Statement — Although India is still heavily dependent on agriculture, its share in global agricultural trade is low and even less than agriculture’s share in India’s total exports. Courses of Action — I. Efforts should be made to increase agricultural production. II. The exports of non-agricultural commodities should be reduced.

Introduction / Context:
The statement highlights an export-composition gap: agriculture is central domestically but under-represented in global trade from India. Remedies should aim at competitiveness, quality, scale, and market access for farm goods—not at arbitrarily suppressing other export sectors.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Status: agriculture is vital domestically; agri share in global trade is low.
• COA I: raise agricultural production (implicitly with quality, logistics, and standards).
• COA II: reduce non-agricultural exports.

Concept / Approach:
A valid action should expand capacity/competitiveness in the underperforming segment. Increasing agricultural production (I), if coupled with quality control, infrastructure, and export standards, directly increases the potential exportable surplus and improves global presence. Reducing non-agri exports (II) does nothing to raise agri competitiveness; it merely distorts totals and could harm the broader economy, jobs, and foreign exchange.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Even if non-agri exports grow, a competitive agri sector can still raise its share by growing faster; cutting others is not a rational lever.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing relative share with absolute volumes; a sector’s share rises by its own growth, not by damaging others.

Final Answer:
Only I follows.