened this council. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is specifically on the Fourth Buddhist Council. • The options include Ashoka, Ajatasatru, Kanishka and Mahapadmananda. • We assume familiarity with which rulers are linked to which councils. Concept / Approach: According to most traditional accounts, the First Buddhist Council was held at Rajagriha soon after the Buddha death during the time of Ajatasatru. The Second was at Vaisali. The Third Council is associated with Emperor Ashoka at Pataliputra, where efforts were made to purify the Sangha and send missionaries abroad. The Fourth Buddhist Council, however, is linked with the Kushana king Kanishka and is believed to have taken place in Kashmir or nearby regions. This council is often connected with the deepening of scholastic activity and compilation of commentaries, influencing the later course of Buddhism. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. List the main councils and their associated rulers. 2. Recall that Ajatasatru is linked with the First Buddhist Council at Rajagriha. 3. Remember that Ashoka, the Mauryan emperor, is associated with the Third Council at Pataliputra. 4. Recognise that Kanishka, the Kushana ruler, is associated with the Fourth Buddhist Council, often held in Kashmir. 5. Mahapadmananda is not linked with any Buddhist council in commonly accepted lists. 6. Therefore, identify Kanishka as the king during whose regime the Fourth Buddhist Council was convened. Verification / Alternative check: Standard histories of Buddhism note that Kanishka patronised Buddhism, particularly schools that contributed to Mahayana thought. They record that under his rule, learned monks assembled at a council where Abhidharma texts and commentaries were discussed or compiled. This event is acknowledged as the Fourth Buddhist Council in many traditions, confirming that Kanishka is the correct answer for this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ashoka: Patron of the Third Buddhist Council, not the Fourth, and associated with Pataliputra rather than Kashmir. Ajatasatru: Ruler connected with the First Buddhist Council immediately after the Buddha passing, not with later councils. Mahapadmananda: Founder of the Nanda dynasty, important in political history but with no strong traditional association with Buddhist councils. Common Pitfalls: A typical error is to pick Ashoka for any question about a Buddhist council because his name is closely linked with the spread of Buddhism. Another confusion arises from mixing up the numbers of the councils and the names of the rulers. A helpful memory pattern is: Ajatasatru with the First, Ashoka with the Third and Kanishka with the Fourth Council. Keeping this sequence in mind makes it easier to answer related questions accurately. Final Answer: The Fourth Buddhist Council was convened during the reign of the Kushana king Kanishka.

Question 12

The Chipko movement, launched by local villagers in the Himalayan region in the twentieth century, was basically a people s protest against which environmental problem?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Chipko movement is one of the most famous environmental movements in India and is often mentioned in school textbooks and competitive exam syllabi. It began in the Himalayan region and involved local villagers hugging trees to prevent them from being cut down. The question asks what major environmental problem the movement was primarily protesting against, which helps test understanding of basic environmental history and activism in India. Given Data / Assumptions: • The subject is the Chipko movement, a twentieth century people s movement. • The options list different types of pollution and environmental issues: cultural pollution, deforestation, water pollution and noise pollution. • We assume awareness of the symbolic act of hugging trees in this movement. Concept / Approach: The word Chipko means to cling or to hug. The movement arose when villagers, particularly women, physically embraced trees to prevent contractors from felling them. This action was a direct response to commercial logging and the large scale cutting of forest trees, which threatened local ecology, water sources and the livelihood of hill communities. Therefore, the main issue at the heart of the Chipko movement was deforestation. While deforestation can cause many environmental problems like soil erosion and loss of biodiversity, the specific focus here is on the act of cutting trees, not on other forms of pollution such as water or noise pollution. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Chipko movement protagonists literally embraced trees to protect them from being cut down by contractors. 2. Understand that the immediate cause of the protest was the granting of forest contracts to outside companies that planned to fell many trees. 3. Recognise that such large scale cutting of trees is called deforestation. 4. Review the options: cultural pollution and noise pollution are not directly connected with tree felling. 5. Water pollution can be affected indirectly by deforestation, but the primary target of Chipko was not industrial waste in rivers but tree cutting itself. 6. Therefore, the most accurate and direct choice is deforestation. Verification / Alternative check: Environmental studies texts and history chapters on post independence India describe Chipko as a forest conservation movement. They highlight its role in raising awareness against deforestation and in shaping later forest policies. The images of villagers hugging trees are widely used as symbols of resistance to deforestation. These consistent descriptions across sources confirm that deforestation is the main environmental problem that Chipko movement opposed. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Cultural pollution: This term usually refers to erosion of traditional culture or values, which was not the central focus of the Chipko protest. Water pollution: Although forests help protect water sources, Chipko actions were directed towards tree cutting, not directly against dumping pollutants into water bodies. Noise pollution: Has no direct connection with the main Chipko campaigns, which were about forests and tree felling. Common Pitfalls: Some learners may overthink the question and relate Chipko to broader ecological issues such as floods or water quality, but exam questions usually look for the simplest, most direct connection: Chipko equals opposition to deforestation. Remembering the image of villagers hugging trees can help keep this core fact clear and prevent confusion with other environmental problems that have different dedicated movements or campaigns. Final Answer: The Chipko movement was basically a protest against deforestation, that is, large scale cutting of forest trees.

