Statement–Assumption — “Strict action will be taken against MCD employees if found guilty of connivance in illegal encroachments.” — New Municipal Commissioner Assumptions: I) Some MCD employees indulge in corruption/collusion. II) The warning will help to minimise corruption. Choose the implicit assumption(s).
Correct Answer: Both I and II are implicit.
Introduction / Context:A deterrent statement targets specific misconduct. For it to be purposeful, there must be misconduct to deter and an expectation that the warning/penalty threat will reduce it.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Illegal encroachments occur with possible insider collusion.
- Announcements of strict action aim to change behaviour through deterrence.
Concept / Approach:I is necessary; otherwise the warning addresses a non-existent problem. II is also necessary; otherwise issuing the warning would be pointless.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Establish existence of a target behaviour (I).2) Establish belief in the warning’s efficacy (II).Verification / Alternative check:Public administration often uses disciplinary threats to curb malfeasance.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Leaving out either undermines the practical logic of making the statement.
Common Pitfalls:Treating public warnings as mere rhetoric with no expected effect.
Final Answer:Both I and II are implicit.