Statement — Some students of a local college were caught traveling on a train without valid tickets.\n\nCourses of Action —\nI. Inform their parents and request them to counsel their wards.\nII. Put these students behind bars for traveling without bona fide credentials.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: If only I follows

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Fare evasion is an offense typically addressed by penalties, education, and parental/guardian involvement for students. Criminal incarceration is disproportionate for a first-time ticketless travel incident unless other serious offenses are involved.



Given Data / Assumptions:


  • Incident: students caught without tickets.
  • COA I: notify parents for counseling and ensure future compliance.
  • COA II: imprison the students.


Concept / Approach:
COA I aligns with restorative responses—fine/penalty as per railway rules plus parental counseling. COA II is excessive and not implied by the statement; carceral measures would be unjustified and administratively costly relative to the infraction.



Step-by-Step Solution:


1) Apply proportionate corrective measures (I) alongside standard penalties.2) Reject imprisonment (II) in absence of aggravating factors.


Verification / Alternative check:
Railway enforcement norms usually provide for on-the-spot fines/compounding and documentation; jail is not standard for simple fare evasion.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:


Only II/Either/Both: disproportionate and counterproductive.Neither: ignores a sensible corrective (I).


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing deterrence with harshness; proportionality matters.



Final Answer:
Only I follows.

More Questions from Course of Action

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion