Question 1

The arrest of which nationalist leader in 1930 led to large protest demonstrations in the streets of Peshawar?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In the North West Frontier Province, the Khudai Khidmatgar movement led by Abdul Ghaffar Khan played a key role in the Indian freedom struggle. The arrest of this leader in 1930 triggered major demonstrations in Peshawar, which are remembered as important episodes of non violent resistance. Questions on this topic test familiarity with regional dimensions of the national movement. Given Data / Assumptions: The event is the arrest of a nationalist leader in 1930. The result was angry demonstrations in Peshawar. The options list Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Abul Kalam Azad, Zakir Husain, Muzaffar Ahmed and Khan Abdul Qayyum Khan. We must link the city of Peshawar and the year 1930 with the correct leader. Concept / Approach: Abdul Ghaffar Khan, also known as Frontier Gandhi, organised the Khudai Khidmatgar or Red Shirt movement among the Pashtuns. In 1930, when he was arrested, massive non violent protests broke out in Peshawar, including the famous Qissa Khwani Bazaar incident, where unarmed demonstrators faced firing. Recognising his deep connection with Peshawar and the Frontier region helps to identify him as the correct option. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Associate Peshawar and the North West Frontier Province with Abdul Ghaffar Khan and the Khudai Khidmatgar movement. Step 2: Recall that 1930 was the year of the Civil Disobedience Movement and many arrests of leaders across India. Step 3: Note that the arrest of Abdul Ghaffar Khan in this period led directly to widespread protests in Peshawar. Step 4: Recognise that Abul Kalam Azad and Zakir Husain were prominent nationalist leaders but mainly associated with other regions and events. Step 5: Choose Abdul Ghaffar Khan as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Historical accounts of the Civil Disobedience Movement mention that in April 1930, the arrest of Abdul Ghaffar Khan led to large demonstrations in the city of Peshawar. The firing on peaceful demonstrators at Qissa Khwani Bazaar became a symbol of non violent courage. No other leader in the options has this specific association with Peshawar in 1930, which confirms our choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Abul Kalam Azad: A major national leader and scholar, but not the central figure in the Peshawar protests of 1930. Zakir Husain: Educator and later President of India, not directly connected with the Frontier protests of that year. Muzaffar Ahmed: Linked with communist activities, not with Peshawar demonstrations triggered by this arrest. Khan Abdul Qayyum Khan: A political figure from the region but not the leader whose arrest in 1930 set off the demonstrations mentioned in the question. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse different Frontier leaders or mix up events of the Civil Disobedience Movement with later developments. To avoid this, it helps to remember a simple association: Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Khudai Khidmatgar, Peshawar and Qissa Khwani Bazaar protests in 1930 all belong together. Final Answer: Correct answer: Abdul Ghaffar Khan.

Question 2

The rulers of which dynasty in India were the successors of Timur, the Central Asian ruler of Iran, Iraq and parts of modern Turkey?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The origin and lineage of ruling dynasties is an important part of medieval Indian history. The Mughals, who established a powerful empire in India in the sixteenth century, traced their ancestry to the famous Central Asian conqueror Timur. Recognising this genealogical link helps explain the prestige and legitimacy claimed by Mughal rulers. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks which Indian dynasty considered itself the successors of Timur. Timur ruled over regions including Iran, Iraq and parts of modern Turkey. The options list Rajputs, Khaljis, Mughals, Tughluqs and Lodis. We must recall which dynasty emphasised Timurid descent. Concept / Approach: Babur, the founder of the Mughal empire in India, was a descendant of Timur on his father's side and of Genghis Khan on his mother's side. Because of this lineage, the Mughals often called themselves Timurid princes and saw their rule in India as a continuation of Timurid traditions. None of the other dynasties listed trace their roots to Timur in this way. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Babur ruled in Central Asia before coming to India and often referred to his Timurid heritage. Step 2: Note that after defeating Ibrahim Lodi at the First Battle of Panipat in 1526, Babur founded the Mughal empire. Step 3: Understand that the word Mughal itself is derived from Mongol, but the rulers particularly stressed their descent from Timur. Step 4: Compare this with the Rajputs, Khaljis, Tughluqs and Lodis, who had different ethnic and regional origins. Step 5: Select Mughals as the correct dynasty. Verification / Alternative check: Historical sources and Babur's own memoir, the Baburnama, make repeated references to his Timurid ancestry. Later Mughal emperors also celebrated this connection in their chronicles and art. This clear tradition confirms that the Mughals are the successors of Timur mentioned in the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Rajputs: A group of warrior clans in North and Western India, not descended from Timur. Khaljis: A dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate with Turkic Afghan links, not Timurid. Tughluqs: Another Delhi Sultanate dynasty with different Central Asian and Turkic associations. Lodis: An Afghan dynasty ruling Delhi before Babur, again not descended from Timur. Common Pitfalls: Some students confuse the words Mongol and Mughal and forget that the Mughal rulers also highlighted their Timurid heritage. Remembering Babur's mixed lineage and the special prestige of Timur in Central Asia helps avoid such confusion and reinforces the link between the Mughals and Timur. Final Answer: Correct answer: Mughals.

Question 3

Which archaeological site provides the oldest evidence of the Neolithic era among the following locations in South Asia?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Neolithic era marks the transition from hunting gathering to agriculture and settled life. In South Asia, several archaeological sites provide evidence of Neolithic cultures. Among them, Mehrgarh is especially important because it shows very early farming and herding practices. Questions about the oldest Neolithic evidence among a list of sites are common in exams on ancient Indian and South Asian history. Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks for the site that presents the oldest evidence of the Neolithic era among the listed locations. The options are Chirand, Mehrgarh, Burzahom, Daimabad and Inamgaon. We must compare the approximate dates and significance of these sites. Concept / Approach: Mehrgarh, located in present day Balochistan in Pakistan, dates back to around the seventh millennium BCE and provides very early evidence of farming, herding and settled life. Chirand in Bihar, Burzahom in Kashmir, Daimabad in Maharashtra and Inamgaon in the Deccan are also important prehistoric sites, but they are generally dated later than Mehrgarh. Recognising Mehrgarh as one of the oldest Neolithic sites in the region is the key to answering correctly. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Mehrgarh is famous for early agriculture, domestication of animals and use of mud brick houses. Step 2: Note that its earliest levels are dated to around 7000 BCE, making it much older than many other South Asian Neolithic sites. Step 3: Remember that Chirand, Burzahom, Daimabad and Inamgaon belong mostly to later Neolithic or Chalcolithic phases. Step 4: Compare the approximate ages and select the site with the earliest known evidence. Step 5: Choose Mehrgarh as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Archaeological summaries and textbooks consistently highlight Mehrgarh as a key early farming settlement that predates the mature Harappan cities. It is often described as one of the earliest known Neolithic sites in South Asia. The other sites are important but do not go back as far in time, which confirms that Mehrgarh is the correct option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Chirand: A Neolithic site in Bihar, but generally later than Mehrgarh in date. Burzahom: A Neolithic and Megalithic site in Kashmir dated later than the earliest phases of Mehrgarh. Daimabad: More famous as a Chalcolithic site in Maharashtra with later artefacts. Inamgaon: A Chalcolithic and later settlement in the Deccan, not as early as Mehrgarh. Common Pitfalls: One common mistake is to focus on sites within present day India and overlook Mehrgarh because it lies in modern Pakistan. Another error is to assume that more widely mentioned names like Burzahom must be the oldest. A clear understanding that Mehrgarh predates the main Harappan phase and represents an early farming community helps avoid these errors. Final Answer: Correct answer: Mehrgarh.