Question 13

In Mughal India, which emperor propounded the syncretic religious order known as Din E Ilahi, or the religion of God, in an attempt to promote harmony among different faiths?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Mughal period in India saw not only political expansion but also major experiments in religious policy. One of the most discussed experiments was the creation of Din E Ilahi, a new spiritual order that attempted to bring together the best elements of different faiths. This question asks which Mughal emperor propounded this idea, a fact that is frequently tested in medieval Indian history sections. Given Data / Assumptions: • The subject is Din E Ilahi, sometimes translated as religion of God. • The options list four Mughal emperors: Jahangir, Akbar, Shah Jahan and Humayun. • We assume knowledge of each ruler general policy and religious outlook. Concept / Approach: Akbar, the third Mughal emperor, is famous for his policy of Sulh i Kul, or universal peace, and for his interest in interfaith dialogue. He invited scholars of different religions to discuss theological issues at his court in Fatehpur Sikri. Out of these discussions and his own beliefs, he developed a new spiritual order called Din E Ilahi. It was not a mass religion but a small order for selected courtiers who took special pledges of loyalty and ethical conduct. The other emperors listed did not propound such a religious order. Jahangir and Shah Jahan followed relatively orthodox policies, and Humayun ruled before Akbar experiment and faced mostly political struggles. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Akbar reigned from 1556 to 1605 and is widely known for his policy of religious tolerance and experimentation. 2. Remember that he abolished the jizya tax for non Muslims and married Rajput princesses, promoting a broad based empire. 3. Note that during his reign, the Ibadat Khana or House of Worship at Fatehpur Sikri hosted debates among scholars from Islam, Hinduism, Christianity, Jainism, Zoroastrianism and other traditions. 4. Understand that from these influences Akbar proposed Din E Ilahi, a syncretic spiritual order emphasising loyalty to the emperor and ethical living. 5. Compare this with Jahangir and Shah Jahan, who did not create any new religions or spiritual orders of this type. 6. Humayun spent much of his career in exile and reconquest and is not associated with such religious innovations. 7. Therefore, Akbar is clearly the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Most standard medieval Indian history texts and exam preparation guides state directly that Akbar founded or propounded Din E Ilahi around 1582. They often explain that the order did not spread widely and died out after his death, but it remains an important example of his attempt at religious synthesis. This consistent attribution across sources confirms that Akbar is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Jahangir: Akbar successor, known for his interest in art and justice but not for creating a new composite religion. Shah Jahan: Famous for monumental architecture such as the Taj Mahal, but he followed a more orthodox religious policy. Humayun: Akbar father, whose reign was marked by military setbacks and temporary loss of the empire, with no record of founding any religious order like Din E Ilahi. Common Pitfalls: Because many Mughal emperors had Persian cultural influences and patronised religious scholars, some students may confuse which ruler did what. A common mistake is to think Jahangir, as Akbar son, might have continued or founded such an order. To avoid this, it helps to remember that the most experimental and syncretic religious policies are a hallmark of Akbar reign, not of his successors. Linking Din E Ilahi directly with Akbar name is a useful memory aid. Final Answer: The syncretic religious order Din E Ilahi was propounded by the Mughal emperor Akbar.

