Critical reasoning – Should all infrastructural development projects be handed over to the private sector? Arguments to evaluate: I. No. Private entities are not equipped to handle such projects. II. Yes. Developed countries have private sector handling such projects.

Introduction / Context:
This policy asks for a blanket handover of all infrastructure to private entities. Strong arguments should present evidence-based capacity assessments, regulatory frameworks, value-for-money, and sector-specific nuances—not sweeping generalizations or appeals to foreign practice.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• I asserts private entities are “not equipped” (absolute claim without substantiation).
• II argues “developed countries do it” (appeal to analogy).

Concept / Approach:
A sound position would weigh public–private options by project type, risk allocation, and governance capacity. Absolute claims (I) and simplistic analogies (II) are weak.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Argument I: Overgeneralizes. Many private firms can and do execute complex projects; capability varies. Without evidence, “not equipped” is weak.Argument II: Appeal to practice elsewhere does not prove suitability in the local institutional context (laws, markets, regulators). Also a weak, non-specific rationale.

Verification / Alternative check:
Better arguments would discuss PPP structures, accountability, funding models, and sectoral readiness—none appear here.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Only I / Only II / Either / Both: Each accepts at least one weak argument.

Common Pitfalls:
Accepting absolute or comparative claims without context or evidence.

Final Answer:
Neither I nor II is strong