Question 4

After independence, who played the leading role in the political integration of the princely states into the Indian Union?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: At the time of Indian independence in 1947, the subcontinent was divided not only into British provinces but also into hundreds of princely states ruled by local monarchs. Integrating these states into a single Indian Union was a major political and diplomatic challenge. The leader most closely associated with this task is Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, often called the Iron Man of India. Given Data / Assumptions: The question concerns the integration of princely states after independence. The options include C Rajagopalachari, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Dr B R Ambedkar. We must identify the leader who headed the States Ministry and spearheaded the process of accession. Concept / Approach: Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, as Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister, was in charge of the new States Ministry, assisted by V P Menon. Together they negotiated with rulers, used persuasion and sometimes pressure, and succeeded in securing instruments of accession from the vast majority of princely states. Nehru played a broader role as Prime Minister, Ambedkar was key in drafting the Constitution, and Azad focused on education and communal harmony. Recognising Patel's specific portfolio and achievements allows us to pick the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that at independence there were more than five hundred princely states that needed to accede to either India or Pakistan. Step 2: Remember that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was appointed Home Minister and put in charge of the States Ministry. Step 3: Note that Patel and his secretary V P Menon framed the strategy for accession, using both diplomacy and firmness. Step 4: Recognise that leaders like Nehru, Azad and Ambedkar had important roles in other areas but did not directly lead the integration process. Step 5: Select Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Political histories of independent India consistently credit Patel with unifying the country by bringing princely states into the Union. He is often compared to Bismarck of Germany for this achievement. While other leaders supported the process, Patel's leadership and decision making were central, which confirms that he is the correct response. Why Other Options Are Wrong: C Rajagopalachari: A senior statesman and the last Governor General of India, but not the main architect of integration of princely states. Jawaharlal Nehru: As Prime Minister, he provided overall leadership, yet the specific task of integrating princely states fell to Patel. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad: Focused more on education, culture and communal harmony than on state integration. Dr B R Ambedkar: Played a historic role as Chairman of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution rather than in integrating princely states. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose Nehru because he was the Prime Minister and a central figure in all major decisions. However, exam questions about princely state integration almost always point to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. A helpful association is to remember him as the Iron Man and unifier of India, responsible for the political map of the modern nation. Final Answer: Correct answer: Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

Question 5

In medieval Indian military history, who among the following rulers is generally regarded as the first to make effective use of gunpowder artillery and field cannons in open battlefield warfare?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of the introduction of gunpowder artillery and field cannons in medieval Indian warfare. The shift from traditional cavalry and elephant based armies to gunpowder based tactics was a turning point in military history. Understanding which ruler first used artillery effectively in a large scale battle helps you connect technology with political change, especially the rise of the Mughal Empire in India. Given Data / Assumptions: The period is medieval India, before full consolidation of the Mughal Empire. The focus is on the first effective use of gunpowder artillery and field cannons. Rulers listed in the options are Babur, Ibrahim Lodi, Sher Shah Suri, Akbar and Alauddin Khalji. The question asks who is generally regarded as the first to use artillery effectively in open warfare, not just experimentally. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the First Battle of Panipat in 1526. Babur, an adventurer from Central Asia and the founder of the Mughal Empire in India, brought with him Turkish style matchlock guns and field artillery, organised with the help of Ottoman expert Ustad Ali Quli. At Panipat, Babur combined artillery with tactics such as wagon laagers and field fortifications to break the much larger army of Ibrahim Lodi. Earlier Indian rulers may have known of gunpowder, but Babur is widely credited with being the first to use modern artillery systematically and decisively in a major Indian battle. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the First Battle of Panipat (1526) is famous for the introduction of gunpowder artillery in North Indian warfare.Step 2: Identify Babur as the commander who used cannons and matchlocks in a planned formation, not just as occasional weapons.Step 3: Note that his opponent, Ibrahim Lodi, relied mainly on traditional cavalry, elephants and archers, and did not use artillery in an organised way.Step 4: Recognise that Sher Shah Suri and Akbar came later and used artillery after Babur had already demonstrated its effectiveness.Step 5: Conclude that Babur is the first medieval Indian ruler commonly credited with effective battlefield use of artillery. Verification / Alternative check: Standard history textbooks and exam guides consistently link the First Battle of Panipat with the introduction of gunpowder artillery by Babur. They often describe his army as small but technologically advanced. Later Mughal emperors, especially Akbar, developed a more regular artillery branch, but Babur remains the pioneer in the Indian context. Earlier rulers such as Alauddin Khalji fought mainly with conventional weapons, and no famous battle before 1526 is described as an artillery based victory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ibrahim Lodi: He commanded the opposing army at Panipat and relied mainly on elephants and cavalry. He did not use artillery in a decisive manner. Sher Shah Suri: A brilliant strategist who later used firearms and artillery, but he followed Babur chronologically. Akbar: He organised a strong artillery department, but the initial introduction of artillery in Indian warfare had already occurred under Babur. Alauddin Khalji: He ruled before gunpowder weapons became significant in Indian warfare and is more associated with cavalry and siege tactics. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse the ruler who first introduced artillery with the ruler who created a fully developed artillery branch. Akbar is famous for having a powerful imperial army with artillery, so some candidates wrongly choose him. Others mistakenly think that the defending Sultan at Panipat, Ibrahim Lodi, may have used artillery. To avoid this, always remember the pair Babur plus First Battle of Panipat as the starting point for artillery based warfare in medieval India. Final Answer: The first medieval Indian ruler who made effective use of gunpowder artillery and field cannons in open battlefield warfare was Babur.

