Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if only I follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The scenario combines immediate hydrological shortfall and fuel scarcity. Sound courses of action in such questions must be timely, actionable, and proportionate to the stated immediacy of the crisis risk.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:To avert a near-term shortfall, leveraging installed thermal capacity by restoring coal inventories (I) is direct and time-relevant. Building new hydro (II) is a long-gestation infrastructure project involving surveys, clearances, design, financing, and construction; it cannot address the immediate crisis flagged by the statement. While hydel diversification is good policy, it does not “follow” from the current emergency as an immediate remedy.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify time horizon: immediate/near-term.2) Select actions commensurate with horizon: logistics and supply restoration (I).3) Defer structural capacity additions (II) as unrelated to the urgent window.Verification / Alternative check:If coal stocks recover, the immediate risk abates; new hydro plants would take years, failing the urgency test.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only II/Either/Both: misunderstand time-to-impact.Neither: ignores the evident stop-gap pathway in I.Common Pitfalls:Confusing strategic diversification with emergency response.
Final Answer:Only I follows.
Discussion & Comments