Statement–Assumption — “Mr. Speight, with the help of some gunmen, arrested the Prime Minister of Fiji.” Assumptions: I) The Prime Minister was corrupt and uninterested in development. II) The democratic system in the country is very weak. Choose the implicit assumption(s).

Introduction / Context:
The statement reports a forceful arrest of a sitting Prime Minister by non-state actors. We seek the necessary background belief that makes the report plausible.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Armed seizure of political leaders indicates institutional breakdown.
• Motives like corruption allegations are speculative unless stated.

Concept / Approach:
For such an arrest to occur, security and constitutional safeguards must have failed or been overpowered—an indicator of weak democratic institutions or a coup-like situation. The statement does not claim anything about the PM’s integrity or policy orientation.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Coups typically happen where civilian control over armed force is compromised.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Only I” is conjectural; “Both” inherits I; “Neither” denies evident institutional implications.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming wrongdoing by the victim to justify the event.

Final Answer:
Only assumption II is implicit.