Question 6

In modern Indian political history, in which year was the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) formally founded by leaders who broke away from the Indian National Congress?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is from contemporary Indian politics and focuses on party formation in the multi party system. The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) emerged as a significant regional and national player, particularly in Maharashtra, after senior leaders split from the Indian National Congress. Remembering the year of its founding helps you place political realignments in a clear timeline, which is important for exams that test basic political awareness. Given Data / Assumptions: The party mentioned is the Nationalist Congress Party, often abbreviated as NCP. It was formed by leaders who left the Indian National Congress. The options include years spread across the second half of the twentieth century and early twenty first century. The task is to identify the year in which NCP was formally founded. Concept / Approach: The key concept is to recall the political developments of the late nineteen nineties. Senior Congress leaders Sharad Pawar, P. A. Sangma and Tariq Anwar questioned the issue of foreign origin leadership in the Congress. This dispute led to their expulsion from the party and the formation of a new outfit, the Nationalist Congress Party, in 1999. The NCP later became a major force in Maharashtra politics and often participated in coalition governments at the state and central levels. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the NCP is not an old party from the early post independence decades; it is relatively recent.Step 2: Connect the birth of the NCP with debates inside the Congress in the late nineteen nineties, particularly around leadership issues.Step 3: Remember the names Sharad Pawar, P. A. Sangma and Tariq Anwar as founders of the NCP.Step 4: Place these events in the year 1999, which is repeatedly mentioned in political summaries.Step 5: From the given options, identify 1999 as the only year that fits this context and select it as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify your choice by recalling major elections and alliances. The NCP was already present in the 1999 general elections, which confirms that it must have been formed that same year or slightly earlier. The year 1949 is too close to independence, 1972 refers to a different era of Congress dominance, 1997 is before the actual split, and 2001 is after the party was already active in politics. These cross checks confirm that 1999 is the correct founding year. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 1949: This year belongs to the early post independence period when the Indian National Congress was still firmly united and NCP did not exist. 1972: This is associated with the period after the 1971 war and is not connected to the formation of NCP. 1997: There were political developments in the nineties, but the formal founding of NCP occurred later, in 1999. 2001: By this time the NCP was already participating in elections and coalitions, so 2001 is too late to be its founding year. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes confuse the founding year of NCP with other political events in the nineteen nineties, such as the formation of different regional parties or coalition governments. Another mistake is to vaguely remember that it was formed in the late nineties or early two thousands and then guess 1997 or 2001. A simple way to avoid confusion is to fix in your mind that 1999 equals NCP formation plus general elections where the party first contested under its own banner. Final Answer: The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) was formally founded in the year 1999.

Question 7

In 1917, Mahatma Gandhi organised a Satyagraha campaign to support the peasants of the Kheda district in which present day Indian state, who were demanding remission of land revenue after crop failure?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question deals with one of the early mass movements led by Mahatma Gandhi in India. After the Champaran Satyagraha in 1917 in Bihar, Gandhi took up another major peasant issue in the Kheda district. This Satyagraha helped shape his methods of non violent protest and strengthened his connection with rural India. Identifying the state in which Kheda is located reinforces your understanding of the geography of the freedom struggle. Given Data / Assumptions: The year mentioned is 1917. The place is Kheda district, which is a specific district in India. Mahatma Gandhi organised a Satyagraha to support peasants facing crop failure and heavy land revenue demands. The task is to identify the present day Indian state containing Kheda district. Concept / Approach: The concept is to connect important Gandhian movements with their regional locations. Kheda district lies in present day Gujarat. The peasants there had suffered crop failure but the colonial government insisted on collecting full land revenue. Gandhi, along with leaders like Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, supported the peasants demand that revenue be remitted or reduced. This became known as the Kheda Satyagraha and is always associated with Gujarat in history textbooks. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Champaran Satyagraha took place in Bihar, while Kheda Satyagraha is associated with Gujarat.Step 2: Remember that Kheda district is geographically located in western India, not in eastern or southern India.Step 3: Recognise that leaders like Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, who came from Gujarat, played a significant role in the Kheda movement.Step 4: Compare this with the options Bihar, Karnataka, Gujarat, West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh.Step 5: Select Gujarat as the correct state for Kheda district and thus for the 1917 peasants Satyagraha. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify your choice by recalling memory aids used in exam preparation. Champaran equals Bihar and indigo cultivators, Kheda equals Gujarat and land revenue remission, Bardoli equals Gujarat and Sardar Patel, and Ahmedabad equals textile mill workers in Gujarat. These pairs show that Kheda belongs with Gujarat and confirm that 1917 Kheda Satyagraha was a movement in that state. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Bihar: This is the location of Champaran Satyagraha, not of the Kheda peasants movement. Karnataka: Located in southern India and not associated with Kheda district or this particular Satyagraha. West Bengal: Known for other movements, but Kheda is not a district in this state. Uttar Pradesh: Important in the national movement, but Kheda is not located there. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse Champaran and Kheda because both involve peasants and Gandhi and occurred in a similar time period. A useful way to avoid this is to always link Champaran with Bihar and indigo cultivation, and Kheda with Gujarat and land revenue remission. Another mistake is to think that every early Gandhian movement happened in Bihar or Uttar Pradesh, which is not correct. Remember that Gujarat played a central role in Gandhian politics. Final Answer: In 1917, Mahatma Gandhi organised a Satyagraha to support the peasants of Kheda district in present day Gujarat.

Question 8

The Government of India decided to declare which of the following rivers as the National River of India in order to highlight its cultural, spiritual and ecological importance?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to Indian geography and environment, with a focus on symbolic recognition of natural resources. The Government of India declared one river as the National River to underline its special cultural, spiritual and ecological significance. Knowing which river enjoys this status is a simple but important fact for many competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: The policy decision was taken by the Government of India. The decision was to declare one river as the National River of India. The options include major Indian rivers such as Ganga, Yamuna, Kaveri and Godavari, plus a None of these option. The task is to identify the river that has been officially given National River status. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the special place the Ganga holds in Indian life. The Ganga is not only one of the longest and most important rivers of North India, but also has deep religious and cultural significance for millions of people. To reflect this importance and to support conservation efforts, the Government of India declared the Ganga as the National River. Along with this, institutions like the National Ganga River Basin Authority were created to coordinate cleaning and protection efforts. Other rivers, though important, have not been given the same formal title at the national level. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall which river is most frequently associated with national level campaigns such as cleaning drives and heritage programmes.Step 2: Recognise that the Ganga is often described as the lifeline of North India and as the holiest river in Hindu tradition.Step 3: Remember that the Government of India created a dedicated authority and declared the Ganga as the National River to strengthen conservation work.Step 4: Compare this with the other options Yamuna, Kaveri and Godavari, which, while important, are not officially designated as the National River.Step 5: Select Ganga as the correct answer and reject the None of these option as incorrect, because such a river has indeed been notified. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by thinking of government programmes and slogans. Phrases like Ganga Action Plan, Namami Gange and references to Ganga as the National River are commonly seen in news and textbooks. By contrast, similar phrases are not used for Yamuna, Kaveri or Godavari at the level of National River status, even though some of them have their own cleaning programmes. This mental check confirms that Ganga is the right choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Yamuna: An important tributary of the Ganga and a sacred river in its own right, but it has not been declared the National River of India. Kaveri: A major river of South India with its own significance, but it does not carry the official National River title. Godavari: The longest river in peninsular India, sometimes called Dakshin Ganga, yet it has not been formally declared the National River. None of these: Incorrect because the Government of India has explicitly declared the Ganga as the National River. Common Pitfalls: A few students confuse the idea of National River with titles like National Waterway or with regional disputes over rivers such as Kaveri. Others may wrongly assume that no river has been given such status and choose None of these. To avoid this, simply remember that Ganga has both the strongest cultural image and an official government designation as the National River of India. Final Answer: The river that has been declared as the National River of India is the Ganga.

