Energy security — Should India build a large strategic oil reserve? Statement: Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face future difficulties? Arguments: I. No. It would block huge foreign exchange and keep money idle. II. Yes. It would help India withstand shocks of sudden price spikes due to unforeseen circumstances.

Verbal Reasoning Statement and Argument Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    Only argument I is strong
  • B
    Only argument II is strong
  • C
    Either I or II is strong
  • D
    Neither I nor II is strong
  • E
    Both I and II are strong

Answer

Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong

Explanation

Introduction / Context:The issue is strategic petroleum reserves (SPR) for energy security. We must weigh fiscal concerns against resilience to supply/price shocks.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Oil price shocks and supply disruptions can harm macroeconomic stability.
  • Reserves are assets, not “idle money,” and can be drawn down in crises.
  • Argument strength is judged on policy logic and general applicability.

Concept / Approach:A strong argument recognizes risk management and national security. A weak argument mischaracterizes reserves as dead capital without acknowledging benefits.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Argument I: Weak. It treats reserves as “idle,” ignoring their insurance value and the fact they can be monetized or rotated.Argument II: Strong. It highlights shock absorption during geopolitical or market turmoil.

Verification / Alternative check:Many nations maintain SPRs precisely for volatility and embargo scenarios; this validates II.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • I strong / Either / Neither / Both: inconsistent with the clear superiority of II.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing liquidity preference with strategic insurance; risk mitigation has a measurable economic value.

Final Answer:Only argument II is strong

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion