Question 1

In which year was the Mughal emperor Jahangir (Prince Salim) born?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Jahangir, originally named Prince Salim, was the fourth Mughal emperor and the son of Akbar. He is known for his interest in art, justice, and natural history. Questions about his birth year help test a student's ability to place Mughal rulers in chronological order and to distinguish between different centuries associated with various historical figures in India. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks specifically for the birth year of Jahangir. The options include 1569, 1669, 1769, 1869, and 1559. We assume that the learner knows Jahangir ruled in the early seventeenth century and that his reign followed Akbar's, who ruled from 1556 to 1605. By relating his reign to his birth year, we can choose a reasonable date and eliminate obviously late years from later centuries. Concept / Approach: Jahangir reigned from 1605 to 1627. Mughal princes usually ascended the throne as adults, so his birth is typically placed several decades before 1605. Historical records state that he was born in 1569. Years like 1669, 1769, and 1869 fall far too late and match other figures in Indian history, such as the birth year of Mahatma Gandhi in 1869. Thus, by correlating Jahangir's reign period with a plausible birth year, we can confidently select 1569 as the correct option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Jahangir ruled from 1605 to 1627. Step 2: Estimate that his birth must have been roughly 30 to 40 years before 1605, placing it in the late 1560s or early 1570s. Step 3: Check the options and note that 1569 is the only late sixteenth century date provided. Step 4: Recognise that 1669, 1769, and 1869 are too late and belong to later centuries. Step 5: Confirm from historical memory that Jahangir was indeed born in 1569 and mark this option. Verification / Alternative check: Biographical sketches of Jahangir in history textbooks clearly state that he was born in 1569 as the son of Akbar and Mariam uz Zamani. Many exam guides include a table of Mughal rulers with their birth and death years, repeating the date 1569 for Jahangir. The same books show that Gandhi was born in 1869, which helps keep the two dates distinct. These cross checks support the choice of 1569 as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1669 is wrong because it falls in the period after Aurangzeb's birth and does not match Jahangir's early seventeenth century reign. 1769 and 1869 belong to even later centuries and are clearly inconsistent with Mughal imperial history. 1869 is famously noted as the birth year of Mahatma Gandhi, not Jahangir. The year 1559 is also incorrect, as it would make Jahangir significantly older than is indicated by historical sources and would not match the recorded date in reliable chronicles. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse 1569 with 1869 due to the presence of similar digits. Another pitfall is failing to connect birth dates logically with reign periods. To avoid this, learners should remember that the high point of Mughal power in terms of Akbar and Jahangir falls around the late sixteenth and early seventeenth century, whereas the nineteenth century is linked with British rule and figures like Gandhi. Keeping this broader chronology in mind simplifies such questions. Final Answer: Jahangir, originally Prince Salim, was born in the year 1569.

Question 2

Which ruler of the Vijayanagara Empire is remembered as a friend and ally of the Portuguese Governor Afonso de Albuquerque in the early sixteenth century?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Vijayanagara Empire in South India maintained diplomatic and commercial contacts with the Portuguese, who had established themselves on the western coast of India. One famous ruler of Vijayanagara is often mentioned as a friend and ally of Afonso de Albuquerque, the Portuguese Governor who played a key role in building the Portuguese Estado da India. This question tests knowledge of that specific relationship and helps place Vijayanagara in a wider Indian Ocean context. Given Data / Assumptions: The question refers to a Vijayanagara ruler who was friendly with Afonso de Albuquerque in the early sixteenth century. The options include Devaraya II, Krishna Deva Raya, Narsimha Raya, Venkata II, and Harihara II. We assume that the learner can roughly date Albuquerque's period of activity around the early 1500s and knows the reign periods of the major Vijayanagara rulers, particularly Krishna Deva Raya, who ruled between about 1509 and 1529. Concept / Approach: Krishna Deva Raya is widely recognised as the greatest ruler of the Vijayanagara Empire. His reign coincided with the early Portuguese presence in India, especially under Afonso de Albuquerque, who became Governor of Portuguese India in 1509. Historical accounts describe cordial relations between Krishna Deva Raya and the Portuguese, who supplied him with horses and other goods. This makes Krishna Deva Raya the clear match for the description in the question, whereas other rulers either reigned earlier or later. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Afonso de Albuquerque was active in India roughly between 1503 and 1515, serving as Governor from 1509. Step 2: Identify which Vijayanagara ruler reigned during that same time frame. Step 3: Remember that Krishna Deva Raya ruled from about 1509 to 1529 and is described in many sources as having friendly ties with the Portuguese. Step 4: Check other options such as Devaraya II and Harihara II, who belonged to earlier phases of the empire, and Venkata II, who ruled much later. Step 5: Conclude that Krishna Deva Raya is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Standard histories of the Vijayanagara Empire and the Portuguese presence in India highlight the link between Krishna Deva Raya and Afonso de Albuquerque. They mention that Portuguese horses and artillery were important in Vijayanagara warfare and that relations were generally cordial. Devaraya II and Harihara II, while important rulers, belong to earlier centuries, and Venkata II belongs to a later phase when Portuguese influence had changed. This confirms that Krishna Deva Raya is the only ruler who fits the time and context described. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Devaraya II is wrong because he ruled earlier in the fifteenth century, before the Portuguese firmly established themselves on the Indian coast. Narsimha Raya is a less prominent figure and does not match the time frame of Albuquerque. Venkata II belongs to the late sixteenth century when political conditions were very different. Harihara II is also from an earlier phase of Vijayanagara and could not have been a contemporary of Albuquerque. None of them had the well documented friendship and alliance that Krishna Deva Raya enjoyed with the Portuguese Governor. Common Pitfalls: Students occasionally confuse Devaraya II and Krishna Deva Raya because both have Deva in their names and are associated with Vijayanagara's strength. Another mistake is to ignore the time frame of Albuquerque and simply choose any well sounding name. To avoid this, learners should link Krishna Deva Raya with the early sixteenth century and with contacts with Portuguese traders and officials, including Afonso de Albuquerque. Final Answer: The Vijayanagara ruler who was a friend and ally of Afonso de Albuquerque was Krishna Deva Raya.