Question 9

In the hymns of the Rigveda, which Vedic god is the most prominent deity, receiving the largest number of individual hymns in this earliest Sanskrit scripture?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your understanding of early Vedic religion as reflected in the Rigveda, the oldest of the four Vedas. The Rigveda is a collection of hymns addressed to various deities connected with natural forces and social life. One particular deity stands out as the most frequently praised and invoked, which reflects the values and concerns of the Vedic people. Given Data / Assumptions: The text in focus is the Rigveda, the earliest Vedic Samhita. The question asks which god is the most prominent in this text, measured by the number of hymns addressed. Options include Indra, Agni, Pashupati, Vishnu and Varuna, all names associated with different aspects of early Indian religious thought. The task is to identify the deity who receives the largest number of hymns in the Rigveda. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the central role of Indra in Rigvedic religion. Indra is described as the king of the gods and the god of thunder, rain and war. He is famous for the myth of slaying the demon Vritra, thereby releasing the waters and bringing fertility to the land. Because the Vedic people were concerned with cattle wealth, battles and rainfall, they invoked Indra frequently, which is why he has the highest number of hymns in the Rigveda. Other gods like Agni, Varuna and Vishnu are also important, but they do not surpass Indra in terms of the sheer number of hymns. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the main deities of the Rigvedic pantheon Indra, Agni, Varuna, Soma, Vishnu and others.Step 2: Remember that Indra is repeatedly described as the most powerful warrior god, protector of the Aryan tribes and destroyer of enemies.Step 3: From your reading, note that the largest number of hymns in the Rigveda are dedicated to Indra, followed closely by Agni and then other deities.Step 4: Compare this with the options and identify Indra as the only deity who clearly fits the description of most prominent in terms of hymn count.Step 5: Choose Indra and eliminate the other options as secondary in this specific text. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Agni: The fire god who is central to ritual, but he has fewer hymns than Indra in the Rigveda. Pashupati: Often associated with Shiva in later traditions, but not the primary Rigvedic deity. Vishnu: A significant deity even in the Rigveda, but his prominence grows much more in later periods; he does not have the largest number of hymns here. Varuna: Important as the guardian of cosmic and moral order, yet his hymn count is lower than that of Indra. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes project the importance of later Hindu deities back onto the Rigveda and pick Vishnu or Shiva related names such as Pashupati. Another mistake is to assume that the ritual role of Agni automatically makes him the most praised, whereas in terms of hymn count Indra still leads. To avoid confusion, remember that Rigvedic religion is more oriented toward deities of war, rain and sacrifice and that Indra is at the top of that list. Final Answer: The most prominent god in the hymns of the Rigveda, receiving the largest number of hymns, is Indra.

Question 10

In early Indian philosophy, who is traditionally regarded as the author of the Nyaya Sutra, the foundational text of the Nyaya school of logic and epistemology?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is from the domain of Indian philosophy and classical schools of thought known as the Darshanas. The Nyaya school is particularly famous for its systematic treatment of logic, reasoning and means of knowledge. Its basic doctrines are set out in a key text called the Nyaya Sutra. Knowing who composed this text helps you connect thinkers with the systems they founded. Given Data / Assumptions: The philosophical text mentioned is the Nyaya Sutra. The Nyaya Sutra is the foundational text of the Nyaya school. The options list several ancient philosophers Gautama, Kanada, Kapila, Badarayana and Patanjali. The task is to identify which of these is traditionally regarded as the author of the Nyaya Sutra. Concept / Approach: The key idea is to match schools with their traditional authors. The Nyaya school focuses on logic and epistemology and its chief text is the Nyaya Sutra, ascribed to the sage Gautama, also known as Akshapada. Kanada is associated with the Vaisheshika school and its Vaisheshika Sutra. Kapila is linked with the Samkhya system. Badarayana is considered the author of the Brahma Sutra of the Vedanta school. Patanjali is associated with the Yoga Sutra. Therefore, among the options, only Gautama (Akshapada) fits correctly as the author of the Nyaya Sutra. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify Nyaya as the school that deals mainly with logic and methods of correct reasoning.Step 2: Recall that the primary text of this school is the Nyaya Sutra.Step 3: Remember that traditional accounts of Indian philosophy attribute this work to sage Gautama, who is also called Akshapada.Step 4: Map the other names to their schools Kanada with Vaisheshika, Kapila with Samkhya, Badarayana with Vedanta, and Patanjali with Yoga.Step 5: Select Gautama (Akshapada) from the options as the only correct match for author of Nyaya Sutra. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Kanada: Founder of the Vaisheshika school, connected with the Vaisheshika Sutra, not the Nyaya Sutra. Kapila: Considered the founder of the Samkhya system, often associated with Samkhya Sutras or teachings, not with Nyaya. Badarayana: Traditionally associated with the Brahma Sutra, a core Vedanta text. Patanjali: Known for composing the Yoga Sutra, the classical text of the Yoga school. Common Pitfalls: Because there are many schools and many sages, students sometimes mix them up, especially Kapila, Kanada and Gautama. Another confusion arises from the fact that the name Gautama also appears in Buddhist contexts, which is a different figure. To avoid errors, always remember Nyaya logic equals Gautama Akshapada, Vaisheshika atoms equals Kanada, and Yoga equals Patanjali. This pairing method keeps the systems clearly separated in memory. Final Answer: The Nyaya Sutra, the foundational text of the Nyaya school of logic, is traditionally attributed to Gautama (Akshapada).

Question 11

In Mughal history, who was the first Mughal ruler to acquire the famous Koh i Noor diamond as part of the imperial treasury after the early sixteenth century conquests in North India?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is about the famous Koh i Noor diamond, one of the most legendary gemstones in world history, and its connection with the Mughals. The Koh i Noor passed through several dynasties and empires. In the context of the Mughal Empire, one particular ruler is recognised as the first to bring the diamond into the Mughal treasury after his early victories in North India. Identifying this ruler helps link political events with symbolic royal possessions. Given Data / Assumptions: The object in question is the Koh i Noor diamond. The focus is on the first Mughal ruler who acquired it. The options list Mughal emperors Babur, Humayun, Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan. The time frame hinted at is the early sixteenth century, during the establishment of Mughal rule in North India. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the outcome of the First Battle of Panipat in 1526, where Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi and captured his immense treasury. Historical accounts indicate that among the treasures taken was a large diamond widely considered to be the Koh i Noor. Babur describes receiving a famous diamond as a gift from his son Humayun after the battle of Khanua, and this stone is commonly identified as the Koh i Noor. Later Mughal emperors such as Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan inherited it as part of the imperial collection, but Babur is regarded as the first Mughal to possess it. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Babur founded the Mughal Empire in India after winning the First Battle of Panipat in 1526.Step 2: Recognise that after his victories Babur captured the treasures of the defeated rulers, including a famous large diamond.Step 3: Understand that later tradition identifies this diamond with the Koh i Noor, which then remained in Mughal possession for generations.Step 4: Compare this information with the list of emperors. Babur comes earliest in the sequence and is linked directly with the initial acquisition.Step 5: Conclude that Babur, not his successors, was the first Mughal ruler to acquire the Koh i Noor diamond. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Humayun: He inherited treasures from Babur and also lost and regained parts of his empire, but he was not the first Mughal to acquire the Koh i Noor. Akbar: He consolidated the empire and extended it greatly, yet the diamond was already within the Mughal treasury by his time. Jahangir: Known for his patronage of art and love of jewels, but he received the diamond as a legacy, not as the first acquirer. Shah Jahan: Famous for architecture and the Peacock Throne set with precious stones, but again he did not first acquire the Koh i Noor. Common Pitfalls: Because Shah Jahan and Jahangir are strongly associated with luxurious courts and jewel studded thrones, candidates sometimes assume that one of them must have obtained the Koh i Noor originally. Others think of Humayun because he is connected with stories of giving and receiving the diamond within the family. The most reliable approach is to track possession back to the first successful conqueror of North India in the Mughal line, which is Babur. Final Answer: The first Mughal ruler to acquire the Koh i Noor diamond as part of the imperial treasury was Babur.

Question 12

During the reign of the Mughal emperor Jahangir, which form of art received his special personal patronage and reached a high level of refinement at the imperial court?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is from the cultural history of the Mughal period. Each Mughal emperor had particular artistic interests. Jahangir, the son of Akbar, is especially remembered for his love of natural beauty, detailed observation and fine craftsmanship. The art form he most keenly patronised at his court is an important exam fact, because it illustrates how royal tastes can shape artistic styles in a given period. Given Data / Assumptions: The emperor mentioned is Jahangir, who ruled after Akbar. The question asks which art received his special patronage. Options include architecture, painting, music, sculpture and calligraphy. The focus is on what Jahangir personally encouraged and developed at his court. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the development of Mughal painting. While Akbar laid the foundations of the Mughal school of miniature painting, Jahangir refined it and brought it to new heights. He had a keen eye for detail, especially in portraits, birds, animals and botanical studies. Under his patronage, artists produced highly realistic and delicate miniatures. Architecture also flourished under different emperors, especially Akbar and Shah Jahan, but Jahangir is most strongly associated with painting. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Mughal culture includes several arts architecture, painting, music and decorative crafts.Step 2: Remember that Jahangir was known as a sensitive patron with a love of nature, and he often commented on paintings in his memoirs.Step 3: Identify Mughal painting as the art that reached a particularly refined stage during his reign, with detailed portraiture and nature studies.Step 4: Compare this with other arts. Shah Jahan is more strongly linked with grand architecture, while Akbar is known for the initial flowering of many arts.Step 5: Select painting as the correct answer from the options. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Architecture: Important under several Mughals, but Jahangir is not the emperor most famous for architectural achievements; that title belongs more to Akbar and Shah Jahan. Music: Mughal emperors enjoyed music, but there is no strong evidence that Jahangir made it the central art of his court. Sculpture: Large scale sculpture was relatively less important in Mughal court art compared to painting, calligraphy and architecture. Calligraphy: This flourished in many Islamic courts, yet in Jahangirs case, historical writing emphasises his intense interest in painting more than calligraphy alone. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates quickly associate any Mughal ruler with architecture because of famous monuments like the Taj Mahal and Red Fort, and they overlook painting. Others know that Akbar encouraged miniature painting and assume that this art peaked only under him. The safe approach is to remember that Akbar initiated the Mughal school, while Jahangir perfected its naturalistic and detailed style. Therefore, Jahangir and painting should be firmly linked in your memory. Final Answer: The art form that received special personal patronage from Jahangir and reached a high level of refinement at his court was painting.

Question 13

During the Delhi Sultanate, whose reign is noted for imposing as much as one half of the agricultural produce as land revenue from certain provinces, reflecting very heavy taxation on peasants?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question belongs to the economic history of the Delhi Sultanate. Land revenue systems were central to the power of the sultans, and different rulers experimented with various rates and methods. One particular Sultan is known for imposing extremely high rates in some areas, reportedly charging up to one half of the agricultural produce as revenue. Recognising this ruler helps you understand how fiscal policies affected peasants and shaped later reforms. Given Data / Assumptions: The period is the Delhi Sultanate era. The focus is on a reign during which as much as 50 percent of the produce was taken as land revenue in certain provinces. The options list several sultans Muhammad bin Tughlaq, Ghiyas ud din Tughlaq, Alauddin Khalji, Firuz Shah Tughlaq and Iltutmish. The task is to identify the ruler whose revenue policies included such a high share of produce. Concept / Approach: The key concept is Alauddin Khaljis market and revenue reforms. To strengthen his army and expand his empire, Alauddin needed large and stable revenue. He introduced a system of rigorous land measurement and in some areas demanded up to one half of the gross produce as state share. He also tried to eliminate intermediaries and fix prices in markets to control inflation. Chroniclers such as Ziauddin Barani describe how heavy these taxes were on peasants. While other sultans also levied revenue, Alauddin Khalji stands out for the specific mention of a one half share in several histories. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the main economic reforms associated with Alauddin Khalji, including price control and revenue changes.Step 2: Remember that he introduced a system where, in some regions, up to 50 percent of the agricultural produce was collected as land revenue.Step 3: Compare this with other sultans: Muhammad bin Tughlaq is known for experiments like shifting the capital and token currency, not specifically for this rate; Firuz Shah Tughlaq focused on irrigation and concessions.Step 4: Identify Alauddin Khalji as the ruler whose reign most clearly matches the description in the question.Step 5: Select Alauddin Khalji as the correct answer from the options. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Muhammad bin Tughlaq: Known for ambitious experiments such as moving the capital to Daulatabad and introducing token currency, not specifically for the 50 percent produce rate. Ghiyas ud din Tughlaq: His short reign focused on consolidating power; he is not mainly remembered for extreme land revenue rates. Firuz Shah Tughlaq: Introduced several welfare measures, remissions and irrigation works, and is not usually linked with such harsh revenue demands. Iltutmish: An early Sultan who helped stabilise the Delhi Sultanate but did not institute this particular revenue policy. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes confuse Alauddin Khalji with Muhammad bin Tughlaq, because both are described as strong and sometimes harsh rulers. However, Muhammad bin Tughlaq is mainly associated with failed experiments and administrative innovations, while Alauddin is tied to strict revenue assessments and price regulations. Keeping these identities separate is essential for answering related questions correctly. Final Answer: The Sultan whose reign witnessed as much as half of the agricultural produce being charged as land revenue in some provinces was Alauddin Khalji.

Question 14

For the first time in India, land was systematically divided into different categories for revenue assessment by taking into account the quality of soil and its productive capacity during the reign of which ruler?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on the evolution of land revenue administration in medieval India. A major development was the systematic classification of land into different categories based on quality and productivity, which allowed the state to assess revenue more rationally. Understanding which ruler first introduced such a system helps you trace the roots of later, more refined revenue settlements under the Mughals. Given Data / Assumptions: The issue is land classification for the purpose of revenue assessment. The classification took into account both the quality of land and its productive capacity. The question specifies that this was done for the first time in India in a systematic way. The options include Alauddin Khalji, Sher Shah Suri, Firuz Shah Tughlaq, Akbar and Muhammad bin Tughlaq. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the administrative legacy of Sher Shah Suri, who ruled for a short period in the mid sixteenth century but introduced many lasting reforms. He reorganised land revenue administration by measuring land, classifying it according to fertility, and fixing a fair share for the state based on average produce. Akbar, with his finance minister Todar Mal, later developed a more elaborate system on similar lines, but Sher Shah is widely credited with pioneering such systematic classification and assessment. Therefore, when a question asks about the first time land was divided into categories for revenue using quality and productive capacity, the answer points to Sher Shah Suri. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall the main administrative reforms of Sher Shah Suri, including roads, sarais, coinage and land revenue improvements.Step 2: Recognise that he introduced regular land surveys and classification of land according to fertility and crop yield.Step 3: Understand that Akbar and Todar Mal later refined this system into the famous Dahsala or Zabti system, but they built on the earlier foundations laid by Sher Shah.Step 4: Compare the reigns of Alauddin Khalji and the Tughlaqs, who had important revenue measures but are not specifically noted for first systematic land classification.Step 5: Select Sher Shah Suri as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Alauddin Khalji: Introduced strict revenue demands and market control, but he did not pioneer the specific kind of land classification described. Firuz Shah Tughlaq: Known more for irrigation works and concessions than for the first systematic land categorisation. Akbar: Played a major role in perfecting land revenue administration, but he followed and refined earlier experiments of Sher Shah. Muhammad bin Tughlaq: Attempted several innovations, many of which failed; he is not credited with this specific reform. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse the pioneer with the perfectionist. Because Akbar and Todar Mal are so strongly associated with Mughal revenue systems, some candidates select Akbar when they see words like land classification and productivity. The safe approach is to remember that Sher Shah Suri came slightly earlier and laid the groundwork that Akbar later improved. Thus the first systematic classification belongs to Sher Shah, while Akbar is known for refinement and expansion. Final Answer: The first systematic division of land into categories for revenue assessment based on quality and productive capacity was carried out during the reign of Sher Shah Suri.

Question 15

After the initial military successes of the Revolt of 1857, what broad objective did most of the leading rebels and princes appear to work for in terms of Indias political future?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question concerns the nature and aims of the Revolt of 1857, often called the First War of Independence by some historians and a large scale mutiny by others. After the rebels achieved some early success, historians have tried to understand what overall political objective they pursued. Recognising that aim helps you see whether the revolt was primarily conservative, seeking restoration, or modern, seeking a new order. Given Data / Assumptions: The time frame is during and just after the initial successes of the Revolt of 1857. The leaders include princes, dispossessed rulers, sepoy leaders and local chiefs. The question asks for their broad collective objective regarding Indias political future. Various possible aims are listed, from restoring Mughal power to creating a federation or a modern democracy. Concept / Approach: The key concept is that the revolt was largely backward looking rather than revolutionary in a modern sense. The rebels opposed British rule and wanted to remove foreign authority. However, they did not have a unified programme for a modern nation state or democratic institutions. Instead, many leaders hoped to restore the old pre British political order, including the authority of the Mughal emperor and traditional princes and landlords. Therefore, the best description is that they aimed to eliminate foreign rule and return to the existing old order, not to create a new type of state. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Bahadur Shah II was proclaimed as a symbol of authority, but real power was exercised by local leaders in different regions.Step 2: Note that the rebels did not issue a single national manifesto calling for a modern constitution or democratic rights.Step 3: Understand that most leaders wanted to regain their lost privileges, jagirs or kingdoms that had been taken away by British policies like Doctrine of Lapse.Step 4: From this, infer that their objective combined two elements removal of British rule and restoration of traditional structures.Step 5: Among the options, choose the one that explicitly states elimination of foreign rule and return of the old order. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: To restore the former glory of the Mughal Empire alone: The Mughal emperor was used as a symbol, but many regional leaders had their own interests and did not work only for Mughal revival. To form a federation of Indian states under Bahadur Shah II: There is no clear evidence of a planned federal structure; the revolt lacked a coherent constitutional design. To secure independent power only in their own regional territories: Some leaders had narrow aims, but the overall objective also included throwing out the British from larger territories. To establish a modern democratic national government: This is a later concept; the 1857 rebels did not have a democratic national programme in the modern sense. Common Pitfalls: Many candidates either romanticise the revolt as a fully modern national movement or, in reaction, treat it as purely local and selfish. The reality is more nuanced. It was broadly anti British and sought to restore an older pattern of rule, but it lacked a single modern national ideology. The safest exam strategy is to pick an option that mentions both elimination of foreign rule and restoration of traditional structures, which matches the mainstream historical interpretation. Final Answer: After the initial successes of the Revolt of 1857, most leaders broadly aimed at eliminating foreign rule and restoring the old political and social order in India.

