Refugee policy — Should all unauthorized refugees be forced to return? Statement: Should all refugees who make unauthorized entry into a country be forced to go back to their homeland? Arguments: I. Yes. They build colonies and occupy a lot of land. II. No. They leave due to hunger or terror and, on human grounds, should not be forced to return.

Introduction / Context:
This question contrasts security/land-use concerns with humanitarian imperatives in refugee policy. We evaluate which argument provides a principled, broadly applicable rationale.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Refugees often flee persecution, conflict, or famine.
• International norms (e.g., non-refoulement) discourage forcing return to danger.
• Strong arguments should rest on human rights or robust public interest, not stereotypes.

Concept / Approach:
Argument I is a generalized claim about land occupation; it neither addresses refugee protection nor proposes lawful integration/processing. Argument II aligns with humanitarian standards and recognizes the moral/legal dimension of forced return.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Practical policy involves screening, asylum adjudication, and international cooperation rather than blanket expulsion.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• I strong: not supported by principle.
• Either/Neither/Both: do not match the clear superiority of II.

Common Pitfalls:
Letting broad fears override humanitarian and legal considerations.

Final Answer:
Only argument II is strong