Energy security — Should India build a large strategic oil reserve? Statement: Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face future difficulties? Arguments: I. No. It would block huge foreign exchange and keep money idle. II. Yes. It would help India withstand shocks of sudden price spikes due to unforeseen circumstances.
-
AOnly argument I is strong
-
BOnly argument II is strong
-
CEither I or II is strong
-
DNeither I nor II is strong
-
EBoth I and II are strong
Answer
Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The issue is strategic petroleum reserves (SPR) for energy security. We must weigh fiscal concerns against resilience to supply/price shocks.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Oil price shocks and supply disruptions can harm macroeconomic stability.
- Reserves are assets, not “idle money,” and can be drawn down in crises.
- Argument strength is judged on policy logic and general applicability.
Concept / Approach:A strong argument recognizes risk management and national security. A weak argument mischaracterizes reserves as dead capital without acknowledging benefits.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Argument I: Weak. It treats reserves as “idle,” ignoring their insurance value and the fact they can be monetized or rotated.Argument II: Strong. It highlights shock absorption during geopolitical or market turmoil.Verification / Alternative check:Many nations maintain SPRs precisely for volatility and embargo scenarios; this validates II.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- I strong / Either / Neither / Both: inconsistent with the clear superiority of II.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing liquidity preference with strategic insurance; risk mitigation has a measurable economic value.
Final Answer:Only argument II is strong