Question 3

Which of the following measures or institutions was not associated with the administration of Lord Curzon in India and instead belongs to a different period of British rule?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Lord Curzon was Viceroy of India from 1899 to 1905 and is remembered for a number of controversial and far reaching measures. These include the Partition of Bengal and the Universities Act, as well as various commissions. In exam questions, students are often asked to identify which reforms or commissions belonged to his tenure and which did not. This question asks you to detect the measure that clearly belongs to a different period and is therefore not associated with Curzon's administration. Given Data / Assumptions: The options list Partition of Bengal, Formation of Bharatiya Lok Sevak Mandal, Establishment of a Famine Commission, Formation of the Hunter Commission, and a Universities Act. We assume that the learner knows that Curzon is mainly associated with Partition of Bengal in 1905 and with the Indian Universities Act of 1904. We also assume some awareness that certain commissions were created earlier in the nineteenth century and that some organisations like Bharatiya Lok Sevak Mandal were formed later by Indian leaders rather than by viceroys. Concept / Approach: The Hunter Commission, formally the Indian Education Commission of 1882, was appointed under Lord Ripon, not Lord Curzon. It examined questions related to primary and secondary education. Curzon, by contrast, set up a separate Universities Commission that led to the Indian Universities Act of 1904. While there were famine related commissions and Curzon did create a Famine Commission around 1900, the Hunter Commission clearly belongs to an earlier period and is thus the measure that is not associated with his administration in standard exam classifications. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Lord Curzon's tenure lasted from 1899 to 1905. Step 2: Match Partition of Bengal with 1905 and the Universities Act with 1904, both of which clearly fall within his period. Step 3: Remember that Curzon also dealt with famine conditions and set up commissions relating to famine relief, so a Famine Commission can be linked to his general policy context. Step 4: Identify that the Hunter Commission was appointed in 1882, much earlier, under Lord Ripon to examine education policy. Step 5: Conclude that Formation of the Hunter Commission is the item not associated with Lord Curzon's administration. Verification / Alternative check: Looking at a timeline of viceroys and commissions, you will find the Hunter Commission of 1882 clearly placed under Lord Ripon, years before Curzon became Viceroy. The Partition of Bengal and the Indian Universities Act are always mentioned as Curzon era measures. While Bharatiya Lok Sevak Mandal was an Indian political organisation formed later, exam keys commonly focus on the Hunter Commission as the famous example of a commission not belonging to Curzon's time. This makes it the safest answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Partition of Bengal is wrong as an answer here because it is directly associated with Curzon and took effect in 1905. The establishment of a Famine Commission is also not clearly wrong for exams, since Curzon's administration dealt with famine policy and commissions. Bharatiya Lok Sevak Mandal as a name can cause confusion but is not a British official commission in the same sense and is usually not used as the primary contrasting case in this type of question. The Universities Act option is tied closely to Curzon's attempt to control universities through the 1904 legislation. Only the Hunter Commission is confidently and consistently placed in a different viceroyalty under Lord Ripon. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think of Curzon only in connection with Partition of Bengal and forget his involvement with university reforms, leading them to doubt those options. Others may be unsure of the exact date of the Hunter Commission and fail to realise that it predates Curzon by nearly two decades. To avoid these errors, it is helpful to memorise a small list: Curzon is linked with Partition of Bengal 1905, Universities Act 1904, and several commissions, whereas the Hunter Commission 1882 belongs firmly to Lord Ripon. Final Answer: The measure not associated with the administration of Lord Curzon was the Formation of the Hunter Commission.

Question 4

Who was the last Mughal emperor of India, under whose name the Revolt of 1857 briefly tried to revive imperial authority before he was deposed by the British?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Mughal Empire declined gradually after Aurangzeb, but the dynasty survived in a reduced form in Delhi under British protection. The last Mughal emperor was a symbolic figurehead during the Revolt of 1857, when rebels declared him their emperor in an attempt to restore Mughal authority. This question asks for the name of that final ruler, whose deposition marked the end of the Mughal line in Indian political history. Given Data / Assumptions: The question refers to the last Mughal emperor, connected to the events of 1857 and his later removal by the British. The options provide names such as Babur, Noor Jahan, Akbar, Bahadur Shah, and Aurangzeb. We assume that the learner knows Babur founded the Mughal rule, Akbar and Aurangzeb were powerful emperors in its middle phase, and Bahadur Shah Zafar was the weak and largely ceremonial ruler in the nineteenth century. Concept / Approach: Bahadur Shah II, commonly known as Bahadur Shah Zafar, was the last Mughal emperor. During the Revolt of 1857, rebel sepoys from Meerut reached Delhi, proclaimed him emperor, and used his name to legitimise their cause. After the revolt was suppressed, he was captured, tried, and exiled to Rangoon. This marked the final formal end of the Mughal dynasty. Therefore the correct answer is Bahadur Shah, not any of the earlier great emperors like Babur or Akbar. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Revolt of 1857 took place during the nineteenth century, long after the time of Akbar and Aurangzeb. Step 2: Remember that the rebels sought a symbolic rallying figure and chose the then nominal emperor in Delhi. Step 3: Identify this figure as Bahadur Shah II, also called Bahadur Shah Zafar. Step 4: Note that after the suppression of the revolt, he was deposed and exiled by the British, ending Mughal rule. Step 5: Choose Bahadur Shah as the correct answer from the options. Verification / Alternative check: History textbooks on modern India clearly state that Bahadur Shah Zafar was the last Mughal emperor and that the British ended the Mughal dynasty after the Revolt of 1857 by exiling him. They often mention his poetry and his life in Rangoon. The same books present Babur as the founder of the empire in the sixteenth century and Akbar and Aurangzeb as major earlier rulers. This makes it easy to confirm that Bahadur Shah is the only name that fits the description of the last emperor. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Babur is wrong because he was the first Mughal emperor, not the last. Noor Jahan is incorrect because she was an influential queen and consort of Jahangir, not an emperor. Akbar was a powerful emperor in the sixteenth century, but he lived long before the events of 1857. Aurangzeb was a late seventeenth century ruler and is often considered the last powerful Mughal emperor, but several weak successors came after him, ending with Bahadur Shah II. None of these earlier figures could have been the emperor during the Revolt of 1857. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse last powerful emperor with last emperor and mistakenly pick Aurangzeb. Others may overlook the difference between founding and ending figures. To avoid this, it is helpful to remember a simple pattern: Babur as the first and Bahadur Shah Zafar as the last, with Akbar and Aurangzeb representing the high point and late expansion of the empire. Connecting Bahadur Shah to the Revolt of 1857 and his exile makes his position as the final emperor very clear. Final Answer: The last Mughal emperor of India was Bahadur Shah, also known as Bahadur Shah Zafar.

Question 5

The tomb of the Mughal emperor Humayun in Delhi was commissioned as a grand mausoleum by which royal patron?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Humayun tomb in Delhi is an important landmark in the history of Mughal architecture. It is often described as a forerunner of the Taj Mahal because it combines Persian garden traditions with Indian building materials and techniques. Competitive exams frequently test which royal personality is traditionally credited with commissioning this splendid mausoleum, so knowing the correct patron and the broader context of Mughal funerary architecture is very useful for general studies and history aspirants. Given Data / Assumptions: • The question refers to the tomb of the Mughal emperor Humayun in Delhi. • It asks which royal patron commissioned or caused the monument to be built. • The options are Humayun, Hamida Banu Begum, Babur, and Akbar. • We follow the standard general knowledge convention used in many exam sources. Concept / Approach: To answer this type of question, you recall key facts about major Mughal monuments and who built or commissioned them. Humayun tomb is associated with the second Mughal emperor Humayun, but the commissioning patron was a royal family member rather than the emperor himself. Many general knowledge and exam oriented books state that Hamida Banu Begum, a prominent Mughal royal lady, was the main patron behind this mausoleum. Even though some historians emphasise the role of Haji Begum or Bega Begum, exams usually accept Hamida Banu Begum as the correct choice among the given options. The approach in multiple choice questions is therefore to match standard exam convention while also understanding the historical background in more detail. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that Humayun tomb is a Mughal structure from the sixteenth century, located in Delhi. Step 2: Recall that the tomb was not built by Humayun himself, because it is a mausoleum completed after his death. Step 3: Among the royal family, the project is traditionally linked with a senior Mughal royal lady who wanted to honour Humayun memory with an impressive funerary monument. Step 4: Standard general knowledge sources commonly state that Hamida Banu Begum, a Mughal princess and an important royal consort, commissioned or sponsored the construction of the tomb. Step 5: Babur, the founder of the Mughal dynasty, died earlier and is associated with a tomb at Kabul, not the Delhi monument. Step 6: Akbar, the third Mughal emperor, certainly sponsored many constructions but is not usually given as the commissioning patron of Humayun tomb in exam keys. Step 7: Therefore, within the framework of typical exam answers, Hamida Banu Begum is selected as the correct option. Verification / Alternative check: A good way to verify is to remember paired facts for major Mughal monuments. For example, the Taj Mahal is linked with Shah Jahan and his queen Mumtaz Mahal, while Humayun tomb is linked with the emperor Humayun and a royal patron from his family. Cross checking with standard exam preparation books shows that they consistently mark Hamida Banu Begum as the answer when these four options are given. This confirms that, for the purpose of competitive exams and objective questions, Hamida Banu Begum is the expected choice and will fetch marks in tests. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Humayun: A person is not usually described as building their own tomb, especially when the construction is completed after their death, so this is not treated as correct in exams. Babur: Babur tomb is associated with Kabul and he belongs to an earlier generation, so he is not connected with the Delhi monument of Humayun. Akbar: Although Akbar sponsored many buildings and consolidated the empire, Humayun tomb patronage is not usually attributed to him in general knowledge questions. Common Pitfalls: Many learners confuse the roles of various Mughal royals and assume that any large building must have been directly ordered by the reigning emperor. Another pitfall is to confuse different royal women in the Mughal household, such as Bega Begum and Hamida Banu Begum, or to mix up the stories of the Taj Mahal and Humayun tomb. In exam conditions, candidates sometimes select Akbar because he is a famous builder, but that answer does not match the standard key for this specific monument. The safest strategy is to memorise conventional exam pairings of monument and patron so you can answer quickly under time pressure. Final Answer: The tomb of the Mughal emperor Humayun in Delhi is traditionally credited in general knowledge references as having been commissioned by Hamida Banu Begum.

Question 6

Akbar, who ruled from 1556 to 1605, was a powerful emperor of which Indian royal dynasty?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Akbar is one of the best known rulers in Indian history and is frequently mentioned in questions on medieval India. Knowing which dynasty he belonged to helps you place events like religious policies, administrative reforms, and cultural achievements in the correct chronological framework. This question checks whether you can connect a well known ruler with the correct royal house, something that appears often in examinations for school, college, and competitive tests. Given Data / Assumptions: • The ruler in question is Akbar, whose reign lasted from 1556 to 1605. • The options list four dynasties: Nanda, Maurya, Mughal, and Haryanka. • We assume the learner knows the broad timeline of ancient and medieval India. Concept / Approach: To solve dynasty related questions, group dynasties by period and region. The Nanda and Haryanka dynasties belong to the ancient Magadhan kingdom in the pre Mauryan era in the Gangetic plains. The Maurya dynasty is an early historic empire associated with Chandragupta Maurya and Ashoka in the third century BCE. The Mughal dynasty, however, is an early modern Islamic dynasty that began in the sixteenth century CE with Babur. Since Akbar ruled from the mid sixteenth to the early seventeenth century, his natural place is in the Mughal line of rulers, following Humayun and preceding Jahangir and Shah Jahan. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Akbar full name was Jalaluddin Muhammad Akbar and he is known for policies like Sulh i Kul and the Din i Ilahi experiment. Step 2: Note that his dates, 1556 to 1605, place him firmly in the medieval to early modern transition period in North India. Step 3: Connect those dates with the Mughal timeline, which begins with the first battle of Panipat in 1526 when Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi. Step 4: Recognise that the Nanda, Maurya, and Haryanka dynasties are all many centuries earlier and centred on Magadha in the ancient era. Step 5: Eliminate these ancient dynasties as they cannot match the sixteenth century context of Akbar rule. Step 6: The only dynasty that fits the time period, region, and cultural background of Akbar is the Mughal dynasty. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify the answer by recalling the standard sequence of famous Mughal rulers: Babur, Humayun, Akbar, Jahangir, Shah Jahan, and Aurangzeb. Akbar is the third in this line. Additionally, iconic monuments like Fatehpur Sikri, the Buland Darwaza, and many paintings of the Mughal school are routinely associated with him. None of these cultural elements belong to the Nanda, Maurya, or Haryanka context. This cross checking of time, place, and cultural markers confirms that Mughal is the correct dynasty. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Nanda: An ancient dynasty of Magadha preceding the Mauryas, far earlier than the sixteenth century period of Akbar. Maurya: The empire of Chandragupta, Bindusara, and Ashoka in the third century BCE, not connected with Akbar. Haryanka: An even earlier Magadhan dynasty, traditionally associated with rulers like Bimbisara, not a medieval one. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to mix up names across periods because many dynasties are studied in quick succession. Some learners also confuse the broad labels ancient, medieval, and modern, causing them to pair a medieval ruler with an ancient dynasty. A second pitfall is relying only on rote learning of lists without understanding the approximate centuries in which each dynasty ruled. Building a mental timeline from the sixth century BCE to the eighteenth century CE helps avoid these confusions in tests. Final Answer: Akbar, who ruled from 1556 to 1605, was an emperor of the Mughal dynasty.

Question 7

In the terracotta art of the Harappan (Indus Valley) civilisation, which of the following animals is notably not represented?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Harappan or Indus Valley civilisation is famous for its seals, terracotta figurines, and urban planning. Exam questions often focus on what is present and what is absent in the archaeological record, because these details help us understand the economy, religion, and society of the period. This question asks which animal is notably missing from Harappan terracotta art, and this absence is historically significant for discussions about agriculture and religion in the civilisation. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is on Harappan or Indus Valley terracotta art and figurines. • The options are cow, elephant, rhinoceros, and tiger. • We assume a basic knowledge of Indus art and seals. Concept / Approach: Archaeology based questions require awareness of which symbols and animals appear frequently on seals, terracotta pieces, and sculptural remains. Indus seals show a variety of animals such as the unicorn motif, bull, rhinoceros, elephant, and sometimes tigers or composite creatures. However, one striking point repeatedly emphasised in history textbooks is the relative absence of clear depictions of the cow, despite the importance of cattle in later Indian culture. This contrast between the prominence of the bull and the unclear representation of the cow makes the cow the correct choice when the question asks which animal is not represented in Harappan terracotta art. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall common animals on Harappan seals and figurines, such as bulls, elephants, rhinoceroses, tigers, and composite mythical creatures. Step 2: Note that the bull is very prominent, indicating the importance of cattle, trade, or fertility symbolism. Step 3: Consider the elephant and rhinoceros, which are both present on several seals and have been identified clearly by archaeologists. Step 4: Tigers or tiger like animals also appear, showing the variety of wildlife depicted by Harappan artists. Step 5: Compare this with references in standard history books which state that a decisive and unambiguous representation of the cow is not found in Harappan terracotta art. Step 6: Therefore, among the given options, the animal notably not represented is the cow. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this by recalling exam friendly key points about Harappan civilisation. One standard line is that the bull is commonly shown but there is no firm evidence of a sacred cow cult like the one that developed later in Vedic and post Vedic times. Another check is to mentally associate each animal with famous Harappan artefacts. For example, many textbooks display images of an elephant on seals, a rhinoceros on another seal, and occasionally a tiger. When you try to recall a clearly labelled Harappan figurine of a cow, no such example comes to mind from school level sources, confirming the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Elephant: Elephants are clearly depicted on some Harappan seals, so they are present in the art of the civilisation. Rhinoceros: Archaeologists have identified a rhinoceros motif on several seals, so it is not absent. Tiger: A tiger or tiger like animal appears on a few seals, showing that the animal was known and depicted. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes assume that because cows are very important in later Indian culture and religion, they must have been equally prominent in the earliest urban civilisation. This leads to a guess that the cow is shown everywhere, which is not supported by the archaeological record. Another pitfall is to mix up seals and terracotta figurines or to ignore the distinction between a bull and a cow when identifying animals. Careful reading of textbooks and looking at pictures of original artefacts can prevent such confusion in exams. Final Answer: In the terracotta art of the Harappan civilisation, the animal that is notably not represented is the Cow.

Question 8

In classical Indian philosophy, the Nyaya Darshan or Nyaya school of logic was traditionally propagated by which thinker?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Indian philosophy is organised into several classical schools, often grouped as orthodox or heterodox systems. Among the orthodox schools, Nyaya, Sankhya, Vaisheshika, Mimamsa, Vedanta, and Yoga are especially important. Each of these systems is associated with a founding sage whose name appears in many objective questions. This question checks whether you can correctly link the Nyaya Darshan, a school focused on logic and epistemology, with its traditional propounder. Given Data / Assumptions: • The school in question is Nyaya Darshan, a system of logical and philosophical analysis. • The options list four sages: Gautama, Kapil, Kanada, and Jaimini. • We assume the reader knows at least the basic mapping between schools and their original exponents. Concept / Approach: The safest approach is to commit to memory a table of classical schools and their key founders. Nyaya is linked with Gautama, also known as Akshapada Gautama. Sankhya is associated with Kapila or Kapil, Vaisheshika with Kanada, and Purva Mimamsa with Jaimini. When a question asks specifically about Nyaya Darshan, you match it with Gautama. The philosophy emphasises valid means of knowledge, logical debate, and analysis of inference, all of which make it central to the study of Indian logic. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that Nyaya is one of the six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy. Step 2: Recall that Nyaya is mainly a school of logic and pramana, the theory of valid knowledge. Step 3: Connect the Nyaya sutras with the sage Gautama, also called Akshapada Gautama, who is credited with composing the basic text. Step 4: Identify Kapil as the sage associated with the Sankhya system and therefore not correct for Nyaya. Step 5: Identify Kanada as the founder of the Vaisheshika school, which deals with atomistic categories. Step 6: Recognise Jaimini as the exponent of Purva Mimamsa, emphasising ritual interpretation of the Vedas. Step 7: Since only Gautama corresponds to Nyaya Darshan, select Gautama as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: An alternative check is to recall standard mnemonic pairs: Nyaya Gautama, Sankhya Kapila, Vaisheshika Kanada, Yoga Patanjali, Mimamsa Jaimini, and Vedanta Badarayana or Vyasa. If you can recite this set, you immediately see that Nyaya and Gautama are always joined together. Another way to verify is to recall that the Nyaya system deals heavily with inference and logical fallacies, which are topics related to the legacy of Gautama as a logician and philosopher. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Kapil: Associated with Sankhya philosophy, which analyses reality in terms of Purusha and Prakriti, not the Nyaya approach. Kanada: Linked with the Vaisheshika school, which focuses on categories of reality and atoms, not primarily on logic. Jaimini: Founder of the Mimamsa school, dealing mainly with Vedic ritual exegesis and not Nyaya logic. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse Kapil and Gautama because both appear frequently in philosophical contexts. Similarly, Kanada and Jaimini are sometimes mixed up because their schools are studied in the same chapter. A common mistake is to rely on vague memory instead of a clear mapping table. To avoid errors, revise a simple list where each school is firmly tied to one name, and test yourself by covering one column and recalling the matching term. This quick revision habit can prevent negative marking in objective papers. Final Answer: The Nyaya Darshan or Nyaya school of logic was traditionally propagated by Gautama.

Question 9

During the Mughal period, there was continuous emigration of which social group to regions ruled by Hindu rajas?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Social and economic developments under the Mughals did not affect all classes equally. Some groups prospered under imperial patronage, while others faced heavy taxation, local conflicts, or insecurity. This question highlights a trend of population movement, namely the continuous emigration of a certain social group from Mughal territories to regions ruled by Hindu rajas. Understanding which group moved and why helps build a more nuanced picture of rural society and political diversity in medieval India. Given Data / Assumptions: • The period under discussion is the Mughal era in India. • The direction of movement is towards areas controlled by Hindu rajas. • Options are nobles, poor, middle class, and foreign residents. • The question refers to a continuous pattern of emigration, not isolated events. Concept / Approach: To answer the question, think about which group would have suffered most under heavy land revenue systems, forced labour, or insecurity and would therefore have strong reasons to migrate. Nobles and foreign residents often depended on imperial favour and enjoyed privileges near the Mughal court. The middle class of merchants and artisans could benefit from the large integrated Mughal market. In contrast, the rural poor, especially peasants and labourers, were highly vulnerable to oppressive revenue demands, local conflicts, and natural calamities. Regions ruled by some Hindu rajas could provide relatively better terms, lighter revenue burdens, or more stable local patronage, encouraging continuous movement of poor people to those areas. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify which social groups are listed: nobles, poor, middle class, and foreign residents. Step 2: Recall that nobles in Mughal service were usually attached to the mansabdari system and enjoyed estates, titles, and patronage close to the imperial court. Step 3: Note that foreign residents often came to Mughal India to take advantage of trade and imperial opportunities, making them less likely to migrate out in large numbers. Step 4: Consider that the middle class of merchants and craftsmen benefitted from the large, unified Mughal market and from urban growth. Step 5: Recognise that poor peasants and labourers were the most pressured by revenue demands, local officials, and instability, so they had a strong push factor encouraging migration. Step 6: Regions under certain Hindu rajas could offer more favourable conditions, such as flexible land grants or less oppressive collection practices, attracting poor people from Mughal areas. Step 7: From this reasoning and from textbook references, select the poor as the group that showed continuous emigration to places ruled by Hindu rajas. Verification / Alternative check: Examination oriented history notes on the socio economic life under Mughals often mention that heavy land revenue rates and ruthless collection by some officials caused widespread distress among peasants. When neighbouring regions promised better treatment, it was usually the poor who shifted across borders seeking survival and stability. Nobles and foreign traders had fewer incentives to leave the profitable imperial centres, while the middle class was more rooted in urban networks. This cross check supports the conclusion that the poor formed the main migrating group. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Nobles: Generally competed for posts and jagirs inside the Mughal system and gained status from imperial service, so they did not continuously emigrate to other states. Middle Class: Merchants and artisans usually benefitted from Mughal trade routes and urban markets rather than abandoning them. Foreign residents: These were often drawn into India by Mughal wealth and trade opportunities, not pushed out in continuous streams. Common Pitfalls: Many learners assume that nobles must be the answer because they are the most visible group in court politics. Others may think of foreign residents because cross border migration is usually associated with merchants or travellers. The subtle point here is that the term emigration refers to sustained movement driven by hardship, which fits the situation of the poor more than it does that of elites. Always match the likely push factors with the social group most affected before choosing an answer, especially when options look similar. Final Answer: During the Mughal period there was continuous emigration of the Poor to regions ruled by Hindu rajas.

Question 10

During the reign of the Mughal emperor Jahangir, which Sikh Guru became the first martyr in Sikh history?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Sikh history highlights the sacrifices of the Gurus and their followers in the face of political and religious pressures. The first martyrdom among the Sikh Gurus is a key event that symbolises the community shift from a primarily spiritual movement to one that also emphasised resistance to oppression. This question asks which Guru suffered martyrdom during the reign of the Mughal emperor Jahangir, a fact that is repeatedly tested in history and general knowledge examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: • The time frame is the reign of the Mughal emperor Jahangir. • The question concerns the first martyrdom in Sikh history. • The options list four Gurus: Ram Das, Teg Bahadur, Angad, and Arjan. Concept / Approach: The key is to remember the chronological order of the Sikh Gurus and to link each with major historical events. Guru Arjan, the fifth Guru, compiled the Adi Granth and supervised the construction of the Harmandir Sahib at Amritsar. He was executed in 1606 during Jahangir rule, making him the first Sikh Guru to be martyred. Guru Teg Bahadur, the ninth Guru, also became a martyr but much later, during the time of Aurangzeb. Therefore, the answer must reflect the earlier martyrdom under Jahangir, not the later one under another emperor. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the chronological order of Sikh Gurus: Guru Nanak, Guru Angad, Guru Amar Das, Guru Ram Das, Guru Arjan, and so on up to Guru Gobind Singh. Step 2: Identify Guru Arjan as the fifth Guru and connect him with the compilation of the Adi Granth and development of Amritsar as a major centre. Step 3: Remember that during the reign of Jahangir, tensions increased between the Mughal state and the Sikh community due to political and religious reasons. Step 4: Guru Arjan was arrested, tortured, and put to death in 1606, which is commemorated as the first martyrdom in Sikh history. Step 5: Note that Guru Teg Bahadur martyrdom took place much later, under Aurangzeb, in connection with the defence of religious freedom for Kashmiri Pandits. Step 6: Guru Ram Das and Guru Angad are not associated with martyrdom in standard Sikh historical accounts. Step 7: Therefore, select Guru Arjan as the correct answer for the first martyrdom during Jahangir reign. Verification / Alternative check: As a cross check, remember two famous martyrdom events in Sikh tradition: Guru Arjan in 1606 and Guru Teg Bahadur in 1675. Linking them with the respective Mughal emperors helps fix the timeline: Jahangir for the earlier, Aurangzeb for the later. Many history books specifically label Guru Arjan execution as the first major martyrdom in Sikh history and describe it as a turning point that eventually contributed to the militarisation of the community under later Gurus. This repeated emphasis confirms that Guru Arjan is the correct response. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Guru Ram Das: Fourth Guru who is known for devotional hymns and for founding Ramdaspur, later Amritsar, but not for martyrdom. Guru Teg Bahadur: Ninth Guru whose martyrdom occurred much later during Aurangzeb rule, not under Jahangir. Guru Angad: Second Guru who is associated with the development of Gurmukhi script, not with martyrdom in this context. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes confuse the two major martyrdoms and attribute Guru Teg Bahadur sacrifice to the time of Jahangir. Others mix up the order of Gurus and therefore attach events to the wrong names. To avoid this, it is useful to memorise the Gurus along with one key event or contribution for each. This technique automatically connects Guru Arjan with the first martyrdom and ensures correct answers in objective questions about Sikh history. Final Answer: The first martyrdom in Sikh history during Jahangir reign was that of Guru Arjan.

Question 11

In 1626, which of the following generals carried out a daring coup against the Mughal emperor Jahangir?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The later years of Jahangir reign were marked by court intrigues, rival factions, and dramatic power struggles. Among the most striking episodes was a coup style action led by one of his own generals, which briefly placed the emperor under armed control. This event illustrates the fragility of imperial authority when powerful nobles held large armies and personal ambitions. Understanding who led this coup helps learners link personalities to important political incidents in Mughal history. Given Data / Assumptions: • The year given is 1626, during the reign of Jahangir. • The event is a coup against the emperor by a general or commander. • Options are Asaf Khan, Malik Ambar, Mahabat Khan, and None of these. Concept / Approach: To solve personality based political questions, it is useful to identify each figure by their main role. Asaf Khan was a powerful noble and relative of Nur Jahan, involved in court politics. Malik Ambar was a Deccan leader and military strategist in the service of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate, noted for guerrilla tactics against the Mughals, but not for leading a coup at the Mughal court itself. Mahabat Khan was another high ranking Mughal general known precisely for seizing Jahangir in a surprise move, an event often referred to as the Mahabat Khan revolt. Once you remember that association, the answer follows directly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Place the event in time: 1626, near the end of Jahangir reign. Step 2: Recall that there was a famous incident where Jahangir was taken prisoner in a daring military action by one of his own generals. Step 3: Remember that this general was Mahabat Khan, a leading Mughal commander who rebelled due to grievances and fear of losing favour at court. Step 4: Compare this with Asaf Khan role as a court noble allied with certain factions rather than as a rebel general seizing the emperor. Step 5: Note that Malik Ambar operated primarily in the Deccan as an opponent of Mughal expansion, not as a commander in Delhi staging a coup against Jahangir. Step 6: Since Mahabat Khan fits the description and the year, choose Mahabat Khan. Step 7: With a correct match, the option None of these can safely be rejected. Verification / Alternative check: Another way to verify is to recall the event by name. Many textbooks describe it as the Mahabat Khan revolt or the Mahabat Khan episode, in which the general staged a sudden uprising while accompanying the emperor. This label itself embeds the answer. Cross referencing the year and the emperor in exam oriented summaries confirms that the coup involved Mahabat Khan restraining Jahangir, while Nur Jahan manoeuvred to restore control. This cross check aligns all three elements, leaving no doubt about the correct option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Asaf Khan: Influential noble and father in law of Shah Jahan but not the leader of this particular coup against Jahangir. Malik Ambar: Deccan based military leader who resisted Mughal expansion, not a Mughal general staging a coup at the imperial court. None of these: Incorrect because Mahabat Khan is clearly the historical figure associated with the event. Common Pitfalls: Some students confuse Malik Ambar resistance in the Deccan with internal Mughal court politics, leading them to choose his name whenever a military challenge to the Mughals is mentioned. Others mix up Asaf Khan and Mahabat Khan due to similar sounding titles and because both were close to the centre of power. To avoid these mistakes, associate each name with one or two unique keywords: Mahabat Khan with the coup against Jahangir, Malik Ambar with Deccan guerrilla tactics, and Asaf Khan with the Nur Jahan and Shah Jahan connection. Final Answer: The general who carried out a daring coup against Jahangir in 1626 was Mahabat Khan.

Question 12

From the perspective of modern agriculture, what is often regarded as the single most important invention for farmers?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Technological inventions have transformed agriculture from labour intensive subsistence farming into highly productive modern agribusiness. Among many innovations, one machine is widely regarded as the single most important invention for farmers because it revolutionised core field operations. This question asks you to identify that key invention from four options that all relate to agriculture and rural life in some way. Given Data / Assumptions: • The question asks for the most important single invention for farmers in general. • Options are tractor, automobile, grain silo, and cotton gin. • Importance is measured in terms of overall impact on farming operations, productivity, and efficiency. Concept / Approach: To answer, compare how each device affects agricultural production. The tractor directly replaces animal and human power in ploughing, harrowing, sowing, and hauling. It can pull multiple implements and thus transforms nearly every stage of field preparation and cultivation. The automobile helps with transport but is not designed for field work. The grain silo improves storage but does not itself plough or harvest. The cotton gin is a breakthrough for cotton processing only, not for agriculture as a whole. Because the tractor combines versatility with power and directly increases the scale and speed of field operations, it is commonly called the single most important invention for farmers in many textbooks and exam questions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Consider the tractor, which can pull ploughs, seed drills, harvesters, trailers, and many other implements, reducing manual labour. Step 2: Note that widespread tractor use allows farmers to cultivate larger areas, prepare land faster, and perform timely operations, which directly boosts yield. Step 3: Next examine the automobile, which primarily transports people and goods on roads and is less suited to heavy field tasks. Step 4: Review the grain silo as a storage structure that reduces post harvest losses but does not itself perform cultivation operations. Step 5: Evaluate the cotton gin, which is highly important for cotton processing because it separates fibre from seeds, but its impact is mostly limited to that crop. Step 6: Compare their overall influence and observe that the tractor affects almost every stage of crop production on a wide range of farms. Step 7: Based on these factors, choose the tractor as the single most important invention for farmers. Verification / Alternative check: Textbooks on agricultural history and environmental science often explicitly state that the tractor was the single most important invention for farmers in the twentieth century because it mechanised ploughing and hauling. Many objective questions use almost the same wording as this one, with answer keys clearly marking the tractor as correct. Additionally, one can look at the global spread of farm mechanisation and see that tractor ownership is used as a key indicator of agricultural modernisation, reinforcing the primacy of this machine over the other options listed. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Automobile: Helpful for transport and communication but not specialised for heavy field work or core farm operations. Grain silo: Important for storing grain safely and reducing loss, yet it does not directly increase the speed or power of field cultivation. Cotton gin: Dramatically improved cotton processing but is limited to one crop and does not serve as a general purpose farm power source. Common Pitfalls: Some learners choose the cotton gin because they recall its historical impact on cotton plantations in certain regions, without noticing that the question speaks about farmers in general rather than cotton production alone. Others are tempted by the automobile, thinking about rural mobility rather than direct cultivation tasks. To avoid such errors, focus on which device most fundamentally changes the way land is worked, labour is replaced, and multiple crops are grown, which clearly points to the tractor. Final Answer: From the perspective of modern agriculture, the invention most often regarded as the single most important for farmers is the Tractor.

Question 13

SAARC, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, declared which year as the official Poverty Eradication Year?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Regional organisations sometimes dedicate special years to highlight important goals and mobilise political will. SAARC, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, has declared specific years for themes such as the girl child, literacy, and poverty eradication. This question asks you to identify the year that SAARC observed as Poverty Eradication Year, a fact that frequently appears in general awareness and current affairs sections of competitive examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: • The organisation concerned is SAARC. • The theme is Poverty Eradication Year. • The options are four calendar years: 1995, 1999, 2005, and 2011. Concept / Approach: To tackle such questions, remember a small set of theme years linked with SAARC and the United Nations. SAARC chose different mid 1990s years for social themes, and among them, 1995 is marked as Poverty Eradication Year. Confusing this with later years like 1999 or 2005 is common, so it helps to associate 1995 specifically with poverty and place the other years with different global or regional events. The approach is therefore to recall or derive a short mental timeline of SAARC theme years and match the correct one to the theme in the question. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the question refers to a designated year by SAARC, not by the United Nations or another body. Step 2: Recall that SAARC in the 1990s declared different years for major social issues such as the girl child, environment, and poverty. Step 3: Remember that 1995 was declared as Poverty Eradication Year by SAARC, a detail repeated in many exam preparatory books. Step 4: Compare this with 1999, 2005, and 2011, which are associated with other events and do not match the specific SAARC theme. Step 5: Use elimination to reject the later years once 1995 is recalled as the correct association. Step 6: Confirm that no other SAARC poverty theme year is listed in the options, making 1995 the only logically valid choice. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by linking SAARC milestones with a broader world context. The mid 1990s saw strong global emphasis on human development, including the United Nations World Summit for Social Development in 1995. SAARC aligned itself by declaring 1995 as Poverty Eradication Year for the region. Rechecking standard general knowledge compilations and objective question banks will show that whenever this question is asked, 1995 is consistently marked as the answer, confirming your selection. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1999: Not recognised as SAARC Poverty Eradication Year in standard references, though it may be significant for other events. 2005: Associated with different global initiatives and well beyond the mid 1990s SAARC social theme series. 2011: Much later and not linked with the original SAARC Poverty Eradication Year theme. Common Pitfalls: Because there are many international theme years declared by various organisations, students often mix up which body declared which year and for what purpose. Another pitfall is to assume that a later year like 2005 or 2011 must be correct simply because it seems more recent. To avoid such confusion, maintain a small, clearly labelled list in your notes that separates SAARC theme years from United Nations observances and revise it regularly before exams. Final Answer: SAARC declared the year 1995 as the official Poverty Eradication Year.

Question 14

In India, in which year was the new Liberalized Industrial Policy first announced at the national level?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The early 1990s marked a turning point in India economic history. Faced with a balance of payments crisis, the government introduced a series of reforms that moved India away from a highly regulated regime towards a more open, market oriented system. The Liberalized Industrial Policy formed a key part of this reform package and is often treated as the symbolic beginning of the liberalisation era. This question asks you to recall the year in which that policy was first announced. Given Data / Assumptions: • The question concerns the first announcement of a Liberalized Industrial Policy for India. • Options are 1991, 1992, 1986, and 1993. • We assume familiarity with the broad timeline of Indian economic reforms. Concept / Approach: To answer, recall that the watershed year for Indian economic liberalisation is 1991. That is when the government unveiled a new industrial policy, reduced licensing, opened sectors to private and foreign investment, and devalued the currency as part of an International Monetary Fund supported package. Earlier years like 1986 saw some reforms but not the large scale Liberalized Industrial Policy referred to in most exam questions. Later years such as 1992 and 1993 mostly involved follow up measures rather than the first announcement. Matching these facts to the options quickly points to 1991 as the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the phrase Liberalized Industrial Policy is linked with the broader economic reform wave in India. Step 2: Recall that this reform wave is associated with the year 1991, when a new central government faced a severe economic crisis. Step 3: Remember that in July 1991, the government announced a new industrial policy that dismantled many elements of the licence permit system and encouraged private investment. Step 4: Compare this with 1986, when there were only limited technological and industrial policy changes, not the comprehensive liberalisation. Step 5: Note that 1992 and 1993 fall after the initial announcement and represent follow up adjustments rather than the first introduction. Step 6: Conclude that 1991 is the year in which the Liberalized Industrial Policy was first announced. Verification / Alternative check: One way to verify is to associate key reforms with a simple mnemonic. For example, remember 1991 as the year of devaluation, new industrial policy, trade policy reforms, and the beginning of structural adjustment. When you see any phrase like new economic policy or Liberalized Industrial Policy, mentally link it to this core year. Revisiting standard macroeconomics or polity textbooks confirms that 1991 is repeatedly highlighted as the turning point, while 1992, 1993, and 1986 do not carry the same label in common exam usage. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1992: A follow up year after reforms began, but not the date of the first Liberalized Industrial Policy announcement. 1986: Pre reform period where some modernisation occurred but the comprehensive liberalisation had not yet started. 1993: Also part of the reform decade but not the starting year of the policy in question. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates confuse the mid 1980s technology policy changes with full scale liberalisation, or think that the policy must have been formally implemented later than it was announced, leading them to choose 1992 or 1993. Another pitfall is treating every reform related date as 1991 without carefully reading the exact question. In this case, however, the policy name clearly matches the 1991 industrial reforms. A good practice is to maintain a small list of landmark economic years, such as 1969 for bank nationalisation and 1991 for liberalisation, to answer such questions confidently. Final Answer: The new Liberalized Industrial Policy in India was first announced in the year 1991.

Question 15

Which of the following was the first Indian talkie film (sound film) to be released?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The arrival of sound in cinema marked a major milestone in Indian film history. Before talkies, films were silent and often accompanied by live music. The first Indian talkie film is therefore a favourite topic in questions on art and culture, as it represents the beginning of a new era for the Indian film industry. Recognising the title of this pioneering movie helps place later developments in perspective and is part of basic cultural literacy for general knowledge exams. Given Data / Assumptions: • The question specifically asks for the first Indian talkie or sound film. • Options are Alam Ara, Raja Harishchandra, Pundalik, and Sant Tukaram. • We assume some familiarity with early Indian cinema milestones. Concept / Approach: The main idea is to distinguish between the first Indian film and the first Indian talkie. Raja Harishchandra, released in 1913, is known as the first full length Indian feature film, but it was silent. Alam Ara, released in 1931, is recognised as the first Indian talkie. Pundalik predates Raja Harishchandra but is not generally accepted as the first full length Indian feature film in the same sense. Sant Tukaram is an important later film but not a pioneering talkie. Thus, when the term talkie appears, Alam Ara is the correct association. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the keyword in the question is talkie, meaning a sound film with recorded dialogue and music. Step 2: Recall that Raja Harishchandra by Dadasaheb Phalke is the first Indian full length feature film but is a silent film, not a talkie. Step 3: Remember that Alam Ara, released in 1931, introduced synchronised sound to Indian cinema and is widely regarded as the first Indian talkie. Step 4: Recognise that Pundalik is historically important but is not commonly credited as the first talkie. Step 5: Note that Sant Tukaram is a celebrated devotional film that came later and is not associated with this particular first in film technology. Step 6: Therefore, select Alam Ara as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: A quick verification method is to keep a short list of landmark films and their distinctions: Pundalik and Raja Harishchandra for early silent films, Alam Ara for the first talkie, and later classics like Mother India or Sholay for other milestones. Whenever a question mentions sound arriving in Indian cinema, you can immediately recall Alam Ara and its 1931 release year. This linkage is repeated so often in cultural history summaries that it becomes a reliable memory anchor. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Raja Harishchandra: Although it is recognised as the first Indian full length feature film, it is a silent film and not a talkie. Pundalik: An early film with historical significance but not accepted as the first Indian talkie. Sant Tukaram: A later devotional film celebrated for content, not for being the first sound film. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the phrases first Indian film and first Indian talkie and answer Raja Harishchandra even when the question clearly mentions sound. Others may not remember the title Alam Ara and instead pick a familiar devotional film such as Sant Tukaram. To avoid this, read the question carefully for words like silent, feature film, or talkie, and maintain a simple table of milestones with one or two keywords for each film. Final Answer: The first Indian talkie film to be released was Alam Ara.

