Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if only I follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Inflation control involves demand- and supply-side tools. Immediate relief for consumers often comes from tax and duty rationalization on essentials, while coercive price controls on producers can distort markets and reduce supply.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:COA I directly and lawfully lowers consumer prices by trimming the tax component, with predictable, implementable impact. COA II interferes with farmgate pricing and may be unenforceable, unfair, and counterproductive (discouraging supply). The statement does not suggest coercive controls over individual producers; it calls for policy levers within the Government’s control.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Target government-controlled components of price (I).2) Avoid directives that breach market mechanisms and farmer viability (II).3) Conclude only I follows.Verification / Alternative check:Even when supply is tight, rationalizing taxes can moderate spikes; asking farmers to accept lower prices may reduce supply and worsen inflation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only II/Either/Both: overlooks feasibility and fairness.Neither: ignores a legitimate instrument directly referenced by the premise.Common Pitfalls:Assuming producers absorb inflation without consequence; cost structures matter.
Final Answer:Only I follows.
Discussion & Comments