Statement–Assumption — “Reservation policy for SC/ST should be extended for another ten years.” — Labour Minister Assumptions: I) Reservation is still necessary to uplift SC/ST communities socially and economically. II) SC/ST candidates are not capable; therefore they are given reservation. Choose the implicit assumption(s).

Introduction / Context:
Extending an affirmative-action policy presupposes that its objectives remain unmet or its support remains necessary.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Reservation measures seek to remedy historic disadvantage.
• Capability is not the basis; opportunity and access are.

Concept / Approach:
Assumption I directly underlies the extension: continued need. Assumption II is a prejudicial claim and is not required to justify reservation; affirmative action is designed to counter systemic barriers, not to substitute for capability.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Public policies are extended when goals are still in progress or disparities persist.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Only II/Both/Neither” misrepresent the logic or add bias.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating support measures with judgments about ability.

Final Answer:
Only assumption I is implicit.