Statement — Some students of a local college were caught traveling on a train without valid tickets. Courses of Action — I. Inform their parents and request them to counsel their wards. II. Put these students behind bars for traveling without bona fide credentials.
-
AIf only I follows
-
BIf only II follows
-
Cif either I or II follows
-
Dif neither I nor II follows
-
Eif both I and II follow
Answer
Correct Answer: If only I follows
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Fare evasion is an offense typically addressed by penalties, education, and parental/guardian involvement for students. Criminal incarceration is disproportionate for a first-time ticketless travel incident unless other serious offenses are involved.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Incident: students caught without tickets.
- COA I: notify parents for counseling and ensure future compliance.
- COA II: imprison the students.
Concept / Approach:COA I aligns with restorative responses—fine/penalty as per railway rules plus parental counseling. COA II is excessive and not implied by the statement; carceral measures would be unjustified and administratively costly relative to the infraction.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Apply proportionate corrective measures (I) alongside standard penalties.2) Reject imprisonment (II) in absence of aggravating factors.Verification / Alternative check:Railway enforcement norms usually provide for on-the-spot fines/compounding and documentation; jail is not standard for simple fare evasion.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only II/Either/Both: disproportionate and counterproductive.Neither: ignores a sensible corrective (I).Common Pitfalls:Confusing deterrence with harshness; proportionality matters.
Final Answer:Only I follows.