Statement — An expert group on technical education stresses that computer education should begin from primary school and be implemented in urban and rural schools simultaneously. Courses of Action — I. The Government should issue instructions to all schools to implement computer education. II. At least one teacher in each school should be trained in computer operations to teach children.

Introduction / Context:
The statement prescribes early computer education and simultaneous implementation across geographies. Valid courses of action must address both policy adoption and delivery capacity.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Goal: universal early computer education.
• Equity: urban and rural roll-out together.
• COA I: formal directive to all schools (ensures adoption, standards, timeline).
• COA II: teacher training (ensures classroom delivery capability).

Concept / Approach:
Policy without capacity fails; capacity without mandate scales poorly. Therefore, I (top-down implementation signal) and II (human resource capability) are complementary and jointly necessary to achieve the stated objective.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Either action alone is insufficient: I without II yields token compliance; II without I yields islands of excellence. Hence both are required.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring training lead times and rural infrastructure; both must be planned in tandem.

Final Answer:
Both I and II follow.