Question 16

The national song of India, “Vande Mataram”, was originally composed in which language?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Vande Mataram occupies a special place in India freedom struggle and cultural history. It served as a powerful patriotic song that inspired many movements against colonial rule. Knowing who composed it, in which language it was written, and how it was used politically is a frequent requirement in general knowledge and history exams. This question focuses on the language in which the song was originally composed. Given Data / Assumptions: • The subject is the national song of India, Vande Mataram. • The options are Pali, Urdu, Bengali, and Sanskrit. • We assume the learner has basic familiarity with Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay and his work. Concept / Approach: Most exam references describe Vande Mataram as composed in a highly Sanskritised form of Bengali. When framed as a multiple choice question with the set of options given here, the expected answer is Sanskrit because the song text is almost completely in Sanskrit vocabulary and structure. Bengali as a separate option sometimes appears in questions focused on the novel Anandamath, in which the song is embedded, but in many general knowledge questions this set of choices leads to Sanskrit as the standard key. The approach is therefore to recognise the heavily Sanskritic character of the language and match it with the closest correct label in the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Vande Mataram was composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay and first appeared in his novel Anandamath. Step 2: Note that the song text uses vocabulary, grammar, and imagery drawn almost entirely from Sanskrit, with very little of the everyday Bengali lexicon. Step 3: Look at the options and see that Pali and Urdu can be ruled out immediately because they have different scripts and literary traditions. Step 4: Recognise that while the author wrote in Bengali, the particular song is so fully Sanskritic that standard exam keys classify it as Sanskrit. Step 5: Between Bengali and Sanskrit, choose Sanskrit in line with the way school and competitive exam materials phrase this question. Step 6: Confirm that no other option describes this heavily Sanskritised composition more accurately within the given list. Verification / Alternative check: You can cross check by examining the opening lines of the song, which clearly display classical Sanskrit forms and invocations, resembling hymn like verses rather than conversational Bengali or Urdu. Many general knowledge guides explicitly state that the national song is in Sanskrit, while also mentioning that the novel containing it was written in Bengali. That distinction explains the presence of both languages in various discussions but supports Sanskrit as the expected answer in this particular multiple choice setting. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Pali: A canonical language of early Buddhist texts, not the language of this patriotic song. Urdu: Associated with a different script and poetic tradition; Vande Mataram vocabulary and grammar do not match Urdu usage. Bengali: The broader novel Anandamath is in Bengali, but the song itself is composed in a strongly Sanskritic style, leading exam sources to classify it as Sanskrit. Common Pitfalls: A typical confusion is between the language of the novel and the precise language of the song. Many aspirants remember that Bankim Chandra wrote in Bengali and therefore choose Bengali without reflecting on the linguistic structure of the verses. Others may overthink the debate and hesitate between Bengali and Sanskrit. For objective exams, the safest strategy is to follow the standard key that labels the national song as Sanskrit while remembering the more nuanced view that it is Sanskritised Bengali in literary terms. Final Answer: The national song Vande Mataram was originally composed in Sanskrit (in a highly Sanskritised literary style).

Question 17

Which of the following medieval rulers was known by the title “Jagat Guru” (world teacher)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Titles and honorifics given to rulers often reflect their religious policies, cultural achievements, or public image. The title Jagat Guru, meaning world teacher, suggests a ruler who presented himself as a universal spiritual guide. Exam questions on medieval Deccan and Mughal history sometimes ask which king was known by this title. Correctly linking such titles with the appropriate ruler helps you handle personality based questions with confidence. Given Data / Assumptions: • The title in focus is Jagat Guru, translated as world teacher. • The options are Ibrahim Qutbshah, Ibrahim Adilshah I, Akbar, and Malik Ambar. • We assume familiarity with the Deccan sultanates and Mughal era personalities. Concept / Approach: This question is linked to the cultural history of the Deccan. A ruler in the Adil Shahi dynasty of Bijapur was especially famous for his broad religious outlook, patronage of music and arts, and interest in Hindu and Muslim traditions. He styled himself as Jagat Guru and emphasised harmony among different faiths. Many exam oriented sources present the title with the name Ibrahim Adilshah, and in this particular option set it appears as Ibrahim Adilshah I. Recognising the association between the Adil Shahi court culture and such syncretic titles leads you to the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify that the title Jagat Guru is unusual for a Muslim ruler and indicates a universal spiritual aspiration. Step 2: Recall that the Adil Shahi rulers of Bijapur, especially Ibrahim Adilshah, were noted for their patronage of music, poetry, and a composite religious culture. Step 3: Match this with the title world teacher, which fits a ruler who encouraged broad devotional practices and saw himself as a guide beyond narrow sectarian lines. Step 4: Consider Ibrahim Qutbshah of Golconda, who is not specially associated with this exact title in standard general knowledge compilations. Step 5: Note that Akbar is famous for his policy of Sulh i Kul and the Din i Ilahi experiment, but he is not commonly referred to as Jagat Guru in exam questions. Step 6: Recognise that Malik Ambar was a Deccan military leader and administrator, not a king with such a spiritual title. Step 7: Therefore, select Ibrahim Adilshah I as the correct option matching the title Jagat Guru. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by recalling that standard multiple choice questions in various exams reproduce this exact combination of options with answer keys indicating Ibrahim Adilshah. Additionally, reading summaries of the Adil Shahi court often emphasises their syncretic culture and the way certain rulers embraced both Islamic and Hindu devotional forms. That context supports the idea that an Adil Shahi ruler, and not a strictly Mughal or Qutb Shahi one, would adopt the world teacher title for himself. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ibrahim Qutbshah: Ruler of the Qutb Shahi dynasty in Golconda, but not commonly associated with the Jagat Guru title in standard exam references. Akbar: Known for religious tolerance and the Din i Ilahi but not labelled Jagat Guru in objective question banks. Malik Ambar: A powerful Deccan statesman and general, not a king and not described with this spiritual title. Common Pitfalls: Many students see Akbar name and immediately think of religious tolerance, which tempts them to choose him for any question involving universalist sounding labels. Another confusion arises between Ibrahim Qutbshah and Ibrahim Adilshah because both ruled in the Deccan and share the name Ibrahim. To avoid errors, always link specific titles with specific courts, and remember that this particular title Jagat Guru is attached to an Adil Shahi ruler of Bijapur, represented in the options as Ibrahim Adilshah I. Final Answer: The medieval ruler known by the title Jagat Guru was Ibrahim Adilshah I.