Question 14

In the history of the Delhi Sultanate, who introduced a strict system of market regulation to control prices of essential goods and ensure regular supplies in the capital?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Delhi Sultanate period saw several experiments in economic and administrative policy. One of the most famous reforms was a strict system of market regulation designed to control prices and prevent hoarding. This question asks which Sultan introduced this system, a key fact often examined in medieval Indian history, especially in questions related to economic administration. Given Data / Assumptions: • The topic is market regulation under the Delhi Sultanate. • The options list Illtutmish, Ala-ud-din Khilji, Ghias-ud-din and Muhammad Bin-Tughlaq. • We assume familiarity with major reforms undertaken by each of these rulers. Concept / Approach: Ala-ud-din Khilji, who ruled from the late thirteenth to the early fourteenth century, is particularly remembered for his bold economic and military reforms. To maintain a large standing army and to prepare for resistance against Mongol invasions, he needed to keep the prices of food grains, cloth, horses and other essentials under control. He introduced a detailed system of market regulations in Delhi, appointing officials to check prices, punish hoarders and maintain records. The market reforms of Ala-ud-din Khilji are discussed in detail in chronicles by writers such as Barani. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Ala-ud-din Khilji was a strong and ambitious Sultan who expanded the empire and faced repeated Mongol threats. 2. Understand that to support his huge standing army, he needed to ensure that soldiers could live on their salaries, which required stable and low prices. 3. Remember that he set maximum prices for essential goods, fixed rates for horses and other military supplies and created separate markets for different types of commodities. 4. Note that market inspectors were appointed to enforce regulations and severe punishments were given to dishonest traders and hoarders. 5. Compare this with Illtutmish, who stabilised the early Sultanate but is not associated with such a detailed market system. 6. Ghias-ud-din and Muhammad Bin-Tughlaq had their own policies, but the classic and widely known market regulation reform is clearly associated with Ala-ud-din Khilji. 7. Therefore, Ala-ud-din Khilji is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Medieval chronicler Ziauddin Barani provides detailed accounts of Ala-ud-din Khilji market control measures in his writings. Modern historians consistently refer to these reforms when discussing price control and economic planning in the Delhi Sultanate. No other Sultan is described with the same level of detail regarding market regulation, confirming that Ala-ud-din Khilji was the ruler who introduced this system. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Illtutmish: Important for consolidating the Sultanate and introducing the silver tanka, but not noted for a comprehensive market regulation system. Ghias-ud-din: The name here is incomplete and could refer to different rulers, but none are as closely linked to market control as Ala-ud-din Khilji. Muhammad Bin-Tughlaq: Known for ambitious but often unsuccessful experiments such as token currency and shifting the capital, rather than the specific price control measures implemented under Ala-ud-din Khilji. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse economic experiments of different Sultans, especially mixing up Ala-ud-din Khilji price control with Muhammad Bin-Tughlaq token currency. To avoid this, it helps to remember that market regulation and fixed prices are the hallmark of Ala-ud-din Khilji economic policy, while token currency and shifting capitals are associated with Muhammad Bin-Tughlaq. Final Answer: The strict system of market regulation in the Delhi Sultanate was introduced by Ala-ud-din Khilji.

