Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is implicit.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The statement is a descriptive observation about production behaviour relative to price. It does not prescribe what should happen nor assert the causal relation between quantity and price.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Assumption I makes a strong claim about price formation that is not required for the observation. Assumption II is a normative belief (“should be reduced”) not necessary to state the empirical fact.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify the nature of the statement: factual correlation, not theory or policy.2) Conclude neither I nor II is needed for the statement’s truth or relevance.Verification / Alternative check:Producers often expand output when prices are high, contradicting II; price is influenced by many factors beyond current quantity, undermining I as a necessary assumption.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Any option claiming I or II adds content not implied by the statement.
Common Pitfalls:Projecting market theories onto a bare observation.
Final Answer:Neither I nor II is implicit.
Discussion & Comments