Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Excise or indirect tax decisions should rely on clear criteria (luxury vs. merit goods, externalities, revenue needs) and sound evidence. Here, both arguments hinge on sweeping generalizations about who buys televisions.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Step-by-Step Solution:
Argument I is weak because it rests on a false absolute (“only rich”).Argument II is weak because simply noting that the poor also purchase TVs does not prove that higher or lower taxes are justified.Verification / Alternative check:
Sound analysis would weigh regressivity, access to information, and market structure—none of which either argument addresses.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option crediting I or II as strong overlooks their general and unsupported nature.Common Pitfalls:
Confusing a sociological observation with a policy rationale.Final Answer:
Neither I nor II is strong
Discussion & Comments