Question 15

Among the following options, which ancient site is recognised as the earliest city discovered in India in the context of the Indus Valley or Harappan civilisation?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The discovery of the Indus Valley or Harappan civilisation in the early twentieth century completely changed our understanding of ancient Indian history. Two major urban centres, Harappa and Mohenjodaro, became well known around the world. This question asks which of these sites is recognised as the earliest city discovered in India in the context of that civilisation, a foundational fact for ancient history questions. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is on the earliest city discovered in India related to the Indus Valley civilisation. • The options are Sindh, Mohenjodaro, Harappa and Rangpur. • We assume knowledge that the initial discovery of the civilisation is often linked with Harappa. Concept / Approach: Harappa, located in present day Pakistan, was the first site where archaeologists found evidence of a previously unknown urban civilisation in the Indus region. Excavations at Harappa took place in the 1920s under the Archaeological Survey of India and revealed a planned city with brick houses, streets and drainage. This led to the recognition of a new Bronze Age urban civilisation. Mohenjodaro, another major city in Sindh, was discovered around the same time but Harappa gave its name to the whole culture, which is often called Harappan civilisation. Other sites like Rangpur were identified later as parts of the broader civilisation. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that the civilisation is called Harappan civilisation because Harappa was the site that first attracted archaeological attention. 2. Recognise that Mohenjodaro is another very important city, but Harappa findings came first in sequence and naming. 3. Understand that Sindh is a region, not a single city, so it cannot be the name of the earliest city discovered. 4. Know that Rangpur is an Indus related site in Gujarat which was excavated later and is not the earliest discovery. 5. Therefore, among the given options, Harappa is regarded as the earliest discovered city of this civilisation in the Indian subcontinent context. Verification / Alternative check: Histories of archaeological discovery in India emphasise that in 1921 and 1922, excavations at Harappa and Mohenjodaro revealed urban remains. Harappa is usually mentioned first and is used to name the civilisation. Textbooks often state that Harappa is the earliest discovered city of this culture, while Mohenjodaro and other sites are described afterwards. This consistent narrative confirms that Harappa is the correct answer to the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sindh: Refers to a geographic region that includes sites like Mohenjodaro but is not itself the name of an excavated city. Mohenjodaro: An equally important city of the Indus civilisation, but Harappa is usually credited as the earlier discovery and gives its name to the culture. Rangpur: A later discovered site in Gujarat, not the first city through which the civilisation became known to archaeologists. Common Pitfalls: Because Mohenjodaro is often highlighted in photographs and documentaries, students sometimes assume it must have been the first city discovered. Others may be misled by the regional name Sindh. To avoid confusion, it is helpful to remember that the entire civilisation bears the name Harappan, a strong clue that Harappa was the initial key discovery that revealed this ancient urban culture to modern scholars. Final Answer: The earliest city discovered in connection with the Indus Valley civilisation was Harappa.

Question 16

In ancient Indian history, which ruler has been described in inscriptions as the destroyer of the Sakas, the Yavanas and the Pallavas, highlighting his success against foreign powers?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Inscriptions in ancient India often praised kings by listing their victories over rival powers. One famous description calls a ruler the destroyer of the Sakas, the Yavanas and the Pallavas. This phrase reflects his success in checking foreign and regional powers that posed challenges to his kingdom. The question tests knowledge of which king earned this title, an important fact in the history of the Satavahana dynasty and Deccan politics. Given Data / Assumptions: • The inscriptional phrase mentions Sakas, Yavanas and Pallavas as defeated enemies. • The options list Skanda Gupta, Gautamiputra Satakarni, Simuka and Satakarni I. • We assume familiarity with Satavahana kings and their conflicts with Saka rulers. Concept / Approach: Gautamiputra Satakarni was one of the greatest rulers of the Satavahana dynasty in the Deccan. Inscriptions, especially the famous Nashik prasasti issued by his mother Gautami Balashri, praise him as the destroyer of the Sakas, the Yavanas and the Palhavas or Pallavas. This refers to his victories over western Kshatrapa Saka rulers and other foreign influenced powers. The other names in the options either belong to different periods or do not match this specific inscriptional title. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Gautamiputra Satakarni ruled in the first to second century CE and is considered a high point of Satavahana power. 2. Remember that during his reign, he fought successfully against the western Kshatrapas or Saka rulers who had taken over parts of the Deccan and western India. 3. Note that the Nashik inscription by his mother describes his victories and calls him the destroyer of the Sakas, Yavanas and Palhavas. 4. Skanda Gupta was a later Gupta ruler who fought the Hunas, not mainly the Sakas, Yavanas and Pallavas as a group. 5. Simuka and Satakarni I were earlier Satavahana rulers, but the famous title is attached specifically to Gautamiputra Satakarni. 6. Therefore, the correct answer is Gautamiputra Satakarni. Verification / Alternative check: Epigraphic studies of the Nashik cave inscriptions emphasise the praise given to Gautamiputra Satakarni as a powerful ruler who humbled the Sakas, Yavanas and Palhavas. Textbooks on ancient India often quote this phrase to show his role in restoring indigenous control over parts of western India. Since no other Satavahana or Gupta king is widely described by precisely this combination of defeated enemies, the identification is secure. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Skanda Gupta: Remembered for defending the Gupta Empire against Huna invasions, not for this particular triad of Sakas, Yavanas and Pallavas. Simuka: Considered the founder of the Satavahana dynasty, but not the ruler associated with the famous inscription that mentions these conquests. Satakarni I: An early Satavahana ruler with some conquests, but the celebrated title destroyer of the Sakas, Yavanas and Pallavas is linked to Gautamiputra Satakarni. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse different Satavahana names because several rulers shared elements like Satakarni. Another pitfall is to associate any strong defender of India, such as Skanda Gupta, with all lists of defeated foreign groups. To avoid errors, it is useful to directly connect the phrase destroyer of Sakas, Yavanas and Palhavas with Gautamiputra Satakarni name and with the Nashik inscription issued by his mother. Final Answer: The ruler praised as the destroyer of the Sakas, the Yavanas and the Pallavas was Gautamiputra Satakarni.