Question 16

During the Indian freedom struggle, which parallel movement in the princely states (states ruled by Indian princes such as Kashmir, Hyderabad, Travancore and others) mobilised people against feudal rulers and for democratic rights?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question addresses an often overlooked aspect of the freedom struggle: the movements inside princely states. While British ruled provinces saw direct anti colonial agitations, the princely states were nominally autonomous under Indian rulers who often maintained feudal structures. In these regions, parallel movements known by terms like State Peoples Movement and Praja Mandal Movement demanded responsible government and democratic rights, linking the struggle against princely autocracy with the wider struggle against British imperialism. Given Data / Assumptions: The setting is the princely states such as Kashmir, Hyderabad, Travancore and other Indian ruled territories. The period is during the Indian freedom struggle. The question mentions that a parallel movement or movements were launched there. The options include State Peoples Movement, Praja Mandal Movement, Swaraj Movement, both of the first two together and another unrelated option. Concept / Approach: The central idea is that the struggle in princely states was organised under various names, often including the terms Praja Mandal (peoples organisation) and State Peoples Conference or State Peoples Movement. These organisations demanded civil liberties, representative institutions and end of arbitrary rule by princes. They were inspired by the national movement in British India but had to focus on local feudal issues. Because the terms State Peoples Movement and Praja Mandal Movement refer essentially to the same broad stream of agitation, the best answer is that both are part of the parallel movement in princely states. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that princely states needed their own form of agitation because the British government often claimed not to interfere with internal matters of Indian rulers.Step 2: Recall that organisations formed there were often called Praja Mandals or State Peoples Conferences, highlighting that they represented the people of the state.Step 3: Understand that these groups campaigned for responsible government, civil rights and in many cases union with a democratic India after independence.Step 4: Compare the options and see that both State Peoples Movement and Praja Mandal Movement describe these parallel struggles.Step 5: Select the combined option Both State Peoples Movement and Praja Mandal Movement as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: State Peoples Movement alone: This term is correct but incomplete when the question clearly implies the wider known label that includes Praja Mandals as well. Praja Mandal Movement alone: Also correct in spirit but incomplete, because many organisations used the broader State Peoples title. Swaraj Movement: A general term for the demand for self rule, not the specific parallel movement inside princely states. Only Congress Socialist Movement: This was a distinct ideological current within the Congress, not the name of the broad peoples struggle in princely states. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes think of the national movement only in terms of British ruled provinces and forget the princely states. Others see just one of the terms Praja Mandal or State Peoples and select it without noticing that the combined option reflects the historical reality better. The safest strategy is to remember that multiple state level organisations operating under these labels together formed the parallel movement against princely autocracy. Final Answer: The parallel movement in princely states during the freedom struggle is best described as the combined State Peoples Movement and Praja Mandal Movement.

Question 17

At which session of the Indian National Congress in 1929 was a historic resolution passed declaring Purna Swaraj (complete independence) as Indias ultimate political goal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is from the constitutional and political history of the freedom struggle. Until the late 1920s, the official demand of the Congress was dominion status within the British Empire. In 1929, a historic shift took place when the Congress adopted Purna Swaraj, meaning complete independence, as its ultimate goal. Knowing at which session and at which place this resolution was passed is crucial for understanding the progression of national demands. Given Data / Assumptions: The year is 1929. The body involved is the Indian National Congress. The resolution declared Purna Swaraj (complete independence) as the political goal. The options list different sessions held at Simla, Lahore, Madras, Calcutta and Karachi. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the Lahore Session of the Congress in December 1929. Under the presidency of Jawaharlal Nehru, this session rejected dominion status as the final objective and adopted Purna Swaraj. It also authorised the launching of a civil disobedience movement and approved the observance of 26 January 1930 as Independence Day. Karachi Session came later in 1931 and is famous for its resolution on fundamental rights and national economic programme, not for the original Purna Swaraj declaration. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the demand for complete independence, or Purna Swaraj, was officially adopted in 1929.Step 2: Remember that the Congress session that year was held at Lahore, with Jawaharlal Nehru as the president.Step 3: Connect the Lahore Session with the decision to launch the civil disobedience movement and to celebrate 26 January as Independence Day.Step 4: Compare this with other sessions Calcutta, Madras, Simla and Karachi and recall that none of these is associated with the first Purna Swaraj resolution.Step 5: Select Lahore Session as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Simla Session: Not associated with the adoption of Purna Swaraj as the political goal. Madras Session: Important in Congress history, but not the venue for the 1929 Purna Swaraj resolution. Calcutta Session: Linked with earlier decisions, including the acceptance of the Non Cooperation programme, but not with the 1929 complete independence demand. Karachi Session: Famous for resolutions on fundamental rights and economic policy in 1931, not for the original Purna Swaraj declaration. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up Lahore and Karachi because both sessions are close in time and both passed important resolutions. Another mistake is to remember that January 26 was celebrated as Independence Day but forget which session decided it. The safest method is to remember a simple chain: Lahore 1929 equals Purna Swaraj, Karachi 1931 equals fundamental rights and economic programme. This ensures you select Lahore for questions about the 1929 resolution. Final Answer: The historic resolution declaring Purna Swaraj as Indias political goal was passed at the Lahore Session of the Indian National Congress in 1929.

