Statement — Developing tourist places in India requires huge resources, as the country is endowed with a vast coastline, rivers, forests, temples, and more. Courses of Action — I. Start more tourist resorts along the coastlines only. II. Systematically exploit India’s overall tourism potential.

Introduction / Context:The premise is that India has diverse tourism assets but that building them out is resource-intensive. A sound course of action must be comprehensive and aligned with the diversity mentioned rather than arbitrarily narrow.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Diversity: coasts, rivers, forests, temples, etc.
• Constraint: large resources needed.
• COA I: focus only on coastline resorts.
• COA II: exploit overall tourism potential (holistic planning across assets).

Concept / Approach:Because the statement cites multiple asset types, a narrow “coast only” plan (I) ignores rivers, forests, heritage, and pilgrimage circuits. It is not a logical consequence of the premise. A comprehensive, phased strategy across themes and regions (II) fits the premise—identify high-impact circuits, invest in infrastructure, safety, sanitation, sustainability, carrying capacity, and marketing; leverage PPP models and digital discovery to stretch limited resources.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:Even if coasts are attractive, the premise’s breadth means prioritization must not exclude other categories; II accommodates this breadth.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:Equating “high ROI” with “single asset focus”; resilience in tourism comes from diversified circuits.

Final Answer:Only II follows.