Question 17

In which of the following years was India s first Prime Minister, Shri Jawaharlal Nehru, honoured with the Bharat Ratna, the highest civilian award of India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Bharat Ratna is India highest civilian award, given for exceptional service in art, literature, science and public service. Several national leaders have received it, including India first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. This question tests the specific year in which he was honoured with the Bharat Ratna, a detail that often appears in general knowledge and Indian polity sections. Given Data / Assumptions: • The award in question is the Bharat Ratna. • The recipient mentioned is Jawaharlal Nehru, India first Prime Minister. • The options provide four years in the early 1950s: 1955, 1953, 1951 and 1950. Concept / Approach: Jawaharlal Nehru served as Prime Minister from independence in 1947 until 1964. The Bharat Ratna was instituted in 1954. Nehru received the award shortly after its creation in recognition of his leadership in the freedom struggle and his role in building modern India. The correct year for his Bharat Ratna is 1955, which fits both the timeline of the award institution and the period of his prime ministership. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that the Bharat Ratna was first instituted in 1954. 2. Recognise that any award of the Bharat Ratna must be from 1954 or later, which immediately rules out 1950 and 1951 as possibilities. 3. Know from standard references that Nehru received the Bharat Ratna soon after the award was created, reflecting his status as a founding leader of the new nation. 4. Among the remaining years 1953 and 1955, 1953 is still earlier than the institution of the award. 5. Therefore, 1955 is the only year that fits both the award history and the widely stated fact that Nehru was honoured with the Bharat Ratna in that year. Verification / Alternative check: Authoritative lists of Bharat Ratna awardees indicate that Jawaharlal Nehru received the Bharat Ratna in 1955. The first recipients in 1954 were C Rajagopalachari, scientist C V Raman and philosopher S Radhakrishnan, followed by Nehru in 1955. This sequence is consistent across textbooks and official documents, confirming that 1955 is the correct year for Nehru award. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1953: The Bharat Ratna had not yet been instituted, so Nehru could not have received it that year. 1951: Also predates the establishment of the Bharat Ratna award. 1950: Again earlier than 1954, the year in which the Bharat Ratna was created. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes guess an earlier year like 1951 or 1953 because they associate Nehru strongly with the very beginning of the republic. Others may not recall the institution year of the Bharat Ratna and assume it goes back to 1950. A simple way to avoid confusion is to remember that the award started in 1954 and that Nehru was honoured in the following year, 1955. Final Answer: Jawaharlal Nehru received the Bharat Ratna in the year 1955.