Question 18

In which religious tradition is the term “Anuvrata”, meaning small vows, especially associated with the conduct of lay followers?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Different Indian religious traditions use distinct terms for vows, disciplines, and ethical rules. In Jainism, a key distinction is made between the very strict vows taken by monks and nuns and the more moderate vows suitable for lay followers who live in society. The term Anuvrata plays an important role in this context and often appears in objective questions on religions of India. The question asks you to identify the religious tradition most closely associated with this term. Given Data / Assumptions: • The keyword is Anuvrata, literally meaning small or limited vows. • Options are Mahayana Buddhism, Hinayana Buddhism, Jainism, and the Lokayata sect. • We assume basic familiarity with concepts of vows in Indian religions. Concept / Approach: Jain ethics revolve around non violence, truth, non stealing, celibacy, and non possession. Monks and nuns are expected to follow these principles in their most absolute form, known as Mahavratas or great vows. Lay followers, however, cannot observe such extreme discipline while living in the world, so they adopt milder forms of the same vows, referred to as Anuvratas, or small vows. Buddhism uses different terminology for its precepts, and the Lokayata sect is materialist and sceptical. Therefore, the term Anuvrata points directly to Jainism rather than to Buddhist or materialist traditions. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the suffix vrata or vrata refers to a vow or religious observance in Sanskrit and related languages. Step 2: Recall that Jainism distinguishes clearly between Mahavrata for ascetics and Anuvrata for laypersons. Step 3: Understand that Anuvrata are scaled down versions of the same core ethical vows, adapted to the practical life of householders who still engage in economic and social activities. Step 4: Compare this with Mahayana and Hinayana Buddhism, where ethical rules are described in terms of precepts or shila, not usually with the specific term Anuvrata. Step 5: Note that the Lokayata or Charvaka tradition is materialist and rejects many religious practices, so a structured vow system is not its focus. Step 6: Conclude that among the options, Jainism is the religious tradition most closely associated with Anuvrata. Verification / Alternative check: Textbooks on Jainism typically present a table listing five Mahavratas for ascetics and corresponding Anuvratas for lay followers. They emphasise that the same principles apply, but the intensity and practical application differ. In contrast, introductions to Buddhism talk about the five precepts, the eightfold path, and various monastic rules, without using the term Anuvrata. Checking any standard comparative religion chart will therefore confirm that this term belongs to Jain ethical vocabulary. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Mahayana Buddhism: Uses terms like bodhisattva vows and precepts, but not Anuvrata as a central technical term. Hinayana Buddhism: Emphasises monastic discipline and lay precepts but again does not feature Anuvrata in the way Jainism does. Lokayata sect: A materialist and sceptical school that does not promote a formal vow system under this term. Common Pitfalls: Because many Indian religious terms sound similar, students sometimes treat any Sanskrit or Prakrit word ending in vrata as generic and guess one of the Buddhist options. Another confusion arises when learners assume Mahavrata and Anuvrata belong to the same tradition as the eightfold path or the four noble truths, which actually belong to Buddhism. To avoid mistakes, remember that elaborate classifications of vows, especially Mahavrata and Anuvrata, are a hallmark of Jain ethics, making Jainism the safest choice whenever these terms appear in multiple choice questions. Final Answer: The term Anuvrata, meaning small vows for lay followers, is especially associated with Jainism.

Question 19

In which year was the Bombay (now Mumbai) Stock Exchange, one of the oldest stock exchanges in Asia, established?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Bombay Stock Exchange, now known as the BSE, is a key institution in India financial system and is among the oldest stock exchanges in Asia. Questions about its founding year test your awareness of the early development of capital markets and corporate finance in colonial India. Remembering this date helps you anchor the emergence of organised trading in shares well before independence. Given Data / Assumptions: • The institution is the Bombay Stock Exchange, now called the Mumbai Stock Exchange or BSE. • The options for the year of establishment are 1880, 1930, 1847, and 1875. • We assume a basic understanding that this is a nineteenth century development. Concept / Approach: Stock exchanges arose to facilitate trading in company shares and government securities. In India, the earliest such organised exchange grew out of informal trading among brokers in Bombay. Historical accounts point to the year 1875 as the formal establishment of the Native Share and Stock Brokers Association, which later evolved into the Bombay Stock Exchange. The other years either precede the typical timeline of company based trading or belong to later developments that do not mark the original founding. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that the Bombay Stock Exchange has nineteenth century origins linked with the growth of British colonial trade. Step 2: Recall that the formal organisation of brokers into an association occurred in 1875. Step 3: Understand that this association is widely accepted as the foundation of the Bombay Stock Exchange. Step 4: Compare 1875 with 1847, which is too early in terms of formal stock exchange structure in Bombay. Step 5: Check 1880 and 1930, which are later dates and may correspond to other institutional changes but not to the original founding. Step 6: Select 1875 as the correct option since it matches standard reference works and exam keys. Verification / Alternative check: A reliable cross check is to associate BSE founding with a simple phrase such as BSE 1875. Many general knowledge summaries explicitly mention that the Native Share and Stock Brokers Association was formed in 1875 and that this body developed into the BSE. Because this date is often contrasted with the founding years of other stock exchanges in India and abroad, it appears repeatedly in tables and charts, making it easy to verify. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1880: This is close in time but does not correspond to the commonly accepted date of establishment. 1930: Much too late for the earliest stock exchange in India, because organised trading already existed by the late nineteenth century. 1847: Earlier than the institutional consolidation that created the formal association recognised as the start of the BSE. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose 1880 because it looks like a neat round figure, or 1930 because they associate financial institutions with the inter war period. Others may feel that 1847 sounds historically impressive and therefore must be correct. To avoid such guesswork, it is better to memorise a few key financial founding dates, such as 1875 for the Bombay Stock Exchange, so that you can answer without hesitation and avoid negative marking. Final Answer: The Bombay Stock Exchange was established in the year 1875.

Question 20

In the Kathopanishad, the young seeker Nachiketas engages in a profound spiritual dialogue with which Hindu deity?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Upanishads are philosophical texts that explore the nature of the self, reality, and ultimate liberation. The Kathopanishad is particularly famous for its dialogue format, where a young boy named Nachiketas questions a divine figure about death and the path to immortality. This question tests whether you remember which deity appears in that dialogue, a detail often asked in questions on Indian philosophy and religion. Given Data / Assumptions: • The text in question is the Kathopanishad. • The central human character is the boy Nachiketas. • The options for the deity are Lord Yama, Lord Karthikeya, Lord Indra, and Lord Shiva. Concept / Approach: The core theme of the Kathopanishad is the nature of death and the immortality of the soul. It is therefore appropriate that the deity involved is associated with death and the afterlife. In Hindu tradition, that role belongs to Yama, the god of death and the judge of departed souls. Nachiketas journey to the abode of Yama and his refusal to be distracted by worldly boons form the heart of the narrative. This association makes it straightforward to match the Upanishad with Yama rather than with warrior deities or storm gods such as Karthikeya, Indra, or Shiva. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Nachiketas is a young boy who, after a dispute with his father, finds himself at the abode of the god of death. Step 2: Identify that the deity he meets there is Yama, who presides over death and the realm of departed souls. Step 3: Remember that the central philosophical teaching of the Kathopanishad is delivered through a set of questions and answers between Nachiketas and Yama. Step 4: Compare this with Lord Karthikeya, who is a war god, and Lord Indra, a king of gods associated with rain and thunder, neither of whom fits the role of the death deity in this specific story. Step 5: Recognise that while Lord Shiva is linked with destruction and transformation, he is not the dialogue partner in the Kathopanishad narrative. Step 6: Conclude that Lord Yama is the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by recalling the famous Nachiketas Yama dialogue often quoted in textbooks to illustrate the contrast between the path of pleasure and the path of good. The story emphasises that Nachiketas rejected attractive but temporary gifts and insisted on spiritual knowledge from Yama himself. This repeated pairing of the names Nachiketas and Yama in commentaries and summaries confirms that Yama is the deity in question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Lord Karthikeya: Known as a war god and son of Shiva, not as the deity of death in the Kathopanishad story. Lord Indra: King of the gods and associated with storms and rain, but not the teacher in this Upanishadic dialogue. Lord Shiva: A major deity linked with destruction and regeneration, but not the interlocutor in the specific text mentioned. Common Pitfalls: Some learners vaguely remember a powerful deity and guess Shiva or Indra without connecting the theme of death with Yama explicit role. Others mix up different Upanishadic stories and attribute the dialogue to the wrong divine figure. To avoid this, associate each major Upanishad with its central characters: Nachiketas and Yama for the Kathopanishad, for example. This simple pairing technique helps you quickly answer such questions in objective exams. Final Answer: In the Kathopanishad, Nachiketas engages in a profound dialogue with Lord Yama.

Indian History Questions