Question 18

After independence, who played the most important role in integrating the princely states into the Union of India and bringing these states into the political unity of the country?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is central to understanding how independent India achieved political unity. At the time of independence, there were hundreds of princely states that had enjoyed varying degrees of autonomy under British paramountcy. Integrating these states into a single Union required diplomacy, firmness and strategic vision. One leader, often called the Iron Man of India, is particularly remembered for leading this process. Given Data / Assumptions: The period is immediately after 1947, when India became independent. Princely states needed to be integrated into the new Indian Union. The options list Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Allan Octavian Hume, Subhas Chandra Bose, Dr Rajendra Prasad and Jawaharlal Nehru. The question asks who played the most important role in unifying these states with India. Concept / Approach: The key concept is the role of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel as Indias first Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister. He, along with his secretary V. P. Menon, negotiated with the rulers of princely states, using a mix of persuasion, guarantees and firmness. Patel secured instruments of accession and handled difficult cases like Hyderabad and Junagadh with decisive action. Because of this, he is widely honoured as the chief architect of the political integration of India. Nehru and others also contributed, but the main credit for state integration belongs to Patel in most historical accounts. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that after independence, nearly 560 princely states faced the choice of joining India, joining Pakistan or remaining independent.Step 2: Remember that Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel was appointed as the minister in charge of Home Affairs and States.Step 3: Note that he and V. P. Menon drafted the Instrument of Accession and worked tirelessly to persuade rulers to sign it.Step 4: Recognise that Patel also authorised police and military action where necessary, as in Hyderabad, to ensure integration.Step 5: Compare this with the roles of Hume (a founder of Congress before independence), Bose (a revolutionary leader), and Dr Rajendra Prasad (first President), and conclude that Patel was the main integrator of the princely states. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Allan Octavian Hume: A retired British civil servant who helped found the Indian National Congress in the nineteenth century, not a leader of post independence integration. Subhas Chandra Bose: A prominent freedom fighter and leader of the Indian National Army, but he was not present in the government during the integration of princely states. Dr Rajendra Prasad: Became the first President of India and played important roles in the Constituent Assembly but did not lead the actual integration process of the princes. Jawaharlal Nehru: As Prime Minister, he supported integration and handled Kashmir issues, but the day to day negotiations with princes were led mainly by Patel. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes choose Nehru because he was the first Prime Minister and a central figure, or Bose because of his heroic image in the freedom struggle. Others confuse Hume as a general architect of modern Indian politics. The safest strategy is to fix a simple association: princely state integration equals Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, supported by V. P. Menon. This ensures correct answers to many related questions. Final Answer: The leader who played the most important role in integrating the princely states and bringing them into Indias unity was Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

Question 19

During the early twentieth century revolutionary movement abroad, who was the main moving spirit behind the organisation of the Ghadar Party among Indian immigrants?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is from the revolutionary phase of the Indian freedom movement, particularly activities of Indian immigrants overseas. The Ghadar Party was formed mainly by expatriate Punjabis in North America to fight for Indias independence through armed revolt. Understanding who acted as the moving spirit behind its organisation helps you map the network of revolutionaries working outside India. Given Data / Assumptions: The organisation in question is the Ghadar Party. It was based largely among Indian immigrants, especially in North America. The phrase moving spirit indicates the key organiser and ideologue. The options list Lala Hardayal, V. D. Savarkar, Mahatma Gandhi, Subhas Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh. Concept / Approach: The core concept is to connect the Ghadar Party with Lala Hardayal. He was an Indian nationalist and intellectual who worked in the United States and Canada. Hardayal helped organise Indian workers and students, edited the Ghadar newspaper and provided ideological direction for a worldwide uprising against British rule. Although many revolutionaries contributed, most histories describe Lala Hardayal as the main organiser or moving spirit in the early stages of the Ghadar movement. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that the Ghadar Party was founded in 1913 in San Francisco, with a strong base among Punjabi immigrants.Step 2: Identify Lala Hardayal as the leading organiser, writer and motivator who played a central role in establishing the party and its newspaper.Step 3: Recognise that Savarkar was active in Europe, especially in London, and associated with other revolutionary circles rather than the Ghadar base in North America.Step 4: Note that Gandhi and Bose led different phases of the freedom struggle and are not connected with the founding of Ghadar.Step 5: Select Lala Hardayal as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Vinayak Damodar Savarkar: A revolutionary and ideologue, but connected more with activities in London and India House, not the Ghadar Party in North America. Mahatma Gandhi: Leader of non violent mass movements, not involved with the militant Ghadar Party. Subhas Chandra Bose: Later leader of the Indian National Army in East Asia, not the founder of Ghadar. Bhagat Singh: A prominent revolutionary within India, associated with the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association, not Ghadar. Common Pitfalls: Because there are many revolutionary organisations and leaders, candidates may confuse Ghadar with India House, HSRA or INA and pick Savarkar, Bhagat Singh or Bose. The best way to avoid this is to always pair Lala Hardayal with Ghadar and remember that this organisation grew among Indian immigrants in the United States and Canada, not in Europe or within India itself. Final Answer: The main moving spirit behind the organisation of the Ghadar Party was Lala Hardayal.

Question 20

In the history of the Delhi Sultanate, which ruler is famous for being the only one to rigorously fix prices of different commodities, strictly enforce quality control and ensure easy availability of essential goods in the markets?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question highlights an important aspect of economic administration in the Delhi Sultanate. One Sultan is particularly remembered for his bold and strict market regulations. He not only fixed prices of many commodities but also enforced quality standards and attempted to guarantee a steady supply of essential goods at controlled rates. Understanding who implemented these measures helps you connect state power with control over the economy in medieval India. Given Data / Assumptions: The period is the Delhi Sultanate. The ruler in question fixed prices of several commodities. He enforced strict quality control and ensured availability of essential goods. The options name Iltutmish, Alauddin Khalji, Raziya Sultan, Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq and Firuz Shah Tughlaq. Concept / Approach: The central concept is the market reforms of Alauddin Khalji. To maintain a large and well paid standing army, he had to keep prices of food grains, cloth, horses and other items low and stable. He created separate markets, fixed maximum prices, used spies to check violations and punished hoarding and black marketing. These regulations were unusual for their rigour and scope, and chroniclers like Ziauddin Barani describe them in detail. No other Sultan is credited with such a comprehensive and strictly enforced price and quality control system. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Alauddin Khalji is often associated with strong administrative measures, including land revenue reforms and market control.Step 2: Remember that he fixed prices of essential commodities and set up special markets for grains, cloth and horses.Step 3: Note that he used a network of spies and severe punishments to ensure that merchants did not violate price or quality rules.Step 4: Compare this with the reigns of Iltutmish, Raziya and the Tughlaq sultans, none of whom are primarily remembered for such detailed market regulations.Step 5: Select Alauddin Khalji as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Iltutmish: Known for consolidating the Sultanate and issuing coins but not for systematic price fixing policies. Raziya Sultan: Remembered as the only woman to sit on the Delhi throne, not for economic reforms of this type. Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq: Focused mainly on restoring order after Alauddins successors; major market regulation is not his hallmark. Firuz Shah Tughlaq: Emphasised welfare measures and public works, but did not implement the kind of rigid price and quality control seen under Alauddin. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up Alauddin Khalji with Muhammad bin Tughlaq, because both are described as powerful and sometimes harsh rulers. However, Muhammad bin Tughlaq is famous for experiments like token currency and capital shift, whereas Alauddin is clearly tied to price control and market regulation. Keeping these associations straight will help you avoid confusion in questions about medieval economic policies. Final Answer: The only Sultan of the Delhi Sultanate who rigorously fixed commodity prices, enforced quality control and ensured easy availability of essentials was Alauddin Khalji.

Indian History Questions