Question 18

In modern Indian political history, who is popularly known as the Iron Lady of India because of her strong and decisive leadership style?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Nicknames and popular titles for political leaders often appear in general knowledge questions. The phrase Iron Lady of India is used to describe a particular leader whose personality and decisions were seen as strong, firm and uncompromising. This question asks you to identify that leader, which requires basic familiarity with prominent figures in India post independence politics. Given Data / Assumptions: • The nickname is Iron Lady of India. • The options include Rani Laxmi Bai, Sonia Gandhi, Indira Gandhi and None of the above. • We assume awareness of the main contributions and time periods of these individuals. Concept / Approach: Indira Gandhi, the first and so far only woman Prime Minister of India, served from 1966 to 1977 and again from 1980 until 1984. She led India through periods of war, political crisis and economic challenges. Her decisions, such as the nationalisation of banks, the 1971 war leading to the creation of Bangladesh and the imposition of the Emergency, made her a highly influential and sometimes controversial figure. Because of her strong style and firm handling of power, she came to be popularly known as the Iron Lady of India. The other names listed have different historical roles and are not widely associated with this title. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Rani Laxmi Bai was a heroic queen who fought in the Revolt of 1857, honoured for bravery but usually remembered as the Rani of Jhansi rather than the Iron Lady of India. 2. Sonia Gandhi has been a major political leader in recent decades, but this specific title is not commonly used for her in standard exam material. 3. Indira Gandhi served multiple terms as Prime Minister and became a symbol of strong central leadership. 4. Popular literature and media frequently describe Indira Gandhi as the Iron Lady of India, echoing the use of a similar label for some women leaders abroad. 5. Therefore, Indira Gandhi is the correct option that matches this widely used nickname. Verification / Alternative check: Biographies and general knowledge compilations often include a table of leaders and their nicknames, in which Indira Gandhi is listed as the Iron Lady of India. This is reinforced by repeated use of the phrase in newspaper articles and history books when discussing her wartime leadership and tough political decisions. No such consistent association exists for the other names in the options, confirming that Indira Gandhi is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rani Laxmi Bai: Known as the Rani of Jhansi and as a symbol of resistance in the Revolt of 1857, but not usually called the Iron Lady of India in exam oriented material. Sonia Gandhi: A prominent political leader and party president, but this specific nickname is not a standard part of general knowledge questions about her. None of the above: Incorrect because a well known leader, Indira Gandhi, clearly matches the nickname given in the question. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may confuse modern nicknames from media commentary with more established exam facts, or they may suppose that any strong woman leader from the past, such as Rani Laxmi Bai, must be the Iron Lady. To avoid such errors, it is helpful to remember that the phrase Iron Lady of India is most consistently associated with Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in general knowledge contexts. Final Answer: The leader popularly known as the Iron Lady of India is Indira Gandhi.

Question 19

Which political philosopher is famous for the call Go back to nature, emphasising a simpler life and a return to natural goodness?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Some famous quotes and slogans summarise key ideas of important thinkers. The phrase Go back to nature is closely linked with a European philosopher who criticised artificialities of civilisation and glorified the natural state of humans. This question asks you to identify that thinker, a common point in the overlap of political science, philosophy and general knowledge. Given Data / Assumptions: • The phrase in focus is Go back to nature. • The options list Rousseau, Dayananda Saraswathi, Vivekanandan and Martin Luther. • We assume basic awareness of the central ideas of these figures. Concept / Approach: Jean Jacques Rousseau was an eighteenth century French philosopher who greatly influenced modern political thought. In his works, he argued that humans in their natural state were essentially good but were corrupted by society and its institutions. His writings often romanticised nature and the simple life, and the slogan Go back to nature is used to capture this aspect of his thought. The Indian reformers Dayananda Saraswathi and Swami Vivekananda focused on religious and social reform, while Martin Luther was a German religious reformer of an earlier age. None of them are commonly associated with this specific quote in exam contexts. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Rousseau criticised the inequalities and corruptions of European society and argued for social contracts based on general will. 2. Remember that he praised the natural state of humans and saw civilisation as a source of moral decline. 3. Understand that the call Go back to nature summarises his appeal to return to simpler, more natural ways of living and to rely less on artificial social distinctions. 4. Dayananda Saraswathi called for a return to the Vedas, not specifically to nature in the sense used here. 5. Swami Vivekananda emphasised spiritual awakening and service to humanity rather than a general return to nature slogan. 6. Martin Luther initiated the Protestant Reformation in the Christian church, with focus on faith and scripture, not on nature as a central idea. 7. Therefore, Rousseau is clearly the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Political theory textbooks and summaries of Western philosophy typically discuss Rousseau views about the state of nature and his criticism of civilisation. They often present the phrase Go back to nature as a slogan that captures his perspective. In contrast, these books do not connect this phrase with Dayananda Saraswathi, Vivekananda or Luther, reinforcing that Rousseau is the correct association for exam purposes. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Dayananda Saraswathi: Known for the call Back to the Vedas, focusing on scriptural reform rather than nature as such. Vivekanandan: Famous for his speeches on Vedanta, universal religion and social service, not led by a Go back to nature slogan. Martin Luther: Central figure in the Protestant Reformation, emphasising faith and scripture, not a champion of a nature centred philosophy. Common Pitfalls: Learners may confuse different reform slogans that all use the idea of going back, such as back to the Vedas or back to the scriptures. It is important to clearly link Go back to nature with Rousseau critique of society and not with Indian religious reformers. Keeping a simple mapping of slogans to thinkers can help: Back to the Vedas with Dayananda, Go back to nature with Rousseau. Final Answer: The call Go back to nature is associated with the philosopher Rousseau.

Question 20

Which Governor General of India issued the historic regulation in 1829 that prohibited the practice of Sati, the burning of widows on the funeral pyres of their husbands?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The practice of Sati, in which a widow was burnt or buried alive on her husband funeral pyre, became a major issue of social reform in nineteenth century India. Social reformers and British officials debated how to address it. Finally, a Governor General took the step of legally prohibiting the practice. This question asks you to identify that Governor General and the regulation issued in 1829, which is an important milestone in Indian social and legal history. Given Data / Assumptions: • The year is 1829. • The issue is the prohibition of Sati. • The options list Sir George Barlow, Lord William Bentinck, Warren Hastings and Lord Minto. • We assume awareness of the roles of these Governors General. Concept / Approach: Lord William Bentinck served as Governor General of India from 1828 to 1835. He is known for introducing several social and administrative reforms, including the abolition of Sati. Influenced by Indian reformers such as Raja Ram Mohan Roy, he enacted Regulation XVII of 1829 in the Bengal Presidency, declaring Sati illegal and punishable by law. This measure later applied to other regions as well. The other officials listed were associated with different periods and policies and did not abolish Sati. Step-by-Step Solution: 1. Recall that Lord William Bentinck tenure as Governor General covered the late 1820s and early 1830s. 2. Remember that he is often described in textbooks as a Governor General with a strong interest in social reform and utilitarian policies. 3. Connect his name with Regulation XVII of 1829, which abolished Sati in the Bengal Presidency and treated it as a criminal offence. 4. Note that Warren Hastings served earlier, in the late eighteenth century, when Sati was not legally prohibited. 5. Sir George Barlow and Lord Minto also served in earlier or different periods and are not linked to the abolition of Sati. 6. Therefore, Lord William Bentinck is the Governor General who prohibited Sati in 1829. Verification / Alternative check: Most standard histories of modern India include a section on social reforms, where they mention Raja Ram Mohan Roy campaign against Sati and Lord William Bentinck decision to outlaw the practice. Regulation XVII of 1829 is specifically cited as a key piece of legislation. No equivalent references are associated with the names of the other Governors General in this context, confirming that Bentinck is the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Sir George Barlow: Served briefly as Governor General and is not connected with major social reforms such as the abolition of Sati. Warren Hastings: First de facto Governor General of India in the late eighteenth century, more associated with administrative and revenue reforms than with the legal prohibition of Sati. Lord Minto: Governor General in the early nineteenth century, but the abolition of Sati came later under Lord William Bentinck. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may confuse the roles of different British officials because many reforms occurred over a long period. A useful method is to link specific reformers with specific social measures: Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Bentinck with Sati abolition, Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar and later officials with widow remarriage and so on. Remembering that 1829 Sati abolition is associated with Lord William Bentinck helps to answer such questions quickly. Final Answer: The Governor General who prohibited Sati in 1829 was Lord William Bentinck.

Indian History Questions