Statement–Assumption — “There should be no screening of the film ‘Kohram’ until further decision.” — High Court order Assumptions: I) People abide by High Court decisions. II) ‘Kohram’ is an objectionable movie. Choose the implicit assumption(s).

Introduction / Context:
A stay order presumes compliance by stakeholders. Whether the content is ultimately objectionable is precisely what the court may be examining; it need not be assumed in advance.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Courts rely on enforceability and compliance for interim orders to be effective.
• Content merits are sub judice; the order is precautionary.

Concept / Approach:
The minimal assumption for efficacy is I (compliance). II would prejudge the case and is unnecessary to justify a temporary halt “until further decision.”

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Interim judicial restraints are standard pending adjudication without implying guilt or objectionability.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Only II/Both/Neither” misread judicial prudence.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating a stay with a final condemnation.

Final Answer:
Only assumption I is implicit.