Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Child labour continues despite legal prohibitions. Sound actions should improve compliance and tackle root causes—poverty, lack of schooling, and demand for cheap labour—rather than discarding protective laws.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Protective legislation sets norms and tools for enforcement; poor implementation does not justify repeal. Education expands opportunities, reduces supply of child labour, and provides a monitoring channel (teachers/social workers).
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Retain/improve laws; enhance enforcement and incentives.2) Implement II: free schooling, mid-day meals, stipends, community outreach.3) Pair with inspections and penalties on employers.
Verification / Alternative check:
Countries that reduced child labour combined strict laws with schooling incentives.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I/Either/Both: undermines child rights. Neither: ignores the role of education.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming unenforced laws are useless; they need better design/enforcement, not abandonment.
Final Answer:
Only II follows.
Discussion & Comments